Combination Biologic Therapy in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Experience From a Tertiary Care Center

Combination treatment of inflammatory bowel disease: Present status and future perspectives

The treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), especially those with severe or refractory disease, represents an important challenge for the clinical gastroenterologist. It seems to be no exaggeration to say that in these patients, not only the scientific background of the gastroenterologist is tested, but also the abundance of "gifts" that he should possess (insight, intuition, determination, ability to take initiative, etc.) for the successful outcome of the treatment. In daily clinical practice, depending on the severity of the attack, IBD is treated with one or a combination of two or more pharmaceutical agents. These combinations include not only the first-line drugs (e.g., mesalazine, corticosteroids, antibiotics, etc) but also second- and third-line drugs (immunosuppressants and biologic agents). It is a fact that despite the significant therapeutic advances there is still a significant percentage of patients who do not satisfactorily respond to the treatment applied. Therefore, a part of these patients are going to surgery. In recent years, several small-size clinical studies, reviews, and case reports have been published combining not only biological agents with other drugs (e.g., immunosuppressants or corticosteroids) but also the combination of two biological agents simultaneously, especially in severe cases. In our opinion, it is at least a strange (and largely unexplained) fact that we often use combinations of drugs in a given patient although studies comparing the simultaneous administration of two or more drugs with monotherapy are very few. As mentioned above, there is a timid tendency in the literature to combine two biological agents in severe cases unresponsive to the applied treatment or patients with severe extraintestinal manifestations. The appropriate dosage, the duration of the administration, the suitable timing for checking the clinical and laboratory outcome, as well as the treatment side-effects, should be the subject of intense clinical research shortly. In this editorial, we attempt to summarize the existing data regarding the already applied combination therapies and to humbly formulate thoughts and suggestions for the future application of the combination treatment of biological agents in a well-defined category of patients. We suggest that the application of biomarkers and artificial intelligence could help in establishing new forms of treatment using the available modern drugs in patients with IBD resistant to treatment.

Novel bispecific nanobody mitigates experimental intestinal inflammation in mice by targeting TNF-α and IL-23p19 bioactivities

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) pose significant challenges in terms of treatment non-response, necessitating the development of novel therapeutic approaches. Although biological medicines that target TNF-α (tumour necrosis factor-α) have shown clinical success in some IBD patients, a substantial proportion still fails to respond.

METHODS

We designed bispecific nanobodies (BsNbs) with the ability to simultaneously target human macrophage-expressed membrane TNF-α (hmTNF-α) and IL-23. Additionally, we fused the constant region of human IgG1 Fc (hIgG1 Fc) to BsNb to create BsNb-Fc.  Our study encompassed in vitro and in vivo characterization of BsNb and BsNb-Fc.

RESULTS

BsNb-Fc exhibited an improved serum half-life, targeting capability and effector function than BsNb. It's demonstrated that BsNb-Fc exhibited superior anti-inflammatory effects compared to the anti-TNF-α mAb (infliximab, IFX) combined with anti-IL-12/IL-23p40 mAb (ustekinumab, UST) by Transwell co-culture assays. Notably, in murine models of acute colitis brought on by 2,4,6-trinitrobenzene sulfonic acid（TNBS) and dextran sulphate sodium (DSS), BsNb-Fc effectively alleviated colitis severity. Additionally, BsNb-Fc outperformed the IFX&UST combination in TNBS-induced colitis, significantly reducing colon inflammation in mice with colitis produced by TNBS and DSS.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight an enhanced efficacy and improved biostability of BsNb-Fc, suggesting its potential as a promising therapeutic option for IBD patients with insufficient response to TNF-α inhibition.

KEY POINTS

A bispecific nanobody (BsNb) was created to target TNF-α and IL-23p19, exhibiting high affinity and remarkable stability. BsNb-Fc inhibited the release of cytokines in CD4+T cells during co-culture experiments. BsNb-Fc effectively alleviated colitis severity in mouse model with acute colitis induced by DSS or TNBS, outperforming the IFX&UST combination.

Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy in Refractory Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (DOUBLE-PIBD): A Multicenter Study from the Pediatric IBD Porto Group of ESPGHAN

BACKGROUND

Current data on dual biologic therapy in children are limited. This multicenter study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of dual therapy in pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

A retrospective study from 14 centers affiliated with the Pediatric IBD Interest and Porto Groups of the European Society for Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition. Included were children with IBD who underwent combinations of biologic agents or biologic and small molecule therapy for at least 3 months. Demographic, clinical, laboratory, endoscopic, and imaging data were collected. Adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Sixty-two children (35 Crohn's disease, 27 ulcerative colitis; median age 15.5 [interquartile range, 13.1-16.8] years) were included. They had all failed previous biologic therapies, and 47 (76%) failed at least 2 biologic agents. The dual therapy included an anti-tumor necrosis factor agent and vedolizumab in 30 children (48%), anti-tumor necrosis factor and ustekinumab in 21 (34%) children, vedolizumab and ustekinumab in 8 (13%) children, and tofacitinib with a biologic in 3 (5%) children. Clinical remission was observed in 21 (35%), 30 (50%), and 38 (63%) children at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Normalization of C-reactive protein and decrease in fecal calprotectin to <250 µg/g were achieved in 75% and 64%, respectively, at 12 months of follow-up. Twenty-nine (47%) children sustained adverse events, 8 of which were regarded as serious and led to discontinuation of therapy in 6.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual biologic therapy may be effective in children with refractory IBD. The potential efficacy should be weighed against the risk of serious adverse events.

Current Evidence for Combined Targeted Therapy for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Biologicals and small molecules have revolutionized the medical management of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD), yet they are only effective in a proportion of patients, and their impact on changing the natural history of the disease is still debatable. Recently, the concept of combining targeted biologics and small-molecule therapies has been introduced to the treatment of IBD. Dual-targeted therapy (sequential and combined), which is the combination of two targeted therapies, might be a reasonable choice for patients to break through the therapeutic ceiling. A recent randomized clinical trial (VEGA) provided the first controlled evidence that the short-term combination of two biological agents may lead to superior disease control than either of the agents alone in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) without jeopardizing safety. Multiple studies are underway in both Crohn's disease and UC. Additionally, real-world evidence is accumulating in IBD patients receiving combination therapies with concomitant IBD and extraintestinal manifestations or in patients with medically refractory IBD. Of note, the majority of these patients were exposed to multiple biological agents earlier and lost response to at least one of the agents in the combination. This review summarizes current knowledge regarding this attractive novel therapeutic option in IBD. Clearly, more controlled data are needed to evaluate optimal timing, efficacy, and mitigation of safety concerns.

Therapeutic potentials of mesenchymal stem cells in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in rats

Interleukin-1beta (IL-1β) and interleukin-17A (IL-17A) have strong pro-inflammatory activities that are involved in inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). Mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) therapy is considered a promising treatment for IBD. This study was performed to understand the role of rat Nlrp3 inflammasome, Hmgb1, and pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-17a) in the pathogenesis of IBD. Also, to evaluate the role of human umbilical cord blood-MSCs (hUCB-MSCs) in the management of IBD. The rats were in four groups: normal controls, indomethacin-induced IBD group, indomethacin-induced IBD rats that received phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), and the IBD group that received hUCB-MSCs as a treatment. The messenger RNA (mRNA) expression levels of rat Nlrp3, Hmgb1, IL-1β, and IL-17a were evaluated by quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction. Histopathological examination of the small intestinal tissues of the studied rats was performed. There was a significant upregulation of the rat Nlrp3, IL-1β, IL-17a mRNA expression (p < 0.001 for the three parameters), and Hmgb1 (p < 0.05) in the untreated IBD group compared to the normal control group. In the MSC-treated group, IL-1β, IL-17a, and rat Nlrp3 mRNA expression significantly decreased compared to both the untreated IBD group and PBS group (p < 0.05 for all). hUCB-MSCs ameliorated IBD in rats by downregulating the pro-inflammatory cytokines (IL-1β and IL-17a) and other inflammatory mediators such as Hmgb1 and rat Nlrp3.

Risankizumab to treat moderately to severely active Crohn's disease in adults: an evaluation of trials and data

INTRODUCTION

Risankizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin (IL)-23. It is approved for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and more recently moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease (CD).

AREAS COVERED

After examining the current landscape of CD management including therapies which are currently approved and those in late stages of development, we will review the interleukin pathway and discuss the specific mechanism of targeted IL-23 inhibition, summarize available clinical trial data on efficacy and safety of Risankizumab, consider future positioning of Risankizumab in the therapeutic armamentarium, and ultimately discuss future needs for the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Risankizumab represents the first and only targeted IL-23 inhibitor approved for the treatment of CD, providing a promising addition to the therapeutic armamentarium for CD, with a favorable safety profile and demonstrated efficacy in both biologic-naïve and exposed populations. It is possible that the targeted nature of Risankizumab may enhance efficacy and safety over combined IL-12/23 inhibition, with trials underway attempting to shed light on that hypothesis.

The Future of Advanced Therapies for Pediatric Crohn's Disease

Pediatric Crohn's disease commonly presents with moderate-to-severe intestinal inflammation with a greater risk of complications if remission is not achieved. Anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies have offered the possibility of deep and durable remission; however, many children do not respond or no longer respond over time. Further, some children do not require broader systemic immunosuppression to achieve remission and are better served by an alternative treatment strategy. Proper utilization of advanced biologic and small-molecule therapies, which have become available for adult patients since anti-tumor necrosis factor medications, is paramount for tighter disease control for a large proportion of children. Newer advanced therapies such as anti-integrin and anti-interleukin biologics, and several small-molecule agents capitalize on various mechanisms through narrower immunologic targets and reduced immunogenicity. Given limited regulatory approvals of these agents for use in children with Crohn's disease, clinicians continue to rely on data extrapolated from clinical trials in adult patients, sparse pediatric studies, and a growing real-world experience for treatment selection and optimization. In this article, we discuss currently available treatment options, pipeline drugs, and relevant data as they pertain to some of the most pressing clinical challenges faced in treating pediatric Crohn's disease.

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation attenuates inflammatory bowel disease in children: a proof-of-concept clinical trial

BACKGROUND

Vagus nerve stimulation is an investigational anti-inflammatory therapy targeting the nervous system to modulate immune activity. This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of transcutaneous auricular VNS (ta-VNS) in patients with pediatric-onset Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC).

METHODS

Participants were 10-21 years of age with mild/moderate CD or UC and fecal calprotectin (FC) > 200 ug/g within 4 weeks of study entry. Subjects were randomized to receive either ta-VNS targeting the cymba conchae of the external left ear, or sham stimulation, of 5 min duration once daily for a 2-week period, followed by a cross over to the alternative stimulation for an additional 2 weeks. At week 4, all subjects received ta-VNS of 5 min duration twice daily until week 16. Primary study endpoints were clinical remission, and a ≥ 50% reduction in FC level from baseline to week 16. Heart rate variability measurements and patient-reported outcome questionnaires were completed during interval and week 16 assessments.

RESULTS

Twenty-two subjects were enrolled and analyzed (10 CD, 12 UC). Six of 10 with CD had a wPCDAI > 12.5 and 6/12 with UC had a PUCAI > 10 at baseline, correlating to mild to moderate symptom activity. Among the 12 subjects with active symptomatic disease indices at baseline, clinical remission was achieved in 3/6 (50%) with CD and 2/6 (33%) with UC at week 16. Despite all subjects having FC levels ≥ 200 within 4 weeks of enrollment, five subjects (4 UC, 1 CD) had FC levels < 200 at the baseline visit and were excluded from the FC analysis. Of the remaining 17, median baseline FC was 907 µg/g (IQR 411-2,120). At week 16, 11/17 (64.7%) of those with baseline FC ≥ 200 had a ≥ 50% reduction in FC (95% CI 38.3-85.8). In the UC subjects, there was an 81% median reduction in FC vs baseline (833 µg/g; p = 0.03) while in the CD subjects, median reduction in FC at 16 weeks was 51% (357 µg/g; p = 0.09). There were no safety concerns.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive ta-VNS attenuated signs and symptoms in a pediatric cohort with mild to moderate inflammatory bowel disease.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT03863704-Date of registration 3/4/2019.

Efficacy and Safety of Dual Targeted Therapy for Partially or Non-responsive Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review of the Literature

BACKGROUND

Dual targeted therapy (DTT) has emerged as an attractive therapeutic option for select patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) who are unable to achieve remission with biologic or small molecule monotherapy. We conducted a systematic review of specific DTT combinations in patients with IBD.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, CINAHL Complete, Web of Science Core Collection, and Cochrane Library to identify articles related to the use of DTT for the treatment of Crohn Disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) published before February 2021.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine studies were identified comprising 288 patients started on DTT for partially or non-responsive IBD. We identified 14 studies with 113 patients receiving anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) and anti-integrin therapies (i.e., vedolizumab and natalizumab), 12 studies with 55 patients receiving vedolizumab and ustekinumab, nine studies with 68 patients receiving vedolizumab and tofacitinib, five studies with 24 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and tofacitinib, six studies with 18 patients receiving anti-TNF therapy and ustekinumab, and three studies with 13 patients receiving ustekinumab and tofacitinib.

CONCLUSION

DTT is a promising approach to improve IBD treatment for patients with incomplete responses to targeted monotherapy. Larger prospective clinical studies are needed to confirm these findings as is additional predictive modeling to identify the patient subgroups most likely to require and benefit from this approach.

Novel Hydrogen Sulfide Hybrid Derivatives of Keap1-Nrf2 Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitor Alleviate Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Acute Experimental Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology possibly associated with intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress. Molecular hybridization by combining two drug fragments to achieve a common pharmacological goal represents a novel strategy. The Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway provides an effective defense mechanism for UC therapy, and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) shows similar and relevant biological functions as well. In this work, a series of hybrid derivatives were synthesized by connecting an inhibitor of Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction with two well-established H₂S-donor moieties, respectively, via an ester linker, to find a drug candidate more effective for the UC treatment. Subsequently, the cytoprotective effects of hybrids derivatives were investigated, and DDO-1901 was identified as a candidate showing the best efficacy and used for further investigation on therapeutic effect on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in vitro and in vivo. Experimental results indicated that DDO-1901 could effectively alleviate DSS-induced colitis by improving the defense against oxidative stress and reducing inflammation, more potent than parent drugs. Compared with either drug alone, such molecular hybridization may offer an attractive strategy for the treatment of multifactorial inflammatory disease.

Emerging role of dual biologic therapy for the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Biologic agents have now been used in the management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) for many years where experience, expertise and confidence in their use has developed over time. In the United Kingdom, there are well established guidelines and recommendations for both single agent biologic treatments, and with combination therapy of a biologic agent with a small molecule agent in maintenance therapy. In recent times, there has been increasing interest and experience using dual biologic therapy (DBT) in IBD, primarily in difficult to treat and refractory cases with high disease burden. However, published data on use, experience and safety profiles is limited and large-scale studies remain low in number in this developing area. We therefore aim to present a summary and review of the available published data in this area to help us better understand the emerging role of DBT in IBD.

Guselkumab plus golimumab combination therapy versus guselkumab or golimumab monotherapy in patients with ulcerative colitis (VEGA): a randomised, double-blind, controlled, phase 2, proof-of-concept trial

BACKGROUND

Despite the introduction of new monoclonal antibodies and oral therapies for the treatment of ulcerative colitis, clinical remission rates remain low, underscoring the need for innovative treatment approaches. We assessed whether guselkumab plus golimumab combination therapy was more effective for ulcerative colitis than either monotherapy.

METHODS

We did a randomised, double-blind, controlled, proof-of-concept trial at 54 hospitals, academic medical centres, or private practices in nine countries. Eligible adults (aged ≥18 to 65 years) had a confirmed diagnosis of ulcerative colitis at least 3 months before screening and moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (Mayo score 6-12) with a centrally-read baseline endoscopy subscore of 2 or higher. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1:1) using a computer-generated randomisation schedule to combination therapy (subcutaneous golimumab 200 mg at week 0, subcutaneous golimumab 100 mg at weeks 2, 6, and 10, and intravenous guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by subcutaneous guselkumab monotherapy 100 mg every 8 weeks for 32 weeks), golimumab monotherapy (subcutaneous golimumab 200 mg at week 0 followed by subcutaneous golimumab 100 mg at week 2 and every 4 weeks thereafter for 34 weeks), or guselkumab monotherapy (intravenous guselkumab 200 mg at weeks 0, 4, and 8, followed by subcutaneous guselkumab 100 mg every 8 weeks thereafter for 32 weeks). The primary endpoint was clinical response at week 12 (defined as a ≥30% decrease from baseline in the full Mayo score and a ≥3 points absolute reduction with either a decrease in rectal bleeding score of ≥1 point or a rectal bleeding score of 0 or 1). Efficacy was analysed in the modified intention-to-treat population up to week 38, which included all randomly assigned patients who received at least one (partial or complete) study intervention dose. Safety was analysed up to week 50, according to study intervention received among all patients who received at least one (partial or complete) dose of study intervention. This trial is complete and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03662542.

FINDINGS

Between Nov 20, 2018, and Nov 15, 2021, 358 patients were screened for eligibility, of whom 214 patients were randomly assigned to combination therapy (n=71), golimumab monotherapy (n=72), or guselkumab monotherapy (n=71). Of the 214 patients included, 98 (46%) were women and 116 (54%) were men and the mean age was 38·4 years (SD 12·0). At week 12, 59 (83%) of 71 patients in the combination therapy group had achieved clinical response compared with 44 (61%) of 72 patients in the golimumab monotherapy group (adjusted treatment difference 22·1% [80% CI 12·9 to 31·3]; nominal p=0·0032) and 53 (75%) of 71 patients in the guselkumab monotherapy group (adjusted treatment difference 8·5% [-0·2 to 17·1; nominal p=0·2155). At week 50, 45 (63%) of 71 patients in the combination therapy group, 55 (76%) of 72 patients in the golimumab monotherapy group, and 46 (65%) of 71 patients in the guselkumab monotherapy group had reported at least one adverse event. The most common adverse events were ulcerative colitis, upper respiratory tract infection, headache, anaemia, nasopharyngitis, neutropenia, and pyrexia. No deaths, malignancies, or cases of tuberculosis were reported during the combination induction period. One case of tuberculosis was reported in the combination therapy group and one case of colon adenocarcinoma was reported in the guselkumab monotherapy group; both occurred after week 12. Two deaths were reported after the final dose of study intervention (poisoning in the combination therapy group and COVID-19 in the guselkumab monotherapy group).

INTERPRETATION

Data from this proof-of-concept study suggest that combination therapy with guselkumab and golimumab might be more effective for ulcerative colitis than therapy with either drug alone. These findings require confirmation in larger trials.

FUNDING

Janssen Research and Development.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Individualizing the use of biologics and small molecule therapies

The advent of biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has marked a significant turning point in the prognosis of IBD, decreasing the rates of corticosteroid dependence, hospitalizations and improving overall quality of life. The introduction of biosimilars has also increased affordability and enhanced access to these otherwise costly targeted therapies. Biologics do not yet represent a complete panacea: A subset of patients do not respond to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents or may subsequently demonstrate a secondary loss of response. Patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF agents typically have a poorer response rate to second-line biologics. It is uncertain which patient would benefit from a different sequencing of biologics or even a combination of biologic agents. The introduction of newer classes of biologics and small molecules may provide alternative therapeutic targets for patients with refractory disease. This review examines the therapeutic ceiling in current treatment strategies of IBD and the potential paradigm shifts in the future.

Precision medicine in inflammatory bowel disease: Individualizing the use of biologics and small molecule therapies

The advent of biologics and small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has marked a significant turning point in the prognosis of IBD, decreasing the rates of corticosteroid dependence, hospitalizations and improving overall quality of life. The introduction of biosimilars has also increased affordability and enhanced access to these otherwise costly targeted therapies. Biologics do not yet represent a complete panacea: A subset of patients do not respond to first-line anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha agents or may subsequently demonstrate a secondary loss of response. Patients who fail to respond to anti-TNF agents typically have a poorer response rate to second-line biologics. It is uncertain which patient would benefit from a different sequencing of biologics or even a combination of biologic agents. The introduction of newer classes of biologics and small molecules may provide alternative therapeutic targets for patients with refractory disease. This review examines the therapeutic ceiling in current treatment strategies of IBD and the potential paradigm shifts in the future.

Defining the Failure of Medical Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease in the Era of Advanced Therapies: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

The expansion of advanced therapies for inflammatory bowel disease created a lag between the development of these new therapies and their incorporation and use in daily practice. At present, no clear definitions for treatment optimization, treatment failure or criteria to abandon therapy are available. We aimed to centralize criteria for a nonresponse to all available molecules and to summarize guideline principles for treatment optimization.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of studies that reported criteria for the treatment response to all advanced therapies (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, ustekinumab, vedolizumab and tofacitinib) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

Across trials, criteria for a response of both patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease are heterogenous. Investigators use different definitions for clinical and endoscopic remission, and endoscopic response and outcomes are assessed at variable time points. Current society guidelines provide heterogenous recommendations on treatment optimization. Most available data on loss of response concern anti-TNF molecules, and newer therapies are not included in the guidelines.

CONCLUSION

The lack of clear definitions and formal recommendations provide the premise for empirical treatment strategies and premature abandonment of therapies.

Breaking through the therapeutic ceiling of inflammatory bowel disease: Dual-targeted therapies

Emerging biologics and small-molecule drugs have changed the clinical status quo of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). However, current treatments remain at a standstill in terms of response and remission in many cases. Accumulating evidence indicates that dual-targeted therapy (DTT) could be promising in overcoming the existing ceiling of IBD treatment. However, data on the efficacy and safety of DTT on Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are still limited or insufficient. Moreover, there is a lack of studies delineating the mechanisms of DTT. Given that various targeted drugs have different targets among the extensive redundant inflammatory networks, DTT could result in various outcomes. In this review, we have summarized the current data on the safety, effectiveness, and clinical development status of novel targeted drugs related to refractory IBD, and have explored the mechanism of action of therapy. We have categorized therapeutic agents into "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Cellular Signaling Pathways" and "Therapeutic Agents Targeting Leukocyte Trafficking" based on the different therapeutic targets, and also by classifying therapeutic agents targeting the cellular signaling pathways into "JAK-dependent" and "JAK-independent," and placed the existing drug combinations into 3 categories based on their mechanisms, namely, overlapping, synergistic, and complementary effects. Lastly, we have proposed the possible mechanisms of DTT to conceive a theoretical framework for clinical decision-making and further drug development and research from an IBD standpoint.

Combination therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: Current evidence and perspectives

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Inflammatory Bowel Diseases (IBD) are chronic nonspecific intestinal inflammatory diseases with a relapsing-remitting course, including Ulcerative Colitis (UC) and Crohn's Disease (CD). Combination therapy has been proposed as a strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD. The aim of this study is to summarize current evidence and perspectives on combination therapies in IBD.

METHODS

Electronic databases such as PubMed, Ovid Embase, Medline, and Cochrane CENTRAL were searched to identify relevant studies.

RESULTS

Current evidence supports that the combination of infliximab and thiopurines is more effective than monotherapy in inducing and maintaining remission in IBD. Data on the combination of other biological agents such as adalimumab, vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and immunosuppressors is lacking or showed conflicting results. Vedolizumab seems a potentially effective maintenance regimen after calcineurin inhibitors-based rescue therapy in acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC). Dual Targeted Therapy, which is the combination of two biological agents and/or small molecules, might be a reasonable choice in patients with concomitant IBD and extraintestinal manifestations, or in patients with medical-refractory IBD who lack valid alternatives. Some safety concerns such as adverse events (serious and opportunistic infections) and malignancies (lymphoma and nonmelanoma skin cancer) were raised in combination therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination therapies seem to be effective in some IBD patients such as refractory IBD patients or patients with extraintestinal manifestations, but it might be associated with an increased risk of adverse events and malignancies.

Current status of novel biologics and small molecule drugs in the individualized treatment of inflammatory bowel disease

Treatment strategies for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are rapidly evolving with the development of biologics and small molecule drugs (SMDs). However, these drugs are not guaranteed to be effective in all patients, and a “ceiling effect” of biologic monotherapy may occur. This issue highlights an unmet need for optimizing the use of biologics and predicting therapeutic responses. Thus, the development of new drugs with novel mechanisms of action is urgently needed for patients with primary nonresponse and secondary loss of response to conventional biologics and SMDs. In addition, combining different biologics or SMDs has been proposed as a novel strategy to enhance treatment efficacy in IBD, which theoretically has multidimensional anti-inflammatory potential. Based on the current evidence available for IBD, dual targeted therapy may be a promising strategy for refractory IBD patients who have failed in multiple biologic trea-tments or who have extraintestinal manifestation. Additionally, identifying the subgroup of IBD patients who are responding to biological combination therapies is also equally important in stable disease remission. In this review, we sum-marize the newly developed biologics and SMDs and the current status of bio-logics/SMDs to highlight the development of individualized treatment in IBD.

Role of the combination of biologics and/or small molecules in the treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a group of chronic diseases that includes ulcerative colitis, Crohn’s disease, and indeterminate colitis. Patients with IBD require prolonged treatment and high utilization of healthcare resources for proper management. The treatment of patients with IBD is focused on achieving therapeutic goals including clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic variables that result in improvement of the quality of life and prevention of disability. Advanced IBD treatment includes tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, integrin antagonist, antagonist of the p40 subunit of interleukin 12/23, and small molecule drugs. However, despite the multiple treatments available, about 40% of patients are refractory to therapy and present with persistent symptoms that have a great impact on their quality of life, with hospitalization and surgery being necessary in many cases. Dual therapy, a strategy sometimes applicable to refractory IBD patients, includes the combination of two biologics or a biologic in combination with a small molecule drug. There are two distinct scenarios in IBD patients in which this approach can be used: (1) Refractory active luminal disease without extraintestinal manifestations; and (2) patients with IBD in remission, but with active extraintestinal manifestations or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases. This review provides a summary of the results (clinical response and remission) of different combinations of advanced drugs in patients with IBD, both in adults and in the pediatric population. In addition, the safety profile of different combinations of dual therapy is analyzed. The use of newer combinations, including recently approved treatments, the application of new biomarkers and artificial intelligence, and clinical trials to establish effectiveness during long-term follow-up, are needed to establish new strategies for the use of advanced treatments in patients with refractory IBD.

Dual Biologic Therapy in Moderate to Severe Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory bowel diseases in children are characterized by a wide variety of symptoms and often a severe clinical course. In the treatment, we aimed to induce and maintain remission. We focused on assessing the efficacy and safety of the concomitant use of two biologic therapies including: anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab) vedolizumab and ustekinumab in a refractory pediatric IBD cohort.

METHODS

Fourteen children (nine ulcerative colitis, one ulcerative colitis/IBD-unspecified, four Crohn's disease) with a disease duration of 5.2 (8 months-14 years) years, initiated dual therapy at an age of 11.7 (3-17) years after failure of monotherapy with a biological drug. Five patients (36%) were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), five (36%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), and three (21%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ). One patient (7%) was switched from a combination of vedolizumab and adalimumab to ustekinumab and adalimumab during follow-up.

RESULTS

A clinical improvement was obtained in ten children (73%; 5 UC, 1 UC/IBD-unspecified, 4 CD) on the PCDAI/PUCAI scale after 4 months of a second biological drug being added. The median fecal calprotectin decreased from 1610 µg/g (140-10,100) to 586 µg/g (5-3410; p = 0.028) between baseline and 4 months.

CONCLUSIONS

Our clinical experience suggests that dual therapy may be an option for pediatric patients with moderate and severe courses of IBD with limited therapeutic options.

Treat-to-target and sequencing therapies in Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic immune-mediated inflammatory condition which can negatively impact a patient's quality of life. The traditional management strategy for CD has focused on symptomatic control, however, this approach fails to prevent organ damage and to change the progressive course of this disease. Thus, the field has moved towards a treat-to-target strategy that includes identifying individualized objective targets, choosing a therapy based on individual factors that include disease severity and risk, closely monitoring disease activity at predefined time points, and optimizing therapies as needed. Due to the increasing number of therapies approved for CD, this review explores the various factors which should be considered in the sequencing of treatment options together with using the treat-to-target framework to control disease activity early in its course and provide holistic patient care.

Combining Pentoxifylline With Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease: Results of a Randomised, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of current biologics may be limited by targeting only one pathway. Pentoxifylline [PTX] interferes with tumour necrosis factor [TNF] gene expression. We performed a randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study to determine if PTX plus vedolizumab [VDZ] in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] is safe and improves response compared with VDZ monotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty adult patients with active CD were randomised to VDZ/PTX or VDZ/placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Endoscopic activity and inflammatory cytokines were measured at baseline and Week 24. Descriptive statistics were used to determine estimates of effect.

RESULTS

Demographics were similar but baseline disease activity was higher in the VDZ/PTX group. There was no difference in clinical remission at Week 14 (60.0% vs 66.67%, odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16, 3.51) or steroid-free clinical remission at Week 24 in patients receiving VDZ/PTX. Improved clinical response was noted in the VDZ/PTX group at Weeks 6, 14, and 24 [Week 6: 20% vs 6.67%, Week 14: 26.67% vs 6.67%, Week 24: 40% vs 20%]. The rate of endoscopic remission was similar between the groups [40% vs 33.33%], with a greater mean decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score-CD [SES-CD] and C-reactive protein [CRP] with VDZ/PTX [SES-CD -3.17 vs -0.15, CRP -5.56 vs 0.46]. An increase in serum TNF-α concentration was observed with VDZ/placebo group; PTX mitigated this effect. No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ/PTX did not provide benefit over VDZ monotherapy in clinical or endoscopic remission but appeared to improve clinical response and was safe. These data should inform a fully powered study.

Effectiveness of Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy for Achieving Endoscopic Remission in Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is a chronic autoimmune disease with relapse-remission courses. A number of patients may present with a refractory disease with partial or no response to treatment. Others may present with extra-intestinal manifestations that makes the treatment with one biologic challenging. Dual target therapy (DTT), combining biologics and/or small molecule drugs, may offer a chance to achieve remission in these cases and improve patients' quality of life despite the limited evidence regarding this approach. We present a case series of refractory inflammatory bowel disease cases managed with DTT. Seven patients with refractory IBD achieved steroid free, clinical, and endoscopic remission by using DTT. These results support that DTT could be an effective approach in selected patients with refractory IBD or with concomitant extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM). Larger studies, ideally randomized controlled trials, are needed to further support the evidence and confirm the efficacy and safety of DTT for IBD.

Combining biological therapies in patients with inflammatory bowel disease: a Finnish multi-centre study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Therapy with two concomitant biologicals targeting different inflammatory pathways has emerged as a new therapy option for treatment refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Data on the efficacy and safety of dual biological therapy (DBT) are scarce and are investigated in this study.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data on all patients treated with a combination of two biologicals in four Finnish tertiary centres were collected and analysed. Remission was assessed by a physician on the basis of biomarkers, endoscopic evaluation and alleviation of symptoms.

RESULTS

A total of 16 patients with 22 trials of DBT were included. Fifteen patients had Crohn's disease. The most common combination of DBT was adalimumab (ADA) and ustekinumab (USTE; 36%) with median follow-up of nine months (range 2-31). Altogether seven (32%) patients were in remission at the end of follow-up and in two trials response to DBT was assessed to be partial with the relief of patient symptoms. In a total of four trials DBT reduced the need for corticosteroids. The majority of patients achieving a response to DBT were treated with the combination of ADA and USTE (56%). At the end of follow-up all nine (41%) patients responding to DBT continued treatment. Infection complications occurred in three patients (19%).

CONCLUSION

DBT is a promising alternative treatment for refractory IBD, and half of our patients benefitted from it. More data on the efficacy and safety of DBT are needed especially in long-term follow up.

Dual Biologic Therapy in a Patient With Niemann-Pick Type C and Crohn Disease: A Case Report and Literature Review

Dual biologic therapy has become a new area of interest in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Monogenic/polygenic IBD and the role of genetics in IBD is an evolving field, with many of these patients having difficult treatment courses. We present a case of a teenage patient with Niemann-Pick disease type C and Crohn colitis, who sustained clinical remission only after escalating to dual biologic therapy (anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha [infliximab] and anti-interleukin-12/anti-interleukin-23 [ustekinumab]). A literature review of dual biologic therapy in pediatric IBD revealed 8 case series and 1 cohort study. In pediatric patients with genetic disorders and IBD who are not responding adequately to biologic therapy, adding a second biologic medication with a different mechanism of action may be efficacious. Targeting both anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha (which induces pro-inflammatory cytokines) and the pro-inflammatory cytokines themselves (interleukin-12/interleukin-23) may be important in impaired macrophage function and increased cytokine response. Our case adds to the sparse literature on the utility of combining ustekinumab and infliximab in pediatric IBD and is the first to describe its use for treating ongoing active luminal disease.

Management of refractory inflammatory bowel disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Nearly one-third of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) do not achieve remission despite our best therapies. When this happens, it is critical to understand the reason for treatment failure. Once nonresponse is confirmed, these patients should be referred to an IBD centre for multidisciplinary care. This review will discuss the remaining treatment options, including escalation of biologics to unlicensed doses, combination biologics, nonvalidated therapies and surgical options. It will additionally provide updates in the management of acute severe ulcerative colitis (ASUC).

RECENT FINDINGS

There is an increasing interest in combination biologics to treat refractory IBD, although data supporting its safety and effectiveness are limited. The use of hyperbaric oxygen, mesenchymal stem cell therapy and dietary interventions also show early promise in this area. Studies have additionally focused on personalized therapy to identify aggressive phenotypes and predict treatment response in these challenging patients. In ASUC, infliximab and cyclosporine remain mainstays of treatment, and tofacitinib shows promise as a salvage therapy.

SUMMARY

Refractory IBD is common, yet large knowledge gaps remain. Recent and ongoing studies have focused on medical, surgical and dietary approaches with mixed success. Larger prospective studies are desperately needed to address this complex issue.

Dual Advanced Therapies and Novel Pharmacotherapies for Moderately to Severely Active Crohn's Disease

Over the past 2 decades, there have been incredible advances in the pharmacotherapeutic options for the treatment of patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease. Despite the leaps and strides in safety, efficacy, and mechanistic specificity of treatment targets, a significant portion (up to ∼20-50%) of patients have refractory Crohn's disease ± concomitant rheumatologic disease/extraintestinal manifestations for which existing biologic and small molecule therapies are ineffective. In this review, we will explore the available evidence for the use of dual advanced therapies (combination of biologic and/or small molecule therapies) and novel pharmacotherapies in phase 2 to 3 clinical trials.

miRNAs Can Affect Intestinal Epithelial Barrier in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The most obvious pathological characterization of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is intestinal epithelium erosion and severe inflammation invasion. Micro-ribonucleic acids (miRNA or microRNA), single-stranded noncoding RNAs of ~22 nucleotides, have been considered as the potential therapeutic targets in the pathogenesis of IBD. Many previous studies have focused on the mechanisms that miRNAs use to regulate inflammation, immunity, and microorganisms in IBD. The review highlights in detail the findings of miRNAs in the intestinal epithelial barrier of IBD, and focuses on their gene targets, signaling pathways associated with IBD, and some potential therapies. It will be beneficial for the elucidation of the interaction between miRNAs and the intestinal epithelial barrier in IBD and provide a theoretical reference for preventing and treating IBD in the future.

Emerging therapies for ulcerative colitis

INTRODUCTION

Despite advances in the medical management of ulcerative colitis (UC), a subgroup of patients does not respond to currently available therapies. A number of novel drugs are in late stages of clinical development or have recently received regulatory approval for UC.

AREAS COVERED

This review focuses on three drug classes that have recently been approved or are awaiting approval for UC: antibodies against interleukin (IL)-23, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR) modulators, and selective inhibitors of Janus kinases (JAK). We provide an overview of their mechanism of action and summarize available evidence for their efficacy and safety. Finally, we discuss expected future challenges in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

The evaluated drugs have demonstrated efficacy with an acceptable safety profile. IL-23 antagonists appear to be safest with very few (serious) adverse events, while the use of S1PR modulators or JAK inhibitors has been associated with infectious and cardiovascular/thromboembolic events, albeit in low numbers. Although advances in drug development are promising, there is an urgent need for (validated) biomarkers to guide rational treatment selection. The scarcity of head-to-head trials also complicates comparisons between available drugs. Breaking the therapeutic ceiling of efficacy in UC will require marked advances in management extending well beyond drug development.

Dual Biologic Therapy for the Treatment of Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Review of the Literature

Background: pediatric patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) who qualify for biological therapy represent a group of severely ill patients. They have never been successful with conventional medication. Biologic medications in monotherapy are frequently used in the disease course, however they result in a 1-year remission, which can be maintained in approximately 40% of IBD patients. Method: the present study aims to summarize the review of literature data on the use of therapy with a combination of two biological and small molecule drugs, anti-TNF (infliximab, adalimumab), vedolizumab and ustekinumab, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (tofacitinib). The risks associated with the use of dual biological therapy and potential adverse effects are particularly important. The literature data was reviewed using the following terms: “use of combination biologic in paediatric IBD”, “combination biologics”, and “dual biologic for treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease”. Conclusion: the use of dual biological therapy is a new therapeutic option. In pediatric IBD, combining the different mechanisms of action of the two biological drugs seems to be safe and effective. Anti-TNF drugs with vedolizumab or ustekinumab may be a particularly beneficial combination. Nevertheless, the clarification and justification of potential advantages of combined biological therapies in further studies, such as randomized control trials, are needed.

Dual biologic therapy with Vedolizumab and Ustekinumab for refractory Crohn's disease in children

There is a paucity of treatment options for patients who have failed multiple biologics. A drawback of biologic therapies is their selectivity in targeting a single pathway. We report the use of dual biologic therapy with vedolizumab and ustekinumab for three highly refractory patients who previously failed both of these medications as monotherapy. The dual biologic therapy led to the closure of a recto-vaginal fistula and restoration of continuity after takedown of a stoma.

Dual biologic therapy with ocrelizumab for multiple sclerosis and vedolizumab for Crohn’s disease: A case report and review of literature

BACKGROUND

Little is known about the safety and efficacy of using two or more biologics for the treatment of immune-mediated diseases, including Crohn’s disease (CD).

CASE SUMMARY

This case report and narrative review demonstrate the potential safety of dual biologic therapy (DBT) in a 45-year-old female with two separate immune-mediated diseases. She had a history of multiple sclerosis for which she was receiving treatment with ocrelizumab, and she had been recently diagnosed with CD after presenting with diarrhoea. The CD diagnosis was confirmed radiologically, endoscopically, histologically, and biochemically. The patient received treatment with vedolizumab, a gut-specific inhibitor of the α₄β₇ integrin on leukocytes. No adverse reactions were observed for the duration of treatment. The safety of ocrelizumab and vedolizumab for the treatment of different immune-mediated diseases was demonstrated.

CONCLUSION

DBT may be a safe and effective option for the treatment of refractory disease or multiple immune-mediated diseases. Newer biologics, which have improved safety profiles and gut specificity, may provide promising avenues for treatment. However, caution must be exercised in the appropriate selection of biologics given their inherent immunosuppressive properties, side effects, and efficacy profiles. Current evidence suggests that biologic therapy is not associated with a worse prognosis in patients with coronavirus disease 2019, but treatment decisions should be made in a multidisciplinary setting. Further research from controlled trials is needed to better understand the safety profile of DBT in CD. The immunopathological mechanisms underlying DBT also remain to be clarified.

Dual Biologic or Small Molecule Therapy for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize emerging data on the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with refractory inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).

METHODS

Through a systematic search of multiple electronic databases through November 9, 2020, we identified cohort studies or case series (>10 patients) reporting the safety and effectiveness of simultaneous use of biologic agents in combination or with tofacitinib in patients with IBD. Rates of adverse events, clinical remission, and endoscopic remission were synthesized using pooled data, and we identified factors associated with successful dual therapy.

RESULTS

We identified 30 studies reporting 288 trials of dual biologic or small molecule therapy in 279 patients (76% Crohn's disease; median duration of treatment 24 weeks (IQR₂₅-IQR₇₅ 1332)). The main indications for dual therapy included medically refractory IBD (81%) and concurrent extra-intestinal manifestations or rheumatologic disease (12%). The most common combinations of dual therapy included tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists & anti-integrins (48%), ustekinumab & anti-integrins (19%); 61% of patients had previously failed at least one of the two therapies used in combination. Over a median follow-up of 32 weeks (IQR₂₅-IQR₇₅ 24-52), pooled rates of adverse and serious adverse events were 31% (95% CI, 13%-54%) and 6.5% (95% CI, 2.1%-13.1%); pooled rates of clinical and endoscopic remission were 59% (95% CI, 42%-74%), and 34% (95% CI, 23%-46%), respectively. 12% (95% CI, 4%-24%) of patients required surgery. Rates of success were higher in patients on dual therapy due to EIM. Heterogeneity was not significant for endoscopic response (P = .88, I² = 0%), endoscopic remission (P = .44, I² = 0%), and malignancy (P = .87, I² = 0%). However, significant heterogeneity existed for other outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Dual biologic or small molecule therapy may be a possible option in highly selected, refractory IBD patients at specialized centers. Higher quality combination of therapies with a significant improvement in the quality of data is required prior to more widespread use.

Selecting the Best Combined Biological Therapy for Refractory Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients

Current medical treatment for inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) does not achieve 100% response rates, and a subset of refractory and severely ill patients have persistent active disease after being treated with all possible drug alternatives. The combination of two biological therapies (CoT) seems a reasonable alternative, and has been increasingly tested in very difficult cases. The present review suggests that CoT seems to be safe and effective for refractory and severely ill IBD patients. Ustekinumab plus vedolizumab and vedolizumab plus anti-TNF were the most used CoTs for Crohn’s disease. For ulcerative colitis, the most used CoTs were vedolizumab plus anti-TNF and vedolizumab plus tofacitinib. The aforesaid CoTs have shown good efficacy and few adverse events have been reported.

The Essential Role of a Multidisciplinary Approach in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases: Combined Medical-Surgical Treatment in Complex Perianal Fistulas in CD

Perianal fistulizing Crohn's disease (PFCD) represents a challenging and complex disease phenotype. Patients typically suffer a more severe disease course than those without perianal complications and are often managing debilitating symptoms. Etiology is understood to be multifactorial, with genetic predisposition, microbiological insult, aberrant immunity, and mechanical factors all implicated. As a result, multimodal treatment strategies must be employed to achieve disease control and fistula closure. This requires the complimentary involvement of medical and surgical disciplines in order to ensure thorough assessment and treatment tailored to the individual scenario and patient goals. The aim of this article is to describe an overview of the various treatment strategies available for PFCD, focusing on how a synergistic approach is required to ensure maximal chances of success.

Systematic Review With Meta-analysis: Safety and Effectiveness of Combining Biologics and Small Molecules in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Combining biologics and small molecules could potentially overcome the plateau of drug efficacy in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to assess the safety and effectiveness of dual biologic therapy (DBT), or small molecule combined with a biologic therapy (SBT) in IBD patients.

Methods

We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Scopus, Web of Science, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and Clinical trials.gov until November 3, 2020, including studies with 2 or more IBD patients on DBT or SBT. Main outcome was safety assessed as pooled rates of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) for each combination. Effectiveness was reported as pooled rates of clinical, endoscopic, and/or radiographic response and remission. The certainty of evidence was rated according to the Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework.

Results

Of the 3688 publications identified, 13 studies (1 clinical trial, 12 observational studies) involving 266 patients on 7 different combinations were included. Median number of prior biologics ranged from 0 to 4, and median duration of follow-up was 16-68 weeks. Most common DBT and SBT were vedolizumab (VDZ) with anti-tumor necrosis factor (aTNF, n = 56) or tofacitinib (Tofa, n = 57), respectively. Pooled rates of SAE for these were 9.6% (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5-21.4) for VDZ-aTNF and 1.0% (95% CI, 0.0-7.6) for Tofa-VDZ. The overall certainty of evidence was very low due to the observational nature of the studies, and very serious imprecision and inconsistency.

Conclusions

DBT or SBT appears to be generally safe and may be effective in IBD patients, but the evidence is very uncertain.

Safety and efficacy of combining biologics or small molecules for inflammatory bowel disease or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases: A European retrospective observational study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Few data are available regarding the combination of biologics or small molecules in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients. We report safety and efficacy of such combinations through a retrospective multicentre series.

METHODS

Combination therapy was defined as the concomitant use of two biologics or one biologic with a small molecule. Patient demographics, disease characteristics and types of combinations were recorded. Safety was evaluated according to the occurrence of serious infection, opportunistic infection, hospitalisation, life-threatening event, worsening of IBD or immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMID), cancer and death. Efficacy was evaluated as the physician global assessment of the combination and comparison of clinical/endoscopic scores of IBD/IMID activity prior and during combination.

RESULTS

A total of 104 combinations were collected in 98 patients. Concomitant IMID were present in 41 patients. Reasons for starting combination therapy were active IBD (67%), active IMID or extra-intestinal manifestations (EIM) (22%), both (10%) and unclassified in 1. Median duration of combination was 8 months (interquartile range 5-16). During 122 patient-years of follow-up, 42 significant adverse events were observed, mostly related to uncontrolled IBD. There were 10 significant infections, 1 skin cancer and no death. IBD disease activity was clinically improved in 70% and IMID/EIM activity in 81% of the patients. Overall, combination was continued in 55% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of biologics and small molecules in patients with IBD and IMID/EIM seems to be a promising therapeutic strategy but is also associated with a risk of opportunistic infections or infections leading to hospitalisation in 10%.

Dual Targeted Therapy for the Management of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The burden of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) is increasing globally and imposes a high morbidity in patients with IBD. Advances have been made in medical management of IBD with the advent of novel therapies such as the biologics and small molecule drugs (SMDs). However, response to these medications is limited; with only 40% of patients achieving clinical remission at 1 year with a biologic. Hence, medical management of IBD is a rapidly evolving paradigm in which not only are new medications being developed but understanding how, when and in whom to use them is evolving. Dual targeted therapy (DTT), which is the combination of biologics and/or SMDs is an attractive concept as it is theoretically a potent and multidimensional anti-inflammatory treatment strategy. In this review, we present the published literature on the use of DTT and highlight its utility in clinical practice. The majority of studies on DTT are case reports and case series on the combination of dual biologic therapy. From the limited evidence available in patients with IBD, dual biologic therapy may be a safe option for patients with refractory IBD who have failed multiple biologic therapies and to manage extraintestinal manifestation of IBD. There are a handful of reports of combination therapy with a biologic and a SMD in patients with IBD. Further studies and randomized control trials are required to comprehensivretain hereely evaluate the safety and efficacy of DTT in IBD.

Management of hepatitis B virus infection in patients with inflammatory bowel disease under immunosuppressive treatment

Hepatitis B remains a significant global clinical problem, despite the implementation of safe and effective vaccination programs. The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) largely follows the regional epidemiologic status. Serological screening with hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), and antibodies to hepatitis B surface (anti-HBs) and core (anti-HBc) proteins is a key element in the management of IBD patients and, ideally, should be performed at IBD diagnosis. Stratification of individual cases should be done according to the serologic profile and the IBD-specific treatment, with particular emphasis in patients receiving immunosuppressive regimens. In patients who have not contracted HBV, vaccination is indicated to accomplish protective immunity. Vaccination in immunosuppressed patients, however, is a challenging issue and several strategies for primary and revaccination have been proposed. The risk of HBV reactivation in patients with IBD should be considered in both HBsAg-positive and HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients, when immunosuppressive therapies are administered. HBV reactivation is preventable via the administration of prophylactic nucleot(s)ide analogues and should be the standard approach in HBsAg-positive patients. HBsAg-negative/anti-HBc-positive patients represent a non-homogeneous group and bear a significantly lower risk of HBV reactivation. Biochemical, serological and molecular monitoring is currently the recommended approach for anti-HBc patients. Acute HBV infection is rarely reported in IBD patients. In the present review, we outline the problems associated with HBV infection in patients with IBD and present updated evidence for their management.

Favorable Outcomes Combining Vedolizumab With Other Biologics or Tofacitinib for Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease

Background

Combining advanced therapies may improve outcomes in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), but there are little data on the effectiveness and safety of this approach.

Methods

We examined outcomes of patients who received vedolizumab in combination with another biologic or tofacitinib between 2016 and 2020.

Results

Fourteen patients (10 ulcerative colitis [UC], 3 Crohn disease, 1 indeterminate colitis) received a combination of advanced therapies. Vedolizumab was combined with tofacitinib in 9 patients, ustekinumab in 3, and adalimumab in 2. Median follow-up on combination therapy was 31 weeks. Normalization of C-reactive protein (CRP) or fecal calprotectin (<5 mg/L and <150 µg/g, respectively) was achieved in 56% (5/9) and 50% (4/8) of patients. Paired median CRP decreased from 14 mg/L to <5 mg/L with combination therapy (n = 9, P = 0.02), and paired median calprotectin from 594 µg/g to 113 µg/g (n = 8, P = 0.12). Among patients with UC, paired median Lichtiger score decreased from 9 to 3 (n = 7, P = 0.02). Prednisone discontinuation was achieved in 67% (4/6) of prednisone-dependent patients. There were 4 infections: 2 required hospitalization (rotavirus, Clostridium difficile), and 2 did not (pneumonia, sinusitis). During follow-up, 5/14 patients discontinued combination therapy (2 nonresponse; 1 improvement and de-escalation; 1 noninfectious adverse effect; 1 loss of coverage).

Conclusions

In this retrospective case series of a cohort with refractory IBD, combining vedolizumab with other biologics or tofacitinib improved inflammatory markers, reduced clinical disease activity and steroid use, and was well tolerated.

Breaking the therapeutic ceiling in drug development in ulcerative colitis

Increased knowledge of the intricate pathogenesis of ulcerative colitis has triggered an advance in drug development during the past two decades, resulting in the advent of several biological agents and small-molecule therapies. Although the increase in therapeutic options is positive, remission rates of patients with ulcerative colitis given new therapeutic agents in induction trials remain at a modest 20-30%, seemingly facing a so-called therapeutic ceiling. This therapeutic ceiling requires a critical appraisal and highlights the need for alternative strategies for drug development. In this Review, we objectively itemise the boundaries of therapeutic efficacy in ulcerative colitis, provide possible explanations for the shortcomings of current strategies, and propose solutions to achieve better therapeutic outcomes in ulcerative colitis.

Novel trends with biologics in inflammatory bowel disease: sequential and combined approaches

Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) management has changed dramatically over the past 20 years, after the introduction of targeted biological therapies. However, the impact of these new drugs in changing the natural history of disease is still under debate. Recent evidence seems to suggest that the extent of their efficacy might be, at least partially, dependent on the timing of their introduction and on the subsequent management strategy. In this complex landscape, the potential role for a more dynamic approach with treatments based on sequencing and combining targeted therapies has been explored only minimally so far. In this review, we aim to explore the potential biological rationale behind the use of sequential and combination therapies in IBD, to summarise the current knowledge on this topic and to propose a management algorithm that combines these notions.

Letter: SARS-CoV-2 infection in two inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with dual targeted therapy-Authors' reply

LINKED CONTENT This article is linked to Al‐Ani et al and Privitera et al papers. To view these articles, visit https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.15779 and https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.16297