Inhibition of the replication of the DNA polymerase M550V mutation variant of human hepatitis B virus by adefovir, tenofovir, L-FMAU, DAPD, penciclovir and lobucavir

Reduction Sensitive Lipid Conjugates of Tenofovir: Synthesis, Stability, and Antiviral Activity

The therapeutic value of numerous small molecules hinges on their ability to permeate the plasma membrane. This is particularly true for tenofovir (TFV), adefovir, and other antiviral nucleosides that demonstrate potent antiviral activity but poor bioavailability. Using TFV as a model substrate, we hybridized two disparate prodrug strategies to afford novel reduction-sensitive lipid conjugates of TFV that exhibit subnanomolar activity toward HIV-1 and are stable in human plasma for more than 24 h with a therapeutic index approaching 30000. These compounds significantly rival the clinically approved formulation of TFV and revitalize the potential of disulfide-bearing prodrugs which have seen limited in vitro and in vivo success since their debut over 20 years ago. We further demonstrate the utility of these conjugates as a tool to indirectly probe the enzymatic hydrolysis of phosphonomonoesters that may further advance the development of other prodrug strategies for nucleosides, peptides, and beyond.

Pharmacokinetics of fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, lamivudine, and efavirenz: results of a randomized, crossover, bioequivalence study

The objective of this study was to assess the bioequivalence between a fixed-dose combination of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate/lamivudine/efavirenz 300/300/600 mg and the individual innovator products. A randomized, balanced, open-label, two-sequence, two-treatment, two-period, single dose, crossover study in 48 healthy adults was conducted. Dosing was separated by a washout period of 32 days. Twenty-seven blood samples were collected in each period from pre-dose to 72 h post-dose. The data of 45 subjects were analyzed for pharmacokinetics and safety. Ninety percent CIs of geometric mean ratio on Cmax, AUC0–t, and AUC0-inf for tenofovir and lamivudine and on Cmax and AUC0-72 for efavirenz were within the acceptance criteria (80–125%). For tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, the Tmax, Kel, and t1/2 values for the test and reference products were 1.02 versus 0.91 h, 0.04 versus 0.04/h, 18.67 versus 18.46 h, respectively. For lamivudine, the Tmax, Kel, and t1/2 values were: 1.38 versus 1.30 h, 0.21 versus 0.19/h, 3.44 versus 3.91 h, respectively. For efavirenz, the Tmax values for the test and reference products were 3.71 and 3.65 h, respectively. Both the treatments were well tolerated. Our findings suggest that the tested formulation is bioequivalent to the innovators’ formulations, and both treatments were well tolerated.

Efficacy and safety of tenofovir-based rescue therapy for chronic hepatitis B patients with previous nucleo(s/t)ide treatment failure

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We investigated the efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF)-based treatment in chronic hepatitis B (CHB) patients who failed previous antiviral therapies.

METHODS

Seventeen patients who failed to achieve virological responses during sequential antiviral treatments were included. The patients were treated with TDF monotherapy (four patients) or a combination of TDF and lamivudine (13 patients) for a median of 42 months. Hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA and hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) were measured, and renal function was also monitored.

RESULTS

Prior to TDF therapy, 180 M, 204 I/V/S, 181 T/V, 236 T, and 184 L mutations were detected. After TDF therapy, the median HBV DNA level decreased from 4.6 log10 IU/mL to 2.0 log10 IU/mL and to 1.6 log10 IU/mL at 12 and 24 months, respectively. HBV DNA became undetectable (≤20 IU/mL) in 14.3%, 41.7%, and 100% of patients after 12, 24, and 48 months of treatment, respectively. HBeAg loss was observed in two patients. Viral breakthrough occurred in five patients who had skipped their medication. No significant changes in renal function were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF-based rescue treatment is effective in reducing HBV DNA levels and is safe for patients with CHB who failed prior antiviral treatments. Patients' adherence to medication is related to viral rebound.

Systemic and Renal Pharmacokinetics of Adefovir and Tenofovir Upon Coadministration

Adefovir and tenofovir are nucleotide analogs that undergo renal secretion by the human renal organic anion transporter. The pharmacokinetics of tenofovir and adefovir following the administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil alone and together were determined in 24 healthy subjects in an 8-day, open-label, fixed-sequence study. Subjects received oral doses of adefovir dipivoxil on days 1 and 8 and oral doses of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate on days 2 to 8. Pharmacokinetic sampling was performed on days 1, 7, and 8. The plasma pharmacokinetics of tenofovir and adefovir were unaltered upon coadministration. Furthermore, the renal clearances (CLrenal) of tenofovir and adefovir were unaffected by their coadministration. The plasma Cmax values of tenofovir and adefovir were 33-fold and 340-fold lower than their Km values for the human renal organic anion transporter. These results demonstrate that coadministration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil does not result in substantial changes to their individual pharmacokinetic profiles.

Differentiated umbilical cord matrix stem cells as a new in vitro model to study early events during hepatitis B virus infection

The role of cell differentiation state on hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication has been well demonstrated, whereas how it determines cell susceptibility to HBV entry is far less understood. We previously showed that umbilical cord matrix stem cells (UCMSC) can be differentiated towards hepatocyte-like cells in vitro. In this study we infected undifferentiated (UD-) and differentiated (D-) UCMSCs with HBV and studied the infection kinetics, comparing them to primary human hepatocytes (PHHs). UD-UCMSCs, although permissive to viral binding, had a very limited uptake capacity, whereas D-UCMSCs showed binding and uptake capabilities similar to PHHs. Likewise, asialoglycoprotein receptor (ASGPR) was up-regulated in UCMSCs upon differentiation. In D-UCMSCs, a dose-dependent inhibition of HBV binding and uptake was observed when ASGPR was saturated with known specific ligands. Subsequent viral replication was shown in D-UCMSCs but not in UD-UCMSCs. Susceptibility of UCMSCs to viral replication correlated with the degree of differentiation. Replication efficiency was low compared to PHHs, but was confirmed by (1) a dose-dependent inhibition by specific antiviral treatment using tenofovir; (2) the increase of viral RNAs along time; (3) de novo synthesis of viral proteins; and (4) secretion of infectious viral progeny.

CONCLUSION

UCMSCs become supportive of the entire HBV life cycle upon in vitro hepatic differentiation. Despite low replication efficiency, D-UCMSCs proved to be fully capable of HBV uptake. Overall, UCMSCs are a unique human, easily available, nontransformed, in vitro model of HBV infection that could prove useful to study early infection events and the role of the cell differentiation state on such events.

Medicinal Chemistry of Nucleoside Phosphonate Prodrugs for Antiviral Therapy

Considerable attention has been focused on the development of phosphonate-containing drugs for application in many therapeutic areas. However, phosphonate diacids are deprotonated at physiological pH and thus phosphonate-containing drugs are not ideal for oral administration, an extremely desirable requisite for the treatment of chronic diseases. To overcome this limitation several prodrug structures of biologically active phosphonate analogues have been developed. The rationale behind the design of such agents is to achieve temporary blockade of the free phosphonic functional group until their systemic absorption and delivery, allowing the release of the active drug only once at the target. In this paper, an overview of acyclic and cyclic nucleoside phosphonate prodrugs, designed as antiviral agents, is presented.

Long-term outcome of primary non-responders to tenofovir therapy in HIV/HBV-co-infected patients: impact of HBV genotype G

AIM

To evaluate the early virological response (EVR) to combined tenofovir-lamivudine or emtricitabine regimen in HBV/HIV-co-infected patients and the long-term efficacy of tenofovir.

METHODS

In this retrospective monocentric study, among the 166 HIV/HBV-co-infected patients regularly followed from 2003 to 2008 at Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital, 61 patients had received, either de novo combination therapy with tenofovir and lamivudine or emtricitabine (group I, n = 15) or add-on tenofovir to lamivudine therapy (group II, n = 46). The HBV polymerase region was sequenced and analysed for all patients with available samples.

RESULTS

All 15 group I patients achieved EVR vs 32 (82%) of group II patients (P = 0.15). Seven adherent group II patients met criteria for primary non-response, but achieved delayed response (DR) to therapy. In these seven patients, when compared with the 39 group II patients, there was a trend to longer duration of lamivudine pre-treatment and to higher rate of lamivudine-resistant mutants; and HBV genotype-G proportion was higher (P = 0.026). No virological breakthrough occurred after a median of 46 months follow up.

CONCLUSION

In these HBV/HIV-co-infected patients, first-line HBV therapy with tenofovir and emtricitabine or lamivudine was associated with EVR. However, DR to tenofovir was observed in 15% of patients who added tenofovir to lamivudine therapy, of whom four of seven (57%) had genotype G-HBV infection. No resistance was evidenced after 46 months of therapy even in patients with DR to tenofovir. At last, a good renal safety profile of TDF was observed after a median follow-up of 4 years of therapy.

Current Antiviral Therapy of Chronic Hepatitis B: Efficacy and Safety

The treatment of chronic hepatitis B is in constant evolution. Interferon, the first agent licensed for chronic hepatitis B treatment, has been superseded by the growing popularity of nucleoside/nucleotide analogues (NA). However, resistance to these agents is a major challenge. Newer NAs, such as entecavir and tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate, have very low resistance rates and favorable safety profiles. Long-term use of these agents can effectively suppress hepatitis B virus DNA, leading to decrease in incidence of hepatitic flares, as well as in the development of cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. The efficacy and safety of various antiviral agents is discussed in this review.

Telbivudine in combination with adefovir versus adefovir monotherapy in HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-resistant chronic hepatitis B

PURPOSE

Lamivudine (LAM) resistance is common on lamivudine monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B. This study examined the safety and efficacy of telbivudine (LDT) given with adefovir (ADV) versus ADV monotherapy in patients with chronic, lamivudine-resistant HBV infection.

METHODS

An open-label, 96 week study with planned recruitment of 150 HBeAg-positive, lamivudine-experienced Asian patients with a confirmed YMDD resistance mutation, randomized 1:1 to receive ADV alone or with LDT. The study was terminated early due to difficulty in enrolling monotherapy patients. At termination, 42 patients had received study medication for 8-61 weeks. Due to incomplete enrolment, summary statistics only were prepared, without significance testing.

RESULTS

A total of 42 patients underwent rescue therapy (switch to ADV or LDT + ADV; n = 21 per group). Median treatment duration was 48 weeks in both groups. HBV DNA changes from baseline were greater in the LDT + ADV arm at all time points (Week 48: -7.4 log10 vs. -4.9 log10 copies/ml), and serum DNA was undetectable (<300 copies/mL) at week 48 in 38.5% (5/13) on LDT + ADV versus 0% (0/9) on ADV monotherapy Two patients (9.6%) on ADV monotherapy experienced virologic breakthrough without evidence of ADV resistance, but none on LDT + ADV; and no confirmed ADV resistance was observed in any on-treatment sample. HBeAg loss occurred in three patients on LDT + ADV and one patient on ADV monotherapy through week 48. Safety profiles were similar between the arms.

CONCLUSION

LDT + ADV combination treatment showed better outcomes against lamivudine resistant HBV than ADV alone, with a similar safety profile.

Management of HIV and hepatitis virus coinfection

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Liver disease related to infection with hepatitis C virus (HCV) and/or hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a frequent cause of morbidity and mortality in those infected with the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in this era of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART). Although progress has been made in the treatment of HBV and HCV in the setting of HIV-coinfection, there is a lack of data in certain areas and several aspects of the management are unclear at this time.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

Available data on the treatment of HBV and HCV infections, especially in the HIV-coinfected patient, are presented. Practical aspects of the management of these patients are reviewed, including diagnosis, treatment indications, monitoring, and toxicities. The impact of HAART on liver disease, end-stage-liver disease, and new therapeutic approaches are also reviewed.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

There are two modalities for the treatment of chronic HBV infection: interferon and nucleos(t)ide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTI). The latter is the mainstream of therapy for HIV-HBV-coinfected patients. The double antiviral activity of NRTI requires coordination and careful selection of treatment for both viruses to avoid selection of resistance mutations and toxicity. Combination of pegylated interferon and ribavirin, the current standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, has significant toxicity and limited efficacy in HIV-HCV-coinfected individuals. Oral anti-HCV treatments are currently under development and need to be studied in the HIV-coinfected population. Liver transplantation has a better outcome in HBV- than in HCV-HIV-coinfected patients. HAART seems to have a positive impact on the liver disease of HBV- and/or HCV-coinfected subjects but the CD4 threshold above which the benefit might take place is unknown at this time.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Anti-HBV treatment in the HIV-coinfected patient relies on the available NRTIs with activity against both viruses. Whereas HBV suppression can be achieved with this approach, toxicities and the selection of HBV-resistant variants result in challenging clinical scenarios. Current anti-HCV treatment (pegylated interferon and ribavirin) has limited efficacy in the HIV-coinfected patient, and STAT-C drugs are eagerly awaited.

Unsuccessful therapy with adefovir and entecavir-tenofovir in a patient with chronic hepatitis B infection with previous resistance to lamivudine: a fourteen-year evolution of hepatitis B virus mutations

Background

Complex mutants can be selected under sequential selective pressure by HBV therapy. To determine hepatitis B virus genomic evolution during antiviral therapy we characterized the HBV quasi-species in a patient who did no respond to therapy following lamivudine breakthrough for a period of 14 years.

Case Presentation

The polymerase and precore/core genes were amplified and sequenced at determined intervals in a period of 14 years. HBV viral load and HBeAg/Anti-HBe serological profiles as well as amino transferase levels were also measured. A mixture of lamivudine-resistant genotype A2 HBV strains harboring the rtM204V mutation coexisted in the patient following viral breakthrough to lamivudine. The L180M+M204V dominant mutant displayed strong lamivudine-resistance. As therapy was changed to adefovir, then to entecavir, and finally to entecavir-tenofovir the viral load showed fluctuations but lamivudine-resistant strains continued to be selected, with minor contributions to the HBV quasi-species composition of additional resistance-associated mutations. At the end of the 14-year follow up period, high viral loads were predominant, with viral strains harboring the lamivudine-resistance signature rtL180M+M204V. The precore/core frame A1762T and G1764A double mutation was detected before treatment and remaining in this condition during the entire follow-up. Specific entecavir and tenofovir primary resistance-associated mutations were not detected at any time. Plasma concentrations of tenofovir indicated adequate metabolism of the drug.

Conclusions

We report the selection of HBV mutants carrying well-defined primary resistance mutations that escaped lamivudine in a fourteen-year follow-up period. With the exception of tenofovir resistance mutations, subsequent unselected primary resistance mutations were detected as minor populations into the HBV quasispecies composition during adefovir or entecavir monotherapies. Although tenofovir is considered an appropriate therapeutic alternative for the treatment of entecavir-unresponsive patients, its use was not effective in the case reported here.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B monoinfection

INTRODUCTION

Resistance in nucleoside/nucleotide analog (NA) therapy has always been a challenge in the management of chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

CLINICAL STUDIES

Initially developed for the treatment of HIV infection, early in vitro and clinical observational studies had shown tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to be also active against CHB. Recent data from various multicenter phase 3 and 4 clinical trials have confirmed TDF being able to achieve a high viral suppression in both NA-naive and -experienced CHB patients. There are also emerging data on the efficacy of TDF in decompensated CHB. Although there are in vitro studies identifying certain mutation loci associated with a reduced susceptibility to TDF, there have so far been no reports of virologic resistance to TDF in clinical studies. TDF has a favorable safety profile, although more long-term data would be needed.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF has the makings of an "ideal" first-line drug for the treatment of CHB.

Advances in treatment of HBV-related liver failure with nucleoside analogues

Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a common cause of liver failure in China. The mortality of fulminant hepatitis B is more than 70%. Adoption of antiviral therapy or not on the basis of comprehensive treatment has become a hot topic of recent research of treatment of fulminant hepatitis B, which causes liver failure in a way different from other reasons. HBV replication plays a critical role in initiating the development of fulminant hepatitis B. Reducing viral load to alleviate excessive immune response by antiviral therapy represents a new idea for the treatment of fulminant hepatitis B. The advent of nucleoside analogues makes it possible to conduct antiviral therapy against fulminant hepatitis B. This article summarizes recent advances in treatment of HBV-related liver failure with nucleoside analogues.

Current therapeutic strategies for recurrent hepatitis B virus infection after liver transplantation

Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related liver disease is the leading indication for liver transplantation (LT) in Asia, especially in China. With the introduction of hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) and oral antiviral drugs, the recurrent HBV infection rate after LT has been evidently reduced. However, complete eradication of recurrent HBV infection after LT is almost impossible. Recurrent graft infection may lead to rapid disease progression and is a frequent cause of death within the first year after LT. At present, the availability of new oral medications, especially nucleoside or nucleotide analogues such as adefovir dipivoxil, entecavir and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, further strengthens our ability to treat recurrent HBV infection after LT. Moreover, since combined treatment with HBIG and antiviral agents after liver re-transplantation may play an important role in improving the prognosis of recurrent HBV infection, irreversible graft dysfunction secondary to recurrent HBV infection in spite of oral medications should no longer be considered an absolute contraindication for liver re-transplantation. Published reviews focusing on the therapeutic strategies for recurrent HBV infection after LT are very limited. In this article, the current therapeutic strategies for recurrent HBV infection after LT and evolving new trends are reviewed to guide clinical doctors to choose an optimal treatment plan in different clinical settings.

Highly active antiretroviral therapy improved persistent lamivudine-resistant viremia in acute hepatitis B virus genotype Ae infection with coinfection of human immunodeficiency virus

A 57-year-old man developed acute hepatitis B virus (AHB), caused by HBV genotype Ae. Lamivudine (LAM) therapy was started at 8 months after the disease onset, because the infection was persistent, but not self-limited. Despite LAM therapy, the hepatitis became chronic. Further, virological breakthrough developed due to the emergence of LAM-resistant YMDD mutants at 11 months after LAM therapy. Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) was combined with LAM against breakthrough hepatitis at 28 months after LAM therapy. Sequential genetic analysis revealed that rtL217R, a mutation potentially diminishing the ADV efficacy, was detected before and after the combination therapy. During the follow-up period, the patient unexpectedly turned out coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) by measuring anti-HIV-1 antibody. At that time, LAM-resistant HIV mutation, M184V, had been already detected. We switched from the combination therapy with LAM plus ADV to highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART), which included tenofovir disoproxil fumarate. HAART drastically improved LAM-resistant viremia and breakthrough hepatitis as well as HIV viremia and CD4 counts. Even in Japan, HBV genotype and HIV coinfection should be determined early in the treatment of AHB, and early induction of nucleotide analogs should be taken into consideration, because the proportion of AHB patients with HBV genotype A and the number of patients horizontally coinfected with HBV and HIV are increasing.

Lack of pharmacokinetic interaction between amdoxovir and reduced- and standard-dose zidovudine in HIV-1-infected individuals

Amdoxovir (AMDX) inhibits HIV-1 containing the M184V/I mutation and is rapidly absorbed and deaminated to its active metabolite, beta-D-dioxolane guanosine (DXG). DXG is synergistic with zidovudine (ZDV) in HIV-1-infected primary human lymphocytes. A recent in silico pharmacokinetic (PK)/enzyme kinetic study suggested that ZDV at 200 mg twice a day (b.i.d.) may reduce toxicity without compromising efficacy relative to the standard 300-mg b.i.d. dose. Therefore, an intense PK clinical study was conducted using AMDX/placebo, with or without ZDV, in 24 subjects randomized to receive oral AMDX at 500 mg b.i.d., AMDX at 500 mg plus ZDV at 200 or 300 mg b.i.d., or ZDV at 200 or 300 mg b.i.d. for 10 days. Full plasma PK profiles were collected on days 1 and 10, and complete urine sampling was performed on day 9. Plasma and urine concentrations of AMDX, DXG, ZDV, and ZDV-5'-O-glucuronide (GZDV) were measured using a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Data were analyzed using noncompartmental methods, and multiple comparisons were performed on the log-transformed parameters, at steady state. Coadministration of AMDX with ZDV did not significantly change either of the plasma PK parameters or percent recovery in the urine of AMDX, DXG, or ZDV/GZDV. Larger studies with AMDX/ZDV, with a longer duration, are warranted.

Another ten stories in antiviral drug discovery (part C): "Old" and "new" antivirals, strategies, and perspectives

The ten stories told here deal with (i) ribavirin as an inhibitor of IMP dehydrogenase and (ii) ribavirin, in combination with pegylated interferon, as the present "standard of care" for hepatitis C; (iii) S-adenosylhomocysteine hydrolase inhibitors as antiviral agents; (iv) new adamantadine derivatives for the treatment of influenza A virus infections; (v) 5-substituted 2'-deoxyuridines (i.e. IDU, TFT) for the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections; (vi) acyclic guanosine analogues (e.g. acyclovir) for the treatment of HSV infections; (vii) OMP decarboxylase inhibitors (i.e. pyrazofurin) and CTP synthetase inhibitors (i.e. cyclopentenylcytosine) as possible antiviral agents; (viii) the future of cidofovir (and alkoxyalkyl esters thereof) and ST-246 as potential antipoxvirus agents; (ix) the two decade journey from tivirapine to rilpivirine in the ultimate therapy of HIV infections; and (x) the extension of the therapeutic application of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (Viread) to the treatment of hepatitis B virus infection, in addition to HIV infection.

Anti-hepatitis B virus activity in vitro of combinations of tenofovir with nucleoside/nucleotide analogues

BACKGROUND

Long-term management of some chronic hepatitis B patients might require combination therapy using drugs with distinct resistance profiles to sustain viral suppression and to reduce the resistance-associated failure. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF), approved for hepatitis B virus (HBV) and HIV-1 treatment, is active against wildtype HBV and HBV containing YMDD mutations, which confer resistance to emtricitabine (FTC), lamivudine (3TC) and telbivudine (LdT) and contribute to entecavir (ETV) resistance. We therefore evaluated the in vitro anti-HBV activity of tenofovir (TFV), the active parent drug of TDF, combined with FTC, 3TC, ETV, LdT and adefovir (AFV).

METHODS

The anti-HBV activities of the compounds were tested using the AD38 cell line that expresses wild-type HBV from a tetracycline-controllable promoter. Intracellular HBV DNA levels were quantified using real-time PCR assay and cytotoxicities were assessed with XTT assays. The antiviral data of the drug combinations were evaluated using MacSynergy analyses on the basis of the Bliss independence model as well as isobologram analyses on the basis of the Loewe additivity theory.

RESULTS

All drug combinations tested, FTC+TFV, 3TC+TFV, ETV+TFV, LdT+TFV and AFV+TFV, showed additive antiviral interactions as analysed by MacSynergy. Isobologram analyses revealed that these combination pairs were additive, with the exception of FTC+TFV, which demonstrated slight synergistic activity. No cytotoxic or antagonistic effects were observed with any of the combinations tested.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of TFV with FTC, 3TC, ETV, LdT or AFV had additive to slightly synergistic anti-HBV effects in vitro. These results support the use of TDF as a component in combination regimens with currently available anti-HBV nucleoside analogues.

Tenofovir and its potential in the treatment of hepatitis B virus

Recent literature is reviewed about treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (CHB), focusing on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF; Viread^®), among the nucleotide and nucleoside analogs. TDF pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics, activity in respect of hepatitis B virus (HBV) multi-drug-resistant mutations, efficacy in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients, and side effects are described. The most predictive response factors to TDF therapy are discussed and all available combination therapies to optimize clinical outcome in the various patient profiles are analyzed, such as compensated and/or decompensated cirrhotic patients. The use of TDF in pregnancy, and prophylaxis after exposure to HBV and post-liver transplantation are also evaluated.

[Treatment of chronic hepatitis B]

SUMMARY

In recent years, marked progress has been made in the treatment of chronic hepatitis B. Several agents have been approved: interferon alpha-(IFN), pegylated interferon alpha2a (PEG-IFN alpha2a), lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and recently, tenofovir. Each drug has advantages and limitations. IFN and PEG-IFN alpha2a have the advantage of inducing a sustained virologic response after a defined, limited course of treatment. However, these drugs are only effective in a minority of patients and have frequent side effects. Analogues have the advantage of being administered orally, with good safety profiles and a potent antiviral effect. However, these drugs need to be administered indefinitely since withdrawal of therapy is generally associated with reactivation, and a sustained response is uncommon except in HBeAg positive patients who develop HBe seroconversion. In case of HBe seroconversion, therapy should usually be continued for at least another 24 weeks. The efficacy of lamivudine is limited by the emergence of lamivudine-resistant HBV. Adefovir is associated with a moderate incidence of resistance but its antiviral effect is not optimal. Entecavir has shown to be more effective with a favourable safety profile and a low incidence of resistance. Telbivudine is more potent and has a lower rate of resistance than lamivudine but the resistance rate is significantly higher than other approved drugs. Tenofovir has a potent antiviral effect with a good resistance profile. The future of chronic hepatitis B therapy appears to be different drug combinations. Normally the advantage of drug combinations versus monotherapy should be additive or synergistic antiviral effects and a decrease in viral resistance. Unfortunately, there are few data available and none of the evaluated analogue combinations have been shown to be better than monotherapy. The only combination which has shown a synergistic effect is of pegylated interferon alpha2a with lamivudine. Therefore, combinations of pegylated interferon with the most potent analogues need to be evaluated. The ultimate goal of therapy is HBsAg seroconversion which is more often observed with interferon. Indeed, quantification of serum HBsAg will be a useful tool to predict the treatment outcome. More potent drugs and new combinations as well as understanding the mechanisms of viral resistance should be evaluated to improve the efficacy of treatment.

New antiviral choice for chronic hepatitis B: tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is an oral prodrug of tenofovir, a novel, acyclic nucleotide analogue with in vitro activity against HIV-1 and HIV-2. TDF is licensed by American Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2001 for the treatment of HIV infection. TDF is currently one of the most widely used nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) for the treatment of HIV infection. Its efficacy, favorable toxicity profile, and convenient dosing have made this drug one of the most popular first-line treatment. Numerous studies have demonstrated the use of TDF in the treatment of HIV infection. It also has been shown to be effective in HIV/HBV coinfected patients and in patients with wild-type and lamivudine-resistant strains. Accumulating evidence suggests that TDF is more potent in suppressing HBV replication. In this review, we summarize the study progress of TDF in treating HBV infection.

Selection of an entecavir-resistant mutant despite prolonged hepatitis B virus DNA suppression, in a chronic hepatitis B patient with preexistent lamivudine resistance: successful rescue therapy with tenofovir

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE

Entecavir has potent activity against hepatitis B virus. Drug resistance has not been reported in nucleoside-naïve patients and is low in lamivudine-refractory patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

A 43-year-old man was treated with lamivudine for hepatitis B e antigen-positive chronic hepatitis B. A viral breakthrough owing to a drug-resistant mutant was observed and entecavir 1 mg daily was added. After the viral load had been near the lower detection range of the PCR assay for 30 weeks, lamivudine was discontinued. The serum hepatitis B virus DNA remained low until a second viral breakthrough was observed after 45 weeks of entecavir monotherapy. Treatment was switched from entecavir to tenofovir disoproxil 245 mg daily, which resulted in a decline below 1000 copies/ml. Sequence analysis revealed the presence of rtL180M and rtM204V lamivudine-resistant-associated mutations at the start of entecavir treatment. During entecavir treatment, the rtS202G mutation was selected. Retrospective analysis revealed that during lamivudine treatment three other mutations had been selected as well, namely rtE1D, rtV207L, and rtI220L.

CONCLUSION

We describe the first case of entecavir resistance in a lamivudine-resistant patient with good initial suppression of viral replication for 70 weeks. On the basis of the data from cross-resistance and sensitivity testing in vitro and treatment outcomes, tenofovir proves to be a good treatment option for entecavir-resistant patients.

Antiviral effects of lamivudine, emtricitabine, adefovir dipivoxil, and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate administered orally alone and in combination to woodchucks with chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus infection. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2008;52:3617-3632. [PMID: 18676881 DOI: 10.1128/aac.00654-08]

Adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) are nucleotide analogs that inhibit the replication of wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) and lamivudine (3TC)-resistant virus in HBV-infected patients, including those who are coinfected with human immunodeficiency virus. The combination of ADV or TDF with other nucleoside analogs is a proposed strategy for managing antiviral drug resistance during the treatment of chronic HBV infection. The antiviral effect of oral ADV or TDF, alone or in combination with 3TC or emtricitabine (FTC), against chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) infection was evaluated in a placebo-controlled study in the woodchuck, an established and predictive model for antiviral therapy. Once-daily treatment for 48 weeks with ADV plus 3TC or TDF plus FTC significantly reduced serum WHV viremia levels from the pretreatment level by 6.2 log(10) and 6.1 log(10) genome equivalents/ml serum, respectively, followed by TDF plus 3TC (5.6 log(10) genome equivalents/ml), ADV alone (4.8 log(10) genome equivalents/ml), ADV plus FTC (one survivor) (4.4 log(10) genome equivalents/ml), TDF alone (2.9 log(10) genome equivalents/ml), 3TC alone (2.7 log(10) genome equivalents/ml), and FTC alone (2.0 log(10) genome equivalents/ml). Individual woodchucks across all treatment groups also demonstrated pronounced declines in serum WHV surface antigen, characteristically accompanied by declines in hepatic WHV replication and the hepatic expression of WHV antigens. Most woodchucks had prompt recrudescence of WHV replication after drug withdrawal, but individual woodchucks across treatment groups had sustained effects. No signs of toxicity were observed for any of the drugs or drug combinations administered. In conclusion, the oral administration of 3TC, FTC, ADV, and TDF alone and in combination was safe and effective in the woodchuck model of HBV infection.

Development of a novel mouse model to evaluate drug candidates against hepatitis B virus

Woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV)-infected woodchucks have been used for preclinical development of drugs against hepatitis B virus (HBV). However, there is no simple in vivo model to evaluate small amounts of compounds against HBV. To develop such a model, HepAD38 cells, in which HBV replication is regulated by tetracycline (tet), were grown as subcutaneous tumours in nude mice. Mice developing viraemia were then left untreated or given tet in the drinking water. In some of the mice given tet, it was removed and the mice were injected intraperitoneally with phosphate buffer saline (PBS), lamivudine (3TC), clevudine (CLV) or tenofovir dipivoxil fumarate (TDF). Virus DNA titres were measured by real-time PCR during and after drug treatment. In water-fed and PBS-injected mice, virus titres reached approximately 10(9) copies/ml serum within 35 days of HepAD38 injection, whereas in tet-treated mice, virus titres remained at 10(4)-10(5) copies/ml. HBV DNA levels were suppressed by 3TC, TDF and CLV, with the latter two drugs showing more sustained virus suppression compared with 3TC. Combination therapy with CLV plus TDF was much more effective than either drug alone in suppressing virus titre for at least 3 weeks after the end of treatment. There was no demonstrable toxicity to HepAD38 cells in drug-treated mice. Hence, a robust tet-controlled system for HBV replication in vivo was demonstrated, validated with monotherapies against HBV and shown to be useful in assessing combination therapy. This system will be useful for preclinical assessment of small amounts of single or multiple compounds against HBV in vivo.

Role of tenofovir in the treatment of chronic HBV infection

Nucleoside analogues revolutionized the treatment of chronic HBV infection and have become the most important therapeutic option within the last decade. Currently, the nucleoside analogues lamivudine, telbivudine and entecavir, and the nucleotide analogue adefovir dipivoxil, are licensed. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is another acyclic nucleotide analogue that has been successfully used in the treatment of HIV-infected patients, but has demonstrated significant antiviral activity in wild-type and lamivudine-resistant HBV infections. The use of TDF 300 mg/day leads to marked suppression of HBV replication below the detection limit in different patients groups with HBV mono- or HIV/HBV co-infection in most instances, and a remarkably high rate of hepatitis B e antigen loss and even hepatitis B surface antigen loss was found in small, uncontrolled studies. Belonging to the substance class of acyclic nucleotide analogues, TDF is not cross-resistant to nucleoside analogue resistance-associated mutations. In equal dosages, TDF has comparable antiviral potency as compared with its congender adefovir dipivoxil, but in clinical studies exhibits higher antiviral efficacy and generates a higher genetic barrier against the development of genotypic HBV resistance due to its approximately 24-fold higher dosage. Owing to the numerous newly developed compounds and as a consequence of the emerging problem of drug resistance, treatment concepts for chronic hepatitis B will certainly be modified in the future. Because of its quite favorable antiviral and safety properties, TDF will likely be highly regarded in the management of HBV infections in the future.

Short communication cellular pharmacology of 9-(beta-D-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl) guanine and its lack of drug interactions with zidovudine in primary human lymphocytes

Amdoxovir, currently in Phase II clinical trials, is rapidly converted to 9-(beta-D-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)guanine (DXG) by adenosine deaminase in vitro and in humans. The cellular pharmacology of DXG in primary human lymphocytes, including dose-response relationships, intracellular half-life of DXG triphosphate (DXG-TP), and combination studies were determined. DXG produced high levels of DXG-TP with a long half-life (16 h) in activated human peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Since zidovudine (ZDV) and DXG select for different resistance mutations, co-formulation of the these two drugs is an attractive proposition. A combination study between DXG and ZDV showed no reduction of DXG-TP or ZDV-TP. Taken together, these results suggest that an appropriately designed DXG prodrug could be given once a day and that co-formulation with ZDV might be a possibility.

Tenofovir monotherapy is effective in hepatitis B patients with antiviral treatment failure to adefovir in the absence of adefovir-resistant mutations

BACKGROUND/AIMS

We sought to identify mutations associated with treatment failure to adefovir (ADV) and to determine virologic response to tenofovir (TDF) alone and in combination with emtricitabine (FTC) in these patients.

METHODS

Serum samples prior to and after the change in treatment to TDF/TDF+FTC from 13 patients were analyzed by direct sequencing and clonal analysis.

RESULTS

ADV-resistant mutations, rtA181V and rtN236T, were detected on direct sequencing in 3 of 8 patients who had virologic breakthrough. Among patients with suboptimal virologic response, rtA181T, rtI233V, and rtN236T were present on clonal analysis in 3 patients. Ten patients received TDF, 8 achieved virologic response. One had ADV-resistance at baseline and persistence of ADV-resistant mutations during TDF treatment, addition of FTC resulted in a further decrease in HBV DNA. Another patient had no ADV-resistance at baseline, and selection of ADV-resistant mutations during TDF treatment. All 3 patients who received TDF+FTC had undetectable HBV DNA within 3-12 months including 2 who had ADV-resistance at baseline.

CONCLUSIONS

TDF monotherapy is effective for patients with virologic breakthrough or suboptimal response to ADV, but combination therapy with a nucleoside analogue should be considered in patients with ADV-resistance. No novel mutations were detected.

Switching patients with lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B virus from tenofovir to adefovir results in less potent HBV-DNA suppression

The nucleotide analogues, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and adefovir dipivoxil, inhibit viral replication and are both effective against the hepatitis B virus (HBV). In our department, tenofovir was prescribed in addition to lamivudine for the treatment of lamivudine resistant chronic hepatitis B. After registration of adefovir, 10 patients were switched to adefovir monotherapy. We studied changes in HBV-DNA and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) in these patients. The median treatment duration with tenofovir was 78 weeks resulting in a median viral load reduction of 5.4 (range 6.8-2.3) log(10) copies/mL compared to baseline (P = 0.005). Two patients had an increase >1 log(10) copies/mL during tenofovir treatment. After the switch to adefovir, six out of 10 patients had an HBV-DNA >4 log(10) copies/mL and the median HBV-DNA increased from 2.8 to 4.5 log(10) copies/mL (P = 0.017). The factors associated with relapse were HBV-DNA PCR positivity at the time of switch and genotype B or D. ALT levels at the beginning of tenofovir treatment also might be a factor. Retreatment with tenofovir (n = 3) resulted in a rapid decline in HBV-DNA. Tenofovir is a potent antiviral drug. Switching to adefovir resulted in viral relapse in 60% of patients and retreatment with tenofovir resulted again in viral decline, which suggests that tenofovir is a more potent antiviral agent.

Evolving clinical strategies for transplantation in the HIV-positive recipient

The transplant community has been slow to recognize the efficacy of highly active antiretroviral therapy in changing the course of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection to a chronic condition. People infected with HIV are dying less often from progression of HIV to acquired immune deficiency syndrome. Unfortunately, there is an increasing rate of morbidity and mortality from comorbidities resulting in end-stage liver and kidney disease, prompting some transplant centers to eliminate HIV infection as a contraindication to transplantation. This overview will describe the evolving clinical strategies that have resulted in good outcomes after solid organ transplantation in the HIV-positive recipient.

Antiviral effect of orally administered (-)-beta-D-2-aminopurine dioxolane in woodchucks with chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus infection

(-)-beta-D-2-Aminopurine dioxolane (APD) is a nucleoside prodrug that is efficiently converted to 9-(beta-D-1,3-dioxolan-4-yl)guanine (DXG). DXG has antiviral activity in vitro against hepatitis B virus (HBV) but limited aqueous solubility, making it difficult to administer orally to HBV-infected individuals. APD is more water soluble than DXG and represents a promising prodrug for the delivery of DXG. A placebo-controlled, dose-ranging efficacy and pharmacokinetic study was conducted with woodchucks that were chronically infected with woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV). APD was efficiently converted to DXG after oral and intravenous administrations of APD, with serum concentrations of DXG being higher following oral administration than following intravenous administration, suggestive of a considerable first-pass intestinal and/or hepatic metabolism. APD administered orally at 1, 3, 10, and 30 mg/kg of body weight per day for 4 weeks produced a dose-dependent antiviral response. Doses of 3 and 10 mg/kg/day reduced serum WHV viremia by 0.4 and 0.7 log(10) copies/ml, respectively. The 30-mg/kg/day dose resulted in a more pronounced, statistically significant decline in serum WHV viremia of 1.9 log(10) copies/ml and was associated with a 1.5-fold reduction in hepatic WHV DNA. Individual woodchucks within the highest APD dose group that had declines in serum WHV surface antigen levels, WHV viremia, and hepatic WHV DNA also had reductions in hepatic WHV RNA. There was a prompt recrudescence of WHV viremia following drug withdrawal. Therefore, oral administration of APD for 4 weeks was safe in the woodchuck model of chronic HBV infection, and the effect on serum WHV viremia was dose dependent.

Hepatitis B in the HIV-Coinfected Patient

HIV and hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection share transmission patterns and risk factors; therefore, it is not surprising that the prevalence of chronic HBV infection is elevated among HIV-infected persons. HBV does not significantly affect the course of HIV disease, but HIV does alter the course of HBV. HIV-infected persons are less likely to clear acute HBV infection spontaneously, and HIV/HBV-coinfected persons face a higher risk of liver-related death than those monoinfected with either virus. The immune restoration associated with highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) can improve control of HBV replication but can also lead to increased immune-mediated liver injury. On balance, use of HAART before severe immunosuppression develops may be beneficial. Still, the complexity of HBV, HIV, and HAART interactions must be evaluated for each individual. There is a dearth of high-quality evidence about management of coinfected patients. A recent consensus conference has issued recommendations. HBV DNA thresholds for starting anti-HBV therapy are the same in coinfected and HBV-monoinfected patients. Continuing drugs with anti-HBV activity is important, because stopping such therapy has been associated with HBV reactivation. Development of resistance is a risk with the long-term maintenance therapy required in most patients.

Clevudine: a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus in vitro and in vivo

Clevudine (CLV) is a nucleoside analog of the unnatural L-configuration that has potent anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) activity in vitro and in vivo with a favorable toxicity profile in all species tested. In cell culture, CLV is readily phosphorylated to the corresponding 5'-triphosphate form of the compound. The mechanism of action of CLV involves the inhibition of the HBV polymerase by CLV 5'-triphosphate. In vivo efficacy studies performed in the duck and woodchuck models showed marked, rapid inhibition of virus replication and no significant toxicity. In the woodchuck model, there was a dose-dependent delay in viral recrudescence and a reduction or loss of covalently closed circular DNA. In Phase II clinical studies, CLV was well tolerated and exhibited potent antiviral activity at all doses investigated. In Phase III studies in both hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive and -negative patients, CLV 30 mg administered once daily demonstrated potent antiviral efficacy and significant biochemical improvement after only 24 weeks of therapy. These effects were sustained in a significant portion of the patients when therapy was stopped after 6 months with no viral rebound occurring in approximately 3 and 16% in HBeAg-positive and -negative patients, respectively. There have been no significant safety or tolerance issues associated with the drug in these studies. Future studies will investigate the safety and tolerance of CLV 30 mg given once daily over 48 weeks and longer.

Effect of switching to tenofovir with emtricitabine in patients with chronic hepatitis B failing to respond to an adefovir-containing regimen

BACKGROUND

In patients with chronic hepatitis B, long-term use of lamivudine is limited by resistance mutations. Adefovir dipivoxil has a very low rate of resistance, but there have been recent reports describing resistance mutations. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate and emtricitabine show potent activity against wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus.

METHODS

We describe a series of seven HIV-seronegative patients who failed to achieve undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir. No lamivudine resistance testing was performed. The antiviral regimen was changed to tenofovir (300 mg daily) and emtricitabine (200 mg daily). Variables collected included levels of hepatitis B viral DNA by polymerase chain reaction, alanine and aspartate aminotransferase, hepatitis B e antigen and hepatitis B e antibody.

RESULTS

The median hepatitis B viral DNA level while on adefovir was 430,000 copies/ml with a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 2.0 log10 copies/ml. Patients were on adefovir for a median period of 10 months before a change in regimen to tenofovir and emtricitabine. This regimen change resulted in a median fall in hepatitis B viral DNA levels of 3.0 log10 copies/ml (range, 2-4) after a median treatment duration of 23 months (range, 14-28). All patients (100%) had achieved undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels following combination therapy. Anti-hepatitis B e seroconversion occurred in one patient. No change in serum creatinine was observed during therapy, and no significant adverse events were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients failing to respond to adefovir monotherapy or an adefovir-containing regimen for chronic hepatitis B virus, a combination of tenofovir and emtricitabine resulted in undetectable hepatitis B viral DNA levels without any renal toxicity. Tenofovir, in combination with emtricitabine, may be an alternative treatment for those with detectable hepatitis B viral DNA on adefovir.

Treatment of chronic hepatitis B: efficacy of current drugs and prospects for the future

Chronic hepatitis B is an important clinical problem often leading to severe complications. In this review, the results obtained in the last few years with the use of current drugs, such as interferon and nucleo(t)side analogues, are summarized and the problems of obtaining a sustained remission, which is only achieved in a small number of patients, are discussed. The new approaches, such as the use of combinations of drugs, to optimize long-term tolerable treatment are also considered.

Randomized controlled study of tenofovir and adefovir in chronic hepatitis B virus and HIV infection: ACTG A5127

Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is an important cause of morbidity and mortality in subjects coinfected with HIV. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV) are licensed for the treatment of HIV-1 and HBV infection, respectively, but both have in vivo and in vitro activity against HBV. This study evaluated the anti-HBV activity of TDF compared to ADV in HIV/HBV-coinfected subjects. ACTG A5127 was a prospective randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of daily 10 mg of ADV versus 300 mg of TDF in subjects with HBV and HIV coinfection on stable ART, with serum HBV DNA >/= 100,000 copies/mL, and plasma HIV-1 RNA </= 10,000 copies/mL. This study closed early based on results of a prespecified interim review, as the primary noninferiority end point had been met without safety issues. Fifty-two subjects were randomized. At baseline, 73% of subjects had a plasma HIV-1 RNA < 50 copies/mL, 86% were HBeAg positive, 94% were 3TC resistant, median serum ALT was 52 IU/L, and 98% had compensated liver disease. The mean time-weighted average change in serum HBV DNA from baseline to week 48 (DAVG(48)) was -4.44 log(10) copies/mL for TDF and -3.21 log(10) copies/mL for ADV. There was no difference in toxicity between the 2 treatment arms, with 11 subjects (5 ADV and 6 TDF) experiencing elevations of serum ALT on treatment. In conclusion, over 48 weeks, treatment with either ADV or TDF resulted in clinically important suppression of serum HBV DNA. Both drugs are safe and efficacious for patients coinfected with HBV and HIV.

Recommendations and potential future options in the treatment of hepatitis B

The natural history of chronic hepatitis B should be clearly defined before appropriate recommendations for treatment can be advocated. In patients who acquire the disease in early life, the complications of chronic hepatitis B continue to occur as a result of prolonged insidious damage to the liver, even in the low viraemic phase. Treatment that ends with hepatitis B e antigen seroconversion with hepatitis B virus DNA levels just below 10(5) copies/ml may not be sufficient. Patients with mild elevation of alanine aminotransferase levels are already at considerable risk of developing complications. Treatment strategy should aim at maximal and prolonged viral suppression to the lowest possible hepatitis B virus DNA levels. Nucleotide/nucleoside analogues will become the mainstay of treatment. Future treatment strategic plans should target maximising antiviral potency and minimising the chance of drug resistance.

Antiretroviral therapy 2006: Pharmacology, applications, and special situations

As we approach the completion of the first 25 years of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) epidemic, there have been dramatic improvements in the care of patients with HIV infection. These have prolonged life and decreased morbidity. There are twenty currently available antiretrovirals approved in the United States for the treatment of this infection. The medications, including their pharmacokinetic properties, side effects, and dosing are reviewed. In addition, the current approach to the use of these medicines is discussed. We have included a section addressing common comorbid conditions including hepatitis B and C along with tuberculosis.

Treatment algorithm for chronic hepatitis B in HIV-infected patients

Recommendations for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) in HIV-infected patients is complex due to the lack of controlled trials and the dual activity of therapeutic agents on both viruses. Thus, proposals for optimal anti-HBV therapy in HIV-infected patients should be pragmatic using the knowledge from HBV mono- and HIV/HBV co-infected studies. There are four approved drugs for the treatment of CHB which include interferon alpha (IFN), lamivudine (LAM), entecavir (ETV) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). LAM, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and emtricitabine (FTC) are approved for HIV and active against HBV. Studies with IFN are limited in HIV/HBV co-infected patients but suggest a decreased response compared with HBV mono-infected patients. LAM and FTC are effective against HBV but are associated with a high rate of HBV resistance. ETV, ADV and TDF are effective against wild-type and LAM-resistant HBV with a favourable resistance profile shown for ADV and TDF. Interferon, ADV or ETV are the preferable drugs in HBV naive patients who do not require HIV therapy. Combination of TDF plus FTC or LAM should be proposed in patients with therapeutic indication for both viruses. TDF should be included in the anti-retroviral regiment of patients with HBV resistance to lamivudine.

Variant of hepatitis B virus with primary resistance to adefovir

The reverse-transcriptase inhibitor lamivudine (Zeffix, GlaxoSmithKline) is often used to treat chronic infection with hepatitis B virus (HBV) until resistance develops. Treatment may then be switched to the reverse-transcriptase inhibitor adefovir (Hepsera, Gilead), which has a lower frequency of resistance. Here, we describe three cases of primary adefovir resistance that were sensitive to tenofovir (Viread, Gilead). All three cases involved a rare HBV variant with a valine at position 233 of the reverse-transcriptase domain instead of isoleucine (rtI233V), as in the wild-type virus. This HBV variant also displayed resistance to adefovir and sensitivity to tenofovir in vitro.

Resistance of human hepatitis B virus to reverse transcriptase inhibitors: from genotypic to phenotypic testing

The treatment of HBV infected patients with analogues of nucleos(t)ides, including lamivudine and adefovir dipivoxil, has significantly increased the rate of anti-HBe seroconversion and therefore reduced the impact of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) on liver disease. Altogether, these antivirals have offered novel options for the treatment of patients who did not respond to previous therapy with interferon alpha, the only available treatment against CHB until 1998. However, therapies using analogues of nucleos(t)ides have been confronted with viral resistances which are often associated to with worsening of liver disease. Drug resistance is conferred by the appearance of one or several mutations within the HBV polymerase gene. These mutations confer to the mutant viral population a phenotypic advantage over the wild-type pretherapeutic viral quasispecies, as they induce a reduction of drug susceptibility of mutant strains in vivo. This reduction of drug susceptibility can be as well measured in vitro, i.e in cell culture, using phenotypic assays. The detection of these mutations has become of crucial importance to better adapt clinical option to the virological status of the patient. Genotypic and more recently phenotypic assays have been developed and both assays can be used for drug resistance testing. Genotypic assay gives information about already characterized mutations associated with viral resistance, while phenotypic testing measures the overall drug susceptibility of patient-derived viral strains in cell culture. These assays are described and their potential use in the clinical setting is discussed.

Pharmacology of current and promising nucleosides for the treatment of human immunodeficiency viruses

Nucleoside antiretroviral agents are chiral small molecules that have distinct advantages compared to other classes including long intracellular half-lives, low protein binding, sustained antiviral response when a dose is missed, and ease of chemical manufacture. They mimic natural nucleosides and target a unique but complex viral polymerase that is essential for viral replication. They remain the cornerstone of highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) and are usually combined with non-nucleoside reverse [corrected] transcriptase and protease inhibitors to provide powerful antiviral responses to prevent or delay the emergence of drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). The pharmacological and virological properties of a selected group of nucleoside analogs are described. Some of the newer nucleoside analogs have a high genetic barrier to resistance development. The lessons learned are that each nucleoside analog should be treated as a unique molecule since any structural modification, including a change in the enantiomeric form, can affect metabolism, pharmacokinetics, efficacy, toxicity and resistance profile.

Assessment and Management of Chronic Hepatitis B

An understanding of the natural history of CHB is critical for the management of the liver disease. Three clinical patterns with different clinical outcomes are recognized: HBeAg-positive CHB, HBeAg-negative CHB,and inactive CHB. Patients with elevated aminotransferase levels and HBV DNA greater than 105 viral copies per mL in serum and with features of chronic hepatitis on liver biopsy are candidates for therapy regardless of HBeAg status. Multiple host and viral factors and safety profiles of current therapies need to be considered carefully before recommending therapy. There appears to be no role for HBV genotyping in the management of patients. Three antiviral agents are approved for use against CHB infection:IFN-a, lamivudine, and adefovir. Efficacy is moderate at best and is limited by the poor tolerability of IFN and the development of resistance, coupled with concerns regarding the long-term safety with nucleoside analogs. Several new nucleoside and nucleotide analogs and novel agents are at various stages of development as potential therapies for CHB. The ideal compound would be one that is active against all replicative intermediates of the virus and has a low toxicity profile. Despite current shortcomings, the future of therapy for HBV is promising, as newer therapeutic options are being developed based on an understanding of the HBV life cycle.

Wild type and YMDD variant of hepatitis B virus: no difference in viral kinetics on lamivudine/tenofovir therapy in HIV-HBV co-infected patients

Prolonged lamivudine therapy has been identified as the major risk for the development of resistance in HBV, with rates of 90% after 4 years of treatment. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate showed activity against both wild type and lamivudine resistant HBV in HIV-HBV co-infected patients. In order to compare the efficacy of lamivudine/tenofovir treatment we investigated detailed HBV kinetics in 13 HIV-HBV co-infected patients with either wild type HBV or lamivudine resistant HBV. The viral strains in both patient groups showed a biphasic viral decline pattern. Only in the first phase of viral decay, which reflects the clearance rate of the free virus from plasma, there was a statistically significant response in favor of the wild type group. After the first phase we observed a similar viral decline till 24 weeks of both groups. This is reassuring for many pretreated co-infected patients harbouring mutant viruses.

Patterns of resistance emerging in HIV-1 from antiretroviral-experienced patients undergoing intensification therapy with tenofovir disoproxil fumarate

Study GS-99-907 was a 48-week, phase 3, double-blind, placebo-controlled intensification trial of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (tenofovir DF). Antiretroviral-experienced patients added tenofovir DF 300 mg once daily to their existing regimen. The patterns of HIV-1 resistance development and the corresponding virologic responses were evaluated in a virology substudy at week 48. Although 94% of these treatment-experienced patients had nucleoside-associated resistance mutations (NAMs) at baseline, addition of tenofovir DF resulted in a mean reduction in viral load of -0.59 log10 copies/mL after 24 weeks that was durable through 48 weeks. Relative to the placebo-controlled arm, patients in the tenofovir DF arm had a reduced frequency of development of resistance mutations to all classes of HIV-1 inhibitors, with reduction in new protease inhibitor (PI)-associated mutations achieving statistical significance. The K65R mutation, which occurred in 8 patients (3%), was the only emergent mutation directly associated with tenofovir DF therapy. New thymidine analogue-associated mutations (TAMs) emerged in 19% of patients by week 48. Other than K65R, the patterns of mutations that developed were not significantly different between the tenofovir DF and placebo control arms, suggesting that the background therapies caused their development. The K65R mutation emerged only in patients with no detectable TAMs at baseline, whereas new TAMs developed similarly between patients with or without TAMs at baseline. Development of K65R was associated with mostly low-level changes in phenotypic susceptibility to tenofovir DF and other nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and was not associated with viral load rebound. No novel patterns of genotypic or phenotypic resistance to tenofovir were identified. Therefore, intensification with once-daily tenofovir DF therapy resulted in a sustained reduction in HIV-1 viral load and a low risk for development of the K65R mutation in this treatment-experienced patient population.

Successful treatment with tenofovir in a child C cirrhotic patient with lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus awaiting liver transplantation. Post-transplant results

Antiviral treatment can be complex in decompensated hepatitis B virus (HBV) cirrhosis because of potential emergence of lamivudine-resistant mutants and worsening liver function, and to multifactorial nephrotoxicity. Negative HBV-DNA status by hybridization before liver transplantation is a favorable prognostic factor. We present the case of a 54-year-old HBV+ liver transplantation candidate who, after testing negative for HBV-DNA, developed YMDD lamivudine-resistant mutants resulting in a deteriorated clinical condition. After 8 months of adefovir plus lamivudine double therapy, only partial response was achieved. Tenofovir was added to this regimen, and an early decline of HBV-DNA was seen at 4 weeks without adverse events. The patient underwent transplantation. At 21-month postoperative follow-up, the patient's outcome was excellent. Post-transplantation HBV prophylaxis, taking into account the prior development of mutants, consists of hepatitis B immunoglobulin plus lamivudine and adefovir. Tenofovir was well tolerated and produced a fast antiviral response, suggesting its potential value in combined antiviral treatment for liver transplantation candidates.

Antiviral effect of oral administration of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate in woodchucks with chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus infection

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) is a nucleotide analogue approved for treatment of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. TDF also has been shown in vitro to inhibit replication of wild-type hepatitis B virus (HBV) and lamivudine-resistant HBV mutants and to inhibit lamivudine-resistant HBV in patients and HBV in patients coinfected with the HIV. Data on the in vivo efficacy of TDF against wild-type virus in non-HIV-coinfected or lamivudine-naïve chronic HBV-infected patients are lacking in the published literature. The antiviral effect of oral administration of TDF against chronic woodchuck hepatitis virus (WHV) infection, an established and predictive animal model for antiviral therapy, was evaluated in a placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study (doses, 0.5 to 15.0 mg/kg of body weight/day). Four weeks of once-daily treatment with TDF doses of 0.5, 1.5, or 5.0 mg/kg/day reduced serum WHV viremia significantly (0.2 to 1.5 log reduction from pretreatment level). No effects on the levels of anti-WHV core and anti-WHV surface antibodies in serum or on the concentrations of WHV RNA or WHV antigens in the liver of treated woodchucks were observed. Individual TDF-treated woodchucks demonstrated transient declines in WHV surface antigen serum antigenemia and, characteristically, these woodchucks also had transient declines in serum WHV viremia, intrahepatic WHV replication, and hepatic expression of WHV antigens. No evidence of toxicity was observed in any of the TDF-treated woodchucks. Following drug withdrawal there was prompt recrudescence of WHV viremia to pretreatment levels. It was concluded that oral administration of TDF for 4 weeks was safe and effective in the woodchuck model of chronic HBV infection.

Selection of Hepatitis B Virus Polymerase Mutations in HIV-Coinfected Patients Treated with Tenofovir

Background

Tenofovir (TDF) is an adenosine nucleotide analogue that has been approved for the treatment of HIV-1 infection. It also shows activity against hepatitis B virus (HBV) in patients with or without lamivudine (LAM)-associated mutations. Development of clinical or virological HBV breakthrough during TDF therapy has not been reported so far. The aim of this study was to analyse the HBV polymerase (pol) from HIV/HBV-coinfected patients with detectable serum levels of HBV DNA during treatment with TDF for longer than 6 months.

Methods

The HBV pol was sequenced from 43 patient's serum before and during TDF therapy. Phenotypic analyses were performed using HBV replication-competent plasmids carrying unique mutations selected under TDF therapy.

Results

Mean exposure to LAM was 35.3 ±27.5 months and to TDF 11.2 ±6.7 months. Genotypic analyses from 21 of the patients revealed LAM-associated mutations, and a further two patients developed a novel mutation, rtA194T, along with LAM-resistance-associated mutations. Phenotypic analyses revealed that constructs harbouring rtA194T combined with rtL180M and rtM204V displayed an over 10-fold increase in the IC50 for TDF compared with the wild type.

Conclusion

The selection of HBV mutations in HBV/HIV-coinfected patients failing TDF therapy is an unlikely event within the first 12 months of treatment. However, HBV from two of the 43 patients treated with TDF for more than 12 months was found to contain one novel mutation located distal to the catalytic site of the HBV pol. In vitro, rtA194T conferred a reduced susceptibility to TDF in the presence of LAM-associated mutations.