1
|
Li J, Dhaliwal R, Stanley M, Junca P, Gordon MD. Functional imaging and connectome analyses reveal organizing principles of taste circuits in Drosophila. Curr Biol 2025; 35:2391-2405.e4. [PMID: 40334663 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2025.04.035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/10/2024] [Revised: 02/26/2025] [Accepted: 04/15/2025] [Indexed: 05/09/2025]
Abstract
Taste is crucial for many innate and learned behaviors. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, taste impacts processes including feeding, oviposition, locomotion, mating, and memory formation. These diverse roles may necessitate the apparent distributed nature of taste responses across different circuits in the fly brain, leading to complexity that has hindered attempts to deduce unifying principles of taste processing and coding. Here, we combine information from the whole-brain connectome with functional calcium imaging to examine the neural representation of taste at early steps of processing. We find that the majority of taste-responsive cells in the subesophageal zone (SEZ), including local interneurons (SEZ-LNs) and projection neurons (SEZ-PNs) targeting the superior protocerebrum, are predicted to encode a single taste modality. This prediction is borne out by calcium imaging of cholinergic and GABAergic cells in the SEZ, as well as five representative SEZ-PNs. Although the connectome reveals some SEZ-PNs receiving direct inputs from sensory neurons, many receive primarily indirect taste inputs via cholinergic SEZ-LNs. These cholinergic SEZ-LNs appear to function as nodes to convey feedforward information to dedicated sets of morphologically similar SEZ-PNs. Together, these studies suggest a previously unappreciated logic and structure to fly taste circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinfang Li
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute, and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Rabiah Dhaliwal
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute, and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Molly Stanley
- Department of Biology, University of Vermont, 109 Carrigan Drive, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Pierre Junca
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute, and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Michael D Gordon
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute, and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, 2350 Health Sciences Mall, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Talross GJS, Carlson JR. New dimensions in the molecular genetics of insect chemoreception. Trends Genet 2025:S0168-9525(25)00078-2. [PMID: 40340097 DOI: 10.1016/j.tig.2025.04.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2025] [Revised: 04/09/2025] [Accepted: 04/10/2025] [Indexed: 05/10/2025]
Abstract
Chemoreception is the foundation of olfaction and taste, which in insects underlie the detection of humans to whom they spread disease and crops that they ravage. Recent advances have provided clear and in some cases surprising new insights into the molecular genetics of chemoreception. We describe mechanisms that govern the choice of a single Odorant receptor gene by an olfactory receptor neuron in Drosophila. We highlight genetic and epigenetic mechanisms by which chemoreceptor expression can be modulated. Exitrons, RNA editing, and pseudo-pseudogenes in chemosensory systems are described. We summarize key insights from the recent structural determinations of odorant and taste receptors. Finally, new molecular components of chemosensory systems, including long noncoding RNAs, are described.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gaëlle J S Talross
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| | - John R Carlson
- Department of Molecular, Cellular and Developmental Biology, Yale University, New Haven, CT 06511, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Walker SR, Peña-Garcia M, Devineni AV. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in Drosophila. Sci Rep 2025; 15:5278. [PMID: 39939650 PMCID: PMC11821855 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-89088-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2024] [Accepted: 02/03/2025] [Indexed: 02/14/2025] Open
Abstract
Our sense of taste is critical for regulating food consumption. The fruit fly Drosophila represents a highly tractable model to investigate mechanisms of taste processing, but taste circuits beyond sensory neurons are largely unidentified. Here, we use a whole-brain connectome to investigate the organization of Drosophila taste circuits. We trace pathways from four populations of sensory neurons that detect different taste modalities and project to the subesophageal zone (SEZ), the primary taste region of the fly brain. We find that second-order taste neurons are primarily located within the SEZ and largely segregated by taste modality, whereas third-order neurons have more projections outside the SEZ and more overlap between modalities. Taste projections out of the SEZ innervate regions implicated in feeding, olfactory processing, and learning. We analyze interconnections within and between taste pathways, characterize modality-dependent differences in taste neuron properties, identify other types of inputs onto taste pathways, and use computational simulations to relate neuronal connectivity to predicted activity. These studies provide insight into the architecture of Drosophila taste circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney R Walker
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Marco Peña-Garcia
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA
| | - Anita V Devineni
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shiu PK, Sterne GR, Spiller N, Franconville R, Sandoval A, Zhou J, Simha N, Kang CH, Yu S, Kim JS, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Schlegel P, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Sterling A, Costa M, Eichler K, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Jefferis GSXE, Murthy M, Bidaye SS, Hampel S, Seeds AM, Scott K. A Drosophila computational brain model reveals sensorimotor processing. Nature 2024; 634:210-219. [PMID: 39358519 PMCID: PMC11446845 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07763-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
The recent assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing more than 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain1,2. Here we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, on the basis of neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity3, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviours. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation4. In addition, using the model to activate neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing5-a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioural studies. Activating different classes of gustatory neurons in the model makes accurate predictions of how several taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes6-10. Our results demonstrate that modelling brain circuits using only synapse-level connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can describe complete sensorimotor transformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip K Shiu
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
- Eon Systems, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Gabriella R Sterne
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Genetics, New York, NY, USA
| | - Nico Spiller
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrea Sandoval
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Joie Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Neha Simha
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Chan Hyuk Kang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Seongbong Yu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Jinseop S Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, South Korea
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
- Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Salil S Bidaye
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | - Stefanie Hampel
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Andrew M Seeds
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Kristin Scott
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Schlegel P, Yin Y, Bates AS, Dorkenwald S, Eichler K, Brooks P, Han DS, Gkantia M, Dos Santos M, Munnelly EJ, Badalamente G, Serratosa Capdevila L, Sane VA, Fragniere AMC, Kiassat L, Pleijzier MW, Stürner T, Tamimi IFM, Dunne CR, Salgarella I, Javier A, Fang S, Perlman E, Kazimiers T, Jagannathan SR, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Costa M, Seung HS, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Bock DD, Jefferis GSXE. Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing of Drosophila. Nature 2024; 634:139-152. [PMID: 39358521 PMCID: PMC11446831 DOI: 10.1038/s41586-024-07686-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 10/04/2024]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has emerged as a key model organism in neuroscience, in large part due to the concentration of collaboratively generated molecular, genetic and digital resources available for it. Here we complement the approximately 140,000 neuron FlyWire whole-brain connectome1 with a systematic and hierarchical annotation of neuronal classes, cell types and developmental units (hemilineages). Of 8,453 annotated cell types, 3,643 were previously proposed in the partial hemibrain connectome2, and 4,581 are new types, mostly from brain regions outside the hemibrain subvolume. Although nearly all hemibrain neurons could be matched morphologically in FlyWire, about one-third of cell types proposed for the hemibrain could not be reliably reidentified. We therefore propose a new definition of cell type as groups of cells that are each quantitatively more similar to cells in a different brain than to any other cell in the same brain, and we validate this definition through joint analysis of FlyWire and hemibrain connectomes. Further analysis defined simple heuristics for the reliability of connections between brains, revealed broad stereotypy and occasional variability in neuron count and connectivity, and provided evidence for functional homeostasis in the mushroom body through adjustments of the absolute amount of excitatory input while maintaining the excitation/inhibition ratio. Our work defines a consensus cell type atlas for the fly brain and provides both an intellectual framework and open-source toolchain for brain-scale comparative connectomics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexander S Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Paul Brooks
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Daniel S Han
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Marina Gkantia
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marcia Dos Santos
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Eva J Munnelly
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Griffin Badalamente
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Varun A Sane
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandra M C Fragniere
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Ladann Kiassat
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Markus W Pleijzier
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tomke Stürner
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Imaan F M Tamimi
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christopher R Dunne
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Irene Salgarella
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Alexandre Javier
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Siqi Fang
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Sridhar R Jagannathan
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy R Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Eyewire, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - H Sebastian Seung
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Molecular, Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Davi D Bock
- Department of Neurological Sciences, Larner College of Medicine, University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, USA.
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Walker SR, Peña-Garcia M, Devineni AV. Connectomic analysis of taste circuits in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.09.14.613080. [PMID: 39314399 PMCID: PMC11419157 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.14.613080] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/25/2024]
Abstract
Our sense of taste is critical for regulating food consumption. The fruit fly Drosophila represents a highly tractable model to investigate mechanisms of taste processing, but taste circuits beyond sensory neurons are largely unidentified. Here, we use a whole-brain connectome to investigate the organization of Drosophila taste circuits. We trace pathways from four populations of sensory neurons that detect different taste modalities and project to the subesophageal zone (SEZ). We find that second-order taste neurons are primarily located within the SEZ and largely segregated by taste modality, whereas third-order neurons have more projections outside the SEZ and more overlap between modalities. Taste projections out of the SEZ innervate regions implicated in feeding, olfactory processing, and learning. We characterize interconnections between taste pathways, identify modality-dependent differences in taste neuron properties, and use computational simulations to relate connectivity to predicted activity. These studies provide insight into the architecture of Drosophila taste circuits.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney R. Walker
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Marco Peña-Garcia
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322
- These authors contributed equally
| | - Anita V. Devineni
- Department of Biology, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322
- Neuroscience Graduate Program, Emory University, Atlanta GA 30322
- Lead contact
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cui X, Meiselman MR, Thornton SN, Yapici N. A gut-brain-gut interoceptive circuit loop gates sugar ingestion in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2024:2024.09.02.610892. [PMID: 39282336 PMCID: PMC11398398 DOI: 10.1101/2024.09.02.610892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/05/2024]
Abstract
The communication between the brain and digestive tract is critical for optimising nutrient preference and food intake, yet the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood1-7. Here, we show that a gut-brain-gut circuit loop gates sugar ingestion in flies. We discovered that brain neurons regulating food ingestion, IN18, receive excitatory input from enteric sensory neurons, which innervate the oesophagus and express the sugar receptor Gr43a. These enteric sensory neurons monitor the sugar content of food within the oesophagus during ingestion and send positive feedback signals to IN1s, stimulating the consumption of high-sugar foods. Connectome analyses reveal that IN1s form a core ingestion circuit. This interoceptive circuit receives synaptic input from enteric afferents and provides synaptic output to enteric motor neurons, which modulate the activity of muscles at the entry segments of the crop, a stomach-like food storage organ. While IN1s are persistently activated upon ingestion of sugar-rich foods, enteric motor neurons are continuously inhibited, causing the crop muscles to relax and enabling flies to consume large volumes of sugar. Our findings reveal a key interoceptive mechanism that underlies the rapid sensory monitoring and motor control of sugar ingestion within the digestive tract, optimising the diet of flies across varying metabolic states.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinyue Cui
- Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Cornell University, 14853, Ithaca, NY, USA
| | - Matthew R. Meiselman
- Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Cornell University, 14853, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Current address: School of Life Sciences, University of Nevada, 89154, Las Vegas, NV, US
| | - Staci N. Thornton
- Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Cornell University, 14853, Ithaca, NY, USA
- Current address: the Department of Kinesiology, University of Connecticut, 06269, Storrs, CT
| | - Nilay Yapici
- Department of Neurobiology and Behaviour, Cornell University, 14853, Ithaca, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Guillemin J, Li J, Li V, McDowell SAT, Audette K, Davis G, Jelen M, Slamani S, Kelliher L, Gordon MD, Stanley M. Taste cells expressing Ionotropic Receptor 94e reciprocally impact feeding and egg laying in Drosophila. Cell Rep 2024; 43:114625. [PMID: 39141516 DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114625] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2024] [Revised: 06/01/2024] [Accepted: 07/30/2024] [Indexed: 08/16/2024] Open
Abstract
Chemosensory cells across the body of Drosophila melanogaster evaluate the environment to prioritize certain behaviors. Previous mapping of gustatory receptor neurons (GRNs) on the fly labellum identified a set of neurons in L-type sensilla that express Ionotropic Receptor 94e (IR94e), but the impact of IR94e GRNs on behavior remains unclear. We used optogenetics and chemogenetics to activate IR94e neurons and found that they drive mild feeding suppression but enhance egg laying. In vivo calcium imaging revealed that IR94e GRNs respond strongly to certain amino acids, including glutamate, and that IR94e plus co-receptors IR25a and IR76b are required for amino acid detection. Furthermore, IR94e mutants show behavioral changes to solutions containing amino acids, including increased consumption and decreased egg laying. Overall, our results suggest that IR94e GRNs on the fly labellum discourage feeding and encourage egg laying as part of an important behavioral switch in response to certain chemical cues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jinfang Li
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Viktoriya Li
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Sasha A T McDowell
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Kayla Audette
- Department of Biology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Grace Davis
- Department of Biology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Meghan Jelen
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada
| | - Samy Slamani
- Department of Biology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Liam Kelliher
- Department of Biology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA
| | - Michael D Gordon
- Department of Zoology, Life Sciences Institute and Djavad Mowafaghian Centre for Brain Health, The University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z3, Canada.
| | - Molly Stanley
- Department of Biology, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT 05405, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Eckstein N, Bates AS, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P, Lu AKY, Rymer T, Finley-May S, Paterson T, Parekh R, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Yu SC, McKellar C, Sterling A, Eichler K, Costa M, Seung S, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Jefferis GSXE, Funke J. Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2024; 187:2574-2594.e23. [PMID: 38729112 PMCID: PMC11106717 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87% for individual synapses, 94% for neurons, and 91% for known cell types across a D. melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Eckstein
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA; Institute of Neuroinformatics UZH/ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK; Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Champion
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle Du
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Eichler K, Hampel S, Alejandro-García A, Calle-Schuler SA, Santana-Cruz A, Kmecova L, Blagburn JM, Hoopfer ED, Seeds AM. Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence in Drosophila. eLife 2024; 12:RP87602. [PMID: 38634460 PMCID: PMC11026096 DOI: 10.7554/elife.87602] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2024] Open
Abstract
Mechanosensory neurons located across the body surface respond to tactile stimuli and elicit diverse behavioral responses, from relatively simple stimulus location-aimed movements to complex movement sequences. How mechanosensory neurons and their postsynaptic circuits influence such diverse behaviors remains unclear. We previously discovered that Drosophila perform a body location-prioritized grooming sequence when mechanosensory neurons at different locations on the head and body are simultaneously stimulated by dust (Hampel et al., 2017; Seeds et al., 2014). Here, we identify nearly all mechanosensory neurons on the Drosophila head that individually elicit aimed grooming of specific head locations, while collectively eliciting a whole head grooming sequence. Different tracing methods were used to reconstruct the projections of these neurons from different locations on the head to their distinct arborizations in the brain. This provides the first synaptic resolution somatotopic map of a head, and defines the parallel-projecting mechanosensory pathways that elicit head grooming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Eichler
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Stefanie Hampel
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Adrián Alejandro-García
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Steven A Calle-Schuler
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Alexis Santana-Cruz
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Lucia Kmecova
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Jonathan M Blagburn
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| | - Eric D Hoopfer
- Neuroscience Program, Carleton CollegeNorthfieldUnited States
| | - Andrew M Seeds
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences CampusSan JuanPuerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Eichler K, Hampel S, Alejandro-García A, Calle-Schuler SA, Santana-Cruz A, Kmecova L, Blagburn JM, Hoopfer ED, Seeds AM. Somatotopic organization among parallel sensory pathways that promote a grooming sequence in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.02.11.528119. [PMID: 36798384 PMCID: PMC9934617 DOI: 10.1101/2023.02.11.528119] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/14/2023]
Abstract
Mechanosensory neurons located across the body surface respond to tactile stimuli and elicit diverse behavioral responses, from relatively simple stimulus location-aimed movements to complex movement sequences. How mechanosensory neurons and their postsynaptic circuits influence such diverse behaviors remains unclear. We previously discovered that Drosophila perform a body location-prioritized grooming sequence when mechanosensory neurons at different locations on the head and body are simultaneously stimulated by dust (Hampel et al., 2017; Seeds et al., 2014). Here, we identify nearly all mechanosensory neurons on the Drosophila head that individually elicit aimed grooming of specific head locations, while collectively eliciting a whole head grooming sequence. Different tracing methods were used to reconstruct the projections of these neurons from different locations on the head to their distinct arborizations in the brain. This provides the first synaptic resolution somatotopic map of a head, and defines the parallel-projecting mechanosensory pathways that elicit head grooming.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina Eichler
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Contributed equally
| | - Stefanie Hampel
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Contributed equally
| | - Adrián Alejandro-García
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Contributed equally
| | - Steven A Calle-Schuler
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Alexis Santana-Cruz
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Lucia Kmecova
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
- Neuroscience Program, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota
- Contributed equally
| | - Jonathan M Blagburn
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Eric D Hoopfer
- Neuroscience Program, Carleton College, Northfield, Minnesota
| | - Andrew M Seeds
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Schlegel P, Yin Y, Bates AS, Dorkenwald S, Eichler K, Brooks P, Han DS, Gkantia M, Dos Santos M, Munnelly EJ, Badalamente G, Capdevila LS, Sane VA, Pleijzier MW, Tamimi IFM, Dunne CR, Salgarella I, Javier A, Fang S, Perlman E, Kazimiers T, Jagannathan SR, Matsliah A, Sterling AR, Yu SC, McKellar CE, Costa M, Seung HS, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Bock DD, Jefferis GSXE. Whole-brain annotation and multi-connectome cell typing quantifies circuit stereotypy in Drosophila. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.06.27.546055. [PMID: 37425808 PMCID: PMC10327018 DOI: 10.1101/2023.06.27.546055] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/11/2023]
Abstract
The fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster combines surprisingly sophisticated behaviour with a highly tractable nervous system. A large part of the fly's success as a model organism in modern neuroscience stems from the concentration of collaboratively generated molecular genetic and digital resources. As presented in our FlyWire companion paper 1 , this now includes the first full brain connectome of an adult animal. Here we report the systematic and hierarchical annotation of this ~130,000-neuron connectome including neuronal classes, cell types and developmental units (hemilineages). This enables any researcher to navigate this huge dataset and find systems and neurons of interest, linked to the literature through the Virtual Fly Brain database 2 . Crucially, this resource includes 4,552 cell types. 3,094 are rigorous consensus validations of cell types previously proposed in the hemibrain connectome 3 . In addition, we propose 1,458 new cell types, arising mostly from the fact that the FlyWire connectome spans the whole brain, whereas the hemibrain derives from a subvolume. Comparison of FlyWire and the hemibrain showed that cell type counts and strong connections were largely stable, but connection weights were surprisingly variable within and across animals. Further analysis defined simple heuristics for connectome interpretation: connections stronger than 10 unitary synapses or providing >1% of the input to a target cell are highly conserved. Some cell types showed increased variability across connectomes: the most common cell type in the mushroom body, required for learning and memory, is almost twice as numerous in FlyWire as the hemibrain. We find evidence for functional homeostasis through adjustments of the absolute amount of excitatory input while maintaining the excitation-inhibition ratio. Finally, and surprisingly, about one third of the cell types proposed in the hemibrain connectome could not yet be reliably identified in the FlyWire connectome. We therefore suggest that cell types should be defined to be robust to inter-individual variation, namely as groups of cells that are quantitatively more similar to cells in a different brain than to any other cell in the same brain. Joint analysis of the FlyWire and hemibrain connectomes demonstrates the viability and utility of this new definition. Our work defines a consensus cell type atlas for the fly brain and provides both an intellectual framework and open source toolchain for brain-scale comparative connectomics.
Collapse
|
13
|
Taisz I, Donà E, Münch D, Bailey SN, Morris BJ, Meechan KI, Stevens KM, Varela-Martínez I, Gkantia M, Schlegel P, Ribeiro C, Jefferis GSXE, Galili DS. Generating parallel representations of position and identity in the olfactory system. Cell 2023; 186:2556-2573.e22. [PMID: 37236194 PMCID: PMC10403364 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/27/2022] [Revised: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2023] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
In Drosophila, a dedicated olfactory channel senses a male pheromone, cis-vaccenyl acetate (cVA), promoting female courtship while repelling males. Here, we show that separate cVA-processing streams extract qualitative and positional information. cVA sensory neurons respond to concentration differences in a 5-mm range around a male. Second-order projection neurons encode the angular position of a male by detecting inter-antennal differences in cVA concentration, which are amplified through contralateral inhibition. At the third circuit layer, we identify 47 cell types with diverse input-output connectivity. One population responds tonically to male flies, a second is tuned to olfactory looming, while a third integrates cVA and taste to coincidentally promote female mating. The separation of olfactory features resembles the mammalian what and where visual streams; together with multisensory integration, this enables behavioral responses appropriate to specific ethological contexts.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- István Taisz
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Erika Donà
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | - Billy J Morris
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Katie M Stevens
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Marina Gkantia
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Dana S Galili
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Sorkaç A, Moșneanu RA, Crown AM, Savaş D, Okoro AM, Memiş E, Talay M, Barnea G. retro-Tango enables versatile retrograde circuit tracing in Drosophila. eLife 2023; 12:e85041. [PMID: 37166114 PMCID: PMC10208638 DOI: 10.7554/elife.85041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/11/2023] [Indexed: 05/12/2023] Open
Abstract
Transsynaptic tracing methods are crucial tools in studying neural circuits. Although a couple of anterograde tracing methods and a targeted retrograde tool have been developed in Drosophila melanogaster, there is still need for an unbiased, user-friendly, and flexible retrograde tracing system. Here, we describe retro-Tango, a method for transsynaptic, retrograde circuit tracing and manipulation in Drosophila. In this genetically encoded system, a ligand-receptor interaction at the synapse triggers an intracellular signaling cascade that results in reporter gene expression in presynaptic neurons. Importantly, panneuronal expression of the elements of the cascade renders this method versatile, enabling its use not only to test hypotheses but also to generate them. We validate retro-Tango in various circuits and benchmark it by comparing our findings with the electron microscopy reconstruction of the Drosophila hemibrain. Our experiments establish retro-Tango as a key method for circuit tracing in neuroscience research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Altar Sorkaç
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Rareș A Moșneanu
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Anthony M Crown
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Doruk Savaş
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Angel M Okoro
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Ezgi Memiş
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Mustafa Talay
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| | - Gilad Barnea
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
- Carney Institute for Brain Science, Brown UniversityProvidenceUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Shiu PK, Sterne GR, Spiller N, Franconville R, Sandoval A, Zhou J, Simha N, Kang CH, Yu S, Kim JS, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Schlegel P, Szi-chieh Y, McKellar CE, Sterling A, Costa M, Eichler K, Jefferis GS, Murthy M, Bates AS, Eckstein N, Funke J, Bidaye SS, Hampel S, Seeds AM, Scott K. A leaky integrate-and-fire computational model based on the connectome of the entire adult Drosophila brain reveals insights into sensorimotor processing. BIORXIV : THE PREPRINT SERVER FOR BIOLOGY 2023:2023.05.02.539144. [PMID: 37205514 PMCID: PMC10187186 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.02.539144] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
The forthcoming assembly of the adult Drosophila melanogaster central brain connectome, containing over 125,000 neurons and 50 million synaptic connections, provides a template for examining sensory processing throughout the brain. Here, we create a leaky integrate-and-fire computational model of the entire Drosophila brain, based on neural connectivity and neurotransmitter identity, to study circuit properties of feeding and grooming behaviors. We show that activation of sugar-sensing or water-sensing gustatory neurons in the computational model accurately predicts neurons that respond to tastes and are required for feeding initiation. Computational activation of neurons in the feeding region of the Drosophila brain predicts those that elicit motor neuron firing, a testable hypothesis that we validate by optogenetic activation and behavioral studies. Moreover, computational activation of different classes of gustatory neurons makes accurate predictions of how multiple taste modalities interact, providing circuit-level insight into aversive and appetitive taste processing. Our computational model predicts that the sugar and water pathways form a partially shared appetitive feeding initiation pathway, which our calcium imaging and behavioral experiments confirm. Additionally, we applied this model to mechanosensory circuits and found that computational activation of mechanosensory neurons predicts activation of a small set of neurons comprising the antennal grooming circuit that do not overlap with gustatory circuits, and accurately describes the circuit response upon activation of different mechanosensory subtypes. Our results demonstrate that modeling brain circuits purely from connectivity and predicted neurotransmitter identity generates experimentally testable hypotheses and can accurately describe complete sensorimotor transformations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip K. Shiu
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Gabriella R. Sterne
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
- University of Rochester Medical Center, Department of Biomedical Genetics
| | - Nico Spiller
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | | | - Andrea Sandoval
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Joie Zhou
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Neha Simha
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| | - Chan Hyuk Kang
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Seongbong Yu
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Jinseop S. Kim
- Department of Biological Sciences, Sungkyunkwan University, Suwon, 16419, South Korea
| | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
- Computer Science Department, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
| | - Yu Szi-chieh
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire E. McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Marta Costa
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
| | | | - Gregory S.X.E. Jefferis
- Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford
- Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, USA
| | - Salil S. Bidaye
- Max Planck Florida Institute for Neuroscience, Jupiter, FL, USA
| | - Stefanie Hampel
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Andrew M. Seeds
- Institute of Neurobiology, University of Puerto Rico-Medical Sciences Campus, San Juan, Puerto Rico
| | - Kristin Scott
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology and Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Yapici N. Eating regulation: How diet impacts food cognition. Curr Biol 2023; 33:R153-R156. [PMID: 36854275 DOI: 10.1016/j.cub.2022.12.060] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2023]
Abstract
How diet alters brain physiology and impacts cognitive functions is poorly understood in any species. A new study has shown that a high-sugar diet disrupts the formation of food-odor associations in the brain of the fly Drosophila melanogaster in a manner that leads to increased food intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nilay Yapici
- Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA.
| |
Collapse
|