The C-truncated delta-opioid receptor underwent agonist-dependent activation and desensitization

Molecular Pharmacology of δ-Opioid Receptors

Opioids are among the most effective analgesics available and are the first choice in the treatment of acute severe pain. However, partial efficacy, a tendency to produce tolerance, and a host of ill-tolerated side effects make clinically available opioids less effective in the management of chronic pain syndromes. Given that most therapeutic opioids produce their actions via µ-opioid receptors (MOPrs), other targets are constantly being explored, among which δ-opioid receptors (DOPrs) are being increasingly considered as promising alternatives. This review addresses DOPrs from the perspective of cellular and molecular determinants of their pharmacological diversity. Thus, DOPr ligands are examined in terms of structural and functional variety, DOPrs' capacity to engage a multiplicity of canonical and noncanonical G protein-dependent responses is surveyed, and evidence supporting ligand-specific signaling and regulation is analyzed. Pharmacological DOPr subtypes are examined in light of the ability of DOPr to organize into multimeric arrays and to adopt multiple active conformations as well as differences in ligand kinetics. Current knowledge on DOPr targeting to the membrane is examined as a means of understanding how these receptors are especially active in chronic pain management. Insight into cellular and molecular mechanisms of pharmacological diversity should guide the rational design of more effective, longer-lasting, and better-tolerated opioid analgesics for chronic pain management.

[Electroacupuncture protects the brain against acute ischemic injury via up-regulation of delta-opioid receptor in rats]

OBJECTIVE

To explore the effect of delta-opioid receptor (DOR) in electroacupuncture (EA) protecting the brain against acute ischemic injury.

METHODS

Fifty-one rats were randomly divided into sham ischemia group, ischemia group, sham EA group, EA group, and EA+DOR antagonist (naltrindole) group. Transient focal cerebral ischemia (1 hour) was induced in rat brain by middle cerebral artery occlusion (MCAO) method. EA was applied on Shuigou (GV 26) and Neiguan (PC 6) for 30 min, starting immediately after the onset of reperfusion. Neurological deficit scores and volume of cerebral infarction were detected after 24-hour reperfusion. Other 12 rats were randomly divided into sham ischemia group, ischemia group, EA group and EA + naltrindole group. DOR protein expressions were assessed by Western blotting after 24-hour reperfusion.

RESULTS

In comparison with the ischemia group and sham EA group, EA significantly reduced ischemic infarction and neurological deficits (P<0.05); EA significantly increased the expression of 60 kD DOR protein (P<0.05) and tended to increase that of 36 kD DOR protein (P>0.05). When naltrindole was combined with EA, the naltrindole completely abolished the EA-induced protection in ischemic infarction and neurological deficits, and also arrested the expression of DOR.

CONCLUSION

EA can up-regulate DOR expression and protect the brain from ischemia-reperfusion injury.

Docking studies suggest ligand-specific delta-opioid receptor conformations

An automated docking procedure was used to study binding of a series of delta-selective ligands to three models of the delta-opioid receptor. These models are thought to represent the three ligand-specific receptor conformations. Docking results are in agreement with point mutation studies and suggest that different ligands--agonists and antagonists--may bind to the same binding site under different receptor conformations. Docking to different receptor models (conformations) also suggests that by changing to a receptor-specific conformation, the receptor may open or close different binding sites to other ligands.

Phosphorylation of the delta-opioid receptor regulates its beta-arrestins selectivity and subsequent receptor internalization and adenylyl cyclase desensitization

In the current study, we investigated the role of receptor phosphorylation and beta-arrestins in delta-opioid receptor (DOR) signaling and trafficking by using a DOR mutant in which all Ser/Thr residues in the C terminus were mutated to Ala (DTS). We demonstrated that the DOR agonist D-[Pen(2),Pen(5)]enkephalin could induce receptor internalization and adenylyl cyclase (AC) desensitization of DTS, but with comparatively slower kinetics than those observed with wild type DOR. Blockade of the internalization of DTS by the dominant-negative mutant dynamin, dynamin K44E, did not affect AC desensitization. However, depletion of beta-arrestins almost totally blocked both internalization and AC desensitization of DTS. A BRET assay suggested that DOR phosphorylation promotes receptor selectivity for beta-arrestin 2 over beta-arrestin 1. Furthermore, in mouse embryonic fibroblast (MEF) cells lacking either beta-arrestin 1 (beta arr1(-/-)) or beta-arrestin 2 (beta arr2(-/-)), agonist-induced DTS desensitization and internalization were similar to that observed in wild type MEFs. In contrast, although DOR internalization decreased in both beta arr1(-/-) MEFs and beta arr2(-/-) MEFs, DPDPE-induced DOR desensitization was significantly reduced in beta arr2(-/-) MEFs, but not in beta arr1(-/-) MEFs. Additionally, the BRET assay suggested that depletion of phosphorylation did not influence the stability of the receptor-beta-arrestin complex. Consistent with this observation, DTS did not recycle after internalization, which is like wild type DOR. Taken together, these results indicate that receptor phosphorylation confers DOR selectivity for beta-arrestin 2 without affecting the stability of the receptor-beta-arrestin complex and the fate of the internalized receptor.

Ligand-specific receptor states: Implications for opiate receptor signalling and regulation

Opiate drugs produce their effects by acting upon G protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) and although they are among the most effective analgesics available, their clinical use is restricted by unwanted side effects such as tolerance, physical dependence, respiratory depression, nausea and constipation. As a class, opiates share a common profile of unwanted effects but there are also significant differences in ligand liability for producing these actions. A growing number of studies show that GPCRs may exist in multiple active states that differ in their signalling and regulatory properties and which may distinctively bind different agonists. In this review we summarize evidence supporting the existence of multiple active conformations for MORs and DORs, analyze information favouring the existence of ligand-specific receptor states and assess how ligand-selective efficacy may contribute to the production of longer lasting, better tolerated opiate analgesics.

Comparison of immunoblotted delta opioid receptor proteins expressed in the adult rat brain and their regulation by growth hormone

It has previously been suggested that exogenous growth hormone (GH) affect quality of life and higher brain functions through the endogenous opioid system. Recently, we showed that GH down-regulate 72 and 48 kDa delta opioid receptor (DOR) proteins in the adult rat cerebral cortex and cerebellum. In the present study, we found that an antiserum raised against the N-terminus of the DOR also recognizes a 36 kDa protein, not recognized by a C-terminus-directed antiserum. We aimed to investigate the identity of the 72, 48 and 36 kDa proteins and to further study the effects of GH on their expression in different brain regions. The expression was studied in hypophysectomized (Hx) and untreated normal female rats. One subgroup of Hx rats received GH as a daily subcutaneous injection for 19 days. Our data show that treatment with GH in Hx rats normalized the expression of the 72 kDa protein in the cerebral cortex, whereas no significant effect were observed for the 48 or 36 kDa proteins. However, GH significantly reduced the ratio between the 72 and 36 kDa proteins in different brain regions of Hx rats. Our data suggest that GH reduces the levels of a 72 kDa DOR that likely represents a dimeric form of a 36 kDa DOR post-translationally truncated at the C-terminus, and that altered receptor dimerization may be involved in GH induced effects in the central nervous system.

Insights into the receptor transcription and signaling: implications in opioid tolerance and dependence

Drug addiction has great social and economical implications. In order to resolve this problem, the molecular and cellular basis for drug addiction must be elucidated. For the past three decades, our research has focused on elucidating the molecular mechanisms behind morphine tolerance and dependence. Although there are many working hypotheses, it is our premise that cellular modulation of the receptor signaling, either via transcriptional or post-translational control of the receptor, is the basis for morphine tolerance and dependence. Thus, in the current review, we will summarize our recent work on the transcriptional and post-translational control of the opioid receptor, with special emphasis on the mu-opioid receptor, which is demonstrated to mediate the in vivo functions of morphine.

Internalization and recycling of human mu opioid receptors expressed in Sf9 insect cells

Internalization and recycling of G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), such as the mu-opioid receptor, largely depend on agonist stimulation. Agonist-promoted internalization of some GPCRs has been shown to mediate receptor desensitization, resensitization, and down-regulation. In this study, we investigated whether different mu opioid agonists displayed different effects in receptor internalization and recycling, the potential mechanisms involved in ohmefentanyl-induced internalization process. In transfected Sf9 insect cells expressing 6His-tagged wild type mu opioid receptor, exposure to 100 nM ohmefentanyl caused a maximum internalization of the receptor at 30 min and receptors seemed to reappear at the cell membrane after 60 min as determined by radioligand binding assay. Ohmefentanyl-induced human mu opioid receptor internalization was concentration-dependent, with about 40% of the receptors internalized following a 30-min exposure to 1 microM ohmefentanyl. 10 microM morphine and 1 microM DAMGO could also induce about 40% internalization. The antagonist naloxone and pretreatment with pertussis toxin both blocked ohmefentanyl-induced internalization without affecting internalization themselves. Incubation with sucrose 0.45 M significantly inhibited ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of the mu receptor. The removal of agonists ohmefentanyl and morphine resulted in the receptors gradually returning to the cell surface over a 60 min period, while the removal of agonist DAMGO only partly resulted in the receptor recycling. The results of this study suggest that ohmefentanyl-induced internalization of human mu opioid receptor in Sf9 insect cells occurs via Gi/o protein-dependent process that likely involves clathrin-coated pits. In addition, the recycling process displays the differential modes of action of different agonists.

Desensitization of endogenously expressed delta-opioid receptors: no evidence for involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2

The involvement of G protein-coupled receptor kinase 2 (GRK2) in the agonist-induced desensitization of delta-opioid receptor-mediated inhibition of cAMP formation in NG108-15 mouse neuroblastomaxrat glioma hybrid cells was investigated. Pretreatment of wild-type cells with the delta-opioid receptor agonist [D-Pen(2,5)]-enkephalin (DPDPE; 100 nM) for as little as 5 min produced marked desensitization of subsequent DPDPE-mediated inhibition of iloprost (300 nM)-stimulated cAMP formation. In NG108-15 cells stably overexpressing wild-type GRK2 or dominant negative mutant GRK2 (DNM GRK2), the DPDPE-induced desensitization of cAMP inhibition was the same as in plasmid-transfected control cells. Pretreatment of wild-type cells with the inhibitors of receptor internalization, concanavalin A (0.25 mg ml(-1)) or hypertonic sucrose (0.4 M), also failed to inhibit DPDPE-mediated desensitization. Finally, in NG108-15 cells stably overexpressing G protein-coupled receptor kinase 6 (GRK6), DPDPE-induced desensitization was significantly increased as compared to plasmid-transfected control cells. These results indicate that GRK2 is unlikely to mediate the desensitization of endogenous delta-opioid receptors in NG108-15 cells, but that other GRKs, such as GRK6, may be more important.

Phosphorylation of Ser363, Thr370, and Ser375 residues within the carboxyl tail differentially regulates mu-opioid receptor internalization

Prolonged activation of opioid receptors leads to their phosphorylation, desensitization, internalization, and down-regulation. To elucidate the relationship between mu-opioid receptor (MOR) phosphorylation and the regulation of receptor activity, a series of receptor mutants was constructed in which the 12 Ser/Thr residues of the COOH-terminal portion of the receptor were substituted to Ala, either individually or in combination. All these mutant constructs were stably expressed in human embryonic kidney 293 cells and exhibited similar expression levels and ligand binding properties. Among those 12 Ser/Thr residues, Ser(363), Thr(370), and Ser(375) have been identified as phosphorylation sites. In the absence of the agonist, a basal phosphorylation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) was observed, whereas [d-Ala(2),Me-Phe(4),Gly(5)-ol]enkephalin (DAMGO)-induced receptor phosphorylation occurs at Thr(370) and Ser(375) residues. Furthermore, the role of these phosphorylation sites in regulating the internalization of MOR was investigated. The mutation of Ser(375) to Ala reduced the rate and extent of receptor internalization, whereas mutation of Ser(363) and Thr(370) to Ala accelerated MOR internalization kinetics. The present data show that the basal phosphorylation of MOR could play a role in modulating agonist-induced receptor internalization kinetics. Furthermore, even though mu-receptors and delta-opioid receptors have the same motif encompassing agonist-induced phosphorylation sites, the different agonist-induced internalization properties controlled by these sites suggest differential cellular regulation of these two receptor subtypes.

Hierarchical phosphorylation of delta-opioid receptor regulates agonist-induced receptor desensitization and internalization

Treatment of HEK293 cells expressing the delta-opioid receptor with agonist [d-Pen(2,5)]enkephalin (DPDPE) resulted in the rapid phosphorylation of the receptor. We constructed several mutants of the potential phosphorylation sites (Ser/Thr) at the carboxyl tail of the receptor in order to delineate the receptor phosphorylation sites and the agonist-induced desensitization and internalization. The Ser and Thr were substituted to alanine, and the corresponding mutants were transiently and stably expressed in HEK293 cells. We found that only two residues, i.e. Thr(358) and Ser(363), were phosphorylated, with Ser(363) being critical for the DPDPE-induced phosphorylation of the receptor. Furthermore, using alanine and aspartic acid substitutions, we found that the phosphorylation of the receptor is hierarchical, with Ser(363) as the primary phosphorylation site. Here, we demonstrated that DPDPE-induced rapid receptor desensitization, as measured by adenylyl cyclase activity, and receptor internalization are intimately related to phosphorylation of Thr(358) and Ser(363), with Thr(358) being involved in the receptor internalization.

Deltorphin II-induced rapid desensitization of delta-opioid receptor requires both phosphorylation and internalization of the receptor

Similar to other G protein-coupled receptors, rapid phosphorylation of the delta-opioid receptor in the presence of agonist has been reported. Hence, agonist-induced desensitization of the delta-opioid receptor has been suggested to be via the receptor phosphorylation, arrestin-mediated pathway. However, due to the highly efficient coupling between the delta-opioid receptor and the adenylyl cyclase, the direct correlation between the rates of receptor phosphorylation and receptor desensitization as measured by the adenylyl cyclase activity could not be established. In the current studies, using an ecdysone-inducible expression system to control the delta-opioid receptor levels in HEK293 cells, we could demonstrate that the rate of deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization is dependent on the receptor level. Only at receptor concentrations </=90 fmol/mg of protein were rapid desensitizations (t(12) <10 min) observed. Apparently, deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization involves cellular events in addition to receptor phosphorylation. Mutation of Ser(363) in the carboxyl tail of the delta-opioid receptor to Ala completely abolished the deltorphin II-induced receptor phosphorylation but not the desensitization response. Although the magnitude of desensitization was attenuated, the rate of deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization remained the same in the S363A mutant as compared with wild type. Also, the S363A mutant could internalize in the presence of deltorphin II. Only when the agonist-induced clathrin-coated pit-mediated receptor internalization was blocked by 0.4 m sucrose that the deltorphin II-induced receptor desensitization was abolished in the S363A mutant. Similarly, 0.4 m sucrose could partially block the agonist-induced rapid desensitization in HEK293 cells expressing the wild type delta-opioid receptor. Taken together, these data supported the hypothesis that rapid desensitization of the delta-opioid receptor involves both the phosphorylation and the internalization of the receptor.

Molecular mechanisms and regulation of opioid receptor signaling

Cloning of multiple opioid receptors has presented opportunities to investigate the mechanisms of multiple opioid receptor signaling and the regulation of these signals. The subsequent identification of receptor gene structures has also provided opportunities to study the regulation of receptor gene expression and to manipulate the concentration of the gene products in vivo. Thus, in the current review, we examine recent advances in the delineation basis for the multiple opioid receptor signaling, and their regulation at multiple levels. We discuss the use of receptor knockout animals to investigate the function and the pharmacology of these multiple opioid receptors. The reasons and basis for the multiple opioid receptor are addressed.

Mutational analysis of the structure and function of opioid receptors

The cloning of the opioid receptors allows the investigation of receptor domains involved in the peptidic and nonpeptidic ligand interaction and activation of the opioid receptors. Receptor chimera studies and mutational analysis of the primary sequences of the opioid receptors have provided insights into the structural domains required for the ligand recognition and receptor activation. In the current review, we examine the current reports on the possible involvement of extracellular domains and transmembrane domains in the high-affinity binding of peptidic and nonpeptidic ligands to the opioid receptor. The structural requirement for the receptors' selectivity toward different ligands is discussed. The receptor domains involved in the activation and subsequent cellular regulation of the receptors' activities as determined by mutational analysis will also be discussed. Finally, the validity of the conclusions based on single amino acid mutations is examined.

Human mu-opioid receptor overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells functionally coupled to endogenous Gi/o proteins

Human mu-opioid receptor (HmuOR) with a tag of six consecutive histidines at its carboxyl terminus had been expressed in recombinant baculovirus infected Sf9 insect cells. The maximal binding capacity for the [3H] diprenorphine and [3H]ohmefentanyl (Ohm) were 9.1 +/- 0.7 and 6.52 +/- 0.23 nmol/g protein, respectively. The [3H] diprenorphine or [3H] Ohm binding to the receptor expressed in Sf9 cells was strongly inhibited by mu-selective agonists [D-Ala2, N-methyl-Phe4, glyol5]enkephalin (DAGO), Ohm, and morphine, but neither by delta nor by kappa selective agonist. Na+ (100 mM) and GTP (50 microM) could reduce HmuOR agonists etorphine and Ohm affinity binding to the overexpressed HmuOR. mu-selective agonists DAGO and Ohm effectively stimulated [35S]GTP-gammaS binding (EC50 = 2.7 nM and 6.9 nM) and inhibited forskolin- stimulated cAMP accumulation (IC50 = 0.9 nM and 0.3 nM). The agonist-dependent effects could be blocked by opioid antagonist naloxone or by pretreatment of cells with pertussis toxin (PTX). These results demonstrated that HmuOR overexpressed in Sf9 insect cells functionally coupled to endogenous G(i/o) proteins.

What peptides these deltorphins be

The deltorphins are a class of highly selective delta-opioid heptapeptides from the skin of the Amazonian frogs Phyllomedusa sauvagei and P. bicolor. The first of these fascinating peptides came to light in 1987 by cloning of the cDNA of from frog skins, while the other members of this family were identified either by cDNA or isolation of the peptides. The distinctive feature of deltorphins is the presence of a naturally occurring D-enantiomer at the second position in their common N-terminal sequence, Tyr-D-Xaa-Phe, comparable to dermorphin, which is the prototype of a group of mu-selective opioids from the same source. The D-amino acid and the anionic residues, either Glu or Asp, as well as their unique amino acid compositions are responsible for the remarkable biostability, high delta-receptor affinity, bioactivity and peptide conformation. This review summarizes a decade of research from many laboratories that defined which residues and substituents in the deltorphins interact with the delta-receptor and characterized pharmacological and physiological activities in vitro and in vivo. It begins with a historical description of the topic and presents general schema for the synthesis of peptide analogues of deltorphins A, B and C as a means to document the methods employed in producing a myriad of analogues. Structure activity studies of the peptides and their pharmacological activities in vitro are detailed in abundantly tabulated data. A brief compendium of the current level of knowledge of the delta-receptor assists the reader to appreciate the rationale for the design of these analogues. Discussion of the conformation of these peptides addresses how structure leads to further hypotheses regarding ligand receptor interaction. The review ends with a broad discussion of the potential applications of these peptides in clinical and therapeutic settings.