Potential clinical value of circulating chromogranin A in patients with prostate carcinoma

An immune-related biomarker index for predicting the effectiveness of immunotherapy and prognosis in hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

Currently, there are no recognized biomarkers for predicting the immunotherapy response and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This study aimed to establish an immune-related gene prognostic index (IRGPI) for HCC, and to investigate the clinical, immune, molecular, and microenvironmental characteristics of the IRGPI subgroups, as well as their impact on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) therapy and patients' prognosis.

METHODS

We analyzed the LIHC dataset (n = 424) from the The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database and the GSE10140 dataset (n = 84) from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) database using weighted gene co-expression network analysis (WGCNA) and univariate/multivariate Cox regression analysis to identify immune-related hub genes with prognostic significance. Subsequently, The IRGPI was then established with these special genes obtained, and the molecular, immune, and clinicopathological characteristics of the IRGPI subgroups, along with their predictive role in ICIs treatment and HCC prognosis, were investigated.

RESULTS

The IRGPI was composed of nine genes, namely CHGA, GAL, CCR3, MMP7, STC1, UCN, OXT, SOCS2, and GCG. The IRGPI-high group exhibited a worse prognosis in both the TCGA and GEO databases compared to the IRGPI-low group. The IRGPI-high group was primarily associated with adaptive immune response and cell-cell interaction pathways and exhibited a higher frequency of gene mutations (such as TP53 and CTNNB1), higher expression of PD-L1 and CTLA4, a higher proportion of macrophages M0 and follicular helper T cells, and a higher APC_co_inhibition and T_cell_co-inhibition immune score. Furthermore, the IRGPI-high group was associated with worse immune subtypes, clinicopathological characteristics, immunotherapy response, and clinical prognosis.

CONCLUSION

IRGPI is a biomarker with significant potential for predicting the immunotherapy response and prognosis of HCC patients, and is closely related to the immunosuppressive microenvironment and poorer clinicopathological characteristics.

Neuroendocrine differentiation in castration resistant prostate cancer. Nuclear medicine radiopharmaceuticals and imaging techniques: A narrative review

BACKGROUND

Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) is the primary treatment for patients suffering from relapsing or advanced prostate cancer (PC). Hormone therapy generally guarantees adequate clinical control of the disease for some years, even in those patients affected by widespread skeletal and soft tissue metastases. Despite ADT, however, most patients treated with hormones eventually progress to castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC), for which there are no effective treatments. This clinical reality is an open challenge to the oncologist because of those neoplasms which elaborate neuroendocrine differentiation (NED).

METHODS

An online search of current and past literature on NED in CRPC was performed. Relevant articles dealing with the biological and pathological basis of NED, with nuclear medicine imaging in CRPC and somatostatin treatment in NED were analyzed.

EVIDENCE FROM THE LITERATURE

NED may arise in prostate cancer patients in the late stages of ADT. The onset of NED offers prognostic insight because it reflects a dramatic increase in the aggressive nature of the neoplasm. Several genetic, molecular, cytological and immunohistochemical markers are associated with this transformation. Among these, overexpression of somatostatin receptors, seen through Nuclear Medicine testing, is one of the most studied.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary studies show that the overexpression of somatostatin receptors related to NED in CRPC may easily be studied in vivo with PET/CT. This finding offers a potentially useful objective for targeted therapy in CRPC. If the overexpression of SSTRs is shown to afflict a significant segment of patients with CRPC, this will open further study of possible therapeutic options based on this marker.

Circulating chromogranin A and its fragments as diagnostic and prognostic disease markers

Chromogranin A (CgA), a secretory protein released in the blood by neuroendocrine cells and neurons, is the precursor of various bioactive fragments involved in the regulation of the cardiovascular system, metabolism, innate immunity, angiogenesis, and tissue repair. After the original demonstration that circulating CgA can serve as a biomarker for a wide range of neuroendocrine tumors, several studies have shown that increased levels of CgA can be present also in the blood of patients with cardiovascular, gastrointestinal, and inflammatory diseases with, in certain cases, important diagnostic and prognostic implications. Considering the high structural and functional heterogeneity of the CgA system, comprising precursor and fragments, it is not surprising that the different immunoassays used in these studies led, in some cases, to discrepant results. Here, we review these notions and we discuss the importance of measuring total-CgA, full-length CgA, specific fragments, and their relative levels for a more thorough assessment of the pathophysiological function and diagnostic/prognostic value of the CgA system.

A Phase I/II Study of the Investigational Drug Alisertib in Combination With Abiraterone and Prednisone for Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Progressing on Abiraterone

Lessons Learned

Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer did not tolerate the combination of alisertib with abiraterone and prednisone.

There was no clear signal indicating that adding alisertib might be beneficial for those patients progressing on abiraterone.

Background.

We hypothesized that Aurora A kinase (AK) contributes to castrate resistance in prostate cancer (PCa) and that inhibiting AK with alisertib can resensitize PCa cells to androgen receptor (AR) inhibitor abiraterone.

Methods.

This was a phase I/II trial to determine the safety and efficacy of alisertib when given in combination with abiraterone plus prednisone (AP). Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients were treated with dose escalation (alisertib at 30, 40, and 50 mg orally b.i.d., days 1–7 every 21 days) per standard 3+3 design.

Results.

Nine of 43 planned subjects were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was not reached, and the dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) included neutropenic fever (1 of 9), neutropenia (1 of 9), fatigue with memory impairment (1 of 9), and diarrhea/mucositis (1 of 9). No prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decrease or circulating tumor cell (CTC) changes were observed during the study. Pharmacodynamically, adding alisertib did not affect total testosterone or dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) levels. There was some change in neuroendocrine markers after therapy. Mean duration on study was 2.5 months. The trial was terminated early.

Conclusion.

A tolerable dose of alisertib in combination with AP in mCRPC was not established in this study. There was no clear signal indicating that alisertib might be beneficial for patients with mCRPC progressing on abiraterone.

Transforming growth factor-β signaling induced during prostate cancer cell death and neuroendocrine differentiation is mediated by bone marrow stromal cells

INTRODUCTION

Prostate cancer that has metastasized to bone undergoes critical interactions with bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs), ultimately promoting tumor survival. Previous studies have shown that BMSCs secrete factors that promote prostate cancer apoptosis or neuroendocrine differentiation. Because of the significance of transforming growth factor-β (TGF-β) family cytokines in cytostasis and bone metastasis, the role of TGF-β signaling in the context of prostate cancer-BMSC interactions was investigated.

METHODS

The role of TGF-β family signaling in BMSC-induced apoptosis of lineage-related prostate cancer cells was investigated in live/dead assays. SMAD phosphorylation or activity during apoptosis and neuroendocrine differentiation was investigated using immunofluorescence, Western blotting, and luciferase reporter assays, along with the ALK-4, -5, -7 kinase inhibitor, SB-431542.

RESULTS

Treatment of castration-resistant prostate cancer cells with SB-431542 resulted in significant reduction of apoptosis mediated by HS-5 BMSCs, supporting the involvement of TGF-β/SMAD signaling during this event. Interestingly, however, pre-treatment of BMSCs with TGF-β1 (5 ng/mL) yielded a conditioned medium that elicited a marked reduction in prostate cancer death. Phosphorylated-SMAD2 (P-SMAD2) was activated in BMSC-triggered transdifferentiated prostate cancer cells, as demonstrated through immunoblotting and luciferase reporter assays. However, SB-431542 did not restore androgen receptor and prostate specific antigen levels down-regulated by BMSC-secreted factors. Prostate cancer cells induced to undergo neuroendocrine differentiation in a BMSC-independent mechanism also showed elevated levels of P-SMAD2.

DISCUSSION

Collectively, our findings indicate that: (1) TGF-β family cytokines or regulated factors secreted from BMSCs are involved in prostate cancer apoptosis; (2) TGF-β signaling in prostate cancer cells is induced during neuroendocrine differentiation; and (3) TGF-β1 stimulation of BMSCs alters paracrine signaling to create a permissive environment for prostate cancer survival, suggesting a mechanism for prostate cancer-mediated colonization of bone.

CONCLUSIONS

TGF-β signaling resulting in activation of SMAD2 in prostate cancer may be an indicator of cellular stress in the presence of toxic paracrine factors released from the bone marrow stroma, ultimately fostering prostate cancer colonization of bone.

Carboplatin plus etoposide in heavily pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients

AIMS

Carboplatin plus etoposide has modest efficacy in docetaxel-pretreated castration-resistant prostate cancer patients. We hypothesized that carboplatin-etoposide could still exert some therapeutic activity after docetaxel, cabazitaxel and either abiraterone or enzalutamide.

PATIENTS & METHODS

We enrolled 15 patients in the first step of a Phase II trial. The target sample size is 46 patients. The primary end point of the study was progression-free survival after 12 weeks.

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival was 11 weeks (range: 8-18), while median overall survival was 18 weeks (range: 12-26). Of seven patients with measurable disease, two had a partial response, two showed stable disease and the remaining three had progressive disease as the best radiological response. Five patients were considered progression-free after 12 weeks, prompting continuation of the trial.

CONCLUSION

Our preliminary findings support the hypothesis that carboplatin plus etoposide may yield some clinical benefit in a population of patients who failed all currently approved therapeutic options for prostate cancer.

Midkine is associated with neuroendocrine differentiation in castration-resistant prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) is an incurable disease and both androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) and neuroendocrine differentiation (NED) are closely related to CRPC transition. More knowledge concerning neuroendocrine (NE)-transformed PC cells, the NED process and its association with CRPC, is needed. Expression of growth factor midkine (MDK) is correlated with poor clinical outcomes in various human cancers, including PC. In the present study, we have evaluated MDK expression and NED in two separate tumor groups: early and advanced PC.

METHODS

Immunohistochemical analysis of MDK, the neuronal marker tubulin-beta III (TUBB3) and the NE-marker chromogranin A (CGA) in a human archival material consisting of hormone naive (HN)/stage T1b (n = 29) and CRPC (n = 24) tumors. Triple immunofluorescent imaging was performed on a selection of specimens.

RESULTS

MDK, TUBB3, and CGA were upregulated in CRPC compared to HN tumors. MDK was highly associated to the expression of both CGA and TUBB3, and identified MDK-positive NE-like looking cells found to co-express CGA or, more commonly, CGA together with TUBB3. CGA and TUBB3 staining displayed a partial expression overlap, an overlap almost exclusively displaying also MDK expression.

CONCLUSIONS

MDK upregulation in CRPC is associated with NED (shown by its relation to CGA and TUBB3). The results suggest that MDK represents an over-bridging marker between different populations of NE-like tumor cells, possibly as part of the NED process and associated CRPC transition, something that needs to be evaluated experimentally as does the applicability of MDK as a future target.

Chromogranin A measurement in metastatic well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma: screening for false positives and a prospective follow-up study. Int J Biol Markers. 2011;26:94-101. [PMID: 21574156 DOI: 10.5301/jbm.2011.8327]

BACKGROUND

Multiple causes of false-positive chromogranin A (CgA) measurement have been reported that may affect its impact as a surrogate marker of RECIST progression in well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (WDGEPNET). ?

AIMS

1) To evaluate the frequency of false-positive CgA results. 2) To prospectively compare CgA variations with RECIST morphological changes in patients without known causes of false-positive CgA measurements.?

METHODS

First, the conditions responsible for potentially false-positive CgA measurements were screened in 184 consecutive patients with metastatic WDGEPNET. Secondly, a variation in CgA at a 6-month interval was compared to RECIST results at 6 months in 46 patients.?

RESULTS

Among 184 patients, elevated CgA was found in 130 cases (71%) including 99 patients with at least one cause of a false-positive result. Impaired kidney function as well as medication with proton pump inhibitors were found to be the 2 major causes of false-positive results. The sensitivity and specificity of CgA measurements compared with morphological tumor changes according to the RECIST criteria were 71% and 50%, respectively, at 6 months.?

CONCLUSION

Routine screening for the causes of false-positive CgA measurements is mandatory in WDGEPNET patients. Our study does not validate the use of CgA as a surrogate marker of tumor progression.

Putative tissue markers in prostate cancer

A variety of putative prostate cancer markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens. These markers exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and to predict disease course. In order to be considered markers for diagnosis or prognosis of disease course, and to be brought forward for large-scale clinical evaluation, they should fulfill several criteria. Firstly, there should be a biological or therapeutic rationale for choosing the marker, or at least a consistent association with disease presence, disease characteristics such as stage, or disease aggressiveness. Secondly, there should be an assessment of the strength of marker association with disease outcome. Thirdly, the marker should be assessed as an independent predictor in a multivariate analysis.

Is there a role for platinum chemotherapy in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer?

Docetaxel chemotherapy is the current standard of care for metastatic hormone-refractory prostate cancer (HRPC). Platinum chemotherapy drugs, such as cisplatin and carboplatin, have moderate single-agent activity in HRPC. Next-generation platinum drugs, including satraplatin and oxaliplatin, may have additional activity in the management of HRPC. Furthermore, neuroendocrine differentiation may play a role in disease progression, providing a rationale for platinum-based chemotherapy in the management of HRPC. The authors reviewed the MEDLINE database for reports related to platinum-based chemotherapy in patients with advanced prostate cancer and evaluated studies that reviewed the role of neuroendocrine differentiation in the progression of HRPC. Older studies from the 1970s and 1980s suggested a lack of activity of cisplatin and carboplatin; however, those studies were flawed at least in part by their methods of response assessment. More recent Phase II studies of carboplatin suggested a moderate level of clinical and palliative activity when it was used as a single agent. However, when carboplatin was combined with a taxane and estramustine, high response rates were observed in several recent clinical trials. In addition, a randomized trial suggested that satraplatin plus prednisone improved progression-free survival compared with prednisone alone. For patients who progressed after docetaxel, no standard options existed in the literature that was reviewed. Several preliminary reports suggested that carboplatin and oxaliplatin may have activity as second-line chemotherapy. Platinum chemotherapy drugs historically have been considered inactive in HRPC, although a review of the data suggested otherwise. Carboplatin, in particular, induced very high response rates when it was combined with estramustine and a taxane, but it also appeared to have activity in patients who progressed after docetaxel. Satraplatin plus prednisone is being investigated in a large Phase III trial as second-line chemotherapy for HRPC. Targeting neuroendocrine cells may provide a new therapeutic approach to HRPC.

Comparison between two commercially available chromogranin A assays in detecting neuroendocrine differentiation in prostate cancer and benign prostate hyperplasia

BACKGROUND

Chromogranin A (CgA) is the neuroendocrine (NE) marker most frequently employed in detecting NE differentiation in prostate cancer patients, either at the tissue level or in the general circulation.

METHODS

We compared the two commercially CgA assay kits in detecting NE differentiation, in benign hyperplasia (BPH) or prostate cancer (PC) patients (pts). 170 pts with BPH, 107 with BPH+inflammation, and 136 PC pts entered the study. CgA was measured in each patient with the immunoradiometric assay (IRMA) and with the enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (ELISA).

RESULTS

A moderate relationship was found between CgA measured with IRMA and ELISA in the whole population (Spearman's R=0.65, p<0.05), in BPH pts (R=0.76, p<0.05), in BPH+inflammation pts (R=0.53, p<0.05) and in PC pts (R=0.60, p<0.05). Twenty-two out of 62 pts (35.4%) with elevated ELISA CgA did not have increased IRMA CgA; by contrast, 21/61 pts (34.4%) with elevated IRMA CgA were not recognized as abnormal by the ELISA kit.

CONCLUSIONS

CgA measured by the two assays provided a significant discordance rate, suggesting that the two kits might elicit different information.

Skewing Towards Neuroendocrine Phenotype in High Grade or High Stage Androgen-Responsive Primary Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The prognostic influence of neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation in prostate cancer patients is not yet properly established. In a series of primary hormone-naive prostate cancers from a patient population that underwent radical prostatectomy, we wanted to determine the relationship between NE phenotype expression and Gleason sum, disease stage, and serum PSA concentration.

METHODS

Chromogranin A (CgA) expression was scored and compared in 105 consecutive primary prostate cancers with their homologous preoperative tumor prostate biopsies.

RESULTS

High grade or high stage prostate cancers expressed a significantly higher CgA score than low grade or localized diseases (p < 0.005). Both the CgA score of the surgical specimens and the PSA level in the serum increased linearly (p = 0.001). In the samples of many corresponding tumor biopsies no significant CgA staining was found.

CONCLUSION

NE differentiation in primary untreated prostate cancer is closely associated with the major prognostic parameters of survival. This association cannot be shown by evaluating the CgA staining in tumor biopsies.

Identification of serum amyloid A as a biomarker to distinguish prostate cancer patients with bone lesions

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer has a propensity to metastasize to the bone. Currently, there are no curative treatments for this stage of the disease. Sensitive biomarkers that can be monitored in the blood to indicate the presence or development of bone metastases and/or response to therapies are lacking. Surface-enhanced laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry (SELDI-TOF MS) is an affinity-based approach that allows sensitive and high-throughput protein profiling and screening of biological samples.

METHODS

We used SELDI-TOF MS for protein profiling of sera from prostate cancer patients (n = 38) with and without bone metastases in our effort to identify individual or multiple serum markers that may be of added benefit to those in current use. Serum was applied to ProteinChip surfaces (H4 and IMAC) to quickly screen samples and detect peaks predominating in the samples obtained from patients with bone metastases. Unique proteins in the bone metastasis cohort observed by SELDI-TOF MS were identified by two-dimensional gel electrophoresis, in-gel trypsin digestion, and tandem MS. The identities of the proteins were confirmed by ELISA and immunodepletion assays.

RESULTS

The cluster of unique proteins in the sera of patients with bone metastases was identified as isoforms of serum amyloid A. Machine-learning algorithms were also used to identify patients with bone metastases with a sensitivity and specificity of 89.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

SELDI-TOF MS protein profiling in combination with other proteomic approaches may provide diagnostic tools with potential clinical applications and serve as tools to aid in the discovery of biomarkers associated with various diseases.

Detection of Prostate Cancer and Predicting Progression

Carcinoma of the prostate is the second leading cause of male cancer-related death in the United States. Better indicators of prostate cancer presence and progression are needed to avoid unnecessary treatment, predict disease course, and develop more effective therapy. Numerous molecular markers have been described in human serum, urine, seminal fluid, and histological specimens that exhibit varying capacities to detect prostate cancer and predict disease course. However, to date, few of these markers have been adequately validated for clinical use. The purpose of this review is to examine the current status of these markers in prostate cancer and to assess the diagnostic potential for future markers from identified genes and molecules that display loss, mutation, or alteration in expression between tumor and normal prostate tissues. In this review we cite 91 molecular markers that display some level of correlation with prostate cancer presence, disease progression, cancer recurrence, prediction of response to therapy, and/or disease-free survival. We suggest criteria to consider when selecting a marker for further development as a clinical tool and discuss five examples of markers (chromogranin A, glutathione S-transferase pi 1, prostate stem cell antigen, prostate-specific membrane antigen, and telomerase reverse transcriptase) that fulfill some of these criteria. Finally, we discuss how to conduct evaluations of candidate prostate cancer markers and some of the issues involved in the validation process.

Selenium and prevention of prostate cancer in high-risk men: the Negative Biopsy Study

Epidemiological and clinical studies suggesting a significant inverse relationship between intake of dietary selenium and overall cancer risk have led to initiation of a randomized, placebo-controlled, phase III clinical trial testing the safety and efficacy of selenized yeast as a chemopreventive agent for prostate cancer. Participants eligible for the 'Negative Biopsy Study', which was initiated in August 1999, are men considered to be at high risk for prostate cancer because of at least one negative sextant prostate biopsy, which was clinically indicated within 1 year of enrollment to the study. After a 30-day run-in period to ensure protocol compliance, participants are randomized to receive either 200 or 400 microg selenized yeast or matched placebo once daily. Primary study endpoints include development of prostate cancer and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) velocity. Secondary biochemical endpoints include change in chromagranin A and alkaline phosphatase. As of 1 June 2003, 514 eligible participants had been enrolled. Randomization schema was effective for selected parameters including age, body mass index, smoking status, baseline PSA and baseline plasma selenium level. Various data, including medical history, family history, and urological symptoms and specimens (including blood and subsequent prostate biopsy samples) had been collected at baseline, and throughout both the intervention and follow-up stages of the protocol. The goal for accrual is 700 evaluable participants.

Selenium and inhibition of disease progression in men diagnosed with prostate carcinoma: study design and baseline characteristics of the ‘Watchful Waiting’ Study

Impediment of the promotion and progression stages of carcinogenesis of the prostate could have a profound impact on treatment choice and prognosis for prostate cancer. Efficacious chemopreventive agents that elicit their activity by slowing the processes of progression could make watchful waiting a viable alternative for a large population of men or could delay the necessity for surgery, radiation or other more invasive treatment modalities associated with frequent side effects. Reports from the Nutritional Prevention of Cancer (NPC) study reported that dietary supplementation with selenium significantly reduced the risk of developing prostate cancer. These data led to initiation of the Watchful Waiting Study, a phase II, multi-center, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical intervention study testing the effects of two doses of selenized yeast on progression of prostate cancer. Participants are men with biopsy-proven prostate cancer who have elected to forgo therapy and be closely followed by 'watchful waiting' that includes quarterly prostate-specific antigen (PSA) screening. Subjects are randomized to receive 200 or 800 microg of selenized yeast or matched placebo daily. Endpoints include time to disease progression and PSA velocity. Secondary endpoints include time to initiation of therapy as well as biochemical markers of disease progression including chromagranin A and alkaline phosphatase. Immunohistochemical analyses for indicators of apoptosis, proliferation and differentiation will be performed on baseline and subsequent prostate biopsy specimens. This report summarizes the primary objectives, research methods and the randomized subjects in this important clinical trial.