Factors influencing recurrence following initial hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases

Adjuvant chemotherapy is associated with better oncological outcomes after ALPPS for colorectal liver metastases

ALPPS enables complete tumor resection in a shorter interval and a larger number of patients than classic two-stage hepatectomies. However, there is little evidence regarding long-term outcomes in patients with colorectal liver metastases (CLM). This study aims to evaluate the short and long-term outcomes of ALPPS in patients with CRM. Single-cohort, prospective, observational study. Patients with unresectable CLM due to insufficient liver remnant who underwent ALPPS between June 2011 and June 2021 were included. Of 32 patients treated, 21 were male (66%) and the median age was 56 years (range = 29-81). Both stages were completed in 30 patients (93.7%), with an R0 rate of 75% (24/32). Major morbidity was 37.5% and the mortality nil. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 28.1 and 8.8 months, respectively. The 1-3, and 5-year OS was 86%, 45%, and 21%, and RFS was 42%, 14%, and 14%, respectively. The only independent risk factor associated with poor RFS (5.7 vs 11.6 months; p = 0.038) and OS (15 vs 37 months; p = 0.009) was not receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. KRAS mutation was associated with worse OS from disease diagnosis (24.3 vs. 38.9 months; p = 0.025). ALPPS is associated with favorable oncological outcomes, comparable to traditional strategies to increase resectability in patients with CLM and high tumor burden. Our results suggest for the first time that adjuvant chemotherapy is independently associated with better short- and long-term outcomes after ALPPS. Selection of patients with KRAS mutations should be performed with caution, as this could affect oncological outcomes.

Preoperative IL-8 levels as prognostic indicators of overall survival: an extended follow-up in a prospective cohort with colorectal liver metastases

INTRODUCTION

CRC with liver metastases is a major contributor to cancer-related mortality. Despite advancements in liver resection techniques, patient survival remains a concern due to high recurrence rates. This study seeks to uncover prognostic biomarkers that predict overall survival in patients undergoing curative hepatic resection for CRC liver metastases.

METHODS

Prospectively collected serum samples from a cohort of 49 patients who received curative hepatic resection for CRC liver metastases were studied. The patients are part of a cohort, previously analyzed for perioperative complications (see methods). Various preoperative serum markers, clinical characteristics, and factors were analyzed. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were conducted to determine associations between these variables and disease-free survival as well as overall survival.

RESULTS

For disease-free survival, univariate analysis highlighted the correlation between poor outcomes and advanced primary tumor stage, high ASA score, and synchronous liver metastases. Multivariate analysis identified nodal-positive primary tumors and synchronous metastases as independent risk factors for disease-free survival. Regarding overall survival, univariate analysis demonstrated significant links between poor survival and high preoperative IL-8 levels, elevated neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and presence of metastases in other organs. Multivariate analysis confirmed preoperative IL-8 and having three or more liver metastases as independent risk factors for overall survival. The impact of IL-8 on survival was particularly noteworthy, surpassing the influence of established clinical factors.

CONCLUSION

This study establishes preoperative IL-8 levels as a potential prognostic biomarker for overall survival in patients undergoing curative liver resection for CRC liver metastases. This study underscores the importance of incorporating IL-8 and other biomarkers into clinical decision-making, facilitating improved patient stratification and tailored treatment approaches. Further research and validation studies are needed to solidify the clinical utility of IL-8 as a prognostic marker.

Integration of the social determinants of health into quality indicators for colorectal cancer surgery: a scoping review protocol

INTRODUCTION

Quality monitoring is a critical component of high-performing cancer care systems. Quality indicators (QIs) are standardised, evidence-based measures of healthcare quality that allow healthcare systems to track performance, identify gaps in healthcare delivery and inform areas of priority for strategic planning. Social structures and economic systems that allow for unequal access to power and resources that shape health and health inequities can be described through the social determinants of health (SDoH) framework. Therefore, granular analysis of healthcare quality through SDoH frameworks is required to identify patient subgroups who may experience health inequity. Given the high burden of disease of colorectal cancer (CRC) and well-defined cancer care pathways, CRC is often the first disease site targeted by health systems for quality improvement. The objective of this review is to examine how SDoH have been integrated into QIs for CRC surgery. This review aims to address three primary questions: (1) Have SDoH been integrated into the development, reporting and assessment of CRC surgery QIs? (2) When integrated, what measures and statistical methods have been applied? (3) In which direction do individual SDoH influence QIs outputs?

METHODS

This review will follow Arksey and O'Malley frameworks for scoping reviews. We will search MEDLINE, EMBASE, HealthSTAR databases for papers that examine QIs for CRC surgery applicable to healthcare systems from database inception until January 2023. Interventional trials, prospective and retrospective observational studies, reviews, case series and qualitative study designs will be included. Two authors will independently review all titles, abstracts and full texts to determine which studies meet the inclusion criteria.

ETHICS & DISSEMINATION

No ethics approval is required for this review. Results will be disseminated through scientific presentation and relevant conferences targeted for researchers examining healthcare quality and equity in cancer care.

REGISTRATION DETAILS

osf.io/vfzd3-Open Science Framework.

The prognostic value of radiomic features in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer patients from the TRIBE2 study

Aims: Evaluating the prognostic role of radiomic features in liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer treated with first-line therapy at baseline and best response among patients undergoing resection. Patients & methods: Among patients enrolled in TRIBE2 (NCT02339116), the association of clinical and radiomic data, extracted by SOPHiA-DDM™ with progression-free and overall survival (OS) in the overall population and with disease-free survival/postresection OS in those undergoing resection was investigated. Results: Among 98 patients, radiomic parameters improved the prediction accuracy of our model for OS (area under the curve: 0.83; sensitivity: 0.85; specificity: 0.73; accuracy: 0.78), but not progression-free survival. Of 46 resected patients, small-distance high gray-level emphasis was associated with shorter disease-free survival and high gray-level zone emphasis/higher kurtosis with shorter postresection OS. Conclusion: Radiomic features should be implemented as tools of outcome prediction for liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer.

The role of tumour biological factors in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal liver metastases following induction systemic treatment: An analysis of the Dutch CAIRO5 trial

BACKGROUND

Large inter-surgeon variability exists in technical anatomical resectability assessment of colorectal cancer liver-only metastases (CRLM) following induction systemic therapy. We evaluated the role of tumour biological factors in predicting resectability and (early) recurrence after surgery for initially unresectable CRLM.

METHODS

482 patients with initially unresectable CRLM from the phase 3 CAIRO5 trial were selected, with two-monthly resectability assessments by a liver expert panel. If no consensus existed among panel surgeons (i.e. same vote for (un)resectability of CRLM), conclusion was based on majority. The association of tumour biological (sidedness, synchronous CRLM, carcinoembryonic antigen and RAS/BRAF^V600E mutation status) and technical anatomical factors with consensus among panel surgeons, secondary resectability and early recurrence (<6 months) without curative-intent repeat local treatment was analysed by uni- and pre-specified multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

After systemic treatment, 240 (50%) patients received complete local treatment of CRLM of which 75 (31%) patients experienced early recurrence without repeat local treatment. Higher number of CRLM (odds ratio 1.09 [95% confidence interval 1.03-1.15]) and age (odds ratio 1.03 [95% confidence interval 1.00-1.07]) were independently associated with early recurrence without repeat local treatment. In 138 (52%) patients, no consensus among panel surgeons was present prior to local treatment. Postoperative outcomes in patients with and without consensus were comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Almost a third of patients selected by an expert panel for secondary CRLM surgery following induction systemic treatment experience an early recurrence only amenable to palliative treatment. Number of CRLM and age, but no tumour biological factors are predictive, suggesting that until there are better biomarkers; resectability assessment remains primarily a technical anatomical decision.

Hepatic Resection in Patients with Colo-Rectal Liver Metastases: Surgical Outcomes and Prognostic Factors of Single-Center Experience

Introduction: Surgical resection has a fundamental role in increasing the chance of survival in patients with colorectal liver metastases. The guidelines have been modified and expanded in time in order to increase the number of patients that can benefit from this treatment. The aim of this study is to analyze the main prognostic factors related to overall and disease-free survival of a series of consecutive patients undergoing liver resection for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM). Materials and Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing liver resection for CRLM between April 2018 and September 2021 was performed. Clinical data and laboratory parameters were evaluated using the log-rank test. OS and DFS were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A retrospective study on 75 patients who underwent liver resection for CRLM was performed. The OS and DFS at 1 and 3 years were 84.3% and 63.8% for OS, 55.6% and 30.7% for DFS, respectively. From the analysis of the data, the most significant results indicate that: patients with a lower CEA value <25 ng/mL had an OS of 93.6% and 80.1% at 1 and 3 years, with an average of 36.7 months (CI 95% 33.1–40.3); moreover, patients with a value equal to or greater than 25 ng/mL had a 1-year survival equal to 57.4%, with an average of 13.8 months (CI 95% 9.4–18.2) (p < 0.001); adjuvant chemotherapy increases by 3 years the overall survival (OS: 68.6% vs. 49.7%) (p = 0.013); localization of the primary tumor affects OS, with a better prognosis for left colon metastases (OS at 42 months: 85.4% vs. 42.2%) (p value = 0.056); patients with stage T1 or T2 cancer have a better 3 years OS (92.9–100% vs. 49.7–56.3%) (p = 0.696), while the N0 stage results in both higher 3 years OS and DFS than the N + stages (OS: 87.5% vs. 68.5% vs. 24.5%); metachronous metastases have a higher 3 years OS than synchronous ones (80% vs. 47.4%) (p = 0.066); parenchymal sparing resections have a better 3 years DFS than anatomical ones (33.7% vs. 0%) (p = 0.067); a patient with a parenchymal R1 resection has a much worse prognosis than an R0 (3 years OS: 0% vs. 68.7%) (p < 0.001). Conclusions: CEA value of less than 25 ng/mL, localization of the primary tumor in the left colon, primary tumor in stage T1/2 and N0, metachronous presentation, R0 resection, fewer than four metastases, and use of adjuvant chemotherapy are all parameters that in our analysis have shown a correlation with a better prognosis; moreover, the evaluation of the series is in line with the latest evidence in the literature in defining the non-inferiority of minimally invasive and parenchymal sparing treatment compared to the classic laparotomic approach with anatomic resection.

Pathological complete response of multiple liver metastases from colon cancer successfully treated with conversion surgery: A case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Recently, the successful long-term survival of patients with unresectable distant metastases from colorectal cancer, who underwent conversion surgery after systemic chemotherapy, have been documented. Herein, we present a patient afflicted with ascending colon cancer and multiple unresectable liver metastases, who underwent conversion surgery, resulting in the complete disappearance of the pathological liver metastases.

PRESENTATION OF CASE

A 70-year-old woman visited our hospital with a chief complaint of weight loss. A diagnosis of ascending colon cancer (cT4aN2aM1a [H3]: TNM classification 8th edition) stage IVa with RAS/BRAF wild-type mutation was made (four liver metastases up to 60 mm in diameter were observed in both lobes). After 2 years and 3 months of systemic chemotherapy (capecitabine, oxaliplatin, and bevacizumab), the tumor marker levels had decreased to normal ranges and all liver metastases showed partial responses with remarkable shrinkage. After confirmation of a liver function and a preserved future liver remnant volume, the patient finally underwent hepatectomy, involving partial resection of S4 and subsegmentectomy of S8, along with a right hemicolectomy. Histopathologic examination revealed that all liver metastases had completely disappeared, while regional lymph node metastases had changed into scar tissue. However, the primary tumor failed to respond to chemotherapy, resulting in ypT3N0M0 ypStage IIA. The patient was discharged from the hospital on the 8th postoperative day without any postoperative complications. She is currently on the 6th month of follow-up without any recurring metastasis.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Curative surgery is recommended for resectable liver metastases of colorectal cancer (CRLM), be it synchronous or heterochronous. Up until now, the efficacy of perioperative chemotherapy for CRLM is limited. Chemotherapy has a double-edged aspect, where some cases have shown successful improvement in the treatment stage.

CONCLUSION

To obtain the maximum benefit from conversion surgery, it is critical to incorporate the appropriate surgical technique, at the correct stage, in order avoid the progression to chemotherapy-associated steatohepatitis (CASH) in the patient.

The prognostic utility of preoperative neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) in patients with colorectal liver metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is used to reflect body's inflammatory status with prognostic value in different cancers. We aimed to investigate the influence of preoperative NLR in the prognosis of CRLM patients receiving surgery using meta-analysis. Data in Cochrane Library, PubMed, Embase, and Web of Science databases created before October 2022 were recruited. Meta-analysis was carried out with RevMan 5.3 and Stata16 software, and the primary outcome indicators included overall survival (OS), and secondary outcome indicators included disease-free survival (DFS) and relapse-free survival (RFS). The pooled risk ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for each outcome indicator were determined using random-effects models or fixed-effects models. The pooled odds ratio (OR) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) for NLR and clinicopathological characteristics were determined with a fixed-effects model. 18 papers published between 2008 and 2022 (3184 patients in total) were included. The pooled analysis found that high preoperative NLR was correlated with poor OS (multivariate HR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.61-2.08, p < 0.01), DFS (multivariate HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.16-2.71, p < 0.01) and RFS (multivariate HR = 1.46, 95% CI = 1.15-1.85, p < 0.01), but NLR was not related to clinicopathological features of CRLM patients correlation. In conclusion, NLR is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in patients with CRLM. More large-scale clinical researches are required in the future to demonstrate the inclusion of preoperative NLR as a prognostic indicator for CRLM patients to guide postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy.

A clinical prediction model for the presence of brain metastases from colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

We conducted this study to explore clinicopathological profiles of brain metastases (BM) and establish a clinical prediction model that predicts the presence of BM in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients.

METHODS

Patients with initially diagnosed CRC were reviewed between the year 2010 and 2015. Multiple imputations are used for handling missing values. Prognostic factors were identified by the univariate and multivariate Cox regression model. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify the predictive factors for the presence of BM. A nomogram was constructed based on statistically significant risk factors of the presence of BM. The decision curve analysis (DCA) was used to assess the clinical usefulness and net benefits of the nomogram for the presence of BM.

RESULTS

Four hundred ninety-five patients with brain metastasis at the initial diagnosis were identified, representing 0.24% of the whole cohort and 0.91% of the metastatic cohort. Multivariable logistic regression demonstrated that young age, positive CEA, adenocarcinoma, lower differentiated grade, presence of liver metastases, presence of lung metastases, and presence of bone metastases were significantly associated with higher risk of developing BM. The decision curve analysis inform clinical decisions were better than a scenario in which all patients or no patients are screened across a wide range of threshold at ≥ 0.027%.

CONCLUSIONS

The risk estimates provided by the nomogram can be extremely useful for earlier diagnosis, especially when discussing screening strategy among high-risk patients.

Circulating Tumor DNA as a Marker of Minimal Residual Disease After Radical Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastases

PURPOSE

Prognostic tools to estimate the risk of relapse for patients with liver-limited metastatic colorectal cancer (LL-mCRC) undergoing resection with curative intent are needed. Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) as a surrogate of postsurgical minimal residual disease is a promising marker in localized CRC. We explored the role of postoperative ctDNA as a marker of minimal residual disease in patients with radically resected LL-mCRC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-six patients with LL-mCRC were retrospectively included. DNA from tumor tissue was sequenced, and one somatic mutation was then assessed by digital droplet polymerase chain reaction in plasma samples collected after surgery to identify the persistence of ctDNA. Relapse-free survival and postresection overall survival were compared between patients with positive vs negative postoperative ctDNA.

RESULTS

ctDNA was found in 39 (51%) of 76 patients with LL-mCRC. At a median follow-up of 77 months, 33 of 39 ctDNA-positive patients and 20 of 37 ctDNA-negative patients experienced disease relapse ( P = .008). ctDNA-positive patients reported significantly shorter RFS than ctDNA-negative ones (median RFS 12.7 v 27.4 months hazard ratio, 2.09, P = .008). In the multivariable model including other prognostic covariates, this association was still significant ( P = .046) and a trend toward shorter overall survival among ctDNA-positive patients was reported (hazard ratio, 1.65, P = .183).

CONCLUSION

The detection of postsurgical ctDNA is an independent negative prognostic marker and identifies patients at high risk of relapse after liver metastases resection.

Clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for liver metastases from colorectal cancer

Colorectal cancer is one of the common malignant tumors of the digestive system in clinical practice. Due to the anatomical characteristics of the colorectum itself, colorectal cancer is prone to liver metastasis. Approximately 15%-25% of colorectal cancer cases are complicated with liver metastasis at diagnosis, 15%-25% are complicated with liver metastasis after radical resection of colorectal cancer, and 80%-90% with liver metastasis cannot undergo radical resection initially. The 5-year survival rate is less than 5%, and liver metastasis is the main cause of death in patients with colorectal cancer. In recent years, with the clinical application of effective chemotherapy and molecular targeted drugs, as well as the rapid development of surgical techniques, an individualized safe, efficient, fast, treatment plan can be formulated according to patients' age, primary colorectal tumor location, degree of differentiation, Ras and B-Raf gene status, tumor size, number and distribution of metastases in the liver. By shrinking the tumor volume in the liver and increasing the residual liver volume, liver metastatic tumors can undergo surgical resection or disease-free status can be achieved in patients with liver metastasis. As a result, patients with colorectal liver metastases can achieve a 5-year survival rate of 30%-57%, which greatly improves the prognosis after operation. According to the postoperative adverse factors, individualized preventive measures are worked out to reduce the impact of adverse factors and improve the prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases. In this paper, we systematically discuss the clinical strategy of conversion therapy and surgical treatment for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases by reviewing the relevant domestic and foreign literature, so as to provide a theoretical reference for the selection of clinical treatment and program for patients with unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases.

Clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastasis with intermediate risk of postoperative recurrence: A multi‐institutional retrospective study

Aims

Risk-scoring systems for colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) after hepatectomy allow prognoses to be predicted preoperatively. We investigated the clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable CRLM according to patient risk status, aiming to determine the subgroup of patients who could benefit from neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Methods

In this multi-institutional retrospective analysis, the preoperative risk score was calculated from six previously reported factors: synchronous metastases, primary lymph node positivity, tumor number, largest tumor diameter, extrahepatic metastasis, and the preoperative carbohydrate antigen 19-9 level. Patients were divided into three groups according to their risk scores: low risk (score = 0), intermediate risk (score 1-10), and high risk (score ≥11). Overall and recurrence-free survival curves were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method. After propensity-score matching in the intermediate-risk group, we compared clinicopathological features and outcomes.

Results

There were 318 cases, from 20 institutions. The preoperative risk score could be calculated in 277 cases. There were 34, 192, and 51 patients in the low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively. Intermediate-risk group patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy had significantly better recurrence-free survival than that of patients without neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .0453). After propensity-score matching in the intermediate-risk group, the recurrence-free survival rate was better in patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (P = .0261). But the overall survival rate was not improved after the matching.

Conclusion

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy for resectable CRLM might prolong the recurrence-free survival period for intermediate-risk patients with preoperative risk scores in the range of 1-10, but the overall survival was not improved by neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Oncological outcomes of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastasis: A result from a propensity score matching study

Background

The efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in treating resectable synchronous colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remain controversial.

Methods

Data from CRLM patients who underwent simultaneous liver resection between January 2015 and December 2019 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database (SEER cohort, n=305) and a single Chinese Cancer Center (NCC cohort, n=268). Using a 1:2 ratio of propensity score matching (PSM), the prognostic impact of NAC for patients who underwent NAC before surgical treatment and patients who underwent surgical treatment alone was evaluated.

Results

After PSM, there was no significant difference in overall survival (OS) between patients receiving NAC prior to CRLM resection and those undergoing surgery only, in both the NCC and SEER cohorts (each P &gt; 0.05). Age was an independent predictor of OS only in the SEER cohort (P = 0.040), while the pN stage was an independent predictor for OS only in the NCC cohort (P = 0.002). Furthermore, Disease-free survival (DFS) was comparable between the two groups in the NCC cohort. In a subgroup analysis, the DFS and OS in the NAC- group were significantly worse than those in the NAC+ group for patients with more than two liver metastases in the NCC cohort (P &lt; 0.05 for both).

Conclusion

NAC did not have a significant prognostic impact in patients with resectable synchronous CRLM. However, patients with more than two liver metastases could be good candidates for receiving NAC.

Repeated hepatic resection for colorectal liver metastases: is this concept safe and feasible?

Background

The beneficial outcomes of hepatectomy in patients with colorectal metastases have encouraged the attempts of repeated hepatectomy in patients with recurrent disease. Although studies have provided encouraging results regarding perioperative outcomes and survival rates following repeated hepatectomy, it remains unclear whether the reported outcomes reflect the therapeutic results of redo hepatectomy or rather reflect the effect of selection bias. The aim of this study was to investigate differences among patients who underwent single and repeated hepatectomy and to hereby identify prognostic factors that contribute to the premises of repeated resection.

Methods

Patients who underwent hepatectomy due to colorectal metastases were listed in a retrospective database. Study participants were divided into a single partial hepatectomy group, a multiple partial hepatectomies group, and into subgroups of two or more than two hepatectomies.

Results

A total of 338 patients with 439 partial liver resections were included in the analysis. The overall survival rate after 1, 3, and 5 years was 89%, 56%, and 36%, respectively. The survival benefit in patients who underwent multiple partial liver resections versus those with a single partial resection was 10%, 16%, and 4% after 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Repeated hepatectomy was not associated with increased rates of surgical and non-surgical complications.

Conclusion

Beneficial outcomes have been found in terms of median overall survival and perioperative morbidity in patients with recurrence of colorectal hepatic metastases after partial and tissue-sparing repeated liver resections.

AST·MLR index and operation injury condition are novel prognostic predictor for the prediction of survival in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases undergoing surgical resection

Background

The prognostic values of preoperative aspartate aminotransferase (AST), monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), AST·MLR index (AMLRI) and operation injury condition in patients with colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) remains unclear. This retrospective study assessed the relationship between these markers, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) in CRLM patients undergoing resection.

Methods

AMLRI was defined as AST × MLR. Operation injury condition was defined according to operation time and blood loss. Cox regression analyses were used to identify risk factors and to develop nomograms. C-indexes, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (time-ROC) curves and calibration curves were used to assess the models.

Results

A total of 379 patients were enrolled. The optimal cut-off value of the AMLRI was 3.33. In the multivariable analysis, AMLRI > 3.33 (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.162, p = 0.002) and serious operation injury condition (HR = 1.539, p = 0.012) were predictive for unfavourable OS, and AMLRI > 3.33 (HR = 1.462, p = 0.021) was predictive for unfavourable PFS. The nomograms were superior to Fong’s Clinical Risk Score (CRS) according to the C-indexes (PFS: 0.682 vs. 0.600; OS: 0.730 vs. 0.586) and time-ROCs.

Conclusions

Preoperative AMLRI and operation injury condition are easily accessible predictors for prognosis. The nomograms performed better than CRS for the prediction of recurrence and survival.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-10009-4.

Parenchymsparende Operationen oder anatomische Resektionen bei Lebermetastasen des kolorektalen Karzinoms?

Darmkrebs ist eine der häufigsten Todesursachen in der westlichen Welt. Die Hälfte der Patienten entwickelt kolorektale Lebermetastasen (CRLM), dabei weisen weniger als 30% der Patienten zum Zeitpunkt der Diagnose eine chirurgisch resektable Metastasierung auf. Im Falle einer Resektabilität bietet die klassische anatomische (Major-)Hepatektomie eine hohe R0-Resektionsrate, allerdings bei gleichzeitig erhöhter Morbidität und Mortalität. In den letzten 2 Jahrzehnten wurden die potenziellen Vorteile der parenchymsparenden Hepatektomie (PSH) in Bezug auf die onkologischen Gesamtergebnisse, das Überleben und die Re-Resektion im Falle eines Rezidivs („Salvageability“) nachgewiesen. Der Beitrag fasst die aktuellen Erkenntnisse zur PSH als chirurgische Therapieoption zusammen und diskutiert den aktuellen „state of the art“ in verschiedenen Szenarien.

Efficacy of laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy compared with open repeat hepatectomy: a single-center, propensity score matching study

Introduction

Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) is considered to be a technically challenging procedure which has not been widely applied. This study aimed to assess the accessibility and security of LRH for patients with hepatic tumor recurrence.

Methods

Between January 2010 and October 2020, we performed 48 LRHs and 31 open repeat hepatectomies (ORHs) for recurrent liver cancer. LRHs were matched to ORHs (1:1) using propensity score matching (PSM) created by comparing preoperative factors. The perioperative data of patients were retrospectively analyzed, including baseline data, operative time, intraoperative blood loss, pathology, days of postoperative stay, complication morbidity, and mortality within 30 days. Overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates with appropriate follow-up were obtained to evaluate the long-term outcomes.

Results

Compared with the ORH, LRH was related with shorter operative duration (169.9 versus 232.9 ml, p < 0.01), less intraoperative bleeding (100.0 versus 500.0 ml, p < 0.01), lower rate of blood transfusion (8.3% versus 58.1%, p < 0.01), and shorter hospitalization (5.0 versus 11.0 days, p < 0.01). The median follow-up was 31 months. The LRH 1-, 3-, and 5-year overall survival were 77.1%, 61.6%, and 46.2% versus 82.3%, 66.5%, and 29.5% for ORH (p = 0.77). The 1-, 3-, and 5-year disease-free survival rates of the two groups were 73.4%, 62.0%, and 44.3% versus 66.1%, 44.1%, and 14.7%, respectively (p = 0.22).

Conclusions

Laparoscopic repeated hepatectomy is safe and practicable with great short-term results for selected patients.

Regional Therapy for Colorectal Cancer Liver Metastases: Which Modality and When?

For patients with unresectable colorectal liver metastases (uCRLM), regional therapies leverage the unique, dual blood supply to the liver; the hepatic artery is the main blood supply for liver tumors, whereas the portal vein supplies most normal hepatic parenchyma. Infusion of cancer therapies via the hepatic artery allows selective delivery to the tumors with relative sparing of normal liver tissue and little extrahepatic exposure, thus limiting systemic side effects. There is a paucity of randomized controlled trial evidence to inform the optimal integration of regional therapies into the management of CRLM. Hepatic arterial infusion pump (HAIP) chemotherapy has a potential survival benefit when used in the adjuvant setting after resection of CRLM. HAIP chemotherapy can be safely given with contemporary systemic therapies and is associated with a high objective response and rate of conversion to resectability in patients with uCRLM. Drug-eluting beads coated with irinotecan transarterial chemoembolization is associated with high objective response rates within the liver and has a well-established safety profile in patients with uCRLM. Transarterial radioembolization achieves high rates of response within the liver but is not associated with improvements in overall survival or quality of life in the first- or second-line setting for uCRLM. The best treatment approach is the one that most aligns with a given patients' values, preferences, and philosophy of care. In the first-line setting, HAIP could be offered to motivated patients who hope to achieve conversion to resectability. After progression on chemotherapy, HAIP, transarterial chemoembolization, and transarterial radioembolization are valuable treatment options to consider for patients with liver-limited or liver-predominant CRLM who seek to optimize response rates and regional control.

Influence of the tumor site and histopathology after resection for non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases. A single center experience

INTRODUCTION

It remains unclear whether liver resection is justified in patients with non-colorectal non-neuroendocrine liver metastases (NCNNLM). A single-center study was conducted to analyse overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), and potential prognostic factors in patients with different types of NCNNLM.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of all patients who underwent liver resection of NCNNLM from January 2006 to July 2019 was performed.

RESULTS

A total of 62 patients were analyzed. 82.3% presented metachronous metastases and 74.2% were unilobar. The most frequent primary tumor site (PTS) were breast (24.2%), urinary tract (19.4%), melanoma (12.9%), and pancreas (9.7%). The most frequent primary tumor pathologies were breast carcinoma (24.2%), non-breast adenocarcinoma (21%), melanoma (12.9%) and sarcoma (12.9%). The most frequent surgical procedure performed was minor hepatectomy (72.6%). R0 resection was achieved in 79.5% of cases. The major complications' rate was 9.7% with a 90-day mortality rate of 1.6%. The 1, 3 and 5-year OS/DFS rate were 65%/28%, 45%/36% and 46%/28%, respectively. We identified the response to neoadjuvant therapy and PTS as possible prognostic factors for OS (P =0.06) and DFS (P =0.06) respectively.

CONCLUSION

Based on the results of our series, NCNNLM resection produces beneficial outcomes in terms of OS and DFS. PTS and the response to neoadjuvant therapy could be the main prognostic factors after resection.

Liquid Biopsy as a Source of Nucleic Acid Biomarkers in the Diagnosis and Management of Lynch Syndrome

Lynch syndrome (LS) is an autosomal dominant inherited cancer predisposition disorder, which may manifest as colorectal cancer (CRC), endometrial cancer (EC) or other malignancies of the gastrointestinal and genitourinary tract as well as the skin and brain. Its genetic cause is a defect in one of the four key DNA mismatch repair (MMR) loci. Testing of patients at risk is currently based on the absence of MMR protein staining and detection of mutations in cancer tissue and the germline, microsatellite instability (MSI) and the hypermethylated state of the MLH1 promoter. If LS is shown to have caused CRC, lifetime follow-up with regular screening (most importantly, colonoscopy) is required. In recent years, DNA and RNA markers extracted from liquid biopsies have found some use in the clinical diagnosis of LS. They have the potential to greatly enhance the efficiency of the follow-up process by making it minimally invasive, reproducible, and time effective. Here, we review markers reported in the literature and their current clinical applications, and we comment on possible future directions.

Treatment strategies to resectable metachronous colorectal liver metastases after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for primary colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

outcome of patients who develop resectable metachronous colorectal liver metastases (CLM) after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for Stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) is not well defined and the value of preoperative chemotherapy is controversial.

METHODS

From 2006 to 2013, all patients undergoing liver resection for Class I metachronous CLM after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CRC, across 32 French academic centers, were included.

RESULTS

Sixty-two patients with an average of 2 ± 1 CLM were included. Thirty-two (52%) patients received preoperative chemotherapy. There was no significant difference in the characteristics of CLM between patients with or without preoperative chemotherapy. After a median follow-up of 29 months, 3-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 79.8% and 34.6%, respectively. The median disease-free survival was not different in patients with or without preoperative chemotherapy (17 vs. 35 months respectively, p = 0.112). In multivariate analysis, only CEA level > 200 ng/ml was associated with the risk of recurrence (p = 0.027; OR = 4.7, 95% CI = 1.2-18.7).

CONCLUSION

Liver resection provides a good outcome in patients with limited metachronous CLM after adjuvant oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy for CRC. The interest of preoperative chemotherapy is not obvious and should be tested in a prospective controlled study.

Phase III randomized trial comparing systemic versus intra-arterial oxaliplatin, combined with LV5FU2 +/- irinotecan and a targeted therapy, in the first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer restricted to the liver (OSCAR): PRODIGE 49

INTRODUCTION

In patients with unresectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRCLM), systemic doublet or triplet chemotherapy and targeted therapy is considered a standard first-line treatment. Hepatic arterial infusion of oxaliplatin (HAI-ox) generates a high response rate, but this still needs to be confirmed in a randomized trial. We incorporated HAI-ox in doublet or triplet + targeted therapy to validate its efficacy.

AIM

The OSCAR study is an ongoing randomized phase III trial comparing FOLFOX + targeted therapy according to RAS status, or FOLFOXIRI + bevacizumab in patients eligible for triplet therapy, with the same regimen but with HAI-ox instead of IV-ox as the first-line treatment for CRCLM.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Main eligibility criteria are colorectal cancer, unresectable liver metastasis, no extra-hepatic metastases except pulmonary nodules if ≤3 and <10 mm, ECOG performance status 0 or 1.

ENDPOINT

The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS). A difference of 4 months for the median PFS in favor of HAI-ox is expected (HR = 0.73). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, overall response rate, secondary liver resection, safety, and quality of life.

CONCLUSION

This study is planned to include 348 patients to demonstrate the superiority of HAI-ox over systemic oxaliplatin in first-line CRCLM treatment (NCT02885753).

Liver-Directed Treatment Options Following Liver Tumor Recurrence: A Review of the Literature

Recurrence following curative-intent hepatectomy for colorectal cancer liver metastasis, hepatocellular carcinoma, or cholangiocarcinoma is unfortunately common with a reported incidence as high as 75%. Various treatment modalities can improve survival following disease recurrence. A review of the literature was performed using PubMed. In addition to systemic therapy, liver-directed treatment options for recurrent liver disease include repeat hepatectomy, salvage liver transplantation, radiofrequency or microwave ablation, intra-arterial therapy, and stereotactic body radiation therapy. Repeat resection can be consider for patients with limited recurrent disease that meets resection criteria, as this therapeutic approach can provide a survival benefit and is potentially curative in a subset of patients. Salvage liver transplantation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma is another option, which has been associated with a 5-year survival of 50%. Salvage transplantation may be an option in particular for patients who are not candidates for resection due to underlying liver dysfunction but meet criteria for transplantation. Ablation is another modality to treat patients who recur with smaller tumors and are not surgical candidates due to comorbidity, liver dysfunction, or tumor location. For patients with inoperable disease, transarterial chemoembolization, or radioembolization with Yttrium-90 are liver-directed intra-arterial therapy modalities with relatively low risks that can be utilized. Stereotactic body radiation therapy is another palliative treatment option that can provide a response and local tumor control for smaller tumors.

Efficacy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-risk resectable colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

The role of preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in patients with resectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) remains undetermined. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of NAC in patients with resectable CRLM, especially in high-risk subgroups for recurrence, with special reference to synchronicity and the CRLM grade in the Japanese classification system.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of a multi-institutional cohort who was diagnosed with resectable CRLM was performed. CRLM was classified into three grades (A, B, and C) according to the combination of H stage (H1: ≤ 4 lesions and ≤ 5 cm, H2: ≥ 5 lesions or > 5 cm, H3: ≥ 5 lesions and > 5 cm), nodal status of the primary tumor (pN0/1: ≤ 3 metastases, pN2: ≥ 4 metastases), and the presence of resectable extrahepatic metastases.

RESULTS

Among 222 patients with resectable CRLM, 97 (43.7%) had synchronous CRLM. The surgical failure-free survival (SF-FS) of patients with synchronous CRLM (without NAC) was significantly worse than that of patients with metachronous CRLM (P = 0.0264). The SF-FS of patients with Grade B/C was also significantly worse than that of Grade A (P = 0.0058). Among the 53 patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM, 31 were assigned to NAC, and all of them underwent liver surgery. In this high-risk subgroup, the SF-FS and OS in the NAC group were significantly better than those in the upfront surgery group (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with synchronous and Grade B/C CRLM could be good candidates for indication of NAC.

Postoperative circulating tumour DNA is associated with pathologic response and recurrence-free survival after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases

Background

Recurrence rates after resection of colorectal cancer liver metastases (CRLM) are high and correlate with worse survival. Postoperative circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) is a promising prognostic biomarker. Focusing on patients with resected CRLM, this study aimed to evaluate the association between the detection of postoperative ctDNA, pathologic response and recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Methods

Twenty-three patients were selected from an ongoing phase-3 trial who underwent resection of RAS-mutant CRLM after induction systemic treatment. CtDNA analysis was performed by droplet digital PCR using blood samples collected at baseline, before and after resection. Pathologic response of CRLM was determined via the Tumour Regression Grading system.

Findings

With a median follow-up of 19.6 months, the median RFS for patients with detectable (N = 6, [26%]) and undetectable (N = 17, [74%]) postoperative ctDNA was 4.8 versus 12.1 months, respectively. Among 21 patients with available tumour tissue, pathologic response in patients with detectable compared to undetectable postoperative ctDNA was found in one of six (17%) and 15 of 15 (100%) patients, respectively (p < 0.001). In univariable Cox regression analyses both postoperative detectable ctDNA (HR = 3.3, 95%CI = 1.1–9.6, p = 0.03) and pathologic non-response (HR = 4.6, 95%CI = 1.4–15, p = 0.01) were associated with poorer RFS and were strongly correlated (r = 0.88, p < 0.001). After adjusting for clinical characteristics in pairwise multivariable analyses, postoperative ctDNA status remained associated with RFS.

Interpretation

The detection of postoperative ctDNA after secondary resection of CRLM is a promising prognostic factor for RFS and appeared to be highly correlated with pathologic response.

Team Strategy Optimization in Combined Resections for Synchronous Colorectal Liver Metastases. A Comparative Study with Bootstrapping Analysis

BACKGROUND

The aim of the study was to evaluate perioperative outcomes and to evaluate factors influencing rative morbidity and adoption of minimally invasive technique in 1-team (1-T) versus two teams (2-T) management of synchronous colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

Within four referral centers, a group of 234 patients treated in 1-T centers was identified and compared with a group of 253 patients treated in 2-T. A nonparametric bootstrap process was applied to the original cohorts of 1-T group and 2-T group as a resampling method to obtain bootstrapped cohorts (155 patients per group).

RESULTS

33.5% of patients in 1-T boot group and 38.1% in the 2-T boot group were operated by laparoscopic approach. Multivariate analysis revealed that approach to primary tumor (laparoscopic or open) and intraoperative blood loss were independent prognostic factors for morbidity. Team approach did not show any significant correlation with incidence of postoperative complications nor with choice for laparoscopic approach.

CONCLUSION

The optimization of team strategy for patients with SCRLM is not solely based on the adoption of a 1-T or 2-T approach, but should instead be based on the implementation of a standard protocol for management of these patients.

Molecular Determinants and Other Factors to Guide Selection of Patients for Hepatic Resection of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) has changed significantly over the last few decades as cytotoxic and targeted chemotherapies have evolved and resection of (technically feasible) colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has become standard of care for eligible patients. Overall, survival for metastatic CRC has considerably improved, but recurrences are common. Numerous clinical risk scores have been suggested to guide patient selection for CRLM resection, but none perfectly predict outcomes; therefore, a personalized approach to metastatic CRC treatment using genetic profiles for risk stratification and prognostication is a critically important advancement. All patients with suspected metastatic CRC should undergo genetic testing for common oncogene mutations (e.g., KRAS, BRAF, and NRAS) in addition to a triphasic CT scan of the chest, abdomen, and pelvis; if hepatectomy may be entertained and there is concern about the future liver remnant (FLR), liver volumetrics should also be performed. MRI and PET are useful adjuncts for cases in which diagnosis or extent of disease is unclear. The decision to operate should be individualized and based on each patient's condition, tumor biology, and technical resectability. Genetic profiles should be used to inform multidisciplinary meetings surrounding topics of chemotherapy and surgical resection, as well as patient discussions concerning the risks and benefits of surgery. In the end, most patients with technically resectable colorectal cancers and adequate cardiopulmonary fitness benefit from surgical resection, as it remains the only chance of long-term survival.

Adjuvant chemotherapy can prolong recurrence-free survival but did not influence the type of recurrence or subsequent treatment in patients with colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Although liver resection is the only potentially curative treatment for colorectal liver metastases, recurrence is frequent. We previously published the early results of a randomized controlled phase 3 trial showing that adjuvant therapy with uracil-tegafur and leucovorin significantly prolongs recurrence-free survival. This study sought to elucidate the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy on patient survival after an additional follow-up period, building upon the results of our previous study.

METHODS

After resection for colorectal liver metastases, patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin or surgery alone. Patients assigned to the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group received 5 cycles of uracil-tegafur and leucovorin within 8 weeks after surgery.

RESULTS

Patients were assigned to an adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin (n = 90) or a surgery alone (n = 90) group; 3 patients were excluded because of protocol violations. After a median follow-up period of 7.36 years (95% confidence interval, 6.93-7.87), 60 (68.2%) patients in the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group and 61 (68.5%) patients in the surgery alone group developed recurrences. The median recurrence-free survival was 1.45 years (95% confidence interval, 0.96-2.16) in the uracil-tegafur and leucovorin group and 0.70 years (95% confidence interval, 0.44-1.07) in the surgery alone group. The locations and treatments of the first recurrences did not differ between the groups, nor did the overall survival (hazard ratio, 0.86; 95% confidence interval, 0.54-1.38; P = .54). The overall survival was significantly longer in patients who underwent curative repeated resection than in patients who received non-surgical treatment (hazard ratio, 0.25; 95% confidence interval, 0.15-0.40; P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant uracil-tegafur and leucovorin significantly prolonged the recurrence-free survival but not the overall survival. The repeated resection was the most important factor influencing overall survival.

Evolution of Surgical Treatment of Colorectal Liver Metastases in the Real World: Single Center Experience in 1212 Cases

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the treatment of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) has undergone significant evolution thanks to technical improvements as well as oncological advances, which have been the subject of targeted studies aimed at understanding the details of this heterogeneous disease. The purpose of this study is to put together pieces of this complex scenario by providing an overview of the evolution that has occurred in the context of a single center within a multidisciplinary management approach.

METHODS

Between 2005 and 2020, 1212 resections for CRLM were performed at the Hepatobiliary Surgery Division of San Raffaele Hospital, Milan. The series was divided into three historical periods, which were compared in terms of disease characteristics and short- and long-term outcomes: Period 1, 2005-2009 (293 cases); Period 2, 2010-2014 (353 cases); Period 3, 2015-2020 (566 cases). The trends for surgical technical complexity, oncological burden of the disease, use of the laparoscopic approach and use of techniques for hepatic hypertrophy were analyzed year by year. Uni- and multivariate analyses were performed to identify factors associated with inclusion to a laparoscopic approach and with long-term prognosis.

RESULTS

The number of resections performed over the years progressively increased, with an increase in the number of cases with a high Clinical Risk Score and a high profile of technical complexity. The proportion of cases performed laparoscopically increased, but less rapidly compared to other malignant tumors. The risk of postoperative morbidity and mortality was similar in the three analyzed periods. Long-term survival, stratified by Clinical Risk Score, improved in Period 3, while overall survival remained unchanged.

CONCLUSION

The cultural background, the maturation of technical expertise and the consolidation of the multidisciplinary team have resulted in safe expansion of the possibility to offer a curative opportunity to patients, while continuously implementing into clinical practice evidence provided by the literature.

The impact of tranexamic acid on administration of red blood cell transfusions for resection of colorectal liver metastases

BACKGROUND

Red blood cell transfusions (RBCT) remain a concern for patients undergoing hepatectomy. The effect of tranexamic acid (TXA), an anti-fibrinolytic, on receipt of RBCT in colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) resection was examined.

METHODS

Hepatectomies for CRLM over 2009-2014 were included. Primary outcome was 30-day receipt of RBCT. Secondary outcomes were 30-day major morbidity (Clavien-Dindo III-V) and 90-day mortality. Multivariable modelling examined the adjusted association between TXA and outcomes.

RESULTS

Of 433 included patients, 146 (34%) received TXA. TXA patients were more likely to have inflow occlusion (41.8% vs. 23.1%; p < 0.01) and major hepatectomies (56.1% vs. 45.6%; p = 0.0193). TXA was independently associated with lower risk of RBCT (Relative risk (RR) 0.59; 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.42-0.85), but not with 30-day major morbidity (adjusted RR 1.02; 95%CI: 0.64-1.60) and 90-day mortality (univariable RR 0.99; 95%CI: 0.95-1.03).

CONCLUSION

Intraoperative TXA was associated with a 41% reduction in risk of 30 -day receipt of RBCT after hepatectomy for CRLM. This finding is important to potentially improve healthcare resource allocation and patient outcomes. Pending further evidence, intraoperative TXA may be an effective method of reducing RBCT in hepatectomy for CRLM.

Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy for treating recurrent liver cancer

Background

Laparoscopic repeat hepatectomy (LRH) is a technically challenging procedure, so LRH for recurrent liver cancer has not been widely accepted. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review of the current literature to identify and evaluate available data of LRH for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (rHCC) and metastases tumour of liver, especially of colorectal liver metastases (CRLM), focusing on the safety and feasibility.

Methods

A comprehensive search of the PubMed database was performed for all studies published in English evaluating LRH for rHCC and recurrent metastases tumour of liver from 1^st January, 2005 to 1^st June, 2019.

Results

A total of 15 studies which comprised 444 patients and reported outcomes for the efficacy and safety of LRH in the treatment of rHCC or CRLM were included in the present review. Moreover, nine studies compared the perioperative outcomes of LRH versus open repeat hepatectomy (ORH). LRH was superior to ORH with reduced blood loss, shorter operative time, shorter hospital stay and lower morbidity rates.

Conclusions

LRH can safely performed in rHCC or CRLM patients with cirrhosis, previous open hepatectomy, multiple recurrent lesions and tumours located in difficult posterosuperior segments.

Recurrence Patterns After Resection of Colorectal Liver Metastasis are Modified by Perioperative Systemic Chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

This study investigated the impact of perioperative systemic chemotherapy on the recurrence rate and pattern following resection of colorectal liver metastases.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted in two centers. Rates and patterns of recurrence and overall survival (OS) were compared between patients treated with and without perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The clinical risk score (CRS) was used to stratify patients in low risk (CRS 0-2) and high risk (CRS 3-5) of recurrence.

RESULTS

A total of 2020 patients were included, of whom 1442 (71%) received perioperative systemic chemotherapy. The median follow-up was 88 months, and 1289 patients (64%) developed a recurrence. The recurrence pattern was independent of chemotherapy in low-risk patients: intrahepatic recurrences (30% vs. 30%, p = 0.97) and extrahepatic recurrences (38% vs. 39%, p = 0.52). In high-risk patients, no difference in intrahepatic recurrences was found (48% vs. 50%, p = 0.59). However, a lower rate of extrahepatic recurrences (43% vs. 55%, p = 0.007) was observed with perioperative systemic chemotherapy, mainly due to a reduction in pulmonary recurrences (25% vs. 35%, p = 0.007). In competing risk analysis, the cumulative incidence of extrahepatic recurrence was significantly lower with perioperative systemic chemotherapy in high-risk patients only (5-year cumulative incidence 44% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Perioperative chemotherapy was associated with improved OS in high-risk patients (adjusted HR 0.73, 95% CI 0.57-0.94, p = 0.02), but not in low-risk patients (adjusted HR 0.99, 95% CI 0.82-1.19, p = 0.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Perioperative systemic chemotherapy had no association with intrahepatic recurrence, but was associated with fewer pulmonary recurrences and superior OS in high-risk patients only.

Colorectal liver metastases: Current management and future perspectives

The liver is the commonest site of metastatic disease for patients with colorectal cancer, with at least 25% developing colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) during the course of their illness. The management of CRLM has evolved into a complex field requiring input from experienced members of a multi-disciplinary team involving radiology (cross sectional, nuclear medicine and interventional), Oncology, Liver surgery, Colorectal surgery, and Histopathology. Patient management is based on assessment of sophisticated clinical, radiological and biomarker information. Despite incomplete evidence in this very heterogeneous patient group, maximising resection of CRLM using all available techniques remains a key objective and provides the best chance of long-term survival and cure. To this end, liver resection is maximised by the use of downsizing chemotherapy, optimisation of liver remnant by portal vein embolization, associating liver partition and portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy, and combining resection with ablation, in the context of improvements in the functional assessment of the future remnant liver. Liver resection may safely be carried out laparoscopically or open, and synchronously with, or before, colorectal surgery in selected patients. For unresectable patients, treatment options including systemic chemotherapy, targeted biological agents, intra-arterial infusion or bead delivered chemotherapy, tumour ablation, stereotactic radiotherapy, and selective internal radiotherapy contribute to improve survival and may convert initially unresectable patients to operability. Currently evolving areas include biomarker characterisation of tumours, the development of novel systemic agents targeting specific oncogenic pathways, and the potential re-emergence of radical surgical options such as liver transplantation.

Analysis of perioperative outcomes following laparoscopic repeat liver resection compared to laparoscopic primary liver resection based on a single surgeon's experience: A 1:2 propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

We report a single surgeon experience with laparoscopic repeat liver resection (LRLR), and analyse short-term outcomes relative to laparoscopic primary liver resection (LPLR).

METHODS

Two-hundred and twenty-two laparoscopic liver resections were performed from 2012 to 2019 of which 33 were LRLR. 1:2 propensity-score matching was done to compare 32 LRLR with 64 LPLR cohort. We further analyzed the first 16 LRLR cases compared to the subsequent 17 cases.

RESULTS

32 LRLR cases were matched to 64 LPLR cases. Apart from a higher frequency of Pringle maneuver in the LPLR cohort (p = 0.006), there were no differences in other perioperative outcomes. There were more posterosuperior located tumours (75.0% vs 17.6%, p = 0.003) and higher median difficulty score (8.50 vs 5.00, p = 0.025) in the initial 16 LRLR cases compared to the next 17. The earlier group had higher median blood loss (250.00 ml vs 50.00 ml, p = 0.012), but other outcomes were similar.

CONCLUSION

LRLR may be safely performed in selected patients with no difference in key perioperative outcomes compared to LPLR.

Strategies for the delay of surgery in the management of resectable hepatobiliary malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic

Objective

We aimed to review data about delaying strategies for the management of hepatobiliary cancers requiring surgery during the covid-19 pandemic.

Background

Given the covid-19 pandemic, many jurisdictions, to spare resources, have limited access to operating rooms for elective surgical activity, including cancer, thus forcing deferral or cancellation of cancer surgeries. Surgery for hepatobiliary cancer is high-risk and particularly resource-intensive. Surgeons must critically appraise which patients will benefit most from surgery and which ones have other therapeutic options to delay surgery. Little guidance is currently available about potential delaying strategies for hepatobiliary cancers when surgery is not possible.

Methods

An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed the available literature to summarize data relating to standard-of-care surgical management and possible mitigating strategies to be used as a bridge to surgery for colorectal liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hilar cholangiocarcinoma.

Results

Outcomes of surgery during the covid-19 pandemic are reviewed. Resource requirements are summarized, including logistics and adverse effects profiles for hepatectomy and delaying strategies using systemic, percutaneous and radiation ablative, and liver embolic therapies. For each cancer type, the long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatectomy and the clinical tools that can be used to prognosticate for individual patients are detailed.

Conclusions

There are a variety of delaying strategies to consider if availability of operating rooms decreases. This review summarizes available data to provide guidance about possible delaying strategies depending on patient, resource, institution, and systems factors. Multidisciplinary team discussions should be leveraged to consider patient- and tumour-specific information for each individual case.

Timing of Perioperative Chemotherapy Does Not Influence Long-Term Outcome of Patients Undergoing Combined Laparoscopic Colorectal and Liver Resection in Selected Upfront Resectable Synchronous Liver Metastases. World J Surg. 2019;43:3110-3119. [PMID: 31451846 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-019-05142-4]

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare patients undergoing combined colorectal and hepatic surgery with and without neoadjuvant chemotherapy to clarify the prognostic advantage of preoperative oncological treatment in a case-matched analysis using propensity scores and to identify factors predictive of good prognosis in a selected population of Synchronous ColoRectal Liver Metastases (SCRLM).

METHODS

A total of 73 patients who underwent upfront elective combined surgery without preoperative CT for SCRLM in two European tertiary referral centers were selected and constituted the study group (NoNACT group). The NoNACT group was matched (ratio 1:1) with patients who were operated after chemotherapy with neoadjuvant intent (NACT group, the control group). The matching was achieved based on six covariates representative of patients and disease characteristics.

RESULTS

While the characteristics of both colorectal and hepatic procedures were similar, the NoNACT group, as compared to the NACT group, had lower blood loss (200 mL vs. 550 mL). Postoperative stay (9 vs. 12 days) and morbidity rate (24.7% vs. 32.9%) were reduced in the NoNACT compared with the NACT group. Mid- and long-term outcomes were comparable. At multivariable analysis, predictors of long-term outcome were: right colonic neoplasms, RAS mutational status, CRS score ≥3 and the absence of perioperative chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer and synchronous resectable liver metastases does not influence the risk of recurrence in patients with favorable tumor biology, while it was associated with increased intraoperative blood loss and morbidity. There is no strong evidence to recommend upfront chemotherapy in the absence of negative prognostic factors.

Does the difficulty grade of laparoscopic liver resection for colorectal liver metastases correlate with long-term outcomes?

INTRODUCTION

Prognosis of patients with colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) is strongly correlated with the oncological outcome after liver resection. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) difficulty score (IMM difficulty score) on the oncological results in patients treated for CRLM.

METHODS

All patients who underwent LLRs for CRLM from 2000 to 2016 in our department, were retrospectively reviewed. Data regarding difficulty classification, -according to the Institute Mutualiste Montsouris score (IMM)-, recurrence rate, recurrence-free survival (RFS), overall survival (OS) and data regarding margin status were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 520 patients were included. Patients were allocated into 3 groups based on IMM difficulty score of the LLR they underwent: there were 227 (43,6%), 84 (16,2%) and 209 (40,2%) patients in groups I, II and III, respectively. The R₁ resection rate in group I, II and III were 8,8% (20/227), 11,9% (10/84) and 12,4% (26/209) respectively (p = 0.841). Three- and 5-year RFS rates were 77% and 73% in group I, 58% and 51% in group II, 61% and 53% in group III, respectively (p = 0.038). Three and 5-year OS rates were 87% and 80% for group I, 77% and 66% for group II, 80% and 69% for group III respectively (p = 0.022).

CONCLUSION

The higher LLR difficulty score correlates with significant morbidity and worse RFS and OS, although the more technically demanding and difficult cases are not associated with increased rates of positive resection margins and recurrence.

Perioperative outcomes comparing laparoscopic with open repeat liver resection for post-hepatectomy recurrent liver cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Repeat laparoscopic hepatectomy (LRH) offers an option for recurrent tumors in liver remnants following an initial liver resection of recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM) and cholangiocellular carcinoma (CCC), showing advantages in some outcomes. The objective of the study was to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and potential benefits of LRH in comparison with repeat open hepatectomy (ORH) for recurrent liver cancer.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed in compliance with the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis) and AMSTAR (Assessing the methodological quality of systematic reviews) guidelines. We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science to identify studies that compared LRH with ORH from inception to September 30, 2019. Outcomes of interest included operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay, complication rate, transfusion and R0 resection rate. The protocol was registered with the PROSPERO register of systematic reviews.

RESULTS

10 retrospective observational studies were suitable for this analysis, involving 767 patients with 334 undergoing LRH (43.5%) and 433 undergoing ORH (56.5%). Compared with ORH, LRH had less intraoperative blood loss (SMD = -1.03; 95% CI: 1.48~-0.59, P < 0.001), less overall postoperative complications (OR = 0.40; 95% CI: 0.16-0.99, P = 0.048), less major complications (OR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15-0.62, P = 0.001), shorter hospital stay (SMD = -0.98; 95% CI: 1.41~-0.54, P < 0.001) and higher R0 resection rate (OR = 2.30, 95% CI: 1.39-3.81, P = 0.001). It was comparable in operation time (WMD = -7.66; 95% CI: 52.50-37.19, P = 0.738), transfusion rate (OR = 0.33; 95% CI:0.11-1.05, P = 0.060), and mortality (OR = 0.76; 95% CI: 0.27-2.18, P = 0.615) between LRH and ORH.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that LRH is a safe and effective technique. Benefits, especially less intra-operative blood loss, less complications rate, shorter hospital stay and higher R0 resection, might be offered in the laparoscopic approach.

Effect of PET-CT on disease recurrence and management in patients with potentially resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases. Long-term results of a randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Preoperative evaluation of resectable colorectal cancer liver metastases with positron emission tomography (PET) combined with computed tomography (PET-CT) is used extensively. The PETCAM trial evaluated the effect of PET-CT (intervention) vs no PET-CT (control) on surgical management. PET-CT resulted in 8% change in surgical management, therefore, we aimed to compare long-term outcomes (disease-free [DFS], overall survival [OS]).

METHODS

Trial recruitment (2005-2010) had prospective follow-up until 2013. Events from 2013 to 2017 were collected retrospectively. Survival was described by the Kaplan-Meier method and compared with log-rank test. Oncologic risk factors were calculated using Cox proportional hazard models.

RESULTS

Among 404 patients randomized, there were no differences in DFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.13; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.89 to 1.43) or OS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.78-1.32) between groups. For all patients randomized, median DFS (PET-CT vs no PET-CT) was 16 months (95% CI, 13-18) and 15 months (95% CI, 11-22), P = .33. For patients who underwent liver resection (n = 368), DFS (17 vs 16 months, P = .51) and OS (58 months vs 52 months, P = .90) were similar between groups, respectively. Risk factors for DFS and OS were age, tumor size, node-positive disease, extrahepatic metastases and disease-free duration.

CONCLUSION

Preoperative PET-CT changes surgical management in a small percentage of cases, without effect on recurrence rates or long-term survival.

Hepatic resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with liver metastases from colorectal cancer: need for cautious planning

Purpose

Current neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) may enable therapies such as surgical resection and local ablation of metastases in patients with colorectal liver metastasis (CLM). We evaluated outcomes in CLM patients who underwent resection and/or local treatment after NAC and identified prognostic factors for oncologic outcomes.

Methods

Patients who received NAC followed by resection and/or local treatment of hepatic metastasis from 2013 to 2015 were included. Treatment and tumor-related variables were tabulated. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors associated with RFS and OS.

Results

Sixty-eight patients received NAC followed by resection and/or local treatment of hepatic metastases. Targeted therapy was administered in 50% of the patients. RFS was 35.8% at 1 year and 19.4% at 2 years postoperatively. OS was 95.6% at 1 year and 88.2% at 2 years postoperatively. In the multivariable analysis, R1 resection margin (hazard ratio [HR], 3.95; P = 0.008) of the liver metastases and ypN1/ypN2 (HR, 2.356 and 1.983, respectively; P = 0.041) were associated with poor RFS. Both factors were also significantly related to OS.

Conclusion

Resection margin of the metastatic tumor and ypN status are the only relevant factors for RFS and OS in CLM patients treated with NAC. Despite early and high rates of recurrence, CLM patients treated with NAC who undergo resection and/or local treatment have acceptable OS. Multidisciplinary review of candidates for surgery and cautious planning are crucial for achieving optimal outcomes.

Laparoscopic Parenchymal-Sparing Hepatectomy for Multiple Colorectal Liver Metastases Improves Outcomes and Salvageability: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

BACKGROUND

Parenchymal-sparing hepatectomy (PSH) is regarded as the standard of care for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) in open surgery. However, the surgical and oncological benefits of laparoscopic PSH compared with laparoscopic major hepatectomy (MH) have not been fully documented.

METHODS

A total of 269 patients who underwent initial laparoscopic liver resections with curative intent for CRLMs between 2004 and 2017 were enrolled. Preoperative patient characteristics and tumor burden were adjusted with propensity score matching, and laparoscopic PSH was compared with laparoscopic MH after matching.

RESULTS

PSH was performed in 148 patients, while MH was performed in 121 patients. After propensity score matching, 82 PSH and 82 MH patients showed similar preoperative characteristics. PSH was associated with lower rates of major postoperative complications compared with MH (6.1 vs. 15.9%; p = 0.046). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and liver-specific RFS rates were comparable between both groups (p = 0.595 and 0.683). Repeat hepatectomy for liver recurrence was more frequently performed in the PSH group (63.9 vs. 36.4%; p = 0.022), and the PSH group also showed a trend toward a higher overall survival (OS) rate (5-year OS 79.4 vs. 64.3%; p = 0.067). Multivariate analyses revealed that initial MH was one of the risk factors to preclude repeat hepatectomy after liver recurrence (hazard ratio 2.39, p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

Laparoscopic PSH provided surgical and oncological benefits for CRLMs, with less complications, similar recurrence rates, and increased salvageability through repeat hepatectomy, compared with laparoscopic MH. PSH should be the standard approach, even in laparoscopic procedures.

Laparoscopic versus open two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases: A bi-institutional, propensity score-matched study

BACKGROUND

The safety and feasibility of laparoscopic, two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases is poorly evaluated.

METHODS

We reviewed retrospectively 86 consecutive patients who underwent complete two-stage hepatectomy (left lobe clearance as the first stage and standard/extended right hepatectomy as the second stage) for bilobar colorectal liver metastases between 2007 and 2017 in 2 tertiary centers. Short- and long-term outcomes were compared between laparoscopic and open two-stage hepatectomy before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy was performed in 38 patients and open two-stage hepatectomy in 48. After propensity score matching, 25 laparoscopic and 25 open patients showed similar preoperative characteristics. For the first stage, a laparoscopic approach was associated with lesser hospital stays (4 vs 7.5 days; P < .001). For the second stage, a laparoscopic approach was associated with less blood loss (250 vs 500 mL; P = .040), less postoperative complications (32% vs 60%; P = .047), lesser hospital stays (9 vs 16 days; P = .013), and earlier administration of chemotherapy (1.6 vs 2 months; P = .039). Overall survival, recurrence-free survival, and liver-recurrence-free survival were comparable between the groups (3-year overall survival: 80% vs 54%; P = .154; 2-year recurrence-free survival: 20% vs 18%; P = .200; 2-year liver-recurrence-free survival: 39% vs 33%; P = .269). Although both groups had comparable recurrence patterns, repeat hepatectomies for recurrence were performed more frequently in the laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy group (56% vs 0%; P = .006).

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic two-stage hepatectomy for bilobar colorectal liver metastases is safe and feasible with favorable surgical and oncologic outcomes compared to open two-stage hepatectomy.

Survival after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent colorectal liver metastasis: A review and meta-analysis of prognostic factors

BACKGROUND

Frequent recurrent hepatic metastasis after hepatic metastasectomy is a major obstacle in the treatment of colorectal liver metastasis (CRLM). We performed the present systematic review to evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes after repeat hepatectomy for recurrent CRLM and determine factors associated with survival in these patients.

DATA SOURCES

An electronic search of PubMed database was undertaken to identify all relevant peer-reviewed papers published in English between January 2000 and July 2018. Hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were calculated for prognostic factors of overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

The search yielded 34 studies comprising 3039 patients, with a median overall morbidity of 23% (range 8%-71%), mortality of 0 (range 0-6%), and 5-year OS of 42% (range 17%-73%). Pooled analysis showed that primary T3/T4 stage tumor (HR = 1.94; 95% CI: 1.04-3.63), multiple tumors (HR = 1.49; 95% CI: 1.10-2.01), largest liver lesion ≥5 cm (HR = 1.89; 95% CI: 1.11-3.23) and positive surgical margin (HR = 1.80; 95% CI: 1.09-2.97) at initial hepatectomy, and high serum level of carcinoembryonic antigen (HR = 1.87; 95% CI: 1.27-2.74), disease-free interval ≤12 months (HR = 1.34; 95% CI: 1.10-1.62), multiple tumors (HR = 1.64; 95% CI: 1.32-2.02), largest liver lesion ≥5 cm (HR = 1.85; 95% CI: 1.34-2.56), positive surgical margin (HR = 2.25; 95% CI: 1.39-3.65), presence of bilobar disease (HR = 1.62; 95% CI: 1.19-2.20), and extrahepatic metastases (HR = 1.60; 95% CI: 1.23-2.09) at repeat hepatectomy were significantly associated with poor OS.

CONCLUSIONS

Repeat hepatectomy is a safe and effective therapy for recurrent CRLM. Long-term outcome is predicted mainly by factors related to repeat hepatectomy.

Emergency Surgery for Obstructive Colon Cancer in Elderly Patients: Results of a Multicentric Cohort of the French National Surgical Association

BACKGROUND

Although elderly patients constitute most of the patients undergoing surgery for obstructed colon cancer, available data in the literature are very limited.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the management and outcomes of elderly patients treated for obstructed colon cancer.

DESIGN

This was a multicenter, retrospective cohort study.

SETTINGS

Between 2000 and 2015, 2325 patients managed for an obstructed colon cancer in member centers of the French National Surgical Association were identified. Data were collected by each center on a voluntary basis after institutional approval. Bowel obstruction was defined clinically and confirmed by imaging.

PATIENTS

Three age groups were defined, including patients <75 years, 75 to 84 years, and ≥85 years.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Postoperative and oncologic results in elderly patients with an obstructed colon cancer were measured. Relative survival was calculated as the ratio of the overall survival with the survival that would have been expected based on the corresponding general population.

INTERVENTIONS

A total of 302 patients (13%) underwent colonic stent insertion, and 1992 (87%) underwent surgery as emergency procedure.

RESULTS

A total of 2294 patients were analyzed (<75 y, n = 1200 (52%); 75-84 y, n = 650 (28%); and ≥85 y, n = 444 (20%)). Elderly patients were more likely to be women (p < 0.0001), to have proximal colon cancer (p < 0.0001), and to have a higher incidence of comorbidities (p < 0.0001). The use of colonic stent or the type of surgery was identical regardless of age. In patients with resected colon cancer, elderly patients had less stage IV disease (p < 0.0001). The absence of tumor resection (p < 0.0001) and definitive stoma rate increased with age (p < 0.0001). Postoperative mortality and morbidity were significantly higher in elderly patients (p < 0.0001), but surgical morbidity was similar across age groups (p = 0.60). Postoperative morbidity was correlated to the 6-month mortality rate in elderly (p < 0.0001). Overall and disease-free survivals were significantly lower in more elderly patients (p < 0.0001) but relative survival was not (p = 0.09).

LIMITATIONS

It is quite difficult to know how to interpret these data as a whole, given the inherent bias in the study population, lack of ability to stratify by performance status, and long study period duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Elderly patients have high morbidity with lower survival in the highest age ranges of elderly subgroups. These data should be considered when deciding on an operative approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/A964.

Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI): A More Promising Inflammation-Based Prognostic Marker for Patients Undergoing Hepatectomy for Colorectal Liver Metastases

BACKGROUND

Systemic inflammation response is involved in the development and progression of cancers. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of a preoperative Fibrinogen-Albumin Ratio Index (FARI) in patients undergoing hepatectomy for colorectal liver metastases (CRLM) and compare it with established systemic inflammation markers, including the neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio, lymphocyte-monocyte ratio, platelet-lymphocyte ratio, and systemic immune-inflammation index.

METHODS

Patients who underwent hepatectomy for CRLM between November 2002 and December 2016 were considered for inclusion. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was conducted to evaluate the ability of markers in predicting survival. Multivariable Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors for overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS).

RESULTS

A total of 452 consecutive patients were enrolled. The areas under the ROC curve of the FARI in predicting OS and DFS were superior to other inflammatory markers and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA). The optimal cut-off value of the FARI was 7.6%. Patients with a high FARI (> 7.6%) showed significantly decreased OS and DFS (all p < 0.001). In multivariable analysis, the FARI was the only inflammatory marker that independently predicted OS and DFS. Additionally, regardless of patients having a high or low CEA, the FARI further stratified these patients into subgroups with significantly distinct OS and DFS (all p < 0.05). The FARI also showed good clinical utility in patients with different clinical characteristics.

CONCLUSIONS

A preoperative FARI is an independent predictor of OS and DFS for patients undergoing hepatectomy for CRLM, superior to the established systemic inflammation markers and CEA.

Multicentre study of perioperative versus adjuvant chemotherapy for resectable colorectal liver metastases

Background

It is not known whether perioperative chemotherapy, compared with adjuvant chemotherapy alone, improves disease‐free survival (DFS) in patients with upfront resectable colorectal liver metastases (CLM). The aim of this study was to estimate the impact of neoadjuvant 5‐fluorouracil, leucovorin and oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) on DFS in patients with upfront resectable CLM.

Methods

Consecutive patients who presented with up to five resectable CLM at two Japanese and two French centres in 2008–2015 were included in the study. Both French institutions favoured perioperative FOLFOX, whereas the two Japanese groups systematically preferred upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) and Cox regression multivariable models were used to adjust for confounding. The primary outcome was DFS.

Results

Some 300 patients were included: 151 received perioperative chemotherapy and 149 had upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy. The weighted 3‐year DFS rate was 33·5 per cent after perioperative chemotherapy compared with 27·1 per cent after upfront surgery plus adjuvant chemotherapy (hazard ratio (HR) 0·85, 95 per cent c.i. 0·62 to 1·16; P = 0·318). For the subgroup of 165 patients who received adjuvant FOLFOX successfully (for at least 3 months), the adjusted effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was not significant (HR 1·19, 0·74 to 1·90; P = 0·476). No significant effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was observed in multivariable regression analysis.

Conclusion

Compared with adjuvant chemotherapy, perioperative FOLFOX does not improve DFS in patients with resectable CLM, provided adjuvant chemotherapy is given successfully.