Histological healing favors lower risk of colon carcinoma in extensive ulcerative colitis

Gastrointestinal pathologist consensus of revised high-grade dysplasia in inflammatory bowel disease impacts the advanced neoplasia rate: a multicenter study

OBJECTIVE

The diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) associated with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) has a significant impact on clinical management, including colectomy. However, the prognosis of HGD remains unclear due to diagnostic uncertainty and low-quality data on subsequent synchronous and metachronous neoplasia. We aimed to evaluate a diagnostic strategy with dedicated gastrointestinal (GI) pathologist consensus of revised HGD and the impact on synchronous and metachronous neoplasia rates.

METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we used the Dutch Nationwide Pathology Databank to identify IBD patients with HGD in seven hospitals. Histopathological specimens of the initial HGD were independently revised by two dedicated GI pathologists. Definitive diagnosis was established in a consensus meeting. Synchronous and metachronous neoplasia incidences were assessed with a competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

We included 54 IBD patients with HGD, of whom 33 (61.1%) with ulcerative colitis and 42 (77.8%) with extensive disease. After consensus, 18 (33.3%) lesions were downgraded to indefinite/low-grade dysplasia, and 6 (11.1%) were revised to colorectal cancer (CRC). Seven patients (13.0%) had synchronous CRC. Patients with downgraded lesions showed a lower cumulative advanced neoplasia (HGD/CRC) incidence compared with confirmed HGD [(Gray's test P < 0.01), 5-year cumulative incidence 0.0% vs. 26.6%].

CONCLUSIONS

We demonstrated frequent downgrading of HGD, associated with lower metachronous neoplasia rates. This underlines the potential impact of dedicated GI pathologist consensus meetings. The high and synchronous and metachronous neoplasia rates after HGD underline the need for close surveillance.

To STRIDE or not to STRIDE: a critique of "treat to target" in ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

The STRIDE consensus intends to complement the clinical endpoint with an endoscopic endpoint of mucosal healing and others as treatment targets in ulcerative colitis. If these targets are not reached, STRIDE requires dose or timing adjustments or switching the medication. This narrative review provides a critique of this concept.

AREAS COVERED

We analyze and discuss the limitations of current endpoints as targets, their currently limited achievability, and the lacking evidence from controlled trials relating to 'treat to target.' The relevant publications in PubMed were identified in a literature review with the key word 'ulcerative colitis.'

EXPERT OPINION

In ulcerative colitis, the standard clinical target is measured traditionally by the MAYO-score, but in variable combinations of patient and physician reported outcomes as well as also different definitions of the endoscopic part. Only a score of 0 is more stringent than clinical remission but is only achieved by a minority of patients in first and even less in second line therapy. The concept is not based on clear evidence that patients indeed benefit from appropriate escalation of treatment. Until the STRIDE approach is proven to be superior to standard treatment focusing on clinical well-being, the field should remain reluctant.

Treatment endpoints in ulcerative colitis: Does one size fit all?

A treat-to-target strategy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) involves treatment intensification in order to achieve a pre-determined endpoint. Such uniform and tight disease control has been demonstrated to improve clinical outcomes compared to treatment driven by a clinician's subjective assessment of symptoms. However, choice of treatment endpoints remains a challenge in management of IBD via a treat-to-target strategy. The treatment endpoints for ulcerative colitis (UC), recommended by the Selecting Therapeutic Targets in Inflammatory Bowel Disease (STRIDE) consensus have changed somewhat over time. The latest STRIDE-II consensus advises immediate (clinical response), intermediate (clinical remission and biochemical normalisation) and long-term treatment (endoscopic healing, absence of disability and normalisation of health-related quality of life, as well as normal growth in children) endpoints in UC. However, achieving deeper levels of remission, such as histologic normalisation or healing of the gut barrier function, may further improve outcomes among UC patients. Generally, all medical therapy should seek to improve short- and long-term mortality and morbidity. Hence treatment endpoints should be chosen based on their ability to predict for improvement in short- and long-term mortality and morbidity. Potential benefits of treatment intensification need to be weighed against the potential harms within an individual patient. In addition, changing therapy that has achieved partial response may lead to worse outcomes, with failure to recapture response on treatment reversion. Patients may also place different emphasis on certain potential benefits and harms of various treatments than clinicians, or may have strong opinions re certain therapies. Potential benefits and harms of therapies, incremental benefits of achieving deeper levels of remission, as well as uncertainties of the same, need to be discussed with individual patients, and a treatment endpoint agreed upon with the clinician. Future research should focus on quantifying the incremental benefits and risks of achieving deeper levels of remission, such that clinicians and patients can make an informed decision about appropriate treatment end-point on an individual basis.

Histologic Remission in Inflammatory Bowel Disease and Female Fertility: A Nationwide Study

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is linked to reduced female fertility, but it is unclear how fertility rates vary by histologic disease activity.

METHODS

Nationwide IBD cohort of Swedish women aged 15 to 44 years. We examined fertility rates during periods with vs without histologic inflammation (n = 21,046; follow-up, 1990-2016) and during periods with vs without clinical activity (IBD-related hospitalization, surgery, or treatment escalation) (n = 24,995; follow-up, 2006-2020). Accounting for sociodemographics and comorbidities, we used Poisson regression to estimate adjusted fertility rate ratios (aFRRs) for live births conceived during 12-month periods of histologic inflammation (vs histologic remission) and 3-month periods of clinically active IBD (vs quiescent IBD).

RESULTS

During periods with vs without histologic inflammation, there were 6.35 (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.98-6.73) and 7.09 (95% CI, 6.48-7.70) live births conceived per 100 person-years of follow-up, respectively, or 1 fewer child per 14 women with 10 years of histologic inflammation (aFRR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.81-1.00). In women with histologic inflammation, fertility was similarly reduced in ulcerative colitis (UC) (aFRR, 0.89 [95% CI, 0.78-1.02]) and Crohn's disease (CD) (aFRR, 0.86 [95% CI, 0.72-1.04]). Clinical IBD activity was associated with an aFRR of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.72-0.79) or 1 fewer child per 6 women with 10 years of clinical activity. Fertility was reduced in clinically active UC (aFRR, 0.75 [95% CI, 0.70-0.81]) and CD (aFRR, 0.76 [95% CI, 0.70-0.82]). Finally, among women with clinically quiescent IBD, histologic inflammation (vs histologic remission) was associated with reduced fertility (aFRR, 0.85 [95% CI, 0.73-0.98]).

CONCLUSIONS

An association between histologic and clinical activity and reduced female fertility in CD and UC was found. Notably, histologic inflammation was also linked to reduced fertility in women with clinically quiescent IBD.

Disease clearance in ulcerative colitis: A new therapeutic target for the future

Advancements in murine modeling systems for ulcerative colitis have diversified our understanding of the pathophysiological factors involved in disease onset and progression. This has fueled the identification of molecular targets, resulting in a rapidly expanding therapeutic armamentarium. Subsequently, management strategies have evolved from symptomatic resolution to well-defined objective endpoints, including clinical remission, endoscopic remission and mucosal healing. While the incorporation of these assessment modalities has permitted targeted intervention in the context of a natural disease history and the prevention of complications, studies have consistently depicted discrepancies associated with ascertaining disease status through clinical and endoscopic measures. Current recommendations lack consideration of histological healing. The simultaneous achievement of clinical, endoscopic, and histologic remission has not been fully investigated. This has laid the groundwork for a novel therapeutic outcome termed disease clearance (DC). This article summarizes the concept of DC and its current evidence.

Measuring the concordance between endoscopic and histologic inflammation and its effect on IBD-associated dysplasia

Background and study aims Chronically inflamed colonic mucosa is primed to develop dysplasia identified at surveillance colonoscopy by targeted or random biopsies. We aimed to explore the effect of mucosal inflammation on detection of visible and "invisible" dysplasia and the concordance between the degree of endoscopic and histologic inflammation. Patients and methods This was a 6-year cross-sectional analysis of endoscopic and histologic data from IBD. A multinomial model was created to estimate the odds for a specific lesion type as well as the odds of random dysplasia relative to the degree of inflammation. Kappa statistics were used to measure concordance between endoscopic and histologic inflammation. Results A total of 3437 IBD surveillance colonoscopies between 2016-2021 were reviewed with 970 procedures from 721 patients containing 1603 visible lesions. Kappa agreement between histologic and endoscopic degree of inflammation was low at 0.4. There was a positive association between increased endoscopic inflammation and presence of tubulovillous adenomas (TVAs) (odds ratio [OR] 2.18; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-4.62; P =0.04). Among cases with visible lesions, the yield of concomitant random dysplasia was 2.7% and 1.9% for random indefinite dysplasia. The odds of random dysplasia significantly increased as the degree of endoscopic and histologic inflammation increased (OR 2.18, 95%CI 1.46-3.26; P <0.001 and OR 2.75; 95%CI 1.65-4.57, P <0.001, respectively. The odds of indefinite random dysplasia also significantly increased as endoscopic and histologic inflammation increased (OR 2.90; 95%CI 1.85, 4.55, P <0.001 and OR 1.98; 95%CI 1.08, 3.62, P <0.035, respectively. Conclusions Endoscopic and histologic inflammation are associated with higher odds of finding TVAs and random low-grade, high-grade, and indefinite dysplasia. Concordance between histologic and endoscopic inflammation severity is low.

Claudin-2 protects against colitis-associated cancer by promoting colitis-associated mucosal healing

Patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are susceptible to colitis-associated cancer (CAC). Chronic inflammation promotes the risk for CAC. In contrast, mucosal healing predicts improved prognosis in IBD and reduced risk of CAC. However, the molecular integration among colitis, mucosal healing, and CAC remains poorly understood. Claudin-2 (CLDN2) expression is upregulated in IBD; however, its role in CAC is not known. The current study was undertaken to examine the role for CLDN2 in CAC. The AOM/DSS-induced CAC model was used with WT and CLDN2-modified mice. High-throughput expression analyses, murine models of colitis/recovery, chronic colitis, ex vivo crypt culture, and pharmacological manipulations were employed in order to increase our mechanistic understanding. The Cldn2KO mice showed significant inhibition of CAC despite severe colitis compared with WT littermates. Cldn2 loss also resulted in impaired recovery from colitis and increased injury when mice were subjected to intestinal injury by other methods. Mechanistic studies demonstrated a possibly novel role of CLDN2 in promotion of mucosal healing downstream of EGFR signaling and by regulation of Survivin expression. An upregulated CLDN2 expression protected from CAC and associated positively with crypt regeneration and Survivin expression in patients with IBD. We demonstrate a potentially novel role of CLDN2 in promotion of mucosal healing in patients with IBD and thus regulation of vulnerability to colitis severity and CAC, which can be exploited for improved clinical management.

Different levels of healing in inflammatory bowel diseases: mucosal, histological, transmural, barrier and complete healing

Mucosal healing on endoscopy has emerged as a key prognostic parameter in the management of patients with IBD (Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis/UC) and can predict sustained clinical remission and resection-free survival. The structural basis for this type of mucosal healing is a progressive resolution of intestinal inflammation with associated healing of ulcers and improved epithelial barrier function. However, in some cases with mucosal healing on endoscopy, evidence of histological activity in mucosal biopsies has been observed. Subsequently, in UC, a second, deeper type of mucosal healing, denoted histological healing, was defined which requires the absence of active inflammation in mucosal biopsies. Both levels of mucosal healing should be considered as initial events in the resolution of gut inflammation in IBD rather than as indicators of complete transmural healing. In this review, the effects of anti-inflammatory, biological or immunosuppressive agents as well as small molecules on mucosal healing in clinical studies are highlighted. In addition, we focus on the implications of mucosal healing for clinical management of patients with IBD. Moreover, emerging techniques for the analysis of mucosal healing as well as potentially deeper levels of mucosal healing such as transmural healing and functional barrier healing of the mucosa are discussed. Although none of these new levels of healing indicate a definitive cure of the diseases, they make an important contribution to the assessment of patients' prognosis. The ultimate level of healing in IBD would be a resolution of all aspects of intestinal and extraintestinal inflammation (complete healing).

Correlation of mucosal healing endpoints with long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND

We evaluated the clinical relevance of achieving histologic endoscopic mucosal improvement (HEMI) and the more stringent target of histologic endoscopic mucosal remission (HEMR) in the phase 3 maintenance trial of upadacitinib for moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis.

METHODS

Clinical and patient-reported outcomes were assessed in patients with clinical response after 8- or 16-week upadacitinib induction who received 52-week upadacitinib maintenance treatment. Cross-sectional and predictive analyses evaluated the relationship between HEMR or HEMI at Week 8/16 and Week 52, respectively, and outcomes at Week 52. Adjusted odds ratios (aOR) were derived from logistic regressions for patients achieving HEMR or HEMI without HEMR versus those not achieving HEMI.

RESULTS

Cross-sectional analyses showed that patients with HEMR had greater odds of achieving all clinical and patient-reported outcomes at Week 52 than those not achieving HEMI. In predictive analyses, patients with HEMR at Week 8/16 had significantly greater odds of achieving clinical remission (aOR = 3.6, p = 0.001) and endoscopic remission (aOR = 3.9, p < 0.001) at Week 52 than patients not achieving HEMI and HEMR. For patients achieving HEMI without HEMR, these odds were lower: clinical remission (aOR = 3.2, p < 0.001) and endoscopic remission (aOR = 2.4, p = 0.010). The odds of achieving clinically meaningful improvements in most patient-reported outcomes were directionally similar between HEMI and HEMR, but not statistically different to patients not achieving HEMI. No hospitalizations or surgeries were observed in patients with HEMR at Week 52.

CONCLUSIONS

Achievement of HEMR or HEMI is clinically relevant with HEMR being associated with greater likelihood of improvement in long-term clinical and patient-reported outcomes. https://www.

CLINICALTRIALS

gov NCT02819635.

Inflammation and Digestive Cancer

Chronic inflammation is linked to carcinogenesis, particularly in the digestive organs, i.e., the stomach, colon, and liver. The mechanism of this effect has, however, only partly been focused on. In this review, we focus on different forms of chronic hepatitis, chronic inflammatory bowel disease, and chronic gastritis, conditions predisposing individuals to the development of malignancy. Chronic inflammation may cause malignancy because (1) the cause of the chronic inflammation is itself genotoxic, (2) substances released from the inflammatory cells may be genotoxic, (3) the cell death induced by the inflammation induces a compensatory increase in proliferation with an inherent risk of mutation, (4) changes in cell composition due to inflammation may modify function, resulting in hormonal disturbances affecting cellular proliferation. The present review focuses on chronic gastritis (Helicobacter pylori or autoimmune type) since all four mechanisms may be relevant to this condition. Genotoxicity due to the hepatitis B virus is an important factor in hepatocellular cancer and viral infection can similarly be central in the etiology and malignancy of inflammatory bowel diseases. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is the dominating cause of chronic gastritis and has not been shown to be genotoxic, so its carcinogenic effect is most probably due to the induction of atrophic oxyntic gastritis leading to hypergastrinemia.

A new endoscopic scoring system corresponding to histological healing using linked color imaging in ulcerative colitis: the SOUL study

Background and study aims  An important therapeutic aim in ulcerative colitis (UC) is endoscopic remission. Although an endoscopic score with white light imaging (WLI) is mainly used to evaluate endoscopic findings, the usefulness of linked color imaging (LCI) has been reported. We evaluated the relationship between LCI and histopathological findings and attempted to establish a new LCI endoscopic evaluation index for UC. Patients and methods  This study was conducted at Kyorin University, Kyoto Prefectural University, and Fukuoka University Chikushi Hospital. Ninety-two patients with a Mayo endoscopic subscore (MES) ≤ 1 who underwent colonoscopy for UC in clinical remission were included. LCI index was defined as redness (R) (Grade 0-2), area of inflammation (A) (Grade 0-3), and lymphoid follicles (L) (Grade 0-3). Histological healing was defined as Geboes score < 2B.1. Endoscopic and histopathological scores were determined by central judgment. Results  In 92 patients, 85 biopsies from the sigmoid colon and 84 biopsies from the rectum (total 169 biopsies) were evaluated. There were 22, 117, and 30 cases of Grades 0, 1, and 2, respectively in LCI index-R; 113, 34, 17, and five cases of Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in LCI index-A; and 124, 27, 14, and four cases of Grades 0, 1, 2, and 3, respectively, in LCI index-L. Histological healing was achieved in 84.0 % of the cases (142 of 169), and there were significant associations with histological healing or non-healing in LCI index-R ( P  = 0.013) and A ( P  = 0.0014). Conclusions  A new LCI index is useful for predicting histological healing in UC patients with MES ≤ 1 and clinical remission.

Interobserver reliability of the Nancy index for ulcerative colitis: An assessment of the practicability and ease of use in a single-centre real-world setting

BACKGROUND

Histological disease severity assessment in ulcerative colitis (UC) has become a mainstay in clinical endpoints definition ("histologic remission") in clinical trials of UC. Several scores are established in the microscopical assessment of disease activity, but the Nancy index (NI) stands out being a histological index with the least amount of scoring items among these scores. To which extent histologic assessment using NI is affected by interobserver reliability in a real word setting, is poorly understood. We therefore performed a single-center retrospective analysis of NI assessment in patients with UC.

METHODS

We retrospectively evaluated the NI in two independent cohorts (total: 1085 biopsies, 547 UC patients) of clinically diagnosed UC patients, who underwent colonoscopy between 2007 and 2020. Cohort #1 consisted of 637 biopsies from 312 patients, Cohort #2 consisted of 448 biopsies from 235 patients. Two blinded pathologists with different levels of expertise scored all biopsies of each cohort. A consensus conference was held for cases with discrepant scoring results. Finally, an overall consensus scoring was obtained from both cohorts.

RESULTS

The interobserver-agreement of the NI was substantial after the assessment of 1085 biopsy samples (κ = 0.796 [95%-CI: 0.771-0.820]). An improvement of the interobserver-agreement was found with growing numbers of samples evaluated by both observers (Cohort #1: κ = 0.772 [95%-CI: 0.739-0.805]; Cohort #2: κ = 0.829 [95%-CI: 0.793-0.864]). The interobserver discordance was the highest in NI grade 1 (observer 1: n=128; observer 2: n=236). Interobserver discordance was the lowest in NI grades 0 (observer 1: n=504; observer 2: n=479) and 3 (observer 1: n=71; observer 2: n=66).

CONCLUSION

The NI is an easy-to-use index with high interobserver reliability to assess the histological disease activity of UC patients in a real-world setting. While NI grades 0 and 3 had a high level of agreement between the observers, NI grade 1 had a poorer agreement-level. This highlights the clinical need to specify histological characteristics leading to NI grade 1.

Ulcerative Colitis-Induced Colorectal Carcinoma: A Deleterious Concatenation

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic inflammatory gastrointestinal ailment that encompasses Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). UC is an idiopathic, chronic inflammatory condition of the colonic mucosa that begins in the rectum and progresses proximally in a continuous way over a portion of the entire colon. Chronic inflammation is linked to cancer, and IBD-related chronic colonic inflammation raises the risk of colorectal cancer. Chronic inflammation has been linked to cancer, and chronic colonic inflammation caused by IBD increases the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC). When CRC arises in people with IBD, unlike sporadic CRC, the lesions are difficult to identify due to mucosal alterations produced by inflammation. The total prevalence of IBD-associated CRC is increasing due to the rapidly increasing frequency of IBD. Screening and surveillance colonoscopy in IBD patients is considered to allow for the early diagnosis of dysplasia and cancer, improving the prognosis of IBD-related CRC by giving patients proactive therapy. This article has reviewed literature pertaining to the mechanisms related to CRC development in UC and its clinical and therapeutic implications.

Measuring Histologic Activity in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Why and How

Histology is used to confirm the diagnosis of inflammatory bowel disease, exclude superimposed infections, and to evaluate for dysplasia. Histology has rarely been used to measure disease activity and guide therapy despite evidence that histologic measurements have value in predicting important clinical outcomes. More recently, there have been numerous studies supporting a role for histologic disease activity measurements in predicting a variety of outcomes including relapse, hospitalizations, steroid use, and dysplasia. The histologic assessment was superior to endoscopic measurements in many of these studies. This review will summarize the recent literature regarding histologic disease activity measurements in ulcerative colitis and Crohn disease. A detailed description of histologic scoring systems will also be provided to provide pathologists with the necessary tools to accurately measure disease activity.

Is histological healing a feasible endpoint in ulcerative colitis?

INTRODUCTION

Currently, treatment goals in ulcerative colitis aim to achieve clinical remission and endoscopic mucosal healing. Emerging evidence suggests that histologic assessment of inflammation is a sensitive marker that can outcompete mucosal healing in predicting the clinical course of disease in patients with ulcerative colitis. Based on this, histologic healing is frequently included as a secondary endpoint in pharmacological trials.

AREAS COVERED

We introduce currently used clinical and endoscopic treatment goals, summarize commonly used histologic scoring systems and then provide an overview on the relevance of histologic healing on the outcome in patients with ulcerative colitis. Finally, we review the efficacy of existing UC therapies for inducing histologic remission.

EXPERT OPINION

Histologic healing is achievable in a substantial portion of UC patients. Further, histologic healing is, as consolidated by several meta-analyses, associated with better disease outcome compared to clinical remission and/or endoscopic healing. However, before becoming a widely acceptable treatment endpoint, consensus definitions for histologic healing and the technical aspects as well as for the timing for obtaining biopsies are needed. And finally, we need more evidence to show that resolution of microscopic inflammation as a means of therapy change or dose escalation is indeed a superior endpoint.

Assessing Severity of Disease in Patients with Ulcerative Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic disease that can present at various stages of disease activity and severity. Traditionally, severity scoring has focused on disease activity during a single moment with various tools, including patient-reported symptoms, as well as clinical, laboratory-based, endoscopic, histologic, and imaging variables. Optimal delivery of care depends on the accurate assessment of disease severity, which must take longitudinal variables into account. This article reviews the history of severity scoring in UC and provides a concise, clinically oriented approach to assessing disease severity.

ECCO Position Paper: Harmonization of the Approach to Ulcerative Colitis Histopathology

Currently, the main targets of drug therapy for ulcerative colitis [UC] are endoscopic and clinical remission. However, there is active discussion about the additional advantages of including histological remission as a target. Accumulating evidence indicates that microscopic activity persists in endoscopically quiescent UC, that histological changes may lag behind clinical remission after treatment, and that absence of histological activity predicts lower rates of relapse, hospitalization, surgery and subsequent neoplasia. Obtaining useful information from mucosal biopsies in this setting depends on accurate and consistent evaluation of histological features. However, there is no standardization of biopsy procedures, histological sample processing technique or histological scoring systems, and there is no agreement on the definitions of histological remission, response or activity. Accordingly, a consensus expert panel convened by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation [ECCO] reviewed the literature and agreed a number of position statements regarding harmonization of UC histopathology. The objective was to provide evidence-based guidance for the standardization and harmonization of procedures, definitions and scoring systems for histology in UC, and to reach expert consensus where possible. We propose the absence of intraepithelial neutrophils, erosion and ulceration as a minimum requirement for the definition of histological remission. For randomized control trials we recommend the use of the Robarts histopathology index [RHI] or the Nancy index [NI]. For observational studies or in clinical practice we recommend the use of the NI. To predict the risk of future neoplasia in UC, cumulative histological scores over time are more useful than single scores.

Adenosquamous carcinoma of the right colon with diffuse signet-ring mucinous component

Colorectal carcinoma is one of the most frequent human malignant neoplasms. Besides the most common histological types, colorectal adenosquamous carcinoma is very rare, being microscopically constituted by tumoural glandular and squamous components. The diagnosis of primary colon adenosquamous carcinoma requires the exclusion of a metastatic squamous cell carcinoma and the extension of a primary squamous cell carcinoma from the anal-rectum junction. We report a case of primary adenosquamous carcinoma of the ascending colon in a 62-year-old Caucasian man affected by long-standing ulcerative colitis. Peritumoural lymph nodes and distant metastasis were present. We reported also a diffuse signet-ring mucinous component, which has not been previously observed. Moreover, we investigated microsatellite and all-RAS/B-RAF status, p16 and p53 protein expression, and the molecular presence of human papillomavirus DNA in all the morphologically distinct components, in order to suggest pathogenetic factors influencing the aggressive prognosis of colon adenosquamous carcinoma.

Histological Remission in Ulcerative Colitis: Under the Microscope Is the Cure

In recent years, the therapeutic goals in ulcerative colitis (UC) have become increasingly stringent. Histological features seem to be a reliable predictor of disease outcomes after therapy, and histological remission (HR) is the new frontier in the treatment of UC. Here, we first provide a historical perspective before reviewing indexes in the era of biologics; histology as a treatment goal in UC trials; the poor correlation between symptoms, endoscopy, and histology; and the impact of histology on disease outcomes. HR seems to be a promising end point for the treatment of UC because it is typically associated with better outcomes. Two new validated indexes are available to assess histology more accurately in trials, and they may also be applicable to clinical practice. Additional interventional trials are now necessary to establish definitions of HR and its potential for disease modification.

What is the role of histopathology in the evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease?

Assessment of disease activity is essential for developing and determining appropriate therapy in patients with Crohn's disease. Currently, clinical and endoscopic treatment targets have been proposed, whereas histologic assessment of disease activity is not recommended in expert guidelines. Histologic assessment of disease activity has emerged as an important tool in ulcerative colitis as persistent histological inflammation is associated with clinical relapse, corticosteroid use, hospitalisation, and development of dysplasia. Similar data for Crohn's disease is limited but emerging literature suggests that histologic evaluation of disease activity may have value. This review summarizes the recent literature regarding histologic evaluation of disease activity in Crohn's disease. Correlation between histologic, endoscopic, and other markers of disease activity are discussed. Histologic scoring systems in Crohn's disease are described and practical guidance is provided to gastroenterologists and pathologists on how to report and interpret histologic data.

The emerging role of histologic disease activity assessment in ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Assessment of disease activity is essential for developing and determining appropriate therapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC). Validated clinical and endoscopic scoring systems have been established to accurately define disease activity. Clinical and endoscopic treatment targets have also been proposed, with gastroenterologists encouraged to optimize medical therapy to achieve these targets. Recently, histology has been recognized as an important prognostic factor and potential treatment target in patients with UC.

METHODS

This review summarizes the recent literature regarding histologic scoring indices in UC and offers practical guidance to gastroenterologists on how to interpret histologic data.

RESULTS

Substantial evidence indicates that histology accurately predicts clinical relapse, hospitalization, corticosteroid use, and development of dysplasia. Furthermore, compared with endoscopy, findings suggest that histology may be more predictive of these outcomes. Because microscopic disease activity can persist in the absence of clinical or endoscopic disease activity, histology may be the ideal marker of inflammation. Standardized definitions of histologic response and remission and a biopsy procurement protocol are needed to guide clinical decision making. It is recommended that overall assessment of disease severity be determined according to the worst affected biopsy fragment. Crypt architectural distortion, basal plasmacytosis, and neutrophilic activity should be reported. A 5-category classification system based on disease chronicity/activity and basal plasmacytosis is proposed. It is not yet necessary to report on the degree of mucosal eosinophilia or use a validated scoring system, although the latter may aid in determining therapeutic response.

CONCLUSIONS

Although rarely used to measure inflammation and guide therapy, histologic disease activity is predictive of important clinical outcomes in UC. Randomized controlled trials are needed to determine whether histology should function as a treatment target.

Adalimumab for Induction of Histological Remission in Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis

BACKGROUND

Histological remission represents a target distinct from endoscopic healing in ulcerative colitis (UC) and seems a better predictor of clinical outcomes.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the ability of adalimumab to achieve histological remission in UC patients.

METHODS

Single-center, retrospective, open-label study of patients treated with adalimumab. Eligible patients were anti-TNF naïve adults with moderately to severely active UC. The Mayo score including endoscopy was performed at baseline and weeks 8 and 52. Histological activity was scored using the Geboes Index. The primary endpoint was histological remission, defined as a Geboes grade ≤ 3.0, at week 52.

RESULTS

We included 34 patients. At week 8, 6 of 34 patients (17.6%) achieved histological remission. At week 52, 9 patients (26.5%, intention to treat; 31%, per protocol) had histological remission. Patients had a significant and progressive reduction in the most severe subgrades of Geboes Index from baseline at weeks 8 and 52. At weeks 8 and 52, 50 and 61.8% of patients achieved mucosal healing (Mayo endoscopic subscore 0-1). All patients who achieved histological remission also had mucosal healing. At week 8, 85.3 and 20.6% of patients achieved clinical response (decrease in Mayo score ≤ 3 points) or remission (Mayo score ≤ 2), respectively. At week 52, the corresponding values were 67.6 and 52.9%, respectively. At week 52, agreement between histological remission and mucosal healing was fair (kappa 0.293). Agreement between histological remission and Mayo endoscopic subscore 0 was good (kappa 0.71).

CONCLUSIONS

Adalimumab was able to achieve histological remission in anti-TNF naïve patients with moderately to severely active UC.

Impact of mucosal inflammation on risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Long-standing ulcerative colitis is an established risk factor for colorectal neoplasia. A number of observational studies have suggested that evidence of mucosal inflammation (endoscopic or histologic) is associated with a greater risk for colorectal neoplasia than is mucosal healing. Our goal was to systematically analyze the risk of colorectal neoplasia in patients with ulcerative colitis who have ongoing mucosal inflammation to better inform surveillance strategies.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect of endoscopic and/or histologic inflammation on the risk of colorectal neoplasia in cohort and case-control studies. Sensitivity analyses for study setting and case definition were performed.

RESULTS

Six studies met the inclusion criteria, incorporating outcomes in 1443 patients. No study used a single validated measure for mucosal inflammation. The pooled odds ratio for colorectal neoplasia was 3.5 (95% confidence interval [CI], 2.6-4.8; P < .001) in those with any mucosal inflammation and 2.6 (95% CI, 1.5-4.5; P = .01) in those with histologic inflammation, when compared with those with mucosal healing. The overall quality of the studies was good.

CONCLUSION

The presence of objective evidence of mucosal inflammation during follow-up in patients with ulcerative colitis is associated with a greater risk of subsequent colorectal neoplasia than in those with mucosal healing. This risk factor should be considered in guidelines on surveillance intervals for these patients.

Disease activity and mucosal healing in inflammatory bowel disease: a new role for histopathology?

Histologic evaluation of disease activity in the setting of inflammatory bowel disease is gaining interest within the gastroenterology community. Recent data suggests that histologic measurements of inflammation in ulcerative colitis are more sensitive at detecting disease activity and perform better than endoscopic measurements in predicting clinical outcomes. Histologic measurements are also increasingly used in ulcerative colitis clinical trials to assess response to new therapies. Histologic measurements of disease activity are less well studied in Crohn's disease, but are gaining attention. Current published treatment algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease do not take into consideration histologic activity; however, this may change in the near future. In order for histologic measurements to be included in clinical decision-making, validated, reliable, and responsive histologic scoring systems are needed. In this review, the recent literature on the significance of histologic activity in both ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease is summarized. Histologic scoring systems are also briefly discussed.

Histological inflammation increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia in ulcerative colitis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Ulcerative colitis (UC) patients are at greater risk for the development of colorectal neoplasia. Several individual studies have demonstrated associations between severity of histologic inflammation and colorectal neoplasia. However, a comprehensive systematic review has not been completed. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the relationship between histologic inflammation and risk for neoplasia among available observational studies.

METHODS

Three databases (EMBASE, MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library) were systematically searched. Studies were included if they included UC patients who underwent colonoscopic assessment and when histologic inflammation and colorectal neoplasia were both reported. Colorectal neoplasia rates were compared. Quantitative meta-analysis was attempted.

RESULTS

Four of 1,422 records found were eligible. Results from 2 case-control studies reported a 3.5-fold increased risk for colorectal neoplasia associated with a single point increase in histologic inflammation. This result was further corroborated by one cohort study that demonstrated increased hazard ratios. The second cohort study reported outcomes for patients with normal gross endoscopy, but had increased histological inflammation when neoplasia was assessed. Finally, this study reported increased risk for neoplastic progression by histological inflammation among patients who were normal by gross endoscopic evaluation. Quantitative meta-analysis was unsuccessful due to heterogeneity between study measures.

CONCLUSIONS

There is strong evidence that histologic inflammation among patients with UC increases the risk of colorectal neoplasia. The depth and nature of assessment of additional clinical variables was varied and may have resulted in greater outcome discrepancy. Additional study related to mechanisms of inflammation-related neoplasia and therapeutic modification is needed.

Histology Grade Is Independently Associated With Relapse Risk in Patients With Ulcerative Colitis in Clinical Remission: A Prospective Study

OBJECTIVES

Objective evidence of inflammation has been associated with the risk of relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) who are in clinical remission. We compared endoscopic and histologic grades for their ability to predict clinical relapse in this patient population.

METHODS

Patients with UC in clinical remission were prospectively enrolled into an observational cohort. Baseline endoscopic scores (Mayo) and histological (Geboes) grades and blood markers were collected. All subjects were followed for 12 months and relapse determined using clinical indices.

RESULTS

A total of 179 subjects were enrolled into the study and followed for 12 months. Clinical relapse occurred in 23%; 5% were hospitalized, and 2% underwent colectomy. In univariate analysis, the baseline Mayo endoscopy score and the Geboes histology grade were significantly associated with the later development of clinical relapse (P<0.001 for both), but only the histology grade remained significant in a multivariate model (P=0.006). The relative risk of clinical relapse was 3.5 (95% CI 1.9-6.4, P<0.0001) in subjects whose baseline Geboes grade was ≥3.1. The area under the curve was 0.73 for the Geboes histology grade to identify subjects at risk of future clinical relapse. Of the patients in clinical, endoscopic, and histological remission at baseline (n=82), only 7% had a clinical relapse over the subsequent 12 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Histology grade has the strongest association with the risk of clinical relapse in patients with UC who are in clinical remission. Consideration should be given to including this end point in evaluating therapy for UC.

Treat to Target in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

OPINION STATEMENT

With the expanding armamentarium in IBD the current treatment targets can be reached. By optimally using our drugs we can avoid long-term complications in IBD. For this the therapeutic strategy has to be changed from a clinically driven approach to a target-driven strategy. Currently mucosal healing, normalization of biomarkers, histological healing, and healing on abdominal imaging are proposed targets. Correct phenotyping of the patient before initiation of therapy is mandatory. Once treatment is initiated a continuous re-evaluation with consequent adaptation of the treatment when goals are not (yet) reached is needed. Both escalation and de-escalation should be considered. Drug levels can be used as a guidance to reach these targets.

Defining Disease Severity in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Current and Future Directions

Although most treatment algorithms in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) begin with classifying patients according to disease severity, no formal validated or consensus definitions of mild, moderate, or severe IBD currently exist. There are 3 main domains relevant to the evaluation of disease severity in IBD: impact of the disease on the patient, disease burden, and disease course. These measures are not mutually exclusive and the correlations and interactions between them are not necessarily proportionate. A comprehensive literature search was performed regarding current definitions of disease severity in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, and the ability to categorize disease severity in a particular patient. Although numerous assessment tools for symptoms, quality of life, patient-reported outcomes, fatigue, endoscopy, cross-sectional imaging, and histology (in ulcerative colitis) were identified, few have validated thresholds for categorizing disease activity or severity. Moving forward, we propose a preliminary set of criteria that could be used to classify IBD disease severity. These are grouped by the 3 domains of disease severity: impact of the disease on the patient (clinical symptoms, quality of life, fatigue, and disability); measurable inflammatory burden (C-reactive protein, mucosal lesions, upper gastrointestinal involvement, and disease extent), and disease course (including structural damage, history/extension of intestinal resection, perianal disease, number of flares, and extraintestinal manifestations). We further suggest that a disease severity classification should be developed and validated by an international group to develop a pragmatic means of identifying patients with severe disease. This is increasingly important to guide current therapeutic strategies for IBD and to develop treatment algorithms for clinical practice.

Cancer surveillance in ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease: new strategies

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients have a higher incidence of colon cancer than the general population. Colon cancer surveillance has traditionally involved taking numerous random biopsies to provide sufficient yield to detect dysplasia. Recently, consensus guidelines have been published which promote the use of chromoendoscopy for IBD colon cancer surveillance. This presents a new set of opportunities and challenges in the evaluation and management of dysplasia in IBD.

RECENT FINDINGS

Dysplasia, previously thought to be 'invisible' to the endoscopist, is now considered to be 'visible' in the majority of cases with the advent of the use of high-definition endoscopy and chromoendoscopy. This changes how we manage dysplastic lesions, providing the patient options for endoscopic resection rather than promoting total proctocolectomy.

SUMMARY

Implemention of chromoendoscopy may require additional training for endoscopists unfamiliar with the technique. However, if this proves to be cost-effective and provides a higher sensitivity in dysplasia detection, then widespread education and implementation will be well worth the efforts. To do so, future studies will need to prove its benefits in preventing or reducing colon cancer morbidity and mortality in this high-risk patient population.

Application of confocal laser endomicroscopy in ulcerative colitis

The etiology of ulcerative colitis (UC) is not very clear. Most scholars believe that intestinal inflammation caused by immune system abnormalities plays an important role in the pathogenesis of UC. The clinical course of UC is characterized by episodes of exacerbation and remission alternately. Traditional electronic endoscopy with random biopsy plays an important role in the diagnosis, treatment and prognosis evaluation of UC. However, this method has some deficiencies, such as poor sensitivity, cumbersome procedures, bleeding caused by multiple biopsies and other complications. The advent of high resolution confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) can allow real-time, noninvasive histopathological examination in vivo, to achieve the goal of "virtual biopsy". This paper reviews the application of CLE in UC.

Colorectal cancer in colitis: a relic of the past?

The incidence of dysplasia and colorectal cancer in patients with long-standing colitis seems to be decreasing and controversy surrounds our detection and management strategies. Dysplasia is rarer, flatter, and smaller than in previous decades. Current surveillance guidelines, onerous in terms of colonoscopic workload and an emphasis on random biopsies, have yet to be shown to prevent colon cancers and colon cancer death in these patients. The evidence base for adjunct techniques such as chromoendoscopy is strong but adoption has been slow. We need to better risk-stratify patients with colitis and direct diminishing medical resources accordingly. Modulating dysplasia and cancer risk will involve optimizing medical therapies and focusing our colonoscopic efforts on those who will most likely benefit.

Mucosal healing in the era of biologic agents in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Mucosal healing has been a central issue in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for the last years, and has been proposed to be included as the new treatment goal in IBD. The molecular understanding of both the disruption and the healing of the intestinal epithelial cell lining and the mucosal barrier in IBD is complex and only partly understood. There is no general agreement on how to define healed mucosa, but there is a general acceptance that clinicians should use endoscopy and imaging technique in their assessments. Mucosal healing is an old concept that has been actualized in the present era of the highly effective biological agents. Randomized clinical studies with mucosal healing as end-point parameters have been reported, and early mucosal healing has been associated with low complication rates. We are waiting for documentation of whether treatment to healed mucosa can change the natural course of IBD. The concept of immunological remission has recently been introduced and can be the new treatment goal and one of several criteria for discontinuation of biological treatment in IBD. In conclusion, mucosal healing is a fairly novel concept and goal for biological treatment of IBD. There is a need for a standardization of its assessment and validation of the prognostic value.