Prevalence and Consequences of Nonadherence to Hemodialysis Regimens

The impact of a partnership care model on self-efficacy and self-care in hemodialysis patients: A quasi-experimental study

Introduction and objective

Self-care and self-efficacy are crucial in managing kidney failure requiring hemodialysis. However, traditional education methods have not effectively improved self-care and self-efficacy. Therefore, utilizing more effective models, such as the partnership care model, is essential. This study aimed to determine the impact of the partnership care model on self-care and self-efficacy in hemodialysis patients.

Materials and methods

This quasi-experimental study was conducted with 74 hemodialysis patients at Shahid Beheshti Hospital in Hamadan. Patients were divided into control and intervention groups. The control group received only routine care, while the intervention group received nursing care based on the partnership care model in addition to routine care. This included eight educational sessions over one month, with two sessions per week. Data were collected using self-care and Sherer self-efficacy questionnaires before and two months after the intervention. Data were analyzed using SPSS version 16.

Results

The study demonstrated significant improvements in self-care and self-efficacy among hemodialysis patients following the collaborative care intervention. Post-intervention, the experimental group showed substantial benefits with an effect size of 1.41 for self-care (95 % CI: 0.87-1.95, p < 0.001) and an effect size of 1.55 for self-efficacy (95 % CI: 0.99-2.10, p < 0.001), highlighting the effectiveness of the intervention.

Conclusion

The study demonstrated that the partnership care model, through comprehensive education and social and motivational support, significantly improved self-care and self-efficacy in hemodialysis patients. Therefore, it is recommended that hospitals and nurses adopt this model to enhance the health and quality of life of patients.

Overall adherence in hemodialysis patients and associated factors: A cross-sectional study from Morocco

INTRODUCTION

Hemodialysis patients' adherence to hemodialysis sessions, medication, diet and, fluid restriction is an essential condition to ensure effective treatment. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the overall adherence of hemodialysis patients in the Marrakech-Safi region of Morocco.

METHODS

A quantitative cross-sectional study of hemodialysis patients at the Safi, Youssoufia and Ibn Tofail public hemodialysis centers was conducted in the last trimester of 2023 using a questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), which was completed by analyzing patient records and interviewing patients during the hemodialysis session.

RESULTS

A total of 199 patients were included in this study. Women accounted for 53.3% of patients, 73.9% were under 65 years, 55.8% had been on hemodialysis for more than 5 years, and 62.8% had an Inter-dialytic-weight (IDW) ≥ 2.5 kg. Mean scores for adherence to hemodialysis, medication, diet and fluid restriction were 534.92 ± 98.71 out of 600, 113.32 ± 50.86 out of 200, 75.38 ± 42.00 out of 200 and 52.51 ± 53.59 out of 200, respectively. Regarding overall adherence, 24.1% had low adherence, 63.8% had moderate adherence, and 12.1% had good adherence, with a mean score of 793.99 ± 151.28 out of 1200. Our results showed that male gender (p = 0.010, ORa = 5.61), young age (p = 0.004, ORa = 8.48), and short duration on hemodialysis (p = 0.001, ORa = 23.91) were risk factors for low overall adherence.

CONCLUSION

Our results justify the increased need for educational programs aimed at improving the overall adherence of hemodialysis patients.

African American Patients' Perspectives on Determinants of Hemodialysis Adherence and Use of Motivational Interviewing to Improve Hemodialysis Adherence

Key Points

African American patients have unique insights on hemodialysis adherence and use of motivational interviewing to promote adherence. Key themes were mental health issues; historical mistrust; social determinants of health; and importance of provider cultural competence. Themes led to a novel conceptual model, which will inform the design of a motivational interviewing-based protocol to improve adherence.

Background

Compared with White patients, African American (AA) patients have a four-fold higher prevalence of kidney failure and higher hemodialysis nonadherence. Adherence behaviors are influenced by psychosocial factors, including personal meaning of a behavior and self-confidence to enact it. We assessed perspectives of AA hemodialysis patients on unique factors affecting dialysis adherence, and use of motivational interviewing (MI), an evidence-based intervention, to improve these factors, dialysis adherence, and outcomes in AAs.

Methods

Self-identified AA hemodialysis patients (N =22) watched a brief video describing MI and then completed a semistructured interview or focus group session. Interview questions explored unique barriers and facilitators of hemodialysis adherence in AAs and perceived utility of MI to address these obstacles. Verbatim transcripts and an iterative inductive/deductive approach were used to develop a hierarchical coding system. Three experienced coders independently coded the same two transcripts. Coding was compared, and discrepancies were reconciled by a fourth coder or consensus. Transcripts, quotations, and codes were managed using Microsoft Excel 2016 and SPSS version 28.0.

Results

Themes and subthemes emerged and culminated in a novel conceptual model informed by three theoretical models of behavior change: Theory of Self-Care Management for Vulnerable Populations; Social Cognitive Theory; and Self Determination Theory. This conceptual model will inform the design of a culturally tailored, MI-based intervention to improve dialysis adherence in AAs.

Conclusions

Integrating AA hemodialysis patient perspectives is critical for enhancing dialysis care delivery and the design of effective interventions such as MI to improve dialysis adherence in AA and promote kidney health equity. AA hemodialysis patients view MI as a tool to clarify patient priorities, build trust, and promote patient-provider therapeutic alliance. Cultural tailoring of MI to address unique barriers of AAs with kidney failure will improve adherence and health outcomes in these vulnerable patients.

Once-per-week haemodialysis in a financial crisis: Predictors of interdialytic weight gain

BACKGROUND

Several countries are experiencing challenges in maintaining standard haemodialysis services for people with kidney failure.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the health profile of people receiving haemodialysis and to identify factors associated with interdialytic weight gain.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 166 adults with kidney failure and receiving haemodialysis for at least 3 months were included.

MEASUREMENTS

A structured chart audit form collected, demographic and haemodialysis treatment characteristics, recent biochemical and haematological results, and prescribed treatment regimens from clinical records. Data were analysed descriptively. Odds ratios (OR) were calculated to identify independent risk factors for interdialytic weight gain.

RESULTS

Mean age was 52 years (SD = 12.5), over half were male (60.2%, n = 100), and most were receiving 4 h of haemodialysis once per week (87.3%, n = 145). Approximately half (51.8%, n = 86) had an interdialytic weight gain >2%. Being female (OR = 3.39; 95% CI, 1.51-7.61), increased comorbidities (OR = 1.50; 95% CI, 1.22-1.84) and having BMI outside of the normal range (overweight/obese [OR = 8.49; 95% CI, 3.58-20.13] or underweight [OR = 4.61; 95% CI, 1.39-15.31]) were independent risk factors for increased interdialytic weight gain.

CONCLUSION

Most patients were receiving 4 h of haemodialysis once per week although only modest alterations in potassium, phosphate, and fluid status were observed. Understanding the patient profile and predictors of interdialytic weight gain will inform the development of self-management interventions to optimise clinician support.

Weight Loss Surgery Increases Kidney Transplant Rates in Patients With Renal Failure and Obesity

OBJECTIVE

To describe the outcomes of kidney transplant (KT) candidates with obesity undergoing sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to meet the criteria for KT.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis was conducted of electronic medical records of KT candidates with obesity (body mass index >35 kg/m2) who underwent SG in our institution. Weight loss, adverse health events, and the listing and transplant rates were abstracted and compared with the nonsurgical cohort.

RESULTS

The SG was performed in 54 patients; 50 patients did not have surgery. Baseline demographic characteristics were comparable at the time of evaluation. Mean body mass index ± SD of the SG group was 41.7±3.6 kg/m2 at baseline (vs 41.5±4.3 kg/m2 for nonsurgical controls); at 2 and 12 months after SG, it was 36.4±4.1 kg/m2 and 32.6±4.0 kg/m2 (P<.01 for both). In the median follow-up time of 15.5 months (interquartile range, 6.4 to 23.9 months), SG was followed by active listing (37/54 people), and 20 of 54 received KT during a median follow-up time of 20.9 months (interquartile range, 14.7 to 28.3 months) after SG. In contrast, 14 of 50 patients in the nonsurgical cohort were listed, and 5 received a KT (P<.01). Three patients (5.6%) experienced surgical complications. There was no difference in overall hospitalization rates and adverse health outcomes, but the SG cohort experienced a higher risk of clinically significant functional decline.

CONCLUSION

In KT candidates with obesity, SG appears to be effective, with 37% of patients undergoing KT during the next 18 months (P<.01). Further research is needed to confirm and to improve the safety and efficacy of SG for patients with obesity seeking a KT.

The effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy on clinical symptoms and treatment adherence in dialysis patients

BACKGROUND

Clinical symptoms and treatment adherence are one of the most important problems in dialysis patients. Psychological treatments can be effective in reducing the problems of these patients. Therefore, this study aimed at investigating the effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) on clinical symptoms and treatment adherence in these patients.

MATERIALS AND METHOD

This study was a quasi-experimental study with the experimental and control groups in the dialysis clinic of Torbat-e Heydarieh City in 2012. The sample consisted of 40 people who were referred to the dialysis clinic, and the available sampling method was used to randomly assign participants to the experimental and control groups. In the experimental group, ACT was performed in eight sessions of 90 minutes. Questionnaires of Depression, Anxiety, and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and general adherence scale were used. Data were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS 21) software and multivariate analysis of covariance (MANCOVA) test.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the mean scores of clinical symptoms and treatment adherence variables in the experimental and control groups (P < 0.05). The effect of this treatment on reducing the clinical symptoms score was 48%, and on increasing the treatment, the adherence score was 44%.

CONCLUSION

ACT can reduce clinical symptoms and increase treatment adherence in dialysis patients, so it is suggested to use this intervention in the design of treatment plans for dialysis patients.

Factors Associated with Nonadherence to Dietary Prescriptions among Hemodialysis Patients, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

The nonadherence of hemodialysis (HD) patients correlates with morbidity and mortality. Despite severe consequences, noncompliance with their medical regimen is the norm for HD patients rather than the exception. Factors associated with nonadherence to dietary restrictions among HD patients have been explored in many studies; however, most were in Western countries and there is a remarkable paucity of studies in Saudi Arabia. HD patients have several features that put them at an increased risk of nonadherence to dietary restrictions, including prolonged, intensive treatment, and their medical regimens are easily determined with objective measures. This crosssectional study aimed to determine factors related to nonadherence to dietary restrictions among 361 HD patients randomly selected from HD centers in Makkah, Saudi Arabia. Individuals were assessed for adherence using the End-Stage Renal Disease - Adherence Questionnaire in addition to clinical examinations and laboratory investigations. Female patients were more likely to be nonadherent to dietary restrictions. Adherence to dietary restrictions was relatively higher among non-Saudi patients, older people, those who are married, those with university qualifications, those who are employed, and those with higher monthly incomes; nevertheless, these differences were not statistically significant. Despite the relatively higher frequency of adherence to dietary restrictions among patients with a duration of dialysis of <60 months, hypertensive patients, patients with a previous kidney transplant, and those with a previous history of psychiatric illnesses, these differences were not statistically significant. Patients with factors associated with nonadherence to dietary restrictions deserve special attention and support to improve their adherence.

Adherence of Hemodialysis Patients to Fluid, Diet, Medications, and Hemodialysis Sessions, Makkah, Saudi Arabia

The adherence of hemodialysis (HD) patients to medical instructions is considered crucial for a longer life expectancy and better quality of life. Despite its importance, there is a remarkable paucity in research dealing with the adherence of patients under HD in Saudi Arabia. The objective of this study was to identify the prevalence of adherence to fluid, diet, medications, and HD sessions among HD patients in Makkah. This was a cross-sectional study in which 361 HD patients were randomly selected from HD centers in three governmental hospitals in Makkah. Individuals were assessed for adherence using the End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire in addition to a clinical examination and laboratory investigations. These methods were used to identify the level of adherence to fluid, diet, medications, and HD sessions. The frequency of adherence of patients was found to be high for dietary guidelines (88.4%), fluid restriction (87.8%), and medications (88.0%), but it was relatively low for adherence to HD sessions (56.0%). The overall adherence rates in the current study population were thought to be within the range of most published international studies.

Non-adherence, medication beliefs and symptom burden among patients receiving hemodialysis -a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to medication is a common and complex issue faced by individuals undergoing hemodialysis (HD). However, more knowledge is needed about modifiable factors influence on non-adherence. This study investigated the prevalence of non-adherence, medication beliefs and symptom burden and severity among patients receiving HD in Denmark. Associations between non-adherence, medications beliefs and symptom burden and severity were also explored.

METHOD

A cross-sectional questionnaire-based multisite study, including 385 participants. We involved patient research consultants in the study design process and the following instruments were included: Medication Adherence Report Scale, Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire and Dialysis Symptom Index. Logistic regression analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The prevalence of non-adherence was 32% (95% CI 27-37%) using a 23-point-cut-off. Just over one third reported being concerned about medication One third also believed physicians to overprescribe medication, which was associated with 18% increased odds of non-adherence. Symptom burden and severity were high, with the most common symptoms being tiredness/ lack of energy, itching, dry mouth, trouble sleeping and difficulties concentrating. A high symptom burden and/or symptom severity score was associated with an increased odd of non-adherence.

CONCLUSION

The study found significant associations between non-adherence and, beliefs about overuse, symptom burden and symptom severity. Our results suggest health care professionals (HCP) should prioritize discussion about medication adherence with patients with focus on addressing patient-HCP relationship, and patients' symptom experience. Future research is recommended to explore the effects of systematically using validated adherence measures in clinical practice on medication adherence, patient-HCP communication and trust. Additionally, studies are warranted to further investigate the relationship between symptom experience and adherence in this population.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03897231.

The effect of an educational app on hemodialysis patients' self-efficacy and self-care: A quasi-experimental longitudinal study

OBJECTIVE

Adequate self-care and exploring ways to improve it is imperative for patients with hemodialysis in order to meet the challenges arising from hemodialysis. This study aimed to determine the effect of an educational app on patients with hemodialysis' self-efficacy and self-care.

METHODS

The present study is a quasi-experimental longitudinal single-group study, carried out from October 2020 to March 2021 with the participation of 60 Patients with hemodialysis. Simple random sampling was used to sample patients. The intervention included an educational application, and participants completed questionnaires on self-efficacy and self-care performance at four points including baseline and at one, three, and six-month intervals post- intervention. Two-way ANOVA with repeated measures was used to examine the impact of the intervention. Bonferroni's posthoc test was also used for in-class calculation and comparison of changes over various periods.

RESULTS

The results of this study showed that the self-care performance of patients at different times was statistically significant (P <0.001). Also, the results showed that the mean total score of self-efficacy in the second period compared to the first was significantly improved (P <0.001). But the trend of changes in the third period compared to the second and the fourth to the third was not significant (p = 0.1 and p = .82). Also, a significant change was observed in the fourth period compared to the first (p = .029).

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed that education through a mobile app can result in significant improvements in these patients' self-care behaviors and self-efficacy over time. The educational intervention should be provided to patients with hemodialysis over a several-month period to allow for proper integration of the learning.

Digital Healthy Diet Literacy and Fear of COVID-19 as Associated with Treatment Adherence and Its Subscales among Hemodialysis Patients: A Multi-Hospital Study

Treatment adherence (TA) is a critical issue and is under-investigated in hemodialysis patients. A multi-center study was conducted from July 2020 to March 2021 on 972 hemodialysis patients in eight hospitals in Vietnam to explore the factors associated with TA during the COVID-19 pandemic. Data were collected, including socio-demographics, an End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ), 12-item short-form health literacy questionnaire (HLS-SF12), 4-item digital healthy diet literacy scale (DDL), 10-item hemodialysis dietary knowledge scale (HDK), 7-item fear of COVID-19 scale (FCoV-19S), and suspected COVID-19 symptoms (S-COVID19-S). Bivariate and multivariate linear regression models were used to explore the associations. Higher DDL scores were associated with higher TA scores (regression coefficient, B, 1.35; 95% confidence interval, 95%CI, 0.59, 2.12; p = 0.001). Higher FCoV-19S scores were associated with lower TA scores (B, -1.78; 95%CI, -3.33, -0.24; p = 0.023). In addition, patients aged 60-85 (B, 24.85; 95%CI, 6.61, 43.11; p = 0.008) with "very or fairly easy" medication payment ability (B, 27.92; 95%CI, 5.89, 44.95; p = 0.013) had higher TA scores. Patients who underwent hemodialysis for ≥5 years had a lower TA score than those who received <5 years of hemodialysis (B, -52.87; 95%CI, -70.46, -35.28; p < 0.001). These findings suggested that DDL and FCoV-19S, among other factors, should be considered in future interventions to improve TA in hemodialysis patients.

Self-Care Behaviors in Patients with Hypertension to Prevent Hypertensive Emergencies: a Qualitative Study Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior

Background: Hypertension is a crucial general health issue. Severe and acute hypertension needs urgent medical intervention. Self-care behaviors can help patients with hypertension in controlling blood pressure and preventing hypertensive emergencies. This study aimed to determine the perception of hypertension towards self-care behaviors using constructs of the theory of planned behavior (TPB) in critically ill patients with hypertension to prevent hypertensive emergencies.

Material and Methods: This study was conducted based on the directed qualitative content analysis of 33 critically ill patients with hypertension who participated in semi-structured interviews and focus group discussions. Results: The data were analyzed based on the four main categories of TPB. The attitude category consisted of positive and negative subcategories. The subjective norms category consisted of authority of healthcare staff, family support and approval, and influence of friends subcategories. The perceived behavioral control category included discipline, self-control, receiving consultation, individual concerns, financial problems, access to medicine, food culture, and coronavirus limitations subcategories. The behavioral intention category had intention to perform the behavior and intention to continue a behavior subcategories.

Conclusion: The results revealed the requirement for a multidimensional approach to improve attitude, subjective norms, and behavioral control for performing self-care behaviors to reduce the number of hypertensive emergencies in critically ill patients with hypertension. Factors affecting self-care included socioeconomic status, family support, governmental organizations, and participants’ health condition.

Influence of continuity of care on self-management ability and quality of life in outpatient maintenance hemodialysis patients

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of continuity of care on self-management ability and quality of life (QOL) in patients undergoing maintenance hemodialysis (MHD).

METHODS

One hundred patients were randomly assigned to the observation group and the control group. In the observation group, patients received a 12-month continuity of care. In the control group, patients were given with routine nursing. Evaluate the patients' self-management ability and QOL between two groups 1 week before discharge and 6 and 12 months outpatient MHD.

RESULTS

Observation group had higher Hemodialysis Self-Management Instrument (HD-SMI) scores and Kidney Disease Quality of Life-Short Form (KDQOL-SF™) scores than control group at 6 and 12 months outpatient MHD. But patients in observation group had a much lower systolic blood pressure than those in control group at 12 months outpatient MHD.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that continuity of care in the form of online education, telephone visit, and outpatient visit could improve self-management ability and QOL of patients undergoing MHD.

Design and Development of a Digital Counseling Program for Chronic Kidney Disease

Background:

Self-management has shown to improve the quality of life in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). Readily accessible self-management tools are essential in promoting adherence to self-care behaviors. In recognizing that digital health facilitates efficient access to self-management programs, we developed a digital counseling program, ODYSSEE Kidney Health, to promote self-care behaviors while supporting health-related quality of life.

Objective:

To present the design and development of ODYSSEE Kidney Health for digital counseling for patients with CKD.

Design:

The study involved an iterative design process based on user-centered design principles to develop the digital counseling program, ODYSSEE Kidney Health.

Setting:

A sample of 10 to 15 participants were purposively sampled from nephrology clinics at the University Health Network, Toronto, Canada.

Methods:

Participants underwent 2 phases in the development process. In each phase, participants were presented with a component of the program, asked to perform goal-oriented tasks, and participate in the “think-aloud” process. Semi-structured interviews followed the first phase to identify feedback about the overall program. Thematic analysis of the interviews identified themes from the usability testing. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize patient demographic data.

Results:

We enrolled 11 participants (n = 7 males, n = 4 females, ages 30-82). The main themes generated anchored on (1) impact on nephrology care, (2) technical features, and (3) CKD content. Overall, participants reported positive satisfaction toward the navigation, layout, and content of the program. They cited the value of the program in their daily CKD care.

Limitations:

Study limitations included using a single center to recruit participants, most of the participants having prior technology use, and using one module as a representative of the entire digital platform.

Conclusion:

The acceptability of a digital counseling program for patients with CKD relies on taking the patients’ perspective using a user-centered design process. It is vital in ensuring adoption and adherence to self-management interventions aimed at sustaining behavioral change.

Relationship between dialysis quality and brain compliance in patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD): a cross-sectional study

BACKGROUND

The high number of patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESRD) on hemodialysis makes it necessary to conduct studies aimed at improving their quality of life.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate brain compliance, using the Brain4care method for intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring, among patients with ESRD before and at the end of the hemodialysis session, and to correlate ICP with the dialysis quality index (Kt/V).

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional study conducted at a renal replacement therapy center in Brazil.

METHODS

Sixty volunteers who were undergoing hemodialysis three times a week were included in this study. Brain compliance was assessed before and after hemodialysis using the noninvasive Brain4care method and intracranial pressure wave morphology was analyzed.

RESULTS

Among these 60 ESRD volunteers, 17 (28%) presented altered brain compliance before hemodialysis. After hemodialysis, 12 (20%) exhibited normalization of brain compliance. Moreover, 10 (83%) of the 12 patients whose post-dialysis brain compliance became normalized were seen to present good-quality dialysis, as confirmed by Kt/V > 1.2.

CONCLUSIONS

It can be suggested that changes to cerebral compliance in individuals with ESRD occur frequently and that a good-quality hemodialysis session (Kt/V > 1.2) may be effective for normalizing the patient's cerebral compliance.

Discordance between hemodialysis patients' reports and their physicians' estimates of adherence to dietary restrictions in Japan

INTRODUCTION

This study examined the discordance between hemodialysis patients' reports and their physicians' estimates of dietary restriction adherence and related factors in Japan.

METHODS

In a cross-sectional survey of 6,644 outpatients, physicians who estimated higher and lower adherence than their patients' self-reported were categorized as overestimation and underestimation in terms of discordance, respectively. Possible factors included clinical indicators, patient characteristics related to negative stereotypes, and health beliefs related to statistical discrimination.

RESULTS

The concordance rate was .069 based on the weighted kappa coefficient. The coefficients of acceptable serum potassium, prevalence of diabetes, and self-efficacy on overestimates were .663 , -.126, and -.132, respectively. The coefficients of these factors on underestimates were -.589, .338, and .145, respectively. All these coefficients were significant.

CONCLUSIONS

The discordance may be high and is related to physicians' clinical data reliance, negative stereotypes about patient characteristics, and a lack of understanding of patients' health beliefs.

Adherence to hemodialysis and medical regimens among patients with end-stage renal disease during COVID-19 pandemic: a cross-sectional study

Background

Adherence of patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) to Hemodialysis (HD), prescribed medications, diet and fluid restrictions is essential to get the desirable outcome and prevent complications. During COVID-19 pandemic, ESRD patients became more concerned with attending the HD sessions and following the protective measures because of the potential for increased susceptibility to COVID-19. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the pandemic on patients' adherence to HD and medical regimens.

Methods

Two hundred five ESRD patients on HD were interviewed with the ESRD Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ) and the Fear-of-COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S). Clinical and laboratory correlates of adherence were retrieved from patients' records.

Results

Self-reported adherence to HD showed that 19.5% were not adherent to HD during the pandemic compared to 11.7% before the pandemic (p < 0.001), with a significant agreement with the actual attendance of HD sessions (Kappa = 0.733, p < 0.001). Twenty-five patients (12.2%) had a history of COVID-19. The FCV-19S had a mean score of 18.8 and showed significant positive correlations with the pre-dialysis phosphorus and potassium. Multivariate analysis showed that the main predictors of non-adherence were the history of COVID-19, understanding and perception scores, and the Fear-of-COVID score.

Conclusions

The COVID-19 pandemic adversely affected the adherence of ESRD patients to HD and medical regimen. Strategies to mitigate patients' fears of COVID-19 and improve their understanding and perceptions of adherence to HD and medical regimen should be adopted in HD centers during the pandemic.

Peer mentorship to improve outcomes in patients on hemodialysis (PEER-HD): a randomized controlled trial protocol

BACKGROUND

Patients receiving in-center hemodialysis experience disproportionate morbidity and incur high healthcare-related costs. Much of this cost stems from potentially avoidable hospitalizations. Peer mentorship has been used effectively to improve outcomes for patients with complex chronic diseases. We propose testing the efficacy of peer mentorship on hospitalization rates among patients receiving hemodialysis.

METHODS

This is a multicenter parallel group randomized controlled pragmatic trial of patients treated at hemodialysis facilities in Bronx, NY and Nashville, TN. The study has two phases. Phase 1 will enroll and train 16 hemodialysis patients (10 in Bronx, NY and 6 in Nashville TN) to be mentors using a program focused on enhancing self-efficacy, dialysis self-management and autonomy-supportive communication skills. Phase 2 will enroll 200 high risk adults receiving hemodialysis (140 in Bronx, NY and 60 in Nashville, TN), half of whom will be randomized to intervention and half to usual care. Intervention participants are assigned to weekly telephone calls with trained mentors (see Phase 1) for a 3-month period. The primary outcome of Phase 1 will be engagement of mentors with training and change in knowledge scores and autonomy skills from pre- to post-training. The primary outcome of Phase 2 will be the composite count of ED visits and hospitalizations at the end of study follow-up in patient participants assigned to intervention as compared to those assigned to usual care. Secondary outcomes for Phase 2 include the change over the trial period in validated survey scores measuring perception of social support and self-efficacy, and dialysis adherence metrics, among intervention participants as compared to usual care participants.

DISCUSSION

The PEER-HD study will test the feasibility and efficacy of a pragmatic peer-mentorship program designed for patients receiving hemodialysis on ED visit and hospitalization rates. If effective, peer-mentorship holds promise as a scalable patient-centered intervention to decrease hospital resource utilization, and by extension morbidity and cost, for patients receiving maintenance in-center hemodialysis.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT03595748 ; 7/23/2018.

TRIAL SPONSOR

National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease (NIDDK) 5R18DK118471.

FUNDING

Funding for this study was provided by the National Institutes of Diabetes, Digestive and Kidney Disease: R18DK118471.

STUDY STATUS

This is an ongoing study and not complete. We are still collecting data for observational follow-up on participants.

RELATED ARTICLES

No related articles for this study have been submitted to any journal. The study sponsor and funders had no role in the design, analysis or interpretation of this data. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the National Institutes of Health.

Characteristics and outcomes of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander patients with dialysis-dependent kidney disease in Australian intensive care units

BACKGROUND

In Australia, 531 people per million population have dialysis-dependent chronic kidney disease (CKD5D). The incidence is four times higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (indigenous) people compared with non-Indigenous Australians. CKD5D increases the risk of hospitalisation, admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) and mortality compared with patients without CKD5D. There is limited literature describing short-term outcomes of patients with CKD5D who are admitted to the ICU, comparing indigenous and non-indigenous patients.

AIMS

This registry-based retrospective cohort analysis compared demographic and clinical data between indigenous and non-indigenous patients with CKD5D and tested whether indigenous status predicted short-term outcomes independently of other contributing factors. Adjusted hospital mortality was the primary outcome measure.

METHODS

Data were from the Australian and New Zealand Intensive Care Society's Centre for Outcome and Resource Evaluation Adult Patient Database. Australian ICU admissions between 2010 and 2017 were included. Data from 173 ICU (2136 beds) include 1 051 697 ICU admissions, of which 23 793 had a pre-existing diagnosis of CKD5D.

RESULTS

Indigenous patients comprised 11.9% of CKD5D patients in ICU. CKD5D was prevalent among 4.9% of indigenous and 2.9% of non-indigenous ICU admissions. Indigenous patients were 13.5 years younger, had fewer comorbidities and lower crude mortality despite equivalent calculated mortality risk. After adjusting for age, remoteness and severity of illness, indigenous status did not predict mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Socioeconomic disadvantage contributes to earlier development of CKD5D and the overrepresentation in ICU of indigenous people. Mortality is equivalent once correcting for confounders, but addressing inequality requires strengthening preventative care.

The worldwide prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions among hemodialysis patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in hemodialysis (HD) patients can lead to undesired health outcomes. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to estimate the pooled prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in HD patients.

METHODS

Research papers from PubMed, CINAHL, and Google Scholar on non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions in HD patients published between 2000 and 2020 were selected for this study. The methodological quality of each study was graded, and the estimates were pooled using the random-effects model of meta-analysis. Analyses of subgroups and meta-regression were carried out. Egger's test and visual analysis of the symmetry of funnel plots were used to assess the publication bias.

RESULTS

Eight hundred sixty-eight potential records were identified during the search. Twenty-three studies that met inclusion criteria were considered for meta-analysis and comprised 11,209 HD patients (mean age 55.85 years± SD 6.86, males 57.74%). The estimated worldwide prevalence of non-adherence to diet and fluid restrictions was 60.2% (95% CI: 47.3- 72.5) and 60.6% (95% CI: 50- 70.7), respectively. The meta-regression found that the income category was negatively, and the risk of bias score was positively associated with the prevalence of non-adherence to fluid restrictions (p<0.05). The funnel plot of studies included pooling the prevalence of non-adherence to fluid restrictions revealed asymmetry, and a significant publication bias was also noted as assessed by Egger's test (P = 0.004). However, the pooled estimate should be interpreted with caution because the prevalence of individual studies varies considerably due to methodological or measurement discrepancies.

CONCLUSION

The pooled prevalence of non-adherence to diet (47.3 - 72.5%) and fluid (50 - 70.7%) restrictions were substantially high. The health care team must recognize the factors and barriers influencing adherence behavior and develop holistic interventions to improve it.

Factors Influencing Self-Care Behavior and Treatment Adherence in Hemodialysis Patients

Low self-care and treatment adherence are found among hemodialysis patients. We aimed to identify the factors influencing self-care behavior and treatment adherence and examine the mediating effect of treatment adherence on self-care behavior. A questionnaire was administered through a social media community from 11 July to 13 August 2021. The data collected from 100 participants were analyzed using the independent t-test, one-way analysis of variance, Pearson’s correlation, multiple linear regression analysis, and hierarchical multiple regression analysis. The mean self-care behavior and treatment adherence scores were 3.52 ± 0.57 and 4.01 ± 0.48, respectively. The mean age and hemodialysis duration were 51.70 ± 9.40 and 7.57 ± 7.21 years, respectively. The common primary cause of end-stage renal disease was glomerulonephritis (n = 39, 39%). Self-care behavior varied with education, frequency of self-care behavior education, and social support and was positively correlated with treatment adherence and social support. Treatment adherence was positively correlated with social support. Treatment adherence, social support, and health status were influenced self-care behavior (54.5%. Self-care behavior and frequency of self-care behavior education influenced treatment adherence (61.3%). Treatment adherence partially mediated the relationship between social support and self-care behavior. Intervention strategies that increase both social support and treatment adherence can promote self-care behavior.

Psychosocial characteristics of patients evaluated for kidney transplant and associations with functional and frailty metrics at a veterans affairs hospital

BACKGROUND

The effect of psychosocial problems on listing outcomes and potential interactions with functional metrics is not well-characterized among Veteran transplant candidates.

METHODS

The results from psychosocial evaluations, frailty metrics, and biochemical markers were collected on 375 consecutive Veteran kidney transplant candidates. Psychosocial diagnoses were compared between patients listed or denied for transplant. Functional abilities were compared among patients with or without psychosocial diagnoses and then evaluated based on reason for denial.

RESULTS

Eighty-four percent of patients had a psychosocial diagnosis. Common issues included substance or alcohol abuse (62%), psychiatric diagnoses (50%), and poor adherence (25%). Patients with psychiatric diagnoses, cognitive impairments, and poor adherence were more likely to be denied for transplant (P < .05). Patients with depression, PTSD, and anxiety did not have worse functional ability, but experienced more exhaustion than patients without these problems. Patients denied for medical but not purely psychosocial reasons had worse troponin and functional metrics compared with listed patients.

CONCLUSION

Over 80% of patients with a psychosocial diagnosis were listed; however, poor adherence was a particularly important reason for denial for purely psychosocial reasons. Patients with psychosocial diagnoses generally were not more functionally limited than their counterparts without psychosocial diagnoses or those listed for transplant.

Missing In-Center Hemodialysis Sessions among Patients with End Stage Renal Disease in Banda Aceh, Indonesia

Indonesian universal health coverage was implemented in 2013 and hemodialysis services became universally accessible, yet few studies have examined patient adherence to hemodialysis schedules. We examined the rates of missed in-center hemodialysis sessions in Banda Aceh and the factors associated with non-attendance. This cross-sectional questionnaire survey included 193 patients receiving in-center hemodialysis. Approximately 28% of the patients missed ≥ 1 hemodialysis session in the month prior to the questionnaire’s administration. About 65% reported attending religious activities as the reason for missing hemodialysis. The level of health literacy was generally low with a mean score of 14.38 out of 26 (55.3%). Multivariate logistic regression analyses showed that patients with educational levels higher than elementary school were less likely to miss hemodialysis sessions. Participants who performed more self-care behaviors had lower odds of missing hemodialysis sessions. Every unit increase in the health literacy score was associated with increased odds of missing hemodialysis sessions. Emphasizing the importance of attending hemodialysis sessions and modifying hemodialysis schedules based on patients’ needs is essential. Patients who miss hemodialysis sessions should be reminded of all self-care behaviors. Health literacy among hemodialysis patients should be improved, with emphasis on patient safety, advanced knowledge, and critical health literacy.

Mitigating Nonattendance Using Clinic-Resourced Incentives Can Be Mutually Beneficial: A Contingency Management-Inspired Partially Observable Markov Decision Process Model

OBJECTIVES

Nonattendance of appointments in outpatient clinics results in many adverse effects including inefficient use of valuable resources, wasted capacity, increased delays, and gaps in patient care. This research presents a modeling framework for designing positive incentives aimed at decreasing patient nonattendance.

METHODS

We develop a partially observable Markov decision process (POMDP) model to identify optimal adaptive reinforcement schedules with which financial incentives are disbursed. The POMDP model is conceptually motivated based on contingency management evidence and practices. We compare the expected net profit and trade-offs for a clinic using data from the literature for a base case and the optimal positive incentive design resulting from the POMDP model. To accommodate a less technical audience, we summarize guidelines for reinforcement schedules from a simplified Markov decision process model.

RESULTS

The results of the POMDP model show that a clinic can increase its net profit per recurrent patient while simultaneously increasing patient attendance. An increase in net profit of 6.10% was observed compared with a policy with no positive incentive implemented. Underlying this net profit increase is a favorable trade-off for a clinic in investing in a targeted contingency management-based positive incentive structure and an increase in patient attendance rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Through a strategic positive incentive design, the POMDP model results show that principles from contingency management can support decreasing nonattendance rates and improving outpatient clinic efficiency of its appointment capacity, and improved clinic efficiency can offset the costs of contingency management.

Use of non-invasive intracranial pressure pulse waveform to monitor patients with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD)

End-stage renal disease (ESRD) is treated mainly by hemodialysis, however, hemodialysis is associated with frequent complications, some of them involve the increased intracranial pressure. In this context, monitoring the intracranial pressure of these patients may lead to a better understanding of how intracranial pressure morphology varies with hemodialysis. This study aimed to follow-up patients with ESRD by monitoring intracranial pressure before and after hemodialysis sessions using a noninvasive method. We followed-up 42 patients with ESRD in hemodialysis, for six months. Noninvasive intracranial pressure monitoring data were obtained through analysis of intracranial pressure waveform morphology, this information was uploaded to Brain4care® cloud algorithm for analysis. The cloud automatically sends a report containing intracranial pressure parameters. In total, 4881 data points were collected during the six months of follow-up. The intracranial pressure parameters (time to peak and P2/P1 ratio) were significantly higher in predialysis when compared to postdialysis for the three weekly sessions and throughout the follow-up period (p<0.01) data showed general improvement in brain compliance after the hemodialysis session. Furthermore, intracranial pressure parameters were significantly higher in the first weekly hemodialysis session (p<0.05). In conclusion, there were significant differences between pre and postdialysis intracranial pressure in patients with ESRD on hemodialysis. Additionally, the pattern of the intracranial pressure alterations was consistent over time suggesting that hemodialysis can improve time to peak and P2/P1 ratio which may reflect in brain compliance.

Non-adherence to hemodialysis regimens among patients on maintenance hemodialysis in sub-Saharan Africa: an example from Cameroon

Background

Non-adherence (NA) to hemodialysis regimens is one of the contributors to the high morbidity and mortality observed in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD). We aimed to determine the prevalence and predictors of NA to hemodialysis (HD) regimens among patients on maintenance HD in Cameroon.

Methods

A cross-sectional study in two HD centers in Cameroon was conducted from January to February 2016. Consenting patients on HD for ≥3 months were included. NA to fluid restriction was defined as a mean interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) in the past month >5.7% of the dry weight, NA to dietary restriction as a pre dialysis serum phosphorus >5.5 mg/dl in a patient on phosphate binders and who is well-nourished, and NA to HD sessions as skipping at least one session in the past month. The study was approved by the institutional ethics board.

Results

A total of 170 (112 males) participants with a median age of 49 years (range 14–79) were included. The median dialysis vintage was 35 months (range 3–180 months). The prevalence of NA was 15.3% to fluid restriction, 26.9% to dietary restriction, and 21.2% to dialysis sessions. Age ≤49 years (p = .006, OR: 5.07, 95% CI: 1.59–16.20) and unmarried status (p = .041, OR: 2.63, 95% CI: 1.04–6.66) were independently associated with NA to fluid restrictions. No factor was associated with NA to dietary restrictions and HD sessions.

Conclusions

NA to HD regimens is common amongst patients in Cameroon. Younger age and being unmarried were the predictors of NA to fluid restriction.

Multidisciplinary Team versus a "Phosphate-Counting" App for Serum Phosphate Control: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Background

Hyperphosphatemia is almost universal in well-nourished patients with ESKD treated with dialysis due to an imbalance between dietary intake and phosphate removal via residual kidney function and dialysis. Although food phosphate content can vary dramatically between meals, the current standard is to prescribe a fixed dose of phosphate binder that may not match meal phosphate intake. The primary objective of our study was to determine if the use of an app that matches phosphate binder dose with food phosphate content would be associated with an improvement in serum phosphate and a reduction in calcium carbonate intake compared with the multidisciplinary renal team.

Methods

Eighty patients with ESKD treated with peritoneal dialysis at a tertiary care hospital in Canada were randomized to the standard of care for serum phosphate management (multidisciplinary renal team) versus the OkKidney app. Serum phosphate was measured at baseline and then monthly for 3 months with adjustments to phosphate management as deemed necessary by the multidisciplinary team (control) or the phosphate binder multiplier in the OkKidney app (intervention) on the basis of the laboratory values. The primary analysis was an unpaired t test of the serum phosphate at study completion.

Results

The participants were 56 (±14) years old, and 54% were men; the most common cause of ESKD was diabetes mellitus. The serum phosphate values were 1.96 (0.41) and 1.85 (0.44) mmol/L in the control and intervention groups, respectively, at the end of 3 months (P=0.30). The median elemental daily dose of calcium carbonate did not differ between the groups at study completion (587 mg [309-928] versus 799 mg [567-1183], P=0.29).

Conclusions

The OkKidney app was associated with similar but not superior serum phosphate control to the standard of care, which included renal dietician support.

Clinical Trial registry name and registration number

US National Library Medicine ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01643486.

A bundled phosphate control intervention (4Ds) for adults with end-stage kidney disease receiving haemodialysis: A cluster randomized controlled trial

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of a bundled self-management intervention (taking control of your phosphate with the 4Ds) to improve phosphate control among adults receiving haemodialysis.

BACKGROUND

Hyperphosphataemia occurs in end-stage kidney disease and is managed by diet, drinks, drugs (phosphate binder medication), and dialysis (the 4Ds). Adherence to the 4Ds is challenging for patients.

DESIGN

A pragmatic cluster randomized controlled trial with repeated measures.

METHODS

Participants were adults receiving haemodialysis with high serum phosphate (>1.6 mmol/L for at least 3 months) recruited between August 2017 -May 2018. Cluster randomization was according to haemodialysis treatment shifts. The 'teach-back' intervention was designed to improve phosphate control. Expected outcomes were reduced serum phosphate and increased knowledge of phosphate in end-stage kidney disease, self-efficacy and adherence to diet, drugs, and dialysis.

RESULTS

There were no differences between groups at baseline. Both groups had similar mean serum phosphate over time; at three months, 46% of the intervention group achieved reductions that met the target serum phosphate level compared with 33% of the control group. There were significant improvements in knowledge of phosphate in end-stage kidney disease, self-efficacy and adherence to diet, drugs, and dialysis (missing) in the intervention group compared with control group.

CONCLUSION

The 4Ds, a bundled self-management intervention, was effective in improving patient confidence and adherence to phosphate control methods.

IMPACT

The 4Ds intervention bundles together four essential strategies for preventing and controlling hyperphosphataemia in end-stage kidney disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ACTRN12617000703303 Registered 16/05/2017.

The Effect of Motivational Interviewing on Adherence to Treatment and Quality of Life in Chronic Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study was to determine the effect of motivational interviewing (MI) on adherence to treatment and quality of life in chronic hemodialysis patients. This study was conducted with a randomized controlled pretest, posttest, and follow-up design from March to July 2016 in the hemodialysis center. After the intervention (n = 30) and control groups (n = 30) completed a pretest, patients in the intervention group received four individual face-to face MI sessions per month. Then both groups participated in a posttest, 3 months after which a follow-up was conducted. A significant increase in adherence to treatment (according to both subjective and objective data) was observed in the experimental group compared to the control group. No significant difference was found between the two groups in their quality of life scores; however, within the experimental group, there was a significant increase in these scores between the posttest and the 3-month follow-up.

Association between health-related hope and adherence to prescribed treatment in CKD patients: multicenter cross-sectional study

Background

In chronic kidney disease (CKD), patients’ adherence to prescriptions for diet and for medications might depend on the degree to which they have hope that they will enjoy life, and that hope could vary with the stage of CKD. The aims of this study were to quantify both the association of CKD stage with health-related hope (HR-Hope), and the association of that hope with psychological and physiological manifestations of adherence.

Methods

This was a cross-sectional study involving 461 adult CKD patients, some of whom were receiving dialysis. The main exposure was HR-Hope, measured using a recently-developed 18-item scale. The outcomes were perceived burden of fluid restriction and of diet restriction, measured using the KDQOL, and physiological manifestations of adherence (systolic and diastolic blood pressure [BP], and serum phosphorus and potassium levels).

General linear models and generalized ordered logit models were fit.

Results

Participants at non-dialysis stage 4 and those at stage 5 had lower HR-Hope scores than did those at stage 2 or 3 (combined). Those at non-dialysis stage 5 had the lowest scores. HR-Hope scores of participants at stage 5D were similar to those of participants at stage 4, but they were lower than the scores of participants at stage 2 or 3 (combined). Higher HR-Hope scores were associated with lower perceived burdens of fluid restriction and of diet restriction (adjusted ORs per ten-point difference were 0.82 and 0.84, respectively). Higher HR-Hope scores were associated with lower systolic BP (adjusted mean difference in systolic BP per ten-point difference in HR-Hope scores was − 1.87 mmHg). In contrast, HR-Hope scores were not associated with diastolic BP, serum phosphorus levels, or serum potassium levels.

Conclusions

Among CKD patients, HR-Hope is associated with disease stage, with psychological burden, and with some physiological manifestations of adherence.

Supplementary Information

Supplementary information accompanies this paper at 10.1186/s12882-020-02120-0.

Interventions Incorporating Therapeutic Alliance to Improve Hemodialysis Treatment Adherence in Black Patients with End-Stage Kidney Disease (ESKD) in the United States: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

In the US, Blacks with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) have a four-fold higher prevalence rate of hemodialysis treatment and higher subsequent rates of hemodialysis treatment nonadherence and hospitalization compared to their White peers. Nonadherence to prescribed dialysis therapy is an underestimated life-threatening behavior, because of its association with increased morbidity and mortality. Few studies have specified and systematically evaluated targeted methods of increasing hemodialysis treatment adherence among Black hemodialysis patients with added focus on therapeutic alliance, a rewarding patient-centered relationship between patients and providers, based on common goals and objectives. This review seeks to evaluate the state of the science to determine the salience of a therapeutic alliance for the development of effective interventions positively impacting hemodialysis treatment adherence among Black patients.

METHODS

Medline (via PubMed), Embase (OvidSP), Cumulative Index of Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL; EBSCOhost), and PsycInfo (ProQuest) databases were used to search for abstracts with the keywords "dialysis", "therapeutic alliance", and "treatment adherence and compliance", including all underlying index terms and alternative variations of terms, in order to cover the entire scope of the field. Only randomized clinical trials and pre/postintervention studies published in the previous 10 years (2009-2019) and including a proportion of Black patients >25% were included for review.

RESULTS

Only three intervention studies met these criteria, for a total aggregated sample of 130 - mean age 58.1 years and 53% female. None of these studies was composed exclusively of Black patients (range 62%-91.3%), nor did they present data specifically for Blacks. Despite the lack of robust data informing strategies to improve hemodialysis adherence among Blacks with ESRD, a limited number of intervention studies have reported positive effects on hemodialysis attendance.

DISCUSSION/CONCLUSION

Further research is warranted to fill this significant gap in our understanding of theoretically based, therapeutic alliance-enhanced, and culturally tailored hemodialysis treatment-adherence interventions among Blacks.

Comparison of Group Discussion and Teach Back Selfcare Education Effects on Knowledge, Attitude, and Performance of Hemodialysis Patients

Background: Hemodialysis patients require self-care training to manage their problems. To understand the effectiveness of different educational methods, it is necessary to evaluate these methods using knowledge, attitude, and practice assessment tool. Objectives: The current study aimed to compare the effects of group discussion and teach-back self-care education on the knowledge, attitude, and performance of hemodialysis patients. Methods: This quasi-experimental study is conducted on 67 patients who were undergoing hemodialysis via fistula for at least 6 months. Using the convenient sampling method, the patients were randomly allocated into two groups: teach-back training (n = 34), and group discussion (n = 33). Both groups were provided with three sessions of self-care training on nutrition, activity, and fistula care by the researcher. Considering the teaching materials, patients in the teach-back group were taught individually to ensure complete comprehension of the information. On the other hand, subjects in the group discussion were exposed to the teaching materials in the form of group training. Data were collected before and one month after providing the training sessions. Results: In this study, the majority of patients in both groups were married men with an average age of 52 years. Following education, knowledge, attitude, and performance increased in both groups. However, the teach-back method (113.88 ± 4.13) had a higher impact on the attitude of patients than group discussion (110.48 ± 5.68) (P = 0.009). Conclusions: Teach-back education increased the knowledge, performance, and attitude of patients. It is, therefore, recommended to use this method for patients with negative attitudes toward treatment and disease.

Theory-Based Interventions to Promote Fluid Intake Adherence Among Dialysis Patients: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Dialysis involves a complex regimen including diet, fluid, medication, and treatment. Therapeutic regimen adherence determines the therapeutic success, quality of life, and survival of patients on dialysis. Complying with fluid management is the most difficult among the therapeutic regimen. Several theory-based interventions have been designed to promote fluid intake compliance in patients receiving dialysis. This review has two aims. One is to explore the effectiveness of theory-based interventions. The other is to examine the extent of the combination of theory and interventions in improving adherence to fluid intake among dialysis patients.

METHODS

A literature review was performed using PubMed, PsycINFO, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library to acquire associated studies. Data were extracted independently by two researchers. The degree of theory application was accessed using a theory coding scheme (TCS).

RESULTS

Eight studies were identified as eligible for inclusion, and five theories were cited as basis (health belief model, social cognitive theory, self-regulation model, transtheoretical model). According to the TCS, adherence outcomes and the extent of theory use were not optimal.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Combining theory with patient health education might be beneficial in improving fluid intake adherence of dialysis patients. The framework and TCS could be considered to guide theory utilization and promote nursing education in improving the quality of renal nursing care.

Effectiveness of a Multifaceted Educational Intervention to Enhance Therapeutic Regimen Adherence and Quality of Life Amongst Iranian Hemodialysis Patients: A Randomized Controlled Trial (MEITRA Study)

Purpose

A multimodal intervention designed and executed to improve therapeutic regimen adherence and quality of life in a sample of Iranian hemodialysis patients. Its feasibility and impact was assessed post intervention.

Patients and Methods

This randomized controlled trial (RCT) study was conducted at two hemodialysis wards of the Shahrvand hospital located in Sari, the capital city of the Mazandaran province, north of Iran. The study sample included patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) receiving outpatient hemodialysis treatment. Considering 10% attrition, 70 registered patients were randomly categorized into intervention and control groups. The proposed intervention included playing of relevant educational video tracks, conducting eight cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) group sessions, and telephone-based peer support. Data were collected applying a set of questionnaires including sociodemographic, Beck Depression Inventory (BDI-SF), Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support (MSPSS), Patient Satisfaction with Nursing Care Quality Questionnaire (PSNCQQ), End-Stage Renal Disease Adherence Questionnaire (ESRD-AQ) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life (WHOQOL-SF) scale. Sociodemographic and clinical data were collected at baseline in both groups and the postintervention assessment was performed in the intervention and nonintervention groups after one month and three months.

Results

A significant change in the self-reported depression symptoms (P=0.001), mean social support score (P=0.001), nursing care satisfaction score (P=0.001), quality of life score (P=0.001) and interdialytic weight gain (IDWG) (P=0.001) was observed among the participants in the intervention group compared to the baseline measures. The highest rise in the ESRD-AQ scores within the intervention group was observed after one month of intervention (mean difference=131.88) compared to the baseline values. Same pattern of statistically significant changes in mean scores of the intervention group’s attendants in all subscales of the ESRD-AQ were also ascertained.

Conclusion

This interventional study revealed that inaugurating of a feasible low-cost intervention without need to add major logistic or financial inputs into existing health-care systems, especially in resource limited contexts, is achievable. Findings of this study could provide insights into scientific basis of evidence-informed interventions applicable in the realm of health-care delivery.

Social determinants of health associated with hemodialysis non-adherence and emergency department utilization: a pilot observational study

Background

Dialysis patients who miss treatments are twice as likely to visit emergency departments (EDs) compared to adherent patients; however, prospective studies assessing ED use after missed treatments are limited. This interdisciplinary pilot study aimed to identify social determinants of health (SDOH) associated with missing hemodialysis (HD) and presenting to the ED, and describe resource utilization associated with such visits.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study with a convenience sample of patients presenting to the ED after missing HD (cases); patients at local dialysis centers identified as HD-compliant by their nephrologists served as matched controls. Patients were interviewed with validated instruments capturing associated risk factors, including SDOH. ED resource utilization by cases was determined by chart review. Chi-square tests and ANOVA were used to detect statistically significant group differences.

Results

All cases visiting the ED had laboratory and radiographic studies; 40% needed physician-performed procedures. Mean ED length of stay (LOS) for cases was 17 h; 76% of patients were admitted with average LOS of 6 days. Comparing 25 cases and 24 controls, we found no difference in economic stability, educational attainment, health literacy, family support, or satisfaction with nephrology care. However, cases were more dependent on public transport for dialysis (p = 0.03). Despite comparable comorbidity burdens, cases were more likely to have impaired mobility, physical limitations, and higher severity of pain and depression. (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

ED visits after missed HD resulted in elevated LOS and admission rates. Frequently-cited SDOH such as health literacy did not confer significant risk for missing HD. However, pain, physical limitations, and depression were higher among cases. Community-specific collaborations between EDs and dialysis centers would be valuable in identifying risk factors specific to missed HD and ED use, to develop strategies to improve treatment adherence and reduce unnecessary ED utilization.

Factors associated with adherence to dietary prescription among adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis in national referral hospitals in Kenya: a mixed-methods survey

Introduction

Adherence to dietary prescriptions among patients with chronic kidney disease is known to prevent deterioration of kidney functions and slow down the risk for morbidity and mortality. This study determined factors associated with adherence to dietary prescription among adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis.

Methods

A mixed-methods study, using parallel mixed design, was conducted at the renal clinics and dialysis units at the national teaching and referral hospitals in Kenya from September 2018 to January 2019. The study followed a QUAN + qual paradigm, with quantitative survey as the primary method. Adult patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis without kidney transplant were purposively sampled for the quantitative survey. A sub-sample of adult patients and their caregivers were purposively sampled for the qualitative survey. Numeric data were collected using a structured, self-reported questionnaire using Open Data Kit "Collect software" while qualitative data were collected using in-depth interview guides and voice recording. Analysis on STATA software for quantitative and NVIV0 12 for qualitative data was conducted. The dependent variable, "adherence to diet prescription" was analyzed as a binary variable. P values < 0.1 and < 0.05 were considered as statistically significant in univariate and multivariate logistic regression models respectively. Qualitative data were thematically analyzed.

Results

Only 36.3% of the study population adhered to their dietary prescriptions. Factors that were independently associated with adherence to diet prescriptions were "flexibility in the diets" (AOR 2.65, 95% CI 1.11-6.30, P 0.028), "difficulties in following diet recommendations" (AOR 0.24, 95% CI 0.13-0.46, P < 001), and "adherence to limiting fluid intake" (AOR 9.74, 95% CI 4.90-19.38, P < 0.001).

Conclusions

For patients with chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis, diet prescriptions with less restrictions and requiring minimal extra efforts and resources are more likely to be adhered to than the restrictive ones. Patients who adhere to their fluid intake restrictions easily follow their diet prescriptions. Prescribed diets should be based on the individual patient's usual dietary habits and assessed levels of challenges in using such diets. Additionally, diet adherence messages should be integrated with fluid limitation messages. Further research on understanding patients' adherence to fluid restriction is also suggested.

Depressive symptoms and dietary non-adherence among end stage renal disease patients undergoing hemodialysis therapy: systematic review

Background

Research suggests that patients with end stage renal disease undergoing hemodialysis have a higher rate of depression and dietary non adherence leading to hospitalization and mortality. The purpose of this review was to synthesize the quantitative evidence on the relationship between depressive symptoms and dietary non adherence among end stage renal disease (ESRD) patients receiving hemodialysis.

Methods

A systematic review was undertaken. Three electronic databases were searched including PubMed, CINHAL and Web of Science. Only quantitative studies published between 2001 and 2016 were included in the review.

Result

A total of 141 publications were reviewed during the search process and 28 articles that fulfilled the inclusion criteria were included in the review. Eleven studies (39.3%) reported on the prevalence of depressive symptoms or depression and its effect on patient outcomes. Ten studies (35.7%) focused on dietary adherence/non adherence in patients with ESRD and the remaining seven (25%) articles were descriptive studies on the relationship between depressive symptoms and dietary non adherence in patients with ESRD receiving hemodialysis. The prevalence of depressive symptoms and dietary non adherence ranged as 6–83.49% and from 41.1–98.3% respectively. Decreased quality of life & increased morbidity and mortality were positively associated with depressive symptoms. Other factors including urea, hemoglobin, creatinine and serum albumin had also association with depressive symptoms. Regarding dietary non adherence, age, social support, educational status, behavioral control and positive attitudes are important factors in ESRD patients receiving hemodialysis. Having depressive symptoms is more likely to increase dietary non adherence.

Conclusion

Depressive symptoms and dietary non adherence were highly prevalent in patients with end stage renal disease receiving hemodialysis therapy. Nearly all of the articles that examined the relationship between depressive symptoms and dietary non adherence found a significant association. Future research using experimental or longitudinal design and gold standard measures with established cut-points is needed to further explain the relationship.

Nonadherence in Hemodialysis Patients and Related Factors: A Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

Nonadherence to dietary and fluid restrictions, hemodialysis (HD), and medication treatment has been shown to increase the risks of hospitalization and mortality significantly. Sociodemographic and biochemical parameters as well as psychosocial conditions such as depression and anxiety are known to affect nonadherence in HD patients. However, evidence related to the relative importance and actual impact of these factors varies among studies.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the factors that affect nonadherence to dietary and fluid restrictions, HD, and medication treatment.

METHODS

This descriptive study was conducted on 274 patients who were being treated at four HD centers in Turkey. The parameters used to determine nonadherence to dialysis treatment were as follows: skipping multiple dialysis sessions during the most recent 1-month period, shortening a dialysis session by more than 10 minutes during the most recent 1-month period, and Kt/V < 1.4. The parameters used to determine nonadherence to dietary and fluid restriction were as follows: serum phosphorus level > 7.5 mg/dl, predialysis serum potassium level > 6.0 mEq/L, and interdialytic weight gain > 5.7% of body weight. The Morisky Green Levine Medication Adherence Scale was performed to determine nonadherence to medication treatment. A patient was classified as nonadherent if he or she did not adhere to one or more of these indices. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale was used to identify patient risk in terms of anxiety and depression. Logistic regression was used to determine the predictors of nonadherence.

RESULTS

The nonadherence rate was 39.1% for dietary and fluid restrictions, 33.6% for HD, and 20.1% for medication. The risk of nonadherence to dietary and fluid restriction was found to be 4.337 times higher in high school graduates (95% CI [1.502, 12.754], p = .007). The risk of nonadherence to HD treatment was 2.074 times higher in men (95% CI [1.213, 3.546], p = .008) and 2.591 times higher in patients with a central venous catheter (95% CI [1.171, 5.733], p = .019). Longer duration in HD resulted in 0.992 times decrease in risk of nonadherence to treatment (95% CI [0.986, 0.998], p = .005).

CONCLUSIONS/IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Educational status, being male, having a central venous catheter, and having a short HD duration were found to be risk factors for nonadherence. Nurses must consider the patient's adherence to the dietary and fluid restrictions, HD, and medication treatment at each visit.

Effectiveness of self-management support in maintenance haemodialysis patients with hypertension: A pilot cluster randomized controlled trial

AIM

Uncontrolled hypertension is an independent risk factor for cardiovascular disease and is the leading cause of mortality in haemodialysis patients. The aim of this study was to examine the effectiveness of self-management support (SMS) for blood pressure (BP) control and health behaviours.

METHODS

We conducted a cluster randomized controlled trial (RCT) in which 90 adult haemodialysis patients were assigned to either an SMS or common intervention (CI) group. The SMS group received an intervention consisting of self-management education and motivational interviewing. The CI group received standard care and routine health education. The primary outcome was the BP monitored before each haemodialysis. Secondary outcomes included salt intake (measured using a balance formula), home BP monitoring (HBPM) (assessed using two self-administered questions), and medication adherence (measured using the Medication-taking Behavior Scale). Data were collected at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months post-intervention.

RESULTS

The SMS group showed continuous reductions in systolic BP from baseline: -9.2, -8.7, and -8.4 mmHg at 1, 3 and 6 months after the intervention, respectively (P < 0.01). Compared with the CI group, the SMS group had a greater decrease in systolic BP at 1 month: -5.9 mmHg (P = 0.0388), but no significant difference was found at 3 or 6 months (P > 0.05). SMS patients showed an improvement in health behaviours relative to baseline (less salt intake, more consistent HBPM, and greater medication adherence) (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Self-management support obtained short-term success in improving salt restriction, regular performance of HBPM and medication adherence, which led to better BP control.

Adherence Behavior in Subjects on Hemodialysis Is Not a Clear Predictor of Posttransplantation Adherence

Introduction

Nonadherence is common in both hemodialysis (HD) and kidney transplant recipients and is a major risk factor for poor clinical outcomes. This retrospective study explored whether nonadherent HD patients become nonadherent transplant recipients.

Methods

Data were collected for 88 patients from the electronic patient system at a subregional renal unit about adherence to HD regimens in the 6 months before transplantation, and for 1 year posttransplantation following return transfer to the posttransplantation clinic from the transplanting center. Pretransplantation definitions of nonadherence included whether the patients: on average, shortened their dialysis prescription by >10 minutes; shortened it by >15 minutes; missed 2 or more HD sessions; and had mean serum phosphate levels >1.8mmol/l. Posttransplantation definitions of nonadherence included mean tacrolimus levels outside 5 to 10 ng/ml; and missed 1 or more posttransplantation clinic appointments.

Results

Nonadherence ranged from 25% to 42% pretransplantation and from 15.9% to 22.7% posttransplantation, depending on how it was operationalized. There was little relationship between pretransplantation data and posttransplantation adherence, with the exception of a significant relationship between pretransplantation phosphate and posttransplantation clinic attendance. Patients who had missed 1 or more transplant clinic appointments had higher mean pretransplantation phosphate levels. Nonadherent patients with high phosphate levels pretransplantation and missed clinic appointments posttransplantation were significantly younger.

Conclusion

Our findings provide little support for the likelihood of a strong direct relationship between pre and posttransplantation behaviors. The findings require confirmation and further research to assess whether interventions in relation to pretransplantation adherence may enhance adherence posttransplantation and improve outcomes.

Predictors of cinacalcet discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients: results from 7 European countries

Background

The putative benefits of cinacalcet therapy for management of secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) are thought to be most manifested when patients are taking it consistently and as prescribed. Real-world descriptions of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in European hemodialysis patients are lacking. To address this knowledge gap, we used Dialysis Outcomes and Practice Patterns Study (DOPPS) data, based on dialysis facility medical records, from seven European countries to estimate rates and predictors of cinacalcet prescription discontinuation and reinitiation in hemodialysis patients and to describe the trajectories of CKD-MBD laboratory values after discontinuation.

Methods

Cox regression analyses were used to predict (1) cinacalcet discontinuation among 613 patients with ≥3 consecutive months without cinacalcet prescription immediately prior to a new cinacalcet prescription and (2) cinacalcet reinitiation among 415 patients with a newly discontinued cinacalcet prescription immediately after ≥3 consecutive months of prescribed use.

Results

Cinacalcet was discontinued in 21 and 35% of new users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Cinacalcet was reinitiated in 38 and 49% of newly-discontinued users after 6 and 12 months, respectively. Predictors of discontinuation included lower parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the previous month (< 150 pg/ml vs. 150–299, HR = 2.57 [95% CI: 1.52–4.33]) and lower serum calcium in the previous month (< 8.4 mg/dl vs. 8.4–10.19, HR = 1.67 [95% CI: 1.08–2.59]). Predictors of reinitiation included higher PTH in the previous month (300–599 pg/ml vs. 150–299, HR = 1.88 [95% CI = 1.19–2.97]; 600+ pg/ml, HR = 3.02 [95% CI = 1.92–4.76]). After cinacalcet discontinuation, mean serum PTH increased from 408 to 510 pg/ml, mean serum calcium briefly rose from 9.12 to 9.22 mg/dl before declining to 9.06 mg/dl, and mean serum phosphorus showed little change.

Conclusions

Nephrologist discontinuation of cinacalcet therapy is common in European countries. Additional research is needed to identify optimal cinacalcet treatment strategies for SHPT management, including comparisons of intermittent cinacalcet therapy versus sustained treatment with reduced dose or frequency.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12882-019-1355-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings: A qualitative exploration of nurses and pharmacists' perspectives

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES

To explore clinician assessment of patient adherence and identify strategies to improve adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings.

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic kidney disease undergoing haemodialysis are typically prescribed complex regimens; as such, they are at high risk of medication nonadherence. Current clinical practices focus on prescribing medications; however, little attention is paid to measuring and ensuring patient adherence to their prescribed treatments.

DESIGN

A qualitative study.

METHODS

Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted in November and December 2016, with 12 nurses and 6 pharmacists, working in Australian haemodialysis settings. The study was conducted and reported in accordance with COREQ guidelines.

RESULTS

Participants were 25-60 years old and had 1-27 years of experience in dialysis. Seven themes related to assessing adherence were identified: prioritisation of resources, interplay between workload and available time, awareness of formalised adherence measures and training deficits, concerns about practicality/suitability of adherence measures, communication of assessment services, patient participation and trust. Three themes related to strategies for improving adherence assessment practices were identified: formalisation of adherence assessment process, integration of assessment processes and tools into routine, and use of multidisciplinary support to assess and promote adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

Current adherence assessment practices could be improved through formalisation and integration of the assessment process into dialysis unit policy/procedures. Additionally, as barriers to assessing adherence were identified at organisational, professional and patient levels, there is a need to address barriers from each level in order to improve adherence assessment practices in haemodialysis settings.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This qualitative study highlights the challenges and practical ways by which adherence assessment practices could be improved in haemodialysis settings. This would encourage renal clinicians to actively participate in adherence assessment and promotion activities to ensure patients benefit from their therapies.

Medication regimen complexity and medication adherence in elderly patients with chronic kidney disease

INTRODUCTION

Elderly patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) stage 5 with or without dialysis treatment usually have concomitant comorbidities, which often result in multiple pharmacological therapies. This study aimed to identify factors associated with medication complexity and medication adherence, as well as the association between medication complexity and medication adherence, in elderly patients with CKD.

METHODS

This prospective study involved elderly patients with CKD stage 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate < 15 ml/min/1.73m² ) recruited from three Norwegian hospitals. Most of the patients were receiving either hemodialysis or peritoneal dialysis. We used the Medication Regimen Complexity Index (MRCI) to assess the complexity of medication regimens, and the eight-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-8) to assess medication adherence. Factors associated with the MRCI and MMAS-8 score were determined using either multivariable linear or ordinal logistic regression analysis.

FINDINGS

In total, 157 patients aged 76 ± 7.2 years (mean ± SD) were included in the analysis. Their overall MRCI score was 22.8 ± 7.7. In multivariable linear regression analyses, female sex (P = 0.044), Charlson Comorbidity Index of 4 or 5 (P = 0.029) and using several categories of phosphate binders (P < 0.001 to 0.04) were associated with the MRCI. Moderate or high adherence (MMAS-8 score ≥ 6) was demonstrated by 83% of the patients. The multivariable logistic regression analyses found no association of medication complexity, age or other variables with medication adherence as assessed using the MMAS-8.

DISCUSSION

Female sex, comorbidity and use of phosphate binders were associated with more-complex medication regimens in this population. No association was found between medication regimen complexity, phosphate binders or age and medication adherence. These findings are based on a homogeneous elderly group, and so future studies should test if they can be generalized to patients of all ages with CKD.