1
|
Ludwig K, Scharlau U, Schneider-Koriath S. [Technique and Study Results of Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer]. Zentralbl Chir 2024; 149:169-177. [PMID: 38417815 DOI: 10.1055/a-2258-0298] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/01/2024]
Abstract
The aim of this paper was to describe the technique of laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma and to present a review of current international studies on this topic.The first part describes and documents a standard laparoscopic gastrectomy for carcinoma. In the second part, after an EMBASE and PubMed search, a total of 123 quality-relevant randomised (RCT) and non-randomised (non-RCT) studies on laparoscopic gastrectomy are identified from a primary total of 3,042 hits by systematic narrowing. The study results are then summarised conclusively for the target criteria of feasibility, outcome, oncological quality, morbidity and mortality.Both, laparoscopic subtotal resection for distal gastric carcinomas and laparoscopic gastrectomy can now be performed safely and with few complications. In a recent literature review of a total of 15 RCTs with 5,576 patients (laparoscopic 2,793 vs. open 2,756), there were no significant differences in terms of feasibility, intraoperative outcome and oncological quality (R0 and lymph node harvest). Surgical morbidity and mortality were comparable. Patients after laparoscopic surgery showed a significantly faster early postoperative recovery with a lower overall morbidity. In contrast, the operating time was significantly longer - by a mean of 45 min - compared to the open technique. The advantages of the laparoscopic technique were equally evident in studies on early gastric carcinoma and advanced carcinomas (>T2).Laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric carcinoma is safe to perform and shows better early postoperative recovery. Complication rates, morbidity and mortality as well as long-term oncological results are comparable with open surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaja Ludwig
- Chirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Uwe Scharlau
- Chirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Sylke Schneider-Koriath
- Chirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Rostock, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baretton G, Lordick F, Gaiser T, Hofheinz R, Horst D, Lorenzen S, Möhler M, Röcken C, Schirmacher P, Stahl M, Thuss-Patience P, Tiemann K. [Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract. German version]. Pathologie (Heidelb) 2024; 45:51-58. [PMID: 38170268 PMCID: PMC10827825 DOI: 10.1007/s00292-023-01215-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/09/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024]
Abstract
As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological therapy concepts, the complexity of therapy decisions and control in the area of carcinomas of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD‑1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Baretton
- Institut für Pathologie, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
| | - F Lordick
- Medizinische Klinik II (Onkologie, Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Pneumologie) und Universitäres Krebszentrum Leipzig, Universitätsmedizin Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| | - T Gaiser
- PATHOLOGIE SPEYER Gemeinschaftspraxis GbR, Speyer, Deutschland
| | - R Hofheinz
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim, Mannheim, Deutschland
| | - D Horst
- Institut für Pathologie, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - S Lorenzen
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, München, Deutschland
| | - M Möhler
- I. Medizinische Klinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - C Röcken
- Institut für Pathologie, Christian-Albrechts-Universität, Kiel, Deutschland
| | - P Schirmacher
- Pathologisches Institut, Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Deutschland
| | - M Stahl
- Klinik für Internistische Onkologie & Onkologische Palliativmedizin, KEM | Evang. Kliniken Essen-Mitte, Evang. Huyssens-Stiftung Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Deutschland
| | - P Thuss-Patience
- Charité Centrum Tumormedizin CC14, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - K Tiemann
- Institut für Hämatopathologie, Hamburg, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Baretton GB, Lordick F, Gaiser T, Hofheinz R, Horst D, Lorenzen S, Moehler M, Röcken C, Schirmacher P, Stahl M, Thuss-Patience P, Tiemann K. Standardized and quality-assured predictive PD-L1 testing in the upper gastrointestinal tract. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:16231-16238. [PMID: 37874352 PMCID: PMC10620316 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05180-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2023] [Accepted: 07/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/25/2023]
Abstract
As a result of the high approval dynamics and the growing number of immuno-oncological concepts, the complexity of treatment decisions and control in the area of cancers of the esophagus, gastroesophageal junction and stomach is constantly increasing. Since the treatment indication for PD-1 inhibitors that are currently approved in the European Union is often linked to the expression of PD-L1 (programmed cell death-ligand 1), the evaluation of tissue-based predictive markers by the pathologist is of crucial importance for treatment stratification. Even though the immunohistochemical analysis of the PD-L1 expression status is one of the best studied, therapy-relevant biomarkers for an immuno-oncological treatment, due to the high heterogeneity of carcinomas of the upper gastrointestinal tract, there are challenges in daily clinical diagnostic work with regard to implementation, standardization and interpretation of testing. An interdisciplinary group of experts from Germany has taken a position on relevant questions from daily pathological and clinical practice, which concern the starting material, quality-assured testing and the interpretation of pathological findings, and has developed recommendations for structured reporting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gustavo B Baretton
- Institute for Pathology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, TU Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, 01307, Dresden, Germany
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Medicine II (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Pulmonology) and University Cancer Center Leipzig, University of Leipzig Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany.
| | - T Gaiser
- Institute of Applied Pathology, 67346, Speyer, Germany
| | - R Hofheinz
- University Medicine Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany
| | - D Horst
- Institute of Pathology of the Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - S Lorenzen
- Department of Medicine III, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - M Moehler
- Department of Medicine I, University Medicine Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - C Röcken
- Institute of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts University, Kiel, Germany
| | - P Schirmacher
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - M Stahl
- Department of Oncology and Palliative Care, Kliniken Essen Mitte, Evangelische Huyssens-Stiftung, Essen-Huttrop, Essen, Germany
| | - P Thuss-Patience
- Charité Center of Tumor Medicine CC14, Charité Campus Virchow-University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - K Tiemann
- Institute of Hematopathology, Hamburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Steinbrück I, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL, Oyama T, Pohl J, von Hahn T, Schmidt A, Allgaier HP. Predictive Factors for the Outcome of Unsupervised Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection During the Initial Learning Curve with Prevalence-Based Indication. Dig Dis Sci 2023; 68:3614-3624. [PMID: 37421512 DOI: 10.1007/s10620-023-08026-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2023] [Accepted: 06/26/2023] [Indexed: 07/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND For an adequate educational strategy of ESD in non-Asian settings with prevalence-based indication it is essential to define adequate lesions, suitable for the beginner without on-site expert-supervision. AIMS We analyzed possible predictors for outcome parameters of effectiveness and safety during the initial learning curve. METHODS The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480), performed between 2007 and 2020 in four tertiary hospitals, were enrolled. Uni-/multivariable regression analysis was done with sex, age, pretreated lesion, lesion size, organ, and organ-based localization as possible independent predictors for en bloc resection (EBR), complication, and resection speed. RESULTS Rates of EBR, complication, and resection speed were 84.5%, 14.2%, and 6.20 (± 4.45) cm2/h. Independent predictors for EBR were pretreated lesion (OR 0.27 [0.13-0.57], p < 0.001) and non-colonic ESD (OR 2.29 [1.26-4.17] (rectum)/5.72 [2.36-13.89] (stomach)/7.80 [2.60-23.42] (esophagus), p < 0.001), for complication pretreated lesion (OR 3.04 [1.46-6.34], p < 0.001) and lesion size (OR 1.02 [1.004-1.04], p = 0.012) and for resection speed pretreated lesion (RC - 3.10 [- 4.39 to - 1.81], p < 0.001), lesion size (RC 0.13 [0.11-0.16], p < 0.001) and male patient (RC - 1.11 [- 1.85 to - 0.37], p < 0.001). We found no significant difference in the incidence of technically unsuccessful resections in esophageal (1/84), gastric (3/113), rectal (7/181), and colonic (3/101) ESDs (p = 0.76). Technical failure was mainly caused by complication and fibrosis/pretreatment. CONCLUSION During the initial learning curve of an unsupervised ESD program with prevalence-based indication, pretreated lesions and colonic ESDs should be avoided. In contrast, lesion size and organ-based localizations have less predictive value for the outcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingo Steinbrück
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany.
| | - Siegbert Faiss
- Department of Gastroenterology, Sana Klinikum Lichtenberg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Berlin, Fanningerstraße 32, 10365, Berlin, Germany
| | - Franz Ludwig Dumoulin
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Gemeinschaftskrankenhaus Bonn, Academic teaching Hospital of University of Bonn, Prinz-Albert-Straße 40, 53113, Bonn, Germany
| | - Tsuneo Oyama
- Department of Endoscopy, Saku Central Hospital Advanced Care Center, 3400-28 Nakagomi, Saku, Nagano, 3850051, Japan
| | - Jürgen Pohl
- Department of Gastroenterology, Asklepios Klinik Altona, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Paul-Ehrlich-Straße 1, 22763, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Thomas von Hahn
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endoscopy, Asklepios Klinik Barmbek, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Hamburg, Rübenkamp 220, 22307, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Arthur Schmidt
- Department of Medicine II, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, Hugstetter Straße 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Hans-Peter Allgaier
- Department of Medicine and Gastroenterology, Evangelisches Diakoniekrankenhaus Freiburg, Academic Teaching Hospital of University of Freiburg, Wirthstraße 11, 79110, Freiburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stolze T, Franke S, Haybaeck J, Moehler M, Grimminger PP, Lang H, Roth W, Gockel I, Kreuser N, Bläker H, Wittekind C, Lordick F, Vieth M, Veits L, Waidmann O, Lingohr P, Peitz U, Schildberg C, Kruschewski M, Vassos N, Goni E, Bruns CJ, Ridwelski K, Wolff S, Lippert H, Schumacher J, Malfertheiner P, Venerito M. Mismatch repair deficiency, chemotherapy and survival for resectable gastric cancer: an observational study from the German staR cohort and a meta-analysis. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:1007-1017. [PMID: 35211781 PMCID: PMC9984318 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-03953-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/21/2021] [Accepted: 02/08/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE In a post hoc analysis of the MAGIC trial, patients with curatively resected gastric cancer (GC) and mismatch repair (MMR) deficiency (MMRd) had better median overall survival (OS) when treated with surgery alone but worse median OS when treated with additional chemotherapy. Further data are required to corroborate these findings. METHODS Between April 2013 and December 2018, 458 patients with curatively resected GC, including cancers of the esophagogastric junction Siewert type II and III, were identified in the German centers of the staR consortium. Tumor sections were assessed for expression of MLH1, MSH2, MSH6 and PMS2 by immunohistochemistry. The association between MMR status and survival was assessed. Similar studies published up to January 2021 were then identified in a MEDLINE search for a meta-analysis. RESULTS MMR-status and survival data were available for 223 patients (median age 66 years, 62.8% male), 23 patients were MMRd (10.3%). After matching for baseline clinical characteristics, median OS was not reached in any subgroup. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd and MMRp had a HR of 0.67 (95% CI 0.13-3.37, P = 0.63) and 1.44 (95% CI 0.66-3.13, P = 0.36), respectively. The meta-analysis included pooled data from 385 patients. Compared to perioperative chemotherapy, patients receiving surgery alone with MMRd had an improved OS with a HR of 0.36 (95% CI 0.14-0.91, P = 0.03), whereas those with MMRp had a HR of 1.18 (95% CI 0.89-1.58, P = 0.26). CONCLUSION Our data support a positive prognostic effect for MMRd in GC patients treated with surgery only and a differentially negative prognostic effect in patients treated with perioperative chemotherapy. MMR status determined by preoperative biopsies may be used as a predictive biomarker to select patients for perioperative chemotherapy in curatively resectable GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Stolze
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S Franke
- Institute of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Haybaeck
- Institute of Pathology, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Neuropathology and Molecular Pathology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Diagnostic and Research Center for Molecular BioMedicine, Institute of Pathology, Medical University Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - M Moehler
- Department of Internal Medicine I, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - P P Grimminger
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - H Lang
- Department of General, Visceral and Transplant Surgery, Johannes Gutenberg-University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - W Roth
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - I Gockel
- Department of Medicine II and University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - N Kreuser
- Department of Medicine II and University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), Leipzig University Medical Center, Leipzig, Germany
| | - H Bläker
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - C Wittekind
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - F Lordick
- University Cancer Center Leipzig, University Hospital Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - M Vieth
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - L Veits
- Institute of Pathology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Klinikum Bayreuth, Bayreuth, Germany
| | - O Waidmann
- Department of Internal Medicine 1, Main Area Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany.,University Cancer Center, University Hospital Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - P Lingohr
- Department of General, Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - U Peitz
- Department of Gastroenterology, Raphaelshospital, Münster, Germany
| | - C Schildberg
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Brandenburg, University Hospital of Visceral Surgery, Brandenburg, Germany
| | - M Kruschewski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Hospital Frankfurt (Oder), Frankfurt (Oder), Germany
| | - N Vassos
- Division of Surgical Oncology and Thoracic Surgery, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Mannheim, University of Heidelberg, Mannheim, Germany
| | - E Goni
- Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - C J Bruns
- Department of General, Tumor and Transplantation Surgery, University Hospital Cologne, Köln, Germany
| | - K Ridwelski
- Department of General and Visceral Surgery, Municipal Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.,AN-Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - S Wolff
- Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - H Lippert
- AN-Institute of Quality Assurance in Operative Medicine, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of General, Visceral, Vascular and Transplantation Surgery, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital, Magdeburg, Germany
| | - J Schumacher
- Human Genetics Center, Philipps University of Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - P Malfertheiner
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany.,Department of Medicine II, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M Venerito
- Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Otto-von-Guericke University Hospital Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Germany. .,Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Infectious Diseases, Medizinische Fakultät der Otto-Von-Guericke-Universität, Leipziger Straße 66, 39120, Magdeburg, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Sisic L, Crnovrsanin N, Nienhueser H, Jung JO, Schiefer S, Haag GM, Bruckner T, Schneider M, Müller-Stich BP, Büchler MW, Schmidt T. Perioperative chemotherapy with 5-FU, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) for esophagogastric adenocarcinoma: ten years real-life experience from a surgical perspective. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2023; 408:81. [PMID: 36763220 PMCID: PMC9918580 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-023-02822-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE According to the results of FLOT4 trial, perioperative FLOT chemotherapy improved overall survival (OS) in locally advanced, resectable esophagogastric adenocarcinoma (EGA) compared to perioperative ECF/ECX. We report real-life data 10 years after introduction of perioperative FLOT at our institution. METHODS Survival of 356 consecutive EGA patients (cT3/4 and/or cN + and/or cM1) who underwent curative surgical resection was retrospectively analysed from a prospective database. A total of 263 patients received preoperative chemotherapy according to FLOT protocol and 93 patients received an epirubicin/platinum/5FU-based regimen (EPF). Propensity score matching (PSM) according to pretretment characteristics was performed to compensate for heterogeneity between groups. RESULTS Median OS did not differ between groups (FLOT/EPF 52.1/46.4 months, p = 0.577). After PSM, survival was non-significantly improved after FLOT compared to EPF (median OS not reached/46.4 months, p = 0.156). Perioperative morbidity and mortality did not differ between groups. Histopathologic response rate was 35% after FLOT and 26% after EPF (p = 0.169). R0 resection could be achieved more frequently after FLOT than after EPF (93%/79%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSION Overall survival after perioperative FLOT followed by surgery is comparable to clinical trials. However, collective real-life application of FLOT failed to provide a significant survival benefit compared to EPF. In clinical reality, patient selection is triggered by age, comorbidity, tumor localization, and clinical tumor stage. Yet matched analyses support FLOT4 trial findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leila Sisic
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nerma Crnovrsanin
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Henrik Nienhueser
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jin-On Jung
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Sabine Schiefer
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Georg Martin Haag
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Bruckner
- Institute for Medical Biometry (Imbi), University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Martin Schneider
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Beat P Müller-Stich
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Markus W Büchler
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, University Hospital Heidelberg, 69120, Heidelberg, Germany.
- Department of General, Visceral, Cancer and Transplant Surgery, University Hospital of Cologne, 50937, Cologne, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Predictive biomarkers are the mainstay of precision medicine. This review summarizes the advancements in tissue-based diagnostic biomarkers for gastric cancer, which is considered the leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide. A disease seen in the elderly, it is often diagnosed at an advanced stage, thereby limiting therapeutic options. In Western countries, neoadjuvant/perioperative (radio-)chemotherapy is administered, and adjuvant chemotherapy is administered in the East. The morpho-molecular classification of gastric cancer has opened novel avenues identifying Epstein-Barr-Virus (EBV)-positive, microsatellite instable, genomically stable and chromosomal instable gastric cancers. In chromosomal instable tumors, receptor tyrosine kinases (RKTs) (e.g., EGFR, FGFR2, HER2, and MET) are frequently overexpressed. Gastric cancers such as microsatellite instable and EBV-positive types often express immune checkpoint molecules, such as PD-L1 and VISTA. Genomically stable tumors show alterations in claudin 18.2. Next-generation sequencing is increasingly being used to search for druggable targets in advanced palliative settings. However, most tissue-based biomarkers of gastric cancer carry the risk of a sampling error due to intratumoral heterogeneity, and adequate tissue sampling is of paramount importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C. Röcken
- Department of Pathology, Christian-Albrechts-University, Arnold-Heller-Str. 3, Haus 14, Haus U33, 24105 Kiel, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Datta RR, Bohle J, Bruns CJ. [51/m-Recurrent unspecific upper abdominal complaints and weight loss : Preparation for the medical specialist examination: part 17]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2022; 93:75-80. [PMID: 36194271 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01731-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- R R Datta
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - J Bohle
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - C J Bruns
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Li Z, Li X, Zhu X, Ai S, Guan W, Liu S. Tracers in Gastric Cancer Surgery. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14235735. [PMID: 36497216 PMCID: PMC9741333 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14235735] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Revised: 11/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
The treatment of gastric cancer mainly depends on radical gastrectomy. Determination of appropriate surgical margins and adequate lymph node (LN) resection are two major surgical steps that directly correlate with prognosis in gastric cancer. Due to the expanding use of minimally invasive procedures, it is no longer possible to locate tumors and LNs through touch. As an alternative, tracers have begun to enter the field due to their capacities for intraoperative visualization. Herein, we summarize the application of contemporary tracers in gastric cancer surgery, including isosulfan blue, methylene blue, patent blue, indocyanine green, carbon particles, and radioactive tracers. Their mechanisms, administration methods, detection efficiency, and challenges, as well as perspectives on them, are also outlined.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Wenxian Guan
- Correspondence: (W.G.); (S.L.); Tel.: +86-25-68182222-60931 (W.G.); +86-25-68182222-60930 (S.L.)
| | - Song Liu
- Correspondence: (W.G.); (S.L.); Tel.: +86-25-68182222-60931 (W.G.); +86-25-68182222-60930 (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Steinbrück I, Faiss S, Dumoulin FL, Oyama T, Pohl J, von Hahn T, Schmidt A, Allgaier H. Learning curve of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) with prevalence-based indication in unsupervised Western settings: a retrospective multicenter analysis. Surg Endosc 2022. [PMID: 36344898 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09742-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 10/14/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS As there is still no consensus about the adequate training strategy for ESD in Western countries, we evaluated unsupervised prevalence-based learning curves including detailed organ-specific subgroup analysis. METHODS The first 120 ESDs of four operators (n = 480) were divided into three groups (1: ESD 1-40, 2: ESD 41-80, 3: ESD 81-120). Outcome parameters were rates of technical success, en bloc and R0 resection, the resection speed, rates of conversion to EMR, curative resection, adverse events, surgery due to adverse events, and recurrence. In addition, we analyzed the achievement of quality benchmarks indicating levels of expertise. RESULTS After exclusion of pretreated lesions, 438 procedures were enrolled in the final analysis. Technical success rates were > 96% with significant improvements regarding rate of en bloc resection (from 82.6 to 91.2%), resection speed (from 4.54 to 7.63 cm2/h), and rate of conversion to EMR (from 22.0 to 8.1%). No significant differences could be observed for rates of R0 resection (65.9 vs. 69.6%), curative resection (55.8 vs. 55.7%), adverse events (16.3 vs. 11.7%), surgery due to adverse events (1.5 vs. 1.3%), and recurrence (12.5 vs. 4.5%). Subgroup and benchmark analysis revealed an improvement in esophageal, gastric, and rectal ESD with achievement of competence levels for the esophagus and stomach within 80 and most of the benchmarks for proficiency level within 120 procedures. Some of the benchmarks could also be achieved in rectal ESD. CONCLUSIONS This trial confirms safety and feasibility of unsupervised ESD along the initial learning curve with prevalence-based indication and exclusion of colonic cases.
Collapse
|
11
|
Schröder W, Fuchs H, Straatman J, Babic B. [Reconstruction and functional results after gastric resection]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2022; 93:1021-1029. [PMID: 36036852 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01705-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/29/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Depending on the extent of gastric resection, namely total, proximal or distal gastrectomy, different methods of reconstruction are available. These reconstructive procedures have not changed with the implementation of minimally invasive or robotic techniques in general but the spectrum of possible anastomotic techniques has been substantially expanded. Functional, in particular nutritional disorders with subsequent impairment of the health-related quality of life, are often diagnosed after gastric resections. The partial preservation of a gastric reservoir has a positive impact on the extent of these disorders. After total gastrectomy, the placement of a jejunal pouch significantly reduces the incidence of postoperative dumping symptoms. Following proximal gastrectomy, double-tract reconstruction offers certain functional advantages as compared to the simple Roux‑Y reconstruction. In Germany, these reconstructive techniques are only used to a low extent and should be include in the repertoire of oncological gastric surgery with appropriate indications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Schröder
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| | - H Fuchs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - J Straatman
- Afdeling Heelkunde, Amsterdam Universitair Medisch Centrum, Amsterdam, Niederlande
| | - B Babic
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinik Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Goetze TO, Al-Batran SE. Perspectives on the Management of Oligometastatic Disease in Esophago-Gastric Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:5200. [PMID: 36358619 PMCID: PMC9658190 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14215200] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 10/17/2022] [Accepted: 10/21/2022] [Indexed: 09/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Gastric adenocarcinoma and esophageal cancer are the fifth and seventh most common cancer types worldwide. At the time of initial diagnosis, up to 50% of esophagogastric cancers present with distant metastatic lesions and are candidates for chemotherapy. Curative surgery in this stage is still an experimental approach. Only a small number of these metastatic patients show an oligometastatic disease with no uniform definition of what oligometastatic means in gastric cancer. Nevertheless, the question remains unanswered as to whether these patients are still candidates for curative concepts. Some studies have attempted to answer this question but have not been adequately designed to address the role of a curative-intended multimodal therapy in this setting. The current FLOT-5 is designed to potentially provide a definitive answer to the question of whether curatively intended surgery plays a role or is a disadvantage in this setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thorsten Oliver Goetze
- Krankenhaus Nordwest gGmbH, Institut of Clinical Cancer Research, UCT—University Cancer Center Frankfurt-Marburg, Steinbacher Hohl 2-26, 60488 Frankfurt, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Müller D, Stier R, Straatman J, Babic B, Schiffmann L, Eckhoff J, Schmidt T, Bruns C, Fuchs HF. [ICG lymph node mapping in cancer surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract]. Chirurgie (Heidelb) 2022; 93:925-933. [PMID: 35925142 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-022-01659-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
The importance of the assessment of the N‑status in gastric carcinoma, tumors of the gastroesophageal junction and esophageal cancer is undisputed; however, there is currently no internationally validated method for lymph node mapping in esophageal and gastric cancer. Near-infrared fluorescence imaging (NIR) is an innovative technique from the field of vibrational spectroscopy, which in combination with the fluorescent dye indocyanine green (ICG) enables intraoperative real-time visualization of anatomical structures. The ICG currently has four fields of application in oncological surgery: intraoperative real-time angiography for visualization of perfusion, lymphography for visualization of lymphatic vessels, visualization of solid tumors, and (sentinel) lymph node mapping. For imaging of the lymph drainage area and therefore the consecutive lymph nodes, peritumoral injection of ICG must be performed. Several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of peritumoral injection of ICG administered 15 min to 3 days preoperatively with subsequent intraoperative visualization of the lymph nodes. So far prospective randomized studies on the validation of the method are still lacking. In contrast, the use of ICG for lymph node mapping and visualization of sentinel lymph nodes in gastric cancer has been performed in large cohorts as well as in prospective randomized settings. Up to now, multicenter studies for ICG-guided lymph node mapping during oncological surgery of the upper gastrointestinal tract are lacking. Artificial intelligence methods can help to evaluate these techniques in an automated manner in the future as well as to support intraoperative decision making and therefore to improve the quality of oncological surgery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dolores Müller
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Raphael Stier
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Jennifer Straatman
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Benjamin Babic
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Lars Schiffmann
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Jennifer Eckhoff
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Christiane Bruns
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland
| | - Hans F Fuchs
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Allgemein‑, Viszeral‑, Tumor- und Transplantationschirurgie, Uniklinik Köln (AöR), Kerpener Str. 62, 50937, Köln, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Huemer F, Hecht S, Scharinger B, Schlintl V, Rinnerthaler G, Schlick K, Heregger R, Melchardt T, Wimmer A, Mühlbacher I, Koch OO, Neureiter D, Klieser E, Seyedinia S, Beheshti M, Greil R, Weiss L. Body composition dynamics and impact on clinical outcome in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction cancer patients undergoing perioperative chemotherapy with the FLOT protocol. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2022:10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w. [PMID: 35864270 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-022-04096-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2022] [Accepted: 05/27/2022] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Perioperative chemotherapy with FLOT constitutes a standard of care approach for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) cancer. We aimed at investigating anthropometric, CT-based and FDG-PET-based body composition parameters and dynamics during this multidisciplinary approach and the impact on clinical outcomes. METHODS This retrospective, single-center study was based on medical records and (FDG-PET)-CT images among gastric/GEJ cancer patients undergoing perioperative FLOT chemotherapy. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2021, 46 gastric/GEJ cancer patients started perioperative FLOT at our tertiary cancer center (Salzburg, Austria). At a median follow-up of 32 months median PFS was 47.4 months and median OS was not reached. The skeletal muscle index (SMI, cm2/m2) turned out to be the only body composition parameter with a statistically significant decrease during pre-operative FLOT (51.3 versus 48.8 cm2/m2, p = 0.02). Neither pre-FLOT body mass index (BMI), nor SMI had an impact on the duration of pre-operative FLOT, the time interval from pre-operative FLOT initiation to surgery, the necessity of pre-operative or post-operative FLOT de-escalation or the likelihood of the start of postoperative chemotherapy. Pre-FLOT BMI (overweight versus normal, HR: 0.11, 95% CI: 0.02-0.65, p = 0.02) and pre-FLOT SMI (sarcopenia versus no sarcopenia, HR: 5.08, 95% CI: 1.27-20.31, p = 0.02) were statistically significantly associated with PFS in the multivariable analysis. CONCLUSION The statistically significant SMI loss during pre-operative FLOT and the meaningful impact of baseline SMI and BMI on PFS argue for the implementation of a nutritional screening and support program prior to the initiation of pre-operative FLOT in clinical routine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Florian Huemer
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Stefan Hecht
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Bernhard Scharinger
- Department of Radiology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Verena Schlintl
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Gabriel Rinnerthaler
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Konstantin Schlick
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Ronald Heregger
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Melchardt
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Angela Wimmer
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Iris Mühlbacher
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Oliver Owen Koch
- Department of Surgery, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Daniel Neureiter
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Eckhard Klieser
- Institute of Pathology, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Sara Seyedinia
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mohsen Beheshti
- Division of Molecular Imaging and Theranostics, Department of Nuclear Medicine, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Richard Greil
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Lukas Weiss
- Department of Internal Medicine III with Haematology, Medical Oncology, Haemostaseology, Infectiology and Rheumatology, Oncologic Center, Salzburg Cancer Research Institute , Center for Clinical Cancer and Immunology Trials (SCRI-CCCIT), Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
- Cancer Cluster Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Vashist Y, Aigner K, Dam M, Gailhofer S, Aigner KR. Regional Chemotherapy Is a Valuable Second-Line Approach in Metastatic Esophageal Cancer after Failure to First-Line Palliative Treatment. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:4868-4878. [PMID: 35877246 PMCID: PMC9316981 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29070386] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2022] [Revised: 07/06/2022] [Accepted: 07/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/19/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Therapeutic options in metastatic esophageal cancer (EC) are limited with unsatisfactory results. We evaluated the efficacy of regional chemotherapy (RegCTx) approach in diffuse metastatic EC using arterial infusion (AI), upper abdominal perfusion (UAP) and isolated-thoracic perfusion (ITP) in 14 patients (N = 8 adenocarcinoma (AC) and N = 6 squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC)) after failure to first-line palliative treatment. Methods: All patients had previously failed first-line palliative treatment attempt with systemic chemotherapy (sCTx). In total 51 RegCTx cycles (12 AI, 3 UAP and 36 ITP) were applied using cisplatin, Adriamycin and Mitomycin C. The outcome was evaluated using RECIST criteria with MediasStat 28.5.14 and SPSS–28.0. Results: No grade III or IV hematological complications occurred. The overall response rate was 41% partial response, 27% stable and 32% progressive disease. Median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95%CI 10.1–65.9). The OS was better in SQCC with 51 months The RegCTx specific survival was 13 months (95%CI 2.9–23.1) in the entire cohort and 25 months in SQCC patients. Conclusion: RegCTx is a valuable safe approach and superior to the current proposed therapeutic options in metastatic EC after failure to first-line therapy.
Collapse
|
16
|
Jesinghaus M, Herz AL, Kohlruss M, Silva M, Grass A, Lange S, Novotny A, Ott K, Schmidt T, Gaida M, Hapfelmeier A, Denkert C, Weichert W, Keller G. Post-neoadjuvant assessment of tumour budding according to ITBCC subgroups delivers stage- and regression-grade independent prognostic information in intestinal-type gastric adenocarcinoma. J Pathol Clin Res 2022; 8:448-457. [PMID: 35715937 PMCID: PMC9353660 DOI: 10.1002/cjp2.284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2022] [Revised: 05/20/2022] [Accepted: 06/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Tumour budding (TB) has been associated with adverse clinicopathological factors and poor survival in a plethora of therapy‐naïve carcinoma entities including gastric adenocarcinoma (GC). As conventional histopathological grading is usually omitted in the post‐neoadjuvant setting of GC, our study aimed to investigate the prognostic impact of TB in GCs resected after neoadjuvant therapy. We evaluated TB according to the criteria from the International Tumour Budding Consensus Conference (ITBCC) in 167 post‐neoadjuvant resections of intestinal‐type GC and correlated the results with overall survival (OS) and clinicopathological parameters. GCs were categorised into Bd1 (0–4 buds, low TB), Bd2 (5–9 buds, intermediate TB), and Bd3 (≥10 buds, high TB). Carcinomas with intermediate and high TB were significantly enriched in higher ypTNM stages and strongly associated with reduced 5‐year OS in univariable analyses (p < 0.001). In multivariable analyses including sex, age, resection status, UICC stage, and tumour regression grading, TB remained a stage‐independent predictor of survival (p < 0.001, hazard ratio Bd2: 2.60, Bd3: 4.74). The assessment of TB according to the ITBCC criteria provides valuable prognostic information in the post‐neoadjuvant setting of intestinal‐type GC and may be a considerable substitute for the conventional grading system in GCs after neoadjuvant therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Moritz Jesinghaus
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany.,Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Anna-Lina Herz
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Meike Kohlruss
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Miguel Silva
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Albert Grass
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Sebastian Lange
- II Medizinische Klinik, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Novotny
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Katja Ott
- Department of Surgery, Klinikum Rosenheim, Rosenheim, Germany
| | - Thomas Schmidt
- Department of Surgery, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Surgery, University Hospital Köln, Köln, Germany
| | - Matthias Gaida
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Alexander Hapfelmeier
- Institute of General Practice and Health Services Research, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,Institute for AI and Informatics in Medicine, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Carsten Denkert
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Marburg, Marburg, Germany
| | - Wilko Weichert
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Comprehensive Cancer Center Munich (CCCM), Munich, Germany
| | - Gisela Keller
- Institute of Pathology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Miftode S, Bruns H. Misclassification of nodal stage in gastric cancer: 16 lymph nodes is not enough. Surg Exp Pathol 2022. [DOI: 10.1186/s42047-022-00109-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Abstract
Background
In gastric cancer, nodal stage plays an important role. Insufficient lymph node harvesting or incomplete examination may lead to misclassification and affect postoperative strategy and group survival. This study’s objective was to determine the minimum number of examined lymph nodes needed in gastric cancer and compare this to the minimum lymph node count according to the current Union for International Cancer Control (UICC) classification using real world data.
Methods
Based on anatomical data, expected mean lymph node counts and their 95% confidence intervals for complete D2 lymphadenectomy were calculated. Using stochastic analysis, a threshold for correct classification in 95% of cases was determined. Survival data of nodal negative gastric cancer patients was extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER)-Database for 2010–2017. Patients reaching at least the calculated theoretical threshold were compared to the minimum threshold according to the current UICC classification.
Results
The expected lymph node count was 30 (95% CI: 28–32; range 17–52), corresponding to a 27 lymph nodes. In nodal negative patients with exactly 16 and at least 27 examined lymph nodes, relative 5 year survival was 79 and 89% in T1/T2 and 39 and 64% T3/T4 gastric cancer, respectively. Theoretically, when only 16 lymph nodes are analyzed, nodal negative staging may be incorrect in up to 47% of cases.
Conclusions
A minimum threshold of 16 examined lymph nodes cannot be justified. Retrospective analysis confirmed systematic misclassification of patients with insufficient lymphadenectomy in nodal negative gastric cancer patients. Correct lymphadenectomy and thorough examination of the surgical specimen is mandatory.
Collapse
|
18
|
Rhode P, Mehdorn M, Lyros O, Kahlert C, Kurth T, Venus T, Schierle K, Estrela-Lopis I, Jansen-Winkeln B, Lordick F, Gockel I, Thieme R. Characterization of Total RNA, CD44, FASN, and PTEN mRNAs from Extracellular Vesicles as Biomarkers in Gastric Cancer Patients. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:cancers13235975. [PMID: 34885085 PMCID: PMC8656496 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13235975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Liquid biopsy is an easily accessible and non-invasive method to gain information about tumor diseases. The purpose of our study was to determine the value of extracellular vesicle-derived mRNAs as biomarkers for the diagnosis of gastric cancer and the response to its treatment. In a cohort of 87 gastric cancer patients and a control group of 14 individuals, we analyzed the absolute RNA concentration from extracellular vesicles (EV) and the relative levels of FASN, PTEN, and CD44 mRNA, and their correlation with clinico-pathological features. These correlated with treatment, tumor grading, and the pathological subtype according to Laurén’s classification. This might reflect their potential as both diagnostic and therapeutic predictors. Abstract In-depth characterization has introduced new molecular subtypes of gastric cancer (GC). To identify these, new approaches and techniques are required. Liquid biopsies are trendsetting and provide an easy and feasible method to identify and to monitor GC patients. In a prospective cohort of 87 GC patients, extracellular vesicles (EVs) were isolated from 250 µL of plasma. The total RNA was isolated with TRIZOL. The total RNA amount and the relative mRNA levels of CD44, PTEN, and FASN were measured by qRT-PCR. The isolation of EVs and their contained mRNA was possible in all 87 samples investigated. The relative mRNA levels of PTEN were higher in patients already treated by chemotherapy than in chemo-naïve patients. In patients who had undergone neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by gastrectomy, a decrease in the total RNA amount was observed after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and gastrectomy, while FASN and CD44 mRNA levels decreased only after gastrectomy. The amount of RNA and the relative mRNA levels of FASN and CD44 in EVs were affected more significantly by chemotherapy and gastrectomy than by chemotherapy alone. Therefore, they are a potential biomarker for monitoring treatment response. Future analyses are needed to identify GC-specific key RNAs in EVs, which could be used for the diagnosis of gastric cancer patients in order to determine their molecular subtype and to accompany the therapeutic response.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philipp Rhode
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Matthias Mehdorn
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Orestis Lyros
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Christoph Kahlert
- Department for Visceral, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, D-01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Thomas Kurth
- Center for Molecular and Cellular Bioengineering (CMCB), Technology Platform, Technische Universität Dresden, D-01307 Dresden, Germany;
| | - Tom Venus
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig, D-0407 Leipzig, Germany; (T.V.); (I.E.-L.)
| | - Katrin Schierle
- Institute of Pathology, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
| | - Irina Estrela-Lopis
- Institute of Medical Physics and Biophysics, University of Leipzig, D-0407 Leipzig, Germany; (T.V.); (I.E.-L.)
| | - Boris Jansen-Winkeln
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - Florian Lordick
- Department of Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pulmonology and Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany;
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL), University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany
| | - Ines Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
| | - René Thieme
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Leipzig, D-04103 Leipzig, Germany; (P.R.); (M.M.); (O.L.); (B.J.-W.); (I.G.)
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Aigner K, Vashist YK, Selak E, Gailhofer S, Aigner KR. Efficacy of Regional Chemotherapy Approach in Peritoneal Metastatic Gastric Cancer. J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10225322. [PMID: 34830604 PMCID: PMC8624731 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10225322] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/13/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Peritoneal spread is frequent in gastric cancer (GC) and a palliative condition. After failure to systemic chemotherapy (sCTx) remaining therapeutic options are very limited. We evaluated the feasibility and efficacy of locoregional chemotherapy (RegCTx) in peritoneal metastatic GC. In total, 38 (23 male and 15 female) patients with peritoneal metastatic GC after failure of previous sCTx and unresectable disease were enrolled in this study. Using the hypoxic abdominal stop-flow perfusion, upper abdominal perfusion and intraarterial infusion technique in total 114 cycles with Cisplatin, Adriamycin and Mitomycin C were applied. No significant procedure related toxicity was noticed- especially no Grade 3 or 4 toxicity occurred. With the RegCTx approach a median overall survival of 17.4 months was achieved. Patients who had undergone previously resection of the GC the median overall survival was even better with 23.5 months. RegCTx is a promising, safe and efficient approach in diffuse metastatic GC. The evaluation of RegCTx in the setting of multimodal treatment approach at less advanced stages is also warranted.
Collapse
|
20
|
Hoffmann A, Behrens HM, Heckl S, Krüger S, Becker T, Röcken C. Neoadjuvant/Perioperative Treatment Affects Spatial Distribution and Densities of Tumor Associated Neutrophils and CD8+ Lymphocytes in Gastric Cancer. J Pers Med 2021; 11:1184. [PMID: 34834537 DOI: 10.3390/jpm11111184] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/29/2021] [Revised: 11/04/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Tumor associated neutrophils (TANs) and cytotoxic T cells (CTLs) are part of the tumor microenvironment of gastric cancer (GC). We explored their tumor biological significance in neoadjuvantly/perioperatively treated GC. Immunostaining was performed on whole tissue sections of 173 GCs, using antibodies directed against myeloperoxidase (MPO) and CD8. Stained specimens were digitalized, and the densities of TANs and CTLs were assessed separately in the mucosa, tumor surface, tumor center, invasion front, and tumor scar. The densities were correlated with clinicopathological patient characteristics. Compared with a historical cohort of 449 treatment naive GCs, the TAN density in the invasion front was significantly lower in neoadjuvantly/perioperatively treated GCs. TAN density in the tumor center and invasion front correlated with tumor regression. TAN density also correlated with CTL density in the tumor center and invasion front. A high density of CTL in the tumor center correlated with an improved overall survival and tumor specific survival. We show that neoadjuvant/perioperative (radio-) chemotherapy impacts on the immune microenvironment of GC, while also depending on sex. The density of TANs in neoadjuvantly/perioperatively treated GCs differed from findings made in a treatment naive GC cohort.
Collapse
|
21
|
Tischoff I, Tannapfel A. [Complete response after neoadjuvant therapy : How certain is the pathology?]. Chirurg 2021. [PMID: 34613440 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01510-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Histopathologic evaluation of tumors after neoadjuvant therapy is performed by tumor regression grading (TRG) systems, which reflect the proportion of vital residual primary tumor in relation to the previous total tumor. The World Health Organization (WHO) tumor grading is replaced by TRG in tumor classification. The histopathological work-up of a tumor is based on the criteria of the TNM classification even after neoadjuvant therapy. A uniform TRG does not exist. For various tumors TRGs based on the tumor entity have been established, consisting of a 3-stage or 5‑stage grading system. Complete histopathological tumor regression is only present if no vital tumor cells are detectable in the histopathological examination of the primary surgical specimens (primary tumor and accompanying locoregional lymph nodes) and there are no distant metastases.
Collapse
|
22
|
Teufel A, Quante M, Kandulski A, Hirth M, Zhan T, Eckardt M, Thieme R, Kusnik A, Yesmembetov K, Wiest I, Riemann JF, Schlitt HJ, Gockel I, Malfertheiner P, Ebert MP. [Prevention of gastrointestinal cancer]. Z Gastroenterol 2021; 59:964-982. [PMID: 34507375 DOI: 10.1055/a-1540-7539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Throughout the past decades, considerable progress has been made in the (early) diagnosis and treatment of gastrointestinal cancers. However, the prognosis for advanced stages of gastrointestinal tumors remains limited for many patients and approximately one third of all tumor patients die as a result of gastrointestinal tumors. The prevention and early detection of gastrointestinal tumors is therefore of great importance.For this reason, we summarize the current state of knowledge and recommendations for the primary, secondary and tertiary prevention of esophageal, stomach, pancreas, liver and colorectal cancer in the following.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andreas Teufel
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Sektion Hepatologie, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim.,Klinische Kooperationseinheit Healthy Metabolism, Zentrum für Präventivmedizin und Digitale Gesundheit Baden-Württemberg, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
| | - Michael Quante
- Klinik für Innere Medizin II, Medizinische Universitätsklinik, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Freiburg im Breisgau
| | - Arne Kandulski
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin I, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Michael Hirth
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Tianzuo Zhan
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Maximilian Eckardt
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - René Thieme
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Alexander Kusnik
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | - Kakharman Yesmembetov
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Stoffwechselerkrankungen und Internistische Intensivmedizin (Med. III), RWTH Universitätsklinikum Aachen, Aachen
| | - Isabella Wiest
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim
| | | | - Hans Jürgen Schlitt
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Chirurgie, Universitatsklinikum Regensburg, Regensburg
| | - Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral-, Transplantations-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitatsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig
| | - Peter Malfertheiner
- Klinik für Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Infektiologie, Medizinische Fakultät Magdeburg, Magdeburg
| | - Matthias Philip Ebert
- II. Medizinische Klinik, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim, Universitätsklinikum Mannheim, Mannheim.,Klinische Kooperationseinheit Healthy Metabolism, Zentrum für Präventivmedizin und Digitale Gesundheit Baden-Württemberg, Medizinische Fakultät Mannheim, Universität Heidelberg, Mannheim
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Lorenzen S, Reinacher-Schick A, Masetti M. [Modern concepts of systemic treatment for adjuvant and palliative treatment of locally advanced or metastasized esophageal cancer]. Chirurg 2021; 92:1085-1093. [PMID: 34387700 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01476-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The approval of a wide variety of PD-1/PD-L1 and CTLA‑4 inhibitors has sustainably influenced the treatment landscape in many tumor entities and established immunotherapy as a new oncological treatment strategy. OBJECTIVE This article summarizes the current clinical state of treatment for locally advanced and metastatic esophageal cancer and assesses the running and future developmental program and the implementation in the clinical routine. MATERIAL AND METHODS Publications from Medline, ASCO and ESMO were systematically collected and evaluated. RESULTS Many phase I-III trials focusing on immunotherapy for gastrointestinal tumors were carried out in recent years but were however without comparable success to other tumor entities and with only moderate response rates between 10% and 25% in monotherapy. Subgroups such as microsatellite instability (MSI) cancers and tumors overexpressing PD-L1 seem to particularly benefit from treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Routine testing for known molecular alterations should therefore be carried out with all advanced esophageal cancers. Initial promising approaches with a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy were recently published and could become new treatment standards for esophageal cancer. CONCLUSION Due to the survival advantage with a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for untreated advanced stage esophageal cancer, it seems likely that this treatment strategy will become established as a new standard of care, assuming approval is granted. Immunotherapy might also become important in the adjuvant treatment of esophageal cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sylvie Lorenzen
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Innere Medizin III, Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675, München, Deutschland.
| | - Anke Reinacher-Schick
- Medizinische Klinik V, Klinik für Hämatologie und Onkologie mit Palliativmedizin, St. Josef-Hospital, Ruhr-Universität, Bochum, Deutschland
| | - Michael Masetti
- Abteilung für Hämatologie und Onkologie, Klinikum rechts der Isar, TU München, München, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Bornschein J, Pritchard DM. Myths and misconceptions in the management of Helicobacter pylori infection. Frontline Gastroenterol 2021; 13:245-253. [PMID: 35493626 PMCID: PMC8996102 DOI: 10.1136/flgastro-2021-101826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2021] [Accepted: 06/20/2021] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The discovery of Helicobacter pylori infection in 1984 revolutionised the management of several common upper gastrointestinal diseases. However, some of the clinical practices that were adopted following discovery of this organism have become less appropriate over the intervening years. This article discusses five 'myths and misconceptions' that we believe have now emerged and which we argue need re-evaluation. Although the prevalence of H. pylori infection is decreasing in some developed countries, it remains a huge global problem and the most serious consequence of infection, gastric adenocarcinoma, is still a major cause of mortality. The epidemiology of H. pylori-related diseases is also changing and careful testing remains crucially important, especially in patients with peptic ulceration. Eradication of H. pylori infection has also become much more difficult over recent years as a result of the widespread acquisition of antibiotic resistance. Routine assessment of the success of eradication should therefore now be performed. Finally, there has been increased awareness about the role of H. pylori in the multistep pathway of gastric carcinogenesis, about the opportunities to prevent cancer development by eradicating this infection in some individuals and about detecting high-risk preneoplastic changes via endoscopic surveillance. The discovery of H. pylori was rightly honoured by the award of the Nobel prize for Physiology and Medicine in 2005. However, unless we re-evaluate and update the ways in which we manage H. pylori infection, much of the fantastic progress that has been made in this field of medicine may tragically be lost once again.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Bornschein
- Translational Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK,Gastroenterology, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, Oxfordshire, UK
| | - D Mark Pritchard
- Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK,Gastroenterology, Liverpool University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Gockel I. [Update gastric cancer]. Chirurg 2021; 92:497-498. [PMID: 33900412 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01395-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/15/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Feldbrügge L, Gronau F, Brandl A, Auer TA, Oeff A, Thuss-Patience P, Pratschke J, Rau B. Systemic Chemotherapy Including Ramucirumab in Combination With Pressurized Intra-Peritoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy Is a Safe Treatment Option for Peritoneal Metastasis of Gastric Cancer. Front Oncol 2021; 10:610572. [PMID: 33912438 PMCID: PMC8074678 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.610572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Pressurized intraperitoneal aerosol chemotherapy (PIPAC) is a laparoscopic technique for local chemotherapy. It has been used for treatment of peritoneal metastasis of gastric cancer (PM GC) in combination with systemic therapy. VEGFR2 antagonist ramucirumab is a second-line therapy for GC, and has been suspected to cause wound healing disorders. Methods This is a retrospective single center cohort study of patients with PM GC, who received PIPAC treatment in combination with systemic chemotherapy with and without ramucirumab. Data on patients’ characteristics and their perioperative courses were collected and complication rates were compared with regard to preoperative use of ramucirumab and time between last dose of systemic therapy and PIPAC treatment. Results Fifty patients underwent 90 PIPAC treatments for PM GC in 3 years. Overall postoperative morbidity was 11% with 6% severe complications. The mean interval between systemic therapy and PIPAC was 20 days. Neither the length of interval nor the use of ramucirumab had an effect on complication rates. Conclusion Our study suggests that addition of ramucirumab to pre-PIPAC systemic therapy, irrespective of the length of the treatment-free interval before PIPAC, does not increase the risk of postoperative complications and is therefore a safe option for treatment of PM GC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Feldbrügge
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Felix Gronau
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Andreas Brandl
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.,Digestive Unit, Champalimaud Foundation, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Timo Alexander Auer
- Department of Radiology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Alan Oeff
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Peter Thuss-Patience
- Department of Hematology, Oncology, and Tumor Immunology, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Johann Pratschke
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Beate Rau
- Department of Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Gronau F, Jara M, Feldbrügge L, Wolf V, Oeff A, Rau B. [Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in gastric cancer]. Chirurg 2021; 92:522-527. [PMID: 33620502 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01371-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gastric cancer with peritoneal metastases is associated with an extremely poor prognosis. Developed multimodal treatment concepts, which include a combination of perioperative systemic treatment and cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC), show promising results with respect to improvement of the long-term survival. METHODS This article contains a review of the literature of published studies on the topic of gastric cancer and peritoneal metastasis. RESULTS The prognosis of patients with gastric cancer peritoneal carcinomatosis shows an extremely limited median survival of 7 months under palliative second-line systemic treatment. The median survival time increased to 12 months with cytoreductive surgery and in combination with HIPEC showed a positive effect on survival in individual studies. EXPERT OPINION Treatment recommendations for patients with peritoneal metastases of gastric cancer should be carried out by experts in surgical reference centers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felix Gronau
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Maximilian Jara
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Linda Feldbrügge
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Vincent Wolf
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Alan Oeff
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland
| | - Beate Rau
- Chirurgische Klinik Campus Charité Mitte
- Campus Virchow Klinikum, Charité Universitätsmedizin, Berlin, Deutschland. .,Klinik für Chirurgie, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353, Berlin, Deutschland.
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Stocker G, Thieme R, Lordick F. [Neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment of gastric cancer, current studies and new biomarkers]. Chirurg 2021; 92:499-505. [PMID: 33566116 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-021-01355-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/12/2021] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
According to current German and European clinical practice guidelines perioperative chemotherapy is the recommended standard of care for localized gastric cancer beyond early cancers, i.e. in stage IB (T2 N0 M0 and T1 N1 M0) or greater. For patients who are able to tolerate intensive chemotherapy, the FLOT regimen (5-fluorouracil, folinic acid, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) should be administered preoperatively and postoperatively for four cycles each. Locally advanced nonmetastatic adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG) should be treated with perioperative chemotherapy as for gastric cancer or alternatively with neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. The best approach for AEG is currently being investigated in ongoing clinical trials. The recommendation of perioperative treatment applies to all histopathological subtypes of gastric cancer. The article summarizes the contemporary data and provides an outlook on current progress in the field of medicinal perioperative treatment.
Collapse
|
29
|
Abstract
BACKGROUND At the time of diagnosis of gastric cancer approximately one third of patients already have metastases. It is important to differentiate between oligometastasis and the diffuse metastatic situation. For the first time the definition of oligometastasis has been integrated into the German S3 guidelines. OBJECTIVE Can multimodal treatment with tumor resection and metastasectomy combined with perioperative chemotherapy, increase the chances of survival in oligometastatic patients? MATERIAL AND METHODS In this review article the data situation of the current literature is discussed. RESULTS The Dutch D1/D2 trial reported an increased median survival for a subgroup of patients with single metastasis who underwent resection. Multimodal treatment with resection doubled the median survival of oligometastatic patients in the German AIO-FLOT 3 study and as a consequence, the AIO-FLOT 5 (RENAISSANCE) trial was designed. Patients with oligometastatic gastric and esophagogastric junction cancer are randomized after chemotherapy to either undergo resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy or to undergo definitive chemotherapy. Further randomized trials investigate the benefit of antibodies and immune checkpoint inhibitors in locoregional and advanced metastatic gastric cancer with promising results. CONCLUSION The results of the ongoing randomized trials will show if oligometastatic patients benefit from a multimodal treatment with resection. The clear definition of the oligometastatic state, assessment of the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and realistic estimation of the R0 resectability will be useful for patient selection.
Collapse
|
30
|
Feldbrügge L, Wolf V, Gronau F, Oeff A, Alevizopoulos AE, Jara M, Rau B. Behandlung des peritoneal metastasierten Magenkarzinoms. Onkologe 2020; 26:945-950. [DOI: 10.1007/s00761-020-00804-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/30/2023]
|
31
|
Abstract
Neoadjuvant or perioperative therapy with radical surgery is a meaningful approach to improve the prognosis of gastric cancer. The FLOT regimen (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, docetaxel) has been established as a perioperative concept in Germany and is also increasingly being used internationally. The prognostic significance of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy has to be awaited based on the results of currently active studies. The microsatellite instability (MSI) status has increasingly gained in importance with respect to decision-making processes in the interdisciplinary tumor board as patients with MSI tumors probably do not benefit from neoadjuvant therapy. Patients with only initial stages of locally advanced MSI tumors (cT2, N0) and those with comorbidities could be spared from neoadjuvant therapy. This article critically deals with the current state of the art concepts as well as with ongoing studies with respect to neoadjuvant and perioperative treatment of gastric cancer. For this purpose, the essential already published and the active studies are presented.
Collapse
|
32
|
Mönig S, Ott K, Gockel I, Lorenz D, Ludwig K, Messmann H, Moehler M, Piso P, Weimann A, Meyer HJ. [S3 guidelines on gastric cancer-diagnosis and treatment of adenocarcinoma of the stomach and esophagogastric junction : Version 2.0-August 2019. AWMF register number: 032/009OL]. Chirurg 2020; 91:37-40. [PMID: 31950198 DOI: 10.1007/s00104-020-01112-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Stefan Mönig
- Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Hôpitaux Universitaires Genève, Rue Gabrielle-Perret-Gentil 4, 1205, Genf, Schweiz
| | - Katja Ott
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Gefäß- und Thoraxchirurgie, RoMed Klinikum Rosenheim, Pettenkoferstraße 10, 83022, Rosenheim, Deutschland
| | - Ines Gockel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Viszeral‑, Transplantations‑, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Department für Operative Medizin (DOPM), Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, AöR, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Dietmar Lorenz
- Chirurgische Klinik I - Allgemein- und Viszeral- und Thoraxchirurgie, Klinikum Darmstadt GmbH, Grafenstraße 9, 64283, Darmstadt, Deutschland
| | - Kaja Ludwig
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, Thorax- und Gefäßchirurgie, Klinikum Südstadt Rostock, Südring 81, 18059, Rostock, Deutschland
| | - Helmut Messmann
- III. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Augsburg, Stenglinstraße 2, 86156, Augsburg, Deutschland
| | - Markus Moehler
- I. Medizinische Klinik, Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131, Mainz, Deutschland
| | - Pompiliu Piso
- Klinik für Allgemein- und Viszeralchirurgie, Krankenhaus Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg, Prüfeninger Straße 86, 93049, Regensburg, Deutschland
| | - Arved Weimann
- Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral- und Onkologische Chirurgie, Klinikum St. Georg gGmbH, Delitzscher Straße 141, 04129, Leipzig, Deutschland
| | - Hans-Joachim Meyer
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie e.V., Luisenstraße 58/59, 10117, Berlin, Deutschland
| |
Collapse
|