Detection of HLA Antibodies in Organ Transplant Recipients - Triumphs and Challenges of the Solid Phase Bead Assay

De novo donor-specific HLA antibody development after kidney transplantation is impacted by PIRCHE II score and recipient age

Background

Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a major cause of graft loss in kidney transplantation, often associated with de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA). The detection of clinically relevant dnDSA relies on evaluating reactivity in single antigen bead (SAB) assays. Immunogenetic mismatches between donor and recipient, particularly involving human leukocyte antigens (HLA), underpin dnDSA development. Understanding this relationship could improve pre-transplant risk assessment and organ allocation.

Methods

We analyzed 1296 kidney transplant patients to study dnDSA development, its relation to age, gender, and the role of HLA-derived peptide mismatches using the Predicted Indirectly Recognizable HLA Epitopes II (PIRCHE II) score. We categorized dnDSA based on bead reactivity patterns and HLA typing into true, possible, and false dnDSA.

Results

During follow-up, 25% of recipients developed dnDSA, 9.3% true, 7.7% possible, and 7.9% false. True dnDSA primarily targeted HLA-DQ (38%), while HLA-C and HLA-DP were uncommon (5% and 3%). Higher PIRCHE II scores were significantly associated with true and possible dnDSA against HLA Class II compared to false dnDSA, supporting our dnDSA classification. For true and possible dnDSA, the single locus PIRCHE II score strongly correlated with locus-specific dnDSA, while the total PIRCHE II score did not appear to influence locus-specific dnDSA development. Younger recipients exhibited a higher risk of dnDSA development, while gender had no impact.

Conclusion

Locus-specific PIRCHE II scores are useful in predicting dnDSA risk post-transplantation, particularly in younger recipients. Promoting transplants with low PIRCHE II scores against key HLA loci like HLA-DQ in younger recipients could improve outcomes.

Prevalence of anti-HLA antibodies among live related renal transplant recipients: A retrospective observational study from a tertiary healthcare Center in India

AIM

Detection of anti-HLA antibodies is crucial for pre-transplant histocompatibility testing, donor selection, and graft survival. The aim of this study was to evaluate the spectrum of anti-HLA antibodies among live related renal transplant recipients from one of the largest transplant centers in north India.

METHODS

In this study, retrospective data of transplant workup done in past four years were analyzed using GraphPad Prism 9 Version 9.2.0 (La Jolla, CA, USA). All samples received for pre-transplant work-up if showed positive screening results underwent Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay. Antibodies identified on L-SAB were evaluated for their specificity and the strength of their mean florescence intensity (MFI).

RESULTS

A total of 1250 renal transplant samples were included for analysis. Out of these, 458 (36.64 %) samples were found positive in screening tests algorithm. All 458 samples were further analyzed for both class I and class II HLA antibodies by Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay. In this study, we observed that anti-A*24:01, anti-B*15:01 and anti-C*07*01 were the three most prevalent anti-HLA antibodies identified against HLA-class I antigens. However, anti-DRB1*11:01, anti-DQA1*05:01-DQB1*03:01 and anti-DPA1*02:01-DPB1*17:01 were the most common anti-HLA antibodies identified against HLA-class II antigen. Furthermore, our study found a significant association between anti-HLA class I antibody and the history of pregnancy. However, in re-transplant cases, we observed the presence of antibodies both against HLA class I and II antigens.

CONCLUSION

For a transplant center, it is of utmost importance to have comprehensive knowledge about the prevalence of HLA antibodies, their MFI, and their association with various sensitization events. This study may immensely help transplant communities in selecting appropriate prospective organ donors, planning desensitization regimes, managing recipients' care and predicting transplant outcomes in live related renal transplantation.

Evaluation of de novo donor specific antibodies after kidney transplantation in the era of donor-derived cell-free DNA

Background

Donor-derived cell-free DNA (dd-cfDNA) is a promising non-invasive biomarker for detecting graft injury in solid organ transplant recipients. Elevated dd-cfDNA levels are strongly associated with rejection and graft injury, especially antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR). While de novo donor-specific antibodies (dnDSA) are crucial in ABMR, the relationship between dd-cfDNA levels and dnDSA features, such as DSA category, MFI and HLA target loci, remains unclear.

Methods

We analyzed dd-cfDNA levels in 75 kidney transplant recipients who developed dnDSA post-transplant. dnDSA were categorized as "true", "possible", or "false" based on bead reactivity patterns and HLA typing. dd-cfDNA was assessed alongside dnDSA detection and sequential follow-up samples in a subgroup.

Results

"True" dnDSA showed significantly higher dd-cfDNA levels compared to "possible" and "false" groups. None of the dd-cfDNA values in the "false" group exceeded 0.6%, and only a small fraction of the "possible" group had values slightly above 0.6%. dd-cfDNA levels were not significantly affected by dnDSA target loci or number. A strong correlation between cumulative dnDSA MFI and dd-cfDNA levels was observed, especially in patients with "true" HLA-DQ-directed dnDSA. Sequential dd-cfDNA analysis showed dynamic changes in 25% of patients, all from the "true" dnDSA group, which tended to align with shifts in cumulative MFI over time.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the correlation between cumulative dnDSA MFI and dd-cfDNA levels, particularly in HLA-DQ-directed dnDSA, and suggest graft injury is dynamic in dnDSA-positive patients. Integrated monitoring of dnDSA and dd-cfDNA offers a promising non-invasive approach for assessing graft injury and alloimmunity, potentially enhancing post-transplant care.

Impact of repeat human leukocyte antigen mismatches on kidney graft survival: A contemporary Collaborative Transplant Study analysis

Repeat human leukocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches (RMM) have been historically associated with an increased risk of graft loss after repeat kidney transplantation, in particular HLA-DR RMM in sensitized recipients. As routine use of sensitive assays can at present prevent the transplantation of RMM in hosts with donor-specific antibodies, we hypothesized that RMM would no longer be associated with graft loss. We performed a registry analysis of the Collaborative Transplant Study database including 6711 patients who received a second kidney transplant (KT) between 2010 and 2021, with at least 1 HLA-A, HLA-B, or HLA-DR mismatch. No increased risk for graft loss was observed for the second KT with a class I RMM, regardless of sensitization status. For the second KT with a HLA-DR RMM, the hazard ratio for graft loss in the first year after transplantation was 1.61 (95% CI 1.16-2.23; P = .004) compared to recipients without an RMM and increased to 2.21 (95% CI 1.24-3.63: P = .002) in sensitized recipients (latest complement-dependent cytotoxicity panel reactive antibodies >0%). Our observations suggest that class I RMM do not need to be systematically avoided. In contrast, HLA-DR RMM still had a negative impact on graft survival in this contemporary cohort, despite the widespread availability of Luminex.

A new strategy for systematically classifying HLA alleles into serological specificities: Update and refinement

HLA antigens were historically defined according to the unique reactivity pattern of cells expressing HLA molecules with distinctive clusters of allo-antisera and/or monoclonal antibodies. Subsequently, amino acid residues determining epitopes (DEP) in the HLA molecule were correlated with reactivity patterns. In current clinical practice, the presence of allo-antibodies is assessed using Luminex-based solid phase single antigen bead (SAB) assays for transplantation. Recently, novel antigens were proposed for HLA molecules with DEP patterns that do not match any serologically defined antigens recognised by the WHO Nomenclature Committee. To validate the antigens, mean fluorescence intensity values of SABs tested on >13,000 patients' sera were extracted from clinical databases and analysed by scatter plots using a linear regression model. We found that when two proteins were considered as the same antigen in the original study, for example, HLA-A*02:01 and -A*02:06, their correlation ranked among the highest values at each locus. In contrast, discrete asymmetric outliers were observed when there were different antigens, for example, HLA-A*30:01 and -A*30:02, allowing validation and confirmation of 20 novel antigens for HLA-A, -B, -C and -DR. The outliers were confirmed to be true or false by flow cytometric crossmatches. In addition to the previously defined residues for antigen assignments, findings suggest that further distinction should be made for common antigens by including the substitutions at residue 67 of HLA-B, 67 and 74 of -DR. These serologic analyses can be applied systematically to identify and confirm novel antigens. These developments will lead to designing optimal SAB panels and further improving virtual donor-specific antibodies assessment.

Immunopathology of lung transplantation: from infection to rejection and vice versa

Lung transplantation offers a lifesaving option for patients with end-stage lung disease, but it is marred by a high risk of post-transplant infections, particularly involving multidrug-resistant bacteria, Cytomegalovirus, and fungal pathogens. This elevated infection rate, the highest among solid organ transplants, poses a significant challenge for clinicians, particularly within the first year post-transplantation, where infections are the leading cause of mortality. The direct exposure of lung allografts to the external environment exacerbates this vulnerability leading to constant immune stimulation and consequently to an elevated risk of triggering alloimmune responses to the lung allograft. The necessity of prolonged immunosuppression to prevent allograft rejection further complicates patient management by increasing susceptibility to infections and neoplasms, and complicating the differentiation between rejection and infection, which require diametrically opposed management strategies. This review explores the intricate balance between preventing allograft rejection and managing the heightened infection risk in lung transplant recipients.

Forming a new perspective: Post-structural approaches to determination of donor compatibility and post-transplant assessment of allograft health

The purpose of this review is to encourage a new perspective on the question of donor-recipient compatibility and post-transplant assessment of graft health based on functional measures. The premise is that we should be better sighted on what (and how) the immune system responds toward rather than what is merely there. Continuance of the pursuit of further and better definition of antigens and antibodies is not however discouraged but seen as necessary to improved understanding of the structural correlates of functional immunity. There currently exists, in the opinion of the authors, an opportunity for histocompatibility and immunogenetics laboratories to develop and widen their scope of involvement into these new areas of laboratory activity in support and to the benefit of the transplant programmes they serve.

Impact of donor-specific antibody with low mean fluorescence intensity on allograft outcomes in kidney transplant

BACKGROUND

Immune-mediated rejection is the most common cause of allograft failure in kidney transplant (KT) patients. Exposure to alloantigen, including human leukocyte antigen (HLA), results in the production of donor-specific antibodies (DSA). There are limited data about low levels of mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) DSA, especially post-transplantation. This study evaluated allograft outcomes in KT patients with low MFI DSA.

METHODS

From January 2007 to December 2021, KT patients who were tested for post-transplant DSA at Ramathibodi Hospital, Bangkok, Thailand, with the DSA MFI ≤ 1000 were evaluated. These KT patients were categorized into two groups: very low DSA (VLL; MFI = 1-500) and low DSA (LL; MFI = 501-1000). All KT patients were evaluated for the primary outcomes, such as the incidence of acute rejection, serum creatinine levels at one and five years after transplantation as well as allograft and patient survivals.

RESULTS

Among 36 KT patients 25 were included as those with VLL and 11 as those with LL. The LL group had significantly higher T-cell mediated allograft rejection (TCMR) than the VLL group (45% vs. 12%, P = 0.04). In addition, 10 patients, 5 in the VLL group and 5 in the LL group developed antibody-mediated allograft rejection (ABMR). Both TCMR and ABMR were confirmed by biopsy results. There was a trend toward higher MFI in KT patients with ABMR than without ABMR (P = 0.22). At 5 post-transplant years, serum creatinine, allograft and patient survivals were comparable between these two groups. Furthermore, the univariate and multivariate analyzes revealed that the LL group was a high risk for rejection.

CONCLUSION

Low MFI DSA values after transplantation may be associated with a higher incidence of rejection, but this finding did not show differences in allograft and patient survival in this study's analysis.

Homozygosity in any HLA locus is a risk factor for specific antibody production: the taboo concept 2.0

Objective

In a cooperative study of the University Hospital Leipzig, University of Leipzig, and the Charité Berlin on kidney transplant patients, we analysed the occurrence of HLA-specific antibodies with respect to the HLA setup of the patients. We aimed at the definition of specific HLA antigens towards which the patients produced these antibodies.

Methods

Patients were typed for the relevant HLA determinants using mainly the next-generation technology. Antibody screening was performed by the state-of-the-art multiplex-based technology using microspheres coupled with the respective HLA alleles of HLA class I and II determinants.

Results

Patients homozygous for HLA-A*02, HLA-A*03, HLA-A*24, HLA-B*07, HLA-B*18, HLA-B*35, HLA-B*44, HLA-C*03, HLA-C*04, and HLA-C*07 in the class I group and HLA-DRB1*01, HLA-DRB1*03, HLA-DRB1*07, HLA-DRB1*15, HLA-DQA1*01, HLA-DQA1*05, HLA-DQB1*02, HLA-DQB1*03(7), HLA-DQB1*06, HLA-DPA1*01, and HLA-DPB1*04 in the class II group were found to have a significant higher antibody production compared to the heterozygous ones. In general, all HLA determinants are affected. Remarkably, HLA-A*24 homozygous patients can produce antibodies towards all HLA-A determinants, while HLA-B*18 homozygous ones make antibodies towards all HLA-B and selected HLA-A and C antigens, and are associated with an elevation of HLA-DRB1, parts of DQB1 and DPB1 alleles. Homozygosity for the HLA class II HLA-DRB1*01, and HLA-DRB1*15 seems to increase the risk for antibody responses against most of the HLA class I antigens (HLA-A, HLA-B, and HLA-C) in contrast to HLA-DQB1*03(7) where a lower risk towards few HLA-A and HLA-B alleles is found. The widely observed differential antibody response is therefore to be accounted to the patient's HLA type.

Conclusion

Homozygous patients are at risk of producing HLA-specific antibodies hampering the outcome of transplantation. Including this information on the allocation procedure might reduce antibody-mediated immune reactivity and prevent graft loss in a patient at risk, increasing the life span of the transplanted organ.

Experimental Structures of Antibody/MHC-I Complexes Reveal Details of Epitopes Overlooked by Computational Prediction

mAbs to MHC class I (MHC-I) molecules have proved to be crucial reagents for tissue typing and fundamental studies of immune recognition. To augment our understanding of epitopic sites seen by a set of anti-MHC-I mAb, we determined X-ray crystal structures of four complexes of anti-MHC-I Fabs bound to peptide/MHC-I/β2-microglobulin (pMHC-I). An anti-H2-Dd mAb, two anti-MHC-I α3 domain mAbs, and an anti-β2-microglobulin mAb bind pMHC-I at sites consistent with earlier mutational and functional experiments, and the structures explain allelomorph specificity. Comparison of the experimentally determined structures with computationally derived models using AlphaFold Multimer showed that although predictions of the individual pMHC-I heterodimers were quite acceptable, the computational models failed to properly identify the docking sites of the mAb on pMHC-I. The experimental and predicted structures provide insight into strengths and weaknesses of purely computational approaches and suggest areas that merit additional attention.

Monocyte HLA-DR level on admission predicting in-hospital mortality rate in exertional heatstroke: A 12-year retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Exertional heatstroke (EHS), a fatal illness, pronounces multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) and high mortality rate. Currently, no ideal factor prognoses EHS. Decreased monocyte human leukocyte-DR antigen (mHLA-DR) has been observed in critically ill individuals, particularly in those with sepsis. While most research focus on the pro-inflammatory response exploration in EHS, there are few studies related to immunosuppression, and no report targeted on mHLA-DR in EHS. The present study tried to explore the prognostic value of mHLA-DR levels in EHS patients.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective study. Clinical data of EHS patients admitted to the intensive care unit of the General Hospital of Southern Theatre Command between January 1, 2008, and December 31, 2020, were recorded and analyzed.

RESULTS

Seventy patients with 54 survivors and 16 nonsurvivors were ultimately enrolled. Levels of mHLA-DR in the nonsurvivors (41.8% [38.1-68.1]%) were significantly lower than those in the survivors (83.1% [67.6-89.4]%, p < 0.001). Multivariate logistic regression indicated that mHLA-DR (odds ratio [OR] = 0.939; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.892-0.988; p = 0.016) and Glasgow coma scale (GCS) scores (OR = 0.726; 95% CI: 0.591-0.892; p = 0.002) were independent risk factors related with in-hospital mortality rate in EHS. A nomogram incorporated mHLA-DR with GCS demonstrated excellent discrimination and calibration abilities. Compared to the traditional scoring systems, the prediction model incorporated mHLA-DR with GCS had the highest area under the curve (0.947, 95% CI: [0.865-0.986]) and Youden index (0.8333), with sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 83.33%, and a greater clinical net benefit.

CONCLUSION

Patients with EHS were at a risk of early experiencing decreased mHLA-DR early. A nomogram based on mHLA-DR with GCS was developed to facilitate early identification and timely treatment of individuals with potentially poor prognosis.

Interferon-γ and its response are determinants of antibody-mediated rejection and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation

Interferon-γ (IFN-γ) is an important cytokine in tissue homeostasis and immune response, while studies about it in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) are very limited. This study aims to comprehensively elucidate the role of IFN-γ in ABMR after renal transplantation. In six renal transplantation cohorts, the IFN-γ responses (IFNGR) biological process was consistently top up-regulated in ABMR compared to stable renal function or even T cell-mediated rejection in both allografts and peripheral blood. According to single-cell analysis, IFNGR levels were found to be broadly elevated in most cell types in allografts and peripheral blood with ABMR. In allografts with ABMR, M1 macrophages had the highest IFNGR levels and were heavily infiltrated, while kidney resident M2 macrophages were nearly absent. In peripheral blood, CD14+ monocytes had the top IFNGR level and were significantly increased in ABMR. Immunofluorescence assay showed that levels of IFN-γ and M1 macrophages were sharply elevated in allografts with ABMR than non-rejection. Importantly, the IFNGR level in allografts was identified as a strong risk factor for long-term renal graft survival. Together, this study systematically analyzed multi-omics from thirteen independent cohorts and identified IFN-γ and IFNGR as determinants of ABMR and clinical outcomes in patients after renal transplantation.

Microvascular activation and exocytosis after exposure to the serum from mismatched recipients by using donor microvascular cultures

BACKGROUND

Microvascular injury resulting from activation and exocytosis are early signs of tissue damage caused by allografting. However, humoral anti-graft reactions are not easily detectable in transplant biopsies. The aim of this study was to establish a bioassay to recapitulate this process in a prospective approach.

METHODS

The study was executed by using our previously established protocol to isolate and freeze the donors' microvascular endothelial cells (MVEC) at the transplantation (34 living-related donors and 26 cadaver donors); and to collect sera from the recipients before the transplantation, one-, three- and six-months after transplantation. The activation and exocytosis of the MVEC were determined by incubating the donors' cultures with the recipients' sera. We determined if there was any endothelial activation by quantifying the releases of monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) and interleukin 8 (IL-8) in supernatants and the expressions of membrane intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD54) and intercellular adhesion molecule-1 (CD106) by flow cytometry. Endothelial exocytosis was determined by quantifying soluble E-selectin (CD62E) and cytoplasmic von Willebrand Factor (vWF) in supernatants. Endothelial activation or exocytosis was considered positive when the fold change (≧1.5) of post-transplantation to pre-transplantation was reached. We also monitored serum PRA and cytokines using Luminex multiple-plex and cytometric bead-based assay respectively.

RESULTS

We found 41.2% recipients (14 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 5.2 folds, p < 0.05) exhibited positive MVEC activation in the first month after transplantation as determined by IL-8 levels; 26.5% recipients (9 out of 34, ranging from 1.5 to 11.8 folds, p < 0.05) by MCP-1 levels. In the group of three months post-transplantation, 70.6% patients were positive (12 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 87.1 folds, p < 0.05) by IL-8 increased levels; 24% recipients (4 out of 17, ranging from 1.8 to 50.5 folds, p < 0.05) measured by MCP-1 levels. However, these changes disappeared six months after transplantation. Flow cytometric data showed that a time-dependent of CD54+ and CD106+ expressions existed over the course of six months. Most CD54+ and CD106+ cells were CD31- (platelet-endothelial cell adhesion molecule-1), though CD31+/CD106+ (37.5%, 3 out of 8) and CD31+/CD106+ (25%. 2 out of 8) were seen. When comparing donor MVEC activation to their recipient's proinflammatory cytokine levels or PRA status, we could not draw a conclusion regarding the connections between them. The sera collected from recipients at either one- or three-months after allografting did not significantly induce the release of either soluble CD62E or vWF (p > 0.05), indicating exocytosis was not significantly involved in the acute phase of allografting.

CONCLUSIONS

This bioassay enables us to detect the activation and exocytosis of donor MVEC elicited by respective sera from mismatched kidney recipients.

Role of therapeutic plasma exchange as a desensitization therapy in human leukocyte antigen incompatible renal transplant patients: A single-center experience

OBJECTIVE

Despite an increase in the rate of successful live donor renal transplantation done annually, the number of potential recipients with acceptable donors is relegated to the ever-expanding cadaver-donor waiting list due to sensitization to human leukocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies. If not sufficiently suppressed, these preformed HLA antibodies can trigger antimicrobial resistance (AMR) and early graft loss. To ameliorate this situation, various desensitization treatments are administered to provide a survival benefit to highly sensitized patients.

METHOD

One hundred and six patients in the time frame of January 2017 to March 2019 were included in the study group. The desensitization protocol included therapeutic plasma exchange and administration of low-dose intravenous immunoglobulin (100 mg/kg per therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) session) to highly sensitized patients (treatment group) who subsequently underwent renal transplantation after negative pre-transplant Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Luminex crossmatch (CDC/LumXM). We compared graft survival rates between the group undergoing desensitization (treatment group) and matched control group of patients that underwent HLA-compatible transplantation.

RESULTS

In the treatment group, Kaplan-Meier analysis estimates an average rate of patient graft survival of 95.2% at 3 years post-transplant, as compared with the rate of 86.9% in the same time frame for the control-matched group (p < 0.05 for both comparisons).

CONCLUSION

Desensitization treatment with TPE before live donor renal transplantation in the case of patients with HLA sensitization provides better survival benefits along with monitoring for donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) and other infections, rather than waiting for a compatible organ donor. The data lays out evidence that desensitization treatments can assist overcome HLA incompatibility barriers in live donor renal transplantation.

Role of Complement-dependent Cytotoxicity Crossmatch and HLA Typing in Solid Organ Transplant

BACKGROUND

Solid organ transplantation is a life-saving medical operation that has progressed greatly because of developments in diagnostic tools and histocompatibility tests. Crossmatching for complement-dependent cytotoxicity (CDC) and human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing are two important methods for checking graft compatibility and reducing the risk of graft rejection. HLA typing and CDC crossmatching are critical in kidney, heart, lung, liver, pancreas, intestine, and multi-organ transplantation.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted on the internet, using PubMed, Scopus, and Google Scholar databases, to identify peer-reviewed publications about solid organ transplants, HLA typing, and CDC crossmatching.

CONCLUSION

Recent advances in HLA typing have allowed for high-resolution evaluation, epitope matching, and personalized therapy methods. Genomic profiling, next-generation sequencing, and artificial intelligence have improved HLA typing precision, resulting in better patient outcomes. Artificial intelligence (AI) driven virtual crossmatching and predictive algorithms have eliminated the requirement for physical crossmatching in the context of CDC crossmatching, boosting organ allocation and transplant efficiency. This review elaborates on the importance of HLA typing and CDC crossmatching in solid organ transplantation.

Seventy-five years of service: an overview of the College of American Pathologists' proficiency testing program in histocompatibility and identity testing

The Histocompatibility and Identity Testing Committee offers an overview of the College of American Pathologists' (CAP) Proficiency Testing (PT) program, commemorating its significant 75th anniversary in 2024. The CAP PT program has undergone significant growth and evolution over the years, ultimately achieving Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services approval. In 1979, CAP's partnership with the American Association for Clinical Histocompatibility Testing marked a pivotal moment, leading to the creation of the first proficiency testing survey in 1980. This laid the foundation for various PT programs managed by the CAP Histocompatibility and Identity Testing Committee, including HLA antibody testing, HLA molecular typing, engraftment monitoring, parentage/relationship testing, HLA disease associations and drug risk, and HLA-B27 typing. Each program's distinctive considerations, grading methodologies, and future prospects are detailed here, highlighting the continual evolution of histocompatibility and identity testing PT to support emerging technologies and evolving laboratory practices in the field.

Crossmatch assays in transplantation: Physical or virtual?: A review

The value of the crossmatch test in assessing pretransplant immunological risk is vital for clinical decisions, ranging from the indication of the transplant to the guidance of induction protocols and treatment with immunosuppressants. The crossmatch tests in transplantation can be physical or virtual, each with its advantages and limitations. Currently, the virtual crossmatch stands out for its sensitivity and specificity compared to the physical tests. Additionally, the virtual crossmatch can be performed in less time, allowing for a reduction in cold ischemia time. It shows a good correlation with the results of physical tests and does not negatively impact graft survival. Proper communication between clinicians and the transplant immunology laboratory will lead to a deeper understanding of each patient's immunological profile, better donor-recipient selection, and improved graft survival.

HLA diversity in ethnic populations can affect detection of donor-specific antibodies by single antigen beads

Introduction

In solid-organ transplantation, human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSA) are strongly associated with graft rejection, graft loss, and patient death. The predominant tests used for detecting HLA DSA before and after solid-organ transplantation are HLA single antigen bead (SAB) assays. However, SAB assays may not detect antibodies directed against HLA epitopes that are not represented in the SAB. The prevalence and potential impact of unrepresented HLA epitopes are expected to vary by ethnicity, but have not been thoroughly investigated. To address this knowledge gap, HLA allele frequencies from seven ethnic populations were compared with HLA proteins present in SAB products from two manufacturers to determine unrepresented HLA proteins.

Materials

Allele frequencies were obtained from the Common, Intermediate, and Well Documented HLA catalog v3.0, and frequencies of unrepresented HLA types were calculated. Next-generation sequencing was used to determine HLA types of 60 deceased solid-organ donors, and results were used to determine if their HLA-A, -B, -C, and -DRB1 proteins were not present in SAB reagents from two vendors. Unrepresented HLA proteins were compared with the most similar protein in SAB assays from either vendor and then visualized using modeling software to assess potential HLA epitopes.

Results

For the seven ethnic populations, 0.5% to 11.8% of each population had HLA proteins not included in SAB assays from one vendor. Non-European populations had greater numbers of unrepresented alleles. Among the deceased donors, 26.7% (16/60) had at least one unrepresented HLA-A, -B, -C, or -DRB1 protein. Structural modeling demonstrated that a subset of these had potential HLA epitopes that are solvent accessible amino acid mismatches and are likely to be accessible to B cell receptors.

Discussion

In conclusion, SAB assays cannot completely rule out the presence of HLA DSA. HLA epitopes not represented in those assays vary by ethnicity and should not be overlooked, especially in non-European populations. Allele-level HLA typing can help determine the potential for HLA antibodies that could evade detection.

Management of the sensitized heart transplant candidate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

For sensitized heart transplant candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting heart transplantation has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease.

RECENT FINDINGS

Advances in the assessment of HLA antibodies allow for identification of heart transplant candidates who may benefit from desensitization strategies to widen the donor pool and mitigate the risk of adverse posttransplant outcomes.

SUMMARY

Antibody sensitization is a barrier to successful heart transplantation and strategies to identify sensitized patients, stratify their risk, and mitigate this risk through desensitization is crucial to optimize the quality of life and survival of HT recipients.

A retrospective observational study to estimate the risk of HLA alloimmunization with blood transfusion: Can the risk be reduced by leucodepletion?

BACKGROUND

In this retrospective study, our aim was to find the effect of leucodepleted (LD) blood transfusions on the formation of anti-HLA-antibodies when compared to non-leucodepleted (non-LD) transfusions using Luminex-based method.

METHODS

In this study, Luminex single antigen bead assay (L-SAB) and HLA typing were performed on 310 patients. Test positivity rates (as MFI - Mean florescence intensity) were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.

RESULTS

Of the 310 patients included in the study, 58.06% (180) patients were male and 41.93% (130) were female. The average age of the patients was 42.86 (±12.37) years. In this study, test positivity rates were significantly lower in the patients who received LD RBC units than in those who received non-LD RBC units (28.43% = 29 of 102 Vs 55.22% = 74 of 134, p < 0.05). In our study, transfusion combined with a history of pregnancy had higher number of significant HLA antibodies compared to cases where transfusion was the only sensitization event (81.81% = 18/22 Vs 39.71% = 85/214, p < 0.05). In addition, anti-HLA-antibodies-MFI were significantly (p < 0.01) higher in non-LD patients compared to LD patients.

CONCLUSION

Patients who received LD RBC units had a significantly lower rate of transfusion-associated alloimmunization compared to those who received non-LD RBC units. Multiparous women had a high risk for transfusion-related alloimmunization compared to both nulliparous women and male patient. Furthermore, class I-anti-HLA-antibodies (HLA-B and HLA-A + B) were significantly associated with pregnancy sensitization and/or blood transfusion as a single sensitization.

Update on Desensitization Strategies and Drugs on Hyperimmune Patients for Kidney Transplantation

The presence in a recipient of antibodies directed against donor-specific antigens represents a major obstacle to transplantation. Removal of these antibodies represents a challenge for physicians dealing with kidney transplantation. Several strategies, techniques, and old and new drugs are currently used for desensitizing these patients. Desensitization may either occur before transplantation, at the time of transplantation, or after transplantation according to whether physicians are dealing with living or deceased donors. Different techniques may be used to reveal the presence of antibodies in the recipients; each technique has different sensitivities and specificities, and different advantages and drawbacks. The targets of the drugs used to desensitize are B cells, plasma cells, the antibodies themselves, and, finally, the complement that is the final actor causing tissue disruption. B cells are relatively easy to target; targeting the plasma cell is more difficult. Indeed, several new drugs are also used in randomized trials to defeat plasma cells. Antibodies may be removed easily, but their removal is often followed by antibody rebound. The complement is not easy to defeat and new drugs are currently used for this aim. Overall, despite difficulties, desensitization is currently possible in many cases, to obtain a safe and successful transplantation.

Comparison of platelet antibody screen, crossmatching and HLA antibody testing in patients refractory to platelet transfusions

Patients undergoing recurrent platelet transfusions can become refractory to these transfusions. Platelet antibody screens (Immucor), platelet crossmatching assays (Immucor), and HLA antibody testing are commonly used to test these patients. The relative effectiveness of these tests has not been determined. A higher incidence of strongly positive screen results that did not predict crossmatch results was anecdotally noted. Therefore, the results of the platelet antibody screens and crossmatches were systematically compiled over a 12-year period from 2010 to 2021. Of note, the Immucor Capture-P Ready Screen (platelet antibody) had a recall in March 2013 after which the performance of the test appears to have changed. The positivity rate of the platelet antibody screen increased over the course of the study, and this was statistically significant when analyzing year as a continuous variable and when grouping years by four-year periods (2010-13,2014-17,2018-21). In contrast, platelet crossmatch reactivity decreased slightly throughout this period. During the 2018-21 period, HLA antibody testing was commonly performed and correlated well with the crossmatch testing but not with the screen. These results suggest that the drastic increase in positivity we observed in the platelet antibody screen over this period is due to increased analytic sensitivity (with possible reduced specificity) of the screen and not a change in our patient population. Based on these results, the platelet antibody screen has little clinical utility and directly performing platelet crossmatching or HLA antibody testing is recommended for patients suspected to be refractory to platelet transfusions due to alloimmune-mediated factors.

Results of haploidentical transplant in patients with donor-specific antibodies: a survey on behalf of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant and Cell Therapy

Background

Donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are IgG allo-antibodies against mismatched donor HLA molecules and can cause graft failure (GF) in the setting of haploidentical hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (haplo-HSCT). Our aim was to report the experience of the Spanish Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GETH-TC) in DSA-positive patients who had undergone haplo-HSCT.

Methods

We conducted a survey of patients who underwent haplo-HSCT in GETH-TC centers between 2012 and 2021. Data were collected on the DSA assay used, monitoring strategy, complement fixation, criteria for desensitization, desensitization strategies and transplant outcomes.

Results

Fifteen centers from the GETH-TC responded to the survey. During the study period, 1,454 patients underwent haplo-HSCT. Seventy of the transplants were performed in 69 DSA-positive patients, all of whom lacked a suitable alternative donor; 61 (88%) patients were female (90% with prior pregnancies). All patients received post-transplant cyclophosphamide-based graft-versus-host disease prophylaxis. Regarding baseline DSA intensity, 46 (67%) patients presented mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) >5,000, including 21 (30%) with MFI >10,000 and three (4%) with MFI >20,000. Six patients did not receive desensitization treatment, four of them with MFI <5,000. Of 63 patients receiving desensitization treatment, 48 (76%) were tested after desensitization therapy, and a reduction in intensity was confirmed in 45 (71%). Three patients (5%) experienced an increase in MFI after desensitization, two of whom experienced primary GF. Cumulative incidence of neutrophil engraftment at day 28 was 74% in a median of 18 days (IQR, 15─20); six patients died before engraftment due to toxicity or infection and eight patients had primary GF despite desensitization in seven of them. After a median follow-up of 30 months, two-year overall and event-free survival were 46.5% and 39%, respectively. The two-year cumulative incidence of relapse was 16% and non-relapse mortality (NRM) was 43%. Infection was the most frequent cause of NRM, followed by endothelial toxicity. Multivariate analysis identified baseline MFI >20,000 as an independent risk factor for survival and an increase in titers after infusion as an independent risk factor for GF.

Conclusions

Haplo-HSCT is feasible in DSA-positive patients, with high rates of engraftment after desensitization guided by DSA intensity. Baseline MFI >20,000 and increased intensity after infusion are risk factors for survival and GF.

Microfluidic antibody affinity profiling of alloantibody-HLA interactions in human serum

Antibody profiling is a fundamental component of understanding the humoral response in a wide range of disease areas. Most currently used approaches operate by capturing antibodies onto functionalised surfaces. Such measurements of surface binding are governed by an overall antibody titre, while the two fundamental molecular parameters, antibody affinity and antibody concentration, are challenging to determine individually from such approaches. Here, by applying microfluidic diffusional sizing (MDS), we show how we can overcome this challenge and demonstrate reliable quantification of alloantibody binding affinity and concentration of alloantibodies binding to Human Leukocyte Antigens (HLA), an extensively used clinical biomarker in organ transplantation, both in buffer and in crude human serum. Capitalising on the ability to vary both serum and HLA concentrations during MDS, we show that both affinity and concentration of HLA-specific antibodies can be determined directly in serum when neither of these parameters is known. Finally, we provide proof of principle in clinical transplant patient sera that our assay enables differentiation of alloantibody reactivity against HLA proteins of highly similar structure, providing information not attainable through currently available techniques. These results outline a path towards detection and in-depth profiling of humoral immunity and may enable further insights into the clinical relevance of antibody reactivity in clinical transplantation and beyond.

Alloreactive T cells to Assess Acute Rejection Risk in Kidney Transplant Recipients

Memory T cells are important mediators of transplant rejection but are not routinely measured before or after kidney transplantation. The aims of this study were as follows: (1) validate whether pretransplant donor-reactive memory T cells are reliable predictors of acute rejection (AR) (2) determine whether donor-reactive memory T cells can distinguish AR from other causes of transplant dysfunction.

Methods

Samples from 103 consecutive kidney transplant recipients (2018-2019) were obtained pretransplantation and at time of for-cause biopsy sampling within 6 mo of transplantation. The number of donor-reactive interferon gamma (IFN-γ) and interleukin (IL)-21-producing memory T cells was analyzed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent spot (ELISPOT) assay.

Results

Of the 63 patients who underwent a biopsy, 25 had a biopsy-proven acute rejection (BPAR; 22 aTCMR and 3 aAMR), 19 had a presumed rejection, and 19 had no rejection. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed that the pretransplant IFN-γ ELISPOT assay distinguished between patients who later developed BPAR and patients who remained rejection-free (area under the curve [AUC] 0.73; sensitivity 96% and specificity 41%). Both the IFN-γ and IL-21 assays were able to discriminate BPAR from other causes of transplant dysfunction (AUC 0.81; sensitivity 87% and specificity 76% and AUC 0.81; sensitivity 93% and specificity 68%, respectively).

Conclusions

This study validates that a high number of donor-reactive memory T cells before transplantation is associated with the development of AR after transplantation. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the IFN-γ and IL-21 ELISPOT assays are able to discriminate between patients with AR and patients without AR at the time of biopsy sampling.

Detection of donor-specific HLA antibodies: A retrospective observation in 350 renal transplant cases

BACKGROUND

The main objective of this study was to determine the results of the cell-based assay (CDC-XM and FC-XM), and correlate with the results of solid phase assay (L-SAB).

METHODS

In this retrospective study, 350 prospective renal transplant recipients were tested for the presence of HLA antibodies by CDC-XM, FC-XM and L-SAB screening with their corresponding donor.

RESULTS

T-cell-FC-XM showed a sensitivity of 71.43% and a specificity of 91.50% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-cell-FCXM showed a sensitivity of 94.94% and a specificity of 61.99% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). On the other hand, T-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 32.14% and a specificity of 98.64% for detecting class I L-SAB (+), while B-CDC-XM showed a sensitivity of 44.30% and a specificity of 94.83% for detecting class II L-SAB (+). In this study, the results indicated that DSA class I MFI value of 2845 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 4585 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive T-cell-CDC-XM. However, DSA class II MFI cut-off of 1988 and above significantly (p ≤0.001) correlated with B-cell-FC-XM positivity, while MFI value of 5986 and above (p ≤0.001) showed strong predictive accuracy of a positive B-cell-CDC-XM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that CDC-XM has poor sensitivity, while FC-XM has poor specificity to detect DSA. L-SAB has good correlation with T-cell-FC-XM (p < 0.0001) but not with B-cell-FC-XM (P = 0.31). DSA strength >2845 and > 1988 significantly correlated with T-cell-FC-XM positivity and B-cell-FC-XM positivity, respectively. While, a MFI value of >4585 and > 5986 significantly correlated with T-cell-CDC-XM positivity and B-cell-CDC-XM positivity, respectively. These MFI cut-off values could serve as a surrogate marker for CDC-XM and FC-XM tests and may help in resolving the limitations of cell-based techniques. In conclusion, we found that L-SAB is more sensitive and specific than CDC-XM and FC-XM and therefore may be used as a test of choice.

Detection and management of HLA sensitization in candidates for adult heart transplantation

Heart transplantation (HT) remains the preferred therapy for patients with advanced heart failure. However, for sensitized HT candidates who have antibodies to human leukocyte antigens , finding a suitable donor can be challenging and can lead to adverse waitlist outcomes. In recent years, the number of sensitized patients awaiting HT has increased likely due to the use of durable and mechanical circulatory support as well as increasing number of candidates with underlying congenital heart disease. This State-of-the-Art review discusses the assessment of human leukocyte antigens antibodies, potential desensitization strategies including mechanisms of action and specific protocols, the approach to a potential donor including the use of complement-dependent cytotoxicity, flow cytometry, and virtual crossmatches, and peritransplant induction management.

Antibody-Mediated Rejection: Diagnosis and Treatment

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is a form of lung allograft rejection that is emerging as an important risk factor for chronic lung allograft dysfunction and decreased long-term survival. In this review, we provide a brief overview of our current understanding of its pathophysiology with an emphasis on donor-specific antibodies before moving on to focus on the current diagnostic criteria and treatment strategies. Our goal is to discuss the limitations of our current knowledge and explore how novel diagnostic and therapeutic options aim to improve outcomes through earlier definitive diagnosis and preemptive targeted treatment.

C3d-binding assay for the detection of complement activating HLA antibodies: A useful tool for allocation to highly sensitised recipients in the post-CDC era?

The CDC crossmatch test is being phased out in solid organ donor allocation, and standard luminex single antigen bead assays do not differentiate complement activating function of HLA antibodies. The current study investigated the LIFECODES C3d-binding assay to determine if it could accurately predict actual T and B cell CDC results in a cohort of highly sensitised patients. Nineteen serum samples from different highly sensitised solid organ patients were crossmatched against cells from 62 unique donors, with 174 total T and B cell crossmatches performed. The sera also underwent SAB assay using OLI and LC platforms, and C3d-binding assay. Complement activating ability of each unique HLA antibody specificity detected using SAB was assigned based on the actual CDC results, which was then used to determine the accuracy of the C3d-binding assay. The C3d-binding assay was found to be highly accurate, with sensitivity of 95%, specificity 89% and negative predictive value 97% for class I DSA and the T cell CDC crossmatch results. Furthermore, we found 100% accuracy for prediction of the complement activating function of HLA-C antibodies. Negative predictive value of above 90% was also found for HLA class II DSA. C3d-binding proved more accurate than virtual crossmatch alone to predict CDC results. This study confirms that the C3d-binding assay predicts actual CDC crossmatch results accurately. In particular, the high negative predictive value of the C3d-binding assay may be extremely useful to define HLA antibodies that do not activate complement in highly sensitised recipients.

Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation

Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.

Afucosylation of HLA-specific IgG1 as a potential predictor of antibody pathogenicity in kidney transplantation

Antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) is the leading cause of graft failure. While donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) are associated with a higher risk of AMR, not all patients with DSAs develop rejection, suggesting that the characteristics of alloantibodies determining their pathogenicity remain undefined. Using human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-A2-specific antibodies as a model, we apply systems serology tools to investigate qualitative features of immunoglobulin G (IgG) alloantibodies including Fc-glycosylation patterns and FcγR-binding properties. Levels of afucosylated anti-A2 antibodies are elevated in seropositive patients, especially those with AMR, suggesting potential cytotoxicity via FcγRIII-mediated mechanisms. Afucosylation of both glycoengineered monoclonal and naturally glycovariant polyclonal serum IgG specific to HLA-A2 drives potentiated binding to, slower dissociation from, and enhanced signaling through FcγRIII, a receptor widely expressed on innate effector cells, and greater cytotoxicity against HLA-A2+ cells mediated by natural killer (NK) cells. Collectively, these results suggest that afucosylated DSA may be a biomarker of AMR and contribute to pathogenesis.

Biosensors Based on Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistors for HLA and MICA Antibody Detection in Kidney Transplantation

This work demonstrates the ability of the Ion-Sensitive Field-Effect Transistor (ISFET)-based immunosensor to detect antibodies against the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) and the major histocompatibility complex class-I-related chain A (MICA). The sensing membrane of the ISFET devices was modified and functionalized using an APTES-GA strategy. Surface properties, including wettability, surface thickness, and surface topology, were assessed in each module of the modification process. The optimal concentrations of HLA and MICA proteins for the immobilization were 10 and 50 μg/mL. The dose-response curve showed a detection range of 1.98–40 µg/mL for anti-HLA and 5.17–40 µg/mL for anti-MICA. The analytical precision (%CV) was found to be 10.69% and 8.92% for anti-HLA and -MICA, respectively. Moreover, the electrical signal obtained from the irrelevant antibody was considerably different from that of the specific antibodies, indicating the specific binding of the relevant antibodies without noise interference. The sensitivity and specificity in the experimental setting were established for both antibodies (anti-HLA: sensitivity = 80.00%, specificity = 86.36%; anti-MICA: sensitivity = 86.67%, specificity = 88.89%). Our data reveal the potential of applying the ISFET-based immunosensor to the detection of relevant anti-HLA and -MICA antibodies, especially in the field of kidney transplantation.

An early evaluation of the HISTO SPOT® AB ID Class I & II test in cardiothoracic transplant patients

The HISTO SPOT^® AB ID assay (BAG Diagnostics GmbH) is a novel single antigen HLA Class I & II antibody definition test used with the MR.SPOT^® processor. We compared this assay with Luminex^® -based assays to assess its potential application in defining unacceptable antigens for transplantation in patients awaiting transplants with cardiothoracic organs. A cohort of 40 sensitized cardiothoracic patients were identified, and one sample was selected from each patient. The required screening was based on the patients' antibody profiles (Class I, n = 17, Class II, n = 11, Class I & II, n = 12). Samples were screened with LABScreen™ Single Antigen (SAg), LIFECODES^® LSA™, HISTO SPOT^® AB ID, and an acid modified LABScreen™ SAg test for detecting antibodies against denatured HLA. Results indicated that HISTO SPOT^® AB ID had reduced sensitivity (68% for Class I; 69% for Class II). When compared to LABScreen™ and LIFECODES^® , HISTO SPOT^® AB ID failed to detect Luminex^® -defined antibodies with median fluorescence intensity (MFI) ranging from 1114 to 24,489. The HISTO SPOT^® AB ID panel used in the study had reduced antigen representation compared with Luminex^® -based assays which further compromised its capacity for antibody detection and definition. Further work is needed to evaluate the clinical relevance of these differences between the performance of HISTO SPOT^® and Luminex^® -based methods.

European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group

This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.

Donor specific HLA antibody in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: Implications for donor selection

Advances in hematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) have led to changes in the approach to donor selection. Many of these new approaches result in greater HLA loci mismatching, either through the selection of haploidentical donors or permissive HLA mismatches. Although these approaches increase the potential of transplant for many patients by expanding the number of acceptable donor HLA genotypes, they add the potential barrier of donor-specific HLA antibodies (DSA). DSA presents a unique challenge in HSCT, as it can limit engraftment and lead to graft failure. However, transient reduction of HLA antibodies through desensitization treatments can limit the risk of graft failure and facilitate engraftment. Thus, the consideration of DSA in donor selection and the management of DSA prior to transplant are playing an increasingly important role in HSCT. In this review, we will discuss studies addressing the role of HLA antibodies in HSCT, the reported impact of desensitization on DSA levels, and the implications for selecting donors for patients with DSA. We found that there is a clear consensus that moderate strength DSA should be avoided, while desensitization strategies are reported to be effective in most cases at reducing DSA to amenable levels. There is limited information regarding the impact of specific characteristics of DSA, such as HLA loci or overall level of sensitization, which could further aid in donor selection for sensitized HSCT candidates.

Effects of different sensitization events on HLA alloimmunization in renal transplant cases; a retrospective observation in 1066 cases

BACKGROUND

Patients awaiting solid organ transplantation may develop anti-HLA antibodies after sensitization events such as transfusions, pregnancies, or previous transplantations. However, the effects of a particular sensitization event on HLA alloimmunization have not been well studied in parallel using cell-based assays and solid-phase assays. In this study, we evaluated and compare how different sensitization events affect the HLA antibody screening (HLA-Ab) and donor specific antibody (DSA) status in solid renal organ transplantation patients.

METHODS

HLA antibody (HLA-Ab) screening tests like complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDC-XM), flow cytometry crossmatch (FC-XM) & Luminex panel-reactive antibody (L-PRA) were performed in all 1066 patients (635 males and 431 females). If any of these tests turned out to be positive, a Luminex single antigen bead (L-SAB) assay was performed for DSA identification. Test positive rates and antibody strengths were analyzed according to the different sensitization events and gender.

RESULTS

In this study, HLA-Ab screening tests positive rates (L-PRA, FC-XM and CDC-XM) were significantly higher in patients with previous transplantation (73.91%, 86.95% and 56.52% p < 0.001), previous pregnancy (57.46%, 70.14% and 18.85% p < 0.001) or blood transfusion (27.33%, 35.55% and 7.33% p < 0.001) compared with patients without a sensitizing event (6.17%, 13.58% & 1.09). In this study, re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength (DSA) than non sensitized group (class I & II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I & II MFI 2659, 3329; P < 0.001) and those with single sensitization events of transfusion (class I & II MFI 11418.04, 17,837.78 vs class I & II MFI 5598.82, 5436.12; P < 0.001) or pregnancy (class I & II MFI 11418, 17,837 vs class I & II MFI 8580.12, 7556.08; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy and blood transfused had high allo-immunization rate for class I HLA antigens. While re-transplantation patients had high allo-immunization rate for both the HLA classes (HLA- class I & HLA- class II). Re-transplantation group showed significantly stronger antibody strength, followed by pregnancy and then transfusion.

Principles of Virtual Crossmatch Testing for Kidney Transplantation

Human leukocyte antigens (HLAs) are the primary determinants of alloimmunity. A crossmatch test is a test that determines the immunologic risk of a recipient with a potential donor by ensuring that there are no transplant-relevant circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against donor antigens. Physical crossmatch (PXM) tests, such as complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch (CDCXM) and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM), require mixing of patient serum and donor cells, are labor intensive, and are logistically challenging. Virtual crossmatch (VXM) test assesses immunologic compatibility between recipient and potential donor by analyzing the results of 2 independently done physical laboratory tests—patient anti-HLA antibody and donor HLA typing. The goal of VXM is pretransplant risk stratification—though there is no consensus on whether such risk assessment involves predicting the PXM result or the posttransplant outcome. Although the concept of VXM is not new, the advent of solid-phase assays for detecting circulating antibodies in the recipient directed against individual HLA and DNA-based methods for typing donor HLA specificities at a higher resolution makes the routine use of VXM a reality. Accordingly, VXM may be applied at different scenarios—both for sensitized and nonsensitized patients. Implementation of VXM-based approach has resulted in statistically significant reduction in cold ischemia time without an increase in hyperacute rejection episodes. Though there are considerable challenges, VXM is expected to be used more often in the future, depending on the transplant center’s tolerance of immunologic risk.

Predictive Potential of Flow Cytometry Crossmatching in Deceased Donor Kidney Transplant Recipients Subjected to Peritransplant Desensitization

Recipient sensitization is a major risk factor of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) and inferior graft survival. The predictive effect of solid-phase human leukocyte antigen antibody testing and flow cytometry crossmatch (FCXM) in the era of peritransplant desensitization remains poorly understood. This observational retrospective single-center study with 108 donor-specific antibody (DSA)-positive deceased donor kidney allograft recipients who had undergone peritransplant desensitization aimed to analyze variables affecting graft outcome. ABMR rates were highest among patients with positive pretransplant FCXM vs. FCXM-negative (76 vs. 18.7%, p < 0.001) and with donor-specific antibody mean fluorescence intensity (DSA MFI) > 5,000 vs. <5,000 (54.5 vs. 28%, p = 0.01) despite desensitization. In univariable Cox regression, FCXM positivity, retransplantation, recipient gender, immunodominant DSA MFI, DSA number, and peak panel reactive antibodies were found to be associated with ABMR occurrence. In multivariable Cox regression adjusted for desensitization treatment (AUC = 0.810), only FCXM positivity (HR = 4.6, p = 0.001) and DSA number (HR = 1.47, p = 0.039) remained significant. In conclusion, our data suggest that pretransplant FCXM and DSA number, but not DSA MFI, are independent predictors of ABMR in patients who received peritransplant desensitization.

Human leukocyte antigen epitope mismatch loads and the development of de novo donor-specific antibodies in cardiothoracic organ transplantation

De novo donor-specific human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies (dnDSA) are associated with increased risk of rejection and mortality in solid organ transplantation. Such dnDSA is produced in some recipients upon allorecognition of mismatched HLA post-transplant. HLA matching is not currently considered in the allocation of deceased donor hearts and lungs and pre-transplant immunological risk stratification is based entirely on the mean fluorescence intensity (MFI) of circulating donor-directed HLA antibodies. HLA epitope-based matching tools predict B-cell or T-cell HLA epitopes that are present in the donor's HLA but absent in the recipient's HLA. We hypothesized that patients with higher epitope mismatch loads would be at increased risk of dnDSA development. We retrospectively analysed 73 heart and/or lung transplant recipients who were tested for DSA between 2015 and 2020. HLAMatchmaker, PIRCHE-II and HLA epitope mismatch algorithm (HLA-EMMA) were used to calculate eplet mismatch (EpMM) loads, T-cell epitope mismatch (TEpMM) loads and solvent accessible amino acid mismatch (SAMM) loads, respectively. Multivariate analyses showed that HLA-EMMA was the only tool with a significant association between the total score for all HLA loci and dnDSA production [odds ratio (OR) 1.021, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.003-1.042, p = .0225] though this increased risk was marginal. The majority of dnDSA were directed against HLA-DQ and patients with higher HLA-DQ TEpMM loads (OR = 1.008, CI = 1.002-1.014, p = .007), and HLA-DR+DQ SAMM loads (OR = 1.035, CI = 1.010-1.064, p = .0077) were most at risk of producing dnDSA. We also showed that patients with a risk epitope within the HLA molecule encoded for by HLA-DQA1*05 + HLA-DQB1*02/03:01 were significantly more likely to produce dnDSA. The use of HLA epitope-based matching tools could be used for cardiothoracic transplant risk stratification to enable early intervention and monitoring of patients at increased risk of producing dnDSA.

Donor-Specific Antibody Is Associated with Increased Expression of Rejection Transcripts in Renal Transplant Biopsies Classified as No Rejection

BACKGROUND

Donor -specific HLA antibody (DSA) is present in many kidney transplant patients whose biopsies are classified as no rejection (NR). We explored whether in some NR kidneys DSA has subtle effects not currently being recognized.

METHODS

We used microarrays to examine the relationship between standard-of-care DSA and rejection-related transcript increases in 1679 kidney transplant indication biopsies in the INTERCOMEX study (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01299168), focusing on biopsies classified as NR by automatically assigned archetypal clustering. DSA testing results were available for 835 NR biopsies and were positive in 271 (32%).

RESULTS

DSA positivity in NR biopsies was associated with mildly increased expression of antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR)-related transcripts, particularly IFNG-inducible and NK cell transcripts. We developed a machine learning DSA probability (DSA_Prob) classifier based on transcript expression in biopsies from DSA-positive versus DSA-negative patients, assigning scores using 10-fold cross-validation. This DSA_Prob classifier was very similar to a previously described "ABMR probability" classifier trained on histologic ABMR in transcript associations and prediction of molecular or histologic ABMR. Plotting the biopsies using Uniform Manifold Approximation and Projection revealed a gradient of increasing molecular ABMR-like transcript expression in NR biopsies, associated with increased DSA (P<2 × 10^-16). In biopsies with no molecular or histologic rejection, increased DSA_Prob or ABMR probability scores were associated with increased risk of kidney failure over 3 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Many biopsies currently considered to have no molecular or histologic rejection have mild increases in expression of ABMR-related transcripts, associated with increasing frequency of DSA. Thus, mild molecular ABMR-related pathology is more common than previously realized.

Noninvasive Assessment of the Alloimmune Response in Kidney Transplantation

Transplantation remains the optimal mode of kidney replacement therapy, but unfortunately long-term graft survival after 1 year remains suboptimal. The main mechanism of chronic allograft injury is alloimmune, and current clinical monitoring of kidney transplants includes measuring serum creatinine, proteinuria, and immunosuppressive drug levels. The most important biomarker routinely monitored is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) donor-specific antibodies (DSAs) with the frequency based on underlying immunologic risk. HLA-DSA should be measured if there is graft dysfunction, immunosuppression minimization, or nonadherence. Antibody strength is semiquantitatively estimated as mean fluorescence intensity, with titration studies for equivocal cases and for following response to treatment. Determination of in vitro C1q or C3d positivity or HLA-DSA IgG subclass analysis remains of uncertain significance, but we do not recommend these for routine use. Current evidence does not support routine monitoring of non-HLA antibodies except anti-angiotensin II type 1 receptor antibodies when the phenotype is appropriate. The monitoring of both donor-derived cell-free DNA in blood or gene expression profiling of serum and/or urine may detect subclinical rejection, although mainly as a supplement and not as a replacement for biopsy. The optimal frequency and cost-effectiveness of using these noninvasive assays remain to be determined. We review the available literature and make recommendations.

Effects of serum from mismatched patients with solid organ transplantation on the activation of microvascular cultures isolated from adipose tissues

BACKGROUND

Aggregating the human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I antigens on the endothelial membrane has been known to elicit an activation, an underlying mechanism of chronic rejection in organ transplant recipients. The current study aims at examining the endothelial responses using HLA typed microvascular cultures from human adipose tissues upon exposure to the serum that contain corresponding antibodies collected from mismatched transplant recipients.

METHODS

We have successfully cultured 30 microvascular cultures and typed their HLAs. They are functionally competent to respond to inflammatory TNF-α stimulation and the aggregating monoclonal antibody against HLA Class I. The post-transplantation serum was collected either from the recipients with pathologically diagnosed chronic rejection or from the recipients without rejection. We determined their activation either by double-staining the endothelial cells in crude cultures with flow cytometry or by quantifying cytokine releases in purified endothelial cells using ELISA.

RESULTS

Under our current protocol, adipose tissue cultures are functionally intact in regard to its responses to TNF-alpha and anti-HLA Class I antibody. We observed that the post-transplantation serum with rejection contained the pathogenic antibodies and led to proinflammatory activation, as demonstrated by not only increased CD54+/CD31+ and CD106+/CD31+ cell counts but also inflammatory cytokine releases including MCP-1, IL-8 and RANTES.

CONCLUSION

This methodological study provides the feasibility of examining the pathogenicity of the alloantibodies in mis-transplant serum. Potentially, the endothelial activation elicited as a result of exposure can be used as an alternative readout for chronic rejection.

SIGNIFICANCE

We prototype an ex vivo model that enables us to examine whether allogenic antibodies from the recipient can functionally activate microvascular endothelial cells from the donor adipose tissues. This system can be further developed as crossmatch using cellular responses as readouts for chronic rejection for post-transplant surveillance.

Approaches for the characterization of clinically relevant pre-transplant human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibodies in solid organ transplant patients

The avoidance of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) attributed to human leucocyte antigen (HLA) antibody incompatibility remains an essential function of clinical Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics (H&I) laboratories who are supporting solid organ transplantation. Developments in HLA antibody identification assays over the past thirty years have greatly reduced unexpected positive cellular crossmatches and improved solid organ transplant outcomes. For sensitized patients, the decision to register unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches is often heavily influenced by results from solid phase antibody assays, particularly the Luminex^® Single Antigen Bead (SAB) assays, although the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by these assays remains unclear. As such, the identification of non-clinically relevant antibodies may proportionally increase the number of unacceptable transplant mismatches registered, with an associated increase in waiting time for a compatible organ. We reflect on the clinical relevance of antibodies identified solely by the Luminex SAB^® assays and consider whether the application of additional assays and/or tools could further develop our ability to define the clinical relevance of antibodies identified in patient sera. Improvements in this area would assist equity of access to a compatible transplant for highly sensitized patients awaiting a solid organ transplant.

Risk Factors Influencing the Outcomes of Kidney Re-Transplantation

BACKGROUND Our kidney transplant waitlist includes 20% re-transplantations (TX2). Knowing what to expect is a clinical obligation. MATERIAL AND METHODS We compared graft and patient survival of all 162 TX2 patients, transplanted 2000 to 2009, with 162 patients after first transplantation (TX1) matched for age, sex, living/non-living donation, and transplantation date. Patient follow-up was 10 years. RESULTS TX2 graft and patient survivals were inferior to TX1 (p<0.001 and p=0.047). TX2 patients had a longer cumulative dialysis vintage, more human leucocyte antigen (HLA) mismatches, more panel-reactive HLA antibodies, more often received induction therapy with rabbit-antithymocyte globulin (rATG), and had a lower body mass index (all p<0.05). Death from infection and graft failure by rejection was more frequent after TX2 (both p<0.05) but not after TX1. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that both cohorts had graft failure and death risk associated with infection and cardiovascular disease, and graft failure by humoral rejection. However, only TX2 patients had an additional risk of graft failure with early inferior graft function and of patient death with ≥2 comorbidities. Moreover, Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that TX2 and not TX1 patients had a lower graft and patient survival associated with infection and with ≥2 comorbidities (all p<0.05). CONCLUSIONS Re-transplantation is associated with worse graft outcomes mainly because of immunologic and graft-quality reasons, although the high number of comorbidities and infection severities aside from cardiovascular disease drive mortality. The more frequent rATG induction of TX2 patients could promote infection by enhancing immunosuppression. By addressing comorbidities, outcomes could possibly be improved.

Evaluation of three different laboratory methods to detect preformed human leukocyte antigen antibodies in a South African kidney transplant population

Background

Anti-human leukocyte antigen antibodies (anti-HLA) play a crucial role in graft. Detection of anti-HLA, both pre- and post-transplant is a crucial investigation in clinical organ transplantation.

Objectives

Three methodologies for the detection of lymphocytotoxic antibodies were compared to establish which of these is best suited to optimise pre-transplant donor-recipient matching.

Methods

Serum samples from 15 renal transplant patients were tested for the presence of anti-HLA by i) cytotoxic-dependent cross-match (CDCXM), ii) flow cytometric cross-match (FCXM) and iii) Luminex-based donor specific antibody cross-match (DSAXM) method, Confirmatory tests for the presence of preformed HLA antibodies were tested using Luminex methodology.

Results

Two (13%) of the 15 patients had positive HLA Class I antibodies (Ab) using all 3 methods. An additional 2 HLA Class I Ab were identified with FCXM/CDCXM. DSAXM identified 1 HLA Class I positive, not indicated by CDCXM/FCXM.

High HLA Class II positivity (40%), identified by CDCXM, while DSAXM and FCXM identified two and one patients, respectively. CDCXM produced 4 false-positive results confirmed by lymphocyte single antigen (LSA) assay.

Conclusions

The DSAXM method appears to add value in pre-transplantation screening to identify pre-sensitised patients that may not reject the donor graft due to the absence of donor-specific antibodies.

Donor-specific antibodies in lung transplantation

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The development of donor-specific antibodies (DSA) after lung transplantation has been recognized as an important risk factor for poor outcomes over the past 20 years. Recently, this has been a focus of intense research, and the purpose of this review is to summarize our current understanding of humoral responses and important recent findings as well as to identify areas of future research.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies have identified donor-derived cell-free DNA (ddcfDNA) as an important biomarker associated with antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Importantly, ddcfDNA levels are noted to be elevated approximately 3 months before the onset of clinical allograft dysfunction, making ddcfDNA a particularly appealing biomarker to predict the onset of AMR. Additional notable recent findings include the identification of an independent association between the isolation of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from respiratory specimens and the development of DSA. This finding provides potential insights into crosstalk between innate and alloimmune responses and identifies a potential therapeutic target to prevent the development of DSA.

SUMMARY

Progress in the field of humoral responses after lung transplantation has been slow, but ongoing and future research in this area are critically necessary to improve patient outcomes in the future.

Management of Donor-Specific Antibodies in Haploidentical Transplant: Multicenter Experience From the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant

Background

Donor specific antibodies (DSAs) can be responsible for graft failure (GF) in the setting of mismatched hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT). The aim of our study is to report the experience of the Madrid Group of Hematopoietic Transplant (GMTH) in patients with DSAs undergoing haplo-HSCT.

Methods

Patients undergoing haplo-HSCT in centers from the GMTH from 2012 to 2020 were included in the study. DSAs were analyzed with a solid-phase single-antigen immunoassay; monitoring was performed during desensitization on days -14, -7, 0 and in a weekly basis until neutrophil engraftment. Desensitization strategies varied depending on center experience, immunofluorescence intensity, complement fixation and type of antibodies.

Results

We identified a total of 20 haplo-HSCT in 19 patients performed with DSAs in 5 centers. 10 (53%) patients presented anti-HLA class I DSAs (6 of them with > 5000 mean fluorescence intensity (MFI)), 4 (21%) presented anti-HLA class II (1 with > 5000 MFI) and 5 (26%) presented both anti-HLA class I and II (5 with > 5000 MFI). 90% of patients received at least two treatments as desensitization strategy and all experienced a decrease of MFI after desensitization (mean reduction 74%). Only one patient who developed progressive increase of MFI after infusion developed GF. Desensitization treatments used included rituximab, immunoglobulins, therapeutic plasma exchange, incompatible platelets, buffy coat and immunosuppressors. Seventeen (90%) patients achieved neutrophil engraftment; one patient died before engraftment because of infection and one patient with class I DSAs developed primary GF despite an intensive desensitization. After a median follow-up of 10 months, OS and EFS were 60% and 58%, respectively, cumulative incidence of relapse was 5% and NRM was 32%.

Conclusions

Despite the optimal strategy of DSAs desensitization remains unclear, the use of desensitization treatment guided by DSAs intensity kinetics constitute an effective approach with high rates of engraftment for patients with DSAs in need for an haplo-HSCT lacking an alternative suitable donor.