CENTRAL AND PERIPHERAL SYMPATHETIC ACTIVATION IN HEART FAILURE

Sympathetic overactivity, hypertension and cardiovascular disease: state of the art

Cardiovascular disease (CVD) remains the most prevalent cause of premature death worldwide. It had been suspected for decades that increased activity of the sympathetic nervous system (SNS) might play a pathogenetic role in the development and progression of hypertension, heart failure (HF) and CVD. The use of microneurographic techniques to directly assess the SNS has allowed this field to advance considerably in recent years. We now have compelling evidence for a key role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis and progression of hypertension and associated hypertension-mediated organ damage (such as endothelial dysfunction, arterial stiffness and left ventricular hypertrophy), HF (with or without reduced left ventricular ejection fraction). Sympathetic overactivity also drives increased cardiovascular risk in the settings of obesity, metabolic syndrome, chronic kidney disease and obstructive sleep apnoea, among other conditions. Thus, sympathetic overactivity is an important factor that drives patients through the CVD continuum, from the early appearance of cardiovascular risk factors, to impairments of the structure and function of components of the heart and arteries, to established CVD, and ultimately to a life-threatening cardiovascular event. A deeper understanding of the role of sympathetic overactivity in the pathogenesis of CVD and HF will support the optimization of therapeutic interventions for these conditions.

The current best drug treatment for hypertensive heart failure with preserved ejection fraction

More than 90 % of patients developing heart failure (HF) have hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type-2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease. HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and non-steroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Subsequently, they have been investigated in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) of mostly hypertensive etiology, and with modest benefits largely assessed on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications. Patients with HFpEF may have diastolic dysfunction but also systolic dysfunction visualized by lack of longitudinal shortening. Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.

What Is the Current Best Drug Treatment for Hypertensive Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction? Review of the Totality of Evidence

BACKGROUND

More than 90% of patients developing heart failure (HF) have an epidemiological background of hypertension. The most frequent concomitant conditions are type 2 diabetes mellitus, obesity, atrial fibrillation, and coronary disease, all disorders/diseases closely related to hypertension.

METHODS

HF outcome research focuses on decreasing mortality and preventing hospitalization for worsening HF syndrome. All drugs that decrease these HF endpoints lower blood pressure. Current drug treatments for HF are (i) angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors, angiotensin receptor blockers, or angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors, (ii) selected beta-blockers, (iii) steroidal and nonsteroidal mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and (iv) sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

RESULTS

For various reasons, these drug treatments were first studied in HF patients with a reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). However, subsequently, they have been investigated and, as we see it, documented as beneficial in HF patients with a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF, HFpEF) and mostly hypertensive etiology, with effect estimates assessed partly on top of background treatment with the drugs already proven effective in HFrEF. Additionally, diuretics are given on symptomatic indications.

CONCLUSIONS

Considering the totality of evidence and the overall need for antihypertensive treatment and/or treatment of hypertensive complications in almost all HF patients, the principal drug treatment of HF appears to be the same regardless of LVEF. Rather than LVEF-guided treatment of HF, treatment of HF should be directed by symptoms (related to the level of fluid retention), signs (tachycardia), severity (NYHA functional class), and concomitant diseases and conditions. All HF patients should be given all the drug classes mentioned above if well tolerated.

Heart failure and the heart-brain axis

In heart failure (HF) strong haemodynamic and neuronal signalling feedback interactions between the heart and the central nervous system (CNS) exist that are able to mutually provoke acute or chronic functional impairment. Cerebral injury secondary to HF may include acute stroke, cognitive decline and dementia and depressive disorders. Also brain stem functions are involved in the cardiac-cerebral interaction in HF as neurohormonal control and neuronal reflex circuits are known to be impaired or imbalanced in HF. In turn, impaired cerebral functions may account for direct and indirect myocardial injury and may contribute to symptomatic severity of HF, to disease progression and to increased mortality. Despite the clinical and pathophysiologic significance of the heart-CNS interaction, this relevant field of HF comorbidity is clinically under-recognized with regard to both diagnostic workup and treatment efforts. Here, principal aspects of pathophysiologic heart-CNS interactions related to HF are discussed such as stroke, effects on cognitive function, on depressive disorder and neurovegetative control and neuronal cardiovascular reflex regulation. Aspects of (limited) treatment options for cerebral functional interactions in HF are examined.

Sympathetic modulation as a goal of antihypertensive treatment: from drugs to devices

The present study aims to examine the effects of nonpharmacological, pharmacological and devices-based treatment on hypertension-related sympathetic overactivity. This will be done by analyzing the results of different published studies, in which sympathetic activity has been assessed via indirect or direct techniques. After examining the rationale for sympathomodulatory interventions in antihypertensive treatment, the study will discuss the methodological intrinsic limitations of the studies aimed at assessing different therapeutic interventions. The core of the study will be then focused on the effects of nonpharmacological (dietary restriction of sodium intake, physical exercise training, weight reduction), pharmacological (monotherapy, combination drug treatment, new drugs such as sodium glucose co-transport protein-2 inhibitors and angiotensin receptor neprilysin inhibitors), as well as devices-based interventions (renal sympathetic nerves ablation and carotid baroreceptor activation therapy) on the hypertension-related sympathetic overdrive. Finally, the areas worthy of future research as well as the debated issues in the field will be highlighted.

Can the new adipokine asprosin be a metabolic troublemaker for cardiovascular diseases? A state-of-the-art review

Adipokines play a significant role in cardiometabolic diseases. Asprosin, a newly discovered adipokine, was first identified as a glucose-raising protein hormone. Asprosin also stimulates appetite and regulates glucose and lipid metabolism. Its identified receptors so far include Olfr734 and Ptprd. Clinical studies have found that asprosin may be associated with cardiometabolic diseases. Asprosin may have diagnostic and therapeutic potential in obesity, diabetes, metabolic syndrome and atherosclerotic cardiovascular diseases. Herein, the structure, receptors, and functions of asprosin and its relationship with cardiometabolic diseases are summarized based on recent findings.

Depression as a cardiovascular disorder: central-autonomic network, brain-heart axis, and vagal perspectives of low mood

If depressive symptoms are not caused by the physiological effects of a substance or other medical or neurological conditions, they are generally classified as mental disorders that target the central nervous system. However, recent evidence suggests that peripheral neural dynamics on cardiovascular control play a causal role in regulating and processing emotions. In this perspective, we explore the dynamics of the Central-Autonomic Network (CAN) and related brain-heart interplay (BHI), highlighting their psychophysiological correlates and clinical symptoms of depression. Thus, we suggest that depression may arise from dysregulated cardiac vagal and sympathovagal dynamics that lead to CAN and BHI dysfunctions. Therefore, treatments for depression should target the nervous system as a whole, with particular emphasis on regulating vagal and BHI dynamics.

Deep phenotype characterization of hypertensive response to exercise: implications on functional capacity and prognosis across the heart failure spectrum

AIMS

Limited evidence is available regarding the role of hypertensive response to exercise (HRE) in heart failure (HF). We evaluated the systolic blood pressure (SBP) to workload slope during exercise across the HF spectrum, investigating haemodynamic and prognostic correlates of HRE.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We prospectively enrolled 369 patients with HF Stage C (143 had preserved [HFpEF], and 226 reduced [HFrEF] ejection fraction), 201 subjects at risk of developing HF (HF Stages A-B), and 58 healthy controls. We performed a combined cardiopulmonary exercise stress echocardiography testing. We defined HRE as the highest sex-specific SBP/workload slope tertile in each HF stage. Median SBP/workload slope was 0.53 mmHg/W (interquartile range 0.36-0.72); the slope was 39% steeper in women than men (p < 0.0001). After adjusting for age and sex, SBP/workload slope in HFrEF (0.47, 0.30-0.63) was similar to controls (0.43, 0.35-0.57) but significantly lower than Stages A-B (0.61, 0.47-0.75) and HFpEF (0.63, 0.42-0.86). Patients with HRE showed significantly lower peak oxygen consumption and peripheral oxygen extraction. After a median follow-up of 16 months, HRE was independently associated with adverse outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalization for cardiovascular reasons: hazard ratio 2.05, 95% confidence interval 1.81-5.18), while rest and peak SBP were not. Kaplan-Meier analysis confirmed a worse survival probability in Stages A-B (p = 0.005) and HFpEF (p < 0.001), but not HFrEF.

CONCLUSION

A steeper SBP/workload slope is associated with impaired functional capacity across the HF spectrum and could be a more sensitive predictor of adverse events than absolute SBP values, mainly in patients in Stages A-B and HFpEF.

Endothelial, Vascular and Sympathetic Alterations as Therapeutic Targets in Chronic Heart Failure

Vascular and sympathetic abnormalities characterize chronic heart failure (CHF). Alterations include (1) a reduction in arterial distensibility, (2) endothelial dysfunction, (3) a decrease in arterial compliance and a parallel increase in arterial stiffness, and (4) sympathetic cardiovascular activation. Altogether, these alterations represent important targets in therapeutic interventions, because they display an independent negative impact on the disease prognosis, favouring disease progression and the development of cardiovascular complications with direct and indirect mechanisms. The present review will examine the effects of the different therapeutic interventions targeting the vascular/sympathetic alterations detected in CHF. Non-pharmacological, pharmacological and device-based treatments will be discussed in detail, highlighting the possible mechanisms responsible for the vascular/sympathetic effects of each intervention. Finally, the unmet goals in treatment in relation to endothelial and adrenergic targets will be also discussed.

Endothelin type A receptor blockade attenuates aorto-caval fistula-induced heart failure in rats with angiotensin II-dependent hypertension

OBJECTIVE

Evaluation of the effect of endothelin type A (ET A ) receptor blockade on the course of volume-overload heart failure in rats with angiotensin II-dependent hypertension.

METHODS

Ren-2 renin transgenic rats (TGR) were used as a model of hypertension. Heart failure was induced by creating an aorto-caval fistula (ACF). Selective ET A receptor blockade was achieved by atrasentan. For comparison, other rat groups received trandolapril, an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEi). Animals first underwent ACF creation and 2 weeks later the treatment with atrasentan or trandolapril, alone or combined, was applied; the follow-up period was 20 weeks.

RESULTS

Eighteen days after creating ACF, untreated TGR began to die, and none was alive by day 79. Both atrasentan and trandolapril treatment improved the survival rate, ultimately to 56% (18 of 31 animals) and 69% (22 of 32 animals), respectively. Combined ACEi and ET A receptor blockade improved the final survival rate to 52% (17 of 33 animals). The effects of the three treatment regimens on the survival rate did not significantly differ. All three treatment regimens suppressed the development of cardiac hypertrophy and lung congestion, decreased left ventricle (LV) end-diastolic volume and LV end-diastolic pressure, and improved LV systolic contractility in ACF TGR as compared with their untreated counterparts.

CONCLUSION

The treatment with ET A receptor antagonist delays the onset of decompensation of volume-overload heart failure and improves the survival rate in hypertensive TGR with ACF-induced heart failure. However, the addition of ET A receptor blockade did not enhance the beneficial effects beyond those obtained with standard treatment with ACEi alone.

Relationships between sympathetic markers and heart rate thresholds for cardiovascular risk in chronic heart failure

BACKGROUND

Results of recent clinical trials have shown that in heart failure (HF) heart rate (HR) values > 70 beats/minute are associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. No information is available on whether the sympathetic nervous system is differently activated in HF patients displaying resting HR values above or below this cutoff.

METHODS

In 103 HF patients aged 62.7 ± 0.9 (mean ± SEM) years and in 62 heathy controls of similar age we evaluated muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA, microneurography) and venous plasma norepinephrine (NE, HPLC assay), subdividing the subjects in different groups according to their resting clinic and 24-h HR values.

RESULTS

In HF progressively greater values of clinic or 24-h HR were associated with a progressive increase in both MSNA and NE. HR cutoff values adopted in large scale clinical trials for determining cardiovascular risk, i.e., 70 beats/minute, were associated with MSNA values significantly greater than the ones detected in patients with lower HR, this being the case also for NE. In HF both MSNA and NE were significantly related to clinic (r = 0.92, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.81, P < 0.0001, respectively) and 24-h (r = 0.91, P < 0.0001 and r = 0.79, P < 0.0001, respectively) HR. The behavior of sympathetic markers described in HF was specific for this clinical condition, being not observed in healthy controls.

CONCLUSIONS

Both clinic and 24-h HR values greater than 70 beats/minute are associated with an increased sympathetic activation, which parallels for magnitude the HR elevations. These findings support the relevance of using in the therapeutic approach to HF drugs exerting sympathomoderating properties.

Diverse pharmacological properties, trial results, comorbidity prescribing and neural pathophysiology suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified

Beta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trials. Hypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rate. Beta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties. This position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failure. Analogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertension. Beta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blocker first choices in clinical practice. Thus, beta-blockers should be regarded as relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice, particularly if characterised by a long half-life, highly selective beta-1 blocking activity and no intrinsic agonist properties.SUMMARYBeta-blockers have solid documentation in preventing cardiovascular complications in the treatment of hypertension; atenolol, metoprolol, oxprenolol and propranolol demonstrate proven cardiovascular prevention in hypertension mega-trialsHypertension is characterised by activation of the sympathetic nervous system from early to late phases, which makes beta-blockers an appropriate treatment seen from a pathophysiological viewpoint, especially in patients with an elevated heart rateBeta-blockers represent a heterogenous class of drugs with regard to both pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic propertiesThis position is manifest by reference to another clinical context, beta-blocker treatment of heart failure, where unequivocally there is no class effect (no similar benefit from all beta-blockers); there are good and less good beta-blockers for heart failureAnalogous differences in beta-blocker efficacy is also likely in hypertensionBeta-blockers are widely used for the treatment of diseases comorbid with hypertension, in approximately 50 different concomitant medical conditions that are frequent in patients with hypertension, leading to many de facto beta-blockers first choices in clinical practiceThese observations, in totality, inform our opinion that beta-blockers are relevant first choices for hypertension in clinical practice and this fact needs highlightingFurther, these arguments suggest European hypertension guideline downgrading of beta-blockers is not justified.

Lethal diquat poisoning manifests as acute central nervous system injury and circulatory failure: A retrospective cohort study of 50 cases

BACKGROUND

The mortality rate of patients with diquat (DQ) poisoning is extremely high due to insufficient understanding of DQ-induced injury. This study aimed to summarize the characteristics of DQ poisoning as well as analyse the correlation between plasma DQ concentration and patient outcomes, thus providing a new strategy for diagnosis and treatment.

METHODS

This single-centre retrospective cohort study was conducted at the Emergency Department of the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, China, between Oct 9, 2019 and March 10, 2022. 50 patients, whose plasma or urine samples tested positive for diquat and negative for paraquat by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, were included in the study.

FINDINGS

The mortality rate of acute DQ poisoning was 25 (50%) of 50. Compared with the survival group, the death group presented significantly higher initial plasma DQ concentration (Cp₁), aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, serum creatinine, and creatine kinase-MB (P < 0.05). We found that six (24.0%) patients died of central nervous system injury, six (24.0%) patients died of refractory circulatory failure, and 13 (52.0%) patients died of central nervous system injury combined with circulatory failure. Receiver operator characteristic curve analysis showed that the area under the curve of Cp₁ was 0.967 (95% CI: 0.911, 1.000), and the cut-off value was 3516.885 ng/mL (sensitivity, 90.9%; specificity, 96.0%).

INTERPRETATION

Lethal DQ poisoning is primarily associated with serious brain and vascular injury, as well as a high rate of mortality. Further research into the mechanisms of refractory circulatory failure and central nerve system damage could help reduce mortality.

FUNDING

There are no funding sources to declare.

Elevated heart rate as sympathetic biomarker in human obesity

BACKGROUND AND AIM

The present study was aimed at determining whether and to what extent a specific heart rate (HR) cutoff value allows to identify in obeses a more pronounced level of adrenergic overdrive.

METHODS AND RESULTS

In 86 obese subjects aged 44.7 ± 0.9 (mean ± SEM) years and in 45 heathy lean controls of similar age we evaluated muscle sympathetic nerve traffic (MSNA, microneurography) and venous plasma norepinephrine (NE, HPLC assay), subdividing the subjects in 3 different groups according to their resting clinic and 24-h HR values (<70, 70-79 and 80-89 beats/minute). MSNA and plasma NE values detected in the three obese groups were almost superimposable each other, no significant difference between groups being observed. A similar behavior was observed when HR values were assessed during the 24-h Holter monitoring. In the group as a whole no significant relationship was detected between MSNA, plasma NE and clinic HR, this being the case also when 24-h HR replaced clinic HR in the correlation analysis. In contrast lean controls displayed a progressive significant increase in MSNA values form the group with clinic (and 24 Holter) values below 70 beats/minute to the ones with HR values between 70 and 79 and above 80 beats/minute.

CONCLUSIONS

In the obese state measurement of resting HR may allow to provide some general information on the functional status of the adrenergic cardiovascular drive. When the information required, however, are more subtle the sensitivity of the approach appears to be reduced and HR cannot be regarded as a faithful sympathetic biomarker.

Sympathetic activation and heart rate thresholds for cardiovascular risk in chronic kidney disease

AIM

The current study was designed at assessing whether the sympathetic cardiovascular drive (SNS) is differently activated in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients displaying less or more elevated resting heart rate (HR) values. It was also designed at determining at which HR cutoff value the SNS displays a greater activation.

METHODS

In 95 CKD middle-age patients we evaluated muscle sympathetic nerve activity (MSNA, microneurography) and venous plasma norepinephrine (HPLC assay), subdividing the patients in different groups according to their resting clinic and 24-h HR.

RESULTS

In CKD progressively greater values of clinic or 24-h HR were associated with a progressive increase in both MSNA and norepinephrine. HR cutoff values indicated by large-scale clinical trials for determining cardiorenal risk, that is more than 80 bpm, were associated with MSNA values significantly greater than the ones detected in patients with lower HR, this being the case also for norepinephrine. Both MSNA and norepinephrine were significantly related to clinic ( r  = 0.47, P  < 0.0001 and r  = 0.26, P  < 0.0001, respectively) and 24-h ( r  = 0.42, P  < 0.0001 and r  = 0.27, P  < 0.0001, respectively) HR. MSNA, norepinephrine, but not HR, were significantly and inversely related to estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) values ( r  = -0.47, r  = -0.23, P  < 0.0001 and P  < 0.02, respectively).

CONCLUSION

In CKD both clinic and 24-h HR values greater than 80 bpm are associated with an enhanced sympathetic activation, which parallelles for magnitude the HR elevations. The sensitivity of HR as sympathetic marker is limited; however, no significant relationship being detected between HR and eGFR or left ventricular mass index.

Is the Sympathetic System Detrimental in the Setting of Septic Shock, with Antihypertensive Agents as a Counterintuitive Approach? A Clinical Proposition

Mortality in the setting of septic shock varies between 20% and 100%. Refractory septic shock leads to early circulatory failure and carries the worst prognosis. The pathophysiology is poorly understood despite studies of the microcirculatory defects and the immuno-paralysis. The acute circulatory distress is treated with volume expansion, administration of vasopressors (usually noradrenaline: NA), and inotropes. Ventilation and anti-infectious strategy shall not be discussed here. When circulation is considered, the literature is segregated between interventions directed to the systemic circulation vs. interventions directed to the micro-circulation. Our thesis is that, after stabilization of the acute cardioventilatory distress, the prolonged sympathetic hyperactivity is detrimental in the setting of septic shock. Our hypothesis is that the sympathetic hyperactivity observed in septic shock being normalized towards baseline activity will improve the microcirculation by recoupling the capillaries and the systemic circulation. Therefore, counterintuitively, antihypertensive agents such as beta-blockers or alpha-2 adrenergic agonists (clonidine, dexmedetomidine) are useful. They would reduce the noradrenaline requirements. Adjuncts (vitamins, steroids, NO donors/inhibitors, etc.) proposed to normalize the sepsis-evoked vasodilation are not reviewed. This itemized approach (systemic vs. microcirculation) requires physiological and epidemiological studies to look for reduced mortality.

Clinical Relevance of the Sympathetic-Vascular Interactions in Health and Disease

The sympathetic nervous system is known to play a pivotal role in the short- and long-term regulation of different cardiovascular functions. In recent decades, increasing evidence has demonstrated that sympathetic neural influences are involved not only in the vasomotor modulation of small resistance arteries but also in the control of large arteries. Sympathetic activity and vascular function, which are key factors in the pathophysiology and prognosis of cardiovascular disease, are linked by a close relationship. Evidence from experimental studies indicates that the sympathetic nervous system is critically influenced, at the central and also at the peripheral level, by the most relevant factors regulating vascular function, namely nitric oxide, reactive oxygen species and endothelin. Additionally, there is evidence of a reciprocal influence between endothelial function and sympathetic mechanisms. This paper will provide an overview of the relationships between endothelial function and the sympathetic nervous system characterizing physiological states. It will also briefly mention the alterations described in cardiovascular disease, with particular emphasis on essential hypertension and congestive heart failure, i.e., the two pathological states in which endothelial dysfunction and neuroadrenergic activation appear to be relevant factors for determining cardiovascular prognosis.