PS01.05 Surgical and Clinical Outcomes With Neoadjuvant Atezolizumab in Resectable Stage IB–IIIB NSCLC: LCMC3 Trial Primary Analysis

A review of perioperative treatment strategies with immunotherapy and tyrosine kinase inhibitors in resectable and stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer

Stage IIIA-N2 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous group with different potential therapeutic approaches. Treatment is typically multimodal with either surgical resection after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and/or radiation or concurrent chemotherapy and radiation if unresectable. Despite the multimodal treatment and early stage, cure rates have traditionally been low. The introduction of immunotherapy changed the treatment landscape for NSCLC in all stages, and the introduction of immunotherapy in early-stage lung cancer has improved event free survival and overall survival. Tyrosine Kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have also improved outcomes in early-stage mutation-driven NSCLC. Optimal treatment choice and sequence is increasingly becoming based upon personalized factors including clinical characteristics, comorbidities, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) score, and the presence of targetable mutations. Despite encouraging data from multiple trials, the optimal multimodal sequence of stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC treatment remains unresolved and warrants further investigation. This review article summarizes recent major clinical trials of neoadjuvant and adjuvant treatment including stage IIIA-N2 NSCLC with a focus on immunotherapy and TKIs.

Pathological complete response to neoadjuvant therapy with serplulimab and chemotherapy in stage IIIB small cell lung cancer: a case report and literature review

Chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy has significantly improved survival in patients with extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC), and neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy has emerged as the standard treatment for those with resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the potential benefits of surgery following neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in locally advanced SCLC remain unclear. Herein, we report a patient diagnosed with stage IIIB SCLC, who was administered five cycles of neoadjuvant serplulimab combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery, and subsequently achieved a pathologic complete response (pCR). Within a follow-up duration of six months, the patient displayed neither recurrence nor metastasis and experienced no treatment-related adverse reactions of any grade. Based on this case, for locally advanced SCLC, neoadjuvant serplulimab combined with chemotherapy followed by surgery may present an effective, safe, and potentially curative treatment strategy. Nonetheless, further prospective studies are needed to verify our findings.

Neoadjuvant therapy in non-small cell lung cancer: basis, promise, and challenges

Introduction

Survival rates for early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remain poor despite the decade-long established standard of surgical resection and systemic adjuvant therapy. Realizing this, researchers are exploring novel therapeutic targets and deploying neoadjuvant therapies to predict and improve clinical and pathological outcomes in lung cancer patients. Neoadjuvant therapy is also increasingly being used to downstage disease to allow for resection with a curative intent. In this review, we aim to summarize the current and developing landscape of using neoadjuvant therapy in the management of NSCLC.

Methods

The PubMed.gov and the ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched on 15 January 2023, to identify published research studies and trials relevant to this review. One hundred and seven published articles and seventeen ongoing clinical trials were selected, and relevant findings and information was reviewed.

Results & Discussion

Neoadjuvant therapy, proven through clinical trials and meta-analyses, exhibits safety and efficacy comparable to or sometimes surpassing adjuvant therapy. By attacking micro-metastases early and reducing tumor burden, it allows for effective downstaging of disease, allowing for curative surgical resection attempts. Research into neoadjuvant therapy has necessitated the development of surrogate endpoints such as major pathologic response (MPR) and pathologic complete response (pCR) allowing for shorter duration clinical trials. Novel chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and targeted therapy agents are being tested at a furious rate, paving the way for a future of personalized systemic therapy in NSCLC. However, challenges remain that prevent further mainstream adoption of preoperative (Neoadjuvant) therapy. These include the risk of delaying curative surgical resection in scenarios of adverse events or treatment resistance. Also, the predictive value of surrogate markers of disease cure still needs robust verification. Finally, the body of published data is still limited compared to adjuvant therapy. Addressing these concerns with more large scale randomized controlled trials is needed.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) has improved outcomes for patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Building off of this, it has been hypothesized that the utilization of ICB early during the disease course may be advantageous, particularly in the neoadjuvant setting prior to definitive surgical resection. Preclinical studies have suggested that a more potent immune response may be induced by neoadjuvant ICB in the presence of a higher antigen burden and intact tumor draining lymph nodes. Recent clinical trials evaluating neoadjuvant ICB with or without chemotherapy combinations in patients with resectable NSCLC led to improved pathological responses and longer event-free survival when neoadjuvant ICB was added to chemotherapy. Surgical outcomes were also supportive of this approach, with encouraging rates of pathological downstaging. Additionally, the availability of pre-treatment biopsy samples and post-treatment surgical resection tissues facilitates the conducting of correlative studies that continue to improve our understanding of the mechanisms of response and resistance to ICB. As long-term survival outcomes from ongoing clinical trials are awaited, several important questions require further investigation, including the optimal duration of neoadjuvant therapy, the clinical endpoints most predictive of long-term outcomes, and translational studies that should be investigated in future trial designs. Additionally, the optimal clinical management of patients with residual disease at the time of surgical resection and those who experience recurrence remains to be determined. In this review, we will (1) discuss the rationale behind neoadjuvant ICB-based therapy in NSCLC, (2) summarize the clinical data available thus far, and (3) highlight unanswered questions that need to be addressed in future studies to maximize the clinical benefits of this approach.

Efficacy and surgical safety of sequential surgical resection after pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy for initial unresectable stage IIIB non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

Neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy is effective in resectable NSCLC. However, its role in unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients remains controversial. This study aimed to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy followed by surgical resection to treat initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients.

METHODS

This study retrospectively analyzed 59 initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients who received induction pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy between June 2019 and April 2022. Clinical characteristics, radiological and pathological responses, and survival outcomes were collected and evaluated.

RESULTS

Fifity-nine initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients were identified and divided into surgery (n = 23) and non-surgery (n = 36) groups with a median follow-up time of 15.0 months. The median PFS/DFS of the surgery group was significantly longer than the non-surgery group (not reached vs. 15.5 months, p = 0.0031). The median overall survival (OS) was not reached in both groups, and the OS rate was 100% (23/23) in the surgery group and 83.3% (30/36) in the non-surgery group. The pathological analysis suggested that 13 of 23 patients (56.5%) achieved major pathological response (MPR) or pathological complete response (pCR), and more squamous cell carcinoma cases were observed in the MPR group compared to the non-MPR group (p = 0.034). All patients in the surgery group had an R0 resection, and no surgical-related mortality was recorded; only three patients (13.0%) experienced any postoperative complications.

CONCLUSION

In this retrospective study, surgical resection after neoadjuvant immunochemotherapy was promising for initial unresectable stage IIIB NSCLC patients, with a high MPR rate and good surgical safety.

Does major pathological response after neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in resectable nonsmall-cell lung cancers predict prognosis? A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

Overall survival is the gold-standard outcome measure for phase 3 trials, but the need for a long follow-up period can delay the translation of potentially effective treatment to clinical practice. The validity of major pathological response (MPR) as a surrogate of survival for non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy remains unclear.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and delivery of PD-1/PD-L1/CTLA-4 inhibitors prior to resection; other forms/modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. Statistics utilized the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model depending on the heterogeneity ( I2 ).

RESULTS

Fifty-three trials (seven randomized, 29 prospective nonrandomized, 17 retrospective) were identified. The pooled rate of MPR was 53.8%. Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR (OR 6.19, 4.39-8.74, P <0.00001). MPR was associated with improved disease-free survival/progression-free survival/event-free survival (HR 0.28, 0.10-0.79, P =0.02) and overall survival (HR 0.80, 0.72-0.88, P <0.0001). Patients with stage III (vs I/II) and PD-L1 ≥1% (vs <1%) more likely achieved MPR (OR 1.66,1.02-2.70, P =0.04; OR 2.21,1.28-3.82, P =0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that neoadjuvant chemo-immunotherapy achieved higher MPR in NSCLC patients, and increased MPR might be associated with survival benefits treated with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. It appears that the MPR may serve as a surrogate endpoint of survival to evaluate neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Only a minority of lung cancers are resectable at diagnosis, and many of these will eventually relapse. Adjuvant chemotherapy in this setting has a modest survival advantage, and there is significant need for new approaches to improve cure rates. Checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy has transformed the prognosis for advanced lung cancer, and is increasingly being used in the neoadjuvant setting alone, or in combination with cytotoxic chemotherapy. While this has demonstrated convincing improvements in event-free survival and pathologic response, questions remain over optimal duration of therapy, predictive and prognostic biomarkers, response assessment and combination with other modalities. In addition, these results must be considered in the context of recent positive studies of adjuvant immunotherapy. Here, we summarise preclinical context and clinical trials in this space, discuss areas of controversy and pitfalls, and consider future challenges.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced, resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy (nIT) is a rapidly emerging paradigm for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The objectives of this PRISMA/MOOSE/PICOD-guided systematic review and meta-analysis were (1) to assess the safety and efficacy of nIT, (2) to compare the safety and efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (nCIT) versus chemotherapy alone (nCT), and (3) to explore predictors of pathologic response with nIT and their association with outcomes.

METHODS

Eligibility was resectable stage I-III NSCLC and the receipt of programmed death-1/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1)/cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 inhibitors before resection; other forms and modalities of neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant therapies were allowed. For statistical analysis, the Mantel-Haenszel fixed-effect or random-effect model was used, depending on the heterogeneity (I2 ).

RESULTS

Sixty-six articles met the criteria (eight randomized studies, 39 prospective nonrandomized studies, and 19 retrospective studies). The pooled pathologic complete response (pCR) rate was 28.1%. The estimated grade ≥3 toxicity rate was 18.0%. Compared with nCT, nCIT achieved higher rates of pCR (odds ratio [OR], 7.63; 95% confidence interval [CI], 4.49-12.97; p < .001), progression-free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR] 0.51; 95% CI, 0.38-0.67; p < .001), and overall survival (OS) (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.36-0.74; p = .0003) but yielded similar toxicity rates (OR, 1.01; 95% CI, 0.67-1.52; p = .97). The results remained robust on sensitivity analysis when all retrospective publications were removed. pCR was associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.25; 0.15-0.43; p < .001) and OS (HR, 0.26; 95% CI, 0.10-0.67; p = .005). PD-L1 expressors (≥1%) were more likely to achieve a pCR (OR, 2.93; 95% CI, 1.22-7.03; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with advanced resectable NSCLC, neoadjuvant immunotherapy was safe and efficacious. nCIT improved pathologic response rates and PFS/OS over nCT, particularly in patients who had tumors that expressed PD-L1, without increasing toxicities.

PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY

This meta-analysis of 66 studies showed that neoadjuvant immunotherapy for advanced resectable non-small cell lung cancer is safe and efficacious. Compared with chemotherapy alone, chemoimmunotherapy improved pathologic response rates and survival, particularly for patients who had tumors that expressed programmed cell death ligand-1, without increasing toxicities.

The Role of Immunotherapy or Immuno-Chemotherapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Comprehensive Review

Many new treatment modalities for non-small-cell carcinoma (NSCLC) have been described in the last two decades. Surgical resections remain the gold standard for early stages and may be considered for locally advanced tumors. Medical treatment has changed drastically in recent years, especially for advanced stages, for which the development of immunotherapy and molecular targeted therapy significantly increased survival and quality of life. The addition of radical surgical resection following immunotherapy or immuno-chemotherapy is feasible and safe with low surgical-related mortality and morbidity in selected patients with initially unresectable NSCLC. However, data from multiple ongoing trials with overall survival as the primary endpoint should be awaited before this strategy is introduced into the standard of care.

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy plus nivolumab with or without ipilimumab in operable non-small cell lung cancer: the phase 2 platform NEOSTAR trial

Neoadjuvant ipilimumab + nivolumab (Ipi+Nivo) and nivolumab + chemotherapy (Nivo+CT) induce greater pathologic response rates than CT alone in patients with operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The impact of adding ipilimumab to neoadjuvant Nivo+CT is unknown. Here we report the results and correlates of two arms of the phase 2 platform NEOSTAR trial testing neoadjuvant Nivo+CT and Ipi+Nivo+CT with major pathologic response (MPR) as the primary endpoint. MPR rates were 32.1% (7/22, 80% confidence interval (CI) 18.7-43.1%) in the Nivo+CT arm and 50% (11/22, 80% CI 34.6-61.1%) in the Ipi+Nivo+CT arm; the primary endpoint was met in both arms. In patients without known tumor EGFR/ALK alterations, MPR rates were 41.2% (7/17) and 62.5% (10/16) in the Nivo+CT and Ipi+Nivo+CT groups, respectively. No new safety signals were observed in either arm. Single-cell sequencing and multi-platform immune profiling (exploratory endpoints) underscored immune cell populations and phenotypes, including effector memory CD8⁺ T, B and myeloid cells and markers of tertiary lymphoid structures, that were preferentially increased in the Ipi+Nivo+CT cohort. Baseline fecal microbiota in patients with MPR were enriched with beneficial taxa, such as Akkermansia, and displayed reduced abundance of pro-inflammatory and pathogenic microbes. Neoadjuvant Ipi+Nivo+CT enhances pathologic responses and warrants further study in operable NSCLC. (ClinicalTrials.gov registration: NCT03158129 .).

Neoadjuvant PD-1 Blockade in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current perspectives and Moving Forward

Perioperative therapy for non-small cell lung cancer has been studied extensively in a bid to improve overall survival, as approximately half of the patients with surgically resectable tumors at the time of diagnosis relapse. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitor therapies, such as the anti-programmed death 1/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-1/PD-L1) blockade, have contributed to achieving an improved overall survival of patients with advanced stage lung cancer. Thus, the development of this treatment strategy has considerable potential to precipitate a breakthrough in cancer immunotherapy. PD-1/PD-L1 blockade has several potential immunological benefits when used as a neoadjuvant therapy. However, there are concerns associated with this neoadjuvant therapy. Many studies have reported its efficacy, but there is limited evidence regarding the long-term survival of patients. Similarly, it is unclear whether existing biomarkers are adequate for monitoring the prognosis of patients, or if new biomarkers are required. In this article, we present recent reports on neoadjuvant PD-1/PD-L1 blockade therapy and discuss its future challenges.

Progress on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer and potential biomarkers

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are highly concerned in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), represented by inhibitors of programmed death protein 1 (PD-1) and its ligand (PD-L1), and inhibitors of cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4). The introduction of immunotherapy in the treatment of perioperative NSCLC has improved the prognosis to a great extent, as demonstrated by several phase II and III clinical trials. The target population for immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC is still under discussion, and the biomarkers for neoadjuvant immunotherapy population selection are the next pending problem. The predictive efficacy of many potential makers is still being explored, including PD-L1 expression levels, tumor mutation burden, circulating tumor DNA, components of the tumor microenvironment, and several clinical factors. We summarize key findings on the utility of ICIs in clinical trials of preoperative NSCLC patients and conclude analyses of relevant biomarkers to provide a better understanding of potentially predictive biomarkers in neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition in the management of glioblastoma: Exploring a new frontier

Brain tumors are one of the leading causes of cancer related death in both the adult and pediatric patient population. Gliomas represent a cohort of brain tumors derived from glial cell lineages which include astrocytomas, oligodendrogliomas and glioblastomas (GBMs). These tumors are known to grow aggressively and have a high lethality with GBM being the most aggressive tumor in this group. Currently, few treatment options exist for GBM outside of surgical resection, radiation therapy and chemotherapy. While these measures have been shown to marginally improve patient survival, patients, especially those diagnosed with GBM, often experience a recurrence of their disease. Following disease recurrence, treatment options become more limited as additional surgical resections can pose life threatening risk to the patient, patients may be ineligible for additional radiation, and the recurrent tumor may be resistant to chemotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the field of cancer immunotherapy as many patients with cancers residing outside the central nervous system (CNS) have experienced a survival benefit from this treatment modality. It has often been observed that this survival benefit is increased following neoadjuvant administration of immune checkpoint inhibitors as tumor antigen is still present in the patient which enables a more robust anti-tumor immune response. Interestingly, results for ICI-based studies for patients with GBM have been largely disappointing which is a stark contrast from the success this treatment modality has had in non-central nervous system cancers. In this review, we will discuss the various benefits of neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition such as how this approach reduces tumor burden and allows for a greater induction of an anti-tumor immune response. Additionally, we will discuss several non-CNS cancers where neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibition has been successful and discuss why we believe this approach may provide a survival benefit for GBM patients. We hope this manuscript will foster future studies aimed at exploring whether this approach may be beneficial for patients diagnosed with GBM.

Systematic review of the perioperative immunotherapy in patients with non-small cell lung cancer: evidence mapping and synthesis

Objectives

This study aimed to use evidence mapping to provide an overview of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as perioperative treatments for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and to identify areas of this field where future research is most urgently needed.

Methods

Multiple databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science) were searched to identify clinical trials published up to November 2021 that examined the effect of perioperative ICIs for perioperative treatment of NSCLC. Study design, sample size, patient characteristics, therapeutic regimens, clinical stages, short-term and long-term therapeutic outcomes, surgery associated parameters, and therapeutic safety were examined.

Results

We included 66 trials (3564 patients) and used evidence mapping to characterize the available data. For surgery associated outcomes, sixty-two studies (2480 patients) provided complete information regarding the use of surgery after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and data on R0 resection were available in 42 studies (1680 patients); for short-term clinical outcomes, 57 studies (1842 patients) evaluated pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant immunotherapy and most of included studies achieved pCR in the range of 30 to 40%; for long-term clinical outcomes, 15 studies (1932 patients) reported DFS, with a median range of 17.9-53.6 months; and only a few studies reported the safety profiles of perioperative immunotherapies.

Conclusion

Our evidence mapping systematically summarized the results of all clinical trials and studies that examined ICIs as perioperative treatments for NSCLC. The results indicated more studies that evaluate long-term patient outcomes are needed to provide a stronger foundation for the use of these treatments.

Neoadjuvant durvalumab for resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): results from a multicenter study (IFCT-1601 IONESCO)

Background

The IONESCO (IFCT-1601) trial assessed the feasibility of neoadjuvant durvalumab, for early-stage resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

In a multicenter, single-arm, phase II trial, patients with IB (≥4 cm)-IIIA, non-N2, resectable NSCLC received three doses of durvalumab (750 mg every 2 weeks) and underwent surgery between 2 and 14 days after the last infusion. The primary endpoint was the complete surgical resection rate. Secondary endpoints included tumor response rate, major histopathological response (MPR: ≤10% remaining viable tumor cells), disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), durvalumab-related safety, and 90-day postoperative mortality (NCT03030131).

Results

Forty-six patients were eligible (median age 60.9 years); 67% were male, 98% were smokers, and 41% had squamous cell carcinoma. Regarding tumor response, 9% had a partial response, 78% had stable disease, and 13% had progressive disease. Among the operated patients (n=43), 41 achieved complete resection (89%, 95% CI 80.1% to 98.1%)), and eight achieved MPR (19%). The 12-month median OS and DFS rates were 89% (95% CI 75.8% to 95.3%) and 78% (95% CI 63.4% to 87.7%), respectively (n=46). The median follow-up was 28.4 months (12.8–41.1). All patients in whom MPR was achieved were disease-free at 12 months compared to only 11% of those with >10% residual tumor cells (p=0.04). No durvalumab-related serious or grade 3–5 events were reported. The unexpected 90-day postoperative mortality of four patients led to premature study termination. None of these four deaths was considered secondary to direct durvalumab-related toxicity.

Conclusions

Neoadjuvant durvalumab given as monotherapy was associated with an 89% complete resection rate and an MPR of 19%. Despite an unexpectedly high rate of postoperative deaths, which prevented us from completing the trial, we were able to show a significant association between MPR and DFS.

Non-small cell lung cancer in China

In China, lung cancer is a primary cancer type with high incidence and mortality. Risk factors for lung cancer include tobacco use, family history, radiation exposure, and the presence of chronic lung diseases. Most early-stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients miss the optimal timing for treatment due to the lack of clinical presentations. Population-based nationwide screening programs are of significant help in increasing the early detection and survival rates of NSCLC in China. The understanding of molecular carcinogenesis and the identification of oncogenic drivers dramatically facilitate the development of targeted therapy for NSCLC, thus prolonging survival in patients with positive drivers. In the exploration of immune escape mechanisms, programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor monotherapy and PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus chemotherapy have become a standard of care for advanced NSCLC in China. In the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology's guidelines for NSCLC, maintenance immunotherapy is recommended for locally advanced NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy. Adjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy will be approved for resectable NSCLC. In this review, we summarized recent advances in NSCLC in China in terms of epidemiology, biology, molecular pathology, pathogenesis, screening, diagnosis, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and neoadjuvant chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and single-arm meta-analysis

Background

It remains uncertain whether neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (nICI) is superior to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) in resectable non-small cell lung cancer. In addition, there are outstanding questions for nICI such as the ideal treatment mode and predictors.

Methods

PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and scientific meetings were searched for eligible single-arm or multi-arm trials until 31 December 2021. The primary outcomes of interest were major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR). The random-effect model was used for statistical analysis.

Results

Twenty-four trials of nICI (n = 1,043) and 29 trials of nCT (n = 2,337) were identified. nICI combination therapy was associated with higher MPR (63.2%, 95% CI: 54.2%–72.1%) and pCR (35.3%, 95% CI: 27.4%–43.3%) rates compared to nCT (16.2%, 95% CI: 7.5%–25.0%, P &lt; 0.001 and 5.5%, 95% CI: 3.5%–7.5%, P &lt; 0.001) and nICI monotherapy (23.3%, 95% CI: 12.7%–33.8%, P &lt; 0.001, and 6.5%, 95% CI: 1.7%–11.2%, P &lt; 0.001). As for safety, nICI monotherapy had the best tolerability; nICI combination showed a similar surgical resection rate and higher R0 resection rate compared to nCT. PD-1 inhibitor and high PD-L1 expression (≥1% or ≥50%) were correlated with higher MPR and pCR rates compared to PD-L1 inhibitor and PD-L1 expression &lt;1%.

Conclusions

nICI combination therapy is associated with higher MPR and pCR rates compared to nCT and nICI monotherapy. PD-1 inhibitor seems to be superior to PD-L1 inhibitor. PD-L1 status appears to be predictive of MPR and pCR for patients receiving nICI.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/display_record.php?RecordID=278661, CRD42021278661.

Dynamic 18 F-FDG PET/CT can predict the major pathological response to neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

Major pathological response (MPR) is a potential surrogate for overall survival. We determined whether the dynamic changes in ¹⁸ F-labeled fluoro-2-deoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT) were associated with MPR in patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Forty-four patients with stage II-III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy and radical surgery were enrolled. Moreover, ¹⁸ F-FDG PET/CT scans were performed at baseline and within 1 week before surgery to evaluate the disease. All histological sections were reviewed to assess MPR. The detailed clinical features of the patients were analyzed. The reliability of the clinical variables was assessed in differentiating between MPR and non-MPR using logistic regression. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis identified the SUVmax changes threshold most associated with MPR. Most of the patients were pathologically diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma and received anti-PD-1 antibodies plus chemotherapy. The immunotherapy regimens included nivolumab, pembrolizumab, and camrelizumab. MPR was observed in more than half of lesions. Tumors with MPR had a higher decrease in the longest dimension on dynamic PET/CT than those without MPR. Furthermore, the decline in SUVmax was significantly different between MPR and non-MPR diseases, and MPR lesions had a prominent mean reduction in SUVmax. SUVmax reduction was independently associated with MPR in the multivariate regression. On ROC analysis, the threshold of SUVmax decrease in 60% was associated with MPR. Dynamic changes in SUVmax were associated with MPR. The tumors with MPR showed a greater PET/CT response than those without MPR. A SUVmax decrease of more than 60% is more likely to result in an MPR after receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy.

A Dramatic Response to Toripalimab With Chemotherapy and Antiangiogenic Agent Followed by Surgery in a Stage IIIB Lung Adenocarcinoma Patient With an Uncommon EGFR Mutation: A Case Report

Lung cancer patients with high programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression in tumor cells and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations are rare, but there is no clinical standard for which treatment such patients should receive. Here, we report a 52-year-old male smoker who was diagnosed with stage IIIB lung adenocarcinoma. A rare EGFR G719A mutation was detected in the lymph node samples by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and a high PD-L1 expression was found by immunohistochemistry (IHC). After 10 cycles of induction therapy (toripalimab plus pemetrexed plus nedaplatin plus apatinib), surgery was successfully performed, followed by 2 cycles of consolidation therapy (toripalimab plus pemetrexed) and 4 cycles of maintenance therapy (toripalimab). A progression-free survival (PFS) of 7 months was achieved. In this case, we showed that the programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor toripalimab plus chemotherapy and apatinib was effective and tolerable in a locally advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with a positive PD-L1 expression.

[Treatment of early and locally advanced stages of non-small cell lung cancer]

Treatment concepts for patients with localized and locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are based on local treatment, surgery and/or radiotherapy, with curative intent. An adjuvant systemic treatment is added after primary resection of an operable NSCLC primarily to reduce the systemic risk of relapse. Locally advanced stages with mediastinal lymph node involvement carry a substantial risk of local and distant recurrence and require multimodal treatment strategies in an interdisciplinary approach. Recently, immunotherapy with programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors is increasingly being integrated into adjuvant, neoadjuvant or perioperative treatment concepts.

Targeted Therapy and Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: Current Evidence and Ongoing Trials

The scenario of neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is rapidly evolving. As already happened for the advanced disease, also early stages have entered the era of precision medicine, with molecular analysis and Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) evaluation that by now can be considered a routine assessment. New treatment options have been recently approved, with osimertinib now part of clinical practice for Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor mutated (EGFRm) patients, and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) available after FDA approval both in the adjuvant (atezolizumab) and neoadjuvant (nivolumab) setting. No mature data on overall survival benefits are available yet, though. Several clinical trials with specific-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and ICIs are currently ongoing, both with and without concomitant chemotherapy. As therapeutic strategies are rapidly expanding, quite a few questions remain unsettled, such as the optimal duration of adjuvant targeted therapy or the effective benefit of ICIs in early-stage EGFRm or ALK (Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase) rearranged patients, or the possibility to individuate high-risk patients after surgical resection assessing minimal residual disease (MRD) by ctDNA evaluation. We hereby report already available literature data and summarize ongoing trials with targeted therapy and immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC, focusing on practice-changing results and new perspectives for potentially cured patients.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy across cancers: meeting report from the Immunotherapy Bridge-December 1st-2nd, 2021

After the success of immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced metastatic cancer, further evaluation in earlier settings, including high-risk, surgically-resectable disease is underway. Potential benefits of a neoadjuvant immunotherapeutic approach include presurgical tumor shrinkage, reduced surgical morbidity, early eradication of micrometastases and prevention of distant disease, and greater antigen-specific T cell response. For some cancers, pathologic response has been established as a surrogate measure for long-term outcomes, therefore offering the ability for early and objective assessment of treatment efficacy and the potential to inform and personalize adjuvant treatment clinical decision-making. Leveraging the neoadjuvant treatment setting offers the ability to deeply interrogate longitudinal tissue in order to gain translatable, pan-malignancy insights into response and mechanisms of resistance to immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy across cancers was a focus of discussion at the virtual Immunotherapy Bridge meeting (December 1-2, 2021). Clinical, biomarker, and pathologic insights from prostate, breast, colon, and non-small-cell lung cancers, melanoma and non-melanoma skin cancers were discussed and are summarized in this report.

Neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer: New perspectives with the incorporation of immunotherapy

The aim of neoadjuvant treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is to eliminate micrometastatic disease to facilitate surgical resection. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (ChT) in localised NSCLC has numerous advantages over other therapeutic modalities and is considered standard treatment in resectable disease. Treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) improves long-term survival in advanced disease and has a better toxicity profile than conventional therapies. These immunotherapy agents (anti-PD1/PD-L1), administered with or without ChT, are currently being evaluated in the preoperative setting, with initial results showing better pathological response rates and more long-term benefits. Importantly, these drugs do not appear to increase the rate of severe adverse effects and/or postoperative complications. However, several questions still need to be resolved, including the identification of predictive biomarkers; comparative studies of immunotherapy alone vs combined treatment with ChT and/or radiotherapy; the optimal duration of treatment; the timing of surgery; the need for adjuvant treatment; appropriate radiologic evaluation and mediastinal staging; and the correlation between pathological response and survival outcomes. Here we review the current evidence for immunotherapy from a multidisciplinary perspective and discuss current and future controversies.

The Difference and Significance of Parietal Pleura Invasion and Rib Invasion in Pathological T Classification With Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

This study was to explore the difference and significance of parietal pleura invasion and rib invasion in pathological T classification with non-small cell lung cancer.

Methods

A total of 8681 patients after lung resection were selected to perform analyses. Multivariable Cox analysis was used to identify the mortality differences in patients between parietal pleura invasion and rib invasion. Eligible patients with chest wall invasion were re-categorized according to the prognosis. Cancer-specific survival curves for different pathological T (pT) classifications were presented.

Results

There were 466 patients considered parietal pleura invasion, and 237 patients served as rib invasion. Cases with rib invasion had poorer survival than those with the invasion of parietal pleura (adjusted hazard ratio [HR]= 1.627, P =0.004). In the cohort for parietal pleura invasion, patients with tumor size ≤5cm reached more satisfactory survival outcomes than patients with tumor size >5cm (unadjusted HR =1.598, P =0.006). However, there was no predictive difference in the cohort of rib invasion. The results of the multivariable analysis revealed that the mortality with parietal pleura invasion plus tumor size ≤5cm were similar to patients with classification pT3 (P =0.761), and patients for parietal pleura invasion plus tumor size >5cm and pT4 had no stratified survival outcome (P =0.809). Patients identified as rib invasion had a poorer prognosis than patients for pT4 (P =0.037).

Conclusions

Rib invasion has a poorer prognosis than pT4. Patients with parietal pleura invasion and tumor size with 5.1-7.0cm could be appropriately up-classified from pT3 to pT4.

Distinct immune gene programs associated with host tumor immunity, neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable NSCLC

PURPOSE

Our understanding of the immunopathology of resectable NSCLC is still limited. Here, we explore immune programs that inform of tumor immunity and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in localized NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

Targeted immune gene sequencing using the HTG Precision Immuno-Oncology panel was performed in localized NSCLCs from three cohorts based on treatment: naïve (n=190), neoadjuvant chemotherapy (n=38) and neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy (n=21). Tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) phenotypes based on the location of CD8+ T cells (inflamed, cold, excluded), tumoral PD-L1 expression (&lt;1% and {greater than or equal to}1%), and tumor infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs). Immune programs and signatures were statistically analyzed based on tumoral PD-L1 expression, immune phenotypes, pathological response and were cross-compared across the three cohorts.

RESULTS

PD-L1 positive tumors exhibited increased signature scores for various lymphoid and myeloid cell subsets (p&lt;0.05). TIME phenotypes exhibited disparate frequencies by stage, PD-L1 expression, and mutational burden. Inflamed and PD-L1+/TILs+ NSCLCs displayed overall significantly heightened levels of immune signatures, with the excluded group representing an intermediate state. A cytotoxic T cell signature was associated with favorable survival in neoadjuvant chemotherapy-treated NSCLCs (p&lt;0.05). Pathological response to chemoimmunotherapy was positively associated with higher expression of genes involved in immune activation, chemotaxis, as well as T and NK cells (p&lt;0.05 for all). Among the three cohorts, chemoimmunotherapy-treated NSCLCs exhibited highest scores for various immune cell subsets including T effector and B cells (p&lt;0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight immune gene programs that may underlie host tumor immunity and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and chemoimmunotherapy in resectable NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy: Leveraging the Immune System to Treat Early-Stage Disease

Given the success of immunotherapy in treating patients with metastatic disease in a variety of tumor types, there is tremendous enthusiasm for expanding the use of immunotherapy to those with early-stage cancer. Administering immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant, preoperative setting is a biologically sound approach because preclinical studies have shown that stronger and broader immune responses can be generated if immunotherapy is administered while the tumor and/or draining lymph nodes are intact. It is therefore likely that administering immunotherapy preoperatively will generate optimal immune responses, leading to high rates of pathologic response as well as improved long-term survival. Although neoadjuvant immunotherapy is currently only approved for use in combination with chemotherapy in triple-negative breast cancer and non-small cell lung cancer, it is anticipated that ongoing and future clinical trials will further define the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in many cancer types. These trials should be designed with appropriate survival endpoints and rigorous correlative studies to include imaging and biospecimen-based analyses to address currently unanswered questions that must be resolved to optimize the use of immunotherapy in early-stage disease.

Real-world clinical outcomes of neoadjuvant immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in resectable non-small cell lung cancer

OBJECTIVES

Early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who undergo complete resection continue to demonstrate high risk of recurrence and death. The advent of the neoadjuvant regimen has brought new hope for these patients. The present study aims to further demonstrate the efficacy of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A real-world observational study was conducted concerning patients who received neoadjuvant pembrolizumab or nivolumab combined with chemotherapy between January 2018 and December 2020 in Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital. The primary endpoint was major pathologic response (MPR), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), pathologic complete response (pCR), disease-free survival (DFS) and toxicity.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients were analyzed and divided into the pembrolizumab (n = 42) and nivolumab groups (n = 34) with a median follow-up time of 12.2 months. Most patients (92%) had stage III disease, with 41 (54%) and 29 (38%) patients initially diagnosed clinical stage IIIA and IIIB, respectively. Fifty (66%), 21 (28%) and 5 (6%) patients received two, three and four cycles of neoadjuvant treatment, separately, achieving an ORR of 75%. None of them needed a reduced initial dose or delay due to intolerable adverse events. Forty-nine (64%) and 28 (37%) patients achieved MPR and pCR, respectively. RNA sequencing showed that MPR associated with increased infiltration of cytotoxic immune cells with tertiary lymphoid structures (TLSs). Histological evaluation highlighted the localization of B cells within TLSs. Forty-two (69%) patients with clinically N2 disease at baseline were downstaged to pathological N0 (39 patients) or N1 (3 patients). One-year-PFS rate of stage III patients was 91%. No difference in baseline characteristics and treatment outcomes was observed between 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

The feasibility of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for resectable NSCLC was further validated, with a high MPR rate and manageable adverse events.

The impact of driver mutation on the treatment outcome of early-stage lung cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy have improved the major pathological response (MPR) in patients with early-stage operable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study aimed to assess whether the presence of targetable driver mutations affects the efficacy of the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We enrolled patients with early-stage operable NSCLC who received preoperative neoadjuvant therapy between January 1, 2017, and December 30, 2020. Neoadjuvant therapy was delivered with platinum-doublet chemotherapy; moreover, pembrolizumab was added at the attending physician’s discretion based on patient’s request. Pathological responses were assessed; moreover, disease-free survival was estimated. Next-generation sequencing was performed in case sufficient preoperative biopsy specimens were obtained. We included 23 patients; among them, 11 received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy while 12 received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The MPR and pathological complete response rates were 54.5% and 27.3%, respectively, in patients who received a combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy. These rates were significantly higher than those in patients who only received neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Three patients in the combination group experienced disease recurrence during the follow-up period even though two of them showed an MPR. These three patients had targetable driver mutations, including an EGFR exon 20 insertion, EGFR exon 21 L858R substitution, and MET exon 14 skipping. Only one patient who remained disease-free had a targetable driver mutation. Among patients with early-stage operable NSCLC requiring neoadjuvant therapy, comprehensive genomic profiling is crucial before the administration of the combination of neoadjuvant immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Inoperable Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy and Rationale for Systemic Therapy

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is the standard treatment for medically inoperable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. SABR results in high rates of in-field tumor control, but among larger and more biologically aggressive tumors, regional and distant failures are problematic. Cytotoxic chemotherapy is rarely used in this patient population and the benefit is unclear. Alternative systemic therapy options with a milder side-effect profile are of considerable interest, and several randomized phase III trials are currently testing immune checkpoint inhibitors in this setting. We review the rationale, data, and ongoing studies evaluating systemic therapy in medically inoperable, early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer treated with SABR.

Exploring the Evolving Scope of Neoadjuvant Immunotherapy in NSCLC

Simple Summary

Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors has recently brought a paradigm shift in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but until now, most clinical benefits of immunotherapy have been demonstrated in the setting of advanced or metastatic disease. However, there has been a recent explosion in trial development and research focus exploring whether the benefits of immunotherapy can extend to the neoadjuvant setting for patients with resectable NSCLC. The aim of this review is to thoroughly outline the preclinical rationale for neoadjuvant immunotherapy research. In addition, we summarize and analyze the published interim results as well as results presented at major conferences from the initial early phase trials. An overview of the current and upcoming randomized clinical trials in this field is also provided. Finally, we highlight future challenges and questions that need to be addressed in upcoming research to clarify the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in the treatment of NSCLC.

Abstract

While lung cancer remains the leading cause of cancer death worldwide, lung cancer mortality has notably decreased in the past decade. Immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors have played a noteworthy role in contributing to this improved survival, particularly for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, until now the benefits have primarily been seen in patients with advanced or metastatic disease. Several recent early phase and ongoing phase III trials have been assessing whether the treatment benefit of immunotherapy in NSCLC can extend to the neoadjuvant setting for resectable diseases. In this comprehensive narrative review, we evaluate the most recent efficacy and safety data from these studies. We also outline questions that will need to be further examined to legitimate neoadjuvant immunotherapy’s role in NSCLC treatment, including the best surrogate marker of response, the incorporation of liquid biopsy for disease monitoring, the ability to be combined with other treatment modalities, the need for further adjuvant therapy, and potential future treatment combinations.

Immunotherapy in Lung Cancer: Are the Promises of Long-Term Benefit Finally Met?

Over the last few years, agents targeting immune checkpoints have shown potential to improve therapeutic outcomes in patients with lung cancer in multiple clinical settings. Inhibitors of PD-1/PD-L1 have been approved for the treatment of different types of lung cancer by the FDA either alone or in combination with chemotherapy or other immune checkpoint inhibitors, such as anti-CTLA-4 agents. The introduction of these agents in clinical practice has revolutionized the therapeutic approach to lung cancer, keeping the promises of long-term benefit in selected patient populations. The therapeutic indications of immunotherapy in lung cancer are rapidly growing, and multiple combinations entered clinical practice or are under active development. Furthermore, the quest for a reliable predictive biomarker is still ongoing to overcome the limits of currently approved tests for patients' selection. In this review, we summarized the current status and progress of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 agents in lung cancer treatment.

Surgical Outcomes Following Nivolumab or Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab In Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

BACKGROUND

Surgical outcomes for non-small cell lung cancer after neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors continue to be debated. We assessed perioperative outcomes of patients treated with Nivolumab or Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab (NEOSTAR) and compared them with patients treated with chemotherapy or previously untreated patients with stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer.

METHODS

Forty-four patients with stage I to IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging Manual, seventh edition) were randomized to nivolumab (N; 3 mg/kg intravenously on days 1, 15, and 29; n = 23) or nivolumab with ipilimumab (NI; I, 1 mg/kg intravenously on day 1; n = 21). Curative-intent operations were planned between 3 and 6 weeks after the last dose of neoadjuvant N. Patients who completed resection upfront or after chemotherapy from the same time period were used as comparison.

RESULTS

In the N arm, 21 (91%) were resected on-trial, 1 underwent surgery off-trial, and one was not resected (toxicity-related). In the NI arm, 16 (76%) resections were performed on-trial, one off-trial, and 4 were not resected (none toxicity-related). Median time to operation was 31 days, and consisted of 2 (5%) pneumonectomies, 33 (89%) lobectomies, and 1 (3%) each of segmentectomy and wedge resection. The approach was 27 (73%) thoracotomy, 7 (19%) thoracoscopy, and 3 (8%) robotic-assisted. Conversion occurred in 17% (n = 2/12) of minimally invasive cases. All 37 achieved R0 resection. Pulmonary, cardiac, enteric, neurologic, and wound complications occurred in 9 (24%), 4 (11%), 2 (5%), 1 (3%), and 1 (3%) patient, respectively. The 30- and 90-day mortality rate was 0% and 2.7% (n = 1), respectively. Postoperative complication rates were comparable with lung resection upfront or after chemotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Operating after neoadjuvant N or NI is overall safe and effective and yields perioperative outcomes similar to those achieved after chemotherapy or upfront resection.

Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Immunotherapy in Early-Stage Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer, Past, Present, and Future

Lung cancer is worldwide the most common malignancy. Standard of care treatments for early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) include surgery and adjuvant chemotherapy. However, these patients continue to have poor prognosis due to systemic or local relapse. Immunotherapy has been considered as a novel approach to improve survival in patients with early-stage NSCLC. Since immune checkpoint inhibitors have transformed the treatment of advanced NSCLC, there is a growing interest in the role of immunotherapy in early-stage NSCLC. In this review, we summarize reported and ongoing clinical trials of immunotherapy in both neoadjuvant and adjuvant settings. We also highlight unaddressed issues in this field of research, such as the predictive markers, the optimal combination therapy, and the need for adjuvant immunotherapy. More studies are needed to optimize the treatment regimen of immunotherapy in patients with early-stage NSCLC.

Current status and future perspectives on immunotherapy in neoadjuvant therapy of resectable non-small cell lung cancer

Resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is defined as stage I-II, and some locally advanced (stage III) tumor. Despite the associated relatively high recurrence rates after surgery, surgical treatment remains the standard treatment for patients with early-stage NSCLC. At present, neoadjuvant therapy is becoming an increasingly popular therapeutic strategy for resectable NSCLC. However, studies have reported that neoadjuvant chemotherapy only slightly improves recurrence rates, making it inadequate for extending patient survival. The significant survival benefits of immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC have greatly stimulated researchers' interests in applying immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for treating early-stage resectable NSCLC. A few recent phase II radomized clinical trials suggested that ICIs yield better major pathologic response (MPR) rates than neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, demonstrating their potential as alternatives to the existing fixed therapy pattern for early-stage NSCLC. Most initial studies regarding neoadjuvant immunotherapy selected MPR and pathologic complete response (pCR) as primary or secondary endpoints, leading to a significant reduction in the time and cost of research and development compared with the use of overall survival time and median survival time as endpoints. Meanwhile, to confirm these benefits, more phase III clinical trials are being conducted, and there is a growing demand for research on related problems, including the screening of population, formulation of treatment strategies, duration and course of immunotherapy, influence of neoadjuvant immunotherapy on the safety of surgery, standardization of treatment effect evaluation and pathologic evaluation, and ways to effectively identify pseudoprogression and avoid resultant misjudgment in surgery and adjuvant therapy.

Safety of Surgery after Neoadjuvant Targeted Therapies in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Narrative Review

New drugs, including immune checkpoint inhibitors and targeted therapy, have changed the prognosis in a subset of patients with advanced lung cancer, and are now actively investigated in a number of trials with neoadjuvant and adjuvant regimens. However, no phase III randomized studies were published yet. The current narrative review proves that targeted therapies are safe in neoadjuvant approach. Unsurprisingly, administration of therapy is related to an acceptable toxicity profile. Severe adverse events’ rate that rarely compromises outcomes of patients with advanced lung cancer is not that commonly accepted in early lung cancer as it may lead to missing the chance of curative surgery. Among those complications, the most important factors that may limit the use of targeted therapies are severe respiratory adverse events precluding the resection occurring after treatment with some anaplastic lymphoma kinase and rarely after epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors. At this point, in the presented literature assessing the feasibility of neoadjuvant therapies with anaplastic lymphoma kinase and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, we did not find any unexpected intraoperative events that would be of special interest to a thoracic surgeon. Moreover, the postoperative course was associated with typical rate of complications.

Advances in systemic therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

Lung cancer remains a leading cause of cancer related mortality worldwide. Despite numerous advances in treatments over the past decade, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains an incurable disease for most patients. The optimal treatment for all patients with locally advanced, but surgically resectable, NSCLC contains at least chemoradiation. Trimodality treatment with surgical resection has been a subject of debate for decades. For patients with unresectable or inoperable locally advanced disease, the incorporation of immunotherapy consolidation after chemoradiation has defined a new standard of care. For decades, the standard of care treatment for advanced stage NSCLC included only cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, with the introduction of targeted therapies and immunotherapy, the landscape of treatment has rapidly evolved. This review discusses the integration of these innovative therapies in the management of patients with newly diagnosed NSCLC.

Neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review

Background

The neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in resectable non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is currently an area of active ongoing research. The place of neoadjuvant ICIs in the treatment guidelines needs to be determined. We carried out a systematic review of published data on neoadjuvant ICIs in resectable NSCLC to study its efficacy and safety.

Patients and methods

A literature search was carried out using the MEDLINE (PubMed) and Embase databases to retrieve articles and conference abstracts of clinical trials measuring the efficacy [major pathological response (MPR) and pathological complete response (pCR)] and safety (failure to undergo resection, surgical delay, treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) grade ≥3) of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in resectable NSCLC until July 2021.

Results

Nineteen studies with a total of 1066 patients were included in this systematic review. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improved pathological response rates, especially in combination with chemotherapy. Using mono ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI, the MPR rates were 0%-45%, 50%, 73%, 53%, and 27%-86%, respectively. Regarding pCR, the rates were 7%-16%, 33%-38%, 27%, 27%, and 9%-63%, respectively. Safety endpoints using monotherapy–ICI, dual therapy–ICI, chemoradiation–ICI, radiotherapy–ICI, and chemo–ICI showed a failure to undergo resection in 0%-17%, 19%-33%, 8%, 13%, and 0%-46%, respectively. The trAEs grade ≥3 rates were 0%-20%, 10%-33%, 7%, 23%, and 0%-67%, respectively.

Conclusion

In patients with resectable NSCLC stage, neoadjuvant immunotherapy can improve pathological response rates with acceptable toxicity. Further research is needed to identify patients who may benefit most from this approach, and adequately powered trials to establish clinically meaningful benefits are awaited.

•

Neoadjuvant strategies involving immunotherapy are currently being investigated in NSCLC.

•

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy was associated with improvement in pathological response rates.

•

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can be safe and feasible with acceptable surgical delay and trAEs.

•

Further research is needed to identify patients benefiting most from these approaches.

Perioperative Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors

The emergence of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has dramatically changed the treatment landscape for patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). These achievements inspired investigators and pharmaceutical companies to conduct clinical trials in patients with early-stage NSCLC because both adjuvant and neoadjuvant platinum-based doublet chemotherapies (PT-DCs) showed only a 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival. IMpower010, a phase 3 trial (P3), showed that adjuvant PT-DC followed by maintenance atezolitumab significantly prolonged disease-free survival over adjuvant PT-DC alone (hazard ratio, 0.79; stage II to IIIA). Since conventional therapies, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy, can promote immunogenic cell death, releasing tumour antigens from dead tumour cells, ICI combination therapies with conventional therapies are widely proposed. The Checkmate 816 trial (P3) indicated a significantly higher pathological complete response rate of neoadjuvant nivolumab/PT-DC combination therapy than of neoadjuvant PT-DC alone (odds ratio, 13.9, for stage IB to IIIA). Detection of circulating tumour DNA is highly anticipated for the evaluation of minimal residual disease. Multimodal approaches and new ICI agents are being attempted to improve the efficacy of ICI treatment in phase 2 trials. This review presents the development of perioperative treatment using ICIs in patients with NSCLC while discussing problems and perspectives.

Surgical perspective on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

With a 5% improvement in 5-year overall survival achieved with current neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy, new treatments for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are urgently needed. The use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) is established in metastatic NSCLC and is being evaluated in resectable NSCLC.

METHODS

Publications and conference databases and clinicaltrials.gov were searched for reports on clinical studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with early resectable NSCLC.

RESULTS

Potential advantages of neoadjuvant ICI include earlier treatment of micrometastatic disease; activation of a broader, potentially durable immune response by the whole tumor and associated lymph nodes; and pathologic assessment of neoadjuvant treatment response, which may guide adjuvant therapy. Surgical considerations include delays to surgery, potential disease progression preventing curative resection, and perioperative morbidity and mortality. Surrogate endpoints of efficacy (pathologic complete response, major pathologic response) and biomarkers predictive of outcome (programmed death ligand 1 expression, tumor mutational burden and circulating tumor DNA) can accelerate clinical trial completion and early-stage treatment development; their application in neoadjuvant ICI studies in NSCLC is reviewed.

CONCLUSIONS

Phase 2 trials of neoadjuvant ICI alone or with chemotherapy showed encouraging safety and efficacy in patients with resectable NSCLC, warranting the ongoing phase 3 studies of neoadjuvant immunotherapy plus chemotherapy. Preoperative and intraoperative unresectability following neoadjuvant ICI appear comparable to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. To help thoracic surgeons and medical oncologists to distinguish amongst ICI beyond efficacy as phase 3 data emerge, surgery-related endpoints for perioperative morbidity, mortality, and complexity should be defined, standardized, incorporated into trial designs, and reported.

Neoadjuvant immunotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer: State of the art

Lung cancer mortality has decreased over the past decade and can be partly attributed to advances in targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have rapidly evolved from investigational drugs to standard of care for the treatment of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In particular, antibodies that block inhibitory immune checkpoints, such as programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death 1 ligand 1 (PD-L1), have revolutionized the treatment of advanced NSCLC, when administered alone or in combination with chemotherapy. Immunotherapy is associated with higher response rates, improved overall survival (OS), and increased tolerability compared with conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy. These benefits may increase the utility of immunotherapy and its combinational use with chemotherapy in the neoadjuvant treatment of patients with NSCLC. Early findings from various ongoing clinical trials suggest that neoadjuvant ICIs alone or combined with chemotherapy may significantly reduce systemic recurrence and improve long-term OS or cure rates in resectable NSCLC. Here we further summarize the safety and efficacy of various neoadjuvant treatment regimens including immunotherapy from ongoing clinical trials and elaborate the role of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with resectable NSCLC. In addition, we discuss several unresolved challenges, including the evaluations to assess neoadjuvant immunotherapy response, the role of adjuvant treatment after neoadjuvant immunotherapy, the efficacy of treatment for oncogenic-addicted tumors, and predictive biomarkers. We also provide our perspective on ways to overcome current obstacles and establish neoadjuvant immunotherapy as a standard of care.