Axial psoriatic arthritis: the impact of underdiagnosed disease on outcomes in real life

Characteristics of patients with psoriatic arthritis in Korea: focusing on axial involvement

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We aimed to clarify the clinical characteristics of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Korean patients focusing on PsA with axial involvement.

METHODS

A retrospective medical chart review was performed to identify PsA patients at a single tertiary center. Cases of AS patients with psoriasis were recruited from a prospective AS registry of the same center. Demographics, laboratory findings, and radiologic characteristics were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 69 PsA patients were identified. In PsA patients, spondylitis (46.4%) was the most common form. Compared to AS patients with psoriasis, PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement were older (50.9 vs. 32.4 years; p < 0.001) and showed greater peripheral disease activity (peripheral arthritis 78.1 vs. 12.5%, p < 0.001; enthesitis 50.0 vs. 6.3%, p = 0.003). AS patients with psoriasis presented a higher rate of HLA-B*27 positivity (81.3 vs. 17.2%; p < 0.001) and a more frequent history of inflammatory back pain (100.0 vs. 75.0%; p = 0.039) than PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement. Significant proportions of PsA patients with radiographic axial involvement had cervical spine involvement (10/18, 55.6%) and spondylitis without sacroiliitis (10/23, 43.5%).

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that axial involvement is common in Korean PsA patients, and its characteristics can be distinct from those of AS.

Revisiting articular syndrome in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era

Articular syndrome is often the presentation of a person's various rheumatic or related diseases. It includes both arthralgia and arthritis, with objective signs of joint inflammation defining the latter. This syndromic approach to joint pain enables a scientific method for early diagnosis of common rheumatic conditions without compromising the recognition of uncommon conditions. This review explores common rheumatic conditions associated with articular syndrome, including osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis (RA), systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). It supports the early differentiation of uncommon but emerging entities such as reactive arthritis (ReA). The aim of the review is to comprehensively overview various forms of articular syndrome to update rheumatologists' and allied health specialists' knowledge. Epidemiology, clinical presentations, diagnostic approaches, and therapeutic strategies are discussed in the context of articular syndrome. The challenges emerging in the peri-pandemic COVID-19 era are highlighted. The improved understanding of the spectrum of clinical conditions and disease states presenting with articular syndrome may facilitate early diagnosis, optimal management, and enhanced patient outcomes within the realm of rheumatology.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis

Among the variety of clinical manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) – including peripheral arthritis, dactylitis, enthesitis, and axial disease – spondylitis is the least studied. There is no generally accepted definition of axial PsA (axPsA), nor is there any common terminology or diagnostic criteria for it. In the rheumatology community, there is also no consensus regarding radiological and MRI assessment of axial involvement in PsA patients, while disease activity indexes and the therapeutic tactics are borrowed from those used in treating axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS). However, despite a range of similarities in immunopathogenetic mechanisms of axPsA and axSpA, there are also certain differences that may affect the treatment response in these patients. The aim of this review is the analysis of data on axial disease in PsA. The article discusses the genetic features, clinical presentations, imaging techniques, differential diagnostics and treatment options of axPsA.

Characterising axial psoriatic arthritis: correlation between whole spine MRI abnormalities and clinical, laboratory and radiographic findings

OBJECTIVE

To describe the prevalence of inflammatory and structural lesions using whole spine MRI in patients with psoriatic disease, and to assess their correlation with clinical features and with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) classification criteria.

METHODS

This retrospective analysis included patients with whole spine and sacroiliac joints (SIJ) MRI, selected from 2 populations: (1) active psoriatic arthritis (PsA), irrespective of axial symptoms; (2) psoriasis with confirmed or suspected PsA and axSpA symptoms. MRI spondylitis and/or sacroiliitis (MRI-SpA) was defined according to Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS) consensus and by radiologist impression. Agreement between MRI-SpA and different inflammatory back pain (IBP) definitions (Berlin/ASAS/rheumatologist criteria) and the axSpA classification criteria were calculated considering MRI as gold standard. Logistic regression determined MRI-SpA-associated factors.

RESULTS

93 patients were analysed (69.9% PsA; 30.1% psoriasis). Back pain was present in 81.7%, defined as IBP in 36.6%-57%. MRI-SpA was found in 9.7% of patients by ASAS definition and in 12.9% by radiologist impression, of which 25% had isolated spondylitis.Low agreement was found between the three IBP definitions and MRI-SpA. Rheumatologist criteria was the most sensitive (50%-55.6%) while ASAS and Berlin criteria were the most specific (61.9%-63%). axSpA criteria had poor sensitivity for MRI-SpA (22.2%-25%). Late onset of back pain or asymptomatic patients accounted for most cases with MRI-SpA not meeting axSpA or IBP criteria. Male sex was associated with MRI-SpA (OR 6.91; 95% CI 1.42 to 33.59) in multivariable regression analysis.

CONCLUSION

Prevalence of MRI-defined axSpA was low and showed poor agreement with IBP and axSpA criteria.

Psoriatic Spondylitis: A Disease Manifestation in Debate: Evidences to Know for the Clinical Rheumatologist

ABSTRACT

With the advent of classification criteria for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), patients with axial manifestations associated with psoriasis, initially described in the l950s as a specific entity termed psoriatic spondylitis (PS), are now categorized within PsA, ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and axSpA. Thus, different terms are used to describe axial disease in patients with PsA including PS, axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA), and psoriatic spondyloarthritis. Patients with PS may present with inflammatory and/or mechanical back pain, but also may display axial disease on imaging despite not complaining of back pain. Cervical spondylitis has been reported in 35% to 75% of patients with PsA. Axial disease is silent in 20% and 25% of patients with axial PsA and PsA, respectively. The majority of axPsA patients have peripheral arthritis alongside the axial involvement, whereas only 2% to 5% of PsA patients have solely axial arthritis with no peripheral arthritis.A debate is currently underway as to whether inflammatory axial disease and psoriasis represent axSpA with psoriasis or a subset of PsA named axPsA. Studies have recognized that axial disease in PsA patients seems to be different demographically, genetically, clinically, and radiographically when compared with AS with or without psoriasis. This narrative review summarizes current knowledge regarding axial involvement of PsA in terms of history, terminology, classification, epidemiology, clinical presentation, imaging, diagnosis, and treatment, with the aim of providing advice for management of PS in clinical evidence-based practice. Data-driven studies are needed to develop clear, nonoverlapping classification criteria for spinal involvement in PsA.

Clinical Manifestations and Diagnosis of Axial Spondyloarthritis

BACKGROUND

Axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) is a chronic, rheumatic disease characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint, spine, and entheses. Axial spondyloarthritis affects up to 1.4% of adults in the United States and is associated with decreased quality of life, increased mortality, and substantial health care-related costs, imposing a high burden on patients, their caregivers, and society.

SUMMARY OF WORK

Diagnosing axSpA can be difficult. In this review, we seek to help rheumatologists in recognizing and diagnosing axSpA.

MAJOR CONCLUSIONS

A discussion of challenges associated with diagnosis is presented, including use and interpretation of imaging, reasons for diagnostic delays, differences in disease presentation by sex, and differential diagnoses of axSpA.

FUTURE RESEARCH DIRECTIONS

The early diagnosis of axSpA and advances in available therapeutic options have improved patient care and disease management, but delays in diagnosis and treatment remain common. Additional research and education are critical for recognizing diverse axSpA presentations and optimizing management early in the course of disease.

No efficacy of anti-IL-23 therapy for axial spondyloarthritis in randomised controlled trials but in post-hoc analyses of psoriatic arthritis-related 'physician-reported spondylitis'?

The three monoclonal antibodies ustekinumab, guselkumab and risankizumab targeting the p 40 or the 19 subunit of interleukin -23 have now been approved for the indication psoriasis and the former two also for psoriatic arthritis (PsA). Ustekinumab and risankizumab have appeared ineffective in randomised controlled trials with patients with axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), but post-hoc analyses of PsA trials have now suggested that they may improve back pain symptoms potentially induced by axial inflammation based on PsA. Here we argue that, based on the absence of efficacy in axSpA, this is unlikely and more probably due to generic, non-specific effects, which are not adequately covered by the tools developed for the assessment of inflammation in axSpA.

Axial Psoriatic Disease: Clinical and Imaging Assessment of an Underdiagnosed Condition

The frequent involvement of the spine and sacroiliac joint has justified the classification of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in the Spondyloarthritis group. Even if different classification criteria have been developed for PsA and Spondyloarthritis over the years, a well-defined distinction is still difficult. Although the majority of PsA patients present peripheral involvement, the axial involvement needs to be taken into account when considering disease management. Depending on the definition used, the prevalence of axial disease may vary from 25 to 70% in patients affected by PsA. To date, no consensus definition has been reached in the literature and the definition of axial involvement in PsA has varied from isolated sacroiliitis to criteria used in ankylosing spondylitis. This article reviews the unmet needs in the clinical and radiological assessment of axial PsA, reporting the various interpretations of axial involvement, which have changed over the years. Focusing on both imaging and clinical standpoints, we reported the prevalence of clinical and radiologic features, describing the characteristics of axial disease detectable by X-rays, magnetic resonance imaging, and PET-CT, and also describing the axial symptoms and outcome measures in patients affected by axial disease.

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis: An update for rheumatologists

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a heterogenous, chronic, inflammatory musculoskeletal disease that can lead to peripheral and axial damage and loss of function. Axial involvement occurs in 25% to 70% of patients with PsA, varying greatly depending on its definition, with the key manifestations being sacroiliitis and/or spondylitis. However, there are no agreed-upon classification or diagnostic criteria for axial involvement in PsA and no consensus on treatment paradigms, which complicates management of PsA. There have only been a few studies assessing biologics in patients with PsA with axial involvement, and most treatment plans are based on evidence from patients with axial spondyloarthritis. Rheumatologists therefore face many challenges in the management of axial PsA, including diagnosis, differential diagnosis, and choice of appropriate treatment. In this review, we summarize the clinical presentation, imaging characteristics, differential diagnoses, treatment options, and prognosis of axial PsA, with the aim of increasing rheumatologists' knowledge of this phenotype of PsA and thereby aiding its optimal management.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To review current understanding of the prevalence, clinical features, outcome measures and recent therapeutic trials in axial psoriatic arthritis (axPsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of axPsA is estimated at 40-50%. However, the definition of axPsA remains unclear, therefore these estimates may be inaccurate. Ax PsA appears to be distinct from ankylosing spondylitis in demographic, clinical, genetic and therapeutic features. Because of the lack of widely accepted definition of axPsA it has been difficult to design therapeutic trials for this domain of PsA. Several studies have demonstrated the uniquness of axPsA. Few recent trials suggest that therapies that work for peripheral arthritis also work for axPsA.

Psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis: A clinical-epidemiological study at a dermatology center in western Mexico

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVE

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic inflammatory illness. Approximately, 15% of psoriasis patients have undiagnosed PsA. In Mexico, we found no related studies. Our objective was to investigate the clinical-epidemiological characteristics of PsA in psoriasis patients in western Mexico.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study including Mexican patients with clinical and histopathological diagnosis of psoriasis. Physical examination, rheumatoid factor analysis and radiographies of axial and peripheral skeleton were performed. The prevalence of PsA using the CASPAR criteria, age, sex; clinical variants of PsA, psoriasis type and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), were assessed. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used.

RESULTS

Of 90 patients with psoriasis, 48 met the criteria for PsA, with a prevalence of 53%, and average age of 50 ± 15 years. Predominating were, the female sex in 29 (60%), the axial variant of PsA in 24 (50%), and psoriasis plaques in 40 (83%). The average PASI was 12 ± 11. All cases were rheumatoid factor negative. These variables were not significantly different when comparing subjects with and without PsA, except for the female sex (60% vs. 7%; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with psoriasis should intentionally be evaluated jointly Dermatologists and Rheumatologists searching joint involvement given the high prevalence of PsA previously undiagnosed.

Secukinumab in patients with psoriatic arthritis and axial manifestations: results from the double-blind, randomised, phase 3 MAXIMISE trial

Objectives

MAXIMISE (Managing AXIal Manifestations in psorIatic arthritis with SEcukinumab) trial was designed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in the management of axial manifestations of psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

Methods

This phase 3b, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multi-centre 52-week trial included patients (≥18 years) diagnosed with PsA and classified by ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis (CASPAR) criteria, with spinal pain Visual Analogue Score ≥40/100 and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) score ≥4 despite use of at least two non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Patients were randomised (1:1:1) to secukinumab 300 mg, secukinumab 150 mg or placebo weekly for 4 weeks and every 4 weeks thereafter. At week 12, placebo patients were re-randomised to secukinumab 300/150 mg. Primary endpoint was ASAS20 (Assessment of SpondyloArthritis international Society) response with secukinumab 300 mg at week 12.

Results

Patients were randomly assigned; 167 to secukinumab 300 mg, 165 to secukinumab 150 mg and 166 to placebo. Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg significantly improved ASAS20 response versus placebo at week 12 (63% and 66% vs 31% placebo). The OR (95% CI) comparing secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg versus placebo, using a logistic regression model after multiple imputation, was 3.8 (2.4 and 6.1) and 4.4 (2.7 and 7.0; p<0.0001).

Conclusions

Secukinumab 300 mg and 150 mg provided significant improvement in signs and symptoms of axial disease compared with placebo in patients with PsA and axial manifestations with inadequate response to NSAIDs.

Trial registration number

NCT02721966.

Recent Advances in Imaging for Diagnosis, Monitoring, and Prognosis of Psoriatic Arthritis

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is an inflammatory condition characterized by a strong heterogeneity and multifaceted behavior. PsA manifests in two types—axial and peripheral—which may be present at the same time. Peripheral manifestations can be further divided into the articular (arthritis) and extra-articular (i.e., enthesitis and dactylitis) subgroups. In such a complex disease, imaging is often required to characterize the type of involvement and to evaluate the radiological damage and progression of PsA. In addition, imaging plays a pivotal role in clinical practice; that is, for axial involvement. Conventional radiology has been the main standard of reference for many years. However, in recent years, there has been growing interest in different imaging modalities, such as ultrasonography (US) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). All these techniques play a role in the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with PsA and cover all the types of the disease. US and MRI have good sensitivities and specificities for detecting synovitis, and this may be helpful for differential diagnosis with other musculoskeletal diseases and useful in the early or preclinical phases of the disease. However, US is not useful in the diagnosis of axial PsA. In addition, other modalities have been investigated in the field of PsA imaging. Computed tomography (CT), in particular, dual energy-CT and high-resolution peripheral CT (HRpQ-CT) might play an important role in the assessment of bone damage, erosions, and new bone formation. Regarding advanced functional imaging, FDG PET/CT is another interesting technique for exploring disease activity.

Evaluating Inflammatory Versus Mechanical Back Pain in Individuals with Psoriatic Arthritis: A Review of the Literature

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a chronic immune-mediated disease characterized by psoriatic skin and nail changes, peripheral joint inflammation, enthesitis, dactylitis, and/or axial involvement, either alone or in combination with each other. The presence of axial involvement has been shown to be a marker of PsA severity; however, there is no widely accepted definition of axial involvement in PsA (axPsA) or consensus on how or when to screen and treat patients with suspected axPsA. Chronic back pain is a prominent feature of axPsA and is thought to have a relevant role in early identification of disease. Chronic back pain can be caused by inflammatory back pain (IBP) or mechanical back pain (MBP). However, MBP can complicate recognition of IBP and delay diagnosis of axPsA. While MBP can also be associated with chronic back pain of ≥ 3 months in duration that is typical of IBP, IBP is characterized by inflammation of the sacroiliac joint and lower spine that is differentiated from MBP by key characteristic features, including insidious onset at age < 40 years, improvement with exercise but not with rest, and nighttime pain. This review discusses the differences in identification and management of IBP and MBP in patients with PsA with axPsA. The summary of available evidence highlights the importance of appropriate and timely screening, difficulties and limitations of differential diagnoses and treatment, and unmet needs in axPsA.

Psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is a long-term disease that may lead to psoriatic changes in skin and nails; inflammation of some joints, including finger and toe joints (dactylitis); inflammation of sites where tendons and ligaments connect to bone (enthesitis); and/or problems in the spine (axial involvement). Approximately 25–70% of patients with PsA have axial involvement (axPsA); this number varies because there is no widely accepted definition for axPsA. Chronic (long-lasting) back pain is a major feature of axSpA and can help doctors recognize axPsA early. Chronic back pain can be caused by inflammatory back pain (IBP) or mechanical back pain (MBP). IBP is described by back pain lasting ≥ 3 months, gradual onset at age < 40 years, improvement with exercise, no improvement with rest, pain at night (with improvement upon getting up), and changes in some laboratory test results. On the other hand, MBP is caused by a physical injury to the lower back. Both IBP and MBP can occur in patients with PsA, but they are treated in different ways. Being able to tell the difference between IBP and MBP is important to make sure that patients receive the right treatment. This review looks at the differences between IBP and MBP, screening for IBP, the difficulties and limitations of diagnosing and treating axPsA, and the needs of patients with axPsA for better diagnosis and treatment.

From Psoriasis to Psoriatic Arthritis: Insights from Imaging on the Transition to Psoriatic Arthritis and Implications for Arthritis Prevention

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To describe the recent advances in the field towards the prevention and early recognition of Psoriatic Arthritis (PsA).

RECENT FINDINGS

Defining the preclinical phase of PsA remains challenging since up to 50% of subjects with psoriasis have subclinical imaging enthesopathy, but many of these do not progress to PsA. Nevertheless, there is evidence that subjects with subclinical imaging enthesopathy are at increased risk of developing PsA. In recent years, it has been shown that both PsA and anti-citrullinated protein antibodies (ACPA) positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are characterized by a subclinical phase of non-specific or brief duration arthralgia with shared imaging features accounting for joint symptomatology. Sonographically determined tenosynovitis and enthesitis are the key imaging features present in non-specific PsO arthralgia that are at risk of future PsA development. Furthermore, the early phases of PsA are complicated by factors including body mass index (BMI), which is a risk factor for PsA, but BMI is also associated with imaging abnormalities on enthesopathy. Fully disentangling these clinical and imaging factors will be important for enrichment for imminent PsA so that disease prevention strategies can be investigated. Psoriasis patients with arthralgia have a higher prevalence of tenosynovitis and imaging enthesopathy is at higher risk of transitioning to overt PsA.

One-year effectiveness, retention rate, and safety of secukinumab in ankylosing spondylitis and psoriatic arthritis: a real-life multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Secukinumab (SEC) is effective for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in randomized trials, but real-life data are lacking.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

Real-life, prospective observational study on 169 consecutive outpatients at baseline (T0) and at 6 (T6) and 12 months (T12) after starting SEC (39 AS, 23%; 130 PsA, 77%).

RESULTS

Significant improvement was seen at T6 and T12 for all clinical variables, including TJC, SJC, ESR, CRP, DAPSA, ASDAS-CRP, and BASDAI, as well as in patient-reported outcomes like VAS-pain. By multivariable regression analysis, in AS patients high BASDAI at T0 correlated with diagnostic delay (R² = 0.4; p = 0.009) and peripheral joint involvement (R² = 0.4; p = 0.04). During follow-up, reduction of BASDAI positively correlated with high ESR (R² = 0.65; p = 0.04). ASDAS-CRP at T0 positively correlated with high ESR (R² = 0.34; p = 0.004). Reduction of ASDAS-CRP from T0 to T6 correlated with current smoking status (R² = 0.42; p = 0.003). In PsA patients, reduction of DAPSA score from T0 to T12 is negatively correlated with the presence of metabolic syndrome (R² = 0.41; p = 0.0025). SEC was well tolerated; 10 patients discontinued treatment for non-severe adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Secukinumab is effective and safe in patients with AS and PsA in a real-life setting.

Axial Psoriatic Arthritis: A Distinct Clinical Entity in Search of a Definition

Axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis is a well-recognized manifestation with a prevalence between 12.5% and 78%. This huge heterogeneity is due to the different criteria used by authors to define psoriatic arthritis with axial involvement combining clinical features with radiographic evidence of disease. Specific genetic and clinical attributes of axial psoriatic arthritis might differentiate it from axial spondyloarthritis with concurrent skin psoriasis. Few studies address the specific management. The purpose of this review is to acknowledge the current understanding of axial involvement in psoriatic arthritis and highlight the need for a definition to facilitate research and clinical recognition.

Current Smoking Is Increased in Axial Psoriatic Arthritis and Radiographic Sacroiliitis

OBJECTIVE

The effect of smoking in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is under debate. Our aim was to test whether smoking is increased in axial PsA (axPsA).

METHODS

Included in the analysis were 1535 patients from PsArt-ID (PsA-International Database). The effect of smoking on axPsA (compared to other PsA phenotypes) and radiographic sacroiliitis were investigated.

RESULTS

Current smoking was more common in axPsA (28.6% vs 18.9%, p < 0.001). It also was found as an independent predictor of axPsA (OR 1.4) and radiographic sacroiliitis (OR 6.6).

CONCLUSION

Current smoking is significantly associated with both axPsA and radiographic sacroiliitis in patients with PsA.