Inactivation system of the mammalian X chromosome

Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation

Early in development, placental and marsupial mammals harbouring at least two X chromosomes per nucleus are faced with a choice that affects the rest of their lives: which of those X chromosomes to transcriptionally inactivate. This choice underlies phenotypical diversity in the composition of tissues and organs and in their response to the environment, and can determine whether an individual will be healthy or affected by an X-linked disease. Here, we review our current understanding of the process of choice during X-chromosome inactivation and its implications, focusing on the strategies evolved by different mammalian lineages and on the known and unknown molecular mechanisms and players involved.

Sex differences in white adipose tissue expansion: emerging molecular mechanisms

The escalating prevalence of individuals becoming overweight and obese is a rapidly rising global health problem, placing an enormous burden on health and economic systems worldwide. Whilst obesity has well described lifestyle drivers, there is also a significant and poorly understood component that is regulated by genetics. Furthermore, there is clear evidence for sexual dimorphism in obesity, where overall risk, degree, subtype and potential complications arising from obesity all differ between males and females. The molecular mechanisms that dictate these sex differences remain mostly uncharacterised. Many studies have demonstrated that this dimorphism is unable to be solely explained by changes in hormones and their nuclear receptors alone, and instead manifests from coordinated and highly regulated gene networks, both during development and throughout life. As we acquire more knowledge in this area from approaches such as large-scale genomic association studies, the more we appreciate the true complexity and heterogeneity of obesity. Nevertheless, over the past two decades, researchers have made enormous progress in this field, and some consistent and robust mechanisms continue to be established. In this review, we will discuss some of the proposed mechanisms underlying sexual dimorphism in obesity, and discuss some of the key regulators that influence this phenomenon.

Transcriptional modulation of entire chromosomes: dosage compensation

Dosage compensation is a regulatory system designed to equalize the transcription output of the genes of the sex chromosomes that are present in different doses in the sexes (X or Z chromosome, depending on the animal species involved). Different mechanisms of dosage compensation have evolved in different animal groups. In Drosophila males, a complex (male-specific lethal) associates with the X chromosome and enhances the activity of most X-linked genes by increasing the rate of RNAPII elongation. In Caenorhabditis, a complex (dosage compensation complex) that contains a number of proteins involved in condensing chromosomes decreases the level of transcription of both X chromosomes in the XX hermaphrodite. In mammals, dosage compensation is achieved by the inactivation, early during development, of most X-linked genes on one of the two X chromosomes in females. The mechanism involves the synthesis of an RNA (Tsix) that protects one of the two Xs from inactivation, and of another RNA (Xist) that coats the other X chromosome and recruits histone and DNA modifying enzymes. This review will focus on the current progress in understanding the dosage compensation mechanisms in the three taxa where it has been best studied at the molecular level: flies, round worms and mammals.

A self-enhanced transport mechanism through long noncoding RNAs for X chromosome inactivation

X-chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mammalian dosage compensation strategy for balancing sex chromosome content between females and males. While works exist on initiation of symmetric breaking, the underlying allelic choice mechanisms and dynamic regulation responsible for the asymmetric fate determination of XCI remain elusive. Here we combine mathematical modeling and experimental data to examine the mechanism of XCI fate decision by analyzing the signaling regulatory circuit associated with long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs) involved in XCI. We describe three plausible gene network models that incorporate features of lncRNAs in their localized actions and rapid transcriptional turnovers. In particular, we show experimentally that Jpx (a lncRNA) is transcribed biallelically, escapes XCI, and is asymmetrically dispersed between two X's. Subjecting Jpx to our test of model predictions against previous experimental observations, we identify that a self-enhanced transport feedback mechanism is critical to XCI fate decision. In addition, the analysis indicates that an ultrasensitive response of Jpx signal on CTCF is important in this mechanism. Overall, our combined modeling and experimental data suggest that the self-enhanced transport regulation based on allele-specific nature of lncRNAs and their temporal dynamics provides a robust and novel mechanism for bi-directional fate decisions in critical developmental processes.

Genetic architecture of skewed X inactivation in the laboratory mouse

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is the mammalian mechanism of dosage compensation that balances X-linked gene expression between the sexes. Early during female development, each cell of the embryo proper independently inactivates one of its two parental X-chromosomes. In mice, the choice of which X chromosome is inactivated is affected by the genotype of a cis-acting locus, the X-chromosome controlling element (Xce). Xce has been localized to a 1.9 Mb interval within the X-inactivation center (Xic), yet its molecular identity and mechanism of action remain unknown. We combined genotype and sequence data for mouse stocks with detailed phenotyping of ten inbred strains and with the development of a statistical model that incorporates phenotyping data from multiple sources to disentangle sources of XCI phenotypic variance in natural female populations on X inactivation. We have reduced the Xce candidate 10-fold to a 176 kb region located approximately 500 kb proximal to Xist. We propose that structural variation in this interval explains the presence of multiple functional Xce alleles in the genus Mus. We have identified a new allele, Xce^e present in Mus musculus and a possible sixth functional allele in Mus spicilegus. We have also confirmed a parent-of-origin effect on X inactivation choice and provide evidence that maternal inheritance magnifies the skewing associated with strong Xce alleles. Based on the phylogenetic analysis of 155 laboratory strains and wild mice we conclude that Xce^a is either a derived allele that arose concurrently with the domestication of fancy mice but prior the derivation of most classical inbred strains or a rare allele in the wild. Furthermore, we have found that despite the presence of multiple haplotypes in the wild Mus musculus domesticus has only one functional Xce allele, Xce^b. Lastly, we conclude that each mouse taxa examined has a different functional Xce allele.

Although mammalian females have two X chromosomes in each cell, only one is functional, while gene expression from the other is silenced through a process called X chromosome inactivation. Little is known about the early stages of this process including how one parental X chromosome is inactivated over the other on a cell-by-cell basis. It has been shown, however, that certain inbred mouse strains are functionally different at a locus that controls this choice that provides an opportunity to identify the locus and determine its molecular mechanism. This has been the goal of many researchers over the past 40 years with incremental success. Here we took advantage of new mouse genotype and whole genome sequencing data to pinpoint the locus controlling choice. Our results identified a smaller region on the X chromosome that contains large duplicated sequences. We propose an explanation for multiple functional alleles in mouse and provide insight into the possible molecular mechanism of X chromosome inactivation choice. Our evolutionary analysis reveals why functional diversity at this locus appears to be common in laboratory mice and offers an explanation as to why we do not see this level of diversity in humans.

Jpx RNA activates Xist by evicting CTCF

In mammals, dosage compensation between XX and XY individuals occurs through X chromosome inactivation (XCI). The noncoding Xist RNA is expressed and initiates XCI only when more than one X chromosome is present. Current models invoke a dependency on the X-to-autosome ratio (X:A), but molecular factors remain poorly defined. Here, we demonstrate that molecular titration between an X-encoded RNA and an autosomally encoded protein dictates Xist induction. In pre-XCI cells, CTCF protein represses Xist transcription. At the onset of XCI, Jpx RNA is upregulated, binds CTCF, and extricates CTCF from one Xist allele. We demonstrate that CTCF is an RNA-binding protein and is titrated away from the Xist promoter by Jpx RNA. Thus, Jpx activates Xist by evicting CTCF. The functional antagonism via molecular titration reveals a role for long noncoding RNA in epigenetic regulation.

Nonrandom X chromosome inactivation is influenced by multiple regions on the murine X chromosome

During the development of female mammals, one of the two X chromosomes is inactivated, serving as a dosage-compensation mechanism to equalize the expression of X-linked genes in females and males. While the choice of which X chromosome to inactivate is normally random, X chromosome inactivation can be skewed in F1 hybrid mice, as determined by alleles at the X chromosome controlling element (Xce), a locus defined genetically by Cattanach over 40 years ago. Four Xce alleles have been defined in inbred mice in order of the tendency of the X chromosome to remain active: Xce(a) < Xce(b) < Xce(c) < Xce(d). While the identity of the Xce locus remains unknown, previous efforts to map sequences responsible for the Xce effect in hybrid mice have localized the Xce to candidate regions that overlap the X chromosome inactivation center (Xic), which includes the Xist and Tsix genes. Here, we have intercrossed 129S1/SvImJ, which carries the Xce(a) allele, and Mus musculus castaneus EiJ, which carries the Xce(c) allele, to generate recombinant lines with single or double recombinant breakpoints near or within the Xce candidate region. In female progeny of 129S1/SvImJ females mated to recombinant males, we have measured the X chromosome inactivation ratio using allele-specific expression assays of genes on the X chromosome. We have identified regions, both proximal and distal to Xist/Tsix, that contribute to the choice of which X chromosome to inactivate, indicating that multiple elements on the X chromosome contribute to the Xce.

Genetic control of X chromosome inactivation in mice: definition of the Xce candidate interval

In early mammalian development, one of the two X chromosomes is silenced in each female cell as a result of X chromosome inactivation, the mammalian dosage compensation mechanism. In the mouse epiblast, the choice of which chromosome is inactivated is essentially random, but can be biased by alleles at the X-linked X controlling element (Xce). Although this locus was first described nearly four decades ago, the identity and precise genomic localization of Xce remains elusive. Within the X inactivation center region of the X chromosome, previous linkage disequilibrium studies comparing strains of known Xce genotypes have suggested that Xce is physically distinct from Xist, although this has not yet been established by genetic mapping or progeny testing. In this report, we used quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping strategies to define the minimal Xce candidate interval. Subsequent analysis of recombinant chromosomes allowed for the establishment of a maximum 1.85-Mb candidate region for the Xce locus. Finally, we use QTL approaches in an effort to identify additional modifiers of the X chromosome choice, as we have previously demonstrated that choice in Xce heterozygous females is significantly influenced by genetic variation present on autosomes (Chadwick and Willard 2005). We did not identify any autosomal loci with significant associations and thus show conclusively that Xce is the only major locus to influence X inactivation patterns in the crosses analyzed. This study provides a foundation for future analyses into the genetic control of X chromosome inactivation and defines a 1.85-Mb interval encompassing all the major elements of the Xce locus.

Abnormal X: autosome ratio, but normal X chromosome inactivation in human triploid cultures

BACKGROUND

X chromosome inactivation (XCI) is that aspect of mammalian dosage compensation that brings about equivalence of X-linked gene expression between females and males by inactivating one of the two X chromosomes (Xi) in normal female cells, leaving them with a single active X (Xa) as in male cells. In cells with more than two X's, but a diploid autosomal complement, all X's but one, Xa, are inactivated. This phenomenon is commonly thought to suggest 1) that normal development requires a ratio of one Xa per diploid autosomal set, and 2) that an early event in XCI is the marking of one X to be active, with remaining X's becoming inactivated by default.

RESULTS

Triploids provide a test of these ideas because the ratio of one Xa per diploid autosomal set cannot be achieved, yet this abnormal ratio should not necessarily affect the one-Xa choice mechanism for XCI. Previous studies of XCI patterns in murine triploids support the single-Xa model, but human triploids mostly have two-Xa cells, whether they are XXX or XXY. The XCI patterns we observe in fibroblast cultures from different XXX human triploids suggest that the two-Xa pattern of XCI is selected for, and may have resulted from rare segregation errors or Xi reactivation.

CONCLUSION

The initial X inactivation pattern in human triploids, therefore, is likely to resemble the pattern that predominates in murine triploids, i.e., a single Xa, with the remaining X's inactive. Furthermore, our studies of XIST RNA accumulation and promoter methylation suggest that the basic features of XCI are normal in triploids despite the abnormal X:autosome ratio.

Isolation and analysis of sequences showing sex-specific cytosine methylation in the mealybug Planococcus lilacinus

Genomic libraries of Planococcus lilacinus, a mealybug in which paternal chromosomes are facultatively heterochromatic and inactive in sons but not in daughters, were probed with subtraction probes in order to estimate the number of sequences displaying sex-specific cytosine methylation in CpG dinucleotides. Sequences showing male-specific methylation were found to occur approximately 2.5 times more often than those showing female-specific methylation. In order to directly isolate sequences showing sex-specific CpG methylation, we employed methylation-specific arbitrarily primed (MS-AP) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and identified 72 sex-specific products, of which 51 were from males and 21 from females. Amplification of bisulfite-modified DNA and subsequent Southern hybridization showed that in 33 out of these 72 sex-specific products, there was differential methylation of homologous sequences; i.e., both methylated and unmethylated copies of the same sequence occurred in one sex whereas only unmethylated copies were present in the opposite sex. Sequencing of bisulfite-modified DNA showed an interspersion of CpG and non-CpG methylation among the sex-specifically methylated sequences. Sequences showing male-specific CpG methylation are organized as transcriptionally silent chromatin in males but not in females, whereas those showing female-specific CpG methylation are organized as transcriptionally silent chromatin in females but not in males. The sequences identified in this study that show differential methylation in males, but are unmethylated in females, may prove useful in the study of imprinting in the mealybug system.

Stochasticity or the fatal ‘imperfection’ of cloning

The concept of clone is analysed with the aim of exploring the limits to which a phenotype can be said to be determined geneticaly. First of all, mutations that result from the replication, topological manipulation or lesion of DNA introduce a source of heritable variation in an otherwise identical genetic background. But more important, stochastic effects in many biological processes may superimpose a phenotypic variation which is not encoded in the genome. The source of stochasticity ranges from the random selection of alleles or whole chromosomes to be expressed in small cell populations, to fluctuations in processes such as gene expression, due to limiting amounts of the players involved. The picture emerging is that the term clone is a statistical over-simplification representing a series of individuals having essentially the same genome but capable of exhibiting wide phenotypic variation. Finally, to what extent fluctuations in biological processes, usually thought of as noise, are in fact signal is also discussed.

An N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea mutagenesis screen for epigenetic mutations in the mouse

The mammalian epigenetic phenomena of X inactivation and genomic imprinting are incompletely understood. X inactivation equalizes X-linked expression between males and females by silencing genes on one X chromosome during female embryogenesis. Genomic imprinting functionally distinguishes the parental genomes, resulting in parent-specific monoallelic expression of particular genes. N-ethyl-N-nitrosourea (ENU) mutagenesis was used in the mouse to screen for mutations in novel factors involved in X inactivation. Previously, we reported mutant pedigrees identified through this screen that segregate aberrant X-inactivation phenotypes and we mapped the mutation in one pedigree to chromosome 15. We now have mapped two additional mutations to the distal chromosome 5 and the proximal chromosome 10 in a second pedigree and show that each of the mutations is sufficient to induce the mutant phenotype. We further show that the roles of these factors are specific to embryonic X inactivation as neither genomic imprinting of multiple genes nor imprinted X inactivation is perturbed. Finally, we used mice bearing selected X-linked alleles that regulate X chromosome choice to demonstrate that the phenotypes of all three mutations are consistent with models in which the mutations have affected molecules involved specifically in the choice or the initiation of X inactivation.

Autosomal dominant mutations affecting X inactivation choice in the mouse

X chromosome inactivation is the silencing mechanism eutherian mammals use to equalize the expression of X-linked genes between males and females early in embryonic development. In the mouse, genetic control of inactivation requires elements within the X inactivation center (Xic) on the X chromosome that influence the choice of which X chromosome is to be inactivated in individual cells. It has long been posited that unidentified autosomal factors are essential to the process. We have used chemical mutagenesis in the mouse to identify specific factors involved in X inactivation and report two genetically distinct autosomal mutations with dominant effects on X chromosome choice early in embryogenesis.

In vitro and early in vivo development of sheep gynogenones and putative androgenones

Genomic imprinting, where only one of the two parental genes is expressed, occurs in many phyla. In mammals, however, this phenomenon has been primarily studied in mice, and to a lesser extent, in humans. To understand how genomic imprinting may affect development in other species, particularly those with a different mode of placental development from mice and humans, 339 sheep zygotes were micromanipulated to contain either 2 large (presumptive male) or 2 small (presumptive female) pronuclei. One hundred and twenty-seven of these embryos and 86 manipulated and nonmanipulated control embryos were transferred to recipient ewes over 3 breeding seasons. Twenty-one control and 7 experimental conceptuses were recovered on day 21. Four of these conceptuses derived from zygotes with 2 small pronuclei were identified by karyotyping to be gynogenones (maternal-derived genome). While the gross morphology of the embryos appeared no different to those of normal controls, the extra-embryonic tissue from the conceptuses showed some hypertrophy and hypervascularization. Preliminary Northern blots of mRNA from allantoic and trophoblast tissue showed an overexpression of H19 and an underexpression of IGF2. Although the sheep gynogenetic phenotype contrasts with that seen in mice, these two genes appear to be similarly differentially expressed.

The evolution of chromosomal sex determination and dosage compensation

In many species, sex is determined by a system based on X and Y chromosomes, the latter having lost much of their genetic activity. Y chromosomes have evolved independently many times, and the associated change in gene dosage in the heterogametic (XY) sex is often compensated for by regulatory mechanisms which ensure equal amounts of gene products of X-linked loci in males and females. There have recently been substantial advances in our knowledge of the molecular biology and genetics of sex chromosomes and dosage compensation, and in our understanding of the population genetic processes which are involved in their evolution.

Genetic conflict and evolution of mammalian X-chromosome inactivation

The existence of parentally imprinted gene expression in the somatic tissues of mammals and plants can be explained by a theory of intragenomic genetic conflict, which is a logical extension of classical parent-offspring conflict theory. This theory unites conceptually the phenomena of autosomal imprinting and X-chromosome inactivation. We argue that recent experimental studies of X-chromosome inactivation and androgenetic development address previously published predictions of the conflict theory, and we discuss possible explanations for the occurrence of random X-inactivation in the somatic tissues of eutherians.

A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome

X-chromosome inactivation results in the cis-limited dosage compensation of genes on one of the pair of X chromosomes in mammalian females. Although most X-linked genes are believed to be subject to inactivation, several are known to be expressed from both active and inactive X chromosomes. Here we describe an X-linked gene with a novel expression pattern--transcripts are detected only from the inactive X chromosome (Xi) and not from the active X chromosome (Xa). This gene, called XIST (for Xi-specific transcripts), is a candidate for a gene either involved in or uniquely influenced by the process of X inactivation.

Localization of the X inactivation centre on the human X chromosome in Xq13

X-chromosome inactivation results in the strictly cis-limited inactivation of many but not all genes on one of the two X chromosomes during early development in somatic cells of mammalian females. One feature of virtually all models of X inactivation is the existence of an X-inactivation centre (XIC) required in cis for inactivation to occur. This concept predicts that all structurally abnormal X chromosomes capable of being inactivated have in common a defineable region of the X chromosome. Here we report an analysis of several such rearranged human X chromosomes and define a minimal region of overlap. The results are consistent with models invoking a single XIC and provide a molecular foothold for cloning and analysing the XIC region. One of the markers that defines this region is the XIST gene, which is expressed specifically from inactive, but not active, X chromosomes. The localization of the XIST gene to the XIC region on the human X chromosome implicates XIST in some aspect of X inactivation.

The evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes

The facts and ideas which have been discussed lead to the following synthesis and model. 1. Heteromorphic sex chromosomes evolved from a pair of homomorphic chromosomes which had an allelic difference at the sex-determining locus. 2. The first step in the evolution of sex-chromosome heteromorphism involved either a conformational or a structural difference between the homologues. A structural difference could have arisen through a rearrangement such as an inversion or a translocation. A conformational difference could have occurred if the sex-determining locus was located in a chromosomal domain which behaved as a single control unit and involved a substantial segment of the chromosome. It is assumed that any conformational difference present in somatic cells would have been maintained in meiotic prophase. 3. Lack of conformational or structural homology between the sex chromosomes led to meiotic pairing failure. Since pairing failure reduced fertility, mechanisms preventing it had a selective advantage. Meiotic inactivation (heterochromatinization) of the differential region of the X chromosome in species with heterogametic males and euchromatinization of the W in species with heterogametic females are such mechanisms, and through them the pairing problems are avoided. 4. Structural and conformational differences between the sex chromosomes in the heterogametic sex reduced recombination. In heterogametic males recombination was reduced still further by the heterochromatinization of the X chromosome, which evolved in response to selection against meiotic pairing failure. 5. Suppression of recombination resulted in an increase in the mutation rate and an increased rate of fixation of deleterious mutations in the recombination-free chromosome regions. Functional degeneration of the genetically isolated regions of the Y and W was the result. In XY males this often led to further meiotic inactivation of the differential region of the X chromosome, and in this way an evolutionary positive-feedback loop may have been established. 6. Structural degeneration (loss of material) followed functional degeneration of Y or W chromosomes either because the functionally degenerate genes had deleterious effects which made their loss a selective advantage, or because shorter chromosomes were selectively neutral and became fixed by chance. 7. The evolutionary routes to sex-chromosome heteromorphism in groups with female heterogamety are more limited than in those with male heterogamety. Oocytes are usually large and long-lived, and are likely to need the products of X- or Z-linked genes. Meiotic inactivation of these chromosomes is therefore unlikely. In the oocytes of ZW females, meiotic pairing failure is avoided through euchromatinization of the W rather than heterochromatinization of the Z chromosome.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Xce genotype has no impact on the effect of imprinting on X-chromosome expression in the mouse yolk sac endoderm

The effect of theXce(x-chromosome controlling element) genotype on the randomness ofX-chromosome inactivation in the mouse was studied by monitoring the expression of theX-linked locuspgk-1. The main aim was to test whether theXcegenotype modified the preferential expression of the maternally derivedX-chromosome in the yolk sac endoderm. Quantitative electrophoresis of phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1) was used to studyPgk-1expression in the foetus, yolk sac mesoderm and yolk sac endoderm at 13½ dayspost coitum. TheXcea/Xcecgenotype caused non-randomX-chromosome expression in the foetus and yolk sac mesoderm. However, there was no evidence that theXcegenotype moderates the preferential expression of the maternally derivedX-chromosome in the yolk sac endoderm, as reported by Rastan & Cattanach (1983).

Parental source of chromosome imprinting and its relevance for X chromosome inactivation

In imprinting, homologous chromosomes behave differently during development according to their parental origin. Typically, paternally derived chromosomes are preferentially inactivated or eliminated. Examples of such phenomena include inactivation of the mammalian X chromosome, inactivation or elimination of one haploid chromosome set in male coccids, and elimination of paternal X chromosomes in the fly Sciara. It has generally been thought that the paternal chromosomes bear an imprint leading to their inactivation or elimination. However, alteration of the parental origin of chromosomes, as in the study of parthenogenotes in mammals and coccids, shows that passage of chromosomes through a male germ cell or fertilization is not essential for inactivation or elimination. It appears that neither chromosome set is programmed to resist or undergo inactivation. Instead the two sets differ in relative sensitivity, and the question is whether the maternal set have an imprint for resistance, or the paternal set one for susceptibility. Very early in development of mammals both X chromosomes are active. This makes it simpler to envisage the maternal X bearing an imprint for resistance to inactivation, which persists through the early developmental period. Similar considerations also apply in coccids and Sciara. Thus, imprinting should be regarded as a phenomenon conferred on the maternal chromosomes in the oocyte. This permits simpler models for the mechanism of X-inactivation, and weakens the case for evolution of X-inactivation from an earlier form of inactivation during male gametogenesis. One may speculate whether imprinting affects timing of gene action in development.

A model for mammalian male determination based on a passive Y chromosome

A model is suggested for mammalian male determination based on interactions postulated to occur among an autosomal repressor gene, an X-linked male-determining gene termed Tdx, and multiple copies of certain DNA sequences on the Y chromosome that do not code for any protein. The repressor, synthesised in limited amounts, has higher affinity for the Y-linked sequences than for Tdx and its affinity for Tdx is greater than that of RNA polymerase. In XY cells the Y effectively binds all available repressor, permitting transcription of Tdx to occur. In XX cells, since competition from the Y-linked high-affinity sequences is absent, the repressor binds to Tdx and prevents transcription. As a result of this competition between Tdx and the Y-linked high-affinity sites for limiting concentrations of the autosomal repressor, the product of the Tdx gene (TDX) is synthesized in the male but not in the female. It is suggested that in determination of the male sex, the role of the Y chromosome is to serve as a sink for the Tdx repressor. The proposed interactions provide a plausible explanation for the genetic properties of several anomalies of sexual development in mouse, man, and other mammals. The model suggests that the postulated multiple, high-affinity sequences on the Y chromosome of the mouse are included among the DNA sequences referred to as the Sxr-Bkm sequences.

Developmental aspects of X chromosome inactivation in eutherian and metatherian mammals

The single active X principle has served for two decades as a focal point for research on the cyclic activation and inactivation of gene loci. Differences in X chromosome inactivation patterns of eutherian and marsupial mammals provide probes for investigating the mechanisms of the X inactivation process. In eutherian mammals, the X chromosome is inactivated early in meiotic prophase in males and remains inactive throughout the rest of spermatogenesis. During meiosis in females, the inactive X chromosome is activated so that both X chromosomes are active in oocytes. During the early cleavage divisions of female embryos, the paternally derived X is activated. It and the maternally derived X remain active until differentiation begins in early embryogenesis. At that time, the paternally derived X is inactivated in cells that give rise to extraembryonic membranes, whereas a random process determines which X chromosome is inactivated in cells that give rise to the embryo itself. Although less is known about developmental aspects of X inactivation in female marsupials, it is clear that the paternal X is preferentially inactive in postembryonic somatic cells. Furthermore, the paternal X is partially active at some loci in some cell types, indicating that it is not regulated as a single unit. The successful adaptation of a small (80-150 g), fecund marsupial to simple laboratory conditions now enables extensive experimentation on the large number of marsupials at various developmental stages. This capability, coupled with the application of newly developed cellular and molecular techniques to questions about X chromosome inactivation, shows great promise for advancing our understanding of the mechanisms that control the cyclic behavior of X chromosome activity.

Interaction between the Xce locus and imprinting of the paternal X chromosome in mouse yolk-sac endoderm

In female eutherian mammals preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome (XP) takes place in certain extra-embryonic tissues such as mouse yolk-sac endoderm, chorionic ectoderm and trophoblast and has been demonstrated both biochemically and cytologically. This is thought to be due to the paternal X chromosome being 'imprinted', that is, somehow marked as different, during either male gametogenesis or fertilization, causing primary nonrandom X-inactivation in tissues that differentiate early, such as trophectoderm and primitive endoderm, from which yolk-sac endoderm is derived. Different alleles of the X-chromosome controlling element, Xce locus, centrally located on the mouse X chromosome, also cause primary nonrandom X-chromosome inactivation in embryonic tissues which would otherwise show random inactivation. The work reported here was designed to elucidate whether the nonrandom inactivation of the imprinted XP in yolk-sac endoderm could be modified, or even overridden, by the effect of different Xce alleles. Using the modified Kanda method we have therefore studied the proportion of cells at metaphase with the XP inactive in separated yolk-sac endoderm and mesoderm of mouse embryos heterozygous for a marker X chromosome (Cattanach's translocation) carrying different Xce alleles on XP and XM. The results show that the extreme Xcec allele, when present on the paternally derived X, can significantly reduce the proportion of inactive XP seen in yolk-sac endoderm compared with controls. This is the first evidence that imprinting of XP is not an 'all or none' event but can be modified by a 'strong' allele at the Xce locus, and is another indication that the Xce locus may represent the inactivation centre.

Transcription of X-chromosomal segmental aneuploids of Drosophila melanogaster and regulation of dosage compensation

Transcription ofXchromosomal DNA has been examined autoradio-graphically in various 1X2Aand 2X2Anormal larvae and 1X2A(+Xfr) and 2X2A(+Xfr) segmental aneuploid larvae of speciesDrosophila melanogaster. The segmental aneuploids contained duplications for the segment 9A–11A and 15D–ISA of theXchromosome. Results show that in the aneuploid male containing 9A–11A duplicaton both the homologous segments involved in the aneuploidy are autonomously hyperactive; their combined activity, measured byX/Agrain ratio, is found to be nearly 70% more than the activity in normal male and about 100% more than that in diplo-Xfemale. In the aneuploid female, containing the aneuploid segment 15D–18A and having three doses of the segment of theXchromosome, the activity was over 100% more than the diplo-Xactivity. The per gene dose activity for the two segments in the aneuploid male and female, respectively, is also significantly higher than their male and female counterparts. The possible role of lack of contiguity of the genetic segments and an intra-nuclear variation has been ruled out by appropriate analysis. We, therefore, interpret these findings to be due to an autonomous expression of theXlinked compensatory genes, resulting from a primary modulation in the organization of the entireXchromosome. The autosomal signal then renders the individual genetic locus hyperactive.

Ectodermal dysplasia in females and inversion of chromosome 9

Absence of sweat glands, hypotrichosis, hypodontia, characteristic facial features, and intolerance to heat, without dystrophia of the nails, are manifestations of sex linked hypohydrotic ectodermal dysplasia. Three males and two females were affected in a family in which the affected females were also carrying a pericentric inversion of chromosome 9. Those phenotypically normal females in this pedigree who were obligate carriers had normal karyotypes. One of the affected females (the proband) had, in addition, primary amenorrhoea, absence of the mammary glands, and rudimentary internal genitalia. The fact that clinical manifestations of ectodermal dysplasia in the carrier females of this family are only observed in those also carrying a pericentric inversion of chromosome 9 in peripheral blood leucocytes perhaps suggests that non-random inactivation of the paternal X chromosome has occurred as a consequence of the inversion.

Relationship between the parental origin of the X chromosomes, embryonic cell lineage and X chromosome expression in mice

The electrophoretic variants of theX-chromosome-linked enzyme phosphoglycerate kinase (PGK-1) have been used to investigate the randomness ofXchromosome expression in the fetus and various extra-embryonic membranes of the mouse conceptus. The amnion shows essentially random expression of the maternally derivedXchromosome (Xm) and the paternally derivedXchromosome (Xp). The parietal endoderm, however, shows exclusive or preferential expression ofXm. The results support the idea that the randomness ofXchromosome expression is correlated with embryonic cell lineage such thatXmis preferentially (perhaps exclusively) expressed in derivatives of the primitive endoderm and trophectoderm but thatXmandXpare randomly expressed in the derivatives of the primitive ectoderm.

Experiments involving ovary transplants, embryo transfers or crosses with heterozygous mothers confirm previous findings thatXmis preferentially expressed regardless of theXchromosome expressed in the reproductive tract. Additional experiments show that the preferentially expressedXchromosome in the parietal endoderm and visceral yolk sac endoderm of a normalXmXpconceptus is alwaysXmregardless of grand-parental origin ofXmand regardless of whether the mother is a normalXXfemale or anXOfemale.Xpis, however, expressed in these tissues hiXpOfemale conceptuses. It is argued that a form of chromosome imprinting occurs at each generation to markXmandXpas different and that this difference influences the choice of whichXchromosomes are expressed in each cell lineage.

X-chromosome inactivation in extra-embryonic membranes of diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos demonstrated by differential staining

In somatic cells of female mammals one of the two X chromosomes is genetically inactive and heterochromatic, resulting in dosage compensation for X-linked genes. In marsupials the paternally derived X chromosome is preferentially inactivated. In eutherian mammals, although either X chromosome can be inactivated at random in somatic cells, preferential inactivation of the paternally derived X chromosome has been demonstrated cytologically in mouse and rat yolk sac and mouse chorion and biochemically in mouse yolk sac, chorionic ectoderm and trophoblast. In mouse yolk sac the non-random element has been shown both biochemically and cytologically to be confined to the endoderm layer in which there is almost total paternal X-chromosome activity in the separated yolk sac layers of diploid parthenogenetic mouse embryos in which both X chromosomes are maternally derived. Kaufman et al. have demonstrated X inactivation in somatic cells of diploid parthenogenetic embryos, and we have used a modification of Kanda's method, which renders the presumptive inactive X dark staining, to reveal an inactive X chromosome in both endoderm and mesoderm layers of separated yolk sacs from parthenogenones. Thus even in tissues in which there is normally total non-random paternal X inactivation, in the absence of a paternally derived X chromosome a maternally derived X can be inactivated.

X-Y translocation in a retarded phenotypic male. Clinical, cytogenetic, biochemical, and serogenetic studies

Cytogenetic studies on a mentally retarded boy revealed an X-Y translocation, karyotype 46,X,t(X;Y)(p22;q11). Only 5 other such cases have been reported and these were all females. The unequivocal male phenotype suggested non-random inactivation of the normal maternally derived X chromosome, and that the non-inactivated X-Y translocation chromosome included the locus for male determination. Confirmation of this was provided by unassociated X and Y chromatin in interphase cells, as well as by reverse banding after BrdU incorporation and autoradiography of metaphase chromosomes. There was anomalous Xg blood group inheritance in the proband, indicating possible localisation of the Xg locus to the terminal portion of the X short arm. Linkage of Xg and a form of X-linked mental retardation is suggested. Close linkage of the Xg locus with the loci for alpha-galactosidase, phosphoglycerate kinase, G-6-PD, and MPS II was excluded.

Gene dosage compensation and the evolution of sex chromosomes

Dosage compensation is a mechanism by means of which the activity of X-linked or Z-linked genes is made equal in the two sexes of organisms with an XX compared to XY or ZZ compared to ZW basis of sex determination. In mammals, compensation is achieved by the inactivation of one X chromosome in somatic cells of females. In Drosophila, compensation does not involve inactivation. The two X chromosomes in females as well as the single X in males are regulated, and individual genes are thought to respond independently to the regulatory mechanism. It is proposed that in both groups of organisms the evolution of heteromorphic sex chromosomes was gradual and occurred as the direct result of the evolution of dosage compensation rather than the reverse.

Model for evolution of Y chromosomes and dosage compensation

Some difficulties with the classical model for the evolution of a genetically invert Y chromosome are discussed. An alternative model is proposed, which is based on the principle of Mullers ratchet; this involves the accumulation of chromosomes bearing deleterious mutant genes in a finite population in the absence of crossing-over. This process would result in the gradual increase, with time, in the number of mutant loci carried in an average Y chromosome, although the frequency of individual deleterious alleles at most loci remains low. It is shown that this creates a selection pressure for differentially increasing the activity of the X chromosome in heterogametic individuals at the expense of that of the Y, leading eventually to a genetically inert Y chromosome and to the evolution of dosage compensation.

Preferential X inactivation in human placenta membranes: is the paternal X inactive in early embryonic development of female mammals?

In placenta membranes of newborn girls carrying electrophoretically distinguishable G6PD alleles, the maternally derived isozyme is expressed preferentially. This phenomenon cannot be explained by allelic differences in enzyme activity or by somatic selection directed against cells with particular G6PD phenotypes. Instead, it may be that in this tissue X inactivation is nonrandom. Preferential expression of the maternal X chromosome, as has been shown in marsupials and in extraembryonic membranes of rodents and now in man, may reflect the state of activity of the X chromosomes in the early stages of female embryonic development.

Identification of the origin of triploidy by HLA markers

HLA-A and HLA-B markers have been determined in fibroblasts grown from tissues of triploid conceptuses and have been tested in the parents. Informative data on the origin of triploidy were obtained in eight cases: diandry I or dispermy in 4 cases, diandry II or dispermy in 2, digyny I or II in 2. This confirms that triploidy involved more frequently two sets of paternal chromosomes.

On the components of segregation distortion in Drosophila melanogaster

The segregation distorter (SD) complex is a naturally occurring meiotic drive system with the property that males heterozygous for an SD-bearing chromosome 2 and an SD(+)-bearing homolog transmit the SD-bearing chromosome almost exclusively. This distorted segregation is the consequence of an induced dysfunction of those sperm that receive the SD(+) homolog. From previous studies, two loci have been implicated in this phenomenon: the Sd locus which is required to produce distortion, and the Responder (Rsp) locus that is the site at which Sd acts. There are two allelic alternatives of Rsp-sensitive (Rsp(sens)) and insensitive (Rsp(ins)); a chromosome carrying Rsp(ins) is not distorted by SD. In the present study, the function and location of each of these elements was examined by a genetic and cytological characterization of X-ray-induced mutations at each locus. The results indicate the following: (1) the Rsp locus is located in the proximal heterochromatin of 2R; (2) a deletion for the Rsp locus renders a chromosome insensitive to distortion; (3) the Sd locus is located to the left of pr (2-54.5), in the region from 37D2-D7 to 38A6-B2 of the salivary chromosome map; (4) an SD chromosome deleted for Sd loses its ability to distort; (5) there is another important component of the SD system, E(SD), in or near the proximal heterochromatin of 2L, that behaves as a strong enhancer of distortion. The results of these studies allow a reinterpretation of results from earlier analyses of the SD system and serve to limit the possible mechanisms to account for segregation distortion.

On the dynamics of activation of mammalian X chromosomes

We have investigated a mathematical model of the process of activation of the X chromosomes in eutherian mammals. The model assumes that the activation is brought about over some definite time interval T by the complete saturation of N receptor sites on an X chromosome by M activating molecules (or multiples of M). The probability λ of a first hit on the receptor site is considered to be very much lower than that of subsequent hits; that is, we assume strong co-operative binding. Assuming further that an incomplete saturation of receptor sites is malfunctional, we can show that for proper activation of X chromosomes in normal diploid males and females, we must have λMT ≥ 3 and 0·96 ≤ N/M ≤ 1. An extension of this analysis for the triploid cases shows that under these conditions, we cannot explain the activation of two X's if the number of activating molecules is fixed at M. This suggests that there must be two classes of triploid embryos differing from each other in a step-wise manner in the number of activating molecules. In other words, triploids with two active X chromosomes would require 2M activating molecules as opposed to M molecules in triploids with a single active X. This interpretation of the two classes of triploids would be consistent with differing imprinting histories of the parental contributions to the triploid zygote.

Analysis of deoxyribonucleic acid replication in human X chromosomes by fluorescence microscopy

The genetically inactive, late-replicating human female X chromosome can be effectively distinguished from its more active, earlier-replicating homologue, when cells are grown according to the appropriate BrdU-33258 Hoechst protocol. Results obtained from a fluorescence analysis of DNA replication in X chromosomes are consistent with those from previous autoradiographic studies, but reflect additional sensitivity and resolution offered by the BrdU-Hoechst methodology. Both qualitative and quantitative differences in 33258 Hoechst fluorescence intensity, reflecting alterations in replication kinetics, can be detected between the two X chromosomes in female cells. The pattern of replication in the single X chromosome in male cells is indistinguishable from that of the early female X. Intercellular fluctuations in the distribution of regions replicating early or late in S phase, particularly with reference to the late female X, can be localized to structural bands, suggesting multifocal control of DNA synthesis in X chromosomes.