Weight stigma and diabetes stigma in U.S. adults with type 2 diabetes: Associations with diabetes self-care behaviors and perceptions of health care

Practical strategies to manage obesity in type 2 diabetes

The rising phenomenon of obesity, a major risk factor for the development and progression of type 2 diabetes, is a complex and multifaceted issue that requires a comprehensive and coordinated approach to be prevented and managed. Although novel pharmacological measures to combat obesity have achieved unprecedented efficacy, a healthy lifestyle remains essential for the long-term success of any therapeutic intervention. However, this requires a high level of intrinsic motivation and continued behavioural changes in the face of multiple metabolic, psychological and environmental factors promoting weight gain, particularly in the context of type 2 diabetes. This review is intended to provide practical recommendations in the context of a holistic, person-centred approach to weight management, including evidence-based and expert recommendations addressing supportive communication, shared decision-making, as well as nutritional and pharmacological therapeutic approaches to achieve sustained weight loss.

Weight-related discrimination, perceived stress and psychological and physical well-being of persons with type 2 diabetes: A mediation analysis

AIMS

The aim of the study was to examine perceived stress as a mediator of the association between weight-related discrimination and physical and psychological well-being among persons with type 2 diabetes (T2D).

METHODS

Data were obtained from 5104 persons with self-reported T2D participating in the All of Us research programme in the United States. The Everyday Discrimination Scale, Cohen's Perceived Stress Scale (PSS) and PROMIS Global Health Scale were used to measure weight-related discrimination, perceived stress and health outcomes (physical and psychological), respectively. Mediation effects of PSS were tested by bootstrapping with 5000 random samples.

RESULTS

Participants were, on average, 63.62 (SD 11.38) years old. Majority of them were female (55.53%), non-Hispanic White (72.61%), married or living with a partner (56.92%), had a household income of <$35,000 (31.99%) and had some college education (33.54%). We found that approximately 18% of study participants reported having experienced weight-related discrimination. We also found that weight-related discrimination was independently associated with poor physical and psychological well-being. These associations were partially mediated by perceived stress such that weight-related discrimination was associated with greater perceived stress, which was in turn associated with poorer physical and psychological well-being.

CONCLUSIONS

Given that weight-related discrimination is associated with poor outcomes through elevated stress, interventions that target stress may disrupt this pathway thereby helping to reduce the health impact of weight-related discrimination. This assertion should, however, be tested in future studies.

Barriers to metabolic surgery and how to address them

After bariatric surgery, patients with obesity achieve sustainable weight loss, gain in mobility, quality of life and life expectancy. Bariatric surgery can lead to remission of type 2 diabetes or to long term glycaemic control for patients with type 2 diabetes, while medical treatment has a preventive efficacy on micro and macrovascular complications. This has led to the concept of metabolic surgery to treat type 2 diabetes. Despite the benefits, only a small proportion of eligible patients undergo bariatric/metabolic surgery. Powerful antidiabetic medications, self-estimated lack of knowledge by medical professionals and fear of surgical complications are some of the arguments to prefer medical treatment of type 2 diabetes obesity versus metabolic surgery. We have reviewed in this paper the barriers which explain the low referral rate to metabolic surgery. With the point of view of the diabetologist, the general practitioner and the patient, we have addressed them to help clinicians and patients model an evidenced-based patient-oriented medical plan.

Weight stigma in healthcare settings: the experience of Arab and Jewish bariatric surgery candidates in Israel

BACKGROUND

Weight-related stigma and discrimination are prevalent in our society with adverse biopsychosocial outcomes to people with obesity and morbid obesity. Studies suggest that weight bias in healthcare settings are quite prevalent, but there have been, as far as we know, lack of studies examining prevalence and correlates of weight bias experiences among bariatric surgery candidates in Israel. We aim to understand the nature and prevalence of weight stigma among bariatric surgery candidates. To identify differences between Jewish and Arab candidates. To examine the impact of weight stigma experiences on weight bias internalization (WBI).

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was performed among 117 adult bariatric surgery candidates from three hospitals in northern Israel (47.8% Jews, 82.4% females, average BMI 42.4 ± 5.2 Kg/meter2). Patients who agreed to participate completed a structured questionnaire on the same day that the bariatric surgery committee met. WBI was measured using a validated 10-item scale. Experiences of weight stigma were measured using items adapted from prior international studies.

RESULTS

About two thirds of the participants had at least one experience of weight stigma (teased, treated unfairly, or discriminated against because of their weight). As many as 75% of participants reported that weight served as a barrier to getting appropriate health care and as many as half of participants felt in the last year that a doctor judged them because of their weight. No significant differences were found between Arabs and Jews in the prevalence of weight stigma experiences and WBI. However, a trend towards more stigma experiences among Jews was noted. WBI was predicted by female gender and experiences of weight stigma, both in general and within healthcare settings.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight stigma towards bariatric surgery candidates in Israel is quite prevalent, and specifically in healthcare settings. It is important to adopt policy actions and intervention programs to improve awareness to this phenomenon among the general public and specifically among healthcare providers, as many healthcare providers may be unaware of the adverse effect of weight stigma and of ways in which they are contributing to the problem. Future studies may validate our findings using larger sample size and longitudinal design.

Bringing an end to diabetes stigma and discrimination: an international consensus statement on evidence and recommendations

People with diabetes often encounter stigma (ie, negative social judgments, stereotypes, prejudice), which can adversely affect emotional, mental, and physical health; self-care, access to optimal health care; and social and professional opportunities. To accelerate an end to diabetes stigma and discrimination, an international multidisciplinary expert panel (n=51 members, from 18 countries) conducted rapid reviews and participated in a three-round Delphi survey process. We achieved consensus on 25 statements of evidence and 24 statements of recommendations. The consensus is that diabetes stigma is driven primarily by blame, perceptions of burden or sickness, invisibility, and fear or disgust. On average, four in five adults with diabetes experience diabetes stigma and one in five experience discrimination (ie, unfair and prejudicial treatment) due to diabetes, such as in health care, education, and employment. Diabetes stigma and discrimination are harmful, unacceptable, unethical, and counterproductive. Collective leadership is needed to proactively challenge, and bring an end to, diabetes stigma and discrimination. Consequently, we achieved unanimous consensus on a pledge to end diabetes stigma and discrimination.

Exploring facilitators and barriers to patient-provider communication regarding diabetes self-management

Objective

Long-term type 2 diabetes management requires open communication between a patient and their provider for self-care adherence. This study explored facilitators and barriers to diabetes-specific communication in West Virginia, a medically underserved state with the highest prevalence of diabetes (16.2%) in the U.S.

Methods

A secondary qualitative analysis was conducted using data from semi-structured interviews (n = 34) and 4 focus groups (n = 23) with participants of a diabetes education program. Transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.

Results

Three facilitators to patient-provider communication emerged: "Patient-Provider Partnership", "Provider Accessibility", and "Empowerment Through Education". Partnership with providers, especially those who were accessible outside of scheduled appointments, and empowerment obtained through diabetes education facilitated diabetes-specific patient-provider communication. However, barriers included "Providers' Focus on 'Numbers' Rather than Patient Concerns", "Patient Lack of Preparation for Appointments", and "Providers 'Talking Down to' Patients".

Conclusion

The findings highlight patient- and provider-related factors that impact diabetes-specific communication.

Innovation

Previous interventions have trained providers in communication skills. Despite some success, challenges in implementation remain considering providers' limited time and overwhelming demands. This study suggests that diabetes education programs incorporating communication and self-advocacy skills could be a promising alternative as they can empower patients to communicate their diabetes-specific needs/preferences with providers.

Feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a self-stigma reduction pilot program for Japanese individuals with type 2 diabetes

Objective

To examine the feasibility, acceptability, and effects of a self-stigma reduction program for patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

Methods

We adopted a within-subjects pre-post study design, measuring self-stigma among T2DM patients who received treatment at a tertiary-level hospital.

Results

Of the 17 participants, 11 participants completed the program (mean age: 54.36 ± 8.58 years; women: 63.6%; mean T2DM duration: 12.09 ± 10.41 years). Participants experienced reduced levels of self-stigma between the pre- and post-study time points (mean pre-study score: 35.82 ± 16.26; mean post-study score: 25.55 ± 16.91). The difference in self-stigma was not significant (effect size: d = 0.8, χ² = 3.6, p = 0.057). Overall, participants who completed the program were satisfied except for the duration of each session.

Conclusion

The self-stigma reduction program was relatively feasible and acceptable. Although due to the small sample size our results were not statistically significant, a large reduction of self-stigma was found in those who completed the program, which is promising. Future studies with larger sample sizes are needed to measure the program's long-term effects on the reduction of self-stigma.

Innovation

This program is innovative as the researchers and healthcare professionals collaborated with patients who contributed their narratives.

Implicit or Unconscious Bias in Diabetes Care

"Implicit bias," also called "unconscious bias," refers to associations outside of conscious awareness that adversely affect one's perception of a person or group. Awareness of implicit bias has been increasing in the realm of diabetes care. Here, the authors highlight several types of unconscious bias on the part of clinicians and patients, including biases based on race, ethnicity, and obesity. They discuss how these biases can negatively affect patient-centered clinical interactions and diabetes care delivery, and they recommend implementation of evidence-based interventions and other health system policy approaches to reduce the potential impact of such biases in health care settings.

The relationship between psychological resilience and quality of life among the Chinese diabetes patients: the mediating role of stigma and the moderating role of empowerment

BACKGROUND

Although some factors, such as stigma and empowerment, influence the complex relationship between psychological resilience and quality of life, few studies have explored similar psychological mechanisms among patients with diabetes. Therefore, this study explored the mediating role of stigma and the moderating role of empowerment in the psychological mechanisms by which psychological resilience affects quality of life.

METHODS

From June to September 2022, data were collected by multi-stage stratified sampling and random number table method. Firstly, six tertiary hospitals in Wuhu were numbered and then selected using the random number table method, resulting in the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College being selected. Secondly, two departments were randomly selected from this hospital: endocrinology and geriatrics. Thirdly, survey points were set up in each department, and T2DM patients were randomly selected for questionnaire surveys. In addition, we used the Connor-Davidson Elasticity Scale (CD-RISC) to measure the psychological resilience of patients, and used the Stigma Scale for Chronic Illness (SSCI) to measure stigma. Empowerment was measured by the Diabetes Empowerment Scale (DES). Quality of Life was assessed by the Diabetes Quality of Life Scale (DQoL). We used SPSS (version 21) and PROCESS (version 4.1) for data analysis.

RESULTS

(1) Psychological resilience was negatively correlated with stigma and quality of life, and positively correlated with empowerment. Stigma was positively associated with empowerment and quality of life. Empowerment was negatively correlated with quality of life. (2) The mediation analysis showed that psychological resilience had a direct predictive effect on the quality of life, and stigma partially mediated the relationship; Empowerment moderates the first half of "PR → stigma → quality of life"; Empowerment moderates the latter part of "PR → stigma → quality of life."

CONCLUSIONS

Under the mediating effect of stigma, psychological resilience can improve quality of life. Empowerment has a moderating effect on the relationship between psychological resilience and stigma, and it also has a moderating effect on the relationship between stigma and quality of life. These results facilitate the understanding of the relationship mechanisms between psychological resilience and quality of life.

The relationship between stigma and psychological distress among people with diabetes: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

Diabetes may perceive or experience varying degrees of stigma and psychological distress. The association between diabetes-related stigma and psychological distress has been examined in many studies, but no research has used a quantitative synthesis method to investigate the severity of this association and the moderators of the relationship. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to quantitatively integrate previous findings to identify the magnitude of the association between stigma and psychological distress among people with diabetes.

REVIEW METHODS

Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines, we systematically searched four English academic databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and PsycINFO) and three Chinese databases (China National Knowledge Infrastructure [CNKI], WANFANG Data, China Science and Technology Journal Database [VIP]). The databases were searched from the inception of each database to the end of March 2023. The pooled correlation coefficient of the association between stigma and psychological distress among people with diabetes was calculated by a random effects model using Stata software (version 17.0), and several moderators that impacted this relationship were identified.

RESULTS

Eligible studies (N = 19) with a total of 12,777 participants were analysed. The pooled correlation was high between diabetes-related stigma and psychological distress (r = 0.50, 95% CI: [0.43-0.57]). Moreover, the association was moderated by the diabetes stigma measurement tools and diabetes distress measurement tools used. However, the relationship was not moderated by type of diabetes, age, gender, geographical location, or type of stigma.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the meta-analysis showed that stigma is strongly related to psychological distress among people with diabetes. Longitudinal or experimental research should be expanded in the future to further identify the causal pathways in the relationship between diabetes stigma and diabetes distress.

Diabetes stigma and weight stigma among physicians treating type 2 diabetes: Overlapping patterns of bias

AIMS

Adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) report experiencing stigma across multiple settings, including stigmatizing interactions with their healthcare providers. However, research examining physician biases toward patients with T2D is scarce. Identifying stigma-related barriers in diabetes care is essential to prevent providers' biases from impairing health care delivery. This study assessed attitudes towards individuals with T2D and obesity among physicians who treat T2D.

METHODS

Physicians specializing in internal medicine or endocrinology (n=205) completed a series of online questionnaires assessing their attitudes towards patients with T2D and obesity, and their attributions of controllability and blame of individuals with T2D and obesity.

RESULTS

While 85% of physicians felt professionally prepared and confident to treat patients with T2D, 1/3 reported being repulsed by patients with T2D and view them as lazy (39%), lacking motivation (44%), and non-compliant with treatment (44%). Many witnessed professionals in their field making negative comments about patients with T2D (44%). Physicians endorsed worse levels of bias towards patients with obesity than T2D, but differences were small.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings highlight the need for stigma reduction interventions for physicians addressing both T2D and obesity. Research assessing the effects of T2D stigma on quality of patient care and health outcomes is needed.

The status of stigma in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and its association with medication adherence and quality of life in China: A cross-sectional study

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a chronic, lifelong disease that can negatively affect patients' mental health and quality of life (QoL). A notable proportion of patients with T2DM worldwide have experienced stigma through instances of discrimination, unfair social treatment and lack of promotion opportunities. Stigma refers to the negative emotional experience of people with illness, often mixed with self-stigmatization. Stigma remains an obstacle to patients' self-management, its association with patients with T2DM on medication adherence and QoL in China are unknown. Therefore, the objective of the study was to analyze the status of stigma in patients with T2DM and its association with medication adherence and QoL in China. A cross-sectional, observational study among 346 inpatients with T2DM in 2 tertiary-level hospitals in Chengdu, China, was conducted using a general data questionnaire, Chinese version type 2 diabetes stigma scale (DSAS-2), Morisky medication adherence scale (MMAS-8) and diabetic QoL specificity scale by convenient sampling method from January to August 2020. The total score and scores for the 3 dimensions of stigma, treated differently, blame and judgment, and self-stigma, were 54.30 ± 12.22, 16.57 ± 4.06, 20.92 ± 4.42, 16.82 ± 4.78, respectively. The scores for medication adherence and QoL were 5.43 ± 1.8 and 73.24 ± 9.38. Pearson correlation analysis showed that the total score of stigma and the scores of each dimension were negatively weak-correlated with the score of medication adherence (r = -0.158 to -0.121, P < .05), and positively moderate-correlated with the score of QoL (R = 0.073 to 0.614, P < .05). Stigma of patients with T2DM was negatively associated with medication adherence, and negatively associated with QoL, namely, the stronger the stigma, the worse the medication adherence and QoL. The results of the hierarchical regression analysis revealed that stigma independently explained 8.8% of the variation in medication adherence and 9.4% to 38.8% of the variation in QoL. The stigma of patients with T2DM was at a moderate degree and negatively correlated with medication adherence and QoL, it is necessary to pay more attention to relieve stigma and negative emotions timely, in order to improve patients' mental health and QoL.

Type 2 diabetes stigma and its association with clinical, psychological, and behavioral outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis

AIM

To synthesize quantitative research evidence on the association between type 2 diabetes (T2D) stigma and psychological, behavioral, and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

We searched APA PyschInfo, Cochrane Central, Scopus, Web of Science, Medline, CINAHL and EMBASE through November 2022. Peer-reviewed observational studies examining the association between T2D stigma and psychological, behavioral, and/or clinical outcomes were eligible for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed with the JBI critical appraisal checklist. Correlation coefficients were pooled in random effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

Our search produced 9642 citations, 29 met the inclusion criteria. Included articles were published between 2014 and 2022. We found a weak positive correlation between T2D stigma and HbA1C (r=0.16, 95% CI:0.08 to 025, I²=70%, N=7 studies), a moderate positive correlation between T2D stigma and depressive symptoms (r=0.49, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.54, I²=26.9%, n=5 studies) and diabetes distress (r=0.54, 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.72, I²=96.9%, n=7studies). Persons with T2D stigma who experienced stigma tended to have less engagement in diabetes self-management, though this association was weak (r=-0.17, 95% CI: -0.25 to -0.08, I²=79.8%, n=7studies).

CONCLUSIONS

T2D stigma was associated with negative health outcomes. Further studies are required to disentangle the underlying causal mechanisms to inform the development of appropriate stigma-reduction interventions.

Women's perceptions of weight stigma and experiences of weight-neutral treatment for binge eating disorder: A qualitative study

BACKGROUND

The detrimental effects of weight stigma are a growing concern as a contributor to negative physical and mental health outcomes, disparities in care, and healthcare avoidance. Research exploring the impact of weight-neutral healthcare is limited but suggests weight-neutral interventions are associated with positive psychological and behavioral outcomes. Little is known about patients' lived experiences receiving weight-neutral healthcare.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews between Feb 5, 2019 and Feb 25, 2020 with 21 women (90% non-Hispanic white, mean age 49 ± 14.8 years) who had type 2 diabetes or prediabetes and high body weight (mean body mass index 43.8 ± 8.4, range: 30.2-63.9) and previously attended a specialized treatment program for binge eating disorder. We recruited individuals with type 2 diabetes or prediabetes who completed of >2 weeks of a specialized binge eating disorder treatment program with the ability to participate in an English-spoken interview and did not have cognitive impairment or severe psychopathology that would limit recall or engagement in the interview. Interviews were analysed using thematic analysis and Nvivo software. The main outcome we studied was patients' lived experience in healthcare settings and in a weight-neutral eating disorder treatment program.

FINDINGS

Participants reported experiencing weight stigma in healthcare encounters and believed this decreased the quality of care they received. While participants frequently attempted to lose weight, they experienced embarrassment, internalized a sense of failure, and felt blamed for their weight and health conditions. In describing experiences within a weight-neutral paradigm, participants reported that helpful elements included consistency in the eating pattern (emphasizing adequate, varied, and nourishing intake), sufficient and specific education, and comprehensive support. Reported impacts included decreased binge episodes, experiencing less shame, and increased resiliency following treatment. Some participants experienced the weight-neutral treatment recommendations and the absence of the pursuit of weight loss as challenging.

INTERPRETATION

Weight-neutral treatment may improve psychological and behavioral outcomes regarding binge eating, and longitudinal, quantitative research is warranted. These findings are useful to decrease weight stigma in provider-patient interactions.

FUNDING

The Dudley Allen Sargent Research Fund, Boston University.

A Spanish-language translation for the U.S. of the type 2 diabetes stigma assessment scale (DSAS-2 Spa-US)

Background

Diabetes stigma is recognized to negatively impact health-related outcomes for people living with type 2 diabetes (T2D), but there is a dearth of evidence among U.S. Latino adults with T2D. Our aim was to develop a Spanish-language translation of the Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2) and examine its psychometric properties among U.S. Latino adults with T2D.

Methods

The translation was developed through a multi-step process, including a focus group with community health workers (n=5) and cognitive debriefing interviews with Latino adults with T2D (n=8). It was field-tested in an online survey of U.S. Latino adults with T2D, recruited via Facebook (October 2018 to June 2019). Exploratory factor analysis examined structural validity. Convergent and divergent validity were assessed by testing hypothesized correlations with measures of general chronic illness stigma, diabetes distress, depressive and anxiety symptoms, loneliness, and self-esteem.

Results

Among 817 U.S. Latino adults with T2D who participated in the online survey, 517 completed the Spanish-language DSAS-2 (DSAS Spa-US) and were eligible for the study (mean age 54 ± 10 years, and 72% female). Exploratory factor analysis supported a single-factor solution (eigenvalue=8.20), accounting for 82% of shared variance among the 19 items, all loading ≥ 0.5. Internal consistency reliability was high (α=0.93). As expected, strong, positive correlations were observed between diabetes stigma and general chronic illness stigma (rs=0.65) and diabetes distress (rs=0.57); medium, positive correlations, between diabetes stigma and depressive (rs=0.45) and anxiety (rs=0.43) symptoms, and loneliness (rs=0.41); and a moderate negative correlation between diabetes stigma and self-esteem (rs=-0.50). There was no relationship between diabetes stigma and diabetes duration (rs=0.07, ns).

Conclusion

The DSAS-2 Spa-US is a version of the DSAS-2, translated into Spanish, that has good psychometric properties for assessing diabetes stigma in U.S. Latino adults with T2D.

The role of resilience in diabetes stigma among young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes

AIM

To explore the prevalence and related factors influencing diabetes stigma among Chinese young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional, quantitative study was conducted through questionnaires.

METHODS

A total of 453 young and middle-aged patients with type 2 diabetes were recruited. Questionnaire survey was conducted with convenience sampling from September 2019 to December 2020. This included demographic questionnaire, Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2) and Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC). The STROBE checklist was applied as the reporting guideline for this study.

RESULTS

The scores of diabetes stigma and resilience of patients were 48.18 ± 14.52 and 66.02 ± 7.18, respectively. Diabetes stigma was negatively correlated with resilience, the correlation coefficient was -0.581. The results showed that the complications, diabetes year, monthly income and insulin treatment are important factors affecting stigma. In addition, it is resilience that was a protective factor of diabetes stigma, explaining 27.2% of the variance in diabetes stigma.

Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2): Cultural and linguistic adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Arabic version

AIMS

To culturally and linguistically adapt the Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-2) into Arabic and assess its psychometric properties.

METHODS

Following forward-backward translation of the DSAS-2, the Content Validity Index (CVI) was assessed. Cognitive debriefing and pilot testing were conducted with adults with T2DM. The Arabic DSAS-2 was included in a multi-center, cross-sectional study (N = 327) Arabic-speaking adults with type 2 diabetes. Psychometric analyses included exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (EFA/CFA), internal consistency reliability, and convergent validity.

RESULTS

The Arabic DSAS-2 was considered appropriate, with an excellent CVI (0.98). Unforced EFA revealed a satisfactory three-factor structure, indicating the same subscales as the original instrument ('Treated differently', 'Blame and judgment', 'Self-stigma'). EFA for three factors showed good indicators (KMO=0.924; Bartlett's test of sphericity χ2 = 4063.709, df=171, p &lt; 0.001). Internal consistency was satisfactory for both the three-factor structure (α = 0.91, α = 0.88, and α = 0.88, respectively) and the single factor (α = 0.94). CFA results were inconclusive. Although fit indices improved for the single-factor model, compared to the three-factor, they remained inadequate. The total scale demonstrated satisfactory convergent validity with self-esteem.

CONCLUSIONS

The Arabic DSAS-2 has excellent reliability and acceptable validity, supporting a three-factor structure as well as the use of a total score.

Propiedades psicométricas de la versión en español del Type 2 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS 2) en población colombiana

Introducción.

El estigma se ha asociado negativamente al control metabólico y la calidad de vida de pacientes con diabetes de tipo 2. El cuestionario Diabetes Stigma Assesment Scale 2 (DSAS 2) fue diseñado para medir específicamente el estigma asociado en personas con este tipo de diabetes. Sin embargo, las propiedades psicométricas de su versión en español aún no han sido analizadas.

Objetivo.

Analizar la validez y confiabilidad de la versión en español del DSAS 2 en población colombiana.

Materiales y métodos.

Se solicitó a 501 pacientes con diabetes de tipo 2 en Barranquilla contestar la versión en español del DSAS 2, un cuestionario con indicadores sociodemográficos y clínicos, así como instrumentos de medición de la depresión, la autoeficacia y el estrés. Se hizo un análisis factorial (exploratorio y confirmatorio) para determinar la estructura interna del DSAS 2 en español y se usó el coeficiente alfa (α) para evaluar su confiabilidad. Además, se analizó la relación entre los puntajes del DSAS 2 y las otras variables estudiadas.

Resultados.

La estructura de tres factores (trato diferente-juicio, culpa y vergüenza) se ajustó adecuadamente a los datos (raíz del error cuadrático medio (RMSEA)=0,081, índice de ajuste comparativo (CIF)=0,959, índice de Tucker-Lewis (TLI)=0,95) y su confiabilidad fue buena (α=0,76). Se observaron correlaciones significativas del puntaje del DSAS 2 en español con la autoeficacia (r_s=-0,37; p<0,001), el estrés (r_s=0,24; p<0,001) y la presencia de síntomas depresivos (r_s=0,1; p=0,021). Además, los puntajes de la escala mostraron variaciones asociadas a variables sociodemográficas y clínicas.

Conclusiones.

La versión en español presenta ciertas diferencias con la versión original del DSAS2, sin embargo, su validez y confiabilidad son suficientes y adecuadas para su uso en Colombia.

Associations between diabetes duration and self-stigma development in Japanese people with type 2 diabetes: a secondary analysis of cross-sectional data

OBJECTIVES

To examine the associations between self-stigma and diabetes duration in a sample of Japanese people with type 2 diabetes.

DESIGN

A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Two university hospitals, one general hospital and one clinic in Tokyo, Japan.

PARTICIPANTS

Outpatients with type 2 diabetes aged 20-74 years and receiving treatment from diabetes specialist physicians (n=209) completed a self-administered questionnaire.

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Self-stigma was measured as the primary outcome. Patient Activation Measure, body mass index and haemoglobin A1c were measured as secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

One-way analysis of covariance showed significant differences in self-stigma levels between the five groups of diabetes duration (≤5 years, 6-10 years, 11-15 years, 16-21 years and 22 years or more) after controlling for age, gender, education, marital status, diabetes treatment (insulin use) and diabetes-related complications, F(4,198)=2.83, p=0.026. Multiple comparisons using Bonferroni correction showed statistically significant differences in self-stigma levels between the groups with ≤5 years (95% CI 59.63 to 69.73) and 11-15 years with diabetes (95% CI 71.12 to 80.82; p=0.020). The highest mean level of self-stigma was observed in the group having diabetes for 11-15 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Self-stigma was associated with diabetes duration and was lowest after diagnosis and gradually increased, with its highest levels being observed in those having diabetes for 11-15 years. Self-stigma takes time to develop and gradually increases in individuals as it is learnt through direct experiences of diabetes-related stigma after self-administering treatment in everyday social situations.

Relationship between perceived social stigma and diabetes self-care activities in Iranian participants with type 1 diabetes

Purpose

A large percentage of side effects and problems associated with diabetes including social stigma interfere with health promotion behaviors in people with diabetes, minimize their social interactions, and indeed prevent them from asking for help regarding treatments and follow-up care services. Therefore, the present study was to elucidate the relationship between perceived social stigma (PSS) and diabetes self-care (DSC) activities in Iranian participants with type 1 diabetes (T1D).

Methods

This correlational study was fulfilled on 135 participants with T1D in the city of Tabriz, Iran, selected through the convenience sampling method. The data were collected via the Demographic and Clinical Data Collection Form, the Type 1 Diabetes Stigma Assessment Scale (DSAS-1), and the Summary of Diabetes Self-Care Activities Questionnaire (SDSCAQ). The data were analyzed using the SPSS Statistics software (Version 16) incorporating descriptive and analytical statistics.

Results

The results revealed that the total score mean of PSS in the study participants was 51.43±12.16, which was at a moderate level. As well, the mean score of the DSC activities was 37.93±11.26. As a whole, no significant relationship was observed between the PSS and the DSC activities.

Conclusion

According to the study findings, the PSS was not significantly correlated with the DSC activities; however, both variables in most study participants were at moderate levels. Therefore, further studies on the factors associated with the social stigma of diabetes are necessary. Knowing these factors can help treatment team plan to reduce the diabetes stigma and improve people with diabetes' self-care.

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Stigma Surrounding Type 2 Diabetes in Colombia

Type 2 diabetes is a global epidemic, and many people feel stigmatized for having this disease. The stigma is a relevant barrier to diabetes management. However, evidence in this regard is scarce in Latin America. This study aimed to analyze the level of stigma surrounding type 2 diabetes in the Colombian population and its relationships with sociodemographic, clinical, psychosocial variables and behaviors related to management of the disease (self-management behaviors). This cross-sectional study included 501 Colombian adults with type 2 diabetes. We estimated the relation between stigma and selected variables through linear regression models. Additionally, we analyzed the mediator role of psychosocial variables in the relationship between stigma and self-management behaviors through structural equation models. A total of 16.4% of patients showed concerning levels of stigma. The time elapsed since diagnosis (β = -0.23) and socioeconomic status (β = -0.13) were significant predictors of the level of stigma. Stigma was negatively correlated with self-efficacy (β = -0.36), self-esteem (β = -0.37), and relationship with health care provider (β = -0.46), and positively correlated with stress (β = 0.23). Self-efficacy, self-esteem, and the relationships with health care providers had a mediation role in the relationship between stigma and self-management behaviors. These variables would be part of the mechanisms through which the perception of stigma harms self-management behaviors. The stigma of type 2 diabetes is frequent in the Colombian population and negatively associated with important aspects of disease management.

Association between patients' body mass index and emergency department wait times: A multicenter observational cohort investigation by the reducing disparities increasing equity in emergency medicine (REDEEM) study group

OBJECTIVE

Numerous studies have demonstrated evidence of obesity bias in healthcare settings, however, little is known about obesity bias in the Emergency Department (ED). The objective of this study was to investigate obesity bias in an ED setting by assessing the association between body mass index (BMI) and door-to-room (DTR) or door-to-provider (DTP) times among ED patients.

METHODS

We conducted an observational cohort study of all adult patient (age ≥ 18 years of age) visits to 21 Mayo Clinic and Mayo Clinic Health System EDs between November 1, 2018 and March 31, 2020. We compared DTR and DTP times based on BMI category.

RESULTS

We found that median DTR and DTP times for adults with class 3 obesity are significantly shorter than patients in the normal weight category. For men with class 3 obesity, median DTR and DTP times were 7.5% and 5.4% shorter than men in the normal weight category. Relative to women in the normal weight category, the median DTR and DTP times were 4.6% and 3.8% faster for women in obesity class 1, 4.9% and 5.1% faster for women in obesity class 2, and DTR was 4.4% faster for women in obesity class 3. These percentage differences translated to slightly shorter wait times of 0.4-1.2 min compared to median wait times for patients with normal BMI.

CONCLUSION

We did not find evidence of longer wait times experienced by people with obesity. Rather, patients with obesity often experienced wait times that were shorter than patients of normal weight.

The roles of experienced and internalized weight stigma in healthcare experiences: Perspectives of adults engaged in weight management across six countries

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

Considerable evidence from U.S. studies suggests that weight stigma is consequential for patient-provider interactions and healthcare for people with high body weight. Despite international calls for efforts to reduce weight stigma in the medical community, cross-country research is lacking in this field. This study provides the first multinational investigation of associations between weight stigma and healthcare experiences across six Western countries.

METHODS

Participants were 13,996 adults residing in Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the UK, and the US who were actively enrolled in an internationally available behavioral weight management program. Participants completed identical online surveys in the dominant language for their country that assessed experienced weight stigma, internalized weight bias, and healthcare behaviors and experiences including perceived quality of care, avoidance or delay of seeking care, experiences with providers, and perceived weight stigma from doctors.

RESULTS

Among participants who reported a history of weight stigma (56-61%), two-thirds of participants in each country reported experiencing weight stigma from doctors. Across all six countries, after accounting for demographics, BMI, and experienced stigma, participants with higher internalized weight bias reported greater healthcare avoidance, increased perceived judgment from doctors due to body weight, lower frequency of obtaining routine checkups, less frequent listening and respect from providers, and lower quality of healthcare. Additionally, experienced weight stigma (from any source) was indirectly associated with poorer healthcare experiences through weight bias internalization, consistently across the six countries.

CONCLUSIONS

Weight stigma in healthcare is prevalent among adults actively engaged in weight management across different Western countries, and internalized weight bias has negative implications for healthcare even after controlling for BMI. The similar findings across all six countries underscore the negative consequences of weight stigma on healthcare behaviors and experiences, and emphasize the need for collective international efforts to address this problem.