1
|
Jasinski M, Wisniewski P, Bielinska M, Siekiera J, Kamecki K, Salagierski M. Perioperative and Oncological Outcomes of Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation versus Partial Nephrectomy for cT1a Renal Cancers: A Retrospective Study on Groups with Similar Clinical Characteristics. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:1528. [PMID: 38672611 PMCID: PMC11049424 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16081528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2024] [Revised: 04/08/2024] [Accepted: 04/13/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Over the recent years, progress in imaging techniques has led to an increased detection of kidney tumours, including small renal masses. While surgery is still the standard of care, there is a growing interest in minimally invasive methods. Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous ablation is particularly attractive because it is a safe and relatively simple procedure. In this study, we investigated the results of US-guided percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) and partial nephrectomy (PN) in the treatment of cT1a renal cancers. Between August 2016 and February 2022, 271 patients with renal tumours underwent percutaneous RFA as initial treatment in our institution. In the same period, 396 patients with renal tumours underwent surgical tumour excision. For the purpose of this study, only patients with confirmed renal cancer with matched age and tumour characteristics (size, location) were selected for both groups. Thus, a group of 44 PN patients and 41 RFA patients were formed with the same qualification criteria for both groups. Parameters such as procedure length, blood loss, hospital stay, analgesics used, and pre- and post-procedural serum creatinine were compared between these groups. Patients followed up with contrast-enhanced CT. There was no significant difference in age, tumour size, tumour location, and creatinine levels between these groups. All procedures were generally well tolerated. During a median follow-up of 28 months, two cases of recurrence/residual disease were found in each group. The overall survival was 100% in both groups, and all patients were disease-free at the end of observation. Percutaneous RFA was associated with a significantly shorter procedure length and hospital stay, lower blood loss, and lower analgesics used than PN. In the selected group of renal cancer patients, US-guided percutaneous RFA was associated with a shorter hospital stay, less analgesics used, and a shorter procedure length than PN, without differences in the oncological results or kidney function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milosz Jasinski
- Urology Department, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland;
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Przemyslaw Wisniewski
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Marta Bielinska
- Department of Coordination of Oncological Patient Handling, The University Clinical Centre in Gdańsk, Dębinki 7, 80-952 Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Jerzy Siekiera
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Kamecki
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Salagierski
- Urology Department, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland;
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Lucignani G, De Lorenzis E, Ierardi AM, Silvani C, Marmiroli A, Nizzardo M, Albo G, Carrafiello G, Montanari E, Boeri L. Perioperative and Survival Outcomes of Patients Treated With Robot-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy and Percutaneous Microwave Ablation for Small Renal Masses: A Single Center Experience. Clin Genitourin Cancer 2024; 22:237-243. [PMID: 38065718 DOI: 10.1016/j.clgc.2023.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2023] [Revised: 11/02/2023] [Accepted: 11/04/2023] [Indexed: 03/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and microwave ablation (MWA) are 2 of the most advanced techniques for the management of localized small renal masses. PURPOSE To compare the perioperative, functional and oncological results of RAPN and MWA. MATERIALS AND METHODS Data from 171 consecutive patients undergoing either RAPN or MWA for a localized small renal mass at a single academic center was retrospectively collected. Baseline features included patients' demographics and masses' characteristics. Procedures were compared in terms of perioperative outcomes and renal function variation Progression of a persistent lesion or local recurrence after a complete treatment defined local tumor progression. Descriptive statistics and survival analysis tested the association between predictors and local tumor progression. RESULTS Of all, 109 and 62 patients underwent RAPN and MWA. Patients in the MWA group were older (P = .002) had higher Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) (P < .001) and higher frequency of preoperative chronic kidney disease (P < .001). MWA led to a shorter postoperative hospitalization time (P < .001) and lower incidence of medical complications (6.5% vs. 22.9%, P = .02) than RAPN. GFR decline was similar between groups both at discharge (P = .39) and at the time of last follow up (P = 1.00). A lower rate of secondary interventions (11.7% vs. 2.8%, P = .037) and a better disease-free survival (83.2% vs. 96.5%, P = .027) were reported after RAPN. Conversely, cancer specific and overall survival were comparable (P > .05). At univariate regression analysis, MWA was associated with local tumor progression (HR 3.46, P = .040). CONCLUSION MWA displayed a lower perioperative impact, while functional outcomes were similar after each intervention. RAPN resulted superior in terms of tumor eradication, but no difference was noted regarding cancer specific survival. Thus, MWA represents a valid alternative in frail patients, though less radical than RAPN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianpaolo Lucignani
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Elisa De Lorenzis
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Maria Ierardi
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Carlo Silvani
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Marmiroli
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Marco Nizzardo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Albo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Gianpaolo Carrafiello
- Department of Radiology, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Emanuele Montanari
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Luca Boeri
- Department of Urology, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Aveta A, Iossa V, Spena G, Conforti P, Pagano G, Dinacci F, Verze P, Manfredi C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Spirito L, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Fiorenza A, Russo P, Crocerossa F, Lucarelli G, Perdonà S, Sanseverino R, Siracusano S, Cilio S, Pandolfo SD. Ablative Treatments for Small Renal Masses and Management of Recurrences: A Comprehensive Review. Life (Basel) 2024; 14:450. [PMID: 38672721 PMCID: PMC11050889 DOI: 10.3390/life14040450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2024] [Revised: 03/23/2024] [Accepted: 03/26/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
This review focuses on ablative techniques for small renal masses (SRMs), including radiofrequency ablation (RFA), cryoablation (CA), microwave ablation (MWA), and irreversible electroporation (IRE), and discusses recurrence management. Through an extensive literature review, we outline the procedures, outcomes, and follow-up strategies associated with each ablative method. The review provides a detailed examination of these techniques-RFA, CA, MWA, and IRE-elucidating their respective outcomes. Recurrence rates vary among them, with RFA and CA showing comparable rates, MWA demonstrating favorable short-term results, and IRE exhibiting promise in experimental stages. For managing recurrences, various strategies are considered, including active surveillance, re-ablation, or salvage surgery. Surveillance is preferred post-RFA and post-CA, due to slow SRM growth, while re-ablation, particularly with RFA and CA, is deemed feasible without additional complications. Salvage surgery emerges as a viable option for larger or resistant tumors. While ablative techniques offer short-term results comparable to surgery, further research is essential to understand their long-term effects fully. Decisions concerning recurrence management should consider individual and tumor-specific factors. Imaging, notably contrast-enhanced ultrasounds, plays a pivotal role in assessing treatment success, emphasizing the necessity of a multidisciplinary approach for optimal outcomes. The lack of randomized trials highlights the need for further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | - Vincenzo Iossa
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Spena
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Paolo Conforti
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Giovanni Pagano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Fabrizio Dinacci
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (C.M.); (L.S.)
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Alessandra Fiorenza
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Pierluigi Russo
- Department of Urology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli, Largo Francesco Vito 1, 00168 Rome, Italy;
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Division of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy;
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (G.S.); (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Roberto Sanseverino
- Department of Urology, Umberto I Hospital, ASL Salerno, 84014 Nocera Inferiore, Italy; (V.I.); (R.S.)
| | | | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.A.); (P.C.); (G.P.); (F.D.); (L.N.); (A.F.); (S.C.)
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67100 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
de Angelis M, Morra S, Scheipner L, Siech C, Jannello LMI, Baudo A, Goyal JA, Tian Z, Longo N, Ahyai S, de Cobelli O, Chun FKH, Saad F, Shariat SF, Carmignani L, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Karakiewicz PI. Cancer-specific mortality in non-metastatic T1a renal cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy versus partial nephrectomy. World J Urol 2024; 42:193. [PMID: 38530480 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-024-04856-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2023] [Accepted: 02/06/2024] [Indexed: 03/28/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Radiotherapy (RT) represents a treatment option for small renal masses with proven feasibility and tolerability. However, it has never been directly compared to partial nephrectomy (PN) with cancer-specific mortality (CSM) as an endpoint. METHODS Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2020), we identified T1aN0M0 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) patients treated with RT or PN. We relied on 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) for age, tumor size and histology. Subsequently, cumulative incidence plots and multivariable competing risks regression (CRR) models were fitted. The same methodology was then re-applied to a subset of patients with tumor size 21-40 mm. RESULTS Of 40,355 patients with T1aN0M0 RCC, 40,262 underwent PN (99.8%) vs 93 underwent RT (0.2%). RT patients were older (median age 72 vs 60 years, p < 0.001) and harbored larger tumor size (median size 28 vs 25 mm, p < 0.001) and a higher proportion of non-clear cell RCC (49% vs 22%, p < 0.001). After 1:1 PSM (92 RT versus 92 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots' derived CSM was 21.3 vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT independently predicted higher CSM (hazard ratio (HR) 4.3, p < 0.001). In the subgroup with tumor size 21-40 mm, after 1:1 PSM (72 RT versus 72 PN patients), cumulative incidence plots derived CSM was 21.3% vs 4%, respectively. In multivariable CRR models, RT also independently predicted higher CSM (HR 4.7, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS In T1aN0M0 RCC patients, relative to PN, RT is associated with significantly higher absolute and relative CSM, even in patients with tumor size 21-40 mm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario de Angelis
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada.
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy.
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy.
| | - Simone Morra
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Lukas Scheipner
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Carolin Siech
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Letizia Maria Ippolita Jannello
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Baudo
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Jordan A Goyal
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Zhe Tian
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Nicola Longo
- Department of Neurosciences, Science of Reproduction and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, 80131, Naples, Italy
| | - Sascha Ahyai
- Department of Urology, Medical University of Graz, Graz, Austria
| | - Ottavio de Cobelli
- Department of Urology, IEO European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, Via Ripamonti 435, Milan, Italy
| | - Felix K H Chun
- Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Fred Saad
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| | - Shahrokh F Shariat
- Department of Urology, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Urology, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY, USA
- Department of Urology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Hourani Center of Applied Scientific Research, Al-Ahliyya Amman University, Amman, Jordan
| | - Luca Carmignani
- Department of Urology, IRCCS Policlinico San Donato, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesco Montorsi
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Alberto Briganti
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI; IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, Milan, Italy
- Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Pierre I Karakiewicz
- Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit, Division of Urology, University of Montréal Health Center, Montreal, QC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Pandolfo SD, Wu Z, Campi R, Bertolo R, Amparore D, Mari A, Verze P, Manfredi C, Franco A, Ditonno F, Cerrato C, Ferro M, Lasorsa F, Contieri R, Napolitano L, Tufano A, Lucarelli G, Cilio S, Perdonà S, Siracusano S, Autorino R, Aveta A. Outcomes and Techniques of Robotic-Assisted Partial Nephrectomy (RAPN) for Renal Hilar Masses: A Comprehensive Systematic Review. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:693. [PMID: 38398084 PMCID: PMC10886610 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16040693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/25/2023] [Revised: 01/28/2024] [Accepted: 01/31/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
Background: Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is increasingly being employed in the management of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and it is expanding in the field of complex renal tumors. The aim of this systematic review was to consolidate and assess the results of RAPN when dealing with entirely central hilar masses and to examine the various methods used to address the surgical difficulties associated with them. Methods: A thorough literature search in September 2023 across various databases focused on RAPN for renal hilar masses, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. The primary goal was to evaluate RAPN's surgical and functional outcomes, with a secondary aim of examining different surgical techniques. Out of 1250 records, 13 full-text manuscripts were reviewed. Results: Evidence is growing in favor of RAPN for renal hilar masses. Despite a predominance of retrospective studies and a lack of long-term data, RAPN shows positive surgical outcomes and preserves renal function without compromising cancer treatment effectiveness. Innovative suturing and clamping methods are emerging in surgical management. Conclusions: RAPN is a promising technique for managing renal hilar masses in RCC, offering effective surgical outcomes and renal function preservation. The study highlights the need for more long-term data and prospective studies to further validate these findings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, University of L’Aquila, 67010 L’Aquila, Italy;
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China;
| | - Riccardo Campi
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Riccardo Bertolo
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
| | - Daniele Amparore
- Division of Urology, Department of Oncology, School of Medicine, University of Turin, San Luigi Hospital, Orbassano, 10043 Turin, Italy;
| | - Andrea Mari
- Urological Robotic Surgery and Renal Transplantation Unit, Careggi Hospital, University of Florence, 50121 Firenze, Italy; (R.C.); (A.M.)
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy;
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
- Department of Urology, Sant’Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Ditonno
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, 37100 Verona, Italy; (R.B.); (F.D.)
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK;
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, IRCCS—European Institute of Oncology, 71013 Milan, Italy;
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy;
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Antonio Tufano
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy; (F.L.); (G.L.)
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department of Urology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS, “Fondazione G. Pascale”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (A.T.); (S.P.)
| | | | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60637, USA; (C.M.); (A.F.); (R.A.)
| | - Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy; (L.N.); (S.C.); (A.A.)
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Muglia R, Marra P, Pinelli D, Dulcetta L, Carbone FS, Barbaro A, Celestino A, Colledan M, Sironi S. Technical and Clinical Outcomes of Laparoscopic-Laparotomic Hepatocellular Carcinoma Thermal Ablation with Microwave Technology: Case Series and Review of Literature. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 16:92. [PMID: 38201536 PMCID: PMC10778313 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16010092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2023] [Revised: 12/21/2023] [Accepted: 12/23/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate technical and clinical outcomes of intraoperative (laparoscopic/laparotomic) microwave ablation on HCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective single-center study evaluating consecutive patients treated for very early/early-stage HCC with intraoperative microwave ablation from 1 July 2017 to 30 June 2023. In these patients, a percutaneous US-guided approach was excluded due to the nodule's suboptimal visibility or harmful location and liver resection for a deep position or adherences. Data about the clinical stage, surgical approach, liver pathology and nodules characteristics, technical success, complications, and follow-up were collected. Technical success was intended as the absence of locoregional persistence at follow-up CT/MRI controls. RESULTS A total of 36 cirrhotic patients (M:F = 30:6, median age 67 years) were enrolled; 18/36 (50%) had a single nodule, 13/36 (36%) had two, 4/36 had three (11%), and 1/36 had four (3%). Among the patients, 24 (67%) were treated with laparoscopy, and 12/36 (33%) with a laparotomic approach. Sixty HCCs of 16.5 mm (6-50 mm) were treated for 7 min (2-30 min) with 100 W of power. A total of 55 nodules (92%) were treated successfully and showed no residual enhancement at the first postoperative follow-up; the other 5/60 (8%) underwent chemo/radioembolization. There was one complication (3%): a biliary fistula treated with percutaneous drainage and glue embolization. The average hospital stay was 3.5 days (1-51 days), and patients were followed up on average for 238 days (13-1792 days). During follow-up, 5/36 patients (14%) underwent liver transplantation, 1/36 (2%) died during hospitalization and 1 after discharge. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic/laparotomic intraoperative HCC MW ablation is feasible in patients unsuitable for percutaneous approach or hepatic resection, with rare complications and with good technical and clinical outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Riccardo Muglia
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (P.M.); (L.D.); (F.S.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Paolo Marra
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (P.M.); (L.D.); (F.S.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Domenico Pinelli
- Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (D.P.); (M.C.)
| | - Ludovico Dulcetta
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (P.M.); (L.D.); (F.S.C.)
| | - Francesco Saverio Carbone
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (P.M.); (L.D.); (F.S.C.)
| | - Alessandro Barbaro
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Antonio Celestino
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy (A.C.)
| | - Michele Colledan
- Department of General Surgery, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (D.P.); (M.C.)
| | - Sandro Sironi
- Department of Radiology, Papa Giovanni XXIII Hospital, 24127 Bergamo, Italy; (P.M.); (L.D.); (F.S.C.)
- School of Medicine, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20126 Milano, Italy (A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Isgrò G, Rogers A, Veeratterapillay R, Rix D, Page T, Maestroni U, Bertolotti L, Pagnini F, Martini C, De Filippo M, Ziglioli F. Role of Renal Biopsy in the Management of Renal Cancer: Concordance between Ultrasound/CT-Guided Biopsy Results and Definitive Pathology, Adverse Events, and Complication Rate. J Clin Med 2023; 13:31. [PMID: 38202038 PMCID: PMC10779766 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13010031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2023] [Revised: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 10/26/2023] [Indexed: 01/12/2024] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: In the last decade, the number of detected renal cancer cases has increased, with the highest incidence in Western countries. Although renal biopsy is reported as a safe procedure, it is not adopted in all centres. As it is not possible to accurately distinguish benign tumours using imaging, this may lead to overtreatment. Most of the cancer detected on imaging is treated by surgery, radiofrequency ablation (RFA), or cryotherapy. (2) Methods: This was a single-centre retrospective study of 225 patients studied preoperatively with ultrasound (US)/CT-guided renal biopsy, with the aim of supporting clinical management. Decisions regarding the biopsy were based on either MDT indication or physician preference. US-guided renal biopsy was the first option for all patients; CT-guided biopsy was used when US-guided biopsy was not feasible. The efficacy of renal biopsy in terms of diagnostic performance and the concordance between biopsy results and definitive pathology were investigated. Additionally, adverse events related to the biopsy were recorded and analysed. Data collected throughout the study were analysed using binary logistic regression, Fisher's exact test, and Pearson's chi-square test to investigate possible correlations between post-procedural complications and the size of the lesion. (3) Results: Renal biopsy was not diagnostic in 23/225 (10.2%) patients. A CT-guided approach was necessary in 20/225 patients after failure of US-guided biopsy. The complication rate of renal biopsy was 4.8% overall-all Clavien grade I and without any serious sequelae. Interestingly, complications occurred in patients with very different sizes of renal cell carcinoma. No correlation between complications and anticoagulant/antiplatelet drugs was found. No seeding was reported among the patients who underwent partial/radical nephrectomy. (4) Conclusions: Renal biopsy was shown to be safe and effective, with a high concordance between biopsy results and definitive pathology and a low rate of complications. The use of a CT-guided approach whenever the US-guided approach failed improved the diagnostic performance of renal biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianmarco Isgrò
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| | - Alistair Rogers
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - Rajan Veeratterapillay
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - David Rix
- Department of Urology, The Newcastle Upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle upon Tyne NE7 7DN, UK (R.V.)
| | - Toby Page
- Department of Urology, James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| | - Umberto Maestroni
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (F.Z.)
| | - Lorenzo Bertolotti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Francesco Pagnini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Chiara Martini
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy
| | - Massimo De Filippo
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Section of Radiology, University-Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (M.D.F.)
| | - Francesco Ziglioli
- Department of Urology, University Hospital of Parma, 43100 Parma, Italy (F.Z.)
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Barjolle I, Ah-Thiane L, Frampas E, Karam G, Rigaud J, David A. Efficacy and safety of cryoablation for localized renal tumor as an alternative approach to partial nephrectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1235705. [PMID: 37860181 PMCID: PMC10584313 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1235705] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 09/11/2023] [Indexed: 10/21/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Renal cryoablation displays a profile of high tolerance, including in a frail population. Cryoablation appears as a validated alternative treatment to surgery for renal tumors smaller than 4 cm. However, evidence is lacking for larger tumors, despite encouraging data for tumors up to 7 cm. Material and methods This retrospective descriptive study of a population with a stage T1b renal tumor treated by cryoablation was conducted at the Nantes University Hospital between January 2009 and July 2021. Primary endpoint was 3-year rate of local recurrence. Secondary endpoints included technical efficacy, overall and cancer-specific survivals, and safety assessment. Results A total of 63 patients were analyzed. Three-year rate of local recurrence was 11.1%. Primary and secondary technical efficacies were achieved in 88.9% and 96.8% of patients, respectively, and 3-year overall and cancer-specific survival were 87.3% and 95.2%, respectively. Most patients (73%) experienced no complications, 13% of patients had minor (CIRSE grades 1 or 2) adverse effects, and 13% had severe but non-lethal (CIRSE grade 3) adverse effects. One patient died following cryoablation due to colic perforation. The most common AE (all grades) was hemorrhage (9.5%). Discussion This study showed a good efficacy and safety of cryoablation for renal tumors up to 7 cm (T1b). Our results were consistent with a rather sparse literature and contributed to guide future recommendations about cryoablation as an alternative to surgery for T1b renal tumors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irène Barjolle
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHU) Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Loic Ah-Thiane
- Department of Radiotherapy, Western Cancer institute (ICO) René Gauducheau 44805 St-Herblain, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Eric Frampas
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHU) Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Georges Karam
- Department of Urology, University Hospital (CHU) Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Jérôme Rigaud
- Department of Urology, University Hospital (CHU) Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| | - Arthur David
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital (CHU) Nantes, Nantes University, Nantes, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Pandolfo SD, Cerrato C, Wu Z, Franco A, Del Giudice F, Sciarra A, Verze P, Lucarelli G, Imbimbo C, Perdonà S, Cherullo EE, Porpiglia F, Derweesh IH, Autorino R. A systematic review of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy outcomes for advanced indications: Large tumors (cT2-T3), solitary kidney, completely endophytic, hilar, recurrent, and multiple renal tumors. Asian J Urol 2023; 10:390-406. [PMID: 38024426 PMCID: PMC10659988 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajur.2023.06.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2023] [Accepted: 06/19/2023] [Indexed: 12/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) has become widely used for treatment of renal cell carcinoma and it is expanding in the field of complex renal masses. The aim of this systematic review was to analyze outcomes of RAPN for completely endophytic renal masses, large tumors (cT2-T3), renal cell carcinoma in solitary kidney, recurrent tumors, completely endophytic and hilar masses, and simultaneous and multiple tumors. Methods A comprehensive search in the PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases was performed in December 2022 for English language papers. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the role of RAPN in the setting of each category of complex renal masses considered. The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the surgical and functional outcomes. Results After screening 1250 records, 43 full-text manuscripts were selected, comprising over 8500 patients. Twelve and thirteen studies reported data for endophytic and hilar renal masses, respectively. Five and three studies reported outcomes for cT2-T3 and solitary kidney patients, respectively. Four studies focused on redo-RAPN for recurrent tumors. Two studies investigated simultaneous bilateral renal masses and five reports focused on multiple tumor excision in ipsilateral kidney. Conclusion Over the past decade, evidence supporting the use of RAPN for the most challenging nephron-sparing surgery indications has continuously grown. Although limitations remain including study design and lack of detailed long-term functional and oncological outcomes, the adoption of RAPN for the included advanced indications is associated with favorable surgical outcomes with good preservation of renal function without compromising the oncological result. Certainly, a higher likelihood of complication might be expected when facing extremely challenging cases. However, none of these indications should be considered per se an exclusion criterion for performing RAPN. Ultimately, a risk-adapted approach should be employed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Department of Urology, University of Verona, Verona, Italy
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Zhenjie Wu
- Department of Urology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, Shanghai, China
- European Association of Urology (EAU) Young Academic Urologists (YAU) Renal Cancer Working Group, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
- Department of Urology, Sant’ Andrea Hospital, La Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Del Giudice
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Sciarra
- Department of Maternal-Infant and Urologic Sciences, La Sapienza University, Policlinico Umberto I Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, Fisciano, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari, Bari, Italy
| | - Ciro Imbimbo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, “Federico II” University, Naples, Italy
| | - Sisto Perdonà
- Department Uro-Gynecology, IRCCS G. Pascale Foundation, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Porpiglia
- Department of Urology, San Luigi Gonzaga Hospital, University of Turin, Orbassano, Italy
| | - Ithaar H. Derweesh
- Department of Urology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Klein C, Cazalas G, Margue G, Piana G, DE Kerviler E, Gangi A, Puech P, Nedelcu C, Grange R, Buy X, Michiels C, Jegonday MA, Rouviere O, Grenier N, Marcelin C, Bernhard JC. Percutaneous tumor ablation versus image guided robotic-assisted partial nephrectomy for cT1b renal cell carcinoma: a comparative matched-pair analysis (UroCCR 80). Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:559-568. [PMID: 37728492 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05274-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/21/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Partial nephrectomy (PN) is the gold standard treatment for cT1b renal tumors. Percutaneous guided thermal ablation (TA) has proven oncologic efficacy with low morbidity for the treatment of small renal masses (<3 cm). Recently, 3D image-guided robot-assisted PN (3D-IGRAPN) has been described, and decreased perioperative morbidity compared to standard RAPN has been reported. Our objective was to compare two minimally invasive image-guided nephron-sparing procedures (TA vs. 3D-IGRAPN) for the treatment of cT1b renal cell carcinomas (4.1-7 cm). METHODS Patients treated with TA and 3D-IGRAPN for cT1b renal cell carcinoma, prospectively included in the UroCCR database (NCT03293563), were pair-matched for tumor size, pathology, and RENAL score. The primary endpoint was the local recurrence rate between the two groups. Secondary endpoints included metastatic evolution, perioperative complications, decrease in renal function, and length of hospitalization. RESULTS A total of 198 patients were included and matched into two groups of 72 patients. The local recurrence rate was significantly higher in the TA group than that in the 3D-IGRAPN group (4.2% vs. 15.2%, P=0.04). Metastatic evolution and perioperative outcomes such as major complications, eGFR decrease, and length of hospitalization did not differ significantly between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS 3D-IGRAPN resulted in a significantly lower local recurrence rate and comparable rates of complications and metastatic evolution compared with thermal ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Clément Klein
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France -
| | - Grégoire Cazalas
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gaëlle Margue
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Gilles Piana
- Department of Radiology, Paoli-Calmettes Institute, Marseille, France
| | | | - Afshin Gangi
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Strasbourg University Hospital, Strasbourg, France
| | - Phillipe Puech
- Department of Radiology, Lille University Hospital, Lille, France
| | - Cosmina Nedelcu
- Department of Radiology, Angers University Hospital, Angers, France
| | - Remi Grange
- Department of Radiology, Saint-Etienne University Hospital, Saint Etienne, France
| | - Xavier Buy
- Department of Interventional Radiology, Bergonié Institute, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Michiels
- Department of Urology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | | | | - Nicolas Grenier
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Clément Marcelin
- Department of Radiology, Bordeaux Pellegrin University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhou Z, Li Z, Ning K, Xiong L, Liu H, Huang Y, Luo X, Peng Y, Chen L, Ma B, Zou X, Wei W, Luo C, Han H, Guo S, Dong P, Zhou F, Yu C, Zhang Z. Long-term effect of acute ischemic injury on the kidney underwent clamped partial nephrectomy. iScience 2023; 26:107610. [PMID: 37664597 PMCID: PMC10474450 DOI: 10.1016/j.isci.2023.107610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 07/01/2023] [Accepted: 08/09/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
GFR reaches a new baseline, primarily correlating with nephron-mass preservation, 1-12 months after partial nephrectomy (PN). However, does the ipsilateral GFR experience subsequent decline, and does acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney? 319 patients with two kidneys and unilateral clamped PN were analyzed. All had preoperative, new-baseline, and latest follow-up imaging/serum creatinine levels. Annual ipsilateral GFR decline rate (AIGDR) was defined as new-baseline GFR minus latest follow-up GFR normalized by new-baseline GFR, per year. Spectrum score was used to reflect the degree of acute ischemic injury in the operated kidney. 100 subjects searching for health screening served as controls. Predictive factors for AIGDR were assessed. The median AIGDR was 2.25%, significantly higher than controls (0.88%, p = 0.036). With some contralateral hypertrophy, the global annual GFR decline was similar to that of controls (0.81% vs. 0.88%, p = 0.7). Spectrum score correlated significantly with AIGDR (p = 0.037). These results support that acute ischemic injury has long-term effect on the operated kidney.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhaohui Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiyong Li
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Kang Ning
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Longbin Xiong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huiming Liu
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yixin Huang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xin Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Yulu Peng
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Lijie Chen
- Department of Anesthesiology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
| | - Binglei Ma
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Xiangpeng Zou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Wensu Wei
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Cheng Luo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Hui Han
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Shengjie Guo
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pei Dong
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Fangjian Zhou
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chunping Yu
- Guangdong Key Laboratory of Urology, Department of Urology, Minimally Invasive Surgery Center, the First Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou Institute of Urology, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhiling Zhang
- Department of Urology, Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center, Guangzhou, China
- State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Collaborative Innovation Center for Cancer Medicine, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lasorsa F, Rutigliano M, Milella M, Ferro M, Pandolfo SD, Crocetto F, Autorino R, Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Lucarelli G. Cancer Stem Cells in Renal Cell Carcinoma: Origins and Biomarkers. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:13179. [PMID: 37685983 PMCID: PMC10487877 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241713179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2023] [Revised: 08/14/2023] [Accepted: 08/22/2023] [Indexed: 09/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The term "cancer stem cell" (CSC) refers to a cancer cell with the following features: clonogenic ability, the expression of stem cell markers, differentiation into cells of different lineages, growth in nonadhesive spheroids, and the in vivo ability to generate serially transplantable tumors that reflect the heterogeneity of primary cancers (tumorigenicity). According to this model, CSCs may arise from normal stem cells, progenitor cells, and/or differentiated cells because of striking genetic/epigenetic mutations or from the fusion of tissue-specific stem cells with circulating bone marrow stem cells (BMSCs). CSCs use signaling pathways similar to those controlling cell fate during early embryogenesis (Notch, Wnt, Hedgehog, bone morphogenetic proteins (BMPs), fibroblast growth factors, leukemia inhibitory factor, and transforming growth factor-β). Recent studies identified a subpopulation of CD133+/CD24+ cells from ccRCC specimens that displayed self-renewal ability and clonogenic multipotency. The development of agents targeting CSC signaling-specific pathways and not only surface proteins may ultimately become of utmost importance for patients with RCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lasorsa
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Monica Rutigliano
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Milella
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples “Federico II”, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area-Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari “Aldo Moro”, 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Li H, Hu Y, Lu D, Wang J, Lin Y, Zhong X, Mou Y, Yao C, Wang Z, Zhang X, Wo Q, Liu H, Liu F, Zhang D, Wang H. Clinical application of superselective transarterial embolization of renal tumors in zero ischaemia robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1212696. [PMID: 37675217 PMCID: PMC10478230 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1212696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2023] [Accepted: 07/31/2023] [Indexed: 09/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective To assess the feasibility and safety of zero ischaemia robotic-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (RALPN) after preoperative superselective transarterial embolization (STE) of T1 renal cancer. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the data of 32 patients who underwent zero ischaemia RALPN after STE and 140 patients who received standard robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (S-RALPN). In addition, we selected 35 patients treated with off-clamp RALPN (O-RALPN) from September 2017 to March 2022 for comparison. STE was performed by the same interventional practitioner, and zero ischaemia laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (LPN) was carried out by experienced surgeon 1-12 hours after STE. The intraoperative data and postoperative complications were recorded. The postoperative renal function, routine urine test, urinary Computed Tomography (CT), and preoperative and postoperative glomerular filtration rate (GFR) data were analyzed. Results All operations were completed successfully. There were no cases of conversion to opening and no deaths. The renal arterial trunk was not blocked. No blood transfusions were needed. The mean operation time was 91.5 ± 34.28 minutes. The mean blood loss was 58.59 ± 54.11 ml. No recurrence or metastasis occurred. Conclusion For patients with renal tumors, STE of renal tumors in zero ischaemia RALPN can preserve more renal function, and it provides a safe and feasible surgical method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haichang Li
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yuning Hu
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dongning Lu
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Jingyun Wang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yanze Lin
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xugang Zhong
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Yixuan Mou
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Cenchao Yao
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Zhida Wang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Xinyu Zhang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Qijun Wo
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Hanbo Liu
- Cancer Center, Department of Interventional Medicine, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital, Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, China
| | - Feng Liu
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Dahong Zhang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Heng Wang
- Urology & Nephrology Center, Department of Urology, Zhejiang Provincial People’s Hospital (Affiliated People’s Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College), Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Mjaess G, Bernhard JC, Khene ZE, Doumerc N, Vaessen C, Henon F, Bruyere F, Brenier M, Parier B, Albisinni S, Ingels A. Retroperitoneal vs. transperitoneal robotic partial nephrectomy: a multicenter propensity-score matching analysis (PADORA Study - UroCCR n° 68). Minerva Urol Nephrol 2023; 75:434-442. [PMID: 37530660 DOI: 10.23736/s2724-6051.23.05346-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy can be performed through either a transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach. This study aimed to compare the rate of trifecta achievement between retroperitoneal (RRPN) and transperitoneal (TRPN) robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using a large multicenter prospectively-maintained database and propensity-score matching analysis. METHODS This study was launched by the French Kidney Cancer Research Network, under the UroCCR Project (NCT03293563). Patients who underwent TRPN or RRPN by experienced surgeons in 15 participating centers were included. Data on demographic and clinical parameters, tumor characteristics, renal function, and surgical parameters were collected. The primary outcome was the rate of trifecta achievement, which was defined as a warm ischemia time of less than 25 minutes, negative surgical margins, and no major complications. Secondary outcomes included operative time, hospital length-of-stay, blood loss, postoperative complications, postoperative renal function, and each trifecta item taken alone. Subgroup analysis was done according to tumor location. RESULTS A total of 2879 patients (2581 TRPN vs. 298 RRPN) were included in the study. Before matching, trifecta was achieved in 73.0% of the patients in the TRPN group compared to 77.5% in the RRPN group (P=0.094). After matching 157 patients who underwent TRPN to 157 patients who underwent RRPN, the trifecta rate was 82.8% in the TRPN group vs. 84.0% in the RRPN group (P=0.065). The RRPN group showed shorter operative time (123 vs. 171 min; P<0.001) and less blood loss (161 vs. 293 mL; P<0.001). RRPN showed a higher trifecta achievement for posterior tumors than TRPN (71% vs. 81%; P=0.017). CONCLUSIONS RRPN is a viable alternative to the transperitoneal approach, particularly for posterior renal tumors, and is a safe and effective option for partial nephrectomy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georges Mjaess
- Department of Urology, Brussels University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium -
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | - Martin Brenier
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Saint Joseph, Paris, France
| | - Bastien Parier
- Department of Urology, Hôpital Kremlin Bicêtre, Paris, France
| | - Simone Albisinni
- Department of Urology, Brussels University Hospital, Brussels, Belgium
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, Tor Vergata University Hospital, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy
| | - Alexandre Ingels
- Department of Urology, CHU Henri Mondor, Créteil, France
- Inserm, Clinical Investigation Center 1430, Henri Mondor University Hospital, AP-HP, Creteil, France
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Aveta A, Cilio S, Contieri R, Spena G, Napolitano L, Manfredi C, Franco A, Crocerossa F, Cerrato C, Ferro M, Del Giudice F, Verze P, Lasorsa F, Salonia A, Nair R, Walz J, Lucarelli G, Pandolfo SD. Urinary MicroRNAs as Biomarkers of Urological Cancers: A Systematic Review. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:10846. [PMID: 37446024 DOI: 10.3390/ijms241310846] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Revised: 06/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/27/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023] Open
Abstract
MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are emerging as biomarkers for the detection and prognosis of cancers due to their inherent stability and resilience. To summarize the evidence regarding the role of urinary miRNAs (umiRNAs) in the detection, prognosis, and therapy of genitourinary cancers, we performed a systematic review of the most important scientific databases using the following keywords: (urinary miRNA) AND (prostate cancer); (urinary miRNA) AND (bladder cancer); (urinary miRNA) AND (renal cancer); (urinary miRNA) AND (testicular cancer); (urinary miRNA) AND (urothelial cancer). Of all, 1364 articles were screened. Only original studies in the English language on human specimens were considered for inclusion in our systematic review. Thus, a convenient sample of 60 original articles was identified. UmiRNAs are up- or downregulated in prostate cancer and may serve as potential non-invasive molecular biomarkers. Several umiRNAs have been identified as diagnostic biomarkers of urothelial carcinoma and bladder cancer (BC), allowing us to discriminate malignant from nonmalignant forms of hematuria. UmiRNAs could serve as therapeutic targets or recurrence markers of non-muscle-invasive BC and could predict the aggressivity and prognosis of muscle-invasive BC. In renal cell carcinoma, miRNAs have been identified as predictors of tumor detection, aggressiveness, and progression to metastasis. UmiRNAs could play an important role in the diagnosis, prognosis, and therapy of urological cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Achille Aveta
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, 13055 Marseille, France
| | - Simone Cilio
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Roberto Contieri
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, 20072 Pieve Emanuele, Italy
| | - Gianluca Spena
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Antonio Franco
- Department of Urology, Sant'Andrea Hospital, "La Sapienza" University, 00189 Rome, Italy
| | - Fabio Crocerossa
- Department of Urology, Magna Graecia University of Catanzaro, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Clara Cerrato
- Urology Unit, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | | | - Paolo Verze
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy
| | - Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Salonia
- Division of Experimental Oncology/Unit of Urology, URI, IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele, 20132 Milan, Italy
| | - Rajesh Nair
- The Urology Centre, Guy's and St. Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, Guy's Hospital, London SE1 9RT, UK
| | - Jochen Walz
- Department of Urology, Institut Paoli-Calmettes Cancer Centre, 13055 Marseille, France
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, Urology Unit, University of Naples "Federico II", 80138 Naples, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, Scuola Medica Salernitana, University of Salerno, 84081 Fisciano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lasorsa F, Rutigliano M, Milella M, Ferro M, Pandolfo SD, Crocetto F, Tataru OS, Autorino R, Battaglia M, Ditonno P, Lucarelli G. Cellular and Molecular Players in the Tumor Microenvironment of Renal Cell Carcinoma. J Clin Med 2023; 12:3888. [PMID: 37373581 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12123888] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/12/2023] [Revised: 06/02/2023] [Accepted: 06/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Globally, clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) represents the most prevalent type of kidney cancer. Surgery plays a key role in the treatment of this cancer, although one third of patients are diagnosed with metastatic ccRCC and about 25% of patients will develop a recurrence after nephrectomy with curative intent. Molecular-target-based agents, such as tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), are recommended for advanced cancers. In addition to cancer cells, the tumor microenvironment (TME) includes non-malignant cell types embedded in an altered extracellular matrix (ECM). The evidence confirms that interactions among cancer cells and TME elements exist and are thought to play crucial roles in the development of cancer, making them promising therapeutic targets. In the TME, an unfavorable pH, waste product accumulation, and competition for nutrients between cancer and immune cells may be regarded as further possible mechanisms of immune escape. To enhance immunotherapies and reduce resistance, it is crucial first to understand how the immune cells work and interact with cancer and other cancer-associated cells in such a complex tumor microenvironment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Lasorsa
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Monica Rutigliano
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Martina Milella
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Matteo Ferro
- Division of Urology, European Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 71013 Milan, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences and Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Octavian Sabin Tataru
- Department of Simulation Applied in Medicine, George Emil Palade University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Sciences and Technology, 540139 Târgu Mureș, Romania
| | - Riccardo Autorino
- Department of Urology, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA
| | - Michele Battaglia
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Pasquale Ditonno
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Lucarelli
- Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, Department of Precision and Regenerative Medicine and Ionian Area, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", 70124 Bari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Medlej ZAA, Medlej W, Slaba S, Torrecillas P, Cueto A, Urbaneja A, Garrido AJ, Lugnani F. Cryoablation and Immunotherapy: An Enthralling Synergy for Cancer Treatment. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:4844-4860. [PMID: 37232823 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30050365] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2023] [Accepted: 05/06/2023] [Indexed: 05/27/2023] Open
Abstract
As less invasive options for surgical tumor removal, minimally invasive ablative techniques have gained popularity. Several solid tumors are being treated with cryoablation, a non-heat-based ablation technique. Cryoablation data in comparison over time demonstrates better tumor response and faster recovery. Combining cryosurgery with other cancer therapies has been explored to improve the cancer-killing process. Cryoablation with the combination of immunotherapy, results in a robust and efficient attack on the cancer cells. This article focuses on investigating the ability of cryosurgery to create a strong antitumor response when combined with immunologic agents resulting in a synergetic effect. To achieve this objective, we combined cryosurgery with immunotherapy using Nivolumab and lpilimumab. Five clinical cases of lymph node, lung cancer, bone, and lung metastasis were followed and analyzed. In this series of patients, percutaneous cryoablation and addressing immunity agents were technically feasible. In the follow-ups, there appeared to be no radiological evidence of new tumor development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zain Al Abidine Medlej
- Agro-Food and Environmental Biosciences and Technologies Department, University of Teramo, 64100 Teramo, Italy
| | - Wassim Medlej
- Cryolebabon and Medical Devices Sarl, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Sami Slaba
- Hotel Dieu de France Hospital, Saint-Joseph University, Beirut 1104 2020, Lebanon
| | | | - Antonio Cueto
- Radiology Department, Clinica Santa Elena, 29620 Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | - Franco Lugnani
- Radiology Department, Clinica Santa Elena, 29620 Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Napolitano L, Manfredi C, Cirillo L, Fusco GM, Passaro F, Abate M, La Rocca R, Mastrangelo F, Spirito L, Pandolfo SD, Crocetto F, Arcaniolo D, Barone B. Cytoreductive Nephrectomy and Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Medicina (Kaunas) 2023; 59:medicina59040767. [PMID: 37109725 PMCID: PMC10143323 DOI: 10.3390/medicina59040767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/04/2023] [Revised: 04/02/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023]
Abstract
In the past decades, several treatments have been proposed for the management of metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). Among these, cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) represents a controversial and open issue in the era of targeted therapy and novel immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors. Two important studies, CARMENA and SURTIME, analyzed therapy with sunitinib with or without CN, and immediate CN followed by sunitinib versus a deferred CN after three cycles of sunitinib, respectively. CARMENA showed the non-inferiority of sunitinib alone versus sunitinib plus CN, whereas SURTIME showed no difference in progression-free survival (PFS), but a better median OS among patients with deferred CN. Therefore, more prospective clinical trials and appropriate patient identification are necessary to support CN in this new scenario. This review provides a snapshot of the current evidence for CN in mRCC, discusses the management strategies, and offers perspectives on the direction of future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Napolitano
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Celeste Manfredi
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luigi Cirillo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Giovanni Maria Fusco
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Passaro
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Marco Abate
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Roberto La Rocca
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesco Mastrangelo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Spirito
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Savio Domenico Pandolfo
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Felice Crocetto
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Davide Arcaniolo
- Unit of Urology, Department of Woman, Child and General and Specialized Surgery, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Biagio Barone
- Department of Neurosciences, Reproductive Sciences and Odontostomatology, University of Naples "Federico II", 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vrabel MR, Schulman JA, Gillam FB, Mantooth SM, Nguyen KG, Zaharoff DA. Focal Cryo-Immunotherapy with Intratumoral IL-12 Prevents Recurrence of Large Murine Tumors. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15082210. [PMID: 37190138 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15082210] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/27/2023] [Revised: 03/31/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Focal ablation technologies are routinely used in the clinical management of inoperable solid tumors but they often result in incomplete ablations leading to high recurrence rates. Adjuvant therapies, capable of safely eliminating residual tumor cells, are therefore of great clinical interest. Interleukin-12 (IL-12) is a potent antitumor cytokine that can be localized intratumorally through coformulation with viscous biopolymers, including chitosan (CS) solutions. The objective of this research was to determine if localized immunotherapy with a CS/IL-12 formulation could prevent tumor recurrence after cryoablation (CA). Tumor recurrence and overall survival rates were assessed. Systemic immunity was evaluated in spontaneously metastatic and bilateral tumor models. Temporal bulk RNA sequencing was performed on tumor and draining lymph node (dLN) samples. In multiple murine tumor models, the addition of CS/IL-12 to CA reduced recurrence rates by 30-55%. Altogether, this cryo-immunotherapy induced complete durable regression of large tumors in 80-100% of treated animals. Additionally, CS/IL-12 prevented lung metastases when delivered as a neoadjuvant to CA. However, CA plus CS/IL-12 had minimal antitumor activity against established, untreated abscopal tumors. Adjuvant anti-PD-1 therapy delayed the growth of abscopal tumors. Transcriptome analyses revealed early immunological changes in the dLN, followed by a significant increase in gene expression associated with immune suppression and regulation. Cryo-immunotherapy with localized CS/IL-12 reduces recurrences and enhances the elimination of large primary tumors. This focal combination therapy also induces significant but limited systemic antitumor immunity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maura R Vrabel
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Comparative Medicine Institute, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Jacob A Schulman
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Francis B Gillam
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Siena M Mantooth
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Comparative Medicine Institute, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - Khue G Nguyen
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
| | - David A Zaharoff
- ImmunoEngineering Laboratory, Joint Department of Biomedical Engineering, UNC-Chapel Hill and NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Comparative Medicine Institute, NC State University, Raleigh, NC 27695, USA
- Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center, UNC-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC 27599, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brassetti A, Anceschi U, Bove AM, Prata F, Costantini M, Ferriero M, Mastroianni R, Misuraca L, Tuderti G, Torregiani G, Covotta M, Gallucci M, Simone G. Purely Off-Clamp Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy Stands the Test of Time: 15 Years Functional and Oncologic Outcomes from a Single Center Experience. Curr Oncol 2023; 30:1196-1205. [PMID: 36661741 PMCID: PMC9858317 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010092] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Revised: 01/09/2023] [Accepted: 01/12/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nephron-sparing surgery represents the gold standard treatment for organ-confined renal tumors. We present 15-years of outcomes after off-clamp laparoscopic partial nephrectomy (ocLPN). METHODS a retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent ocLPN between May 2001 and December 2005. Baseline demographic, clinical, pathologic, surgical, functional and survival data were collected. The Kaplan-Meier method evaluated group-specific oncologic outcomes at 5, 10 and 15 years and the log rank test assessed differences between groups. The same analysis investigated the probabilities of developing a significant renal function impairment (sRFI) and achieving ROMeS. Cox analyses identified predictors of this latter tricomposite outcome. RESULTS We included 63 patients whose median tumor size was 3 cm (IQR:2-4). At 15 years, the chances of developing local recurrence, metachronous renal cancers or distant metastases were 2 ± 2%, 23 ± 6% and 17 ± 5%, respectively. Consequently, disease-free, cancer-specific and overall-survival probabilities were 68 ± 6%, 90 ± 4% and 72 ± 6%. MCRSS and UCISS well predicted oncologic outcomes. Overall, nine (14%) patients experienced an sRFI and 33 (52%) achieved ROMeS. Age (HR: 1.046; p = 0.033) and malignant histology (low-risk cancers HR: 3.233, p = 0.048) (intermediate/high risk cancers HR: 5.721, p = 0.023) were independent predictors of ROMeS non-achievement. CONCLUSIONS At 15 years from ocLPN, most of patients will experience both excellent functional and oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Aldo Brassetti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Umberto Anceschi
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Alfredo Maria Bove
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Prata
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Manuela Costantini
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | | | - Riccardo Mastroianni
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Leonardo Misuraca
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Gabriele Tuderti
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Giulia Torregiani
- Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Marco Covotta
- Department of Anesthesiology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Michele Gallucci
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Simone
- Department of Urology, IRCCS “Regina Elena” National Cancer Institute, 00144 Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Jasinski M, Bielinska M, Siekiera J, Kamecki K, Salagierski M. Ultrasound-Guided Percutaneous Thermal Ablation of Renal Cancers-In Search for the Ideal Tumour. Cancers (Basel) 2023; 15:cancers15020518. [PMID: 36672467 PMCID: PMC9856471 DOI: 10.3390/cancers15020518] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2022] [Revised: 01/04/2023] [Accepted: 01/11/2023] [Indexed: 01/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Over the recent years, the progress in imaging techniques has led to an increased detection of kidney tumours, including small renal masses. While surgery is still the standard of care, there is a growing interest in minimally invasive methods. Ultrasound (US)-guided percutaneous ablation is particularly attractive because it is a safe and relatively simple procedure. In this study, we investigated the success of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in relation to kidney tumour diameter and location. Between August 2016 and September 2021, 253 patients with 259 renal tumours underwent US-guided RFA as a primary treatment in our institution. A total of 67 patients were excluded from this study. Abdominal computed tomography (CT) and tumour biopsy were performed before the procedure. Patients were followed with contrast-enhanced CT, the average follow-up time was 28 months. The studied group was composed of 186 patients with 191 renal tumours-only biopsy-confirmed renal cancers were included. During the follow-up, 46 cases of residual disease and 4 cases of local progression were found. There was a significant correlation between tumour size and the ablation success rate. The success rate was 73.5% and 87.6% for lesions ≤25 mm, 94.6% for lesions ≤25 mm and exophytic, 79.1% for lesions 26-30 mm and 84.4% for lesions 26-30 mm and exophytic, respectively. Four Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications were observed. US-guided percutaneous RFA of T1a renal cancers is safe and well-tolerated. Its effectiveness depends on tumour size, with best results for exophytic lesions smaller than 3 cm. Most of the recurrent or residual tumours can be successfully re-treated with US-guided percutaneous RFA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Milosz Jasinski
- Department of Urology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
- Correspondence:
| | - Marta Bielinska
- Department of Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Jerzy Siekiera
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Krzysztof Kamecki
- Department of Urology, Institute of Oncology, Romanowskiej 2, 85-796 Bydgoszcz, Poland
| | - Maciej Salagierski
- Department of Urology, Collegium Medicum, University of Zielona Góra, Zyty 28, 65-046 Zielona Góra, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
Buse S, Mager R, Mazzone E, Mottrie A, Frees S, Haferkamp A. Impact of Blood Loss on Renal Function and Interaction with Ischemia Duration after Nephron-Sparing Surgery. Curr Oncol 2022; 29:9760-6. [PMID: 36547181 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol29120767] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Revised: 11/30/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Nephron-sparing surgery (NSS) exposes the kidney to ischemia-reperfusion injury. Blood loss and hypotension are also associated with kidney injury. We aimed to test the hypothesis that, during NSS, both ischemia duration and blood loss significantly affect postoperative renal function and that their effects interact. METHODS Consecutive patients undergoing NSS were enrolled. The primary endpoint was renal function expressed as the absolute delta between preoperative and postoperative peak creatinine. We developed a generalized linear model with the ischemia duration and absolute hemoglobin difference as independent variables, their interaction term, and the RENAL score. The model was than expanded to include a history of hypertension (as a proxy for hypotension susceptibility) and related interaction terms. Further, we described the perioperative and mid-term oncological outcomes. RESULTS A total of 478 patients underwent NSS, and 209 (43.7%) required ischemia for a mean of 10.9 min (SD 8). Both the ischemia duration (partial eta 0.842, p = 0.006) and hemoglobin difference (partial eta 0.933, p = 0.029) significantly affected postoperative renal function, albeit without evidence of a significant interaction (p = 0.525). The RENAL score also significantly influenced postoperative renal function (p = 0.023). After the addition of a previous history of hypertension, the effects persisted, with a significant interaction between blood loss and a history of hypertension (p = 0.02). CONCLUSIONS Ischemia duration and blood loss had a similar impact on postoperative renal function, albeit without potentiating each other. While the surgical technique and ischemia minimization remain crucial to postoperative kidney function, increased awareness of conscious hemodynamic management appears warranted.
Collapse
|