Combination Therapy Does Not Improve Rate of Clinical or Endoscopic Remission in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases Treated With Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab

Medical management of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease

Management of inflammatory bowel disease, both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), has seen a seismic shift over the past decade. Over the past five years, there has been the introduction of many new therapies with differing mechanisms of action and a goal of achieving mucosal healing, as well as clinical and biochemical remission (1,2). In addition, management is aimed at restoring normal growth and normalizing quality of life. The ultimate goal is to individualize medical management and determine the right drug for the right patient by identifying which inflammatory pathway is predominant and avoiding unwarranted lack of efficacy or side effects through biomarkers and risk prognostication. Patient's age, location of disease, behavior (inflammatory vs. penetrating/structuring), severity and growth delay all play into deciding on the best treatment approach. Ultimately, early intervention is key in preventing complications. The therapeutic approaches to management can be broken down to nutritional therapy, biologic agents, immunomodulators (including corticosteroids), aminosalicylates and antibiotics. There are numerous other therapies, such as small molecule agents recently approved in adults, which are garnering a great deal of interest.

Clinical outcomes of patients with remitting ulcerative colitis after discontinuation of indigo naturalis

Indigo naturalis is an effective treatment for ulcerative colitis. However, long-term use of indigo naturalis causes adverse events, such as pulmonary hypertension. The natural history of patients with ulcerative colitis who discontinued indigo naturalis after induction therapy is unknown. Moreover, the clinical features of patients who relapsed within 52 weeks after the discontinuation of indigo naturalis are unclear. This study aimed to assess the clinical outcomes of patients with ulcerative colitis after discontinuation of indigo naturalis and to identify potential markers responsible for relapse. This single-center retrospective study investigated the follow-up of 72 patients who achieved a clinical response 8 weeks after indigo naturalis treatment. We observed relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis after the discontinuation of indigo naturalis. We analyzed the factors predicting long-term outcomes after discontinuation of indigo naturalis. Relapse was observed in 24%, 57%, and 71% of patients at 8, 26, and 52 weeks, respectively. There were no predictive markers in patients who relapsed within 52 weeks after the discontinuation of indigo naturalis. The ulcerative colitis relapse rate after indigo naturalis discontinuation was high. Follow-up treatment is required after the discontinuation of indigo naturalis in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Integrating Evidence to Guide Use of Biologics and Small Molecules for Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Advances in science have led to the development of multiple biologics and small molecules for the treatment of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). This growth in advanced medical therapies has been accompanied by an increase in methodological innovation to study and compare therapies. Guidelines provide an evidence-based approach to integrating therapies into routine practice, but they are often unable to provide timely recommendations as new therapies come to market, and they have limited incorporation of real-world evidence when making recommendations. This limits the scope and usability of guidelines, and a gap remains in defining how best to position and integrate advanced medical therapies for IBD. In this review, we provide a framework for clinicians and researchers to understand key differences in sources of evidence, how different methodologies are applied to study the comparative effectiveness of advanced medical therapies in IBD, and considerations for how these sources of evidence can be used to better integrate current guideline recommendations. Over time, we anticipate this framework will allow for a transition to living guidelines and/or practice recommendations.

Higher Ustekinumab Levels in Maintenance Therapy are Associated with Greater Mucosal Healing and Mucosal Response in Crohn's Disease: An Experience of 2 IBD Centers

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST), a human monoclonal antibody that binds the p40 subunit of interleukin 12 (IL-12) and IL-23, is licensed for induction and maintenance therapy of moderate to severe inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). To date, there is limited data published on any potential association between ustekinumab serum trough levels and mucosal healing in order to guide treatment strategies and appropriate dosing.

AIM

This study aims to identify a relationship between maintenance ustekinumab serum trough levels and mucosal healing and/or response in patients with Crohn's disease in an observational cohort study.

METHODS

Ustekinumab serum trough levels and antibody titres were analyzed in patients on maintenance drug using an ELISA drug-tolerant assay. Mucosal response (MR) was defined as ≥50% reduction in fecal calprotectin level (FC) and/or ≥50% reduction in the Simple Endoscopic Score for Crohn's Disease (SES-CD score). Mucosal healing (MH) was defined as FC ≤150 µg/mL and/or global SES-CD score ≤5. Median trough levels were analyzed using the Kruskal-Wallis test, and logistic regression was used to determine sensitivity and specificity of levels predicting mucosal response.

RESULTS

Forty-seven patients on maintenance ustekinumab for Crohn's disease were included in this study. The majority were female (66%), with a median age of 40 years (21-78 years). The majority of patients were biologic-experienced (89.4%, n = 42). Patients with histologically confirmed Crohn's disease represented 100% (n = 47) of the cohort. Over one-third of patients (n = 18, 38.3%) were on higher than standard dosing of 90 mg every 8 weeks. Patients with mucosal healing (n = 30) had significantly higher mean serum ustekinumab levels (5.7 µg/mL, SD 6.4) compared with those with no response (1.1 µg/mL, SD 0.52; n = 7, P < .0001). A serum ustekinumab trough level greater than 2.3 µg/mL was associated with MH, with a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 90.6% (likelihood ratio 10.7). Similarly, for patients with MR (n = 40), we observed a higher mean serum ustekinumab trough level (5.1 µg/mL, SD 6.1) compared with those with no response (1.1 µg/mL, SD 0.52; n = 7, P < .0001). Furthermore, a serum ustekinumab trough level greater than 2.3 µg/mL was associated with a 10-fold increased likelihood of mucosal response vs mucosal nonresponse (sensitivity 100%, specificity 90.5%, likelihood ratio 10.5).

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates that higher ustekinumab serum trough levels are associated with a greater likelihood of achieving mucosal healing and mucosal response in patients with Crohn's disease regardless of prior biologic exposure. Further prospective studies are required to correlate target maintenance trough levels and the optimal time to dose-escalate in order to improve patient outcomes.

Immunogenicity and Loss of Effectiveness of Biologic Therapy for Inflammatory Bowel Disease Patients Due to Anti-Drug Antibody Development

Many patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) experience a loss of effectiveness to biologic therapy (i.e., anti-TNF therapy, etc.). Therefore, in addition to the adverse effects of the treatment, these patients also face failure to achieve and maintain remission. Immunogenicity, the process of production of antibodies to biological agents, is fundamental to the evolution of loss of response to treatment in IBD patients. The presence of these antibodies in patients is linked to decreased serum drug levels and inhibited biological activity. However, immunogenicity rates exhibit significant variability across inflammatory disease states, immunoassay formats, and time periods. In this review, we aimed to elucidate the immunogenicity and immune mechanisms of antibody formation to biologics, the loss of therapy response, clinical results of biological treatment for IBD from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, as well as to summarize the most recent strategies for overcoming immunogenicity and approaches for managing treatment failure in IBD.

Therapeutic drug monitoring of vedolizumab therapy in inflammatory bowel disease

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic drug monitoring is effective for optimizing anti-tumor necrosis factor therapies in inflammatory bowel disease, but for vedolizumab, a gut-selective leucocyte migration inhibitor, data are scarce.

METHODS

Observational cohort study including 116 bio-experienced inflammatory bowel disease patients treated with vedolizumab for active luminal disease. Biobanked trough blood samples (n = 676) covering 96% of patients were analyzed using a drug-binding immunofluorometric assay. Steroid-free treatment outcomes were classified by clinical disease activity indices and objective findings, primarily endoscopy.

RESULTS

Patients with clinical remission to vedolizumab induction therapy (37%) had significantly higher trough levels than those without at weeks 6 (mean 34.1 vs 28.0 μg/mL, P = 0.03) and 10 (34.8 vs 27.5 μg/mL, P = 0.01). Optimal thresholds for discrimination were 32.4 μg/mL (AUCROC 0.66, P = 0.04) and 23.5 (AUCROC 0.67, P = 0.01), respectively. This positive association persisted during maintenance phase with 11.9 μg/mL (AUCROC 0.69, P < 0.01) associated with clinical remission (37%) and 15.3 (AUCROC 0.74, P < 0.001) for objective remission (46%). Stratification by temporal evolution of treatment effects revealed higher induction and maintenance vedolizumab levels in persistent and slow responders as compared to secondary or persistent failures. Pharmacokinetics was influenced by rare formation of anti-vedolizumab antibodies (2%), and to a lesser extent gender and albumin during induction, but not disease severity, concomitant steroids, or thiopurine metabolites. Switching to subcutaneous administrations resulted in 2.3-fold increase in steady-state trough levels.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports maintaining adequate drug exposure being essential for sustained positive outcomes of vedolizumab and emphasizes individualized, therapeutic drug monitoring-based treatment regimens. Controlled trials and pharmacokinetic modeling are, however, needed.

Choosing Therapy for Moderate to Severe Crohn's Disease

The availability of approved therapies for Crohn's disease has significantly increased over the past decade. To choose the appropriate therapy for the patient, ideally head to head studies, and data on positioning could help the provider individualize the decision. Due to the paucity of head-to-head trial data, we turn to network meta-analysis and real-world studies to help guide our treatment choices. Ultimately, the best approach is to consider each patient on an individual basis, taking into consideration the characteristics of their disease, individual risk factors, extra-intestinal manifestations, co-morbid conditions, patient age, cost, and personal preferences. In this review, we summarize the evidence comparing biologic as well as small molecule therapies for the treatment of moderate-to-severe Crohn's disease. We have summarized the evidence in relation to factors such as efficacy, fistulizing disease, pregnancy, infection risk, and co-existing conditions.

A Comparison of Treatment Effect Sizes in Matched Phase 2 and Phase 3 Trials of Advanced Therapeutics in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

INTRODUCTION

Phase 2 trials are fundamental to the rational and efficient design of phase 3 trials. We aimed to determine the relationship of treatment effect size estimates from phase 2 and phase 3 clinical trials on advanced therapeutics in inflammatory bowel disease.

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and the Cochrane library were searched from inception to December 19, 2022, to identify paired phase 2 and 3 placebo-controlled induction studies of advanced therapeutics for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Treatment effect sizes were expressed as a risk ratio (RR) between the active arm and placebo arm. For the same therapeutics, RRs from phase 2 trials were divided by the RR from phase 3 trial to quantify the relationship of effect sizes between phases.

RESULTS

Twenty-two studies (9 phase 2 trials, 13 phase 3 trials) were included for CD and 30 studies (12 phase 2 trials, 18 phase 3 trials) for UC. In UC (pooled RR 0.72; 95% confidence interval: 0.58-0.86; RR <1 indicates smaller treatment effect sizes in phase 2 trials), but not CD (pooled RR 1.01; 95% confidence interval: 0.84-1.18), phase 2 trials systematically underestimated treatment effect sizes for the primary endpoint compared with phase 3 trials. The underestimation was observed for clinical, but not endoscopic, endpoints in UC.

DISCUSSION

Treatment effect sizes for the primary and clinical endpoints were similar across clinical trial phases in CD, but not UC, where only endoscopic endpoints were comparable. This will help inform clinical development plans and future trial design.

Prevalence of Immunomodulator Use as Combination Therapy With Vedolizumab or Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

INTRODUCTION

The benefit of adding an immunomodulator to vedolizumab and ustekinumab remains unclear and may compromise the safety of these biologics. We evaluated the prevalence and predictors of immunomodulator use with vedolizumab or ustekinumab in patients with inflammatory bowel disease in a large longitudinal cohort.

METHODS

Clinical information was ascertained from electronic medical records of patients enrolled in TARGET-IBD, a prospective longitudinal observational cohort of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) at 34 sites. The prevalence of immunomodulator use with vedolizumab, ustekinumab, and antitumor necrosis factor therapies and predictors of immunomodulator use with vedolizumab and ustekinumab were estimated. Rates of combination therapy were additionally stratified by time from drug approval.

RESULTS

Four thousand thirty-nine adults with IBD were identified, of whom 18.8% were treated with vedolizumab and 13.0% were treated with ustekinumab. Combination therapy with vedolizumab and ustekinumab exceeded 30% (30.7% and 36.2%, respectively) and was more likely in those with perianal disease or previous biologic exposure. Age and presence of extraintestinal manifestations did not consistently predict the use of an immunomodulator. Combination therapy decreased in the years after drug approval.

DISCUSSION

Combination therapy with vedolizumab or ustekinumab was common and was associated with perianal disease and greater exposure to other biologics, although the practice is decreasing with time. Further data are needed to determine the efficacy and safety of combination therapy in patients initiating vedolizumab or ustekinumab for IBD.

Resolving Histological Inflammation in Ulcerative Colitis With Mirikizumab in the LUCENT Induction and Maintenance Trial Programmes

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

To evaluate the effect of mirikizumab, a p19-targeted anti-interleukin-23, on histological and/or endoscopic outcomes in moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis [UC].

METHODS

Endoscopic remission [ER], histological improvement [HI], histological remission [HR], histological-endoscopic mucosal improvement [HEMI], and histological-endoscopic mucosal remission [HEMR] were assessed at Week [W]12 [LUCENT-1: N = 1162, induction] and W40 [LUCENT-2: N = 544, maintenance] for patients randomised to mirikizumab or placebo. Analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of: HEMI at W12 with mirikizumab and HEMR at W40 in patients re-randomised to subcutaneous [SC] mirikizumab; associations between W12 histological/endoscopic endpoints and W40 outcomes in mirikizumab responders re-randomised to mirikizumab SC; and associations between W40 endoscopic normalisation [EN] with/without HR.

RESULTS

Significantly more patients treated with mirikizumab achieved HI, HR, ER, HEMI, and HEMR vs placebo [p <0.001], irrespective of prior biologic/tofacitinib failure [p <0.05]. Lower clinical baseline disease activity, female sex, no baseline immunomodulator use, and no prior biologic/tofacitinib failure were predictors of HEMI at W12 [p <0.05]. Corticosteroid use and longer disease duration were negative predictors of achieving HEMR at W40 [p <0.05]. W12 HI, HR, or ER was associated with W40 HEMI or HEMR [p <0.05]; ER at W12 was associated with clinical remission [CR] [p <0.05] and corticosteroid-free remission [CSFR] at W40 [p = 0.052]. HR and HEMR at W12 were associated with CSFR, CR, and symptomatic remission at W40. Alternate HEMR [EN + HR] at W40 was associated with bowel urgency remission at W40 [p <0.05].

CONCLUSIONS

Early resolution of endoscopic and histological inflammation with mirikizumab is associated with better UC outcomes. Clinicaltrials.gov: LUCENT-1, NCT03518086; LUCENT-2, NCT03524092.

Novel Hydrogen Sulfide Hybrid Derivatives of Keap1-Nrf2 Protein-Protein Interaction Inhibitor Alleviate Inflammation and Oxidative Stress in Acute Experimental Colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is an idiopathic inflammatory disease of unknown etiology possibly associated with intestinal inflammation and oxidative stress. Molecular hybridization by combining two drug fragments to achieve a common pharmacological goal represents a novel strategy. The Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1)-nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2) pathway provides an effective defense mechanism for UC therapy, and hydrogen sulfide (H₂S) shows similar and relevant biological functions as well. In this work, a series of hybrid derivatives were synthesized by connecting an inhibitor of Keap1-Nrf2 protein-protein interaction with two well-established H₂S-donor moieties, respectively, via an ester linker, to find a drug candidate more effective for the UC treatment. Subsequently, the cytoprotective effects of hybrids derivatives were investigated, and DDO-1901 was identified as a candidate showing the best efficacy and used for further investigation on therapeutic effect on dextran sulfate sodium (DSS)-induced colitis in vitro and in vivo. Experimental results indicated that DDO-1901 could effectively alleviate DSS-induced colitis by improving the defense against oxidative stress and reducing inflammation, more potent than parent drugs. Compared with either drug alone, such molecular hybridization may offer an attractive strategy for the treatment of multifactorial inflammatory disease.

Northern Jiangsu People's Hospital

In recent years, more and more drugs have been used in the treatment of ulcerative colitis, but the efficacy of monotherapy is limited, especially for patients with refractory moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC). Combination therapy is mainly used for patients with a poor response or partial efficacy of monotherapy and has become a new direction for exploring the treatment strategy of ulcerative colitis. Therefore, the authors review the combined treatment options of ulcerative colitis in the context of the existing literature and discuss considerations for the practical application of combination therapy, hoping to provide new ideas for clinicians in the treatment of ulcerative colitis.

GADECCU 2022 Guideline for the treatment of Ulcerative Colitis. Adaptation and updating of the GETECCU 2020 Guideline

INTRODUCTION

Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory disease that compromises the colon, affecting the quality of life of individuals of any age. In practice, there is a wide spectrum of clinical situations. The advances made in the physio pathogenesis of UC have allowed the development of new, more effective and safer therapeutic agents.

OBJECTIVES

To update and expand the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of relevant treatments for remission induction and maintenance after a mild, moderate or severe flare of UC.

RECIPIENTS

Gastroenterologists, coloproctologists, general practitioners, family physicians and others health professionals, interested in the treatment of UC.

METHODOLOGY

GADECCU authorities obtained authorization from GETECCU to adapt and update the GETECCU 2020 Guide for the treatment of UC. Prepared with GRADE methodology. A team was formed that included authors, a panel of experts, a nurse and a patient, methodological experts, and external reviewers. GRADE methodology was used with the new information.

RESULTS

A 118-page document was prepared with the 44 GADECCU 2022 recommendations, for different clinical situations and therapeutic options, according to levels of evidence. A section was added with the new molecules that are about to be available.

CONCLUSIONS

This guideline has been made in order to facilitate decision-making regarding the treatment of UC, adapting and updating the guide prepared by GETECCU in the year 2020.

Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics for moderate to severe Crohn's disease

Crohn's disease (CD) is a relapsing and progressive condition characterized by diarrhea, abdominal pain, weight loss, and hematochezia that results in serious complications such as perforations, fistulas, and abscesses. Various medications, interventions, and surgical treatments have been used to treat CD. The Korean guidelines for CD management were distributed in 2012 and revised in 2017 by the Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) Research Group of the Korean Association for the Study of Intestinal Diseases. Substantial progress in mucosal immunologic research has elucidated the pathophysiology of IBD, leading to development of biological agents for treatment of CD. The first developed biologic agent, tumor necrosis factor-α agents, were shown to be efficacious in CD, heralding a new era in management of CD. Subsequently, vedolizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin α4β7, and ustekinumab, a human monoclonal antibody that inhibits the common p40 subunit of interleukin-12 and interleukin-23, were both approved for clinical use and are efficacious and safe for both induction and maintenance of remission in moderate-to-severe CD patients. Moreover, a recent study showed the non-inferiority of CT-P13, an infliximab biosimilar, compared with infliximab in CD patients. The third Korean guidelines for CD management provide updated information regarding treatment of moderate-to-severe CD patients with biologic agents.

Korean clinical practice guidelines on biologics and small molecules for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis

Ulcerative colitis (UC), a relapsing-remitting chronic inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), has a variable natural course but potentially severe disease course. Since the development of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents has changed the natural disease course of moderate-to-severe UC, therapeutic options for patients who failed conventional treatments are expanding rapidly. IBD clinical trials have demonstrated the potential efficacy and safety of novel biologics such as anti-integrin α4β7 and anti-interleukin-12/23 monoclonal antibodies and small molecules such as a Janus kinase inhibitor. Anti-TNF biosimilars also have been approved and are widely used in IBD patients. Wise drug choices should be made considering evidence-based efficacy and safety. However, the best position of these drugs remains several questions, with limited data from direct comparative trials. In addition, there are still concerns to be elucidated on the effect of therapeutic drug monitoring and combination therapy with immunomodulators. The appropriate treatment regimens in acute severe UC and the risk of perioperative use of biologics are unclear. As novel biologics and small molecules have been approved in Korea, we present the Korean guidelines for medical management of adult outpatients with moderate-to-severe UC and adult hospitalized patients with acute severe UC, focusing on biologics and small molecules.

Medical Treatment Options for Ulcerative Colitis

The landscape of management of ulcerative colitis, a type of inflammatory bowel disease, continues to change with advancement in pharmaceutical options as well as clinical treatment targets. Ulcerative colitis primarily involves the superficial layers of the large bowel, and cause active inflammation that can affect the colon from the rectum to the cecum in a relapsing and a remitting course. In this review, we provide evidence-based guidance on the selection of appropriate medical therapies based on individual patient and disease characteristics, with a focus on biologics and small molecules. We also review the role of surgery and management of acute severe ulcerative colitis.

Combining Pentoxifylline With Vedolizumab for Crohn's Disease: Results of a Randomised, Placebo-controlled Pilot Study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The efficacy of current biologics may be limited by targeting only one pathway. Pentoxifylline [PTX] interferes with tumour necrosis factor [TNF] gene expression. We performed a randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study to determine if PTX plus vedolizumab [VDZ] in patients with Crohn's disease [CD] is safe and improves response compared with VDZ monotherapy.

METHODS

Thirty adult patients with active CD were randomised to VDZ/PTX or VDZ/placebo and followed for 24 weeks. Endoscopic activity and inflammatory cytokines were measured at baseline and Week 24. Descriptive statistics were used to determine estimates of effect.

RESULTS

Demographics were similar but baseline disease activity was higher in the VDZ/PTX group. There was no difference in clinical remission at Week 14 (60.0% vs 66.67%, odds ratio [OR] 0.76, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16, 3.51) or steroid-free clinical remission at Week 24 in patients receiving VDZ/PTX. Improved clinical response was noted in the VDZ/PTX group at Weeks 6, 14, and 24 [Week 6: 20% vs 6.67%, Week 14: 26.67% vs 6.67%, Week 24: 40% vs 20%]. The rate of endoscopic remission was similar between the groups [40% vs 33.33%], with a greater mean decrease in Simple Endoscopic Score-CD [SES-CD] and C-reactive protein [CRP] with VDZ/PTX [SES-CD -3.17 vs -0.15, CRP -5.56 vs 0.46]. An increase in serum TNF-α concentration was observed with VDZ/placebo group; PTX mitigated this effect. No serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

VDZ/PTX did not provide benefit over VDZ monotherapy in clinical or endoscopic remission but appeared to improve clinical response and was safe. These data should inform a fully powered study.

Treatment persistence of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in IBD patients is independent of prior immunogenicity to anti-TNFs: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Immunological treatment failure of anti-TNF therapy negatively influences treatment persistence of a second anti-TNF in IBD patients. So far it is unknown if this effect is also observed for other monoclonal antibodies. We assessed the influence of immunogenicity to anti-TNFs on treatment persistence of subsequent ustekinumab and vedolizumab therapy.

METHODS

IBD patients with and without immunogenicity to anti-TNFs (undetectable trough levels and antibody titers ≥20 ng/mL) and subsequent ustekinumab (UST) and/or vedolizumab (VDZ) therapy were included in this retrospective, single-center study. The Kaplan-Meier method with the log-rank test and Cox proportional hazards were used as statistical methods.

RESULTS

One hundred patients (Crohn's disease: 62, Ulcerative colitis: 31, IBD unclassified: 7) with 127 treatment lines (62 with UST, 65 with VDZ) were included in the analysis. Immunogenicity to previous anti-TNFs did not influence treatment persistence of subsequent ustekinumab and vedolizumab therapy (UST: Log rank: p = .95, Immunogenicity: HR for treatment discontinuation: 0.97 [95% CI 0.31-3.04]; VDZ: p = .65, HR: 0.85 [0.41-1.75]; total cohort [UST and VDZ]: p = .62, HR: 0.86 [0.47-1.57]). Azathioprine co-treatment did not lengthen treatment persistence (UST: Log rank: p = .77, azathioprine: HR: 1.20 [0.34-4.27]; VDZ: p = .92, HR: 0.58 [0.17-1.99]; total cohort: p = .79, HR: 1.10 [0.55-2.20]). In this anti-TNF experienced cohort, patients with ustekinumab remained longer on treatment than patients receiving vedolizumab (Log rank: p = .005, UST: HR: 0.43 [0.23-0.79]).

CONCLUSIONS

Immunogenicity to anti-TNFs does not influence treatment persistence of subsequent ustekinumab and vedolizumab therapy.

Comorbidity Influences the Comparative Safety of Biologic Therapy in Older Adults With Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

INTRODUCTION

There are limited data on comparative risk of infections with various biologic agents in older adults with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs). We aimed to assess the comparative safety of biologic agents in older IBD patients with varying comorbidity burden.

METHODS

We used data from a large, national commercial insurance plan in the United States to identify patients 60 years and older with IBD who newly initiated tumor necrosis factor-α antagonists (anti-TNF), vedolizumab, or ustekinumab. Comorbidity was defined using the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI). Our primary outcome was infection-related hospitalizations. Cox proportional hazards models were fitted in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare the risk of infections between the different therapeutic classes.

RESULTS

The anti-TNF, vedolizumab, and ustekinumab cohorts included 2,369, 972, and 352 patients, respectively, with a mean age of 67 years. The overall rate of infection-related hospitalizations was similar to that of anti-TNF agents for patients initiating vedolizumab (hazard ratio [HR] 0.94, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.04) and ustekinumab (0.92, 95% CI 0.74-1.16). Among patients with a CCI of >1, both ustekinumab (HR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.46-0.91, p-interaction <0.01) and vedolizumab (HR: 0.78, 95% CI: 0.65-0.94, p-interaction: 0.02) were associated with a significantly lower rate of infection-related hospitalizations compared with anti-TNFs. No difference was found among patients with a CCI of ≤1.

DISCUSSION

Among adults 60 years and older with IBD initiating biologic therapy, both vedolizumab and ustekinumab were associated with lower rates of infection-related hospitalizations than anti-TNF therapy for those with high comorbidity burden.

Long-term effectiveness of ustekinumab comparable to antitumor necrosis factor agents in patients with Crohn's disease

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST), an antibody against the p40 subunit of interleukin-12/23, has been proven to be effective in patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, large, long-term comparative studies of UST against anti--tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents are lacking. We compared the effectiveness of anti-TNF agents and UST in CD patients without prior use of biologics.

METHODS

We used a large nationwide anonymized Japanese database containing administrative medical claims data and various related patient data. In a propensity score-matched cohort with similar clinical characteristics, 2-year effectiveness was compared between patients treated with infliximab or adalimumab (anti-TNF group) and those treated with UST (UST group). Primary outcomes were cumulative rates of hospitalization, surgery, and persistence.

RESULTS

Among 53 540 CD patients, 7047 were extracted for eligibility, of which 5665 were treated with an anti-TNF agent and 1382 with UST. After propensity score matching, the cumulative hospitalization rates were comparable between anti-TNF and UST groups (P = 0.85; 25.3% vs 26.5% at 1 year, 33.8% vs 39.8% at 2 years). The cumulative surgery rates were also comparable between these groups (P = 0.46; 5.5% vs 5.1% at 1 year, 8.3% vs 8.4% at 2 years). The persistence rate at 1 year was higher in UST group (90.8% vs 92.5%), and that at 2 years was higher in anti-TNF group (81.2% and 74.6%); however, there was no significant difference in the cumulative persistence rate (P = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-TNF agents and UST appear to have comparable effectiveness for CD patients without prior use of biologics.

Risk of Infections With Ustekinumab and Tofacitinib Compared to Tumor Necrosis Factor α Antagonists in Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND & AIMS

The comparative safety of therapies is important to inform relative positioning within the therapeutic algorithm. Tumor necrosis factor α antagonists (anti-TNF) are associated with an increased risk of infections. Whether there is a similar increase with ustekinumab (UST) or tofacitinib has not been established.

METHODS

We identified patients with Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis from a national commercial health insurance plan in the United States between 2008 and 2019. Infectious outcomes were ascertained for patients newly initiating anti-TNF, UST, or tofacitinib therapy. Cox proportional hazards models were fit in propensity score-weighted cohorts to compare rates between patients treated with UST or tofacitinib and anti-TNF therapy.

RESULTS

Our study included 19,096, 2420, and 305 patients with inflammatory bowel disease initiating anti-TNF, UST, and tofacitinib therapy, respectively. Over follow-up on-treatment, 7% and 44% of anti-TNF patients had infection-related hospitalizations and developed infections, respectively, compared with 4% and 32% of UST patients and 6% and 41% of tofacitinib patients. In the weighted Cox analysis, UST was associated with a significantly lower risk of infection (hazard ratio [HR], 0.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.86-0.99) compared with anti-TNF therapy. There was a trend towards a reduction in infection-related hospitalizations (HR, 0.84; 95% CI, 0.66-1.03). The risk of infections (HR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.75-1.24) or infection-related hospitalizations (HR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.27-1.05) were similar between patients on tofacitinib and anti-TNF.

CONCLUSIONS

UST is associated with reduced risk of infections compared to anti-TNF biologics in inflammatory bowel disease, whereas no difference was observed between tofacitinib and anti-TNF therapy.

Decreased risk of treatment failure with vedolizumab and thiopurines combined compared with vedolizumab monotherapy in Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

While infliximab combined to thiopurines is more effective than infliximab monotherapy in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) and UC, the impact of adding thiopurines to vedolizumab remains controversial. We emulated two target trials comparing the effectiveness of combination therapy versus vedolizumab monotherapy in CD and UC.

DESIGN

Based on two US and the French nationwide healthcare databases, patients with CD and UC who initiated vedolizumab were identified. The study methodology, including confounding adjustment and outcome definitions, were previously validated in successful emulations of the SONIC and SUCCESS trials. Risk ratios for treatment failure based on hospitalisation or surgery related to disease activity, treatment switch, or prolonged corticosteroids use, were estimated after 1:1 propensity score (PS) matching.

RESULTS

Among a total of 10 299 vedolizumab users, 804 CD and 1088 UC pairs of combination therapy versus vedolizumab monotherapy users were PS matched. Treatment failure occurred at week 26 in 236 (29.3%) and 376 (34.3%) patients with CD and at week 16 in 236 (21.7%) and 263 (24.2%) patients with UC initiating combination therapy and vedolizumab monotherapy, respectively. The risk of treatment failure was decreased with combination therapy compared with vedolizumab monotherapy in CD (RR 0.85, 95% CI: 0.74 to 0.98) and to a lesser extent in UC (RR 0.90, 95% CI: 0.77 to 1.05). Findings were consistent across databases.

CONCLUSION

Using validated methodologies, combination therapy with vedolizumab and thiopurines was associated with lower treatment failure compared with vedolizumab monotherapy in CD but not UC across the USA and France.

Shared decision-making in the management of patients with inflammatory bowel disease

The rapid progress of research into inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has resulted in increasingly more treatment options. Different options have different advantages and disadvantages, and the preferences of patients may also differ. If patients can be invited to the formulation of medical decision-making, their compliance and satisfaction would be improved, thus possibly achieving better therapeutic results. The present review aims to summarize the current literature on shared decision-making (SDM) in the management of IBD, with the goal of promoting the application of SDM.

Trends in Medical Management of Moderately to Severely Active Ulcerative Colitis: A Nationwide Retrospective Analysis

BACKGROUND

With an increasing number of therapeutic options available for the management of ulcerative colitis (UC), the variability in treatment and prescribing patterns is not well known. While recent guidelines have provided updates on how these therapeutic options should be used, patterns of long-term use of these drugs over the past 2 decades remain unclear.

METHODS

We analyzed a retrospective, nationwide cohort of more than 1.7 million prescriptions for trends in prescribing behaviors and to evaluate practices suggested in guidelines relating to ordering biologics, step-up therapy, and combination therapy. The primary outcome was 30-day steroid-free remission and secondary outcomes included hospitalization, cost, and additional steroid usage. A pipeline was created to identify cohorts of patients under active UC medical management grouped by prescribing strategies to evaluate comparative outcomes between strategies. Cox proportional hazards and multivariate regression models were utilized to assess postexposure outcomes and adjust for confounders.

RESULTS

Among 6 major drug categories, we noted major baseline differences in patient characteristics at first exposure corresponding to disease activity. We noted earlier use of biologics in patient trajectories (762 days earlier relative to UC diagnosis, 2018 vs 2008; P < .001) and greater overall use of biologics over time (2.53× more in 2018 vs 2008; P < .00001) . Among biologic-naive patients, adalimumab was associated with slightly lower rates of remission compared with infliximab or vedolizumab (odds ratio, 0.92; P < .005). Comparisons of patients with early biologic initiation to patients who transitioned to biologics from 5-aminosalicylic acid suggest lower steroid consumption for early biologic initiation (-761 mg prednisone; P < .001). Combination thiopurine-biologic therapy was associated with higher odds of remission compared with biologic monotherapy (odds ratio, 1.36; P = .01).

CONCLUSIONS

As biologic drugs have become increasingly available for UC management, they have increasingly been used at earlier stages of disease management. Large-scale analyses of prescribing behaviors provide evidence supporting early use of biologics compared with step-up therapy and use of thiopurine and biologic combination therapy.

Targeting IL12/23 in ulcerative colitis: update on the role of ustekinumab

As our comprehension of the pathogenic mechanisms of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) increases, the therapeutic armamentarium for its treatment can expand, and novel target therapies join the treatment pipeline. Interleukin (IL)-12 and IL23 are two key cytokines responsible for promoting and perpetuating bowel inflammation in IBD. Ustekinumab is a monoclonal antibody directed against the shared p40 subunit of both cytokines, and it was recently approved for the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). In the pivotal phase III UNIFI trial, ustekinumab showed a superiority over placebo in both clinical and endoscopic outcomes; furthermore, it was characterized by a favorable safety profile, with a similar rate of adverse events as compared with placebo. Recent evidence from real-life experiences have started accumulating, generally confirming the effectiveness and safety figures emerged from the registration studies. However, most of these observational studies enrolled multirefractory patients; moreover, comparative data with other target therapies are lacking, leaving physicians without clear indications about the appropriate positioning of ustekinumab in the therapeutic pipeline for UC. This review examines the basis of targeting IL12-23 in UC therapy and summarizes the data from both clinical trials and real-life studies, to highlight the main evidence already available and the research gaps that need to be filled for the optimal usage of ustekinumab in UC.

Conventional Therapies for Crohn's Disease

Crohn's disease is a chronic and progressive immune-mediated disease with increasing incidence worldwide. There are no curative therapies. The primary agents used in the treatment of Crohn's disease are aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunomodulators, and biologics. Each agent has different roles in the induction and maintenance of remission of disease. The biologics available include anti-TNF agents, anti-integrins, and anti-interleukins. The choice of initial biologic therapy should be determined through shared decision-making between the patient and provider.

Pediatric Management of Crohn's Disease

Pediatric Crohn's disease is often more severe, requires higher levels of immunosuppression, and is associated with greater morbidity compared with adult Crohn's disease. Unique considerations in pediatric Crohn's disease include growth impairment, pubertal delay, bone disease, longevity of disease burden, and psychosocial impact. Treatment options are limited, requiring off-label use of therapy in this challenging patient population. Understanding the medications available, the existing evidence supporting their use, and side effects is important. There is tremendous potential for growth and improvement in this field and it is essential that all gastroenterologists have an understanding of this complex and unique patient population.

The Optimal Management of Fistulizing Crohn’s Disease: Evidence beyond Randomized Clinical Trials

Fistulizing Crohn’s disease (FCD) remains the most challenging aspect of treating patients with CD. FCD can occur in up to 30% of patients with CD and may lead to significant disability and impaired quality of life. The optimal treatment strategies for FCD require a multidisciplinary approach, including a combined medical and surgical approach. The therapeutic options for FCD are limited due to sparse evidence from randomized clinical trials (RCTs). The current recommendations are mainly based on post hoc analysis from RCTs, real-world clinical studies and expert opinion. There is variation in everyday clinical practice amongst gastroenterologists and surgeons. The evidence for anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy is the strongest in the treatment of FCD. However, long-term fistula healing can be achieved in only 30–50% of patients. In recent years, emerging data in the advent of therapeutic modalities, including the use of new biologic agents, therapeutic drug monitoring, novel surgical methods and mesenchymal stem cell therapy, have been shown to improve outcomes in achieving fistula healing. This review summarizes the existing literature on current and emerging therapies to provide guidance beyond RCTs in managing FCD.

IL-23 Monoclonal Antibodies for IBD: So Many, So Different?

Interleukin [IL]-23 is a member of the IL-12 family of cytokines and has been implicated in multiple inflammatory disorders including psoriasis, psoriatic arthritis, and the inflammatory bowel diseases [IBDs]. Blockade of both IL-12 and IL-23 using an antibody that targets a shared subunit is highly effective in treating psoriasis, and recent data suggest similar efficacy in IBD with minimal adverse events. In this review, we summarise published data on the efficacy of anti-IL-12/23 therapies in IBD as well as emerging data on more selective anti-IL-23 specific therapies. Last, we discuss novel therapeutics under development which target the IL-23 pathway in unique ways and suggest that a biomarker-driven approach will soon guide clinicians to prescribe anti-IL-23 therapies to the patients most likely to respond to them.

Long-term effectiveness and safety of ustekinumab in bio-naïve and bio-experienced anti-tumor necrosis factor patients with Crohn's disease: a real-world multicenter Brazilian study

Background

The effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) in the treatment of Crohn’s disease (CD) has been demonstrated in the pivotal Phase 3 UNITI 1 and 2 and IM-UNITI studies in both anti-TNF-naïve and anti-TNF-exposed patients. Given the selective nature of pivotal trial designs, real-world effectiveness and safety studies are warranted. We report our experience with UST treatment in a large, real-world multicenter cohort of Brazilian patients with CD.

Methods

We performed a retrospective multicenter study including patients with CD, predominantly biologically refractory CD, who received UST. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients in clinical remission at weeks 8, 24 and 56. Possible predictors of clinical and biological response/remission and safety outcomes were also assessed.

Results

Overall, 245 CD (mean age 39.9 [15–87]) patients were enrolled. Most patients (86.5%) had been previously exposed to biologics. According to nonresponder imputation analysis, the proportions of patients in clinical remission at weeks 8, 24 and 56 were 41.0% (n = 98/239), 64.0% (n = 153/239) and 39.3% (n = 94/239), respectively. A biological response was achieved in 55.4% of patients at week 8, and 59.3% were in steroid-free remission at the end of follow-up. No significant differences in either clinical or biological remission were noted between bio-naïve and bio-experienced patients. Forty-eight patients (19.6%) presented 60 adverse events during the follow-up, of which 8 (13.3%) were considered serious adverse events (3.2% of 245 patients). Overall, a proximal disease location, younger age, perianal involvement, and smoking were associated with lower rates of clinical remission over time.

Conclusions

UST therapy was effective and safe in the long term in this large real-life cohort of Brazilian patients with refractory CD, regardless of previous exposure to other biological agents.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12876-022-02280-3.

Evidence-based efficacy of methotrexate in adult Crohn's disease in different intestinal and extraintestinal indications

INTRODUCTION

Methotrexate (MTX) is included in the therapeutic armamentarium of Crohn's disease (CD), although its positioning is currently uncertain in an era in which many effective biological drugs are available. No systematic reviews or meta-analysis have stratified the clinical outcomes of MTX according to the specific clinical scenarios of its use.

METHODS

Medline, PubMed and Scopus were used to extract eligible studies, from database inception to May 2021. A total of 163 studies were included. A systematic review was performed by stratifying the outcomes of MTX according to formulation, clinical indication and criteria of efficacy.

RESULTS

The use of MTX is supported by randomized clinical trials only in steroid-dependent CD, with similar outcomes to thiopurines. The use of MTX in patients with steroid-refractoriness, failure of thiopurines or in combination with biologics is not supported by high levels of evidence. Combination therapy with biologics can optimize the immunogenic profile of the biological drug, but the impact on long-term clinical outcomes is described only in small series with anti-TNFα. Other off-label uses, such as fistulizing disease, mucosal healing, postoperative prevention and extraintestinal manifestations, are described in small uncontrolled series. The best performance in most indications was shown by parenteral MTX, favouring higher doses (25 mg/week) in the induction phase.

DISCUSSION

Evidence from high-quality studies in favour of MTX is scarce and limited to the steroid-dependent disease, in which other drugs are the leading players today. Many limitations on study design have been found, such as the prevalence of retrospective underpowered studies and the lack of stratification of outcomes according to specific types of patients and formulations of MTX.

CONCLUSION

MTX is a valid option as steroid-sparing agent in steroid-dependent CD. Numerous other clinical scenarios require well-designed clinical studies in terms of patient profile, drug formulation and dosage, and criteria of efficacy.

Effectiveness and Durability of Ustekinumab Therapy With or Without Immunomodulators for Ulcerative Colitis Patients in Japan

Background and Aims

The effectiveness and durability of ustekinumab therapy with or without thiopurine immunomodulators (IMs) for ulcerative colitis (UC) in real-world Asian, Japanese patients have not yet been elucidated.

Methods

To evaluate the additive effects of IMs on ustekinumab, a retrospective cohort study of UC patients receiving ustekinumab with or without thiopurine IMs, azathioprine or 6-mercaptopurine, was conducted from March 2020 to August 2021. The primary endpoint was clinical remission or response rate at week 8. The secondary endpoints were clinical remission or response rates at weeks 24 and 52, the durability of each treatment, and adverse events.

Results

Of the 50 patients with UC treated with ustekinumab, 42 were enrolled. Sixteen patients were treated with a combination of ustekinumab and an IM. The clinical response rates of all patients at weeks 8, 24, and 52 were 53.7%, 63.3%, and 42.9%, respectively. There was no significant difference in the clinical responses or remission rates between the combination therapy and monotherapy groups at weeks 8, 24, and 52. (50.0% vs. 56.0%, P = .757; 70.0% vs. 60.0%, P = .702; and 42.9% vs. 42.9%, P = 1.00, respectively). A Kaplan-Meier analysis showed no difference in IM use on the durability of ustekinumab treatment (log-rank test; P = .955).

Conclusions

The response rate for Japanese UC patients is similar to previous reports based on American and European UC patients. There was no significant difference between the ustekinumab monotherapy group and the ustekinumab and IM combination group in the real world.

Immunomodulators: still having a role?

Immunomodulators, particularly the thiopurines and to a lesser extent methotrexate, were standard of care for inflammatory bowel diseases, including Crohn’s disease and ulcerative colitis, for >40 years. While there has been a renaissance in available therapies with the advent of biologics and small molecules, an impetus remains for the ongoing use of thiopurines and methotrexate. This is particularly true for the maintenance of remission and when used in combination therapy with infliximab to suppress anti-biologic antibodies. This article summarizes the data behind immunomodulator use in Crohn’s disease, focusing on the beneficial role these drugs still have while acknowledging their clinical limitations.

Methotrexate in inflammatory bowel disease: A primer for gastroenterologists

Methotrexate is an antineoplastic agent that is also used at lower doses for anti-inflammatory properties. Along with thiopurines (azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine), it has historically been an important part of pharmacological treatment for patients with inflammatory bowel disease. Despite an increase in therapeutic options, these immunomodulators continue to play important roles in the management of inflammatory bowel disease, used either as a monotherapy in mild to moderate cases or in combination with monoclonal antibodies to prevent immunogenicity and maintain efficacy. In light of data linking the use of thiopurines with the risk of malignancies, methotrexate has regained attention as a potential alternative. In this article, we review data on the pharmacology, safety, and efficacy of methotrexate and discuss options for the positioning of methotrexate alone, or in combination, in therapeutic algorithms for Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis.

Short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in treatment-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis and Crohn's disease - a real-world two-center cohort study

OBJECTIVES

Real-world data about sustained clinical remission (SCR) and treatment optimization with vedolizumab for ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are scarce. We aimed to investigate the short and long-term effectiveness and safety of vedolizumab in a real-world cohort in Denmark.

METHODS

A retrospective two-center cohort study was conducted between November 2014 and November 2019 with the primary outcomes of clinical remission (CR) at weeks 14, 30, 52 and 104 and SCR defined as CR at week 14 through week 52.

RESULTS

The study included 182 patients (UC: 97, CD: 85), all previously exposed to at least one biological therapy. Rates of CR at weeks 14, 30, 52 and 104 were 36.6, 35.1, 34.0 and 27.8%, respectively, in UC, and 31.7, 30.1, 26.5 and 22.4% in CD. SCR was achieved in 19.6 and 20.0%, respectively. In UC and CD, optional dosing of vedolizumab at week 10 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.03-1.17), and OR = 0.68 (95% CI, 0.22-2.04)), as well as increase of frequency (OR = .26 (95% CI, 0.01-2.86), and OR = 0.19 (95% CI, 0.01-1.45)), were not associated with CR at week 52. Furthermore, combination treatment with azathioprine was not associated with long-term outcomes. However, dose intensification of vedolizumab successfully restored CR in 65.2 and 57.1% of patients with UC and CD experiencing loss of response.

CONCLUSIONS

Vedolizumab is effective in achieving and restoring short and long-term CR and SCR in patients with treatment-refractory UC and CD. This study emphasizes that supplementary dosing at week 10, and simultaneous treatment with azathioprine, did not improve long-term outcomes.

Research-Based Product Innovation to Address Critical Unmet Needs of Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

Despite progress in recent decades, patients with inflammatory bowel diseases face many critical unmet needs, demonstrating the limitations of available treatment options. Addressing these unmet needs will require interventions targeting multiple aspects of inflammatory bowel disease pathology, including disease drivers that are not targeted by available therapies. The vast majority of late-stage investigational therapies also focus primarily on a narrow range of fundamental mechanisms. Thus, there is a pressing need to advance to clinical stage differentiated investigational therapies directly targeting a broader range of key mechanistic drivers of inflammatory bowel diseases. In addition, innovations are critically needed to enable treatments to be tailored to the specific underlying abnormal biological pathways of patients; interventions with improved safety profiles; biomarkers to develop prognostic, predictive, and monitoring tests; novel devices for nonpharmacological approaches such as minimally invasive monitoring; and digital health technologies. To address these needs, the Crohn's & Colitis Foundation launched IBD Ventures, a venture philanthropy-funding mechanism, and IBD Innovate®, an innovative, product-focused scientific conference. This special IBD Innovate® supplement is a collection of articles reflecting the diverse and exciting research and development that is currently ongoing in the inflammatory bowel disease field to deliver innovative and differentiated products addressing critical unmet needs of patients. Here, we highlight the pipeline of new product opportunities currently advancing at the preclinical and early clinical development stages. We categorize and describe novel and differentiated potential product opportunities based on their potential to address the following critical unmet patient needs: (1) biomarkers for prognosis of disease course and prediction/monitoring of treatment response; (2) restoration of eubiosis; (3) restoration of barrier function and mucosal healing; (4) more effective and safer anti-inflammatories; (5) neuromodulatory and behavioral therapies; (6) management of disease complications; and (7) targeted drug delivery.

Ustekinumab trough concentration affects clinical and endoscopic outcomes in patients with refractory Crohn's disease: a Chinese real-world study

BACKGROUND

Ustekinumab (UST), a newly-used biologic targeting p40 subunit of IL12 and IL23 in China, exerts a confirmed therapeutic effect on the induction and maintenance therapies for refractory Crohn's disease (CD). Therapeutic drug monitoring based on trough and antibody concentration is of core importance when treating patients who lose response to UST. We aimed to analyze the UST exposure-response relationship in CD treatment in the real-world setting.

METHODS

We retrospectively enrolled patients with CD who received UST between March 1, 2020 and May 31, 2021, at the inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) center of the Sun Yat-Sun Affiliated Sixth Hospital. Baseline characteristic information, biomarker examination, clinical outcomes determined by the Crohn's disease activity index (CDAI), and endoscopic outcomes evaluated using a simple endoscopic score for Crohn's disease (SES-CD) at week 16/20 were collected. The optimal UST cut-off trough concentration was identified using receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) analysis.

RESULTS

Nineteen eligible patients were included in the study, the mean age was 29.1 ± 9.1 years and the mean disease duration was 5.5 ± 4.7 years. At the initiation of the study, 89.5% of the patients had been exposed to prior biologics, 42.1% had previous CD-related surgeries, and 52.6% had perianal diseases. At week 16/20 after the UST initiation, clinical response, clinical remission, endoscopic response, and endoscopic remission were 89.5%, 84.2%, 42.2%, and 73.7%, respectively. The cut-off optimal trough concentration for UST was 1.12 μg/mL, as determined by the ROC with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.78, sensitivity of 87.5%, and specificity of 72.7%. Patients with a UST trough concentration > 1.12 μg/mL had a significantly higher rate of endoscopic remission than those without (70.0% vs. 11.1%, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

UST is an effective therapeutic option for refractory CD treatment. A UST trough concentration above 1.12 μg/mL was associated with endoscopic remission at week 16/20 after UST initiation. Trial registration This study was approved and retrospectively registered by the Ethics Committee of Sun Yat-Sen University (2021ZSLYEC-066, March 29, 2021) and the Clinical Trial Registry (NCT04923100, June 10, 2021).

Twenty-five years of biologicals in IBD: What´s all the hype about?

Twenty-five years ago the field was revolutionized by the introduction of infliximab as the first hybrid anti-TNF-antibody. Subsequently, other humanized anti-TNFs were developed and marketed, followed by antibodies to new targets including integrins (vedolizumab) and interleukin 12/23 (ustekinumab). All these so-called biologicals were shown in registrational trials to induce remission superior to placebo but consistently were effective in only a minority of patients. Even though in most trials only the responders were selected to continue on the respective medication for maintenance, many experienced a secondary loss of response and only a minority of usually <25% of the initial cohort achieved long-term (1 year) remission. In 'real life studies', the outcome was somewhat better, probably due to proper selection of patients and open, mostly retrospective study designs. A clear benefit of biologicals is apparent in otherwise treatment refractory patients, in extraintestinal manifestations and in Crohn´s disease (CD) with fistulizing complications. Biologicals achieve mucosal healing (MH) more often than corticosteroids or thiopurines, and MH is associated with improved prognosis. However, this does not justify escalating treatment until MH is reached since controlled trials proving this point of 'treat to target' are lacking both in ulcerative colitis and CD. Surgical rates have decreased with increasing use of biologicals, but disease progression has not been proven to improve. With the exception of opportunistic infections, serious adverse events are rare. In conclusion, biologicals have changed the scene considerably and expanded our armamentarium, but there is also a marketing hype fostering expectations without evidence.

Biologic monotherapy versus combination therapy with immunomodulators in the induction and maintenance of remission of Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis

Despite current guidelines, the optimal treatment of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) remains challenging. The available medications are not without risk and there is not a single correct treatment regimen for every patient. Personalizing treatment and selecting the most appropriate therapy is crucial for optimal response, remission, quality of life, and healthcare utilization. Biologics, especially anti-tumor necrosis factor-α medications, are widely used in the induction and maintenance of disease remission in patients with IBD. Similarly, immunomodulators, including thiopurines and methotrexate, are traditionally popular for the maintenance of remission. In this manuscript, we review the use of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy with immunomodulators for the treatment of ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. We examine overall remission, immunogenicity and adverse effects, mainly serious infections and malignancy, in an effort to help guide treatment decisions and weigh the risks and benefits of biologic monotherapy vs. combination therapy.

Superior treatment persistence with ustekinumab in Crohn's disease and vedolizumab in ulcerative colitis compared with anti-TNF biological agents: real-world registry data from the Persistence Australian National IBD Cohort (PANIC) study

BACKGROUND

Medication persistence contributes real-world evidence about treatment effectiveness, tolerability and prescriber and patient acceptability.

AIMS

To evaluate persistence of biological agents in Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) and the effects of immunomodulator use and treatment lines.

METHODS

Retrospective national population-based data on treatment persistence for adalimumab, infliximab vedolizumab and ustekinumab for CD and UC were analysed from the Australian Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

There were 2499 patients included with 8219 person-years of follow-up. In CD patients ustekinumab had increased persistence compared to anti-TNF agents (HR: 1.79, 95%CI: 1.32-2.38, P < 0.01). Twelve-month CD persistence rates were ustekinumab 80.0%, vedolizumab 73.5%, infliximab 68.1% and adalimumab 64.2% (P = 0.01). In moderate-severe UC vedolizumab had increased persistence compared to anti-TNF agents (HR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.27-2.18 P < 0.001). Twelve-month UC persistence rates were vedolizumab 73.4%, infliximab 61.1% and adalimumab 45.5% (P < 0.001). Immunomodulator co-therapy did not significantly increase persistence in non-anti-TNF therapy (P > 0.05). Thiopurines increased persistence of anti-TNF agents in CD (P < 0.001) and UC (P = 0.03). Methotrexate co-therapy increased persistence of anti-TNF agents in CD (P = 0.001) only. First-line therapy was superior to non-first line in persistence (P < 0.001). In fistulising CD, the persistence of infliximab and adalimumab was not significantly different (P = 0.11).

CONCLUSION

Persistence was highest in ustekinumab in CD and vedolizumab in UC. Factors which increased the persistence of biological agents are first-line therapy, and immunomodulator co-therapy in anti-TNF agent use.

Effectiveness of Third-Class Biologic Treatment in Crohn's Disease: A Multi-Center Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Multiple studies have described the effectiveness of ustekinumab (UST) and vedolizumab (VDZ) in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) failing anti- Tumor necrosis factors (TNFs); however, the effectiveness of VDZ or UST as a third-class biologic has not yet been described.

AIMS AND METHODS

In this retrospective multicenter cohort study, we aimed to investigate the effectiveness of VDZ and UST as a third-class biologic in patients with CD.

RESULTS

Two-hundred and four patients were included; 156/204 (76%) patients received VDZ as a second- and UST as a third-class therapy (group A); the remaining 48/204 (24%) patients received UST as a second- and VDZ as a third-class therapy (group B). At week 16-22, 87/156 (55.5%) patients and 27/48 (56.2%) in groups A and B, respectively, responded to treatment (p = 0.9); 41/156 (26.2%) and 15/48 (31.2%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5). At week 52; 89/103 (86%) patients and 25/29 (86.2%) of the patients with available data had responded to third-class treatment in groups A and B, respectively (p = 0.9); 31/103 (30%) and 47/29 (24.1%) were in clinical remission (p = 0.5).

CONCLUSION

Third-class biological therapy was effective in more than half of the patients with CD. No differences in effectiveness were detected between the use of VDZ and UST as a third-class agent.

Steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis: a critical review of national and international guideline recommendations

Es gibt zahlreiche nationale und internationale Leitlinien zu chronisch entzündlichen Darmerkrankungen, die auf vergleichbarer Evidenz sowie ähnlichen Prozeduren beruhen und daher homogen sein sollten. In dieser kritischen Übersicht wurden die Leitlinienempfehlungen aus Europa (ECCO), Deutschland, Großbritannien, Kanada, den USA und Japan zur Therapie der steroidrefraktären Colitis ulcerosa verglichen. Die meisten Leitlinien unterschieden zwischen moderater/schwerer (ambulanter) und schwerer/fulminanter Colitis in der Klinik. Die Empfehlungen zur ersten Kategorie weisen gravierende Unterschiede auf, während zur Behandlung des stationären Patienten weitgehende Übereinstimmung herrscht. Verschiedene Erklärungen für die Inkonsistenzen werden diskutiert.

Comparison of short- and long-term effectiveness between ustekinumab and vedolizumab in patients with Crohn's disease refractory to anti-tumour necrosis factor therapy

BACKGROUND

The best option between vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-tumour necrosis factor (TNF) failure remains unclear in Crohn's disease.

AIMS

To compare the short- and long-term effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab in Crohn's disease patients with prior anti-TNF exposure.

METHODS

All Crohn's disease patients treated with ustekinumab or vedolizumab after exposure to at least one anti-TNF agent were included from two referral centres. Primary endpoint was corticosteroid-free clinical remission defined as Crohn's disease activity index <150 at week 54. Deep remission (corticosteroid-free clinical remission and faecal calprotectin <100 µg/g) was assessed at week 14. Propensity-matched analyses were applied to make the two groups comparable.

RESULTS

Overall, 312 patients (ustekinumab = 224 and vedolizumab = 88) were included. After propensity score analysis, ustekinumab was more effective to achieve corticosteroid-free clinical remission at week 54 (49.3% vs 41.2%, P = 0.04) and deep remission at Week 14 (25.9% vs 3.8%, P = 0.02) than vedolizumab. The rate of primary nonresponders (6.7% vs 14.8%, P = 0.034) and the long-term risk of drug discontinuation due to therapeutic failure (HR = 1.53 [1.04-2.07], P = 0.029) were lower in patients treated with ustekinumab compared with vedolizumab. Predictors of ustekinumab failure were complicated phenotype (odds ratio [OR] = 2.35 [1.31-4.22]; P = 0.004) and anti-TNF primary non-response (OR = 2.55 [1.27-5.12]; P = 0.008). We did not find any predictor of corticosteroid-free clinical remission in patients treated with vedolizumab. Vedolizumab was less effective than ustekinumab in patients >35 years old (OR = 0.41 [0.19-0.87]), with noncomplicated phenotype (OR=0.42 [0.18-0.96]), no prior bowel resection (OR = 0.49 [0.24-0.96]), and no steroids at baseline (OR=0.47 [0.23-0.97]).

CONCLUSION

Ustekinumab was more effective to achieve early and long-term effectiveness than vedolizumab in Crohn's disease patients who previously failed response to anti-TNF agents.

5-Aminolevulinic Acid as a Novel Therapeutic for Inflammatory Bowel Disease

5-Aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA) is a naturally occurring nonprotein amino acid licensed as an optical imaging agent for the treatment of gliomas. In recent years, 5-ALA has been shown to possess anti-inflammatory and immunoregulatory properties through upregulation of heme oxygenase-1 via enhancement of porphyrin, indicating that it may be beneficial for the treatment of inflammatory conditions. This study systematically examines 5-ALA for use in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Firstly, the ex vivo colonic stability and permeability of 5-ALA was assessed using human and mouse fluid and tissue. Secondly, the in vivo efficacy of 5-ALA, in the presence of sodium ferrous citrate, was investigated via the oral and intracolonic route in an acute DSS colitis mouse model of IBD. Results showed that 5-ALA was stable in mouse and human colon fluid, as well as in colon tissue. 5-ALA showed more tissue restricted pharmacokinetics when exposed to human colonic tissue. In vivo dosing demonstrated significantly improved colonic inflammation, increased local heme oxygenase-1 levels, and decreased concentrations of proinflammatory cytokines TNF-α, IL-6, and IL-1β in both plasma and colonic tissue. These effects were superior to that measured concurrently with established anti-inflammatory treatments, ciclosporin and 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine). As such, 5-ALA represents a promising addition to the IBD armamentarium, with potential for targeted colonic delivery.

Update on TDM (Therapeutic Drug Monitoring) with Ustekinumab, Vedolizumab and Tofacitinib in Inflammatory Bowel Disease

The goal of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is to optimize anti-TNF (tumor necrosis factor) biologic treatment in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although commercial assays are readily available for both ustekinumab and vedolizumab, the use of TDM with these newer biologic medications is at its infancy. The clinical utility of TDM with non-anti-TNF mechanisms of action is not clear. This review summarizes the latest available data on the pharmacokinetics of newer biologic and oral small molecules and highlights the threshold concentrations that have been associated with improved outcomes in IBD patients.

How to Optimize Treatment With Ustekinumab in Inflammatory Bowel Disease: Lessons Learned From Clinical Trials and Real-World Data

Ustekinumab is a fully human IgG1 monoclonal antibody that has been approved for the treatment of moderate to severe Crohn's disease, and more recently moderate to severe ulcerative colitis. It binds with high affinity to the p40 subunit of human interleukin-12 and 23. This mechanism of action prevents the bioactivity of both interleukins, thus precluding their interaction with the cell surface receptor protein. The pivotal clinical trials (UNITI-1, UNITI-2 and IM-UNITI) demonstrated its clinical efficacy and safety, in naïve patients and also in those previously exposed to immunosuppressants and/or biologics. There is now an extensive experience with its use worldwide, corroborating its favorable profile even in patients with refractory disease. However, the number of medical treatment options available in inflammatory bowel disease are still limited. Hence, we should prioritize the treatments that have a greater probability of response in an individual patient. Our aim was to review and summarize all the available literature regarding the potential predictors of response to ustekinumab that can increase the success rate with this therapy in clinical practice.