1
|
Molinelli C, Jacobs F, Nader-Marta G, Borea R, Scavone G, Ottonello S, Fregatti P, Villarreal-Garza C, Bajpai J, Kim HJ, Puglisi S, de Azambuja E, Lambertini M. Ovarian Suppression: Early Menopause and Late Effects. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2024; 25:523-542. [PMID: 38478329 PMCID: PMC10997548 DOI: 10.1007/s11864-024-01190-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
OPINION STATEMENT Around 90% of breast tumours are diagnosed in the early stage, with approximately 70% being hormone receptor-positive. The cornerstone of adjuvant therapy for early-stage hormone receptor-positive breast cancer is endocrine therapy, tailored according to disease stage, biological characteristics of the tumour, patient's comorbidities, preferences and age. In premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer, ovarian function suppression is a key component of the adjuvant endocrine treatment in combination with an aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen. Moreover, it can be used during chemotherapy as a standard strategy for ovarian function preservation in all breast cancer subtypes. In the metastatic setting, ovarian function suppression should be used in all premenopausal patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer to achieve a post-menopausal status. Despite its efficacy, ovarian function suppression may lead to several side effects that can have a major negative impact on patients' quality of life if not properly managed (e.g. hot flashes, depression, cognitive impairment, osteoporosis, sexual dysfunction, weight gain). A deep knowledge of the side effects of ovarian function suppression is necessary for clinicians. A correct counselling in this regard and proactive management should be considered a fundamental part of survivorship care to improve treatment adherence and patients' quality of life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Molinelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Flavia Jacobs
- Humanitas Clinical and Research Center - IRCCS, Humanitas Cancer Center, Via Manzoni 56, 20089, Rozzano, Milan, Italy
| | - Guilherme Nader-Marta
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), 90, Rue Meylemeersch, 1070, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Roberto Borea
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Graziana Scavone
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Silvia Ottonello
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O. Senologia Chirurgica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Surgical Sciences and Integrated Diagnostic (DISC), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion - TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, Monterrey, Mexico
| | - Jyoti Bajpai
- Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute (HBNI), Ernest Borges Rd, Parel East, Parel, Mumbai, Maharashtra, 400012, India
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88, Olympic-Ro 43-Gil, Songpa-Gu, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Silvia Puglisi
- Medical Oncology Unit 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy
| | - Evandro de Azambuja
- Academic Trials Promoting Team, Institut Jules Bordet and l'Université Libre de Bruxelles (U.L.B), 90, Rue Meylemeersch, 1070, Anderlecht, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy.
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinical Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Largo Rosanna Benzi 10, 16132, Genoa, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McCann KE, Goldfarb SB, Traina TA, Regan MM, Vidula N, Kaklamani V. Selection of appropriate biomarkers to monitor effectiveness of ovarian function suppression in pre-menopausal patients with ER+ breast cancer. NPJ Breast Cancer 2024; 10:8. [PMID: 38242892 PMCID: PMC10798954 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-024-00614-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 01/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists has been widely adopted to provide reversible ovarian function suppression for pre-menopausal breast cancer patients who are also receiving aromatase inhibitor or tamoxifen therapy based on results of 25 randomized trials representing almost 15,000 women demonstrating a survival benefit with this approach. Past clinical trials designed to establish the efficacy of GnRH agonists have monitored testosterone in the prostate cancer setting and estradiol in the breast cancer setting. We explore the merits of various biomarkers including estradiol, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), and luteinizing hormone (LH) and their utility for informing GnRH agonist treatment decisions in breast cancer. Estradiol remains our biomarker of choice in ensuring adequate ovarian function suppression with GnRH agonist therapy among pre-menopausal women with breast cancer. We recommend future trials to continue to focus on estradiol levels as the primary endpoint, as they have in the past.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly E McCann
- University of California Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, 90095, USA
| | - Shari B Goldfarb
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Tiffany A Traina
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA
| | - Meredith M Regan
- Dana Farber Cancer Institute / Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, 02215, USA
| | | | - Virginia Kaklamani
- University of Texas Health Sciences Center San Antonio / MD Anderson Cancer Center, San Antonio, TX, 78229, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Nilsson HP, Bergh J, Malmros J, Ljungman P, Foukakis T, Stragliotto CL, Friman EI, Linderholm B, Valachis A, Andersson A, Harrysson S, Vennström L, Frisk P, Mörse H, Eloranta S. ProFertil study protocol for the investigation of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during chemotherapy aiming at fertility protection of young women and teenagers with cancer in Sweden-a phase III randomised double-blinded placebo-controlled study. BMJ Open 2023; 13:e078023. [PMID: 38070906 PMCID: PMC10728964 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-078023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 10/31/2023] [Indexed: 12/18/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) cotreatment used to transiently suppress ovarian function during chemotherapy to prevent ovarian damage and preserve female fertility is used globally but efficacy is debated. Most clinical studies investigating a beneficial effect of GnRHa cotreatment on ovarian function have been small, retrospective and uncontrolled. Unblinded randomised studies on women with breast cancer have suggested a beneficial effect, but results are mixed with lack of evidence of improvement in markers of ovarian reserve. Unblinded randomised studies of women with lymphoma have not shown any benefit regarding fertility markers after long-term follow-up and no placebo-controlled study has been conducted so far. The aim of this study is to investigate if administration of GnRHa during cancer treatment can preserve fertility in young female cancer patients in a double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. METHODS AND ANALYSIS A prospective, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase III study including 300 subjects with breast cancer. In addition, 200 subjects with lymphoma, acute leukemias and sarcomas will be recruited. Women aged 14-42 will be randomised 1:1 to treatment with GnRHa (triptorelin) or placebo for the duration of their gonadotoxic chemotherapy. Follow-up until 5 years from end of treatment (EoT). The primary endpoint will be change in anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) recovery at follow-up 12 months after EoT, relative to AMH levels at EoT, comparing the GnRHa group and the placebo group in women with breast cancer. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study is designed in accordance with the principles of Good Clinical Practice (ICH-GCP E6 (R2)), local regulations (ie, European Directive 2001/20/EC) and the ethical principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Within 6 months of study completion, the results will be analysed and the study results shall be reported in the EudraCT database. STUDY REGISTRATION The National Institutional review board in Sweden dnr:2021-03379, approval date 12 October 2021 (approved amendments 12 June 2022, dnr:2022-02924-02 and 13 December 2022, dnr:2022-05565-02). The Swedish Medical Product Agency 19 January 2022, Dnr:5.1-2021-98927 (approved amendment 4 February 2022). Manufacturing authorisation for authorised medicinal products approved 6 December 2021, Dnr:6.2.1-2020-079580. Stockholm Medical Biobank approved 22 June 2022, RBC dnr:202 253. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT05328258; EudraCT number:2020-004780-71.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | - Jonas Bergh
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme cancer, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Johan Malmros
- Pediatric Theme Astrid Lindgren's Pediatric Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Per Ljungman
- Department of Cellular Therapy and Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
- Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine Huddinge, Karolinska Institute, Huddinge, Sweden
| | - Theodoros Foukakis
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
- Theme cancer, Karolinska Comprehensive Cancer Center and University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | - Barbro Linderholm
- Department of Oncology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Antonis Valachis
- Oncology, Örebro universitet Fakulteten för medicin och hälsa, Orebro, Sweden
| | - Anne Andersson
- Department of Oncology, Norrlands University Hospital, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Sara Harrysson
- Department of Hematology, Cancer Theme, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Lovisa Vennström
- Department of Hematology and Coagulation, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Goteborg, Sweden
| | - Per Frisk
- Akademiska Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Helena Mörse
- Center for Pediatric Oncology, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Sandra Eloranta
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Solna, Sweden
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, Department of Medicine Solna, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cui W, Rocconi RP, Thota R, Anderson RA, Bruinooge SS, Comstock IA, Denduluri N, Gassman A, Gralow J, Hutt KJ, Amiri-Kordestani L, Lambertini M, Leighton J, Lu KH, Mostoufi-Moab S, Pollastro T, Pradhan S, Saber H, Schenkel C, Spratt D, Wedam S, Phillips KA. Measuring ovarian toxicity in clinical trials: an American Society of Clinical Oncology research statement. Lancet Oncol 2023; 24:e415-e423. [PMID: 37797647 DOI: 10.1016/s1470-2045(23)00390-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/26/2023] [Revised: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 08/03/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
Anticancer agents can impair ovarian function, resulting in premature menopause and associated long-term health effects. Ovarian toxicity is not usually adequately assessed in trials of anticancer agents, leaving an important information gap for patients facing therapy choices. This American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) statement provides information about the incorporation of ovarian toxicity measures in trial design. ASCO recommends: (1) measurement of ovarian toxicity in relevant clinical trials of anticancer agents that enrol post-pubertal, pre-menopausal patients; (2) collection of ovarian function measures at baseline and at 12-24 months after anticancer agent cessation, as a minimum, and later in line with the trial schedule; and (3) assessment of both clinical measures and biomarkers of ovarian function. ASCO recognises that routine measurement of ovarian toxicity and function in cancer clinical trials will add additional complexity and burden to trial resources but asserts that this issue is of such importance to patients that it cannot continue to be overlooked.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wanda Cui
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| | - Rodney P Rocconi
- The University of Mississippi Medical Center, Cancer Center & Research Institute, Jackson, MS, USA
| | | | - Richard A Anderson
- Medical Research Council Centre for Reproductive Health, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | | | - Ioanna A Comstock
- Office of Rare Diseases, Pediatrics, Urologic and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Urology, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Audrey Gassman
- Office of Rare Diseases, Pediatrics, Urologic and Reproductive Medicine, Division of Urology, Obstetrics, and Gynecology, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Julie Gralow
- American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA, USA
| | - Karla J Hutt
- Development and Stem Cell Program and Department of Anatomy and Developmental Biology, Biomedicine Discovery Institute, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| | - Laleh Amiri-Kordestani
- Division of Oncology 1, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genoa, Italy; Department of Medical Oncology, UO Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - John Leighton
- Division of Hematology Oncology Toxicity, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Karen H Lu
- Department of Gynecologic Oncology and Reproductive Medicine, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Sogol Mostoufi-Moab
- Center for Childhood Cancer Research, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | | | - Shan Pradhan
- Office of Oncologic Diseases, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Haleh Saber
- Division of Hematology Oncology Toxicity, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | | | - Daniel Spratt
- Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Suparna Wedam
- Division of Oncology 1, Center for Drug Evaluation and Research, US Food and Drug Administration, Silver Spring, MD, USA
| | - Kelly-Anne Phillips
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia; Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Parkville, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Yuan Y, Zhang C, Lei X, Ren T, Chen H, Zhao Q. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists during Gonadal Chemotherapy for the Effect on Pregnancy Outcome and Ovarian Function in Premenopausal Patients with Breast Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Breast Care (Basel) 2023; 18:270-278. [PMID: 37900550 PMCID: PMC10601703 DOI: 10.1159/000528028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 10/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Objectives The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHas) on pregnancy outcomes, premature ovarian failure (POF), menstrual recovery, disease-free survival (DFS), and adverse events in premenopausal breast cancer patients during gonadal chemotherapy. Methods We systematically searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Embase databases. The trials were eligible if they included premenopausal breast cancer patients treated with chemotherapy alone or with concurrent GnRHa and reported ovarian function recovery data. Heterogeneity for the eligible data was assessed, and a pooled risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated. A meta-analysis was conducted using a fixed-effect model. Results Fifteen randomized controlled trials were included in this analysis. The results indicated that GnRHa combined with chemotherapy significantly increased pregnancy rates compared with chemotherapy alone (RR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.16-2.67) and decreased rates of POF (RR = 0.42; 95% CI: 0.35-0.51). For secondary endpoints, the GnRHa group improved menstrual recovery rates (RR = 1.20; 95% CI: 1.11-1.30) and decreased the rate of amenorrhea 1-2 years after chemotherapy (RR = 0.50; 95% CI: 0.40-0.63). Furthermore, the 5-year DFS and overall survival (OS) rates were significantly improved in the GnRHa group. Conclusion For premenopausal breast cancer patients receiving gonadal toxic chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy with GnRHa can better protect the ovarian function of patients, reduce the rate of POF and amenorrhea, and improve the pregnancy rate, menstrual recovery rate, DFS rate, and OS rate of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan Yuan
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Chu Zhang
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Xueli Lei
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Shenyang Pharmaceutical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Tianshu Ren
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Han Chen
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| | - Qingchun Zhao
- Department of Pharmacy, General Hospital of Northern Theater Command, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Hong YH, Park C, Paik H, Lee KH, Lee JR, Han W, Park S, Chung S, Kim HJ. Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer: A Review. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:221-242. [PMID: 37387349 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e28] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2023] [Revised: 05/11/2023] [Accepted: 05/12/2023] [Indexed: 07/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation is a major concern in young patients diagnosed with breast cancer and planning to receive multimodality treatment, including gonadotoxic chemotherapy with or without age-related decline through long-term endocrine therapy. Most breast cancer patients undergo multimodality treatments; many short-term and long-term side effects arise during these therapies. One of the most detrimental side effects is reduced fertility due to gonadotoxic treatments with resultant psychosocial stress. Cryopreservation of oocytes, embryos, and ovarian tissue are currently available fertility preservation methods for these patients. As an adjunct to these methods, in vitro maturation or gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist could also be considered. It is also essential to communicate well with patients in the decision-making process on fertility preservation. It is essential to refer patients diagnosed with breast cancer on time to fertility specialists for individualized treatment, which may lead to desirable outcomes. To do so, a multimodal team-based approach and in-depth discussion on the treatment of breast cancer and fertility preservation is crucial. This review aims to summarize infertility risk related to currently available breast cancer treatment, options for fertility preservation and its details, barriers to oncofertility counseling, and psychosocial issues.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeon Hee Hong
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Changhee Park
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Haerin Paik
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kyung-Hun Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jung Ryeol Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wonshik Han
- Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seho Park
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seockhoon Chung
- Department of Psychiatry, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Hee Jeong Kim
- Division of Breast Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
White R, Wilson A, Bechman N, Keay SD, McAvan L, Quenby S, Odendaal J. Fertility preservation, its effectiveness and its impact on disease status in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 2023; 287:8-19. [PMID: 37269752 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2023.05.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2022] [Revised: 05/14/2023] [Accepted: 05/21/2023] [Indexed: 06/05/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preservation of reproductive function is a key concern for many premenopausal women with breast cancer, given the known gonadotoxic effects of treatments. The present systematic review aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of fertility preservation strategies in pre-menopausal women with breast cancer. METHODS Primary research assessing fertility preservation strategies of any type was identified. Markers of preservation of fertility including return of menstrual function, clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates were selected as main outcome measures. An additional analysis of safety data was also performed. RESULTS Fertility preservation interventions were overall associated with higher fertility outcomes: with a pooled odds ratio 4.14 (95% CI 3.59-4.77) for any kind of fertility preservation intervention. This was seen both for return of menstruation and for clinical pregnancy rate, but not for live birth rates. Fertility preservation was associated with a reduced rate of disease recurrence (OR 0.63 (95% CI 0.49-0.81)), while there was no significant difference in disease free survival (OR 0.88 (95% CI 0.74-1.05)) or in overall survival (OR 0.9 (95% CI 0.74-1.10)) between the fertility preservation group and those who had not undergone fertility preservation. CONCLUSION Fertility preservation is both effective in preserving reproductive function, and safe with regard to disease recurrence, disease free survival and overall survival in premenopausal women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rhiannon White
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Anna Wilson
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Natasha Bechman
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Stephen D Keay
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Lucy McAvan
- University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Siobhan Quenby
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom
| | - Joshua Odendaal
- Division of Biomedical Sciences, Clinical Sciences Research Laboratories, Warwick Medical School, University of Warwick, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom; University Hospitals Coventry & Warwickshire, Coventry CV2 2DX, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Kim SE, Kim WJ, Choi D, Lee DY. Comparison of goserelin and leuprorelin for ovarian protection during chemotherapy in young patients with breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2023; 198:231-237. [PMID: 36781519 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-023-06877-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/01/2023] [Indexed: 02/15/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Although different gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may have different effects, their effect of ovarian protection during chemotherapy for breast cancer has not been compared. This study aimed to compare the effects of goserelin and leuprorelin for ovarian protection during chemotherapy in young patients with breast cancer. METHODS This prospective study analyzed 193 patients with breast cancer aged ≤ 40 years who had regular menstruation and serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels ≥ 1 ng/mL before treatment. Patients received either goserelin or leuprorelin for ovarian protection during doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. Resumption of menstruation and changes in serum levels of AMH were compared between the two groups at 12 months after completion of chemotherapy. RESULTS The mean age and the pretreatment serum AMH level were 33.2 years and 4.4 ng/mL in goserelin group and 34.2 years and 4.0 ng/mL in leuprorelin group. The proportion of patients who resumed menstruation was not different between the goserelin (94.4%) and leuprorelin (95.3%) groups at 12 months after chemotherapy completion. Serum AMH levels decreased significantly in both the goserelin (from 4.4 to 1.2 ng/mL) and leuprorelin (from 4.0 to 1.2 ng/mL) groups, with no statistical significance. In addition, no difference was found in the proportion of patients with serum AMH levels ≥ 1 ng/mL between the goserelin (49.5%) and leuprorelin (44.2%) groups at 12 months after chemotherapy. CONCLUSION Goserelin and leuprorelin were comparable in terms of ovarian protection during doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy in young patients with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sung Eun Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Won-Ji Kim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - DooSeok Choi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea
| | - Dong-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-ro, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, 06351, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Ben-Aharon I, van Laarhoven HWM, Fontana E, Obermannova R, Nilsson M, Lordick F. Early-Onset Cancer in the Gastrointestinal Tract Is on the Rise-Evidence and Implications. Cancer Discov 2023; 13:538-551. [PMID: 36757194 DOI: 10.1158/2159-8290.cd-22-1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 22.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 11/15/2022] [Accepted: 12/20/2022] [Indexed: 02/10/2023]
Abstract
Epidemiologic data indicate a significant increase in the incidence of colorectal cancer in younger populations in the past three decades. Moreover, recent evidence also demonstrates a similar trend in gastric, pancreatic, and biliary tract cancers. A majority of these early-onset cases are sporadic and lack hereditary or familial background, implying a potential key role for behavioral, lifestyle, nutritional, microbial, and environmental factors. This review explores the current data on early-onset gastrointestinal cancer, exploring the etiology, unique treatment considerations for this population, future challenges, as well as implications for research and practice. SIGNIFICANCE The worrisome trend of an increasing incidence of early-onset gastrointestinal cancers appears to be correlated with nonhereditary etiologies in which behavioral, lifestyle, nutritional, microbial, and environmental factors, as well as host mechanisms, may play a key role. Further epidemiologic and pathogenetic research is urgently needed to better understand the underlying mechanisms and to develop preventive strategies and tailored early detection. Young patients with gastrointestinal cancer face unique challenges and unmet needs. These must be addressed in the future management of the disease to minimize treatment-related somatic morbidity and prevent psychosocial sequelae.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irit Ben-Aharon
- Division of Oncology, Rambam Health Care Center, Haifa, Israel
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion, Haifa, Israel
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hanneke W M van Laarhoven
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Cancer Center Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Medical Oncology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elisa Fontana
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Sarah Cannon Research Institute, London, United Kingdom
| | - Radka Obermannova
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Department of Comprehensive Cancer Care, Masaryk Memorial Cancer Institute, Brno, Czech Republic
- Faculty of Medicine, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic
| | - Magnus Nilsson
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention and Technology, Karolinska Institutet and Department of Upper Abdominal Diseases, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Florian Lordick
- Gastrointestinal Tract Cancer Group, European Organization for Treatment and Research of Cancer (EORTC), Brussels, Belgium
- University Cancer Center Leipzig (UCCL) and 2nd Medical Department (Oncology, Gastroenterology, Hepatology, Pneumology and Infectiology), University Medicine Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Chi YN, Yang JM, Liu N, Cui YH, Ma L, Lan XB, Ma WQ, Liu YJ, Yu JQ, Du J. Development of protective agents against ovarian injury caused by chemotherapeutic drugs. Biomed Pharmacother 2022; 155:113731. [PMID: 36179491 DOI: 10.1016/j.biopha.2022.113731] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/28/2022] [Revised: 09/05/2022] [Accepted: 09/19/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is one of the causes of ovarian injury and infertility. Although assisted reproductive technology helps young female patients with cancer become pregnant, preventing chemotherapy-induced ovarian injury will often possess even more significant benefits. OBJECTIVE We aimed at demonstrating the hazardous effects and mechanisms of ovarian injury by chemotherapeutic agents, as well as demonstrating agents that protect the ovary from chemotherapy-induced injury. RESULTS Chemotherapeutic agents cause death or accelerate activation of follicles and damage to the blood vessels in the ovary, resulting in inflammation. These often require drug development to protect the ovaries from injury. CONCLUSIONS Our findings provide a basis for the development of drugs to protect the ovaries from injury. Although there are many preclinical studies on potential protective drugs, there is still an urgent need for a large number of clinical experiments to verify their potential use.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yan-Nan Chi
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Jia-Mei Yang
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China; School of Basic Medicine, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Ning Liu
- Key Laboratory of Hui Ethnic Medicine Modernization, the Ministry of Education, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Yan-Hong Cui
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Lin Ma
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Xiao-Bing Lan
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Wen-Qian Ma
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Yan-Jie Liu
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China
| | - Jian-Qiang Yu
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China; Ningxia Hui Medicine Modern Engineering Research Center and Collaborative Innovation Center, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Pharmacology, Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan 750004, China.
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Kumar R, Abreu C, Toi M, Saini S, Casimiro S, Arora A, Paul AM, Velaga R, Rameshwar P, Lipton A, Gupta S, Costa L. Oncobiology and treatment of breast cancer in young women. Cancer Metastasis Rev 2022; 41:749-770. [PMID: 35488982 DOI: 10.1007/s10555-022-10034-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2022] [Accepted: 04/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Female breast cancer emerged as the leading cancer type in terms of incidence globally in 2020. Although mortality due to breast cancer has improved during the past three decades in many countries, this trend has reversed in women less than 40 years since the past decade. From the biological standpoint, there is consensus among experts regarding the clinically relevant definition of breast cancer in young women (BCYW), with an age cut-off of 40 years. The idea that breast cancer is an aging disease has apparently broken in the case of BCYW due to the young onset and an overall poor outcome of BCYW patients. In general, younger patients exhibit a worse prognosis than older pre- and postmenopausal patients due to the aggressive nature of cancer subtypes, a high percentage of cases with advanced stages at diagnosis, and a high risk of relapse and death in younger patients. Because of clinically and biologically unique features of BCYW, it is suspected to represent a distinct biologic entity. It is unclear why BCYW is more aggressive and has an inferior prognosis with factors that contribute to increased incidence. However, unique developmental features, adiposity and immune components of the mammary gland, hormonal interplay and crosstalk with growth factors, and a host of intrinsic and extrinsic risk factors and cellular regulatory interactions are considered to be the major contributing factors. In the present article, we discuss the status of BCYW oncobiology, therapeutic interventions and considerations, current limitations in fully understanding the basis and underlying cause(s) of BCYW, understudied areas of BCYW research, and postulated advances in the coming years for the field.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rakesh Kumar
- Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India. .,Cancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India. .,Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA. .,Department of Human and Molecular Genetics, Virginia Commonwealth University, School of Medicine, Richmond, VA, USA.
| | - Catarina Abreu
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Masakazu Toi
- Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Sunil Saini
- Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - Sandra Casimiro
- Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Anshika Arora
- Cancer Research Institute, Himalayan Institute of Medical Sciences, Swami Rama Himalayan University, Dehradun, India
| | - Aswathy Mary Paul
- Cancer Research Program, Rajiv Gandhi Centre for Biotechnology, Trivandrum, India
| | - Ravi Velaga
- Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Kyoto, Japan
| | - Pranela Rameshwar
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology and Oncology, Rutgers New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Allan Lipton
- Hematology-Oncology, Department of Medicine, Penn State University School of Medicine, Hershey, PA, USA
| | - Sudeep Gupta
- Department of Medical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre and Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai, India
| | - Luis Costa
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital de Santa Maria- Centro Hospitalar Universitário Lisboa Norte, Lisbon, Portugal.,Instituto de Medicina Molecular-João Lobo Antunes, Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Wang Y, Li Y, Liang J, Zhang N, Yang Q. Chemotherapy-Induced Amenorrhea and Its Prognostic Significance in Premenopausal Women With Breast Cancer: An Updated Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:859974. [PMID: 35463307 PMCID: PMC9022106 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.859974] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA) is one of the most common side effects in premenopausal patients with breast cancer, and several factors may contribute to the incidence of CIA. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to summarize clinical risk factors associated with CIA incidence and to evaluate their prognostic effects in patients with breast cancer. Methods Three electronic databases (Cochrane Library, EMBASE, and MEDLINE) were systematically searched for articles published up to October 2021. The articles included clinical trials that evaluated risk factors associated with CIA and their prognostic value in treatment. For the meta-analysis, pooled odds ratio estimates (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the inverse variance-weighted approach, in addition to publication bias and the chi-square test. Results A total of 68 studies involving 26,585 patients with breast cancer were included in this meta-analysis, and 16,927 patients developed CIA. From the 68 studies, 7 risk factors were included such as age group, hormone receptor (HR) status, estrogen receptor (ER) status, progesterone receptor (PR) status, tamoxifen administration, chemotherapeutic regimen, and tumor stage. Based on our results, patients with age of ≤40, HR-negative status, ER-negative status, PR-negative status, no use of tamoxifen, and use of anthracycline-based regimen (A) compared with anthracycline-taxane-based regimen (A+T) were associated with less incidence of CIA in patients with breast cancer. Moreover, CIA was associated with favorable disease-free survival (OR = 0.595, 95% CI = 0.537 to 0.658, p < 0.001) and overall survival (OR = 0.547, 95% CI = 0.454–0.660, p < 0.001) in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. Conclusion Age, HR status, ER status, PR status, tamoxifen administration, and chemotherapeutic regimen can be considered independent factors to predict the occurrence of CIA. CIA is a favorable prognostic factor in premenopausal patients with breast cancer. CIA should be a trade-off in the clinical management of premenopausal patients with breast cancer, and further large cohort studies are necessary to confirm these results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yifei Wang
- Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Yaming Li
- Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Jingshu Liang
- Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Nan Zhang
- Breast Cancer Center, Jinan Central Hospital, Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, China
| | - Qifeng Yang
- Department of Breast Surgery, General Surgery, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Pathology Tissue Bank, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Jinan, China.,Research Institute of Breast Cancer, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Chen CP, Lu X. Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor inhibits triple-negative breast cancer proliferation and metastasis. J Int Med Res 2022; 50:3000605221082895. [PMID: 35264044 PMCID: PMC8918972 DOI: 10.1177/03000605221082895] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor (GnRHR) is expressed in several malignant tumors and inhibits the proliferation and metastasis of cancer cells, but its role in triple-negative breast cancers (TNBCs) is unclear. This study investigated the biological effects of GnRHR and their influence on TNBC prognosis. METHODS The GSE21653 database was used to obtain information about GnRHR expression and clinicopathological factors in patients with TNBC. GnRHR was activated in cultured MDA-MB-231 and MDA-MB-468 cells by leuprolide acetate and antagonized by elagolix sodium. Cell proliferation was assessed by the cell counting kit-8 and colony formation assays. Cell metastasis was detected by the wound healing assay and Transwell assay. Apoptosis and the cell cycle were investigated by flow cytometry. GnRHR protein expression was determined by western blotting. RESULTS GnRHR mRNA expression was significantly higher in patients with TNBC than in hormone receptor+/human epidermal growth factor receptor (HER)2- and HER2+ patients with breast cancer. Patients with high GnRHR expression had significantly better disease-free survival than those with lower expression. Activated GnRHR significantly inhibited cell proliferation and metastasis, increased apoptosis, and enhanced GnRHR protein expression levels. CONCLUSION GnRHR inhibits TNBC proliferation and metastasis, suggesting it could be targeted for TNBC treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cai-Ping Chen
- The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China
| | - Xiang Lu
- The Affiliated Hospital of Jiaxing University, Jiaxing, China
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Lan A, Jin Y, Wang Y, Wang Y, Ding N, Dai Y, Jiang L, Tang Z, Peng Y, Liu S. Pre-treatment circulating reproductive hormones levels predict pathological and survival outcomes in breast cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Int J Clin Oncol 2022. [PMID: 35239089 DOI: 10.1007/s10147-022-02141-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2021] [Accepted: 02/03/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to evaluate the correlation of pre-treatment circulating reproductive hormones levels with pathological and survival outcomes in breast cancer patients received neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). METHODS Information from 196 premenopausal and 137 postmenopausal breast cancer patients who received NAC were retrospectively analyzed. Treatment response to NAC, with odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) was estimated using logistic regression adjusted for key confounders. Survival outcomes with hazard ratios (HR) and 95% CI were estimated using Cox regression adjusted for key confounders. The Kaplan-Meier method was applied in the survival analysis. RESULTS Premenopausal patients with lower testosterone levels (OR = 0.996, 95% CI 0.992-0.999, P = 0.026), and postmenopausal patients with higher follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) levels (OR = 1.045, 95% CI 1.014-1.077, P = 0.005) were likely to achieve pathological complete response (pCR). In multivariate survival analysis, the lowest tertile (T) progesterone was associated with worse overall survival (OS) in premenopausal patients (T2 vs T1, HR = 0.113, 95% CI 0.013-0.953, P = 0.045; T3 vs T1, HR = 0.109, 95% CI 0.013-0.916, P = 0.041). Premenopausal patients with the lowest tertile progesterone exhibited worse 3-year OS compared with those with higher tertiles (72.9% vs 97.4%, log-rank, P = 0.007). CONCLUSION Pre-treatment testosterone and FSH are significant independent predictors for pCR to NAC in premenopausal and postmenopausal patients, respectively. Low progesterone levels are correlated with worse OS in premenopausal patients. These findings may provide a theoretical basis for pre-operative endocrine therapy combined with NAC in breast cancer.
Collapse
|
15
|
Valsamakis G, Valtetsiotis K, Charmandari E, Lambrinoudaki I, Vlahos NF. GnRH Analogues as a Co-Treatment to Therapy in Women of Reproductive Age with Cancer and Fertility Preservation. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23:ijms23042287. [PMID: 35216409 PMCID: PMC8875398 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23042287] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/02/2022] [Revised: 02/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
In this review, we analyzed existing literature regarding the use of Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) analogues (agonists, antagonists) as a co-treatment to chemotherapy and radiotherapy. There is a growing interest in their application as a prophylaxis to gonadotoxicity caused by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy due to their ovarian suppressive effects, making them a potential option to treat infertility caused by such chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. They could be used in conjunction with other fertility preservation options to synergistically maximize their effects. GnRH analogues may be a valuable prophylactic agent against chemotherapeutic infertility by inhibiting rapid cellular turnover on growing follicles that contain types of cells unintentionally targeted during anti-cancer treatments. These could create a prepubertal-like effect in adult women, limiting the gonadotoxicity to the lower levels that young girls have. The use of GnRH agonists was found to be effective in hematological and breast cancer treatment whereas for ovarian endometrial and cervical cancers the evidence is still limited. Studies on GnRH antagonists, as well as the combination of both agonists and antagonists, were limited. GnRH antagonists have a similar protective effect to that of agonists as they preserve or at least alleviate the follicle degradation during chemo-radiation treatment. Their use may be preferred in cases where treatment is imminent (as their effects are almost immediate) and whenever the GnRH agonist-induced flare-up effect may be contra-indicated. The combination treatment of agonists and antagonists has primarily been studied in animal models so far, especially rats. Factors that may play a role in determining their efficacy as a chemoprotective agent that limits gonadal damage, include the type and stage of cancer, the use of alkylating agents, age of patient and prior ovarian reserve. The data for the use of GnRH antagonist alone or in combination with GnRH agonist is still very limited. Moreover, studies evaluating the impact of this treatment on the ovarian reserve as measured by Anti-Müllerian Hormone (AMH) levels are still sparse. Further studies with strict criteria regarding ovarian reserve and fertility outcomes are needed to confirm or reject their role as a gonadal protecting agent during chemo-radiation treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Valsamakis
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Konstantinos Valtetsiotis
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| | - Evangelia Charmandari
- First University Department of Paediatrics, Aghia Sophia Childrens Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 152 33 Athens, Greece;
| | - Irene Lambrinoudaki
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| | - Nikolaos F. Vlahos
- Second University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Aretaieion University Hospital, Athens Medical School, Ethnikon and Kapodistriakon University of Athens, 115 28 Athens, Greece; (K.V.); (I.L.); (N.F.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Torrisi R, Basilico V, Giordano L, Caruso M, Musolino A, Monari MN, Carnaghi C, Santoro A. Is Anti-Müllerian Hormone a Marker of Ovarian Reserve in Young Breast Cancer Patients Receiving a GnRH Analog during Chemotherapy? Breast Care (Basel) 2022; 17:10-15. [PMID: 35355699 PMCID: PMC8914273 DOI: 10.1159/000514445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) is the most reliable biomarker of ovarian reserve; however, its role in predicting ovarian recovery after chemotherapy is unclear. Administration of a GnRH analog (GnRHa) during chemotherapy significantly reduces the ovarian failure rate and increases the pregnancy rate. The available data on the behavior of AMH during concurrent administration of chemotherapy and GnRHa are inconsistent. We investigated whether concurrent administration of triptorelin and adjuvant chemotherapy might reduce the expected drop of AMH. Methods Eligible patients were premenopausal women aged <40 years, with a diagnosis of early breast cancer, and candidates to 4-8 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy. Triptorelin (3.75 mg i.m.) was started before chemotherapy and administered every 4 weeks thereafter. The principal endpoint was the proportion of patients with an AMH percent change ≤50% between 12 months after chemotherapy and basal levels. The secondary endpoint was the proportion of patients achieving postchemotherapy AMH levels above the threshold of 0.2 ng/mL. Results Fifty patients were enrolled, 31 of whom had blood samples available at baseline and 1 year after the end of chemotherapy. AMH decreased to nearly undetectable levels after chemotherapy and recovered after 12 months, but they did not exceed 1 tenth of the pretreatment levels. As for the secondary endpoint, 15 of the 31 patients recovered AMH levels above the threshold. Conclusions This study did not reach its principal endpoint; however, the rate of 48% of patients who recovered AMH above threshold levels favorably compared with those in studies without concurrent GnRHa, supporting a better recovery of AMH with triptorelin.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rosalba Torrisi
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Medical Oncology Unit, Rozzano, Italy,*Rosalba Torrisi, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Medical Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Via Manzoni 56, IT–20089 Rozzano (Italy),
| | - Vera Basilico
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Humanitas, Castellanza, Italy
| | - Laura Giordano
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Medical Oncology Unit, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Michele Caruso
- Medical Oncology Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania, Italy
| | | | - Marta Noemi Monari
- Laboratory of Clinical Analysis, Humanitas Clinical and Research Center, IRCCS, Rozzano, Italy
| | - Carlo Carnaghi
- Medical Oncology Unit, Istituto Clinico Mater Domini Humanitas, Castellanza, Italy,Medical Oncology Humanitas Centro Catanese di Oncologia, Catania, Italy
| | - Armando Santoro
- IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital Medical Oncology Unit, Rozzano, Italy,Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Rozzano, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Maksimenko J, Irmejs A, Gardovskis J. Pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Hered Cancer Clin Pract 2022; 20:3. [PMID: 35062994 PMCID: PMC8781048 DOI: 10.1186/s13053-022-00209-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Often young women affected with BRCA1/2 positive breast cancer have not finished or even not started their childbearing before the onset of the disease. The aim of our mini-review is to summarize state of art knowledge on pregnancy after breast cancer in BRCA1/2 carriers. Methods A broad review of the literature was conducted using MEDLINE (via PubMed) for relevant articles published. Main body of the abstract This review summarizes the impact of different cytotoxic agents on a fertility, fertility preservation, maternal and fetal prognosis after pregnancy in breast cancer survivors with BRCA1/2. Conclusion According to the existing literature evidence pregnancy after therapy for breast cancer in BRCA carriers is safe for the mother and offspring, but patients’ needs, oncofertility counseling and fertility-sparing strategy should be carefully planned before starting the cytotoxic treatment.
Collapse
|
18
|
Khan SZ, Arecco L, Villarreal-Garza C, Sirohi B, Ponde NF, Habeeb B, Brandão M, Azim HA, Chowdhury AR, Bozovic-Spasojevic I, Kovalenko I, Odhiambo A, Seid FU, Mutombo AB, Petracci F, Vidra R, Altuna SC, Petrova M, Kourie HR, Ozturk MA, Razeti MG, Lengyel CG, Talibova N, Mariamidze E, Sacardo KP, Duma N, Gyawali B, Trapani D, Tagliamento M, Lambertini M. Knowledge, Practice, and Attitudes of Physicians in Low- and Middle-Income Countries on Fertility and Pregnancy-Related Issues in Young Women With Breast Cancer. JCO Glob Oncol 2022; 8:e2100153. [PMID: 35025688 PMCID: PMC8769103 DOI: 10.1200/go.21.00153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility and pregnancy-related issues are highly relevant for young (≤ 40 years) patients with breast cancer. Limited evidence exists on knowledge, practice, and attitudes of physicians from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) regarding these issues. Online in @ASCO_pubs #JCOGlobOncol large survey by @matteolambe et al. showing suboptimal practice and attitudes of physicians in #LMICs on #fertility and #pregnancy issues in young #BreastCancer patients: increased awareness and education in #oncofertility are needed@OncoAlert![]()
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shah Zeb Khan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, BINOR, Bannu, Pakistan
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Bhawna Sirohi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Chennai, India
| | | | - Baker Habeeb
- Department of Medical Oncology, Shaqlawa Teaching Hospital, Erbil, Iraq
| | - Mariana Brandão
- Department of Medical Oncology, Institut Jules Bordet, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Center, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon, Mexico
| | - Arman Reza Chowdhury
- Department of Oncology, Evercare Cancer Centre, Evercare Hospital, Dhaka, Bangladesh
| | | | | | - Andrew Odhiambo
- Unit of Medical Oncology, Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Fahmi Usman Seid
- Department of Oncology, Hawassa University School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Hawassa, Sidama, Ethiopia.,Department of Oncology, Tikur Anbessa Hospital College of Health Sciences, Addis Ababa University, Ethiopia
| | | | | | - Radu Vidra
- Oncology Department, The Regional Institute of Gastroenterology and Hepatology "Prof Dr Octavian Fodor," Cluj-Napoca, Romania.,Oncology Department, Iuliu Hatieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania
| | | | - Mila Petrova
- MHAT Nadezhda Department of Medical Oncology, Sofia, Bulgaria
| | | | - Mehmet Akif Ozturk
- Bahçeşehir University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Narmin Talibova
- Department of Medical Oncology, National Oncology Center, Baku, Azerbaijan
| | - Elene Mariamidze
- Department of Oncology and Hematology, Todua Clinic, Tbilisi, Georgia
| | | | - Narjust Duma
- The Cancer Care Equity Program, Lowe Center For Thoracic Oncology, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA
| | | | | | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genoa, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Borges VF. The Expanded Role of Ovarian Suppression for Young Women's Breast Cancer: An Era of Patient-Tailored Decision Making. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:342-344. [PMID: 34850044 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab214] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Virginia F Borges
- Division of Medical Oncology, University of Colorado, Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Lambertini M, Boni L, Michelotti A, Magnolfi E, Cogoni AA, Mosconi AM, Giordano M, Garrone O, Arpino G, Poggio F, Cinacchi P, Bighin C, Fregatti P, Pronzato P, Blondeaux E, Del Mastro L. Long-Term Outcomes with Pharmacological Ovarian Suppression during Chemotherapy in Premenopausal Early Breast Cancer Patients. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 114:400-408. [PMID: 34850043 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/13/2021] [Revised: 07/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is an established strategy to protect ovarian function in premenopausal breast cancer patients, no long-term safety data are available raising some concerns in women with hormone receptor-positive disease. There are controversial data on its fertility preservation potential. METHODS The PROMISE-GIM6 is a multicenter, randomized, open-label, phase III superiority trial conducted at 16 Italian centers from October 2003 to January 2008. Eligible patients were randomized to (neo)adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control arm) or combined with the GnRHa triptorelin (GnRHa arm). Primary planned endpoint was incidence of chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian insufficiency (POI). Post-hoc endpoints were disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and post-treatment pregnancies. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated. RESULTS Of 281 randomized patients, 80.4% had hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. Median follow-up was 12.4 years (interquartile range = 11.3-13.2 years). No differences in 12-year DFS (65.7% [95% CI = 57.0% to 73.1%] in GnRHa arm vs. 69.2% [95% CI = 60.3% to 76.5%] in control arm; HR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.76 to 1.77) nor in 12-year OS (81.2% [95% CI = 73.6% to 86.8%] in GnRHa arm vs. 81.3% [95% CI = 73.1% to 87.2%] in control arm; HR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.67 to 2.03) were observed. In patients with hormone receptor-positive disease, the HR was 1.02 (95% CI = 0.63 to 1.63) for DFS and 1.12 (95% CI = 0.59 to 2.11) for OS. In the GnRHa and control arms, 9 and 4 patients had a post-treatment pregnancy, respectively (HR = 2.14, 95% CI = 0.66 to 6.92). CONCLUSIONS Final analysis of the PROMISE-GIM6 trial provides reassuring results on the safety of GnRHa use during chemotherapy as a strategy to preserve ovarian function in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer, including those with hormone receptor-positive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Boni
- Clinical Trial Center, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Michelotti
- UO Oncologia Medica I, Ospedale S. Chiara, Dipartimento di oncologia, dei trapianti e delle nuove tecnologie, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | | | | | - Anna Maria Mosconi
- S.C. Oncologia Medica, Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Ornella Garrone
- Dipartimento di Oncologia, Ospedale di Insegnamento S. Croce e Carle, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Grazia Arpino
- Department of Medical Oncology, Università di Napoli Federico II, Napoli, Italy
| | - Francesca Poggio
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Italy
| | - Paola Cinacchi
- UO Oncologia Medica I, Ospedale S. Chiara, Dipartimento di oncologia, dei trapianti e delle nuove tecnologie, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Claudia Bighin
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- Department of Surgery, U.O.C. Clinica di Chirurgia Senologica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Integrated Diagnostic Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Paolo Pronzato
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- Department of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Breast Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | |
Collapse
|
21
|
Li X, Liu S, Chen X, Huang R, Ma L, Weng H, Yu Y, Zong X. GnRHa protects the ovarian reserve by reducing endoplasmic reticulum stress during cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy. NPJ Breast Cancer 2021; 7:132. [PMID: 34620881 DOI: 10.1038/s41523-021-00340-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/18/2020] [Accepted: 09/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy-induced ovarian dysfunction is a serious adverse effect in premenopausal patients with cancer. Gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogs (GnRHa) protect ovarian function, but its molecular mechanisms have not yet been determined. In this study, we attempted to determine the previously unknown molecular mechanism by which such protection occurs. Serum anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) levels were tested in tumor-bearing nude mice, a series of exploratory experiments were conducted. We discovered that GnRHa protects granulosa cells from chemotherapeutic toxicity in vivo and in vitro. We also showed that CTX-induced endoplasmic reticulum stress inhibits the secretion of AMH, and treatment with GnRHa relieves ER stress and the subsequent unfolded-protein response by modulating mTOR signaling to induce autophagy. The results of mechanistic studies indicated that GnRHa-modulated mTOR signaling to induce autophagy, which alleviated CTX-induced ER stress and promoted the secretion of AMH.
Collapse
|
22
|
Lu YS, Wong A, Kim HJ. Ovarian Function Suppression With Luteinizing Hormone-Releasing Hormone Agonists for the Treatment of Hormone Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer in Premenopausal Women. Front Oncol 2021; 11:700722. [PMID: 34595110 PMCID: PMC8477635 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.700722] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 08/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Chemotherapy and endocrine therapies are mainstays of treatment for early and advanced hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer. In premenopausal women with HR+ tumors, the benefits of adding ovarian function suppression (OFS) to endocrine therapy have been debated. Consequently, for many years, tamoxifen monotherapy has been the standard of care for endocrine treatment in the adjuvant setting. Recent studies have, however, provided new evidence that, in some premenopausal patients, OFS in combination with tamoxifen or aromatase inhibitors (AIs) can significantly increase survival versus tamoxifen alone. Luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone agonists (LHRHa), including goserelin, triptorelin, and leuprorelin, achieve OFS through sustained suppression of the release of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone from the pituitary. In turn, this suppresses production and secretion of estradiol, an ovarian hormone that supports cancer cell growth, survival, and proliferation. In this review, we discuss the clinical evidence supporting the addition of LHRHa to adjuvant endocrine therapies, including tamoxifen and AIs, for premenopausal women with breast cancer. We also discuss the role of LHRHa use in combination with adjuvant chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function and fertility in young patients with breast cancer. Finally, we discuss important practical aspects of the use of LHRHa in breast cancer treatment, including side-effects, patient adherence to treatment, and the use of slow-release, long-acting drug formulations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yen-Shen Lu
- Department of Oncology, National Taiwan University Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Andrea Wong
- Department of Haematology-Oncology, Cancer Science Institute, National University of Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
| | - Hee-Jeong Kim
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Asan Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Arecco L, Ruelle T, Martelli V, Boutros A, Latocca MM, Spinaci S, Marrocco C, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. How to Protect Ovarian Function before and during Chemotherapy? J Clin Med 2021; 10:jcm10184192. [PMID: 34575299 PMCID: PMC8467797 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10184192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2021] [Revised: 08/29/2021] [Accepted: 09/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A significant number of women receive a cancer diagnosis before their age of natural menopause. Among these patients, the most frequent neoplasms are breast cancer, gynecological, and hematological malignancies. Premature ovarian insufficiency and infertility are among the most feared short- to long-term consequences of anticancer treatments in premenopausal patients. Both patient- and treatment-related characteristics are key factors in influencing the risk of gonadotoxicity with the use of chemotherapy. The cryopreservation of oocytes/embryos is a standard strategy for fertility preservations offered to young women interested in future family planning, but it does not allow gonadal function protection during chemotherapy. Ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) during chemotherapy is now recommended as an option to reduce the risk of gonadotoxicity in order to avoid the negative consequences of premature ovarian insufficiency in premenopausal women receiving cytotoxic therapy, including those not interested in fertility preservation. This review summarizes the risk of treatment-induced gonadotoxicity in premenopausal patients and the evidence available on the protective role of administering GnRHa during chemotherapy to preserve ovarian function.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Valentino Martelli
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 1, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Andrea Boutros
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- U.O. Oncologia Medica 2, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi ASL3, 16149 Genova, Italy;
| | - Camilla Marrocco
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy;
- Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- U.O. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, 16132 Genova, Italy; (L.A.); (M.M.L.); (C.M.)
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Sciences (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, 16132 Genova, Italy; (T.R.); (V.M.); (A.B.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-010-555-4254; Fax: +39-010-555-6536
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Buonomo B, Massarotti C, Dellino M, Anserini P, Ferrari A, Campanella M, Magnotti M, De Stefano C, Peccatori FA, Lambertini M. Reproductive issues in carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes: an expert meeting. BMC Med 2021; 19:205. [PMID: 34503502 PMCID: PMC8431919 DOI: 10.1186/s12916-021-02081-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 08/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Healthy individuals and patients with cancer who are carriers of germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes face multiple reproductive challenges that require appropriate counseling and specific expertise. MAIN BODY On December 5th-7th, 2019, patient advocates and physicians with expertise in the field of reproductive medicine, fertility preservation, and oncology were invited to "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital in Avellino (Italy) for a workshop on reproductive management of women with germline pathogenic variants in the BRCA1/2 genes. From the discussion regarding the current evidence and future prospective in the field, eight main research questions were formulated and eight recommendations were developed regarding fertility, fertility preservation, preimplantation genetic testing, and pregnancy in healthy carriers and patients with cancer. CONCLUSION Several misconceptions about the topic persist among health care providers and patients often resulting in a discontinuous and suboptimal management. With the aim to offer patient-tailored counseling about reproductive issues, both awareness of current evidences and research should be promoted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Barbara Buonomo
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Department of Neurosciences, Rehabilitation, Ophthalmology, Genetics, Maternal and Child Health (DiNOGMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Academic Unit of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Miriam Dellino
- Gynecologic Oncology Unit, IRCCS Istituto Tumori "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Paola Anserini
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Alberta Ferrari
- Department of Surgical Sciences, General Surgery III-Breast Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, and Department of Clinical Surgical Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy
| | - Maria Campanella
- aBRCAdabra, National Patient Advocacy Association for carriers of BRCA genes mutation, Palermo, Italy
| | - Mirosa Magnotti
- ACTO Campania, Alleanza Contro il Tumore Ovarico, Avellino, Italy
| | - Cristofaro De Stefano
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, "San Giuseppe Moscati" Hospital, Avellino, Italy
| | - Fedro Alessandro Peccatori
- Fertility and Procreation Unit, Gynecologic Oncology Program, European Institute of Oncology IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy. .,Department of Medical Oncology, UOC Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Rao M, Dhanushkodi M. Locally Advanced Breast Cancer—A Narrative Review of Management in the Indian Scenario. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol 2021. [DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022] Open
Abstract
AbstractLocally advanced breast cancer (LABC) forms a significant proportion of the total breast cancer (BC) burden in the country. It is a heterogeneous entity, encompassing a variety of presentations indicative of advanced disease. The standard of care for the treatment of LABC is multimodal, involving chemotherapy, surgery, radiation, and/or hormonal therapy. With improved understanding of the biology of BC, addition of newer agents of systemic therapy to our armamentarium, advances in surgical techniques and radiation delivery, clinicians are now able to tailor treatment according to the individual and consider a more conservative approach to management (in contrast to a mandatory radical mastectomy, decades ago), disease biology, and stage permitting with better survival outcomes. Here, we review all the treatment modalities and options available to aid a clinician in formulating an optimal treatment plan for a patient presenting with LABC and also how best to tailor the treatment to enable cost effectiveness in the Indian setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manjula Rao
- Consultant Breast Oncosurgeon, Breast CMT, Apollo Proton Cancer Centre, Tharamani, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| | - Manikandan Dhanushkodi
- Department of Medical Oncology, Cancer Institute (WIA), Adyar, Chennai, Tamil Nadu, India
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Villarreal-Garza C, Mesa-Chavez F, Plata de la Mora A, Miaja-Avila M, Garcia-Garcia M, Fonseca A, de la Rosa-Pacheco S, Cruz-Ramos M, García Garza MR, Mohar A, Bargallo-Rocha E. Prospective Study of Fertility Preservation in Young Women With Breast Cancer in Mexico. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2021; 19:1-8. [PMID: 34153944 DOI: 10.6004/jnccn.2020.7692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 11/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite the risk of treatment-related infertility, implementation of fertility-preservation (FP) strategies among young patients with breast cancer is often suboptimal in resource-constrained settings such as Mexico. The "Joven & Fuerte: Program for Young Women With Breast Cancer" strives to enhance patient access to supportive care services, including FP measures through alliances with assisted-reproduction units and procurement of coverage of some of these strategies. This study describes patients from Joven & Fuerte who have preserved fertility, and assesses which characteristics were associated with the likelihood of undergoing FP. METHODS Women aged ≤40 years with recently diagnosed breast cancer were prospectively accrued. Sociodemographic and clinicopathologic data were collected from patient-reported and provider-recorded information at diagnosis and 1-year follow-up. Descriptive statistics, chi-square test, and simple logistic regression were used to compare patients who preserved fertility with those who did not. RESULTS In total, 447 patients were included, among which 53 (12%) preserved fertility, representing 38% of the 140 women who desired future biologic children. Oocyte/embryo cryopreservation was the most frequently used method for FP (59%), followed by temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) during chemotherapy (26%), and use of both GnRHa and oocyte/embryo cryopreservation (15%). Younger age, higher educational level, being employed, having private healthcare insurance, and having one or no children were associated with a significantly higher likelihood of preserving fertility. CONCLUSIONS By facilitating referral and seeking funds and special discounts for underserved patients, supportive care programs for young women with breast cancer can play a crucial role on enhancing access to oncofertility services that would otherwise be prohibitive because of their high costs, particularly in resource-constrained settings. For these efforts to be successful and widely applied in the long term, sustained and extended governmental coverage of FP options for this young group is warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cynthia Villarreal-Garza
- 1Centro de Cancer de Mama, TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
| | - Fernanda Mesa-Chavez
- 1Centro de Cancer de Mama, TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
| | - Alejandra Plata de la Mora
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
- 3Departamento de Tumores Mamarios e Investigacion, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico
| | - Melina Miaja-Avila
- 1Centro de Cancer de Mama, TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
| | - Marisol Garcia-Garcia
- 1Centro de Cancer de Mama, TecSalud, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Nuevo Leon
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
| | - Alan Fonseca
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
- 3Departamento de Tumores Mamarios e Investigacion, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico
| | | | - Marlid Cruz-Ramos
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
- 3Departamento de Tumores Mamarios e Investigacion, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico
| | | | - Alejandro Mohar
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
- 6Unidad de Epidemiologia e Investigacion Biomedica en Cancer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, and
- 7Instituto de Biomedicas, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico, México
| | - Enrique Bargallo-Rocha
- 2Joven & Fuerte, Programa para la Atencion e Investigacion para Pacientes Jovenes con Cancer de Mama en Mexico, Ciudad de Mexico
- 3Departamento de Tumores Mamarios e Investigacion, Instituto Nacional de Cancerologia, Ciudad de Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Roesch EE, Moore HCF. Fertility Preservation and Breast Cancer. Curr Breast Cancer Rep 2021; 13:197-207. [DOI: 10.1007/s12609-021-00420-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
|
28
|
Martelli V, Latocca MM, Ruelle T, Perachino M, Arecco L, Beshiri K, Razeti MG, Tagliamento M, Cosso M, Fregatti P, Lambertini M. Comparing the Gonadotoxicity of Multiple Breast Cancer Regimens: Important Understanding for Managing Breast Cancer in Pre-Menopausal Women. Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press) 2021; 13:341-351. [PMID: 34079366 PMCID: PMC8164347 DOI: 10.2147/bctt.s274283] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/26/2021] [Accepted: 04/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Over the last several decades, improvements in breast cancer treatment have contributed to increased cure rates for women diagnosed with this malignancy. Consequently, great importance should be paid to the long-term side effects of systemic therapies. For young women (defined as per guideline ≤40 years at diagnosis) who undergo chemotherapy, one of the most impactful side effects on their quality of life is premature ovarian insufficiency (POI) leading to fertility-related problems and the side effects of early menopause. Regimens, type, and doses of chemotherapy, as well as the age of patients and their ovarian reserve at the time of treatment are major risk factors for treatment-induced POI. For these reasons, childbearing desire and preservation of ovarian function and/or fertility should be discussed with all premenopausal patients before planning the treatments. This manuscript summarizes the available fertility preservation techniques in breast cancer patients, the risk of treatment-induced POI with different anticancer treatments, and the possible procedures to prevent it. A special focus is paid to the role of oncofertility counseling, as a central part of the visit in this setting, during which the patient should receive all the information about the potential consequences of the disease and of the proposed treatment on her future life.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentino Martelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Tommaso Ruelle
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Luca Arecco
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Kristi Beshiri
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maurizio Cosso
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Piero Fregatti
- U.O.C. Clinica Di Chirurgia Senologica, Department of Surgery, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Integrated Diagnostic Surgical Sciences, School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C Clinica Di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Dolmans MM, Taylor HS, Rodriguez-Wallberg KA, Blumenfeld Z, Lambertini M, von Wolff M, Donnez J. Utility of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists for fertility preservation in women receiving chemotherapy: pros and cons. Fertil Steril 2021; 114:725-738. [PMID: 33040981 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.08.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2020] [Accepted: 08/06/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marie-Madeleine Dolmans
- Pôle de Gynécologie, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium; Gynecology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Brussels, Belgium
| | - Hugh S Taylor
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut
| | - Kenny A Rodriguez-Wallberg
- Department of Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Division of Gynecology and Reproduction, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Zeev Blumenfeld
- Department of Reproductive Endocrinology, Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy; Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Jacques Donnez
- Société de Recherche pour l'Infertilité, Brussels, Belgium; Catholic University of Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Lei YY, Yeo W. The risk of menopausal symptoms in premenopausal breast cancer patients and current pharmacological prevention strategies. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2021; 20:1163-1175. [PMID: 33951990 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2021.1926980] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: For young premenopausal breast cancer (BC) patients, adjuvant chemotherapy and other anti-cancer treatments can increase the risk of menopausal symptoms and may cause chemotherapy-related amenorrhea (CRA), infertility and premature ovarian insufficiency (POI).Areas covered: In this report, menopausal symptoms related to anti-cancer treatment are described. Menstrual disturbances associated with the use of adjuvant chemotherapy, endocrine therapy, and targeted therapy against human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in premenopausal women withBC are discussed. To prevent menopausal symptoms, CRA and POI, data on the efficacy of temporary ovarian suppression with gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) during chemotherapy are highlighted. Pooled analyses have confirmed that concurrent administration of GnRHa during chemotherapy could significantly reduce the risk of developing chemotherapy-induced POI in premenopausal women with early-stageBC. In addition, reports have suggested that embryo/oocyte cryopreservation may increase the chance of pregnancy after the diagnosis ofBC, although such data remain limited.Expert opinion: Commonly experienced by pre-menopausal women withBC, anti-cancer treatment could cause severe menopausal symptoms. Temporary ovarian suppression with GnRHa during chemotherapy provided asafe and efficient strategy to reduce the likelihood of chemotherapy-induced POI in premenopausal patients with early-stageBC undergoing (neo)-adjuvant chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Yuan Lei
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| | - Winnie Yeo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Prince of Wales Hospital, the Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China.,Hong Kong Cancer Institute, State Key Laboratory in Oncology in South China, Faculty of Medicine, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, New Territories, Hong Kong SAR, China
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Yu KD, Ge JY, Liu XY, Mo M, He M, Shao ZM. Cyclophosphamide-free Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Ovarian Protection in Young Women with Breast Cancer: a Randomized Phase 3 Trial. J Natl Cancer Inst 2021; 113:1352-1359. [PMID: 33822134 PMCID: PMC8486325 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djab065] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2020] [Revised: 01/08/2021] [Accepted: 03/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy-induced premature menopause leads to some consequences, including infertility. We initiated this randomized phase 3 trial to determine whether a cyclophosphamide-free adjuvant chemotherapy regimen would increase the likelihood of menses resumption and improve survival outcomes. METHODS Young women with operable ER-positive HER2-negative breast cancer after definitive surgery were randomized to receive adjuvant epirubicin/cyclophosphamide followed by weekly paclitaxel (EC-wP) or epirubicin/paclitaxel followed by weekly paclitaxel (EP-wP). All patients received at least 5-year adjuvant endocrine therapy after chemotherapy. Two coprimary endpoints were the rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy and 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01026116). All statistical tests were 2-sided. RESULTS Between Jan 2011 and Dec 2016, 521 patients (median age = 34 years; interquartile range = 31-38 years) were enrolled, with 261 in the EC-wP group and 260 in the EP-wP group. The rate of menstrual resumption at 12 months after chemotherapy was 48.3% in EC-wP (95% confidence interval [CI] = 42.2% to 54.3%) and 63.1% in EP-wP (95% CI = 57.2% to 68.9%), with an absolute difference of 14.8% (95% CI = 6.37% to 23.2%, P < 0.001). The post-hoc exploratory analysis by patient-reported outcome questionnaires indicated that pregnancy might occur in fewer women in the EC-wP group than in the EP-wP group. At a median follow-up of 62 months, the 5-year DFS was 78.3% (95% CI = 72.2% to 83.3%) in EC-wP and 84.7% (95% CI = 79.3% to 88.8%) in EP-wP (stratified log-rank P = 0.07). The safety data were consistent with the known safety profiles of relevant drugs. CONCLUSIONS The cyclophosphamide-free chemotherapy regimen might be associated with a higher probability of menses resumption.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ke-Da Yu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
- Correspondence to: Zhi-Ming Shao, MD, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Rd, Shanghai 200032, China (e-mail: ) and Ke-Da Yu, MD, PhD, Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, 270 Dong'an Rd, Shanghai 200032, China (e-mail: )
| | - Jing-Yu Ge
- Shanghai Medical College, Fudan University, Shanghai, China
| | - Xi-Yu Liu
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Mo
- Department of Cancer Prevention and Clinical Statistics Center, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Min He
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhi-Ming Shao
- Department of Breast Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Breast Cancer, Shanghai, China
| | | |
Collapse
|
32
|
Brancati S, Gozzo L, Longo L, Vitale DC, Russo G, Drago F. Fertility Preservation in Female Pediatric Patients With Cancer: A Clinical and Regulatory Issue. Front Oncol 2021; 11:641450. [PMID: 33796467 PMCID: PMC8008167 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.641450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Accepted: 01/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Fertility preservation represents one important goal of cancer patients’ management due to the high impact on health and quality of life of survivors. The available preventive measures cannot be performed in all patients and are not feasible in all health-care facilities. Therefore, the pharmacological treatment with GnRHa has become a valuable non-invasive and well-tolerated alternative, especially in those who cannot access to cryopreservation options due to clinical and/or logistic issues. Supporting data demonstrate a significant advantage for the survivors who received GnRHa in the long-term maintenance of ovarian function and preservation of fertility. The prevention of the risk of ovarian failure with GnRHa is a typical off-label use, defined as the administration of a medicinal product not in accordance with the authorized product information. Italy has officially recognized the off-label use of GnRHa in adult women at risk of premature and permanent menopause following chemotherapy. However, fertility preservation still represents an unmet medical need in adolescents who cannot access to other treatment options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Serena Brancati
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Lucia Gozzo
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Laura Longo
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Daniela Cristina Vitale
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Giovanna Russo
- Pediatric Onco-Hematology, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy
| | - Filippo Drago
- Clinical Pharmacology Unit/Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Department of Biomedical and Biotechnological Sciences, University of Catania, Catania, Italy.,Centre for Research and Consultancy in HTA and drug Regulatory Affairs (CERD), University of Catania, Catania, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Cho HW, Lee S, Min KJ, Hong JH, Song JY, Lee JK, Lee NW, Kim T. Advances in the Treatment and Prevention of Chemotherapy-Induced Ovarian Toxicity. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21207792. [PMID: 33096794 PMCID: PMC7589665 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21207792] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/20/2020] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Due to improvements in chemotherapeutic agents, cancer treatment efficacy and cancer patient survival rates have greatly improved, but unfortunately gonadal damage remains a major complication. Gonadotoxic chemotherapy, including alkylating agents during reproductive age, can lead to iatrogenic premature ovarian insufficiency (POI), and loss of fertility. In recent years, the demand for fertility preservation has increased dramatically among female cancer patients. Currently, embryo and oocyte cryopreservation are the only established options for fertility preservation in women. However, there is growing evidence for other experimental techniques including ovarian tissue cryopreservation, oocyte in vitro maturation, artificial ovaries, stem cell technologies, and ovarian suppression. To prevent fertility loss in women with cancer, individualized fertility preservation options including established and experimental techniques that take into consideration the patient’s age, marital status, chemotherapy regimen, and the possibility of treatment delay should be provided. In addition, effective multidisciplinary oncofertility strategies that involve a highly skilled and experienced oncofertility team consisting of medical oncologists, gynecologists, reproductive biologists, surgical oncologists, patient care coordinators, and research scientists are necessary to provide cancer patients with high-quality care.
Collapse
|
34
|
Arecco L, Perachino M, Damassi A, Latocca MM, Soldato D, Vallome G, Parisi F, Razeti MG, Solinas C, Tagliamento M, Spinaci S, Massarotti C, Lambertini M. Burning Questions in the Oncofertility Counseling of Young Breast Cancer Patients. Breast Cancer (Auckl) 2020; 14:1178223420954179. [PMID: 32952399 PMCID: PMC7476336 DOI: 10.1177/1178223420954179] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 12/28/2022]
Abstract
The improved prognosis of breast cancer patients makes survivorship issues an area of crucial importance. In this regard, an increased attention is needed toward the development of potential anticancer treatment-related long-term side-effects, including gonadal failure and infertility in young women. Therefore, fertility preservation and family planning are crucial issues to be addressed in all young women of reproductive age with newly diagnosed cancer. Despite a growing availability of data on the efficacy and safety of fertility preservation options and the fact that conceiving after prior history of breast cancer has become more accepted over time, there are still several gray zones in this field so that many physicians remain uncomfortable to deal with these topics. The purpose of this review is to answer some of the most controversial questions frequently asked by patients during their oncofertility counseling, in order to provide a detailed and up-to-date overview on the evidence available in this field to physicians involved in the care of young women with breast cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luca Arecco
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Marta Perachino
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Alessandra Damassi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Maddalena Latocca
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Davide Soldato
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Giacomo Vallome
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Francesca Parisi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Maria Grazia Razeti
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Cinzia Solinas
- Department of Medical Oncology, Azienda Tutela della Salute Sardegna, Hospital A.Segni Ozieri, Sassari, Italy
| | - Marco Tagliamento
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Stefano Spinaci
- Division of Breast Surgery, Ospedale Villa Scassi e ASL3, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Massarotti
- Physiopathology of Human Reproduction Unit, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DiMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy.,Department of Medical Oncology, U.O.C. Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Marin L, Vitagliano A, Capobianco G, Dessole F, Ambrosini G, Andrisani A. Which is the optimal timing for starting chemoprotection with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists after oocyte cryopreservation? Reflections on a critical case of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome. J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod 2020; 50:101815. [PMID: 32562778 DOI: 10.1016/j.jogoh.2020.101815] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2020] [Revised: 05/12/2020] [Accepted: 05/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
Aim of this report is to alert clinicians about the potential significant sequelae of administering depot gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) shortly after oocytes cryopreservation. In our case report, a 28-year-old nulligravid Caucasian woman diagnosed with breast cancer underwent controlled ovarian stimulation-oocyte cryopreservation before chemotherapy. The oocyte retrieval was performed without complications and the woman was discharged after five hours. Three days later, the patient self-injected depot-GnRHa as chemoprotective agent, as indicated by the oncologist. The next day, the patient referred to the emergency room and she was diagnosed with ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) and required inpatient care. As a consequence, the start of the chemotherapy was delayed by two weeks. In conclusion, chemoprotection with depot-GnRHa after oocyte/embryo cryopreservation is not exempt from risks. The timing for depot-GnRHa administration should be established by the agreement between oncologist and gynecologist in order to avoid the risk of OHSS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Loris Marin
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Salus Pueri, Padua, Italy.
| | - Amerigo Vitagliano
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Salus Pueri, Padua, Italy
| | - Giampiero Capobianco
- Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Gynecologic and Obstetric Clinic, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Francesco Dessole
- Department of Surgical, Microsurgical and Medical Sciences, Gynecologic and Obstetric Clinic, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Guido Ambrosini
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Salus Pueri, Padua, Italy
| | - Alessandra Andrisani
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, University of Padua, Salus Pueri, Padua, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Lee DY, Kim JY, Yu J, Kim SW. Prediction of Successful Ovarian Protection Using Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonists During Chemotherapy in Young Estrogen Receptor-Negative Breast Cancer Patients. Front Oncol 2020; 10:863. [PMID: 32656076 PMCID: PMC7326007 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.00863] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/07/2020] [Accepted: 05/01/2020] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: It is important to identify factors predicting successful ovarian protection using gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists during chemotherapy. However, only a few studies have prospectively assessed this issue in young breast cancer patients. Objective: This study evaluated the predictive factors for successful ovarian protection with GnRH agonists during chemotherapy in young estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. Materials and Methods: This prospective study analyzed 67 estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients ≤40 years of age who were longitudinally assessed after receiving GnRH agonists during cyclophosphamide-based chemotherapy for ovarian protection. Associations between clinical characteristics or pretreatment hormones and successful ovarian protection [resumption of menstruation and anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≥1 ng/ml]. Results: The mean age and pretreatment serum level of AMH were 33.2 years and 4.57 ng/ml, respectively. At 12 months after the completion of chemotherapy, most women (97%) experienced the resumption of menstruation. However, the proportion of patients with AMH ≥1 ng/ml at 12 months was 70.1%. In multivariate analyses, only the pretreatment serum AMH level (P < 0.001) was predictive for AMH ≥1 ng/ml at 12 months. Receiver operating characteristic curve analyses of pretreatment AMH exhibited an area under the curve of 0.866 (95% CI = 0.777–0.955) for AMH ≥1 ng/ml at 12 months. The cutoff value for the prediction of AMH concentration ≥1 ng/ml at 12 months was 2.87 ng/ml of pretreatment AMH with a sensitivity of 0.87 and a specificity of 0.75. Conclusions: Pretreatment AMH (2.87 ng/ml) is a useful predictor for AMH ≥1 ng/ml at 12 months after receiving GnRH agonists in young estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer patients. This finding can help improve decision-making regarding fertility preservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong-Yun Lee
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ji-Yeon Kim
- Department of Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jonghan Yu
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seok Won Kim
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
R L, A Y, J M, L F, V J. The affect of goserelin on the QoL of women having chemotherapy for EBC: Results from the OPTION trial. Breast 2020; 52:122-131. [PMID: 32505861 PMCID: PMC7303950 DOI: 10.1016/j.breast.2020.05.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/22/2020] [Indexed: 11/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The OPTION trial results showed that premenopausal women with early stage breast cancer (EBC) receiving chemotherapy benefited from ovarian function protection with goserelin. The impact of treatments on patient reported Quality of Life (QoL) were also examined. Patients and methods 227 pre-menopausal women with EBC, were randomly assigned to chemotherapy±goserelin (C±G); 132 (58%) were ER-ve. Patients were stratified by age (≤40 years and >40 years). QoL was assessed with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Breast, and Endocrine Symptom checklist at baseline (pre-treatment), 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months, then annually to 5 years. Treatment Outcome Index (TOI) score was the primary outcome. Results 213 patients were available for QoL analysis. There was a significant decrease in TOI scores for both treatment groups at 3 and 6 months that returned to pre-treatment levels at 12 months, then continued to increase reflecting improved QoL. By 3 months there was a significant difference from baseline in both groups for menopausal symptoms, and between groups in the proportion experiencing hot flushes at any time. The C + G group experienced higher levels of vasomotor symptoms generally during the treatment phase; by 24 months, the short-term negative effect of goserelin was reversed, with hot flushes twice as frequent in the chemotherapy only group (40.9% vs 21.3%). Conclusions These results show that young women diagnosed with breast cancer experienced only a short-term decrease in QoL from the addition of goserelin, in order to preserve ovarian function during chemotherapy treatment. Ovarian damage from breast cancer chemotherapy is a concern for the younger patient. OPTION showed goserelin reduced the rate of premature ovarian insufficiency in the ≤40yrs. Patient reported QoL is an important consideration in evaluating these treatments. OPTION QoL revealed greater vasomotor symptoms with goserelin at 3 and 6 mths. Overall goserelin treatment resulted in only a short term decrease in QoL.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Leonard R
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, United Kingdom
| | - Yellowlees A
- Quantics Consulting Ltd, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Mansi J
- Department of Oncology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Fallowfield L
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE -C) University of Sussex, United Kingdom
| | - Jenkins V
- Sussex Health Outcomes Research & Education in Cancer (SHORE -C) University of Sussex, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Mandelbaum RS, Klar M, Takiuchi T, Bainvoll L, Matsuzaki S, Paulson RJ, Matsuo K. Fertility-sparing treatment for early-stage epithelial ovarian cancer: Contemporary oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2020; 46:1263-1281. [PMID: 32500605 DOI: 10.1111/jog.14302] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2020] [Revised: 04/21/2020] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
AIM Epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) can be a devastating diagnosis in women of reproductive age who desire future fertility. However, in early-stage disease, fertility-sparing surgery (FSS) can be considered in appropriately selected patients. METHODS This is a narrative descriptive review of the recent literature on FSS for EOC from oncologic, reproductive and endocrinologic perspectives. RESULTS The recurrence rate following FSS performed for stage I EOC in published retrospective studies collectively is 13% but ranges from 5 to 29%, while mortality ranges from 0 to 18%. Five-year disease-free survival following FSS is over 90% but decreases with higher stage and grade. Recurrences following FSS are more likely to be localized with a more favorable prognosis compared to recurrences following radical surgery. Adjuvant chemotherapy is recommended in women with high-risk disease, and strategies to minimize gonadotoxicity during chemotherapy such as gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists may be considered. Oocyte, embryo and/or ovarian cryopreservation can also be offered to patients desiring future biologic children. Reproductive outcomes following FSS, including pregnancy and miscarriage rates, resemble those of the general population, with a chance of successful pregnancy of nearly 80%. CONCLUSION In retrospective data, FSS appears to be oncologically safe in stage IA and IC grade 1-2 non-clear cell EOC. In patients with grade 3 tumors or clear cell histology, treatment can be individualized, weighing a slightly higher risk of recurrence with fertility goals. A multidisciplinary approach with oncology and reproductive endocrinology may be of utility to help these patients achieve their fertility goals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel S Mandelbaum
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Maximilian Klar
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Tsuyoshi Takiuchi
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan
| | - Liat Bainvoll
- Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Shinya Matsuzaki
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Richard J Paulson
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Koji Matsuo
- Division of Gynecologic Oncology, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.,Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Subhedar PD, McLaughlin SA. Breast cancer in the young patient: review of therapy and treatment considerations. Breast Cancer Management 2020. [DOI: 10.2217/bmt-2020-0008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In 2019, 13,050 young women were diagnosed with pre-invasive or invasive breast cancer in the USA and 1070 women died of their disease. Young women are underrepresented in clinical trials, and treatment for these women less than 40 years old is extrapolated from studies of older women. Young women face unique challenges such as decreased fertility, psychosocial issues and an extended survivorship period that impacts quality of life. Herein, we review breast cancer treatment options in the young patient (women <40 years old). We explore the biologic differences between breast cancer in young versus older patients, review surgical and systemic therapy options and highlight special considerations that are unique in these young patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Preeti D Subhedar
- Emory University School of Medicine, 1365 Clifton Road, Atlanta, GA 30322, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Evidence suggests a likely negative impact of deleterious BRCA mutations on female fertility. Hence, different studies have aimed to address the reproductive potential and performance of fertility preservation strategies in BRCA-mutated breast cancer patients with a prime focus on their safety and efficacy. However, several uncertainties exist in many domains of this field. The aim of the current paper is to overview the reproductive potential and fertility preservation options in breast and ovarian cancer patients harbouring a BRCA mutation. We also discuss pre-implantation genetic testing in an attempt to help physicians during oncofertility counselling of these patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suleiman Ghunaim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Haifa Idriss-ART Unit, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Ghina Ghazeeri
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Haifa Idriss-ART Unit, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Dalia Khalife
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Haifa Idriss-ART Unit, American University of Beirut Medical Center, PO Box 11-0236, Riad El Solh, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Hatem A Azim
- Breast Cancer Centre, Hospital Zambrano Hellion, Tecnologico de Monterrey, San Pedro Garza Garcia, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Vriens IJH, Ter Welle-Butalid EM, de Boer M, de Die-Smulders CEM, Derhaag JG, Geurts SME, van Hellemond IEG, Luiten EJT, Dercksen MW, Lemaire BMD, van Haaren ERM, Vriens BEPJ, van de Wouw AJ, van Riel AMMGH, Janssen-Engelen SLE, van de Poel MHW, Schepers-van der Sterren EEM, van Golde RJT, Tjan-Heijnen VCG. Preserving fertility in young women undergoing chemotherapy for early breast cancer; the Maastricht experience. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2020; 181:77-86. [PMID: 32236826 PMCID: PMC7182539 DOI: 10.1007/s10549-020-05598-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2020] [Accepted: 03/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Purpose We assessed the uptake of fertility preservation (FP), recovery of ovarian function (OFR) after chemotherapy, live birth after breast cancer, and breast cancer outcomes in women with early-stage breast cancer. Methods Women aged below 41 years and referred to our center for FP counseling between 2008 and 2015 were included. Data on patient and tumor characteristics, ovarian function, cryopreservation (embryo/oocyte) and transfer, live birth, and disease-free survival were collected. Kaplan–Meier analyses were performed for time-to-event analyses including competing risk analyses, and patients with versus without FP were compared using the logrank test. Results Of 118 counseled women with a median age of 31 years (range 19–40), 34 (29%) chose FP. Women who chose FP had less often children, more often a male partner and more often favorable tumor characteristics. The 5-year OFR rate was 92% for the total group of counseled patients. In total, 26 women gave birth. The 5-year live birth rate was 27% for the total group of counseled patients. Only three women applied for transfer of their cryopreserved embryo(s), in two combined with preimplantation genetic diagnosis (PGD) because of BRCA1-mutation carrier ship. The 5-year disease-free survival rate was 91% versus 88%, for patients with versus without FP (P = 0.42). Conclusions Remarkably, most women achieved OFR, probably related to the young age at diagnosis. Most pregnancies occurred spontaneously, two of three women applied for embryo transfer because of the opportunity to apply for PGD.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ingeborg J H Vriens
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands. .,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| | - Elena M Ter Welle-Butalid
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Maaike de Boer
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Christine E M de Die-Smulders
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Josien G Derhaag
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Sandra M E Geurts
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Irene E G van Hellemond
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | | | - M Wouter Dercksen
- Department of Internal Medicine, Máxima Medical Center, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Bea M D Lemaire
- Department of Surgery, Elkerliek Hospital, Helmond, The Netherlands
| | - Els R M van Haaren
- Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands
| | - Birgit E P J Vriens
- Department of Internal Medicine, Catharina Hospital, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Agnes J van de Wouw
- Department of Internal Medicine, VieCuri Medical Center, Venlo, The Netherlands
| | | | | | | | | | - Ron J T van Golde
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen
- Division of Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.,GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Yu B, Davidson NE. Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone (GnRH) Agonists for Fertility Preservation: Is POEMS the Final Verse? J Natl Cancer Inst 2020; 111:107-108. [PMID: 30371813 DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djy188] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/04/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 12/28/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Bo Yu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Nancy E Davidson
- Seattle Cancer Care Alliance, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Durrani S, Heena H. Controversies Regarding Ovarian Suppression and Infertility in Early Stage Breast Cancer. Cancer Manag Res 2020; 12:813-817. [PMID: 32104064 PMCID: PMC7008199 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s231524] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2020] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
A common side effect of chemotherapy in breast cancer is early menopause in premenopausal patients, which is mainly a result of an indirect form of ovarian ablation, and is associated with substantial impairment of quality of life. Suppressing the production of ovarian estrogen has been shown to reduce the recurrence of hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer in premenopausal women, but whether it has an added advantage over tamoxifen is being discussed. Types of permanent ablation of the ovarian function include surgical oophorectomy and radiation-induced ovarian failure. Both are associated with similar response rates in hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer. Medical castration with luteinizing hormone-releasing hormone analogs (LHRHa) has the benefit of being a reversible approach. Another advantage that premenopausal patients who wish to reduce the risk of developing premature ovarian insufficiency induced by chemotherapy may be offered LHRHa irrespective of whether they desire pregnancy and their age at diagnosis. This also helps reduce the risk of menopausal signs and symptoms as well as the loss of bone density in the long-term, which are primary concerns for women. This is of utmost importance to premenopausal women who do not want to conceive after treatment or are not candidates for fertility preservation strategies because of age. It should be emphasized that for women who are interested in fertility preservation, gamete cryopreservation remains the first option, and LHRHa is not an alternative. During chemotherapy, however, temporary ovarian suppression with LHRHa may be given to women who either have no access to a fertility clinic or who have declined chemotherapy or have contraindications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sajid Durrani
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| | - Humariya Heena
- Research Center, King Fahad Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ter Welle-Butalid MEE, Vriens IJHI, Derhaag JGJ, Leter EME, de Die-Smulders CEC, Smidt MM, van Golde RJTR, Tjan-Heijnen VCGV. Counseling young women with early breast cancer on fertility preservation. J Assist Reprod Genet 2019; 36:2593-2604. [PMID: 31760547 PMCID: PMC6910894 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-019-01615-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/21/2019] [Accepted: 10/18/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Women with early-stage breast cancer may still have a future child wish, while chemotherapy may impair fertility. To pursue on fertility preservation shortly after breast cancer diagnosis is complex. This review holds a critical reflection on all topics that need to be counseled to give them the opportunity to make a well-informed decision before starting any oncological treatment. METHODS A comprehensive literature review was performed on papers published in English language on breast cancer in young women, risk of chemotherapy-induced infertility, fertility preservation techniques, impact of possible mutation carriership, and future pregnancy outcome. RESULTS Below 40 years of age, the risk of permanent chemotherapy-induced ovarian function failure is approximately 20%, where taxanes do not significantly add to this risk. Overall, 23% of reported women who performed fertility preservation by cryopreserving oocytes or embryos returned for embryo transfer. Of these, 40% gave live birth. Both fertility preservation in women diagnosed with breast cancer and pregnancy after treatment seem safe with respect to breast cancer survival. Women who have a genetic predisposition for breast cancer like BRCA gene mutation should also be informed about the possibility of pre-implantation genetic diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS Women with an early stage of breast cancer and a possible future child wish should be referred to an expertise center in breast cancer, fertility preservation, and genetics in this complex decision-making process, shortly after diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M E Elena Ter Welle-Butalid
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - I J H Ingeborg Vriens
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J G Josien Derhaag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - E M Edward Leter
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - C E Christine de Die-Smulders
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Clinical Genetics, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M Marjolein Smidt
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- Department of Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - R J T Ron van Golde
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - V C G Vivianne Tjan-Heijnen
- GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
- Department of Internal Medicine, division of Medical Oncology, Maastricht University Medical Center, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Salama M, Anazodo A, Woodruff TK. Preserving fertility in female patients with hematological malignancies: a multidisciplinary oncofertility approach. Ann Oncol 2019; 30:1760-1775. [PMID: 31418765 DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz284] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Oncofertility is a new interdisciplinary field at the intersection of oncology and reproductive medicine that expands fertility options for young cancer patients. The most common forms of hematological malignancies that occur in girls and young women and therefore necessitate oncofertility care are acute lymphocytic leukemia, acute myeloid leukemia, non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, and Hodgkin's lymphoma. Aggressive gonadotoxic anticancer regimens including alkylating chemotherapy and total body irradiation are used often in treating girls and young women with hematological malignancies. The risks of gonadotoxicity and subsequent iatrogenic premature ovarian insufficiency and fertility loss depend mainly on the type and stage of the disease, dose of anticancer therapy as well as the age of the patient at the beginning of treatment. To avoid or at least mitigate the devastating complications of anticancer therapy-induced gonadotoxicity, effective and comprehensive strategies that integrate different options for preserving and restoring fertility ranging from established to experimental strategies should be offered before, during, and after chemotherapy or radiotherapy. A multidisciplinary approach that involves strong coordination and collaboration between hemato-oncologists, gynecologists, reproductive biologists, research scientists, and patient navigators is essential to guarantee high standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Salama
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine-Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - A Anazodo
- Kids Cancer Centre, Sydney Children's Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Nelune Cancer Centre, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, Australia; School of Women's and Children's Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| | - T K Woodruff
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine-Northwestern University, Chicago, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Lambertini M, Blondeaux E, Perrone F, Del Mastro L. Improving Adjuvant Endocrine Treatment Tailoring in Premenopausal Women With Hormone Receptor-Positive Breast Cancer. J Clin Oncol 2019; 38:1258-1267. [PMID: 31618128 DOI: 10.1200/jco.19.02242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The Oncology Grand Rounds series is designed to place original reports published in the Journal into clinical context. A case presentation is followed by a description of diagnostic and management challenges, a review of the relevant literature, and a summary of the authors' suggested management approaches. The goal of this series is to help readers better understand how to apply the results of key studies, including those published in Journal of Clinical Oncology, to patients seen in their own clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Lambertini
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Francesco Perrone
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori, IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy.,University of Genova, Genoa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Savoie MB, Laffan A, Brickman C, Daniels B, Levin A, Rowen T, Smith J, Van Blarigan EL, Hope TA, Berry-Lawhorn JM, Anwar M, Van Loon K. A multi-disciplinary model of survivorship care following definitive chemoradiation for anal cancer. BMC Cancer 2019; 19:906. [PMID: 31510960 PMCID: PMC6737598 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-019-6053-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Accepted: 08/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Following definitive chemoradiation for anal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC), patients face a variety of chronic issues including: bowel dysfunction, accelerated bone loss, sexual dysfunction, and psychosocial distress. The increasing incidence of this disease, high cure rates, and significant long-term sequelae warrant increased focus on optimal survivorship care following definitive chemoradiation. In order to establish our survivorship care model for ASCC patients, a multi-disciplinary team of experts performed a comprehensive literature review and summarized best practices for the multi-disciplinary management of this unique patient population. We reviewed principle domains of our survivorship approach: (1) management of chronic toxicities; (2) sexual health; (3) HIV management in affected patients; (4) psychosocial wellbeing; and (5) surveillance for disease recurrence and survivorship care delivery. We provide recommendations for the optimization of survivorship care for ASCC patients can through a multi-disciplinary approach that supports physical and psychological wellness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marissa B Savoie
- School of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Angela Laffan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Cristina Brickman
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Bevin Daniels
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Anna Levin
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Psycho-Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Tami Rowen
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - James Smith
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Erin L Van Blarigan
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Urology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Thomas A Hope
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - J Michael Berry-Lawhorn
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Mekhail Anwar
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA
| | - Katherine Van Loon
- Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
- Department of Medicine, Division of Hematology/Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Blumenfeld Z. Fertility Preservation Using GnRH Agonists: Rationale, Possible Mechanisms, and Explanation of Controversy. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019; 13:1179558119870163. [PMID: 31488958 PMCID: PMC6710670 DOI: 10.1177/1179558119870163] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2019] [Accepted: 07/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The only clinically accepted method of fertility preservation in young women facing gonadotoxic chemo- and/or radiotherapy for malignant or autoimmune diseases is cryopreservation of embryos or unfertilized ova, whereas cryopreservation of ovarian tissue for future reimplantation, or in vitro maturation of follicles, and the use of gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists (GnRHa) are still considered investigational, by several authorities. Whereas previous publications have raised the fear of GnRHa's possible detrimental effects in patients with hormone receptor-positive breast cancers, recent randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have shown that it either improves or does not affect disease-free survival (DFS) in such patients. This review summarizes the pros and cons of GnRHa co-treatment for fertility preservation, suggesting 5 theoretical mechanisms for GnRHa action: (1) simulating the prepubertal hypogonadotropic milieu, (2) direct effect on GnRH receptors, (3) decreased ovarian perfusion, (4) upregulation of an ovarian-protecting molecule such as sphingosine-1-phosphate, and (5) protecting a possible germinative stem cell. We try to explain the reasons for the discrepancy between most publications that support the use of GnRHa for fertility preservation and the minority of publications that did not support its efficiency.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zeev Blumenfeld
- Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Poggio F, Lambertini M, Bighin C, Conte B, Blondeaux E, D'Alonzo A, Dellepiane C, Buzzatti G, Molinelli C, Boccardo F, Del Mastro L. Potential Mechanisms of Ovarian Protection with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist in Breast Cancer Patients: A Review. Clin Med Insights Reprod Health 2019; 13:1179558119864584. [PMID: 31391786 PMCID: PMC6669835 DOI: 10.1177/1179558119864584] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/25/2019] [Indexed: 01/22/2023]
Abstract
The use of chemotherapy in premenopausal cancer patients may lead to chemotherapy-induced premature ovarian failure. Pharmacological temporary ovarian suppression obtained with the gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) administered concomitantly with chemotherapy has been investigated as a technique capable to reduce the gonadotoxicity, reducing the risk of developing premature menopause. In recent years, important evidence has become available on the efficacy and safety of this strategy that should now be considered a standard option for ovarian function preservation in premenopausal breast cancer patients. However, in women interested in fertility preservation, this is not an alternative to cryopreservation strategies, which remains the first option to be proposed. The purpose of this review is to summarize the mechanisms of GnRHa in the preservation of fertility in premenopausal cancer patient candidates to receive chemotherapy, highlighting the areas of doubt that require further investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Matteo Lambertini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Claudia Bighin
- UO Breast Unit, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Benedetta Conte
- UO Breast Unit, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, IST, Genova, Italy
| | - Eva Blondeaux
- UO Breast Unit, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, IST, Genova, Italy
| | | | | | - Giulia Buzzatti
- UO Breast Unit, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, IST, Genova, Italy
| | | | - Francesco Boccardo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Clinica di Oncologia Medica, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| | - Lucia Del Mastro
- UO Breast Unit, IRCCS San Martino Hospital, IST, Genova, Italy.,Department of Internal Medicine and Medical Specialties (DIMI), School of Medicine, University of Genova, Genova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Condorelli M, Lambertini M, Del Mastro L, Boccardo F, Demeestere I, Bober SL. Fertility, sexuality and cancer in young adult women. Curr Opin Oncol 2019; 31:259-67. [DOI: 10.1097/cco.0000000000000540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/26/2023]
|