1
|
Markland L, Díaz JAC, Boyle LA, Pessoa J, van Staaveren N. Observations on the associations between damaging and aggressive behaviors, related lesions, and their implications for the welfare of pigs in the grower-finisher period. Front Vet Sci 2025; 12:1523663. [PMID: 40196809 PMCID: PMC11973387 DOI: 10.3389/fvets.2025.1523663] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2024] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Introduction Pigs perform damaging and aggressive behaviors, but few studies investigated associations between behaviors and resulting lesions in intensive settings. We investigated such associations within and across production stages to understand implications for welfare, and interpreted cut-off values of behavior for use as warning signals. Methods Four batches of 419 pigs each (n = 1,676 pigs) were followed on arrival to a commercial grower-finisher unit at 12 weeks of age until slaughter. Pigs had docked tails, were managed according to routine practice and housed in 48 mixed-sex groups in eight rooms [35(±2) pigs/pen; 6 pens/room/batch]. Ear and tail lesions were assessed when pigs arrived to grower stage I [24.9 ± 5.33 kg of body weight (BW)], after 2 weeks when transferred to grower stage II (33.3 ± 7.04 kg BW), and after 4 weeks when transferred to the finisher stage (60.2 ± 7.74 kg BW; 18 weeks of age). All occurrences of damaging (ear, tail, and flank biting) and aggressive behaviors were recorded for 5 min per pen from the week after pigs arrived for 11 weeks. Results High variability existed between pens for behaviors and percentage of pigs that developed new ear or tail lesions on arrival to grower II and finisher stage. There were significant correlations among the behaviors only within grower stage II (all behaviors: 0.65 ≤ rs ≤ 0.80, p < 0.05), while the only correlations across production stages were ear biting (grower II and finisher rs = -0.29, p < 0.05), flank biting (grower II and finisher rs = 0.70, p < 0.05), and aggression (grower I and II rs = 0.37, p < 0.05). This suggests a sensitive period during grower stage II but also that performance of behaviors changes over time. The frequency of ear and tail biting did not need to be high for new lesions to develop, but thresholds changed depending on stage, behaviors, and lesion type. Discussion This underscores the intricacies in developing cut-off values for warning signals and may relate to the cumulative effect of different risk factors. Thus, early identification and multifaceted management strategies tailored to specific pens are needed to address behaviors with adverse implications for pig welfare. This highlights the challenges and complexities of improving pig welfare within current intensive production settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucy Markland
- Pig and Poultry Research and Knowledge Transfer Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Fermoy, Ireland
- School of Veterinary Medicine, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz
- Pig and Poultry Research and Knowledge Transfer Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Fermoy, Ireland
| | - Laura Ann Boyle
- Pig and Poultry Research and Knowledge Transfer Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Fermoy, Ireland
| | - Joana Pessoa
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kongens Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Nienke van Staaveren
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, Netherlands
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Munsterhjelm C, Tuominen-Brinkas M, Koskikallio H, Heinonen M, Ahlqvist K, Valros A. Tail status at both individual and pen level affects tail biting victimisation in pigs over the finishing period. Animal 2025; 19:101428. [PMID: 39954334 DOI: 10.1016/j.animal.2025.101428] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2025] [Accepted: 01/13/2025] [Indexed: 02/17/2025] Open
Abstract
Tail biting is a significant welfare problem in commercial pig production. Individual tail health was assessed in non-docked pigs (n = 1 579) on five farms (180-441 pigs and 16-30 pens per farm) at introduction to the finishing unit (W0) and 9 weeks later (W9) to present longitudinal descriptive data, establish risk factors for being tail bitten and investigate possibilities to infer information about W0 tail health based on W9 tail appearance. Tail health was described in terms of posture (hanging), shortening (loss of distal flattening), lesion type (TLT; 0 = no lesion, 1 = minor lesion on intact skin; or with skin penetration 2 = < 0.5 cm, 3 = 0.5-2 cm, or 4 = > 2 cm), length (iL) and change therein from W0 to W9 (ΔL). ΔL may include cumulating information on received tail biting given that the variation was large and negative values were present. The average intact tail measured 22 ± 2.1 and 29 ± 2.3 cm at W0 and W9, respectively, with no effect of sex. Tail lesion prevalence decreased unexpectedly from W0 to W9, possibly due to a docking-like effect in the present population showing a relatively high injury prevalence at W0. Mixed models predicting tail health at W9 were built with pig (n = 1 323-1 492) as statistical unit and pen (n = 94-124) nested within farm as random effects. Pen-level tail appearance at W0 was included as eligible predictors. No model predicted TLT 2,3 or 4 at W9, suggesting that factors other than early tail appearance determined late victimisation. A larger ΔL was predicted by the individual-level factors barrow (vs female), a larger iL, no tail shortening and any other TLT as compared to 4 in the individual at W0; as well as smaller percentage of hanging tails in the pen, a larger average iL in the pen (px̅L) and an interaction between iL and px̅L. According to the interaction effect, two different scenarios predicted a smaller ΔL: smaller iL and px̅L, or especially larger iL and px̅L. The scenarios may be re-targeting of previous victims by individuals accustomed to an environment with tail biting and two-stage tail-biting where the longest tails were the most attractive objects for exploration. We conclude that pigs with better tail health at introduction to the finishing unit receive less injurious biting during 9 weeks. Pen-level tail health has a profound effect that is very different at extremes of tail length. One-fourth of early skin-penetrating tail injuries may not be detectable shortly before slaughter.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Munsterhjelm
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland.
| | - M Tuominen-Brinkas
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - H Koskikallio
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Heinonen
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - K Ahlqvist
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| | - A Valros
- Research Centre for Animal Welfare, Department of Production Animal Medicine, Koetilantie 7, 00014 University of Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Staaveren N, Pessoa J, Boyle LA, Calderón Díaz JA. Description of patterns of ear and tail lesions during the grower-finisher period in a commercial pig farm. Porcine Health Manag 2024; 10:23. [PMID: 38937857 PMCID: PMC11210170 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-024-00374-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2023] [Accepted: 06/13/2024] [Indexed: 06/29/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ear and tail lesions are prevalent indicators of impaired welfare observed in pig production with different multifactorial causes. Understanding the progression of ear and tail lesions over time is important to implement preventative strategies on commercial pig farms. Therefore, this case study aimed to provide a detailed account of patterns of ear and tail lesions in pigs on a single commercial farm during the grower-finisher period. CASE PRESENTATION A total of 1,676 12-week old pigs (n = 773 females and n = 903 males, all tail docked) were followed from arrival to the grower facilities until transferred to the finisher stage on a commercial pig farm in Ireland. Pigs were individually weighed and inspected for the severity of fresh ear and tail lesions (score 0-4) on transfer to the first grower (24.9 ± 5.33 kg, 12 weeks of age, n = 1,676 pigs), second grower (33.3 ± 7.04 kg, 14 weeks of age, n = 1,641 pigs), and finisher stage (60.2 ± 7.74 kg, 18 weeks of age, n = 1,626 pigs). Due to the low number of pigs with high scores, ear lesions were classified as no (score 0), mild (score 1), moderate (score 2) and severe (score ≥ 3) and tail lesions were classified as no (score 0), mild (score 1), and moderate-to-severe (score ≥ 2). Ear lesions were more prevalent than tail lesions at each inspection. There were approx. 19% of pigs with ear lesions at all three inspections but no pigs presented with tail lesions at all three inspections. When considering the specific severity categories, we observed 32 different ear lesion score combinations and 15 different tail lesion score combinations across the three inspections. CONCLUSION The high number of observed patterns of ear and tail lesions suggest large individual variability in lesion progression. Ear lesions were more of an issue than tail lesions and little is known about this health and welfare problem indicating that further research into causes and management strategies is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nienke van Staaveren
- Department of Population Health Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Animal Biosciences, Ontario Agricultural College, University of Guelph, Guelph, ON, Canada
| | - Joana Pessoa
- Technical University of Denmark, National Food Institute, Kemitorvet 204, Kongens Lyngby, 2800, Denmark
| | - Laura Ann Boyle
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Co. Cork, Fermoy, Ireland.
| | - Julia Adriana Calderón Díaz
- Pig Development Department, Teagasc Animal and Grassland Research and Innovation Centre, Moorepark, Co. Cork, Fermoy, Ireland
- PIC Europe, Sant Cugat del Valles, C/Pau Vila, 22 2o piso, Barcelona, 08174, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ward SA, Pluske JR, Plush KJ, Pluske JM, Rikard-Bell CV. Assessing Decision Support Tools for Mitigating Tail Biting in Pork Production: Current Progress and Future Directions. Animals (Basel) 2024; 14:224. [PMID: 38254393 PMCID: PMC10812681 DOI: 10.3390/ani14020224] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2023] [Revised: 01/05/2024] [Accepted: 01/08/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
Tail biting (TB) in pigs is a complex issue that can be caused by multiple factors, making it difficult to determine the exact etiology on a case-by-case basis. As such, it is often difficult to pinpoint the reason, or set of reasons, for TB events, Decision Support Tools (DSTs) can be used to identify possible risk factors of TB on farms and provide suitable courses of action. The aim of this review was to identify DSTs that could be used to predict the risk of TB behavior. Additionally, technologies that can be used to support DSTs, with monitoring and tracking the prevalence of TB behaviors, are reviewed. Using the PRISMA methodology to identify sources, the applied selection process found nine DSTs related to TB in pigs. All support tools relied on secondary information, either by way of the scientific literature or expert opinions, to determine risk factors for TB predictions. Only one DST was validated by external sources, seven were self-assessed by original developers, and one presented no evidence of validation. This analysis better understands the limitations of DSTs and highlights an opportunity for the development of DSTs that rely on objective data derived from the environment, animals, and humans simultaneously to predict TB risks. Moreover, an opportunity exists for the incorporation of monitoring technologies for TB detection into a DST.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia A Ward
- Australasian Pork Research Institute Ltd., Willaston, SA 5118, Australia
| | - John R Pluske
- Australasian Pork Research Institute Ltd., Willaston, SA 5118, Australia
- Faculty of Science, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia
| | | | - Jo M Pluske
- SciEcons Consulting, Perth, WA 6010, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Wallgren P, Johansson M, Wallgren T, Susic Z, Sigfridson K, Johansson SE. Impact of feed, light and access to manipulable material on tail biting in pigs with intact tails. Acta Vet Scand 2024; 66:2. [PMID: 38195502 PMCID: PMC10777577 DOI: 10.1186/s13028-023-00716-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/02/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Tail biting (TB) is a welfare issue with economic consequences due to infections and ill-thrift. This study aimed to reduce tail injuries in a high-performing non-tail-docking pig herd. RESULTS During eleven years preceding the trial, the annual incidence of tail injuries registered at slaughter in pigs from the herd increased from 3% (equivalent to the national mean) to 10%. It was positively correlated to a high weight gain and negatively correlated to daylight length. The overall incidence of tail injuries during the four years preceding the trial was 9.2% with significant differences between four identically structured buildings for fatteners (I < II < III < IV). The feed was enriched with amino acids, minerals and fibres. The buildings used different illumination strategies, I: standard fluorescent tubes with an invisible flickering light of 30-40% for 14 h daily, II: non-flickering led light for 14 h daily, III (control) and IV: standard fluorescent tubes for 2 h daily. IV had free access to manipulable material (hay-silage), while I-III was offered 100-200 g daily. During the adaptation period (6 months), the incidence of tail injuries decreased significantly in all buildings to a mean of 5.4%. The largest decrease (from 11.4 to 4.3%) was obtained in IV. During the trial period (12 months), the mean incidence of tail injuries decreased in all groups to a mean of 3.0%. There were no differences in treatment incidences of individual pigs due to TB between groups, but the use of enriched pellets due to TB in pens was lowest in II. The low incidence of tail injuries was retained during the post-trial period (6 months) when all buildings used artificial illumination for two hours per day. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of TB in fast growing non-tail-docked pigs in the herd was successfully reduced by supplementing the feed with amino acids, minerals, vitamins and fibres. Additional manipulable material accelerated that process and non-flickering illumination may have had an impact in preventing TB. The results obtained do not support the need for tail-docking of pigs, provided that the needs of the pigs in terms of feed ingredients, stocking density and access to manipulable materials are fulfilled.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Per Wallgren
- National Veterinary Institute, SVA, 751 89, Uppsala, Sweden.
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7054, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
| | | | - Torun Wallgren
- Department of Animal Environment and Health, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Box 7068, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Zeljko Susic
- Lantmännen Farming, Box 407, 751 06, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Svoboda M, Hodkovicova N, Siwicki A, Szweda W. The importance of slaughterhouses in monitoring the occurrence of tail biting in pigs - Review. VET MED-CZECH 2023; 68:349-358. [PMID: 37981944 PMCID: PMC10646543 DOI: 10.17221/85/2023-vetmed] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2023] [Accepted: 09/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Tail biting in pigs represents a very serious problem in modern pig farming, particularly with the intensification of the industry. It is considered a multifactorial syndrome and can be caused by various factors, leading to significant economic losses through reduced weight gain and partial or total condemnation of slaughtered carcasses due to secondary bacterial infections. The aim of this article is to summarise the current knowledge regarding tail biting in pigs, with a primary focus on the use of slaughterhouses for evaluating tail lesions and monitoring their prevalence. The introduction addresses the factors influencing the incidence of tail biting in pig farms and prevention strategies. Subsequent sections cover topics such as tail docking, the negative effects of pig tail biting, the advantages and drawbacks of examining tail lesions in slaughterhouses, and the methodical procedure for evaluating such lesions. Additionally, the article discusses the relationship between tail lesions and meat inspection findings, as well as the prevalence of tail lesions in various European countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Svoboda
- Ruminant and Swine Clinic, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Veterinary Sciences Brno, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Nikola Hodkovicova
- Department of Infectious Diseases and Preventive Medicine, Veterinary Research Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Andrzej Siwicki
- Department of Microbiology and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Wojciech Szweda
- Department of Epizootiology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Olsztyn, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kakanis M, Marinou K, Sossidou EN. Greek Pig Farmers' Perceptions and Experiences of Tail Biting and Tail Docking. Animals (Basel) 2023; 13:ani13040672. [PMID: 36830460 PMCID: PMC9952019 DOI: 10.3390/ani13040672] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Tail biting is both an important economic and a welfare problem. The primary preventive measure, almost on a routine basis throughout Europe, remains tail docking following a risk analysis. This study aimed to get insight on the perceptions of Greek pig farmers towards tail docking, intervention measures, and risk factors of tail biting, as well as opinions on pig welfare themes. Eighty-two farmers answered a questionnaire provided online and in printed form. In the case of a tail-biting outbreak, the most important intervention measure is the removal of the bitten pig (victim), while feed quality, air movements, and stocking density were ranked as the highest risk factors (p ≤ 0.05). Chains are the most common type of enrichment by 67% followed by plastic objects by 29.5%. Almost half of the farmers reported having no tail-biting problem on their farm, while 64.4% of the respondents have already tried at least once to raise pigs with intact tails. To reduce routine tail docking, it is essential to apply specific farm-oriented solutions effectively. To succeed in this aim, it is important to consider farmers' concerns and practices. This study is the first step in that direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michail Kakanis
- Department of Veterinary Service, Regional Unit of Pieria, Directorate of Rural Economy and Veterinary Service, 25 Martiou 49, 60132 Katerini, Greece
- Correspondence: (M.K.); (E.N.S.)
| | - Katerina Marinou
- Directorate of Animal Welfare, Veterinary Medicines and Veterinary Applications, Hellenic Ministry of Rural Development and Food, 2 Acharnon Street, 10176 Athens, Greece
| | - Evangelia N. Sossidou
- Veterinary Research Institute, Ellinikos Georgikos Organismos-DIMITRA, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
- Correspondence: (M.K.); (E.N.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
The Effects of Pen Size and Design, Bedding, Rooting Material and Ambient Factors on Pen and Pig Cleanliness and Air Quality in Fattening Pig Houses. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12121580. [PMID: 35739916 PMCID: PMC9219434 DOI: 10.3390/ani12121580] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 06/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
There are several environmental and ambient factors that can affect pig eliminative behaviour. The aim of this survey was to investigate factors related to the physical and ambient environment that have the strongest effects on pig and pen cleanliness and ammonia concentration. Data were collected from 87 pig farms and analysed using mixed (ammonia concentration) or generalized linear (pen and pig cleanliness) model in SAS. The pen was cleaner when pen partitions were open compared to closed (p = 0.010) and increased with increasing amount of litter (p = 0.002), using straw (p = 0.002) as rooting material. Pig cleanliness was higher when pen partitions in the eliminative area were open compared to closed (p = 0.007) and increased with increasing space per pig in the resting area (p < 0.001), with decreasing temperature (p < 0.001), and lowering of air velocity (p = 0.003). Other factors that increased cleanliness was using straw as rooting material (p = 0.028) and increasing amount of litter in the resting area (p = 0.002). Ammonia concentration was reduced with increasing floor space in the eliminative area (p < 0.001) and increasing amount of litter (p = 0.006). Our results pinpoint physical and ambient conditions affecting pen and pig cleanliness and air quality.
Collapse
|
9
|
Stygar AH, Chantziaras I, Maes D, Aarestrup Moustsen V, De Meyer D, Quesnel H, Kyriazakis I, Niemi JK. Economic feasibility of interventions targeted at decreasing piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality across European countries. Porcine Health Manag 2022; 8:22. [PMID: 35650652 PMCID: PMC9158370 DOI: 10.1186/s40813-022-00266-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Piglet perinatal and pre-weaning mortality is a welfare problem causing economic losses in pig production. In this study, the effects of housing and management interventions on the economic result of sow enterprises representing six European countries (Belgium, Denmark, Finland, Germany, The Netherlands and Spain) were tested. Interventions concerned: (1) installing mechanical ventilation, (2) re-designing of the gestation unit, (3) drying and warming newborn piglets, (4) providing enrichment for gestating sows, including high-fiber dietary supplementation and point-source objects, and (5) music provision and backscratching of sows in the farrowing unit. A bio-economic model was used to determine the effects of interventions on economic outcomes during the nursery phase and to calculate a maximum cost of 1%-point reduction in perinatal and pre-weaning mortality, irrespective of the intervention type. Biological parameters were set according to previous observational and experimental studies. Interventions 1-4 were expected to decrease perinatal mortality, defined as stillbirths and deaths occurring within the first 48 h of postnatal life. Intervention 5 was expected to decrease pre-weaning mortality. Interventions increased fixed (1-3) and variable costs (3-5). We hypothesized that housing and management interventions would have a positive economic effect. RESULTS Piglet mortality can be decreased in various ways. Interventions concerning ventilation and re-designing of the gestation unit (1 and 2) were the most beneficial in countries with low housing costs and high perinatal mortality. Drying and warming newborn piglets (3) resulted in varying economic results, with the highest increase in profits obtained in a country with low labor costs and high litter size. Interventions providing sows with enrichment and human-animal interaction (4 and 5) were effective across varying conditions. Regardless of intervention type, policies aiming at 1%-point reduction in perinatal and pre-weaning mortality could cost from €0.2 to €0.5 (average €0.4) and from €0.4 to €0.5 (average €0.5) per piglet, respectively, depending on productions conditions. CONCLUSIONS To decrease piglet mortality, farmers should consider low input interventions, such as those targeting appropriate behavior. Our results suggest that providing enrichment or increasing human-animal interaction pays off and brings positive economic result even when piglet mortality is marginally reduced.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna H Stygar
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Bioeconomy and Environment, Latokartanonkaari 9, 00790, Helsinki, Finland.
| | - Ilias Chantziaras
- Unit of Porcine Health Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | - Dominiek Maes
- Unit of Porcine Health Management, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Ghent University, Salisburylaan 133, 9820, Merelbeke, Belgium
| | | | | | - Hélène Quesnel
- PEGASE, INRAE, Institut Agro, 35590, Saint-Gilles, France
| | - Ilias Kyriazakis
- Institute for Global Food Security, Queen's University, Belfast, BT7 1NN, UK
| | - Jarkko K Niemi
- Natural Resources Institute Finland (Luke), Bioeconomy and Environment, Kampusranta 9, 60320, Seinäjoki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Gomes A, Romeo C, Ghidini S, Vieira-Pinto M. The Relationship between Carcass Condemnations and Tail Lesion in Swine Considering Different Production Systems and Tail Lengths. Animals (Basel) 2022; 12:ani12080949. [PMID: 35454196 PMCID: PMC9030673 DOI: 10.3390/ani12080949] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Revised: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Tail biting is considered a major welfare problem in swine production, associated with relevant financial costs for farmers. The European Union has reaffirmed the prohibition of tail docking practices, with all Member States establishing standards for the protection of pigs as well as measures to reduce the need for tail docking and tail biting prevalence. This research aims to assess the importance of tail lesions (using two different scores) and its influence on carcass condemnations considering different production systems and tail length. According to the results, higher tail lesion scores reflected higher total condemnations rates. An intimate association was encountered between the scarring score and total and local carcass condemnations. Tail length was also significant, with undocked animals presenting higher tail lesions scores. Organic batches reported more total condemnations. This research highlights the importance of tail lesions on carcass condemnations that may also be influenced by docking and type of production. These results suggest that scarred tail tissue should be included in the current tail surveillance program. Abstract Tail biting has been recognised as an intractable problem in pig production. This study aims to evaluate tail lesion occurrence in slaughtered pigs and explore the relationship between carcass condemnations and tail lesion considering different production systems and tail lengths and to evaluate the importance of creating a detailed tail score classification that includes scarred lesions. Data on a total of 9189 pigs from 73 batches with different tail lengths (undocked; docked mid-length; fully docked) and from distinct production systems (conventional; conventional antibiotic-free and organic) were collected at a Spanish abattoir. Batches with higher tail lesion scores presented a significantly higher chance of total condemnation and total condemnation due to pyaemia, being even more associated with scarring score. The within-batches probability for local condemnations and local condemnation due to abscesses increased significantly with higher scarring scores. Regarding tail length, docked at mid-length and undocked carcasses presented significantly higher odds to be condemned due to abscess. Organic farms showed a higher probability of total condemnations. This research highlights the importance of tail lesions on carcass condemnations that may also be influenced by docking and type of production. Results suggest that scarring score should be included in the tail surveillance program.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alice Gomes
- School of Agrarian and Veterinary Sciences (ECAV), University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal;
| | - Claudia Romeo
- Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy; (C.R.); (S.G.)
- Istituto Zooprofilattico Sperimentale Della Lombardia e dell’Emilia Romagna, Via Bianchi 9, 25124 Brescia, Italy
| | - Sergio Ghidini
- Department of Food and Drug, University of Parma, Via del Taglio 10, 43126 Parma, Italy; (C.R.); (S.G.)
| | - Madalena Vieira-Pinto
- Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- CECAV—Veterinary and Animal Research Centre, University of Trás-os-Montes and Alto Douro (UTAD), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Associate Laboratory for Animal and Veterinary Sciences (AL4AnimalS), 5001-801 Vila Real, Portugal
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kalies A, Baumgartner J, Beyerbach M, Stanojlovic M, Scholz T, Richter F, von Altrock A, Hennig-Pauka I. Interactive Rooting Towers and Behavioural Observations as Strategies to Reduce Tail Biting on Conventional Pig Fattening Farms. Animals (Basel) 2021; 11:ani11113025. [PMID: 34827758 PMCID: PMC8614303 DOI: 10.3390/ani11113025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/22/2021] [Revised: 09/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Eight pens (25 pigs/pen; n = 200) provided with an interactive straw-filled rooting tower (experimental group) and five pens (25 pigs/pen; n = 125) with a stationary (fixed) tower without straw (control group) were compared within three fattening periods on a conventional farm with fully slatted flooring. The effectiveness of the tower to trigger favourable behaviour in feeding and outside feeding periods was assessed. The incidence of deep tail injuries was lower in the experimental group (experimental group: Odds Ratio 0.3, p < 0.001) and was influenced by the batch (Odds Ratio: 2.38, p < 0.001) but not by pen and sex. In spring, most pens were excluded due to severe tail biting. Tail injury scores were more severe in the control group in weeks 5, 6 and 7 compared to the experimental group (p = 0.002, p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively). Tower manipulation was more frequent during feeding compared to outside feeding time (p = 0.002). More head than tail manipulation occurred in the experimental group (p = 0.03). The interactive tower as the only measure was not appropriate to reduce tail biting sufficiently in pigs with intact tails on a conventional fattening farm. Of high priority to prevent tail biting outbreaks was the early detection of biting pigs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Kalies
- Clinic for Swine, Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Johannes Baumgartner
- Institute of Animal Welfare Science, Department for Farm Animals and Veterinary Public Health, University of Veterinary Medicine Vienna, Veterinärplatz 1, 1210 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Martin Beyerbach
- Institute for Biometry, Epidemiology and Information Processing, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bünteweg 2, 30559 Hannover, Germany;
| | - Milos Stanojlovic
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany; (M.S.); (F.R.)
| | - Tobias Scholz
- Chamber of Agriculture of North Rhine-Westphalia, Haus Duesse 2, 59505 Bad Sassendorf, Germany;
| | - Franziska Richter
- Department of Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmacy, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Buenteweg 17, 30559 Hannover, Germany; (M.S.); (F.R.)
| | - Alexandra von Altrock
- Clinic for Swine, Small Ruminants, Forensic Medicine and Ambulatory Service, University of Veterinary Medicine Hannover, Foundation, Bischofsholer Damm 15, 30173 Hannover, Germany;
- Correspondence: (A.v.A.); (I.H.-P.); Tel.: +49-511-953-7833 (A.v.A.); +49-511-856-7260 (I.H.-P.)
| | - Isabel Hennig-Pauka
- Field Station for Epidemiology, University of Veterinary Medicine, Hannover, Foundation, Buescheler Straße 9, 49456 Bakum, Germany
- Correspondence: (A.v.A.); (I.H.-P.); Tel.: +49-511-953-7833 (A.v.A.); +49-511-856-7260 (I.H.-P.)
| |
Collapse
|