Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Inhibitors Are Associated With Favorable Outcomes Compared to Beta Blockers in Reducing Mortality Following Abdominal Aneurysm Repair

Background The best medical therapy to control hypertension following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair is yet to be determined. We therefore examined whether treatment with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors (RAASIs) versus beta blockers influenced postoperative and 1-year clinical end points following abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in a Medicare-linked database. Methods and Results All patients with hypertension undergoing endovascular aneurysm repair and open aneurysm repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative Vascular Implant Surveillance and Interventional Outcomes Network database between 2003 and 2018 were included. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on their preoperative and discharge medications, either RAASIs or beta blockers. Our cohort included 8789 patients, of whom 3523 (40.1%) were on RAASIs, and 5266 (59.9%) were on beta blockers. After propensity score matching, there were 3053 matched pairs of patients in each group. After matching, RAASI use was associated with lower risk of postoperative mortality (odds ratio [OR], 0.3 [95% CI, 0.1-0.6]), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.1 [95% CI, 0.03-0.6]), and nonhome discharge (OR, 0.6 [95% CI, 0.5-0.7]). Before propensity score matching, RAASI use was associated with lower 1-year mortality (hazard ratio [HR], 0.4 [95% CI, 0.4-0.5]) and lower risk of aneurysmal rupture (HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]). These results persisted after propensity score matching for mortality (HR, 0.4 [95% CI, 0.4-0.5]) and aneurysmal rupture (HR, 0.7 [95% CI, 0.5-0.9]). Conclusions In this large contemporary retrospective cohort study, RAASI use was associated with favorable postoperative outcomes compared with beta blockers. It was also associated with lower mortality and aneurysmal rupture at 1 year of follow-up.

Pharmacotherapy in Clinical Trials for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

There is no medical treatment proven to limit abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) progression. This systematic review aimed to summarise available trial evidence on the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in limiting AAA growth and AAA-related events.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed to examine the efficacy of pharmacotherapy in reducing AAA growth and AAA-related events. Pubmed, Embase (Excerpta Medica Database), and the Cochrane library were searched from March, 1999 to March 29, 2022. AAA growth (mm/year) in the intervention and control groups was expressed as mean and standard deviation (SD). The results of AAA growth were expressed as mean difference (MD) and its 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Odds ratios (ORs) were calculated for the AAA-related events.Heterogeneity was quantified using the I² statistic. Forest plots were created to show the pooled results of each outcome.

OUTCOMES

A total of 1373 articles were found in different databases according to the search strategy, and 10 articles were identified by hand searching. A total of 26 articles were included in our systematic review after the screening. For the studies of metformin, the meta-analysis demonstrated that metformin use was associated with a lower AAA growth rate (MD: -0.81 mm/y, 95% CI: -1.19 to -0.42, P < 0.0001, I² = 87%), Metformin use also was related to the lower rates of AAA-related events (OR: 0.53, 95% CI: 0.36 to 0.76, P = 0.0007, I² = 60%). The hypotensive drugs of the studies mainly included angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEI), angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARB), and propranolol. The overall meta-analysis of blood pressure-lowering drugs reported no significant effect in limiting the AAA growth (MD: 0.31mm/year, 95%CI: -0.03 to 0.65, P = 0.07, I² = 66%) and AAA-related events (OR: 1.33, 95%CI: 0.76 to 2.32, P = 0.32, I² = 98%), In the subgroup analysis of the hypotensive drugs, the ACEI/ARB and propranolol also showed no significant in reducing the AAA growth and AAA-related events. The meta-analysis of the antibiotics demonstrated that the antibiotics were not associated with a lower AAA growth rate (MD: -0.27 mm/y, 95% CI: -0.88 to 0.34, P = 0.39, I² = 77%) and AAA-related events (OR: 0.94, 95%CI: 0.65 to 1.35, P = 0.72, I² = 0%). The results of statins also showed no significant effect in limiting AAA growth (MD: -1.11mm/year, 95%CI: -2.38 to 0.16, P = 0.09, I² = 96%) and AAA-related events (OR: 0.53, 95%CI: 0.26 to 1.06, P = 0.07, I² = 92%).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, effective pharmacotherapy for AAA was still lacking. Although the meta-analysis showed that metformin use was associated with lower AAA growth and AAA-related events, all of the included studies about metformin were cohort studies or case-control studies. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are needed for further verification.

Mechanical activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor contributes to abdominal aortic aneurysm formation

Objective

The angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) can be activated under conditions of mechanical stretch in some cellular systems. Whether this activity influences signaling within the abdominal aorta to promote to abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) development remains unknown. We evaluated the hypothesis that mechanical AT1R activation can occur under conditions of hypertension (HTN) and contribute to AAA formation.

Methods

BPH/2 mice, which demonstrate spontaneous neurogenic, low-renin HTN, and normotensive BPN/3 mice underwent AAA induction via the calcium chloride model, with or without an osmotic minipump delivering 30 mg/kg/d of the AT1R blocker Losartan. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured at baseline and weekly via a tail cuff. The aortic diameter (AoD) was measured at baseline and terminal surgery at 21 days by digital microscopy. Aortic tissue was harvested for immunoblotting (phosphorylated extracellular signal-regulated kinase-1 and -2 [pERK1/2] to ERK1/2 ratio) and expressed as the fold-change from the BPN/3 control mice. Aortic vascular smooth muscle cells (VSMCs) underwent stretch with or without Losartan (1 μM) treatment to assess the mechanical stimulation of ERK1/2 activity. Statistical analysis of the blood pressure, AoD, and VSMC ERK1/2 activity was performed using analysis of variance. However, the data distribution was determined to be log-normal (Shapiro-Wilk test) for ERK1/2 activity. Therefore, it was logarithmically transformed before analysis of variance.

Results

At baseline, the SBP was elevated in the BPH/2 mice relative to the BPN/3 mice (P < .05). Losartan treatment significantly reduced the SBP in both mouse strains (P < .05). AAA induction did not affect the SBP. At 21 days after induction, the percentage of increase in the AoD from baseline was significantly greater in the BPH/2 mice than in the BPN/3 mice (101.28% ± 4.19% vs 75.59% ± 1.67% above baseline; P < .05). Losartan treatment significantly attenuated AAA growth in both BPH/2 and BPN/3 mice (33.88% ± 2.97% and 43.96% ± 3.05% above baseline, respectively; P < .05). ERK1/2 activity was increased approximately fivefold in the BPH/2 control mice relative to the BPN/3 control mice (P < .05). In the BPH/2 and BPN/3 mice with AAA, ERK1/2 activity was significantly increased relative to the respective baseline control (P < .05) and effectively reduced by concomitant Losartan therapy (P < .05). Biaxial stretch of the VSMCs in the absence of angiotensin II demonstrated increased ERK1/2 activation (P < .05 vs static control), which was significantly inhibited by Losartan.

Conclusions

In BPH/2 mice with spontaneous neurogenic, low-renin HTN, AAA growth was amplified compared with the normotensive control and was effectively attenuated using Losartan. ERK1/2 activity was significantly elevated in the BPH/2 mice and after AAA induction in the normotensive and hypertensive mice but was attenuated by Losartan treatment. These data suggest that AT1R activation contributes to AAA development. Therefore, further investigation into this signaling pathway could establish targets for pharmacotherapeutic engineering to slow AAA growth. (JVS-Vascular Science 2021;2:194-206.).

Clinical Relevance

Hypertension (HTN) and abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) have been epidemiologically linked for decades; however, a biomechanical link has not yet been identified. Using a murine model of spontaneous neurogenic HTN experimentally demonstrated to have low circulating renin, mechanical activation of the angiotensin II type 1 receptor (AT1R) was identified with elevated blood pressure and AAA induction. HTN amplified AAA growth. However, more importantly, blocking the activation of AT1R with the angiotensin receptor blocker Losartan effectively abrogated AAA development. Although inhibiting the production of angiotensin II has previously been unsuccessful in altering AAA growth, the results from the present study suggest that blocking the activation of AT1R through direct ligand binding or mechanical stimulation might alter aortic wall signaling and warrants further investigation.

Captopril versus atenolol to prevent expansion rate of thoracic aortic aneurysms: rationale and design

Thoracic aortic aneurysms are correlated with significant mortality and morbidity. No therapy, however, is effective at limiting aneurysm expansion and preventing rupture. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors can reduce the wall shear stress and inflammation, both of which play vital roles in the expansion of the aneurysm. A total of 636 patients will be randomized into one of three parallel arms, receiving captopril, atenolol or placebo. The primary end point will be the rate of change in the absolute diameter of the aortic root and ascending aorta on MRI of the aorta after 36 months. The trial will investigate the efficacy of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors versus beta-blocker therapy in reducing the growth rate of thoracic aortic aneurysms and rupture. Trial registration number: NCT04224675.

Mouse models for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture is estimated to cause 200,000 deaths each year. Currently, the only treatment for AAA is surgical repair; however, this is only indicated for large asymptomatic, symptomatic or ruptured aneurysms, is not always durable, and is associated with a risk of serious perioperative complications. As a result, patients with small asymptomatic aneurysms or who are otherwise unfit for surgery are treated conservatively, but up to 70% of small aneurysms continue to grow, increasing the risk of rupture. There is thus an urgent need to develop drug therapies effective at slowing AAA growth. This review describes the commonly used mouse models for AAA. Recent research in these models highlights key roles for pathways involved in inflammation and cell turnover in AAA pathogenesis. There is also evidence for long non-coding RNAs and thrombosis in aneurysm pathology. Further well-designed research in clinically relevant models is expected to be translated into effective AAA drugs.

Angiotensin I Infusion Reveals Differential Effects of Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme in Aortic Resident Cells on Aneurysm Formation

BACKGROUND

Angiotensin (Ang)I is cleaved by angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) to generate AngII. The purpose of this study was to determine the roles of ACE in endothelial and smooth muscle cells in aortic aneurysms.

METHODS AND RESULTS

AngI infusion led to thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in low-density lipoprotein receptor-deficient mice, which were ablated by ACE inhibition. Endothelial or smooth muscle cell-specific ACE deletion resulted in reduction of AngI-induced thoracic, but not abdominal, aortic dilatation.

CONCLUSIONS

AngI infusion causes thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms in mice. ACE in aortic resident cells has differential effects on AngI-induced thoracic and abdominal aortic aneurysms.

The expression of Nesprin-1 increased in aortic dissection: why?

Background

To detect the expression of Nesprin-1 in aortic dissection (AD) in patients and to investigate the role of Nesprin-1 in the pathogenesis of AD in a mouse model.

Methods

Blood and tissue specimens from AD patients were collected. The expression of Nesprin-1 in tissues from AD patients and non-AD patients with heart disease was studied by western blotting and quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). In addition, the expression and distribution of Nesprin-1 in AD and sham mice were compared in an induced AD mouse model, and detected by immunohistochemistry and qRT-PCR.

Results

Immunoblotting and qRT-PCR both showed that the expression of Nesprin-1 was significantly higher in AD versus control patients. An animal model of AD was established by continuous injection of Ang II into ApoE^-/- mice. The expression of Nesprin-1 in aortic tissue of AD mice was higher than that of sham-operated mice as determined by immunohistochemistry. qRT-PCR showed that Nesprin-1 gene expression in aorta of AD mice was higher than that of sham-operated mice.

Conclusions

An increased expression of Nesprin-1 was associated with AD, and hence Nesprin-1 may be involved in the pathogenesis of ADs. Preliminary findings suggest that Nesprin-1 may be a therapeutic target for the treatment of AD.

The role of IL-1β in aortic aneurysm

Interleukin-1β (IL-1β) is a vital cytokine that plays an important role in regulating immune responses to infectious challenges and sterile insults. In addition, two endogenous inhibitors of functional receptor binding, IL-1 receptor antagonist (IL-1Ra), complete the family. To gain biological activity, IL-1β requires processing by the protease caspase-1 and activation of inflammasomes. Numerous clinical association studies and experimental approaches have implicated members of the IL-1 family, their receptors, or components of the processing machinery in the underlying processes of cardiovascular diseases. Here, we summarize the current state of knowledge regarding the pro-inflammatory and disease-modulating role of the IL-1 family in aneurysm. We discuss clinical evidence, signalling pathway, and mechanism of action and last, lend a perspective on currently developing therapeutic strategies involving IL-1β in aneurysm.

Current Status and Perspectives on Pharmacologic Therapy for Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm

Background:

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA), a common disease involving the segmen-tal expansion and rupture of the aorta, has a high mortality rate. Therapeutic options for AAA are cur-rently limited to surgical repair to prevent catastrophic rupture. Non-surgical approaches, particularly pharmacotherapy, are lacking for the treatment of AAA.

Objective:

We review both basic and clinical studies and discuss the current challenges to developing medical therapy that reduces AAA progression.

Results:

Studies using animal models of AAA progression and human AAA explant cultures have identified several potential targets for preventing AAA growth. However, no clinical studies have con-vincingly confirmed the efficacy of any pharmacologic treatment against the growth of AAA. Thus, there is as yet no strong recommendation regarding pharmacotherapy to reduce the risk of AAA pro-gression and rupture.

Conclusion:

This review identifies concerns that need to be addressed for the field to progress and dis-cusses the challenges that must be overcome in order to develop effective pharmacotherapy to reduce AAA progression in the future.

An evaluation of the effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on the growth rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomised placebo-controlled trial (AARDVARK)

BACKGROUND

Although data are inconsistent, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-Is) have been associated with a reduced incidence of abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) rupture in analysis of administrative databases.

OBJECTIVES

(1) To investigate whether or not the ACE-I perindopril (Coversyl arginine, Servier) reduces small AAA growth rate and (2) to evaluate blood pressure (BP)-independent effects of perindopril on small AAA growth and to compare the repeatability of measurement of internal and external aneurysm diameters.

DESIGN

A three-arm, multicentre, single-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

SETTING

Fourteen hospitals in England.

PARTICIPANTS

Men or women aged ≥ 55 years with an AAA of 3.0-5.4 cm in diameter by internal or external measurement according to ultrasonography and who met the trial eligibility criteria.

INTERVENTIONS

Patients were randomised to receive 10 mg of perindopril arginine daily, 5 mg of the calcium channel blocker amlodipine daily or placebo daily.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was AAA diameter growth using external measurements in the longitudinal plane, which in-trial studies suggested was the preferred measure. Secondary outcome measures included AAA rupture, AAA repair, modelling of the time taken for the AAA to reach the threshold for intervention (5.5 cm) or referral for surgery, tolerance of study medication (measured by compliance, adverse events and quality of life) and a comparison of the repeatability of measures of internal and external AAA diameter. Patients were followed up every 3-6 months over 2 years.

RESULTS

In total, 227 patients were recruited and randomised into the three groups, which were generally well matched at baseline. Multilevel modelling was used to determine the maximum likelihood estimates for AAA diameter growth. No significant differences in the estimates of annual growth were apparent [1.68 (standard error 0.02) mm, 1.77 (0.02) mm and 1.81 (0.02) mm in the placebo, perindopril and amlodipine groups, respectively]. Similarly, no significant differences in the slopes of modelled growth over time were apparent between perindopril and placebo (p = 0.78) or between perindopril and amlodipine (p = 0.89). The results were essentially unaffected by adjustment for potential confounders. Compliance, measured by pill counts, was good throughout (> 80% at all visit time points). There were no significant in-trial safety concerns. Six patients withdrew because of adverse events attributed to the study medications (n = 2 perindopril, n = 4 amlodipine). No patients ruptured their AAA and 27 underwent elective surgery during the trial (n = 9 placebo, n = 10 perindopril, n = 8 amlodipine).

CONCLUSIONS

We were unable to demonstrate a significant impact of perindopril compared with placebo or amlodipine on small AAA growth over a 2-year period. Furthermore, there were no differences in the times to reach a diameter of 5.5 cm or undergo surgery among the three groups. Perindopril and amlodipine were well tolerated by this population. External AAA measurements were found to be more repeatable than internal measurements. The observed AAA growth measurement variability was greater than that expected pre trial. This, combined with slower than expected mean growth rates, resulted in our having limited power to detect small differences between growth rates and hence this adds uncertainty to the interpretation of the results. Several further analyses are planned including a multivariate analysis of determinants of AAA growth, an evaluation of the possible differential effect of perindopril on fast AAA growth and an investigation into the roles of central BP and BP variability on AAA growth.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN51383267.

FUNDING

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 20, No. 59. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information. The NIHR Biomedical Research Centre based at Imperial College NHS Trust supported the trial. Servier provided perindopril at no charge.

Renin-angiotensin system blockade does not attenuate abdominal aortic aneurysm growth, rupture rate, or perioperative mortality after elective repair

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to summarize the literature regarding the effects of renin-angiotensin system blockade (RASB) using angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEis) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) on human abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) growth, rupture, and perioperative mortality.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Our review protocol was registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42016054082). We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials database, MEDLINE, and Embase from inception to 2017 for studies examining the effects of ACEi or ARB treatment on AAA growth, rupture, or perioperative mortality. Review, abstraction, and quality assessment were conducted in duplicate, and a third author resolved discrepancies. We assessed study quality using the Cochrane and Newcastle-Ottawa scales. We used random-effects models to calculate pooled mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Heterogeneity was quantified using the I2 statistic.

RESULTS

Our search yielded 525 articles. One randomized and seven observational studies involving 35,448 patients were included. Inter-rater agreement was excellent (κ = 0.78), and risk of bias was low to moderate. All studies investigated ACEis, three studies investigated ARBs, and two studies included a composite RASB group consisting of ACEi or ARB users. Five studies assessed AAA growth, two assessed rupture rate, and one reported 30-day mortality after elective open repair. There was no difference in AAA growth rate between RASB and control (mean difference, 0.03 mm/y; 95% CI, -0.40 to 0.46; P = .88; I2 = 60%). No protective effect of RASB (OR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.72, 1.16; P = .47; I2 = 90%) was demonstrated for AAA rupture. Finally, RASB increased 30-day mortality in patients undergoing elective open AAA repair (OR, 5; 95% CI, 1.4, 27) according to a single well-adjusted study.

CONCLUSIONS

RASB does not appear to affect AAA growth and rupture rate but increases elective perioperative mortality. The small number of heterogeneous, retrospective studies and limited long-term follow-up preclude a definitive dismissal of RASB as pharmacotherapy for AAA. Prospective, long-term data are needed to clarify the effect of RASB on AAA growth, rupture, and perioperative mortality.

Animal models in the research of abdominal aortic aneurysms development

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a prevalent and potentially life threatening disease. Many animal models have been developed to simulate the natural history of the disease or test preclinical endovascular devices and surgical procedures. The aim of this review is to describe different methods of AAA induction in animal models and report on the effectiveness of the methods described in inducing an analogue of a human AAA. The PubMed database was searched for publications with titles containing the following terms "animal" or "animal model(s)" and keywords "research", "aneurysm(s)", "aorta", "pancreatic elastase", "Angiotensin", "AngII" "calcium chloride" or "CaCl(2)". Starting date for this search was set to 2004, since previously bibliography was already covered by the review of Daugherty and Cassis (2004). We focused on animal studies that reported a model of aneurysm development and progression. A number of different approaches of AAA induction in animal models has been developed, used and combined since the first report in the 1960's. Although specific methods are successful in AAA induction in animal models, it is necessary that these methods and their respective results are in line with the pathophysiology and the mechanisms involved in human AAA development. A researcher should know the advantages/disadvantages of each animal model and choose the appropriate model.

AT1-receptor blockade attenuates outward aortic remodeling associated with diet-induced obesity in mice

The renin-angiotensin system (RAS) and obesity have been implicated in vascular outward remodeling, including aneurysms, but the precise mechanisms are not yet understood. We investigated the effect of the angiotensin receptor type 1 (AT1-receptor) antagonist telmisartan on aortic outward remodeling in a diet-induced obesity model in mice. C57/Black6J mice were fed either a low-fat diet (LFD) or a high-fat diet (HFD) for 14 weeks. One group of HFD mice was additionally exposed to telmisartan (3 mg/kg per day) for the last 4 weeks. HFD led to aortic outward remodeling, characterized by increased proteolysis, along with structural changes, such as fragmentation of elastic fibers and decreased elastin content. Vascular damage was associated with up-regulation of matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2 (MMP-2), MMP-3, MMP-12, cathepsin D, and cathepsin B. HFD aortae exhibited an enhanced inflammatory status, characterized by tumor necrosis factor α (TNF-α) and interleukin-1β (IL-1β) colocalized with adipocytes in the adventitia. HFD resulted in a significant increase in aortic dimensions, evident by ultrasound measurements. Telmisartan abolished aortic dilatation and preserved elastin content. HFD induced enhanced expression of aortic MMP-2, MMP-9, and TNF-α was abrogated by telmisartan. Adventitial proteolytic and inflammatory factors were also examined in samples from human abdominal aneurysms. The expression of TNF-α, IL-1β, and MMP-9 was higher in the adventitial fat of diseased vessels compared with healthy tissues. Finally, adipocytes treated with TNF-α showed enhanced MMP-2, MMP-3, and cathepsin D, which was prevented by telmisartan. Taken together, HFD in mice induced aortic dilatation with up-regulation of matrix degrading and inflammatory pathways similar to those seen in human aortic aneurysmatic tissue. The HFD-induced vascular pathology was reduced by AT1-receptor antagonist telmisartan.

An evaluation of the effect of an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor on the growth rate of small abdominal aortic aneurysms: a randomized placebo-controlled trial (AARDVARK)

Aims

The AARDVARK (Aortic Aneurysmal Regression of Dilation: Value of ACE-Inhibition on RisK) trial investigated whether ACE-inhibition reduces small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) growth rate, independent of blood pressure (BP) lowering.

Methods and results

A three-arm, multi-centre, single-blind, and randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN51383267) was conducted in 14 hospitals in England. Subjects aged ≥55 years with AAA diameter 3.0–5.4 cm were randomized 1:1:1 to receive perindopril arginine 10 mg, or amlodipine 5 mg, or placebo and followed 3–6 monthly over 2 years. The primary outcome was aneurysm growth rate (based on external antero-posterior ultrasound measurements in the longitudinal plane), determined by multi-level modelling to provide maximum likelihood estimates. Two hundred and twenty-four subjects were randomized (2011–2013) to placebo (n = 79), perindopril (n = 73), or amlodipine (n = 72). Mean (SD) changes in mid-trial systolic BP (12 months) were 0.5 (14.3) mmHg, P = 0.78 compared with baseline, −9.5 (13.1) mmHg (P < 0.001), and −6.7 (12.0) mmHg (P < 0.001), respectively. No significant differences in the modelled annual growth rates were apparent [1.68 mm (SE 0.2), 1.77 mm (0.2), and 1.81 mm (0.2), respectively]. The estimated difference in annual growth between the perindopril and placebo groups was 0.08 mm (CI −0.50, 0.65). Similar numbers of AAAs in each group reached 5.5 cm diameter and/or underwent elective surgery: 11 receiving placebo, 10 perindopril, and 11 amlodipine.

Conclusion

Small AAA growth rates were lower than anticipated, but there was no significant impact of perindopril compared with placebo or placebo and amlodipine, combined despite more effective BP lowering.

Recent Advances in the Development of Experimental Animal Models Mimicking Human Aortic Aneurysms

Aortic aneurysm is a common and life-threatening disease that can cause death from rupture. Current therapeutic options are limited to surgical or endovascular procedures because no pharmacological approaches have been proven to decrease the chance of expansion or rupture. The best approach to the management of aortic aneurysm would be the understanding and prevention of the processes involved in disease occurrence, progression, and rupture. There is a need for animal models that can reproduce the pathophysiological features of human aortic aneurysm, and several such models have been studied. This review will emphasize recent advances in animal models used in the determination of mechanisms and treatments of aortic aneurysms.

Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors and Angiotensin II Receptor Blockers in Patients With Abdominal Aortic Aneurysms

Objective—

The renin–angiotensin system is thought to play a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs). However, effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II type 1 receptor blockers (ARBs) on human AAAs remain unclear. We therefore examined whether treatment with ACEIs or ARBs influenced hard clinical end points in a nation-wide cohort of patients with AAA.

Approach and Results—

All patients diagnosed with AAA during the period 1995 to 2011 were identified from the Danish nation-wide registries. Subjects were divided according to ACEI and ARB treatment status and followed up for an average of 5 years. Study outcomes were evaluated by time-dependent Cox proportional hazard models. Of 9441 patients with AAA, 12.6% were treated with ACEIs and 5.0% received ARBs. Incidence rates of death from AAA per 100 patient-years were 3.7, 3.6, 4.0, and 4.7 for treatment with ACEIs or ARBs, ACEIs, ARBs, and no ACEI/ARB, respectively. Hazard ratios of death from AAA were 0.64 (95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.80; P <0.001) for patients receiving ACEIs and 0.65 (95% confidence interval, 0.48–0.88; P =0.006) for those receiving ARBs, respectively ( P for difference=0.944). The risk of surgery for AAA was significantly reduced in patients receiving ACEIs (hazard ratio, 0.86 [95% confidence interval, 0.74–0.99]; P =0.040) but not in patients receiving ARBs (hazard ratio, 1.02 [95% confidence interval, 0.84–1.23]; P =0.867; P for difference=0.119).

Conclusions—

In this observational study, treatment with ACEIs or ARBs was associated with a comparable reduction in mortality but not in surgery for AAA among patients with AAA. Randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.

A peptide antagonist of thrombospondin-1 promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm progression in the angiotensin II-infused apolipoprotein-E-deficient mouse

OBJECTIVE

Interaction of the activating sequence in thrombospondin-1 (TSP-1) with the conserved sequence (leucine-serine-lysine-leucine [LSKL]) in the latency-associated peptide region of latent transforming growth factor (TGF)-β complex is important in regulating TGF-β1 activity. We aimed to assess the effect of blocking peptide LSKL on the progression of pre-established abdominal aortic aneurysm in angiotensin II-infused apolipoprotein E-deficient (ApoE(-/-)) mice.

APPROACH AND RESULTS

Abdominal aortic aneurysm was established in 3-month-old male ApoE(-/-) mice with subcutaneous infusion of angiotensin II for 28 days. After this, mice received LSKL peptide or control SLLK (serine-leucine-leucine-lysine) peptide (4 mg/kg) via daily intraperitoneal injection for an additional 2 weeks. Administration of LSKL peptide promoted larger suprarenal aortic diameter, as determined by ultrasound and morphometric analysis, and stimulated more severe atherosclerosis within the aortic arch. In addition, mice receiving LSKL peptide exhibited elevated circulating proinflammatory cytokine levels and greater inflammatory cells within the suprarenal aorta compared with controls. Mice receiving LSKL peptide showed low plasma TGF-β1 activity and low levels of aortic tissue phosphorylated to total Smad2/3. Aortic gene expression of TGF-β receptor 1 (TGFBRI) and receptor 2 (TGFBRII), but not TGF-β1 and thrombospondin-1, were lower in mice receiving LSKL peptide than controls. LSKL peptide administration was associated with greater aortic elastin fragmentation and lower expression and activity of the TGF-β1-target gene lysyl oxidase like 1 (LOXL1).

CONCLUSIONS

Attenuation of thrombospondin-1-directed activation of TGF-β1 promotes abdominal aortic aneurysm and atherosclerosis progression in the angiotensin II-infused ApoE(-/-) mouse model.

Aliskiren limits abdominal aortic aneurysm, ventricular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis in an apolipoprotein-E-deficient mouse model

In the present study, the efficacy of aliskiren in limiting the progression of abdominal aortic aneurysm, ventricular hypertrophy and atherosclerosis were examined in a mouse model. Aliskiren limited the progression of these pathologies, suggesting the potential of this medication for cardiovascular-protective protection.

Role of the renin-angiotensin system on abdominal aortic aneurysms

BACKGROUND

Abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) is a complex degenerative disease, which leads to morbidity and mortality in a large portion of the elderly population. Current treatment options for AAA are quite limited as there is no proven indication for pharmacological therapy and surgery is recommended for AAA larger than 5·5 cm in luminal diameter. Thus, there is a great need to elucidate the underlying pathophysiological cellular and molecular mechanisms to develop effective therapies. In this narrative review, we will discuss recent findings concerning some potential molecular and clinical aspects of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) in AAA pathophysiology.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This narrative review is based on the material found on MEDLINE and PubMed up to April 2013. We looked for the terms 'angiotensin, AT1 receptor, ACE inhibitors' in combination with 'abdominal aortic aneurysm, pathophysiology, pathways'.

RESULTS

Several basic research and clinical studies have recently investigated the role of the RAS in AAA. In particular, the subcutaneous infusion of Angiotensin II has been shown to induce AAA in Apo56 knockout mice. On the other hand, the pharmacological treatments targeting this system have been shown as beneficial in AAA patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Emerging evidence suggests that RAS may act as a molecular and therapeutic target for treating AAA. However, several issues on the role of RAS and the protective activities of angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and Angiotensin 1 receptors blockers against AAA require further clarifications.

Novel mechanisms of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) are a common but asymptomatic disease that has high susceptibility to rupture. Current therapeutic options are limited to surgical procedures because no pharmacological approaches have been proven to decrease either expansion or rupture of human AAAs. The current dearth of effective medical treatment is attributed to insufficient understanding of the mechanisms underlying the initiation, propagation and rupture of AAAs. This review will emphasize recent advances in mechanistic studies that may provide insights into potential pharmacological treatments for this disease. While we primarily focus on recent salient findings, we also discuss mechanisms that continue to be controversial depending on models under study. Despite the progress on exploring mechanisms of experimental AAAs, ultimate validation of mechanisms will require completion of prospective double-blinded clinical trials. In addition, we advocate increased emphasis of collaborative studies using animal models and human tissues for determination of mechanisms that explore expansion and rupture of existing AAAs.

Protective effects of angiotensin-converting enzyme I/I and matrix metalloproteinase-3 6A/6A polymorphisms on dilatative pathology within the ascending thoracic aorta

OBJECTIVE

Activation of matrix metalloproteinases and the renin/angiotensin signaling pathways is under investigation with regard to their potential pathogenesis in dilatative pathology of the aorta. The purpose of this study was to explore matrix metalloproteinase-3 5A/6A and angiotensin-converting enzyme I/D polymorphisms as predisposing factors to dilatative pathology of the aorta.

METHODS

We studied 107 patients who underwent aortic reconstruction surgery due to dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta and a random sample of the population (n = 773), all from Lithuania. The insertion/deletion (-1171 5A/6A) polymorphism in the promoter region of matrix metalloproteinase-3 studied by real-time polymerase-chain-reaction amplification and the D and I alleles were identified on the basis of standard polymerase-chain-reaction amplification of the respective fragments from intron 16 of the angiotensin-converting enzyme gene.

RESULTS

The frequency of the angiotensin-converting enzyme D allele was significantly higher in dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta patients than in the reference group subjects (0.55 vs 0.48, respectively). The latter group had a significantly higher frequency of the angiotensin-converting enzyme I/I genotype than in dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta patients (27.4% vs 16.5%, respectively). In the reference group, the frequency of combined angiotensin-converting enzyme I/I and matrix metalloproteinase-3 6A/6A genotypes was 7.5%, while in the dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta patient group, there was no one carrying that combined genotype (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

The present study showing a role of angiotensin-converting enzyme and matrix metalloproteinase-3 in the development of dilatative pathology of ascending thoracic aorta permits us to entertain a possible protective mechanism for the combined effects of the angiotensin-converting enzyme I/I and the matrix metalloproteinase-3 6A/6A genotypes.

Current status of medical management for abdominal aortic aneurysm

Previous trials indicate that surgical management of small abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) does not reduce mortality. The medical management of AAA, however, has to a large degree been ignored until recently. Medical management is not only needed to limit the expansion of small AAAs but also to reduce the high incidence of other cardiovascular events in these patients. In this review current evidence regarding medical therapy for patients with small AAAs is discussed. Four current randomised controlled trials are examining the efficacy of exercise, doxycycline and angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in limiting AAA progression. A further trial using a mast cell stabilisation agent is expected to start soon. It is anticipated that a range of novel therapies for small AAAs will be identified within the next decade.

Diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for small abdominal aortic aneurysms

Abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) affect 5% of the population in developed countries and are characterized by progressive aortic dilatation with an unpredictable time course. This condition is more common in men than in women, and in smokers than in nonsmokers. If left untreated, AAA can result in aortic rupture and death. Pathologically, aortic extracellular matrix degradation, inflammation, and neovascularization are hallmarks of AAA. Diagnosis of AAA and subsequent surveillance utilize established aortic imaging methods, such as ultrasound, CT, and MRI. More-speculative diagnostic approaches include molecular and cellular imaging methods that interrogate the underlying pathological processes at work within the aneurysm. In this Review, we explore the current diagnostic and therapeutic strategies for the management of AAA. We also describe the diagnostic potential of new imaging techniques and therapeutic potential of new treatments for the management of small AAA.

Experimental models of abdominal aortic aneurysms

Despite being a leading cause of death in the West, the pathophysiology of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAA) is still incompletely understood. Pharmacotherapy to reduce the growth of small AAAs is limited and techniques for repairing aneurysms continue to evolve. Experimental models play a key role in AAA research, as they allow a detailed evaluation of the pathogenesis of disease progression. This review focuses on in vivo experimental models, which have improved our understanding of the potential mechanisms of AAA development and contributed to the advancement of new treatments.

Animal models of abdominal aortic aneurysm and their role in furthering management of human disease

Abdominal aortic aneurysm is a common degenerative disorder associated with sudden death due to aortic rupture. Current therapy is limited to open surgical repair of the aorta or endovascular placement of covered stents to exclude the abdominal aortic aneurysm from the circulation. A number of different animal models have been developed in order to study abdominal aortic aneurysm in an effort to advance current management deficiencies. Large animal models have been mostly used to assist in developing novel methods to surgically treat abdominal aortic aneurysms. Small animal models, particularly those developed in rodents, have been employed to further the understanding of the mechanisms involved in abdominal aortic aneurysm in order to identify potential new medical treatments. It is expected that findings from these animal models will contribute importantly to new treatments for human abdominal aortic aneurysm. This review explores the animal models which are used in abdominal aortic aneurysm research and highlights their advantages and disadvantages.

TGF-beta in the pathogenesis and prevention of disease: a matter of aneurysmic proportions

TGF-beta regulates many aspects of cellular performance relevant to tissue morphogenesis and homeostasis. Postnatal perturbation of TGF-beta signaling contributes to the pathogenesis of many disease states, as recently exemplified through the study of Marfan syndrome (MFS), including aortic aneurysm and skeletal muscle myopathy. Heterogeneity in the regulation and consequences of TGF-beta signaling, amplified in the context of disease, has engendered confusion and controversy regarding its utility as a therapeutic target. Three studies recently published in the JCI, including one in this issue, underscore the complexity of this subject. Heydemann and colleagues implicate dimorphic variation in latent TGF-beta-binding protein 4 (LTBP4), a regulator of TGF-beta bioavailability and activation, as a modifier of muscular dystrophy in gamma-sarcoglycan-deficient mice. In contrast to experience with ascending aortic aneurysm in MFS, Wang and colleagues show that systemic abrogation of TGF-beta signaling worsens (rather than attenuates) Ang II-induced abdominal aortic aneurysm progression in mice. Tieu and colleagues define alterations in the regulation of vascular inflammation in the pathogenesis of Ang II-induced aneurysm and dissection in mice, which may help shed some light on this apparent paradox.