1
|
Nakamoto T, Yoshida T, Katayama S, Ohe C, Kawaura T, Horii S, Ikeda J, Kono Y, Murota T, Kitawaki T, Araki M, Kinoshita H. Development and Validation of a Preoperative Nomogram for Endoscopic Management Decision Making in Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Ann Surg Oncol 2024; 31:1393-1401. [PMID: 37925655 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-14514-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 10/12/2023] [Indexed: 11/07/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE We aimed to develop and validate a preoperative nomogram that predicts low-grade, non-muscle invasive upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (LG-NMI UTUC), thereby aiding in the accurate selection of endoscopic management (EM) candidates. METHODS This was a retrospective study that included 454 patients who underwent radical surgery (Cohort 1 and Cohort 2), and 26 patients who received EM (Cohort 3). Utilizing a multivariate logistic regression model, a nomogram predicting LG-NMI UTUC was developed based on data from Cohort 1. The nomogram's accuracy was compared with conventional European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) models. External validation was performed using Cohort 2 data, and the nomogram's prognostic value was evaluated via disease progression metrics in Cohort 3. RESULTS In Cohort 1, multivariate analyses highlighted the absence of invasive disease on imaging (odds ratio [OR] 7.04; p = 0.011), absence of hydronephrosis (OR 2.06; p = 0.027), papillary architecture (OR 24.9; p < 0.001), and lack of high-grade urine cytology (OR 0.22; p < 0.001) as independent predictive factors for LG-NMI disease. The nomogram outperformed the two conventional models in predictive accuracy (0.869 vs. 0.759-0.821) and exhibited a higher net benefit in decision curve analysis. The model's clinical efficacy was corroborated in Cohort 2. Moreover, the nomogram stratified disease progression-free survival rates in Cohort 3. CONCLUSION Our nomogram ( https://kmur.shinyapps.io/UTUC_URS/ ) accurately predicts LG-NMI UTUC, thereby identifying suitable candidates for EM. Additionally, the model serves as a useful tool for prognostic stratification in patients undergoing EM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takahiro Nakamoto
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan.
- Faculty of Engineering, Tottori University Graduate School of Engineering, Tottori, Japan.
| | - Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Chisato Ohe
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University Hospital, Osaka, Japan
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takayuki Kawaura
- Department of Mathematics, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Satoshi Horii
- Department of Urology, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Junichi Ikeda
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Yumiko Kono
- Department of Radiology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takashi Murota
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Medical Center, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Tomoki Kitawaki
- Department of Mathematics, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Dentistry, and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Okayama, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gottlieb J, Linehan J, Murray KS. Advances in chemoablation in upper tract urothelial carcinoma: overview of indications and treatment patterns. Transl Androl Urol 2023; 12:1449-1455. [PMID: 37814691 PMCID: PMC10560338 DOI: 10.21037/tau-23-69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 10/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a difficult disease for clinicians to treat, due to the multitude of oncological and patient factors to consider. Despite the challenges of diagnostic staging, endoscopic management, and disease recurrence, there is still a need for local therapeutic options that do not subject patients to the morbidities of radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). Intraluminal chemotherapies have allowed for improved oncological control in patients with low-grade disease receiving renal-sparing treatment approaches. This narrative review discusses the treatment modalities available for localized low-grade UTUC, with a focus on the current status of chemoablation. The OLYMPUS trial was a pivotal study that lead to the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approval of UGN-101 (mitomycin-C) in April 2020 for the treatment of low-grade UTUC, and intraluminal chemotherapy is now a widely used modality for managing this disease. The trial reported a complete response (CR) rate of 59%, and an estimated treatment durability of 82% at 1 year. However, a concern was the reported 44% ureteral stricture rate using the retrograde approach. More research is currently underway to determine the ideal instillation method for intraluminal therapies (e.g., retrograde vs. antegrade). Lastly, we discuss upcoming treatment options. Newer novel agents like padeliporfin vascular targeted photodynamic (VTP) therapy (brand name TOOKAD) are currently being studied, which will in hope provide additional treatment options for UTUC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Josh Gottlieb
- Department of Urologic Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jennifer Linehan
- Department of Urologic Oncology, St. John’s Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Katie S. Murray
- Department of Urology, NYU Langone Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Yoshida T, Ohe C, Nakamoto T, Kinoshita H. Learning from the past and present to change the future: Endoscopic management of upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma. Int J Urol 2023; 30:634-647. [PMID: 37294007 DOI: 10.1111/iju.15208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
Current guidelines recommend endoscopic management (EM) for patients with low-risk upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma, as well as those with an imperative indication. However, regardless of the tumor risk, radical nephroureterectomy is still mainly performed worldwide despite the benefits of EM, such as renal function maintenance, no hemodialysis requirement, and treatment cost reduction. This might be explained by the association of EM with a high risk of local recurrence and progression. Furthermore, the need for rigorous patient selection and close surveillance following EM may be relevant. Nevertheless, recent developments in diagnostic modalities, pathological evaluation, surgical devices and techniques, and intracavitary regimens have been reported, which may contribute to improved risk stratification and treatments with superior oncological outcomes. In this review, considering recent advances in endourology and oncology, we propose novel treatment strategies for optimal EM.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Takashi Yoshida
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Chisato Ohe
- Corporate Sponsored Research Programs for Multicellular Interactions in Cancer, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Takahiro Nakamoto
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
- Department of Pathology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Hidefumi Kinoshita
- Department of Urology and Andrology, Kansai Medical University, Osaka, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shen CY, Jou YC, Kan WC, Tzai TS, Tsai YS. Outcome of Non-Muscle Invasive Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma Receiving Endoscopic Ablation: An Inverse Probability of Treatment Weighting Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11. [PMID: 35268398 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11051307] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2022] [Revised: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
We compared the outcomes in early-stage upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) patients receiving endoscopic ablation (EA) with radical nephroureterectomy (RNU). From 2004 to 2018, cTa/T1N0M0 UTUC patients undergoing EA and RNU were enrolled. For reducing observational bias, propensity scores based on inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) were utilized for comparing the oncologic outcomes and renal function changes. In total, 65 of 184 cTa/T1 UTUC patients were analyzed after exclusion of 119 patients with end-stage renal disease, and lack of previous ureteroscopic biopsy. The studied patients included 23 who received EA and 42 RNU, and both groups were well balanced after adjusting with IPTW. The median follow-up period was 43.6 months. There was no statistical difference between the two groups in terms of oncological outcome. The EA group exhibited less estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) decline one year later (0.0% vs. 20.2%, p < 0.001) and less worsening of chronic kidney status (13.2% vs. 46.5%, p = 0.026). Among patients receiving EA, high-grade tumors exhibited higher subsequent recurrence in the residual urinary tract than did the low-grade ones. (p = 0.037). In summary, endoscopic ablation preserves renal function without compromising oncological outcome in selected UTUC patients. High-grade tumors should be strictly followed up following endoscopic ablation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Ah Hamid AR, Rahman IA, Umbas R, Mochtar CA, Saraswati M, Matondang S. Retroperitoneoscopic proximal ureter resection and ureteroureterostomy as an alternative management for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: A case report. Urol Case Rep 2021; 40:101944. [PMID: 34849346 PMCID: PMC8609137 DOI: 10.1016/j.eucr.2021.101944] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2021] [Revised: 11/08/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) with bladder cuff removal is the treatment of choice for upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC). Partial ureterectomy (PU) with ureteroureterostomy in this case has shown a good result. We herein report an elderly woman with adenocarcinoma colon complaining gross intermittent hematuria and solid ureteral mass on NCCT. Patient declined RNU, so we performed PU with ureteroureterostomy. Histology examination showed high-grade infiltrating urothelial carcinoma with negative margin. Four cycles of Gemcitabine and cisplatin were given. Routine follow up and evaluation were done without any mass progression. PU and ureteroureterostomy with adjuvant chemotherapy are an alternative procedure for UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agus Rizal Ah Hamid
- Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| | - Irham Arif Rahman
- Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| | - Rainy Umbas
- Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| | - Chaidir Arif Mochtar
- Department of Urology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| | - Meilania Saraswati
- Department of Anatomical Pathology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| | - Sahat Matondang
- Department of Radiology, Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Universitas Indonesia, Pangeran Diponegoro No 71, Jakarta, 10310, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Fero KE, Shan Y, Lec PM, Sharma V, Srinivasan A, Movva G, Baillargeon J, Chamie K, Williams SB. Treatment Patterns, Outcomes, and Costs Associated With Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. JNCI Cancer Spectr 2021; 5:pkab085. [PMID: 34805743 PMCID: PMC8599752 DOI: 10.1093/jncics/pkab085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2021] [Revised: 07/28/2021] [Accepted: 08/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is a heterogeneous disease that presents a clinical management challenge for the urologic surgeon. We assessed treatment patterns, costs, and survival outcomes among patients with nonmetastatic UTUC. Methods We identified 4114 patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic UTUC from 2004 to 2013 in the Survival Epidemiology, and End Results-Medicare population-based database. Patients were stratified into low- or high-risk disease groups. Median total costs from 30 days prior to diagnosis through 365 days after diagnosis were compared between groups. Overall and cancer-specific survival were evaluated using Cox proportional hazards regression. All statistical tests were 2-sided. Results After risk stratification, 1027 (24.9%) and 3087 (75.0%) patients were classified into low- vs high-risk UTUC groups. Most patients underwent at least 1 surgical intervention (95.1%); 68.4% underwent at least 1 endoscopic intervention. Patients diagnosed with high- vs low-risk UTUC were more likely to undergo nephroureterectomy (83.6% vs 72.0%; P < .001); few patients with low-risk disease were exclusively managed endoscopically (16.9%). At 365 days after diagnosis, costs of care for high- vs low-risk UTUC were statistically significantly higher ($108 520 vs $91 233; median difference $16 704, 95% confidence interval [CI] = $11 619 to $21 778; P < .001). Those with high-risk UTUC had worse cancer-specific and overall survival compared with patients with low-risk UTUC (cancer-specific survival hazard ratio [HR] = 4.14, 95% CI = 3.19 to 5.37; overall survival HR = 1.78, 95% CI = 1.62 to 1.96). Conclusions UTUC continues to be managed primarily with nephroureterectomy, regardless of risk stratification, and patients with high-risk UTUC have worse overall and cancer-specific survival. Substantial costs are associated with management of low- and high-risk UTUC, with the latter being more costly up to 1 year from diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine E Fero
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Yong Shan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Patrick M Lec
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Vidit Sharma
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Aditya Srinivasan
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Giri Movva
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Jacques Baillargeon
- Department of Medicine, Division of Epidemiology, Sealy Center on Aging, The University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston, Galveston, TX, USA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Stephen B Williams
- Department of Surgery, Division of Urology, The University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ng Chieng Hin J, Hettiarachchilage D, Gravestock P, Rai B, Somani BK, Veeratterapillay R. Role of Ureteroscopy in Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Curr Urol Rep 2021; 22:49. [PMID: 34622345 PMCID: PMC8497313 DOI: 10.1007/s11934-021-01065-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Purpose of Review Upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) is uncommon accounting for less than 10% of all urothelial tumours. Ureteroscopic management (URS) is the first line treatment for low-risk disease and has been increasingly utilised due to technological advances and increasing surgical experience. This review looks at patient outcomes relating to URS, emerging technologies and the role of adjuvant intracavitary therapy in the management of UTUC. Recent Findings URS has firmly established itself in the management algorithm for UTUC, and a good body of evidence supports its use for low-risk disease, wherein oncological outcomes are comparable to traditional nephroureterectomy (RNU). Larger tumours can now be managed using URS with a lower morbidity than radical surgery, though with higher associated local recurrence rate and risk of progression to RNU, and as a result, patient selection and close surveillance remains key. There is limited evidence for adjuvant intracavitary therapy (Mitomycin C or BCG) in UTUC although the development of novel polymers and biodegradable stents may improve drug delivery to the upper urinary tract. Summary URS has a clearly defined role in low-risk UTUC, and its use in larger tumours appears to be appropriate in a selected cohort of patients. The efficacy of adjuvant intracavitary therapy is as of yet undetermined, though developments in delivery techniques are promising. Likewise further developments of laser technology are anticipated to further expand the role of URS. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11934-021-01065-7.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Bhavan Rai
- Department of Urology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle, UK
| | - Bhaskar K Somani
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Southamptom, Southamptom, UK.
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Shenhar C, Veredgorn Y, Bulis S, Aviv T, Darawsha AE, Gilad R, Baniel J, Ehrlich Y, Lifshitz D. Endoscopic Management of Low-Grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: Characterizing the Long-term Burden of Care in Comparison to Radical Nephroureterectomy. Urology 2021; 159:152-159. [PMID: 34536409 DOI: 10.1016/j.urology.2021.06.053] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/31/2021] [Revised: 06/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/22/2021] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare procedure burden, oncologic, surgical and renal-function outcomes between patients with low-grade upper urothelial cancer (UTUC) who were referred for either radical management (RM) or kidney-sparing endoscopic management (EM). PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data of all patients treated for UTUC at our tertiary medical center between 2000 and 2018 and selected patients diagnosed with unilateral low-grade UTUC. RESULTS Twenty-four patients were treated with EM and 37 with RM. Surgical and oncologic risk factors were similar between the arms except for tumor size. Mean follow-up was 4.9 ± 3.4 years. The 5-year overall-survival rate was 85% with EM and 84% with RM (P = .707). Metastasis-free and cancer-specific survival were also similar (P = .994, P = .960). End-of-follow-up average glomerular filtration rates were 58.7 ± 21.5 and 49.2 ± 22.1 mL/min/1.73 m2, respectively (P = .12). Ninety-two percent of patients managed endoscopically had local recurrences, with an average of 3.2 recurrences per patient. Four (17%) patients underwent salvage radical nephroureterectomy. Procedure burden was higher with EM, having 6.5 ± 4.4 operations and 344 ± 272 minutes under anesthesia compared with 1.9 ± 0.4 operations (P <.0001) and 213 ± 84 minutes under anesthesia (P = .031) with RM. Cost-of-care analysis revealed higher costs for EM in both private and publicly funded medical insurance plans. CONCLUSION Patients undergoing endoscopic management had an 83% chance of preserving their kidney and an 81% chance of 5-year metastasis-free survival at a cost of 6.5 ± 4.4 operations during a mean follow-up of 4.9 ± 3.4 years. Our findings support EM for low-grade UTUC as a valid option from oncological aspects but highlight the associated costs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chen Shenhar
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel.
| | - Yotam Veredgorn
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel; Department of Urology, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Shir Bulis
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Tzach Aviv
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Abd Elhalim Darawsha
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Ron Gilad
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Jack Baniel
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Yaron Ehrlich
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - David Lifshitz
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Petah Tikva, Israel, Affiliated with the Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katayama S, Mori K, Schuettfort VM, Pradere B, Mostafaei H, Quhal F, Rajwa P, Motlagh RS, Laukhtina E, Moschini M, Grossmann NC, Araki M, Teoh JYC, Rouprêt M, Margulis V, Enikeev D, Karakiewicz PI, Abufaraj M, Compérat E, Nasu Y, Shariat SF. Accuracy and Clinical Utility of a Tumor Grade- and Stage-based Predictive Model in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma. Eur Urol Focus 2021; 8:761-768. [PMID: 34053904 DOI: 10.1016/j.euf.2021.05.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Revised: 04/21/2021] [Accepted: 05/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Among various clinicopathologic factors used to identify low-risk upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), tumor grade and stage are of utmost importance. The clinical value added by inclusion of other risk factors remains unproven. OBJECTIVE To assess the performance of a tumor grade- and stage-based (GS) model to identify patients with UTUC for whom kidney-sparing surgery (KSS) could be attempted. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS In this international study, we reviewed the medical records of 1240 patients with UTUC who underwent radical nephroureterectomy. Complete data needed for risk stratification according to the European Association of Urology (EAU) and National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) guidelines were available for 560 patients. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were performed to determine if risk factors were associated with the presence of localized UTUC. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy of the GS, EAU, and NCCN models in predicting pathologic stage were calculated. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS Overall, 198 patients (35%) had clinically low-grade, noninvasive tumors, and 283 (51%) had ≤pT1disease. On multivariable analyses, none of the EAU and NCCN risk factors were associated with the presence of non-muscle-invasive UTUC among patients with low-grade and low-stage UTUC. The GS model exhibited the highest accuracy, sensitivity, and negative predictive value among all three models. According to the GS, EAU, and NCCN models, the proportion of patients eligible for KSS was 35%, 6%, and 4%, respectively. Decision curve analysis revealed that the net benefit of the three models was similar within the clinically reasonable range of probability thresholds. CONCLUSIONS The GS model showed favorable predictive accuracy and identified a greater number of KSS-eligible patients than the EAU and NCCN models. A decision-making algorithm that weighs the benefits of avoiding unnecessary kidney loss against the risk of undertreatment in case of advanced carcinoma is necessary for individualized treatment for UTUC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY We assessed the ability of three models to predict low-grade, low-stage disease in patients with cancer of the upper urinary tract. No risk factors other than grade assessed on biopsy and stage assessed from scans were associated with better prediction of localized cancer. A model based on grade and stage may help to identify patients who could benefit from kidney-sparing treatment of their cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Satoshi Katayama
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Keiichiro Mori
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, The Jikei University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
| | - Victor M Schuettfort
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Benjamin Pradere
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital of Tours, Tours, France
| | - Hadi Mostafaei
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
| | - Fahad Quhal
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, King Fahad Specialist Hospital, Dammam, Saudi Arabia
| | - Pawel Rajwa
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Medical University of Silesia, Zabrze, Poland
| | - Reza Sari Motlagh
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Ekaterina Laukhtina
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marco Moschini
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, Luzerner Kantonsspital, Luzern, Switzerland
| | - Nico C Grossmann
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Department of Urology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Motoo Araki
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh
- S.H. Ho Urology Centre, Department of Surgery, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Morgan Rouprêt
- GRC 5 Predictive Onco-Uro, Urology, Sorbonne University, Pitie-Salpetriere Hospital, Paris, France
| | - Vitaly Margulis
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Dmitry Enikeev
- Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, University of Montreal Health Centre, Montreal, Canada
| | - Mohammad Abufaraj
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan
| | - Eva Compérat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Yasutomo Nasu
- Department of Urology, Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine, Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences, Okayama, Japan
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health, Sechenov University, Moscow, Russia; Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; Research Division of Urology, Department of Special Surgery, The University of Jordan, Amman, Jordan; Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA; Department of Urology, Second Faculty of Medicine, Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology, Vienna, Austria; European Association of Urology Research Foundation, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Shabsigh A, Kleinmann N, Smith AB, Scherr D, Seltzer E, Schoenberg M, Lerner SP. Pharmacokinetics of UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel instilled via retrograde catheter for the treatment of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 2021; 87:799-805. [PMID: 33677615 PMCID: PMC8110485 DOI: 10.1007/s00280-021-04246-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the pharmacokinetic properties of UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel used as primary chemoablative treatment for low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), in a subset of patients participating in a phase 3 clinical trial. METHODS Pharmacokinetic parameters (Cmax, Tmax, AUC(0-6), λz, t½, and AUCinf) were evaluated in six participants (male or female, ≥ 18 years) with biopsy-proven, low-grade UTUC who received the first of 6 once-weekly instillations of UGN-101 to the renal pelvis and calyces via retrograde ureteral catheter. Plasma samples were collected prior to instillation and 30 min, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 h post-instillation. Safety was assessed by laboratory evaluations, physical exam, and adverse event monitoring. RESULTS The mean age of the six participants was 69 years; most were male (5/6) and Caucasian (5/6). Mean (SD) Cmax was 6.24 (4.11) ng/mL and mean Tmax was 1.79 (1.89) hours after instillation. Mean apparent t½ following instillation was 1.27 (0.63) hours. Mean total systemic exposure to mitomycin up to 6 h post-instillation was 20.30 (19.69) ng h/mL. At 6 h post-instillation, mitomycin plasma concentrations of 5/6 participants were < 2 ng/mL. There were no clinically important adverse events or changes in laboratory values in any participant after a single instillation of UGN-101. CONCLUSION The reverse thermal gel formulation of UGN-101 is associated with higher concentration and extended dwell time of mitomycin in contact with the urothelium of the upper urinary tract while limiting systemic absorption of mitomycin. REGISTRATION NCT02793128; registered June 8, 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Shabsigh
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, 300 W 10th Ave, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
| | - Nir Kleinmann
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Douglas Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Mark Schoenberg
- UroGen Pharma, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Scott Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Scotland KB, Hubbard L, Cason D, Banks J, Leong JY, Healy K, Leiby B, Hubosky SG, Bagley DH. Long term outcomes of ureteroscopic management of upper tract urothelial carcinoma. Urol Oncol 2020; 38:850.e17-850.e26. [DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2020.06.027] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2020] [Accepted: 06/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
12
|
Raman JD. Adjuvant and ablative therapies for low-risk UTUC: avenues to enhance kidney preservation. Nat Rev Urol 2020; 17:433-434. [DOI: 10.1038/s41585-020-0338-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
|
13
|
Kleinmann N, Matin SF, Pierorazio PM, Gore JL, Shabsigh A, Hu B, Chamie K, Godoy G, Hubosky S, Rivera M, O'Donnell M, Quek M, Raman JD, Knoedler JJ, Scherr D, Stern J, Weight C, Weizer A, Woods M, Kaimakliotis H, Smith AB, Linehan J, Coleman J, Humphreys MR, Pak R, Lifshitz D, Verni M, Adibi M, Amin MB, Seltzer E, Klein I, Konorty M, Strauss-Ayali D, Hakim G, Schoenberg M, Lerner SP. Primary chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial carcinoma using UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel (OLYMPUS): an open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol 2020; 21:776-785. [PMID: 32631491 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(20)30147-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/20/2019] [Revised: 02/20/2020] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Most patients with low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer are treated by radical nephroureterectomy. We aimed to assess the safety and activity of a non-surgical treatment using instillation of UGN-101, a mitomycin-containing reverse thermal gel. METHODS In this open-label, single-arm, phase 3 trial, participants were recruited from 24 academic sites in the USA and Israel. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with primary or recurrent biopsy-proven, low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer (measuring 5-15 mm in maximum diameter) and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of less than 3 (Karnofsky Performance Status score >40) were registered to receive six instillations of once-weekly UGN-101 (mitomycin 4 mg per mL; dosed according to volume of patient's renal pelvis and calyces, maximum 60 mg per instillation) via retrograde catheter to the renal pelvis and calyces. All patients had a planned primary disease evaluation 4-6 weeks after the completion of initial therapy, in which the primary outcome of complete response was assessed, defined as negative 3-month ureteroscopic evaluation, negative cytology, and negative for-cause biopsy. Activity (complete response, expected to occur in >15% of patients) and safety were assessed by the investigator in all patients who received at least one dose of UGN-101. Data presented are from the data cutoff on May 22, 2019. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02793128. FINDINGS Between April 6, 2017, and Nov 26, 2018, 71 (96%) of 74 enrolled patients received at least one dose of UGN-101. 42 (59%, 95% CI 47-71; p<0·0001) patients had a complete response at the primary disease evaluation visit. The median follow-up for patients with a complete response was 11·0 months (IQR 5·1-12·4). The most frequently reported all-cause adverse events were ureteric stenosis in 31 (44%) of 71 patients, urinary tract infection in 23 (32%), haematuria in 22 (31%), flank pain in 21 (30%), and nausea in 17 (24%). 19 (27%) of 71 patients had study drug-related or procedure-related serious adverse events. No deaths were regarded as related to treatment. INTERPRETATION Primary chemoablation of low-grade upper tract urothelial cancer with intracavitary UGN-101 results in clinically significant disease eradication and might offer a kidney-sparing treatment alternative for these patients. FUNDING UroGen Pharma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Kleinmann
- Department of Urology, Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Surena F Matin
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | | | - John L Gore
- Department of Urology, University of Washington Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA
| | - Ahmad Shabsigh
- Department of Urology, The Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center, Columbus, OH, USA
| | - Brian Hu
- Department of Urology, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - Karim Chamie
- Department of Urology, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Guilherme Godoy
- Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Scott Hubosky
- Department of Urology, Sidney Kimmel Medical College at Thomas Jefferson University Hospitals, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Marcelino Rivera
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Health System, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | | - Marcus Quek
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Jay D Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - John J Knoedler
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Douglas Scherr
- Department of Urology, Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, NY, USA
| | - Joshua Stern
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA
| | - Christopher Weight
- Department of Urology, University of Minnesota Health, Minneapolis, MN, USA
| | - Alon Weizer
- Department of Urology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA
| | - Michael Woods
- Department of Urology, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA
| | - Hristos Kaimakliotis
- Department of Urology, Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, IN, USA
| | - Angela B Smith
- Department of Urology, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jennifer Linehan
- Department of Urology, John Wayne Cancer Institute, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Jonathan Coleman
- Department of Urology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA
| | | | - Raymond Pak
- Department of Urology, Mayo Clinic Jacksonville, Jacksonville, FL, USA
| | - David Lifshitz
- Department of Urology, Rabin Medical Center, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | | | - Mehrad Adibi
- Department of Urology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Mahul B Amin
- Department of Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, TN, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Mark Schoenberg
- Department of Urology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, NY, USA; UroGen Pharma, New York, NY, USA
| | - Seth P Lerner
- Department of Urology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Raman J, Shore ND. Management of Low-grade Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: An Unmet Need. Rev Urol 2020; 22:1-8. [PMID: 32523465 PMCID: PMC7265178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
Upper tract urothelial cancers (UTUC) are frequently managed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU), a major operative procedure that may entail short-term morbidity and long-term decline in renal function. Kidney-sparing procedures offer a less invasive alternative to RNU for low-risk, low-grade UTUC (LG-UTUC). They are associated with similar disease-specific survival rates and better long-term renal function, albeit with a potentially increased risk of recurrence. Strategies to decrease LG-UTUC recurrence include improved risk stratification and enhanced endoscopic instrumentation. Chemoablation may represent an alternative, innovative kidney-sparing approach for LG-UTUC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jay Raman
- Division of Urology, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center Hershey, PA
| | - Neal D Shore
- Atlantic Urology Clinics and Carolina Urologic Research Center Myrtle Beach, SC
| |
Collapse
|