Cost Utility Analysis of Dupilumab Versus Endoscopic Sinus Surgery for Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

Multivariate analysis of clinical and radiological risk factors for revision endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: can phenotype predict recurrence?

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to analyse clinical and radiological features (phenotypes) to predict revision risk after functional endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps.

METHOD

Phenotype characteristics of the patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery were analysed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The rates of asthma, aspirin sensitivity, smoking and a positive prick test result were significantly higher in revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery cases (p < 0.001, 0.001, < 0.001 and < 0.001, respectively). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that only gender, pre-operative nasal steroid use, pre-operative systemic steroid use, intra-operative systemic steroid use and smoking were significant risk factors for revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery (p = 0.034, 0.001, 0.010, 0.007 and 0.001, respectively). In addition, only eosinophilia and aspirin sensitivity were significant risk factors for multiple revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery procedures (p = 0.043 and 0.005, odds ratio = 2.4 and 5.2).

CONCLUSION

Beyond the endotype of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, defining clinical and radiological factors enables a valid prediction of patients at high risk of revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

Sinonasal Symptom Correlation With the Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS)

BACKGROUND

Commonly used endoscopic nasal polyp grading scales have been shown to correlate poorly with symptom scores and quality of life metrics. The recently described Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS) is a grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities by describing incremental recurrence in relation to the surgically opened sinus cavities.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine if the POPS correlated with sinonasal symptoms.

METHODS

CRSwNP patients were prospectively administered SNOT-22 questionnaires and graded according to the POPS starting at their 1-month postoperative appointments. Total POPS scores (sum of each side) and Max POPS score (larger value of left and right) were correlated with SNOT-22 total scores and subdomains using Kendall correlation testing.

RESULTS

A total of 127 patients were enrolled in the study. Both Total POPS or Max POPS were significantly correlated to the SNOT-22 total score (P < .001, P < .001), Rhinologic (P < .001, P < .001), Extra-Nasal Rhinologic (P < .001, P < .001), Ear/Facial (P < .001, P < .001), and Psychologic (P = .028, P = .017) subdomains. Kendall's tau indicated strong correlation (≥0.3) with Rhinologic subdomain, moderate correlation (.21-.29) with Extra-Nasal Rhinologic and Ear/Facial subdomains, and weak correlation (.1-.19) with Psychologic subdomain.

CONCLUSION

Previous endoscopic nasal polyp grading scales poorly correlate with symptoms and patient reported outcome measures. The new POPS moderately correlates with the total SNOT-22 score and strongly correlates with the Rhinologic subdomain, indicating that it may have good potential as a tool to evaluate postoperative CRSwNP patients.

[Results of a survey on the current management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Germany]

INTRODUCTION

With a prevalence of 0.55% to 4%, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a relevant part of the daily work of German otolaryngologists. The aim of the questionnaire-based data collection was to assess the current treatment status of CRSwNP in Germany.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

For this purpose, 24 questions within an anonymized online questionnaire were sent to all German ENT departments.

RESULTS

Of 160 contacted ENT departments, 50 participated in the survey (31.3%). Among these, 76% performed more than 100 sinus surgeries annually and 38% treated more than 50 patients with biologics. Saline irrigations (80%) and intranasal glucocorticoids (GCS, 96%) were the most common conservative therapies. Systemic GCSs (52%) and intranasal GCS irrigation (20%) were less common. 80% of departments used biologics in the therapy of CRSwNP with an overall preference for dupilumab (70%). For therapy of aspirin intolerance, biologics (52%) were preferred to aspirin desensitization (26%). Prior to treatment with biologics clinical workup included the nasal polyp score (90%), the SNOT-22 questionnaire (84%), surrogate markers of type 2 inflammation (60%-72%), and computer tomography (50%). Final treatment success was assessed after 24 weeks (50%).

CONCLUSION

Mostly, the responding departments followed German and European recommendations for diagnosis and therapy of CRSwNP. Therapy with biologics is widely used. The value of preoperative systemic GCS and the frequent performance of CT before initiation of therapy with a biologic should be debated in regard to its currently widespread use.

[Decision-making in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in the era of biologics]

Chronic rhinosinusitis is one of the most common chronic diseases in the population. Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) in adults is predominantly characterized by a type 2 inflammatory endotype. If sufficient control cannot be achieved through primary drug therapy, surgical intervention is usually recommended as the next stage of treatment. Nowadays, various biologics are available that have been or will be approved for use in these patients. This review summarizes the presentations from the 29th Congress of the European Rhinologic Society in Sofia 2023 and the latest findings on decision-making in the treatment of CRSwNP. Standard therapy with medication and sinus surgery fails in some patients with CRSwNP. Biologics that act on the type 2 inflammatory pathway led to a reduction in the nasal polyp score (NPS), an improvement in nasal obstruction, and an improvement in quality of life without significant side effects. Biomarkers such as total IgE, serum eosinophils, and Osteoprotegerin (OPG) can provide indications of the success of the treatment. In summary, it can be said that for many patients with recurrent CRSwNP, a combination of paranasal sinus surgery and treatment with a biologic that is precisely tailored to the patient's endotype is the best option. However, the question of which surgical approach and which biologic at which time and for which patient is still ongoing and requires further studies.

Influence of Prior Endoscopic Sinus Surgery Extent on Dupilumab Effectiveness in CRSwNP Patients

BACKGROUND

Guidelines recommend that the vast majority of patients with severe uncontrolled chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) should have at least one endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) prior to starting biologics. Because ESS can be performed with a variable extension, the aim of this study would be to evaluate the association between surgical extensiveness, as measured by ACCESS score, and outcomes collected in patients treated with Dupilumab.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a multicentric retrospective study; patients affected by CRSwNP who were subjected to Dupilumab therapy and who underwent at least one ESS prior to Dupilumab initiation were included. ACCESS score was assigned to each patient's pre-Dupilumab CT scan. Subjective and objective parameters (SNOT-22, NPS, VAS scores, Sniffin' Sticks) were collected before and during the administration of therapy. Statistical correlations between ACCESS scores and clinical outcomes were investigated.

RESULTS

A total of 145 patients were included; mean time from last previous ESS was 68.6 months, and on average, patients were subjected to 2.2 surgeries. Many correlations with ACCESS scores were demonstrated: better NPS at all timepoints and subjective scores (30-days SNOT-22, VAS nasal obstruction, and rhinorrhea) were achieved in patients with low ACCESS score (more extensive ESS). On the other hand, significantly worse VAS loss of smell values were demonstrated in patients with lower ACCESS scores.

CONCLUSION

Dupilumab patients subjected to a prior extensive ESS may have reduced size of polyps and improved subjective indicators, together with a decreased chance to recover smell, when compared with patients who underwent a minimal excision.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1556-1563, 2024.

Biologics versus functional endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a literature review

OBJECTIVE

To review the literature comparing functional endoscopic sinus surgery to dupilumab for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps, in terms of symptom control, cost-effectiveness and complications.

METHOD

A literature review was conducted using PubMed, ScienceDirect and Cochrane databases. Data were extracted manually.

RESULTS

A total of six papers relevant to the main objective were found.

CONCLUSION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps has a significant impact on patients' quality of life. Both functional endoscopic sinus surgery and dupilumab achieve comparable disease control and result in good symptom relief. Dupilumab is far more expensive than functional endoscopic sinus surgery and is not considered cost-effective for the time being. This is expected to change after 10 years when the drug patent expires. More research is needed to compare the complications of both treatment modalities.

Real-Life Study of Patient Preference for Dupilumab or Revision Surgery for Recurrent Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

(1) Background: Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has a high rate of recurrence in patients, despite therapy with local corticosteroids and functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Dupilumab, a recombinant monoclonal human IgG4 antibody directed against the IL-4 receptor α that inhibits both IL-4 and IL-13 signal transduction, is available for symptomatic therapy. Patient preference between repeated surgery and injection therapy with Dupilumab is not known. (2) Methods: Patients who had experienced at least one surgical intervention for nasal polyps and were treated with Dupilumab for at least 3 months completed a retrospective patient questionnaire. (3) Results: In a cohort of 75 previously operated CRSwNP patients, 91.5% preferred therapy with Dupilumab to repeated surgery for nasal polyps. Preference for Dupilumab in the subgroups of patients with concomitant Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Exacerbated Respiratory Disease (N-ERD) (n = 32), patients with concomitant asthma (n = 25), and patients without concomitant disease (n = 18) was 100%, 96%, and 72%, respectively. (4) Conclusions: Patient preference for Dupilumab over repeat surgery is strongest in previously operated CRSwNP patients with concomitant asthma or N-ERD, but remains very high in patients without concomitant disease.

Effectiveness of dupilumab versus endoscopic sinus surgery for the treatment of type-2 chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a preliminary report

PURPOSE

Historically managed with intranasal corticosteroids (INCS) and endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS), type-2 Chronic RhinoSinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) treatment was revolutionized by the introduction of dupilumab but universally accepted guidelines are still lacking.

METHODS

Patients treated at our University Hospital for type-2 CRSwNP were enrolled. Demographic data were collected, as well as laboratory (eosinophils, total IgE), endoscopic [nasal polyps score (NPS), modified Lund-Kennedy score (mLKS)], radiological [Lund-Mackay score (LMS) at CT scan], SNOT-22, and olfactory [Sniffin' Sticks identification test (SSIT)] features. Patients were treated with dupilumab or ESS and re-evaluated after 3 and 12 months.

RESULTS

At 3 and 12 months, patients undergoing ESS achieved a higher reduction of NPS and mLKS, while patients receiving dupilumab experienced a higher improvement at SNOT-22 and SSIT with a greater positive variation in the prevalence of anosmia (- 57.7% vs - 42.9%) and normosmia (+ 37.8 vs + 28.5%). Mean mLKS and LMS were quite similar. Results were independent of clinical features known to contribute to CRSwNP severity, except for patients with ≥ 2 prior ESS who had a significantly lower smell improvement.

CONCLUSION

ESS and dupilumab were effective at reducing CRSwNP inflammatory burning. CRSwNP smell impairment cannot be attributed only to olfactory cleft obstruction and other mechanisms may be involved. Dupilumab acts systemically with poor correlation with NPS. As of today, dupilumab appears to be more suitable for elderly patients with anesthesiological contraindications and/or several previous surgeries, while ESS may represent the first-line choice in surgery-naive patients.

Prescribing Practices and Barriers of Biologics for Chronic Rhinosinusitis Amongst Otolaryngologists

OBJECTIVE(S)

Biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) are an evolving therapeutic option, but there are limited data on physician experiences in prescribing them. The goal of this study was to gain a better understanding of these experiences including prescribing practices, patient factors which guide prescriber decision, and physician and patient-reported issues which might limit cost-effectiveness of these therapies.

METHODS

A survey was distributed to attending otolaryngologists using the Canadian Society of Otolaryngology (CSOHNS) email distribution and eSurvey program. Responses were tabulated for the entire cohort and compared between rhinologists and non-rhinologists where appropriate. Frequencies and proportions were expressed as a percentage of total respondents. Fisher's exact test was used for statistical analysis between groups.

RESULTS

Seventy-nine total survey responses were recorded representing a response rate of 43%. Significantly more rhinologists reported prescribing biologic medications on their own (100% vs. 50%; p < 0.001) and a higher proportion (1 to 10% vs. <1%) of their patients were on biologics compared with non-rhinologists (p = 0.023). Rhinologists were more likely to consider poor response to medical therapies, need for rescue steroids, and comorbid type 2 conditions in their decision to pursue biologics than non-rhinologists, but they also experienced poorer assistance from patient support programs and less availability to medications.

CONCLUSION

Rhinologists are more comfortable with prescribing and managing biologics for CRSwNP compared with non-rhinologist colleagues. Clinicians prescribing biologic medications for CRSwNP should be familiar with guidelines, indications, and potential adverse events.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

N/A Laryngoscope, 2024.

Usefulness of post-operative endoscopic score for optimal treatment selection in recurrent eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

OBJECTIVE

This study retrospectively analysed post-operative endoscopic scores to determine the optimal post-operative treatment in patients with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

METHODS

In total, 339 adults who underwent initial bilateral functional endoscopic sinus surgery for eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis were enrolled. Patients were divided into group A, which required no additional post-operative treatment; group B, which required local/systemic steroids post-operatively; and group C, which further required dupilumab and/or revision surgery.

RESULTS

Sixty-five per cent of patients could be treated with initial functional endoscopic sinus surgery (group A). Post-operative steroids were required in 35 per cent of patients with a post-operative endoscopic score of 30 per cent (group B). Further advanced treatments with dupilumab and/or revision functional endoscopic sinus surgery were required in 10 per cent of patients with a post-operative endoscopic score of 65 per cent (group C).

CONCLUSION

The post functional endoscopic sinus surgery endoscopic score can be used as an index to determine treatment at the time of eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis recurrence.

The current findings in eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is a persistent inflammatory disease of the nasal cavity and paranasal sinuses. Traditional classification is denoted by the presence (CRSwNP) or absence of nasal polyps (CRSsNP). Particularly, CRSwNP is distinguished by the presence of infiltrating cells and inflammatory markers in the nasal mucosa. Patients with CRSwNP in Western countries predominantly display a type 2 endotype, whereas those in Asian regions display a mixed type 2 endotype. Nevertheless, recent transcriptome analyses have revealed two types of nasal polyps - type 2 and non-type 2 polyps, suggesting that geographical differences in endotypes likely resulted from the different proportions of each endotype. Moreover, various endotypes of CRSsNP have been identified, making phenotype a crucial factor for predicting treatment efficacy. Type 2 endotypes, designated as eosinophilic CRS (ECRS) in Japan, are characterized by severe eosinophilic infiltration into the paranasal sinus tissue and are particularly refractory. In this review, we discuss the latest developments in ECRS. We also provide recent findings on the involvement of nasal epithelial cells in pathogenesis.

["Radical" versus "functional" surgery of the paranasal sinuses-A contradiction?]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

The terms "functional" and "radical" paranasal sinus surgery were often considered to be different operations which were mutually exclusive. This overview aims to look at the basics of these terms and surgical procedures and to work out the resulting surgical concepts for clinically relevant indications.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Selective literature analysis using the data base PubMed, corresponding textbooks and resulting secondary literature regarding functional and radical or extended paranasal sinus surgery. Similarly, the current literature regarding clinically relevant indications for sinus surgery were analyzed.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Modern pathophysiological knowledge, anatomically and pathophysiologically substantiated endoscopic surgical procedures and the usage of up to date technical possibilities have resulted in concepts which combine functional and so-called radical or extended surgery of the paranasal sinuses that complement each other and sometimes even overlap. The preoperative diagnosis and definition of underlying diseases are decisive and should be as precise as possible, as the extent and surgical details mainly depend on them: a sole creation of free drainage pathways, an additional creation of anatomical access for subsequent topical treatment or a complete (radical) removal of a pathological process.

Impact of dupilumab prescribing on utilization of medical and surgical therapies for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

KEY POINTS

Increased dupilumab utilization coincided with decreased ESS in patients with CRSwNP between 2019 and 2021. One potential confounder was the concurrent COVID-19 pandemic, which may have negatively impacted surgery utilization rates.

Brazilian guideline for the use of immunobiologicals in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps ‒ 2024 update

INTRODUCTION

Biologics targeting type 2 inflammation have revolutionized the way we treat patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Particularly in severe and difficult-to-control cases, these drugs have provided a new reality for these patients, allowing for the effective and safe treatment of extensive diseases that were not completely managed with the typical strategy of surgery and topical medications.

OBJECTIVES

The experience achieved with the approval of these medications by ANVISA for use in CRSwNP and the knowledge obtained regarding outcomes, adverse effects, and the ideal patient profile prompted the update of the previously published guideline, with a detailed review of the most recent scientific literature, the personal experiences of experts, and the adaptation to the reality of the Brazilian healthcare system, both public and private.

RESULTS

We proposed a new eligibility criterion for biologics in patients with CRSwNP based on four pillars of indication: the impact of the disease on the patient's life, whether in the presence of specific symptoms or in overall quality of life; the extent of sinonasal disease; the presence of type 2 comorbidities, considering other associated diseases that may also benefit from anti-T2 biologics, and the presence of biomarkers to define type 2 inflammation, especially those associated with worse disease prognoses.

CONCLUSIONS

This innovative and pioneering method has two major advantages. First, it ensures a comprehensive evaluation of patients; second, it is flexible, as advancements in our understanding of the disease and changes in cost-effectiveness can be addressed by simply adjusting the required score for indication, without the need to modify the entire evaluation scheme.

Relief of Airflow Limitation and Airway Inflammation by Endoscopic Sinus Surgery in a Patient with Severe Asthma with Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis

Although endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is beneficial in improving asthma symptoms, its impact on the lung function in patients with asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis remains unclear. We herein report a case of severe asthma with eosinophilic chronic rhinosinusitis, in which ESS substantially improved airflow limitation and concomitantly reduced fractional exhaled nitric oxide and blood eosinophil counts. ESS likely relieved airflow limitation by suppressing type 2 inflammatory pathways. This case highlights ESS as a promising strategy for achieving clinical remission in patients with severe asthma and chronic rhinosinusitis.

Should Biologics Be Used Before Aspirin Desensitization in Aspirin-Exacerbated Respiratory Disease?

There has been a paradigm shift in the management of aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease (AERD). It started in 2015 when the first biologic was Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved for severe eosinophilic asthma. Thus, there emerged a new era in the treatment of patients with type 2-mediated airway diseases. This has led to an increasing number of options for patients, undoubtably a great thing, but has left clinicians without a clear answer for how to balance the therapies that exist for AERD, what to recommend for treatment, and how to best assess the benefits and risks of each therapy. This paper aims to explore these benefits and risks, and to provide a roadmap for future studies.

Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis and Pathogenic Role of Protease

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) is an inflammation of the nasal and paranasal sinus mucosa, and eosinophilic CRS (eCRS) is a subtype characterized by significant eosinophil infiltration and immune response by T-helper-2 cells. The pathogenesis of eCRS is heterogeneous and involves various environmental and host factors. Proteases from external sources, such as mites, fungi, and bacteria, have been implicated in inducing type 2 inflammatory reactions. The balance between these proteases and endogenous protease inhibitors (EPIs) is considered important, and their imbalance can potentially lead to type 2 inflammatory reactions, such as eCRS. In this review, we discuss various mechanisms by which exogenous proteases influence eCRS and highlight the emerging role of endogenous protease inhibitors in eCRS pathogenesis.

Reduction in healthcare resource use through 24 months following sinus surgery with steroid-eluting implants in chronic rhinosinusitis patients with and without nasal polyps: a real-world study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the impact of steroid-eluting implants after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) on health care resource use (HCRU) in chronic rhinosinusitis patients with (CRSwNP) and without (CRSsNP) nasal polyps.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study using real-world evidence data included adult patients with CRS who underwent ESS in 2015-2019 with at least 24 months of data before and after ESS. Patients who received implants were matched to patients who did not based on a propensity score developed using baseline characteristics and NP status. HCRU was compared between cohorts within each CRSwNP and CRSsNP subgroup using chi-square tests (binary variables).

RESULTS

The implant cohort in the CRSwNP subgroup had fewer all-cause outpatient (90.0% vs. 93.9%, p < .001) and all-cause otolaryngology (64.3% vs. 76.4%, p < .001) visits as well as fewer endoscopy (40.5% vs. 47.4%, p = .005) and debridement (48.8% vs. 55.6%, p = .007) procedures than the non-implant cohort. The implant cohort in the CRSsNP subgroup had fewer all-cause outpatient (88.9% vs. 94.2%, p < .001) and all-cause otolaryngology (53.5% vs. 74.4%, p < .001) visits as well as fewer endoscopy (31.8% vs. 41.7%, p < .001) and debridement (36.7% vs. 53.4%, p <.001) procedures than the non-implant cohort. Revision sinus surgery was reduced in the implant cohort in both subgroups, and reached statistical significance in the CRSwNP subgroup (3.8% vs. 6.0%, p = .039) but not in the CRSsNP subgroup (3.6% vs. 4.2%, p = .539).

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, patients receiving implants had lower HCRU for 24 months after sinus surgery independent of nasal polyp status, and revision surgery was reduced in CRSwNP patients. These findings provide additional evidence that long-term reductions in HCRU may be achieved with steroid-eluting implant use during sinus surgery.What is known on this topicPatients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) have a disproportionately higher burden of disease and consume greater healthcare resources than chronic rhinosinusitis patients without nasal polyps (CRSsNP).CRSwNP patients represent approximately 30% of CRS patients who undergo surgery, but their clinical course is disproportionally complicated by disease recurrence and revision surgery.Steroid-eluting sinus implants have been shown in clinical trials to improve short-term postoperative outcomes after endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) in CRS patients in general.A recent real-world evidence study reported that steroid-eluting sinus implants following ESS were associated with a reduction in HCRU in CRS patients followed for 18 months, but the impact of implants on HCRU in CRSwNP and CRSsNP patients separately remains unknown. What this study addsIn this observational study, reduced HCRU was observed in CRSwNP and CRSsNP patients who receive steroid-eluting sinus implants.Use of implants in CRSwNP and CRSsNP patients was associated with a significant reduction in healthcare visits (all-cause outpatient, all-cause otolaryngology), and sinus procedures (endoscopy, debridement).Revision surgery was significantly reduced in the implant cohort of CRSwNP patients and trended lower in the implant cohort of CRSsNP patients.Use of implants had no significant impact on all-cause ER/urgent care visits or sinus-related imaging.

Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio might predict the response to dupilumab treatment for patients with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab is a monoclonal antibody against interleukin 4 receptor alpha and has proven to be clinically effective in treating patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, a certain number of patients are non- or partial responders. This study aims to investigate the relevance of inflammatory markers with regard to therapy response to dupilumab in CRSwNP patients.

METHODS

All patients with CRSwNP treated with dupilumab at a tertiary healthcare center with available pretreatment inflammatory markers were included. The values of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) were associated with the outcome. Patients were stratified according to the respective median value (> median was considered high). The binary logistic regression was performed with regard to total treatment response (post-treatment total nasal polyp score (NPS) 0).

RESULTS

A total of 65 CRSwNP patients with available pretreatment peripheral blood values were included in the study. The mean pre- and post-treatment total NPS values were 4.3 ± 1.9 and 1.2 ± 1.6, respectively. High PLR (> 131.2) was independently associated with a 3.9-fold higher probability of reaching the NPS value of 0 in the multivariable analysis. On the other hand, High NLR (> 1.9) did not significantly associate with the outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study provides insights into the potential positive predictive value of the high PLR (> 131.2) in CRSwNP patients regarding treatment with dupilumab. There is a need for further prospective studies for validation of these results, especially in cohorts of patients with severe CRSwNP.

Phenotypic associations of medical polypectomy and revision surgery following endoscopic sinus surgery: a retrospective study of a single-centre experience in Scotland

BACKGROUND

Some chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps patients undergo revision surgery at some point following initial functional endoscopic sinus surgery. This review aimed to identify the predictive factors for recurrence of nasal polyps requiring oral corticosteroids or revision surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps following functional endoscopic sinus surgery.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of 221 patients who underwent functional endoscopic sinus surgery for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a tertiary rhinology centre, between January 2015 and December 2018, was undertaken.

RESULTS

Forty-four (21.6 per cent) patients underwent medical polypectomy, 19 (9 per cent) underwent revision surgery and 51 (24.3 per cent) underwent combined polypectomy during the mean follow-up time of 5.3 years. Patients aged less than 55 years of age, with a history of previous functional endoscopic sinus surgery, peripheral blood eosinophil counts of 300 cells/μl or higher, a Lund-Mackay score of more than 17 and concomitant aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease had significantly increased odds for medical polypectomy, revision surgery and combined polypectomy.

CONCLUSION

Knowing these predictive factors, clinicians can better identify patients with an increased likelihood of severe polyp recurrence and therefore arrange closer follow-up to optimise therapy.

Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS): Development of a New Sinonasal Polyp Grading Scale

OBJECTIVE

Commonly used endoscopic grading scales, such as the nasal polyp scale, inadequately describe the degree of polyposis found postoperatively in the paranasal sinus cavities. The purpose of this study was to create a novel grading system that more accurately characterizes polyp recurrence in postoperative sinus cavities, the Postoperative Polyp Scale (POPS).

METHODS

A modified Delphi method was utilized to establish the POPS using consensus opinion among 13 general otolaryngologists, rhinologists, and allergists. Postoperative endoscopy videos from 50 patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps were reviewed by 7 fellowship-trained rhinologists and scored according to the POPS. Videos were rated again 1 month later by the same reviewers, and scores were assessed for test-retest and inter-rater reliability.

RESULTS

Overall inter-rater reliability for the first and second reviews of the 52 videos was Kf = 0.49 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) and Kf = 0.50 (95% CI 0.42-0.57) for the POPS. Intra-rater reliability showed near-perfect test-retest reliability for the POPS with Kf = 0.80 (95% CI 0.76-0.84).

CONCLUSION

The POPS is an easy-to-use, reliable, and novel objective endoscopic grading scale that more accurately describes polyp recurrence in the postoperative state which will be useful in the future for measuring the efficacy of various medical and surgical interventions.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

5 Laryngoscope, 133:2885-2890, 2023.

Trends in price, spending, and utilization of omalizumab among Medicare beneficiaries

KEY POINTS

Between January 2005 and January 2023, the average selling price of omalizumab increased by nearly 60%. Between 2016 and 2021, Medicare Part B and D spending on omalizumab totaled over $3.7 billion. Between 2016 and 2021, Medicare Part B and D utilization of omalizumab increased by approximately 30%.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of biologics for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in Canada

BACKGROUND

Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab are the three biologics currently approved for use in CRSwNP in Canada. Despite evidence of efficacy, their cost-effectiveness, which is a key factor influencing prescribing patterns, has not yet been compared to each other.

METHODS

A cost-effectiveness model using quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) was constructed using a Decision Tree Markov analysis. A third-party healthcare payer perspective and a 10-year time horizon was used. A willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of 50,000 Canadian dollars (CAD) per QALY was used to determine cost-effectiveness. Dupilumab, omalizumab, and mepolizumab were each compared to each other.

RESULTS

Omalizumab was the most cost-effective biologic using current estimates of cost and efficacy in CRSwNP. Using omalizumab as a baseline, dupilumab had an ICER of $235,305/QALY. Mepolizumab was dominated by omalizumab and dupilumab at the current drug prices and estimates of efficacy. Sensitivity analyses determined that when increasing the WTP threshold to $150,000/QALY, dupilumab became cost-effective compared to omalizumab in 22.5% of simulation scenarios. Additionally, altering dosing frequency had a significant effect on cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

When comparing the relative cost-effectiveness of biologics in recalcitrant CRSwNP, omalizumab currently appears to be the most cost-effective option. Future reductions in drug prices, adjustments to currently approved dosing regimens, better patient selection, and improvements in sinus surgery outcomes will challenge the current cost-effectiveness models and necessitate reassessment as treatments for CRSwNP continue to evolve.

Mepolizumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a heterogeneous upper airway disease that is prevalent globally. Recent research into the molecular basis of the disease has led to the development of biologics as a new therapeutic option for severe and recalcitrant forms of CRSwNP. Mepolizumab is a monoclonal antibody targeting IL-5, one of the signature cytokines of the type 2 immune response and which plays an important role in the pathogenesis of CRSwNP. Here we present the latest evidence behind mepolizumab, examining disease pathophysiology and pharmacology, as well as data from clinical trials, real-life studies and meta-analyses. As we welcome this promising step forward into precision medicine, we discuss practical issues and future perspectives on mepolizumab and biologics for CRSwNP.

The argument against the use of dupilumab in patients with limited polyp burden in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP)

Dupilumab and other biologics have revolutionized the management of recalcitrant polyps in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP). Despite strong evidence for the efficacy of dupilumab in treating polyps, factors such as cost and uncertain efficacy over surgery have limited its use to patients who have failed the use of topical nasal steroids and initial surgical management. Likewise, the use of this drug is often directed towards patients with greater polyp burdens. Recent studies, however, have investigated the use of dupilumab and other biologics in expanded patient populations, including those with limited polyp burden. The overall trend in the literature suggests a future move towards the use of biologics as first-line therapy for all patients with CRSwNP. The arguments against widespread, routine use of dupilumab and biologics in all patients with CRSwNP are threefold. First, endoscopic sinus surgery has been found to provide similar symptomatic benefit to dupilumab in the treatment of these patient populations. The surgical improvement of patients' sinonasal anatomy offers a rapid elimination of sources of ongoing inflammation that contribute to long-term polyp formation and symptoms. Medical non-compliance in this specific patient population is known to be an issue, with surgery offering a much greater long-term prospect of symptomatic relief in non-compliant patients. The second concern revolves around the potential for side effects of dupilumab and other biologics. Initial studies have shown an acceptable safety profile, but trials assessing the use of dupilumab for a separate indication revealed a higher rate of conjunctivitis. Long-term safety data is limited for biologics, and we must be prepared for the possibility of severe, unanticipated adverse events in the future. Our third and most profound concern is the significant cost of dupilumab. This medication is enormously expensive, and all current literature suggests that treatment would need to be life-long to remain effective. Studies comparing endoscopic sinus surgery to various biologics, including dupilumab, have shown comparable overall quality of life metrics with biologics, all while delivering considerably higher anticipated lifetime costs. As our knowledge progresses regarding the efficacy of dupilumab and other biologics in a variety of clinic situations, it is important to understand the context in which these advances are being made. While dupilumab and other biologics offer undeniable efficacy in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis which has failed to respond to standard therapies, we argue that biologics remain only a component of effective management in this patient population. Endoscopic sinus surgery and topical nasal steroids offer equal efficacy and substantially lower costs than biologics, and these factors should be considered when selecting treatment options for patients.

The Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) With Biologics

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps affects a significant portion of the worldwide population. This illness is associated with several chronic conditions and has an important impact on patient quality of life, leading to a great societal economic burden. In recent years, biologic medications have been developed and found to be effective in the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. This review focuses on these treatment options and their ability to improve patient outcomes, including quality of life. It also reviews available evidence with regards to patient selection, monitoring of patients after treatment initiation, and comparison of different biologics and with other treatment options such as sinus surgery.

Management paradigms for chronic rhinosinusitis in individuals with asthma: An evidence-based review with recommendations

BACKGROUND

Despite the significant morbidity associated with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) in individuals with asthma (CRSwA), there is a paucity of codified, evidence-based management strategies for CRS in this population.

METHODS

Using PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Review Databases, a systematic review was performed covering management strategies for CRSwA. A total of 5903 articles were screened, and 70 were included for full-text analysis. After application of exclusion criteria, 53 articles comprised the qualitative synthesis. The level of evidence was graded and benefit-harm assessments, as well as value judgment and recommendations, were provided RESULTS: Strong evidence confirms the benefit of oral and topical medications on sinonasal-specific outcomes in individuals with CRSwA; there is low-grade evidence demonstrating that these agents improve lung function and/or asthma control. Moderate to strong evidence suggests that endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) improves both sinonasal- and asthma-specific quality of life. Although there is insufficient to low evidence to indicate that ESS improves pulmonary function in this population, data indicate a positive impact of this intervention on asthma control. Biologic medications strongly improve both subjective and objective sinonasal- and asthma-specific outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Evidence supports managing CRS in individuals with CRSwA in a stepwise fashion, starting with traditional nonbiologic oral and topical medication, and escalating to second-line treatments, such as ESS and biologics. Optimal treatment of individuals who have CRSwA often requires concurrent, directed management of asthma, as not all CRS interventions impact asthma status.

Definition of severity and treatment response in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a Delphi study among French experts

INTRODUCTION

The introduction of biotherapies has significantly changed the management of patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). These drugs are generally reserved for severe or recurrent CRSwNP. Thus, the concepts of severity of the disease and treatment response must be mastered by otorhinolaryngologists. However, a clear definition of these concepts in CRSwNP is missing.

METHODS

This article focuses on definitions of severity and treatment response in CRSwNP by providing an expert consensus among French rhinologists, using a Delphi study.

RESULTS

The severity assessment should seek the presence of uncontrolled asthma, olfactory disorders, nasal blockage, impaired quality of life (QOL) and cumulative annual dose of systemic corticosteroids.The treatment response should assess the presence of olfactory disorders, nasal blockage, QOL impairment, response to background therapy, resistance and/or dependence to oral corticosteroids, cumulative annual dose of systemic corticosteroids, response to surgery and to biologics.A failure after polypectomy should not be considered as a failure of surgical management of CRSwNP and must discuss the realization of an extended sinus surgery procedure before the prescription of biologics.

CONCLUSION

Definitions of severity, control of CRSwNP, as well as therapeutic strategies to improve patients' QOL achieved high level of consensus.

Real Life Observational Study of Treatment Success of Monoclonal Antibodies for Refractory Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is a mainly type-2-driven inflammatory disease that is often refractory to medical and surgical treatment and characterized by a high rate of recurrence. Monoclonal antibodies have been approved for severe refractory CRSwNP. Randomized controlled trials (RCT) have shown significant improvement in objective and subjective parameters. The results of these RCTs cannot necessarily be transferred to daily routine. The purpose of this retrospective study is to evaluate the treatment effects of biologics in patients with CRSwNP in a real-life setting. Patients treated with one of the approved biologics since July 2020 with at least 6 months follow-up were included in the study. Changes in SNOT-22 and nasal polyp score (NPS), as well as subjective change in sense of smell, number of sinus surgeries prior to and during treatment, comorbidities, discontinuation or change of monoclonal antibody and adverse events were evaluated. Thirty-three patients were included in this study. The mean SNOT-22 score and NPS improved significantly. The subjective assessment of sense of smell showed an improvement in 81.8% of patients. The monoclonal antibody had to be changed in seven patients. No severe adverse events occurred during the initiation of the treatment and follow-up. Biologics can be a treatment option in patients with severe refractory CRSwNP, showing significant improvements in quality of life, symptoms and polyp scores in randomized controlled trials and clinical routine with rare complications. Further research is needed to evaluate possible biomarkers, interdose interval prolongation and long-term safety.

The Role of Biologics in the Treatment of Chronic Rhinosinusitis

The last decade has seen significant developments in the field of biologics for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Translational research borne from knowledge of the pathophysiology of type 2 inflammatory disease of the lower airways and the strong association with CRSwNP, has led to major therapeutic breakthroughs, with phase 3 trials of four biologics completed at the time of writing, and more underway. This article explores the evidence behind biologics for CRSwNP, the guidance on their use and the health economic factors influencing their position amongst the established therapeutic options for this common chronic condition.

Comparative short-term efficacy of endoscopic sinus surgery and biological therapies in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy between endoscopic sinus surgery and different biologics in treating chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults by reviewing the existing clinical trials.

METHODS

Data extraction and risk of bias assessment were conducted by 2 independent reviewers according to the PRISMA recommendations and any disagreement was resolved by a third investigator. Outcomes were measured through a random-effects model. We searched Embase, Web of Science, MEDLINE, Cochrane, and other relevant sources from its inception to April 30, 2022. We included randomized controlled trials(RCTs) involving endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) or biologics in treating adult patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Studies involving other miscellaneous diseases, non-RCT design, and insufficient participants or follow-up were excluded.

RESULTS

In this systematic review, five RCTs and 1748 patients were included. All the biologics, as well as ESS, could significantly improve key nasal outcomes in CRSwNP both at 6 months and 1 year. Dupilumab exhibited better efficacy than ESS in improving SNOT-22 scores at one year. However, ESS showed superiority over three biologics in improving nasal congestion scores (NCS) at two various time points, except for better efficacy of Dupilumab at 1 year. For the loss of smell scores, a greater improvement was observed in the Dupilumab cohort compared with other biologics and even ESS counterparts. Safety analysis showed no significant difference between the ESS cohort and biologic treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

In summary, ESS showed comparable improvement in quality of life and symptoms to Omalizumab, Mepolizumab, and Benralizumab. Dupilumab seems to be more effective than ESS in selected items, whereas head-to-head trials and real-world studies are urgent to compare their efficacy. Our findings also showed that biologics could be applied as alternative or adjuvant therapy for uncontrolled severe CRSwNP.

Canadian multidisciplinary expert consensus on the use of biologics in upper airways: a Delphi study

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) often coexists with lower airway disease. With the overlap between upper and lower airway disease, optimal management of the upper airways is undertaken in conjunction with that of the lower airways. Biologic therapy with targeted activity within the Type 2 inflammatory pathway can improve the clinical signs and symptoms of both upper and lower airway diseases. Knowledge gaps nevertheless exist in how best to approach patient care as a whole. There have been sixteen randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trails performed for CRSwNP targeted components of the Type 2 inflammatory pathway, notably interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5 and IL-13, IL- 5R, IL-33, and immunoglobulin (Ig)E. This white paper considers the perspectives of experts in various disciplines such as rhinology, allergy, and respirology across Canada, all of whom have unique and valuable insights to contribute on how to best approach patients with upper airway disease from a multidisciplinary perspective.

METHODS

A Delphi Method process was utilized involving three rounds of questionnaires in which the first two were completed individually online and the third was discussed on a virtual platform with all the panelists. A national multidisciplinary expert panel of 34 certified specialists was created, composed of 16 rhinologists, 7 allergists, and 11 respirologists who evaluated the 20 original statements on a scale of 1-9 and provided comments. All ratings were quantitively reviewed by mean, median, mode, range, standard deviation and inter-rater reliability. Consensus was defined by relative interrater reliability measures-kappa coefficient ([Formula: see text]) value > 0.61.

RESULTS

After three rounds, a total of 22 statements achieved consensus. This white paper only contains the final agreed upon statements and clear rationale and support for the statements regarding the use of biologics in patients with upper airway disease.

CONCLUSION

This white paper provides guidance to Canadian physicians on the use of biologic therapy for the management of upper airway disease from a multidisciplinary perspective, but the medical and surgical regimen should ultimately be individualized to the patient. As more biologics become available and additional trials are published we will provide updated versions of this white paper every few years.

Clinical outcomes of dupilumab therapy in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in a Canadian tertiary care rhinology practice

BACKGROUND

In 2020, dupilumab became the first monoclonal antibody therapy to be approved by Health Canada for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). The primary aim of this study was to characterize the outcomes in an initial cohort of patients with CRSwNP who have undergone dupilumab therapy.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted of patients with CRSwNP who were treated with dupilumab. Demographic information, comorbidities, number of previous surgeries, and insurance information were collected. The primary outcome were changes in the sinonasal outcome test (SNOT-22) scores from baseline to timepoints after receiving dupilumab.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were considered for dupilumab therapy, and 27 (56%) received coverage or were able to fund the medication independently. Patients waited an average of 3.6 months to obtain access to the medication. The mean age of the patients was 43. Forty-one percent (11/27) of patients had aspirin exacerbated respiratory disease, and 96% (26/27) had a diagnosis of asthma. The mean length of time on dupilumab was 12.1 months. The baseline SNOT-22 score was 60.6. The mean decrease at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 12 months after starting dupilumab was 8.8, 26.5, 42.8, and 33.8, respectively. There were no serious adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Patients treated with dupilumab in a Canadian tertiary care rhinology clinic demonstrated substantial clinical improvement as measured by disease-specific sinonasal outcomes. Further studies are needed to determine the longer-term effectiveness and adverse event profile of this novel therapy.

Cost-utility analysis of dupilumab compared with endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps. Evaluation in Colombia, a developing country

INTRODUCTION

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) compromise's respiratory function, sleep, concentration, work capacity and quality of life, generating high costs for patient and health systems. The aim of the study was to analyze the cost-utility of Dupilumab compared to endoscopic sinus surgery for patients with CRSwNP.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We developed a model-based cost-utility analysis from the perspective of the Colombian health system to compare Dupilumab vs endoscopic nasal surgery in patients with difficult-to-treat CRSwNP. Transition probabilities were extracted from the published literature about CRSwNP and costing was based on local tariffs. We performed probabilistic sensitivity analysis for outcomes, probabilities, and costs (10.000 Monte Carlo simulations).

RESULTS

The cost of dupilumab ($ 142.919) was 7.8 times higher than nasal endoscopic sinus surgery ($ 18.347). In terms of QALYs, surgery generates better results than Dupilumab: 11.78 vs. 9.05 QALYs.

CONCLUSIONS

From the perspective of the health system, endoscopic sinus surgery for the management of CRSwNP is a dominant alternative in all the analyzed scenarios compared to the use of Dupilumab. From a cost-utility point of view, the use of dupilumab should be considered when the patient requires multiple surgeries or when there is a contraindication for surgeries performance.

Considerations for shared decision-making in treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

Shared decision-making is an approach where physicians and patients work together to determine a personalized treatment course. Such an approach is integral to patient-centered care in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). CRSwNP is a chronic inflammatory condition of the sinonasal cavity that can severely impact physical health, smell, and quality of life (QOL). Traditional standard-of-care treatment options include topical (i.e. sprays) and oral corticosteroids and endoscopic sinus surgery, but more recently, novel corticosteroid delivery methods (i.e. high volume irrigations, recently-approved exhalation breath-powered delivering devices, and drug-eluting steroid implants) and 3 new FDA approved biologics directed against type II immunomodulators have become available. The availability of these therapeutics offers exciting new opportunities in CRSwNP management but requires personalized and shared-decision making as each modality has variable impacts on CRSwNP and related comorbid conditions. Studies have published treatment algorithms, but the practical use of these lean guidelines is heavily influenced by the lens of the treating physician, the most common being otolaryngologists and allergy immunologists. Clinical equipoise occurs when there is no basis for one intervention to be regarded as “better” than another. While most guidelines, in general, support the use of topical corticosteroids with or without oral corticosteroids followed by ESS for the majority of unoperated CRSwNP patients, there are situations of clinical equipoise that arise particularly in CRSwNP who have failed surgery or those with severe comorbid conditions. In the shared decision-making process, clinicians and patients must consider symptomatology, goals, comfort, compliance, treatment efficacy, and treatment cost when determining the initial choice of therapy and escalation of therapy with the potential use of multiple modalities for recalcitrant CRSwNP. A summary of salient considerations that might constitute shared decision-making is presented in this summary.

Cost-effectiveness analysis comparing in-office posterior nasal nerve ablation to surgical therapies

BACKGROUND

Recently, in-office posterior nasal nerve ablation (PNA) devices have offered a new tool to treat refractory chronic rhinitis, but their cost-effectiveness relative to traditional interventions such as vidian neurectomy (VN) and posterior nasal neurectomy (PNN) remains unexplored.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the cost-effectiveness of these interventions in patients with refractory chronic rhinitis.

METHODS

A decision tree with embedded Markov models was created to compare the cost-effectiveness of PNN, VN, and PNA, measured in quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) over a 30-year time horizon with a $100,000/QALY willingness-to-pay threshold. One- and two-way sensitivity analyses were completed.

RESULTS

Sensitivity analysis found that in-office PNA became cost-effective compared to VN when patients undergoing PNA were less than 20 % more likely than VN to have symptoms recur; this value was assumed to be twice as likely in the base case. In the base case, however, VN and in-office PNA were more effective and less expensive than PNN, while VN was cost-effective when compared to in-office PNA (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio $11,616.24/QALY). Other assumptions were not found to considerably impact incremental cost-effectiveness.

CONCLUSION

Although highly limited by currently available data, PNA may be cost-effective compared to VN as long-term outcomes on the durability of its effects emerge. These data should not be used by payers considering coverage or utilization since long-term data is still nascent. However, that as new technologies emerge for rhinitis, it will be important to monitor longer-term outcomes to identify high value care, but based on limited data PNA devices may meet this standard.

Economics of Medical and Surgical Management of Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps: A Contemporary Review

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a chronic inflammatory condition with significant patient morbidity and associated healthcare costs. While the economic burden of CRS overall has been previously described, the economic impact of CRSwNP has received less attention. Patients with CRSwNP have higher disease burden and healthcare resource utilization than those with CRS without nasal polyposis. Rapid evolution of medical management in recent years with the use of targeted biologics warrants further investigation into the economic burden of CRSwNP.

OBJECTIVE

Provide an updated review of the literature on the economic impact of CRSwNP.

METHODS

A literature review.

RESULTS

Research shows that patients with CRSwNP have higher direct costs and usage of ambulatory services compared to matched non-CRS controls. Patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS) incur roughly $13,000 in costs which is particularly relevant given the rate of disease recidivism and need for revision surgery associated with CRSwNP. Disease burden additionally leads to indirect costs through loss of wages and productivity due to work absenteeism and presenteeism, with estimates of up to roughly $10,000 lost in mean annual productivity cost in refractory CRSwNP. Several studies have shown FESS to be more cost-effective in intermediate and long-term management than medical therapy with biologics, despite similar long-term outcomes with respect to quality-of-life metrics.

CONCLUSION

CRSwNP is a chronic condition with high recurrence rates making it a challenge to manage over time. Current research suggests that FESS is more cost-effective than medical management, including use of newer biologics. Further investigation into both direct and indirect costs associated with medical management is warranted to perform accurate cost-effectiveness analyses and allow for the best allocation of limited healthcare resources.

Biologics for Nasal Polyps: Synthesizing Current Recommendations into a Practical Clinical Algorithm

BACKGROUND

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) has been traditionally managed with a combination of topical and systemic medical therapy as well as endoscopic sinus surgery. The emergence of biologic therapies that target specific aspects of the inflammatory cascade has ushered in a potentially new paradigm in the management options available for CRSwNP.

PURPOSE

To summarize the current literature and recommendations supporting the use of available biologic therapies for CRSwNP and to develop an algorithm to aid clinical decision-making regarding treatment selection.

METHODS

A review of available literature and studies that demonstrated the clinical efficacy of biologic agents for the treatment of CRSwNP informing current CRSwNP consensus algorithms.

RESULTS

Current biologic medications target immunoglobulin E, interleukins, or interleukin receptors implicated in the Th2 inflammatory cascade. Institution of biologic therapy is now an option for patients who have disease refractory to topical medical therapy and endoscopic sinus surgery, those who cannot tolerate surgery, or patients with other comorbid Th2 diseases. Response to treatment should be monitored at 4-6 months and 1 year after initiating therapy. Across multiple indirect comparisons, dupilumab appears to have the largest therapeutic benefit across multiple subjective and objective outcomes. The choice of therapeutic agent also depends on drug availability, patient tolerance, presence of comorbid illnesses, and cost.

CONCLUSIONS

Biologics are emerging as an important option in the management of patients with CRSwNP. While more data is required to fully inform indications, treatment selection, and health economics related to their use, biologics may offer robust symptom relief to patients who have failed other interventions.

A comparative analysis of endoscopic sinus surgery versus biologics for treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis

BACKGROUND

Comparative effectiveness research between endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) and biologic therapy for severe chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis (CRSwNP) is a nascent field as new therapeutic modalities become clinically available.

METHODS

A prospective, multicenter cohort of CRSwNP patients, undergoing ESS between 2011 and 2019, were compared to phase-3 biologic trial data. Patients undergoing ESS received baseline nasal endoscopy quantified via Lund-Kennedy (LK) grading. Patients meeting inclusion criteria, modified from Dupilumab-LIBERTY-NP-24&52, omalizumab-POLYP-1&2, and Mepolizumab-SYNAPSE clinical trials, were included in this study. Baseline characteristics and outcome measures were compared between these cohorts at 24 weeks and 52 weeks, when possible.

RESULTS

A total of 111 CRSwNP patients met modified inclusion criteria. There were no statistically significant differences in baseline age, sex, asthma status, aspirin-exacerbated respiratory disease status, smell identification, LK-polyp score, and Lund-Mackay computed tomography (CT) scores between ESS and biologic groups. At 24 weeks, ESS demonstrated significantly greater improvements in 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) compared to one (of two) dupilumab trials (p < 0.05) and both omalizumab trials (p < 0.001). ESS associated with significantly lower nasal polyp scores (NPS) compared to dupilumab (p < 0.001) and omalizumab (p < 0.001), despite comparable improvements in smell identification (p > 0.05). At 52 weeks, ESS resulted in statistically similar improvement in SNOT-22 scores compared to dupilumab (p = 0.21), but NPS remained significantly lower in the ESS group compared to dupilumab (p < 0.001) and mepolizumab (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

At 24 weeks and 52 weeks, ESS offers comparable SNOT-22 improvements compared to dupilumab. ESS and dupilumab offer comparable improvement in smell identification at 24 weeks. Compared to omalizumab, ESS offers superior SNOT-22 improvements. ESS offers significantly greater reductions in polyp size compared to omalizumab, dupilumab, and mepolizumab therapies.

Mepolizumab for the treatment of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps in adults

INTRODUCTION

The treatment paradigm for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) is complex, consisting of a combination of conservative, medical and surgical management. High rates of recurrence despite current standard of care has led to the search for treatments that can improve outcomes and limit the treatment burden for patients living with this chronic condition.

AREAS COVERED

Eosinophils are granulocytic white blood cells that proliferate as part of the innate immune response. IL5 is an inflammatory cytokine implicated in the development of eosinophil-associated diseases that has emerged as a target for biologic therapy. Mepolizumab (NUCALA) is a humanized antiIL5 monoclonal antibody that represents a novel therapeutic approach to CRSwNP. The results of multiple clinical trials are encouraging but its real-world implementation requires a thorough cost-benefit analysis across a range of clinical situations.

EXPERT OPINION

: Mepolizumab is an emerging biologic therapy that shows promising potential for the treatment of CRSwNP. It appears to provide both objective and subjective improvement as an addon therapy to standard of care treatment. Its specific role in treatment algorithms remains a topic of discussion. Future research surrounding its efficacy and cost effectiveness as compared to alternative options is needed.

Surgical management of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps under local anaesthesia: indications and results

Objective

Our objective was to specify the indications and duration of effectiveness of Awake Patient Polyp Surgery (APPS) in Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP). Secondary objectives were to evaluate complications and Patient-Reported Experience (PREMs) and Outcome Measures (PROMs).

Methods

We collected information regarding sex, age, comorbidities and treatments. Duration of effectiveness was the duration of non-recurrence defined by the time between APPS and a new treatment. Nasal Polyp Score (NPS) and Visual Analogic Scales (VAS, from 0/10 to 10/10) for nasal obstruction and olfactory disorders were assessed preoperatively and one month after surgery. PREMs were evaluated using a new tool: the APPS score.

Results

Seventy-five patients were enrolled (SR = 3.1, mean age = 60.9 ± 12.3 years). 60% of patients had a previous history of sinus surgery, 90% had stage 4 NPS and more than 60% had overuse of systemic corticosteroids. Mean time of non-recurrence was 31.3 ± 2.3 months. We found a significant improvement (all p < 0.001) for NPS (3.8 ± 0.4 vs 1.5 ± 0.6), VAS obstruction (9.5 ± 1.6 vs 0.9 ± 1.7) and VAS olfactory disorders (4.9 ± 0.2 vs 3.8 ± 1.7). Mean APPS score was 46.3 ± 5.5/50.

Conclusions

APPS is a safe and efficient procedure in the management of CRSwNP.

Comparison of guidelines for prescription and follow-up of biologics for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps

PURPOSE

To compare international and regional guidelines for prescription and monitoring of response to biologics in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP).

METHODS

A literature review was performed to identify publications reporting indications for biologic therapy in CRSwNP. A full-text reading identified specific issues for comparison: prior surgery, evidence of type 2 inflammation (T2I), smell function, comorbidities, use of systemic corticosteroids, impact on quality of life, and endoscopic and CT findings were compared for the prescription, while the monitoring of the treatment was described in relation to timing, classification of response and criteria for withdrawal.

RESULTS

Ten publications were found. Prior surgery was strictly necessary in five guidelines, while in all the remaining it was variably recommended. A confirmation of T2I was considered necessary in one publication, unnecessary in two, and recommended or constituted only one of the factors to consider in seven. All the other issues analyzed were variably considered. Reevaluation was suggested at 4-6 months and 1 year, mostly assessing improvement in the same criteria used for prescription.

CONCLUSIONS

A combination of subjective and objective findings is used for the identification of patients with CRSwNP who are indicated for biologic therapy. Major debate has developed on the need for previous surgery, which is generally recommended, or strictly necessary for some authors. Confirmation of T2I is generally suggested, but compulsory only in a minority of guidelines. Smell function, use of systemic corticosteroids, and the impact on quality of life are the other factors most frequently considered.

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps management in the biologic therapy era: an international YO-IFOS survey

PURPOSE

To investigate the consistency between the international guidelines recommendations and worldwide standard practices regarding diagnostic work-up and follow-up strategies for managing patients with Chronic Rhinosinusitis with Nasal Polyps (CRSwNP) in the era of monoclonal antibodies.

METHODS

A questionnaire developed by the Rhinology section of the Young Otolaryngologists of the International Federation of Oto-rhino-laryngological Societies (Yo-IFOS) included items regarding the management of CRSwNP patients, monoclonal prescription, surgical and follow-up procedures, awareness of biologicals availability, and other relevant clinical practices. The online survey was directed to otolaryngologists and distributed in Europe, North America, South America, and the Middle East through otolaryngological and/or rhinological societies.

RESULTS

A total of 202 responses were analyzed; the mean participants' age was 45 ± 11 (73% men and 27% women), and 31% were from the United States, Canada 19%, Europe 45%, Middle East and South America 5%. Only 60% of the respondents declared using validated symptoms and endoscopic score systems in their clinical practice. Several practice discrepancies emerged in our cohort, including preferred surgical approach, prescription of preoperative oral steroids, and perioperative antibiotics (59% and 58%, respectively), as well as divergent awareness levels of available biologics for CRSwNP worldwide.

CONCLUSIONS

CRSwNP needs a complex and time-consuming assessment, according to the latest guidelines. There seems to be a gap between these recommendations and the real-world data, which should draw more attention to bringing them into uniform clinical practice in the near future.

Updates in biologic therapy for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps and NSAID-exacerbated respiratory disease

Chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) associated with type 2 inflammation and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-exacerbated respiratory disease (N-ERD) can be difficult to control with standard medical therapy and sinus surgery. In this group, biologicals are potentially promising treatment options. The phase III clinical trials for omalizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab and benralizumab in CRSwNP have demonstrated favourable outcomes. Moving forward, direct comparisons among biologicals, refining patient selection criteria for specific biologicals, determining optimal treatment duration and monitoring long-term outcomes are areas of emerging interest. This review summarizes the clinical evidence from the recent 2 years on the role of biologicals in severe CRSwNP and N-ERD, and proposes an approach towards decision-making in their use.

A prospective study on the efficacy of dupilumab in chronic rhinosinusitis with type 2 inflammation

Objective

Treatment for chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP) includes endoscopic sinus surgery and topic and/or systemic corticosteroids, which have only temporary effects. The development of biologic therapies has provided a new treatment paradigm for CRSwNP. Dupilumab is the only biological approved in Italy for CRSwNP, but its efficacy in a real-life context is still scarce.

Methods

We carried out a monocentric prospective study at our institution with a 6-month follow-up on patients administered biweekly 300 mg dupilumab therapy for CRSwNP, prescribed according to EPOS 2020 criteria. Patients were evaluated at baseline and every 2 months.

Results

Median values at baseline and 6 months were, respectively, 3/12 and 8/12 for the Brief Smell Identification Test (p = 0.005), 5/8 and 2/8 for the Nasal Polyp Score (p < 0.001), 10/20 and 6/20 for the Lund-Kennedy score (p < 0.001), 65/110 and 14/110 for the Sinonasal Outcome Test (p < 0.001), and 15/25 and 23/25 for the Asthma Control Test score (p = 0.009). Adverse events were mild, consisting mainly in discomfort at the site of injection. Four patients developed asymptomatic hypereosinophilia. The treatment was not discontinued in any patient.

Conclusions

Dupilumab was confirmed to be an effective and safe treatment for CRSwNP, as previously seen in registrational studies.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the curative effects and safety of endoscopic sinus surgery in children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps

BACKGROUND

At present, the surgical treatment of sinusitis with nasal polyps has made great progress, but its recurrence rate is still high. Therefore, this time, meta-analysis is used to study the therapeutic effect of endoscopic sinus surgery on children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps, analyze its effectiveness and safety, and provide theoretical basis for clinical treatment.

METHODS

Boolean logic searching was adopted to retrieve articles from various databases, including PubMed, Medline, and Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), published from the establishment of the database to December 30, 2021. The following search terms were used: "endoscopic sinus surgery", "antrochoanal polyps", "chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps", and "nasal polyps". Comparative studies on traditional surgical treatment and endoscopic sinus surgery were also screened out. Review Manager was utilized for meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 9 references were included in the study, and most of them were low risk bias (medium and high quality). Meta-analysis showed that there was no statistical heterogeneity between the control group and the experimental group (Chi²=0.03, I²=0%, P=0.98). According to the fixed effect model analysis, the number of patients with polyp formation in the experimental group was significantly less than that in the control group (Z=2.65, P=0.008). Compared with the control group, there is no statistical heterogeneity in the postoperative recurrence (Chi²=1.59, I²=0%, P=0.45). According to the analysis of fixed effect model, the postoperative recurrence in the experimental group is significantly less than that in the control group (Z=2.92, OR =2.78, 95% CI: 1.40-5.52, P=0.004). Compared with the control group, the results of postoperative visual analogue scale (VAS) were statistically different (Chi²=12.63, I²=84%, P=0.002). According to the random effect model analysis, the VAS score of the experimental group was significantly lower than that of the control group (Z=18.06, MD =4.51, 95% CI: 3.96-5.05, P<0.00001).

DISCUSSION

Endoscopic sinus surgery could reduce the postoperative recurrence and pain of patients, and showed high curative effects and safety in the treatment of children with chronic sinusitis with nasal polyps.

Comparison of Different Biologics for Treating Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps: A Network Analysis

BACKGROUND

Several promising clinical trials have demonstrated the effects of type 2 biologics compared with placebos in chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). However, there are no head-to-head randomized controlled trials (RCTs) between the biologics.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy and safety of different biologics used for the treatment of CRSwNP.

METHODS

We systematically identified RCTs investigating the effects of biologics for CRSwNP. Primary outcomes were nasal polyp score (NPS), nasal congestion severity, and serious adverse events. Secondary outcomes included the 22-item Sino-Nasal Outcome Test (SNOT-22) score, loss of smell severity, the University of Pennsylvania Smell Identification Test score, and the Lund-Mackay computed tomography score. Bucher indirect treatment comparison (ITC) was used to compare the outcome parameters.

RESULTS

Seven RCTs (Bachert 2017, OSTRO, POLYP 1, POLYP 2, SINUS-24, SINUS-52, and SYNAPSE) involving 1913 patients and 4 biologics (benralizumab, dupilumab, mepolizumab, and omalizumab) were included for ITC. Dupilumab presented better effects in decreasing NPS and nasal congestion severity compared with the other 3 biologics at 24 weeks of the treatment and at the end of follow-up (more than 48 weeks). Benralizumab was the least effective in reducing nasal congestion severity and SNOT-22 score at 24 weeks. No significant differences were observed between the effects of the other biologics.

CONCLUSION

Our current findings suggest that dupilumab exhibits the best efficacy and safety for the treatment of CRSwNP.

Indications for Absorbable Steroid-Eluting Sinus Implants: Viewpoint via the Delphi Method

Absorbable steroid-eluting sinus implants provide targeted corticosteroid release over a sustained period and are designed to prevent both undesirable adhesion formation and sinus ostia restenosis. Here, we highlight the key evidence of these implants to date and query a group of experts via a Delphi process on the indications and optimal timing for intraoperative or in-office placement of these implants. Six of a total of 12 statements reached consensus and were accepted. Overall, experts largely agree that intraoperative or in-office use of steroid-eluting stents could be considered for patients: (1) who are diabetic or intolerant of oral steroids, (2) undergoing extended frontal sinus surgery, and (3) with recurrent stenosis. Given the lack of expert consensus on other key statements, clinicians should carefully consider these treatment options on a case-by-case basis after shared decision-making.