1
|
Eckstein N, Bates AS, Champion A, Du M, Yin Y, Schlegel P, Lu AKY, Rymer T, Finley-May S, Paterson T, Parekh R, Dorkenwald S, Matsliah A, Yu SC, McKellar C, Sterling A, Eichler K, Costa M, Seung S, Murthy M, Hartenstein V, Jefferis GSXE, Funke J. Neurotransmitter classification from electron microscopy images at synaptic sites in Drosophila melanogaster. Cell 2024; 187:2574-2594.e23. [PMID: 38729112 DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2024.03.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/02/2023] [Revised: 10/04/2023] [Accepted: 03/13/2024] [Indexed: 05/12/2024]
Abstract
High-resolution electron microscopy of nervous systems has enabled the reconstruction of synaptic connectomes. However, we do not know the synaptic sign for each connection (i.e., whether a connection is excitatory or inhibitory), which is implied by the released transmitter. We demonstrate that artificial neural networks can predict transmitter types for presynapses from electron micrographs: a network trained to predict six transmitters (acetylcholine, glutamate, GABA, serotonin, dopamine, octopamine) achieves an accuracy of 87% for individual synapses, 94% for neurons, and 91% for known cell types across a D. melanogaster whole brain. We visualize the ultrastructural features used for prediction, discovering subtle but significant differences between transmitter phenotypes. We also analyze transmitter distributions across the brain and find that neurons that develop together largely express only one fast-acting transmitter (acetylcholine, glutamate, or GABA). We hope that our publicly available predictions act as an accelerant for neuroscientific hypothesis generation for the fly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nils Eckstein
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA; Institute of Neuroinformatics UZH/ETHZ, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Shakeel Bates
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, The University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK; Department of Neurobiology and Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Andrew Champion
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Michelle Du
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Yijie Yin
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Philipp Schlegel
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Sven Dorkenwald
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Arie Matsliah
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Szi-Chieh Yu
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Claire McKellar
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Amy Sterling
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Katharina Eichler
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Marta Costa
- Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Sebastian Seung
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Mala Murthy
- Princeton Neuroscience Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, USA
| | - Volker Hartenstein
- Department of Molecular Cell and Developmental Biology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Gregory S X E Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
| | - Jan Funke
- HHMI Janelia Research Campus, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Liu J, Zheng C, Duan Y. New comparative genomic evidence supporting the proteomic diversification role of A-to-I RNA editing in insects. Mol Genet Genomics 2024; 299:46. [PMID: 38642133 DOI: 10.1007/s00438-024-02141-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2023] [Accepted: 12/29/2023] [Indexed: 04/22/2024]
Abstract
Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, resembling A-to-G mutation, confers adaptiveness by increasing proteomic diversity in a temporal-spatial manner. This evolutionary theory named "proteomic diversifying hypothesis" has only partially been tested in very few organisms like Drosophila melanogaster, mainly by observing the positive selection on nonsynonymous editing events. To find additional genome-wide evidences supporting this interesting assumption, we retrieved the genomes of four Drosophila species and collected 20 deep-sequenced transcriptomes of different developmental stages and neuron populations of D. melanogaster. We systematically profiled the RNA editomes in these samples and performed meticulous comparative genomic analyses. Further evidences were found to support the diversifying hypothesis. (1) None of the nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster had ancestral G-alleles, while the silent editing sites had an unignorable fraction of ancestral G-alleles; (2) Only very few nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster had corresponding G-alleles derived in the genomes of sibling species, and the fraction of such situation was significantly lower than that of silent editing sites; (3) The few nonsynonymous editing with corresponding G-alleles had significantly more variable editing levels (across samples) than other nonsynonymous editing sites in D. melanogaster. The proteomic diversifying nature of RNA editing in Drosophila excludes the restorative role which favors an ancestral G-allele. The few fixed G-alleles in sibling species might facilitate the adaptation to particular environment and the corresponding nonsynonymous editing in D. melanogaster would introduce stronger advantage of flexible proteomic diversification. With multi-Omics data, our study consolidates the nature of evolutionary significance of A-to-I RNA editing sites in model insects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jiyao Liu
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Caiqing Zheng
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Yuange Duan
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Lv P, Yang X, Du J. LKRSDH-dependent histone modifications of insulin-like peptide sites contribute to age-related circadian rhythm changes. Nat Commun 2024; 15:3336. [PMID: 38637528 PMCID: PMC11026460 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-024-47740-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/10/2024] [Indexed: 04/20/2024] Open
Abstract
To understand aging impact on the circadian rhythm, we screened for factors influencing circadian changes during aging. Our findings reveal that LKRSDH mutation significantly reduces rhythmicity in aged flies. RNA-seq identifies a significant increase in insulin-like peptides (dilps) in LKRSDH mutants due to the combined effects of H3R17me2 and H3K27me3 on transcription. Genetic evidence suggests that LKRSDH regulates age-related circadian rhythm changes through art4 and dilps. ChIP-seq analyzes whole genome changes in H3R17me2 and H3K27me3 histone modifications in young and old flies with LKRSDH mutation and controls. The results reveal a correlation between H3R17me2 and H3K27me3, underscoring the role of LKRSDH in regulating gene expression and modification levels during aging. Overall, our study demonstrates that LKRSDH-dependent histone modifications at dilps sites contribute to age-related circadian rhythm changes. This data offers insights and a foundational reference for aging research by unveiling the relationship between LKRSDH and H3R17me2/H3K27me3 histone modifications in aging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pengfei Lv
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Xingzhuo Yang
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China
| | - Juan Du
- Department of Entomology and MOA Key Lab of Pest Monitoring and Green Management, College of Plant Protection, China Agricultural University, Beijing, 100193, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sun R, Feng J, Wang J. Underlying Mechanisms and Treatment of Cellular Senescence-Induced Biological Barrier Interruption and Related Diseases. Aging Dis 2024; 15:612-639. [PMID: 37450933 PMCID: PMC10917536 DOI: 10.14336/ad.2023.0621] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 06/21/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023] Open
Abstract
Given its increasing prevalence, aging is of great concern to researchers worldwide. Cellular senescence is a physiological or pathological cellular state caused by aging and a prominent risk factor for the interruption of the integrity and functionality of human biological barriers. Health barriers play an important role in maintaining microenvironmental homeostasis within the body. The senescence of barrier cells leads to barrier dysfunction and age-related diseases. Cellular senescence has been reported to be a key target for the prevention of age-related barrier diseases, including Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, age-related macular degeneration, diabetic retinopathy, and preeclampsia. Drugs such as metformin, dasatinib, quercetin, BCL-2 inhibitors, and rapamycin have been shown to intervene in cellular senescence and age-related diseases. In this review, we conclude that cellular senescence is involved in age-related biological barrier impairment. We further outline the cellular pathways and mechanisms underlying barrier impairment caused by cellular senescence and describe age-related barrier diseases associated with senescent cells. Finally, we summarize the currently used anti-senescence pharmacological interventions and discuss their therapeutic potential for preventing age-related barrier diseases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ruize Sun
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Juan Feng
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| | - Jue Wang
- Department of Neurology, Shengjing Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Krupp S, Hubbard I, Tam O, Hammell GM, Dubnau J. TDP-43 pathology in Drosophila induces glial-cell type specific toxicity that can be ameliorated by knock-down of SF2/SRSF1. PLoS Genet 2023; 19:e1010973. [PMID: 37747929 PMCID: PMC10553832 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1010973] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2023] [Revised: 10/05/2023] [Accepted: 09/13/2023] [Indexed: 09/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Accumulation of cytoplasmic inclusions of TAR-DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is seen in both neurons and glia in a range of neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Disease progression involves non-cell autonomous interactions among multiple cell types, including neurons, microglia and astrocytes. We investigated the effects in Drosophila of inducible, glial cell type-specific TDP-43 overexpression, a model that causes TDP-43 protein pathology including loss of nuclear TDP-43 and accumulation of cytoplasmic inclusions. We report that TDP-43 pathology in Drosophila is sufficient to cause progressive loss of each of the 5 glial sub-types. But the effects on organismal survival were most pronounced when TDP-43 pathology was induced in the perineural glia (PNG) or astrocytes. In the case of PNG, this effect is not attributable to loss of the glial population, because ablation of these glia by expression of pro-apoptotic reaper expression has relatively little impact on survival. To uncover underlying mechanisms, we used cell-type-specific nuclear RNA sequencing to characterize the transcriptional changes induced by pathological TDP-43 expression. We identified numerous glial cell-type specific transcriptional changes. Notably, SF2/SRSF1 levels were found to be decreased in both PNG and in astrocytes. We found that further knockdown of SF2/SRSF1 in either PNG or astrocytes lessens the detrimental effects of TDP-43 pathology on lifespan, but extends survival of the glial cells. Thus TDP-43 pathology in astrocytes or PNG causes systemic effects that shorten lifespan and SF2/SRSF1 knockdown rescues the loss of these glia, and also reduces their systemic toxicity to the organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah Krupp
- Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, New York, United States of America
| | - Isabel Hubbard
- Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, New York, United States of America
| | - Oliver Tam
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - Gale M. Hammell
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, New York, United States of America
| | - Josh Dubnau
- Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, New York, United States of America
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, New York, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Lockyer J, Reading A, Vicenzi S, Delandre C, Marshall O, Gasperini R, Foa L, Lin JY. Optogenetic inhibition of Gα signalling alters and regulates circuit functionality and early circuit formation. bioRxiv 2023:2023.05.06.539674. [PMID: 37214843 PMCID: PMC10197587 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.06.539674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
Optogenetic techniques provide genetically targeted, spatially and temporally precise approaches to correlate cellular activities and physiological outcomes. In the nervous system, G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) have essential neuromodulatory functions through binding extracellular ligands to induce intracellular signaling cascades. In this work, we develop and validate a new optogenetic tool that disrupt Gαq signaling through membrane recruitment of a minimal Regulator of G-protein signaling (RGS) domain. This approach, Photo-induced Modulation of Gα protein - Inhibition of Gαq (PiGM-Iq), exhibited potent and selective inhibition of Gαq signaling. We alter the behavior of C. elegans and Drosophila with outcomes consistent with GPCR-Gαq disruption. PiGM-Iq also changes axon guidance in culture dorsal root ganglia neurons in response to serotonin. PiGM-Iq activation leads to developmental deficits in zebrafish embryos and larvae resulting in altered neuronal wiring and behavior. By altering the choice of minimal RGS domain, we also show that this approach is amenable to Gαi signaling.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jayde Lockyer
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Andrew Reading
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Silvia Vicenzi
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
- Current affiliation, Moores Cancer Center, School of Medicine, Division of Regenerative Medicine, University of California, San Diego, California, USA
| | - Caroline Delandre
- Menzies Institute of Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Owen Marshall
- Menzies Institute of Medical Research, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Robert Gasperini
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - Lisa Foa
- School of Psychological Sciences, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| | - John Y. Lin
- Tasmanian School of Medicine, University of Tasmania, Tasmania, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Krupp S, Tam O, Hammell MG, Dubnau J. TDP-43 pathology in Drosophila induces glial-cell type specific toxicity that can be ameliorated by knock-down of SF2/SRSF1. bioRxiv 2023:2023.05.04.539439. [PMID: 37205372 PMCID: PMC10187300 DOI: 10.1101/2023.05.04.539439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Accumulation of cytoplasmic inclusions of TAR-DNA binding protein 43 (TDP-43) is seen in both neurons and glia in a range of neurodegenerative disorders, including amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), frontotemporal dementia (FTD) and Alzheimer's disease (AD). Disease progression involves non-cell autonomous interactions among multiple cell types, including neurons, microglia and astrocytes. We investigated the effects in Drosophila of inducible, glial cell type-specific TDP-43 overexpression, a model that causes TDP-43 protein pathology including loss of nuclear TDP-43 and accumulation of cytoplasmic inclusions. We report that TDP-43 pathology in Drosophila is sufficient to cause progressive loss of each of the 5 glial sub-types. But the effects on organismal survival were most pronounced when TDP-43 pathology was induced in the perineural glia (PNG) or astrocytes. In the case of PNG, this effect is not attributable to loss of the glial population, because ablation of these glia by expression of pro-apoptotic reaper expression has relatively little impact on survival. To uncover underlying mechanisms, we used cell-type-specific nuclear RNA sequencing to characterize the transcriptional changes induced by pathological TDP-43 expression. We identified numerous glial cell-type specific transcriptional changes. Notably, SF2/SRSF1 levels were found to be decreased in both PNG and in astrocytes. We found that further knockdown of SF2/SRSF1 in either PNG or astrocytes lessens the detrimental effects of TDP-43 pathology on lifespan, but extends survival of the glial cells. Thus TDP-43 pathology in astrocytes or PNG causes systemic effects that shorten lifespan and SF2/SRSF1 knockdown rescues the loss of these glia, and also reduces their systemic toxicity to the organism.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. Krupp
- Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, NY 11794, USA
| | - O Tam
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.,11794
| | - M Gale Hammell
- Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, 1 Bungtown road, Cold Spring Harbor, NY.,11794
| | - J Dubnau
- Program in Neuroscience, Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, NY 11794, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine, NY 11794, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Butto T, Mungikar K, Baumann P, Winter J, Lutz B, Gerber S. Nuclei on the Rise: When Nuclei-Based Methods Meet Next-Generation Sequencing. Cells 2023; 12:cells12071051. [PMID: 37048124 PMCID: PMC10093037 DOI: 10.3390/cells12071051] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2023] [Revised: 03/22/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/03/2023] Open
Abstract
In the last decade, we have witnessed an upsurge in nuclei-based studies, particularly coupled with next-generation sequencing. Such studies aim at understanding the molecular states that exist in heterogeneous cell populations by applying increasingly more affordable sequencing approaches, in addition to optimized methodologies developed to isolate and select nuclei. Although these powerful new methods promise unprecedented insights, it is important to understand and critically consider the associated challenges. Here, we provide a comprehensive overview of the rise of nuclei-based studies and elaborate on their advantages and disadvantages, with a specific focus on their utility for transcriptomic sequencing analyses. Improved designs and appropriate use of the various experimental strategies will result in acquiring biologically accurate and meaningful information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tamer Butto
- Institute for Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55128 Mainz, Germany
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (S.G.); Tel.: +49-(0)6131-39-27331 (S.G.)
| | - Kanak Mungikar
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Peter Baumann
- Faculty of Biology, Johannes Gutenberg-University, 55128 Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Jennifer Winter
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), 55122 Mainz, Germany
| | - Beat Lutz
- Leibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), 55122 Mainz, Germany
- Institute of Physiological Chemistry, University Medical Center Mainz, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | - Susanne Gerber
- Institute of Human Genetics, University Medical Center Mainz, 55131 Mainz, Germany
- Correspondence: (T.B.); (S.G.); Tel.: +49-(0)6131-39-27331 (S.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Many insect cells are encapsulated within the exoskeleton and cannot be dissociated intact, making them inaccessible to single-cell transcriptomic profiling. We have used single-nucleus RNA sequencing to extract transcriptomic information from multiple Drosophila tissues. Here, we describe procedures for the (1) dissociation of single nuclei, (2) isolation of single nuclei using two popular cell sorters, and (3) preparation of libraries for Smart-seq2 and 10× Genomics. This protocol enables generation of high-quality transcriptomes from single nuclei and can be applied to other species. For complete details on the use and execution of this protocol, please refer to McLaughlin et al. (2021) and Li et al. (2022).
Collapse
|
10
|
Chu Y, Gong J, Wu P, Liu Y, Du Y, Ma L, Fu D, Zhu H, Qu G, Zhu B. Deciphering Precise Gene Transcriptional Expression Using gwINTACT in Tomato. Front Plant Sci 2022; 13:852206. [PMID: 35498641 PMCID: PMC9048029 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2022.852206] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/10/2022] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
Functional gene transcription mainly occurs in the nucleus and has a significant role in plant physiology. The isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell type (INTACT) technique provides an efficient and stable nucleus purification method to investigate the dynamic changes of nuclear gene transcriptional expression. However, the application of traditional INTACT in plants is still limited to seedlings or root cells because of severe chloroplast pollution. In this study, we proposed a newly designed and simplified INTACT based on mas-enhanced GFP (eGFP)-SlWIP2 (gwINTACT) for nuclear purification in tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) leaves, flowers, and fruits for the first time. The yield of the nucleus purified using gwINTACT from transgenic tomato leaves was doubled compared with using a traditional INTACT procedure, accompanied by more than 95% removal of chloroplasts. Relative gene expression of ethylene-related genes with ethylene treatment was reevaluated in gwINTACT leaves to reveal more different results from the traditional gene expression assay based on total RNA. Therefore, establishing the gwINTACT system in this study facilitates the precise deciphering of the transcriptional status in various tomato tissues, which lays the foundation for the further experimental study of nucleus-related molecular regulation on fruit ripening, such as ChIP-seq and ATAC-seq.
Collapse
|
11
|
Certel SJ, McCabe BD, Stowers RS. A conditional GABAergic synaptic vesicle marker for Drosophila. J Neurosci Methods 2022; 372:109540. [PMID: 35219770 PMCID: PMC8940707 DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2022.109540] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Throughout the animal kingdom, GABA is the principal inhibitory neurotransmitter of the nervous system. It is essential for maintaining the homeostatic balance between excitation and inhibition required for the brain to operate normally. Identification of GABAergic neurons and their GABA release sites are thus essential for understanding how the brain regulates the excitability of neurons and the activity of neural circuits responsible for numerous aspects of brain function including information processing, locomotion, learning, memory, and synaptic plasticity, among others. NEW METHOD Since the structure and features of GABA synapses are critical to understanding their function within specific neural circuits of interest, here we developed and characterized a conditional marker of GABAergic synaptic vesicles for Drosophila, 9XV5-vGAT. RESULTS 9XV5-vGAT is validated for conditionality of expression, specificity for localization to synaptic vesicles, specificity for expression in GABAergic neurons, and functionality. Its utility for GABAergic neurotransmitter phenotyping and identification of GABA release sites was verified for ellipsoid body neurons of the central complex. In combination with previously reported conditional SV markers for acetylcholine and glutamate, 9XV5-vGAT was used to demonstrate fast neurotransmitter phenotyping of subesophageal ganglion neurons. COMPARISON WITH EXISTING METHODS This method is an alternative to single cell transcriptomics for neurotransmitter phenotyping and can be applied to any neurons of interest represented by a binary transcription system driver. CONCLUSION A conditional GABAergic synaptic vesicle marker has been developed and validated for GABA neurotransmitter phenotyping and subcellular localization of GABAergic synaptic vesicles.
Collapse
|
12
|
Zhu H, Zhao SD, Ray A, Zhang Y, Li X. A comprehensive temporal patterning gene network in Drosophila medulla neuroblasts revealed by single-cell RNA sequencing. Nat Commun 2022; 13:1247. [PMID: 35273186 PMCID: PMC8913700 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-28915-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
During development, neural progenitors are temporally patterned to sequentially generate a variety of neural types. In Drosophila neural progenitors called neuroblasts, temporal patterning is regulated by cascades of Temporal Transcription Factors (TTFs). However, known TTFs were mostly identified through candidate approaches and may not be complete. In addition, many fundamental questions remain concerning the TTF cascade initiation, progression, and termination. In this work, we use single-cell RNA sequencing of Drosophila medulla neuroblasts of all ages to identify a list of previously unknown TTFs, and experimentally characterize their roles in temporal patterning and neuronal specification. Our study reveals a comprehensive temporal gene network that patterns medulla neuroblasts from start to end. Furthermore, the speed of the cascade progression is regulated by Lola transcription factors expressed in all medulla neuroblasts. Our comprehensive study of the medulla neuroblast temporal cascade illustrates mechanisms that may be conserved in the temporal patterning of neural progenitors. During development, neural progenitors generate a variety of neural types sequentially. Here the authors examine gene expression patterns in Drosophila neural progenitors at single-cell level, and identify a gene regulatory network controlling the sequential generation of different neural types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hailun Zhu
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Sihai Dave Zhao
- Department of Statistics, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.,Carl R. Woese Institute for Genomic Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Alokananda Ray
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Yu Zhang
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA
| | - Xin Li
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, 61801, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Certel SJ, Ruchti E, McCabe BD, Stowers RS. A conditional glutamatergic synaptic vesicle marker for Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 2022; 12:6493328. [PMID: 35100385 PMCID: PMC8895992 DOI: 10.1093/g3journal/jkab453] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
Glutamate is a principal neurotransmitter used extensively by the nervous systems of all vertebrate and invertebrate animals. It is primarily an excitatory neurotransmitter that has been implicated in nervous system development, as well as a myriad of brain functions from the simple transmission of information between neurons to more complex aspects of nervous system function including synaptic plasticity, learning, and memory. Identification of glutamatergic neurons and their sites of glutamate release are thus essential for understanding the mechanisms of neural circuit function and how information is processed to generate behavior. Here, we describe and characterize smFLAG-vGlut, a conditional marker of glutamatergic synaptic vesicles for the Drosophila model system. smFLAG-vGlut is validated for functionality, conditional expression, and specificity for glutamatergic neurons and synaptic vesicles. The utility of smFLAG-vGlut is demonstrated by glutamatergic neurotransmitter phenotyping of 26 different central complex neuron types of which nine were established to be glutamatergic. This illumination of glutamate neurotransmitter usage will enhance the modeling of central complex neural circuitry and thereby our understanding of information processing by this region of the fly brain. The use of smFLAG for glutamatergic neurotransmitter phenotyping and identification of glutamate release sites can be extended to any Drosophila neuron(s) represented by a binary transcription system driver.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah J Certel
- Division of Biological Sciences, Center for Structural and Functional Neuroscience, The University of Montana, Missoula, MT 59812, USA
| | - Evelyne Ruchti
- Brain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne VD 1015, Switzerland
| | - Brian D McCabe
- Brain Mind Institute, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology (EPFL), Lausanne VD 1015, Switzerland
| | - R Steven Stowers
- Department of Microbiology and Cell Biology, Montana State University, Bozeman, MT 59717, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li H, Janssens J, De Waegeneer M, Kolluru SS, Davie K, Gardeux V, Saelens W, David F, Brbić M, Spanier K, Leskovec J, McLaughlin CN, Xie Q, Jones RC, Brueckner K, Shim J, Tattikota SG, Schnorrer F, Rust K, Nystul TG, Carvalho-Santos Z, Ribeiro C, Pal S, Mahadevaraju S, Przytycka TM, Allen AM, Goodwin SF, Berry CW, Fuller MT, White-Cooper H, Matunis EL, DiNardo S, Galenza A, O’Brien LE, Dow JAT, Jasper H, Oliver B, Perrimon N, Deplancke B, Quake SR, Luo L, Aerts S, Agarwal D, Ahmed-Braimah Y, Arbeitman M, Ariss MM, Augsburger J, Ayush K, Baker CC, Banisch T, Birker K, Bodmer R, Bolival B, Brantley SE, Brill JA, Brown NC, Buehner NA, Cai XT, Cardoso-Figueiredo R, Casares F, Chang A, Clandinin TR, Crasta S, Desplan C, Detweiler AM, Dhakan DB, Donà E, Engert S, Floc'hlay S, George N, González-Segarra AJ, Groves AK, Gumbin S, Guo Y, Harris DE, Heifetz Y, Holtz SL, Horns F, Hudry B, Hung RJ, Jan YN, Jaszczak JS, Jefferis GSXE, Karkanias J, Karr TL, Katheder NS, Kezos J, Kim AA, Kim SK, Kockel L, Konstantinides N, Kornberg TB, Krause HM, Labott AT, Laturney M, Lehmann R, Leinwand S, Li J, Li JSS, Li K, Li K, Li L, Li T, Litovchenko M, Liu HH, Liu Y, Lu TC, Manning J, Mase A, Matera-Vatnick M, Matias NR, McDonough-Goldstein CE, McGeever A, McLachlan AD, Moreno-Roman P, Neff N, Neville M, Ngo S, Nielsen T, O'Brien CE, Osumi-Sutherland D, Özel MN, Papatheodorou I, Petkovic M, Pilgrim C, Pisco AO, Reisenman C, Sanders EN, Dos Santos G, Scott K, Sherlekar A, Shiu P, Sims D, Sit RV, Slaidina M, Smith HE, Sterne G, Su YH, Sutton D, Tamayo M, Tan M, Tastekin I, Treiber C, Vacek D, Vogler G, Waddell S, Wang W, Wilson RI, Wolfner MF, Wong YCE, Xie A, Xu J, Yamamoto S, Yan J, Yao Z, Yoda K, Zhu R, Zinzen RP. Fly Cell Atlas: A single-nucleus transcriptomic atlas of the adult fruit fly. Science 2022; 375:eabk2432. [PMID: 35239393 PMCID: PMC8944923 DOI: 10.1126/science.abk2432] [Citation(s) in RCA: 202] [Impact Index Per Article: 101.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/23/2023]
Abstract
For more than 100 years, the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster has been one of the most studied model organisms. Here, we present a single-cell atlas of the adult fly, Tabula Drosophilae, that includes 580,000 nuclei from 15 individually dissected sexed tissues as well as the entire head and body, annotated to >250 distinct cell types. We provide an in-depth analysis of cell type-related gene signatures and transcription factor markers, as well as sexual dimorphism, across the whole animal. Analysis of common cell types between tissues, such as blood and muscle cells, reveals rare cell types and tissue-specific subtypes. This atlas provides a valuable resource for the Drosophila community and serves as a reference to study genetic perturbations and disease models at single-cell resolution.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hongjie Li
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,Huffington Center on Aging and Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jasper Janssens
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium,Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Maxime De Waegeneer
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium,Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Sai Saroja Kolluru
- Departments of Bioengineering and Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA USA, and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Kristofer Davie
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Vincent Gardeux
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Wouter Saelens
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Fabrice David
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Maria Brbić
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Katina Spanier
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium,Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Jure Leskovec
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA, and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Colleen N. McLaughlin
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Qijing Xie
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Robert C. Jones
- Departments of Bioengineering and Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA USA, and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Katja Brueckner
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Jiwon Shim
- Department of Life Science, College of Natural Science, Hanyang University, Seoul, Republic of Korea 04763
| | - Sudhir Gopal Tattikota
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Frank Schnorrer
- Aix-Marseille University, CNRS, IBDM (UMR 7288), Turing Centre for Living systems, 13009 Marseille, France
| | - Katja Rust
- Institute of Physiology and Pathophysiology, Department of Molecular Cell Physiology, Philipps-University, Marburg, Germany,Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Todd G. Nystul
- Department of Anatomy, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Zita Carvalho-Santos
- Behavior and Metabolism Laboratory, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Carlos Ribeiro
- Behavior and Metabolism Laboratory, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Soumitra Pal
- National Center of Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Sharvani Mahadevaraju
- Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Kidney and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Teresa M. Przytycka
- National Center of Biotechnology Information, National Library of Medicine, NIH, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA
| | - Aaron M. Allen
- Centre for Neural Circuits & Behaviour, University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield road, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK
| | - Stephen F. Goodwin
- Centre for Neural Circuits & Behaviour, University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield road, Oxford, OX1 3SR, UK
| | - Cameron W. Berry
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Margaret T. Fuller
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Helen White-Cooper
- Molecular Biosciences Division, Cardiff University, Cardiff, CF10 3AX UK
| | - Erika L. Matunis
- Department of Cell Biology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD 21205, USA
| | - Stephen DiNardo
- Perelman School of Medicine, The University of Pennsylvania, and The Penn Institute for Regenerative Medicine Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Anthony Galenza
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305, USA
| | - Lucy Erin O’Brien
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA 94305, USA
| | - Julian A. T. Dow
- Institute of Molecular, Cell & Systems Biology, College of Medical, Veterinary and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK
| | - FCA Consortium
- FCA Consortium: All authors listed before Acknowledgements, and all contributions and affiliations listed in the Supplementary Materials
| | - Heinrich Jasper
- Immunology Discovery, Genentech, Inc., 1 DNA Way, South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Brian Oliver
- Laboratory of Cellular and Developmental Biology, National Institute of Diabetes and Kidney and Digestive Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - Norbert Perrimon
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Harvard University, Boston, MA 02115; Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Boston, MA, USA,corresponding authors: (N.P.), (B.D.), (S.R.Q.), (L.L.), (S.A.)
| | - Bart Deplancke
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL) and Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland,corresponding authors: (N.P.), (B.D.), (S.R.Q.), (L.L.), (S.A.)
| | - Stephen R. Quake
- Departments of Bioengineering and Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford CA USA, and Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA,corresponding authors: (N.P.), (B.D.), (S.R.Q.), (L.L.), (S.A.)
| | - Liqun Luo
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA,corresponding authors: (N.P.), (B.D.), (S.R.Q.), (L.L.), (S.A.)
| | - Stein Aerts
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium,Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium,corresponding authors: (N.P.), (B.D.), (S.R.Q.), (L.L.), (S.A.)
| | - Devika Agarwal
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | | | - Michelle Arbeitman
- Biomedical Sciences Department, Florida State University, Tallahassee, FL, USA
| | - Majd M Ariss
- Department of Genetics, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Jordan Augsburger
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Kumar Ayush
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Catherine C Baker
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Torsten Banisch
- Skirball Institute and HHMI, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY 10016, USA
| | - Katja Birker
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Rolf Bodmer
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Benjamin Bolival
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Susanna E Brantley
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Julie A Brill
- Cell Biology Program, The Hospital for Sick Children (SickKids), Toronto, ON M5G 0A4, Canada.,Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8, Canada
| | - Nora C Brown
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Norene A Buehner
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Xiaoyu Tracy Cai
- Immunology Discovery, Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA
| | - Rita Cardoso-Figueiredo
- Behavior and Metabolism Laboratory, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Fernando Casares
- CABD (Andalusian Centre for Developmental Biology), CSIC-UPO-JA, Seville 41013, Spain
| | - Amy Chang
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Thomas R Clandinin
- Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Sheela Crasta
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Department of Applied Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, USA.,Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Claude Desplan
- Department of Biology, New York University, New York, New York 10003, USA
| | | | - Darshan B Dhakan
- Behavior and Metabolism Laboratory, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Erika Donà
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK
| | - Stefanie Engert
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Swann Floc'hlay
- VIB-KU Leuven Center for Brain and Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.,Laboratory of Computational Biology, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Nancy George
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Amanda J González-Segarra
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Andrew K Groves
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Department of Neuroscience, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Samantha Gumbin
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Yanmeng Guo
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Devon E Harris
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Yael Heifetz
- The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Stephen L Holtz
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Felix Horns
- Department of Bioengineering and Biophysics Graduate Program, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Bruno Hudry
- Université Côte d'Azur, CNRS, INSERM, iBV, France
| | - Ruei-Jiun Hung
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Yuh Nung Jan
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jacob S Jaszczak
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Timothy L Karr
- Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA
| | | | - James Kezos
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Anna A Kim
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,University of California, Santa Barbara, CA 93106, USA.,Uppsala University, Sweden
| | - Seung K Kim
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.,Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Lutz Kockel
- Department of Developmental Biology and Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Nikolaos Konstantinides
- Institut Jacques Monod, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique-UMR 7592, Université Paris Diderot, Paris, France
| | - Thomas B Kornberg
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Henry M Krause
- Donnelly Centre for Cellular and Biomolecular Research, Department of Molecular Genetics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON M5S 3E1, Canada
| | - Andrew Thomas Labott
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Meghan Laturney
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Ruth Lehmann
- Skirball Institute, Department of Cell Biology and HHMI, New York University Langone Medical Center, New York City, NY 10016
| | - Sarah Leinwand
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Jiefu Li
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Joshua Shing Shun Li
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Kai Li
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ke Li
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Liying Li
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Tun Li
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Maria Litovchenko
- Laboratory of Systems Biology and Genetics, Institute of Bioengineering, School of Life Sciences, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland.,Swiss Institute of Bioinformatics, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Han-Hsuan Liu
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Yifang Liu
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Tzu-Chiao Lu
- Huffington Center on Aging, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jonathan Manning
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Anjeli Mase
- Department of Cell and Tissue Biology, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | | | - Neuza Reis Matias
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Caitlin E McDonough-Goldstein
- Department of Biology, Syracuse University, Syracuse, NY, USA.,Department of Evolutionary Biology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | | | - Alex D McLachlan
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | - Paola Moreno-Roman
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Norma Neff
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Megan Neville
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Oxford OX1 3SR, UK
| | - Sang Ngo
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Tanja Nielsen
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Caitlin E O'Brien
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - David Osumi-Sutherland
- European Bioinformatics Institute (EMBL/EBI), Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Cambridge, UK
| | | | - Irene Papatheodorou
- European Molecular Biology Laboratory, European Bioinformatics Institute, EMBL-EBI, Wellcome Trust Genome Campus, Hinxton CB10 1SD, UK
| | - Maja Petkovic
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Clare Pilgrim
- Department of Physiology, Development and Neuroscience, University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 3DY, UK
| | | | - Carolina Reisenman
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Erin Nicole Sanders
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Gilberto Dos Santos
- The Biological Laboratories, Harvard University, 16 Divinity Avenue, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | - Kristin Scott
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Aparna Sherlekar
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Philip Shiu
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - David Sims
- MRC Weatherall Institute of Molecular Medicine, University of Oxford, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DS, UK
| | - Rene V Sit
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Maija Slaidina
- Skirball Institute, Faculty of Medicine, New York University, New York, NY 10016
| | - Harold E Smith
- Genomics Core, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, US National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA
| | - Gabriella Sterne
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Yu-Han Su
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Daniel Sutton
- Graduate Program in Genetics and Genomics, Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030 USA
| | - Marco Tamayo
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | | | - Ibrahim Tastekin
- Behavior and Metabolism Laboratory, Champalimaud Research, Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Christoph Treiber
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, UK
| | - David Vacek
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Georg Vogler
- Development, Aging and Regeneration Program, Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute, La Jolla, CA 92037, USA
| | - Scott Waddell
- Centre for Neural Circuits and Behaviour, University of Oxford, Tinsley Building, Mansfield Road, Oxford OX1 3TA, UK
| | - Wanpeng Wang
- Cardiovascular Research Institute, University of California, San Francisco, CA 94143, USA
| | - Rachel I Wilson
- Department of Neurobiology, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Mariana F Wolfner
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
| | - Yiu-Cheung E Wong
- Department of Developmental Biology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Anthony Xie
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Department of Biology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Jun Xu
- Department of Genetics, Blavatnik Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02115, USA
| | - Shinya Yamamoto
- Department of Molecular and Human Genetics, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.,Jan and Dan Duncan Neurological Research Institute, Texas Children's Hospital, Houston, TX 77030, USA
| | - Jia Yan
- Chan Zuckerberg Biohub, San Francisco CA, USA
| | - Zepeng Yao
- Department of Molecular and Cell Biology, University of California, Berkeley, Berkeley, CA 94720, USA
| | - Kazuki Yoda
- Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA
| | - Ruijun Zhu
- Department of Physiology, Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.,Howard Hughes Medical Institute, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Robert P Zinzen
- Laboratory for Systems Biology of Neural Tissue Differentiation, Berlin Institute for Medical Systems Biology (BIMSB), Max Delbrueck Centre for Molecular Medicine (MDC) in the Helmholtz Association, Robert-Roessle-Strasse 12, 13125 Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Torres-Méndez A, Pop S, Bonnal S, Almudi I, Avola A, Roberts RJV, Paolantoni C, Alcaina-Caro A, Martín-Anduaga A, Haussmann IU, Morin V, Casares F, Soller M, Kadener S, Roignant JY, Prieto-Godino L, Irimia M. Parallel evolution of a splicing program controlling neuronal excitability in flies and mammals. Sci Adv 2022; 8:eabk0445. [PMID: 35089784 PMCID: PMC8797185 DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.abk0445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Accepted: 12/08/2021] [Indexed: 05/08/2023]
Abstract
Alternative splicing increases neuronal transcriptomic complexity throughout animal phylogeny. To delve into the mechanisms controlling the assembly and evolution of this regulatory layer, we characterized the neuronal microexon program in Drosophila and compared it with that of mammals. In nonvertebrate bilaterians, this splicing program is restricted to neurons by the posttranscriptional processing of the enhancer of microexons (eMIC) domain in Srrm234. In Drosophila, this processing is dependent on regulation by Elav/Fne. eMIC deficiency or misexpression leads to widespread neurological alterations largely emerging from impaired neuronal activity, as revealed by a combination of neuronal imaging experiments and cell type-specific rescues. These defects are associated with the genome-wide skipping of short neural exons, which are strongly enriched in ion channels. We found no overlap of eMIC-regulated exons between flies and mice, illustrating how ancient posttranscriptional programs can evolve independently in different phyla to affect distinct cellular modules while maintaining cell-type specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Torres-Méndez
- Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08003, Spain
- Francis Crick Institute, London, UK
| | | | - Sophie Bonnal
- Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08003, Spain
| | - Isabel Almudi
- Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain
- Department of Genetics, Microbiology and Statistics and Institut de Recerca de la Biodiversitat (IRBio), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | | | - Chiara Paolantoni
- Center for Integrative Genomics, Génopode Building, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Ana Alcaina-Caro
- Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain
| | | | - Irmgard U. Haussmann
- Department of Life Science, School of Health Sciences, Birmingham City University, Birmingham B5 3TN, UK
| | - Violeta Morin
- Institute of Molecular Biology (IMB), Mainz, Germany
| | - Fernando Casares
- Centro Andaluz de Biología del Desarrollo (CABD), CSIC-Universidad Pablo de Olavide-Junta de Andalucía, Seville, Spain
| | - Matthias Soller
- School of Biosciences, College of Life and Environmental Sciences, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
- Birmingham Centre for Genome Biology, University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham B15 2TT, UK
| | | | - Jean-Yves Roignant
- Center for Integrative Genomics, Génopode Building, Faculty of Biology and Medicine, University of Lausanne, CH-1015 Lausanne, Switzerland
- Institute of Pharmaceutical and Biomedical Sciences, Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Staudingerweg 5, 55128 Mainz, Germany
| | | | - Manuel Irimia
- Centre for Genomic Regulation, Barcelona Institute of Science and Technology (BIST), Barcelona 08003, Spain
- Universitat Pompeu Fabra (UPF), Barcelona 08003, Spain
- ICREA, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Xiao Y, Yuan Y, Jimenez M, Soni N, Yadlapalli S. Clock proteins regulate spatiotemporal organization of clock genes to control circadian rhythms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2021; 118:e2019756118. [PMID: 34234015 PMCID: PMC8285898 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.2019756118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Circadian clocks regulate ∼24-h oscillations in gene expression, behavior, and physiology. While the genetic and molecular mechanisms of circadian rhythms are well characterized, what remains poorly understood are the intracellular dynamics of circadian clock components and how they affect circadian rhythms. Here, we elucidate how spatiotemporal organization and dynamics of core clock proteins and genes affect circadian rhythms in Drosophila clock neurons. Using high-resolution imaging and DNA-fluorescence in situ hybridization techniques, we demonstrate that Drosophila clock proteins (PERIOD and CLOCK) are organized into a few discrete foci at the nuclear envelope during the circadian repression phase and play an important role in the subnuclear localization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms. Specifically, we show that core clock genes, period and timeless, are positioned close to the nuclear periphery by the PERIOD protein specifically during the repression phase, suggesting that subnuclear localization of core clock genes might play a key role in their rhythmic gene expression. Finally, we show that loss of Lamin B receptor, a nuclear envelope protein, leads to disruption of PER foci and per gene peripheral localization and results in circadian rhythm defects. These results demonstrate that clock proteins play a hitherto unexpected role in the subnuclear reorganization of core clock genes to control circadian rhythms, revealing how clocks function at the subcellular level. Our results further suggest that clock protein foci might regulate dynamic clustering and spatial reorganization of clock-regulated genes over the repression phase to control circadian rhythms in behavior and physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangbo Xiao
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Ye Yuan
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Mariana Jimenez
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Neeraj Soni
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109
| | - Swathi Yadlapalli
- Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48109;
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Jauregui-Lozano J, Bakhle K, Weake VM. In vivo tissue-specific chromatin profiling in Drosophila melanogaster using GFP-tagged nuclei. Genetics 2021; 218:6281219. [PMID: 34022041 DOI: 10.1093/genetics/iyab079] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2021] [Accepted: 05/17/2021] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The chromatin landscape defines cellular identity in multicellular organisms with unique patterns of DNA accessibility and histone marks decorating the genome of each cell type. Thus, profiling the chromatin state of different cell types in an intact organism under disease or physiological conditions can provide insight into how chromatin regulates cell homeostasis in vivo. To overcome the many challenges associated with characterizing chromatin state in specific cell types, we developed an improved approach to isolate Drosophila melanogaster nuclei tagged with a GFPKASH protein. The perinuclear space-localized KASH domain anchors GFP to the outer nuclear membrane, and expression of UAS-GFPKASH can be controlled by tissue-specific Gal4 drivers. Using this protocol, we profiled chromatin accessibility using an improved version of Assay for Transposable Accessible Chromatin followed by sequencing (ATAC-seq), called Omni-ATAC. In addition, we examined the distribution of histone marks using Chromatin immunoprecipitation followed by sequencing (ChIP-seq) and Cleavage Under Targets and Tagmentation (CUT&Tag) in adult photoreceptor neurons. We show that the chromatin landscape of photoreceptors reflects the transcriptional state of these cells, demonstrating the quality and reproducibility of our approach for profiling the transcriptome and epigenome of specific cell types in Drosophila.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Kimaya Bakhle
- Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| | - Vikki M Weake
- Department of Biochemistry, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA.,Purdue University Center for Cancer Research, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN 47907, USA
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Chongtham MC, Butto T, Mungikar K, Gerber S, Winter J. INTACT vs. FANS for Cell-Type-Specific Nuclei Sorting: A Comprehensive Qualitative and Quantitative Comparison. Int J Mol Sci 2021; 22:5335. [PMID: 34069481 DOI: 10.3390/ijms22105335] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/06/2021] [Revised: 05/11/2021] [Accepted: 05/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Increasing numbers of studies seek to characterize the different cellular sub-populations present in mammalian tissues. The techniques “Isolation of Nuclei Tagged in Specific Cell Types” (INTACT) or “Fluorescence-Activated Nuclei Sorting” (FANS) are frequently used for isolating nuclei of specific cellular subtypes. These nuclei are then used for molecular characterization of the cellular sub-populations. Despite the increasing popularity of both techniques, little is known about their isolation efficiency, advantages, and disadvantages or downstream molecular effects. In our study, we compared the physical and molecular attributes of sfGFP+ nuclei isolated by the two methods—INTACT and FANS—from the neocortices of Arc-CreERT2 × CAG-Sun1/sfGFP animals. We identified differences in efficiency of sfGFP+ nuclei isolation, nuclear size as well as transcriptional (RNA-seq) and chromatin accessibility (ATAC-seq) states. Therefore, our study presents a comprehensive comparison between the two widely used nuclei sorting techniques, identifying the advantages and disadvantages for both INTACT and FANS. Our conclusions are summarized in a table to guide researchers in selecting the most suitable methodology for their individual experimental design.
Collapse
|
19
|
Ryvkin J, Bentzur A, Shmueli A, Tannenbaum M, Shallom O, Dokarker S, Benichou JIC, Levi M, Shohat-Ophir G. Transcriptome Analysis of NPFR Neurons Reveals a Connection Between Proteome Diversity and Social Behavior. Front Behav Neurosci 2021; 15:628662. [PMID: 33867948 PMCID: PMC8044454 DOI: 10.3389/fnbeh.2021.628662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/16/2021] [Indexed: 12/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Social behaviors are mediated by the activity of highly complex neuronal networks, the function of which is shaped by their transcriptomic and proteomic content. Contemporary advances in neurogenetics, genomics, and tools for automated behavior analysis make it possible to functionally connect the transcriptome profile of candidate neurons to their role in regulating behavior. In this study we used Drosophila melanogaster to explore the molecular signature of neurons expressing receptor for neuropeptide F (NPF), the fly homolog of neuropeptide Y (NPY). By comparing the transcription profile of NPFR neurons to those of nine other populations of neurons, we discovered that NPFR neurons exhibit a unique transcriptome, enriched with receptors for various neuropeptides and neuromodulators, as well as with genes known to regulate behavioral processes, such as learning and memory. By manipulating RNA editing and protein ubiquitination programs specifically in NPFR neurons, we demonstrate that the proper expression of their unique transcriptome and proteome is required to suppress male courtship and certain features of social group interaction. Our results highlight the importance of transcriptome and proteome diversity in the regulation of complex behaviors and pave the path for future dissection of the spatiotemporal regulation of genes within highly complex tissues, such as the brain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ryvkin
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Assa Bentzur
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Anat Shmueli
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Miriam Tannenbaum
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Omri Shallom
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shiran Dokarker
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Jennifer I. C. Benichou
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Mali Levi
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Galit Shohat-Ophir
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
- The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Hatch HAM, Belalcazar HM, Marshall OJ, Secombe J. A KDM5-Prospero transcriptional axis functions during early neurodevelopment to regulate mushroom body formation. eLife 2021; 10:63886. [PMID: 33729157 PMCID: PMC7997662 DOI: 10.7554/elife.63886] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Mutations in the lysine demethylase 5 (KDM5) family of transcriptional regulators are associated with intellectual disability, yet little is known regarding their spatiotemporal requirements or neurodevelopmental contributions. Utilizing the mushroom body (MB), a major learning and memory center within the Drosophila brain, we demonstrate that KDM5 is required within ganglion mother cells and immature neurons for proper axogenesis. Moreover, the mechanism by which KDM5 functions in this context is independent of its canonical histone demethylase activity. Using in vivo transcriptional and binding analyses, we identify a network of genes directly regulated by KDM5 that are critical modulators of neurodevelopment. We find that KDM5 directly regulates the expression of prospero, a transcription factor that we demonstrate is essential for MB morphogenesis. Prospero functions downstream of KDM5 and binds to approximately half of KDM5-regulated genes. Together, our data provide evidence for a KDM5-Prospero transcriptional axis that is essential for proper MB development.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayden AM Hatch
- Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
| | - Helen M Belalcazar
- Department of Genetics Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
| | - Owen J Marshall
- Menzies Institute for Medical Research University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia
| | - Julie Secombe
- Dominick P. Purpura Department of Neuroscience Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States.,Department of Genetics Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, United States
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Brovkina MV, Duffié R, Burtis AEC, Clowney EJ. Fruitless decommissions regulatory elements to implement cell-type-specific neuronal masculinization. PLoS Genet 2021; 17:e1009338. [PMID: 33600447 PMCID: PMC7924761 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pgen.1009338] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2020] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
In the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster, male-specific splicing and translation of the Fruitless transcription factor (FruM) alters the presence, anatomy, and/or connectivity of >60 types of central brain neurons that interconnect to generate male-typical behaviors. While the indispensable function of FruM in sex-specific behavior has been understood for decades, the molecular mechanisms underlying its activity remain unknown. Here, we take a genome-wide, brain-wide approach to identifying regulatory elements whose activity depends on the presence of FruM. We identify 436 high-confidence genomic regions differentially accessible in male fruitless neurons, validate candidate regions as bona fide, differentially regulated enhancers, and describe the particular cell types in which these enhancers are active. We find that individual enhancers are not activated universally but are dedicated to specific fru+ cell types. Aside from fru itself, genes are not dedicated to or common across the fru circuit; rather, FruM appears to masculinize each cell type differently, by tweaking expression of the same effector genes used in other circuits. Finally, we find FruM motifs enriched among regulatory elements that are open in the female but closed in the male. Together, these results suggest that FruM acts cell-type-specifically to decommission regulatory elements in male fruitless neurons. Courtship behavior in male Drosophila melanogaster is controlled by a well-defined neural circuit that is labeled by the male-specific transcription factor Fruitless (FruM). While FruM is known to change the number, anatomy and connectivity of neurons which comprise the circuit and has been suggested to repress the expression of a few gene targets, the mechanism of how FruM regulates genes across many different kinds of neurons is unknown. Using an approach to identify gene regulatory elements based on their chromatin accessibility states (ATAC-seq), we identified a large set of chromatin accessibility changes downstream of Fruitless. By examining the activity of these regulatory elements in vivo, we found that their activity was 1) sexually dimorphic and 2) specific to a single class of FruM neurons, suggesting that FruM acts on different chromatin targets in different neuron classes comprising the courtship circuit. Further, we found a known FruM-regulated enhancer of the FruM-repressed gene Lgr3 to have closed chromatin specifically in FruM neurons. Combined with an enrichment of FruM motifs in regions which are closed in FruM neurons, we present a mechanism where FruM directs the decommissioning of sex-shared regulatory elements to masculinize neurons in a cell-type specific manner.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Margarita V. Brovkina
- Graduate Program in Cellular and Molecular Biology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - Rachel Duffié
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biophysics, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
- Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain and Behavior Institute, Columbia University, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Abbigayl E. C. Burtis
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
| | - E. Josephine Clowney
- Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, The University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
22
|
McLaughlin CN, Brbić M, Xie Q, Li T, Horns F, Kolluru SS, Kebschull JM, Vacek D, Xie A, Li J, Jones RC, Leskovec J, Quake SR, Luo L, Li H. Single-cell transcriptomes of developing and adult olfactory receptor neurons in Drosophila. eLife 2021; 10:e63856. [PMID: 33555999 PMCID: PMC7870146 DOI: 10.7554/elife.63856] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
Recognition of environmental cues is essential for the survival of all organisms. Transcriptional changes occur to enable the generation and function of the neural circuits underlying sensory perception. To gain insight into these changes, we generated single-cell transcriptomes of Drosophila olfactory- (ORNs), thermo-, and hygro-sensory neurons at an early developmental and adult stage using single-cell and single-nucleus RNA sequencing. We discovered that ORNs maintain expression of the same olfactory receptors across development. Using receptor expression and computational approaches, we matched transcriptomic clusters corresponding to anatomically and physiologically defined neuron types across multiple developmental stages. We found that cell-type-specific transcriptomes partly reflected axon trajectory choices in development and sensory modality in adults. We uncovered stage-specific genes that could regulate the wiring and sensory responses of distinct ORN types. Collectively, our data reveal transcriptomic features of sensory neuron biology and provide a resource for future studies of their development and physiology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Colleen N McLaughlin
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Maria Brbić
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Qijing Xie
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Neurosciences Graduate Program, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Tongchao Li
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Felix Horns
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Biophysics Graduate Program, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Sai Saroja Kolluru
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Chan Zuckerberg BiohubStanfordUnited States
| | - Justus M Kebschull
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - David Vacek
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Anthony Xie
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Jiefu Li
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Biology Graduate Program, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Robert C Jones
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Jure Leskovec
- Department of Computer Science, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Stephen R Quake
- Department of Bioengineering, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
- Chan Zuckerberg BiohubStanfordUnited States
- Department of Applied Physics, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Liqun Luo
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| | - Hongjie Li
- Department of Biology, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Stanford UniversityStanfordUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Kasahara R, Yuzawa T, Fujii T, Aoki F, Suzuki MG. dmrt11E ortholog is a crucial factor for oogenesis of the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 2021; 129:103517. [PMID: 33422636 DOI: 10.1016/j.ibmb.2020.103517] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2020] [Revised: 12/26/2020] [Accepted: 12/27/2020] [Indexed: 05/26/2023]
Abstract
DMRT (Doublesex and Mab-3-related transcription factor) is a highly conserved transcription factor family involved in sex determination in numerous animal species. One DMRT, dmrt2/dmrt11E, has entirely different functions in invertebrate and vertebrate species, indicating unpredicted functions. Here, we performed functional analysis of the dmrt11E gene in the domesticated silkworm, Bombyx mori. This gene was preferentially expressed in ovarioles at the last larval instar stage. Its mRNA accumulated in ovarian eggs during the adult stage. CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knockout of Bombyx dmrt11E (Bmdmrt11E) caused defects in oogenesis, resulting in the production of abnormal eggs with transparent liquids. These eggs had significantly reduced fertility and lipid levels. Transcriptomic comparisons between ovaries of control and mutant insects at two developmental stages identified six genes that may be under the control of Bmdmrt11E. Finally, we provide a possible model for lipid uptake and storage in eggs of Bombyx mori.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ryota Kasahara
- Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8562, Japan
| | - Tomohisa Yuzawa
- Japan Water Systems Corporation, 4-9-4 Hatchobori, Chuo-ku, Tokyo, 104-0032, Japan
| | - Takehsi Fujii
- Department of Agricultural Science and Technology, Faculty of Agriculture, Setsunan University, 45-1 Nagao-Togecho, Hirakata-shi, Osaka, 573-0101, Japan
| | - Fugaku Aoki
- Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8562, Japan
| | - Masataka G Suzuki
- Department of Integrated Biosciences, Graduate School of Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa-shi, Chiba, 277-8562, Japan.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Lathen DR, Merrill CB, Rothenfluh A. Flying Together: Drosophila as a Tool to Understand the Genetics of Human Alcoholism. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:E6649. [PMID: 32932795 PMCID: PMC7555299 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21186649] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/11/2020] [Revised: 09/07/2020] [Accepted: 09/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Alcohol use disorder (AUD) exacts an immense toll on individuals, families, and society. Genetic factors determine up to 60% of an individual's risk of developing problematic alcohol habits. Effective AUD prevention and treatment requires knowledge of the genes that predispose people to alcoholism, play a role in alcohol responses, and/or contribute to the development of addiction. As a highly tractable and translatable genetic and behavioral model organism, Drosophila melanogaster has proven valuable to uncover important genes and mechanistic pathways that have obvious orthologs in humans and that help explain the complexities of addiction. Vinegar flies exhibit remarkably strong face and mechanistic validity as a model for AUDs, permitting many advancements in the quest to understand human genetic involvement in this disease. These advancements occur via approaches that essentially fall into one of two categories: (1) discovering candidate genes via human genome-wide association studies (GWAS), transcriptomics on post-mortem tissue from AUD patients, or relevant physiological connections, then using reverse genetics in flies to validate candidate genes' roles and investigate their molecular function in the context of alcohol. (2) Utilizing flies to discover candidate genes through unbiased screens, GWAS, quantitative trait locus analyses, transcriptomics, or single-gene studies, then validating their translational role in human genetic surveys. In this review, we highlight the utility of Drosophila as a model for alcoholism by surveying recent advances in our understanding of human AUDs that resulted from these various approaches. We summarize the genes that are conserved in alcohol-related function between humans and flies. We also provide insight into some advantages and limitations of these approaches. Overall, this review demonstrates how Drosophila have and can be used to answer important genetic questions about alcohol addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel R. Lathen
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Ph.D. Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA;
| | - Collin B. Merrill
- Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
| | - Adrian Rothenfluh
- Department of Psychiatry and Neuroscience Ph.D. Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA;
- Molecular Medicine Program, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA;
- Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84132, USA
- Department of Human Genetics, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Petruccelli E, Brown T, Waterman A, Ledru N, Kaun KR. Alcohol Causes Lasting Differential Transcription in Drosophila Mushroom Body Neurons. Genetics 2020; 215:103-116. [PMID: 32132098 PMCID: PMC7198272 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.120.303101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/06/2019] [Accepted: 02/26/2020] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Repeated alcohol experiences can produce long-lasting memories for sensory cues associated with intoxication. These memories can problematically trigger relapse in individuals recovering from alcohol use disorder (AUD). The molecular mechanisms by which ethanol changes memories to become long-lasting and inflexible remain unclear. New methods to analyze gene expression within precise neuronal cell types can provide further insight toward AUD prevention and treatment. Here, we used genetic tools in Drosophila melanogaster to investigate the lasting consequences of ethanol on transcription in memory-encoding neurons. Drosophila rely on mushroom body (MB) neurons to make associative memories, including memories of ethanol-associated sensory cues. Differential expression analyses revealed that distinct transcripts, but not genes, in the MB were associated with experiencing ethanol alone compared to forming a memory of an odor cue associated with ethanol. Adult MB-specific knockdown of spliceosome-associated proteins demonstrated the necessity of RNA-processing in ethanol memory formation. These findings highlight the dynamic, context-specific regulation of transcription in cue-encoding neurons, and the lasting effect of ethanol on transcript usage during memory formation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Petruccelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
- Department of Biological Sciences, Southern Illinois University Edwardsville, Illinois 62026
| | - Tariq Brown
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Amanda Waterman
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Nicolas Ledru
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| | - Karla R Kaun
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02912
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Davis FP, Nern A, Picard S, Reiser MB, Rubin GM, Eddy SR, Henry GL. A genetic, genomic, and computational resource for exploring neural circuit function. eLife 2020; 9:e50901. [PMID: 31939737 PMCID: PMC7034979 DOI: 10.7554/elife.50901] [Citation(s) in RCA: 109] [Impact Index Per Article: 27.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/06/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2020] [Indexed: 12/11/2022] Open
Abstract
The anatomy of many neural circuits is being characterized with increasing resolution, but their molecular properties remain mostly unknown. Here, we characterize gene expression patterns in distinct neural cell types of the Drosophila visual system using genetic lines to access individual cell types, the TAPIN-seq method to measure their transcriptomes, and a probabilistic method to interpret these measurements. We used these tools to build a resource of high-resolution transcriptomes for 100 driver lines covering 67 cell types, available at http://www.opticlobe.com. Combining these transcriptomes with recently reported connectomes helps characterize how information is transmitted and processed across a range of scales, from individual synapses to circuit pathways. We describe examples that include identifying neurotransmitters, including cases of apparent co-release, generating functional hypotheses based on receptor expression, as well as identifying strong commonalities between different cell types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fred P Davis
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Molecular Immunology and Inflammation BranchNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of HealthBethesdaUnited States
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Serge Picard
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Michael B Reiser
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Gerald M Rubin
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
| | - Sean R Eddy
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Howard Hughes Medical Institute and Department of Molecular and Cellular BiologyHarvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
- John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied SciencesHarvard UniversityCambridgeUnited States
| | - Gilbert L Henry
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical InstituteAshburnUnited States
- Cold Spring Harbor LaboratoryCold Spring HarborUnited States
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Abstract
Cells differentiate from undifferentiated precursors in order to establish the tissues of vascular plants. The different cell types and stem cells are first specified in the early embryo. How cell type specification is instructed by transcriptional control on a genome-wide level is poorly understood. A major hurdle has been the technical challenge associated with obtaining cellular transcriptomes in this inaccessible tissue. Recently, we adapted a two-component genetic labeling system called INTACT to isolate nuclei and generate a microarray-based expression atlas of the cell types in the early Arabidopsis thaliana embryo. Here we present a step-by-step description of the adapted INTACT protocol, as well as the approach to generate transcriptomic profiles. This protocol has been adapted to account for using seeds with embryos of various developmental stages as a starting material, and the relatively few cell type-specific nuclei that can be isolated from embryos.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Dolf Weijers
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Gruzin M, Mekheal M, Ruhlman K, Winkowski M, Petko J. Developmental expression of doublesex-related transcripts in the common house spider, Parasteatoda tepidariorum. Gene Expr Patterns 2020; 35:119101. [DOI: 10.1016/j.gep.2020.119101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2019] [Revised: 02/12/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
|
29
|
Merrick C, Filingeri D. The evolution of wetness perception: A comparison of arachnid, insect and human models. J Therm Biol 2019; 85:102412. [PMID: 31657753 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2019.102412] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2019] [Revised: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 09/06/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
Hygroreceptors are a type of humidity sensor that have been identified in several invertebrate classes including Insecta and Arachnida. While their structure has been well researched, the nature of the mechanisms behind their function is debated as being either mechanical, evaporative, or psychrometric in insects and potentially also olfactory in arachnids. There is evidence that can be used to support or oppose each of these concepts, which also invites the possibility of multiple unified mechanisms occurring together. The integration of multiple sensory modalities has also formed the foundation of wetness perception in humans, led by thermal and tactile cues with supplementary information from vision and sound. These inputs are integrated by a vast neural network in the brain, which also occurs on a smaller scale in insects and arachnids. It is possible that as cerebral capacity increased throughout human evolution, this facilitated a preferable system of wetness perception via multisensory integration and rendered hygroreceptors obsolete. While this cerebral development hypothesis is only speculative, it gives a framework for further investigation. Additional research needs to be conducted to correctly classify hygroreceptor types in invertebrates and their relative prevalence before evolutionary associations can be made with vertebrate species. This integratory premise also applies to the human system, as knowing the relative contribution and compounding effects of each sensory modality on wetness perception will aid the overall understanding of the system and help to uncover the evolutionary development pathways underpinning each sense.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charlotte Merrick
- THERMOSENSELAB, Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
| | - Davide Filingeri
- THERMOSENSELAB, Environmental Ergonomics Research Centre, Loughborough Design School, Loughborough University, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Abstract
Analysis of the molecular mechanisms driving cell specification, differentiation, and other cellular processes can be difficult due to the heterogeneity of tissues and organs. Therefore, it is critical to isolate pure cell populations in order to properly assess the function of certain cell types in the context of a tissue. This protocol describes use of the INTACT (isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell types) method in Xenopus, followed by proteomics analysis of nuclear protein complexes. The INTACT protocol utilizes two transgenes: (1) a three-part nuclear targeting fusion (NTF) consisting of a nuclear envelope protein (Nup35) that targets the NTF to the nuclear membrane, an enhanced green fluorescent protein (EGFP) cassette for NTF visualization in live animals, and a biotin ligase receptor protein (BLRP) that provides a substrate for the biotinylation of the NTF, and (2) the E. coli ligase BirA (which biotinylates the NTF) tagged to mCherry (for visualization). Either or both transgenes are driven by a tissue-specific promoter, making this protocol easily adaptable to proteomics analyses of immunoprecipitated complexes from INTACT-isolated nuclei of multiple tissue types to determine the composition of protein complexes in pure cell populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lauren Wasson
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.,University of North Carolina McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Nirav M Amin
- University of North Carolina McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| | - Frank L Conlon
- Department of Genetics, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599; .,University of North Carolina McAllister Heart Institute, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599.,Department of Biology, University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina 27599
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Domsch K, Carnesecchi J, Disela V, Friedrich J, Trost N, Ermakova O, Polychronidou M, Lohmann I. The Hox transcription factor Ubx stabilizes lineage commitment by suppressing cellular plasticity in Drosophila. eLife 2019; 8:42675. [PMID: 31050646 PMCID: PMC6513553 DOI: 10.7554/elife.42675] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/08/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
During development cells become restricted in their differentiation potential by repressing alternative cell fates, and the Polycomb complex plays a crucial role in this process. However, how alternative fate genes are lineage-specifically silenced is unclear. We studied Ultrabithorax (Ubx), a multi-lineage transcription factor of the Hox class, in two tissue lineages using sorted nuclei and interfered with Ubx in mesodermal cells. We find that depletion of Ubx leads to the de-repression of genes normally expressed in other lineages. Ubx silences expression of alternative fate genes by retaining the Polycomb Group protein Pleiohomeotic at Ubx targeted genomic regions, thereby stabilizing repressive chromatin marks in a lineage-dependent manner. Our study demonstrates that Ubx stabilizes lineage choice by suppressing the multipotency encoded in the genome via its interaction with Pho. This mechanism may explain why the Hox code is maintained throughout the lifecycle, since it could set a block to transdifferentiation in adult cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katrin Domsch
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Vanessa Disela
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Jana Friedrich
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Nils Trost
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Olga Ermakova
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| | | | - Ingrid Lohmann
- Centre for Organismal Studies (COS) Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Delandre C, Marshall OJ. United colours of chromatin? Developmental genome organisation in flies. Biochem Soc Trans 2019; 47:691-700. [PMID: 30902925 DOI: 10.1042/BST20180605] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/04/2019] [Revised: 02/21/2019] [Accepted: 02/22/2019] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
The organisation of DNA into differing forms of packaging, or chromatin, controls many of the cell fate decisions during development. Although early studies focused on individual forms of chromatin, in the last decade more holistic studies have attempted to determine a complete picture of the different forms of chromatin present within a cell. In the fruit fly, Drosophila melanogaster, the study of chromatin states has been aided by the use of complementary and cell-type-specific techniques that profile the marks that recruit chromatin protein binding or the proteins themselves. Although many questions remain unanswered, a clearer picture of how different chromatin states affect development is now emerging, with more unusual chromatin states such as Black chromatin playing key roles. Here, we discuss recent findings regarding chromatin biology in flies.
Collapse
|
33
|
Engel GL, Taber K, Vinton E, Crocker AJ. Studying alcohol use disorder using Drosophila melanogaster in the era of 'Big Data'. Behav Brain Funct 2019; 15:7. [PMID: 30992041 PMCID: PMC6469124 DOI: 10.1186/s12993-019-0159-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 04/04/2019] [Indexed: 02/08/2023]
Abstract
Our understanding of the networks of genes and protein functions involved in Alcohol Use Disorder (AUD) remains incomplete, as do the mechanisms by which these networks lead to AUD phenotypes. The fruit fly (Drosophila melanogaster) is an efficient model for functional and mechanistic characterization of the genes involved in alcohol behavior. The fly offers many advantages as a model organism for investigating the molecular and cellular mechanisms of alcohol-related behaviors, and for understanding the underlying neural circuitry driving behaviors, such as locomotor stimulation, sedation, tolerance, and appetitive (reward) learning and memory. Fly researchers are able to use an extensive variety of tools for functional characterization of gene products. To understand how the fly can guide our understanding of AUD in the era of Big Data we will explore these tools, and review some of the gene networks identified in the fly through their use, including chromatin-remodeling, glial, cellular stress, and innate immunity genes. These networks hold great potential as translational drug targets, making it prudent to conduct further research into how these gene mechanisms are involved in alcohol behavior.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gregory L. Engel
- Department of Psychological Sciences, Castleton University, Castleton, VT 05735 USA
| | - Kreager Taber
- Program in Neuroscience, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
| | - Elizabeth Vinton
- Program in Neuroscience, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
| | - Amanda J. Crocker
- Program in Neuroscience, Middlebury College, Middlebury, VT 05753 USA
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Agrawal P, Chung P, Heberlein U, Kent C. Enabling cell-type-specific behavioral epigenetics in Drosophila: a modified high-yield INTACT method reveals the impact of social environment on the epigenetic landscape in dopaminergic neurons. BMC Biol 2019; 17:30. [PMID: 30967153 PMCID: PMC6456965 DOI: 10.1186/s12915-019-0646-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2018] [Accepted: 03/07/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Epigenetic mechanisms play fundamental roles in brain function and behavior and stressors such as social isolation can alter animal behavior via epigenetic mechanisms. However, due to cellular heterogeneity, identifying cell-type-specific epigenetic changes in the brain is challenging. Here, we report the first use of a modified isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell type (INTACT) method in behavioral epigenetics of Drosophila melanogaster, a method we call mini-INTACT. RESULTS Using ChIP-seq on mini-INTACT purified dopaminergic nuclei, we identified epigenetic signatures in socially isolated and socially enriched Drosophila males. Social experience altered the epigenetic landscape in clusters of genes involved in transcription and neural function. Some of these alterations could be predicted by expression changes of four transcription factors and the prevalence of their binding sites in several clusters. These transcription factors were previously identified as activity-regulated genes, and their knockdown in dopaminergic neurons reduced the effects of social experience on sleep. CONCLUSIONS Our work enables the use of Drosophila as a model for cell-type-specific behavioral epigenetics and establishes that social environment shifts the epigenetic landscape in dopaminergic neurons. Four activity-related transcription factors are required in dopaminergic neurons for the effects of social environment on sleep.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pavan Agrawal
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
| | - Phuong Chung
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Ulrike Heberlein
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA
| | - Clement Kent
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA, USA.
- Department of Biology, York University, Toronto, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bozek M, Cortini R, Storti AE, Unnerstall U, Gaul U, Gompel N. ATAC-seq reveals regional differences in enhancer accessibility during the establishment of spatial coordinates in the Drosophila blastoderm. Genome Res 2019; 29:771-783. [PMID: 30962180 PMCID: PMC6499308 DOI: 10.1101/gr.242362.118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2018] [Accepted: 03/26/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Establishment of spatial coordinates during Drosophila embryogenesis relies on differential regulatory activity of axis patterning enhancers. Concentration gradients of activator and repressor transcription factors (TFs) provide positional information to each enhancer, which in turn promotes transcription of a target gene in a specific spatial pattern. However, the interplay between an enhancer regulatory activity and its accessibility as determined by local chromatin organization is not well understood. We profiled chromatin accessibility with ATAC-seq in narrow, genetically tagged domains along the antero-posterior axis in the Drosophila blastoderm. We demonstrate that one-quarter of the accessible genome displays significant regional variation in its ATAC-seq signal immediately after zygotic genome activation. Axis patterning enhancers are enriched among the most variable intervals, and their accessibility changes correlate with their regulatory activity. In an embryonic domain where an enhancer receives a net activating TF input and promotes transcription, it displays elevated accessibility in comparison to a domain where it receives a net repressive input. We propose that differential accessibility is a signature of patterning cis-regulatory elements in the Drosophila blastoderm and discuss potential mechanisms by which accessibility of enhancers may be modulated by activator and repressor TFs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Bozek
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biochemie, Genzentrum, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Roberto Cortini
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biochemie, Genzentrum, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Andrea Ennio Storti
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biochemie, Genzentrum, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Ulrich Unnerstall
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biochemie, Genzentrum, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Ulrike Gaul
- Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Department Biochemie, Genzentrum, 81377 München, Germany
| | - Nicolas Gompel
- Ludwig-Maximilians Universität München, Fakultät für Biologie, Biozentrum, 82152 Planegg-Martinsried, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Bhattacharyya S, Sathe AA, Bhakta M, Xing C, Munshi NV. PAN-INTACT enables direct isolation of lineage-specific nuclei from fibrous tissues. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0214677. [PMID: 30939177 PMCID: PMC6445515 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214677] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2018] [Accepted: 03/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent studies have highlighted the extraordinary cell type diversity that exists within mammalian organs, yet the molecular drivers of such heterogeneity remain elusive. To address this issue, much attention has been focused on profiling the transcriptome and epigenome of individual cell types. However, standard cell type isolation methods based on surface or fluorescent markers remain problematic for cells residing within organs with significant connective tissue. Since the nucleus contains both genomic and transcriptomic information, the isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell types (INTACT) method provides an attractive solution. Although INTACT has been successfully applied to plants, flies, zebrafish, frogs, and mouse brain and adipose tissue, broad use across mammalian organs remains challenging. Here we describe the PAN-INTACT method, which can be used to isolate cell type specific nuclei from fibrous mouse organs, which are particularly problematic. As a proof-of-concept, we demonstrate successful isolation of cell type-specific nuclei from the mouse heart, which contains substantial connective tissue and harbors multiple cell types, including cardiomyocytes, fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and epicardial cells. Compared to established techniques, PAN-INTACT allows more rapid isolation of cardiac nuclei to facilitate downstream applications. We show cell type-specific isolation of nuclei from the hearts of Nkx2-5Cre/+; R26Sun1-2xsf-GFP-6xmyc/+ mice, which we confirm by expression of lineage markers. Furthermore, we perform Assay for Transposase Accessible Chromatin (ATAC)-Seq to provide high-fidelity chromatin accessibility maps of Nkx2-5+ nuclei. To extend the applicability of PAN-INTACT, we also demonstrate successful isolation of Wt1+ podocytes from adult kidney. Taken together, our data suggest that PAN-INTACT is broadly applicable for profiling the transcriptional and epigenetic landscape of specific cell types. Thus, we envision that our method can be used to systematically probe mechanistic details of cell type-specific functions within individual organs of intact mice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samadrita Bhattacharyya
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Adwait A. Sathe
- McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Minoti Bhakta
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Chao Xing
- McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
| | - Nikhil V. Munshi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
- McDermott Center for Human Growth and Development, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
- Department of Molecular Biology, UT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
- Hamon Center for Regenerative Science and Medicine, Dallas, Texas, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Del Toro-De León G, Köhler C. Endosperm-specific transcriptome analysis by applying the INTACT system. Plant Reprod 2019; 32:55-61. [PMID: 30588542 DOI: 10.1007/s00497-018-00356-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/19/2018] [Accepted: 12/14/2018] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
KEY MESSAGE We report the adaptation of the INTACT method for RNA-sequencing in the endosperm and demonstrate its feasibility for allele-specific expression analysis. Tissue-specific transcriptome analyses provide important insights into the developmental programs of defined cell types. The isolation of nuclei tagged in specific cell types (INTACT) is a versatile method that allows to isolate highly pure nuclei from defined tissue types that can be used for several downstream applications. Here, we describe the adaptation of INTACT from endosperm nuclei for high-throughput RNA-sequencing. By analyzing the ratio of parental reads and tissue-specific gene expression in the endosperm, we could assess the contamination level of our samples. Based on this analysis, we estimate that in most of the samples the contamination level is lower than in previously published datasets. We further show that the nuclear transcriptome and total transcriptome of the endosperm are well correlated. Together, our data show that INTACT of the endosperm is a reliable methodology for endosperm-specific transcriptome analysis that overcomes the limitation of time-consuming manual endosperm dissection that is connected with high levels of maternal tissue contamination. INTACT does not rely on expensive equipment and can be set up in every standard molecular biology laboratory, making it the method of choice for future molecular studies of the endosperm.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerardo Del Toro-De León
- Department of Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Claudia Köhler
- Department of Plant Biology, Uppsala BioCenter, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences and Linnean Center for Plant Biology, Uppsala, Sweden.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Palovaara J, Weijers D. Adapting INTACT to analyse cell-type-specific transcriptomes and nucleocytoplasmic mRNA dynamics in the Arabidopsis embryo. Plant Reprod 2019; 32:113-121. [PMID: 30430248 DOI: 10.1007/s00497-018-0347-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/05/2018] [Accepted: 10/31/2018] [Indexed: 05/06/2023]
Abstract
In the early embryo of vascular plants, the different cell types and stem cells of the seedling are specified as the embryo develops from a zygote towards maturity. How the key steps in cell and tissue specification are instructed by genome-wide transcriptional activity is poorly understood. Progress in defining transcriptional regulation at the genome-wide level in plant embryos has been hampered by difficulties associated with capturing cell-type-specific transcriptomes in this small and inaccessible structure. We recently adapted a two-component genetic nucleus labelling system called INTACT to isolate nuclei from distinct cell types at different stages of Arabidopsis thaliana embryogenesis. We have used these to generate a transcriptomic atlas of embryo development following microarray-based expression profiling. Here, we present a general description of the adapted INTACT procedure, including the two-component labelling system, seed isolation, nuclei preparation and purification, as well as transcriptomic profiling. We also compare nuclear and cellular transcriptomes from the early Arabidopsis embryo to assess nucleocytoplasmic differences and discuss how these differences can be used to infer regulation of gene activity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joakim Palovaara
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands
- Molecular Genetics, University of Bremen, 28359, Bremen, Germany
| | - Dolf Weijers
- Laboratory of Biochemistry, Wageningen University, 6708 WE, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Meissner GW, Nern A, Singer RH, Wong AM, Malkesman O, Long X. Mapping Neurotransmitter Identity in the Whole-Mount Drosophila Brain Using Multiplex High-Throughput Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization. Genetics 2019; 211:473-482. [PMID: 30563859 PMCID: PMC6366916 DOI: 10.1534/genetics.118.301749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 12/13/2018] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Identifying the neurotransmitters used by specific neurons is a critical step in understanding the function of neural circuits. However, methods for the consistent and efficient detection of neurotransmitter markers remain limited. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) enables direct labeling of type-specific mRNA in neurons. Recent advances in FISH allow this technique to be carried out in intact tissue samples such as whole-mount Drosophila melanogaster brains. Here, we present a FISH platform for high-throughput detection of eight common neurotransmitter phenotypes in Drosophila brains. We greatly increase FISH throughput by processing samples mounted on coverslips and optimizing fluorophore choice for each probe to facilitate multiplexing. As application examples, we demonstrate cases of neurotransmitter coexpression, reveal neurotransmitter phenotypes of specific cell types, and explore the onset of neurotransmitter expression in the developing optic lobe. Beyond neurotransmitter markers, our protocols can in principle be used for large-scale FISH detection of any mRNA in whole-mount fly brains.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Geoffrey W Meissner
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
| | - Aljoscha Nern
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
| | - Robert H Singer
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
- Department of Anatomy and Structural Biology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York 10461
| | - Allan M Wong
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
| | - Oz Malkesman
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
| | - Xi Long
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, Virginia 20147
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Abstract
Our understanding of alcohol use disorder (AUD), particularly alcohol's effects on the nervous system, has unquestionably benefited from the use of model systems such as Drosophila melanogaster. Here, we briefly introduce the use of flies in alcohol research, and highlight the genetic accessibility and neurobiological contribution that flies have made to our understanding of AUD. Future fly research offers unique opportunities for addressing unresolved questions in the alcohol field, such as the neuromolecular and circuit basis for cravings and alcohol-induced neuroimmune dysfunction. This review strongly advocates for interdisciplinary approaches and translational collaborations with the united goal of confronting the major health problems associated with alcohol abuse and addiction.
Collapse
|
41
|
Bates AS, Janssens J, Jefferis GS, Aerts S. Neuronal cell types in the fly: single-cell anatomy meets single-cell genomics. Curr Opin Neurobiol 2019; 56:125-134. [PMID: 30703584 DOI: 10.1016/j.conb.2018.12.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 40] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 12/23/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
At around 150 000 neurons, the adult Drosophila melanogaster central nervous system is one of the largest species, for which a complete cellular catalogue is imminent. While numerically much simpler than mammalian brains, its complexity is still difficult to parse without grouping neurons into consistent types, which can number 1-1000 cells per hemisphere. We review how neuroanatomical and gene expression data are being used to discover neuronal types at scale. The correlation among multiple co-varying neuronal properties, including lineage, gene expression, morphology, connectivity, response properties and shared behavioral significance is essential to the definition of neuronal cell type. Initial studies comparing morphological and transcriptomic definitions of neuronal type suggest that these are highly consistent, but there is much to do to match these approaches brain-wide. Matched single-cell transcriptomic and morphological data provide an effective reference point to integrate other data types, including connectomics data. This will significantly enhance our ability to make functional predictions from brain wiring diagrams as well facilitating molecular genetic manipulation of neuronal types.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Jasper Janssens
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Department of Human Genetics KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium
| | - Gregory Sxe Jefferis
- Neurobiology Division, MRC Laboratory of Molecular Biology, Cambridge CB2 0QH, UK; Drosophila Connectomics Group, Department of Zoology, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EJ, UK.
| | - Stein Aerts
- VIB Center for Brain & Disease Research, KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium; Department of Human Genetics KU Leuven, Leuven 3000, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Sapiro AL, Shmueli A, Henry GL, Li Q, Shalit T, Yaron O, Paas Y, Billy Li J, Shohat-Ophir G. Illuminating spatial A-to-I RNA editing signatures within the Drosophila brain. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2019; 116:2318-27. [PMID: 30659150 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1811768116] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
A fundamental question in contemporary neuroscience is how the remarkable cellular diversity required for the intricate function of the nervous system is achieved. Here, we bridge the gap between a cellular machinery that is known to diversify the transcriptome and the existence of distinct neuronal populations that compose the Drosophila brain. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing is a ubiquitous mechanism that generates transcriptomic diversity in cells by recoding certain adenosines within the pre-mRNA sequence into inosines. We present a spatial map of RNA editing across different neuronal populations in Drosophila brain. Each neuronal population has a distinct editing signature, with the majority of differential editing occurring in highly conserved regions of transcripts that encode ion channels and other essential neuronal genes. Adenosine-to-inosine (A-to-I) RNA editing, catalyzed by ADAR enzymes, is a ubiquitous mechanism that generates transcriptomic diversity. This process is particularly important for proper neuronal function; however, little is known about how RNA editing is dynamically regulated between the many functionally distinct neuronal populations of the brain. Here, we present a spatial RNA editing map in the Drosophila brain and show that different neuronal populations possess distinct RNA editing signatures. After purifying and sequencing RNA from genetically marked groups of neuronal nuclei, we identified a large number of editing sites and compared editing levels in hundreds of transcripts across nine functionally different neuronal populations. We found distinct editing repertoires for each population, including sites in repeat regions of the transcriptome and differential editing in highly conserved and likely functional regions of transcripts that encode essential neuronal genes. These changes are site-specific and not driven by changes in Adar expression, suggesting a complex, targeted regulation of editing levels in key transcripts. This fine-tuning of the transcriptome between different neurons by RNA editing may account for functional differences between distinct populations in the brain.
Collapse
|
43
|
Shih MFM, Davis FP, Henry GL, Dubnau J. Nuclear Transcriptomes of the Seven Neuronal Cell Types That Constitute the Drosophila Mushroom Bodies. G3 (Bethesda) 2019; 9:81-94. [PMID: 30397017 PMCID: PMC6325895 DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200726] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/02/2018] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
The insect mushroom body (MB) is a conserved brain structure that plays key roles in a diverse array of behaviors. The Drosophila melanogaster MB is the primary invertebrate model of neural circuits related to memory formation and storage, and its development, morphology, wiring, and function has been extensively studied. MBs consist of intrinsic Kenyon Cells that are divided into three major neuron classes (γ, α'/β' and α/β) and 7 cell subtypes (γd, γm, α'/β'ap, α'/β'm, α/βp, α/βs and α/βc) based on their birth order, morphology, and connectivity. These subtypes play distinct roles in memory processing, however the underlying transcriptional differences are unknown. Here, we used RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) to profile the nuclear transcriptomes of each MB neuronal cell subtypes. We identified 350 MB class- or subtype-specific genes, including the widely used α/β class marker Fas2 and the α'/β' class marker trio Immunostaining corroborates the RNA-seq measurements at the protein level for several cases. Importantly, our data provide a full accounting of the neurotransmitter receptors, transporters, neurotransmitter biosynthetic enzymes, neuropeptides, and neuropeptide receptors expressed within each of these cell types. This high-quality, cell type-level transcriptome catalog for the Drosophila MB provides a valuable resource for the fly neuroscience community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Fred Pejman Davis
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA; National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD
| | - Gilbert Lee Henry
- Janelia Research Campus, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Ashburn, VA; Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory, Cold Spring Harbor, NY
| | - Josh Dubnau
- Department of Anesthesiology, Stony Brook School of Medicine; Department of Neurobiology and Behavior, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Jones SG, Nixon KCJ, Chubak MC, Kramer JM. Mushroom Body Specific Transcriptome Analysis Reveals Dynamic Regulation of Learning and Memory Genes After Acquisition of Long-Term Courtship Memory in Drosophila. G3 (Bethesda) 2018; 8:3433-46. [PMID: 30158319 DOI: 10.1534/g3.118.200560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The formation and recall of long-term memory (LTM) requires neuron activity-induced gene expression. Transcriptome analysis has been used to identify genes that have altered expression after memory acquisition, however, we still have an incomplete picture of the transcriptional changes that are required for LTM formation. The complex spatial and temporal dynamics of memory formation creates significant challenges in defining memory-relevant gene expression changes. The Drosophila mushroom body (MB) is a signaling hub in the insect brain that integrates sensory information to form memories across several different experimental memory paradigms. Here, we performed transcriptome analysis in the MB at two time points after the acquisition of LTM: 1 hr and 24 hr. The MB transcriptome was compared to biologically paired whole head (WH) transcriptomes. In both, we identified more transcript level changes at 1 hr after memory acquisition (WH = 322, MB = 302) than at 24 hr (WH = 23, MB = 20). WH samples showed downregulation of developmental genes and upregulation of sensory response genes. In contrast, MB samples showed vastly different changes in transcripts involved in biological processes that are specifically related to LTM. MB-downregulated genes were highly enriched for metabolic function. MB-upregulated genes were highly enriched for known learning and memory processes, including calcium-mediated neurotransmitter release and cAMP signaling. The neuron activity inducible genes Hr38 and sr were also specifically induced in the MB. These results highlight the importance of sampling time and cell type in capturing biologically relevant transcript level changes involved in learning and memory. Our data suggests that MB cells transiently upregulate known memory-related pathways after memory acquisition and provides a critical frame of reference for further investigation into the role of MB-specific gene regulation in memory.
Collapse
|
45
|
Petruccelli E, Feyder M, Ledru N, Jaques Y, Anderson E, Kaun KR. Alcohol Activates Scabrous-Notch to Influence Associated Memories. Neuron 2018; 100:1209-1223.e4. [PMID: 30482693 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuron.2018.10.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2018] [Revised: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 10/02/2018] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Drugs of abuse, like alcohol, modulate gene expression in reward circuits and consequently alter behavior. However, the in vivo cellular mechanisms through which alcohol induces lasting transcriptional changes are unclear. We show that Drosophila Notch/Su(H) signaling and the secreted fibrinogen-related protein Scabrous in mushroom body (MB) memory circuitry are important for the enduring preference of cues associated with alcohol's rewarding properties. Alcohol exposure affects Notch responsivity in the adult MB and alters Su(H) targeting at the dopamine-2-like receptor (Dop2R). Alcohol cue training also caused lasting changes to the MB nuclear transcriptome, including changes in the alternative splicing of Dop2R and newly implicated transcripts like Stat92E. Together, our data suggest that alcohol-induced activation of the highly conserved Notch pathway and accompanying transcriptional responses in memory circuitry contribute to addiction. Ultimately, this provides mechanistic insight into the etiology and pathophysiology of alcohol use disorder.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emily Petruccelli
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Michael Feyder
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Nicolas Ledru
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Yanabah Jaques
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Edward Anderson
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA
| | - Karla R Kaun
- Department of Neuroscience, Brown University, Providence, RI 02912, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Shmueli A, Shalit T, Okun E, Shohat-Ophir G. The Toll Pathway in the Central Nervous System of Flies and Mammals. Neuromolecular Med 2018; 20:419-436. [PMID: 30276585 DOI: 10.1007/s12017-018-8515-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2018] [Accepted: 09/26/2018] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Toll receptors, first identified to regulate embryogenesis and immune responses in the adult fly and subsequently defined as the principal sensors of infection in mammals, are increasingly appreciated for their impact on the homeostasis of the central as well as the peripheral nervous systems. Whereas in the context of immunity, the fly Toll and the mammalian TLR pathways have been researched in parallel, the expression pattern and functionality have largely been researched disparately. Herein, we provide data on the expression pattern of the Toll homologues, signaling components, and downstream effectors in ten different cell populations of the adult fly central nervous system (CNS). We have compared the expression of the different Toll pathways in the fly to the expression of TLRs in the mouse brain and discussed the implications with respect to commonalities, differences, and future perspectives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat Shmueli
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel
| | - Tali Shalit
- The Mantoux Bioinformatics institute of the Nancy and Stephen Grand Israel National Center for Personalized Medicine, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
| | - Eitan Okun
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- The Paul Feder Laboratory on Alzheimer's Disease Research, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Building 901, room 315, Ramat-Gan, 5290000, Israel.
| | - Galit Shohat-Ophir
- The Mina and Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
- The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan, Israel.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abstract
In general, neurons in insects and many other invertebrate groups are individually recognizable, enabling us to assign an index number to specific neurons in a manner which is rarely possible in a vertebrate brain. This endows many studies on insect nervous systems with the opportunity to document neurons with great precision, so that in favourable cases we can return to the same neuron or neuron type repeatedly so as to recognize many separate morphological classes. The visual system of the fly's compound eye particularly provides clear examples of the accuracy of neuron wiring, allowing numerical comparisons between representatives of the same cell type, and estimates of the accuracy of their wiring.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian A Meinertzhagen
- a Department of Psychology and Neuroscience , Life Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University , Halifax , Canada.,b Janelia Research Campus of Howard Hughes Medical Institute , Ashburn , VA , USA
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Ryvkin J, Bentzur A, Zer-Krispil S, Shohat-Ophir G. Mechanisms Underlying the Risk to Develop Drug Addiction, Insights From Studies in Drosophila melanogaster. Front Physiol 2018; 9:327. [PMID: 29740329 PMCID: PMC5928757 DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2018.00327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2017] [Accepted: 03/15/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The ability to adapt to environmental changes is an essential feature of biological systems, achieved in animals by a coordinated crosstalk between neuronal and hormonal programs that allow rapid and integrated organismal responses. Reward systems play a key role in mediating this adaptation by reinforcing behaviors that enhance immediate survival, such as eating or drinking, or those that ensure long-term survival, such as sexual behavior or caring for offspring. Drugs of abuse co-opt neuronal and molecular pathways that mediate natural rewards, which under certain circumstances can lead to addiction. Many factors can contribute to the transition from drug use to drug addiction, highlighting the need to discover mechanisms underlying the progression from initial drug use to drug addiction. Since similar responses to natural and drug rewards are present in very different animals, it is likely that the central systems that process reward stimuli originated early in evolution, and that common ancient biological principles and genes are involved in these processes. Thus, the neurobiology of natural and drug rewards can be studied using simpler model organisms that have their systems stripped of some of the immense complexity that exists in mammalian brains. In this paper we review studies in Drosophila melanogaster that model different aspects of natural and drug rewards, with an emphasis on how motivational states shape the value of the rewarding experience, as an entry point to understanding the mechanisms that contribute to the vulnerability of drug addiction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julia Ryvkin
- The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Assa Bentzur
- The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Shir Zer-Krispil
- The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| | - Galit Shohat-Ophir
- The Mina & Everard Goodman Faculty of Life Sciences and The Leslie and Susan Gonda Multidisciplinary Brain Research Center, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Abstract
Progression of a cell along a differentiation path is characterized by changes in gene expression profiles. Alterations of these transcriptional programs result from cell type-specific transcription factors that act in a dynamic chromatin environment. Understanding the precise contribution of these molecular factors during the differentiation process requires accessing specific cell types within a developing organ. This chapter describes a streamlined and alternative version of INTACT, a method enabling the isolation of specific cell populations by affinity-purification of tagged nuclei and the subsequent analysis of gene expression, transcription factor binding profiles, as well as chromatin state at a genome-wide scale. In particular, modifications of the nuclei isolation, capture, and purification procedures are proposed that improve time scale, yield, and purity. In addition, the combination of different tags enables the analysis of distinct cell populations from a single transgenic line and the subtractive purification of subpopulations of cells, including those for which no specific promoter is available. Finally, we describe a chromatin immunoprecipitation protocol that has been successfully used to profile histone modifications and other chromatin-associated proteins such as RNA Polymerase II in different cell populations of the Arabidopsis root, including the quiescent center of the stem cell niche.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Karina Morao
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR8197, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Erwann Caillieux
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR8197, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - Vincent Colot
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR8197, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France
| | - François Roudier
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS) UMR8197, Institut de Biologie de l'Ecole Normale Supérieure, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (INSERM) U1024, Ecole Normale Supérieure, 46 rue d'Ulm, 75230, Paris Cedex 05, France.
- Laboratoire Reproduction et Développement des Plantes, Univ Lyon, ENS de Lyon, UCB Lyon 1, CNRS, INRA, F-69342, Lyon, France.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Marshall OJ, Brand AH. Chromatin state changes during neural development revealed by in vivo cell-type specific profiling. Nat Commun 2017; 8:2271. [PMID: 29273756 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-02385-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2017] [Accepted: 11/23/2017] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
A key question in developmental biology is how cellular differentiation is controlled during development. While transitions between trithorax-group (TrxG) and polycomb-group (PcG) chromatin states are vital for the differentiation of ES cells to multipotent stem cells, little is known regarding the role of chromatin states during development of the brain. Here we show that large-scale chromatin remodelling occurs during Drosophila neural development. We demonstrate that the majority of genes activated during neuronal differentiation are silent in neural stem cells (NSCs) and occupy black chromatin and a TrxG-repressive state. In neurons, almost all key NSC genes are switched off via HP1-mediated repression. PcG-mediated repression does not play a significant role in regulating these genes, but instead regulates lineage-specific transcription factors that control spatial and temporal patterning in the brain. Combined, our data suggest that forms of chromatin other than canonical PcG/TrxG transitions take over key roles during neural development. While transitions between active and repressive chromatin states are essential for differentiation, little is known regarding their role during development of the brain in Drosophila. Here, the authors investigate the large scale chromatin remodelling taking place during fly neural development.
Collapse
|