Effect of HMGcoA reductase inhibitors on stroke. A meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials

Contemporary Treatment of the Asymptomatic Carotid Patient

Stroke is a persistent leading cause of morbidity and mortality, and carotid artery atherosclerosis remains a treatable cause of future stroke. Although most patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease may be at a relatively low risk for future stroke, most completed strokes are unheralded; thus, the identification and appropriate treatment of patients with asymptomatic carotid artery disease remains a critical part of overall stroke prevention. Select patients with asymptomatic carotid artery stenosis with an increased risk of future stroke based on the degree of stenosis and other imaging or patient-related characteristics are appropriate to consider for carotid artery intervention.

Interventions in Carotid Artery Surgery: An Overview of Current Management and Future Implications

Atherosclerotic carotid artery disease has been well studied over the last half-century by multiple randomized controlled trials attempting to elucidate the appropriate modality of therapy for this disease process. Surgical techniques have evolved from carotid artery endarterectomy and transfemoral carotid artery stenting to the development of hybrid techniques in transcarotid artery revascularization. In this article, the authors provide a review of the available literature regarding operative and medical management of carotid artery disease.

Medication use and mammographic breast density

PURPOSE

A dense breast on mammogram is a strong risk factor for breast cancer. Identifying factors that reduce mammographic breast density could thus provide insight into breast cancer prevention. Due to the limited number of studies and conflicting findings, we investigated the associations of medication use (specifically statins, aspirin, and ibuprofen) with mammographic breast density.

METHODS

We evaluated these associations in 775 women who were recruited during an annual screening mammogram at Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis. We measured mammographic breast density using Volpara. We used multivariable-adjusted linear regressions to determine the associations of medication use (statins, aspirin, and ibuprofen) with mammographic breast density. Least squared means were generated and back-transformed for easier interpretation.

RESULTS

The mean age of study participants was 52.9 years. Statin use in the prior 12 months was not associated with volumetric percent density or dense volume, but was positively associated with non-dense volume. The mean volumetric percent density was 8.6% among statin non-users, 7.2% among women who used statins 1-3 days/week, and 7.3% among women who used statins ≥ 4 days/week (p trend = 0.07). The non-dense volume was 1297.1 cm³ among statin non-users, 1368.7 cm³ among women who used statins 1-3 days/week, and 1408.4 cm³ among those who used statins ≥ 4 days/week (p trend = 0.02). We did not observe statistically significant differences in mammographic breast density by aspirin or ibuprofen use.

CONCLUSION

Statin, aspirin, and ibuprofen use was not associated with volumetric percent density and dense volume, but statin use was positively associated with non-dense volume. Any potential associations of these medications with breast cancer risk are unlikely to be mediated through an effect on volumetric percent density.

Medical Management for Secondary Stroke Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This article reviews the evidence base and recommendations for medical management for secondary stroke prevention.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent developments for secondary stroke prevention include evidence to support the use of short-term dual antiplatelet therapy after minor stroke and transient ischemic attack, direct oral anticoagulants for nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, reversal agents for direct oral anticoagulant-associated hemorrhage, and aspirin rather than presumptive anticoagulation with a direct oral anticoagulant for embolic stroke of undetermined source.

SUMMARY

Most strokes are preventable. The mainstays of medical management for secondary stroke prevention include antihypertensive therapy; antithrombotic therapy, with antiplatelet agents for most stroke subtypes or anticoagulants such as warfarin or a direct oral anticoagulant for cardioembolic stroke specifically; cholesterol-lowering therapy, principally with statins, but with potential roles for ezetimibe or proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 inhibitors in selected patients; and glycemic control to prevent microvascular complications from diabetes mellitus or pioglitazone in selected patients with insulin resistance but not diabetes mellitus.

Evidence-based guidelines for intra-articular injection in knee osteoarthritis: Formulating and evaluating research questions

OBJECTIVE

To formulate and evaluate clinical questions about intra-articular injection for knee osteoarthritis in developing clinical practice guidelines and to introduce a new methodology for framing relevant questions.

METHODS

We framed the clinical questions and evaluated the importance of these questions according to the following four steps: (a) first round questionnaire survey intended to get the clinical questions from doctors; (b) evaluating importance of questions via second round questionnaire survey intended to summarize and rank the clinical questions; (c) consensus conference was conducted by clinical and methodological experts; and (d) confirm the important clinical questions according to PICO (Patients, Intervention, Comparison and Outcomes) principles.

RESULTS

After the first round questionnaire survey, the number of clinical questions was 26. Thirteen of these 26 questions were regarded as important questions by the second questionnaire survey. Ultimately, the 13 important clinical questions were determined in a consensus conference. All included questions were deconstructed by clinical experts and methodologists based on the PICO principles.

CONCLUSION

The present study describes an approach about the selection of clinical questions and importance evaluation. Relevant important clinical questions about intra-articular injection for knee osteoarthritis are determined according to the methodology. It could help other guideline developers to utilize this method to frame clinical questions.

The impact of reimbursement criteria on the appropriateness of ‘statin’ prescribing

BACKGROUND

In Belgium, regulations restrict the reimbursement of statins to patients with total serum cholesterol above 250 mg/dl (6.41 mmol/l) after a three-month lipid-lowering diet. We investigated the possible impact of these regulations on characteristics of Belgian patients receiving a lipid-lowering drug.

DESIGN

From 1998 to 2000, standard questionnaires on coronary risk factors and treatments with lipid-lowering drugs were completed by 301 GPs sampled at random in the 11 Belgian Provinces. Questionnaires had to be completed for 18 consecutive patients 35 years old or more attending GPs' practices, irrespective of the underlying motive for attendance.

RESULTS

Of the 5511 patients included in the study, 1519 (28%) had established coronary disease or diabetes mellitus, or > or = 2 non-cholesterol coronary risk factors. Most (70%) of these patients were not treated with a lipid-lowering drug. Only 22% of patients with established coronary disease, 10% of patients with diabetes mellitus and 9% of patients with > or = 2 coronary risk factors were treated with a statin. Fifty-nine percent of fibrate users and 50% of statin users had a pre-treatment cholesterol level above 250 mg/dl, but had no or only one non-cholesterol coronary risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

In Belgium, the majority of patients at higher risk of coronary event do not benefit from lipid-lowering drugs, particularly the statins. In contrast, one of two statin users and three of five fibrate users should probably not receive the drug prescribed. Regulation based on blood cholesterol level encourages the overlooking of other risk factors relevant for selecting patients having the greatest chance to benefit from statin treatment.

CHADS2 and CHA2DS2-VASc Scores Predict the Risk of Ischemic Stroke Outcome in Patients with Interatrial Block without Atrial Fibrillation

Aim: To evaluate the role of CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores in predicting the risk of ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) outcomes in patients with interatrial block (IAB) without a history of atrial fibrillation (AF).

Methods: A retrospective study was conducted, including 1,046 non-anticoagulated inpatients (612 males, 434 females; mean age: 63 ± 10 years) with IAB and without AF. IAB was defined as P-wave duration > 120 ms using a 12-lead electrocardiogram. CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores were retrospectively calculated. The primary outcomes evaluated were ischemic stroke or TIA.

Results: During the mean follow-up period of 4.9 ± 0.7 years, 55 (5.3%) patients had an ischemic stroke or TIA. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis showed that the CHADS₂ score [area under the curve (AUC), 0.638; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.562–0.715; P = 0.001] and the CHA₂DS₂-VASc score (AUC, 0.671; 95% CI, 0.599–0.744; P <0.001) were predictive of ischemic strokes or TIA. Cut-off point analysis showed that a CHADS₂ score ≥ 3 (sensitivity = 0.455 and specificity = 0.747) and a CHA₂DS₂-VASc score ≥ 4 (sensitivity = 0.564 and specificity = 0.700) provided the highest predictive value for ischemic stroke or TIA. The multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that CHADS₂ [hazard ratio (HR), 1.442; 95% CI, 1.171–1.774; P = 0.001] and CHA₂DS₂-VASc (HR, 1.420; 95% CI, 1.203–1.677; P <0.001) scores were independently associated with ischemic stroke or TIA following adjustment for smoking, left atrial diameter, antiplatelet agents, angiotensin inhibitors, and statins.

Conclusions: CHADS₂ and CHA₂DS₂-VASc scores may be predictors of risk of ischemic stroke or TIA in patients with IAB without AF.

Antithrombotic selection and risk factor management in ischemic stroke and transient ischemic attack

In addition to appropriate antithrombotic therapy, the identification and treatment of modifiable ischemic stroke risk factors can reduce the likelihood of recurrent stroke. Neurosurgeons should be knowledgeable of the specific risk factors and general recommendations for ischemic stroke, as they may play a significant role in the management options for patients with intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic disease. The authors of this article review the indications for and selection of antithrombotics in patients with cerebral ischemia. In addition, the identification and secondary prevention of select risk factors are discussed.

High serum total cholesterol levels as a risk factor of ischemic stroke in Asian individuals

Evaluation of: Cui R, Iso H, Yamagishi K et al.; JPHC Study Group. High serum total cholesterol levels is a risk factor of ischemic stroke for general Japanese population: the JPHC study. Atherosclerosis 221(2), 565–569 (2012). An elevated cholesterol level is one of the established modifiable risk factors for secondary prevention of stroke. However, the stroke–cholesterol relationship remains a relatively weak relationship. Furthermore, the controversy regarding the optimal cholesterol level still persists. While elevated cholesterol levels are associated with higher risk for cerebral ischemic events, lower levels might increase the risk for hemorrhagic events. This study by Cui and colleagues presents robust large-scale epidemiological data regarding the association of elevated total cholesterol with the stroke risk among the Asian cohort. One of the important findings of this study is the relationship between elevated cholesterol and large artery atherosclerotic stroke. This is especially relevant in the Asian context, where large artery atherosclerosis constitutes more than half of all ischemic stroke subtypes. This paper reviews the study by Cui and colleagues regarding the role of high serum total cholesterol as a risk factor for ischemic stroke in Japanese men.

Adverse events associated with individual statin treatments for cardiovascular disease: an indirect comparison meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Statins are the most widely prescribed drug available. Due to this reason, it is important to understand the risks involved with the drug class and individual statins.

AIM

We conducted a meta-analysis and employed indirect comparisons to identify differing risk effects across statins.

DESIGN

We included any randomized clinical trial (RCT) of atorvastatin, fluvastatin, lovastatin, pitavastatin, pravastatin, rosuvastatin and simvastatin used for cardiovascular disease event prevention. The main outcome was adverse events [all-cause mortality, cancers, rhabdomylosis, diabetes, aspartate and alanine aminotransferase (AST/ALT), and creatinine kinase (CK) increases beyond the upper limit of normal]. In order to evaluate the relative effects of each drug on adverse events, we calculated adjusted indirect comparisons of the adverse-event outcomes.

RESULTS

Seventy-two trials involving 159,458 patients met our inclusion criteria. Overall, statin treatments significantly increased the rate of diabetes when compared to controls (OR: 1.09; 95% CI: 1.02-1.16) and elevated AST (OR: 1.31; 95% CI: 1.04-1.66) and ALT (OR: 1.28; 95% CI: 1.11-1.48) levels when compared to controls. Using indirect comparisons, we also found that atorvastatin significantly elevated AST levels compared to pravastatin (OR: 2.21; 95% CI: 1.13-4.29) and simvastatin significantly increased CK levels when compared to rosuvastatin (OR: 4.39; 95% CI: 1.01-19.07). Higher dose studies had increased risk of AST elevations.

DISCUSSION

Although statins are generally well tolerated, there are risks associated with almost all drugs. With few exceptions, statins appear to exert a similar risk across individual drugs.

The CHADS2 score predicts ischemic stroke in the absence of atrial fibrillation among subjects with coronary heart disease: data from the Heart and Soul Study

BACKGROUND

We sought to evaluate the prognostic performance of the CHADS(2) score for prediction of ischemic stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) in subjects with coronary heart disease (CHD) without atrial fibrillation (AF).

METHODS

In 916 nonanticoagulated outpatients with stable CHD and no AF by baseline electrocardiogram, we calculated CHADS(2) scores (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age ≥75 years, diabetes [1 point each], and prior stroke or TIA [2 points]). The primary outcome was time to ischemic stroke or TIA over a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 2.3 years.

RESULTS

Over 5,821 person-years of follow-up, 40 subjects had an ischemic stroke/TIA (rate 0.69/100 person-years, 95% CI 0.50-0.94). Compared with subjects with low (0-1) CHADS(2) scores, those with intermediate (2-3) and high (4-6) CHADS(2) scores had an increased rate of stroke/TIA, even after adjustment for age, tobacco, antiplatelet therapy, statins, and angiotensin inhibitors (CHADS(2) score 2-3: HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.3, P = .03; CHADS(2) score 4-6: HR 4.0, 95% CI 1.5-10.6, P = .006). Model discrimination (c-statistic = 0.65) was comparable with CHADS(2) model fit in published AF-only cohorts.

CONCLUSIONS

The CHADS(2) score predicts ischemic stroke/TIA in subjects with stable CHD and no baseline AF. The event rate in non-AF subjects with high CHADS(2) scores (5-6) was comparable with published rates in AF patients with moderate CHADS(2) scores (1-2), a population known to derive benefit from stroke prevention therapies. These findings should inform efforts to determine whether stroke prevention therapies or screening for silent AF may benefit subjects with stable CHD and high CHADS(2) scores.

Chitooligosaccharides decreases plasma lipid levels in healthy men

Chitosan, which is derived from chitin, has drawn much attention due to its low toxicity and potential use in medical and pharmaceutical applications. The biological activities of chitosan have been shown to depend on its molecular weight (MW) and degree of deacetylation. In this study, we investigated whether oral chitooligosaccharides, which are easily absorbed into the body, can reduce the plasma level of lipid in smokers and non-smokers because smoking is a high-risk factor for cardiovascular diseases. All healthy men (11 smokers and 8 non-smokers) consumed 500 mg of chitooligosaccharides in water twice daily before a meal (breakfast and dinner) over a 6-week period. Total cholesterol and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels were significantly decreased in both the smoker group and non-smoker group when compared with baseline. These results suggest that low MW chitooligosaccharides would be an effective dietary supplement for lowering cholesterol level.

Geraniol and simvastatin show a synergistic effect on a human hepatocarcinoma cell line

Simvastatin is a competitive inhibitor of 3-hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase activity, whereas geraniol is a monoterpene with multiple pharmacologic effects on mevalonate metabolism. Both of them inhibit growth and proliferation of many cell lines. The present study was designed to determine the action of geraniol, in combination with simvastatin, by assessing their effects in vitro on human hepatocarcinoma cell line (Hep G2). The treatment of Hep G2 cells with concentrations of simvastatin or geraniol that did not inhibit cell proliferation (5 µmol·l⁻¹ of simvastatin and 50 µmol·l⁻¹ of geraniol) resulted in a significant inhibition of cell proliferation. We also examined the effect of simvastatin, geraniol and the combination of both on the biosynthesis of lipids from [¹⁴C]-acetate. Our results demonstrate that the combination of simvastatin and geraniol synergistically inhibited cholesterol biosynthesis and proliferation of Hep G2 cell line, contributing to a better understanding of the action of a component of essential oils targeting a complex metabolic pathway, which would improve the use of drugs or their combination in the fight against cancer and/or cardiovascular diseases.

Intensive statin therapy compared with moderate dosing for prevention of cardiovascular events: a meta-analysis of >40 000 patients

AIMS

Statin therapy is associated with important benefits for patients at risk of, and with, established cardiovascular disease. There is widespread interest in whether intensive dosing of statins yields larger treatment effects. We aimed to determine if intensive dosing is clinically important using a meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials (RCTs).

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches of electronic databases from inception to December 2010. We included any RCT evaluating a larger dose with a clinically common dose. Two reviewers independently extracted data, in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and a trial sequential analysis.

RESULTS

We identified 10 RCTs enrolling a total of 41 778 participants. Trials followed patients for a mean of 2.5 years. We did not find statistically significant effects on all-cause mortality [relative risk (RR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.83-1.03, P = 0.14, I(2) = 38%] or cardiovascular disease (CVD) deaths (RR 0.89, 95% CI, 0.78-1.01, P = 0.07, I(2) = 34%). When we pooled the composite endpoint of coronary heart disease (CHD) death plus non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), we found a significant protective effect of intensive statin dosing (RR 0.90, 95% CI, 0.84-0.96, P ≤ 0.0001, I(2) = 0%). We also found a significant effect on non-fatal MIs (RR 0.82, 95% CI, 0.76-0.89, P ≤ 0.0001, I(2) = 0%) and a significant reduction in the composite of fatal and non-fatal strokes (excluding transient ischaemic attacks) reported in 10 RCTs (RR 0.86, 95% CI, 0.77-0.96, P = 0.006, I(2) = 0%). A subgroup analysis of three trials examining acute coronary syndrome patients found significant effects on all-cause (RR 0.75, 95% CI, 0.61-0.91, P = 0.005, I(2) = 0%) and CVD mortality (RR 0.74, 95% CI, 0.59-0.94, P = 0.013, I(2) = 0%) with intensive dosing. Applying an analysis of optimal information size on the primary analysis, we found that the evidence for CHD death plus non-fatal MIs is conclusive. The evidence for CVD deaths alone is not yet conclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Available evidence suggests that intensive statin therapy reduces the risk of non-fatal events and may have a role in reducing mortality.

Interventions in the management of serum lipids for preventing stroke recurrence

BACKGROUND

Studies have shown that interventions which reduce total and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels also reduce coronary heart disease (CHD) and stroke events in those with a history of CHD. However, it is uncertain whether treatment to alter cholesterol levels can prevent recurrence of either stroke or subsequent cardiovascular events and whether differences in outcomes exist between classes of lipid-lowering therapy. This is an update of a Cochrane review first published in 2002.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate the effect of altering serum lipids pharmacologically for preventing subsequent cardiovascular disease and stroke recurrence in patients with a history of stroke.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Stroke Group Trials Register (last searched December 2008), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library Issue 3, 2008), MEDLINE (1966 to December 2008) and EMBASE (1980 to December 2008). We contacted pharmaceutical companies known to produce a lipid-lowering agent for information on relevant publications or unpublished work.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Unconfounded randomised trials of participants aged 18 years and over with a history of stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently selected trials, assessed quality and extracted data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included eight studies involving approximately 10,000 participants. The active interventions were pravastatin, atorvastatin, simvastatin, clofibrate, and conjugated oestrogen. Fixed-effect analysis showed no overall effect on stroke recurrence but statin therapy alone had a marginal benefit in reducing subsequent cerebrovascular events in those with a previous history of stroke or TIA (odds ratio (OR) 0.88, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.77 to 1.00). There was no evidence that such intervention reduced all-cause mortality or sudden death (OR 1.00, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.20). Three statin trials showed a reduction in subsequent serious vascular events (OR 0.74, 95% CI 0.67 to 0.82).

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is evidence that statin therapy in patients with a history of ischaemic stroke or TIA significantly reduces subsequent major coronary events but only marginally reduces the risk of stroke recurrence. There is no clear evidence of beneficial effect from statins in those with previous haemorrhagic stroke and it is unclear whether statins should be started immediately post stroke or later. In view of this and the evidence of the benefit of statin therapy in those with a history of CHD, patients with ischaemic stroke or TIA, with or without a history of established CHD, should receive statins.

Transesophageal echocardiography for the evaluation and management of patients with cerebral ischemia

To prevent recurrent strokes and transient ischemic attacks, considerable attention is devoted to investigating the etiology of acute cerebral ischemia in the large subpopulation of patients without an easily identifiable cause. In general, transthoracic echocardiography is an insensitive tool for the evaluation of patients with cerebral ischemia, unless clinical signs and/or symptoms of cardiac disease are present. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), because of its increased sensitivity for aortic arch atheromata, atrial septal pathology, left atrial thrombi, and valvular abnormalities, is the preferred cardiac imaging modality, especially in young patients, older patients with hypertension or systemic atherosclerosis, and patients with prosthetic heart valves. This paper reviews the prognostic and therapeutic impact of TEE in patients with cerebral ischemia, specifically focusing on the ability of information obtained by this technique to alter patient management and improve risk stratification.

Primary prevention of cardiovascular mortality and events with statin treatments: a network meta-analysis involving more than 65,000 patients

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of 3-hydroxy-3-methyl-glutaryl-CoA reductase inhibitors (statins) in primary prevention of cardiovascular events.

BACKGROUND

The role of statins is well established for secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) clinical events and mortality. Little is known of their role in primary cardiovascular event prevention.

METHODS

We conducted comprehensive searches of 10 electronic databases from inception to May 2008. We contacted study investigators and maintained a comprehensive bibliography of statin studies. We included randomized trials of at least 12-month duration in predominantly primary prevention populations. Two reviewers independently extracted data in duplicate. We performed random-effects meta-analysis and meta-regression, calculated optimal information size, and conducted a mixed-treatment comparison analysis.

RESULTS

We included 20 randomized clinical trials. We pooled 19 trials (n = 63,899) for all-cause mortality and found a relative risk (RR) of 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.87 to 0.99, p = 0.03 [I(2) = 5%, 95% CI: 0% to 51%]). Eighteen trials (n = 59,469) assessed cardiovascular deaths (RR: 0.89, 95% CI: 0.81 to 0.98, p = 0.01 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 41%]). Seventeen trials (n = 53,371) found an RR of 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77 to 0.95, p = 0.004 [I(2) = 61%, 95% CI: 38% to 77%]) for major cardiovascular events, and 17 trials (n = 52,976) assessed myocardial infarctions (RR: 0.77, 95% CI: 0.63 to 0.95, p = 0.01 [I(2) = 59%, 95% CI: 24% to 74%]). Incidence of cancer was not elevated in 10 trials (n = 45,469) (RR: 1.02, 95% CI: 0.94 to 1.11, p = 0.59 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 46%]), nor was rhabdomyolysis (RR: 0.97, 95% CI: 0.25 to 3.83, p = 0.96 [I(2) = 0%, 95% CI: 0% to 40%]). Our analysis included a sufficient sample to reliably answer our primary outcome of CVD mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins have a clear role in primary prevention of CVD mortality and major events.

Pravastatin for cardiovascular event primary prevention in patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension in the Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Study

Lipid-lowering therapy in individuals with high risk of cardiovascular disease reduces the incidence of coronary heart disease. However, few studies have assessed the benefits of cholesterol lowering for primary prevention of coronary heart disease in hypertensive patients with mild dyslipidemia or without conventional dyslipidemia. The large, randomized Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese Study showed a 33% reduction in coronary heart disease incidence with pravastatin as the primary prevention in Japanese patients. We conducted an exploratory analysis of the effect of diet plus pravastatin therapy on the primary prevention of cardiovascular events (coronary heart disease, coronary heart disease plus cerebral infarction, and cardiovascular disease) in the 3277 patients with hypertension during the 5-year follow-up. There were no significant differences in mean baseline total cholesterol, blood pressure levels, or variation in blood pressure during the 5-year period between the diet (n=1664) and diet plus pravastatin (n=1613) groups. In the diet plus pravastatin group, the relative risk of coronary heart disease plus cerebral infarction was reduced by 35% (hazard ratio: 0.65; CI: 0.46 to 0.93; P=0.02), cerebral infarction by 46% (hazard ratio: 0.54; CI: 0.29 to 0.98; P=0.04), and cardiovascular disease by 33% (hazard ratio: 0.67; CI: 0.49 to 0.91; P=0.01). In patients without a history of cardiovascular disease who have hypertension and mildly elevated cholesterol, pravastatin was effective in reducing the incidence of cardiovascular disease, particularly cerebral infarction. Hence, in patients with hypertension with mildly elevated cholesterol levels, treatment with a statin is advisable to reduce the burden of cardiovascular disease.

Issues and challenges in the assessment, diagnosis and treatment of cardiovascular risk factors: assessing the needs of cardiologists

BACKGROUND

This needs assessment, initiated by the Academy for Healthcare Education Inc. in cooperation with AXDEV Group Inc., explored the knowledge, attitudes, behavior, and skills of community-based and academic-affiliated U.S. cardiologists in the area of CV risk assessment, treatment, and management from July 2006 to December 2006.

METHODS

The needs assessment used a multistage, mixed-method approach to collect, analyze, and verify data from two independent sources. The exploratory phase collected data from a representative sampling of U.S. cardiologists by means of qualitative panel meetings, one-on-one interviews, and quantitative questionnaires. In the validation phase, 150 cardiologists from across the United States completed a quantitative online questionnaire. Data were analyzed with standardized statistical methods.

RESULTS

The needs assessment found that cardiologists have areas of weakness pertaining to their interpersonal skills, which may influence patient-physician communication and patient adherence. Cardiologists appeared to have little familiarity with or lend little credence to the concept of relative CV risk. In daily clinical practice, they faced challenges with regard to optimal patient outcome in areas of patient referral from primary-care providers, CV risk assessment and treatment, and patient monitoring. Community-based and academic-affiliated cardiologists appeared to be only moderately interested in educational interventions that pertain to CV risk-reduction strategies.

CONCLUSION

Educational interventions that target cardiologists' interpersonal skills to enhance their efficacy may benefit community-based and academic-affiliated specialists. Other desirable educational initiatives should address gaps in the patient referral process, improve patient knowledge and understanding of their disease, and provide supportive educational tools and materials to enhance patient-physician communication.

Characterization of ischemic events and use of prescription antiplatelet and anticoagulant agents after stroke or transient ischemic attack

Stroke patients are at risk for subsequent ischemic events; yet preventive therapy is often underused. An analysis was performed to determine the rate of secondary ischemic events and use of prescription antiplatelets or anticoagulants after ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA). Patients age 25 years or older with a medical claim for stroke or TIA between July 1, 1998 and September 30, 1999 were identified from a managed care database. Patients sustaining a stroke or TIA within 6 months before the index event were excluded. Patients were categorized as hospitalized stroke, nonhospitalized stroke, or TIA and were followed for 24 months for a secondary stroke, TIA, or acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Use of prescription antiplatelet or anticoagulant agents was determined for each subgroup. Over 2 years, subsequent stroke occurred in 5.8% of patients, TIA occurred in 3.8%, and AMI occurred in 4.9%. Death occurred in 32.3% during follow-up. Hospitalized stroke patients were the subgroup at highest risk, with a 7.6% stroke rate and a 45.4% death rate within 2 years. Prescription antiplatelet or warfarin therapy was given in 45.7% of hospitalized stroke cases, 29.5% of nonhospitalized stroke cases, and 39.2% of TIA cases. Against the background of current treatment, patients who suffer a stroke or TIA are at high risk of death and a subsequent stroke within 2 years. These outcomes highlight the importance of effective secondary stroke prevention efforts for those suffering acute stroke, whether or not they are hospitalized.

Combination polypharmacy for cardiovascular disease prevention in men: a decision analysis and cost-effectiveness model

Pharmacotherapies to lower blood pressure and cholesterol are effective in the primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD). The use of fixed-dose medication combinations has not been well studied. The authors created a Markov model to analyze the cost-effectiveness of 4 fixed-dose medications for primary CVD prevention in men. The initial decision node was to treat or not treat men older than 55 years, without CVD, hypertension, or dyslipidemia with a combination of simvastatin, captopril, hydrochlorothiazide, and atenolol. Probability, costs, and effectiveness were derived from the literature. The outcome variable was marginal cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). Sensitivity analyses were performed. The average cost of treatment was $70,000 compared with $93,000 for non-treatment. Treatment resulted in 13.62 QALYs vs 12.96 QALYs without treatment. Primary prevention of CVD with fixed-dose medications dominated "no-treatment." The use of a fixed-dose polypharmacy approach to CVD prevention in men older than 55 years may be cost-effective.

Statin therapy in stroke prevention: a meta-analysis involving 121,000 patients

PURPOSE

More than 120,000 patients now have taken part in randomized trials evaluating statin therapy for stroke prevention. We aimed to conduct a comprehensive review of all randomized trials and determine the therapeutic potential of statins for all strokes.

METHODS

We searched 10 electronic databases (from inception to December 2006). We additionally contacted study authors and authors of previous reviews. We extracted data on study characteristics and outcomes related to all-cause mortality, all-stroke incidence, specific type of strokes, and cholesterol changes. We pooled data using a random-effects model and conducted meta-regression.

RESULTS

We included 42 trials assessing statin therapy for all-stroke prevention (n=121,285), resulting in a pooled relative risk (RR) of 0.84 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.79-0.91). The pooled RR of statin therapy for all-cause mortality (n=116,080) was 0.88 (95% CI, 0.83-0.93). Each unit increase in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) resulted in a 0.3% increased RR of death (P=.02). Seventeen trials evaluated statins on cardiovascular death (n=57,599, RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.74-0.90), and 11 evaluated nonhemorrhagic cerebrovascular events (n=58,604, RR 0.81, 95% CI, 0.69-0.94). Eleven trials reported hemorrhagic stroke incidence (total n=54,334, RR 0.94, 95% CI, 0.68-1.30) and 21 trials reported on fatal strokes (total n=82,278, RR 0.99, 95% CI, 0.80-1.21). Only one trial reported on statin therapy for secondary prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin therapy provides high levels of protection for all-cause mortality and nonhemorrhagic strokes. This overview reinforces the need to consider prolonged statin treatment in patients at high risk of major vascular events, but caution remains for patients at risk of bleeds.

The stroke rehabilitation paradigm

The matrix of stroke rehabilitation is evolving as we look outside the box of traditional therapy type, timing, and intensity of rehabilitation techniques. For inpatient wards, the goal of medical stability and prompt resolution of complications to maximize participation in therapy remains paramount. In the current medical model, we focus on teaching compensatory strategies and rarely on restorative approaches because of time and financial limitations. Researchers aim to identify new technologic and molecular approaches to improve functional outcomes and more accurately predict disability. This article examines different concepts surrounding the comprehensive rehabilitation paradigm of stroke survivors.

European guidelines on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice: executive summary. Fourth Joint Task Force of the European Society of Cardiology and other societies on cardiovascular disease prevention in clinical practice (constituted by representatives of nine societies and by invited experts)

Other experts who contributed to parts of the guidelines: Edmond Walma, Schoonhoven (The Netherlands), Tony Fitzgerald, Dublin (Ireland), Marie Therese Cooney, Dublin (Ireland), Alexandra Dudina, Dublin (Ireland) European Society of Cardiology (ESC) Committee for Practice Guidelines (CPG):, Alec Vahanian (Chairperson) (France), John Camm (UK), Raffaele De Caterina (Italy), Veronica Dean (France), Kenneth Dickstein (Norway), Christian Funck-Brentano (France), Gerasimos Filippatos (Greece), Irene Hellemans (The Netherlands), Steen Dalby Kristensen (Denmark), Keith McGregor (France), Udo Sechtem (Germany), Sigmund Silber (Germany), Michal Tendera (Poland), Petr Widimsky (Czech Republic), José Luis Zamorano (Spain)

Document reviewers: Irene Hellemans (CPG Review Coordinator) (The Netherlands), Attila Altiner (Germany), Enzo Bonora (Italy), Paul N. Durrington (UK), Robert Fagard (Belgium), Simona Giampaoli(Italy), Harry Hemingway (UK), Jan Hakansson (Sweden), Sverre Erik Kjeldsen (Norway), Mogens Lytken Larsen (Denmark), Giuseppe Mancia (Italy), Athanasios J. Manolis (Greece), Kristina Orth-Gomer (Sweden), Terje Pedersen (Norway), Mike Rayner (UK), Lars Ryden (Sweden), Mario Sammut (Malta), Neil Schneiderman (USA), Anton F. Stalenhoef (The Netherlands), Lale Tokgözoglu (Turkey), Olov Wiklund (Sweden), Antonis Zampelas (Greece)

Action on vascular risk factors: importance of blood pressure and lipid lowering in stroke secondary prevention

INTRODUCTION

Secondary stroke prevention comprises a broad spectrum of therapeutic actions that includes the appropriate management of risk factors and the action on blood pressure and serum lipids that are of great importance to decrease stroke recurrences.

METHODS

We conducted a review of the published studies analyzing the relevance of the treatment of blood pressure and serum lipids, with special attention to recent findings of clinical trials and current guidelines on stroke secondary prevention.

RESULTS

The relationship between blood pressure and stroke has been widely demonstrated; however, the role of serum lipids has been discussed for a long time. Recent results from epidemiological studies and clinical trials have demonstrated its role as modifiable risk factor for stroke. Blood pressure and lipid lowering are associated with significant reductions in recurrent strokes as well as in other vascular events in transient ischemic attack (TIA) or stroke patients. The PROGRESS and MOSES trials suggest that diuretics, angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers could confer additional benefits in stroke patients, and the SPARCL study did so for statins. These drugs are not only efficacious in the reduction of stroke recurrences, but also in other cardiovascular events.

CONCLUSIONS

Blood pressure and serum lipids are two important and modifiable vascular risk factors that should be taken into consideration when planning secondary stroke prevention measures. This approach should include hypotensive drugs (mainly the combination of diuretics and ACE inhibitors) with the objective to maintain normal blood pressure, avoiding levels >130/80 mm Hg in all stroke patients, and statins (atorvastatin 80 mg) in patients with noncardioembolic TIA or stroke.

Plasma concentrations of C-reactive protein and total homocysteine in relation to the severity and risk factors for cerebrovascular disease

Higher C-reactive protein (CRP) and plasma homocysteine (tHcy) concentrations have been shown to indicate increased risk of coronary heart disease and cerebrovascular disease (CVD), but the mechanisms by which they increase the risk of atherothrombotic disease are under investigation. This study evaluates the associations of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) and tHcy with the risk factors, severity, and outcome on discharge in patients with CVD. hs-CRP, fasting tHcy, and lipid profile were determined in 50 patients with CVD and 20 healthy control subjects. Clinical data, National Institutes of Health stroke scale (NIHSS) on admission and disability Rankin scale on discharge, were recorded. Based on epidemiologic studies, cutoff points of 1.5 mg/L (hs-CRP) and 15mumol/L (tHcy) were used to indicate increased risk. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to relate tHcy with other CVD risk factors, NIHSS on admission and the disability Rankin scale on discharge. Overall, 38% of patients had increased hs-CRP and 26% had elevated tHcy. hs-CRP (P = 0.005) and tHcy (P < 0.0001) concentrations were significantly higher in patients compared with controls, and these differences remained significant after correction for age and sex. tHcy showed significant correlations with hs-CRP (rs = 0.35; P = 0.003) and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C; rs = 0.49; P = 0.005). Logistic regression analysis with CVD as the dependent variable showed significant association with hs-CRP (P = 0.01) and tHcy (P < 0.0001) after adjustment for potential confounders. hs-CRP showed increased trend with disease severity and significant association with the disability Rankin scale (P = 0.033). These data support 4 main conclusions: (1) Elevation of hs-CRP and tHcy are common in CVD; (2) the significant relationship between tHcy and hs-CRP suggests that the association of tHcy with CVD risk may be dependent on inflammation-related mechanisms; (3) increased hs-CRP and tHcy show that patients with CVD may be at greater risk of subsequent coronary heart disease; and (4) admission hs-CRP could be used as an indicator of prognosis.

Statins reduce the risk of lung cancer in humans: a large case-control study of US veterans

BACKGROUND

Statins are commonly used cholesterol-lowering agents that are noted to suppress tumor cell growth in several in vitro and animal models.

METHODS

We studied the association of lung cancer and the use of statins in patients enrolled in the Veterans Affairs (VA) Health Care System. A retrospective case-control study nested in a cohort study was conducted using prospectively collected data from the Veterans Integrated Service Networks 16 VA database from 1998 to 2004. We analyzed data on 483,733 patients from eight states located in south central United States. The primary variables of interest were lung cancer and the use of statins prior to the diagnosis of lung cancer. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to adjust for covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and race. Statistical software was used for statistical computing.

RESULTS

Of the 483,733 patients in the study, 163,662 patients (33.8%) were receiving statins and 7,280 patients (1.5%) had a primary diagnosis of lung cancer. Statin use > 6 months was associated with a risk reduction of lung cancer of 55% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.45; 95% confidence interval, 0.42 to 0.48; p < 0.01). Furthermore, the protective effect of statin was seen across different age and racial groups and was irrespective of the presence of diabetes, smoking, or alcohol use.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins appear to be protective against the development of lung cancer, and further studies need to be done to define the clinical utility of statins as chemo protective agents.

Ongoing clinical trials of the pleiotropic effects of statins

BACKGROUND

The multiple effects (ie, pleiotropic effects of statins) have received increasing recognition and may have clinical applicability across a broad range of cardiovascular and noncardiovascular conditions.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the relevance and significance of ongoing clinical trials of the pleiotropic effects of statins, focusing on nonlipid effects.

METHOD

Ongoing trials were identified through personal communication, reports presented at scientific meetings (2000-2004), and queries made to AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co, Merck & Co, Novartis, and Pfizer, manufacturers of the currently marketed statins. Published trials and other source material were identified through electronic searches on MEDLINE (1990-2003), abstract books, and references identified from bibliographies of pertinent articles. Eligible studies were the clinical trials of statins currently under way in which primary or secondary outcomes included the statins' nonlipid (ie, pleiotropic) effect(s). Data were extracted and trial quality was assessed by the authors.

RESULTS

Of the 22 ongoing trials of the nonlipid effects of statins identified, 10 assessed inflammatory markers and plaque stabilization, 4 assessed oxidized low density lipoprotein/vascular oxidant stress, 3 assessed end-stage renal disease, 3 assessed fibrinogen/viscosity, 2 assessed endothelial function, 2 assessed acute coronary syndrome, 2 assessed aortic stenosis progression, and 1 each assessed hypertension, osteoporosis, ischemic burden, Alzheimer's disease, multiple sclerosis, and stroke (outcomes often overlapped).

CONCLUSION

Given the excellent safety and tolerability of statins as a class, full exploration of their pleiotropic effects has the potential to provide additional benefits to many patients.

Statins reduce the risk of pancreatic cancer in humans: a case-control study of half a million veterans

OBJECTIVE

Statins are commonly used cholesterol-lowering agents that are noted to suppress tumor cell growth in several in vitro and animal models.

METHODS

We studied the association between pancreatic cancer and statins in veterans. A retrospective, nested case-control study was conducted using prospectively collected data from the Veterans Integrated Service Networks 16 Veteran Affairs database from 1998 to 2004. We analyzed data on 483,733 patients from 8 states located in south central United States. The primary variables of interest were pancreatic cancer and the use of statins before the diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Multiple logistic regression analysis was done to adjust for covariates including age, sex, body mass index, smoking, diabetes, and race. The SAS software was used for statistical computing.

RESULTS

Of the 483,733 patients in the study, 163,467 (33.79%) were on statins, and 475 (0.098%) patients had a primary diagnosis of pancreatic cancer. Statin use of more than 6 months was associated with a risk reduction of pancreatic cancer of 67% (adjusted odds ratio, 0.33; 95% confidence interval, 0.26-0.41; P < 0.01).A dose-response relationship was noted between statin use and pancreatic cancer with an 80% risk reduction (adjusted odds ratio, 0.2; 95% confidence interval, 0.13-0.29; P < 0.01) with use of statin for more than 4 years. Furthermore, the protective effect of statin was seen across different age and racial groups, and was irrespective of the presence of diabetes, smoking, or alcohol use.

CONCLUSIONS

Statins seem to be protective against the development of pancreatic cancer, and the magnitude of the effect correlates with the duration of statin use.

Molecular basis of differences among statins and a comparison with antioxidant vitamins

Although all statin drugs lower levels of circulating low-density lipoprotein cholesterol by inhibiting 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A, molecular differences among statins affect their metabolism, solubility, and intramembrane localization, which in turn is likely to influence their efficacy and safety. In addition, these properties may have a differential impact on the pleiotropic effects of statins, including their ability to improve endothelial function and to affect proliferation and apoptosis in vascular tissues. Many pleiotropic effects of statins appear to be due to inhibition of small guanosine triphosphate-binding proteins and/or restoration of nitric oxide bioavailability, and atorvastatin metabolites may also directly protect vascular tissues from oxidative damage. The possibility of cardiovascular benefits from antioxidant effects of atorvastatin metabolites contrasts with the lack of benefits seen in most studies of antioxidant vitamins. This article reviews some of the differences in pleiotropic effects of statins and assesses the contribution of their solubility and membrane localization as the possible basis for these differences. In addition, the possibility that statin benefits on stroke reflect pleiotropic effects is reviewed. Finally, possible reasons for differences between the effects of atorvastatin metabolites and antioxidant vitamins are considered.

Cholesterol, C-reactive protein, and cerebrovascular events following intensive and moderate statin therapy

BACKGROUND

While statins have been shown to reduce cerebrovascular events (CVE), the relationship between cholesterol, C-reactive protein (CRP), and CVE in patients treated with different statin strategies is still being explored.

METHODS

PROVE IT-TIMI 22 was a randomized trial of intensive (atorvastatin 80 mg/day) and moderate (pravastatin 40 mg/day) statin therapy in 4,162 patients with acute coronary syndromes followed for an average of 24 months; serial biomarkers allowed for an assessment of the lipid and non-lipid effects of statins as they relate to CVE.

RESULTS

In this study, 45 patients on intensive statin therapy and 40 patients on moderate statin therapy had a CVE during the study period (2.1% v. 1.9%, P = 0.62). While the lipid profiles of patients with and without CVE were similar, those with CVE had higher CRP levels at 30 days and 4 months (2.7 v. 1.9, 2.4 v. 1.7 mg/L; P = 0.012, P = 0.005). Day 30 CRP remained an independent predictor of CVE after adjusting for age, development of atrial fibrillation, diabetes, and prior CVE. Patients with low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels < 70 mg/dL and > or = 70 mg/dL had similar rates of CVE, while patients with CRP < 2 mg/L tended to have lower event rates when compared to those with higher levels. The lowest rates of CVE were seen in patients who had LDL < 70 mg/dL and CRP < 2 mg/L.

CONCLUSION

In PROVE IT--TIMI 22, achieved LDL levels did not appear to independently impact the rate of CVE. In contrast, patients with elevated CRP levels were at higher risk of stroke or transient ischemic attack, reinforcing the link between inflammation and CVE. The goal of this PROVE IT-TIMI 22 sub-study was to examine the relationship between cholesterol, CRP, and CVE in patients on intensive and moderate statin therapy. The achieved lipid levels were similar in patients with and without a CVE; however, the achieved levels of CRP were higher in patients who subsequently developed a stroke or TIA. These findings further support the relationship between inflammation and CVE.

Predictors of Long-Term Mortality in Patients With Ischemic Stroke Referred for Transesophageal Echocardiography

Background and Purpose— Findings on transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) after ischemic stroke predict recurrent embolic events and prompt therapy; however, the additive predictive power of TEE findings on long-term mortality is unknown. Our goal was to study the impact of TEE findings on all cause mortality in ischemic stroke patients referred for TEE.

Methods— We reviewed 245 consecutive patients who underwent TEE for ischemic stroke of undetermined origin (2000 to 2003). Long-term survival was assessed using the Social Security Death Index.

Results— In a mean follow-up period of 3.0 (1.4 to 4.8) years, death occurred in 19.2% of patients. TEE findings included patent foramen ovale (18.8%), left atrium/left ventricle thrombus (2.4%), spontaneous echo contrast (3.7%), atrial septal aneurysm (3.3%), valve vegetation/mass/tumor (7.8%), complex aortic atheroma ([CAA]; 14.7%), and the composite of any cardiac source of embolus (39.2%). A total atherosclerotic burden (TAB) score was also recorded. On Cox hazard regression analysis, measures of aortic atherosclerosis (CAA [hazard ratio (HR), 2.7; 95% CI, 1.4 to 5.3] or TAB score [HR, 1.4; 95% CI, 1.2 to 1.6]) were independent predictors of death, whereas other TEE findings were not.

Conclusion— In patients with ischemic stroke of undetermined origin referred for TEE, measures of aortic atherosclerosis, including CAA, represent the only TEE findings that predict long-term mortality after all other clinical factors are considered. Further study is needed to determine whether treatments for CAA effect long-term survival in patients with ischemic stroke.

New strategies in the medical treatment of carotid artery disease

Most patients with ischemic stroke or transient ischemic attack are screened for internal carotid artery stenosis. Although it is important to identify candidates for endarterectomy or stenting, the clinician must realize that most patients are not candidates for revascularization. Therefore, medical therapy remains the cornerstone of treatment. In this article, current thinking on medical therapy for carotid atherosclerosis is outlined, including aggressive use of statins, targeted blood pressure lowering, and antithrombotic therapy. Implementation of these therapies will likely reduce the need for revascularization procedures in the future.

Lipids and stroke: the opportunity of lipid-lowering treatment

Dyslipemia is a clear risk factor (RF) for ischemic heart disease and peripheral artery disease, but its relation with ischemic stroke (IS) is not so clear. HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor drugs or statins (simvastatin, atorvastatin, pravastatin) reduce the relative risk of IS by between 18 and 51% in patients with IHD, in patients with high vascular disease risk and in hypertensive patients with other RFs, acute coronary syndrome, and type 2 diabetes mellitus. According to the guidelines for use, statins are indicated in the majority of patients with IS since the risk is equivalent to that of IHD or high vascular disease risk. In view of the existing clinical evidence of benefit, it would not seem unreasonable to proceed with treatment of patients using statins while awaiting specific studies justifying their use. The non-lipid-lowering mechanisms of the statins and results of studies, such as the Heart Protection Study, provide evidence for widening the indications of statins beyond the prevention of dyslipemia, as a new therapeutic approach in the prevention of IS in patients with plasma levels of total cholesterol or low density lipoproteins currently considered within the normal distribution. The neuroprotective role, which these drugs may play in the acute phase of cerebral ischemia, remains to be clarified, but very recent evidence suggests that such patients may also benefit.

Statins and cognition: what can we learn from existing randomized trials?

BACKGROUND

Statins are being developed as treatments for Alzheimer's dementia based on evidence from preclinical and observational studies. However, cholesterol plays an integral role in cell membrane signal transduction and suboptimal cholesterol level could potentially impair neuronal function. Additionally, results of observational nonrandomized studies may have been affected by treatment bias.

METHODS

We performed a systematic literature review in MEDLINE from January 1966 to July 2004 and included published prospective, randomized, and placebo-controlled human studies that examined the cognitive effects of statins.

RESULTS

Nine studies with sample sizes ranging from 22 to 20,000 and duration of 3 weeks to 5 years, met criteria for review. Study populations and cognitive outcomes varied. Four studies were >6 months or longer. Overall, none of these studies reported finding a positive benefit for any statin on cognition in non-demented subjects although there was inconsistent evidence for acute cognitive worsening in some studies.

CONCLUSION

While statins intuitively have appeal for the prevention or treatment of dementia, any conclusions about their efficacy should await more definitive evidence from on-going prospective clinical trials.

Statins and stroke prevention

Data from studies on the benefits of statins in coronary artery disease patients in preventing recurrent primary and secondary cardiac endpoints, as well as ischemic strokes, imply the potential value of statins in recurrent ischemic stroke prevention without coronary artery disease symptoms or, by extension, primary ischemic stroke prevention. However, data on the latter are lacking, although the ongoing Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels (SPARCL) study is designed to answer that question. Until these data become available, clinicians are justified in using statins to avert recurrent ischemic strokes due to atherosclerosis, especially if elevated total cholesterol, increased low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and/or reduced high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, as specified in the National Cholesterol Education Program Third Adult Treatment Panel, are present. This article reviews the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis, particularly the major components of atheromas of cholesterol, smooth muscle cells, inflammation, "foam cells," and connective tissue elements. Emphasis is placed on the first three and the results of statin trials in coronary artery disease, as well as the beneficial pleiotrophic effects of statins in ischemic strokes.