Atopic Dermatitis: Clinical Aspects and Unmet Needs

Head and neck dermatitis: a variant of atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis involves the head and neck area across all age groups. This manifestation is frequently referred to as "the head and neck dermatitis." Aside from a considerable deterioration of the quality of life, it poses a significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenge. The head and neck dermatitis may be mimicked by other inflammatory conditions such as seborrheic dermatitis or contact dermatitis. Furthermore, it can be associated with a wide range of infectious, ocular, psychiatric and hair disorders, which should raise clinical alertness and encourage a multidisciplinary management of the affected individuals. Skin lesions in the head and neck area are often difficult to treat, particularly because of a considerable exposure of this region to exacerbating factors and limitations regarding the use of some pharmaceuticals. Although several hypotheses explaining the recalcitrant course of head and neck dermatitis have been proposed, none of them provide successful solutions applicable in the daily clinical practice. This comprehensive review comprises the current insights on the pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and comorbidities of the head and neck dermatitis. Recommendations regarding possible treatments of this condition such as antifungals, as well as special considerations for the choice of biologics or JAK inhibitors in the candidates for systemic treatment are outlined.

An Overview of Atopic Dermatitis Disease Burden, Pathogenesis, and the Current Treatment Landscape: Recommendations for Appropriate Utilization of Systemic Therapies

Objective

To review the disease impact, immunopathogenesis, and treatment landscape of atopic dermatitis (AD), including recommendations for appropriate utilization of systemic treatments.

Methods

A PubMed search for relevant articles on AD and the treatment landscape was conducted using the key words "atopic dermatitis," "biologic," "therapeutic inertia," "Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor," and "systemic treatment."

Results

AD is a common, chronic inflammatory skin disease that can have a profound negative impact on quality of life. With recent advancements and approvals of systemic treatments, it is now possible to offer targeted therapy to patients with moderate-to-severe AD. When topical treatments are no longer sufficient for managing AD, recently published AD management guidelines recommend that providers consider/offer advanced systemic treatments.

Limitations

More data are needed on the use of systemic treatments in special populations, including head-to-head comparisons of available systemic treatments in these populations.

Conclusion

An increased awareness of the immunopathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment landscape of AD is needed amongst healthcare providers (HCPs). Special consideration of diagnosis and treatment options should be given to certain populations, including patients of different ages, those who may be pregnant or become pregnant, are biologic-experienced, and/or have comorbidities. Of note, HCPs should be aware of the clinical presentation in patients with skin of color. Therapeutic inertia can prevent HCPs from intensifying treatment when needed, and HCPs should know when it is appropriate to offer systemic treatments, including biologics and JAK inhibitors.

Unmet Needs of Effective Advanced Systemic Therapies in Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis Patients in the TARGET-DERM AD Registry

In the United States, 40-50% of patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) have moderate-to-severe disease, often necessitating advanced systemic therapies (ASTs; biologics or Janus kinase inhibitors). TARGET-DERM AD is an observational, longitudinal registry that tracks the natural history and treatment of AD, including patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Among enrollees, we defined 4 patient subgroups: AST-Naïve, AST-Retrospective (AST initiated prior to enrollment), AST-Prospective (AST initiated at or after enrollment), and AST-Failed (failed at any point). This analysis describes AST-patient demographics, treatment patterns, and longitudinal outcomes. Of 598 qualifying participants (22% adolescent, 78% adult), 34% were AST-Naive, 27% AST-Retrospective, 31% AST-Prospective, and 8% AST-Failed. Comparing the adult subgroups showed significant differences in enrollment age, and race/ethnicity, but not among adolescents. There was no significant difference in AST prescription rates. Literature-based validated thresholds were used to define unchanged or worsening for each outcome, which was combined into a single category, "lacked improvement." At 52 weeks of AST, AST-Prospective adolescents lacked improvement on Validated Investigator's Global Assessment of Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) (26%), body surface area (BSA) (34%), Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)-Pain (63%), and NRS-Sleep (52%); AST-Prospective adults lacked improvement on vIGA-AD (21%), BSA (51%), NRS-Pain (66%), and NRS-Sleep (60%). As one-third of participants did not progress to AST, and noteworthy proportions of patients lacked improvement, this study highlights unmet needs and treatment inadequacies in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Nemolizumab with concomitant topical therapy in adolescents and adults with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2): results from two replicate, double-blind, randomised controlled phase 3 trials

BACKGROUND

Nemolizumab, an interleukin (IL)-31 receptor subunit α antagonist, inhibits the IL-31 pathway of itch and skin inflammation in atopic dermatitis. Two international phase 3 studies were done to assess the efficacy and safety of nemolizumab in atopic dermatitis. In this Article we report results for the 16-week initial treatment period of both trials.

METHODS

ARCADIA 1 and ARCADIA 2 were identical 48-week randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 trials in adult and adolescent participants (aged ≥12 years) with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis, associated pruritus, and inadequate response to topical steroids. Participants were enrolled from 281 clinics, hospitals, and academic centres in 22 countries across both trials, and were randomly assigned (2:1) to receive nemolizumab 30 mg subcutaneously (baseline loading dose 60 mg) or matching placebo once every 4 weeks with background topical corticosteroids (TCS) with or without topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI; ie, TCS-TCI background treatment). Randomisation was done via interactive response technology and stratified by baseline disease and pruritus severity. Study staff and participants were masked throughout the study, with outcome assessors masked until database lock. Coprimary endpoints at week 16 post-baseline were Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) success (score of 0 [clear skin] or 1 [almost clear skin] with a ≥2-point improvement from baseline) and at least 75% improvement in Eczema Area and Severity Index score from baseline (EASI-75 response). Outcome rates were compared between groups with the Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test adjusting for randomisation strata. The key secondary endpoints were the proportion of participants with Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) score improvement of at least 4 points at weeks 1, 2, 4, and 16; PP-NRS score below 2 at weeks 4 and 16; Sleep Disturbance Numerical Rating Scale score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; EASI-75 response plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16; and IGA success plus PP-NRS score improvement of at least 4 points at week 16. Efficacy analyses were done on an intention-to-treat basis; safety analyses included all participants who received one dose of nemolizumab or placebo. Both studies are completed (ClinicalTrials.gov: ARCADIA 1, NCT03985943 and ARCADIA 2, NCT03989349).

FINDINGS

Between Aug 9, 2019, and Nov 2, 2022, 1728 participants were enrolled across both trials: 1142 were allocated to nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI (620 in ARCADIA 1 and 522 in ARCADIA 2) and 586 to placebo plus TCS-TCI (321 in ARCADIA 1 and 265 in ARCADIA 2). ARCADIA 1 included 500 (53%) male participants and 441 (47%) female participants, and ARCADIA 2 included 381 (48%) male participants and 406 (52%) female participants. Mean age ranged from 33·3 (SD 15·6) years to 35·2 (17·0) years across the treatment groups. Both trials met the coprimary endpoints; at week 16, a greater proportion of participants receiving nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI versus placebo plus TCS-TCI had IGA success (ARCADIA 1: 221 [36%] of 620 vs 79 [25%] of 321, adjusted percentage difference 11·5% [97·5% CI 4·7-18·3], p=0·0003; ARCADIA 2: 197 [38%] of 522 vs 69 [26%] of 265, adjusted difference 12·2% [4·6-19·8], p=0·0006) and an EASI-75 response (ARCADIA 1: 270 [44%] vs 93 [29%], adjusted difference 14·9% [7·8-22·0], p<0·0001; ARCADIA 2: 220 [42%] vs 80 [30%], adjusted difference 12·5% [4·6-20·3], p=0·0006). Significant benefits were observed with nemolizumab for all key secondary endpoints including improvement in itch, as early as week 1, and sleep improvement by week 16. The safety profile was similar between nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI and placebo plus TCS-TCI. In the safety sets, 306 (50%) of 616 participants (ARCADIA 1) and 215 (41%) of 519 participants (ARCADIA 2) who received nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in six [1%] and 13 [3%], respectively); and 146 (45%) of 321 (ARCADIA 1) and 117 (44%) of 263 (ARCADIA 2) who received placebo plus TCS-TCI had at least one treatment-emergent adverse event (serious treatment-emergent adverse events in four [1%] and three [1%], respectively). Ten serious treatment-emergent adverse events possibly related to nemolizumab were reported in five (1%) participants in ARCADIA 2. No deaths occurred.

INTERPRETATION

Nemolizumab plus TCS-TCI was efficacious and showed statistically and clinically significant improvements in inflammation and itch in adults and adolescents with moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis. Nemolizumab might offer a valuable extension of current therapies if approved.

FUNDING

Galderma.

Italian healthcare resource consumptions and direct costs of adults with atopic dermatitis before and after dupilumab treatment

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease, associated with comorbidities, and high healthcare consumptions and costs. This study assessed the burden before and after treatment with dupilumab in adults with severe AD from 2018 to 2020, from the perspective of the Italian National Health Service (SSN).

METHODS

From Fondazione Ricerca e Salute's administrative healthcare database (~5 million inhabitants/year), adults treated with dupilumab from 09/01/2018 to 31/12/2020 (index date) and a five-year lookback were identified. Age, sex and comorbidities at baseline, concomitant drugs, overnight hospitalizations, outpatient specialist services and direct costs charged to the SSN one year before/after index date were assessed.

RESULTS

Of 337 adults treated with dupilumab (5.8x100,000 adult inhabitants/2019; 8.0x100,000/2020; 55% males; mean age 43±19), 68% (228/337) had ≥12-month follow-up available. Asthma was a common comorbidity (23% patients). Rates of patients treated with nearly all concomitant AD-related therapies reduced from 12 months before to 12 months after dupilumab treatment: antibacterials (from 59% to 50%), systemic corticosteroids (55% to 29%), antihistamines (54% to 38%) and cyclosporine (52% to 7%). A similar trend was observed among patients with asthma as comorbidity. Within 12 months before/after dupilumab, patients hospitalized halved from 14% to 7%, and patients receiving outpatient specialist care reduced from 72% to 65%. Annual mean direct total costs per patient treated with dupilumab charged to the SSN, net of dupilumab cost, were €1384 and €773, before and after dupilumab dispensation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Before dupilumab, observed patients had higher healthcare resource consumptions and direct SSN costs than after dupilumab.

Pharmacological Trends in the Management of Atopic Dermatitis: A Comprehensive Review

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a prevalent, chronic inflammatory skin condition characterized by pruritus, erythema, and impaired skin barrier function. AD management presents significant challenges due to its complex pathophysiology involving immune dysregulation and genetic predispositions. While traditional therapies, such as topical corticosteroids and emollients, remain foundational, their limitations have spurred the development of novel pharmacological approaches. This comprehensive review explores current pharmacological trends in the management of AD, focusing on emerging therapies that target specific immunological pathways. Biologic agents, including monoclonal antibodies against interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, and IL-31 receptors, offer targeted mechanisms to modulate immune responses implicated in AD pathogenesis. Janus kinase (JAK) and phosphodiesterase-4 (PDE-4) inhibitors represent another class of promising therapies, providing alternatives for patients resistant to conventional treatments. The review synthesizes evidence from clinical trials and studies to evaluate these pharmacological agents' efficacy and safety profiles. Considerations for personalized medicine approaches, including biomarkers for treatment response prediction and genotype-based therapies, are discussed to highlight the potential for tailored treatment strategies in AD management. In conclusion, this review underscores the evolving landscape of pharmacological interventions for AD, emphasizing the need for continued research to address unmet clinical needs and optimize patient outcomes. By delineating current advancements and future directions, this review aims to inform clinical practice and guide future research endeavours in dermatology.

Unmet needs in treating itch: reaching beyond eczema

PURPOSE

Pruritus is an unpleasant sensation that creates the urge to scratch. In many chronic conditions, relentless pruritus and scratching perpetuates a vicious itch-scratch cycle. Uncontrolled itch can detrimentally affect quality of life and may lead to sleep disturbance, impaired concentration, financial burden, and psychological suffering. Recent strides have been made to develop guidelines and investigate new therapies to treat some of the most common severely pruritic conditions, however, a large group of diseases remains underrecognized and undertreated. The purpose of this article is to provide a comprehensive review of the challenges hindering the treatment of pruritus.

METHODS

An online search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov from 1994 to 2024. Included studies were summarized and assessed for quality and relevance in treating pruritus.

RESULTS

Several barriers to treating pruritus emerged, including variable presentation, objective measurement of itch, and identifying therapeutic targets. Itch associated with autoimmune conditions, connective tissue diseases, genodermatoses, cutaneous T-cell lymphoma, and pruritus of unknown origin were among the etiologies with the greatest unmet needs.

CONCLUSION

Treating pruritus poses many challenges and there are many itchy conditions that have no yet been addressed. There is an urgent need for large-scale controlled studies to investigate potential targets for these conditions and novel therapies.

A Multidisciplinary Approach Is Beneficial in Atopic Dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a highly heterogeneous chronic inflammatory skin disorder that is frequently associated with a plethora of comorbidities. AD is, therefore, considered a systemic disease impacted by a considerable burden and leading to poor quality of life, especially in patients with moderate-to-severe disease. Since atopic and non-atopic comorbidities can further worsen the disease course, accurate establishment of the patient's individual intrinsic risk profile and needs is crucial and may help in guiding the selection of the best treatment option. Better quality of care for patients with AD can be delivered through a multidisciplinary team led by a dermatologist, for comprehensive patient management. The implementation of a multidisciplinary approach for AD could enhance the delivery of optimised and safe treatments, improve the standard of care and patient outcomes in the short and long term, and prevent or delay the lifelong impact of uncontrolled AD. Understanding the unmet needs, assessing correctly the patient risk profile and enhancing the shared patient-physician decision-making process can lead to disease control and quality-of-life improvement, especially in the context of the introduction of newer treatment for AD. This narrative review is a call for more data to establish standardised patient profiles and multidisciplinary strategies in AD management. In view on the fast-evolving treatments for AD, this review aims at highlighting the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to a comprehensive assessment and holistic care in patients with moderate-to-severe AD.

Burden of Disease in the Real-Life Setting of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis: Italian Data From the MEASURE-AD Study

INTRODUCTION

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively impacts the quality of life and work productivity of patients.

OBJECTIVES

We sought to evaluate the real-world burden of AD patients in Italy.

METHODS

This sub-analysis of the MEASURE-AD multicountry study conducted between December 2019-2020 included patients diagnosed with moderate-to-severe AD eligible for or receiving systemic therapy in the previous 6 months. During a single visit, physician and patient-reported questionnaires were used.

RESULTS

A total of 118 adult patients were enrolled and 57.6% (N = 68) of patients had moderate-to-severe AD at the time of enrolment according to the Eczema Area and Severity Index. Sleep disorders interfered with daily function in the previous week in 58.5% (N = 69) of patients, pruritus was severe in 50% (N = 59) and 42.4% (N = 50) reported a flare lasting >7 days in the previous 6 months. According to the Dermatology Quality of Life Index, 37.3% (N = 44) of patients reported a severe impact of AD and approximately 10% had clinical depression/anxiety. Current drug therapy was considered inadequate in controlling AD in 26.3% (N=31) of patients. Work activity impairment was 38.6±31.7% and monthly AD-related expenses were 148.6±134.6 Euros per patient.

CONCLUSIONS

This real-life study documents a high burden of disease in patients with moderate-severe AD in Italy.

MrgprA3+ Primary Sensory Neurons Mediate Acute Allergic Itch Responses in Atopic Dermatitis Model Mice

Itch is a prominent symptom of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, the underlying mechanism remains complex and has not yet been fully elucidated. Mas-related G protein-coupled receptor A3 (MrgprA3) has emerged attention as a marker of primary sensory neurons that specifically transmit itch signals; however, its involvement in AD-related itch has not been extensively explored. In this study, we developed an AD itch mouse model by repeatedly applying house dust mite (HDM) extract to barrier-impaired skin via a special diet. To clarify the role of MrgprA3+ neurons in itch behavior in our AD model, we adopted a toxin receptor-mediated cell knockout strategy using transgenic mice in which the diphtheria toxin receptor (DTR) gene was placed under the control of the Mrgpra3 promoter. When the HDM extract was repeatedly applied to the face and back skin of special diet-fed mice, the mice exhibited AD-like dry and eczematous skin lesions accompanied by three types of itch-related behaviors:1) spontaneous scratching, 2) acute scratching after antigen challenge, and 3) light touch-evoked scratching. Upon diphtheria toxin administration, substantial depletion of DTR+/MrgprA3+ neurons was observed in the dorsal root ganglion. Ablation of MrgprA3+ neurons suppressed acute itch responses after HDM application, whereas spontaneous and touch-evoked itch behaviors remained unaffected. Our findings unequivocally demonstrate that in our AD model, MrgprA3+ primary sensory neurons mediate acute allergic itch responses, whereas these neurons are not involved in spontaneous itch or alloknesis.

Probiotics and Prebiotics Orally Assumed as Disease Modifiers for Stable Mild Atopic Dermatitis: An Italian Real-Life, Multicenter, Retrospective, Observational Study

The role of the skin-gut axis in atopic dermatitis (AD) remains a subject of debate, limiting non-pharmacological interventions such as probiotics and prebiotics. To improve understanding of their potential as a monotherapy for stable mild cases, we conducted a real-life, multicenter, retrospective observational study in Italy. We administered three selected bacteria (Bifidobacterium animalis subsp. lactis BS01, Lactiplantibacillus plantarum LP14, and Lacticaseibacillus rhamnosus LR05) orally to patients with mild atopic dermatitis without a placebo control group, following up for 12 weeks. Clinical assessments using the Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), and Three-Item Severity (TIS) score were conducted on 144 enrolled patients (average age: 25.1 ± 17.6 years). Notably, both pruritus and AD-related lesions (erythema, edema/papules, excoriation) exhibited significant clinical and statistical improvement (p < 0.001) after 12 weeks of exclusive probiotic and prebiotic use. These preliminary results suggest a potential link between the skin-gut microbiome and support the rationale for using specific probiotics and prebiotics in mild AD, even for maintenance, to reduce flares and dysbiosis.

How to Understand Personalized Medicine in Atopic Dermatitis Nowadays?

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a heterogeneous disease in terms of its phenotypical, barrier, and immunological presentation. Emerging therapies are undoubtedly contributing to a new chapter in the treatment of AD, bringing an excellent possibility of individualization, and thereby creating a tailored approach. The two most promising substance groups are biological drugs (dupilumab, tralokinumab, lebrikizumab, nemolizumab) and Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKis) (baricitinib, upadacitinib, and abrocitinib). The vision that certain well-defined phenotypes and endotypes, as well as personal preferences, may guide the future treatment of AD is both tempting and appealing, but not yet reality. The accessibility of new drugs such as biologics and small molecules has opened up the discussion regarding personalized medicine, referring to the complex nature of AD as well as the experiences from clinical trials and real-world evidence. We have now reached the point of creating new strategies and AD treatment goals by increasing the amount of new information concerning the efficacy and safety of new drugs. This article has reviewed the novel treatment options for AD in the light of the heterogeneity of this disease and proposes a broader vision on the strategy of personalized treatment of AD.

Multiplex Proteomic Evaluation in Inborn Errors with Deregulated IgE Response

(1) Background: Atopic dermatitis constitutes one of the most common inflammatory skin manifestations of the pediatric population. The onset of many inborn errors occurs early in life with an AD-like picture associated with a deregulated IgE response. The availability of proteomic tests for the simultaneous evaluation of hundreds of molecules allows for more precise diagnosis in these cases. (2) Methods: Comparative genomic hybridization microarray (Array-CGH) analysis and specific IgE evaluation by using allergenic microarray (ISAC) and microarray (ALEX2) systems were performed. (3) Results: Proteomic investigations that use multiplex methods have proven to be extremely useful to diagnose the sensitization profile in inborn errors with deregulated IgE synthesis. Four patients with rare diseases, such as recessive X-linked ichthyosis (RXLI, OMIM 308100), Comel-Netherton syndrome (NS, OMIM256500), monosomy 1p36 syndrome (OMIM: 607872), and a microduplication of Xp11.4 associated with extremely high levels of IgE: 7.710 kU/L, 5.300 kU/L, 1.826 kU/L, and 10.430 kU/L, respectively, were evaluated by micro- and macroarray multiplex methods. Polyreactivity to both environmental and food allergens was observed in all cases, including the first described case of association of X-chromosome microduplication and HIE. (4) Conclusions: Extensive use of proteomic diagnostics should be included among the procedures to be implemented in inborn errors with hyper-IgE.