Differential Roles of Extracellular Histidine Residues of GPR68 for Proton-Sensing and Allosteric Modulation by Divalent Metal Ions

Molecular basis of proton-sensing by G protein-coupled receptors

Three proton-sensing G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), GPR4, GPR65, and GPR68, respond to changes in extracellular pH to regulate diverse physiology and are implicated in a wide range of diseases. A central challenge in determining how protons activate these receptors is identifying the set of residues that bind protons. Here, we determine structures of each receptor to understand the spatial arrangement of putative proton sensing residues in the active state. With a newly developed deep mutational scanning approach, we determined the functional importance of every residue in proton activation for GPR68 by generating ~9,500 mutants and measuring effects on signaling and surface expression. This unbiased screen revealed that, unlike other proton-sensitive cell surface channels and receptors, no single site is critical for proton recognition in GPR68. Instead, a network of titratable residues extend from the extracellular surface to the transmembrane region and converge on canonical class A GPCR activation motifs to activate proton-sensing GPCRs. More broadly, our approach integrating structure and unbiased functional interrogation defines a new framework for understanding the rich complexity of GPCR signaling.

Protons taken hostage: Dynamic H-bond networks of the pH-sensing GPR68

Proton-sensing G Protein Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) sense changes in the extracellular pH to effect cell signaling for cellular homeostasis. They tend to be overexpressed in solid tumors associated with acidic extracellular pH, and are of direct interest as drug targets. How proton-sensing GPCRs sense extracellular acidification and activate upon protonation change is important to understand, because it may guide the design of therapeutics. Lack of publicly available experimental structures make it challenging to discriminate between conflicting mechanisms proposed for proton-binding, as main roles have been assigned to either an extracellular histidine cluster or to an internal carboxylic triad. Here we present a protocol to derive and evaluate structural models of the proton-sensing GPR68. This approach integrates state-of-the-art homology modeling with microsecond-timescale atomistic simulations, and with a detailed assessment of the compatibility of the structural models with known structural features of class A GPCRs. To decipher structural elements of potential interest for protonation-coupled conformational changes of GPR68, we used the best-compatible model as a starting point for independent atomistic simulations of GPR68 with different protonation states, and graph computations to characterize the response of GPR68 to changes in protonation. We found that GPR68 hosts an extended hydrogen-bond network that inter-connects the extracellular histidine cluster to the internal carboxylic triad, and which can even reach groups at the cytoplasmic G-protein binding site. Taken together, results suggest that GPR68 relies on dynamic, hydrogen-bond networks to inter-connect extracellular and internal proton-binding sites, and to elicit conformational changes at the cytoplasmic G-protein binding site.

Interplay between local protein interactions and water bridging of a proton antenna carboxylate cluster

Proteins that bind protons at cell membrane interfaces often expose to the bulk clusters of carboxylate and histidine sidechains that capture protons transiently and, in proton transporters, deliver protons to an internal site. The protonation-coupled dynamics of bulk-exposed carboxylate clusters, also known as proton antennas, is poorly described. An essential open question is how water-mediated bridges between sidechains of the cluster respond to protonation change and facilitate transient proton storage. To address this question, here I studied the protonation-coupled dynamics at the proton-binding antenna of PsbO, a small extrinsinc subunit of the photosystem II complex, with atomistic molecular dynamics simulations and systematic graph-based analyses of dynamic protein and protein-water hydrogen-bond networks. The protonation of specific carboxylate groups is found to impact the dynamics of their local protein-water hydrogen-bond clusters. Regardless of the protonation state considered for PsbO, carboxylate pairs that can sample direct hydrogen bonding, or bridge via short hydrogen-bonded water chains, anchor to nearby basic or polar protein sidechains. As a result, carboxylic sidechains of the hypothesized antenna cluster are part of dynamic hydrogen bond networks that may rearrange rapidly when the protonation changes.

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) enhances cAMP production in human TDAG8-expressing cells

Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA) is a chelating agent that binds tightly to metal ions. We found that cAMP response element (CRE)-driven promoter activity by protons was enhanced by EDTA in human T-cell death-associated gene 8 (TDAG8)-overexpressed HEK293T cells. The enhancing action by EDTA was also detected by proton-induced cAMP production that is located upstream from the CRE-driven promoter activity even at physiological proton concentration pH7.4. The proton-induced CRE-driven promoter activity was not enhanced by other chelating agents, ethylene glycol tetraacetic acid (EGTA) and sodium citrate. The enhanced CRE-driven promoter activity by EDTA was not attenuated by increasing the extracellular calcium ion concentration. These results indicate that the EDTA-enhancing action may not be due to its chelating action but might rather be another EDTA-specific effect. Enhanced cAMP production by EDTA was also detected in a human leukemia cell line HL-60, in which TDAG8 and OGR1 (ovarian cancer G-protein-coupled receptor 1) were endogenously expressed, suggesting that the medical use of EDTA would influence the physiological and pathophysiological functions of hematopoietic cells.

pH and proton-sensitive receptors in brain ischemia

Extracellular proton concentration is at 40 nM when pH is 7.4. In disease conditions such as brain ischemia, proton concentration can reach µM range. To respond to this increase in extracellular proton concentration, the mammalian brain expresses at least three classes of proton receptors. Acid-sensing ion channels (ASICs) are the main neuronal cationic proton receptor. The proton-activated chloride channel (PAC), which is also known as (aka) acid-sensitive outwardly rectifying anion channel (ASOR; TMEM206), mediates acid-induced chloride currents. Besides proton-activated channels, GPR4, GPR65 (aka TDAG8, T-cell death-associated gene 8), and GPR68 (aka OGR1, ovarian cancer G protein-coupled receptor 1) function as proton-sensitive G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Though earlier studies on these GPCRs mainly focus on peripheral cells, we and others have recently provided evidence for their functional importance in brain injury. Specifically, GPR4 shows strong expression in brain endothelium, GPR65 is present in a fraction of microglia, while GPR68 exhibits predominant expression in brain neurons. Here, to get a better view of brain acid signaling and its contribution to ischemic injury, we will review the recent findings regarding the differential contribution of proton-sensitive GPCRs to cerebrovascular function, neuroinflammation, and neuronal injury following acidosis and brain ischemia.

Role of proton-activated G protein-coupled receptors in pathophysiology

Local acidification is a common feature of many disease processes such as inflammation, infarction, or solid tumor growth. Acidic pH is not merely a sequelae of disease but contributes to recruitment and regulation of immune cells, modifies metabolism of parenchymal, immune and tumor cells, modulates fibrosis, vascular permeability, oxygen availability and consumption, invasiveness of tumor cells, and impacts on cell survival. Thus, multiple pH-sensing mechanisms must exist in cells involved in these processes. These pH-sensors play important roles in normal physiology and pathophysiology, and hence might be attractive targets for pharmacological interventions. Among the pH-sensing mechanisms, OGR1 (GPR68), GPR4 (GPR4), and TDAG8 (GPR65) have emerged as important molecules. These G protein-coupled receptors are widely expressed, are upregulated in inflammation and tumors, sense changes in extracellular pH in the range between pH 8 and 6, and are involved in modulating key processes in inflammation, tumor biology, and fibrosis. This review discusses key features of these receptors and highlights important disease states and pathways affected by their activity.

Physiological relevance of proton-activated GPCRs

The detection of H⁺ concentration variations in the extracellular milieu is accomplished by a series of specialized and non-specialized pH-sensing mechanisms. The proton-activated G protein–coupled receptors (GPCRs) GPR4 (Gpr4), TDAG8 (Gpr65), and OGR1 (Gpr68) form a subfamily of proteins capable of triggering intracellular signaling in response to alterations in extracellular pH around physiological values, i.e., in the range between pH 7.5 and 6.5. Expression of these receptors is widespread for GPR4 and OGR1 with particularly high levels in endothelial cells and vascular smooth muscle cells, respectively, while expression of TDAG8 appears to be more restricted to the immune compartment. These receptors have been linked to several well-studied pH-dependent physiological activities including central control of respiration, renal adaption to changes in acid–base status, secretion of insulin and peripheral responsiveness to insulin, mechanosensation, and cellular chemotaxis. Their role in pathological processes such as the genesis and progression of several inflammatory diseases (asthma, inflammatory bowel disease), and tumor cell metabolism and invasiveness, is increasingly receiving more attention and makes these receptors novel and interesting targets for therapy. In this review, we cover the role of these receptors in physiological processes and will briefly discuss some implications for disease processes.

pH-Sensing G Protein-Coupled Receptor OGR1 (GPR68) Expression and Activation Increases in Intestinal Inflammation and Fibrosis

Local extracellular acidification occurs at sites of inflammation. Proton-sensing ovarian cancer G-protein-coupled receptor 1 (OGR1, also known as GPR68) responds to decreases in extracellular pH. Our previous studies show a role for OGR1 in the pathogenesis of mucosal inflammation, suggesting a link between tissue pH and immune responses. Additionally, pH-dependent signalling is associated with the progression of intestinal fibrosis. In this study, we aimed to investigate OGR1 expression and OGR1-mediated signalling in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our results show that OGR1 expression significantly increased in patients with IBD compared to non-IBD patients, as demonstrated by qPCR and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Paired samples from non-inflamed and inflamed intestinal areas of IBD patients showed stronger OGR1 IHC staining in inflamed mucosal segments compared to non-inflamed mucosa. IHC of human surgical samples revealed OGR1 expression in macrophages, granulocytes, endothelial cells, and fibroblasts. OGR1-dependent inositol phosphate (IP) production was significantly increased in CD14+ monocytes from IBD patients compared to healthy subjects. Primary human and murine fibroblasts exhibited OGR1-dependent IP formation, RhoA activation, F-actin, and stress fibre formation upon an acidic pH shift. OGR1 expression and signalling increases with IBD disease activity, suggesting an active role of OGR1 in the pathogenesis of IBD.

The evolution and mechanism of GPCR proton sensing

Of the 800 G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) in humans, only three (GPR4, GPR65, and GPR68) regulate signaling in acidified microenvironments by sensing protons (H+). How these receptors have uniquely obtained this ability is unknown. Here, we show these receptors evolved the capability to sense H+ signals by acquiring buried acidic residues. Using our informatics platform pHinder, we identified a triad of buried acidic residues shared by all three receptors, a feature distinct from all other human GPCRs. Phylogenetic analysis shows the triad emerged in GPR65, the immediate ancestor of GPR4 and GPR68. To understand the evolutionary and mechanistic importance of these triad residues, we developed deep variant profiling, a yeast-based technology that utilizes high-throughput CRISPR to build and profile large libraries of GPCR variants. Using deep variant profiling and GPCR assays in HEK293 cells, we assessed the pH-sensing contributions of each triad residue in all three receptors. As predicted by our calculations, most triad mutations had profound effects consistent with direct regulation of receptor pH sensing. In addition, we found that an allosteric modulator of many class A GPCRs, Na+, synergistically regulated pH sensing by maintaining the pKa values of triad residues within the physiologically relevant pH range. As such, we show that all three receptors function as coincidence detectors of H+ and Na+. Taken together, these findings elucidate the molecular evolution and long-sought mechanism of GPR4, GPR65, and GPR68 pH sensing and provide pH-insensitive variants that should be valuable for assessing the therapeutic potential and (patho)physiological importance of GPCR pH sensing.