1
|
Zimba B, Mpinganjira S, Msosa T, Bickton FM. The urban-poor vaccination: Challenges and strategies in low-and-middle income countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2024; 20:2295977. [PMID: 38166597 PMCID: PMC10766387 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2295977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2023] [Accepted: 12/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
Vaccination is one of the success stories of public health. The benefit of vaccination goes beyond individual protection to include promoting population well-being, improving cognitive development, and increasing economic productivity. However, the existing inequalities in the access to vaccination undermines its impact. There are significant variations in the coverage of vaccination between and within countries. Despite that urban populations have better access to health services; evidence has shown that the urban poor have the worst health indicators including vaccination uptake. Additionally, there are unique challenges affecting vaccination in urban settings, especially in urban slums. This paper has discussed key challenges some of the proposed interventions that can improve urban vaccination service delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Boston Zimba
- Department of Public Health, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - Samuel Mpinganjira
- Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Takondwa Msosa
- Department of Public Health, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| | - Fanuel Meckson Bickton
- Lung Health Group, Malawi-Liverpool-Wellcome Trust Clinical Research Programme, Blantyre, Malawi
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Kamuzu University of Health Sciences, Blantyre, Malawi
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Habib SS, Zaidi S, Riaz A, Tahir HN, Mazhar LA, Memon Z. Social determinants of low uptake of childhood vaccination in high-risk squatter settlements in Karachi, Pakistan - A step towards addressing vaccine inequity in urban slums. Vaccine X 2024; 17:100427. [PMID: 38299204 PMCID: PMC10827488 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2023] [Revised: 12/22/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 02/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Routine vaccination has remained historically low in major urban pockets of Pakistan, and now lags behind rural vaccination rates. Grossly insufficient publicly funded primary healthcare infrastructure, heterogeneous mix of providers and multi-ethnicity of populations pose challenges in the delivery of essential health services. This paper ascertains factors associated with uptake of routine childhood vaccination, using Pentavalent-3 vaccine, as a proxy indicator for completion of age-appropriate vaccines in urban slums of Karachi, at high risk of Polio and vaccine preventable disease outbreaks. Methods Data was drawn from baseline assessment of an urban immunization delivery pilot project in urban slums of Karachi, Pakistan. The study sample comprised of 2,097 households with children aged 4-12 months, sampled through a cross-sectional cluster survey, applying a structured questionnaire. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine the association between Penta-3 vaccination, as the outcome variable, and predictor variables including socio-demographic characteristics and healthcare access factors. Results The findings showed that the likelihood of being immunized with Penta-3 was higher for non-Pashtun ethnicity [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 1.69; 95% CI 1.33-2.14], children of educated mothers, secondary or higher [aOR 2.95, 95% CI 2.34-3.71], and those whose fathers were formally employed (aOR 1.53; 95% CI 1.19-1.97). No association was seen by gender of child [aOR 0.89; 95% CI 0.73-1.08], and place of new born delivery [aOR 1.01; 95% CI 0.83-1.24]. Conclusion Pockets of critically low under-vaccinations within the urban slums of Karachi are associated with Pashtun ethnicity, distance to the vaccination centre, lack of mothers' education and lack of stable family income as in the case of unemployed and daily wage-earning fathers. Recognition of these factors is required in designing contextually appropriate strategies to address vaccine inequity in urban settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shifa Salman Habib
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Shehla Zaidi
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
- Aga Khan University (International), AKU-UK, Aga Khan Centre, 10 Handyside Street, London N1C 4DN, UK
| | - Atif Riaz
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Hasan Nawaz Tahir
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Lala Aftab Mazhar
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| | - Zahid Memon
- Department of Community Health Sciences, Aga Khan University, Stadium Road, P. O. Box 3500, Karachi 74800, Pakistan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Jain M, Duvendack M, Shisler S, Parsekar SS, Leon MDA. Effective interventions for improving routine childhood immunisation in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review of systematic reviews. BMJ Open 2024; 14:e074370. [PMID: 38365291 PMCID: PMC10875475 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-074370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 01/30/2024] [Indexed: 02/18/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE An umbrella review providing a comprehensive synthesis of the interventions that are effective in providing routine immunisation outcomes for children in low and middle-income countries (L&MICs). DESIGN A systematic review of systematic reviews, or an umbrella review. DATA SOURCES We comprehensively searched 11 academic databases and 23 grey literature sources. The search was adopted from an evidence gap map on routine child immunisation sector in L&MICs, which was done on 5 May 2020. We updated the search in October 2021. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA We included systematic reviews assessing the effectiveness of any intervention on routine childhood immunisation outcomes in L&MICs. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Search results were screened by two reviewers independently applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted by two researchers independently. The Specialist Unit for Review Evidence checklist was used to assess review quality. A mixed-methods synthesis was employed focusing on meta-analytical and narrative elements to accommodate both the quantitative and qualitative information available from the included reviews. RESULTS 62 systematic reviews are included in this umbrella review. We find caregiver-oriented interventions have large positive and statistically significant effects, especially those focusing on short-term sensitisation and education campaigns as well as written messages to caregivers. For health system-oriented interventions the evidence base is thin and derived from narrative synthesis suggesting positive effects for home visits, mixed effects for pay-for-performance schemes and inconclusive effects for contracting out services to non-governmental providers. For all other interventions under this category, the evidence is either limited or not available. For community-oriented interventions, a recent high-quality mixed-methods review suggests positive but small effects. Overall, the evidence base is highly heterogenous in terms of scope, intervention types and outcomes. CONCLUSION Interventions oriented towards caregivers and communities are effective in improving routine child immunisation outcomes. The evidence base on health system-oriented interventions is scant not allowing us to reach firm conclusions, except for home visits. Large evidence gaps exist and need to be addressed. For example, more high-quality evidence is needed for specific caregiver-oriented interventions (eg, monetary incentives) as well as health system-oriented (eg, health workers and data systems) and community-oriented interventions. We also need to better understand complementarity of different intervention types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Monica Jain
- International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, New Delhi, Delhi, India
| | | | - Shannon Shisler
- International Initiative for Impact Evaluation, Washington, DC, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Mohamed Y, Danchin M, Kaufman J. Multicomponent interventions to improve routine childhood vaccine uptake in low and middle-income countries: a scoping review protocol. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e075414. [PMID: 37758679 PMCID: PMC10537822 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-075414] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2023] [Accepted: 09/04/2023] [Indexed: 09/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Vaccine coverage remains inequitable globally. Many systematic reviews have looked at the effectiveness of strategies to improve vaccine uptake; however, these reviews frequently lack data from low and middle-income countries (LMICs), where evidence of cost-effective strategies is most valuable. This is partly because reviews often exclude non-randomised, observational or unpublished evaluations that are common in LMICs. Many reviews also exclude multicomponent interventions due to challenges isolating the effect of each component. A comprehensive mapping of multicomponent interventions implemented in LMICs would increase the visibility of studies excluded from systematic reviews and improve comparability of future evaluations by providing guidance for researchers on evaluation frameworks. This scoping review aims to identify, compare and summarise the properties and evaluation methods of multicomponent interventions to improve uptake of routine childhood vaccines in LMICs, and to assess the strengths and limitations of evaluation frameworks applied. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This review will be conducted using the Joanna Briggs Institute methodology for scoping reviews and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses Extension for Scoping Reviews guidelines. We will search the following databases: MEDLINE, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane, Eldis and Global Health (CAB Direct), Global Index Medicus, 3ie Portal, Google Scholar, COnnecting REpositories, and reference lists. One author will screen titles and abstracts and extract data from included articles using a pretested data extraction template. Uncertainties will be resolved through discussion with another author. Only studies published in English will be included for full review. We will assess the practicability, applicability, sensitivity and specificity of the evaluation frameworks used and present results using descriptive statistics, summary tables and charts. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION Ethics approval is not required. The review will be submitted as part of a doctoral thesis, presented at conferences and published in peer-reviewed journals. STUDY REGISTRATION https://osf.io/7r84g.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yasmin Mohamed
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Margaret Danchin
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of General Medicine, The Royal Children's Hospital Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | - Jessica Kaufman
- Vaccine Uptake Group, Murdoch Children's Research Institute, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
- Department of Paediatrics, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Kulkarni S, Ishizumi A, Eleeza O, Patel P, Feika M, Kamara S, Bangura J, Jalloh U, Koroma M, Sankoh Z, Sandy H, Toure M, Igbu TU, Sesay T, Fayorsey RN, Abad N. Using photovoice methodology to uncover individual-level, health systems, and contextual barriers to uptake of second dose of measles containing vaccine in Western Area Urban, Sierra Leone, 2020. Vaccine X 2023; 14:100338. [PMID: 37577263 PMCID: PMC10422676 DOI: 10.1016/j.jvacx.2023.100338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 06/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/15/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Vaccination coverage for the second dose of the measles-containing vaccine (MCV2) among children has remained stagnant in Sierra Leone at nearly 67% since its introduction in 2015. Identifying community-specific barriers faced by caregivers in accessing MCV2 services for their children and by health workers in delivering MCV2 is key to informing strategies to improve vaccination coverage. Methods We used Photovoice, a participatory method using photographs and narratives to understand community barriers to MCV2 uptake from March- September 2020. Six female and five male caregivers of MCV2-eligible children (15-24 months of age), and six health care workers (HCWs) in Freetown, Sierra Leone participated. After having an orientation to photovoice, they photographed barriers related to general immunization and MCV2 uptake in their community. This was followed by facilitated discussions where participants elaborated on the barriers captured in the photos. Transcripts from the six immunization-related discussions were analyzed to deduce themes through open-ended coding. A photo exhibition was held for participants to discuss the barriers and suggested solutions with decision-makers, such as the ministry of health. Results We identified and categorized nine themes into three groups: 1) individual or caregiver level barriers (e.g., caregivers' lack of knowledge on MCV2, concerns about vaccine side effects, and gender-related barriers); 2) health system barriers, such as HCWs' focus on children below one year and usage of old child health cards; and 3) contextual barriers, such as poverty, poor infrastructure, and the COVID-19 pandemic. Participants suggested the decision-makers to enhance community engagement with caregivers and HCW capacity including, increasing accountability of their work using performance-based approaches, among different strategies to improve MCV2 uptake. Conclusion Photovoice can provide nuanced understanding of community issues affecting MCV2. As a methodology, it should be integrated in broader intervention planning activities to facilitate the translation of community-suggested strategies into action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shibani Kulkarni
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| | | | | | - Palak Patel
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Mame Toure
- ICAP Sierra Leone, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Tom Sesay
- Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | - Neetu Abad
- U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta GA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Belt RV, Abdullah S, Mounier-Jack S, Sodha SV, Danielson N, Dadari I, Olayinka F, Ray A, Crocker-Buque T. Improving Equity in Urban Immunization in Low- and Middle-Income Countries: A Qualitative Document Review. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:1200. [PMID: 37515016 PMCID: PMC10386579 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11071200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/10/2023] [Revised: 06/21/2023] [Accepted: 06/22/2023] [Indexed: 07/30/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION As the world continues to urbanize, particularly in low- and middle-income countries, understanding the barriers and effective interventions to improve urban immunization equity is critical to achieving both Immunization Agenda 2030 targets and the Sustainable Development Goals. Approximately 25 million children missed one or more doses of the diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis (DTP3) vaccine in 2021 and it is estimated that close to 30% of the world's children missing the first dose of DTP, known as zero-dose, live in urban and peri-urban settings. METHODS The aim of this research is to improve understanding of urban immunization equity through a qualitative review of mixed method studies, urban immunization strategies and funding proposals across more than 70 urban areas developed between 2016 and 2020, supported by Gavi, the Vaccine Alliance. These research studies and strategies created a body of evidence regarding the barriers to vaccination in urban settings and potential interventions relevant to low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) with a focus on the vaccination of urban poor, populations of concern and residents of informal settlements. Through the document review we identified common challenges to achieving equitable coverage in urban areas and mapped proposed interventions. RESULTS We identified 70 documents as part of the review and categorized results across (1) social determinants of health, (2) immunization service-delivery barriers and (3) quality of services. Barriers and solutions identified in the documents were categorized in these thematic areas, drawing information from results in more than 21 countries. CONCLUSION Populations of concern such as migrants, refugees, residents of informal settlements and the urban poor face barriers to accessing care which include poor availability and quality of service. Example solutions proposed to these challenges include tailored delivery strategies, improved use of digital data collection and child-friendly services. More research is required on the efficacy of the proposed interventions identified and on gender-specific dynamics in urban poor areas affecting equitable immunization coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Victoria Belt
- Nuffield Department of Women’s and Reproductive Health, University of Oxford, 75 George Street, Oxford OX1 2RL, UK
| | - Shakil Abdullah
- Department of Anthropology, University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT 06269, USA
| | - Sandra Mounier-Jack
- Department of Global Health Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| | - Samir V. Sodha
- Department of Immunization Vaccines and Biologicals, WHO Headquarters, Avenue Appia 20, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Niklas Danielson
- Coverage & Equity Unit, Immunization Section, PG-Health, UNICEF Headquarters, 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Ibrahim Dadari
- Coverage & Equity Unit, Immunization Section, PG-Health, UNICEF Headquarters, 3 UN Plaza, New York, NY 10017, USA
| | - Folake Olayinka
- Public Health Institute, STAR Fellow Department, 901 D St, SW, Suite 1040, Washington, DC 20024, USA
| | - Arindam Ray
- Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, New Delhi 110075, India
| | - Tim Crocker-Buque
- Department of Global Health Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London WC1E 7HT, UK
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Shaum A, Wardle MT, Amponsa-Achiano K, Aborigo R, Opare J, Wallace AS, Bandoh D, Quaye P, Osei-Sarpong F, Abotsi F, Bonsu G, Conklin L. Evaluation of Container Clinics as an Urban Immunization Strategy: Findings from the First Year of Implementation in Ghana, 2017-2018. Vaccines (Basel) 2023; 11:vaccines11040814. [PMID: 37112727 PMCID: PMC10143135 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines11040814] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/17/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2017, the Expanded Programme on Immunization in Ghana opened two container clinics in Accra, which were cargo containers outfitted to deliver immunizations. At each clinic, we assessed performance and clinic acceptance during the first 12 months of implementation. METHODS We employed a descriptive mixed-method design using monthly administrative immunization data, exit interviews with caregivers of children of <5 years (N = 107), focus group discussions (FGDs) with caregivers (n = 6 FGDs) and nurses (n = 2 FGDs), and in-depth interviews (IDIs) with community leaders (n = 3) and health authorities (n = 3). RESULTS Monthly administrative data showed that administered vaccine doses increased from 94 during the opening month to 376 in the 12th month across both clinics. Each clinic exceeded its target doses for the 12-23 month population (second dose of measles). Almost all (98%) exit interview participants stated that the clinics made it easier to receive child health services compared to previous health service interactions. The accessibility and acceptability of the container clinics were also supported from health worker and community perspectives. CONCLUSIONS Our initial data support container clinics as an acceptable strategy for delivering immunization services in urban populations, at least in the short term. They can be rapidly deployed and designed to serve working mothers in strategic areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Shaum
- Center for Global Health, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Melissa T Wardle
- Center for Global Health, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Kwame Amponsa-Achiano
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - Raymond Aborigo
- Navrongo Health Research Centre, Health Research Division, Ghana Health Service, Navrongo 03821, Ghana
| | - Joseph Opare
- African Field Epidemiology Network, Kampala 10102, Uganda
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Center for Global Health, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| | - Delia Bandoh
- Ghana Field Epidemiology and Laboratory Training Programme, School of Public Health, University of Ghana, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - Pamela Quaye
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - Fred Osei-Sarpong
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - Francis Abotsi
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - George Bonsu
- Department of Disease Control and Prevention, Public Health Division, Ghana Health Service, Accra 00233, Ghana
| | - Laura Conklin
- Center for Global Health, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA 30329, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nambiar D, Mathew B, Dubey S, Moola S. Interventions addressing maternal and child health among the urban poor and homeless: an overview of systematic reviews. BMC Public Health 2023; 23:492. [PMID: 36918855 PMCID: PMC10015840 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-023-15410-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Inequalities in access to and utilization of maternal and child health (MCH) care are hampering progress on the path to achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. In a number of Low- and Middle-Income Countries (LMICs) population subgroups at disproportionate risk of being left behind are the urban poor. Within this neglected group is the further neglected group of the homeless. Concomitantly, a number of interventions from the antenatal period onward have been piloted, tested, and scaled in these contexts. We carried out an overview of systematic reviews (SRs) to characterize the evidence around maternal and child health interventions relevant to urban poor homeless populations in LMICs. METHODS We searched Medline, Cochrane Library, Health Systems Evidence and EBSCOhost databases for SRs published between January 2009 and 2020 (with an updated search through November 2021). Our population of interest was women or children from urban poor settings in LMICs; interventions and outcomes corresponded with the World Health Organization's (WHO) guidance document. Each SR was assessed by two reviewers using established standard critical appraisal checklists. The overview was registered in PROSPERO (ID: CRD42021229107). RESULTS In a sample of 33 high quality SRs, we found no direct relevant evidence for pregnant and lactating homeless women (and children) in the reviewed literature. There was a lack of emphasis on evidence related to family planning, safe abortion care, and postpartum care of mothers. There was mixed quality evidence that the range of nutritional interventions had little, unclear or no effect on several child mortality and development outcomes. Interventions related to water, sanitation, and hygiene, ensuring acceptability of community health services and health promotion type programs could be regarded as beneficial, although location seemed to matter. Importantly, the risk of bias reporting in different reviews did not match, suggesting that greater attention to rigour in their conduct is needed. CONCLUSION The generalizability of existing systematic reviews to our population of interest was poor. There is a clear need for rigorous primary research on MCH interventions among urban poor, and particularly homeless populations in LMICs, as it is as yet unclear whether the same, augmented, or altogether different interventions would be required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Devaki Nambiar
- The George Institute for Global Health, 308 Elegance Tower, Jasola District Centre, 110025, New Delhi, India.
| | | | - Shubhankar Dubey
- Indian Council of Medical Research- Regional Medical Research Center, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Tran BX, Tran LM, Hwang J, Do H, Ho R. Editorial: Strengthening Health System and Community Responses to Confront COVID-19 Pandemic in Resource-Scare Settings. Front Public Health 2022; 10:935490. [PMID: 35875028 PMCID: PMC9296814 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.935490] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2022] [Accepted: 06/15/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bach Xuan Tran
- Institute for Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Hanoi Medical University, Hanoi, Vietnam
- *Correspondence: Bach Xuan Tran
| | - Linh My Tran
- Institute of Health Economics and Technology (iHEAT), Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Jongnam Hwang
- Division of Social Welfare & Health Administration, Wonkwang University, Iksan, South Korea
| | - Hoa Do
- Center of Excellence in Public Health Nutrition, Nguyen Tat Thanh University, Hanoi, Vietnam
| | - Roger Ho
- Department of Psychological Medicine, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mehmood M, Setayesh H, Siddiqi DA, Siddique M, Iftikhar S, Soundardjee R, Dharma VK, Bhurgri AK, Stuckey EM, Sultan MA, Chandir S. Prevalence, geographical distribution and factors associated with pentavalent vaccine zero dose status among children in Sindh, Pakistan: analysis of data from the 2017 and 2018 birth cohorts enrolled in the provincial electronic immunisation registry. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058985. [PMID: 35584879 PMCID: PMC9119190 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058985] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To estimate the prevalence of zero dose children (who have not received any dose of pentavalent (diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, Haemophilus influenzae type B and hepatitis B) vaccine by their first birthday) among those who interacted with the immunisation system in Sindh, Pakistan along with their sociodemographic characteristics and risk factors. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS We conducted a descriptive analysis of child-level longitudinal immunisation records of 1 467 975 0-23 months children from the Sindh's Zindagi Mehfooz (Safe Life) Electronic Immunisation Registry (ZM-EIR), for the birth cohorts of 2017 and 2018. SETTING Sindh province, Pakistan which has a population of 47.9 million people and an annual birth cohort of 1.7 million. PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES The primary outcome measure was zero dose status among enrolled children. Logistic regression was performed to identify the risk factors associated with the zero dose status. RESULTS Out of 1 467 975 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR in Sindh, 10.6% (154 881/1 467 975) were zero dose. There were sharp inequities across the 27 districts. Zero dose children had a lower proportion of hospital births (28.5% vs 34.0%; difference 5.5 percentage points (pp) (95% CI 5.26 to 5.74); p<0.001) and higher prevalence from slums (49.5% vs 42.3%; difference 7.2 pp (95% CI 6.93 to 7.46); p<0.001), compared with non-zero dose children. Children residing in urban compared with rural areas were at a higher risk (relative risk (RR): 1.20; p<0.001; 95% CI 1.18 to 1.22), while children with educated compared with uneducated mothers were at a lower risk of being zero dose (RR: 0.47-0.96; p<0.001; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.98). CONCLUSIONS Despite interacting with the immunisation system, 1 out of 10 children enrolled in the ZM-EIR in Sindh were zero dose. It is crucial to monitor the prevalence of zero dose children and investigate their characteristics and risk factors to effectively reach and follow-up with them.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariam Mehmood
- Maternal & Child Health, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | - E M Stuckey
- Polio, Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | | | - Subhash Chandir
- Maternal & Child Health, IRD Pakistan, Karachi, Pakistan
- IRD Global, Singapore
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Jalloh MF, Patel P, Sutton R, Kulkarni S, Toure M, Wiley K, Sessay T, Lahuerta M. Qualitative assessment of caregiver experiences when navigating childhood immunisation in urban communities in Sierra Leone. BMJ Open 2022; 12:e058203. [PMID: 35534060 PMCID: PMC9086636 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-058203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To gain in-depth understanding of the caregiver experience when navigating urban immunisation services for their children. DESIGN An exploratory qualitative assessment comprising 16 in-depth interviews using an interpretative phenomenology approach. SETTING Caregivers were purposively recruited from slums (n=8) and other urban communities (n=8) in the capital city of Sierra Leone. PARTICIPANTS Caregivers of children ages 6-36 months old who were fully vaccinated (n=8) or undervaccinated (n=8). RESULTS Emotional enablers of vaccination were evident in caregivers' sense of parental obligation to their children while also anticipating reciprocal benefits in children's ability to take care of their parents later in life. Practical enablers were found in the diversity of immunisation reminders, information access, information trust, getting fathers more involved, positive experiences with health workers and postvaccination information sharing in the community. Underlying barriers to childhood vaccination were due to practical constraints such as overcrowding and long waiting times at the clinic, feeling disrespected by health workers, expecting to give money to health workers for free services and fear of serious vaccine side effects. To improve vaccination outcomes, caregivers desired more convenient and positive clinic experiences and deeper community engagement. CONCLUSIONS Health system interventions, community engagement and vaccination outreach need to be tailored for urban settings. Vaccine communication efforts may resonate more strongly with caregivers when vaccination is framed both around parental responsibilities to do the right thing for the child and the future benefits to the parent.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed F Jalloh
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Palak Patel
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | | | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Mame Toure
- ICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Kerrie Wiley
- School of Public Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Tom Sessay
- Expanded Programme on Immunization and Child Health, Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Western Area, Sierra Leone
| | - Maria Lahuerta
- ICAP at Columbia University, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Epidemiology, Columbia University Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Ahmed KA, Grundy J, Hashmat L, Ahmed I, Farrukh S, Bersonda D, Shah MA, Yunus S, Banskota HK. An analysis of the gender and social determinants of health in urban poor areas of the most populated cities of Pakistan. Int J Equity Health 2022; 21:52. [PMID: 35436931 PMCID: PMC9017040 DOI: 10.1186/s12939-022-01657-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2022] [Accepted: 03/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Recent surveys, studies and reviews in urban areas of Pakistan have highlighted the impacts of social inequities on access of women and children to health services for women and children in Pakistan. Objectives The Urban Slum Profiles and coverage surveys were conducted between 2017 and 2019. The objective of the profiles was to obtain an updated listing of slums and other underserved areas, and to better understand current vaccination and health service coverage in these areas. Utilising findings from these studies, this paper aims to better understand the gender and social determinants of health that are giving rise to health inequalities in the slums. Methods The Urban Slum Profiles adopted a mixed methods approach combining both qualitative and quantitative methods. The study was comprised of two main survey approaches of Urban Slum Profiles and Immunisation Coverage Survey in 4431 urban poor areas of the 10 most highly populated cities of Pakistan. Results Findings are classified into six analytic categories of (1) access to health services, (2) female workforce participation, (3) gender-friendly health services, (4) access to schools and literacy, (5) social connections, and (6) autonomy of decision making. Out of a national sample of 14,531 children in urban poor areas of 10 cities, the studies found that just over half of the children are fully immunised (54%) and 14% of children had received zero doses of vaccine. There are large shortages of health facilities and female health workforce in the slums, with significant gaps in the quality of health infrastructure, which all serve to limit both demand for, and supply of, health services for women and children. Results demonstrate low availability of schools, low levels of female literacy and autonomy over decision making, limited knowledge of the benefits of vaccination, and few social connections outside the home. All these factors interact and reinforce existing gender norms and low levels of health literacy and service access. Conclusion The Urban Slum profiles and coverage studies provide an opportunity to introduce gender transformative strategies that include expansion of a female health workforce, development of costed urban health action plans, and an enabling policy environment to support community organisation and more equitable health service delivery access.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - John Grundy
- College of Public Health, Medicine, and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Australia
| | - Lubna Hashmat
- Civil Society Human and Institutional Development Programme - CHIP, CHIP House # 1, Street # 9, G.8/2, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Imran Ahmed
- Civil Society Human and Institutional Development Programme - CHIP, CHIP House # 1, Street # 9, G.8/2, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | | | | - Muhammad Akram Shah
- EPI Program, National Institute of Health (NIH), Prime Minister's Health Complex, Park Road, Chakshahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | - Soofia Yunus
- EPI Program, National Institute of Health (NIH), Prime Minister's Health Complex, Park Road, Chakshahzad, Islamabad, Pakistan
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Khanam F, Ross AG, McMillan NAJ, Qadri F. Toward Typhoid Fever Elimination. Int J Infect Dis 2022; 119:41-43. [PMID: 35338009 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2022.03.036] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2022] [Revised: 03/18/2022] [Accepted: 03/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Salmonella enterica serotype Typhi (S Typhi) causes typhoid fever and is responsible for an estimated 9 million cases and 110,000 deaths globally per annum. Typhoid fever is endemic in areas where water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) infrastructure is poor. Serious complications develop in approximately 10%-15% of patients if left untreated, and this is driven by inadequate diagnostic methods and the high burden of antibiotic-resistant strains, complicating clinical management and ultimately prognosis. Asymptomatic chronic carriers, in addition to acutely infected patients, contribute to continued transmission through the shedding of the organism in the feces. The high morbidity and mortality of typhoid fever in low- and middle-income countries reinforce the need for an integrated control approach, which may ultimately lead to elimination of the disease in the 21st century. Here we discuss the challenges faced in pursuit of typhoid fever elimination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farhana Khanam
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh.
| | - Allen G Ross
- Rural Health Research Institute, Charles Sturt University, Orange Campus, Australia
| | - Nigel A J McMillan
- Menzies Health Institute Queensland, University of Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ishizumi A, Sutton R, Mansaray A, Parmley L, Eleeza O, Kulkarni S, Sesay T, Conklin L, Wallace AS, Akinjeji A, Toure M, Lahuerta M, Jalloh MF. Community Health Workers' Experiences in Strengthening the Uptake of Childhood Immunization and Malaria Prevention Services in Urban Sierra Leone. Front Public Health 2021; 9:767200. [PMID: 34938707 PMCID: PMC8687740 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.767200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Community health workers (CHWs) play an integral role in Sierra Leone's health systems strengthening efforts. Our goal was to understand CHWs' experiences of providing immunization and malaria prevention services in urban settings and explore opportunities to optimize their contributions to these services. Methods: In 2018, we conducted an exploratory qualitative assessment in the Western Area Urban district, which covers most of the capital city of Freetown. We purposively selected diverse health facilities (i.e., type, ownership, setting) and recruited CHWs through their supervisors. We conducted eight focus group discussions (FGD) with CHWs, which were audio-recorded. The topics explored included participants' background, responsibilities and priorities of urban CHWs, sources of motivation at work, barriers to CHWs' immunization and malaria prevention activities, and strategies used to address these barriers. The local research team transcribed and translated FGDs into English; then we used qualitative content analysis to identify themes. Results: Four themes emerged from the qualitative content analysis: (1) pride, compassion, recognition, and personal benefits are important motivating factors to keep working as CHWs; (2) diverse health responsibilities and competing priorities result in overburdening of CHWs; (3) health system- and community-level barriers negatively affect CHWs' activities and motivation; (4) CHWs use context-specific strategies to address challenges in their work but require further support. Conclusion: Focused support for CHWs is needed to optimize their contributions to immunization and malaria prevention activities. Such interventions should be coupled with systems-level efforts to address the structural barriers that negatively affect CHWs' overall work and motivation, such as the shortage of work supplies and the lack of promised financial support.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Atsuyoshi Ishizumi
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Roberta Sutton
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Anthony Mansaray
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Lauren Parmley
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Oliver Eleeza
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Tom Sesay
- Child Health and Immunization Program, Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Laura Conklin
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| | - Adewale Akinjeji
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Mame Toure
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Maria Lahuerta
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, NY, United States
| | - Mohamed F Jalloh
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Nnaji CA, Owoyemi AJ, Amaechi UA, Wiyeh AB, Ndwandwe DE, Wiysonge CS. Taking stock of global immunisation coverage progress: the gains, the losses and the journey ahead. Int Health 2021; 13:653-657. [PMID: 31927563 PMCID: PMC8643426 DOI: 10.1093/inthealth/ihz120] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2019] [Revised: 11/12/2019] [Accepted: 11/15/2019] [Indexed: 01/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the enormous benefits of vaccination, global immunisation coverage progress has stalled and remains suboptimal in many countries. In this commentary, we review the recently published update of the World Health Organization and United Nations Children's Fund Estimates of National Immunization Coverage. We highlight trends in which, despite substantial gains made in improving immunisation coverage at the global level, there remain numerous challenges with reaching and sustaining optimal coverage. We contextualise the trends by exploring plausible supply- and demand-side root causes. Based on these, we stress the need for targeted, context-appropriate strategies for reaching and maintaining optimal immunisation coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C A Nnaji
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - A J Owoyemi
- Department of Biomedical and Health Information Sciences, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, United States of America
| | - U A Amaechi
- Strategy, Investment and Impact Division, Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - A B Wiyeh
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - D E Ndwandwe
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| | - C S Wiysonge
- School of Public Health and Family Medicine, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, South Africa
- Cochrane South Africa, South African Medical Research Council, Cape Town, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Ross AG, Alam M, Rahman M, Qadri F, Mahmood SS, Zaman K, Chau TN, Chattopadhyay A, Chaudhuri SPG. Rise of informal slums and the next global pandemic. J Infect Dis 2021; 224:S910-S914. [PMID: 34668553 DOI: 10.1093/infdis/jiab492] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Informal slums are growing exponentially in the developing world and these will serve as the breeding ground for a future global pandemic. Virtually every sustainable development goal is unmet in slums around the globe thus we must act now to divert a global humanitarian crisis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen G Ross
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Munirul Alam
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Mahbubur Rahman
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Shehrin S Mahmood
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - K Zaman
- International Centre for Diarrhoeal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Decouttere C, De Boeck K, Vandaele N. Advancing sustainable development goals through immunization: a literature review. Global Health 2021; 17:95. [PMID: 34446050 PMCID: PMC8390056 DOI: 10.1186/s12992-021-00745-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/30/2020] [Accepted: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Immunization directly impacts health (SDG3) and brings a contribution to 14 out of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), such as ending poverty, reducing hunger, and reducing inequalities. Therefore, immunization is recognized to play a central role in reaching the SDGs, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). Despite continuous interventions to strengthen immunization systems and to adequately respond to emergency immunization during epidemics, the immunization-related indicators for SDG3 lag behind in sub-Saharan Africa. Especially taking into account the current Covid19 pandemic, the current performance on the connected SDGs is both a cause and a result of this. METHODS We conduct a literature review through a keyword search strategy complemented with handpicking and snowballing from earlier reviews. After title and abstract screening, we conducted a qualitative analysis of key insights and categorized them according to showing the impact of immunization on SDGs, sustainability challenges, and model-based solutions to these challenges. RESULTS We reveal the leveraging mechanisms triggered by immunization and position them vis-à-vis the SDGs, within the framework of Public Health and Planetary Health. Several challenges for sustainable control of vaccine-preventable diseases are identified: access to immunization services, global vaccine availability to LMICs, context-dependent vaccine effectiveness, safe and affordable vaccines, local/regional vaccine production, public-private partnerships, and immunization capacity/capability building. Model-based approaches that support SDG-promoting interventions concerning immunization systems are analyzed in light of the strategic priorities of the Immunization Agenda 2030. CONCLUSIONS In general terms, it can be concluded that relevant future research requires (i) design for system resilience, (ii) transdisciplinary modeling, (iii) connecting interventions in immunization with SDG outcomes, (iv) designing interventions and their implementation simultaneously, (v) offering tailored solutions, and (vi) model coordination and integration of services and partnerships. The research and health community is called upon to join forces to activate existing knowledge, generate new insights and develop decision-supporting tools for Low-and Middle-Income Countries' health authorities and communities to leverage immunization in its transformational role toward successfully meeting the SDGs in 2030.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Catherine Decouttere
- KU Leuven, Access-To-Medicines research Center, Naamsestraat 69, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Kim De Boeck
- KU Leuven, Access-To-Medicines research Center, Naamsestraat 69, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Nico Vandaele
- KU Leuven, Access-To-Medicines research Center, Naamsestraat 69, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Tagoe ET, Sheikh N, Morton A, Nonvignon J, Sarker AR, Williams L, Megiddo I. COVID-19 Vaccination in Lower-Middle Income Countries: National Stakeholder Views on Challenges, Barriers, and Potential Solutions. Front Public Health 2021; 9:709127. [PMID: 34422750 PMCID: PMC8377669 DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.709127] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 21.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
The development of COVID-19 vaccines does not imply the end of the global pandemic as now countries have to purchase enough COVID-19 vaccine doses and work towards their successful rollout. Vaccination across the world has progressed slowly in all, but a few high-income countries (HICs) as governments learn how to vaccinate their entire populations amidst a pandemic. Most low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) have been relying on the COVID-19 Vaccines Global Access (COVAX) Facility to obtain vaccines. COVAX aims to provide these countries with enough doses to vaccinate 20% of their populations. LMICs will likely encounter additional barriers and challenges rolling out vaccines compared HICs despite their significant experience from the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). This study explores potential barriers that will arise during the COVID-19 vaccine rollout in lower-middle-income countries and how to overcome them. We conducted sixteen semi-structured interviews with national-level stakeholders from Ghana and Bangladesh (eight in each country). Stakeholders included policymakers and immunisation programme experts. Data were analysed using a Framework Analysis technique. Stakeholders believed their country could use existing EPI structures for the COVID-19 vaccine rollout despite existing challenges with the EPI and despite its focus on childhood immunisation rather than vaccinating the entire population over a short period of time. Stakeholders suggested increasing confidence in the vaccine through community influencers and by utilising local government accredited institutions such as the Drug Authorities for vaccine approval. Additional strategies they discussed included training more health providers and recruiting volunteers to increase vaccination speed, expanding government budgets for COVID-19 vaccine purchase and delivery, and exploring other financing opportunities to address in-country vaccine shortages. Stakeholders also believed that LMICs may encounter challenges complying with priority lists. Our findings suggest that COVID-19 vaccination is different from previous vaccination programs, and therefore, policymakers have to expand the EPI structure and also take a systematic and collaborative approach to plan and effectively rollout the vaccines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eunice Twumwaa Tagoe
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Nurnabi Sheikh
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Alec Morton
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | | | - Abdur Razzaque Sarker
- Population Studies Division, Bangladesh Institute of Development Studies (BIDS), Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Lynn Williams
- School of Psychological Sciences & Health, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| | - Itamar Megiddo
- Department of Management Science, University of Strathclyde, Glasgow, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Jalloh MF, Hickler B, Parmley LE, Sutton R, Kulkarni S, Mansaray A, Eleeza O, Patel P, Wilhelm E, Conklin L, Akinjeji A, Toure M, Wolff B, Prybylski D, Wallace AS, Lahuerta M. Using immunisation caregiver journey interviews to understand and optimise vaccination uptake: lessons from Sierra Leone. BMJ Glob Health 2021; 6:bmjgh-2021-005525. [PMID: 34045184 PMCID: PMC8162096 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgh-2021-005525] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2021] [Accepted: 05/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Quantitative and qualitative assessments have revealed diverse factors that influence the uptake of childhood immunisation services and shed light on reasons for vaccination delays and refusals. UNICEF and partner organisations developed the Immunisation Caregiver Journey Framework as a novel way to understand caregiver experiences in accessing and receiving immunisation services for children. This framework aims to help immunisation programmes identify vaccination barriers and opportunities to improve vaccination uptake by enhancing the overall caregiver journey in a systems-focused manner, using human-centred design principles. In this paper, we adapt the framework into a flexible qualitative inquiry approach with theoretical guidance from interpretative phenomenology. We draw from the implementation experiences in Sierra Leone to inform methodological guidance on how to design and implement the Immunisation Caregiver Journey Interviews (ICJI) to understand the lived experiences of caregivers as they navigate immunisation services for their children. Practical guidance is provided on sampling techniques, conducting interviews, data management, data analysis and the use of data to inform programmatic actions. When properly implemented, the ICJI approach generates a rich qualitative understanding of how caregivers navigate household and community dynamics, as well as primary healthcare delivery systems. We argue that understanding and improving the caregiver journey will enhance essential immunisation outcomes, such as the completion of the recommended vaccination schedule, timeliness of vaccination visits and reduction in dropouts between vaccine doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed F Jalloh
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | | | - Lauren E Parmley
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Roberta Sutton
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Anthony Mansaray
- Sierra Leone Country Office, ICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Oliver Eleeza
- Sierra Leone Country Office, ICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Palak Patel
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Oak Ridge, Tennessee, USA
| | - Elisabeth Wilhelm
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Laura Conklin
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Adewale Akinjeji
- Sierra Leone Country Office, ICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Mame Toure
- Sierra Leone Country Office, ICAP at Columbia University, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Brent Wolff
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Dimitri Prybylski
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Maria Lahuerta
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Which public health interventions are effective in reducing morbidity, mortality and health inequalities from infectious diseases amongst children in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs): An umbrella review. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0251905. [PMID: 34111134 PMCID: PMC8191901 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251905] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2020] [Accepted: 05/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite significant progress in the last few decades, infectious diseases remain a major threat to child health in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs)—particularly amongst more disadvantaged groups. It is imperative to understand the best available evidence concerning which public health interventions reduce morbidity, mortality and health inequalities in children aged under five years. To address this gap, we carried out an umbrella review (a systematic reviews of reviews) to identify evidence on the effects of public health interventions (promotion, protection, prevention) on morbidity, mortality and/or health inequalities due to infectious diseases amongst children in LMICs. Ten databases were searched for records published between 2014–2021 alongside a manual search of gray literature. Articles were quality-assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews tool (AMSTAR 2). A narrative synthesis was conducted. We identified 60 systematic reviews synthesizing 453 individual primary studies. A majority of the reviews reported on preventive interventions (n = 48), with a minority on promotion (n = 17) and almost no reviews covering health protection interventions (n = 2). Effective interventions for improving child health across the whole population, as well as the most disadvantaged included communication, education and social mobilization for specific preventive services or tools, such as immunization or bed nets. For all other interventions, the effects were either unclear, unknown or detrimental, either at the overall population level or regarding health inequalities. We found few reviews reporting health inequalities information and the quality of the evidence base was generally low. Our umbrella review identified some prevention interventions that might be useful in reducing under five mortality from infectious diseases in LMICs, particularly amongst the most disadvantaged groups.
Collapse
|
21
|
Feldstein LR, Sutton R, Jalloh MF, Parmley L, Lahuerta M, Akinjeji A, Mansaray A, Eleeza O, Sesay T, Kulkarni S, Conklin L, Wallace AS. Access, demand, and utilization of childhood immunization services: A cross-sectional household survey in Western Area Urban district, Sierra Leone, 2019. J Glob Health 2021; 10:010420. [PMID: 32509292 PMCID: PMC7243070 DOI: 10.7189/jogh.10.010420] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Urban childhood immunization programs face unique challenges in access, utilization, and demand due to frequent population movement between and within localities, sprawling informal settlements, and population heterogeneity. We conducted a cross-sectional household survey in the Western Area Urban district, Sierra Leone, stratified by slums and non-slums as defined by the United Nations Development Program. Methods Based on data from child vaccination cards, weighted vaccination coverage was estimated from 450 children aged 12-36 months (household response rate = 83%). Interviews with 444 caregivers identified factors related to accessing routine immunization services. Factors associated with coverage in bivariate analyses were examined in multivariate models using backward stepwise procedure. Results Coverage was similar in slums and non-slums for 3-doses of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-hepatitis B-Haemophilus influenzae type b (pentavalent) vaccine (86%, 92%) and second dose of measles vaccine (33%, 29%). In a multivariate logistic regression model, incomplete pentavalent vaccine coverage was associated with being second or later birth order (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 4.5 (95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.4-14.9), a household member not approving of childhood vaccinations (aOR = 7.55, 95% CI = 1.52-37.38), self-reported delay of child receiving recommended vaccinations (aOR = 4.8, 95% CI = 1.0-22.1), and living in a household made of natural or rudimentary materials (aOR = 3.5, 95% CI = 1.2-10.6). Overall, the majority (>70%) of caregivers reported occupation as petty trader and <50% reported receiving vaccination information via preferred communication sources. Conclusions Although vaccination coverage in slums was similar to non-slums, study findings support the need for targeted interventions to improve coverage, especially for the second dose of measles vaccine to avoid large scale measles outbreaks. Strategies should focus on educating household members via preferred communication channels regarding the importance of receiving childhood vaccinations on time for all offspring, not just the first born. Vaccination coverage could be further improved by increasing accessibility through innovative strategies such as increasing the number of vaccination days and modifying hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leora R Feldstein
- Global Immunization Division (GID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Epidemic Intelligence Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Roberta Sutton
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mohamed F Jalloh
- Global Immunization Division (GID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Lauren Parmley
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Maria Lahuerta
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA.,Department of Epidemiology, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Adewale Akinjeji
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Anthony Mansaray
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Oliver Eleeza
- ICAP at Columbia University, Mailman School of Public Health, New York, New York, USA
| | - Tom Sesay
- Child Health/EPI Program, Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Shibani Kulkarni
- Global Immunization Division (GID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA.,Evaluation Fellow (Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education), GID, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Laura Conklin
- Global Immunization Division (GID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Global Immunization Division (GID), Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Bello IM, Lebo E, Shibeshi ME, Akpan GU, Chakauya J, Masresha BG, Daniel F. Implementation of integrated supportive supervision in the context of coronavirus 19 pandemic: its effects on routine immunization and vaccine preventable surveillance diseases indicators in the East and Southern African countries. Pan Afr Med J 2021; 38:164. [PMID: 33995771 PMCID: PMC8077641 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.2021.38.164.27349] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2020] [Accepted: 02/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) global pandemic has caused serious disruption to almost all aspect of human endeavor forcing countries to implement unprecedented public health measures aimed at mitigating its effects, such as total lockdown (inter and intra), travel bans, quarantine, social distancing in an effort to contain the spread of the virus. Supportive supervision is a functional component of the immunization systems that allows identification of existing gaps, provides an opportunity for onsite training, and document real-time findings for improvement of the program. The control measures of COVID-19 pandemic have also resulted in limitation of operations of the immunization system including supportive supervision. This has limited many aspects of supportive supervision for surveillance and routine immunization monitoring system in the East and Southern African countries. The aim of this study is to identify the effects of COVID-19 on Integrated Supportive Supervision visits for expanded programme on immunization (EPI) and how it influences the immunization and vaccine preventable disease (VPD) surveillance indicators, and its short-term effect towards notification of increase or decrease morbidity and mortality. Methods we reviewed the integrated supportive supervision (ISS) data and the routine administrative coverage from 19 countries in the East and Southern Africa (ESA) for the period January to August 2019 to analyze the trends in the number of visits, vaccine-preventable diseases (VPD), and routine immunization (RI) indicators using t-test, and compare with the period January to August 2020 during the months of the COVID-19 pandemic. Results thirteen countries out of the 19 considered, had shown a decline in the number of integrated supportive supervision (ISS) visits, with 10 (77%) having more than 59% decrease during the January-August 2020 as compared to the same period 2019. Eleven (57%) of the countries have shown a decrease (p-value < 0.05). Ethiopia and Kenya had the highest drop (p-value < 0.000). Six (32%) had an increase in the number of visits, with Madagascar, Zambia, and Zimbabwe having >100% increase in the number of visits. Sixty-seven percent (67%) of the countries that have decreased in the number of ISS visits have equally witnessed a drop in DPT3 administrative coverage. Countries with a low proportion of outreach sessions conducted in the period of January - August 2020, have all had sessions interruption, with more than 40% of the reasons associated with the lockdown. Conclusion countries have experienced a decrease in the number of supportive supervision visits conducted, during the period of the COVID-19 pandemic and, this has influenced the routine immunization and vaccine-preventable diseases surveillance (VPD) process indicators monitored through the conduct of the visits. Continuous decrease in these performance indicators pose a great threat to the performance sustained and the functionality of the surveillance and immunization system, and consequently on increased surveillance sensitivity to promptly detect outbreaks and aiming to reducing morbidity and mortality in the sub-region.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isah Mohammed Bello
- World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team Office for East and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 5160, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Emmaculate Lebo
- World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team Office for East and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 5160, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Messeret Eshetu Shibeshi
- World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team Office for East and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 5160, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Godwin Ubong Akpan
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Cité du Djoué, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Jethro Chakauya
- World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team Office for East and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 5160, Harare, Zimbabwe
| | - Balcha Girma Masresha
- World Health Organization, Regional Office for Africa, Cité du Djoué, Brazzaville, Congo
| | - Fussum Daniel
- World Health Organization, Inter-Country Support Team Office for East and Southern Africa, P.O. Box 5160, Harare, Zimbabwe
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Portnoy A, Resch SC, Suharlim C, Brenzel L, Menzies NA. What We Do Not Know About the Costs of Immunization Programs in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. VALUE IN HEALTH : THE JOURNAL OF THE INTERNATIONAL SOCIETY FOR PHARMACOECONOMICS AND OUTCOMES RESEARCH 2021; 24:67-69. [PMID: 33431155 PMCID: PMC7813212 DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2020.08.2097] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2019] [Revised: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 05/22/2023]
Abstract
• For many countries, there are limited data on the costs of running immunization services, and even less on the costs of increasing immunization coverage. • When considering different approaches for scaling up coverage, countries and funders need to understand the marginal change in coverage produced, costs of introduction, and how cost and coverage effects change depending on programmatic context. • Costing studies would benefit from improved, systematic reporting and leveraging ongoing program evaluation efforts to collect costing data. Long-term investments in the health system may allow for routine data collection and improved efficiency for budgeting and planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allison Portnoy
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Stephen C Resch
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Christian Suharlim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Management Sciences for Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Nicolas A Menzies
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA; Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Minta AA, Andre-Alboth J, Childs L, Nace D, Rey-Benito G, Boncy J, Adrien P, Francois J, Phaïmyr Jn Charles N, Blot V, Vanden Eng J, Priest JW, Rogier E, Tohme RA. Seroprevalence of Measles, Rubella, Tetanus, and Diphtheria Antibodies among Children in Haiti, 2017. Am J Trop Med Hyg 2020; 103:1717-1725. [PMID: 32618256 DOI: 10.4269/ajtmh.20-0112] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023] Open
Abstract
In Haiti, measles, rubella, and maternal and neonatal tetanus have been eliminated, but a diphtheria outbreak is ongoing as of 2019. We conducted a nationally representative, household-based, two-stage cluster survey among children aged 5-7 years in 2017 to assess progress toward maintenance of control and elimination of selected vaccine-preventable diseases (VPDs). We stratified Haiti into West region (West department, including the capital city) and non-West region (all other departments). We obtained vaccination history and dried blood spots, and measured antibody concentrations to VPDs on a multiplex bead assay. Among 1,146 children, national seropositivity was 83% (95% CI: 80-86%) for tetanus, 83% (95% CI: 81-85%) for diphtheria, 87% (95% CI: 85-89%) for measles, and 84% (95% CI: 81-87%) for rubella. None of the children had long-term immunity to tetanus or diphtheria (IgG concentration ≥ 1 international unit/mL). Seropositivity in the West region was lower than that in the non-West region. Vaccination coverage was 68% (95% CI: 61-74%) for ≥ 3 doses of tetanus- and diphtheria-containing vaccine (DTP3), 84% (95% CI: 80-87%) for one dose of measles-rubella vaccine (MR1), and 20% (95% CI: 16-24%) for MR2. The seroprevalence of measles, rubella, and diphtheria antibodies is lower than population immunity levels needed to prevent disease transmission, particularly in the West region; reintroduction of these diseases could lead to an outbreak. To maintain VPD control and elimination, Haiti should achieve DTP3 and MR2 coverage ≥ 95%, and include tetanus and diphtheria booster doses in the routine immunization schedule.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna A Minta
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jocelyne Andre-Alboth
- National Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Lana Childs
- Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.,Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Douglas Nace
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | | | - Jacques Boncy
- National Public Health Laboratory, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Paul Adrien
- Directorate of Epidemiology, Laboratory and Research, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | - Jeannot Francois
- Expanded Program on Immunization, Ministry of Public Health and Population, Port-au-Prince, Haiti
| | | | - Valery Blot
- Institut Haitien de l'Enfance, Pétion-Ville, Haiti
| | - Jodi Vanden Eng
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Jeffrey W Priest
- Division of Foodborne, Waterborne, and Environmental Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Eric Rogier
- Division of Parasitic Diseases and Malaria, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| | - Rania A Tohme
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Jalloh MF, Namageyo-Funa A, Gleason B, Wallace AS, Friedman M, Sesay T, Ocansey D, Jalloh MS, Feldstein LR, Conklin L, Hersey S, Singh T, Kaiser R. Assessment of VaxTrac electronic immunization registry in an urban district in Sierra Leone: Implications for data quality, defaulter tracking, and policy. Vaccine 2020; 38:6103-6111. [PMID: 32753291 PMCID: PMC10869104 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.07.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2020] [Revised: 07/12/2020] [Accepted: 07/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In 2016, the Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation (MoHS) piloted VaxTrac, an electronic immunization registry (EIR), in an urban district to improve management of vaccination records and tracking of children who missed scheduled doses. We aimed to document lessons learned to inform decision-making on VaxTrac and similar EIRs' future use. METHODS Ten out of 50 urban health facilities that implemented VaxTrac were purposively selected for inclusion in a rapid mixed-method assessment from November to December 2017. For a one-month period, records of six scheduled vaccine doses among children < 2 years old in VaxTrac were abstracted and compared to three paper-based records (register of under-two children, daily tally sheet, and monthly summary form). We used the under-two register as the reference gold standard for comparison purposes. We interviewed and observed 10 heath workers, one from each selected facility, who were using VaxTrac. RESULTS Overall, VaxTrac captured < 65% of the vaccine doses reported in the paper-based sources, but in the largest health facility VaxTrac captured the highest number of doses. Two additional notable patterns emerged: 1) the aggregated data sources reported higher doses administered compared to the under-two register and VaxTrac; 2) data sources that need real-time data capture during the vaccination session reported fewer doses administered compared to the monthly HF2 summary form. Health workers expressed that the EIR helped them to shorten the time to manage, summarize, and report vaccination records. Workflows for data entry in VaxTrac were inconsistent among facilities and rarely integrated into existing processes. Data sharing restrictions contributed to duplicate records. CONCLUSION Although VaxTrac helped to shorten the time to manage, summarize, and report vaccination records, data sharing restrictions coupled with inconsistent and inefficient workflows were major implementation challenges. Readiness-to-introduce and sustainability should be carefully considered before implementing an EIR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed F Jalloh
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States.
| | - Apophia Namageyo-Funa
- Strategic Information and Workforce Development Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
| | - Brigette Gleason
- Sierra Leone Country Office, Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
| | - Michael Friedman
- Sierra Leone Country Office, Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Tom Sesay
- Sierra Leone Ministry of Health and Sanitation, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | | | | | - Leora R Feldstein
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
| | - Laura Conklin
- Immunization Systems Branch, Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, United States
| | - Sara Hersey
- Sierra Leone Country Office, Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Tushar Singh
- Sierra Leone Country Office, Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| | - Reinhard Kaiser
- Sierra Leone Country Office, Division of Global Health Protection, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Freetown, Sierra Leone
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
de Cock C, van Velthoven M, Milne-Ives M, Mooney M, Meinert E. Use of Apps to Promote Childhood Vaccination: Systematic Review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2020; 8:e17371. [PMID: 32421684 PMCID: PMC7265109 DOI: 10.2196/17371] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2019] [Revised: 03/13/2020] [Accepted: 03/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Vaccination is a critical step in reducing child mortality; however, vaccination rates have declined in many countries in recent years. This decrease has been associated with an increase in the outbreak of vaccine-preventable diseases. The potential for leveraging mobile platforms to promote vaccination coverage has been investigated in the development of numerous mobile apps. Although many are available for public use, there is little robust evaluation of these apps. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aimed to assess the effectiveness of apps supporting childhood vaccinations in improving vaccination uptake, knowledge, and decision making as well as the usability and user perceptions of these apps. METHODS PubMed, Excerpta Medica Database (EMBASE), Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, ClinicalTrials.gov, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC) databases were systematically searched for studies published between 2008 and 2019 that evaluated childhood vaccination apps. Two authors screened and selected studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Data were extracted and analyzed, and the studies were assessed for risk of bias. RESULTS A total of 28 studies evaluating 25 apps met the inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. Overall, 9 studies assessed vaccination uptake, of which 4 reported significant benefits (P<.001 or P=.03) of the implementation of the app. Similarly, 4 studies indicated a significant (P≤.054) impact on knowledge and on vaccination decision making. Patient perceptions, usability, and acceptability were generally positive. The quality of the included studies was found to be moderate to poor, with many aspects of the methodology being unclear. CONCLUSIONS There is little evidence to support the use of childhood vaccination apps to improve vaccination uptake, knowledge, or decision making. Further research is required to understand the dichotomous effects of vaccination-related information provision and the evaluation of these apps in larger, more robust studies. The methodology of studies must be reported more comprehensively to accurately assess the effectiveness of childhood vaccination apps and the risk of bias of studies. INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID) RR2-10.2196/16929.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline de Cock
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Michelle van Velthoven
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Madison Milne-Ives
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Mooney
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edward Meinert
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
- Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Slums, Space, and State of Health-A Link between Settlement Morphology and Health Data. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2020; 17:ijerph17062022. [PMID: 32204347 PMCID: PMC7143924 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17062022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2020] [Revised: 03/06/2020] [Accepted: 03/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Approximately 1 billion slum dwellers worldwide are exposed to increased health risks due to their spatial environment. Recent studies have therefore called for the spatial environment to be introduced as a separate dimension in medical studies. Hence, this study investigates how and on which spatial scale relationships between the settlement morphology and the health status of the inhabitants can be identified. To this end, we summarize the current literature on the identification of slums from a geographical perspective and review the current literature on slums and health of the last five years (376 studies) focusing on the considered scales in the studies. We show that the majority of medical studies are restricted to certain geographical regions. It is desirable that the number of studies be adapted to the number of the respective population. On the basis of these studies, we develop a framework to investigate the relationship between space and health. Finally, we apply our methodology to investigate the relationship between the prevalence of slums and different health metrics using data of the global burden of diseases for different prefectures in Brazil on a subnational level.
Collapse
|
28
|
Van Velthoven MH, Milne-Ives M, de Cock C, Mooney M, Meinert E. Use of Apps to Promote Childhood Vaccination: Protocol for a Systematic Review. JMIR Res Protoc 2020; 9:e16929. [PMID: 32022694 PMCID: PMC7055758 DOI: 10.2196/16929] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Accepted: 11/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The decline in the uptake of routine childhood vaccinations has resulted in outbreaks of vaccine-preventable diseases. Vaccination apps can be used as a tool to promote immunization through the provision of reminders, dissemination of information, peer support, and feedback. Objective The aim of this review is to systematically review the evidence on the use of apps to support childhood vaccination uptake, information storage, and record sharing. Methods We will identify relevant papers by searching the following electronic databases: PubMed, Embase by Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ClinicalTrials.gov, and Education Resources Information Center (ERIC). We will review the reference lists of those studies that we include to identify relevant additional papers not initially identified using our search strategy. In addition to the use of electronic databases, we will search for grey literature on the topic. The search strategy will include only terms relating to or describing the intervention, which is app use. As almost all titles and abstracts are in English, 100% of these will be reviewed, but retrieval will be confined to papers written in the English language. We will record the search outcome on a specifically designed record sheet. Two reviewers will select observational and intervention studies, appraise the quality of the studies, and extract the relevant data. All studies will involve the use of apps relating to child vaccinations. The primary outcome is the uptake of vaccinations. Secondary outcomes are as follows: (1) use of app for sharing of information and providing vaccination reminders and (2) use of app for storage of vaccination information; knowledge and decision making by parents regarding vaccination (ie, risks and benefits of vaccination); costs and cost-effectiveness of vaccination apps; use of the app and measures of usability (eg, usefulness, acceptability, and experiences of different users: parents and health care professionals); use of technical standards for development of the app; and adverse events (eg, data leaks and misinformation). We will exclude studies that do not study an app. We anticipate a limited scope for meta-analysis and will provide a narrative overview of findings and tabular summaries of extracted data. Results This project was funded by the Sir David Cooksey Fellowship in Healthcare Translation at the University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom. We will submit the full systematic review for publication in the Journal of Medical Internet Research. Conclusions This review will follow, where possible, the Cochrane Collaboration and the Centre for Review and Dissemination methodologies for conducting systematic reviews. We will report our findings based on guidelines from the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The review results will be used to inform the development of a vaccination app. International Registered Report Identifier (IRRID) PRR1-10.2196/16929
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Madison Milne-Ives
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health (DEPTH) Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Caroline de Cock
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health (DEPTH) Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Mooney
- School of Nursing & Midwifery, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Edward Meinert
- Digitally Enabled PrevenTative Health (DEPTH) Research Group, Department of Paediatrics, Oxford, United Kingdom.,Department of Primary Care and Public Health, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Ross AG, Rahman M, Alam M, Zaman K, Qadri F. Can we 'WaSH' infectious diseases out of slums? Int J Infect Dis 2020; 92:130-132. [PMID: 31962180 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/14/2019] [Revised: 01/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
The world is becoming increasingly urban and most of this growth is taking place in urban slums of the developing world. The current (2019) global population stands at 7.7 billion, with approximately one billion (13%) living in urban slums. By 2030 the world's population is projected to grow to 8.5 billion, with an estimated two billion (24%) living in slums. Slums are typically overcrowded, with most residents sharing a single room with four to five family members. There is usually no formal sewage or waste disposal system. Open sewage, with antimicrobial-resistant organisms, typically flows just outside the door, which during the rainy season often enters the home and contaminates the household drinking source. Hygiene is difficult if not impossible to maintain, hence the significant burden of infectious diseases, especially those with a faecal-oral mode of transmission. Transmission is year-round and the leading enteric pathogens are rotavirus, Cryptosporidium, Shigella, Campylobacter, Salmonella typhi, and Vibrio cholera. Water, sanitation, and hygiene (WaSH) will be crucial components of a future integrated control strategy for infectious diseases in slums. Cheap WaSH interventions have been trialled, but their impact has been modest and short-lived. More expensive WaSH alternatives that will provide lasting change now need to be explored. Can we 'WaSH' infectious diseases out of slums?
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Allen G Ross
- International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Gold Coast, Australia.
| | - Mahbubur Rahman
- International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Munirul Alam
- International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - K Zaman
- International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | - Firdausi Qadri
- International Center for Diarrheal Disease Research, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Hu Y, Wang Y, Chen Y, Liang H. Analyzing the Urban-Rural Vaccination Coverage Disparity through a Fair Decomposition in Zhejiang Province, China. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2019; 16:ijerph16224575. [PMID: 31752311 PMCID: PMC6887931 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph16224575] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2019] [Revised: 11/16/2019] [Accepted: 11/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
Objectives: Exploring determinants underlying disparities in full vaccination coverage (FVC) can contribute to improved immunization interventions. FVC and its risk factors in Zhejiang province have been studied, yet the determinants explaining the rural-urban disparity in FVC have not been studied. This study aimed to disentangle the factors explaining rural-urban disparities in FVC of vaccine doses scheduled during the first year of life in Zhejiang province. Methods: We used data from a vaccination coverage survey among children aged 24-35 months conducted in 2016. The outcome measure was full vaccination status, and the grouping variable was the area of residence. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the FVC and rural-urban residence across the exposure variables. The Fairlie decomposition technique was used to decompose factors contributing to explaining the FVC disparity. Results: There were 847 children included in this study, of which 49.6% lived in a rural area. FVC was 94% in rural areas and 85% in urban areas. A disparity of 9% to the advantage of the rural areas and the exposure variables explained 81.1% of the disparity. Maternal factors explained 49.7% of the explained disparity with education, occupation, and ethnicity being the significant contributors to the explained disparity. Children's birth order and immigration status contributed somewhat to the explained inequality. Conclusion: There was a significant disparity in FVC in Zhejiang province, a disadvantage to the urban areas. Policy recommendations or health interventions to reduce the inequality should be focused on eliminating poverty and women's illiteracy, targeted at migrant children or children from minority ethnicities.
Collapse
|
31
|
Jalloh MF, Wilhelm E, Abad N, Prybylski D. Mobilize to vaccinate: lessons learned from social mobilization for immunization in low and middle-income countries. Hum Vaccin Immunother 2019; 16:1208-1214. [PMID: 31464551 PMCID: PMC7227704 DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2019.1661206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/04/2022] Open
Abstract
Creating and sustaining demand for immunization services is a global priority to ensure that vaccine-eligible populations are fully protected from vaccine-preventable diseases. Social mobilization remains a key health promotion strategy used by low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to promote vaccination demand. In this commentary, we synthesize illustrative evidence on successful social mobilization efforts promoting the uptake of immunization services in select LMICs. The first example focuses on Sierra Leone’s routine immunization program during the Universal Child Immunization initiative in the late 1980s. We then give an example of India’s establishment of a social mobilization network in the early- to mid-2000s to support polio elimination in high-risk communities. Thirdly, we highlight the complexities of social mobilization in a humanitarian emergency during the 2017–2018 diphtheria outbreak among displaced Rohingyas in camps and settlements in Bangladesh. Lastly, we draw upon examples from the introduction of the human papillomavirus vaccine in several countries. We then critically examine recurring challenges faced when implementing social mobilization for immunization in LMICs and offer practical recommendations for improvement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohamed F Jalloh
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
| | - Elisabeth Wilhelm
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
| | - Neetu Abad
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
| | - Dimitri Prybylski
- Global Immunization Division, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, USA
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Munk C, Portnoy A, Suharlim C, Clarke-Deelder E, Brenzel L, Resch SC, Menzies NA. Systematic review of the costs and effectiveness of interventions to increase infant vaccination coverage in low- and middle-income countries. BMC Health Serv Res 2019; 19:741. [PMID: 31640687 PMCID: PMC6806517 DOI: 10.1186/s12913-019-4468-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In recent years, several large studies have assessed the costs of national infant immunization programs, and the results of these studies are used to support planning and budgeting in low- and middle-income countries. However, few studies have addressed the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve immunization coverage, despite this being a major focus of policy attention. Without this information, countries and international stakeholders have little objective evidence on the efficiency of competing interventions for improving coverage. Methods We conducted a systematic literature review on the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions to improve immunization coverage in low- and middle-income countries, including both published and unpublished reports. We evaluated the quality of included studies and extracted data on costs and incremental coverage. Where possible, we calculated incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) to describe the efficiency of each intervention in increasing coverage. Results A total of 14 out of 41 full text articles reviewed met criteria for inclusion in the final review. Interventions for increasing immunization coverage included demand generation, modified delivery approaches, cash transfer programs, health systems strengthening, and novel technology usage. We observed substantial heterogeneity in costing methods and incompleteness of cost and coverage reporting. Most studies reported increases in coverage following the interventions, with coverage increasing by an average of 23 percentage points post-intervention across studies. ICERs ranged from $0.66 to $161.95 per child vaccinated in 2017 USD. We did not conduct a meta-analysis given the small number of estimates and variety of interventions included. Conclusions There is little quantitative evidence on the costs and cost-effectiveness of interventions for improving immunization coverage, despite this being a major objective for national immunization programs. Efforts to improve the level of costing evidence—such as by integrating cost analysis within implementation studies and trials of immunization scale up—could allow programs to better allocate resources for coverage improvement. Greater adoption of standardized cost reporting methods would also enable the synthesis and use of cost data. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (10.1186/s12913-019-4468-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Munk
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Allison Portnoy
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA. .,Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
| | - Christian Suharlim
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Emma Clarke-Deelder
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | | | - Stephen C Resch
- Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Nicolas A Menzies
- Department of Global Health and Population, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.,Center for Health Decision Science, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ozawa S, Yemeke TT, Evans DR, Pallas SE, Wallace AS, Lee BY. Defining hard-to-reach populations for vaccination. Vaccine 2019; 37:5525-5534. [PMID: 31400910 PMCID: PMC10414189 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.06.081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2019] [Revised: 06/24/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
Extending the benefits of vaccination to everyone who is eligible requires an understanding of which populations current vaccination efforts have struggled to reach. A clear definition of "hard-to-reach" populations - also known as high-risk or marginalized populations, or reaching the last mile - is essential for estimating the size of target groups, sharing lessons learned based on consistent definitions, and allocating resources appropriately. A literature review was conducted to determine what formal definitions of hard-to-reach populations exist and how they are being used, and to propose definitions to consider for future use. Overall, we found that (1) there is a need to distinguish populations that are hard to reach versus hard to vaccinate, and (2) the existing literature poorly defined these populations and clear criteria or thresholds for classifying them were missing. Based on this review, we propose that hard-to-reach populations be defined as those facing supply-side barriers to vaccination due to geography by distance or terrain, transient or nomadic movement, healthcare provider discrimination, lack of healthcare provider recommendations, inadequate vaccination systems, war and conflict, home births or other home-bound mobility limitations, or legal restrictions. Although multiple mechanisms may apply to the same population, supply-side barriers should be distinguished from demand-side barriers. Hard-to-vaccinate populations are defined as those who are reachable but difficult to vaccinate due to distrust, religious beliefs, lack of awareness of vaccine benefits and recommendations, poverty or low socioeconomic status, lack of time to access available vaccination services, or gender-based discrimination. Further work is needed to better define hard-to-reach populations and delineate them from populations that may be hard to vaccinate due to complex refusal reasons, improve measurement of the size and importance of their impact, and examine interventions related to overcoming barriers for each mechanism. This will enable policy makers, governments, donors, and the vaccine community to better plan interventions and allocate necessary resources to remove existing barriers to vaccination.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachiko Ozawa
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Tatenda T Yemeke
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Sarah E Pallas
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Aaron S Wallace
- Global Immunization Division, U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Bruce Y Lee
- Public Health Computational and Operations Research (PHICOR), Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of International Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Global Obesity Prevention Center (GOPC), Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Sowe A, Johansson K. Disentangling the rural-urban immunization coverage disparity in The Gambia: A Fairlie decomposition. Vaccine 2019; 37:3088-3096. [PMID: 31036454 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2019.04.062] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2018] [Revised: 04/17/2019] [Accepted: 04/19/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Exploring factors underlying disparities in immunization uptake is highly relevant and can contribute to improved immunization interventions globally. The Gambia is an interesting case, since higher immunization coverage in rural areas has been shown for many years, yet the factors explaining this unexpected rural-urban disparity have not been studied. The aim of our study was to quantify the rural-urban disparity in immunization coverage and identify factors that contribute to explaining it. METHODS Data from the nationally representative Demographic and Health Survey 2013 was used to select children aged 12-23 months (Weighted n = 1644) for the study. The outcome measure was full immunization status, the grouping variable was area of residence. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the proportions of full immunization and rural-urban residence across the exposure variables. The Fairlie decomposition technique was used to decompose factors contributing to explaining the coverage disparity. RESULTS The findings show that there is a disparity of 16.06 percentage points to the advantage of the rural areas and the exposure variables explained 76.49% of the disparity. Material factors explained 92.03% of the explained disparity with maternal occupation and household wealth quintile being the only significant individual material variable contributors to the explained disparity. Lower household wealth quintile and working especially in agriculture were associated with higher immunization coverage and they were more common in rural areas. Religion and mother's age group e each contributed somewhat to the explained inequality. CONCLUSIONS There was a large immunization coverage disparity between rural and urban areas in The Gambia. This disparity was mainly explained by mothers working in agriculture and living in the poorest households, being more likely to immunize their children - unexpected findings. Our study showed that the drivers of healthcare disparities differ by setting and deserve more research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alieu Sowe
- Ministry of Health and Social Welfare, Gambia.
| | - Klara Johansson
- Department of Epidemiology and Global Health, Umeå University, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Manyazewal T, Mekonnen A, Demelew T, Mengestu S, Abdu Y, Mammo D, Abebe W, Haffa B, Zenebe D, Worku B, Aman A, Tigabu S. Improving immunization capacity in Ethiopia through continuous quality improvement interventions: a prospective quasi-experimental study. Infect Dis Poverty 2018; 7:119. [PMID: 30497515 PMCID: PMC6267782 DOI: 10.1186/s40249-018-0502-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2018] [Accepted: 11/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Strong scientific evidence is needed to support low-income countries in building effective and sustainable immunization programs and proactively engaging in global vaccine development and implementation initiatives. This study aimed to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of system-wide continuous quality improvement (CQI) interventions to improve national immunization programme performance in Ethiopia. METHODS The study used a prospective, quasi-experimental design with an interrupted time-series analysis to collect data from 781 government health sectors (556 healthcare facilities, 196 district health offices, and 29 zonal health departments) selected from developing and emerging regions in Ethiopia. Procedures included baseline quality assessment of immunization programme and services using structured checklists; immunization systems strengthening using onsite technical support, training, and supportive supervision interventions in a Plan-Do-Check-Act cycle over 12 months; and collection and analysis of data at baseline and at the 6th and 12th month of interventions using statistical process control and the t-test. Outcome measures were the coverage of the vaccines pentavalent 3, measles, Bacillus Calmette-Guérin vaccine (BCG), Pneumococcal Conjugate Vaccine (PCV), as well as full vaccination status; while process measures were changes in human resources, planning, service delivery, logistics and supply, documentation, coordination and collaboration, and monitoring and evaluation. Analysis and interpretation of data adhered to SQUIRE 2.0 guidelines. RESULTS Prior to the interventions, vaccination coverage was low and all seven process indicators had an aggregate score of below 50%, with significant differences in performance at healthcare facility level between developing and emerging regions (P = 0.0001). Following the interventions, vaccination coverage improved significantly from 63.6% at baseline to 79.3% for pentavalent (P = 0.0001), 62.5 to 72.8% for measles (P = 0.009), 62.4 to 73.5% for BCG (P = 0.0001), 65.3 to 81.0% for PCV (P = 0.02), and insignificantly from 56.2 to 74.2% for full vaccination. All seven process indicators scored above 75% in all regions, with no significant differences found in performance between developing and emerging regions. CONCLUSIONS The CQI interventions improved immunization capacity and vaccination coverage in Ethiopia, where the unstable transmission patterns and intensity of infectious diseases necessitate for a state of readiness of the health system at all times. The approach was found to empower zone, district, and facility-level health sectors to exercise accountability and share ownership of immunization outcomes. While universal approaches can improve routine immunization, local innovative interventions that target local problems and dynamics are also necessary to achieve optimal coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tsegahun Manyazewal
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. .,Center for Innovative Drug Development and Therapeutic Trials for Africa (CDT-Africa), College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
| | - Alemayehu Mekonnen
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Tesfa Demelew
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Semegnew Mengestu
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Yusuf Abdu
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Dereje Mammo
- Ethiopian Medical Association, P.O. Box 2179, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Workeabeba Abebe
- Ethiopian Pediatrics Society, P.O. Box 14205, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.,Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, School of Medicine, College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, P.O. Box 9086, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Belay Haffa
- Ethiopian Pediatrics Society, P.O. Box 14205, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Daniel Zenebe
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Bogale Worku
- Ethiopian Pediatrics Society, P.O. Box 14205, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Amir Aman
- Federal Ministry of Health, Government of Ethiopia, P.O. Box 1234, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| | - Setegn Tigabu
- Ethiopian Public Health Association, P.O. Box 7117, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ozawa S, Yemeke TT, Thompson KM. Systematic review of the incremental costs of interventions that increase immunization coverage. Vaccine 2018; 36:3641-3649. [PMID: 29754699 PMCID: PMC7853081 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2017] [Revised: 05/03/2018] [Accepted: 05/04/2018] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
Achieving and maintaining high vaccination coverage requires investments, but the costs and effectiveness of interventions to increase coverage remain poorly characterized. We conducted a systematic review of the literature to identify peer-reviewed studies published in English that reported interventions aimed at increasing immunization coverage and the associated costs and effectiveness of the interventions. We found limited information in the literature, with many studies reporting effectiveness estimates, but not providing cost information. Using the available data, we developed a cost function to support future programmatic decisions about investments in interventions to increase immunization coverage for relatively low and high-income countries. The cost function estimates the non-vaccine cost per dose of interventions to increase absolute immunization coverage by one percent, through either campaigns or routine immunization. The cost per dose per percent increase in absolute coverage increased with higher baseline coverage, demonstrating increasing incremental costs required to reach higher coverage levels. Future studies should evaluate the performance of the cost function and add to the database of available evidence to better characterize heterogeneity in costs and generalizability of the cost function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sachiko Ozawa
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA; Department of Maternal and Child Health, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
| | - Tatenda T Yemeke
- Division of Practice Advancement and Clinical Education, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
37
|
Enhancing immunization during second year of life by reducing missed opportunities for vaccinations in 46 countries. Vaccine 2018; 36:3260-3268. [PMID: 29731113 DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2018.04.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 04/22/2018] [Accepted: 04/23/2018] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Delivering vaccination services during the second year of life (2YL)1 provides countries with an opportunity to achieve greater coverage, to provide booster doses and vaccines missed during the first year of life, as well as contribute towards disease control and elimination goals. METHODS Using data from demographic health surveys (DHSs) conducted during 2010 to 2016, this paper explores the proportion of missed opportunities for vaccinations generally provided during routine immunization among children in their 2YL. RESULTS DHS data in 46 countries surveyed 478,737 children, from which 169,259 children were 12-23 months old and had vaccination/health cards viewed by surveyors. From this group, 69,489 children aged 12-23 months had contact with health services in their 2YL. Three scenarios for a missed opportunity for vaccinations were analysed: (1) a child received one vaccine in the immunization schedule and was eligible for another vaccine, but did not receive any further vaccination, (2) a child received a vitamin A supplementation (VAS) and was due for a vaccine, but did not receive vaccines that were due, and (3) a child was taken to a health facility for a sick visit and was due (and eligible) for a vaccine, but did not receive the vaccine. A total of 16,409 (24%) children had one or more missed opportunities for vaccinations. CONCLUSION This analysis highlights the magnitude of the problem of missed opportunities in the 2YL. The global community needs to provide better streamlined guidance, policies and strategies to promote vaccination screenings at well-child and sick child visits in the 2YL. Where they do not exist, well-child visits in the 2YL should be established and strengthened.
Collapse
|
38
|
Asuman D, Ackah CG, Enemark U. Inequalities in child immunization coverage in Ghana: evidence from a decomposition analysis. HEALTH ECONOMICS REVIEW 2018; 8:9. [PMID: 29644503 PMCID: PMC5895562 DOI: 10.1186/s13561-018-0193-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2018] [Accepted: 03/25/2018] [Indexed: 05/14/2023]
Abstract
Childhood vaccination has been promoted as a global intervention aimed at improving child survival and health, through the reduction of vaccine preventable deaths. However, there exist significant inequalities in achieving universal coverage of child vaccination among and within countries. In this paper, we examine rural-urban inequalities in child immunizations in Ghana. Using data from the recent two waves of the Ghana Demographic and Health Survey, we examine the probability that a child between 12 and 59 months receives the required vaccinations and proceed to decompose the sources of inequalities in the probability of full immunization between rural and urban areas. We find significant child-specific, maternal and household characteristics on a child's immunization status. The results show that children in rural areas are more likely to complete the required vaccinations. The direction and sources of inequalities in child immunizations have changed between the two survey waves. We find a pro-urban advantage in 2008 arising from differences in observed characteristics whilst a pro-rural advantage emerges in 2014 dominated by the differences in coefficients. Health system development and campaign efforts have focused on rural areas. There is a need to also specifically target vulnerable children in urban areas, to maintain focus on women empowerment and pay attention to children from high socio-economic households in less favourable economic times.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Derek Asuman
- Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, E.N. Omaboe Building, P. O. Box LG 74, Legon, Ghana
| | - Charles Godfred Ackah
- Institute of Statistical, Social and Economic Research, University of Ghana, E.N. Omaboe Building, P. O. Box LG 74, Legon, Ghana
| | - Ulrika Enemark
- Section for Health Promotion and Health Services Research, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Bartholins Alle 2, 8000 Aarhus C, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Mwamba GN, Yoloyolo N, Masembe Y, Nsambu MN, Nzuzi C, Tshekoya P, Dah B, Kaya G. Vaccination coverage and factors influencing routine vaccination status in 12 high risk health zones in the Province of Kinshasa City, Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC), 2015. Pan Afr Med J 2017; 27:7. [PMID: 29296142 PMCID: PMC5745950 DOI: 10.11604/pamj.supp.2017.27.3.11930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/07/2017] [Accepted: 05/04/2017] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Introduction Vaccination coverage of the first dose of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis-hepatitis B-Haemophilus influenza type b (pentavalent) vaccine for the City-Province of Kinshasain the years 2012 – 2014 wasbelow the national objective of 92%, with coverage less than 80% reported in 12 of the 35 health zones (HZ). The purpose of this study was to discern potential contributing factors to low vaccination coverage in Kinshasa. Methods We conducted a multi-stage cluster household study of children 6 – 11 months in households residing in their current neighborhood for at least 3 months in the 12 high risk HZ in Kinshasa. Additional information on vaccination status of the children was collected at the health facility. Results Of the 1,513 households with a child 6-11 months old, 81% were eligible and participated. Among the 1224 children surveyed, 96% had received the first dose of pentavalent vaccine; 84% had received the third dose; and 71% had received all recommended vaccines for their age. Longer travel time to get to health facility (p=0.04) and shorter length of residence in the neighborhood (p=0.04) showed significant differences in relation to incomplete vaccination. Forty percent of children received their most recent vaccination in a facility outside of their HZ of residence. Conclusion This survey found vaccination coverage in 12 HZs in Kinshasa was higher than estimates derived from administrative reports. The large percentage of children vaccinated outside of their HZ of residence demonstrates the challenge to use of the Reaching Every District strategy in urban areas.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Yolande Masembe
- World Health Organization, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | - Cathy Nzuzi
- Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | | | - Barthelemy Dah
- World Health Organization, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| | - Guylain Kaya
- Ministry of Health, Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Crocker-Buque T, Mindra G, Duncan R, Mounier-Jack S. Immunization, urbanization and slums - a systematic review of factors and interventions. BMC Public Health 2017; 17:556. [PMID: 28595624 PMCID: PMC5465583 DOI: 10.1186/s12889-017-4473-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 76] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2016] [Accepted: 05/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Background In 2014, over half (54%) of the world’s population lived in urban areas and this proportion will increase to 66% by 2050. This urbanizing trend has been accompanied by an increasing number of people living in urban poor communities and slums. Lower immunization coverage is found in poorer urban dwellers in many contexts. This study aims to identify factors associated with immunization coverage in poor urban areas and slums, and to identify interventions to improve coverage. Methods We conducted a systematic review, searching Medline, Embase, Global Health, CINAHL, Web of Science and The Cochrane Database with broad search terms for studies published between 2000 and 2016. Results Of 4872 unique articles, 327 abstracts were screened, leading to 63 included studies: 44 considering factors and 20 evaluating interventions (one in both categories) in 16 low or middle-income countries. A wide range of socio-economic characteristics were associated with coverage in different contexts. Recent rural-urban migration had a universally negative effect. Parents commonly reported lack of awareness of immunization importance and difficulty accessing services as reasons for under-immunization of their children. Physical distance to clinics and aspects of service quality also impacted uptake. We found evidence of effectiveness for interventions involving multiple components, especially if they have been designed with community involvement. Outreach programmes were effective where physical distance was identified as a barrier. Some evidence was found for the effective use of SMS (text) messaging services, community-based education programmes and financial incentives, which warrant further evaluation. No interventions were identified that provided services to migrants from rural areas. Conclusion Different factors affect immunization coverage in different urban poor and slum contexts. Immunization services should be designed in collaboration with slum-dwelling communities, considering the local context. Interventions should be designed and tested to increase immunization in migrants from rural areas. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12889-017-4473-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tim Crocker-Buque
- Health Protection Research Unit in Immunisation, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK.
| | - Godwin Mindra
- Programme Division, Health Section, UNICEF Headquarters, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Richard Duncan
- Programme Division, Health Section, UNICEF Headquarters, 3 United Nations Plaza, New York, 10017, USA
| | - Sandra Mounier-Jack
- Health Protection Research Unit in Immunisation, Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, 15-17 Tavistock Place, London, WC1H 9SH, UK
| |
Collapse
|