1
|
Gilham C, Nedjai B, Scibior-Bentkowska D, Reuter C, Banwait R, Brentnall AR, Cuzick J, Peto J, Lorincz AT. Long-term prediction by DNA methylation of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia: Results of the ARTISTIC cohort. Int J Cancer 2024; 155:81-92. [PMID: 38507581 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.34913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2023] [Revised: 01/09/2024] [Accepted: 02/08/2024] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Methylation markers have shown potential for triaging high-risk HPV-positive (hrHPV+) women to identify those at increased risk of invasive cervical cancer (ICC). Our aim was to assess the performance of the S5 DNA methylation classifier for predicting incident high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and ICC among hrHPV+ women in the ARTISTIC screening trial cohort. The S5 classifier, comprising target regions of tumour suppressor gene EPB41L3 and L1 and L2 regions of HPV16, HPV18, HPV31, and HPV33, was assayed by pyrosequencing in archived hrHPV+ liquid-based samples from 343 women with high-grade disease (139 CIN2, 186 CIN3, and 18 ICC) compared to 800 hrHPV+ controls. S5 DNA methylation correlated directly with increasing severity of disease and inversely with lead time to diagnosis. S5 could discriminate between hrHPV+ women who developed CIN3 or ICC and hrHPV+ controls (p <.0001) using samples taken on average 5 years before diagnosis. This relationship was independent of cytology at baseline. The S5 test showed much higher sensitivity than HPV16/18 genotyping for identifying prevalent CIN3 (93% vs. 61%, p = .01) but lower specificity (50% vs. 66%, p <.0001). The S5 classifier identified most women at high risk of developing precancer and missed very few prevalent advanced lesions thus appearing to be an objective test for triage of hrHPV+ women. The combination of methylation of host and HPV genes enables S5 to combine the predictive power of methylation with HPV genotyping to identify hrHPV-positive women who are at highest risk of developing CIN3 and ICC in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Gilham
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Belinda Nedjai
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | | | - Caroline Reuter
- Wolfson Institute for Biomedical Research, University College London, London, UK
| | - Rawinder Banwait
- Blizzard Institute, Centre for Genomics and Child Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Jack Cuzick
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Julian Peto
- Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Attila T Lorincz
- Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Rebolj M, Brentnall AR, Cuschieri K. Predictable changes in the accuracy of human papillomavirus tests after vaccination: review with implications for performance monitoring in cervical screening. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:1733-1743. [PMID: 38615108 PMCID: PMC11130303 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-024-02681-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2024] [Accepted: 04/03/2024] [Indexed: 04/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) is changing the performance of cytology as a cervical screening test, but its effect on HPV testing is unclear. We review the effect of HPV16/18 vaccination on the epidemiology and the detection of HPV infections and high-grade cervical lesions (CIN2+) to evaluate the likely direction of changes in HPV test accuracy. The reduction in HPV16/18 infections and cross-protection against certain non-16/18 high-risk genotypes, most notably 31, 33, and/or 45, will likely increase the test's specificity but decrease its positive predictive value (PPV) for CIN2+. Post-vaccination viral unmasking of non-16/18 genotypes due to fewer HPV16 co-infections might reduce the specificity and the PPV for CIN2+. Post-vaccination clinical unmasking exposing a higher frequency of CIN2+ related to non-16/18 high-risk genotypes is likely to increase the specificity and the PPV of HPV tests. The effect of HPV16/18 vaccination on HPV test sensitivity is difficult to predict based on these changes alone. Programmes relying on HPV detection for primary screening should monitor the frequency of false-positive and false-negative tests in vaccinated (younger) vs. unvaccinated (older) cohorts, to assess the outcomes and performance of their service.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matejka Rebolj
- Centre for Cancer Screening, Prevention, and Early Detection, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK.
| | - Adam R Brentnall
- Centre for Evaluation and Methods, Wolfson Institute of Population Health, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kate Cuschieri
- Scottish HPV Reference Laboratory, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh, NHS Lothian Scotland, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Downham L, Jaafar I, Rol ML, Nyawira Nyaga V, Valls J, Baena A, Zhang L, Gunter MJ, Arbyn M, Almonte M. Accuracy of HPV E6/E7 oncoprotein tests to detect high-grade cervical lesions: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Br J Cancer 2024; 130:517-525. [PMID: 37973957 PMCID: PMC10876647 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02490-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cervical carcinogenesis is mediated by the HPV-E6 and E7 oncoproteins, considered as biomarkers usable in managing screen-positive women. METHODS We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis assessing the accuracy of HPV-E6/E7-oncoprotein tests to detect underlying cervical-precancer and cancer. We included studies reporting data on oncoprotein test accuracy detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse. Random effects logistic regression models were applied for pooling absolute and relative accuracy. RESULTS Twenty-two studies were included. Sensitivity and specificity estimates ranged from 54.2% (95%CI: 45.2-63.0) to 69.5% (95%CI:60.8-76.9) and from 82.8% (95%CI: 50.4-95.8) to 99.1 (95%CI: 98.8-99.3), respectively in the population irrespective of HPV status. Higher sensitivity estimates ranging from 60.8% (95%CI: 49.6-70.9) to 75.5% (95%CI: 71.7-78.9) but lower specificity estimates ranging from 83.7% (95%CI: 76.1-89.3) to 92.1% (95%CI: 88.5-94.6) were observed in studies enrolling high-risk-HPV-positive women. Studies recruiting only HIV-positive women showed a pooled sensitivity of 46.9% (95%CI: 30.6-63.9) with a specificity of 98.0% (95%CI: 96.8-98.7). CONCLUSIONS The high specificity of oncoprotein tests supports its use for triaging HPV-positive women. However, oncoprotein-negative women would not be recommended to undertake routine screening, requiring further follow-up. Large-scale and longitudinal studies are needed to further investigate the role of E6/E7-oncoprotein detection in predicting the risk of developing cervical pre-cancer and cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Downham
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France.
| | - Iman Jaafar
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mary Luz Rol
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Victoria Nyawira Nyaga
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Joan Valls
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Cancer Epidemiology Research Program, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Idibell, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Armando Baena
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Li Zhang
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marc J Gunter
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Nutrition and Metabolism Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Department of Cancer Epidemiology, Scientific Institute of Public Health, Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Human Structure and Repair, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Maribel Almonte
- Early Detection, Prevention and Infections Branch, International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon, France
- Department of Non-Communicable Diseases, World Health Organisation, Geneva, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Berger L, Wolf-Breitinger M, Weiß C, Tuschy B, Berlit S, Sütterlin M, Spaich S. Prevalence of higher-grade dysplasia in persistently high-risk human papillomavirus positive, cytology negative women after introduction of the new cervical cancer screening in Germany. Cancer Causes Control 2023; 34:469-477. [PMID: 36854989 PMCID: PMC10105660 DOI: 10.1007/s10552-023-01677-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to the recently implemented organized cervical cancer screening program in Germany, women older than 35 years with negative cytology but persistent high-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) infection > 12 months should be referred to colposcopy for further evaluation. This study aimed to present and dissect colposcopic and histopathological findings with particular focus on associated hrHPV genotypes. METHODS This study is a retrospective analysis of clinical data from 89 hrHPV positive patients with normal cytology who underwent colposcopic examination at a certified dysplasia outpatient clinic in Germany in 2021. RESULTS While 38 (43%) women had a normal colposcopic finding, 45 (51%) had minor and 6 (7%) major changes. Thirty-one (35%) of the women were HPV 16 and/or HPV 18 positive and 58 (65%) women were positive for other hrHPV only. Among patients who underwent colposcopy with biopsies (in case of an abnormal finding or type 3 transformation zone, n = 68), eight (12%) had cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and six (9%) had CIN 2. The proportion of women diagnosed with CIN 3 varied among different hrHPV genotypes (HPV 16: 11%, HPV 18: 33%, HPV 31: 27%, HPV 33: 33%, HPV 52: 33%). CONCLUSION Persistently hrHPV positive women with negative cytology are at increased risk of being diagnosed with CIN 3. As CIN 3 prevalence seems to differ with regard to hrHPV strain, immediate HPV genotyping for risk stratification and subsequent early referral for colposcopy might constitute a feasible strategy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Berger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany.
| | - Maja Wolf-Breitinger
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Christel Weiß
- Department of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Benjamin Tuschy
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Sebastian Berlit
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Marc Sütterlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Saskia Spaich
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Medical Center Mannheim, Heidelberg University, Theodor-Kutzer Ufer 1-3, 68165, Mannheim, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stuebs FA, Koch MC, Dietl AK, Adler W, Geppert C, Hartmann A, Knöll A, Beckmann MW, Mehlhorn G, Schulmeyer CE, Gass P. Cytology and High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Test for Cervical Cancer Screening Assessment. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071748. [PMID: 35885651 PMCID: PMC9318141 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071748] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 07/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: A new nationwide screening strategy was implemented in Germany in January 2020. No data are available for women referred to certified dysplasia units for secondary clarification after primary diagnosis by a local physician. We therefore investigated combined testing with Papanicolaou smears and high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and compared the data with the final histological findings. Methods: Between January 2015 and October 2020, all referred women who underwent colposcopy of the uterine cervix in our certified dysplasia unit were included. Cytology findings were classified using the Munich III nomenclature. Results: A total of 3588 colposcopies were performed in 3118 women, along with Pap smear and hrHPV co-testing, followed by histology. Women with Pap II-p (ASC-US) and a positive hrHPV co-test had a 22.4% risk for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3/high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL). The risk of CIN 3/HSIL was 83.8% in women with Pap IVa-p (HSIL) and a positive hrHPV co-test. A positive hrHPV co-test increased the risk for HSIL+ (OR 5.942; 95% CI, 4.617 to 7.649; p < 0.001) as compared to a negative hrHPV co-test. Conclusions: The accuracy of Pap smears is comparable with the screening results. A positive hrHPV test increases the risk for HSIL+ fivefold. Colposcopy is necessary to diagnose HSIL+ correctly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frederik A. Stuebs
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21–23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.K.D.); (M.W.B.); (C.E.S.); (P.G.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Martin C. Koch
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Hospital ANregiomed Ansbach, Escherichstraße 1, 91522 Ansbach, Germany;
| | - Anna K. Dietl
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21–23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.K.D.); (M.W.B.); (C.E.S.); (P.G.)
| | - Werner Adler
- Department of Medical Informatics, Biometry and Epidemiology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Waldstrasse 6, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Carol Geppert
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 8–10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.G.); (A.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Arndt Hartmann
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 8–10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.G.); (A.H.); (G.M.)
| | - Antje Knöll
- Institute of Clinical and Molecular Virology, Erlangen University Hospital, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Schlossgarten 4, 91054 Erlangen, Germany;
| | - Matthias W. Beckmann
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21–23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.K.D.); (M.W.B.); (C.E.S.); (P.G.)
| | - Grit Mehlhorn
- Institute of Pathology, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Krankenhausstrasse 8–10, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (C.G.); (A.H.); (G.M.)
- Gynecology Consultancy Practice, German Cancer Society [DKG] and Committee on Cervical Pathology and Colposcopy [AG-CPC] Certified Gynaecological Dysplasia Consultancy Practice, Frauenarztpraxis Erlangen, Neustädter Kirchenplatz 1a, 91054 Erlangen, Germany
| | - Carla E. Schulmeyer
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21–23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.K.D.); (M.W.B.); (C.E.S.); (P.G.)
| | - Paul Gass
- Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Erlangen University Hospital, Comprehensive Cancer Center Erlangen–European Metropolitan Area of Nuremberg (CCC ER-EMN), Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Universitaetsstrasse 21–23, 91054 Erlangen, Germany; (A.K.D.); (M.W.B.); (C.E.S.); (P.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Turhan Cakir A. Cyberchondria levels in women with human papilloma virus. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2022; 48:2610-2614. [PMID: 35801694 DOI: 10.1111/jog.15354] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 04/01/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
AIM To investigate the level of cyberchondria in patients with high-risk human papilloma virus (HPV) positivity. METHODS One hundred and forty women who applied to our clinic between July 2020 and September 2020 and were diagnosed with high-risk HPV positivity or abnormal uterine bleeding (AUB) were included in the study. The Cyberchondria Severity Scale (CSS) was administered face-to-face to the participants. CSS and subscales scores of both groups of patients were evaluated and compared. RESULTS The mean score of the patients on the CSS was 78.54 ± 22.09 and the patients with AUB and HPV(+) was 67.43 ± 19.87 and 84.16 ± 21.08, respectively. The mean subscale scores were as follows, compulsion 13.89 ± 6.49, distress 20.07 ± 7.54, excessiveness 22.40 ± 8.18, reassurance 15.07 ± 6.56, and mistrust of medical professionals 7.26 ± 3.62. The mean scores of the CSS and subscales except for the mistrust of medical professional subscale were higher in patients who were HPV-positive than in other patients. CONCLUSIONS Women with HPV have higher levels of cyberchondria. Medical professionals can reduce this anxiety by giving information to patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anil Turhan Cakir
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey.,Department of Gynecologic Oncology, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, Faculty of Medicine, Zonguldak, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Temporal Trends in Cervical Cancer Screening Practices and Associated Downstream Abnormalities and Procedures Among Women With Insurance in the United States. Obstet Gynecol 2022; 140:55-64. [DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000004838] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/01/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
8
|
Rebolj M, Pesola F, Mathews C, Mesher D, Soldan K, Kitchener H. The impact of catch-up bivalent human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical screening outcomes: an observational study from the English HPV primary screening pilot. Br J Cancer 2022; 127:278-287. [PMID: 35347326 PMCID: PMC9296648 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-022-01791-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2021] [Revised: 01/31/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In England, bivalent vaccination (Cervarix) against high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) genotypes 16/18 was offered in a population-based catch-up campaign in 2008-2010 to girls aged 14-17 years. These women are now entering the national cervical screening programme. We determined the impact of catch-up bivalent vaccination on their screening outcomes. METHODS We studied the overall and genotype-specific screening outcomes in 108,138 women aged 24-25 (offered vaccination) and 26-29 years (not offered vaccination) included in the English HPV screening pilot between 2013 and 2018. RESULTS At 24-25 years, the detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) associated with HPV16/18 decreased from 3 to 1% (p < 0.001), with estimated vaccine effectiveness of 87% (95% CI: 82-91%). The detection of any CIN2+ halved from 6 to 3% (p < 0.001), with an estimated vaccine effectiveness of 72% (95% CI: 66-77%). The positive predictive value of a colposcopy for CIN2+ decreased for both low-grade (p < 0.001) and high-grade (p = 0.02) abnormalities on triage cytology. The decreases in screen-detected abnormalities at age 26-29 were of a substantially smaller magnitude. CONCLUSIONS These data confirm high effectiveness of bivalent HPV vaccination delivered through a population-based catch-up campaign in England. These findings add to the rationale for extending screening intervals for vaccinated cohorts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matejka Rebolj
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
| | - Francesca Pesola
- Cancer Prevention Trials Unit, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Health and Lifestyle Research Unit, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Christopher Mathews
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences & Medicine, King's College London, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
| | - David Mesher
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI and HIV (BSHSH) Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - Kate Soldan
- Blood Safety, Hepatitis, STI and HIV (BSHSH) Division, National Infection Service, Public Health England, 61 Colindale Avenue, London, NW9 5EQ, UK
| | - Henry Kitchener
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Oxford Road, Manchester, M13 9PL, UK
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Rebolj M, Mathews CS, Denton K. Cytology interpretation after a change to HPV testing in primary cervical screening: Observational study from the English pilot. Cancer Cytopathol 2022; 130:531-541. [PMID: 35377967 PMCID: PMC9542289 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 03/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overcalling of abnormalities has been a concern for using cytology triage after positive high-risk human papillomavirus (HPV) tests in cervical screening. METHODS The authors studied the detection of cytological and histological abnormalities at age 24 to 64 years, using data from the English HPV pilot. The pilot compared routine implementation of primary cervical screening based on cytology (N = 931,539), where HPV test results were not available before cytology reporting, with that based on HPV testing (N = 403,269), where cytology was only required after positive HPV tests. RESULTS Revealed HPV positivity was associated with a higher direct referral to colposcopy after any abnormality (adjusted odds ratio [ORadj ], 1.16; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.14-1.18). Laboratories with higher direct referral referred fewer persistently HPV-positive women after early recall. The detection of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN2+) after direct referral increased with an ORadj of 1.17 (95% CI, 1.13-1.20) for informed versus uninformed cytology. Generally, the positive predictive value (PPV) of colposcopy for CIN2+ remained comparable under both conditions of interpreting cytology. In women 50 to 64 years old with high-grade dyskaryosis, however, the PPV increased from 71% to 83% after revealing HPV positivity (ORadj , 2.05; 95% CI, 1.43-2.93). CONCLUSIONS Quality-controlled cervical screening programs can avoid inappropriate overgrading of HPV-positive cytology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matejka Rebolj
- Cancer Prevention GroupSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical SciencesFaculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Christopher S. Mathews
- Cancer Prevention GroupSchool of Cancer and Pharmaceutical SciencesFaculty of Life Sciences and MedicineKing's College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Karin Denton
- Severn PathologySouthmead HospitalNorth Bristol NHS TrustBristolUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Avian A, Clemente N, Mauro E, Isidoro E, Di Napoli M, Dudine S, Del Fabro A, Morini S, Perin T, Giudici F, Cammisuli T, Foschi N, Mocenigo M, Montrone M, Modena C, Polenghi M, Puzzi L, Tomaic V, Valenti G, Sola R, Zanolla S, Vogrig E, Riva E, Angeletti S, Ciccozzi M, Castriciano S, Pachetti M, Petti M, Centonze S, Gerin D, Banks L, Marini B, Canzonieri V, Sopracordevole F, Zanconati F, Ippodrino R. Clinical validation of full HR-HPV genotyping HPV Selfy assay according to the international guidelines for HPV test requirements for cervical cancer screening on clinician-collected and self-collected samples. J Transl Med 2022; 20:231. [PMID: 35581584 PMCID: PMC9115952 DOI: 10.1186/s12967-022-03383-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 04/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/28/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND According to international guidelines, Human Papillomavirus (HPV) DNA tests represent a valid alternative to Pap Test for primary cervical cancer screening, provided that they guarantee balanced clinical sensitivity and specificity for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or more (CIN2+) lesions. The study aimed to assess whether HPV Selfy (Ulisse BioMed - Trieste, Italy), a full-genotyping HPV DNA test that detects and differentiates 14 high-risk HPV (HR-HPV) types, meets the criteria for primary cervical cancer screening described in the international guidelines, on clinician-collected as well as on self-collected samples. METHODS For each participant woman, consecutively referring to Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina (Trieste, Italy) and CRO-National Cancer Institute (Aviano, Italy) for the cervical cancer screening program, the following samples were tested: (a) a clinician-collected cervical specimen, analyzed with the reference test (Hybrid Capture®2 test, HC2) and HPV Selfy; and (b) a self-collected vaginal sample, analyzed with HPV Selfy. Enrolled women were also asked to fulfill a questionnaire about self-sampling acceptability. As required by guidelines, a non-inferiority test was conducted to compare the clinical performance of the test under evaluation with its reference test. RESULTS HPV Selfy clinical sensitivity and specificity resulted non-inferior to those of HC2. By analysis of a total of 889 cervical liquid-based cytology samples from a screening population, of which 98 were from women with CIN2+, HPV Selfy showed relative sensitivity and specificity for CIN2+ of 0.98 and 1.00 respectively (non-inferiority score test: P = 0.01747 and P = 0.00414, respectively); the test reached adequate intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility. Moreover, we demonstrated that the performance of HPV Selfy on self-collected vaginal samples was non-inferior to the performance obtained on clinician-collected cervical specimen (0.92 relative sensitivity and 0.97 relative specificity). Finally, through HPV Selfy genotyping, we were able to describe HPV types prevalence in the study population. CONCLUSIONS HPV Selfy fulfills all the requirements of the international Meijer's guidelines and has been clinically validated for primary cervical cancer screening purposes. Moreover, HPV Selfy has also been validated for self-sampling according to VALHUDES guidelines. Therefore, at date, HPV Selfy is the only full-genotyping test validated both for screening purposes and for self-sampling. Trial registration ASUGI Trieste n. 16008/2018; CRO Aviano n.17149/2018.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Avian
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy ,grid.438882.d0000 0001 0212 6916Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology PhD Study Programme, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - Nicolò Clemente
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Ginecologia Oncologica, IRCCS - Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) (Istituto Nazionale Tumori – National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Mauro
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Erica Isidoro
- grid.413694.dAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina UCO/SC Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Michela Di Napoli
- grid.413694.dAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina UCO/SC Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandra Dudine
- grid.413694.dAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina UCO/SC Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy
| | - Anna Del Fabro
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Ginecologia Oncologica, IRCCS - Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) (Istituto Nazionale Tumori – National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Stefano Morini
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Ginecologia Oncologica, IRCCS - Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) (Istituto Nazionale Tumori – National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Tiziana Perin
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Ginecologia Oncologica, IRCCS - Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) (Istituto Nazionale Tumori – National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Fabiola Giudici
- grid.5133.40000 0001 1941 4308Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Tamara Cammisuli
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Anatomia Patologica, IRCCS – CRO (Istituto Nazionale Tumori - National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Nicola Foschi
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Marco Mocenigo
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy ,grid.438882.d0000 0001 0212 6916Molecular Genetics and Biotechnology PhD Study Programme, University of Nova Gorica, Nova Gorica, Slovenia
| | - Michele Montrone
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Chiara Modena
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Martina Polenghi
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Luca Puzzi
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vjekoslav Tomaic
- grid.4905.80000 0004 0635 7705Institut Ruđer Bošković, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Giulio Valenti
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Riccardo Sola
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Shivani Zanolla
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Enea Vogrig
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Riva
- grid.488514.40000000417684285Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Angeletti
- grid.488514.40000000417684285Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | - Massimo Ciccozzi
- grid.488514.40000000417684285Policlinico Universitario Campus Biomedico, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Maria Pachetti
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy ,grid.418712.90000 0004 1760 7415Institute of Maternal and Child Health, IRCCS Burlo Garofolo, Trieste, Italy
| | - Matteo Petti
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Sandro Centonze
- Clinical Research Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy
| | - Daniela Gerin
- Cervical Cancer Screening Coordination Unit, Azienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina, Trieste, Italy
| | - Lawrence Banks
- grid.425196.d0000 0004 1759 4810International Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology, Trieste, Italy
| | - Bruna Marini
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Canzonieri
- grid.5133.40000 0001 1941 4308Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy ,grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Anatomia Patologica, IRCCS – CRO (Istituto Nazionale Tumori - National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Francesco Sopracordevole
- grid.418321.d0000 0004 1757 9741Ginecologia Oncologica, IRCCS - Centro Di Riferimento Oncologico (CRO) (Istituto Nazionale Tumori – National Cancer Institute), Aviano, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Zanconati
- grid.413694.dAzienda Sanitaria Universitaria Giuliano Isontina UCO/SC Anatomia e Istologia Patologica, Cattinara Hospital, Trieste, Italy ,grid.5133.40000 0001 1941 4308Department of Medicine, Surgery and Health Sciences, University of Trieste, Trieste, Italy
| | - Rudy Ippodrino
- Ulisse BioMed S.P.a, Area Science Park, SS 14, km 163.5, Trieste, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Secosan C, Pasquini A, Zahoi D, Motoc A, Lungeanu D, Balint O, Ilian A, Balulescu L, Grigoras D, Pirtea L. Role of Dual-Staining p16/Ki-67 in the Management of Patients under 30 Years with ASC-US/L-SIL. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020403. [PMID: 35204494 PMCID: PMC8870853 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020403] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2021] [Revised: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 02/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Patients diagnosed with low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion ((L-SIL) or atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) are subjected to additional investigations, such as colposcopy and biopsy, to rule out cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2+ (CIN 2+). Especially in young patients, lesions tend to regress spontaneously, and many human papilloma virus (HPV) infections are transient. Dual-staining p16/Ki-67 has been proposed for the triage of patients with ASC-US or L-SIL, but no prospective study addressing only this subgroup of patients has been conducted so far. We performed a prospective study including all eligible patients referred for a loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) in the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Timișoara University City Hospital. HPV genotyping and dual-staining for p16/Ki-67 were performed prior to LEEP, at 6 and 12 months after LEEP. A total of 60 patients were included in the study and completed the follow-up evaluation. We analyzed the sensitivity and specificity for biopsy-confirmed CIN2+ using the 95% confidence interval (CI) of high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV), dual-staining p16/Ki-67, colposcopy, and combinations of the tests on all patients and separately for the ASC-US and L-SIL groups. Dual-staining p16/Ki-67 alone or in combination with HR-HPV and/or colposcopy showed a higher specificity that HR-HPV and/or colposcopy for the diagnosis of biopsy confirmed CIN2+ in patients under 30 years. Colposcopy + p16/Ki-67 and HR-HPV + colposcopy + p16/Ki-67 showed the highest specificity in our study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Secosan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| | - Andrea Pasquini
- Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Department of Functional Sciences, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
- Faculty of Medicine, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +40-770904689
| | - Delia Zahoi
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.Z.); (A.M.)
| | - Andrei Motoc
- Department of Anatomy and Embryology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (D.Z.); (A.M.)
| | - Diana Lungeanu
- Center for Modeling Biological Systems and Data Analysis, Department of Functional Sciences, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania;
| | - Oana Balint
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| | - Aurora Ilian
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| | - Ligia Balulescu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| | - Dorin Grigoras
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| | - Laurentiu Pirtea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Victor Babeş University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 300041 Timisoara, Romania; (C.S.); (O.B.); (A.I.); (L.B.); (D.G.); (L.P.)
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Detection and Outcome of Endocervical Atypia in Cytology in Primary HPV Screening Programme. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11122402. [PMID: 34943636 PMCID: PMC8700048 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11122402] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2021] [Revised: 12/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Most endocervical adenocarcinomas (EAC) are associated with high-risk HPV (hrHPV) infection, with HPV genotypes 16, 18 and 45 accounting for >90% of the cases. Among endocervical glandular lesions, screening with hrHPV test has previously shown to predict the outcome better than cytology, although around one-fifth of the EAC remain negative both in hrHPV testing and cytology. The study consists of two consecutive HPV-primary screening rounds, conducted in 2012–2015 and 2017–2020. Of the 87 women aged 35 to 60 years of age diagnosed with Atypical endocervical cells, NOS or Atypical endocervical cells, favor neoplastic cytology during the first screening round, 63 (72.4%) were hrHPV positive and 24 (27.6%) were hrHPV negative. Among hrHPV positive patients, three EAC, two adenocarcinomas in situ (AIS), one AIS + high-grade intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and 13 HSIL were found. Of the histologically verified lesions, 68.4% (13/19) were purely of squamous origin. All the EAC and AIS were HPV16 or HPV 18 positive. No high-grade histological lesions were found among the hrHPV negative patients with cytological glandular atypia. A later database search revealed one HPV-negative, gastric-type mucinous EAC that was missed by the HPV primary screening.
Collapse
|
13
|
Bouvard V, Wentzensen N, Mackie A, Berkhof J, Brotherton J, Giorgi-Rossi P, Kupets R, Smith R, Arrossi S, Bendahhou K, Canfell K, Chirenje ZM, Chung MH, Del Pino M, de Sanjosé S, Elfström M, Franco EL, Hamashima C, Hamers FF, Herrington CS, Murillo R, Sangrajrang S, Sankaranarayanan R, Saraiya M, Schiffman M, Zhao F, Arbyn M, Prendiville W, Indave Ruiz BI, Mosquera-Metcalfe I, Lauby-Secretan B. The IARC Perspective on Cervical Cancer Screening. N Engl J Med 2021; 385:1908-1918. [PMID: 34758259 DOI: 10.1056/nejmsr2030640] [Citation(s) in RCA: 103] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Véronique Bouvard
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Nicolas Wentzensen
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Anne Mackie
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Julia Brotherton
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Paolo Giorgi-Rossi
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Rachel Kupets
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Robert Smith
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Silvina Arrossi
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Karima Bendahhou
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Karen Canfell
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Z Mike Chirenje
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Michael H Chung
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Marta Del Pino
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Miriam Elfström
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Eduardo L Franco
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Chisato Hamashima
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Françoise F Hamers
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - C Simon Herrington
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Raúl Murillo
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Suleeporn Sangrajrang
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Rengaswamy Sankaranarayanan
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Mona Saraiya
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Mark Schiffman
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Fanghui Zhao
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Marc Arbyn
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Walter Prendiville
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Blanca I Indave Ruiz
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Isabel Mosquera-Metcalfe
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| | - Béatrice Lauby-Secretan
- From the International Agency for Research on Cancer, Lyon (V.B., W.P., B.I.I.R., I.M.M., B.L.-S.), and the National Public Health Agency, Saint-Maurice (F.F.H.) - both in France; the National Cancer Institute, Rockville, MD (N.W., M. Schiffman); Public Health England and Screening, London (A.M.); Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Amsterdam (J. Berkhof); VCS Foundation, Melbourne, VIC (J. Brotherton), Australia; Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale - IRCCS Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy (P.G.R.); the University of Toronto, Toronto (R.K.); the American Cancer Society (R. Smith), Emory University (M.H.C.), and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (M. Saraiya) - all in Atlanta; the Center for the Study of the State and Society, and the National Scientific and Technical Research Council - both in Buenos Aires (S.A.); the Casablanca Cancer Registry, Casablanca, Morocco (K.B.); The Daffodil Centre, a joint venture between the Cancer Council NSW and the University of Sydney, King's Cross, NSW, Australia (K.C.); the University of Zimbabwe College of Health Sciences, Harare (Z.M.C.); Hospital Clínic de Barcelona, Barcelona (M.P.); PATH, Seattle (S. de Sanjosé); Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm (M.E.); McGill University, Montreal (E.F.); Teikyo University, and the National Cancer Center - both in Tokyo (C.H.); the University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh (C.S.H.); Hospital Universitario San Ignacio, Bogota, Colombia (R.M.); the National Cancer Institute, Bangkok, Thailand (S. Sangrajrang); Research Triangle Institute International, New Delhi, India (R. Sankaranarayanan); Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing (F.Z.); and Sciensano, Brussels (M.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mongia A, Pompeo G, Sani C, Burroni E, Fantacci G, Bisanzi S, Cellai F, Ventura L, Bottari F, Carozzi F. Hybrid capture 2 and cobas® 4800: Comparison of performance of two clinically validated tests for human papillomavirus primary screening of cervical cancer. J Med Screen 2021; 28:472-479. [PMID: 33567993 DOI: 10.1177/0969141321992820] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare, in a primary human papillomavirus screening setting, two different validated human papillomavirus tests, considering their analytical and clinical screening performances. METHODS In Tuscany, a human papillomavirus screening program was implemented in 2013. Hybrid capture 2 (Qiagen) was used for testing until May 2016, when it was replaced by the cobas® 4800 human papillomavirus test (Cobas; Roche). We evaluated the performance of Hybrid capture 2 and Cobas on: the same screening population in two different periods (before and after changing to Cobas); the same Hybrid capture 2-positive consecutive samples. Discordant samples (Hybrid capture 2-positive/Cobas negative) were typed on the L1 gene (reverse line blot, AB Analitica) and E6/E7 genes (BD Onclarity assay). RESULTS In the considered time period (n = 37,775), human papillomavirus positivity was 9.8% and 7.4%, respectively, for Hybrid capture 2 and Cobas (p < 0.0001). At immediate colposcopy, the cervical intraepithelial neoplasia, grade 2 positive predictive value was, respectively, 23.8% and 34% (p < 0.001). At one-year recall, human papillomavirus persistence was, respectively, 40.6% and 62.2% (p < 0.0001). Of Hybrid capture 2-positive re-tested samples (n = 620), 32.4% were Cobas negative. Of discordant samples typed on L1, 7% were positive for the 12 high-risk human papillomavirus. Of the samples found to be negative for the 12 high-risk human papillomavirus types on L1, 14.5% were positive on E6/E7 typing. Among the discordant samples, the only two cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 lesions were non-high-risk human papillomavirus positive on both L1 and E6/E7 typing. CONCLUSION At baseline, Hybrid capture 2 showed greater human papillomavirus positivity and a lower CIN2+ positive predictive value than Cobas, which was more specific than Hybrid capture 2 in detection of high-risk human papillomavirus: 80% of discordant samples were confirmed as high-risk human papillomavirus negative. This higher analytical specificity determined the non-identification of two CIN3 lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Mongia
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.,General Laboratory - Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - G Pompeo
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - C Sani
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - E Burroni
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - G Fantacci
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.,Medically Assisted Procreation Unit, Valdichiana Hospital (AUSL Toscana sud est), Cortona (AR), Italy
| | - S Bisanzi
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - F Cellai
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - L Ventura
- Clinical Epidemiology Unit - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| | - F Bottari
- European Institute of Oncology (IEO), Milan, Italy
| | - F Carozzi
- Regional Cancer Prevention Laboratory - Institute for Cancer Research, Prevention and Clinical Network (ISPRO), Florence, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Gates A, Pillay J, Reynolds D, Stirling R, Traversy G, Korownyk C, Moore A, Thériault G, Thombs BD, Little J, Popadiuk C, van Niekerk D, Keto-Lambert D, Vandermeer B, Hartling L. Screening for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer: protocol for systematic reviews to inform Canadian recommendations. Syst Rev 2021; 10:2. [PMID: 33388083 PMCID: PMC7777363 DOI: 10.1186/s13643-020-01538-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2020] [Accepted: 11/17/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening in primary care for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer by systematically reviewing evidence of (a) effectiveness; (b) test accuracy; (c) individuals' values and preferences; and (d) strategies aimed at improving screening rates. METHODS De novo reviews will be conducted to evaluate effectiveness and to assess values and preferences. For test accuracy and strategies to improve screening rates, we will integrate studies from existing systematic reviews with search updates to the present. Two Cochrane reviews will provide evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes from the conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. We will search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central (except for individuals' values and preferences, where Medline, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched) via peer-reviewed search strategies and the reference lists of included studies and reviews. We will search ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. Two reviewers will screen potentially eligible studies and agree on those to include. Data will be extracted by one reviewer with verification by another. Two reviewers will independently assess risk of bias and reach consensus. Where possible and suitable, we will pool studies via meta-analysis. We will compare accuracy data per outcome and per comparison using the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model and report relative sensitivities and specificities. Findings on values and preferences will be synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach and thematic analysis, depending on study designs. Two reviewers will appraise the certainty of evidence for all outcomes using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and come to consensus. DISCUSSION The publication of guidance on screening in primary care for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer by the Task Force in 2013 focused on cytology. Since 2013, new studies using human papillomavirus tests for cervical screening have been published that will improve our understanding of screening in primary care settings. This review will inform updated recommendations based on currently available studies and address key evidence gaps noted in our previous review.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Gates
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| | - Jennifer Pillay
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| | - Donna Reynolds
- Department of Family and Community Medicine and Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rob Stirling
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Equity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Gregory Traversy
- Centre for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Equity, Public Health Agency of Canada, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Ainsley Moore
- Family Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | | | - Brett D. Thombs
- Faculty of Medicine, McGill University and Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada
| | - Julian Little
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | | | - Dirk van Niekerk
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Diana Keto-Lambert
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| | - Ben Vandermeer
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| | - Lisa Hartling
- Alberta Research Centre for Health Evidence, University of Alberta, 11405 87 Avenue NW, Edmonton, Alberta T6G 1C9 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Marlow L, Forster AS, McBride E, Rockliffe L, Kitchener H, Waller J. Information needs among women taking part in primary HPV screening in England: a content analysis. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e044630. [PMID: 33323451 PMCID: PMC7745520 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2020] [Revised: 11/09/2020] [Accepted: 11/25/2020] [Indexed: 01/02/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Introducing primary human papillomavirus (HPV) testing to cervical screening programmes means changes to the results women receive. We explored additional information needs among women undergoing HPV primary screening. DESIGN Women were sent a postal questionnaire shortly after receiving their results and 6 and 12 months later. Each questionnaire asked if women had any unanswered questions about cervical screening or HPV testing. Free-text responses constituted the data. Themes were identified using content analysis. SETTING National Health Service (NHS) Cervical Screening Programme, England. PARTICIPANTS 381 women who recorded one or more free-text responses. RESULTS The most common theme represented women's emotional responses and attempts to understand their results. This theme was raised by 45% of women overall, but was as high as 59% in the HPV cleared group. General questions about the cause and epidemiology of HPV were raised by 38% of women and were more common among those testing HPV positive with normal cytology (52%). Questions about the purpose and procedure for HPV testing were most common among HPV-negative women (40%, compared with 16%-24% of the other results groups). Questions about future implications of test results were raised by 19% of women, and this theme was most common among those with persistent HPV. CONCLUSIONS Despite provision of information alongside screening invitations, women can still have unanswered questions following receipt of their results. Details about the epidemiology of HPV and why cervical screening procedures are changing should be included with screening invitations. Some results groups may benefit from additional tailored information with their results letter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Marlow
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Alice S Forster
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Emily McBride
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| | - Lauren Rockliffe
- School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Henry Kitchener
- Women's Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, Greater Manchester, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Cancer Prevention Group, School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Bonde J, Floore A, Ejegod D, Vink FJ, Hesselink A, van de Ven PM, Valenčak AO, Pedersen H, Doorn S, Quint WG, Petry KU, Poljak M, Stanczuk G, Cuschieri K, de Sanjosé S, Bleeker M, Berkhof J, Meijer CJLM, Heideman DAM. Methylation markers FAM19A4 and miR124-2 as triage strategy for primary human papillomavirus screen positive women: A large European multicenter study. Int J Cancer 2020; 148:396-405. [PMID: 32997803 PMCID: PMC7756277 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.33320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 51] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/29/2020] [Revised: 07/04/2020] [Accepted: 07/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
In human papillomavirus (HPV) cervical cancer screening, cytology is used as triage to counter the low specificity of HPV testing. VALID-SCREEN is a EU-multicenter, retrospective study conducted to evaluate the clinical performance of the FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation-based molecular triage test as a substitute or addition to cytology as reflex testing of HPV screen positive women. FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test (QIAsure Methylation Test) was evaluated in 2384 HPV-positive cervical screening samples, from women 29-76 years of age, derived from four EU countries. Specimens were collected in ThinPrep or SurePath media, HPV-status, concurrent cytology, and histology diagnosis were provided by the parent institutes. The control population consisted of women with no evidence of disease within 2 years of follow-up. A total of 899 histologies were retrieved; 527 showed no disease, 124 CIN2 (5.2%), 228 CIN3 (9.6%) and 20 cervical cancers (0.8%); 19 of 20 screen-detected cervical cancers were found methylation-positive (sensitivity 95%). Overall specificity of FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test was 78.3% (n = 2013; 95%CI: 76-80). The negative predictive value of hrHPV positive, methylation-negative outcomes were 99.9% for cervical cancer (N = 1694; 95%CI: 99.6-99.99), 96.9% for ≥CIN3 (95%CI: 96-98), and 93.0% for ≥CIN2 (95%CI: 92-94). Overall sensitivity for CIN3 using FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation test was 77% (n = 228; 95%CI: 71-82). CIN3 sensitivity was uniform between centers independent of sample collection medias, DNA extraction methods and HPV screening tests. Being objectively reported compared to the subjectivity of cytology, equally performing across settings and screening methods, the FAM19A4/miR124-2 methylation constitute an alternative/supplement to cytology as triage method to be investigated in real-life pilot implementation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jesper Bonde
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Ditte Ejegod
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Frederique J Vink
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Peter M van de Ven
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Helle Pedersen
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | | | - Wim G Quint
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, Rijswijk, The Netherlands
| | - Karl Ulrich Petry
- Department of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, Klinikum Wolfsburg, Germany
| | - Mario Poljak
- Institute of Microbiology and Immunology, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Grazyna Stanczuk
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Western Isles Hospital, Scotland, UK
| | - Kate Cuschieri
- HPV Research Group, Division of Pathology, University of Edinburgh, Scotland, UK
| | - Silvia de Sanjosé
- Infections and Cancer Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Maaike Bleeker
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Chris J L M Meijer
- Self-screen B.V, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.,Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Daniëlle A M Heideman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Pathology, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Gilham C, Sargent A, Kitchener HC, Peto J. HPV testing compared with routine cytology in cervical screening: long-term follow-up of ARTISTIC RCT. Health Technol Assess 2020; 23:1-44. [PMID: 31219027 DOI: 10.3310/hta23280] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The National Screening Committee (NSC) based its recommendation that human papillomavirus (HPV) testing should replace cytology in primary cervical screening largely on the 2009 follow-up results of the ARTISTIC trial (A Randomised Trial In Screening To Improve Cytology). The NSC must now decide on screening intervals and triage policy. Options include extending the screening interval up to 10 years for human papillomavirus-negative (HPV-) women, delaying recall for human papillomavirus-positive (HPV+) women with normal cytology (as their infections are usually transient), and basing triage on full HPV typing. METHODS In ARTISTIC, 24,510 women were recruited who were attending routine cervical cytology in Greater Manchester in 2001-3. The women were randomly allocated between revealing and concealing their HPV test results and were recalled every 3 years. After 2009, the women returned to routine cytological screening with recall every 3 years for those aged < 50 years, and every 5 years for those aged 50-64 years. We have followed the cohort to 2015 through national cancer registration for CIN3 (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3) and cancer, and through linkage to the cervical screening call-recall system to obtain lifetime cytology records. RESULTS The analysis comprised 24,496 women at round 1 and 13,591 women at round 2 (which was 30-48 months later). Follow-up via local histology laboratories and national cancer registration identified 505 cases of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or cervical cancer (CIN3+) (including 22 invasive cervical cancers). The cumulative CIN3+ risk 10 years after a negative HPV test [0.31%, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.18% to 0.49%, in the revealed arm] was similar to that 3 years after negative cytology (0.30%, 95% CI 0.23% to 0.41%, in the concealed arm) and fell sharply with age, from 1.1% (95% CI 0.7% to 1.8%) in those women aged < 25 years to 0.08% (95% CI 0.03% to 0.20%) in those women aged > 50 years. The 10-year cumulative CIN3+ risk following a new HPV infection at round 2 was 3.4% (95% CI 2.1% to 5.4%). The highest risks were associated with type-specific persistent infections that, overall, resulted in a 10-year cumulative CIN3+ risk of 20.4% (95% CI 15.6% to 26.4%). CONCLUSIONS We found a similar level of protection 10 years after a negative HPV test and 3 years after negative cytology. These data support a considerably longer screening interval after a negative HPV test than after a negative cytology test. About three-quarters of women with HPV infection and normal cytology clear their infections within about 3 years. Their risk of CIN3+ within this time frame is low (1.5%), suggesting that the current policy of annual repeat testing and referral after 2 years may be unnecessarily cautious. Approximately 40% of women who remained HPV+ had cleared their initial infection and acquired a new HPV type. The cumulative CIN3+ risks in women with type-specific persistent infections are about six times higher than in women with new infections. Triage strategies based on HPV persistence would, therefore, reduce unnecessary referral of women with new (and largely transient) infections. HPV assays that identify HPV types 31, 33, 45, 52 and 58 in addition to 16 and 18 could be useful in triage as well as in primary HPV testing. Similar results in recent routine HPV screening suggest that our results are generalisable despite changes in cytology and HPV assay methods. We are continuing to follow the ARTISTIC cohort into the new era of primary HPV screening. Future work will focus on the implications of more sensitive HPV testing for primary HPV screening policy and triage of HPV-positive women. Our results suggest that a more sensitive test is needed to detect occult CIN3 at high risk of progression to cancer, but this would substantially increase the overall HPV detection rate. Tests such as DNA (deoxyribonucleic acid) methylation for distinguishing HPV infection from neoplasia will be evaluated on stored samples and on further samples now being collected from women in the cohort who are still being screened. FUNDING This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 23, No. 28. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clare Gilham
- Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Alexandra Sargent
- Department of Virology, Central Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Henry C Kitchener
- School of Cancer and Sciences, University of Manchester, St Mary's Hospital, Manchester, UK
| | - Julian Peto
- Non-Communicable Disease Epidemiology Unit, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Tao X, Zhang H, Wang L, Pan Q, Ji S, Zhou X, Zhao C. Atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance cervical cytology in the Chinese population: Age-stratified reporting rates, high-risk HPV testing, and immediate histologic correlation results. Cancer Cytopathol 2020; 129:24-32. [PMID: 32697438 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.22333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2020] [Revised: 05/31/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The US American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines for cervical cancer screening have been largely adopted worldwide. Pooled high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing has been routinely used to risk-stratify women who have atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) cytology. However, it has been reported that there are distinguished differences in the distribution of hrHPV genotypes between the Chinese and American populations. METHODS The objective of this study was to analyze the age-stratified reporting rates, hrHPV-positive rates, and genotyping by different cytology preparation methods and hrHPV testing assays, along with the immediate histopathologic correlation of ASC-US cytology, in the Chinese population. RESULTS The ASC-US reporting rate of 1,597,136 Papanicolaou (Pap) tests was 4.2%, and the overall hrHPV-positive rate was 48.7% in the ASC-US cases. In total, 25,338 women with ASC-US Pap tests had immediate histologic follow-up, and the detection rate for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and higher lesions (CIN2+) was 7.1%, including 0.6% carcinomas. Among the women who underwent hrHPV testing, CIN2+ lesions were identified in 657 of 6154 (10.7%) who had hrHPV-positive results and in only 1.5% those who had hrHPV-negative results. Further genotyping analysis revealed that HPV types 16 and/or 18 were commonly identified genotypes among the Chinese women who had ASC-US cytology. CONCLUSIONS This large-scale study demonstrated that the hrHPV-positive rate, the CIN2+ detection rate, and the distribution of hrHPV genotypes in Chinese women with ASC-US cytology were essentially consistent with those from the American population, further supporting that the current and newly released 2019 American Society of Colposcopy and Cervical Pathology guidelines should be applicable to the Chinese population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Tao
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Huina Zhang
- Department of Pathology, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, New York
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Qiuzhi Pan
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Shuting Ji
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xianrong Zhou
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Chengquan Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University, Shanghai, China.,Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Shiraz A, Crawford R, Egawa N, Griffin H, Doorbar J. The early detection of cervical cancer. The current and changing landscape of cervical disease detection. Cytopathology 2020; 31:258-270. [PMID: 32301535 DOI: 10.1111/cyt.12835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Revised: 03/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/23/2020] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Cervical cancer prevention has undergone dramatic changes over the past decade. With the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccination, some countries have seen a dramatic decline in HPV-mediated cervical disease. However, widespread implementation has been limited by economic considerations and the varying healthcare priorities of different countries, as well as by vaccine availability and, in some instances, vaccine hesitancy amongst the population/government. In this environment, it is clear that cervical screening will retain a critical role in the prevention of cervical cancer and will in due course need to adapt to the changing incidence of HPV-associated neoplasia. Cervical screening has, for many years, been performed using Papanicolaou staining of cytology samples. As our understanding of the role of HPV in cervical cancer progression has advanced, and with the availability of sensitive detection systems, cervical screening now incorporates HPV testing. Although such tests improve disease detection, they are not specific, and cannot discriminate high-grade from low-grade disease. This has necessitated the development of effective triage approaches to stratify HPV-positive women according to their risk of cancer progression. Although cytology triage remains the mainstay of screening, novel strategies under evaluation include DNA methylation, biomarker detection and the incorporation of artificial intelligence systems to detect cervical abnormalities. These tests, which can be partially anchored in a molecular understanding of HPV pathogenesis, will enhance the sensitivity of disease detection and improve patient outcomes. This review will provide insight on these innovative methodologies while explaining their scientific basis drawing from our understanding of HPV tumour biology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aslam Shiraz
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Gynae-Oncology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Robin Crawford
- Department of Gynae-Oncology, Addenbrookes Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nagayasu Egawa
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Heather Griffin
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - John Doorbar
- Department of Pathology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
McBride E, Tatar O, Rosberger Z, Rockliffe L, Marlow LAV, Moss-Morris R, Kaur N, Wade K, Waller J. Emotional response to testing positive for human papillomavirus at cervical cancer screening: a mixed method systematic review with meta-analysis. Health Psychol Rev 2020; 15:395-429. [PMID: 32449477 DOI: 10.1080/17437199.2020.1762106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Tens-of-millions of women every year test positive for human papillomavirus (HPV) at routine cervical screening. We performed a mixed-methods systematic review using a results-based convergent design to provide the first comprehensive overview of emotional response to testing positive for HPV (HPV+). We mapped our findings using the cognitive behavioural framework. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to 09-Nov-2019 and 33 papers were included. Random-effects meta-analyses revealed that HPV+ women with abnormal or normal cytology displayed higher short-term anxiety than those with normal results (MD on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory = 7.6, 95% CI: 4.59-10.60 and MD = 6.33, CI: 1.31-11.35, respectively); there were no long-term differences. Psychological distress (general/sexual/test-specific) was higher in HPV+ women with abnormal cytology in the short-term and long-term (SMD = 0.68, CI: 0.32-1.03 and SMD = 0.42, CI: 0.05-0.80, respectively). Testing HPV+ was also related to disgust/shame, surprise and fear about cancer. Broadly, adverse response related to eight cognitive constructs (low control, confusion, cancer-related concerns, relationship concerns, sexual concerns, uncertainty, stigma, low trust) and six behavioural constructs (relationship problems, social impact, non-disclosure of results, idiosyncratic prevention, indirect clinical interaction, changes to sexual practice). Almost exclusive use of observational and qualitative designs limited inferences of causality and conclusions regarding clinical significance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McBride
- Department of Behavioural Science and Health, University College London (UCL), London, UK
| | - Ovidiu Tatar
- Research Center-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada.,Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Psychiatry and Addiction, Faculty of Medicine, Université de Montréal, QC, Canada
| | - Zeev Rosberger
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.,Department of Psychology, Psychiatry and Oncology, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Lauren Rockliffe
- Manchester Centre for Health Psychology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Laura A V Marlow
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London (KCL), London, UK
| | - Rona Moss-Morris
- Department of Psychology, King's College London (KCL), London, UK
| | - Navdeep Kaur
- Research Center-Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Canada
| | - Kristina Wade
- Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital, Montreal, Canada.,Faculty of Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Canada
| | - Jo Waller
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College London (KCL), London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McBride E, Marlow LA, Forster AS, Ridout D, Kitchener H, Patnick J, Waller J. Anxiety and distress following receipt of results from routine HPV primary testing in cervical screening: The psychological impact of primary screening (PIPS) study. Int J Cancer 2020; 146:2113-2121. [PMID: 31251820 PMCID: PMC7065242 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2019] [Revised: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 06/24/2019] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
We used a cross-sectional survey to examine short-term anxiety and distress in women receiving different results following routine human papillomavirus (HPV) primary testing at cervical screening. Participants were women aged 24-65 (n = 1,127) who had attended screening at one of five sites piloting HPV primary screening in England, including a control group with normal cytology who were not tested for HPV. Women completed a postal questionnaire ~2 weeks after receiving their screening result. Unadjusted mean anxiety scores ranged from 32.9 (standard deviation [SD] = 12.2) in HPV-negative women to 42.1 (SD = 14.9) in women who were HPV-positive with abnormal cytology. In adjusted analyses, anxiety was significantly higher in women testing HPV-positive with either normal cytology (mean difference [MD] = 3.5, CI: 0.6-6.4) or abnormal cytology (MD = 7.2, CI: 3.7-10.6), than the control group. Distress was slightly higher in women who tested HPV-positive with abnormal cytology (MD = 0.9, CI: 0.02-1.8), than the control group. We also found increased odds of very high anxiety in women who tested HPV-positive with normal or abnormal cytology compared to the control group. This pattern of results was only observed among women receiving their first HPV-positive result, not among women found to have persistent HPV at 12-month follow-up. Testing HPV-positive with normal cytology for the first time, is associated with elevated anxiety despite carrying very low immediate cervical cancer risk. However, receiving the same test result at 12-month early recall does not appear to be associated with higher anxiety, suggesting anxiety may normalise with repeated exposure and/or over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily McBride
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health CareUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Laura A.V. Marlow
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health CareUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Alice S. Forster
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health CareUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Deborah Ridout
- Population, Policy and Practice ProgrammeUCL Great Ormond Street Institute of Child HealthLondonUnited Kingdom
| | - Henry Kitchener
- Women's Cancer Centre, Institute of Cancer SciencesUniversity of ManchesterManchesterUnited Kingdom
| | - Julietta Patnick
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population HealthUniversity of OxfordOxfordUnited Kingdom
| | - Jo Waller
- Research Department of Behavioural Science and Health, Institute of Epidemiology and Health CareUniversity College LondonLondonUnited Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Weston G, Dombrowski C, Harvey MJ, Iftner T, Kyrgiou M, Founta C, Adams EJ. Use of the Aptima mRNA high-risk human papillomavirus (HR-HPV) assay compared to a DNA HR-HPV assay in the English cervical screening programme: a decision tree model based economic evaluation. BMJ Open 2020; 10:e031303. [PMID: 32152154 PMCID: PMC7064071 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031303] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To estimate the impact of using the Aptima messenger RNA (mRNA) high-risk human papilloma virus (HR-HPV) assay versus a DNA HR-HPV assay in a primary HPV cervical screening programme. DESIGN One hypothetical cohort followed for 3 years through HPV primary cervical screening. SETTING England. PARTICIPANTS A hypothetical cohort of women aged 25-65 years tested in the National Health Service (NHS) Cervical Screening Programme (CSP) for first call or routine recall testing. METHODS A decision tree parameterised with data from the CSP (2017/18) and the HORIZON study. Uncertainty analyses were conducted using data from the FOCAL and GAST studies, other DNA HPV tests in addition to one-way and probabilistic sensitivity and scenarios analyses, to test the robustness of results. INTERVENTIONS Aptima mRNA HR-HPV assay and a DNA HR-HPV assay (cobas 4800 HPV assay). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Primary: total colposcopies and total costs for the cohort. Secondary: total HPV and cytology tests, number lost to follow-up. RESULTS At baseline for a population of 2.25 million women, an estimated £15.4 million (95% credibility intervals (CI) £6.5 to 24.1 million) could be saved and 28 009 (95% CI 27 499 to 28 527) unnecessary colposcopies averted if Aptima mRNA assays are used instead of a DNA assay, with 90 605 fewer unnecessary HR-HPV and 253 477 cytology tests performed. These savings are due to a lower number of HPV positive samples in the mRNA arm. When data from other primary HPV screening trials were compared, results indicated that using the Aptima mRNA assay generated cost savings and reduced testing in every scenario. CONCLUSION Using the Aptima mRNA assay versus a DNA assay would almost certainly yield cost savings and reduce unnecessary testing and procedures, benefiting the NHS and women in the CSP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Thomas Iftner
- Department of Medical Virology, University Hospital Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Maria Kyrgiou
- Institute of Reproductive and Developmental Biology, Department of Surgery & Cancer, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Queen Charlotte's and Chelsea, Hammersmith Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - Christina Founta
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Musgrove Park Hospital, Taunton & Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, Somerset, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
24
|
Dodd RH, Mac O, Brotherton JML, Cvejic E, McCaffery KJ. Levels of anxiety and distress following receipt of positive screening tests in Australia's HPV-based cervical screening programme: a cross-sectional survey. Sex Transm Infect 2020; 96:166-172. [PMID: 32001660 DOI: 10.1136/sextrans-2019-054290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2019] [Revised: 12/17/2019] [Accepted: 01/11/2020] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE From December 2017, the Australian National Cervical Screening Program commenced 5 yearly primary human papillomavirus (HPV) screening; one of the first high-income countries to implement primary HPV screening. This study aimed to examine the psychosocial impact of self-reporting testing HPV positive in a sample of women screened since the renewal of the programme. METHODS Women in Australia aged 25-74 years who reported participating in cervical screening since December 2017 were recruited through an online market research company to complete a cross-sectional survey. The primary outcomes were anxiety and general distress. RESULTS 1004 women completed the online survey; 80.9% reported testing HPV negative (HPV-), 6.5% reported testing HPV positive (HPV+) and 12.9% did not know/remember their test result. Women who reported testing HPV+ had significantly poorer psychological outcomes on a range of measures. Those who reported testing HPV+ had higher anxiety scores (53.03 vs 43.58 out of 80, p<0.001), showed more general distress (3.94 vs 2.52 out of 12, p=0.004), concern about their test result (5.02 vs 2.37, p<0.001), expressed greater distress about their test result (7.06 vs 4.74, p<0.001) and cancer worry (quite or very worried 35.4% vs 11.6%, p<0.001) than women who reported testing HPV-. Concern regarding test results was also significantly higher in women who did not know/remember their test result (3.20 vs 2.37, p<0.001) compared with women who reported testing HPV-. Women who reported testing HPV+ had greater knowledge of HPV (9.25 vs 6.62, p<0.001) and HPV testing (2.44 vs 1.30, p<0.001) than women who reported testing HPV-. CONCLUSIONS Receipt of an HPV+ test result was associated with high levels of anxiety and distress, which reached clinical significance. Further work is needed to understand whether distress and concern could be reduced by ensuring all women receive high-quality standardised information with their results or by other interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachael Helen Dodd
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Olivia Mac
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Julia M L Brotherton
- VCS Population Health, Victorian Cytology Service, Carlton South, Victoria, Australia.,Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Erin Cvejic
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirsten J McCaffery
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Kong TW, Kim M, Kim YH, Kim YB, Kim J, Kim JW, Park MH, Park JH, Rhee JH, Lim MC, Hong JS. High-risk human papillomavirus testing as a primary screening for cervical cancer: position statement by the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology. J Gynecol Oncol 2019; 31:e31. [PMID: 31789003 PMCID: PMC6918897 DOI: 10.3802/jgo.2020.31.e31] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2019] [Revised: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 11/08/2019] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Based on emerging data and current knowledge regarding high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing as a primary screening for cervical cancer, the Korean Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology and the Korean Society of Gynecologic Oncology support the following scientific facts: • Compared to cytology, hrHPV screening has higher sensitivity and detects more cases of high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. • Qualified hrHPV testing can be considered as an alternative primary screening for cervical cancer to the current cytology method. • The starting age of primary hrHPV screening should not be before 25 years because of possible overtreatment in this age, which has a high human papillomavirus (HPV) prevalence but rarely progresses to cancer. The screening interval should be no sooner than every 3 years and no longer than every 5 years. • Before the introduction of hrHPV screening in Korea, research into comparative effectiveness of primary hrHPV screening for cervical cancer should be conducted to determine the appropriate HPV assay, starting age, and screening interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tae Wook Kong
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Ajou University School of Medicine, Suwon, Korea
| | - Miseon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Gangnam Medical Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Young Han Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Institute of Women's Life Medical Science, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Beom Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Jayeon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, CHA Seoul Fertility Center, CHA University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Weon Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Mi Hye Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, College of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Joo Hyun Park
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Gangnam Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Ho Rhee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Keimyung University School of Medicine, Daegu, Korea
| | - Myong Cheol Lim
- Cancer Healthcare Research Branch and Center for Uterine Cancer, Research Institute and Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Joon Seok Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Gilham C, Sargent A, Peto J. Triaging women with human papillomavirus infection and normal cytology or low-grade dyskaryosis: evidence from 10-year follow up of the ARTISTIC trial cohort. BJOG 2019; 127:58-68. [PMID: 31541495 PMCID: PMC6916371 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Objectives To estimate long‐term cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 (CIN3) risks associated with different triage strategies for human papillomavirus positive (HPV+) women with a view to reducing unnecessary referrals. Design The ARTISTIC trial cohort was recruited in Manchester in 2001–03 and was followed up for CIN3 and cancer notification through national registration until December 2015. Results The 10‐year cumulative risk of CIN3+ was much higher for women with HPV16/18 infection (19.4%, 95% CI 15.8–23.8% with borderline/low‐grade cytology and 10.7%, 95% CI 8.3–13.9% with normal cytology) than for those with other HPV types (7.3%, 95% CI 5.4–9.7% with borderline/low‐grade cytology and 3.2%, 95% CI 2.2–4.5% with normal cytology). Among the 379 women with normal to low‐grade cytology and new HPV infection, the 10‐year cumulative CIN3+ risk was 2.9% (95% CI 1.6–5.2%). Conclusions The CIN3 risk is confined to women with persistent type‐specific HPV so partial genotyping test assays identifying HPV16/18 as a minimum are essential for efficient risk stratification. Immediate referral to colposcopy for HPV+ women with borderline or low‐grade cytology and referral after a year if still HPV+ with normal cytology may be unnecessary. Low‐grade lesions can safely be retested to identify those with persistent HPV. Recall intervals of 1 year for HPV16/18 and 2 years for other high‐risk HPVs are justified for women with normal cytology and might also be considered for women with borderline/low‐grade cytology. The minimal risk of invasive cancer that has progressed beyond stage 1A must be weighed against the advantages for patients and the NHS of reducing the number of referrals to colposcopy. Tweetable abstract Cervical screening would be better for women and cheaper for the NHS if women with HPV and normal to low‐grade cytology were retested after a year or two when many infections will have cleared. Cervical screening would be better for women and cheaper for the NHS if women with HPV and normal to low‐grade cytology were retested after a year or two when many infections will have cleared.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Gilham
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - A Sargent
- Clinical Virology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - J Peto
- London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Kola-Palmer S, Dhingra K. Awareness and knowledge of human papilloma virus in UK women aged 25 years and over: Results from a cross-sectional internet-based survey. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) 2019; 29:e13181. [PMID: 31639253 DOI: 10.1111/ecc.13181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2017] [Revised: 02/14/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The expanding use of human papilloma virus (HPV) testing within cervical screening requires an evaluation of public understanding of HPV. This study aimed to explore HPV awareness and knowledge using a previously psychometrically validated measure in a sample of UK women aged 25 years and over. METHODS An anonymous web-based cross-sectional survey design was used, and responses were recorded for 246 women (mean age = 37.59, SD = 9.20). RESULTS Findings indicated limits to women's understanding of HPV, its transmission, treatment and link with cancer. The mean HPV knowledge score was 9.35 (4.43), and the mean HPV testing score was 3.34 (1.91). Multivariate analyses revealed that information seeking following cervical screening and being a student is associated with higher HPV knowledge and that having a positive HPV test result and having university education is associated with higher HPV testing knowledge. CONCLUSIONS These results highlight that there is a lack of knowledge and misunderstanding relating to HPV and its link with cancer in adult women in the UK. The findings suggest that public health HPV information campaigns are urgently needed, especially with a drop in UK cervical screening attendance rates, and with the upcoming change to HPV primary testing within the UK NHS cervical screening programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Katie Dhingra
- School of Social Sciences, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Knowledge of Human Papillomavirus (HPV), Attitudes and Practices Towards Anti-HPV Vaccination Among Israeli Pediatricians, Gynecologists, and Internal Medicine Doctors: Development and Validation of an Ad Hoc Questionnaire. Vaccines (Basel) 2019; 7:vaccines7040157. [PMID: 31640127 PMCID: PMC6963669 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines7040157] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2019] [Revised: 10/17/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Human papillomavirus (HPV) is a highly widespread virus which is responsible for one of the most common sexually transmitted infections. Two main preventative strategies exist: anti-HPV vaccination and cervical screening. Health-care workers play a key role in promoting public health campaigns; however, vaccine hesitancy is an often under-recognized challenge. To investigate the overall knowledge of HPV and HPV-related issues, as well as the attitudes and practices of health professionals towards recommending the anti-HPV vaccine, an ad hoc knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) questionnaire was developed and validated in a sample of 139 Israeli pediatricians, gynecologists, and internal medicine doctors. The KAP questionnaire was found to be psychometrically valid and sound (with an rKR-20 coefficient of 0.74 for the second part and a Cronbach's alpha of 0.85 for the third part). Furthermore, the present study confirmed the importance of health-care providers in recommending the immunization practice. Parents that had been strongly advised by health-care providers to vaccinate their children accepted immunization for their girls (odds ratio (OR) 1.09 (95% CI 1.04-1.14)) and boys (OR 1.06 (95% CI 1.02-1.10)), had a lower probability of deciding to postpone the immunization appointment (OR 0.81 (95% CI 0.66-0.98)), had fewer doubts and concerns about the vaccine (OR 0.69 (95% CI 0.54-0.89)), and had a lower probability of refusing the vaccination (OR 0.93 (95% CI 0.86-0.99)). Interestingly, the use of new, emerging tools such as ad hoc websites, applications, and other interactive devices reduced vaccine hesitancy (OR 0.90 (95% CI 0.82-0.99)) and concerns about the side-effects of the vaccine (OR 0.92 (95% CI 0.86-0.99)). However, among Israeli health-care workers, knowledge was generally moderate, with updated information lacking in about 30% of surveyed health-care providers and approximately 20% of them not recommending the anti-HPV vaccine among boys. This study has practical implications for policy- and decision-makers in that they should be aware of the overall level of knowledge among health-care workers and should implement ad hoc educational interventions to address gaps in knowledge and help medical providers routinely recommend the anti-HPV vaccine both to male and female children and adolescents.
Collapse
|
29
|
Castañon A, Rebolj M, Sasieni P. Is a delay in the introduction of human papillomavirus-based cervical screening affordable? J Med Screen 2019; 26:44-49. [PMID: 30280637 PMCID: PMC6376595 DOI: 10.1177/0969141318800355] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2018] [Accepted: 08/22/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE It often takes considerable time for sufficient evidence to accumulate to support implementation of new methods in routine screening. Where national screening programmes are already effective, switching to a more sensitive screening test may not be a priority. Although risk associated with overly rapid implementation exists, postponement is also associated with a (to date unquantified) missed opportunity to prevent deaths. This risk tends not to be addressed where effective screening methods are already in use. We here estimate the monetary value of a one-year delay in replacing cytology cervical screening with human papillomavirus testing. METHODS Using a previously validated model, we calculated the number of incident and fatal cervical cancers that would be diagnosed by 2030 in England, under the assumption that human papillomavirus testing replaces cytology in 2020 rather than 2019, and the monetary value of the quality-adjusted life years lost in preventable cases. RESULTS A one-year delay in the implementation of human papillomavirus screening would miss the opportunity to prevent 581 cases of cervical cancer, and lead to a loss of 1595 quality-adjusted life years (3.5% discount rate) with a monetary value of £32 million (at £20,000 per quality-adjusted life year). CONCLUSION This is a measurable loss and should be considered in prioritising decision-making in screening.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alejandra Castañon
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- King’s College London, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cancer Prevention Group, Innovation Hub, Guys Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - Matejka Rebolj
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- King’s College London, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cancer Prevention Group, Innovation Hub, Guys Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| | - Peter Sasieni
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- King’s College London, School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cancer Prevention Group, Innovation Hub, Guys Cancer Centre, Guys Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Budget impact analysis of cervical cancer screening in Portugal: comparison of cytology and primary HPV screening strategies. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:235. [PMID: 30808324 PMCID: PMC6391842 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-6536-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2018] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Primary Human Papilloma Virus (HPV) testing is the currently recommended cervical cancer (CxCa) screening strategy by the Portuguese Society of Gynecology (SPG) clinical consensus. However, primary HPV testing has not yet been adopted by the Portuguese organized screening programs. This modelling study compares clinical benefits and costs of replacing the current practice, namely cytology with ASCUS HPV triage, with 2 comparative strategies: 1) HPV (pooled) test with cytology triage, or 2) HPV test with 16/18 genotyping and cytology triage, in organized CxCa screenings in Portugal. Methods A budget impact model compares screening performance, clinical outcomes and budget impact of the 3 screening strategies. A hypothetical cohort of 2,078,039 Portuguese women aged 25–64 years old women is followed for two screening cycles. Screening intervals are 3 years for cytology and 5 years for the HPV strategies. Model inputs include epidemiological, test performance and medical cost data. Clinical impacts are assessed with the numbers of CIN2–3 and CxCa detected. Annual costs, budget impact and cost of detecting one CIN2+ were calculated from a public healthcare payer’s perspective. Results HPV testing with HPV16/18 genotyping and cytology triage (comparator 2) shows the best clinical outcomes at the same cost as comparator 1 and is the most cost-effective CxCa screening strategy in the Portuguese context. Compared to screening with cytology, it would reduce annual CxCa incidence from 9.3 to 5.3 per 100,000, and CxCa mortality from 2.7 to 1.1 per 100,000. Further, it generates substantial cost savings by reducing the annual costs by €9.16 million (− 24%). The cost of detecting CIN2+ decreases from the current €15,845 to €12,795. On the other hand, HPV (pooled) test with cytology triage (comparator 1) reduces annual incidence of CxCa to 6.9 per 100,000 and CxCa mortality to 1.6 per 100,000, with a cost of €13,227 per CIN2+ detected with annual savings of €9.36 million (− 24%). The savings are mainly caused by increasing the length of routine screening intervals from three to five years. Conclusion The results support current clinical recommendations to replace cytology with HPV with 16/18 genotyping with cytology triage as screening algorithm.
Collapse
|
31
|
Hillemanns P, Friese K, Dannecker C, Klug S, Seifert U, Iftner T, Hädicke J, Löning T, Horn L, Schmidt D, Ikenberg H, Steiner M, Freitag U, Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Sauerbrei W, Beckmann MW, Gebhardt M, Friedrich M, Münstedt K, Schneider A, Kaufmann A, Petry KU, Schäfer APA, Pawlita M, Weis J, Mehnert A, Fehr M, Grimm C, Reich O, Arbyn M, Kleijnen J, Wesselmann S, Nothacker M, Follmann M, Langer T, Jentschke M. Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 1 with Introduction, Screening and the Pathology of Cervical Dysplasia. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:148-159. [PMID: 30792545 PMCID: PMC6379164 DOI: 10.1055/a-0818-5440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 12/03/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aims Annual opportunistic screening for cervical carcinoma has been carried out in Germany since 1971. The creation of this S3 guideline meets an important need, outlined in the National Cancer Plan, with regard to screening for cervical cancer, as the guideline aims to provide important information and support for planned organized screening for cervical cancer in Germany. Methods With the financial support of German Cancer Aid, 21 professional societies developed evidence-based statements and recommendations (classified using the GRADE system) for the screening, management and treatment of precancerous conditions of the cervix. Two independent scientific institutes compiled systematic reviews for this guideline. Recommendations The first part of this short summary presents the pathological basis and considers various questions related to screening for cervical cancer. As also reported in earlier reviews, the meta-analysis by Kleijnen Systematic Reviews showed that HPV-based screening offers better protection against invasive cervical cancer compared to cytology-based screening. The authors of this guideline therefore recommend - in accordance with the guideline of the Joint National Committee of Germany (Gemeinsamer Bundesauschuss, G-BA) - that women aged 35 and above should be examined at regular intervals (at least every 3 years) and undergo HPV-based screening. Co-testing can also be carried out. Women between the ages of 20 and 35 should have cytological screening every 2 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hillemanns
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Christian Dannecker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München, Germany
| | - Stefanie Klug
- Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Ulrike Seifert
- Tumorepidemiologie, Universitäts KrebsCentrum (UCC), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Iftner
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hädicke
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Löning
- Institut für Pathologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schmidt
- Institut für Pathologie, Referenzzentrum für Gynäkopathologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hans Ikenberg
- CytoMol - MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Manfred Steiner
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ihringen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Freitag
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Wismar, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria.,Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i. T., Austria
| | - Willi Sauerbrei
- Institut für Med. Biometrie und Statistik (IMBI), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Achim Schneider
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum im Fürstenberg-Karree, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kaufmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Joachim Weis
- Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation - UKF Reha gGmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mathias Fehr
- Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe in Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | | | - Olaf Reich
- Privatklinik Graz Ragnitz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brüssel, Belgium
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Follmann
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Jentschke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Hillemanns P, Friese K, Dannecker C, Klug S, Seifert U, Iftner T, Hädicke J, Löning T, Horn L, Schmidt D, Ikenberg H, Steiner M, Freitag U, Siebert U, Sroczynski G, Sauerbrei W, Beckmann MW, Gebhardt M, Friedrich M, Münstedt K, Schneider A, Kaufmann A, Petry KU, Schäfer APA, Pawlita M, Weis J, Mehnert A, Fehr M, Grimm C, Reich O, Arbyn M, Kleijnen J, Wesselmann S, Nothacker M, Follmann M, Langer T, Jentschke M. Prevention of Cervical Cancer: Guideline of the DGGG and the DKG (S3 Level, AWMF Register Number 015/027OL, December 2017) - Part 2 on Triage, Treatment and Follow-up. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd 2019; 79:160-176. [PMID: 30792546 PMCID: PMC6379166 DOI: 10.1055/a-0828-7722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2018] [Revised: 12/20/2018] [Accepted: 12/20/2018] [Indexed: 02/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Aims Annual opportunistic screening for cervical carcinoma has been done in Germany since 1971. The creation of this S3 guideline meets an important need, outlined in the National Cancer Plan, with regard to screening for cervical cancer, as this guideline aims to provide important information and support for planned organized screening for cervical cancer in Germany. Methods With the financial support of German Cancer Aid, 21 professional societies developed evidence-based statements and recommendations (classified using the GRADE system) for the screening, management and treatment of precancerous conditions of the cervix. Two independent scientific institutes compiled systematic reviews for this guideline. Recommendations The second part of this short summary deals with the triage, treatment and follow-up care of cervical dysplasia. With regard to those women who do not participate in screening, the guideline authors recommend sending out repeat invitation letters or an HPV self-collection kit. Colposcopy should be carried out for further investigation if cytology findings are Pap II-p and HPV test results are positive or if the results of an HPV 16 or HPV 18 screening test are positive. A single abnormal Pap smear should be triaged and investigated using HPV testing or p16/Ki67 dual staining.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter Hillemanns
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - Christian Dannecker
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, München, Germany
| | - Stefanie Klug
- Lehrstuhl für Epidemiologie, Technische Universität München, München, Germany
| | - Ulrike Seifert
- Tumorepidemiologie, Universitäts KrebsCentrum (UCC), Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der Technischen Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
| | - Thomas Iftner
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Juliane Hädicke
- Institut für Medizinische Virologie und Epidemiologie der Viruskrankheiten, Universitätsklinikum Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Thomas Löning
- Institut für Pathologie, Albertinen-Krankenhaus Hamburg, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lars Horn
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Dietmar Schmidt
- Institut für Pathologie, Referenzzentrum für Gynäkopathologie, Mannheim, Germany
| | - Hans Ikenberg
- CytoMol - MVZ für Zytologie und Molekularbiologie, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Manfred Steiner
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Ihringen, Germany
| | - Ulrich Freitag
- Facharzt für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Wismar, Germany
| | - Uwe Siebert
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria.,Division of Health Technology Assessment and Bioinformatics, ONCOTYROL - Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Gaby Sroczynski
- Institute of Public Health, Medical Decision Making and Health Technology Assessment, Department of Public Health, Health Services Research and Health Technology Assessment, UMIT - University for Health Sciences, Medical Informatics and Technology, Hall i.T., Austria
| | - Willi Sauerbrei
- Institut für Med. Biometrie und Statistik (IMBI), Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | | | - Michael Friedrich
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Helios Klinikum Krefeld, Krefeld, Germany
| | - Karsten Münstedt
- Frauenklinik, Ortenau Klinikum Offenburg-Gengenbach, Offenburg, Germany
| | - Achim Schneider
- Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum im Fürstenberg-Karree, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Kaufmann
- Klinik für Gynäkologie, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | | | | | | - Joachim Weis
- Klinik für Tumorbiologie, Klinik für Onkologische Rehabilitation - UKF Reha gGmbH, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anja Mehnert
- Abteilung für Medizinische Psychologie und Medizinische Soziologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - Mathias Fehr
- Gynäkologie & Geburtshilfe in Frauenfeld, Spital Thurgau AG, Frauenfeld, Switzerland
| | | | - Olaf Reich
- Privatklinik Graz Ragnitz, Graz, Austria
| | - Marc Arbyn
- Cancer Center, Sciensano, Brüssel, Belgium
| | - Jos Kleijnen
- Kleijnen Systematic Reviews Ltd, York, United Kingdom
| | | | - Monika Nothacker
- AWMF-Institut für Medizinisches Wissensmanagement, Marburg, Germany
| | - Markus Follmann
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Thomas Langer
- Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie, Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Berlin, Germany
| | - Matthias Jentschke
- Klinik für Frauenheilkunde und Geburtshilfe, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Rebolj M, Rimmer J, Denton K, Tidy J, Mathews C, Ellis K, Smith J, Evans C, Giles T, Frew V, Tyler X, Sargent A, Parker J, Holbrook M, Hunt K, Tidbury P, Levine T, Smith D, Patnick J, Stubbs R, Moss S, Kitchener H. Primary cervical screening with high risk human papillomavirus testing: observational study. BMJ 2019; 364:l240. [PMID: 30728133 PMCID: PMC6364146 DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l240] [Citation(s) in RCA: 102] [Impact Index Per Article: 20.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To provide the first report on the main outcomes from the prevalence and incidence rounds of a large pilot of routine primary high risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing in England, compared with contemporaneous primary liquid based cytology screening. DESIGN Observational study. SETTING The English Cervical Screening Programme. PARTICIPANTS 578 547 women undergoing cervical screening in primary care between May 2013 and December 2014, with follow-up until May 2017; 183 970 (32%) were screened with hrHPV testing. INTERVENTIONS Routine cervical screening with hrHPV testing with liquid based cytology triage and two early recalls for women who were hrHPV positive and cytology negative, following the national screening age and interval recommendations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Frequency of referral for a colposcopy; adherence to early recall; and relative detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse from hrHPV testing compared with liquid based cytology in two consecutive screening rounds. RESULTS Baseline hrHPV testing and early recall required approximately 80% more colposcopies, (adjusted odds ratio 1.77, 95% confidence interval 1.73 to 1.82), but detected substantially more cervical intraepithelial neoplasia than liquid based cytology (1.49 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse, 1.43 to 1.55; 1.44 for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse, 1.36 to 1.51) and for cervical cancer (1.27, 0.99 to 1.63). Attendance at early recall and colposcopy referral were 80% and 95%, respectively. At the incidence screen, the 33 506 women screened with hrHPV testing had substantially less cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse than the 77 017 women screened with liquid based cytology (0.14, 0.09 to 0.23). CONCLUSIONS In England, routine primary hrHPV screening increased the detection of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse and cervical cancer by approximately 40% and 30%, respectively, compared with liquid based cytology. The very low incidence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 3 or worse after three years supports extending the screening interval.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matejka Rebolj
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Janet Rimmer
- Young Person and Adult Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Sheffield, UK
| | - Karin Denton
- PHE Screening Quality Assurance Service South, Public Health England, Bristol, UK
- Severn Pathology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - John Tidy
- Department of Gynaecological Oncology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Christopher Mathews
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
- School of Cancer and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Kay Ellis
- Cytology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - John Smith
- Cytology, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Chris Evans
- NHS Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Thomas Giles
- NHS Liverpool Clinical Laboratories, Royal Liverpool University Hospital, Liverpool, UK
| | - Viki Frew
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Xenia Tyler
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Norfolk & Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Norwich, UK
| | - Alexandra Sargent
- Clinical Virology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Janet Parker
- Cellular Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Miles Holbrook
- Cellular Pathology, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Katherine Hunt
- Severn Pathology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Penny Tidbury
- Severn Pathology, Southmead Hospital, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Tanya Levine
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK
| | - David Smith
- Department of Cellular Pathology, Northwick Park Hospital, London, UK
| | - Julietta Patnick
- Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Ruth Stubbs
- Young Person and Adult Screening Programmes, Public Health England, Sheffield, UK
| | - Sue Moss
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts & The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Henry Kitchener
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester and Manchester NIHR BRC, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Andreassen T, Hansen BT, Engesaeter B, Hashim D, Støer NC, Tropé A, Moen K, Ursin G, Weiderpass E. Psychological effect of cervical cancer screening when changing primary screening method from cytology to high-risk human papilloma virus testing. Int J Cancer 2019; 145:29-39. [PMID: 30549273 PMCID: PMC6590646 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.32067] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/24/2018] [Revised: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/21/2018] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
From 2015, Norway has implemented high‐risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) testing in primary screening for cervical cancer. Women aged 34–69 years, living in four counties, have been pseudo‐randomly assigned (1:1 randomization) to either hrHPV testing every 5 years (followed by cytology if hrHPV is positive), or cytology testing every 3 years (followed by hrHPV testing if low‐grade cytology is detected). We compared anxiety and depression scores among participants by screening arm and results. In total, 1,008 women answered a structured questionnaire that included the validated Patient Health Questionnaire‐4 (PHQ‐4). The Relative Risk Ratio (RRR) of mild vs. normal anxiety and depression scores, and moderate/severe vs. normal anxiety and depression scores, were estimated by multinomial logistic regression with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs). Compared to women who were screened with cytology, women randomized to hrHPV testing were not more likely to have mild anxiety and depression scores (RRR 0.96, CI 0.70–1.31) nor more likely to have moderate/severe anxiety and depression scores (RRR 1.14, CI 0.65–2.02). Women with five different combinations of abnormal screening test results were not more likely to have mild or moderate/severe vs. normal anxiety and depression scores than women with normal screening results. The likelihood of having abnormal long‐term (4–24 months after the screening) anxiety or depression scores among women 34 years and older was not affected by screening method or screening results. The results of our study suggest that a change to hrHPV testing in primary screening would not increase psychological distress among participants. What's new? Norway is one of the first countries to implement high‐risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) testing in primary cervical‐cancer screening. Does this newer type of testing impact the emotional well‐being of patients? In this study, the authors found no significant difference in either anxiety or depression scores between the viral‐screening arm and standard cytology screening. These findings could be useful for other countries considering implementing hrHPV testing, and are reassuring for the ongoing implementation process in Norway.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Trude Andreassen
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Bo T Hansen
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Birgit Engesaeter
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Dana Hashim
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Haematology and Medical Oncology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY
| | - Nathalie C Støer
- Oslo University Hospital, Norwegian National Advisory Unit on Women's Health, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ameli Tropé
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kåre Moen
- Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Giske Ursin
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.,University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA
| | - Elisabete Weiderpass
- Cancer Registry of Norway, Institute of PopulationBased Cancer Research, Oslo, Norway.,Folkhälsan Research Centre, Genetic Epidemiology Group, and Faculty of Medicine, Helsinki University, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Community Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Tromsø, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway.,Department of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Kim G, Yu K, Kim J, Kim S, Park S, Ahn S, Lee JY, Kim S, Park HH, Lee D. Diagnostic Availability of Estrogen Receptor Alpha mRNA on Cervical Cancer Tissue. KOREAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY SCIENCE 2018. [DOI: 10.15324/kjcls.2018.50.4.449] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Geehyuk Kim
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Kwangmin Yu
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Jungho Kim
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Seoyong Kim
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sunyoung Park
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sungwoo Ahn
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Ji-Young Lee
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Yonsei University, Wonju, Korea
| | - Sunghyun Kim
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, College of Health Sciences, Catholic University of Pusan, Pusan, Korea
| | - Ho-Hyun Park
- Department of Biomedical Laboratory Science, Mokpo Science University, Mokpo, Korea
| | - Dongsup Lee
- Department of Clinical Laboratory Science, Hyejeon College, Hongseong, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zheng B, Yang H, Li Z, You J, Wei G, Zhang H, Zeng Z, Xie F, Zhao C. Atypical Squamous Cells of Undetermined Significance Cervical Cytology Report Rate and Histologic Follow-up Findings From the Largest College of American Pathologists-Certified Laboratory in China. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2018; 143:748-752. [PMID: 30605022 DOI: 10.5858/arpa.2018-0244-oa] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT.— Reports for atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASC-US) and histologic findings are rare in China. OBJECTIVE.— To analyze the correlation findings of ASC-US cytology with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) test and histopathologic follow-ups. DESIGN.— ASC-US cases with hrHPV test and histologic follow-ups between 2011 and 2015 were analyzed at a College of American Pathologists-certified laboratory. RESULTS.— A total of 2 206 588 Papanicolaou (Pap) tests were performed, including 1 513 265 liquid-based cytology preparations (68.58%), and 693 323 conventional Pap tests (31.42%). The overall ASC-US reporting rate was 3.77% (83 199 of 2 206 588), with the highest in women aged 40 to 49 years. Of 18 574 women with ASC-US Pap and HPV testing, the hrHPV positivity rate was 34.98% (6498 of 18 574) with the highest in women younger than 30 years. A total of 6012 women with ASC-US Pap test findings had histologic follow-ups within 6 months; the overall cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 2 and above (CIN2+) detection rate was 7.87% (473 of 6012). One thousand nine hundred nine women with ASC-US Pap and HPV testing had histologic results. CIN2+ lesion was found in 13.98% (124 of 887) of women with ASC-US Pap/HPV-positive test results, significantly higher than 2.84% (29 of 1022) for women with ASC-US Pap/HPV-negative test results. Cervical squamous cell carcinoma was found in 3.95% (35 of 887) of women with ASC-US/HPV-positive test results. CONCLUSIONS.— This is one of the largest studies to investigate HPV and histologic follow-up findings in women with ASC-US in China. The ASC-US reporting rate, HPV positivity rate, and CIN2+ detection rate were all within the currently recognized benchmark ranges. These findings may contribute to establishing a baseline for better understanding of the status of cervical screening in China.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baowen Zheng
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Huaitao Yang
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Zaibo Li
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Jia You
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Guijian Wei
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Huina Zhang
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Zhengyu Zeng
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Fengxiang Xie
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| | - Chengquan Zhao
- From Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong, China (Drs Zheng, You, Wei, and Mr Zeng); the Department of Pathology, Conemaugh Health System, Johnstown, Pennsylvania (Dr Yang); the Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus (Dr Li); the Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania (Drs Zhang and Zhao); and Jinan Kingmed Diagnostics, Jinan, Shandong, China (Dr Xie)
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Leeman A, Del Pino M, Molijn A, Rodriguez A, Torné A, de Koning M, Ordi J, van Kemenade F, Jenkins D, Quint W. HPV testing in first-void urine provides sensitivity for CIN2+ detection comparable with a smear taken by a clinician or a brush-based self-sample: cross-sectional data from a triage population. BJOG 2018; 124:1356-1363. [PMID: 28391609 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.14682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2017] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the sensitivity of high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) and genotype detection in self-collected urine samples in the morning (U1), and later on (U2), brush-based self-samples (SS), and clinician-taken smears (CTS) for detecting cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2+ (CIN2+) in a colposcopic referral population. DESIGN Cross-sectional single-centre study. SETTING A colposcopy clinic in Spain. POPULATION A cohort of 113 women referred for colposcopy after an abnormal Pap smear. METHODS Women undergoing colposcopy with biopsy for abnormal Pap smears were sent a device (Colli-Pee™, Novosanis, Wijnegem, Belgium) to collect U1 on the morning of colposcopy. U2, CTS, and SS (Evalyn brush™, Rovers Medical Devices B.V., Oss, the Netherlands) were also analysed. All samples were tested for HPV DNA using the analytically sensitive SPF10-DEIA-LiPA25 assay and the clinically validated GP5+/6+-EIA-LMNX. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Histologically confirmed CIN2+ and hrHPV positivity for 14 high-risk HPV types. RESULTS Samples from 91 patients were analysed. All CIN3 cases (n = 6) tested positive for hrHPV in CTS, SS, U1, and U2 with both HPV assays. Sensitivity for CIN2+ with the SPF10 system was 100, 100, 95, and 100%, respectively. With the GP5+/6+ assay, sensitivity was 95% in all sample types. The sensitivities and specificities for both tests on each of the sample types did not significantly differ. There was 10-14% discordance on hrHPV genotype. CONCLUSIONS CIN2+ detection using HPV testing of U1 shows a sensitivity similar to that of CTS or brush-based SS, and is convenient. There was substantial to almost excellent agreement between all samples on genotype with both hrHPV assays. There was no advantage in testing U1 compared with U2 samples. TWEETABLE ABSTRACT Similar CIN2+ sensitivity for HPV testing in first-void urine, physician-taken smear and brush-based self-sample.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Leeman
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - M Del Pino
- Faculty of Medicine-University 9 of Barcelona, Institute of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I 8 Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Molijn
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - A Rodriguez
- Faculty of Medicine-University 9 of Barcelona, Institute of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I 8 Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - A Torné
- Faculty of Medicine-University 9 of Barcelona, Institute of Gynaecology, Obstetrics and Neonatology, Hospital Clínic-Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi I 8 Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - M de Koning
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - J Ordi
- Department of Pathology, ISGLobal 11 (Institut de Salit Global de Barcelona)-Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain
| | - F van Kemenade
- Department of Pathology, Erasmus Medical Centre, CA Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - D Jenkins
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| | - W Quint
- DDL Diagnostic Laboratory, ER Rijswijk, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Austin RM, Onisko A, Zhao C. Enhanced Detection of Cervical Cancer and Precancer Through Use of Imaged Liquid-Based Cytology in Routine Cytology and HPV Cotesting. Am J Clin Pathol 2018; 150:385-392. [PMID: 30137189 DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqy114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Cervical screening strives to prevent cervical cancer (CxCa), minimizing morbidity and mortality. Most large US reports on cytology and human papillomavirus (HPV) cotesting of women aged 30 years and older are from one laboratory, which used conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smears from 2003 to 2009. METHODS We quantified detection of CxCa and precancer (cervical intraepithelial neoplasia 3/adenocarcinoma in situ [CIN3/AIS]) in 300,800 cotests at Magee Womens Hospital since 2005. Screening histories preceding CxCa and CIN3/AIS diagnoses were examined to assess the contribution of cytology and HPV testing. Cotesting utilized Food and Drug Administration-approved imaged liquid-based cytology (LBC) and from-the-vial HPV tests. RESULTS LBC identified more women subsequently diagnosed with CxCa and CIN3/AIS than HPV testing. HPV-negative/cytology-positive results preceded 13.1% of CxCa and 7.2% of CIN3/AIS diagnoses. CONCLUSIONS LBC enhanced cotesting detection of CxCa and CIN3/AIS to a greater extent than previously reported with conventional Pap smear and HPV cotesting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R Marshall Austin
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| | - Agnieszka Onisko
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
- Faculty of Computer Science, Bialystok University of Technology, Bialystok, Poland
| | - Chengquan Zhao
- Department of Pathology, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Curry SJ, Krist AH, Owens DK, Barry MJ, Caughey AB, Davidson KW, Doubeni CA, Epling JW, Kemper AR, Kubik M, Landefeld CS, Mangione CM, Phipps MG, Silverstein M, Simon MA, Tseng CW, Wong JB. Screening for Cervical Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA 2018; 320:674-686. [PMID: 30140884 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.10897] [Citation(s) in RCA: 675] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE The number of deaths from cervical cancer in the United States has decreased substantially since the implementation of widespread cervical cancer screening and has declined from 2.8 to 2.3 deaths per 100 000 women from 2000 to 2015. OBJECTIVE To update the US Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) 2012 recommendation on screening for cervical cancer. EVIDENCE REVIEW The USPSTF reviewed the evidence on screening for cervical cancer, with a focus on clinical trials and cohort studies that evaluated screening with high-risk human papillomavirus (hrHPV) testing alone or hrHPV and cytology together (cotesting) compared with cervical cytology alone. The USPSTF also commissioned a decision analysis model to evaluate the age at which to begin and end screening, the optimal interval for screening, the effectiveness of different screening strategies, and related benefits and harms of different screening strategies. FINDINGS Screening with cervical cytology alone, primary hrHPV testing alone, or cotesting can detect high-grade precancerous cervical lesions and cervical cancer. Screening women aged 21 to 65 years substantially reduces cervical cancer incidence and mortality. The harms of screening for cervical cancer in women aged 30 to 65 years are moderate. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the benefits of screening every 3 years with cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years substantially outweigh the harms. The USPSTF concludes with high certainty that the benefits of screening every 3 years with cytology alone, every 5 years with hrHPV testing alone, or every 5 years with both tests (cotesting) in women aged 30 to 65 years outweigh the harms. Screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and women younger than 21 years does not provide significant benefit. Screening women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix for indications other than a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer provides no benefit. The USPSTF concludes with moderate to high certainty that screening women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer, screening women younger than 21 years, and screening women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix for indications other than a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer does not result in a positive net benefit. CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATION The USPSTF recommends screening for cervical cancer every 3 years with cervical cytology alone in women aged 21 to 29 years. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends screening every 3 years with cervical cytology alone, every 5 years with hrHPV testing alone, or every 5 years with hrHPV testing in combination with cytology (cotesting) in women aged 30 to 65 years. (A recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women younger than 21 years. (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women older than 65 years who have had adequate prior screening and are not otherwise at high risk for cervical cancer. (D recommendation) The USPSTF recommends against screening for cervical cancer in women who have had a hysterectomy with removal of the cervix and do not have a history of a high-grade precancerous lesion or cervical cancer. (D recommendation).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Alex H Krist
- Fairfax Family Practice Residency, Fairfax, Virginia
- Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond
| | - Douglas K Owens
- Veterans Affairs Palo Alto Health Care System, Palo Alto, California
- Stanford University, Stanford, California
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Chien-Wen Tseng
- University of Hawaii, Honolulu
- Pacific Health Research and Education Institute, Honolulu, Hawaii
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Melnikow J, Henderson JT, Burda BU, Senger CA, Durbin S, Weyrich MS. Screening for Cervical Cancer With High-Risk Human Papillomavirus Testing: Updated Evidence Report and Systematic Review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. JAMA 2018; 320:687-705. [PMID: 30140883 DOI: 10.1001/jama.2018.10400] [Citation(s) in RCA: 144] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Cervical cancer can be prevented with detection and treatment of precancerous cell changes caused primarily by high-risk types of human papillomavirus (hrHPV), the causative agents in more than 90% of cervical cancers. OBJECTIVE To systematically review benefits and harms of cervical cancer screening for hrHPV to inform the US Preventive Services Task Force. DATA SOURCES MEDLINE, PubMed, PsycINFO, and the Cochrane Collaboration Registry of Controlled Trials from January 2011 through February 15, 2017; surveillance through May 25, 2018. STUDY SELECTION Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing primary hrHPV screening alone or hrHPV cotesting (both hrHPV testing and cytology) with cytology (Papanicolaou [Pap] test) screening alone. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Two investigators independently reviewed abstracts and full-text articles and quality rated included studies; data were qualitatively synthesized. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES Invasive cervical cancer; cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN); false-positive, colposcopy, and biopsy rates; psychological harms. RESULTS Eight RCTs (n = 410 556), 5 cohort studies (n = 402 615), and 1 individual participant data (IPD) meta-analysis (n = 176 464) were included. Trials were heterogeneous for screening interval, number of rounds, and protocol. For primary hrHPV screening, evidence was consistent across 4 trials demonstrating increased detection of CIN 3 or worse (CIN 3+) in round 1 (relative risk [RR] range, 1.61 [95% CI, 1.09-2.37] to 7.46 [95% CI, 1.02-54.66]). Among 4 hrHPV cotesting trials, first-round CIN 3+ detection was not significantly different between screening groups; RRs for cumulative CIN 3+ detection over 2 screening rounds ranged from 0.91 to 1.13. In first-round screening, false-positive rates for primary hrHPV screening ranged from 6.6% to 7.4%, compared with 2.6% to 6.5% for cytology. For cotesting, false-positives ranged from 5.8% to 19.9% in the first round of screening, compared with 2.6% to 10.9% for cytology. First-round colposcopy rates were also higher, ranging 1.2% to 7.9% for primary hrHPV testing, compared with 1.1% to 3.1% for cytology alone; colposcopy rates for cotesting ranged from 6.8% to 10.9%, compared with 3.3% to 5.2% for cytology alone. The IPD meta-analysis of data from 4 cotesting trials and 1 primary hrHPV screening trial found lower risk of invasive cervical cancer with any hrHPV screening compared with cytology alone (pooled RR, 0.60 [95% CI, 0.40-0.89]). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Primary hrHPV screening detected higher rates of CIN 3+ at first-round screening compared with cytology. Cotesting trials did not show initial increased CIN 3+ detection. Both hrHPV screening strategies had higher false-positive and colposcopy rates than cytology, which could lead to more treatments with potential harms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joy Melnikow
- University of California, Davis, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Sacramento
| | - Jillian T Henderson
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Brittany U Burda
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Caitlyn A Senger
- Kaiser Permanente Research Affiliates Evidence-based Practice Center, Center for Health Research, Kaiser Permanente, Portland, Oregon
| | - Shauna Durbin
- University of California, Davis, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Sacramento
| | - Meghan S Weyrich
- University of California, Davis, Center for Healthcare Policy and Research, Sacramento
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Ejegod DM, Pedersen H, Alzua GP, Pedersen C, Bonde J. Time and temperature dependent analytical stability of dry-collected Evalyn HPV self-sampling brush for cervical cancer screening. PAPILLOMAVIRUS RESEARCH 2018; 5:192-200. [PMID: 29689311 PMCID: PMC6026099 DOI: 10.1016/j.pvr.2018.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 03/28/2018] [Accepted: 04/16/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
As a new initiative, HPV self-sampling to non-attenders using the dry Evalyn self-sampling brush is offered in the Capital Region of Denmark. The use of a dry brush is largely uncharted territory in terms of analytical stability. In this study we aim to provide evidence on the analytical quality of dry HPV self-sampling brushes as a function of time and temperature. We assessed the analytical stability of dry stored Evalyn brushes at three different temperatures, (4 °C, room temperature, 30 °C) and five different storage time points; T = 0 (baseline), 2, 4, 8, 16, and 32 weeks prior to HPV analysis using the BD Onclarity HPV assay. Mean Ct value of the Onclarity internal control was used as comparator of cellularity across time and temperatures, with no or only borderline statistical differences observed. HPV detection was stable throughout the five time points. In addition, analytically amplifiable DNA copy numbers and DNA fragmentation was assessed using the Agena iPLEX Exome QC assay, with no or only borderline statistical differences observed. In conclusion, the Evalyn brush is analytically stable with respect to human genomic material and HPV detection for up to 32 weeks at temperatures ranging from 4 °C to 30 °C. The Capital Region of Denmark is implementing HPV self-sampling using a dry brush. But how analytically stable is a dry collected self-sampling device? Stability was established for both human DNA (all, N = 637) and HPV (positives, N = 41). We found the Evalyn Self-sampling brush stable up to 6 month. Neither 4 °C nor 30 °C changed the analytical stability of the dry brush.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ditte Møller Ejegod
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark.
| | - Helle Pedersen
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Garazi Peña Alzua
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Camilla Pedersen
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| | - Jesper Bonde
- Molecular Pathology Laboratory, Department of Pathology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Kettegård Alle 30, 2650, Hvidovre, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Landy R, Windridge P, Gillman MS, Sasieni PD. What cervical screening is appropriate for women who have been vaccinated against high risk HPV? A simulation study. Int J Cancer 2018; 142:709-718. [PMID: 29023748 PMCID: PMC5765470 DOI: 10.1002/ijc.31094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2017] [Revised: 09/14/2017] [Accepted: 10/02/2017] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Women vaccinated against HPV16/18 are approaching the age for cervical screening; however, an updated screening algorithm has not been agreed. We use a microsimulation model calibrated to real published data to determine the appropriate screening intensity for vaccinated women. Natural histories in the absence of vaccination were simulated for 300,000 women using 10,000 sets of transition probabilities. Vaccination with (i) 100% efficacy against HPV16/18, (ii) 15% cross-protection, (iii) 22% cross-protection, (iv) waning vaccine efficacy and (v) 100% efficacy against HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58 was added, as were a range of screening scenarios appropriate to the UK. To benchmark cost-benefits of screening for vaccinated women, we evaluated the proportion of cancers prevented per additional screen (incremental benefit) of current cytology and likely HPV screening scenarios in unvaccinated women. Slightly more cancers are prevented through vaccination with no screening (70.3%, 95% CR: 65.1-75.5) than realistic compliance to the current UK screening programme in the absence of vaccination (64.3%, 95% CR: 61.3-66.8). In unvaccinated women, when switching to HPV primary testing, there is no loss in effectiveness when doubling the screening interval. Benchmarking supports screening scenarios with incremental benefits of ≥2.0%, and rejects scenarios with incremental benefits ≤0.9%. In HPV16/18-vaccinated women, the incremental benefit of offering a third lifetime screen was at most 3.3% (95% CR: 2.2-4.5), with an incremental benefit of 1.3% (-0.3-2.8) for a fourth screen. For HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58-vaccinated women, two lifetime screens are supported. It is important to know women's vaccination status; in these simulations, HPV16/18-vaccinated women require three lifetime screens, HPV16/18/31/33/45/52/58-vaccinated women require two lifetime screens, yet unvaccinated women require seven lifetime screens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Landy
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of MedicineQueen Mary University of London, Charterhouse SquareLondonEC1M 6BQUK
| | - Peter Windridge
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of MedicineQueen Mary University of London, Charterhouse SquareLondonEC1M 6BQUK
| | - Matthew S. Gillman
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of MedicineQueen Mary University of London, Charterhouse SquareLondonEC1M 6BQUK
| | - Peter D. Sasieni
- Centre for Cancer Prevention, Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Barts and The London School of MedicineQueen Mary University of London, Charterhouse SquareLondonEC1M 6BQUK
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Asciutto KC, Ernstson A, Forslund O, Borgfeldt C. Self-sampling with HPV mRNA analyses from vagina and urine compared with cervical samples. J Clin Virol 2018; 101:69-73. [PMID: 29433016 DOI: 10.1016/j.jcv.2018.02.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2017] [Revised: 01/14/2018] [Accepted: 02/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In order to increase coverage in the organized cervical screening program, self-sampling with HPV analyses has been suggested. OBJECTIVES The aim was to compare human papillomavirus (HPV) mRNA detection in vaginal and urine self-collected samples with clinician-taken cervical samples and the corresponding clinician-taken histological specimens. STUDY DESIGN Self-collected vaginal, urine and clinician-taken cervical samples were analyzed from 209 women with the Aptima mRNA assay (Hologic Inc, MA, USA). Cervical cytology, colposcopy, biopsy and/or the loop electrosurgical excision procedure (LEEP) were performed in every examination. RESULTS The sensitivity of the HPV mRNA test in detecting high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesions (HSIL)/adenocarcinoma in situ (AIS)/cancer cases was as follows: for the vaginal self-samples 85.5% (95% CI; 75.0-92.8), the urinary samples 44.8% (95% CI; 32.6-57.4), and for routine cytology 81.7% (95% CI; 70.7-89.9). For the clinician-taken cervical HPV samples the sensitivity of the HPV mRNA test in detecting HSIL/AIS/cancer was 100.0% (95% CI; 94.9-100.0). The specificity of the HPV mRNA was similar for the clinician-taken cervical HPV samples and the self-samples: 49.0% vs. 48.1%. The urinary HPV samples had a specificity of 61.9% and cytology had a specificity of 93.3%. CONCLUSION The sensitivity of the Aptima HPV mRNA test in detecting HSIL/AIS/cancer from vaginal self-samples was similar to that of routine cytology. The Aptima HPV mRNA vaginal self-sampling analysis may serve as a complement in screening programs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Avalon Ernstson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Ola Forslund
- Department of Clinical Microbiology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Sweden
| | - Christer Borgfeldt
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Lund University, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Nayar R, Goulart RA, Davey DD. Primary HPV cervical cancer screening in the United States: Are we ready? J Am Soc Cytopathol 2018; 7:50-55. [PMID: 31043251 DOI: 10.1016/j.jasc.2017.12.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2017] [Accepted: 12/03/2017] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
In September 2017, the United States Preventive Services Task Force put forth updated draft guidelines for cervical cancer screening in the United States, which were then open to public comment. The recommendations allowed for every-3-year cervical cytology screening in women aged 21 to 65 years with an option for every-5-year high-risk human papillomavirus testing in women aged 30 to 65 years. There was no option for cotesting. Other recommendations were similar to those published by other professional organizations. The Cytopathology Education and Technology Consortium provided an official response during the open comment period, which is summarized here along with additional commentary by the authors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ritu Nayar
- Department of Pathology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine. Medical Director for Cytopathology, Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Chicago, Illinois.
| | - Robert A Goulart
- Cytopathology Services, New England Pathology Associates at Trinity Health of New England, Mercy Medical Center, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Diane D Davey
- Department of Clinical Sciences, University of Central Florida, Orlando, Florida
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Johnson HC, Lafferty EI, Eggo RM, Louie K, Soldan K, Waller J, Edmunds WJ. Effect of HPV vaccination and cervical cancer screening in England by ethnicity: a modelling study. Lancet Public Health 2018; 3:e44-e51. [PMID: 29307388 PMCID: PMC5765530 DOI: 10.1016/s2468-2667(17)30238-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2017] [Revised: 09/25/2017] [Accepted: 10/23/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Health equality is increasingly being considered alongside overall health gain when assessing public health interventions. However, the trade-off between the direct effects of vaccination and herd immunity could lead to unintuitive consequences for the distribution of disease burden within a population. We used a transmission dynamic model of human papillomavirus (HPV) to investigate the effect of ethnic disparities in vaccine and cervical screening uptake on inequality in disease incidence in England. METHODS We developed an individual-based model of HPV transmission and disease, parameterising it with the latest data for sexual behaviour (from National Survey of Sexual Attitudes and Lifestyles [Natsal-3]) and vaccine and screening uptake by ethnicity (from Public Health England [PHE]) and fitting it to data for HPV prevalence (from ARTISTIC, PHE, Natsal-3) and HPV-related disease incidence (from National Cancer Registry [ONS]). The outcome of interest was the age-adjusted incidence of HPV-related cancer (both cervical and non-cervical) in all women in England in view of differences and changes in vaccination and screening uptake by ethnicity in England, over time. We also studied three potential public health interventions aimed at reducing inequality in HPV-related disease incidence: increasing uptake in black and Asian females to match that in whites for vaccination; cervical screening in women who turn 25 in 2018 or later; and cervical screening in all ages. FINDINGS In the pre-vaccination era, before 2008, women from ethnic minorities in England reported a disproportionate share of cervical disease. Our model suggests that Asian women were 1·7 times (95% credibility interval [CI] 1·1-2·7) more likely to be diagnosed with cervical cancer than white women (22·8 vs 13·4 cases per 100 000 women). Because HPV vaccination uptake is lower in ethnic minorities, we predict an initial widening of this gap, with cervical cancer incidence in Asian women up to 2·5 times higher (95% CI 1·3-4·8) than in white women 20 years after vaccine introduction (corresponding to an additional 10·8 [95% CI 10·1-11·5] cases every year). In time, we predict that herd immunity benefits will diffuse from the larger white sub-population and the disparity will narrow. Increased cervical screening uptake in vaccinated women from ethnic minorities would lead to rapid improvement in equality with parity in incidence after 20 years of HPV vaccination. INTERPRETATION Our study suggests that the introduction of HPV vaccination in England will initially widen a pre-existing disparity in the incidence of HPV-related cancer by ethnicity, partly due to herd immunity disproportionately benefiting subgroups with high vaccination rates. Although in time this induced disparity will narrow, increasing cervical screening uptake in girls from ethnic minorities should be encouraged to eliminate the inequality in cervical cancer incidence in the medium term. We recommend that dynamic effects should be considered when estimating the effect of public health programmes on equality. FUNDING Cancer Research UK.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Helen C Johnson
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
| | - Erin I Lafferty
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Rosalind M Eggo
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| | - Karly Louie
- Wolfson Institute of Preventive Medicine, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Kate Soldan
- National Centre for Infectious Disease Surveillance and Control (CIDSC), London, UK
| | - Jo Waller
- Health Behaviour Research Centre, London, UK
| | - W John Edmunds
- Centre for the Mathematical Modelling of Infectious Diseases, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Cavalcante GHO, de Araújo JMG, Fernandes JV, Lanza DCF. A seminested PCR assay for detection and typing of human papillomavirus based on E1 gene sequences. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 91:20-26. [PMID: 29370952 DOI: 10.1016/j.diagmicrobio.2017.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2017] [Revised: 11/01/2017] [Accepted: 12/16/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
HPV infection is considered one of the leading causes of cervical cancer in the world. To date, more than 180 types of HPV have been described and viral typing is critical for defining the prognosis of cancer. In this work, a seminested PCR which allow fast and inexpensively detection and typing of HPV is presented. The system is based on the amplification of a variable length region within the viral gene E1, using three primers that potentially anneal in all HPV genomes. The amplicons produced in the first step can be identified by high resolution electrophoresis or direct sequencing. The seminested step includes nine specific primers which can be used in multiplex or individual reactions to discriminate the main types of HPV by amplicon size differentiation using agarose electrophoresis, reducing the time spent and cost per analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo Henrique O Cavalcante
- Applied Molecular Biology Lab - LAPLIC, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil; Postgraduate Program in Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Josélio M G de Araújo
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases and Cancer - LADIC, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - José Veríssimo Fernandes
- Laboratory of Molecular Biology for Infectious Diseases and Cancer - LADIC, Department of Microbiology and Parasitology, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil
| | - Daniel C F Lanza
- Applied Molecular Biology Lab - LAPLIC, Department of Biochemistry, Federal University of Rio Grande do Norte, Natal, RN, Brazil.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Tao X, Austin RM, Zhang H, Zhang L, Xiao J, Zhou X, Wang L, Zhao C. Histopathologic follow-up and HPV test results with HSIL Papanicolaou test results in China's largest academic women's hospital. Cancer Cytopathol 2017; 125:947-953. [PMID: 28885778 DOI: 10.1002/cncy.21914] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2017] [Revised: 08/03/2017] [Accepted: 08/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/07/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Xiang Tao
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - R. Marshall Austin
- Department of Pathology; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| | - Hao Zhang
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - Lihong Zhang
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - Jianan Xiao
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - Xianrong Zhou
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - Li Wang
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
| | - Chengquan Zhao
- Department of Pathology; Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital of Fudan University; Shanghai China
- Department of Pathology; University of Pittsburgh Medical Center; Pittsburgh Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Adams TS, Mbatani NH. Clinical management of women presenting with field effect of HPV and intraepithelial disease. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2017; 47:86-94. [PMID: 29030149 DOI: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2017.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2017] [Revised: 08/29/2017] [Accepted: 08/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
Abstract
Anogenital human papillomavirus is the most common sexually transmitted infection acquired through skin-to-skin contact. Most infections are cleared by an intact immune system. Persistence of these infections results in precancerous lesions and, eventually, to cancers of the cervix, vagina, vulva, and perianal area. The introduction of the prophylactic human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccinations may reduce the incidence of these infections, but the effect of these vaccinations will be seen only in the decades that follow. In the meantime, multiple therapies such as immune modulators, ablative modalities, and surgical excision are used in an attempt to treat precancerous lesions and hence prevent cancer. There is an increase in multicentric disease in young women, especially with the HIV epidemic and in women who are immune compromised. This article aims to address the challenges and management options in women who have a field effect of HPV-associated disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T S Adams
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, H Floor, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa; SAMRC Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre (SAMRC GCR), Cape Town, South Africa.
| | - N H Mbatani
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, H Floor, Old Main Building, Groote Schuur Hospital, University of Cape Town, Anzio Road, Observatory, Cape Town, 7925, South Africa; SAMRC Gynaecological Cancer Research Centre (SAMRC GCR), Cape Town, South Africa.
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Zheng B, Yang H, Li Z, Wei G, You J, Liang X, Zhao C. HPV test results and histological follow-up results of patients with LSIL Cervical Cytology from the Largest CAP-certified laboratory in China. J Cancer 2017; 8:2436-2441. [PMID: 28900480 PMCID: PMC5595072 DOI: 10.7150/jca.19421] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2017] [Accepted: 05/30/2017] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Age-adjusted evaluations have explored the possible utility of (HPV test results in women with LSIL Pap. We investigated HPV test results and histopathologic follow-up results of LSIL patients from China's largest CAP-certified laboratory. METHODS Patients with LSIL between 2011 and 2015 from the Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics were retrospectively retrieved and their hrHPV test results and histological follow-up results were collected and analyzed. RESULTS LSIL result was identified in 37,895 cases from 2,206,588 Pap tests (1.7%) including 1,513,265 liquid-based cytology and 693,323 conventional Pap tests. The average of these women was 38.4 years (15-88). The LSIL reporting rate in women <30 years was significantly higher than that in women > 30 years (2.1% vs 1.7%). The age specific reporting LSIL rates declined with increased age. 8,014 of 37,895 (21.2%) women with LSIL cytology also had HC2 HPV test results. 75.8% of women with LSIL Pap tests were hrHPV+ and the HPV+ rates declined with increased age except in patients older than 60 years. Overall histopathologic diagnoses within 6 months after LSIL were identified in 5,987 of 37,895 patients at Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics. CIN2/3 was identified in 15.2% patients, CIN1 in 66.9%, negative in 14.9% patients. No invasive carcinoma was found in all patients. Of 8014 patients with LSIL Pap test and HPV testing results, 1727 patients had histological follow-up within 6 months after Pap cytology test and HPV testing. The detection rate of CIN2/3 was significantly higher in patients with positive HPV testing result than that in patients with negative HPV testing result (17.8% vs. 8.1%). Among patients with LSIL/HPV negative tests, CIN2/3 was detected in 1 of 30 (3.3%) women aged 50 years and above, appearing lower than those in women less than 50 years (8.0%, 28/351, P=0.357). CONCLUSION This is the largest histological follow-up study in women with LSIL Pap from China and the data are helpful in establishing a baseline for better understanding the status of cervical screening in China. The 85.1% positive predict value of LSIL Pap cytology for follow-up CIN lesion was within currently recognized benchmark ranges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baowen Zheng
- Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510330, P. R. China
| | - Huaitao Yang
- Department of Pathology, University Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA
| | - Zaibo Li
- Department of Pathology, Wexner Medical Center at Ohio State University, Columbus, OH 43210, USA
| | - Guijian Wei
- Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510330, P. R. China
| | - Jia You
- Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510330, P. R. China
| | - Xiaoman Liang
- Guangzhou Kingmed Diagnostics, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510330, P. R. China
| | - Chengquan Zhao
- Department of Pathology, Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA 15213, USA
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Veldhuijzen NJ, Polman NJ, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ, Berkhof J. Stratifying HPV-positive women for CIN3+ risk after one and two rounds of HPV-based screening. Int J Cancer 2017; 141:1551-1560. [DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30865] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/06/2017] [Revised: 05/15/2017] [Accepted: 06/12/2017] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke J. Veldhuijzen
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics; VU University Medical Center (VUmc); Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Nicole J. Polman
- Department of Pathology; VU University Medical Center (VUmc); Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Peter J.F. Snijders
- Department of Pathology; VU University Medical Center (VUmc); Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Chris J.L.M. Meijer
- Department of Pathology; VU University Medical Center (VUmc); Amsterdam The Netherlands
| | - Johannes Berkhof
- Department of Epidemiology & Biostatistics; VU University Medical Center (VUmc); Amsterdam The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|