1
|
Rosenbrock J, Kaul H, Oertel M, Celik E, Linde P, Fan J, Eichenauer DA, Bröckelmann PJ, von Tresckow B, Kobe C, Dietlein M, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Eich HT, Baues C. Involved-site Radiation Therapy is Equally Effective and Less Toxic Than Involved-field Radiation Therapy in Patients Receiving Combined Modality Treatment for Early-stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma-An Analysis of the Randomized Phase 3 HD17 Trial of the German Hodgkin Study Group. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2024:S0360-3016(24)00514-5. [PMID: 38631539 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2024.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2023] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/19/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Combined modality treatment with chemotherapy followed by consolidation radiation therapy (RT) provides excellent outcomes for patients with early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The international standard of care for consolidation RT, involved-site/involved-node radiation therapy (ISRT/INRT), has never been evaluated in a randomized phase 3 trial against the former standard involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT). METHODS AND MATERIALS In the multicenter phase 3 GHSG (German Hodgkin Study Group) HD17 trial, patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma were randomized between the standard Combined modality treatment group and a positron-emission tomography (PET)-guided group. In the standard group, patients received 2 cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (eBEACOPP) and 2 cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by 30 Gy IFRT. In the experimental group, patients received no further therapy if postchemotherapy PET was negative and 30 Gy GHSG INRT, comparable to and therefore termed here ISRT, if PET was positive. Here, we analyze the interim PET-positive patients in a post hoc analysis, and therefore the randomized comparison of IFRT versus INRT/ISRT. RESULTS A total of 1100 patients were randomized, of which 311 had a positive PET after chemotherapy. Kaplan-Meier estimates of 4-year progression-free survival were 96.8% (95% CI, 91.6%-98.8%) in the IFRT group and 95.4% (95% CI, 89.9%-97.9%; HR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.44-4.42) in the ISRT group. The pattern of recurrence analyses indicated that none of the cases of disease progression or recurrence in the ISRT group would have been prevented by the use of IFRT. Acute grade 3/4 toxicities occurred in 8.5% of IFRT patients and 2.6% of ISRT patients (P = .03). CONCLUSIONS For the first time, consolidation INRT/ISRT was randomly compared with IFRT in a phase 3 trial. Regarding progression-free survival, no advantage of IFRT could be demonstrated. In summary, our data confirm the status of INRT/ISRT as the current standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Johannes Rosenbrock
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Helen Kaul
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Oertel
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Eren Celik
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Philipp Linde
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jiaqi Fan
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Paul J Bröckelmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, West German Cancer Center (WTZ), University Hospital Essen, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG); Department of Radiation Oncology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Federico M, Plattel W, Hutchings M, Stepanishyna Y, Fortpied C, André M. Reply to T. Vassilakopoulos et al. J Clin Oncol 2024:JCO2400143. [PMID: 38593392 DOI: 10.1200/jco.24.00143] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 01/25/2024] [Indexed: 04/11/2024] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Massimo Federico
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Wouter Plattel
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Yana Stepanishyna
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Marc André
- Massimo Federico, MD, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy; Wouter Plattel, MD, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; Martin Hutchings, MD, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark; Yana Stepanishyna, MD, Haematology Department, Jules Bordet Institute, Brussels, Belgium, National Cancer Institute, Kyiv, Ukraine; Catherine Fortpied, MSc, EORTC Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium; and Marc André, MD, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rask Kragh Jørgensen R, Bergström F, Eloranta S, Tang Severinsen M, Bjøro Smeland K, Fosså A, Haaber Christensen J, Hutchings M, Bo Dahl-Sørensen R, Kamper P, Glimelius I, E Smedby K, K Parsons S, Mae Rodday A, J Maurer M, M Evens A, C El-Galaly T, Hjort Jakobsen L. Machine Learning-Based Survival Prediction Models for Progression-Free and Overall Survival in Advanced-Stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. JCO Clin Cancer Inform 2024; 8:e2300255. [PMID: 38608215 DOI: 10.1200/cci.23.00255] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2023] [Revised: 02/02/2024] [Accepted: 02/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients diagnosed with advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma (aHL) have historically been risk-stratified using the International Prognostic Score (IPS). This study investigated if a machine learning (ML) approach could outperform existing models when it comes to predicting overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). PATIENTS AND METHODS This study used patient data from the Danish National Lymphoma Register for model development (development cohort). The ML model was developed using stacking, which combines several predictive survival models (Cox proportional hazard, flexible parametric model, IPS, principal component, penalized regression) into a single model, and was compared with two versions of IPS (IPS-3 and IPS-7) and the newly developed aHL international prognostic index (A-HIPI). Internal model validation was performed using nested cross-validation, and external validation was performed using patient data from the Swedish Lymphoma Register and Cancer Registry of Norway (validation cohort). RESULTS In total, 707 and 760 patients with aHL were included in the development and validation cohorts, respectively. Examining model performance for OS in the development cohort, the concordance index (C-index) for the ML model, IPS-7, IPS-3, and A-HIPI was found to be 0.789, 0.608, 0.650, and 0.768, respectively. The corresponding estimates in the validation cohort were 0.749, 0.700, 0.663, and 0.741. For PFS, the ML model achieved the highest C-index in both cohorts (0.665 in the development cohort and 0.691 in the validation cohort). The time-varying AUCs for both the ML model and the A-HIPI were consistently higher in both cohorts compared with the IPS models within the first 5 years after diagnosis. CONCLUSION The new prognostic model for aHL on the basis of ML techniques demonstrated a substantial improvement compared with the IPS models, but yielded a limited improvement in predictive performance compared with the A-HIPI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rasmus Rask Kragh Jørgensen
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Fanny Bergström
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sandra Eloranta
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Marianne Tang Severinsen
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Alexander Fosså
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Peter Kamper
- Department of Hematology, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Ingrid Glimelius
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology, Cancer Precision Medicine, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Karin E Smedby
- Clinical Epidemiology Division, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Hematology, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Susan K Parsons
- Department of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Angie Mae Rodday
- Department of Medicine, Institute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA
| | - Matthew J Maurer
- Department of Qualitative Health Sciences, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Andrew M Evens
- Division of Blood Disorders, Rutgers Cancer Institute New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ
| | - Tarec C El-Galaly
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Lasse Hjort Jakobsen
- Department of Hematology, Clinical Cancer Research Centre, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Mathematical Sciences, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Milunović V. How I Follow Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete (Metabolic) Remission? Medicina (Kaunas) 2024; 60:344. [PMID: 38399631 PMCID: PMC10890383 DOI: 10.3390/medicina60020344] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 02/15/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by a high cure rate in the modern era of medicine regardless of stage, but patients suffer from a high risk of comorbidity associated with the administered therapy. The main aim of this review article is to assess and analyze the various comorbidities associated with Hodgkin lymphoma and address the survivorship of patients, including fertility, secondary cancers due to cardiovascular toxicity, and quality of life. Furthermore, this review explores the optimal strategy for detecting relapse. The treatment paradigm of Hodgkin lymphoma has shifted, with a paradigm shift toward achieving a high cure rate and low toxicity as a standard of care in this patient population. Checkpoint inhibitors, especially nivolumab, in combination with chemotherapy are increasingly being studied in the first line of therapy. However, their long-term toxicity remains to be assessed in longer follow-up. In conclusion, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, regardless of their treatment, should be followed up individually by a multidisciplinary survivorship team in order to detect and properly treat the long-term side effects of therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vibor Milunović
- Division of Hematology, Clinical Hospital Merkur, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ollivier L, Debbi K, To NH, Cailleteau A, Supiot S, Mervoyer A, Guimas V, Belkacémi Y. Is oligometastatic disease an applicable and useful concept in haematologic malignancies? A narrative review of radiation therapy standards, modern techniques, and innovations. Cancer Radiother 2024; 28:119-130. [PMID: 38143233 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2023.08.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 08/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/29/2023] [Indexed: 12/26/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Haematologic malignancies are particular in that they can generally be cured, even when distant metastases are present at diagnosis, unlike solid malignancies. Systemic treatments, including chemotherapy, targeted therapies, and immunotherapy, are the standard of care with excellent results. The considerable progress made in the management of these diseases in the last 20years has redefined the role of radiation therapy as minor in many clinical situations. We propose a literature review of data, showing that radiation therapy still has a role in curative, salvage, and palliative therapy situations. MATERIAL AND METHODS A document and literature search was carried out in the following databases: Medline and ClinicalTrial.gov, for the terms "radiotherapy", "haematologic malignancies", "Hodgkin lymphoma", "non-Hodgkin lymphoma", "CAR T cells", "multiple myeloma", "solitary plasmocytoma", "intensity-modulated radiotherapy", "extracranial stereotactic body radiation therapy" and "proton therapy references". RESULTS Haemopathological malignancies include a wide range of diseases and radiation therapy indications have been assessed over the past 20years. Currently, radiation therapy is indicated for localized disease (solitary plasmocytoma), as an adjuvant (Hodgkin lymphoma), in palliative settings, or after systemic treatment in relapsed patients (chimeric antigen receptor [CAR] T-cells) with a low recurrence burden, which can therefore be considered "oligorecurrence". Radiation therapy, through total body irradiation, has important indications, thanks to its immunomodulatory and/or myeloablative effects. Moreover, recent technological developments have made possible significant improvement in safety, contributing to radiation therapy being positioned in the treatment strategy of several indications. CONCLUSIONS Given the effectiveness of systemic treatments in hematologic malignancies, the oligometastasis stage is of little importance. A curative intent after local radiation therapy, even advanced stage, is possible, both with residual disease for advanced Hodgkin lymphoma, aggressive non-Hodgkin lymphoma, or solitary plasmocytoma, and even without evidence of disease after chemotherapy for Hodgkin or non-Hodgkin lymphoma. The role of new treatments, such as CAR T cells, allows us to consider radiation therapy after systemic treatment of relapsed diseases with low volume recurrence, which can be considered oligorecurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Ollivier
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - K Debbi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France
| | - N-H To
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de recherche biomédicale (IMRB), Inserm U955, i-Biot, Créteil, France
| | - A Cailleteau
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - S Supiot
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - A Mervoyer
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - V Guimas
- Service d'oncologie radiothérapie, Institut de cancérologie de l'Ouest, centre René-Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France
| | - Y Belkacémi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, centre Sein Henri-Mondor, CHU Henri-Mondor, AP-HP, university Paris Est Créteil (Upec), Créteil, France; Institut Mondor de recherche biomédicale (IMRB), Inserm U955, i-Biot, Créteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Vassilakopoulos TP, Arapaki M, Diamantopoulos PT, Liaskas A, Panitsas F, Siakantaris MP, Dimou M, Kokoris SI, Sachanas S, Belia M, Chatzidimitriou C, Konstantinou EA, Asimakopoulos JV, Petevi K, Boutsikas G, Kanellopoulos A, Piperidou A, Lefaki ME, Georgopoulou A, Kopsaftopoulou A, Zerzi K, Drandakis I, Dimopoulou MN, Kyrtsonis MC, Tsaftaridis P, Plata E, Variamis E, Tsourouflis G, Kontopidou FN, Konstantopoulos K, Pangalis GA, Panayiotidis P, Angelopoulou MK. Prognostic Impact of Serum β 2-Microglobulin Levels in Hodgkin Lymphoma Treated with ABVD or Equivalent Regimens: A Comprehensive Analysis of 915 Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:238. [PMID: 38254729 PMCID: PMC10813286 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020238] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2023] [Revised: 12/26/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The significance of serum beta-2 microglobulin (sβ2m) in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is controversial. We analyzed 915 patients with HL, who were treated with ABVD or equivalent regimens with or without radiotherapy. Sβ2m levels were measured by a radioimmunoassay (upper normal limit 2.4 mg/L). Sequential cutoffs (1.8-3.0 by 0.1 mg/L increments, 3.5 and 4.0 mg/L) were tested along with ROC analysis. The median sβ2m levels were 2.20 mg/L and were elevated (>2.4 mg/L) in 383/915 patients (41.9%). Higher sβ2m was associated with inferior freedom from progression (FFP) at all tested cutoffs. The best cutoff was 2.0 mg/L (10-year FFP 83% vs. 70%, p = 0.001), which performed better than the 2.4 mg/L cutoff ("normal versus high"). In multivariate analysis, sβ2m > 2.0 mg/L was an independent adverse prognostic factor in the whole patient population. In multivariate overall survival analysis, sβ2m levels were predictive at 2.0 mg/L cutoff in the whole patient population and in advanced stages. Similarly, sβ2m > 2.0 mg/L independently predicted inferior HL-specific survival in the whole patient population. Our data suggest that higher sβ2m is an independent predictor of outcome in HL but the optimal cutoff lies within the normal limits (i.e., at 2.0 mg/L) in this predominantly young patient population, performing much better than a "normal versus high" cutoff set at 2.4 mg/L.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria Arapaki
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Panagiotis T. Diamantopoulos
- First Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (P.T.D.)
| | - Athanasios Liaskas
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Fotios Panitsas
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Marina P. Siakantaris
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria Dimou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Styliani I. Kokoris
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Sotirios Sachanas
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Marina Belia
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Chrysovalantou Chatzidimitriou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Elianna A. Konstantinou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - John V. Asimakopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Kyriaki Petevi
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - George Boutsikas
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Alexandros Kanellopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Alexia Piperidou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria-Ekaterini Lefaki
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Angeliki Georgopoulou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Anastasia Kopsaftopoulou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Kalliopi Zerzi
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Ioannis Drandakis
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria N. Dimopoulou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Marie-Christine Kyrtsonis
- First Department of Internal Medicine Propedeutic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece
| | - Panayiotis Tsaftaridis
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Eleni Plata
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Eleni Variamis
- First Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (P.T.D.)
| | - Gerassimos Tsourouflis
- Second Department of Surgery Propedeutic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 11527Athens, Greece
| | - Flora N. Kontopidou
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Ippokration General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece;
| | - Kostas Konstantopoulos
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Gerassimos A. Pangalis
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Panayiotis Panayiotidis
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria K. Angelopoulou
- Department of Haematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, School of Medicine, Laikon General Hospital, 17 Ag. Thoma Str., 11527 Athens, Greece; (M.A.); (M.D.); (M.B.); (C.C.); (E.A.K.); (J.V.A.); (A.K.); (P.T.); (M.K.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Federico M, Fortpied C, Stepanishyna Y, Gotti M, van der Maazen R, Cristinelli C, Re A, Plattel W, Lazarovici J, Merli F, Specht L, Schiano de Colella JM, Hutchings M, Versari A, Edeline V, Stamatoulas A, Girinsky T, Ricardi U, Aleman B, Meulemans B, Tonino S, Raemaekers J, André M. Long-Term Follow-Up of the Response-Adapted Intergroup EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 Trial for Localized Hodgkin Lymphoma. J Clin Oncol 2024; 42:19-25. [PMID: 37967311 PMCID: PMC10730029 DOI: 10.1200/jco.23.01745] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2023] [Revised: 09/02/2023] [Accepted: 09/22/2023] [Indexed: 11/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Clinical trials frequently include multiple end points that mature at different times. The initial report, typically based on the primary end point, may be published when key planned co-primary or secondary analyses are not yet available. Clinical Trial Updates provide an opportunity to disseminate additional results from studies, published in JCO or elsewhere, for which the primary end point has already been reported.The primary analysis of the Early positron emission tomography (ePET) Response-Adapted Treatment in localized Hodgkin Lymphoma H10 Trial demonstrated that in ePET-negative patients, the risk of relapse increased when involved-node radiotherapy (INRT) was omitted and that in ePET-positive patients, switching from doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) to bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPPesc) significantly improved 5-year progression-free survival (PFS). Here, we report the final results of a preplanned analysis at a 10-year follow-up. In the favorable (F) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 98.8% versus 85.4% (hazard ratio [HR], 13.2; 95% CI, 3.1 to 55.8; P value for noninferiority = .9735; difference test P < .0001) in favor of ABVD + INRT; in the unfavorable (U) ePET-negative group, the 10-year PFS rates were 91.4% and 86.5% (HR, 1.52; 95% CI, 0.84 to 2.75; P value for noninferiority = .8577; difference test P = .1628). In ePET-positive patients, the difference in terms of PFS between standard ABVD and intensified BEACOPPesc was no longer statistically significant (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.37 to 1.20; P = .1777). In conclusion, the present long-term analysis confirms that in ePET-negative patients, the omission of INRT is associated with lower 10-year PFS. Instead, in ePET-positive patients, no significant difference between standard and experimental arms emerged although intensification with BEACOPPesc was safe, with no increase in late adverse events, namely, second malignancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | - Manuel Gotti
- Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, Pavia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Wouter Plattel
- University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | | | - Francesco Merli
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Annibale Versari
- Azienda Unità Sanitaria Locale- IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Berthe Aleman
- The Netherlands Cancer Institute-Antoni Van Leeuwenhoekziekenhuis, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Sanne Tonino
- Amsterdam University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - John Raemaekers
- Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Knaup H, Weindler J, van Heek L, Voltin CA, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Dietlein M, Kobe C, Roth K. PET/CT Reconstruction and Its Impact on [Measures of] Metabolic Tumor Volume. Acad Radiol 2023:S1076-6332(23)00691-8. [PMID: 38155023 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2023.12.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2023] [Revised: 12/10/2023] [Accepted: 12/11/2023] [Indexed: 12/30/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES In oncological imaging, the use of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for further prognostic differentiation and the development of risk adapted strategies appears promising. The aim of this analysis was to evaluate ultra-high definition (UHD) and ordered subset expectation maximization (OSEM) PET/CT reconstructions for their potential impact on different methods of MTV measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS We analyzed positron emission tomography combined with computed tomography (PET/CT) scans of 40 Hodgkin lymphoma patients before first-line treatment who had undergone fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT. The MTVs were determined taking an SUV of 4.0 (MTV4.0) as a fixed threshold or 41% of the single hottest voxel (MTV41%) as an adaptive threshold for automated lymphoma delineation in both UHD and OSEM reconstructions. We then compared the absolute and relative differences between MTV4.0 and MTV41% in UHD and OSEM reconstructions. The relative distribution of MTV4.0 and MTV41% in relation to the reconstruction method applied was recorded and respective differences were tested for statistical significance using the paired sample t-test. RESULTS A comparison of MTV4.0 and MTV41% showed smaller relative and absolute differences in MTV between different reconstruction settings for the MTV4.0 method. Conversely, the absolute as well as the relative differences between MTVs obtained from different reconstructions settings were significantly greater when the MTV41% method was applied (p < 0001). CONCLUSION MTV4.0 brings higher robustness between different reconstruction settings, while with MTV41% the deviation between volumes obtained with different reconstruction settings is greater. For clinical routine and for multicenter settings, the MTV4.0 therefore appears most promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Henry Knaup
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Jasmin Weindler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Michael Fuchs
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (M.F., P.B.)
| | - Peter Borchmann
- German Hodgkin Study Group, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne Bonn, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany (M.F., P.B.)
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.).
| | - Katrin Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, Cologne, 50937, Germany (H.K., J.W., L.V.H., C.A.V., M.D., C.K., K.R.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Al-Juhaishi T, Ahmed S. Management of limited-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program 2023; 2023:500-509. [PMID: 38066938 PMCID: PMC10905319 DOI: 10.1182/hematology.2023000511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2023]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a rare type of B-cell malignancy with bimodal age distribution targeting young adults and elderly. Prognostic models are available to identify risk of recurrence and response to treatment. Currently, positron emission tomography scanning is most useful in optimizing therapy. Outcomes are generally excellent with standard chemotherapy or combined modality therapy. Balancing efficacy and the risk of late effects in Hodgkin lymphoma is essential, including early detection of potential complications. Incorporation of novel therapies such as brentuximab vedotin and checkpoint inhibitors are being explored in the frontline setting, having already demonstrated improved survival and tolerable toxicity in advanced HL. Furthermore, the addition of these agents have the potential to transform treatment paradigms for early-stage HL and may result in improved outcomes with decreased risks of late toxicities that continue to afflict long-term survivors. However, the patient population, sequencing, and combinations with cytotoxic chemotherapy all remain still standing questions as results of current and upcoming randomized trials are awaited. In this article, we discuss the current data on the approach to initial treatment of early-stage classical HL, review toxicity profiles, and examine upcoming novel therapy trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sairah Ahmed
- University of Texas, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
van Heek L, Weindler J, Gorniak C, Kaul H, Müller H, Mettler J, Baues C, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Ferdinandus J, Dietlein M, Voltin CA, Kobe C, Roth KS. Prognostic value of baseline metabolic tumor volume (MTV) for forecasting chemotherapy outcome in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma: Data from the phase III HD17 trial. Eur J Haematol 2023; 111:881-887. [PMID: 37644732 DOI: 10.1111/ejh.14093] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Revised: 08/17/2023] [Accepted: 08/19/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The prognostic relevance of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) having recently been demonstrated in patients with early-stage favorable and advanced-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. The current study aimed to assess the potential prognostic value of 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma patients treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD17 trial. METHODS 18 F-FDG PET/CT images were available for MTV analysis in 154 cases. We used three different threshold methods (SUV2.5 , SUV4.0 , and SUV41% ) to calculate MTV. Receiver-operating-characteristic analysis was performed to describe the value of these parameters in predicting an adequate therapy response. Therapy response was evaluated as PET negativity after 2 cycles of eBEACOPP followed by 2 cycles of ABVD. RESULTS All three threshold methods analyzed for MTV showed a positive correlation with the PET response after chemotherapy. Areas under the curve (AUC) were 0.70 (95% CI 0.53-0.87) and 0.65 (0.50-0.80) using the fixed thresholds of SUV4.0 and SUV2.5 , respectively, for MTV- calculation. The calculation of MTV using a relative threshold of SUV41% showed an AUC of 0.63 (0.47-0.79). CONCLUSIONS MTV does have predictive value after chemotherapy in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly when the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 is used for MTV calculation. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01356680.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Weindler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Claudia Gorniak
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Mettler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiooncology, Marienhospital Herne, Ruhr University Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen-Bonn-Cologne-Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Katrin S Roth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Lewis KL, Trotman J. Integration of PET in DLBCL. Semin Hematol 2023; 60:291-304. [PMID: 38326144 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.12.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2023] [Revised: 11/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2024]
Abstract
F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-computerized tomography (18FDG-PET/CT) is the gold-standard imaging modality for staging and response assessment for most lymphomas. This review focuses on the utility of 18FDG-PET/CT, and its role in staging, prognostication and response assessment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), including emerging possibilities for future use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Judith Trotman
- Concord Repatriation General Hospital, Concord, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Aleman BMP, Ricardi U, van der Maazen RWM, Meijnders P, Beijert M, Boros A, Izar F, Janus CPM, Levis M, Martin V, Specht L, Corning C, Clementel E, Raemaekers JM, André MP, Federico M, Fortpied C, Girinsky T. A Quality Control Study on Involved Node Radiation Therapy in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 Trial on Stages I and II Hodgkin Lymphoma: Lessons Learned. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2023; 117:664-674. [PMID: 37179034 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2023.05.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2023] [Revised: 04/29/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Involved node radiation therapy (INRT) was introduced in the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer/Lymphoma Study Association/Fondazione Italiana Linfomi H10 trial, a large multicenter trial in early-stage Hodgkin Lymphoma. The present study aimed to evaluate the quality of INRT in this trial. METHODS AND MATERIALS A retrospective, descriptive study was initiated to evaluate INRT in a representative sample encompassing approximately 10% of all irradiated patients in the H10 trial. Sampling was stratified by academic group, year of treatment, size of the treatment center, and treatment arm, and it was done proportional to the size of the strata. The sample was completed for all patients with known recurrences to enable future research on relapse patterns. Radiation therapy principle, target volume delineation and coverage, and applied technique and dose were evaluated using the EORTC Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance platform. Each case was reviewed by 2 reviewers and, in case of disagreement also by an adjudicator for a consensus evaluation. RESULTS Data were retrieved for 66 of 1294 irradiated patients (5.1%). Data collection and analysis were hampered more than anticipated by changes in archiving of diagnostic imaging and treatment planning systems during the running period of the trial. A review could be performed on 61 patients. The INRT principle was applied in 86.6%. Overall, 88.5% of cases were treated according to protocol. Unacceptable variations were predominately due to geographic misses of the target volume delineations. The rate of unacceptable variations decreased during trial recruitment. CONCLUSIONS The principle of INRT was applied in most of the reviewed patients. Almost 90% of the evaluated patients were treated according to the protocol. The present results should, however, be interpreted with caution because the number of patients evaluated was limited. Individual case reviews should be done in a prospective fashion in future trials. Radiation therapy Quality Assurance tailored to the clinical trial objectives is strongly recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Berthe M P Aleman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
| | | | | | - Paul Meijnders
- Department of Radiotherapy, Iridium Network, Centre for Oncological Research of the University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Max Beijert
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Angela Boros
- Radiation Oncology Department, Center Hospitalier Lyon Sud, Pierre Benite, France
| | - Françoise Izar
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | - Cécile P M Janus
- Department of Radiotherapy, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Mario Levis
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Valentine Martin
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Lena Specht
- Department of Oncology, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Coreen Corning
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Enrico Clementel
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John M Raemaekers
- Department of Internal Medicine, Rijnstate Hospital, Arnhem, Netherlands
| | - Marc P André
- Department of Hematology, CHU UCL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Massimo Federico
- CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Catherine Fortpied
- The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Headquarters, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Theodore Girinsky
- Department of Radiotherapy, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Zijtregtop EAM, Zeal J, Metzger ML, Kelly KM, Mauz-Koerholz C, Voss SD, McCarten K, Flerlage JE, Beishuizen A. Significance of E-lesions in Hodgkin lymphoma and the creation of a new consensus definition: a report from SEARCH. Blood Adv 2023; 7:6303-6319. [PMID: 37522740 PMCID: PMC10589789 DOI: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2023010024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/27/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The International Staging Evaluation and Response Criteria Harmonization for Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Hodgkin Lymphoma (SEARCH for CAYAHL) seeks to provide an appropriate, universal differentiation between E-lesions and stage IV extranodal disease in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). A literature search was performed through the PubMed and Google Scholar databases using the terms "Hodgkin disease," and "extranodal," "extralymphatic," "E lesions," "E stage," or "E disease." Publications were reviewed for the number of participants; median age and age range; diagnostic modalities used for staging; and the definition, incidence, and prognostic significance of E-lesions. Thirty-six articles describing 12 640 patients met the inclusion criteria. Most articles reported staging per the Ann Arbor (72%, 26/36) or Cotswolds modification of the Ann Arbor staging criteria (25%, 9/36), and articles rarely defined E-lesions or disambiguated "extranodal disease." The overall incidence of E-lesions for patients with stage I-III HL was 11.5% (1330/11 602 unique patients). Available stage-specific incidence analysis of 3888 patients showed a similar incidence of E-lesions in stage II (21.2%) and stage III (21.9%), with E-lesions rarely seen with stage I disease (1.1%). E-lesions likely remain predictive, but we cannot unequivocally conclude that identifying E-lesions in HL imparts prognostic value in the modern era of the more selective use of targeted radiation therapy. A harmonized E-lesion definition was reached based on the available evidence and the consensus of the SEARCH working group. We recommend that this definition of E-lesion be applied in future clinical trials with explicit reporting to confirm the prognostic value of E-lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eline A. M. Zijtregtop
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Jamie Zeal
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN
- Department of Medicine, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN
| | - Monika L. Metzger
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Kara M. Kelly
- Department of Pediatrics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, University at Buffalo Jacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences, Buffalo, NY
| | - Christine Mauz-Koerholz
- Department of Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Zentrum für Kinderheilkunde der Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Giessen, Germany
- Medical Faculty, Martin-Luther-University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | - Stephan D. Voss
- Department of Radiology, Boston Children’s Hospital Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | - Jamie E. Flerlage
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Tennessee Health Sciences Center, Memphis, TN
- Department of Oncology, St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, TN
| | - Auke Beishuizen
- Department of Pediatric Oncology/Hematology, Erasmus MC-Sophia Children’s Hospital, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Ho T, Coleman C, Shah P, Yazbeck V. Advances in Hodgkin's lymphoma pharmacotherapy: a focus on histone deacetylase inhibitors. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:1427-1438. [PMID: 37249399 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2023.2219392] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2023] [Accepted: 05/25/2023] [Indexed: 05/31/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Classical Hodgkin lymphomas (cHL) usually have excellent cure rates. Yet, for patients with refractory or relapsed cHL, prognosis deteriorates as the disease becomes resistant to subsequent lines of therapies: autologous stem cell transplantation, brentuximab vedotin, and checkpoint inhibitors. Immune escape and drug resistance are hallmarks of Hodgkin Reed Sternberg cell survival, prompting the need for additional therapeutic strategies. Histone modification-based combination is an effective clinical strategy. AREAS COVERED In this review, we discuss the different histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor molecules that have been developed and studied in cancer therapy with a focus on cHL. We review their preclinical and clinical activities both as single agents and in combination studies. Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Google Scholar, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases, using search terms 'Hodgkin lymphoma,' 'histone deacetylase inhibitor', and variations on such (e.g. 'HDAC' and individual drug names) in combination using operators 'AND,' 'OR,' and 'NOT' according to Boolean logic. EXPERT OPINION HDAC inhibitors alone will not be sufficient for the treatment of R/RcHL, but given their disease control capacity, synergistic interaction with currently approved drugs, and ability to overcome drug resistance, particularly PD-1 inhibitors, we believe that HDACinhibitors will eventually become incorporated into the treatment armamentarium of cHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thuy Ho
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Cara Coleman
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Palak Shah
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| | - Victor Yazbeck
- Massey Cancer Center, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Alderuccio JP, Kuker RA, Yang F, Moskowitz CH. Quantitative PET-based biomarkers in lymphoma: getting ready for primetime. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2023; 20:640-657. [PMID: 37460635 DOI: 10.1038/s41571-023-00799-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 08/20/2023]
Abstract
The use of functional quantitative biomarkers extracted from routine PET-CT scans to characterize clinical responses in patients with lymphoma is gaining increased attention, and these biomarkers can outperform established clinical risk factors. Total metabolic tumour volume enables individualized estimation of survival outcomes in patients with lymphoma and has shown the potential to predict response to therapy suitable for risk-adapted treatment approaches in clinical trials. The deployment of machine learning tools in molecular imaging research can assist in recognizing complex patterns and, with image classification, in tumour identification and segmentation of data from PET-CT scans. Initial studies using fully automated approaches to calculate metabolic tumour volume and other PET-based biomarkers have demonstrated appropriate correlation with calculations from experts, warranting further testing in large-scale studies. The extraction of computer-based quantitative tumour characterization through radiomics can provide a comprehensive view of phenotypic heterogeneity that better captures the molecular and functional features of the disease. Additionally, radiomics can be integrated with genomic data to provide more accurate prognostic information. Further improvements in PET-based biomarkers are imminent, although their incorporation into clinical decision-making currently has methodological shortcomings that need to be addressed with confirmatory prospective validation in selected patient populations. In this Review, we discuss the current knowledge, challenges and opportunities in the integration of quantitative PET-based biomarkers in clinical trials and the routine management of patients with lymphoma.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Pablo Alderuccio
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA.
| | - Russ A Kuker
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Fei Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Medical Physics, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| | - Craig H Moskowitz
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology, Sylvester Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vassilakopoulos TP, Liaskas A, Pereyra P, Panayiotidis P, Angelopoulou MK, Gallamini A. Incorporating Monoclonal Antibodies into the First-Line Treatment of Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13187. [PMID: 37685994 PMCID: PMC10487754 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/22/2023] [Revised: 08/06/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The long-term survival of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients treated according to the current standard of care is excellent. Combined-modality schedules (ABVD plus radiotherapy) in early-stage disease, along with treatment intensity adaptation to early metabolic response assessed by PET/CT in advanced stage HL, have been the cornerstones of risk stratification and treatment decision-making, minimizing treatment-related complications while keeping efficacy. Nevertheless, a non-negligible number of patients are primary refractory or relapse after front-line treatment. Novel immunotherapeutic agents, namely Brentuximab Vedotin (BV) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPI), have already shown outstanding efficacy in a relapsed/refractory setting in recent landmark studies. Several phase 2 single-arm studies suggest that the addition of these agents in the frontline setting could further improve long-term disease control permitting one to reduce the exposure to cytotoxic drugs. However, a longer follow-up is needed. At the time of this writing, the only randomized phase 3 trial so far published is the ECHELON-1, which compares 1 to 1 BV-AVD (Bleomycin is replaced by BV) with standard ABVD in untreated advanced-stage III and IV HL. The ECHELON-1 trial has proven that BV-AVD is safe and more effective both in terms of long-term disease control and overall survival. Just recently, the results of the S1826 SWOG trial demonstrated that the combination nivolumab-AVD (N-AVD) is better than BV-AVD, while preliminary results of other randomized ongoing phase 3 trials incorporating anti-PD-1 in this setting will be soon available. The aim of this review is to present the recent data regarding these novel agents in first-line treatment of HL and to highlight current and future trends which will hopefully reshape the overall management of this disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros P. Vassilakopoulos
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.L.); (P.P.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Athanasios Liaskas
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.L.); (P.P.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Patricio Pereyra
- Department of Hematology, National Hospital Alejandro Posadas, Buenos Aires 1684, Argentina;
| | - Panayiotis Panayiotidis
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.L.); (P.P.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Maria K. Angelopoulou
- Department of Hematology and Bone Marrow Transplantation, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Laikon General Hospital, 11527 Athens, Greece; (A.L.); (P.P.); (M.K.A.)
| | - Andrea Gallamini
- Research and Clinical Innovation Department, Antoine Lacassagne Cancer Center, 06100 Nice, France;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Eichenauer DA, Bühnen I, Baues C, Kobe C, Kaul H, Greil R, Moccia A, Zijlstra JM, Hertenstein B, Topp MS, Just M, von Tresckow B, Eich HT, Fuchs M, Dietlein M, Hartmann S, Engert A, Borchmann P. Interim PET-guided treatment for early-stage NLPHL: a subgroup analysis of the randomized GHSG HD16 and HD17 studies. Blood 2023; 142:553-560. [PMID: 37257195 DOI: 10.1182/blood.2023019939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 04/25/2023] [Indexed: 06/02/2023] Open
Abstract
The optimal first-line treatment for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) diagnosed in early stages is largely undefined. We, therefore, analyzed 100 NLPHL patients treated in the randomized HD16 (early-stage favorable; n = 85) and HD17 (early-stage unfavorable; n = 15) studies. These studies investigated the omission of consolidation radiotherapy (RT) in patients with a negative interim positron emission tomography (iPET) (ie, Deauville score <3) after chemotherapy (HD16: 2× doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine [ABVD]; HD17: 2× escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone [BEACOPP] plus 2× ABVD). Patients with NLPHL treated in the HD16 and HD17 studies had 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) rates of 90.3% and 92.9%, respectively. Thus, the 5-year PFS did not differ significantly from that of patients with classical Hodgkin lymphoma treated within the same studies (HD16: P = .88; HD17: P = .50). Patients with early-stage favorable NLPHL who had a negative iPET after 2× ABVD and did not undergo consolidation RT tended to have a worse 5-year PFS than patients with a negative iPET who received consolidation RT (83% vs 100%; P = .05). There were 10 cases of NLPHL recurrence. However, no NLPHL patient died during follow-up. Hence, the 5-year overall survival rate was 100%. Taken together, contemporary Hodgkin lymphoma-directed treatment approaches result in excellent outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed early-stage NLPHL and, thus, represent valid treatment options. In early-stage favorable NLPHL, consolidation RT appears necessary after 2× ABVD to achieve the optimal disease control irrespective of the iPET result.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dennis A Eichenauer
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ina Bühnen
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Richard Greil
- Salzburg Cancer Research Institute, Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials, Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Austrian Group for Medical Tumor Therapy, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Alden Moccia
- Department of Medical Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Bellinzona, Switzerland
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joseé M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije universiteit, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Bernd Hertenstein
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Klinikum Bremen-Mitte, Bremen, Germany
| | - Max S Topp
- Second Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Marianne Just
- Onkologische Schwerpunktpraxis Bielefeld, Bielefeld, Germany
| | - Bastian von Tresckow
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Hematology and Stem Cell Transplantation, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK partner site Essen), Essen, Germany
| | - Hans-Theodor Eich
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sylvia Hartmann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
- German Hodgkin Study Group, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Heger JM, Ferdinandus J, Mattlener J, Borchmann S. Clinical applications of circulating tumor DNA in Hodgkin lymphoma. Semin Hematol 2023; 60:157-163. [PMID: 37422345 DOI: 10.1053/j.seminhematol.2023.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 05/15/2023] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
Hodgkin lymphoma is a B-cell lymphoma often affecting young adults. Outcomes following intensive chemo- and radiotherapy are generally favourable but leave patients at high risk for early and late toxicities frequently reducing quality of life. Relapsed/refractory disease is regularly difficult to treat and ultimately results in death in a relevant subset of patients. Current strategies for risk stratification and response evaluation rely on clinical features and imaging only, and lack discriminatory power to detect patients at risk for disease progression. Here, we explore how circulating tumor DNA sequencing might help to overcome these shortcomings. We provide an overview over recent technical and methodological developments and suggest potential use cases for different clinical situations. Circulating tumor DNA sequencing offers the potential to significantly augment current risk stratification strategies with the ultimate goal of further individualizing treatment strategies for patients with HL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan-Michel Heger
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany.
| | - Justin Ferdinandus
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Julia Mattlener
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| | - Sven Borchmann
- Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology (CIO) Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf, University of Cologne, Medical Faculty and University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cancer Center Cologne Essen - Partner Site Cologne, CIO Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany; Cologne Lymphoma Working Group (CLWG), Cologne, Germany; German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Ferhanoglu B, Ozbalak M. Sequencing novel agents in the treatment of classical Hodgkin lymphoma. Expert Rev Hematol 2023; 16:991-1015. [PMID: 37897182 DOI: 10.1080/17474086.2023.2276212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2023] [Accepted: 10/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/29/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) is a curable disease, with durable remission achieved in about 80% of patients following first-line treatment. Three new drugs were introduced to the daily use in cHL: brentuximab vedotin (BV), nivolumab, and pembrolizumab. All three drugs were initially approved for the treatment of relapsed/refractory cHL (RRHL) and with their promising outcomes, they are now incorporated in different stages of the treatment. AREAS COVERED We performed a literature search using PubMed on all cHL studies investigating BV and CPIs within the past 10 years. We analyzed literature to presume the sequencing of these novel agents. EXPERT OPINION Addition of BV or nivolumab to AVD backbone in the frontline setting showed promising activity in advanced stage cHL. BV and CPIs combined with chemotherapy in the second-line treatment of cHL are evaluated in phase 2 studies and comparable results are reported. The results of BrECADD, with good efficacy and toxicity profile, should be followed. Pembrolizumab was shown to be more effective in RRHL compared to BV in patients who have relapsed post-ASCT or ineligible for ASCT. BV is used in post-ASCT maintenance in high-risk cases, although its role will be questioned as it is increasingly used in the frontline treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Burhan Ferhanoglu
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Hematology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Murat Ozbalak
- Basaksehir Cam ve Sakura City Hospital, Division of Hematology, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Abstract
The treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma, using cytotoxic chemotherapy and selective radiotherapy, has resulted in progressively increasing cure rates over the last 40 years. Recent studies have been directed at using response-adapted approaches to modulate treatment according to the responses seen using functional imaging, with the aim of balancing the probability of cure against the toxicity of more extensive treatments, in particular the risks of infertility, second malignancy and cardiovascular disease. The results of these studies suggest that we have reached the limits of what might be expected from the conventional treatments, but the arrival of antibody-based therapies, specifically antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint blocking antibodies, now holds out the prospect of further improvements. The next challenge will be to select those groups for whom they are most needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Peter W M Johnson
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, School of Cancer Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Oertel M, Hering D, Nacke N, Kittel C, Kröger K, Kriz J, Fuchs M, Baues C, Vordermark D, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Herfarth K, Lukas P, Schmidberger H, Marnitz S, Borchmann P, Engert A, Haverkamp U, Eich HT. Radiation Therapy in the German Hodgkin Study Group HD 16 and HD 17 Trials: Quality Assurance and Dosimetric Analysis for Hodgkin Lymphoma in the Modern Era. Adv Radiat Oncol 2023; 8:101169. [PMID: 36896214 PMCID: PMC9991533 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101169] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2022] [Accepted: 12/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Radiation therapy (RT) is an integral part of treatment concepts for early-stage Hodgkin lymphoma. This analysis reports on RT quality in the recent HD16 and 17 trials of the German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG). Methods and Materials All RT plans of involved-node radiation therapy (INRT) in HD 17 were requested for analysis, along with 100 and 50 involved-field radiation therapy (IFRT) plans in HD 16 and 17, respectively. A structured assessment regarding field design and protocol adherence was performed by the reference radiation oncology panel of the GHSG. Results Overall, 100 (HD 16) and 176 (HD 17) patients were eligible for analysis. In HD 16, 84% of RT series were evaluated as correct, with significant improvement compared with the predecessor studies (P < .001). In HD 17, 76.1% of INRT cases revealed a correct RT design compared with 69.0% of IFRT-cases, which was superior to previous studies (P < .001). Comparing INRT and IFRT, we found no significant differences in the percentage of any deviation (P = .418) or major deviations (P = .466). Regarding dosimetry, INRT was accompanied by an improvement in thyroid doses. Comparing different RT techniques, we found that intensity-modulated RT showed a reduction of high doses in the lung at the expense of an increased low-dose exposure in HD 17. Conclusions The latest study generation of the GHSG demonstrates an improved quality in RT. A modern INRT design could be established without deterioration in quality. On a conceptual level, an individual consideration of the appropriate RT technique has to be performed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Nina Nacke
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christopher Kittel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kai Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Jan Kriz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alexianer Clemenshospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Heinz Schmidberger
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Düsseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Pepper NB, Oertel M, Rehn S, Kobe C, Eich HT. Modern PET-Guided Radiotherapy Planning and Treatment for Malignant Lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:389-399. [PMID: 36241473 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2022] [Accepted: 09/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
Malignant lymphoma comprises a broad spectrum of diverse entities originating from different types of lymphocytes. In the last century, successive improvements of treatment possibilities have led to an continuous amelioration of patient prognosis from lethal outcome to high rates of disease control and long-term survivors. PET/CT-based imaging plays a key role in stratification of stage and treatment response. Especially for radiotherapy, an essential treatment modality for lymphoma patients, functional imaging and the reevaluation of disease activity after frontline chemotherapy has led to major improvements regarding size of treatment fields and toxicity. International expert groups like the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG) develop guidelines for the optimal use of imaging for treatment planning. The shift from uniform large-field treatment volumes to complex individual setups taking into account biological response-assessments based on functional imaging resulted in a further de-escalation of side effects and modernization of lymphoma treatment. This paper aims to summarize the use of FDG-PET-imaging for radiation therapy planning in malignant lymphoma in the context of historic and future developments, as well as associated limitations and challenges ahead. We will discuss the contemporary standard of care as recommended by international expert guidelines like the ILROG, the national comprehensive cancer network (NCCN), as well as the newly updated German S3-guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Michael Oertel
- University Hospital Muenster, Department of Radiation Oncology, Muenster, Germany
| | - Stephan Rehn
- University Hospital Muenster, Department of Radiation Oncology, Muenster, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- University Hospital Muenster, Department of Radiation Oncology, Muenster, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Nanni C, Kobe C, Baeßler B, Baues C, Boellaard R, Borchmann P, Buck A, Buvat I, Chapuy B, Cheson BD, Chrzan R, Cottereau AS, Dührsen U, Eikenes L, Hutchings M, Jurczak W, Kraeber-Bodéré F, Lopci E, Luminari S, MacLennan S, Mikhaeel NG, Nijland M, Rodríguez-Otero P, Treglia G, Withofs N, Zamagni E, Zinzani PL, Zijlstra JM, Herrmann K, Kunikowska J. European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM) Focus 4 consensus recommendations: molecular imaging and therapy in haematological tumours. Lancet Haematol 2023; 10:e367-e381. [PMID: 37142345 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-3026(23)00030-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2022] [Revised: 12/23/2022] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
Given the paucity of high-certainty evidence, and differences in opinion on the use of nuclear medicine for hematological malignancies, we embarked on a consensus process involving key experts in this area. We aimed to assess consensus within a panel of experts on issues related to patient eligibility, imaging techniques, staging and response assessment, follow-up, and treatment decision-making, and to provide interim guidance by our expert consensus. We used a three-stage consensus process. First, we systematically reviewed and appraised the quality of existing evidence. Second, we generated a list of 153 statements based on the literature review to be agreed or disagreed with, with an additional statement added after the first round. Third, the 154 statements were scored by a panel of 26 experts purposively sampled from authors of published research on haematological tumours on a 1 (strongly disagree) to 9 (strongly agree) Likert scale in a two-round electronic Delphi review. The RAND and University of California Los Angeles appropriateness method was used for analysis. Between one and 14 systematic reviews were identified on each topic. All were rated as low to moderate quality. After two rounds of voting, there was consensus on 139 (90%) of 154 of the statements. There was consensus on most statements concerning the use of PET in non-Hodgkin and Hodgkin lymphoma. In multiple myeloma, more studies are required to define the optimal sequence for treatment assessment. Furthermore, nuclear medicine physicians and haematologists are awaiting consistent literature to introduce volumetric parameters, artificial intelligence, machine learning, and radiomics into routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Nanni
- Medicina Nucleare, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Bettina Baeßler
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiooncology, Radiotherapy and CyberKnife Center, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ronald Boellaard
- Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands; Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Irène Buvat
- Laboratory of Translational Imaging in Oncology, Institut Curie, Inserm, PSL University, Orsay, France
| | - Björn Chapuy
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumorimmunology, Charité University Medical Center Berlin, Benjamin Franklin Campus, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Robert Chrzan
- Department of Radiology, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland
| | | | - Ulrich Dührsen
- Klinik für Hämatologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Universität Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Live Eikenes
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Martin Hutchings
- Department of Haematology, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Wojciech Jurczak
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Kraków, Poland
| | - Françoise Kraeber-Bodéré
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, University Hospital Hôtel-Dieu, Nantes, France; CRCI2NA, INSERM, CNRS, Université d'Angers, Nantes Université, Nantes, France
| | - Egesta Lopci
- Nuclear Medicine, IRCCS-Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Stefano Luminari
- Surgical, Medical and Dental Department of Morphological Sciences Related to Transplant, Oncology and Regenerative Medicine Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy; Hematology Unit, Azienda USL IRCCS of Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Steven MacLennan
- Academic Urology Unit, Institute of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - N George Mikhaeel
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Guy's Cancer Centre, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Trust, London, UK; School of Cancer & Pharmaceutical Sciences, King's College, University of London, London, UK
| | - Marcel Nijland
- Department of Hematology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, Netherlands
| | | | - Giorgio Treglia
- Imaging Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland; Faculty of Biomedical sciences, Università della Svizzera italiana, Lugano, Switzerland; Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Nadia Withofs
- Division of Nuclear Medicine and Oncological Imaging, Department of Medical Physics, CHU of Liege, Liege, Belgium; GIGA-CRC In Vivo Imaging, University of Liege, Liege, Belgium
| | - Elena Zamagni
- Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Pier Luigi Zinzani
- Istituto di Ematologia "Seràgnoli", IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy; Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica, Diagnostica e Sperimentale, Università di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Josée M Zijlstra
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, VUMC Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Ken Herrmann
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany; German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Jolanta Kunikowska
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zeman MN, Akin EA, Merryman RW, Jacene HA. Interim FDG-PET/CT for Response Assessment of Lymphoma. Semin Nucl Med 2023; 53:371-388. [PMID: 36376131 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2022.10.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
Abstract
The clinical use and prognostic value of interim FDG-PET/CT (iPET/CT), which is performed after treatment initiation but prior to its completion, varies by lymphoma subtype. Evidence supporting the prognostic value of iPET/CT is more robust for classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL), and in this lymphoma subtype, response-adapted treatment approaches guided by iPET/CT are a widely used standard of care for first-line therapy. The data supporting use of iPET/CT among patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) is less well-established, but failure to achieve complete metabolic response on iPET/CT is generally considered a poor prognostic factor with likely consequences for progression free survival. This review will present the available evidence supporting use of iPET/CT in lymphoma patients, particularly as it relates to prognostication and the ability to inform response-adapted treatment strategies. The latter will be addressed through a discussion on the major iPET-response adapted clinical trials with mention of ongoing trials. Special attention will be given to cHL and a few subtypes of NHL, including diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL), follicular lymphoma (FL), and peripheral T cell lymphoma (PTCL).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Merissa N Zeman
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA
| | - Esma A Akin
- Department of Radiology, Division of Nuclear Medicine, George Washington University, Medical Faculty Associates, Washington, DC
| | - Reid W Merryman
- Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Division of Hematologic Malignancies, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | - Heather A Jacene
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Imaging, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Di Ciaccio PR, Mills G, Shipton MJ, Campbell B, Gregory G, Langfield J, Greenwood M, McKeague S, Shanavas M, Eslick R, Kidson-Gerber G, Smallbone P, Tang C, Morris K, Bilmon I, Yannakou C, Badoux X, Berkahn L, Farina S, Mason KD, Motum P, Goss K, Hamad N. The clinical features, management and outcomes of lymphoma in pregnancy: A multicentre study by the Australasian Lymphoma Alliance. Br J Haematol 2023; 201:887-896. [PMID: 36880558 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18727] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Revised: 02/18/2023] [Accepted: 02/18/2023] [Indexed: 03/08/2023]
Abstract
Lymphoma in pregnancy (LIP) presents unique clinical, social and ethical challenges; however, the evidence regarding this clinical scenario is limited. We conducted a multicentre retrospective observational study reporting on the features, management, and outcomes of LIP in patients diagnosed between January 2009 and December 2020 at 16 sites in Australia and New Zealand for the first time. We included diagnoses occurring either during pregnancy or within the first 12 months following delivery. A total of 73 patients were included, 41 diagnosed antenatally (AN cohort) and 32 postnatally (PN cohort). The most common diagnoses were Hodgkin lymphoma (HL; 40 patients), diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL; 11) and primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PMBCL; six). At a median follow up of 2.37 years, the 2- and 5-year overall survival (OS) for patients with HL were 91% and 82%. For the combined DLBCL and PMBCL group, the 2-year OS was 92%. Standard curative chemotherapy regimens were successfully delivered to 64% of women in the AN cohort; however, counselling regarding future fertility and termination of pregnancy were suboptimal, and a standardised approach to staging lacking. Neonatal outcomes were generally favourable. We present a large multicentre cohort of LIP reflecting contemporary practice and identify areas in need of ongoing research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pietro R Di Ciaccio
- Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia.,College of Health and Medicine, Australian National University, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.,School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Georgia Mills
- Northern Beaches Hospital, Frenchs Forest, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine, Macquarie University, Ryde, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Michael J Shipton
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Belinda Campbell
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria, Australia
| | | | - Jenna Langfield
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Matthew Greenwood
- Royal North Shore Hospital, St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sean McKeague
- Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Mohammad Shanavas
- Mater Hospital Brisbane, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.,University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Renee Eslick
- The Canberra Hospital, Garran, Australian Capital Territory, Australia
| | - Giselle Kidson-Gerber
- Prince of Wales Hospital and The Royal Hospital for Women, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of New South Wales, Randwick, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Catherine Tang
- Gosford Hospital, Gosford, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine and Public Health, The University of Newcastle, Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Kirk Morris
- Royal Brisbane and Women's Hospital, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Ian Bilmon
- Sydney Adventist Hospital, Wahroonga, New South Wales, Australia.,Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Costas Yannakou
- Epworth Freemasons, Epworth HealthCare, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Xavier Badoux
- St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | | | - Kylie D Mason
- Royal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Penelope Motum
- Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | | | - Nada Hamad
- School of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health, UNSW Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Haematology, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,School of Medicine, Sydney, University of Notre, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Ladbury C, Eustace N, Amini A, Dandapani S, Williams T. Biology-Guided Radiation Therapy. Surg Oncol Clin N Am 2023; 32:553-568. [PMID: 37182992 DOI: 10.1016/j.soc.2023.02.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/29/2023]
Abstract
Biology-guided radiation therapy is an emerging field whereby delivery of external beam radiotherapy incorporates biological/molecular imaging to inform radiation treatment. At present, there is evidence for the use of functional imaging such as PET to evaluate treatment response in patients both during and after radiation treatment as well as to provide a method of adapting or selecting patient-specific treatments. Examples in thoracic, gastrointestinal, and hematologic malignancies are provided. Improvements in PET metrics, thresholds, and novel radiotracers will further move this novel field forward.
Collapse
|
27
|
Binkley MS, Advani RH. Treatment approaches for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Clinical Lymphoma Myeloma and Leukemia 2023:S2152-2650(23)00111-8. [PMID: 37076366 DOI: 10.1016/j.clml.2023.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/03/2023] [Revised: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 03/25/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023]
Abstract
Nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) is a rare variant of Hodgkin lymphoma characterized by a persistent risk of relapse but an excellent overall survival. Historically, it was treated similarly to classic Hodgkin lymphoma, but efforts have been made to deintensify treatment due to risk of late toxicity associated with intensive therapy. For patients with completely resected stage IA NLPHL, no further treatment may be considered, particularly for pediatric patients. For those with stage I-II NLPHL without risk factors such as B symptoms, sites>2, or variant pattern histology, lower intensity treatment with radiotherapy or chemotherapy alone may be sufficient. However, combined modality therapy is a standard treatment for favorable and unfavorable risk stage I-II NLPHL associated with excellent progression-free and overall survival rates. For patients with advanced stage NLPHL, the optimal chemotherapy is not defined, but R-CHOP appears to be an effective treatment. Efforts to study NLPHL through multicenter collaborative efforts are crucial to develop evidence based and individualized treatments for patients with NLPHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Binkley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA.
| | - Ranjana H Advani
- Department of Medicine, Division of Oncology, Stanford University, Palo Alto, CA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Oertel M, Eich HT. [Cardiovascular risk evaluation in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma-are we on the road to individualized planning?]. Strahlenther Onkol 2023; 199:333-6. [PMID: 36749383 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-023-02051-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/19/2023] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
|
29
|
LaCasce AS, Dockter T, Ruppert AS, Kostakoglu L, Schöder H, Hsi E, Bogart J, Cheson B, Wagner-Johnston N, Abramson J, Blum K, Leonard JP, Bartlett NL. Positron Emission Tomography-Adapted Therapy in Bulky Stage I/II Classic Hodgkin Lymphoma: CALGB 50801 (Alliance). J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:1023-1034. [PMID: 36269899 PMCID: PMC9928671 DOI: 10.1200/jco.22.00947] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Revised: 08/01/2022] [Accepted: 08/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Patients with bulky stage I/II classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) are typically treated with chemotherapy followed by radiation. Late effects associated with radiotherapy include increased risk of second cancer and cardiovascular disease. We tested a positron emission tomography (PET)-adapted approach in patients with bulky, early-stage cHL, omitting radiotherapy in patients with interim PET-negative (PET-) disease and intensifying treatment in patients with PET-positive (PET+) disease. METHODS Eligible patients with bulky disease (mass > 10 cm or 1/3 the maximum intrathoracic diameter on chest x-ray) received two cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) followed by interim fluorodeoxyglucose PET (PET2). Patients with PET2-, defined as 1-3 on the 5-point scale, received four additional cycles of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine. Patients with PET2+ received four cycles of escalated bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone followed by 30.6 Gy involved-field radiation. RESULTS Of 94 evaluable patients, 53% were female with median age 30 years (range, 18-58 years). Eight-five (90%) had stage II disease, including 48 (51%) with stage IIB/IIBE. Seventy-eight (78%) were PET2- and 21 (22%) were PET2+. The predominant toxicity was neutropenia, with 9% of patients developing febrile neutropenia and one developing sepsis. The primary end point of 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 93.1% in PET2- and 89.7% in PET2+ patients. Three-year overall survival was 98.6% and 94.4%, respectively. The estimated hazard ratio comparing PFS of patients with PET2+ and patients with PET2- was 1.03 (85% upper bound 2.38) and was significantly less than the null hypothesis of 4.1 (one-sided P = .04). CONCLUSION Our study of PET-adapted therapy in bulky stage I/II cHL met its primary goal and was associated with an excellent 3-year PFS rate of 92.3% in all patients, with the majority being spared radiotherapy and exposure to intensified chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Travis Dockter
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN
| | - Amy S. Ruppert
- Alliance Statistics and Data Management Center, The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH
| | | | - Heiko Schöder
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
| | - Eric Hsi
- Wake Forest University Health Sciences, Winston-Salem, NC
| | - Jeffrey Bogart
- State University of New York Upstate Medical University Syracuse-Health Science Center, Syracuse, NY
| | - Bruce Cheson
- Scientific Advisor, Lymphoma Research Foundation, New York, NY
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Kalra M, Bakhshi S, Singh M, Seth R, Verma N, Jain S, Radhakrishnan V, Mandal P, Mahajan A, Arora RS, Dinand V, Kapoor G, Sajid M, Kumar R, Taluja A, Mallick S, Chandra J. Response assessment by positron emission tomography-computed tomography as compared with contrast-enhanced computed tomography in childhood Hodgkin lymphoma can reduce the need for radiotherapy in low- and middle-income countries. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2023; 70:e30091. [PMID: 36411263 DOI: 10.1002/pbc.30091] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2022] [Revised: 09/21/2022] [Accepted: 10/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The InPOG-HL-15-01, a multicentric prospective study, used a risk-stratified and response-based approach with doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (ABVD) backbone to treat children and adolescents with newly diagnosed Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) and reduce the use of radiation therapy (RT). Children/adolescents with bulky disease or inadequate response at early response assessment (ERA) after two cycles of chemotherapy were assigned to receive RT. For ERA, positron emission tomography computed tomography (PET-CT) was recommended but not mandatory in view of limited access. This study aimed to compare the impact of using contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) and PET-CT on treatment decisions and outcomes. METHODOLOGY 396 patients were enrolled and 382 had an ERA at the assigned time point. Satisfactory response was defined as Deauville score 3 or less for patients undergoing PET-CT and complete response (CR)/very good partial response (VGPR) for patients undergoing CECT. Outcomes of interest incorporate 5 year event-free survival (EFS), EFS including abandonment (EFSa), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS At ERA, satisfactory response was documented in 277 out of 382 (72.5%) participants and this was significantly higher in PET-CT (151 out of 186, 81.2%) as compared with CECT-based assessments (126 out of 196, 64.3%) respectively (p value < .001). Amongst the 203 patients with nonbulky disease (wherein the indication for RT was entirely dependent on ERA), 96 out of 114 (84.2%) and 61 out of 89 (68.5%) patients achieved a satisfactory response according to the PET-CT and CECT (p value = .008) respectively and hence a lesser proportion of patients in the PET-CT arm received RT. Despite a lower usage of RT the 5 year OS of both groups, ERA based on CECT (91.8%) versus PET-CT (94.1%) was comparable (p value = .391) and so was the 5 year EFS (86.7 vs. 85.5%, p value = .724). CONCLUSION Use of PET-CT as the modality for ERA is more likely to indicate a satisfactory response as compared with CECT and thereby decreases the need for RT in response-based treatment algorithm for HL-afflicted children. The reduction in the application of RT did not impact the overall outcome and plausibly would lower the risk of delayed toxic effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manas Kalra
- Department of Pediatric Hematology Oncology BMT, Sir Ganga Ram Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Sameer Bakhshi
- Department of Medical Oncology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - M Singh
- Department of Medical and Pediatric Oncology, Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna, India
| | - Rachna Seth
- Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Nishant Verma
- Department of Pediatrics, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, India
| | - Sandeep Jain
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - V Radhakrishnan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Cancer Institute, Adyar, Chennai, India
| | - Piali Mandal
- Department of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Amita Mahajan
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Indraprastha Apollo Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Ramandeep S Arora
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Max Super Specialty Hospital, New Delhi, India
| | - Veronique Dinand
- Department of Palliative and Supportive Unit, BJ Wadia Hospital, Mumbai, India
| | - Gauri Kapoor
- Department of Pediatric Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute, New Delhi, India
| | - M Sajid
- Department of Medical and Pediatric Oncology, Mahavir Cancer Sansthan, Patna, India
| | - Rakesh Kumar
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - A Taluja
- Cankids Kidscan, New Delhi, India
| | - Saumyaranjan Mallick
- Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India
| | - Jagdish Chandra
- Department of Pediatrics, Kalawati Saran Children's Hospital, New Delhi, India
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Fornecker LM, Lazarovici J, Aurer I, Casasnovas RO, Gac AC, Bonnet C, Bouabdallah K, Feugier P, Specht L, Molina L, Touati M, Borel C, Stamatoullas A, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Pascal L, Lugtenburg P, Di Renzo N, Vander Borght T, Traverse-Glehen A, Dartigues P, Hutchings M, Versari A, Meignan M, Federico M, André M. Brentuximab Vedotin Plus AVD for First-Line Treatment of Early-Stage Unfavorable Hodgkin Lymphoma (BREACH): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Randomized, Phase II Trial. J Clin Oncol 2023; 41:327-335. [PMID: 35867960 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01281] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The prognosis of patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma remains unsatisfactory. We assessed the efficacy and safety of brentuximab vedotin plus doxorubicin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine (BV-AVD) in previously untreated, early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02292979). METHODS BREACH is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase II trial. Eligible patients were age 18-60 years with ≥ 1 unfavorable EORTC/LYSA criterion. Patients were randomly assigned (2:1) to four cycles of BV-AVD or standard doxorubicin, bleomycin, vincristine, and dacarbazine (ABVD), followed by 30 Gy involved node radiotherapy. The primary end point was the positron emission tomography (PET) response rate after two cycles by expert independent review using the Deauville score. The study was designed to test if the PET-negative rate after two cycles of BV-AVD was superior to 75%. We hypothesized a 10% increase in the PET-negative rate after two cycles of BV-AVD. RESULTS Between March 2015 and October 2016, 170 patients were enrolled. After two cycles, the primary end point of the study was met: 93 (82.3%; 90% CI, 75.3 to 88.0) of 113 patients in the BV-AVD arm were PET-negative (Deauville score 1-3) compared with 43 (75.4%; 90% CI, 64.3% to 84.5%) of 57 in the ABVD arm. The 2-year progression-free survival (PFS) was 97.3% (95% CI, 91.9 to 99.1) and 92.6% (95% CI, 81.4% to 97.2%) in the BV-AVD and ABVD arms, respectively. High total metabolic tumor volume was associated with a significantly shorter PFS (hazard ratio, 17.9; 95% CI, 2.2 to 145.5; P < .001). For patients with high total metabolic tumor volume, the 2-year PFS rate was 90.9% (95% CI, 74.4 to 97.0) and 70.7% (95% CI, 39.4% to 87.9%) in the BV-AVD and ABVD arms, respectively. CONCLUSION BV-AVD demonstrated an improvement in the PET-negative rate compared with ABVD after two cycles.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luc-Matthieu Fornecker
- Institut de Cancérologie Strasbourg Europe (ICANS) and University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | | | - Igor Aurer
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | | | | | - Pierre Feugier
- University Hospital of Nancy and University of Lorraine, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Lena Specht
- Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Pieternella Lugtenburg
- Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Michel Meignan
- LYSA Imaging and University Paris Est Créteil, Créteil, France
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Kosydar S, Ansell SM. Long-term outcomes for patients with Hodgkin lymphoma at increased risk of progression or relapse. Leuk Lymphoma 2023; 64:5-17. [PMID: 36215148 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2131422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Although advancements in the treatment of Hodgkin lymphoma have enabled many patients to be cured of their disease, about half of patients who relapse or experience refractory disease ultimately fail treatment, even after autologous stem cell transplant. Risk stratification is crucial to enable escalation of therapy in patients at increased risk for progression while allowing for less intensive therapy in lower risk groups. Utilization of clinical factors to inform risk scores was common practice, but this historical approach has been supplemented by PET/CT risk adapted management. Long-term outcomes of high-risk patients have improved over the decades with advancements in therapy and emergence of novel agents including antibody-drug conjugates and immune checkpoint inhibitors, yet further research is urgently needed. Herein, we review long-term outcomes of patients with Hodgkin lymphoma at increased risk for progression or relapse and discuss limitations of current risk strategies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuel Kosydar
- Department of Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
33
|
Oertel M, Hering D, Baues C, Kittel C, Fuchs M, Kriz J, Kröger K, Vordermark D, Herfarth K, Engenhart-Cabillic R, Lukas P, Haverkamp U, Borchmann P, Eich HT. Radiation doses to mediastinal organs at risk in early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma- a risk stratified analysis of the GHSG HD17 trial. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1183906. [PMID: 37213291 PMCID: PMC10196378 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1183906] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 04/14/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction The German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG) HD17 trial established the omission of radiotherapy (RT) for patients with early-stage unfavorable Hodgkin lymphoma being PET-negative after 2 cycles of BEACOPP escalated plus 2 cycles of ABVD. This patient group reveals heterogeneity in characteristics and disease extent which prompted us to perform a decisive dosimetric analysis according to GHSG risk factors. This may help to tailor RT individually balancing risks and benefits. Methods For quality assurance, RT-plans were requested from the treating facilities (n= 141) and analyzed centrally. Dose-volume histograms were scanned either paper-based or digitally to obtain doses to mediastinal organs. These were registered and compared according to GHSG risk factors. Results Overall, RT plans of 176 patients were requested, 139 of which had dosimetric information on target volumes within the mediastinum. Most of these patients were stage II (92.8%), had no B-symptoms (79.1%) and were aged < 50 years (89.9%). Risk factors were present in 8.6% (extranodal involvement), 31.7% (bulky disease), 46.0% (elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate) and 64.0% (three involved areas), respectively. The presence of bulky disease significantly affected the mean RT doses to the heart (p=0.005) and to the left lung (median: 11.3 Gy vs. 9.9 Gy; p=0.042) as well as V5 of the right and left lung, respectively (median right lung: 67.4% vs. 51.0%; p=0.011; median left lung: 65.9% vs. 54.2%; p=0.008). Significant differences in similar organs at risk parameters could be found between the sub-cohorts with the presence or absence of extranodal involvement, respectively. In contrast, an elevated erythrocyte sedimentation rate did not deteriorate dosimetry significantly. No association of any risk factor with radiation doses to the female breast was found. Conclusion Pre-chemotherapy risk factors may help to predict potential RT exposure to normal organs and to critically review treatment indication. Individualized risk-benefit evaluations for patients with HL in early-stage unfavorable disease are mandatory.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael Oertel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dominik Hering
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Christopher Kittel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Dusseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jan Kriz
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Alexianer Clemenshospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Kai Kröger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Dirk Vordermark
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Halle (Saale), Halle (Saale), Germany
| | - Klaus Herfarth
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Rita Engenhart-Cabillic
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Giessen-Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Peter Lukas
- Department of Radiooncology, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Uwe Haverkamp
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne, Dusseldorf, University Hospital of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Hans Theodor Eich
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Muenster, Muenster, Germany
- *Correspondence: Hans Theodor Eich,
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Lehner B, Panny M. Hodgkin lymphoma—how much therapy do we need? memo 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12254-022-00856-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
|
35
|
Weil CR, Parsons MJ, Hutten RJ, Lew FH, Johnson SB, Gaffney DK, Tao R. Patterns of care and outcomes of early stage I-II Hodgkin lymphoma treated with or without radiation therapy. Leuk Lymphoma 2022; 63:2847-2857. [PMID: 35904407 DOI: 10.1080/10428194.2022.2105325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Omission of radiotherapy in the upfront management of early-stage classic Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) has become more common with time. We report patterns of care and outcomes of stage I-II cHL treated with chemotherapy (CT) only versus CT and radiotherapy (combined modality therapy, CMT). From the National Cancer Database, we identified 28,327 early-stage cHL patients treated with CT (n = 15,798) or CMT (n = 12,529) from 2004 to 2018. CMT utilization declined over the period from 58% to 34%. With median follow-up of 6.2 years, the 5- and 10-year overall survival for CT versus CMT was 93.3% versus 96.9% (p < 0.001) and 88.7% versus 93.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. On multivariable analysis, uninsured (OR 0.75, p < 0.001) and Black patients (OR 0.86, p = 0.02) were less likely to receive CMT, and treatment with CT was predictive of death (OR 2.0, p < 0.001). This report highlights real-world outcomes in early-stage cHL, with worse survival with CT and notable disparities in CMT utilization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christopher R Weil
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA.,Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Matthew J Parsons
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Ryan J Hutten
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Felicia H Lew
- Elson S. Floyd College of Medicine, Washington State University, Spokane, WA, USA
| | - Skyler B Johnson
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - David K Gaffney
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - Randa Tao
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Zhang XY, Collins GP. Checkpoint Inhibitors and the Changing Face of the Relapsed/Refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma Pathway. Curr Oncol Rep 2022; 24:1477-1488. [PMID: 35696020 PMCID: PMC9606050 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-022-01292-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs) targeting PD1 are highly active in relapsed/refractory classical Hodgkin lymphoma. A plethora of recent studies, often small and non-randomised, have raised many questions about how to optimally integrate these into clinical practice. We aim to discuss the use of CPIs in different relapsed/refractory settings in an effort to better define their role and highlight areas of research. RECENT FINDINGS CPIs have shown efficacy at first relapse, as salvage pre- and post-autologous (ASCT) and allogeneic stem cell transplant (alloSCT) and as maintenance post-ASCT. Immune-related adverse events require careful attention, especially when used peri-alloSCT, where it is associated with hyperacute graft-versus-host disease. Newer PD1 inhibitors, as well as strategies to overcome CPI resistance, are being tested. CPIs are increasingly deployed at earlier points in the classical Hodgkin lymphoma pathway. Whilst progress is clearly being made, randomised studies are required to more clearly define the optimal positioning of these agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiao-Yin Zhang
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK
| | - Graham P Collins
- Department of Clinical Haematology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, UK.
- Department of Haematology, Cancer and Haematology Centre, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, OX3 7LE, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Maco M, Kupcova K, Herman V, Ondeckova I, Kozak T, Mocikova H, Havranek O; Czech Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Circulating tumor DNA in Hodgkin lymphoma. Ann Hematol 2022. [PMID: 36074181 DOI: 10.1007/s00277-022-04949-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2021] [Accepted: 08/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Somatic mutations of genes involved in NF-κB, PI3K/AKT, NOTCH, and JAK/STAT signaling pathways play an important role in the pathogenesis of Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). HL tumor cells form only about 5% of the tumor mass; however, it was shown that HL tumor-derived DNA could be detected in the bloodstream. This circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) reflects the genetic profile of HL tumor cells and can be used for qualitative and quantitative analysis of tumor-specific somatic DNA mutations within the concept of liquid biopsy. Overall, the most frequently mutated gene in HL is STAT6; however, the exact spectrum of mutations differs between individual HL histological subtypes. Importantly, reduction of ctDNA plasma levels after initial treatment is highly correlated with prognosis. Therefore, ctDNA shows great promise as a novel tool for non-invasive tumor genome analysis for biomarker driven therapy as well as for superior minimal residual disease monitoring and treatment resistance detection. Here, we summarize the recent advancements of ctDNA analysis in HL with focus on ctDNA detection methodologies, genetic profiling of HL and its clonal evolution, and the emerging prognostic value of ctDNA.
Collapse
|
38
|
Binkley MS. Characterizing the immune microenvironment for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2022; 199:310-312. [PMID: 35993185 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18406] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2022] [Revised: 08/02/2022] [Accepted: 08/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
The microenvironment of nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL) and its relationship to presentation and outcomes has not been widely investigated. In a large cohort of patients with NLPHL, Hartmann and colleagues showed an association between microenvironmental factors and clinical presentation serving to inform future studies evaluating the prognostic impact of the immunoarchitectural patterns and cell types present. Commentary on: Hartmann et al. Tumor cell characteristics and microenvironment composition correspond to clinical presentation in newly diagnosed nodular lymphocyte predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2022 (Online ahead of print). doi: 10.1111/bjh.18376.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael S Binkley
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Coutte A, Pointreau Y. [Hematological pathologies: the most successful model of de-escalation in radiotherapy]. Cancer Radiother 2022; 26:925-930. [PMID: 35965244 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2022.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/31/2022] [Revised: 06/13/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
Abstract
The proportion of patients irradiated in the context of malignant hematological pathologies decreased over the last decades. The main causes are the late side effects of the historical series and the new therapeutic strategies aiming to relay radiotherapy to the rank of option. At the same time, radiotherapy has been modernised, target volumes and total doses have been drastically reduced. Hodgkin's lymphomas, indolent follicular lymphomas and primary cerebral lymphomas are the main witnesses of this therapeutic deflation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Coutte
- Service de radiothérapie, CHU Amiens Picardie, 1, rond-point du Professeur Christian Cabrol, 80054 Amiens, France.
| | - Y Pointreau
- Institut inter-régionaL de Cancérologie (ILC) - Centre Jean Bernard, 9, Rue Beauverger, 72000 Le Mans, France; Service de radiothérapie, centre régional universitaire de cancérologie Henry-S.-Kaplan, hôpital Bretonneau, CHRU de Tours, 2, boulevard Tonnellé, 37044 Tours, France; COLIB, Club des Oncologues LIBéraux, 72000 Le Mans, France
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Hartmann S, Soltani AS, Bankov K, Bein J, Hansmann ML, Rosenwald A, Bernd HW, Feller A, Ott G, Möller P, Stein H, Klapper W, Borchmann P, Engert A, Eichenauer DA. Tumour cell characteristics and microenvironment composition correspond to clinical presentation in newly diagnosed nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma. Br J Haematol 2022; 199:382-391. [PMID: 35880396 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18376] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/11/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Different studies have characterized the microenvironment and its prognostic impact in classic Hodgkin lymphoma whereas such analyses are pending for nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (NLPHL). We thus investigated characteristics of tumour cells and microenvironment in NLPHL and evaluated possible correlations with the clinical presentation. Lymph node samples from 152 NLPHL patients who had first-line treatment within the randomized German Hodgkin Study Group HD16-HD18 trials were available and analysed with regard to IgD status and nuclear size of the tumour cells as well as presence of PD1-positive follicular T helper cells and CD163-positive macrophages in the microenvironment. While large tumour cell nuclei and high numbers of PD1-positive follicular T helper cells in the microenvironment were more common in patients presenting with early/intermediate stages than in patients with advanced-stage disease (p < 0.0001, unpaired t-test; p = 0.0022, Mann-Whitney test), no differences between risk groups were observed in terms of the IgD status of the tumour cells and the content of CD163-positive macrophages in the microenvironment. PD1-positive follicular T helper cells were present in both cases with typical and variant growth patterns and rosetting around the tumour cells was observed in 96% of patients, indicating an important role of PD1-positive follicular T helper cells in NLPHL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvia Hartmann
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Ahmad Sajad Soltani
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Katrin Bankov
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Julia Bein
- Dr. Senckenberg Institute of Pathology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Martin-Leo Hansmann
- Frankfurt Institute for Advanced Studies, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Institute of General Pharmacology and Toxicology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,Institute of Pathology and Molecular Pathology, Helios University Hospital Wuppertal, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Andreas Rosenwald
- Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg and Comprehensive Cancer Center (CCC) Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany
| | | | | | - German Ott
- Department of Clinical Pathology, Robert-Bosch-Krankenhaus, and Dr. Margarete Fischer-Bosch Institute of Clinical Pharmacology, Stuttgart, Germany
| | - Peter Möller
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Ulm, Ulm, Germany
| | | | - Wolfram Klapper
- Institute of Pathology, Hematopathology Section and Lymph Node Registry, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Dennis A Eichenauer
- First Department of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Dusseldorf, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Katano A, Minamitani M, Yamashita H, Nakagawa K. Delayed Onset of Pleural Effusion After Thoracic Radiation Therapy for Hodgkin Lymphoma: A Case Report With Over 30-Year Follow-Up. Cureus 2022; 14:e27138. [PMID: 36017284 PMCID: PMC9392964 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.27138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/05/2022] Open
|
42
|
Espenel S, Chargari C, Blanchard P, Bockel S, Morel D, Rivera S, Levy A, Deutsch E. Practice changing data and emerging concepts from recent radiation therapy randomised clinical trials. Eur J Cancer 2022; 171:242-258. [PMID: 35779346 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.04.038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Oncology treatments are constantly and rapidly evolving. We aimed at highlighting the latest radiation therapy practice changing trials and emerging concepts, through an overview of recent randomised clinical trials (RCTs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Requests were performed in the Medline database to identify all publications reporting radiation therapy RCTs from 2018 to 2021. RESULTS Recent RCTs sustained the role of newer combinatorial strategies through radioimmunotherapy for early stage or metastatic lung cancer, newer pro-apoptotic agents (e.g. debio 1143 in locoregionally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma) or nanoparticles (e.g. NBTXR3 in locally advanced soft-tissue sarcoma). High-tech radiotherapy allows intensifying treatments and gaining ground in some indications through the development of stereotactic body radiotherapy for example. First randomised evidence on personalised radiation therapy through imaging-based (18FDG positron emission tomography-computed tomography for lung cancer or early stage unfavourable Hodgkin lymphoma, PMSA positron emission tomography-computed tomography or magnetic resonance imaging for high-risk prostate cancer) or biological biomarkers (PSA for prostate cancer, HPV for head and neck cancer, etc) were conducted to more tailored treatments, with more favourable outcomes. Patients' quality of life and satisfaction appeared to be increasing aims. RCTs have validated (ultra)hypofractionated schemes in many indications as for breast, prostate or rectal cancer, resulting in equivalent outcomes and toxicities, more convenient for patients and favouring shared decision making. CONCLUSION Radiation therapy is a dynamic field of research, and many RCTs have greatly impacted therapeutic standards over the last years. Investments in radiotherapy research should facilitate the transfer of innovation to clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophie Espenel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Cyrus Chargari
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Institut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, F-91220, Brétigny sur Orge, France.
| | - Pierre Blanchard
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Oncostat, Inserm U-1018, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Sophie Bockel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Daphne Morel
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Sofia Rivera
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Antonin Levy
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Gustave Roussy, Département de Radiothérapie, F-94805, Villejuif, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Faculté de Médecine, F-94270, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Inserm U-1030, Laboratoire de Radiothérapie Moléculaire et d'Innovation Thérapeutique, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
van Heek L, Stuka C, Kaul H, Müller H, Mettler J, Hitz F, Baues C, Fuchs M, Borchmann P, Engert A, Dietlein M, Voltin CA, Kobe C. Predictive value of baseline metabolic tumor volume in early-stage favorable Hodgkin Lymphoma - Data from the prospective, multicenter phase III HD16 trial. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:672. [PMID: 35717166 PMCID: PMC9206242 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09758-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/19/2021] [Accepted: 06/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background 18F -fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) plays an important role in the staging and response assessment of lymphoma patients. Our aim was to explore the predictive relevance of metabolic tumor volume (MTV) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) in patients with early stage Hodgkin lymphoma treated within the German Hodgkin Study Group HD16 trial. Methods 18F-FDG PET/CT images were available for MTV and TLG analysis in 107 cases from the HD16 trial. We calculated MTV and TLG using three different threshold methods (SUV4.0, SUV41% and SUV140%L), and then performed receiver-operating-characteristic analysis to assess the predictive impact of these parameters in predicting an adequate therapy response with PET negativity after 2 cycles of chemotherapy. Results All three threshold methods analyzed for MTV and TLG calculation showed a positive correlation with the PET response after 2 cycles chemotherapy. The largest area under the curve (AUC) was observed using the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 for MTV- calculation (AUC 0.69 [95% CI 0.55–0.83]) and for TLG-calculation (AUC 0.69 [0.55–0.82]). The calculations for MTV and TLG with a relative threshold showed a lower AUC: using SUV140%L AUCs of 0.66 [0.53–0.80] for MTV and 0.67 for TLG [0.54–0.81]) were observed, while with SUV41% an AUC of 0.61 [0.45–0.76] for MTV, and an AUC 0.64 [0.49–0.80]) for TLG were seen. Conclusions MTV and TLG do have a predictive value after two cycles ABVD in early stage Hodgkin lymphoma, particularly when using the fixed threshold of SUV4.0 for MTV and TLG calculation. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00736320.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lutz van Heek
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| | - Colin Stuka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Helen Kaul
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen - Bonn - Cologne - Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Horst Müller
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen - Bonn - Cologne - Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Jasmin Mettler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Felicitas Hitz
- Swiss Group for Clinical Cancer Research, Bern, Switzerland.,Department of Medical Oncology and Haematology, Kantonsspital St.Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology and Cyberknife Center, Faculty of Medicine and UniversityHospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Michael Fuchs
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen - Bonn - Cologne - Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen - Bonn - Cologne - Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Andreas Engert
- First Department of Internal Medicine and German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen - Bonn - Cologne - Düsseldorf (CIO ABCD), Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Markus Dietlein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Conrad-Amadeus Voltin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Carsten Kobe
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, University of Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Loap P, Orlandi E, De Marzi L, Vitolo V, Barcellini A, Iannalfi A, Dendale R, Kirova Y, Mirandola A. Cardiotoxicity model-based patient selection for Hodgkin lymphoma proton therapy. Acta Oncol 2022; 61:979-986. [PMID: 35668710 DOI: 10.1080/0284186x.2022.2084639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) is a highly curable hematological malignancy. Consolidation radiation therapy techniques have made significant progresses to improve organ-at-risk sparing in order to reduce late radiation-induced toxicity. Recent technical breakthroughs notably include intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT), which has demonstrated a major dosimetric benefit at the cardiac level for mediastinal HL patients. However, its implementation in clinical practice is still challenging, notably due to the limited access to proton therapy facilities. In this context, the purpose of this study was to estimate the benefit of IMPT for HL proton therapy for diverse cardiac adverse events and to propose a general frame for mediastinal HL patient selection strategy for IMPT based on cardiotoxicity reduction, patient clinical factors, and IMPT treatment availability. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective dosimetric study included 30 mediastinal HL patients treated with VMAT. IMPT plans were generated on the initial simulation scans. Dose to the heart, to the left ventricle and to the valves were retrieved to calculate the relative risk (RR) of ischemic heart disease (IHD), congestive heart failure (CHF) and valvular disease (VD). Composite relative risk reduction (cRRR) of late cardiotoxicity, between VMAT and IMPT, were calculated as the weighted mean of relative risk reduction for IHD, CHF and VD, calculated across a wide range of cardiovascular risk factor combinations. The proportion of mediastinal HL patients who could benefit from IMPT was estimated in European countries, based on the country population and on the number of active gantries, to propose country-specific cRRR thresholds for patient selection. RESULTS Compared with VMAT, IMPT significantly reduced average mean doses to the heart (2.36 Gy vs 0.99 Gy, p < 0.01), to the left ventricle (0.67 Gy vs 0.03, p < 0.01) and to the valves (1.29 Gy vs. 0.06, p < 0.01). For a HL patient without cardiovascular risk factor other than anthracycline-based chemotherapy, the relative risks of late cardiovascular complications were significantly lower after IMPT compared with VMAT for ischemic heart disease (1.07 vs 1.17, p < 0.01), for congestive heart failure (2.84 vs. 3.00, p < 0.01), and for valvular disease (1.01 vs. 1.06, p < 0.01). The median cRRR of cardiovascular adverse events with IMPT was 4.8%, ranging between 0.1% and 30.5%, depending on the extent of radiation fields and on the considered cardiovascular risk factors. The estimated proportion of HL patients currently treatable with IMPT in European countries with proton therapy facilities ranged between 8.0% and 100% depending on the country, corresponding to cRRR thresholds ranging from 24.0% to 0.0%. CONCLUSION While a statistically significant clinical benefit is theoretically expected for ischemic heart disease, cardiac heart failure and valvular disease for mediastinal HL patients with IMPT, the overall cardiotoxicity risk reduction is notable only for a minority of patients. In the context of limited IMPT availability, this study proposed a general model-based selection approach for mediastinal HL patient based on calculated cardiotoxicity reduction, taking into consideration patient clinical characteristics and IMPT facility availability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pierre Loap
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Centre de Protonthérapie (CPO), Institut Curie, Orsay, France.,Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| | - Ester Orlandi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| | - Ludovic De Marzi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Centre de Protonthérapie (CPO), Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Viviana Vitolo
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| | - Amelia Barcellini
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| | - Alberto Iannalfi
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| | - Rémi Dendale
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Centre de Protonthérapie (CPO), Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Youlia Kirova
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Curie, Paris, France.,Centre de Protonthérapie (CPO), Institut Curie, Orsay, France
| | - Alfredo Mirandola
- Radiation Oncology Clinical Department, Centro Nazionale di Adronterapia Oncologica (CNAO), Pavia, Italia
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Dreyling M, André M, Gökbuget N, Tilly H, Jerkeman M, Gribben J, Ferreri A, Morel P, Stilgenbauer S, Fox C, Maria Ribera J, Zweegman S, Aurer I, Bödör C, Burkhardt B, Buske C, Dollores Caballero M, Campo E, Chapuy B, Davies A, de Leval L, Doorduijn J, Federico M, Gaulard P, Gay F, Ghia P, Grønbæk K, Goldschmidt H, Kersten MJ, Kiesewetter B, Landman-Parker J, Le Gouill S, Lenz G, Leppä S, Lopez-Guillermo A, Macintyre E, Mantega MVM, Moreau P, Moreno C, Nadel B, Okosun J, Owen R, Pospisilova S, Pott C, Robak T, Spina M, Stamatopoulos K, Stary J, Tarte K, Tedeschi A, Thieblemont C, Trappe RU, Trümper LH, Salles G. The EHA Research Roadmap: Malignant Lymphoid Diseases. Hemasphere 2022; 6:e726. [PMID: 35620592 PMCID: PMC9126526 DOI: 10.1097/hs9.0000000000000726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | - Marc André
- Université Catholique de Louvain, CHU UcL Namur, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Nicola Gökbuget
- Department of Medicine II, Hematology/Oncology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Hervé Tilly
- INSERM U1245, Department of Hematology, Centre Henri Becquerel and Université de Rouen, France
| | | | - John Gribben
- Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Andrés Ferreri
- Lymphoma Unit, Department of Onco-hematology, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milano, Italy
| | - Pierre Morel
- Service Hematologie Clinique Therapie Cellulaire, CHU Amiens Picardie, Amiens, France
| | - Stephan Stilgenbauer
- Comprehensive Cancer Center Ulm (CCCU), Sektion CLL Klinik für Innere Medizin III, Universität Ulm, Germany
| | - Christopher Fox
- School of Medicine, University of Nottingham, United Kingdom
| | - José Maria Ribera
- Clinical Hematology Department, ICO-Hospital Germans Trias i Pujol, Josep Carreras Research Institute, Badalona, Spain
| | - Sonja Zweegman
- Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Igor Aurer
- University Hospital Centre Zagreb and Medical School, University of Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Csaba Bödör
- HCEMM-SE Molecular Oncohematology Research Group, Department of Pathology and Experimental Cancer Research, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Birgit Burkhardt
- Experimentelle und Translationale päd. Hämatologie u Onkologie, Leitung der Bereiche Lymphome und Stammzelltransplantation, Universitätsklinikum Münster (UKM), Klinik für Kinder- und Jugendmedizin, Pädiatrische Hämatologie und Onkologie, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Buske
- Institute of Experimental Cancer Research, CCC Ulm, University Hospital Ulm, Germany
| | - Maria Dollores Caballero
- Clinical and Transplant Unit, University Hospital of Salamanca, Spain
- Department of Medicine at the University of Salamanca, Spain
- El Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Salamanca (IBSAL), Salamanca, Spain
| | - Elias Campo
- Institut d’Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bjoern Chapuy
- Department of Hematology, Oncology and Tumor Immunology, Charité, University Medical Center Berlin, Campus Benjamin Franklin, Berlin, Germany
- Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andrew Davies
- Southampton NCRI/UK Experimental Cancer Medicines Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Southampton, United Kingdom
| | - Laurence de Leval
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Lausanne University Hospital and Lausanne University, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Jeanette Doorduijn
- Department of Hematology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | | | - Philippe Gaulard
- Département de Pathologie, Hôpital Henri Mondor, AP-HP, Créteil, France
| | - Francesca Gay
- Clinical Trial Unit, Division of Hematology 1, AOU Città Della Salute e Della Scienza, University of Torino, Italy
| | - Paolo Ghia
- Università Vita Salute San Raffaele and IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy
| | - Kirsten Grønbæk
- Department of Hematology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Biotech Research & Innovation Centre (BRIC), University of Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Hartmut Goldschmidt
- University Hospital Heidelberg, Internal Medicine V and National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Marie-Jose Kersten
- Department of Hematology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Cancer Center Amsterdam and LYMMCARE, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Barbara Kiesewetter
- Department of Medicine I, Division of Oncology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Judith Landman-Parker
- Pediatric Hematology Oncology, Sorbonne Université APHP/hôpital A Trousseau, Paris, France
| | - Steven Le Gouill
- Service d’Hématologie, Clinique du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, France
| | - Georg Lenz
- Medical Department A for Hematology, Oncology and Pneumology, University Hospital Münster, Germany
| | - Sirpa Leppä
- University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Centre, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Elizabeth Macintyre
- Onco-hematology, Université de Paris and Necker-Enfants Malades Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, France
| | | | - Philippe Moreau
- Hematology Department, University Hospital Hotel-Dieu, Nantes, France
| | - Carol Moreno
- Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Spain
| | - Bertrand Nadel
- Aix Marseille Univ, CNRS, INSERM, CIML, Marseille, France
| | - Jessica Okosun
- Centre for Haemato-Oncology, Barts Cancer Institute, Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom
| | - Roger Owen
- St James’s Institute of Oncology, Leeds, United Kingdom
| | - Sarka Pospisilova
- Department of Internal Medicine—Hematology and Oncology and Department of Medical Genetics and Genomics, Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University and University Hospital Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Christiane Pott
- Klinisch-experimentelle Hämatologie, Medizinische Klinik II, Hämatologie und Internistische Onkologie, Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Germany
| | | | - Michelle Spina
- Division of Medical Oncology and Immune-related Tumors, National Cancer Institute, Aviano, Italy
| | - Kostas Stamatopoulos
- Institute of Applied Biosciences, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas, Thessaloniki, Greece
| | - Jan Stary
- Department of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology 2nd Faculty of Medicine, Charles University Prague University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Karin Tarte
- Immunology and Cell Therapy Lab at Rennes University Hospital, Rennes, France
| | | | - Catherine Thieblemont
- Department of Hemato-Oncology, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Paris, France
| | - Ralf Ulrich Trappe
- Department of Internal Medicine II: Haematology and Oncology, DIAKO Hospital Bremen, Germany
| | - Lorenz H. Trümper
- Hematology and Medical Oncology, University Medicine Goettingen, Germany
| | - Gilles Salles
- Lymphoma Service, Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Rossi C, André M, Dupuis J, Morschhauser F, Joly B, Lazarovici J, Ghesquières H, Stamatoullas A, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Feugier P, Gac AC, Moatti H, Fornecker LM, Deau B, Joubert C, Fortpied C, Raemaekers J, Federico M, Kanoun S, Meignan M, Traverse-Glehen A, Cottereau AS, Casasnovas RO. High-risk stage IIB Hodgkin lymphoma treated in the H10 and AHL2011 trials: total metabolic tumor volume is a useful risk factor to stratify patients at baseline. Haematologica 2022; 107:2897-2904. [PMID: 35638548 PMCID: PMC9713544 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2021.280004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Stage IIB Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) patients, with a mediastinum-to-thorax (M/T) ratio of ≥0.33 or extranodal localization have a poor prognosis and are treated either as limited or advanced stage. We compared these two approaches in patients included in two randomized phase III trials enrolling previously untreated early (H10) or advanced stage HL (AHL2011). We included HL patients with Ann-Arbor stage IIB with M/T ≥0.33 or extranodal involvement enrolled in the H10 or AHL2011 trials with available positron emission tomography at baseline (PET0) and after two cycles of chemotherapy (PET2). Baseline total metabolic tumor volume (TMTV) was calculated using the 41% SUVmax method. PET2 response assessment used the Deauville score. One hundred and fourty-eight patients were eligible, including 83 enrolled in the AHL2011 trial and 65 in the H10 trial. The median TMTV value was 155.5 mL (range, 8.3-782.9 mL), 165.6 mL in AHL2011 and 147 mL in H10. PET2 positivity rates were 16.9% (n=14) and 9.2% (n=6) in AHL2011 and H10 patients, respectively. With a median follow-up of 4.1 years (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.9-4.4), overall 4-year PFS was 88.0%, 87.0% in AHL2011 and 89.2% in H10. In univariate and mutivariate analyses, baseline TMTV and PET2 response influenced significantly progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR]=4.94, HR=3.49 respectively). Notably, among the 16 patients who relapsed, 13 (81%) had a baseline TMTV baseline ≥155 mL. Upfront ABVD plus radiation therapy or upfront escBEACOPP without radiotherapy provide similar patient's outcome in high-risk stage IIB HL. TMTV is useful to stratify these patients at baseline.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cédric Rossi
- Department of Hematology, Dijon-Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France,INSERM 1231, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Franche-Comté, France,C. Rossi
| | - Marc André
- Department of Hematology, CHU UCL Namur, Université Catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium
| | - Jehan Dupuis
- Lymphoid Malignancies Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital (AP-HP), Créteil, France
| | - Franck Morschhauser
- Groupe de Recherche sur les Formes Injectables et les Technologies Associees (GRITA), Department of Hematology, CHU Lille, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Bertrand Joly
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Sud Francilien, Corbeille-Essonnes, France
| | - Julien Lazarovici
- Department of Hematology, Université Paris-Saclay, Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Hervé Ghesquières
- Department of Hematology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud and Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre-Bénite, France
| | | | | | - Pierre Feugier
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Anne-Claire Gac
- Department of Hematology, Institut d'Hématologie de Basse Normandie, Caen, France
| | - Hannah Moatti
- Department of Hematology, CHU Paris-GH St-Louis Lariboisière F-Widal - Hôpital Saint-Louis, Paris, France
| | | | | | | | - Catherine Fortpied
- European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, Brussels, Belgium
| | - John Raemaekers
- Department of Hematology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Massimo Federico
- CHIMOMO Department, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Policlinico, Modena, Italy
| | - Salim Kanoun
- Nuclear Medecine Unit, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Michel Meignan
- LYSA Imaging, University Hospital H Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Alexandra Traverse-Glehen
- Department of Pathology, Centre Hospitalier Lyon Sud and Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre-Bénite, France and
| | | | - René-Olivier Casasnovas
- Department of Hematology, Dijon-Bourgogne University Hospital, Dijon, France,INSERM 1231, University of Burgundy Franche-Comté, Franche-Comté, France
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Shbib Dabaja B, Boyce-Fappiano D, Dong W, Damron E, Fang P, Gunther J, Rodriguez MA, Strati P, Steiner R, Nair R, Lee H, Abou Yehia Z, Shihadeh F, Pinnix C, Ng AK. Second Malignancies in Patients with Hodgkin’s Lymphoma: Half a Century of Experience. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2022; 35:64-69. [PMID: 35601797 PMCID: PMC9121058 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2022.04.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2021] [Revised: 04/07/2022] [Accepted: 04/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Therapeutic improvements for Hodgkin’s Lymphoma (HL) has resulted in excellent survival outcomes. Thus, patients are increasing susceptible to developing secondary malignancy (SM) a feared iatrogenic complication. Materials & Methods We evaluated the SM risk in a cohort of patients with HL treated over a 50-year period. In total, 1653 patients were treated for HL from 1956 to 2009 at a tertiary-cancer-center. A cumulative incidence function was used to quantify SM risk and the Fine and Gray competing risk model was used to identify disease and treatment related correlates. Results Two-hundred-ninety patients (19%) developed SMs. Paradoxically, SM risk was higher in the modern era with 20-year cumulative incidence rates of 11.1%, 11.9%, 17% and 21.8%, for patients treated <1970, 1971–1986, 1986–1995 and 1996–2009, respectively. We hypothesized that the disproportionately high rate of early deaths in the early era may skew the assessment of SM risks, a much-delayed event. When the analysis was restricted to patients with early-stage favorable HL treated >1980, we found a reversal of the trend, especially on the risk of solid tumor, with a hazard ratio of 0.57 (p = 0.0651) in patients treated after 1996. Conclusion Our findings highlight the limitations of comparing the risk of a late event between groups with disparate rates of early deaths, despite the use of a competing risk model. When partially corrected for, patients treated in the more recent time period experienced a lower solid tumor risk.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bouthaina Shbib Dabaja
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
- Corresponding author at: Department of Radiation Oncology, Division of Radiation Oncology Incident Commander, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Director of Research of the International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group (ILROG), 1515 Holcombe Blvd., Houston, TX 77030, USA.
| | - David Boyce-Fappiano
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Wenli Dong
- Departments of Biostatistics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ethan Damron
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Penny Fang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jill Gunther
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Maria A. Rodriguez
- Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Paolo Strati
- Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Raphael Steiner
- Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ranjit Nair
- Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Hun Lee
- Departments of Lymphoma/Myeloma, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Zeinab Abou Yehia
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Rutgers Robertwood Johnson Medical Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Ferial Shihadeh
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Chelsea Pinnix
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Andrea K. Ng
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Dana-Farber/Brigham and Women’s Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Houston, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Waldstein C. Radiotherapy update: current role of radiotherapy in the treatment of lymphomas. memo 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s12254-022-00803-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
SummaryRadiotherapy (RT) remains an important modality in the modern treatment of lymphomas. In Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), its role is stage-dependent. In early stage favorable HL, RT is an essential component of combined treatment. In early unfavorable and advanced stage HL, RT can be omitted if patients are positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) negative after chemotherapy. In non-Hodgkin lymphomas (NHL), RT can be used as definitive treatment of indolent lymphoma. In aggressive NHL, the role of RT is limited to consolidation therapy of bulky disease, extranodal involvement and in elderly patients. Overall, technology evolved from extended fields to involved-node (INRT) and involved-site radiotherapy (ISRT), with concurrent reduction in doses. This short review summarizes current evidence and provides a future outlook with regard to the role of RT in the treatment of lymphomas.
Collapse
|
49
|
Casasnovas RO, Bouabdallah R, Brice P, Lazarovici J, Ghesquieres H, Stamatoullas A, Dupuis J, Gac AC, Gastinne T, Joly B, Bouabdallah K, Nicolas-Virelizier E, Feugier P, Morschhauser F, Sibon D, Bonnet C, Berriolo-Riedinger A, Edeline V, Parrens M, Damotte D, Coso D, André M, Meignan M, Rossi C. Positron Emission Tomography-Driven Strategy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma: Prolonged Follow-Up of the AHL2011 Phase III Lymphoma Study Association Study. J Clin Oncol 2022; 40:1091-1101. [PMID: 34990281 DOI: 10.1200/jco.21.01777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The AHL2011 study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01358747) demonstrated that a positron emission tomography (PET)-driven de-escalation strategy after two cycles of bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, and prednisone (BEACOPP) provides similar progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and reduces early toxicity compared with a nonmonitored standard treatment. Here, we report, with a prolonged follow-up, the final study results. METHODS Patients with advanced Hodgkin lymphoma (stage III, IV, or IIB with mediastinum/thorax ratio > 0.33 or extranodal involvement) age 16-60 years were prospectively randomly assigned between 6 × BEACOPP and a PET-driven arm after 2 × BEACOPP delivering 4 × ABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, and dacarbazine) in PET2- and 4 × BEACOPP in PET2+ patients. PET performed after four cycles of chemotherapy had to be negative to complete the planned treatment. RESULTS In total, 823 patients were enrolled including 413 in the standard arm and 410 in the PET-driven arm. With a 67.2-month median follow-up, 5-year PFS (87.5% v 86.7%; hazard ratio [HR] = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.74 to 1.57; P = .67) and OS (97.7% in both arms; HR = 1.012; 95% CI, 0.50 to 2.10; P = .53) were similar in both randomization arms. In the whole cohort, full interim PET assessment predicted patients' 5-year PFS (92.3% in PET2-/PET4-, 75.4% [HR = 3.26; 95% CI, 18.3 to 5.77] in PET2+/PET4- and 46.5% [HR = 12.4; 95% CI, 7.31 to 19.51] in PET4+ patients, respectively; P < .0001) independent of international prognosis score. Five-year OS was also affected by interim PET results, and PET2+/PET4- patients (93.5%; HR = 3.3; 95% CI, 1.07 to 10.1; P = .036) and PET4+ patients (91.9%; HR = 3.756; 95% CI, 1.07 to 13.18; P = .038) had a significant lower OS than PET2-/PET4- patients (98.2%). Twenty-two patients (2.7%) developed a second primary malignancy, 13 (3.2%) and 9 (2.2%) in the standard and experimental arms, respectively. CONCLUSION The extended follow-up confirms the continued efficacy and favorable safety of AHL2011 PET-driven strategy, which is noninferior to standard six cycles of BEACOPP. PET4 provides additional prognostic information to PET2 and allows identifying patients with particularly poor prognosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- René-Olivier Casasnovas
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital F. Mitterrand and Inserm UMR 1231, Dijon, France
| | - Reda Bouabdallah
- Department of Hematology, Institut P. Calmette, Marseille, France.,Department of Hematology, Hopital privé de Provence, Aix en Provence, France
| | - Pauline Brice
- Department of Hematology, APHP, Hopital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | | | - Hervé Ghesquieres
- Department of Hematology, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Centre Hospitalier Lyon-Sud, et Université Claude Bernard Lyon-1, Pierre Bénite, France
| | | | - Jehan Dupuis
- Lymphoid Malignancies Unit, Henri Mondor University Hospital, Créteil, France
| | - Anne-Claire Gac
- Department of Hematology, Institut d'hématologie de basse normandie, Caen, France
| | - Thomas Gastinne
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Nantes, Nantes, France
| | - Bertrand Joly
- Department of Hematology, Hospital Sud Francilien, Corbeille-Essonnes, France
| | - Krimo Bouabdallah
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | | | - Pierre Feugier
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital of Nancy, Vandoeuvre les Nancy, France
| | - Franck Morschhauser
- Department of Hematology, CHU Lille, Unité GRITA, Université de Lille 2, Lille, France
| | - David Sibon
- Department of Hematology, Hopital Necker, Paris, France
| | | | | | - Véronique Edeline
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hopital R. Huguenin, Institut Curie, St-Cloud, France
| | - Marie Parrens
- Department of Pathology, University Hospital of Bordeaux and Inserm UMR 1053, Bordeaux, France
| | - Diane Damotte
- Department of Pathology, Université de Paris et GH Paris Centre APHP, Paris, France
| | - Diane Coso
- Department of Hematology, Institut P. Calmette, Marseille, France
| | - Marc André
- Department of Hematology, CHU UCL Namur, Université catholique de Louvain, Yvoir, Belgium.,Pole Mont, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Michel Meignan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital H. Mondor, Creteil, France
| | - Cédric Rossi
- Department of Hematology, University Hospital F. Mitterrand and Inserm UMR 1231, Dijon, France
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Bröckelmann PJ, Borchmann P. Navigating increasingly individualised Hodgkin lymphoma treatments to optimally balance risks and benefits. Br J Haematol 2022; 197:515-517. [PMID: 35262911 DOI: 10.1111/bjh.18130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Accepted: 02/23/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Bröckelmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany.,Mildred Scheel School of Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Düsseldorf (MSSO ABCD), Cologne, Germany.,Max Planck Research Group Mechanisms of DNA Repair, Max Planck Institute for Biology of Ageing, Cologne, Germany
| | - Peter Borchmann
- Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department I of Internal Medicine, Center for Integrated Oncology Aachen Bonn Cologne Duesseldorf (CIO ABCD), University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.,German Hodgkin Study Group (GHSG), Cologne, Germany
| |
Collapse
|