1
|
Diaz Brochero C, Nocua-Báez LC, Cortes JA, Charniga K, Buitrago-Lopez A, Cucunubá ZM. Decoding mpox: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the transmission and severity parameters of the 2022-2023 global outbreak. BMJ Glob Health 2025; 10:e016906. [PMID: 39890207 PMCID: PMC11792283 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2024-016906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 01/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/03/2025] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The 2022-2023 mpox outbreak has been the largest in history. We aim to synthesise the key epidemiological parameters related to the dynamics, transmission, and severity of mpox (incubation period, serial interval, generation time, infectious period, basic (R0) and effective (R(t)) reproductive number, and case fatality rate (CFR)). METHODS Systematic review of observational studies in MEDLINE, EMBASE and other sources up to September 2023 (PROSPERO: CRD42023404503). Quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal for case series, cross-sectional and cohort studies, and a designed quality assessment questionnaire for mathematical models. Meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. RESULTS For transmissibility parameters, we estimated a pooled incubation period of 7.60 (95% CI 7.14 to 8.10) days and a pooled serial interval of 8.30 (95% CI 6.74 to 10.23) days. One study reported a generation time of 12.5 days (95% CI 7.5 to 17.3). Three studies reported presymptomatic transmission in 27-50% of paired cases investigated. R(t) varied between 1.16 and 3.74 and R0 varied between 0.006 and 7.84. The epidemic peaked between August and September 2022 in Europe and the Americas whereas transmission has continued in African countries. For severity parameters, we estimated a pooled CFR by continent: 0.19% (95% CI 0.09% to 0.37%) for the Americas and 0.33% (95% CI 0.15% to 0.7%) for Europe. For Africa, we found that the CFRs of countries associated with group I were higher (range 17-64%) than those associated with group IIb (range 0-6%). CONCLUSION Pooled mpox serial interval was slightly larger than pooled incubation period, suggesting transmission occurs mostly postsymptom onset, although presymptomatic transmission can occur in an important proportion of cases. CFR estimates varied by geographical region and were higher in Africa, in countries linked with clade I. Our results contribute to a better understanding of mpox dynamics, and the development of mathematical models to assess the impact of current and future interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Candida Diaz Brochero
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | | | - Jorge Alberto Cortes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia
| | | | - Adriana Buitrago-Lopez
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| | - Zulma M Cucunubá
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Pontificia Universidad Javeriana, Bogota, Colombia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tenaya WM, Suartha N, Suarsana N, Damriyasa M, Apsasi IAP, Sari TK, Agustini LP, Miswati Y, Agustina KK. Epidemiological and viral studies of rabies in Bali, Indonesia. Vet World 2023; 16:2446-2450. [PMID: 38328353 PMCID: PMC10844785 DOI: 10.14202/vetworld.2023.2446-2450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 11/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Aim Rabies has been endemic in Bali since 2009, and cases has recently increased. Unfortunately, there is a lack of available vaccines, which hinders the eradication program. This study aimed to investigate the epidemiological and virological aspects of rabies infection in Bali. Materials and Methods A total of 24 brain samples were collected from rabid dogs in all districts of Bali. The samples were tested using the direct fluorescent antibody (DFA) test and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to confirm the presence of rabies virus in the samples. Samples with the highest virus content were propagated in vivo and then inoculated into BALB/c mice. The brains of dead mice were used to prepare an inoculate cultured in murine neuroblastoma cells. Supernatant-positive viruses representing each district were then reinoculated into eight groups of five BALB/c mice. A brain sample from each dead mouse was tested using DFA and PCR and detected under a fluorescence microscope. Results All rabies virus-positive samples collected from rabid dogs in all districts of Bali were positive. Rabies virus was detected by DFA test and PCR and was consistently confirmed in the in vivo and in vitro studies. BALB/c mice inoculated with the highest viral dilution (105 cells/mL) of culture supernatant showed typical signs of rabies, indicating that the virus could be properly investigated. Conclusion This study demonstrated a wide epidemiological distribution of rabies in Bali. The obtained virus can be adapted for in vitro and in vivo studies and can be used to develop a homologous vaccine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wayan Masa Tenaya
- Department of Disease Prevention, Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Nyoman Suartha
- Department of Veterinary Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Nyoman Suarsana
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Made Damriyasa
- Laboratory of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Ida Ayu Pasti Apsasi
- Laboratory of Parasitology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Tri Komala Sari
- Laboratory of Virology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| | - Luh Putu Agustini
- Laboratory of Virology, Veterinary Disease Investigation Center, Denpasar Bali, Jl. Raya Sesetan No. 266, Denpasar, Bali, 80223, Indonesia
| | - Yuli Miswati
- Laboratory of Virology, Veterinary Disease Investigation Center, Bukittinggi Jl. Bukittinggi-Payakumbuh, Tabek Panjang, Sumatra Barat, Sumatra, 26192, Indonesia
| | - Kadek Karang Agustina
- Department of Disease Prevention, Veterinary Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Udayana University, Denpasar Bali of Indonesia, Jl. PB Sudirman, Denpasar, Bali, 80234, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lee B, Song H, Apio C, Han K, Park J, Liu Z, Xuwen H, Park T. An analysis of the waning effect of COVID-19 vaccinations. Genomics Inform 2023; 21:e50. [PMID: 38224717 PMCID: PMC10788359 DOI: 10.5808/gi.23088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2023] [Revised: 12/12/2023] [Accepted: 12/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/17/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccine development is one of the key efforts to control the spread of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, it has become apparent that the immunity acquired through vaccination is not permanent, known as the waning effect. Therefore, monitoring the proportion of the population with immunity is essential to improve the forecasting of future waves of the pandemic. Despite this, the impact of the waning effect on forecasting accuracies has not been extensively studied. We proposed a method for the estimation of the effective immunity (EI) rate which represents the waning effect by integrating the second and booster doses of COVID-19 vaccines. The EI rate, with different periods to the onset of the waning effect, was incorporated into three statistical models and two machine learning models. Stringency Index, omicron variant BA.5 rate (BA.5 rate), booster shot rate (BSR), and the EI rate were used as covariates and the best covariate combination was selected using prediction error. Among the prediction results, Generalized Additive Model showed the best improvement (decreasing 86% test error) with the EI rate. Furthermore, we confirmed that South Korea's decision to recommend booster shots after 90 days is reasonable since the waning effect onsets 90 days after the last dose of vaccine which improves the prediction of confirmed cases and deaths. Substituting BSR with EI rate in statistical models not only results in better predictions but also makes it possible to forecast a potential wave and help the local community react proactively to a rapid increase in confirmed cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bogyeom Lee
- Department of Industrial Engineering, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Hanbyul Song
- Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Catherine Apio
- Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Kyulhee Han
- Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Jiwon Park
- Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Zhe Liu
- Interdisciplinary Program of Bioinformatics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Hu Xuwen
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Taesung Park
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Xu X, Wu Y, Kummer AG, Zhao Y, Hu Z, Wang Y, Liu H, Ajelli M, Yu H. Assessing changes in incubation period, serial interval, and generation time of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med 2023; 21:374. [PMID: 37775772 PMCID: PMC10541713 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-023-03070-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 09/05/2023] [Indexed: 10/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND After the first COVID-19 wave caused by the ancestral lineage, the pandemic has been fueled from the continuous emergence of new SARS-CoV-2 variants. Understanding key time-to-event periods for each emerging variant of concern is critical as it can provide insights into the future trajectory of the virus and help inform outbreak preparedness and response planning. Here, we aim to examine how the incubation period, serial interval, and generation time have changed from the ancestral SARS-CoV-2 lineage to different variants of concern. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis that synthesized the estimates of incubation period, serial interval, and generation time (both realized and intrinsic) for the ancestral lineage, Alpha, Beta, and Omicron variants of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS Our study included 280 records obtained from 147 household studies, contact tracing studies, or studies where epidemiological links were known. With each emerging variant, we found a progressive shortening of each of the analyzed key time-to-event periods, although we did not find statistically significant differences between the Omicron subvariants. We found that Omicron BA.1 had the shortest pooled estimates for the incubation period (3.49 days, 95% CI: 3.13-4.86 days), Omicron BA.5 for the serial interval (2.37 days, 95% CI: 1.71-3.04 days), and Omicron BA.1 for the realized generation time (2.99 days, 95% CI: 2.48-3.49 days). Only one estimate for the intrinsic generation time was available for Omicron subvariants: 6.84 days (95% CrI: 5.72-8.60 days) for Omicron BA.1. The ancestral lineage had the highest pooled estimates for each investigated key time-to-event period. We also observed shorter pooled estimates for the serial interval compared to the incubation period across the virus lineages. When pooling the estimates across different virus lineages, we found considerable heterogeneities (I2 > 80%; I2 refers to the percentage of total variation across studies that is due to heterogeneity rather than chance), possibly resulting from heterogeneities between the different study populations (e.g., deployed interventions, social behavior, demographic characteristics). CONCLUSIONS Our study supports the importance of conducting contact tracing and epidemiological investigations to monitor changes in SARS-CoV-2 transmission patterns. Our findings highlight a progressive shortening of the incubation period, serial interval, and generation time, which can lead to epidemics that spread faster, with larger peak incidence, and harder to control. We also consistently found a shorter serial interval than incubation period, suggesting that a key feature of SARS-CoV-2 is the potential for pre-symptomatic transmission. These observations are instrumental to plan for future COVID-19 waves.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangyanyu Xu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Yanpeng Wu
- Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Allisandra G Kummer
- Laboratory of Computational Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA
| | - Yuchen Zhao
- Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Zexin Hu
- Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Yan Wang
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Hengcong Liu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China
| | - Marco Ajelli
- Laboratory of Computational Epidemiology and Public Health, Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, IN, USA.
| | - Hongjie Yu
- School of Public Health, Fudan University, Key Laboratory of Public Health Safety, Ministry of Education, Shanghai, China.
- Shanghai Institute of Infectious Disease and Biosecurity, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Zou K, Hayashi M, Simon S, Eisenberg JN. Trade-off Between Quarantine Length and Compliance to Optimize COVID-19 Control. Epidemiology 2023; 34:589-600. [PMID: 37255265 PMCID: PMC10231873 DOI: 10.1097/ede.0000000000001619] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Guidance on COVID-19 quarantine duration is often based on the maximum observed incubation periods assuming perfect compliance. However, the impact of longer quarantines may be subject to diminishing returns; the largest benefits of quarantine occur over the first few days. Additionally, the financial and psychological burdens of quarantine may motivate increases in noncompliance behavior. METHODS We use a deterministic transmission model to identify the optimal length of quarantine to minimize transmission. We modeled the relation between noncompliance behavior and disease risk using a time-varying function of leaving quarantine based on studies from the literature. RESULTS The first few days in quarantine were more crucial to control the spread of COVID-19; even when compliance is high, a 10-day quarantine was as effective in lowering transmission as a 14-day quarantine; under certain noncompliance scenarios a 5-day quarantine may become nearly protective as 14-day quarantine. CONCLUSION Data to characterize compliance dynamics will help select optimal quarantine strategies that balance the trade-offs between social forces governing behavior and transmission dynamics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaiyue Zou
- From the Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael Hayashi
- Department of Epidemiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI
| | - Sophia Simon
- Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA
| | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
González RI, Moya PS, Bringa EM, Bacigalupe G, Ramírez-Santana M, Kiwi M. Model based on COVID-19 evidence to predict and improve pandemic control. PLoS One 2023; 18:e0286747. [PMID: 37319168 PMCID: PMC10270358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0286747] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2022] [Accepted: 05/22/2023] [Indexed: 06/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Based on the extensive data accumulated during the COVID-19 pandemic, we put forward simple to implement indicators, that should alert authorities and provide early warnings of an impending sanitary crisis. In fact, Testing, Tracing, and Isolation (TTI) in conjunction with disciplined social distancing and vaccination were expected to achieve negligible COVID-19 contagion levels; however, they proved to be insufficient, and their implementation has led to controversial social, economic and ethical challenges. This paper focuses on the development of simple indicators, based on the experience gained by COVID-19 data, which provide a sort of yellow light as to when an epidemic might expand, despite some short term decrements. We show that if case growth is not stopped during the 7 to 14 days after onset, the growth risk increases considerably, and warrants immediate attention. Our model examines not only the COVID contagion propagation speed, but also how it accelerates as a function of time. We identify trends that emerge under the various policies that were applied, as well as their differences among countries. The data for all countries was obtained from ourworldindata.org. Our main conclusion is that if the reduction spread is lost during one, or at most two weeks, urgent measures should be implemented to avoid scenarios in which the epidemic gains strong impetus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael I. González
- Centro de Nanotecnología Aplicada, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile
- Center for the Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, CEDENNA, Santiago, Chile
| | - Pablo S. Moya
- Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Eduardo M. Bringa
- Centro de Nanotecnología Aplicada, Universidad Mayor, Santiago, Chile
- CONICET, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad de Mendoza, Mendoza, Argentina
| | - Gonzalo Bacigalupe
- School of Education and Human Development, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, MA, United States of America
- CreaSur, Universidad de Concepción, Concepción, Chile
| | - Muriel Ramírez-Santana
- Departamento de Salud Pública, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Católica del Norte, Coquimbo, Chile
| | - Miguel Kiwi
- Center for the Development of Nanoscience and Nanotechnology, CEDENNA, Santiago, Chile
- Departamento de Física, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Moore SM, España G, Perkins TA, Guido RM, Jucaban JB, Hall TL, Huhtanen ME, Peel SA, Modjarrad K, Hakre S, Scott PT. Community incidence patterns drive the risk of SARS-CoV-2 outbreaks and alter intervention impacts in a high-risk institutional setting. Epidemics 2023; 43:100691. [PMID: 37267710 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2023.100691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2022] [Revised: 04/20/2023] [Accepted: 05/26/2023] [Indexed: 06/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Optimization of control measures for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) in high-risk institutional settings (e.g., prisons, nursing homes, or military bases) depends on how transmission dynamics in the broader community influence outbreak risk locally. We calibrated an individual-based transmission model of a military training camp to the number of RT-PCR positive trainees throughout 2020 and 2021. The predicted number of infected new arrivals closely followed adjusted national incidence and increased early outbreak risk after accounting for vaccination coverage, masking compliance, and virus variants. Outbreak size was strongly correlated with the predicted number of off-base infections among staff during training camp. In addition, off-base infections reduced the impact of arrival screening and masking, while the number of infectious trainees upon arrival reduced the impact of vaccination and staff testing. Our results highlight the importance of outside incidence patterns for modulating risk and the optimal mixture of control measures in institutional settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean M Moore
- Department of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA.
| | - Guido España
- Department of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
| | - T Alex Perkins
- Department of Biological Sciences and Eck Institute for Global Health, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN 46556, USA
| | - Robert M Guido
- Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, SC 29207, USA
| | | | - Tara L Hall
- Moncrief Army Health Clinic, Fort Jackson, SC 29207, USA
| | - Mark E Huhtanen
- United States Army Training Center, Fort Jackson, SC 29207, USA
| | - Sheila A Peel
- Diagnostics and Countermeasures Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Kayvon Modjarrad
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| | - Shilpa Hakre
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA; Henry M. Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Inc., Bethesda, MD 20817, USA
| | - Paul T Scott
- Emerging Infectious Diseases Branch, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Silver Spring, MD 20910, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Koichubekov B, Takuadina A, Korshukov I, Turmukhambetova A, Sorokina M. Is It Possible to Predict COVID-19? Stochastic System Dynamic Model of Infection Spread in Kazakhstan. Healthcare (Basel) 2023; 11:752. [PMID: 36900757 PMCID: PMC10000940 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare11050752] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2023] [Revised: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 02/26/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, scientists have begun to actively use models to determine the epidemiological characteristics of the pathogen. The transmission rate, recovery rate and loss of immunity to the COVID-19 virus change over time and depend on many factors, such as the seasonality of pneumonia, mobility, testing frequency, the use of masks, the weather, social behavior, stress, public health measures, etc. Therefore, the aim of our study was to predict COVID-19 using a stochastic model based on the system dynamics approach. METHOD We developed a modified SIR model in AnyLogic software. The key stochastic component of the model is the transmission rate, which we consider as an implementation of Gaussian random walks with unknown variance, which was learned from real data. RESULTS The real data of total cases turned out to be outside the predicted minimum-maximum interval. The minimum predicted values of total cases were closest to the real data. Thus, the stochastic model we propose gives satisfactory results for predicting COVID-19 from 25 to 100 days. The information we currently have about this infection does not allow us to make predictions with high accuracy in the medium and long term. CONCLUSIONS In our opinion, the problem of the long-term forecasting of COVID-19 is associated with the absence of any educated guess regarding the dynamics of β(t) in the future. The proposed model requires improvement with the elimination of limitations and the inclusion of more stochastic parameters.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berik Koichubekov
- Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol St. 40, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan
| | - Aliya Takuadina
- Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol St. 40, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan
| | - Ilya Korshukov
- Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol St. 40, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan
| | - Anar Turmukhambetova
- Institute of Life Sciences, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol St. 40, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan
| | - Marina Sorokina
- Department of Informatics and Biostatistics, Karaganda Medical University, Gogol St. 40, Karaganda 100008, Kazakhstan
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Yanson K, Laviers W, Suhaidi F, Greeley Z, Merryman C, Proctor R, Hall D, Neely L. Clinical performance evaluation of BD SARS-CoV-2 reagents for BD MAX TM System in asymptomatic individuals. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2023; 105:115861. [PMID: 36495738 PMCID: PMC9671610 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2022.115861] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2022] [Revised: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Transmission by asymptomatic individuals is a persistent hurdle in the effort to control the spread of SARS-CoV-2. Therefore, it is essential to continue developing assays and evaluate their performance for detection of SARS-CoV-2 in individuals without COVID-19 symptoms. In this study, 223 nasopharyngeal swab specimens collected from COVID-19 asymptomatic individuals were tested using the BD SARS-CoV-2 (RT-PCR-based) reagents for the BD MAX™ System and compared with results obtained with the Biomerieux BioFire® Respiratory RT-PCR Panel. Positive and negative percent agreements of 100% (95% CI, 84.5%-100%) and 99.0% (95% CI, 96.5%-99.7%), respectively, were observed for the BD SARS-CoV-2 assay. These results demonstrate the effectiveness of the BD SARS-CoV-2 assay for detecting SARS-CoV-2 in asymptomatic individuals and suggest that this assay can facilitate optimized case surveillance and infection control efforts. Investigations using larger sample sizes of asymptomatic individuals would be beneficial to support the findings in this study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karen Yanson
- Corresponding author. Tel: 410-316-4793; fax: 410-316-4041
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Lori Neely
- Corresponding author. Tel: 410-316-3616; fax: 410-316-3690
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Lustig A, Vattiato G, Maclaren O, Watson LM, Datta S, Plank MJ. Modelling the impact of the Omicron BA.5 subvariant in New Zealand. J R Soc Interface 2023; 20:20220698. [PMID: 36722072 PMCID: PMC9890098 DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2022.0698] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2022] [Accepted: 01/06/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2023] Open
Abstract
New Zealand experienced a wave of the Omicron variant of SARS-CoV-2 in early 2022, which occurred against a backdrop of high two-dose vaccination rates, ongoing roll-out of boosters and paediatric doses, and negligible levels of prior infection. New Omicron subvariants have subsequently emerged with a significant growth advantage over the previously dominant BA.2. We investigated a mathematical model that included waning of vaccine-derived and infection-derived immunity, as well as the impact of the BA.5 subvariant which began spreading in New Zealand in May 2022. The model was used to provide scenarios to the New Zealand Government with differing levels of BA.5 growth advantage, helping to inform policy response and healthcare system preparedness during the winter period. In all scenarios investigated, the projected peak in new infections during the BA.5 wave was smaller than in the first Omicron wave in March 2022. However, results indicated that the peak hospital occupancy was likely to be higher than in March 2022, primarily due to a shift in the age distribution of infections to older groups. We compare model results with subsequent epidemiological data and show that the model provided a good projection of cases, hospitalizations and deaths during the BA.5 wave.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Giorgia Vattiato
- Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
- Department of Physics, The University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Oliver Maclaren
- Department of Engineering Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Leighton M. Watson
- School of Earth and Environment, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| | - Samik Datta
- National Institute of Water and Atmospheric Research, Wellington, New Zealand
| | - Michael J. Plank
- Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Mizani MA, Dashtban A, Pasea L, Lai AG, Thygesen J, Tomlinson C, Handy A, Mamza JB, Morris T, Khalid S, Zaccardi F, Macleod MJ, Torabi F, Canoy D, Akbari A, Berry C, Bolton T, Nolan J, Khunti K, Denaxas S, Hemingway H, Sudlow C, Banerjee A, on behalf of the CVD-COVID-UK Consortium. Using national electronic health records for pandemic preparedness: validation of a parsimonious model for predicting excess deaths among those with COVID-19-a data-driven retrospective cohort study. J R Soc Med 2023; 116:10-20. [PMID: 36374585 PMCID: PMC9909113 DOI: 10.1177/01410768221131897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Accepted: 09/24/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To use national, pre- and post-pandemic electronic health records (EHR) to develop and validate a scenario-based model incorporating baseline mortality risk, infection rate (IR) and relative risk (RR) of death for prediction of excess deaths. DESIGN An EHR-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING Linked EHR in Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD); and linked EHR and COVID-19 data in England provided in NHS Digital Trusted Research Environment (TRE). PARTICIPANTS In the development (CPRD) and validation (TRE) cohorts, we included 3.8 million and 35.1 million individuals aged ≥30 years, respectively. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES One-year all-cause excess deaths related to COVID-19 from March 2020 to March 2021. RESULTS From 1 March 2020 to 1 March 2021, there were 127,020 observed excess deaths. Observed RR was 4.34% (95% CI, 4.31-4.38) and IR was 6.27% (95% CI, 6.26-6.28). In the validation cohort, predicted one-year excess deaths were 100,338 compared with the observed 127,020 deaths with a ratio of predicted to observed excess deaths of 0.79. CONCLUSIONS We show that a simple, parsimonious model incorporating baseline mortality risk, one-year IR and RR of the pandemic can be used for scenario-based prediction of excess deaths in the early stages of a pandemic. Our analyses show that EHR could inform pandemic planning and surveillance, despite limited use in emergency preparedness to date. Although infection dynamics are important in the prediction of mortality, future models should take greater account of underlying conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehrdad A Mizani
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1
2BE, UK
| | - Ashkan Dashtban
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Laura Pasea
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Alvina G Lai
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Johan Thygesen
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Chris Tomlinson
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Alex Handy
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Jil B Mamza
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical,
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| | - Tamsin Morris
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical,
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
| | - Sara Khalid
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and
Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK
| | - Francesco Zaccardi
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester,
LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Mary Joan Macleod
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University
of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK
| | - Fatemeh Torabi
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea
University, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| | - Dexter Canoy
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health,
University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
| | - Ashley Akbari
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea
University, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
| | - Colin Berry
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of
Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| | - Thomas Bolton
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1
2BE, UK
| | - John Nolan
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1
2BE, UK
| | - Kamlesh Khunti
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester,
LE5 4PW, UK
| | - Spiros Denaxas
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Harry Hemingway
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - Cathie Sudlow
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1
2BE, UK
| | - Amitava Banerjee
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
| | - on behalf of the CVD-COVID-UK Consortium
- Institute of Health Informatics, University College London,
London NW1 2DA, UK
- BHF Data Science Centre, Health Data Research UK, London, NW1
2BE, UK
- Medical and Scientific Affairs, BioPharmaceuticals Medical,
AstraZeneca, Cambridge, CB2 0AA, UK
- Nuffield Department of Orthopaedics, Rheumatology and
Musculoskeletal Sciences, University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 7HE, UK
- Leicester Diabetes Centre, University of Leicester, Leicester,
LE5 4PW, UK
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences and Nutrition, University
of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, AB24 3FX, UK
- Faculty of Medicine, Health and Life Science, Swansea
University, Swansea, SA2 8QA, UK
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health,
University of Oxford, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK
- Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of
Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8TA, UK
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Theu JA, Kabaghe AN, Bello G, Chitsa-Banda E, Kagoli M, Auld A, Mkungudza J, O'Malley G, Bangara FF, Peacocke EF, Babaye Y, Ng'ambi W, Saussier C, MacLachlan E, Chapotera G, Phiri MD, Kim E, Chiwaula M, Payne D, Wadonda-Kabondo N, Chauma-Mwale A, Divala TH. SARS-CoV-2 Prevalence in Malawi Based on Data from Survey of Communities and Health Workers in 5 High-Burden Districts, October 2020. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:S76-S84. [PMID: 36502413 DOI: 10.3201/eid2813.212348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
To determine early COVID-19 burden in Malawi, we conducted a multistage cluster survey in 5 districts. During October-December 2020, we recruited 5,010 community members (median age 32 years, interquartile range 21-43 years) and 1,021 health facility staff (HFS) (median age 35 years, interquartile range 28-43 years). Real-time PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection prevalence was 0.3% (95% CI 0.2%-0.5%) among community and 0.5% (95% CI 0.1%-1.2%) among HFS participants; seroprevalence was 7.8% (95% CI 6.3%-9.6%) among community and 9.7% (95% CI 6.4%-14.5%) among HFS participants. Most seropositive community (84.7%) and HFS (76.0%) participants were asymptomatic. Seroprevalence was higher among urban community (12.6% vs. 3.1%) and HFS (14.5% vs. 7.4%) than among rural community participants. Cumulative infection findings 113-fold higher from this survey than national statistics (486,771 vs. 4,319) and predominantly asymptomatic infections highlight a need to identify alternative surveillance approaches and predictors of severe disease to inform national response.
Collapse
|
13
|
Ricks PM, Njie GJ, Dawood FS, Blain AE, Winstead A, Popoola A, Jones C, Li C, Fuller J, Anantharam P, Olson N, Walker AT, Biggerstaff M, Marston BJ, Arthur RR, Bennett SD, Moolenaar RL. Lessons Learned from CDC's Global COVID-19 Early Warning and Response Surveillance System. Emerg Infect Dis 2022; 28:S8-S16. [PMID: 36502410 DOI: 10.3201/eid2813.212544] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Early warning and response surveillance (EWARS) systems were widely used during the early COVID-19 response. Evaluating the effectiveness of EWARS systems is critical to ensuring global health security. We describe the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) global COVID-19 EWARS (CDC EWARS) system and the resources CDC used to gather, manage, and analyze publicly available data during the prepandemic period. We evaluated data quality and validity by measuring reporting completeness and compared these with data from Johns Hopkins University, the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, and indicator-based data from the World Health Organization. CDC EWARS was integral in guiding CDC's early COVID-19 response but was labor-intensive and became less informative as case-level data decreased and the pandemic evolved. However, CDC EWARS data were similar to those reported by other organizations, confirming the validity of each system and suggesting collaboration could improve EWARS systems during future pandemics.
Collapse
|
14
|
McAndrew T, Codi A, Cambeiro J, Besiroglu T, Braun D, Chen E, De Cèsaris LEU, Luk D. Chimeric forecasting: combining probabilistic predictions from computational models and human judgment. BMC Infect Dis 2022; 22:833. [PMID: 36357829 PMCID: PMC9648897 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-022-07794-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2022] [Accepted: 10/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Forecasts of the trajectory of an infectious agent can help guide public health decision making. A traditional approach to forecasting fits a computational model to structured data and generates a predictive distribution. However, human judgment has access to the same data as computational models plus experience, intuition, and subjective data. We propose a chimeric ensemble-a combination of computational and human judgment forecasts-as a novel approach to predicting the trajectory of an infectious agent. Each month from January, 2021 to June, 2021 we asked two generalist crowds, using the same criteria as the COVID-19 Forecast Hub, to submit a predictive distribution over incident cases and deaths at the US national level either two or three weeks into the future and combined these human judgment forecasts with forecasts from computational models submitted to the COVID-19 Forecasthub into a chimeric ensemble. We find a chimeric ensemble compared to an ensemble including only computational models improves predictions of incident cases and shows similar performance for predictions of incident deaths. A chimeric ensemble is a flexible, supportive public health tool and shows promising results for predictions of the spread of an infectious agent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Allison Codi
- College of Health, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Juan Cambeiro
- Metaculus, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, Columbia University, New York, USA
| | - Tamay Besiroglu
- Metaculus, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
- Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA
| | - David Braun
- Department of Psychology, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| | - Eva Chen
- Good Judgment Inc., New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Damon Luk
- College of Health, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Prioritizing interventions for preventing COVID-19 outbreaks in military basic training. PLoS Comput Biol 2022; 18:e1010489. [PMID: 36206315 PMCID: PMC9581358 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1010489] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/21/2022] [Revised: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 08/12/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Like other congregate living settings, military basic training has been subject to outbreaks of COVID-19. We sought to identify improved strategies for preventing outbreaks in this setting using an agent-based model of a hypothetical cohort of trainees on a U.S. Army post. Our analysis revealed unique aspects of basic training that require customized approaches to outbreak prevention, which draws attention to the possibility that customized approaches may be necessary in other settings, too. In particular, we showed that introductions by trainers and support staff may be a major vulnerability, given that those individuals remain at risk of community exposure throughout the training period. We also found that increased testing of trainees upon arrival could actually increase the risk of outbreaks, given the potential for false-positive test results to lead to susceptible individuals becoming infected in group isolation and seeding outbreaks in training units upon release. Until an effective transmission-blocking vaccine is adopted at high coverage by individuals involved with basic training, need will persist for non-pharmaceutical interventions to prevent outbreaks in military basic training. Ongoing uncertainties about virus variants and breakthrough infections necessitate continued vigilance in this setting, even as vaccination coverage increases.
Collapse
|
16
|
Meza R, Jeon J. Invited Commentary: Mechanistic and Biologically Based Models in Epidemiology-A Powerful Underutilized Tool. Am J Epidemiol 2022; 191:1776-1780. [PMID: 35650016 DOI: 10.1093/aje/kwac099] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2022] [Revised: 03/31/2022] [Accepted: 04/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Mechanistic and biologically based mathematical models of chronic and behavioral disease processes aim to capture the main mechanistic or biological features of the disease development and to connect these with epidemiologic outcomes. These approaches have a long history in epidemiologic research and are complementary to traditional epidemiologic or statistical approaches to investigate the role of risk factor exposures on disease risk. Simonetto et al. (Am J Epidemiol. 2022;191(10):1766-1775) present a mechanistic, process-oriented model to investigate the role of smoking, hypertension, and dyslipidemia in the development of atherosclerotic lesions and their progression to myocardial infarction. Their approach builds on and brings to cardiovascular disease the ideas and perspectives of earlier mechanistic and biologically based models for the epidemiology of cancer and other chronic diseases, providing important insights into the mechanisms and epidemiology of smoking related myocardial infarction. We argue that although mechanistic modeling approaches have demonstrated their value and place in epidemiology, they are highly underutilized. We call for efforts to grow mechanistic and biologically based modeling research, expertise, and awareness in epidemiology, including the development of training and collaboration opportunities to attract more students and researchers from science, technology, engineering, and medical field into the epidemiology field.
Collapse
|
17
|
Zhang XS, Xiong H, Chen Z, Liu W. Importation, Local Transmission, and Model Selection in Estimating the Transmissibility of COVID-19: The Outbreak in Shaanxi Province of China as a Case Study. Trop Med Infect Dis 2022; 7:227. [PMID: 36136638 PMCID: PMC9502723 DOI: 10.3390/tropicalmed7090227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2022] [Revised: 08/30/2022] [Accepted: 08/31/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Since the emergence of the COVID-19 pandemic, many models have been applied to understand its epidemiological characteristics. However, the ways in which outbreak data were used in some models are problematic, for example, importation was mixed up with local transmission. Methods: In this study, five models were proposed for the early Shaanxi outbreak in China. We demonstrated how to select a reasonable model and correctly use the outbreak data. Bayesian inference was used to obtain parameter estimates. Results: Model comparison showed that the renewal equation model generates the best model fitting and the Susceptible-Exposed-Diseased-Asymptomatic-Recovered (SEDAR) model is the worst; the performance of the SEEDAR model, which divides the exposure into two stages and includes the pre-symptomatic transmission, and SEEDDAAR model, which further divides infectious classes into two equally, lies in between. The Richards growth model is invalidated by its continuously increasing prediction. By separating continuous importation from local transmission, the basic reproduction number of COVID-19 in Shaanxi province ranges from 0.45 to 0.61, well below the unit, implying that timely interventions greatly limited contact between people and effectively contained the spread of COVID-19 in Shaanxi. Conclusions: The renewal equation model provides the best modelling; mixing continuous importation with local transmission significantly increases the estimate of transmissibility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xu-Sheng Zhang
- Statistics, Modelling and Economics, Data, Analytics & Surveillance, UK Health Security Agency, London NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - Huan Xiong
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China
| | - Zhengji Chen
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China
| | - Wei Liu
- School of Public Health, Kunming Medical University, Kunming 650500, China
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Reich NG, Lessler J, Funk S, Viboud C, Vespignani A, Tibshirani RJ, Shea K, Schienle M, Runge MC, Rosenfeld R, Ray EL, Niehus R, Johnson HC, Johansson MA, Hochheiser H, Gardner L, Bracher J, Borchering RK, Biggerstaff M. Collaborative Hubs: Making the Most of Predictive Epidemic Modeling. Am J Public Health 2022; 112:839-842. [PMID: 35420897 PMCID: PMC9137029 DOI: 10.2105/ajph.2022.306831] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nicholas G Reich
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Justin Lessler
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sebastian Funk
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Cecile Viboud
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Alessandro Vespignani
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Ryan J Tibshirani
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Katriona Shea
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Melanie Schienle
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael C Runge
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Roni Rosenfeld
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Evan L Ray
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rene Niehus
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Helen C Johnson
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Michael A Johansson
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Harry Hochheiser
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Lauren Gardner
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Johannes Bracher
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Rebecca K Borchering
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| | - Matthew Biggerstaff
- Nicholas G. Reich and Evan L. Ray are with the Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of Massachusetts-Amherst. Justin Lessler is with the Department of Epidemiology, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Sebastian Funk is with the Centre for Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases and Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK. Cecile Viboud is with the Fogarty International Center, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD. Alessandro Vespignani is with the Laboratory for the Modeling of Biological and Socio-technical Systems, Northeastern University, Boston, MA. Ryan J. Tibshirani is with the Department of Statistics & Data Science and the Department of Machine Learning, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, PA. Katriona Shea and Rebecca K. Borchering are with the Department of Biology and Center for Infectious Disease Dynamics, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park. Melanie Schienle and Johannes Bracher are with the Chair of Statistics and Econometrics, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology, Karlsruhe, Germany. Michael C. Runge is with the Eastern Ecological Science Center, US Geological Survey, Laurel, MD. Roni Rosenfeld is with the Machine Learning Department, Carnegie Mellon University. Rene Niehus and Helen C. Johnson are with the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, Solna, Sweden. Michael A. Johansson and Matthew Biggerstaff are with the COVID-19 Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Harry Hochheiser is with the Department of Biomedical Informatics and Intelligent Systems Program, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA. Lauren Gardner is with the Department of Civil and Systems Engineering, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Oh J, Apio C, Park T. Mathematical modeling of the impact of Omicron variant on the COVID-19 situation in South Korea. Genomics Inform 2022; 20:e22. [PMID: 35794702 PMCID: PMC9299565 DOI: 10.5808/gi.22025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The rise of newer coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) variants has brought a challenge to ending the spread of COVID-19. The variants have a different fatality, morbidity, and transmission rates and affect vaccine efficacy differently. Therefore, the impact of each new variant on the spread of COVID-19 is of interest to governments and scientists. Here, we proposed mathematical SEIQRDVP and SEIQRDV3P models to predict the impact of the Omicron variant on the spread of the COVID-19 situation in South Korea. SEIQEDVP considers one vaccine level at a time while SEIQRDV3P considers three vaccination levels (only one dose received, full doses received, and full doses + booster shots received) simultaneously. The omicron variant's effect was contemplated as a weighted sum of the delta and omicron variants' transmission rate and tuned using a hyperparameter k. Our models' performances were compared with common models like SEIR, SEIQR, and SEIQRDVUP using the root mean square error (RMSE). SEIQRDV3P performed better than the SEIQRDVP model. Without consideration of the variant effect, we don't see a rapid rise in COVID-19 cases and high RMSE values. But, with consideration of the omicron variant, we predicted a continuous rapid rise in COVID-19 cases until maybe herd immunity is developed in the population. Also, the RMSE value for the SEIQRDV3P model decreased by 27.4%. Therefore, modeling the impact of any new risen variant is crucial in determining the trajectory of the spread of COVID-19 and determining policies to be implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jooha Oh
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Catherine Apio
- Interdisciplinary Programs in Bioinformatics, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Taesung Park
- Department of Statistics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
- Interdisciplinary Programs in Bioinformatics, Seoul 08826, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Choi K, Choi H, Kahng B. COVID-19 epidemic under the K-quarantine model: Network approach. CHAOS, SOLITONS, AND FRACTALS 2022; 157:111904. [PMID: 35169382 PMCID: PMC8831130 DOI: 10.1016/j.chaos.2022.111904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2021] [Revised: 02/05/2022] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 05/10/2023]
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic is still ongoing worldwide, and the damage it has caused is unprecedented. For prevention, South Korea has adopted a local quarantine strategy rather than a global lockdown. This approach not only minimizes economic damage but also efficiently prevents the spread of the disease. In this work, the spread of COVID-19 under local quarantine measures is modeled using the Susceptible-Exposed-Infected-Recovered model on complex networks. In this network approach, the links connected to infected and so isolated people are disconnected and then reinstated when they are released. These link dynamics leads to time-dependent reproduction number. Numerical simulations are performed on networks with reaction rates estimated from empirical data. The temporal pattern of the accumulated number of confirmed cases is then reproduced. The results show that a large number of asymptomatic infected patients are detected as they are quarantined together with infected patients. Additionally, possible consequences of the breakdowns of local quarantine measures and social distancing are considered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Choi
- CCSS, CTP and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - Hoyun Choi
- CCSS, CTP and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
| | - B Kahng
- Center for Theoretical Physics, Seoul National University, Seoul 08826, Korea
- CCSS and KI for Grid Modernization, Korea Institute of Energy Technology, Naju, Jeonnam 58217, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Crawford FW, Jones SA, Cartter M, Dean SG, Warren JL, Li ZR, Barbieri J, Campbell J, Kenney P, Valleau T, Morozova O. Impact of close interpersonal contact on COVID-19 incidence: Evidence from 1 year of mobile device data. SCIENCE ADVANCES 2022; 8:eabi5499. [PMID: 34995121 PMCID: PMC8741180 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abi5499] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 11/17/2021] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Close contact between people is the primary route for transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We quantified interpersonal contact at the population level using mobile device geolocation data. We computed the frequency of contact (within 6 feet) between people in Connecticut during February 2020 to January 2021 and aggregated counts of contact events by area of residence. When incorporated into a SEIR-type model of COVID-19 transmission, the contact rate accurately predicted COVID-19 cases in Connecticut towns. Contact in Connecticut explains the initial wave of infections during March to April, the drop in cases during June to August, local outbreaks during August to September, broad statewide resurgence during September to December, and decline in January 2021. The transmission model fits COVID-19 transmission dynamics better using the contact rate than other mobility metrics. Contact rate data can help guide social distancing and testing resource allocation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forrest W. Crawford
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Statistics and Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sydney A. Jones
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Matthew Cartter
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, Hartford, CT, USA
| | - Samantha G. Dean
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua L. Warren
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zehang Richard Li
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Olga Morozova
- Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Zardini A, Galli M, Tirani M, Cereda D, Manica M, Trentini F, Guzzetta G, Marziano V, Piccarreta R, Melegaro A, Ajelli M, Poletti P, Merler S. A quantitative assessment of epidemiological parameters required to investigate COVID-19 burden. Epidemics 2021; 37:100530. [PMID: 34826786 PMCID: PMC8595250 DOI: 10.1016/j.epidem.2021.100530] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2021] [Revised: 10/07/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Solid estimates describing the clinical course of SARS-CoV-2 infections are still lacking due to under-ascertainment of asymptomatic and mild-disease cases. In this work, we quantify age-specific probabilities of transitions between stages defining the natural history of SARS-CoV-2 infection from 1965 SARS-CoV-2 positive individuals identified in Italy between March and April 2020 among contacts of confirmed cases. Infected contacts of cases were confirmed via RT-PCR tests as part of contact tracing activities or retrospectively via IgG serological tests and followed-up for symptoms and clinical outcomes. In addition, we provide estimates of time intervals between key events defining the clinical progression of cases as obtained from a larger sample, consisting of 95,371 infections ascertained between February and July 2020. We found that being older than 60 years of age was associated with a 39.9% (95%CI: 36.2-43.6%) likelihood of developing respiratory symptoms or fever ≥ 37.5 °C after SARS-CoV-2 infection; the 22.3% (95%CI: 19.3-25.6%) of the infections in this age group required hospital care and the 1% (95%CI: 0.4-2.1%) were admitted to an intensive care unit (ICU). The corresponding proportions in individuals younger than 60 years were estimated at 27.9% (95%CI: 25.4-30.4%), 8.8% (95%CI: 7.3-10.5%) and 0.4% (95%CI: 0.1-0.9%), respectively. The infection fatality ratio (IFR) ranged from 0.2% (95%CI: 0.0-0.6%) in individuals younger than 60 years to 12.3% (95%CI: 6.9-19.7%) for those aged 80 years or more; the case fatality ratio (CFR) in these two age classes was 0.6% (95%CI: 0.1-2%) and 19.2% (95%CI: 10.9-30.1%), respectively. The median length of stay in hospital was 10 (IQR: 3-21) days; the length of stay in ICU was 11 (IQR: 6-19) days. The obtained estimates provide insights into the epidemiology of COVID-19 and could be instrumental to refine mathematical modeling work supporting public health decisions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Margherita Galli
- Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento, Italy; Department of Mathematics, Computer Science and Physics, University of Udine, Udine, Italy
| | - Marcello Tirani
- Directorate General for Health, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy; Health Protection Agency of the Metropolitan Area of Milan, Milano, Italy
| | - Danilo Cereda
- Directorate General for Health, Lombardy Region, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Filippo Trentini
- Bruno Kessler Foundation, Trento, Italy; Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, and CovidCrisisLab, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Raffaella Piccarreta
- Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, and CovidCrisisLab, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy; Department of Decision Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessia Melegaro
- Dondena Centre for Research on Social Dynamics and Public Policy, and CovidCrisisLab, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy; Department of Social and Political Sciences, Bocconi University, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Ajelli
- Laboratory for Computational Epidemiology and Public Health, Indiana University School of Public Health, Bloomington, United States
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Clouston SAP, Morozova O, Meliker JR. A wind speed threshold for increased outdoor transmission of coronavirus: an ecological study. BMC Infect Dis 2021; 21:1194. [PMID: 34837983 PMCID: PMC8626759 DOI: 10.1186/s12879-021-06796-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2021] [Accepted: 10/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND To examine whether outdoor transmission may contribute to the COVID-19 epidemic, we hypothesized that slower outdoor wind speed is associated with increased risk of transmission when individuals socialize outside. METHODS Daily COVID-19 incidence reported in Suffolk County, NY, between March 16th and December 31st, 2020, was the outcome. Average wind speed and maximal daily temperature were collated by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. Negative binomial regression was used to model incidence rates while adjusting for susceptible population size. RESULTS Cases were very high in the initial wave but diminished once lockdown procedures were enacted. Most days between May 1st, 2020, and October 24th, 2020, had temperatures 16-28 °C and wind speed diminished slowly over the year and began to increase again in December 2020. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted analyses revealed that days with temperatures ranging between 16 and 28 °C where wind speed was < 8.85 km per hour (KPH) had increased COVID-19 incidence (aIRR = 1.45, 95% C.I. = [1.28-1.64], P < 0.001) as compared to days with average wind speed ≥ 8.85 KPH. CONCLUSION Throughout the U.S. epidemic, the role of outdoor shared spaces such as parks and beaches has been a topic of considerable interest. This study suggests that outdoor transmission of COVID-19 may occur by noting that the risk of transmission of COVID-19 in the summer was higher on days with low wind speed. Outdoor use of increased physical distance between individuals, improved air circulation, and use of masks may be helpful in some outdoor environments where airflow is limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sean A P Clouston
- Program in Public Health, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University, #3-071, Nichols Rd., Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8338, USA.
- Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA.
| | - Olga Morozova
- Program in Public Health, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University, #3-071, Nichols Rd., Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8338, USA
- Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| | - Jaymie R Meliker
- Program in Public Health, Health Sciences Center, Stony Brook University, #3-071, Nichols Rd., Stony Brook, NY, 11794-8338, USA
- Department of Family, Population, and Preventive Medicine, Renaissance School of Medicine at Stony Brook, Stony Brook, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
d'Onofrio A, Manfredi P, Iannelli M. Dynamics of partially mitigated multi-phasic epidemics at low susceptible depletion: phases of COVID-19 control in Italy as case study. Math Biosci 2021; 340:108671. [PMID: 34302820 PMCID: PMC8294756 DOI: 10.1016/j.mbs.2021.108671] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/06/2021] [Revised: 07/08/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
To mitigate the harmful effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, world countries have resorted - though with different timing and intensities - to a range of interventions. These interventions and their relaxation have shaped the epidemic into a multi-phase form, namely an early invasion phase often followed by a lockdown phase, whose unlocking triggered a second epidemic wave, and so on. In this article, we provide a kinematic description of an epidemic whose time course is subdivided by mitigation interventions into a sequence of phases, on the assumption that interventions are effective enough to prevent the susceptible proportion to largely depart from 100% (or from any other relevant level). By applying this hypothesis to a general SIR epidemic model with age-since-infection and piece-wise constant contact and recovery rates, we supply a unified treatment of this multi-phase epidemic showing how the different phases unfold over time. Subsequently, by exploiting a wide class of infectiousness and recovery kernels allowing reducibility (either to ordinary or delayed differential equations), we investigate in depth a low-dimensional case allowing a non-trivial full analytical treatment also of the transient dynamics connecting the different phases of the epidemic. Finally, we illustrate our theoretical results by a fit to the overall Italian COVID-19 epidemic since March 2020 till February 2021 i.e., before the mass vaccination campaign. This show the abilities of the proposed model in effectively describing the entire course of an observed multi-phasic epidemic with a minimal set of data and parameters, and in providing useful insight on a number of aspects including e.g., the inertial phenomena surrounding the switch between different phases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Piero Manfredi
- Department of Economics and Management, University of Pisa, Italy.
| | | |
Collapse
|
25
|
Zhao S, Ran J, Han L. Exploring the Interaction between E484K and N501Y Substitutions of SARS-CoV-2 in Shaping the Transmission Advantage of COVID-19 in Brazil: A Modeling Study. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2021; 105:1247-1254. [PMID: 34583340 PMCID: PMC8592180 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.21-0412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic poses serious threats to global health, and the emerging mutation in SARS-CoV-2 genomes is one of the major challenges of disease control. Considering the growth of epidemic curve and the circulating SARS-CoV-2 variants in Brazil, the role of locally prevalent E484K and N501Y substitutions in contributing to the epidemiological outcomes is of public health interest for investigation. We developed a likelihood-based statistical framework to reconstruct reproduction numbers, estimate transmission advantage associated with different SARS-CoV-2 variants regarding the marking (identifying) 484K and 501Y substitutions (including Alpha, Zeta, and Gamma variants) in Brazil, and explored the interactive effects of genetic activities on transmission advantage marked by these two mutations. We found a significant transmission advantage associated with the 484K/501Y variants (including P.1 or Gamma variants), which increased the infectivity significantly by 23%. In contrast and by comparison to Gamma variants, E484K or N501Y (including Alpha or Zeta variants) substitution alone appeared less likely to secure a concrete transmission advantage in Brazil. Our finding indicates that the combined impact of genetic activities on transmission advantage marked by 484K/501Y outperforms their independent contributions in Brazil, which implies an interactive effect in shaping the increase in the infectivity of COVID-19. Future studies are needed to investigate the mechanisms of how E484K and N501Y mutations and the complex genetic mutation activities marked by them in SARS-CoV-2 affect the transmissibility of COVID-19.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shi Zhao
- JC School of Public Health and Primary Care, Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China.,CUHK Shenzhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, China
| | - Jinjun Ran
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Lefei Han
- School of Global Health, Chinese Center for Tropical Diseases Research, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Modeling-Based Estimate of the Vaccination Rate, Lockdown Rules and COVID-19. Healthcare (Basel) 2021; 9:healthcare9101245. [PMID: 34682925 PMCID: PMC8535981 DOI: 10.3390/healthcare9101245] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2021] [Revised: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 09/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
COVID-19 has become a severe infectious disease and has caused high morbidity and mortality worldwide. Restriction rules such as quarantine and city lockdown have been implemented to mitigate the spread of infection, leading to significant economic impacts. Fortunately, development and inoculation of COVID-19 vaccines are being conducted on an unprecedented scale. The effectiveness of vaccines raises a hope that city lockdown might not be necessary in the presence of ongoing vaccination, thereby minimizing economic loss. The question, however, is how fast and what type of vaccines should be inoculated to control the disease without limiting economic activity. Here, we set up a simulation scenario of COVID-19 outbreak in a modest city with a population of 2.5 million. The basic reproduction number (R0) was ranging from 1.0 to 5.5. Vaccination rates at 1000/day, 10,000/day and 100,000/day with two types of vaccine (effectiveness v = 51% and 89%) were given. The results indicated that R0 was a critical factor. Neither high vaccination rate (10,000 persons/day) nor high-end vaccine (v = 89%) could control the disease when the scenario was at R0 = 5.5. Unless an extremely high vaccination rate was given (>4% of the entire population/per day), no significant difference was found between two types of vaccine. With the population scaled to 25 million, the required vaccination rate was >1,000,000/day, a quite unrealistic number. Nevertheless, with a slight reduction of R0 from 5 to 3.5, a significant impact of vaccine inoculation on disease control was observed. Thus, our study raised the importance of estimating transmission dynamics of COVID-19 in a city before determining the subsequent policy.
Collapse
|
27
|
Campillo-Funollet E, Van Yperen J, Allman P, Bell M, Beresford W, Clay J, Dorey M, Evans G, Gilchrist K, Memon A, Pannu G, Walkley R, Watson M, Madzvamuse A. Predicting and forecasting the impact of local outbreaks of COVID-19: use of SEIR-D quantitative epidemiological modelling for healthcare demand and capacity. Int J Epidemiol 2021; 50:1103-1113. [PMID: 34244764 PMCID: PMC8407866 DOI: 10.1093/ije/dyab106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/03/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The world is experiencing local/regional hotspots and spikes in the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes COVID-19 disease. We aimed to formulate an applicable epidemiological model to accurately predict and forecast the impact of local outbreaks of COVID-19 to guide the local healthcare demand and capacity, policy-making and public health decisions. METHODS The model utilized the aggregated daily COVID-19 situation reports (including counts of daily admissions, discharges and bed occupancy) from the local National Health Service (NHS) hospitals and COVID-19-related weekly deaths in hospitals and other settings in Sussex (population 1.7 million), Southeast England. These data sets corresponded to the first wave of COVID-19 infections from 24 March to 15 June 2020. A novel epidemiological predictive and forecasting model was then derived based on the local/regional surveillance data. Through a rigorous inverse parameter inference approach, the model parameters were estimated by fitting the model to the data in an optimal sense and then subsequent validation. RESULTS The inferred parameters were physically reasonable and matched up to the widely used parameter values derived from the national data sets by Biggerstaff M, Cowling BJ, Cucunubá ZM et al. (Early insights from statistical and mathematical modeling of key epidemiologic parameters of COVID-19, Emerging infectious diseases. 2020;26(11)). We validate the predictive power of our model by using a subset of the available data and comparing the model predictions for the next 10, 20 and 30 days. The model exhibits a high accuracy in the prediction, even when using only as few as 20 data points for the fitting. CONCLUSIONS We have demonstrated that by using local/regional data, our predictive and forecasting model can be utilized to guide the local healthcare demand and capacity, policy-making and public health decisions to mitigate the impact of COVID-19 on the local population. Understanding how future COVID-19 spikes/waves could possibly affect the regional populations empowers us to ensure the timely commissioning and organization of services. The flexibility of timings in the model, in combination with other early-warning systems, produces a time frame for these services to prepare and isolate capacity for likely and potential demand within regional hospitals. The model also allows local authorities to plan potential mortuary capacity and understand the burden on crematoria and burial services. The model algorithms have been integrated into a web-based multi-institutional toolkit, which can be used by NHS hospitals, local authorities and public health departments in other regions of the UK and elsewhere. The parameters, which are locally informed, form the basis of predicting and forecasting exercises accounting for different scenarios and impacts of COVID-19 transmission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eduard Campillo-Funollet
- School of Life Sciences, Centre for Genome Damage and Stability, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | - James Van Yperen
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| | | | - Michael Bell
- Public Health Intelligence and Adult Social Care, Brighton and Hove City Council, Hove, UK
| | - Warren Beresford
- Planning and Intelligence, Brighton and Hove, Sussex Commissioners, East Sussex, UK
| | - Jacqueline Clay
- Public Health and Social Research Unit, West Sussex County Council, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
| | - Matthew Dorey
- Public Health and Social Research Unit, West Sussex County Council, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
| | - Graham Evans
- Public Health Intelligence, East Sussex County Council, St Anne’s Crescent, Lewes, UK
| | - Kate Gilchrist
- Public Health Intelligence and Adult Social Care, Brighton and Hove City Council, Hove, UK
| | - Anjum Memon
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Brighton and Sussex Medical School, Brighton, UK
| | - Gurprit Pannu
- Sussex Health and Care Partnership, Millview Hospital, Hove, East Sussex, UK
| | - Ryan Walkley
- Public Health and Social Research Unit, West Sussex County Council, Chichester, West Sussex, UK
| | - Mark Watson
- Sussex Health and Care Partnership, Lewes, UK
| | - Anotida Madzvamuse
- Department of Mathematics, School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Biggerstaff M, Slayton RB, Johansson MA, Butler JC. Improving Pandemic Response: Employing Mathematical Modeling to Confront COVID-19. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 74:913-917. [PMID: 34343282 PMCID: PMC8385824 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Modeling complements surveillance data to inform COVID-19 public health decision making and policy development. This includes the use of modeling to improve situational awareness, to assess epidemiological characteristics, and to inform the evidence base for prevention strategies. To enhance modeling utility in future public health emergencies, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the Infectious Disease Modeling and Analytics Initiative. The initiative objectives are to: (1) strengthen leadership in infectious disease modeling, epidemic forecasting, and advanced analytic work; (2) build and cultivate a community of skilled modeling and analytics practitioners and consumers across CDC; (3) strengthen and support internal and external applied modeling and analytic work; and, (4) working with partners, coordinate government-wide advanced data modeling and analytics for infectious diseases. These efforts are critical to help prepare CDC, the country, and the world to respond effectively to present and future infectious disease threats.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew Biggerstaff
- COVID-19 Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Office of the Deputy Directory for Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rachel B Slayton
- COVID-19 Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Office of the Deputy Directory for Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Michael A Johansson
- COVID-19 Response, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Office of the Deputy Directory for Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jay C Butler
- Office of the Deputy Directory for Infectious Diseases, US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Patil NA, Gore PM, Jaya Prakash N, Govindaraj P, Yadav R, Verma V, Shanmugarajan D, Patil S, Kore A, Kandasubramanian B. Needleless electrospun phytochemicals encapsulated nanofibre based 3-ply biodegradable mask for combating COVID-19 pandemic. CHEMICAL ENGINEERING JOURNAL (LAUSANNE, SWITZERLAND : 1996) 2021; 416:129152. [PMID: 33654455 PMCID: PMC7907737 DOI: 10.1016/j.cej.2021.129152] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2020] [Revised: 02/11/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2021] [Indexed: 05/09/2023]
Abstract
The emergence of COVID-19 pandemic has severely affected human health and world economies. According to WHO guidelines, continuous use of face mask is mandatory for personal protection for restricting the spread of bacteria and virus. Here, we report a 3-ply cotton-PLA-cotton layered biodegradable face-mask containing encapsulated phytochemicals in the inner-filtration layer. The nano-fibrous PLA filtration layer was fabricated using needleless electrospinning of PLA & phytochemical-based herbal-extracts. This 3-layred face mask exhibits enhanced air permeability with a differential pressure of 35.78 Pa/cm2 and superior bacterial filtration efficiency of 97.9% compared to conventional face masks. Close-packed mesh structure of the nano-fibrous mat results in effective adsorption of particulate matter, aerosol particles, and bacterial targets deep inside the filtration layer. The outer hydrophobic layer of mask exhibited effective blood splash resistance up to a distance of 30 cm, ensuring its utilization for medical practices. Computational analysis of constituent phytochemicals using the LibDock algorithm predicted inhibitory activity of chemicals against the protein structured bacterial sites. The computational analysis projected superior performance of phytochemicals considering the presence of stearic acid, oleic acid, linoleic acid, and Arachidic acid exhibiting structural complementarity to inhibit targeted bacterial interface. Natural cotton fibers and PLA bio-polymer demonstrated promising biodegradable characteristics in the presence of in-house cow-dung based biodegradation slurry. Addition of jaggery to the slurry elevated the biodegradation performance, resulting in increment of change of weight from 07% to 12%. The improved performance was attributed to the increased sucrose content in biodegradation slurry, elevating the bacterial growth in the slurry. An innovative face mask has shown promising results for utilization in day-to-day life and medical frontline workers, considering the post-pandemic environmental impacts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nikhil Avinash Patil
- Nanofibre & Nano Surface Texturing Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Ministry of Defence, Girinagar, Pune 411025, Maharashtra, India
| | - Prakash Macchindra Gore
- Nanofibre & Nano Surface Texturing Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Ministry of Defence, Girinagar, Pune 411025, Maharashtra, India
- Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds Campus, Geelong 3216, Victoria, Australia
| | - Niranjana Jaya Prakash
- Nanofibre & Nano Surface Texturing Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Ministry of Defence, Girinagar, Pune 411025, Maharashtra, India
| | - Premika Govindaraj
- Materials Science and Engineering at the Factory of Future - Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn 3122, Victoria, Australia
| | - Ramdayal Yadav
- Institute for Frontier Materials, Deakin University, Waurn Ponds Campus, Geelong 3216, Victoria, Australia
| | - Vivek Verma
- Synthesis and Solid State Pharmaceutical Centre, Department of Chemical Sciences, Bernal Institute, University of Limerick, V94T9PX Limerick, Ireland
| | - Dhivya Shanmugarajan
- Department of Life Sciences, Altem Technologies, Platinum Partner of Dassault Systemes, Bangalore 560095, Karnataka, India
| | - Shivanand Patil
- Siddheshwar Techtessile Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur 416012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Abhay Kore
- Siddheshwar Techtessile Pvt. Ltd., Kolhapur 416012, Maharashtra, India
| | - Balasubramanian Kandasubramanian
- Nanofibre & Nano Surface Texturing Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering, Defence Institute of Advanced Technology, Ministry of Defence, Girinagar, Pune 411025, Maharashtra, India
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Campi G, Valletta A, Perali A, Marcelli A, Bianconi A. Epidemic spreading in an expanded parameter space: the supercritical scaling laws and subcritical metastable phases. Phys Biol 2021; 18. [PMID: 34038897 DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/ac059d] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
While the mathematical laws of uncontrolled epidemic spreading are well known, the statistical physics of coronavirus epidemics with containment measures is currently lacking. The modelling of available data of the first wave of the Covid-19 pandemic in 2020 over 230 days, in different countries representative of different containment policies is relevant to quantify the efficiency of these policies to face the containment of any successive wave. At this aim we have built a 3D phase diagram tracking the simultaneous evolution and the interplay of the doubling time,Td, and the reproductive number,Rtmeasured using the methodological definition used by the Robert Koch Institute. In this expanded parameter space three different main phases,supercritical,criticalandsubcriticalare identified. Moreover, we have found that in thesupercriticalregime withRt> 1 the doubling time is smaller than 40 days. In this phase we have established the power law relation betweenTdand (Rt- 1)-νwith the exponentνdepending on the definition of reproductive number. In thesubcriticalregime whereRt< 1 andTd> 100 days, we have identified arrested metastable phases whereTdis nearly constant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaetano Campi
- Institute of Crystallography, CNR, via Salaria Km 29. 300, Monterotondo Stazione, Roma I-00015, Italy.,Rome International Centre Materials Science Superstripes RICMASS via dei Sabelli 119A, 00185 Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Valletta
- Institute for Microelectronics and Microsystems, IMM, Consiglio Nazionale delle Ricerche CNR Via del Fosso del Cavaliere 100, 00133 Roma, Italy
| | - Andrea Perali
- Rome International Centre Materials Science Superstripes RICMASS via dei Sabelli 119A, 00185 Rome, Italy.,School of Pharmacy, Physics Unit, University of Camerino, 62032 Camerino (MC), Italy
| | - Augusto Marcelli
- Rome International Centre Materials Science Superstripes RICMASS via dei Sabelli 119A, 00185 Rome, Italy.,INFN-Laboratori Nazionali di Frascati, 00044 Frascati (RM), Italy
| | - Antonio Bianconi
- Institute of Crystallography, CNR, via Salaria Km 29. 300, Monterotondo Stazione, Roma I-00015, Italy.,Rome International Centre Materials Science Superstripes RICMASS via dei Sabelli 119A, 00185 Rome, Italy.,National Research Nuclear University MEPhI (Moscow Engineering Physics Institute), 115409 Moscow, Russia
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Akhmetzhanov AR, Jung SM, Cheng HY, Thompson RN. A hospital-related outbreak of SARS-CoV-2 associated with variant Epsilon (B.1.429) in Taiwan: transmission potential and outbreak containment under intensified contact tracing, January-February 2021. Int J Infect Dis 2021; 110:15-20. [PMID: 34146689 PMCID: PMC8214728 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2021.06.028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Revised: 06/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/12/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES A hospital-related cluster of 22 cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) occurred in Taiwan in January-February 2021. Rigorous control measures were introduced and could only be relaxed once the outbreak was declared over. Each day after the apparent outbreak end, we estimated the risk of future cases occurring in order to inform decision-making. METHODS Probabilistic transmission networks were reconstructed, and transmission parameters (the reproduction number R and overdispersion parameter k) were estimated. The reporting delay during the outbreak was estimated (Scenario 1). In addition, a counterfactual scenario with less effective interventions characterized by a longer reporting delay was considered (Scenario 2). Each day, the risk of future cases was estimated under both scenarios. RESULTS The values of R and k were estimated to be 1.30 ((95% credible interval (CI) 0.57-3.80) and 0.38 (95% CI 0.12-1.20), respectively. The mean reporting delays considered were 2.5 days (Scenario 1) and 7.8 days (Scenario 2). Following the final case, ttthe inferred probability of future cases occurring declined more quickly in Scenario 1 than Scenario 2. CONCLUSIONS Rigorous control measures allowed the outbreak to be declared over quickly following outbreak containment. This highlights the need for effective interventions, not only to reduce cases during outbreaks but also to allow outbreaks to be declared over with confidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sung-Mok Jung
- School of Public Health, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan; Graduate School of Medicine, Hokkaido University, Hokkaido, Japan
| | - Hao-Yuan Cheng
- Epidemic Intelligence Centre, Taiwan Centres for Disease Control, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Robin N Thompson
- Mathematics Institute, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK; Zeeman Institute for Systems Biology and Infectious Disease Epidemiology Research, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Xin H, Wong JY, Murphy C, Yeung A, Ali ST, Wu P, Cowling BJ. The incubation period distribution of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Infect Dis 2021; 73:2344-2352. [PMID: 34117868 DOI: 10.1093/cid/ciab501] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Incubation period is an important parameter to inform quarantine period and to study transmission dynamics of infectious diseases. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on published estimates of the incubation period distribution of COVID-19, and showed that the pooled median of the point estimates of the mean, median and 95 th percentile for incubation period are 6.3 days (range: 1.8 to 11.9 days), 5.4 days (range: 2.0 to 17.9 days) and 13.1 days (range: 3.2 to 17.8 days) respectively. Estimates of the mean and 95 th percentile of the incubation period distribution were considerably shorter before the epidemic peak in China compared to after the peak, and variation was also noticed for different choices of methodological approach in estimation. Our findings implied that corrections may be needed before directly applying estimates of incubation period into control of or further studies on emerging infectious diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hualei Xin
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Jessica Y Wong
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Caitriona Murphy
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Amy Yeung
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China
| | - Sheikh Taslim Ali
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.,Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Peng Wu
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.,Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong
| | - Benjamin J Cowling
- WHO Collaborating Centre for Infectious Disease Epidemiology and Control, School of Public Health, Li Ka Shing Faculty of Medicine, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China.,Laboratory of Data Discovery for Health Limited, Hong Kong Science Park, New Territories, Hong Kong
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cimolai N. In pursuit of the right tail for the COVID-19 incubation period. Public Health 2021; 194:149-155. [PMID: 33915459 PMCID: PMC7997403 DOI: 10.1016/j.puhe.2021.03.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023]
Abstract
Definition of the incubation period for COVID-19 is critical for implementing quarantine and thus infection control. Whereas the classical definition relies on the time from exposure to time of first symptoms, a more practical working definition is the time from exposure to time of first live virus excretion. For COVID-19, average incubation period times commonly span 5-7 days which are generally longer than for most typical other respiratory viruses. There is considerable variability reported however for the late right-hand statistical distribution. A small but yet epidemiologically important subset of patients may have the late end of the incubation period extend beyond the 14 days that is frequently assumed. Conservative assumptions of the right tail end distribution favor safety, but pragmatic working modifications may be required to accommodate high rates of infection and/or healthcare worker exposures. Despite the advent of effective vaccines, further attention and study in these regards are warranted. It is predictable that vaccine application will be associated with continued confusion over protection and its longevity. Measures for the application of infectivity will continue to be extremely relevant.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nevio Cimolai
- Faculty of Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Canada; Children's and Women's Health Centre of British Columbia, 4480 Oak Street, Vancouver, B.C, V6H3V4, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Morozova O, Li ZR, Crawford FW. One year of modeling and forecasting COVID-19 transmission to support policymakers in Connecticut. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2021:2020.06.12.20126391. [PMID: 32587978 PMCID: PMC7310630 DOI: 10.1101/2020.06.12.20126391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
To support public health policymakers in Connecticut, we developed a county-structured compartmental SEIR-type model of SARS-CoV-2 transmission and COVID-19 disease progression. Our goals were to provide projections of infections, hospitalizations, and deaths, as well as estimates of important features of disease transmission, public behavior, healthcare response, and clinical progression of disease. In this paper, we describe a transmission model developed to meet the changing requirements of public health policymakers and officials in Connecticut from March 2020 to February 2021. We outline the model design, implementation and calibration, and describe how projections and estimates were used to support decision-making in Connecticut throughout the first year of the pandemic. We calibrated this model to data on deaths and hospitalizations, developed a novel measure of close interpersonal contact frequency to capture changes in transmission risk over time and used multiple local data sources to infer dynamics of time-varying model inputs. Estimated time-varying epidemiologic features of the COVID-19 epidemic in Connecticut include the effective reproduction number, cumulative incidence of infection, infection hospitalization and fatality ratios, and the case detection ratio. We describe methodology for producing projections of epidemic evolution under uncertain future scenarios, as well as analytical tools for estimating epidemic features that are difficult to measure directly, such as cumulative incidence and the effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions. The approach takes advantage of our unique access to Connecticut public health surveillance and hospital data and our direct connection to state officials and policymakers. We conclude with a discussion of the limitations inherent in predicting uncertain epidemic trajectories and lessons learned from one year of providing COVID-19 projections in Connecticut.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olga Morozova
- Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University (SUNY), NY, USA
| | - Zehang Richard Li
- Department of Statisitcs, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | - Forrest W Crawford
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Crawford FW, Jones SA, Cartter M, Dean SG, Warren JL, Li ZR, Barbieri J, Campbell J, Kenney P, Valleau T, Morozova O. Impact of close interpersonal contact on COVID-19 incidence: evidence from one year of mobile device data. MEDRXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR HEALTH SCIENCES 2021:2021.03.10.21253282. [PMID: 33758869 PMCID: PMC7987027 DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.10.21253282] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
Close contact between people is the primary route for transmission of SARS-CoV-2, the virus that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). We sought to quantify interpersonal contact at the population-level by using anonymized mobile device geolocation data. We computed the frequency of contact (within six feet) between people in Connecticut during February 2020 - January 2021. Then we aggregated counts of contact events by area of residence to obtain an estimate of the total intensity of interpersonal contact experienced by residents of each town for each day. When incorporated into a susceptible-exposed-infective-removed (SEIR) model of COVID-19 transmission, the contact rate accurately predicted COVID-19 cases in Connecticut towns during the timespan. The pattern of contact rate in Connecticut explains the large initial wave of infections during March-April, the subsequent drop in cases during June-August, local outbreaks during August-September, broad statewide resurgence during September-December, and decline in January 2021. Contact rate data can help guide public health messaging campaigns to encourage social distancing and in the allocation of testing resources to detect or prevent emerging local outbreaks more quickly than traditional case investigation. ONE SENTENCE SUMMARY Close interpersonal contact measured using mobile device location data explains dynamics of COVID-19 transmission in Connecticut during the first year of the pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Forrest W Crawford
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Statistics & Data Science, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Department of Ecology & Evolutionary Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Yale School of Management, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Sydney A Jones
- Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control & Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Matthew Cartter
- Infectious Diseases Section, Connecticut Department of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Samantha G Dean
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Joshua L Warren
- Department of Biostatistics, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Zehang Richard Li
- Department of Statistics, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | - Olga Morozova
- Program in Public Health and Department of Family, Population and Preventive Medicine, Stony Brook University, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Abstract
The spatio-temporal dynamics of an outbreak provide important insights to help direct public health resources intended to control transmission. They also provide a focus for detailed epidemiological studies and allow the timing and impact of interventions to be assessed.A common approach is to aggregate case data to administrative regions. Whilst providing a good visual impression of change over space, this method masks spatial variation and assumes that disease risk is constant across space. Risk factors for COVID-19 (e.g. population density, deprivation and ethnicity) vary from place to place across England so it follows that risk will also vary spatially. Kernel density estimation compares the spatial distribution of cases relative to the underlying population, unfettered by arbitrary geographical boundaries, to produce a continuous estimate of spatially varying risk.Using test results from healthcare settings in England (Pillar 1 of the UK Government testing strategy) and freely available methods and software, we estimated the spatial and spatio-temporal risk of COVID-19 infection across England for the first 6 months of 2020. Widespread transmission was underway when partial lockdown measures were introduced on 23 March 2020 and the greatest risk erred towards large urban areas. The rapid growth phase of the outbreak coincided with multiple introductions to England from the European mainland. The spatio-temporal risk was highly labile throughout.In terms of controlling transmission, the most important practical application of our results is the accurate identification of areas within regions that may require tailored intervention strategies. We recommend that this approach is absorbed into routine surveillance outputs in England. Further risk characterisation using widespread community testing (Pillar 2) data is needed as is the increased use of predictive spatial models at fine spatial scales.
Collapse
|
37
|
Schrago CG, Barzilai LP. Challenges in estimating virus divergence times in short epidemic timescales with special reference to the evolution of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic. Genet Mol Biol 2021; 44:e20200254. [PMID: 33570080 PMCID: PMC7869796 DOI: 10.1590/1678-4685-gmb-2020-0254] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The estimation of evolutionary parameters provides essential information for designing public health policies. In short time intervals, however, nucleotide substitutions are ineffective to record all complexities of virus population dynamics. In this sense, the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic poses a challenge for evolutionary analysis. We used computer simulation to evolve populations in scenarios of varying temporal intervals to evaluate the impact of the age of an epidemic on estimates of time and geography. Before estimating virus timescales, the shape of tree topologies can be used as a proxy to assess the effectiveness of the virus phylogeny in providing accurate estimates of evolutionary parameters. In short timescales, estimates have larger uncertainty. We compared the predictions from simulations with empirical data. The tree shape of SARS-CoV-2 was closer to shorter timescales scenarios, which yielded parametric estimates with larger uncertainty, suggesting that estimates from these datasets should be evaluated cautiously. To increase the accuracy of the estimates of virus transmission times between populations, the uncertainties associated with the age estimates of both the crown and stem nodes should be communicated. We place the age of the common ancestor of the current SARS-CoV-2 pandemic in late September 2019, corroborating an earlier emergence of the virus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carlos G. Schrago
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de
Genética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| | - Lucia P. Barzilai
- Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro, Departamento de
Genética, Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Proactive and blended approach for COVID-19 control in Taiwan. Biochem Biophys Res Commun 2021; 538:238-243. [PMID: 33220926 PMCID: PMC7831726 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.10.100] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has become the greatest threat to human society in a century. To better devise control strategies, policymakers should adjust policies based on scientific evidence in hand. Several countries have limited the epidemics of COVID-19 by prioritizing containment strategies to mitigate the impacts on public health and healthcare systems. However, asymptomatic/pre-symptomatic transmission of COVID-19 complicated traditional symptom-based approaches for disease control. In addition, drastic population-based interventions usually have significant societal and economic impacts. Therefore, in Taiwan, the containment strategies consisted of the more extended case-based interventions (e.g., case detection with enhanced surveillance and contact tracing with active monitoring and quarantine of close contacts) and more targeted population-based interventions (e.g., face mask use in recommended settings and risk-oriented border control with corresponding quarantine requirement). The success of the blended approach emphasizes not only the importance of evidence-supported policymaking but also the coordinated efforts between the government and the people.
Collapse
|
39
|
Anzai A, Nishiura H. "Go To Travel" Campaign and Travel-Associated Coronavirus Disease 2019 Cases: A Descriptive Analysis, July-August 2020. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10030398. [PMID: 33494315 PMCID: PMC7864523 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10030398] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2020] [Revised: 01/13/2021] [Accepted: 01/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The Japanese government initiated the Go To Travel campaign on 22 July 2020, offering deep discounts on hotel charges and issuing coupons to be used for any consumption at travel destinations in Japan. In the present study, we aimed to describe the possible epidemiological impact of the tourism campaign on increasing travel-associated cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) in the country. We compared the incidence rates of travel-associated and tourism-related cases prior to and during the campaign. The incidence of travel-associated COVID-19 cases during the tourism campaign was approximately three times greater than the control period 22 June to 21 July 2020 and approximately 1.5 times greater than the control period of 15 to 19 July. The incidence owing to tourism was approximately 8 times and 2-3 times greater than the control periods of 22 June to 21 July and 15 to 19 July, respectively. Although the second epidemic wave in Japan had begun to decline by mid-August, enhanced domestic tourism may have contributed to increasing travel-associated COVID-19 cases during 22 to 26 July, the early stage of the Go To Travel campaign.
Collapse
|
40
|
Medema G, Been F, Heijnen L, Petterson S. Implementation of environmental surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 virus to support public health decisions: Opportunities and challenges. CURRENT OPINION IN ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & HEALTH 2020; 17:49-71. [PMID: 33024908 PMCID: PMC7528975 DOI: 10.1016/j.coesh.2020.09.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 224] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Analysing wastewater can be used to track infectious disease agents that are shed via stool and urine. Sewage surveillance of SARS-CoV-2 has been suggested as a tool to determine the extent of COVID-19 in cities and serve as an early warning for (re-)emergence of SARS-CoV-2 circulation in communities. The focus of this review is on the strength of evidence, opportunities and challenges for the application of sewage surveillance to inform public health decision making. Considerations for undertaking sampling programs are reviewed including sampling sites, strategies, sample transport, storage and quantification methods; together with the approach and evidence base for quantifying prevalence of infection from measured wastewater concentration. Published SARS-CoV-2 sewage surveillance studies (11 peer reviewed and 10 preprints) were reviewed to demonstrate the current status of implementation to support public health decisions. Although being very promising, a number of areas were identified requiring additional research to further strengthen this approach and take full advantage of its potential. In particular, design of adequate sampling strategies, spatial and temporal resolution of sampling, sample storage, replicate sampling and analysis, controls for the molecular methods used for the quantification of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in wastewater. The use of appropriate prevalence data and methods to correlate or even translate SARS-CoV-2 concentrations in wastewater to prevalence of virus shedders in the population is discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gertjan Medema
- KWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, Nieuwegein, 3433 PE, the Netherlands
- Delft University of Technology, Stevinweg 1, Delft, 2628 CN, the Netherlands
- Michigan State University, 1405 S Harrison Rd, East-Lansing, Michigan, 48823, USA
| | - Frederic Been
- KWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, Nieuwegein, 3433 PE, the Netherlands
| | - Leo Heijnen
- KWR Water Research Institute, Groningenhaven 7, Nieuwegein, 3433 PE, the Netherlands
| | - Susan Petterson
- Water & Health Pty Ltd, North Sydney, 2060, Australia
- School of Medicine, Griffith University, Parklands Drive, Gold Coast, Australia
| |
Collapse
|