1
|
Okumu F, Moore SJ, Selvaraj P, Yafin AH, Juma EO, Shirima GG, Majambere S, Hardy A, Knols BGJ, Msugupakulya BJ, Finda M, Kahamba N, Thomsen E, Ahmed A, Zohdy S, Chaki P, DeChant P, Fornace K, Govella N, Gowelo S, Hakizimana E, Hamainza B, Ijumba JN, Jany W, Kafy HT, Kaindoa EW, Kariuki L, Kiware S, Kweka EJ, Lobo NF, Marrenjo D, Matoke-Muhia D, Mbogo C, McCann RS, Monroe A, Ndenga BA, Ngowo HS, Ochomo E, Opiyo M, Reithinger R, Sikaala CH, Tatarsky A, Takudzwa D, Trujillano F, Sherrard-Smith E. Elevating larval source management as a key strategy for controlling malaria and other vector-borne diseases in Africa. Parasit Vectors 2025; 18:45. [PMID: 39915825 PMCID: PMC11803969 DOI: 10.1186/s13071-024-06621-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2024] [Accepted: 12/04/2024] [Indexed: 02/09/2025] Open
Abstract
Larval source management (LSM) has a long history of advocacy and successes but is rarely adopted where funds are limited. The World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines on malaria prevention recommend the use of LSM as a supplementary intervention to the core vector control methods (insecticide-treated nets and indoor residual spraying), arguing that its feasibility in many settings can be limited by larval habitats being numerous, transient, and difficult to find or treat. Another key argument is that there is insufficient high-quality evidence for its effectiveness to support wide-scale implementation. However, the stagnation of progress towards malaria elimination demands that we consider additional options to the current emphasis on insecticidal commodities targeting adult mosquitoes inside homes. This letter is the result of a global, crossdisciplinary collaboration comprising: (a) detailed online expert discussions, (b) a narrative review of countries that have eliminated local malaria transmission, and (c) a mathematical modeling exercise using two different approaches. Together, these efforts culminated in seven key recommendations for elevating larval source management as a strategy for controlling malaria and other mosquito-borne diseases in Africa (Box 1). LSM encompasses the use of larvicide (a commodity) as well as various environmental sanitation measures. Together, these efforts lead to the long-term reduction of mosquito populations, which benefits the entire community by controlling both disease vector and nuisance mosquitoes. In this paper, we argue that the heavy reliance on large-scale cluster-randomized controlled trials (CRTs) to generate evidence on epidemiological endpoints restricts the recommendation of approaches to only those interventions that can be measured by functional units and deliver relatively uniform impact and, therefore, are more likely to receive financial support for conducting these trials. The explicit impacts of LSM may be better captured by using alternative evaluation approaches, especially high-quality operational data and a recognition of locally distinct outcomes and tailored strategies. LSM contributions are also evidenced by the widespread use of LSM strategies in nearly all countries that have successfully achieved malaria elimination. Two modelling approaches demonstrate that a multifaceted strategy, which incorporates LSM as a central intervention alongside other vector control methods, can effectively mitigate key biological threats such as insecticide resistance and outdoor biting, leading to substantial reductions in malaria cases in representative African settings. This argument is extended to show that the available evidence is sufficient to establish the link between LSM approaches and reduced disease transmission of mosquito-borne illnesses. What is needed now is a significant boost in the financial resources and public health administration structures necessary to train, employ and deploy local-level workforces tasked with suppressing mosquito populations in scientifically driven and ecologically sensitive ways. In conclusion, having WHO guidelines that recognize LSM as a key intervention to be delivered in multiple contextualized forms would open the door to increased flexibility for funding and aid countries in implementing the strategies that they deem appropriate. Financially supporting the scale-up of LSM with high-quality operations monitoring for vector control in combination with other core tools can facilitate better health. The global health community should reconsider how evidence and funding are used to support LSM initiatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fredros Okumu
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania.
- Institute of Biodiversity, Animal Health, and Comparative Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK.
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, (NM-AIST), Tengeru, P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania.
| | - Sarah J Moore
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, (NM-AIST), Tengeru, P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
- Vector Control Product Testing Unit (VCPTU) Ifakara Health Institute, Environmental Health, and Ecological Sciences, P.O. Box 74, Bagamoyo, Tanzania
- Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute, Kreuzstrasse 2, 4123, Allschwil, Switzerland
- University of Basel, Petersplatz 1, 4001, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Prashanth Selvaraj
- Institute for Disease Modeling, Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, USA
| | | | - Elijah O Juma
- Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), KEMRI Headquarters, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - GloriaSalome G Shirima
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | | | - Andy Hardy
- Department of Geography and Earth Sciences, Aberystwyth University, Penglais Campus, Aberystwyth, UK
| | - Bart G J Knols
- K&S Consulting, Kalkestraat 20, 6669 CP, Dodewaard, The Netherlands
| | - Betwel J Msugupakulya
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
| | - Marceline Finda
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Najat Kahamba
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Edward Thomsen
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | - Ayman Ahmed
- Institute of Endemic Diseases, University of Khartoum, Khartoum, 11111, Sudan
| | - Sarah Zohdy
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Entomology Branch, U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Prosper Chaki
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Peter DeChant
- DeChant Vector Solutions LLC, 1755 9th St, Columbia, OR, 97018, USA
| | - Kimberly Fornace
- Faculty of Infectious and Tropical Diseases and Centre for Climate Change and Planetary Health, London School Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK
- School of Biodiversity, One Health and Veterinary Medicine, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
- Saw Swee Hock School of Public Health, National University of Singapore and National University Health System, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Nicodem Govella
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, (NM-AIST), Tengeru, P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Steven Gowelo
- Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | | | - Busiku Hamainza
- National Malaria Elimination Centre, P.O. Box 32509, 10101, Lusaka, Zambia
| | | | | | - Hmooda Toto Kafy
- Global Fund Program Management Unit, RSSH and Malaria Grant, Federal Ministry of Health, Khartoum, Sudan
| | - Emmanuel W Kaindoa
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
| | - Lenson Kariuki
- Ministry of Health-Vector Borne and Neglected Tropical Diseases, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Samson Kiware
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- Pan-African Mosquito Control Association (PAMCA), Dar es Salaam, Tanzania
| | - Eliningaya J Kweka
- Pesticides Bioefficacy Section, Tanzania Plant Health and Pesticides Authority, P.O. Box 3024, Arusha, Tanzania
- Department of Medical Parasitology and Entomology, Catholic University of Health and Allied Sciences, P.O. Box 1464, Mwanza, Tanzania
| | - Neil F Lobo
- University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA
| | | | - Damaris Matoke-Muhia
- Centre for Biotechnology Research and Development, Kenya Medical Research Institute, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Charles Mbogo
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
- Public Health Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640‑00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Robert S McCann
- Center for Vaccine Development and Global Health, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA
| | - April Monroe
- U.S. President's Malaria Initiative, U.S. Agency for International Development, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | - Halfan S Ngowo
- Environmental Health and Ecological Science Department, Ifakara Health Institute, P.O. Box 53, Ifakara, Tanzania
- School of Life Science and Bioengineering, The Nelson Mandela African Institution of Science and Technology, (NM-AIST), Tengeru, P.O. Box 447, Arusha, Tanzania
| | - Eric Ochomo
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK
- Kenya Medical Research Institute (KEMRI), Nairobi, Kenya
- Public Health Unit, KEMRI-Wellcome Trust Research Programme, PO Box 43640‑00100, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Mercy Opiyo
- Centro de Investigação Em Saúde de Manhiça (CISM), Maputo, Mozambique
- University of California San Francisco Malaria Elimination Initiative (UCSF MEI), San Francisco, USA
| | | | | | - Allison Tatarsky
- Malaria Elimination Initiative, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, USA
| | | | - Fedra Trujillano
- School of Geographical & Earth Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, G12 8QQ, UK
| | - Ellie Sherrard-Smith
- Department of Vector Biology, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
- Malaria Modelling Group, School of Public Health, Imperial College London, London, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brophy MK, Weis E, Drexler NA, Paddock CD, Nicholson WL, Kersh GJ, Salzer JS. Conceptual Framework for Community-Based Prevention of Brown Dog Tick-Associated Rocky Mountain Spotted Fever. Emerg Infect Dis 2024; 30:2231-2240. [PMID: 39447135 PMCID: PMC11521193 DOI: 10.3201/eid3011.240293] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/26/2024] Open
Abstract
Rocky Mountain spotted fever (RMSF) is a severe tickborne disease that can reach epidemic proportions in communities with certain social and ecologic risk factors. In some areas, the case-fatality rate of brown dog tick-associated RMSF is up to 50%. Because of the spread of brown dog tick-associated RMSF in the southwestern United States and northern Mexico, the disease has the potential to emerge and become endemic in other communities that have large populations of free-roaming dogs, brown dog ticks, limited resources, and low provider awareness of the disease. By using a One Health approach, interdisciplinary teams can identify communities at risk and prevent severe or fatal RMSF in humans before cases occur. We have developed a conceptual framework for RMSF prevention to enable communities to identify their RMSF risk level and implement prevention and control strategies.
Collapse
|
3
|
Bardosh K, Desir L, Jean L, Yoss S, Poovey B, Nute A, de Rochars MVB, Telfort MA, Benoit F, Chery G, Charlotin MC, Noland GS. Evaluating a community engagement model for malaria elimination in Haiti: lessons from the community health council project (2019-2021). Malar J 2023; 22:47. [PMID: 36759860 PMCID: PMC9910254 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-023-04471-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Community engagement (CE) plays a critical role in malaria control and elimination. CE approaches vary substantially, with more participatory programmes requiring higher levels of adaptive management. This study evaluates the effectiveness of a volunteer-based CE programme developed in Haiti in 2018. The approach was based on local leaders organizing and implementing monthly anti-malaria activities in their communities, and was implemented as part of Malaria Zero Consortium activities. METHODS This programme evaluation draws on quantitative and qualitative data collected from 23 Community Health Councils (CHCs) over a two-year period (2019-2021) in Grand'Anse department, a malaria hotspot region in Haiti. RESULTS Monthly monitoring data showed that 100% of the 23 CHCs remained functional over the two-year period, with an average of 0.90 monthly meetings held with an 85% attendance rate. A high degree of transparency and diversity in membership helped create strong planning and involvement from members. CHCs conducted an average of 1.6 community-based activities per month, directly engaging an average of 123 people per month. High levels of fluctuation in monthly activities were indicative of local ownership and self-organization. This included school and church sensitization, environmental sanitation campaigns, mass education, support for case referrals and community mobilization during mass drug administration (MDA) and indoor residual spraying (IRS) campaigns. Members drew on the tradition of konbit (mutual self-help), local histories of health and development campaigns and a lexicon of "solidarity" in difficult times as they negotiated their agency as community volunteers. Small incentives played both symbolic and supportive roles. Some level of politicization was viewed as inevitable, even beneficial. Rumours about financial and political profiteering of CHC volunteers took time to dispel while the tendency towards vertical planning in malaria control created conditions that excluded CHCs from some activities. This generated resentment from members who felt sidelined by the government malaria programme. CONCLUSION The CHC model was effective in promoting group solidarity and community-based anti-malaria activities over a two-year period in Haiti. With the end of the Malaria Zero Consortium in early 2021, there is now an opportunity to better integrate this programme into the primary healthcare system, evaluate the impact of the CHCs on malaria epidemiology, and promote the greater integration of CHCs with active surveillance and response activities.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kevin Bardosh
- School of Public Health, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA. .,The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Luccene Desir
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Lorence Jean
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Sarah Yoss
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Brianna Poovey
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Andrew Nute
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA
| | - Madsen Valerie Beau de Rochars
- grid.418694.60000 0001 2291 4696The Carter Center, Atlanta, GA USA ,grid.15276.370000 0004 1936 8091Department of Health Services Research, Management and Policy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL USA
| | - Marc-Aurèle Telfort
- grid.436183.bMinistère de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Jeremie and Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Fabiola Benoit
- grid.436183.bMinistère de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Jeremie and Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Ginette Chery
- grid.436183.bMinistère de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Jeremie and Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Marie Carmelle Charlotin
- grid.436183.bMinistère de la Sante Publique et de la Population, Jeremie and Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Nieto-Sanchez C, Hatley DM, Grijalva MJ, Peeters Grietens K, Bates BR. Communication in Neglected Tropical Diseases' elimination: A scoping review and call for action. PLoS Negl Trop Dis 2022; 16:e0009774. [PMID: 36228006 PMCID: PMC9595560 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0009774] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2021] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 09/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the practice of communication is often called upon when intervening and involving communities affected by NTDs, the disciplinary framework of health communication research has been largely absent from NTD strategies. To illustrate how practices conceptualized and developed within the communication field have been applied in the context of NTD elimination, we conducted a scoping review focusing on two diseases currently targeted for elimination by the WHO: lymphatic filariasis and Chagas disease. METHODS We examined studies published between 2012 and 2020 in five electronic databases. Selected articles were required to (i) have explicit references to communication in either the abstract, title, or key words; (ii) further elaborate on the search terms (communication, message, media, participation and health education) in the body of the article; and (iii) sufficiently describe communication actions associated to those terms. Using the C-Change Socio-Ecological Model for Social and Behavior Change Communication as a reference, the articles were analysed to identify communication activities, theoretical frameworks, and/or rationales involved in their design, as well as their intended level of influence (individual, interpersonal, community, or enabling environment). RESULTS AND IMPLICATIONS A total of 43 articles were analysed. Most interventions conceptualized communication as a set of support tools or supplemental activities delivering information and amplifying pre-defined messages aimed at increasing knowledge, encouraging community involvement, promoting individual behavior change, or securing some degree of acceptability of proposed strategies. Although important attempts at further exploring communication capabilities were identified, particularly in participation-based strategies, for most studies, communication consisted of an underdeveloped and under-theorized approach. We contend that a more complex understanding of the capacities offered by the health communication field could help attain the biomedical and social justice goals proposed in NTD elimination strategies. Three ways in which the field of health communication could further enhance NTD efforts are presented: informing interventions with theory-based frameworks, exploring the political complexity of community participation in specific contexts, and identifying conceptualizations of culture implied in interventions' design. CONCLUSION This article is a call to action to consider the resources offered by the health communication field when researching, designing, or implementing NTD interventions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudia Nieto-Sanchez
- Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - David M. Hatley
- Department of Epidemiology, University of London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom
| | - Mario J. Grijalva
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute (ITDI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Research in Health in Latin America (CISeAL), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
| | - Koen Peeters Grietens
- Socio-Ecological Health Research Unit, Department of Public Health, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium
- Nagasaki, School of Tropical Medicine and Global Health, Nagasaki University, Nagasaki, Japan
| | - Benjamin R. Bates
- Infectious and Tropical Disease Institute (ITDI), Department of Biomedical Sciences, Heritage College of Osteopathic Medicine, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
- Center for Research in Health in Latin America (CISeAL), Facultad de Ciencias Exactas y Naturales, Pontifical Catholic University of Ecuador, Quito, Ecuador
- School of Communication Studies, Ohio University, Athens, Ohio, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Annan E, Guo J, Angulo-Molina A, Yaacob WFW, Aghamohammadi N, C Guetterman T, Yavaşoglu Sİ, Bardosh K, Dom NC, Zhao B, Lopez-Lemus UA, Khan L, Nguyen USDT, Haque U. Community acceptability of dengue fever surveillance using unmanned aerial vehicles: A cross-sectional study in Malaysia, Mexico, and Turkey. Travel Med Infect Dis 2022; 49:102360. [PMID: 35644475 DOI: 10.1016/j.tmaid.2022.102360] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/02/2022] [Revised: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
Surveillance is a critical component of any dengue prevention and control program. There is an increasing effort to use drones in mosquito control surveillance. Due to the novelty of drones, data are scarce on the impact and acceptance of their use in the communities to collect health-related data. The use of drones raises concerns about the protection of human privacy. Here, we show how willingness to be trained and acceptance of drone use in tech-savvy communities can help further discussions in mosquito surveillance. A cross-sectional study was conducted in Malaysia, Mexico, and Turkey to assess knowledge of diseases caused by Aedes mosquitoes, perceptions about drone use for data collection, and acceptance of drones for Aedes mosquito surveillance around homes. Compared with people living in Turkey, Mexicans had 14.3 (p < 0.0001) times higher odds and Malaysians had 4.0 (p = 0.7030) times the odds of being willing to download a mosquito surveillance app. Compared to urban dwellers, rural dwellers had 1.56 times the odds of being willing to be trained. There is widespread community support for drone use in mosquito surveillance and this community buy-in suggests a potential for success in mosquito surveillance using drones. A successful surveillance and community engagement system may be used to monitor a variety of mosquito spp. Future research should include qualitative interview data to add context to these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Annan
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA.
| | - Jinghui Guo
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA
| | - Aracely Angulo-Molina
- Department of Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Sonora, Hermosillo, 83000, Sonora, Mexico
| | - Wan Fairos Wan Yaacob
- Faculty of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Kelantan, Kampus Kota Bharu, Lembah Sireh, 15050, Kota Bharu, Kelantan, Malaysia; Institute for Big Data Analytics and Artificial Intelligence (IBDAAI), Kompleks Al-Khawarizmi, Universiti Teknologi MARA, 40450, Shah Alam, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Nasrin Aghamohammadi
- Centre for Epidemiology and Evidence-Based Practice, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Malaya, Kuala Lumpur, 50603, Malaysia
| | | | - Sare İlknur Yavaşoglu
- Department of Biology, Faculty of Science and Arts, Aydın Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, 09010, Turkey
| | - Kevin Bardosh
- Center for One Health Research, School of Public Health, University of Washington, USA
| | - Nazri Che Dom
- Faculty of Health Sciences, Universiti Teknologi MARA Cawangan Selangor, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Bingxin Zhao
- Department of Statistics, Purdue University, 250 N. University St, West Lafayette, IN, 47907, USA
| | - Uriel A Lopez-Lemus
- Department of Health Sciences, Center for Biodefense and Global Infectious Diseases, Colima, 28078, Mexico
| | - Latifur Khan
- Department of Computer Science, The University of Texas at Dallas, Richardson, TX, 75080, USA
| | - Uyen-Sa D T Nguyen
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
| | - Ubydul Haque
- Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, University of North Texas Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, 76107, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Keys H, Ureña K, Reyes J, Bardosh K, Pell C, Puello J, Blount S, Noland GS. Rapid ethnographic assessment for potential anti-malarial mass drug administration in an outbreak area of Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic. Malar J 2021; 20:76. [PMID: 33557830 PMCID: PMC7869078 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-021-03594-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2020] [Accepted: 01/15/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the Dominican Republic, a recent outbreak of malaria in the capital, Santo Domingo, threatens efforts to eliminate the disease. Mass drug administration (MDA) has been proposed as one strategy to reduce transmission. The success of MDA is contingent upon high levels of acceptance among the target population. To inform the design of future MDA campaigns, this rapid ethnographic assessment examined malaria-related knowledge and attitudes toward malaria MDA among residents of a transmission focus in Santo Domingo. METHODS In October 2019, a rapid ethnographic assessment was conducted in the Los Tres Brazos transmission focus, which had not previously received MDA. National malaria programme staff conducted 61 structured interviews with key informants, recorded observations, and held 72 informal conversations. Using a grounded theory approach, data were analysed during three workshop sessions with research team members. RESULTS Among those who had heard of malaria in the structured interviews (n = 39/61; 64%), understanding of the disease was largely based on personal experience from past outbreaks or through word-of-mouth. Community health workers (promotores) were trusted for health information and malaria diagnosis more so than professional clinicians. No participant (0%) was familiar with malaria MDA. After learning about MDA, almost all study participants (92%) said that they would participate, seeing it as a way to care for their community. Reasons for not participating in future MDA included not trusting drug administrators, feeling reluctant to take unprescribed medicine, and fear of missing work. Additional identified challenges to MDA included reaching specific demographic groups, disseminating effective MDA campaign messages, and managing misinformation and political influence. CONCLUSION Residents appear accepting of MDA despite a lack of prior familiarity. Successful MDA will depend on several factors: fostering relationships among community-based health workers, clinicians, community leaders, and others; developing clear health messages that use local terms and spreading them through a variety of media and social networks; and contextualizing MDA as part of a broader effort to promote community health.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter Keys
- Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Building B-REC B 8.01, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Keyla Ureña
- Centro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Av. Juan Pablo Duarte No. 269, 10301, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Jhefres Reyes
- Colegio de Abogados de la Republica Dominicana, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Kevin Bardosh
- Center for One Health Research, School of Public Health, University of Washington, Washington, USA
| | - Christopher Pell
- Amsterdam Institute for Global Health and Development (AIGHD), Centre for Social Science and Global Health, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Global Health, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jose Puello
- Centro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades Transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis (CECOVEZ), Av. Juan Pablo Duarte No. 269, 10301, Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| | - Stephen Blount
- The Carter Center, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, GA, 30307, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Keys HM, Noland GS, De Rochars MB, Taylor TH, Blount S, Gonzales M. Perceived discrimination in bateyes of the Dominican Republic: results from the Everyday Discrimination Scale and implications for public health programs. BMC Public Health 2019; 19:1513. [PMID: 31718594 PMCID: PMC6852895 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-019-7773-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 10/11/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Discrimination is a major driver of health disparities among minority groups and can impede the reach of public health programs. In the Dominican Republic, residents of bateyes, or agricultural 'company towns,' often face barriers to health care. This study examined the extent of perceived discrimination among batey populations and places the findings within the context of disease elimination efforts. METHODS In March-April 2016, a stratified, multi-stage cluster survey that included the 9-item Everyday Discrimination Scale (EDS) was conducted among residents (n = 768) of bateyes across the Dominican Republic. Exploratory factor analysis, differential item functioning, and linear and logistic regression were used to assess associations between EDS scores, ethnic group status, reasons for discrimination, and healthcare-seeking behavior. RESULTS Three ethnic groups were identified in the population: Haitian-born persons (42.5%), Dominican-born persons with Haitian descent (25.5%), and Dominican-born persons without Haitian descent (32.0%). Mean EDS scores (range 0-45) were highest among persons born in Haiti (18.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 16.4-20.1), followed by persons with Haitian descent (16.5, 95% CI = 14.9-18.0), and those without Haitian descent (13.3, 95% CI = 12.1-14.5). Higher EDS scores were significantly associated with Haitian birth (β = 6.8, 95% CI = 4.2-9.4; p < 0.001) and Haitian descent (β = 6.1, 95% CI = 3.2-9.0; p < 0.001). Most respondents (71.5%) had scores high enough to elicit reasons for their discrimination. Regardless of ethnic group, poverty was a common reason for discrimination, but Haitian-born and Haitian-descended people also attributed discrimination to their origin, documentation status, or skin color. EDS scores were not significantly associated with differences in reported care-seeking for recent fever (β = 1.7, 95% CI = - 1.4-4.9; p = 0.278). CONCLUSION Perceived discrimination is common among batey residents of all backgrounds but highest among Haitian-born people. Discrimination did not appear to be a primary barrier to care-seeking, suggesting other explanations for reduced care-seeking among Haitian populations. Public health community engagement strategies should avoid exacerbating stigma, build active participation in programs, and work towards community ownership of disease control and elimination goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hunter M. Keys
- Department of Anthropology, University of Amsterdam, Building B-REC B 8.01, Nieuwe Achtergracht 166, 1018 WV Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | | | - Madsen Beau De Rochars
- Health Services Research, Management and Policy Department, University of Florida, 1225 Center Drive, HPNP 3101, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
| | - Thomas H. Taylor
- Division of Laboratory Systems, Center for Surveillance, Epidemiology, and Laboratory Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30333 USA
| | - Stephen Blount
- The Carter Center, 453 Freedom Parkway, Atlanta, GA 30307 USA
| | - Manuel Gonzales
- Centro de Prevención y Control de Enfermedades transmitidas por Vectores y Zoonosis, Av. Juan Pablo Duarte No. 269, 10301 Santo Domingo, Dominican Republic
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
"Wherever doctors cannot reach, the sunshine can": overcoming potential barriers to malaria elimination interventions in Haiti. Malar J 2018; 17:393. [PMID: 30373575 PMCID: PMC6206681 DOI: 10.1186/s12936-018-2553-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 10/26/2018] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Haiti and the Dominican Republic, the only two Caribbean countries with endemic malaria transmission, are committed to eliminating malaria. With a Plasmodium falciparum prevalence under 1% and a highly focal transmission, the efforts towards elimination in Haiti will include several community-based interventions that must be tailored to the local sociocultural context to increase their uptake. However, little is known about local community perceptions regarding malaria and the planned elimination interventions. The aim of this study is to develop a robust understanding of how to tailor, implement and promote malaria elimination strategies in Haiti. METHODS A cross-sectional qualitative study was conducted December 2015-August 2016 in Grande-Anse and the North Department in Haiti. Data collection included key informant interviews (n = 51), in-depth interviews (n = 15) and focus group discussions (n = 14) with health workers, traditional healers, teachers, priests or pastors, informal community leaders, public officials, and community members. Following a grounded theory approach, transcripts were coded and analysed using content analysis. Coded text was sorted by the types of interventions under consideration by the malaria elimination programme. RESULTS The level of knowledge about malaria was low. Many participants noted community beliefs about malaria being caused by magical phenomena in addition to vector-borne transmission. Participants described malaria as a problem rooted in the environment, with vector control the most noted method of prevention. Though participants noted malaria a severe disease, it ranked lower than other health problems perceived as more acute. Access barriers to healthcare were described including a lack of bed nets. Some distrust about pills, tests, and foreigners in general was expressed, and in few cases linked to previous experience with malaria campaigns under dictatorial regimes. CONCLUSIONS There are several potential barriers and opportunities to implement community-based malaria elimination interventions in rural Haiti. Elimination efforts should include the collaboration of voodoo priests and other traditional healers, be coupled with solutions to wider community concerns or other health interventions, and learn from previous or similar programmes, such as the campaign to eliminate lymphatic filariasis. It is essential to engage with communities and gain their trust to successfully implement targeted aggressive elimination activities.
Collapse
|