Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients receiving ibrutinib with or without antiviral prophylaxis. A retrospective multicentric GIMEMA study

Drug-Induced Liver Injury Associated With Emerging Cancer Therapies

Targeted therapies and immunotherapies have shown great promise as best-in-class treatments for several cancers with respect to efficacy and safety. While liver test abnormalities are rather common in patients treated with kinase inhibitors or immunotherapy, events of severe hepatotoxicity in these patients are rare in comparison with those associated with chemotherapeutics. The underlying mechanisms and risk factors for severe hepatotoxicity with novel oncology therapies are not well understood, complicating the drug-induced liver injury (DILI) risk assessment in the preclinical and clinical phases of drug development. The epidemiological and clinical characteristics, as well as mechanisms of liver toxicity, are described here to the current state of knowledge. Tools to study and assess the risk of DILI during drug development are concisely summarised, focusing on caveats thereof for novel oncology treatments. Emerging tools to optimise safety assessments and gather additional mechanistic insights into DILI are introduced. Particularly in oncology, where standard liver signals during drug development are tolerated to a marginally higher degree than in other indications due to the life-saving, life-extending and quality-of-life improvements for patients with severe or advanced cancers versus previous standard-of-care therapeutics, safety assessments must be tailored to the drug and indication. Trends in patient safety-centred drug development programmes and regulatory approval processes must continually be revisited and streamlined via obtaining an overall greater understanding of DILI and the tools available to assess mechanisms of injury, frequency, severity and prognosis.

Management of infections for patient treated with ibrutinib in clinical practice

Ibrutinib, a highly effective inhibitor of the Bruton tyrosine kinase, has significantly transformed the therapeutic approach in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Despite these advancements, the disease continues to be characterized by immune dysfunction and increased susceptibility to infections, with mortality rates from infections showing no significant improvement over the past few decades. Therefore, timely prevention, recognition, and treatment of infections remains an important aspect of the standard management of a patient with CLL. A panel of hematologists with expertise in CLL met to discuss existing literature and clinical insights for the management of infectious in CLL undergoing ibrutinib treatment. Despite not being a fully comprehensive review on the topic, this work provides a set of practical recommendations that can serve as a guide to healthcare professionals who manage these patients in their daily clinical practice.

Risk of hepatic decompensation from hepatitis B virus reactivation in hematological malignancy treatments

In this editorial, we discussed the apparent discrepancy between the findings described by Colapietro et al, in their case report and data found in the literature. Colapietro et al reported a case of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related hepatic decompensation in a patient with chronic myeloid leukemia and a previously resolved HBV infection who was receiving Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor therapy. First of all, we recapitulated the main aspects of the immune system involved in the response to HBV infection in order to underline the role of the innate and adaptive response, focusing our attention on the protective role of anti-HBs. We then carefully analyzed literature data on the risk of HBV reactivation (HBVr) in patients with previous HBV infection who were treated with either tyrosine kinase inhibitors or BTK inhibitors for their hematologic malignancies. Based on literature data, we suggested that several factors may contribute to the different risks of HBVr: The type of hematologic malignancy; the type of therapy (BTK inhibitors, especially second-generation, seem to be at a higher risk of HBVr than those with tyrosine kinase inhibitors); previous exposure to an anti-CD20 as first-line therapy; and ethnicity and HBV genotype. Therefore, the warning regarding HBVr in the specific setting of patients with hematologic malignancies requires further investigation.

Navigating the complex terrain of hepatitis B virus reactivation in the era of Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors

In this editorial, we offer a summary of the risk associated with hepatitis B reactivation (HBVr) in the setting of both solid and hematologic malignancies treated with Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, with insights derived from current studies. Furthermore, we emphasize the critical need for a framework regarding robust risk evaluation in patients undergoing such treatments. This framework is essential for identifying those at increased risk of HBVr, enabling healthcare providers to implement proactive measures to prevent reactivation and ensure the safe administration of BTK inhibitor therapy.

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: Management of Adverse Events in the Era of Targeted Agents

The treatment landscape for CLL has undergone a profound transformation with the advent of targeted agents (TAs) like Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (BTKis) and BCL-2 inhibitors (BCL-2is). These agents target crucial cellular pathways in CLL, offering superior efficacy over traditional chemo-immunotherapy, which has led to improved progression-free and overall survival rates. This advancement promises enhanced disease control and potentially normal life expectancy for many patients. However, the journey is not without challenges, as these TAs are associated with a range of adverse events (AEs) that can impact treatment efficacy and patient quality of life. This review focuses on detailing the various AEs related to TA management in CLL, evaluating their frequency and clinical impact. The aim is to present a comprehensive guide to the effective management of these AEs, ensuring optimal tolerability and efficacy of TAs. By reviewing the existing literature and consolidating findings, we provide insights into AE management, which is crucial for maximizing patient outcomes in CLL therapy.

Risk of hepatitis B virus reactivation in oncological patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: A case report and literature analysis

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation (HBVr) represents a severe and potentially life-threatening condition, and preventive measures are available through blood test screening or prophylactic therapy administration. The assessment of HBVr traditionally considers factors such as HBV profile, including hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen, along with type of medication (chemotherapy; immunomodulants). Nevertheless, consideration of possible patient's underlying tumor and the specific malignancy type (solid or hematologic) plays a crucial role and needs to be assessed for decision-making process.

NOTCH pathway mutation contributes to inferior prognosis in HBV-infected chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients with hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection have a poor prognosis, underlying mechanism remains unclear. NOTCH mutations are frequent in CLL and associated with disease progression and drug resistance. It is also reported to be associated with hepatitis infection in lymphoid malignancies. In order to investigate the relation between the NOTCH pathway and HBV-associated CLL, we studied 98 previously untreated HBV-positive CLL patients and 244 HBV-negative CLL. NOTCH mutations were more frequent in HBV-positive CLL subgroup (p = 0.033). By survival analysis, HBV infection was associated with disease progression and poor survival (p = 0.0099 for overall survival (OS) and p = 0.0446 for time-to-treatment (TTT)). Any lesions of the NOTCH pathway (NOTCH1, NOTCH2, and SPEN) aggravated prognosis. In multivariate analysis, NOTCH mutation retained an independent significance for HBV-infected patients (p = 0.016 for OS and p = 0.023 for TTT). However, HBV positive with NOTCH unmutated had no statistical difference in prognosis compared with HBV-negative patients (p = 0.1706 for OS and p = 0.2387 for TTT), which indicated that NOTCH pathway mutation contributed to inferior prognosis in HBV-infected CLL. In conclusion, a cohort of CLL patients with HBV positive displayed a worse clinical outcome and the status of the NOTCH signaling pathway might play a crucial role.

Risk of Hepatitis B Reactivation in Patients Receiving Ibrutinib: The National Veterans Affairs Cohort

Background

Ibrutinib has been a first-line treatment for chronic lymphocytic leukemia since 2014. Case reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation after ibrutinib initiation have been presented. The association between the risk of HBV reactivation and ibrutinib initiation remains unclear. This nationwide study aimed to estimate the incidence of HBV reactivation after ibrutinib initiation.

Method

This study included patients who received ibrutinib between 1 February 2014 and 31 October 2019. Possible reactivations were searched by (1) changes in HBV surface antigen or HBV DNA from no data or negative status to positive after ibrutinib initiation, (2) alanine aminotransferase levels that were at least 3 times the baseline value after ibrutinib initiation, and (3) new antiviral prescriptions against HBV after ibrutinib initiation. Individual chart reviews were conducted to identify HBV reactivation attributed to ibrutinib. The cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation was calculated.

Results

A total 4130 patients were eligible during the study period. Of these, patients with negative HBV core antibody (anti-HBcAb; n = 1670) and patients who were taking antivirals against HBV (n = 60) were excluded. There were 2219 patients without anti-HBcAb testing results. Among the remaining 181 patients with positive anti-HBcAb, 7 HBV reactivations were directly attributable to ibrutinib treatment after chart review, for a 3.9% cumulative incidence.

Conclusions

Our study revealed a low cumulative incidence of HBV reactivation after ibrutinib initiation among patients with previous anti-HBcAb positivity, indicating a moderate risk of HBV reactivation.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation after ibrutinib treatment

New immunosuppressive and antineoplastic drugs are becoming both more numerous and more widely used, even during several years. Most of them present a low-moderate risk of hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation in HBsAg-negative and anti-HBc-positive patients. However, their reactivation capacity has not been clearly studied. We present the clinical case of a patient with these serological characteristics who, after 5 years of treatment with ibrutinib for chronic lymphocytic leukaemia, developed VHB reactivation, which was controlled with tenofovir. The occurrence of this event with drugs such as ibrutinib may lead to changes in HBV reactivation prophylaxis.

Prevention and management of hepatitis B virus reactivation in patients with hematological malignancies in the targeted therapy era

Hepatitis due to hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation can be serious and potentially fatal, but is preventable. HBV reactivation is most commonly reported in patients receiving chemotherapy, especially rituximab-containing therapy for hematological malignancies and those receiving stem cell transplantation. Patients with inactive and even resolved HBV infection still have persistence of HBV genomes in the liver. The expression of these silent genomes is controlled by the immune system. Suppression or ablation of immune cells, most importantly B cells, may lead to reactivation of seemingly resolved HBV infection. Thus, all patients with hematological malignancies receiving anticancer therapy should be screened for active or resolved HBV infection by blood tests for hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) and antibody to hepatitis B core antigen. Patients found to be positive for HBsAg should be given prophylactic antiviral therapy. For patients with resolved HBV infection, there are two approaches. The first is pre-emptive therapy guided by serial HBV DNA monitoring, and treatment with antiviral therapy as soon as HBV DNA becomes detectable. The second approach is prophylactic antiviral therapy, particularly for patients receiving high-risk therapy, especially anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Entecavir and tenofovir are the preferred antiviral choices. Many new effective therapies for hematological malignancies have been introduced in the past decade, for example, chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cell therapy, novel monoclonal antibodies, bispecific antibody drug conjugates, and small molecule inhibitors, which may be associated with HBV reactivation. Although there is limited evidence to guide the optimal preventive measures, we recommend antiviral prophylaxis in HBsAg-positive patients receiving novel treatments, including Bruton's tyrosine kinase inhibitors, B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitors, and CAR-T cell therapy. Further studies are needed to determine the risk of HBV reactivation with these agents and the best prophylactic strategy.

Hepatitis B virus reactivation in seronegative occult hepatitis B patient receiving ibrutinib therapy

BACKGROUND

Ibrutinib is a Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitor approved for the treatment for several mature B-cell malignancies. Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a well-described complication in patients with chronic HBV infection or prior HBV exposure undergoing cytotoxic or immunosuppressive chemotherapy for hematologic malignancies. This phenomenon has been frequently reported with rituximab. However, published data on the risk of HBV reactivation induced by ibrutinib are scarce. Cases of HBV reactivation in hematologic patients receiving ibrutinib therapy have recently been described, but limited only to overt hepatitis B patients or seropositive occult hepatitis B patients.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report the first case of HBV reactivation during ibrutinib treatment in an asymptomatic 82-year-old woman with seronegative occult hepatitis B patient (i.e., negative for HBsAg, anti-HBc and anti-HBs). Four months after ibrutinib treatment, her liver function test (LFT) was deranged, with seroconversion to HBsAg positivity. Serum hepatitis B virus DNA was quantified to be 1.92 × 10⁸ IU/ml. Antiviral treatment was initiated, and viral load was gradually suppressed with improvement in LFT.

CONCLUSIONS

Our case illustrated that in populations with a high incidence of HBV exposure, systematic screening for HBV exposure is essential prior to ibrutinib treatment, followed by serial monitoring of serologic and molecular markers of hepatitis B. There is a need for an international consensus to support the recommendation of antiviral prophylaxis against HBV reactivation in patients using ibrutinib.

Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Patients Receiving Bruton Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

BACKGROUND

Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors are used to treat B-cell hematologic malignancies. Ibrutinib has been associated with hepatitis B virus (HBV) reactivation. We sought to identify patients with hematologic malignancies who developed HBV reactivation after receiving first-generation (ibrutinib) or second-generation (acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib) BTK inhibitors.

METHODS

We retrospectively studied all consecutive patients with hematologic malignancies with past HBV infection (HBV surface antigen [HBsAg] negative and hepatitis B core antibody [anti-HBc] positive) or chronic HBV infection (HBsAg positive and anti-HBc positive) treated with BTK inhibitors at our institution from November 1, 2015, through November 1, 2022.

RESULTS

Of 82 patients initially identified, 53 were excluded (11 because of false-positive anti-HBc results, and 42 because they were receiving anti-HBV prophylaxis owing to recent receipt of anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies). The 29 remaining patients were further analyzed and 3 (10%; 2/28 with past and 1/1 with chronic HBV infection) were found to have HBV reactivation. One patient received ibrutinib, and 2 received acalabrutinib. All developed HBV-associated hepatitis requiring anti-HBV therapy and survived. One patient continued receiving acalarutinib. Among the patients with past HBV infection, 13 received ibrutinib and 1 (8%) had HBV reactivation; 14 received acalabrutinib and 1 (7%) had HBV reactivation (P = 1.0).

CONCLUSIONS

HBV reactivation risk is intermediate in patients with past HBV infection who receive BTK inhibitors. For patients with past HBV infection who received BTK inhibitors, data are insufficient to recommend universal anti-HBV prophylaxis, but monitoring for HBV reactivation is warranted.

How We Manage Patients with Indolent B-Cell Malignancies on Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors: Practical Considerations for Nurses and Pharmacists

The most common forms of B-cell malignancy, non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) and chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), have seen a drastic shift in the treatment landscape over the last two decades with the introduction of targeted agents. Among them are Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors, which have demonstrated excellent efficacy in indolent B-cell NHLs and CLL. Although BTK inhibitors are generally thought to be more tolerable than chemoimmunotherapy, they are associated with a unique safety profile including varying rates of rash, diarrhea, musculoskeletal events, cardiovascular events, and bleeding. Ibrutinib was the first BTK inhibitor to gain a Health Canada indication, followed by second-generation BTK inhibitors acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, which have better safety profiles compared to ibrutinib, likely due to their improved selectivity for BTK. As BTK inhibitors are oral agents given continuously until disease progression, long-term adverse event (AE) monitoring and management as well as polypharmacy considerations are important for maintaining patient quality of life. This paper intends to serve as a reference for Canadian nurses and pharmacists on dosing, co-administration, and AE management strategies when caring for patients with indolent B-cell NHL or CLL being treated with BTK inhibitors.

Real-World Clinical Outcomes and Adverse Events in Patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Treated with Ibrutinib: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Background and Objectives: The treatment of chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) has acquired new targeted therapies. In clinical trials, ibrutinib improved outcomes safely. Real-world data called for a reappraisal of ibrutinib strategies. We report on a single center's experience with ibrutinib monotherapy, aiming to explore the outcomes, tolerability, and prognosis of CLL patients in routine clinical practice. Materials and Methods: Data were collected from all CLL patients treated with ibrutinib at Fundeni Clinical Institute, Bucharest, Romania, between January 2016 and June 2021. Results: A total of one hundred twenty-three CLL adult patients were treated with ibrutinib. Of the patients, 87% had relapsed/refractory CLL. The median age at ibrutinib initiation was 65 years; 44.7% of patients were staged Rai III/IV. At 32-month median follow-up, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 50 months, the overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the overall response rate (ORR) was 86.2%. The age or number of previous therapies did not impact outcomes or tolerability. An Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) score ≥ 2 and shorter time from initiation of last therapy (TILT) before ibrutinib predicted inferior PFS. Baseline characteristics had no impact on the OS except for TILT in R/R CLL patients. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) of any grade and grade ≥ 3 AEs were reported in 82.1% and 30.9% of the patients, respectively. Infections were the most common AEs (29.3%). Drug discontinuation was permanent in 43.9% of patients, mainly due to disease progression (17.1%) and toxicity (8.9%). Patients with a Cumulative Illness Rating Scale (CIRS) score ≥ 6 had a higher risk for toxicity-related discontinuation. An ECOG PS ≥ 2 predicted an increased rate of permanent discontinuation and grade ≥ 3 AEs. Conclusions: The outcomes of this study align with the results from ibrutinib clinical trials. Our study demonstrated that poor patient fitness, early relapse before ibrutinib, and permanent ibrutinib discontinuation are essential outcome determinants. Patient comorbidity burden and fitness were significant predictors for ibrutinib intolerance.