Diagnosis and Prognosis of COVID-19 Disease Using Routine Blood Values and LogNNet Neural Network

The mean corpuscular volume (MCV) is a hematological biomarker associated with COVID-19 mortality risk

AIM

This study aimed to investigate the role of mean corpuscular volume (MCV) as a predictor of mortality due to COVID-19.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective, single-center, and longitudinal study included 122 patients with COVID-19.

RESULTS

Compared to the survivor's group, the non-survivors had higher MCV (92.13 ± 3.67 fL), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio [NLR] (16.99 [21.31]), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio [PLR] (350.33 [304.68]), and systemic immune-inflammation index [SII] (3684.92 [4073.25]) levels (p < 0.05 for all). The optimal cutoff values for predicting in-hospital COVID-19 mortality, determined by the Youden index, indicated that patients with MCV > 89 fL, NLR > 8.69, PLR > 418.08, or SII > 2149.36 were at a higher risk of death due to SARS-CoV-2 infection. The area under the curves (AUC) of NLR, SII, MCV, and PLR was sufficient for accurate prediction. COVID-19 patients with MCV > 89 fL and PLR > 418.08 were 3.65 (95% CI 1.03-12.87; p = 0.043) and 5.08 (95% CI 1.06-24.22; p = 0.041) times more likely to die than those without these values, respectively. MCV was positively correlated with age, mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH), urea, blood urea nitrogen (BUN), and creatinine.

CONCLUSION

MCV > 89 fL and PLR > 418.08 at the time of hospital admission were associated with an increased COVID-19 mortality risk.

Single Cell Transcriptomics Genomics Based on Machine Learning Algorithm: Constructing and Validating Neutrophil Extracellular Trap Gene Model in COPD

Background

Neutrophil trap (NET) is an important feature of chronic inflammatory diseases. At present, there are still few studies to explore the characteristics of NET in different chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. This study aimed to identify NET signature genes in different COPD patients.

Methods

We analyzed single-cell RNA sequencing data from COPD and non-COPD individuals to identify differentially expressed neutrophil genes. Machine learning algorithms were applied to construct models A and B, specific to smoking and non-smoking COPD patients, respectively.

Results

Through single-cell cluster analysis, 165 neutrophil characteristic genes in COPD group were successfully identified. Model A, consisting of key genes CD63, RNASE2, ERAP2, and model B, consisting of GRIPAP1, NHS, EGFLAM, and GLUL, were validated internally and externally, showing significant risk scores and good diagnostic efficacy (AUC: 60.24-87.22). Alveolar lavage fluid in patients with COPD was studied and confirmed higher expression levels of RNASE2 and NHS in severe COPD patients.

Conclusion

The study successfully developed NET signature gene models for identifying smoking and non-smoking COPD respectively, with validated specificity and predictive power, offering a foundation for personalized treatment strategies.

A multicenter study on developing a prognostic model for severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome using machine learning

Background

Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome (SFTS) is a disease caused by infection with the Severe Fever with Thrombocytopenia Syndrome virus (SFTSV), a novel Bunyavirus. Accurate prognostic assessment is crucial for developing individualized prevention and treatment strategies. However, machine learning prognostic models for SFTS are rare and need further improvement and clinical validation.

Objective

This study aims to develop and validate an interpretable prognostic model based on machine learning (ML) methods to enhance the understanding of SFTS progression.

Methods

This multicenter retrospective study analyzed patient data from two provinces in China. The derivation cohort included 292 patients treated at The Second Hospital of Nanjing from January 2022 to December 2023, with a 7:3 split for model training and internal validation. The external validation cohort consisted of 104 patients from The First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College during the same period. Twenty-four commonly available clinical features were selected, and the Boruta algorithm identified 12 candidate predictors, ranked by Z-scores, which were progressively incorporated into 10 machine learning models to develop prognostic models. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver-operating-characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, recall, and F1 score. The clinical utility of the best-performing model was evaluated through decision curve analysis (DCA) based on net benefit. Robustness was tested with 10-fold cross-validation, and feature importance was explained using SHapley Additive exPlanation (SHAP) both globally and locally.

Results

Among the 10 machine learning models, the XGBoost model demonstrated the best overall discriminatory ability. Considering both AUC index and feature simplicity, a final interpretable XGBoost model with 7 key features was constructed. The model showed high predictive accuracy for patient outcomes in both internal (AUC = 0.911, 95% CI: 0.842-0.967) and external validations (AUC = 0.891, 95% CI: 0.786-0.977). A clinical tool based on this model has been developed and implemented using the Streamlit framework.

Conclusion

The interpretable XGBoost-based prognostic model for SFTS shows high predictive accuracy and has been translated into a clinical tool. The model's 7 key features serve as valuable indicators for early prognosis of SFTS, warranting close attention from healthcare professionals in clinical practice.

The external validity of machine learning-based prediction scores from hematological parameters of COVID-19: A study using hospital records from Brazil, Italy, and Western Europe

The unprecedented worldwide pandemic caused by COVID-19 has motivated several research groups to develop machine-learning based approaches that aim to automate the diagnosis or screening of COVID-19, in large-scale. The gold standard for COVID-19 detection, quantitative-Real-Time-Polymerase-Chain-Reaction (qRT-PCR), is expensive and time-consuming. Alternatively, haematology-based detections were fast and near-accurate, although those were less explored. The external-validity of the haematology-based COVID-19-predictions on diverse populations are yet to be fully investigated. Here we report external-validity of machine learning-based prediction scores from haematological parameters recorded in different hospitals of Brazil, Italy, and Western Europe (raw sample size, 195554). The XGBoost classifier performed consistently better (out of seven ML classifiers) on all the datasets. The working models include a set of either four or fourteen haematological parameters. The internal performances of the XGBoost models (AUC scores range from 84% to 97%) were superior to ML models reported in the literature for some of these datasets (AUC scores range from 84% to 87%). The meta-validation on the external performances revealed the reliability of the performance (AUC score 86%) along with good accuracy of the probabilistic prediction (Brier score 14%), particularly when the model was trained and tested on fourteen haematological parameters from the same country (Brazil). The external performance was reduced when the model was trained on datasets from Italy and tested on Brazil (AUC score 69%) and Western Europe (AUC score 65%); presumably affected by factors, like, ethnicity, phenotype, immunity, reference ranges, across the populations. The state-of-the-art in the present study is the development of a COVID-19 prediction tool that is reliable and parsimonious, using a fewer number of hematological features, in comparison to the earlier study with meta-validation, based on sufficient sample size (n = 195554). Thus, current models can be applied at other demographic locations, preferably, with prior training of the model on the same population. Availability: https://covipred.bits-hyderabad.ac.in/home; https://github.com/debashreebanerjee/CoviPred.

Machine learning approaches to predict the need for intensive care unit admission among Iranian COVID-19 patients based on ICD-10: A cross-sectional study

Background & Aim

Timely identification of the patients requiring intensive care unit admission (ICU) could be life-saving. We aimed to compare different machine learning algorithms to predict the requirements for ICU admission in COVID-19 patients.

Methods

We screened all patients with COVID-19 at six academic hospitals in Tehran comprising our study population. A total of 44,112 COVID-19 patients (≥18 years old) were included, among which 7722 patients were hospitalized. We used a Random Forest algorithm to select significant variables. Then, prediction models were developed using the Support Vector Machine, Naıve Bayes, logistic regression, lightGBM, decision tree, and K-Nearest Neighbor algorithms. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, F1 score, and receiver operating characteristic-Area Under the Curve (AUC) were used to compare the prediction performance of different models.

Results

Based on random Forest, the following predictors were selected: age, cardiac disease, cough, hypertension, diabetes, influenza & pneumonia, malignancy, and nervous system disease. Age was found to have the strongest association with ICU admission among COVID-19 patients. All six models achieved an AUC greater than 0.60. Naıve Bayes achieved the best predictive performance (AUC = 0.71).

Conclusion

Naïve Bayes and lightGBM demonstrated promising results in predicting ICU admission needs in COVID-19 patients. Machine learning models could help quickly identify high-risk patients upon entry and reduce mortality and morbidity among COVID-19 patients.

A stochastic scale conjugate neural network procedure for the SIRC epidemic delay differential system

In this study, a stochastic computing structure is provided for the numerical solutions of the SIRC epidemic delay differential model, i.e. SIRC-EDDM using the dynamics of the COVID-19. The design of the scale conjugate gradient (CG) neural networks (SCGNNs) is presented for the numerical treatment of SIRC-EDDM. The mathematical model is divided into susceptible S ( ρ ) , recovered R ( ρ ) , infected I ( ρ ) , and cross-immune C ( ρ ) , while the numerical performances have been provided into three different cases. The exactitude of the SCGNNs is perceived through the comparison of the accomplished and reference outcomes (Runge-Kutta scheme) and the negligible absolute error (AE) that are performed around 10-06 to 10-08 for each case of the SIRC-EDDM. The obtained results have been presented to reduce the mean square error (MSE) using the performances of train, validation, and test data. The neuron analysis is also performed that shows the AE by taking 14 neurons provide more accurateness as compared to 4 numbers of neurons. To check the proficiency of SCGNNs, the comprehensive studies are accessible using the error histograms (EHs) investigations, state transitions (STs) values, MSE performances, regression measures, and correlation.

Presepsin as a prognostic biomarker in COVID-19 patients: combining clinical scoring systems and laboratory inflammatory markers for outcome prediction

BACKGROUND

There is still limited research on the prognostic value of Presepsin as a biomarker for predicting the outcome of COVID-19 patients. Additionally, research on the combined predictive value of Presepsin with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers for disease prognosis is lacking.

METHODS

A total of 226 COVID-19 patients admitted to Beijing Youan Hospital's emergency department from May to November 2022 were screened. Demographic information, laboratory measurements, and blood samples for Presepsin levels were collected upon admission. The predictive value of Presepsin, clinical scoring systems, and inflammation markers for 28-day mortality was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 190 patients were analyzed, 83 (43.7%) were mild, 61 (32.1%) were moderate, and 46 (24.2%) were severe/critically ill. 23 (12.1%) patients died within 28 days. The Presepsin levels in severe/critical patients were significantly higher compared to moderate and mild patients (p < 0.001). Presepsin showed significant predictive value for 28-day mortality in COVID-19 patients, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.828 (95% CI: 0.737-0.920). Clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers also played a significant role in predicting 28-day outcomes. After Cox regression adjustment, Presepsin, qSOFA, NEWS2, PSI, CURB-65, CRP, NLR, CAR, and LCR were identified as independent predictors of 28-day mortality in COVID-19 patients (all p-values < 0.05). Combining Presepsin with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers further enhanced the predictive value for patient prognosis.

CONCLUSION

Presepsin is a favorable indicator for the prognosis of COVID-19 patients, and its combination with clinical scoring systems and inflammation markers improved prognostic assessment.

Development of Biomarkers and Prognosis Model of Mortality Risk in Patients with COVID-19

Background

As of 30 April 2023, the COVID-19 pandemic has resulted in over 6.9 million deaths worldwide. The virus continues to spread and mutate, leading to continuously evolving pathological and physiological processes. It is imperative to reevaluate predictive factors for identifying the risk of early disease progression.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on a cohort of 1379 COVID-19 patients who were discharged from Xin Hua Hospital affiliated with Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine between 15 December 2022 and 15 February 2023. Patient symptoms, comorbidities, demographics, vital signs, and laboratory test results were systematically documented. The dataset was split into testing and training sets, and 15 different machine learning algorithms were employed to construct prediction models. These models were assessed for accuracy and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), and the best-performing model was selected for further analysis.

Results

AUROC for models generated by 15 machine learning algorithms all exceeded 90%, and the accuracy of 10 of them also surpassed 90%. Light Gradient Boosting model emerged as the optimal choice, with accuracy of 0.928 ± 0.0006 and an AUROC of 0.976 ± 0.0028. Notably, the factors with the greatest impact on in-hospital mortality were growth stimulation expressed gene 2 (ST2,19.3%), interleukin-8 (IL-8,17.2%), interleukin-6 (IL-6,6.4%), age (6.1%), NT-proBNP (5.1%), interleukin-2 receptor (IL-2R, 5%), troponin I (TNI,4.6%), congestive heart failure (3.3%) in Light Gradient Boosting model.

Conclusion

ST-2, IL-8, IL-6, NT-proBNP, IL-2R, TNI, age and congestive heart failure were significant predictors of in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 patients.

Association of Coagulopathy and Inflammatory Biomarkers with Severity in SARS-CoV-2-Infected Individuals of the Al-Qunfudhah Region of Saudi Arabia

BACKGROUND

Identifying prognosticators/predictors of COVID-19 severity is the principal focus for early prediction and effective management of the disease in a time-bound and cost-effective manner. We aimed to evaluate COVID-19 severity-dependent alteration in inflammatory and coagulopathy biomarkers.

METHODS

A hospital-dependent retrospective observational study (total: n = 377; male, n = 213; and female, n = 164 participants) was undertaken. COVID-19 exposure was assessed by performing real-time PCR on nasopharyngeal (NP) swabs. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied for both continuous and categorical variables using Rstudio-version-4.0.2. Pearson correlation and regression were executed with a cut-off of p < 0.05 for evaluating significance. Data representation by R-packages and ggplot2.

RESULTS

A significant variation in the mean ± SD (highly-sever (HS)/moderately severe (MS)) of CRP (HS/MS: 102.4 ± 22.9/21.3 ± 6.9, p-value < 0.001), D-dimer (HS/MS: 661.1 ± 80.6/348.7 ± 42.9, p-value < 0.001), and ferritin (HS/MS: 875.8 ± 126.8/593.4 ± 67.3, p-value < 0.001) were observed. Thrombocytopenia, high PT, and PTT exhibited an association with the HS individuals (p < 0.001). CRP was correlated with neutrophil (r = 0.77), ferritin (r = 0.74), and WBC (r = 0.8). D-dimer correlated with platelets (r = -0.82), PT (r = 0.22), and PTT (r = 0.37). The adjusted odds ratios (Ad-OR) of CRP, ferritin, D-dimer, platelet, PT, and PTT for HS compared to MS were 1.30 (95% CI -1.137, 1.50; p < 0.001), 1.048 (95% CI -1.03, 1.066; p < 0.001), 1.3 (95% CI -1.24, 1.49, p > 0.05), -0.813 (95% CI -0.734, 0.899, p < 0.001), 1.347 (95% CI -1.15, 1.57, p < 0.001), and 1.234 (95% CI -1.16, 1.314, p < 0.001), respectively.

CONCLUSION

SARS-CoV-2 caused alterations in vital laboratory parameters and raised ferritin, CRP, and D-dimer presented an association with disease severity at a significant level.

Developing an interpretable machine learning model for predicting COVID-19 patients deteriorating prior to intensive care unit admission using laboratory markers

Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) remains a significant global health challenge, prompting a transition from emergency response to comprehensive management strategies. Furthermore, the emergence of new variants of concern, such as BA.2.286, underscores the need for early detection and response to new variants, which continues to be a crucial strategy for mitigating the impact of COVID-19, especially among the vulnerable population. This study aims to anticipate patients requiring intensive care or facing elevated mortality risk throughout their COVID-19 infection while also identifying laboratory predictive markers for early diagnosis of patients. Therefore, haematological, biochemical, and demographic variables were retrospectively evaluated in 8,844 blood samples obtained from 2,935 patients before intensive care unit admission using an interpretable machine learning model. Feature selection techniques were applied using precision-recall measures to address data imbalance and evaluate the suitability of the different variables. The model was trained using stratified cross-validation with k=5 and internally validated, achieving an accuracy of 77.27%, sensitivity of 78.55%, and area under the receiver operating characteristic (AUC) of 0.85; successfully identifying patients at increased risk of severe progression. From a medical perspective, the most important features of the progression or severity of patients with COVID-19 were lactate dehydrogenase, age, red blood cell distribution standard deviation, neutrophils, and platelets, which align with findings from several prior investigations. In light of these insights, diagnostic processes can be significantly expedited through the use of laboratory tests, with a greater focus on key indicators. This strategic approach not only improves diagnostic efficiency but also extends its reach to a broader spectrum of patients. In addition, it allows healthcare professionals to take early preventive measures for those most at risk of adverse outcomes, thereby optimising patient care and prognosis.

A Novel COVID-19 Diagnosis Approach Utilizing a Comprehensive Set of Diagnostic Information (CSDI)

The aim of the study was to develop a computerized method for distinguishing COVID-19-affected cases from cases of pneumonia. This task continues to be a real challenge in the practice of diagnosing COVID-19 disease. In the study, a new approach was proposed, using a comprehensive set of diagnostic information (CSDI) including, among other things, medical history, demographic data, signs and symptoms of the disease, and laboratory results. These data have the advantage of being much more reliable compared with data based on a single source of information, such as radiological imaging. On this basis, a comprehensive process of building predictive models was carried out, including such steps as data preprocessing, feature selection, training, and evaluation of classification models. During the study, 9 different methods for feature selection were used, while the grid search method and 12 popular classification algorithms were employed to build classification models. The most effective model achieved a classification accuracy (ACC) of 85%, a sensitivity (TPR) equal to 83%, and a specificity (TNR) of 88%. The model was built using the random forest method with 15 features selected using the recursive feature elimination selection method. The results provide an opportunity to build a computer system to assist the physician in the diagnosis of the COVID-19 disease.

Hemoglobin and Its Z Score Reference Intervals in Febrile Children: A Cohort Study of 98,572 Febrile Children

OBJECTIVES

Febrile disease and age of children were associated with a variation in hemoglobin (Hb) level. Both CRP and Hb serve as laboratory markers that offer valuable insights into a patient's health, particularly in relation to inflammation and specific medical conditions. Although a direct correlation between CRP and Hb levels is not established, the relationship between these markers has garnered academic attention and investigation. This study aimed to determine updated reference ranges for Hb levels for age and investigated its correlation with CRP in febrile children under the age of 18.

METHODS

This is a cohort study of in Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals conducted from January 2010 to December 2019. Blood samples were collected from 98,572 febrile children who were or had been admitted in the pediatric emergency department. The parameters of individuals were presented as the mean ± standard deviation or 2.5th and 97.5th percentiles. We also determined the variation of Hb and Z score of Hb between CRP levels in febrile children.

RESULT

We observed that the Hb levels were the highest immediately after birth and subsequently underwent a rapid decline, reaching their lowest point at around 1-2 months of age, and followed by a steady increment in Hb levels throughout childhood and adolescence. In addition, there was a significant and wide variation in Hb levels during the infant period. It revealed a significant association between higher CRP levels and lower Hb levels or a more negative Z score of Hb across all age subgroups. Moreover, in patients with bacteremia, CRP levels were higher, Hb concentrations were lower, and Z scores of Hb were also lower compared to the non-bacteremia group. Furthermore, the bacteremia group exhibited a more substantial negative correlation between CRP levels and a Z score of Hb (r = -0.41, p < 0.001) compared to the non-bacteremia group (r = -0.115, p < 0.049).

CONCLUSION

The study findings revealed that the Hb references varied depending on the age of the children and their CRP levels. In addition, we established new reference values for Hb and its Z scores and explore their relationship with CRP. It provides valuable insights into the Hb status and its potential association with inflammation in febrile pediatric patients.

Artificial Neural Networks for IoT-Enabled Smart Applications: Recent Trends

In the age of neural networks and the Internet of Things (IoT), the search for new neural network architectures capable of operating on devices with limited computing power and small memory size is becoming an urgent agenda [...].

Prognostic Value of C-Reactive Protein in SARS-CoV-2 Infection: A Simplified Biomarker of COVID-19 Severity in Northern Ethiopia

Purpose

To evaluate the role of C-reactive protein (CRP) in predicting severe COVID-19 patients.

Methods

A prospective observational cohort study was conducted from July 15 to October 28, 2020, at Kuyha COVID-19 isolation and treatment center hospital, Mekelle City, Northern Ethiopia. A total of 670 blood samples were collected serially. SARS-CoV-2 infection was confirmed by RT-PCR from nasopharyngeal swabs and CRP concentration was determined using Cobas Integra 400 Plus (Roche). Data were analyzed using STATA version 14. P-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Overall, COVID-19 patients had significantly elevated CRP at baseline when compared to PCR-negative controls [median 11.1 (IQR: 2.0-127.8) mg/L vs 0.9 (IQR: 0.5-1.9) mg/L; p=0.0004)]. Those with severe COVID-19 clinical presentation had significantly higher median CRP levels compared to those with non-severe cases [166.1 (IQR: 48.6-332.5) mg/L vs 2.4 (IQR: 1.2-7.6) mg/L; p<0.00001)]. Moreover, COVID-19 patients exhibited higher median CRP levels at baseline [58 (IQR: 2.0-127.8) mg/L] that decreased significantly to 2.4 (IQR: 1.4-3.9) mg/L after 40 days after symptom onset (p<0.0001). Performance of CRP levels determined using ROC analysis distinguished severe from non-severe COVID-19 patients, with an AUC value of 0.83 (95% CI: 0.73-0.91; p=0.001; 77.4% sensitivity and 89.4% specificity). In multivariable analysis, CRP levels above 30 mg/L were significantly associated with an increased risk of developing severe COVID-19 for those who have higher ages and comorbidities (ARR 3.99, 95% CI: 1.35-11.82; p=0.013).

Conclusion

CRP was found to be an independent determinant factor for severe COVID-19 patients. Therefore, CRP levels in COVID-19 patients in African settings may provide a simple, prompt, and inexpensive assessment of the severity status at baseline and monitoring of treatment outcomes.

Common Prognostic Biomarkers and Outcomes in Patients with COVID-19 Infection in Saudi Arabia

Background: COVID-19 is a respiratory disease that eventually became a pandemic, with 300 million people infected around the world. Alongside the improvement in COVID-19 management and vaccine development, identifying biomarkers for COVID-19 has recently been reported to help in early prediction and managing severe cases, which might improve outcomes. Our study aimed to find out if there is any correlation between clinical severity and elevated hematological and biochemical markers in COVID-19 patients and its effect on the outcome. Methods: We have collected retrospective data on socio-demographics, medical history, biomarkers, and disease outcomes from five hospitals and health institutions in the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia. Results: Pneumonia was the most common presentation of COVID-19 in our cohort. The presence of abnormal inflammatory biomarkers (D-dimer, CRP, troponin, LDH, ferritin, and t white blood cells) was significantly associated with unstable COVID-19 disease. In addition, patients with evidence of severe respiratory disease, particularly those who required mechanical ventilation, had higher biomarkers when compared to those with stable respiratory conditions (p < 0.001). Conclusion: Identifying biomarkers predicts outcomes for COVID-19 patients and may significantly help in their management.

LogNNet model as a fast, simple and economical AI instrument in the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19

Rapid and effective detection of the diagnosis and prognosis of COVID-19 disease is important in terms of reducing the mortality of the disease and reducing the pressure on health systems. Methods such as PCR testing and computed tomography used for this purpose in current health systems are costly, require an expert team and take time. This study offers a fast, economical and reliable approach for the early diagnosis and prognosis of infectious diseases, especially COVID-19. For this purpose, characteristics of a large population of COVID-19 patients were determined (51 different routine blood values) and calibrated. In order to determine the diagnosis and prognosis of the disease, the calibrated features were run with the LogNNet model. LogNNet has a simple algorithm and performance indicators comparable to the most efficient algorithms available.This approach pointed out that routine blood values contain important information, especially in the detection of COVID-19, and showed that the LogNNet model can be used as an economical, safe and fast alternative tool in the diagnosis of this disease.-In the LogNNet feedforward neural network, a feature vector is passed through a specially designed reservoir matrix and transformed into a new feature vector of a different size, increasing the classification accuracy.-The presented network architecture can achieve 80%-99% classification accuracy using a range of weightings on devices with a total memory size of 1 to 29 kB constrained.-Due to the chaotic mapping procedures, the RAM usage in the LogNNet neural network processing process is greatly reduced. Hence, optimization of chaotic map parameters has an important function in LogNNet neural network application.

Clinical prediction rule for bacterial arthritis: Chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis model

Objectives:

Differences in demographic factors, symptoms, and laboratory data between bacterial and non-bacterial arthritis have not been defined. We aimed to identify predictors of bacterial arthritis, excluding synovial testing.

Methods:

This retrospective cross-sectional survey was performed at a university hospital. All patients included received arthrocentesis from January 1, 2010, to December 31, 2020. Clinical information was gathered from medical charts from the time of synovial fluid sample collection. Factors potentially predictive of bacterial arthritis were analyzed using the Student’s t-test or chi-squared test, and the chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis. The resulting subgroups were divided into three groups according to the risk of bacterial arthritis: low-risk, intermediate-risk, or high-risk groups.

Results:

A total of 460 patients (male/female = 229/231; mean ± standard deviation age, 70.26 ± 17.66 years) were included, of whom 68 patients (14.8%) had bacterial arthritis. The chi-squared automatic interaction detector decision tree analysis revealed that patients with C-reactive protein > 21.09 mg/dL (incidence of septic arthritis: 48.7%) and C-reactive protein ⩽ 21.09 mg/dL plus 27.70 < platelet count ⩽ 30.70 × 10⁴/μL (incidence: 36.1%) were high-risk groups.

Conclusions:

Our results emphasize that patients categorized as high risk of bacterial arthritis, and appropriate treatment could be initiated as soon as possible.

Effect of ferritin, INR, and D-dimer immunological parameters levels as predictors of COVID-19 mortality: A strong prediction with the decision trees

Background and objective

A hyperinflammatory environment is thought to be the distinctive characteristic of COVID-19 infection and an important mediator of morbidity. This study aimed to determine the effect of other immunological parameter levels, especially ferritin, as a predictor of COVID-19 mortality via decision-trees analysis.

Material and method

This is a retrospective study evaluating a total of 2568 patients who died (n = 232) and recovered (n = 2336) from COVID-19 in August and December 2021. Immunological laboratory data were compared between two groups that died and recovered from patients with COVID-19. In addition, decision trees from machine learning models were used to evaluate the performance of immunological parameters in the mortality of the COVID-19 disease.

Results

Non-surviving from COVID-19 had 1.75 times higher ferritin, 10.7 times higher CRP, 2.4 times higher D-dimer, 1.14 times higher international-normalized-ratio (INR), 1.1 times higher Fibrinogen, 22.9 times higher procalcitonin, 3.35 times higher troponin, 2.77 mm/h times higher erythrocyte-sedimentation-rate (ESR), 1.13sec times longer prothrombin time (PT) when compared surviving patients. In addition, our interpretable decision tree, which was constructed with only the cut-off values of ferritin, INR, and D-dimer, correctly predicted 99.7% of surviving patients and 92.7% of non-surviving patients.

Conclusions

This study perfectly predicted the mortality of COVID-19 with our interpretable decision tree constructed with INR and D-dimer, especially ferritin. For this reason, we think that it may be important to include ferritin, INR, and D-dimer parameters and their cut-off values in the scoring systems to be planned for COVID-19 mortality.

Hematological, Inflammatory, Coagulation, and Oxidative/Antioxidant Biomarkers as Predictors for Severity and Mortality in COVID-19: A Prospective Cohort-Study

Purpose

Oxidative stress (OS) and inflammation are pivotal points in the pathophysiology of coronavirus disease-2019 (COVID-19). This study aims to use routine laboratory and oxidative stress/antioxidative biomarkers as predictors for the mortality of the disease.

Patients and Methods

This prospective cohort study, made up of 120 COVID-19 patients from emergency units in Erbil, Duhok, Kirkuk, and Sulaymaniyah cities in Iraq, from May the 1st to May the 30th, 2021, and 60 healthy controls (HCs) (n = 60). The patients were re-categorized into mild (n = 54), severe (n = 40), and critical (n = 26) groups based on the clinical criteria. Following admission to the hospital, blood was directly collected for measuring routine laboratory biomarkers.

Results

Neutrophils and neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were higher in the critical group, while lymphocytes were lower in the severe and critical groups compared to the mild group. The CRP, ferritin, and D-dimer values were more elevated in severe and critical cases than in mild COVID-19 cases. The levels of malondialdehyde (MDA), nitric oxide (NO), and copper were elevated, while the superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity level and total antioxidant capacity (TAC) level were lower. However, vitamin C, glutathione peroxidase (GPx), and catalase activity levels were not changed in the COVID-19 groups compared to the HCs. NO and ferritin were predictors of ICU hospitalization; D-dimer, MDA, and NLR were predictors of mortality. NO, and NLR were predictors of SpO2 depression. Moreover, NO, and copper have both good diagnostic values, their cutoffs were 39.01 and 11.93, respectively.

Conclusion

There is an association between immune dysregulation and oxidative imbalance. The biomarkers, that could be considered as predictors for the severity and mortality of COVID-19, are the NLR, NO, ferritin, and D-dimer. The age equal to and older than 50 has a poor prognosis in the Kurdish population.

Ct, IL-18 polymorphism, and laboratory biomarkers for predicting chemosensory dysfunctions and mortality in COVID-19

Aim

Patients with COVID-19 often experience chemosensory dysfunction. This research intends to uncover the association of RT-PCR Ct value with chemosensory dysfunctions and SpO2. This study also aims to investigate Ct, SpO2, CRP, D-dimer, and -607 IL-18 T/G polymorphism in order to find out predictors of chemosensory dysfunctions and mortality.

Materials & methods

This study included 120 COVID-19 patients, of which 54 were mild, 40 were severe and 26 were critical. CRP, D-dimer, RT-PCR, and IL-18 polymorphism were evaluated. Results & conclusion: Low Ct was associated with SpO2 dropping and chemosensory dysfunctions. IL-18 T/G polymorphism did not show an association with COVID-19 mortality; conversely, age, BMI, D-dimer and Ct values did.

Biomarkers: Promising and valuable tools towards diagnosis, prognosis and treatment of Covid-19 and other diseases

The use of biomarkers as early warning systems in the evaluation of disease risk has increased markedly in the last decade. Biomarkers are indicators of typical biological processes, pathogenic processes, or pharmacological reactions to therapy. The application and identification of biomarkers in the medical and clinical fields have an enormous impact on society. In this review, we discuss the history, various definitions, classifications, characteristics, and discovery of biomarkers. Furthermore, the potential application of biomarkers in the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of various diseases over the last decade are reviewed. The present review aims to inspire readers to explore new avenues in biomarker research and development.

Exploring the Role of Industry 4.0 and Simulation as a Solution to the COVID-19 Outbreak: a Literature Review

The COVID-19 pandemic was an unexpected and disruptive event that significantly affected the performance of manufacturing systems and supply chains in various sectors. In this paper, a literature review is provided, which investigates the role that Industry 4.0 technologies and simulation tools have played in addressing the effects of the pandemic crisis. Specifically, a bibliometric analysis provides an overview of the most influential technologies through a study of the most used keywords. While a document analysis, conducted on critical papers that concern real case studies, shows that so far simulation provided support in four main areas: energy consumption, healthcare supply chain & contact tracing, food supply chain, and in general supply chain management. The main outcome of this research work is that Industry 4.0 technologies and simulation models were particularly important during the pandemic crisis and their properties deserve to be deeply exploited in the near future.

Machine Learning Sensors for Diagnosis of COVID-19 Disease Using Routine Blood Values for Internet of Things Application

Healthcare digitalization requires effective applications of human sensors, when various parameters of the human body are instantly monitored in everyday life due to the Internet of Things (IoT). In particular, machine learning (ML) sensors for the prompt diagnosis of COVID-19 are an important option for IoT application in healthcare and ambient assisted living (AAL). Determining a COVID-19 infected status with various diagnostic tests and imaging results is costly and time-consuming. This study provides a fast, reliable and cost-effective alternative tool for the diagnosis of COVID-19 based on the routine blood values (RBVs) measured at admission. The dataset of the study consists of a total of 5296 patients with the same number of negative and positive COVID-19 test results and 51 routine blood values. In this study, 13 popular classifier machine learning models and the LogNNet neural network model were exanimated. The most successful classifier model in terms of time and accuracy in the detection of the disease was the histogram-based gradient boosting (HGB) (accuracy: 100%, time: 6.39 sec). The HGB classifier identified the 11 most important features (LDL, cholesterol, HDL-C, MCHC, triglyceride, amylase, UA, LDH, CK-MB, ALP and MCH) to detect the disease with 100% accuracy. In addition, the importance of single, double and triple combinations of these features in the diagnosis of the disease was discussed. We propose to use these 11 features and their binary combinations as important biomarkers for ML sensors in the diagnosis of the disease, supporting edge computing on Arduino and cloud IoT service.

Differences Between Omicron Infections and Fever Outpatients: Comparison of Clinical Manifestations and Initial Routine Hematology Indicators

PURPOSE

We evaluated the differences between patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant infections and Fever outpatients, so that prevention and control measures can be taken in time.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 65 patients with SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant. Sixty-nine age- and sex-matched Fever outpatients were enrolled during the same period of time. We also reanalyzed data from 81 SARS-CoV-2 Wild-Type-infected patients. We compared the clinical characteristics and initial indexes of routine tests among the 3 groups.

RESULTS

A total of 93.8% of the patients with Omicron infections had clinical symptoms, and the major symptoms were cough, fever and pharyngalgia. Pharyngalgia was a specific manifestation in Omicron group compared to Wild-Type group. The white blood cell of the Omicron group was lower than that of the Fever group [5.0 (3.6-6.1) vs 10.1 (7.6-12.9) ×109/L, P < 0.001]. The neutrophil count in Omicron group was lower than that in Fever and Wild-Type group [2.6 (1.8-3.9) vs 8.1 (5.9-10.9), P < 0.001; 2.6 (1.8-3.9) vs 3.4 (2.5-4.7) ×109/L, P < 0.001]. The white blood cell and neutrophil counts were lower in Omicron group than in the Fever group. The top 5 major symptoms were fever, cough, pharyngalgia, headache and expectoration.

CONCLUSION

There are differences between the patients with Omicron infections and Fever outpatients, both in clinical manifestations and initial routine hematology indicators. We hope to provide some clues for early identification combined with a history of living in the epidemic area.