Triple Therapy-Based on Tegoprazan, a New Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker, for First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Randomized, Double-Blind, Phase III, Clinical Trial

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker-Based Dual, Triple, and Quadruple Regimens for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Infection Treatment: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

In the last few years, numerous new potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based randomized controlled trials (RCTs) concerning the first-line regimens for Helicobacter pylori infection treatment from various countries have been published. However, no network meta-analysis (NWM) exists, which examines the comparative efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based dual, triple, and quadruple treatments, and, therefore, in this NWM, we examined this matter comparing efficacy and safety of these P-CAB-based regimens.

METHODS

Databases were searched for identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion of relevant RCTs. Extracted data were entered into a Bayesian NWM, and the ranking order for each regimen was evaluated by means of the surface under the cumulative ranking area values.

RESULTS

Twenty-five eligible RCTs were included with 7,605 patients randomized to 6 first-line regimens, i.e. P-CAB dual therapy, P-CAB triple therapy, P-CAB quadruple therapy, PPI dual therapy, PPI triple therapy, and PPI quadruple therapy. The surface under the cumulative ranking area values (%) for these 6 regimens were 92.7, 62.5, 33.9, 75.1, 19.4, and 16.3, respectively. The comparative effectiveness ranking showed that P-CAB dual therapy regimen ranked first for efficacy and last for adverse effects and had the best profile for integrated efficacy-safety.

DISCUSSION

In this NWM concerning the comparative efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based dual, triple, and quadruple regimens for the first-line H. pylori infection treatment, the overall results showed that P-CAB-based dual treatment ranked first for efficacy with the best-integrated efficacy-safety profile. This is of importance, since the dual regimens overcome the crucial issue of clarithromycin resistance. Consequently, these findings are expected to be useful in helping clinical decision making and future guidelines.

Tegoprazan-Containing Versus Proton Pump Inhibitor-Containing Therapy for First-Line Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Introduction

Concerns have been raised regarding the decreasing success rates of the standard treatment of Helicobacter pylori (proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and two/three antibiotics) and the long-term effects carried by PPI. Despite conflicting data, Tegoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker, is hypothesized to be superior to PPI for eradicating H pylori. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to determine the superiority of Tegoprazan-containing therapy to PPI-containing therapy for H pylori eradication.

Methods

A systematic literature search identified studies published until December 12, 2024, from MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and CENTRAL. The search strategy included the following keywords: "Tegoprazan," "Proton Pump Inhibitors," and "Helicobacter pylori." Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the efficacy of Tegoprazan to any PPI were included. Risk of bias assessment was performed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 (RoB2) tool for RCTs. The random-effect model was used to calculate the pooled risk ratio (RR) and its 95% Confidence Interval (95% CI) from the intention-to-treat population.

Results

Six RCTs with low risks of bias were included in this meta-analysis. All studies included treatment-naïve patients and compared first-line H pylori treatment. The overall eradication rates of Tegoprazan-containing (N = 1052) versus PPI-containing therapy (N = 1058) were 83.37% and 80.06%, respectively (RR 1.045; 95% CI 1.008-1.084; I 2 = 0%). Tegoprazan-containing therapy demonstrated comparable treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) rates compared to PPI-containing therapy (46.48% vs. 46.31%; RR 1.026; 95% CI 0.952-1.106; I 2 = 48%).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis demonstrated that Tegoprazan-containing therapy is superior to PPI-containing therapy for first-line H pylori eradication, with comparable safety profiles.

Effectiveness of Herbal Medicines with Anti-Inflammatory, Antimicrobial, and Antioxidant Properties in Improving Oral Health and Treating Gingivitis and Periodontitis: A Systematic Review

OBJECTIVES

This systematic review investigates the effectiveness of natural extracts with anti-inflammatory properties for improving oral health, particularly in managing gingivitis and periodontal disease (PD). With PD being a major global health issue, exacerbated by microbial dysbiosis and oxidative stress, the integration of phytochemicals and herbal formulations into periodontal therapy offers a promising avenue for adjunctive treatments.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines and registered under the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (ID: 641944). Databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, were searched between 18-24 December 2024, using Boolean keywords combining terms such as "herbal medicine", "plant extracts", "anti-inflammatory", and "periodontal therapy". Studies involving animal models, in vitro data, or non-peer-reviewed articles were excluded.

RESULTS

Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. Polyherbal formulations and single-component extracts (e.g., Camellia sinensis, Punica granatum, Zingiber officinale, and Rosmarinus officinalis) demonstrated comparable efficacy to conventional agents like chlorhexidine (CHX). Polyherbal rinses, camellia sinensis gels, and extracts like Punica granatum reduced inflammation, improved gingival health, and showed antimicrobial properties, offering effective natural alternatives.

CONCLUSIONS

Natural products, including single extracts and polyherbal formulations, provide effective and safe alternatives for managing gingivitis and PD. Their anti-inflammatory, antimicrobial, and antioxidant properties support their adjunctive role alongside with scaling and root planning therapy (SRP) in periodontal therapy. However, further large-scale, long-term studies are needed to standardize formulations and establish optimal protocols.

Efficacy of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors for Gastric Ulcers: Bayesian and Frequentist Network Meta-Analysis With Cross-Inference Through a Quality management System

Purpose

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been the mainstay treatment for gastric ulcer (GU) for over 30 years. However, since the discovery of a new class of acid suppressants, potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs), the desire for a therapeutic agent has continued and the clinical trials on P-CABs have been conducted. In this regard, we aimed to assess whether P-CABs are noninferior to PPIs in patients with GU in terms of efficacy.

Methods

We performed a systematic review and network meta-analysis (NMA) based on randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Additionally, we used a new methodology of inference concept with the purpose of grouping between P-CABs and PPIs. Moreover, our quality management system was integrated throughout the research to ensure data accuracy.

Findings

We initially screened 438 studies and extracted 10 homogeneous GU RCTs with 6315 participants. The odds ratios (ORs) for the 4-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, tegoprazan 100 mg (OR = 4.14, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.56-26.3) and pantoprazole 40 mg (OR = 4.12, 95% CI 1.90-8.88) were the largest, respectively. The ORs for the 8-week cure rate in Bayesian + frequentist NMA, lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 8.77, 95% credible interval [CI] 0.95-78.9) and lansoprazole 30 mg (OR = 7.91, 95% CI 2.60-24.03) was the largest, respectively.

Conclusions

The results of the NMA reveal that the cure rates of P-CABs in cases of GU were not inferior to those of PPIs. As the inference by grouping PPIs and P-CABs, the results showed similar trends in terms of effectiveness between the two therapeutic classes.

Comparison of tegoprazan and proton pump inhibitors for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker with potent gastric acid-suppressing activity, may be a potential agent for treating Helicobacter pylori infection. The study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication compared with proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A comprehensive literature search was conducted up to August 2024 using PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library to investigate the beneficial effects of TPZ-based therapy for H. pylori eradication. Studies that evaluated the eradication rates between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies were included. The authors conducted a meta-analysis to calculate the eradication rate and pooled risk ratio (RR) with a 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

Seven studies involving 3200 patients were included. H. pylori eradication rates did not differ significantly between the TPZ- and PPI-based therapies based on the intention-to-treat (77.3% vs. 76.4%, p = 0.68; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.97-1.05]) and per-protocol (84.3% vs. 84.2%, p = 0.69; pooled RR = 1.01 [0.98-1.04]) analyses. Additionally, no significant difference was observed in the adverse drug events between TPZ- and PPI-based therapies (27.2% vs. 30.8%, p = 0.26; pooled RR = 0.91 [0.76-1.08]).

CONCLUSIONS

H. pylori eradication and adverse drug event rates with TPZ- and PPI-based treatments were similar.

The efficacy and safety of Vonoprazan and Tegoprazan in Helicobacter pylori eradication: a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

Potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based therapies are emerging as promising alternatives for eradicating Helicobacter pylori infection. However, the comparative efficacy of P-CAB-based therapy versus proton-pump inhibitor (PPI)-based therapy in treating H. pylori infection remains uncertain.

Objectives

This meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of P-CAB-based therapies, including Vonoprazan (VPZ) and Tegoprazan (TPZ), compared to PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. Subgroup analysis assessed the influence of drug history, experimental drug, treatment duration, combination therapies, and geographic regions on treatment outcomes.

Design

Meta-analysis.

Data sources and methods

Comprehensive searches were conducted in major databases, including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science, up to January 1, 2024. The primary outcome was the eradication rate, analyzed by intention-to-treat (ITT). Secondary outcomes included adverse events. Heterogeneity among studies was assessed using the χ2 test and the I 2 test. I 2 > 50% or p < 0.05 indicated significant heterogeneity.

Results

The analysis totally included 28 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comprising 37 studies and 8818 patients diagnosed with H. pylori infection. Of these, 14 RCTs, including 20 studies and 4286 patients, compared P-CAB-based therapy with 14-day bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT). P-CAB-based therapy exhibited superior eradication rates compared to both 14-day BQT and PPI-based therapy (ITT analysis: 87.0% vs 79.8%, risk ratio (RR) = 1.08, 95% CI: 1.04-1.12, p < 0.0001; and 85.6% vs 77.8%, RR = 1.09, 95% CI: 1.05-1.12, p < 0.00001, respectively). This enhanced efficacy was particularly pronounced in patients with clarithromycin-resistant infections (73.7% vs 41.5%, RR = 1.53, 95% CI: 1.07-2.20, p = 0.02). Subgroup analysis demonstrated higher eradication rates with P-CAB-based therapy in treatment-naïve participants, VPZ recipients, and those receiving 7- or 14-day regimens (dual, triple, or quadruple therapy). However, no significant differences were observed in treatment-experienced subgroups, TPZ recipients, or those on 10-day regimens. In addition, P-CAB-based therapy showed a lower incidence of adverse events than PPI-based treatments (RR = 0.73, 95% CI: 0.63-0.86, p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

P-CAB-based therapies are more effective than traditional PPI-based treatments for eradicating H. pylori infection, with a reduced incidence of adverse events.

PROSPERO registration

CRD42024503665.

Emerging Long-Term Risks of the Use of Proton Pump Inhibitors and Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers

Acid-related disorders represent a significant global health burden. Pharmacological treatment of these conditions has at times been challenged and limited by incomplete effectiveness, antibiotic resistance, adverse medication effects and/or interactions, and disease recurrence. Since the early 1990s, the mainstay of treatment has been proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). Recently, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a clearance for vonoprazan, a potassium-competitive acid blocker (PCAB). PCABs are a new class of acid-suppressing agents that may overcome some of these challenges. The aim of this review is to evaluate and compare the emerging long-term risks of PPI and PCAB therapies.

Helicobacter pylori eradication for primary prevention of gastric cancer: progresses and challenges

Gastric cancer remains a significant global health challenge, causing a substantial number of cancer-related deaths, particularly in China. While the exact causes of gastric cancer are still being investigated, Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection has been identified as the primary risk factor, which triggers chronic inflammation and a multistage progression of gastric lesions that may lead to carcinogenesis over a long latency time. Since the 1990s, numerous efforts have focused on assessing the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication in preventing new cases of gastric cancer among both the general population and patients who have undergone early-stage cancer treatment. This body of work, including several community-based interventions and meta-analyses, has shown a reduction in both the incidence of and mortality from gastric cancer following H. pylori treatment, alongside a decreased risk of metachronous gastric cancer. In this review, we seek to consolidate current knowledge on the effects of H. pylori treatment on gastric cancer prevention, its systemic consequences, cost-effectiveness, and the influence of antibiotic resistance and host characteristics on treatment outcomes. We further discuss the potential for precision primary prevention of H. pylori treatment and comment on the efficient implementation of test-and-treat policies and allocation of health resources towards minimizing the burden of gastric cancer globally.

How ligands modulate the gastric H,K-ATPase activity and its inhibition by tegoprazan

The introduction of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) has been a major innovation in gastric H,K-ATPase inhibition and many laboratories are actively engaged in the development of novel molecules within this class. This work investigates the interaction between H,K-ATPase and tegoprazan, a representative of the P-CABs group, in terms of K+ and H+ binding, through functional and structural analyses. First, by studying the H,K-ATPase activity, we found a model to describe the non-Michaelis-Menten kinetics through a "ping-pong" mechanism that explains a stoichiometry of 1 H+, 1 K+, and 1 ATP molecule, but also considering the influence of H+ on the ionization states of the protein. A kinetic evaluation of the inhibition of tegoprazan denotes the binding to two different intermediates states with apparent Kd (μM) 0.56 ± 0.04 and 2.70 ± 0.24 at pH 7.2. Molecular dynamics simulations revealed important changes in the interactions of tegoprazan with the transmembrane residues depending on whether the site contains K+ or not. This explains the decrease in affinity as a function of K+ concentration observed in the kinetic experiments. On the other hand, the structures predict that the protonation of tegoprazan is responsible for the change in its dihedral angle. The rotation of the benzimidazole ring allows the inhibitor to be positioned further into the luminal cavity, a situation compatible with the higher inhibition affinity of H,K-ATPase measured at low pH. Results presented herein will provide a basis for the rational design of novel P-CABs ligands.

Effect of tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, on non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced enteropathy

As the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are typically used in the treatment of chronic conditions, the incidence of NSAID-induced enteropathy is increasing. Given the challenges associated with discontinuing NSAIDs, effective preventive and treatment strategies are crucial. We assessed the effect of tegoprazan on NSAID-induced enteropathy. Human epithelial cells (HIEC-6, HT-29, and Caco-2) were treated with indomethacin and tegoprazan. Cell viability, expression levels of tight-junction proteins, levels of proinflammatory cytokines, and apoptosis were assessed by conducting MTT assays, RT-PCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence staining, respectively. Tegoprazan significantly ameliorated the inhibition of cell proliferation induced by indomethacin. Tegoprazan also mitigated the suppression of occludin and ZO-1 expression by indomethacin, thereby restoring intestinal permeability. Additionally, tegoprazan reversed the indomethacin-induced elevation of the levels of proinflammatory cytokines and the rate of apoptosis of small intestinal epithelial cells. Our findings indicate that tegoprazan exerts a protective effect against NSAID-induced injury to small intestinal epithelial cells. The effect involves enhancement of the expression levels of tight junction proteins and the suppression of inflammation and apoptosis.

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for Helicobacter pylori infection: Real-world evidence

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved for Helicobacter pylori eradication in Korea. We compared the efficacy and safety of tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for H. pylori eradication in real-world clinical practice.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with H. pylori infection treated with tegoprazan- or rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies. The primary endpoint was H. pylori eradication rate. The secondary endpoint was adverse events.

RESULTS

Among the 1474 included patients, 620 and 854 received tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies, respectively. Intention-to-treat analysis showed no significant difference in the eradication rates between the tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapy groups (74.7% [95% confidence interval [CI], 71.1-78.0%] vs 72.7% [95% CI, 69.7-75.6%], P = 0.400). Per-protocol analysis also demonstrated similar eradication rates for the groups (tegoprazan vs rabeprazole: 88.0% [95% CI, 85.0-90.6%] vs 85.9% [95% CI, 83.2-88.3%], P = 0.288). Although the overall adverse event rate did not differ between groups (tegoprazan vs rabeprazole, 39.2% vs 40.6%, P = 0.578), abdominal discomfort was less frequent in the tegoprazan group than in the rabeprazole group (1.3 vs 4.8%, P = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based concomitant therapies for H. pylori eradication showed comparable efficacy and overall safety. The effect of tegoprazan on dose increases or other regimens, such as bismuth-containing quadruple therapy, should be further evaluated, because the efficacy of tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy may be suboptimal in regions where the clarithromycin resistance rate is high.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers and Proton Pump Inhibitors for First-Line Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Given the increasing antibiotic resistance and the inadequate acid-suppressing effects of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), it is crucial to continuously optimize existing Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) treatment regimens. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of novel potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB)-based eradication regimens compared with traditional PPI-based regimens for the initial treatment of H. pylori.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis, searching seven electronic databases for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating initial P-CAB-based H. pylori eradication therapy. The primary outcome was the H. pylori eradication rate. Secondary outcomes included adverse events and patient compliance. We synthesized the effect sizes of the trials using odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI).

RESULTS

A total of 54 RCTs involving 15,320 patients (74.9% male, mean age 30.2 years) were included in this study. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, VPZ-HD-dual, VPZ-triple, and VPZ-quadruple regimens demonstrated significantly higher eradication rates than PPI-triple, PPI-quadruple, and VPZ-dual regimens. Similar trends were observed in the per-protocol (PP) analysis. Subgroup analysis indicated that poor patient compliance significantly reduced eradication rates. Resistance to clarithromycin and metronidazole significantly weakened the eradication effects of PPI-triple, TPZ-triple, and VPZ-triple regimens. Additionally, the eradication rates for 7-day regimens were significantly lower than those for 14-day or 10-day regimens, but there was no significant difference between the eradication rates of 10-day and 14-day regimens. Notably, the risk of adverse events with VPZ-HD-dual was significantly lower than with VPZ-quadruple.

CONCLUSION

Vonoprazan combined with high-dose amoxicillin dual therapy not only provides satisfactory eradication rates but also exhibits lower adverse event rates and good patient compliance, indicating its potential as a promising regimen for further promotion.

Efficacy and safety of tegoprazan for duodenal ulcers in Chinese patients: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, non-inferiority, phase III study

OBJECTIVE

Tegoprazan represents a newly developed potassium-competitive acid blocker utilized for the treatment of acid-related disorders. The present study aimed to explore the therapeutic effectiveness of tegoprazan in Chinese individuals with duodenal ulcers (DU).

METHODS

In the current multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-group, non-inferiority, phase III clinical trial, individuals with DU underwent randomization 1:1 to be administered tegoprazan 50 mg or lansoprazole 30 mg once daily. The primary efficacy endpoint was the 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rate. Secondary endpoints included 4-week endoscopic ulcer healing rate and relief of DU-related gastrointestinal symptoms at weeks 2, 4, and 6. Safety analysis encompassed adverse events (AEs) and laboratory indexes.

RESULTS

The 6-week cumulative endoscopic ulcer healing rates were 96.9% (188/194) and 99.0% (189/191) in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively, indicating a difference of -2.0% (95% confidence interval (CI) = -4.9 to 0.8) in the full analysis set (FAS). The corresponding healing rates were 98.4% (185/188) and 99.5% (183/184) in the per-protocol set, respectively, indicating a difference of -1.1% (95% CI = -3.1 to 1.0). The 4-week healing rates in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups were 89.2% (173/194) and 88.5% (169/191) in the FAS, respectively, with a difference of 0.7% (95% CI = -5.6 to 7.0). Treatment-related AEs, all mild-to-moderate, were reported in 38.2% (78/204) and 48.2% (94/195) of participants in the tegoprazan and lansoprazole groups, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Tegoprazan 50 mg once daily is effective and non-inferior to lansoprazole 30 mg once daily in Chinese patients with DU, showing a promising safety and tolerability profile.

CLINICALTRIALS.GOV REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT05010954.

Nationwide Trends in Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapies in Korea: Impact of Guideline Updates on Treatment Practices

INTRODUCTION

Helicobacter pylori infects over 50% of the global population, prompting the issuance of guidelines for effective diagnosis and treatment. However, research on guideline dissemination and adherence is limited. Therefore, we assessed the nationwide status of H. pylori eradication therapies in Korea before and after guideline updates.

METHODS

Using data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service, this retrospective cohort study analyzed changes in H. pylori eradication therapies across three periods: Phase I (2006-2007), Phase II (2014-2015), and Phase III (2021-2022). It examined therapy regimens, confirmation tests, and retreatment rates.

RESULTS

Among 1,657,746 patients included, the number undergoing eradication therapy increased across the phases (Phase I: 234,365; Phase II: 493,889; Phase III: 929,492). The use of conventional triple therapy declined from 96.1% in Phase I to 88.3% in Phase III, while non-bismuth and bismuth quadruple therapies increased to 6.8% and 3.3%, respectively, in Phase III. The proportion of patients following a 1-week regimen of conventional triple therapy decreased from 90.3% in Phase I to 54.2% in Phase III, while a 2-week regimen increased to 36.1% in Phase III. Confirmation testing within 1 year of therapy increased from 21.3% in Phase I to 43.0% in Phase III, whereas retreatment rates increased from 3.8% in Phase I to 8.8% in Phase III.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline updates have influenced H. pylori eradication practices in Korea, leading to increased use of quadruple therapies with longer treatment durations. However, further improvements in confirmatory tests and retreatment following failed initial therapy are required.

Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers: Current Clinical Use and Future Developments

PURPOSE OF THE REVIEW

Acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) represents the standard of care in the treatment of acid-related diseases. However, despite their effectiveness, PPIs display some intrinsic limitations, which underlie the unmet clinical needs that have been identified over the past decades. The aims of this review are to summarize the current status and future development of the new class of antisecretory drugs (potassium-competitive acid blockers, P-CABs) that have recently been introduced into medical practice.

RECENT FINDINGS

Over the past decades, clinical needs unmet by the current acid suppressants have been recognized, especially in the management of patients with GERD, Helicobacter pylori infection and NSAID-related peptic ulcer. The failure to address these needs is mainly due to their inability to achieve a consistent acid suppression in all patients and, particularly, to control nighttime acidity. It was then realized that an extended duration of acid suppression would exert additional benefits. The available data with P-CABs show that they are able to address these unmet clinical needs. Four different P-CABs (vonoprazan, tegoprazan, fexuprazan and keverprazan) are currently available. However, only two of them are approved outside Asia. Vonoprazan is available in North, Central and South America while tegoprazan is marketed only in Latin American countries. Two other compounds (namely linazapran glurate and zestaprazan) are presently under clinical development. While clinical trials on GERD have been performed with all P-CABs, only vonoprazan and tegoprazan have been investigated as components of Helicobacter pylori eradication regimens. The available data show that-in the above two clinical indications-P-CABs provide similar or better efficacy in comparison with PPIs. Their safety in the short-term overlaps that of PPIs, but data from long-term treatment are needed.

Comparison of the Efficacy Between the Dual Therapy of Tegoprazan and the Quadruple Therapy of Tegoprazan: A Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study

INTRODUCTION

Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period.

METHODS

A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed.

RESULTS

The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% confidence interval 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them ( P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs 89.0%, P = 0.020).

DISCUSSION

The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan-Containing Sequential Eradication Treatment Compared to Esomeprazole-Containing Sequential Eradication of Helicobacter pylori in South Korea, a Region With High Antimicrobial Resistance: A Prospective, Randomized, Single Tertiary Center Study

BACKGROUND

Treatment with potassium-competitive acid blockers has shown acceptable efficacy in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In regions like Korea, where the clarithromycin resistance rate is high, alternative combinations like non-bismuth quadruple therapies have shown favorable results. This study compared the outcomes of sequential eradication therapy with new potassium-competitive acid blocker tegoprazan and conventional esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection were consecutively recruited. Patients were allocated to either an esomeprazole-containing sequential or a tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy group. Sequential therapy comprised esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg) twice daily for the initial 5 days, followed by esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) with clarithromycin (500 mg) and metronidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days. Eradication rate, compliance, and adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

A total of 406 patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled in the trial and analyzed per protocol. Eradication rate by intention-to-treat and per-protocol was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7-88.9) for esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy, and 87.1% (95% CI: 82.5-91.8) for tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy, with no statistical significance (p = 0.399). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in treatment compliance between the two groups. Nausea was more prevalent (23.3%, 27/202) with sequential tegoprazans than with esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy (14.2%, 29/204; p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

Tegoprazan-containing 10-day sequential eradication treatment demonstrated similar eradication efficacy compared to esomeprazole-containing treatment, even in regions with high antimicrobial resistance, such as Korea.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06382493.

Bismuth add-on improves the efficacy of 2-week tegoprazan-based triple therapy for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication: a real-world evidence study

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of bismuth added to a 2-week triple therapy consisting of tegoprazan (TPZ), amoxicillin, and clarithromycin for first-line Helicobacter pylori eradication.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We reviewed the retrospective data of patients who received a 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy with or without 300 mg bismuth twice daily. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate of adding bismuth to the TPZ-based triple regimen (TAC-B group), compared to no bismuth added (TAC group).

RESULTS

In total, 306 and 256 patients were included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses, respectively. The eradication success rates were significantly higher in the TAC-B group than in the TAC group (ITT, 82.9% vs. 71.8%, p = 0.029; PP, 95.8% vs. 87.5%, p = 0.027, respectively). The adherence rate to the eradication regimen was 100% in the TAC-B group and 97.0% in the TAC group. The adverse drug event rate in the TAC-B group was comparable to that in the TAC group (29.2% vs. 27.3%, p = 0.742). No use of bismuth was significantly associated with eradication failure (p = 0.038).

CONCLUSIONS

The bismuth add-on increased the first-line H. pylori eradication rate of 2-week TPZ-based triple therapy.

CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION

www.clinicaltrials.gov identifier is NCT05453994.

P-CAB versus PPI in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Background

The efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the eradication of Helicobacter pylori (Hp) remains controversial when compared with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs).

Objectives

The current study set out to compare the differences in the eradication rate and adverse reactions between eradication regimens based on P-CAB or PPI drugs and the differences between the vonoprazan-based and the tegoprazan-based regimens to explore the efficacy and safety of different Hp eradication regimens.

Data sources and methods

Databases including PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and WOS were searched from the inception of these databases up to July 2023, and eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included. The outcome measures were the eradication rate and the incidence of adverse reactions of different regimens in treating Hp. The results were estimated as relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and R 4.2.1 software was used to perform the network meta-analysis (NMA).

Results

A total of 20 studies were included in the analysis, involving 5815 patients with Hp. In terms of eradication rate, the 2-week vonoprazan-based triple regimen (V-Tri-2w) was the best, which was superior to the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 0.9, 95% CI: (0.85-0.95)] and the 1-week tegoprazan-based triple regimen [T-Tri-1w, RR = 0.79, 95% CI: (0.64-0.97)]; the 2-week tegoprazan-based quadruple regimen (T-Qua-2w) was superior to the 1-week PPI-based triple regimen [P-Tri-1w, RR = 0.82, 95% CI: (0.67-0.99)], and there was no difference between the remaining tegoprazan-based regimens and the PPI-based or vonoprazan-based regimens. In terms of the incidence of adverse reactions, the 2-week vonoprazan-based binary regimen (V-Bi-2w) was lower than that of the 2-week PPI-based quadruple regimen [P-Qua-2w, RR = 1.98, 95% CI: (1.57-2.52)]; there was no significant difference between 1 and 2 weeks for each regimen, such as the vonoprazan-based triple regimen [RR = 1.11, 95% CI: (0.82-1.52)].

Conclusion

In the eradication treatment of Hp, the efficacy and safety of vonoprazan-based regimens are generally better than those of PPI-based regimens. Among them, the V-Tri-2w regimen has the highest eradication rate and may be the preferred choice for Hp eradication.

Fourteen-Day Tegoprazan-Amoxicillin Dual Therapy as the First-Line Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection (SHARE2301): A Multicenter, Noninferiority, Randomized Clinical Trial

BACKGROUND

Potassium-competitive acid blockers have demonstrated enormous potential in the eradication treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection, with tegoprazan being one of the representatives. The available data on the safety and efficacy of tegoprazan in dual therapy are limited.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The multicenter, noninferiority, randomized-controlled trial was conducted from May 2023 to March 2024. Treatment-naive subjects were randomly assigned (1:1) to enter either the tegoprazan-amoxicillin (TA) group (tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily and amoxicillin 750 mg four times daily) or the esomeprazole-amoxicillin (EA) group (esomeprazole 20 mg and amoxicillin 750 mg all four times daily), with a duration for 14 days. The primary outcome was eradication rate as determined by 13C-urea breath test, including per-protocol (PP) analysis and intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and compliance.

RESULTS

A total of 368 individuals were included in the randomization. The eradication rates in the EA group and the TA group were 84.2% and 85.8%, respectively, according to an ITT analysis (p = 0.77), and 88.5% and 88.2%, respectively, according to PP analysis (p = 1.00). The eradication rates for the TA group were not inferior to those of the EA group in both PP (p = 0.0023) and ITT analyses (p = 0.0009). There were no significant statistical differences in the incidence of adverse events and compliance between the two groups. The multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that poor compliance increased the risk of eradication failure (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Dual therapy containing tegoprazan is safe and effective to be considered as a clinical first-line treatment option, but further optimization involving antimicrobial susceptibility testing and adjustments in dosage and frequency is warranted.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05870683.

Pharmacokinetic Interactions Between Tegoprazan and the Combination of Clarithromycin, Amoxicillin and Bismuth in Healthy Chinese Subjects: An Open-Label, Single-Center, Multiple-Dosage, Self-Controlled, Phase I Trial

BACKGROUND

Tegoprazan is a potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid and which may be used for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. This study focuses on the pharmacokinetic interaction and safety between tegoprazan and the combination of clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth in healthy Chinese subjects.

METHODS

An open-label, three-period, single-center, multiple-dosage, single-sequence, phase I trial was conducted in 22 healthy subjects. In period 1, the subjects took tegoprazan 50 mg twice daily for 7 days, and in period 2 they were administered clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and bismuth potassium citrate 600 mg twice daily for 7 days (days 14-20). Tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth potassium citrate were then administered in combination for 7 days (days 21-27) in period 3. Blood samples were collected up to 12 h after the last dose of each period. Safety assessments were performed in each period.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ratios (GMRs) [90% confidence interval (CI)] of maximum plasma concentration at steady state (Cmax,ss) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve over the dosing interval (AUCτ) at steady state were 195.93% (175.52-218.71%) and 287.54% (263.28-314.04%) for tegoprazan and 423.23% (382.57-468.22%) and 385.61% (354.62-419.30%) for tegoprazan metabolite M1, respectively. The GMRs (90% CI) of Cmax,ss and AUCτ were 83.69% (77.44-90.45%) and 110.30% (102.74-118.41%) for clarithromycin, 126.25% (114.73-138.93%) and 146.94% (135.33-159.55%) for 14-hydroxyclarithromycin, 75.89% (69.73-82.60%) and 94.34% (87.94-101.20%) for amoxicillin, and 158.43% (125.43-200.11%) and 183.63% (156.42-215.58%) for bismuth, respectively. All reported adverse events were mild. The frequency of adverse events during the coadministration stage was not higher than that during the single- or triple-drug administration stages.

CONCLUSION

The plasma exposure of tegoprazan, M1, 14-hydroxyclarithromycin and bismuth was increased after the coadministration of tegoprazan, clarithromycin, amoxicillin and bismuth. The coadministration exhibited favorable safety and tolerability.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION

CTR20230643.

The Effect of Tegoprazan on the Treatment of Endoscopic Resection-Induced Artificial Ulcers: A Multicenter, Randomized, Active-Controlled Study

Background/Aims

: Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker that has beneficial effects on acid-related disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux and peptic ulcer diseases. This study aimed to validate the effect of tegoprazan on endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD)-induced artificial ulcers.

Methods

: Patients from 16 centers in Korea who underwent ESD for gastric neoplasia were enrolled. After ESD, pantoprazole was administered intravenously for 48 hours. The patients were randomly allocated to either the tegoprazan or esomeprazole group. Tegoprazan 50 mg or esomeprazole 40 mg were administered for 4 weeks, after which gastroscopic evaluation was performed. If the artificial ulcer had not healed, the same dose of tegoprazan or esomeprazole was administered for an additional 4 weeks, and a gastroscopic evaluation was performed.

Results

: One hundred sixty patients were enrolled in this study. The healing rates of artificial ulcers at 4 weeks were 30.3% (23/76) and 22.1% (15/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.006). At 8 weeks after ESD, the cumulative ulcer healing rates were 73.7% (56/76) and 77.9% (53/68) in the tegoprazan and esomeprazole groups, respectively (p=0.210). Delayed bleeding occurred in two patients in the tegoprazan group (2.6%) and in one patient in the esomeprazole group (1.5%). Other adverse events were negligible in both groups.

Conclusions

: Tegoprazan showed similar effects on post-ESD artificial ulcer healing in comparison with esomeprazole.

Treatment of Helicobacter pylori with potassium competitive acid blockers: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infects over half the global population, causing gastrointestinal diseases like dyspepsia, gastritis, duodenitis, peptic ulcers, G-MALT lymphoma, and gastric adenocarcinoma. Eradicating H. pylori is crucial for treating and preventing these conditions. While conventional proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based triple therapy is effective, there's growing interest in longer acid suppression therapies. Potassium competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) triple and dual therapy are new regimens for H. pylori eradication. Initially used in Asian populations, vonoprazan (VPZ) has been recently Food and Drug Administration-approved for H. pylori eradication.

AIM

To assess the efficacy of regimens containing P-CABs in eradicating H. pylori infection.

METHODS

This study, following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis by searching MEDLINE and Scopus libraries for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) or observational studies with the following command: [("Helicobacter pylori" OR "H pylori") AND ("Treatment" OR "Therapy" OR "Eradication") AND ("Vonaprazan" OR "Potassium-Competitive Acid Blocker" OR "P-CAB" OR "PCAB" OR "Revaprazan" OR "Linaprazan" OR "Soraprazan" OR "Tegoprazan")]. Studies comparing the efficacy of P-CABs-based treatment to classical PPIs in eradicating H. pylori were included. Exclusion criteria included case reports, case series, unpublished trials, or conference abstracts. Data variables encompassed age, diagnosis method, sample sizes, study duration, intervention and control, and H. pylori eradication method were gathered by two independent reviewers. Meta-analysis was performed in R software, and forest plots were generated.

RESULTS

A total of 256 references were initially retrieved through the search command. Ultimately, fifteen studies (7 RCTs, 7 retrospective observational studies, and 1 comparative unique study) were included, comparing P-CAB triple therapy to PPI triple therapy. The intention-to-treat analysis involved 8049 patients, with 4471 in the P-CAB intervention group and 3578 in the PPI control group across these studies. The analysis revealed a significant difference in H. pylori eradication between VPZ triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies [risk ratio (RR) = 1.17, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.22, P < 0.0001] and (RR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.09-1.17, P < 0.0001], respectively. However, no significant difference was found between tegoprazan (TPZ) triple therapy and PPI triple therapy in both RCTs and observational studies (RR = 1.04, 95%CI: 0.93-1.16, P = 0.5) and (RR = 1.03, 95%CI: 0.97-1.10, P = 0.3), respectively.

CONCLUSION

VPZ-based triple therapy outperformed conventional PPI-based triple therapy in eradicating H. pylori, positioning it as a highly effective first-line regimen. Additionally, TPZ-based triple therapy was non-inferior to classical PPI triple therapy.

The role of metal ions in the occurrence, progression, drug resistance, and biological characteristics of gastric cancer

Metal ions exert pivotal functions within the human body, encompassing essential roles in upholding cell structure, gene expression regulation, and catalytic enzyme activity. Additionally, they significantly influence various pathways implicated in divergent mechanisms of cell death. Among the prevailing malignant tumors of the digestive tract worldwide, gastric cancer stands prominent, exhibiting persistent high mortality rates. A compelling body of evidence reveals conspicuous ion irregularities in tumor tissues, encompassing gastric cancer. Notably, metal ions have been observed to elicit distinct contributions to the progression, drug resistance, and biological attributes of gastric cancer. This review consolidates pertinent literature on the involvement of metal ions in the etiology and advancement of gastric cancer. Particular attention is directed towards metal ions, namely, Na, K, Mg, Ca, Fe, Cu, Zn, and Mn, elucidating their roles in the initiation and progression of gastric cancer, cellular demise processes, drug resistance phenomena, and therapeutic approaches.

Optimal treatment duration of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy in Helicobacter pylori infection: A retrospective study

The use of bismuth-containing quadruple therapy (BQT) in Helicobacter pylori eradication has been increasing. Although the recommended treatment length for BQT is 14 days, longer durations may be associated with higher rates of adverse events. The aim of this study was to evaluate the optimal duration of BQT by comparing eradication rates and adverse events among 7, 10, and 14-day regimens. A total of 328 patients treated with BQT at Seoul National University Hospital from January 2010 to May 2022 were retrospectively evaluated. The eradication rates of different treatment groups were compared using intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses. Baseline characteristics of the enrolled patients and adverse events were also analyzed. A total of 74, 177, and 77 patients were included in the 7-, 10-, and 14-day groups, respectively. Forty-one patients were lost during the follow-up. The eradication rates were 71.6%, 84.2%, and 80.5% (P = .106) by ITT, and 84.1%, 94.9%, and 92.5% (P = .028) by PP analysis in the 7-, 10-, and 14-day groups, respectively. The 10-day regimen showed significantly higher eradication rates than the 7-day regimen in both ITT (P = .024) and PP (P = .018) analyses. However, there were no significant differences in eradication rates between the 10- and 14-day groups in either ITT (P = .667) or PP (P = .537) analysis. Adverse event incidence was comparable among the groups (P = .835). Treatment with BQT for 10 days was as effective as 14 days without increasing the adverse events.

Comparative Efficacy of Tegoprazan vs Esomeprazole/Sodium Bicarbonate for the Treatment of Helicobacter pylori Infection

INTRODUCTION

Potassium-competitive acid blockers and proton pump inhibitors/sodium bicarbonate can rapidly increase intragastric pH. In this study, we aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of tegoprazan-based and esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-based triple therapies in the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the data of patients with H. pylori infection treated with a 14-day tegoprazan-based triple therapy or 14-day esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-based triple therapy. The primary end point was the H. pylori eradication rate with first-line treatment in an intention-to-treat analysis. Secondary end points included the eradication rate with first-line therapy in the per-protocol analysis and adverse events associated with eradication therapy.

RESULTS

Of the 854 included patients, 435 were treated with tegoprazan-based therapy, and 419 received esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-based therapy. In the intention-to-treat population, no significant difference in eradication rate was detected between the tegoprazan-treated and esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-treated groups (78.6% [95% confidence interval (CI), 74.6-82.3%] vs 81.4% [95% CI, 77.4-84.9%], P = 0.313). The per-protocol analysis also revealed a similar eradication rate between groups (tegoprazan vs esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate: 85.5% [95% CI, 81.8-87.5%] vs 87.8% [95% CI, 84.1-90.7%], P = 0.339). However, abdominal discomfort and diarrhea were more common in the esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-treated group than in the tegoprazan-treated group (abdominal discomfort: 1.1% vs 3.8%, P = 0.012; diarrhea: 9.9% vs 21.2%, P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

The efficacy of the esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication was comparable with that of the tegoprazan-based triple therapy. However, esomeprazole/sodium bicarbonate-based therapy exhibited a higher risk of abdominal discomfort and diarrhea than tegoprazan-based therapy.

Efficacy and Safety of Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers Versus Proton Pump Inhibitors as Helicobacter pylori Eradication Therapy: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Helicobacter pylori is a gram-negative bacterium that chronically infects the gastric epithelium. Potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) are a promising alternative, being more potent than standard proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). The meta-analysis followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing P-CAB and PPI-based therapy, confirmed H. pylori infection, and measured eradication rates after at least four weeks. Subgroup analyses were conducted based on therapy type and trial location. Quality assessment used the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool, RoB 2.0, and statistical analysis was performed using ReviewManager (RevMan) 5.4 (2020; The Cochrane Collaboration, London, United Kingdom). A p-value of <0.05 is considered statistically significant. In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, P-CABs demonstrated superior overall efficacy, consistently observed in the first-line treatment subgroup. However, no significant difference was found in the subgroup receiving salvage therapy. Another ITT subgroup analyzed the impact of geographical location, favoring P-CABs in the overall study population and the Japanese subgroup. However, no statistically significant differences were found in the subgroups of other countries. In the PPA, P-CABs showed superior efficacy overall, consistently seen in the first-line treatment subgroup. However, no significant difference was found in the subgroup receiving salvage eradication therapy. Another PPA subgroup analysis considered the geographical impact on eradication rates, revealing P-CABs as superior to PPIs in the overall study population and the Japanese subgroup, but not in other countries. No significant adverse event outcomes were observed. P-CAB-based triple therapy is more effective than PPI-based triple therapy as the primary treatment for H. pylori eradication, particularly in Japanese patients. Nevertheless, regarding salvage therapy, both treatments show comparable efficacy. Additionally, the tolerability of P-CAB-based and PPI-based triple therapy is similar, with a similar occurrence of adverse events.

Efficacy of Tegoprazan in Patients with Laryngopharyngeal Reflux Disease: A Preliminary Feasibility Study

Tegoprazan is a novel, potent, and highly selective potassium-competitive acid blocker that inhibits gastric acid secretion with rapid onset of action and prolonged control of gastric acidity. We performed a preliminary feasibility study to evaluate whether tegoprazan could control symptoms more effectively than a placebo in patients with laryngopharyngeal reflux disease (LPRD). In this double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, 35 patients with LPRD were randomly assigned to two groups: tegoprazan 50 mg daily and placebo. The primary endpoint was the complete resolution rate of LPRD symptoms after 8 weeks of medication, and the secondary endpoints were the complete resolution rate of LPRD symptoms after 4 weeks of medication and changes in the reflux symptom index (RSI) and reflux finding score (RFS) from baseline at 4 and 8 weeks of medication. There was no difference in the complete symptom resolution rates at 8 weeks between the tegoprazan and placebo groups (29.4% [5/17] vs. 27.8% [5/18], p = 1.000). Moreover, there was no significant difference in the complete symptom resolution rates at 4 weeks between the two groups. Compared with the baseline, both tegoprazan and placebo significantly reduced the total RSI and RFS scores after 4 and 8 weeks of medication; however, tegoprazan was not superior to the placebo. In conclusion, tegoprazan (50 mg daily) administration improved LPRD symptoms and signs. However, tegoprazan did not show superiority over placebo. Considering the potential effectiveness of tegoprazan as an acid-suppressing therapy and the possibility of type II error due to a low number of included patients herein, prospective, large-scale, multi-center studies with a higher dose of tegoprazan for a prolonged duration are required to elucidate the efficacy of tegoprazan in patients with LPRD. (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT05871398).

Efficacy and Tolerability of 14-Day Tegoprazan- versus Rabeprazole-Based Triple Therapy for Eradication of Helicobacter pylori: A Real-World Evidence Study

Background/Aims

Tegoprazan, a new, fast, and strong potassium-competitive acid blocker, has been approved for the treatment of gastric acid-related diseases in Korea. However, real-world clinical data regarding this drug are scarce. We aimed to compare the Helicobacter pylori eradication rates of tegoprazan- and rabeprazole-based triple therapy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed data from patients who received first-line treatment for H. pylori infection using tegoprazan- or rabeprazole-based triple therapy for 2 weeks (50 mg tegoprazan or 20 mg rabeprazole+1,000 mg amoxicillin+500 mg clarithromycin twice daily). The primary endpoint was the eradication rate as determined by intention-to-treat analysis.

Results

Of the 677 patients included in our study, 344 and 333 received tegoprazan-based and rabeprazole-based triple therapy, respectively. The eradication rate from intention-to-treat analysis was 76.7% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.1% to 81.0%) for tegoprazan-based triple therapy and 75.4% (95% CI, 70.5% to 79.8%) for rabeprazole-based triple therapy. There was no significant difference in the eradication rates between the two groups (p>0.999). Per-protocol analysis also revealed no significant difference between the eradication rates of the two groups (tegoprazan 83.4% [95% CI, 79.0% to 87.2%] vs rabeprazole 83.5% [79.0% to 87.4%], p>0.999). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in adverse event rates between the two groups (tegoprazan, 27.6%; rabeprazole, 25.8%; p=0.604).

Conclusions

The eradication rate of tegoprazan-based triple therapy was similar to that of rabeprazole-based triple therapy. Further studies on the dose-escalation effect of tegoprazan for H. pylori eradication and the efficacy of tegoprazan in regimens other than conventional triple therapy are needed.

Optimizing Helicobacter pylori Treatment: An Updated Review of Empirical and Susceptibility Test-Based Treatments

As the rate of discovery of drug-resistant Helicobacter pylori cases increases worldwide, the relevant societies have updated their guidelines for primary eradication regimens. A promising strategy against drug-resistant H. pylori is tailored therapy based on the results of an antibiotic susceptibility test; however, it is difficult to apply this strategy to all cases. Although culture-based antibiotic susceptibility tests can assess resistance to any antimicrobial agent, their greatest disadvantage is the time required to draw a conclusion. In contrast, molecular-based methods, such as polymerase chain reaction, can rapidly determine the presence of resistance, although a single test can only test for one type of antimicrobial agent. Additionally, the limited availability of facilities for molecular-based methods has hindered their widespread use. Therefore, low-cost, minimally invasive, simple, and effective primary regimens are needed. Several studies have compared the efficacy of the latest primary eradication regimens against that of tailored therapies, and their results have shaped guidelines. This article reviews the latest research on empirical and tailored treatments for H. pylori infections. Evidence for the superiority of tailored therapy over empirical therapy is still limited and varies by region and treatment regimen. A network meta-analysis comparing different empirical treatment regimens showed that vonoprazan triple therapy provides a superior eradication effect. Recently, favorable results towards vonoprazan dual therapy have been reported, as it reached eradication levels similar to those of vonoprazan triple therapy. Both vonoprazan dual therapy and tailored therapy based on antibiotic susceptibility tests could contribute to future treatment strategies.

Current status of gastric and oral infection/diseases caused by Helicobacter pylori

Helicobacter pylori is found in the stomach, which is its optimal habitat, and is considered an important factor in various serious diseases, including stomach cancer. The World Health Organization has identified H. pylori as a causative agent of gastric cancer, as confirmed by animal experiments in rodents. The fact that H. pylori can live in the harsh environment of stomach acid was the greatest hindrance to the discovery of H. pylori. It was not so long ago, in 1983, that it was successfully isolated and cultured. Subsequently, H. pylori eradication therapy was established, and it became possible to control gastric cancer to some extent. However, the mechanism, route, and mode of H. pylori infection still remain unclear. Furthermore, currently, the prevention of first‐episode gastric cancer and control of recurrent gastric cancer are not perfect. One of the reasons for this may be that the status of H. pylori in the oral cavity, which is the entry point for the organism (the beginning of the digestive system: the first route of infection), is still unknown. Therefore, we reviewed the current status of H. pylori infection in the stomach and oral cavity, focusing on (1) the mechanism of infection, (2) pathogenic factors, (3) the actual status of eradication therapy, and (4) control strategies.

Newer, Older, and Alternative Agents for the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori Infection: A Narrative Review

Although discovered 40 years ago, Helicobacter pylori infection is still raising diagnostic and therapeutic problems today. The infection is currently managed based on statements in several guidelines, but implementing them in practice is a long process. Increasing antibiotic resistance and weak compliance of the patients limit the efficacy of eradication regimens, leaving much room for improvement. Third-generation proton pump inhibitors have added little to the results of the first two generations. Potassium-competitive acid blockers have a stronger and longer inhibitory action of acid secretion, increasing the intragastric pH. They obtained superior results in eradication when compared to proton pump inhibitors. Instead of innovative antibiotics, derivatives of existing antimicrobials were developed; some new fluoroquinolones and nitazoxanide seem promising in practice, but they are not recommended by the guidelines. Carbonic anhydrase inhibitors have both anti-secretory and bactericidal effects, and some researchers are expecting their revival in the treatment of infection. Capsules containing components of the eradication regimens have obtained excellent results, but are of limited availability. Probiotics, if containing bacteria with anti-Helicobacter pylori activity, may be useful, increasing the rates of eradication and lowering the prevalence and severity of the side effects.

Efficacy of tegoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy compared with bismuth quadruple therapy for Helicobacter pylori infection: A randomized, double-blind, active-controlled study

BACKGROUND

Bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) is recommended as the first-line empirical therapy for Helicobacter pylori eradication as it is not associated with resistance. However, few studies have investigated the use of potassium-competitive acid blockers for BQT.

AIM

To investigate the efficacy and safety profiles of tegoprazan-based BQT (TBMT) versus lansoprazole-based BQT (LBMT) for H. pylori eradication.

METHODS

We included patients older than 18 with an H. pylori infection without a history of H. pylori eradication who visited four university-affiliated hospitals between March 2020 and December 2021. H. pylori infection was diagnosed using a rapid urease test or Giemsa staining. Patients were randomly assigned to the TBMT or LBMT group.

RESULTS

217 subjects were randomly allocated to receive either TBMT (n = 108) or LBMT (n = 109) therapy. Intention-to-treat (ITT) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 80.0% and 77.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: -8.4 to 13.7, p = 0.0124), respectively. Corresponding modified ITT rates were 90.3% and 84.5% (95% CI: -3.6 to 15.2, p = 0.0005), respectively. Per-protocol (PP) eradication rates of TBMT and LBMT were 90.2% and 82.4% (95% CI: -2.5 to 18.2, p = 0.0003), respectively. There was no significant difference in the rate of adverse events between the TBMT and LBMT groups (39.1% vs. 43.4%, p = 0.5211). TBMT showed higher eradication rates than that of LBMT in ITT, m-ITT, and PP analysis.

CONCLUSION

TBMT showed a noninferior eradication rate and similar adverse events to LBMT as a first-line eradication regimen. Our results suggest that tegoprazan might be substituted for proton pump inhibitors in H. pylori eradication regimens.

Effectiveness of 7-day triple therapy with half-dose clarithromycin for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori without the A2143G and A2142G point mutations of the 23S rRNA gene in a high clarithromycin resistance area

BACKGROUND

Tailored therapy has been widely used for patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in South Korea. Herein, we evaluated the treatment outcomes of tailored clarithromycin-based triple therapy (TT) in patients infected with H. pylori.

METHODS

We enrolled 460 patients without A2142G and A2143G point mutations by dual priming oligonucleotide-based polymerase chain reaction who had taken TT and undergone the urease breath test to evaluate eradication in clinical practice. Eradication rates according to the treatment duration and dose of clarithromycin were analyzed.

RESULTS

Among 460 patients (164 women, median age 63.0 years), 250 patients underwent TT with full-dose clarithromycin (TT-full CLA), and 216 patients underwent TT with half-dose clarithromycin (TT-half CLA). The eradication rates were 88.0% (220/250) in patients with TT-full CLA and 85.2% (179/210) in patients with TT-half CLA. In 250 patients with TT-full CLA, the eradication rates were 86.8% (33/38) in patients with 7-day TT-full CLA and 88.2% (187/212) in patients with 10-day or 14-day TT-full CLA (P = 0.788). In 210 patients with TT-half CLA, the eradication rates were 84.2% (139/165) in those with a 7-day TT-half CLA and 88.9% (40/45) in those with a 10-day or 14-day TT-half CLA (P = 0.436).

CONCLUSION

For patients with H. pylori infection without A2142G and A2143G point mutations by DPO-PCR in clinical practice, treatment extension above 7-day TT with full CLA did not improve the eradication rates. Future studies on the treatment outcomes of TT-half CLA considering effectiveness and compliance are warranted.

Approach to Patients with Consecutive Helicobacter pylori Eradication Failure

<i>Helicobacter pylori</i> (<i>H. pylori</i>) is associated with various gastrointestinal disorders, such as gastritis, peptic ulcers, mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue lymphoma, and gastric cancer. Therefore, the International Agency for Research on Cancer, a specialized cancer agency of the World Health Organization, categorizes <i>H. pylori</i> as a definite gastric carcinogen (group I). <i>H. pylori</i> eradication is a major challenge both medically and socioeconomically in countries with high prevalence of <i>H. pylori</i> and gastric cancer. However, the efficacy of first-line clarithromycin-containing triple therapy and second-line bismuth-containing quadruple therapy continues to decline worldwide including in Korea. The role of salvage therapy is being recognized globally; however, the exact salvage therapy which is useful in daily clinical practice remains unestablished. In this review, factors associated with eradication failure will be discussed. Furthermore, eradication regimens that may be useful as salvage therapies based on Korean guidelines, Maastricht VI/Florence consensus report and previous research are summarized.

Prediction of the Drug–Drug Interaction Potential between Tegoprazan and Amoxicillin/Clarithromycin Using the Physiologically Based Pharmacokinetic and Pharmacodynamic Model

Tegoprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker. This study investigated the effect of drug–drug interaction on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of tegoprazan co-administered with amoxicillin and clarithromycin, the first-line therapy for the eradication of Helicobacter pylori, using physiologically based pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic (PBPK/PD) modeling. The previously reported tegoprazan PBPK/PD model was modified and applied. The clarithromycin PBPK model was developed based on the model provided by the SimCYP® compound library. The amoxicillin model was constructed using the middle-out approach. All of the observed concentration–time profiles were covered well by the predicted profiles with the 5th and 95th percentiles. The mean ratios of predicted to observed PK parameters, including the area under the curve (AUC), maximum plasma drug concentration (Cmax), and clearance, were within the 30% intervals for the developed models. Two-fold ratios of predicted fold-changes of Cmax and AUC from time 0 to 24 h to observed data were satisfied. The predicted PD endpoints, including median intragastric pH and percentage holding rate at pH above 4 or 6 on day 1 and day 7, were close to the corresponding observed data. This investigation allows evaluation of the effects of CYP3A4 perpetrators on tegoprazan PK and PD changes, thus providing clinicians with the rationale for co-administration dosing adjustment.

[Treatment of Acid-related Diseases Using Potassium-competitive Acid Blockers]

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have several limitations to their efficacy including insufficient acid suppression, slow onset of action, and variable efficacy among patients due to CYP2C19 metabolism. Potassium-competitive acid blockers inhibit H⁺-K⁺-ATPase in a reversible and K⁺-competitive manner, are novel acid suppressive drugs with rapid onset of action, meal independence, and prolonged control of intragastric acidity compared to PPIs. Potassium-competitive acid blockers exhibited non-inferior therapeutic efficacies on reflux esophagitis, gastric ulcers, and Helicobacter pylori eradication. The review is focused on the unmet needs across the acid-related diseases and recent updates on clinical studies using vonoprazan and tegoprazan.

Potassium-Competitive Acid Blockers: Present and Potential Utility in the Armamentarium for Acid Peptic Disorders

Potassium-competitive acid blockers (PCABs) such as vonoprazan represent a novel class of acid suppressants that show tremendous promise to enhance care of acid peptic disorders. PCAB characteristics distinct from those of proton pump inhibitors-such as acid stability with dosing independent of food consumption, rapid onset of action, less variability with CYP2C19 polymorphisms, and extended half-lives-may add value in clinical practice. With recently reported data beyond Asian populations and expanding regulatory approval of PCABs, clinicians should be aware of these medications and their potential roles in the management of acid peptic disorders. This article provides an up-to-date summary of the evidence around PCABs for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease (especially erosive esophagitis healing and maintenance), eosinophilic esophagitis, Helicobacter pylori infection, and peptic ulcer healing and secondary prophylaxis.

Comparative Efficacy of 14-Day Tegoprazan-Based Triple vs. 10-Day Tegoprazan-Based Concomitant Therapy for Helicobacter pylori Eradication

Tegoprazan, a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker, is currently available for the treatment of Helicobacter pylori infection. We compared the efficacies of tegoprazan-based triple and concomitant therapies in a real-world practice. Data of patients treated with a 14-day tegoprazan-based triple therapy (50 mg of tegoprazan + 1000 mg of amoxicillin + 500 mg of clarithromycin twice daily) or 10-day tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy (50 mg of tegoprazan + 1000 mg of amoxicillin + 500 mg of clarithromycin + 500 mg of metronidazole twice daily) were retrospectively reviewed. Primary endpoint was eradication rate in the intention-to-treat (ITT) population. Of the 928 included patients, 551 and 377 were treated with triple and concomitant therapies, respectively. Eradication rate from ITT analysis was 76.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7−79.8%) in the triple therapy group and 85.9% (95% CI, 82.2−89.2%) in the concomitant therapy group (p < 0.001). Eradication rate in the per-protocol analysis was also higher in the concomitant therapy group than in the triple therapy group (triple vs. concomitant therapy: 84.5% [81.1−87.5%] vs. 91.1% [87.8−93.8%]). Overall adverse event rate was 29.0% in the triple therapy group and 45.9% in the concomitant therapy group (p < 0.001). Adherence rate was similar between the two groups (triple vs. concomitant therapy: 90.0 vs. 92.6%, p = 0.180). Overall, the 10-day tegoprazan-based concomitant therapy had superior efficacy than the 14-day tegoprazan-based triple therapy for H. pylori eradication. Although concomitant therapy showed common adverse events, adherence was comparable between the two therapies.