A phase II randomized, multicenter, open-label trial of continuing adjuvant temozolomide beyond 6 cycles in patients with glioblastoma (GEINO 14-01)

Prognosis of glioblastoma patients improves significantly over time interrogating historical controls

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common devastating primary brain cancer in adults. In our clinical practice, median overall survival (mOS) of GBM patients seems increasing over time.

METHODS

To address this observation, we have retrospectively analyzed the prognosis of 722 newly diagnosed GBM patients, aged below 70, in good clinical conditions (i.e. Karnofsky Performance Status -KPS- above 70%) and treated in our department according to the standard of care (SOC) between 2005 and 2018. Patients were divided into two groups according to the year of diagnosis (group 1: from 2005 to 2012; group 2: from 2013 to 2018).

RESULTS

Characteristics of patients and tumors of both groups were very similar regarding confounding factors (age, KPS, MGMT promoter methylation status and treatments). Follow-up time was fixed at 24 months to ensure comparable survival times between both groups. Group 1 patients had a mOS of 19 months ([17.3-21.3]) while mOS of group 2 patients was not reached. The recent period of diagnosis was significantly associated with a longer mOS in univariate analysis (HR=0.64, 95% CI [0.51 - 0.81]), p < 0.001). Multivariate Cox analysis showed that the period of diagnosis remained significantly prognostic after adjustment on confounding factors (adjusted Hazard Ratio (aHR) 0.49, 95% CI [0.36-0.67], p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This increase of mOS over time in newly diagnosed GBM patients could be explained by better management of potentially associated non-neurological diseases, optimization of validated SOC, better management of treatments side effects, supportive care and participation in clinical trials.

A combined analysis of two prospective randomised studies exploring the impact of extended post-radiation temozolomide on survival outcomes in newly diagnosed glioblastoma

PURPOSE

The optimal duration of post-radiation temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma remains unclear, with no published phase III randomised trials. Standard-of-care stipulates 6 months. However, in routine care, it is often extended to 12 months, despite lacking robust supporting data.

METHODS

GEINO14-01 (Spain) and EX-TEM (Australia) studies enrolled glioblastoma patients without progression at the end of 6 months post-radiation temozolomide. Participants were randomised 1:1 to six additional months of temozolomide or observation. Primary endpoint was 6-month progression free survival from date of randomisation (6mPFS). Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and toxicity. 204 patients were required to detect an improvement in 6mPFS from 50 to 60% (80% power). Neither study recruited sufficient patients. We performed a combined analysis of individual patient data.

RESULTS

205 patients were recruited: 159 in GEINO14-01 (2014-2018) and 46 in EX-TEM (2019-2022). Median follow-up was 20.0 and 14.5 months. Baseline characteristics were balanced. There was no significant improvement in 6mPFS (57.2% vs 64.0%, OR0.75, p = 0.4), nor across any subgroups, including MGMT methylated; PFS (HR0.92, p = 0.59, median 7.8 vs 9.7 months); or OS (HR1.03, p = 0.87, median 20.1 vs 19.4 months). During treatment extension, 64% experienced any grade adverse event, mainly fatigue and gastrointestinal (both 54%). Only a minority required treatment changes: 4.5% dose delay, 7.5% dose reduction, 1.5% temozolomide discontinuation.

CONCLUSION

For glioblastoma patients, extending post-radiation temozolomide from 6 to 12 months is well tolerated but does not improve 6mPFS. We could not identify any subset that benefitted from extended treatment. Six months should remain standard-of-care.

Dexamethasone and overall survival and progression free survival in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma: a meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Glioblastomas, the most common primary malignant brain tumors in adults, still hold poor prognosis. Corticosteroids, such as dexamethasone, are usually prescribed to reduce peritumoral edema and limit neurological symptoms, although potential detrimental effects of these drugs have been described. The present meta-analysis aimed to explore the association of dexamethasone with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS

PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for pertinent studies following the Preferred Reporting Items of Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis checklist. Pooled multivariable-adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for OS and PFS and their associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using the random-effects model and the heterogeneity among studies was assessed using I2. The quality of evidence was assessed using the GRADE criteria.

RESULTS

Seven studies were included, pooling data of 1,257 patients, with age varying from 11 to 81 years. Glioblastoma patients on pre- or peri-operative dexamethasone were associated with a significantly poorer overall survival (HR: 1.33, 95% CI: 1.15, 1.55; 7 studies; I2: 59.9%) and progression free survival (HR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.05, 2.97; 3 studies; I2: 71.1%) compared to patients not on dexamethasone. The quality of evidence was moderate for overall survival and low for progression free survival.

CONCLUSION

Dexamethasone appeared to be associated with poor survival outcomes of glioblastoma patients.

State of the neoadjuvant therapy for glioblastoma multiforme-Where do we stand?

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common malignant primary brain tumor in adults. Despite several investigations in this field, maximal safe resection followed by chemoradiotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide with or without tumor-treating fields remains the standard of care with poor survival outcomes. Many endeavors have failed to make a dramatic change in the outcomes of GBM patients. This study aimed to review the available strategies for newly diagnosed GBM in the neoadjuvant setting, which have been mainly neglected in contrast to other solid tumors.

SOMATIC DEFICIENT MISMATCH REPAIR ASSESSED BY IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY AND CLINICAL FEATURES IN BRAZILIAN GLIOBLASTOMA PATIENTS

BACKGROUND

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most frequent primary malignant CNS tumor. Deficient mismatch repair (dMMR) is associated with better prognosis and is a biomarker for immunotherapy. Evaluation of MMR by immunohistochemistry (IHC) is accessible, cost effective, sensitive, and specific.

AIM

Our objective was to investigate MMR proteins in adult GBM patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 68 GBM samples to evaluate the proficiency of MMR genes expression assessed by IHC. Clinicopathologic and molecular features were compared in proficient (pMMR) or dMMR.

RESULTS

10 (14.7%) samples showed dMMR, and the most frequent was MSH6 (100%) followed by MSH2, PMS2, and MLH1. We observed heterogeneous expression of dMMR in 5 GBMs. The median overall survival did not differ between pMMR (19.8 months; 0.2-30) and dMMR (16.9 months; 6.4-27.5) (p = 0.31). We observed a significantly higher overall survival associated with gross total resection compared to subtotal resection or biopsy (30.7 vs. 13.6 months, p = 0.02) and MGMT methylated status (29.6 vs. 19.8 months, p = 0.049). At the analysis time, 10 patients were still alive, all in the pMMR group.

CONCLUSIONS

Our data demonstrated dMMR phenotype assessed by IHC in an expressive portion of GBM patients, however without significant impact on overall survival.

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM-2) expression and prognostic significance in glioblastoma patients

PURPOSE

Pyruvate kinase M2 (PKM2) is a key enzyme that catalyzes the irreversible and final step of glycolysis. It is closely associated with cancer development and progression. The relationship between PKM2 and prognosis in glioblastoma (GB) patients is unknown. The aim of this study was to measure PKM2 expression and evaluate its effect on prognosis in GB patients.

METHODS

Patients who underwent radiotherapy (RT) for glioblastoma between 2010 and 2021 were evaluated immunohistochemically. A single pathologist evaluated pathology specimens of all patients. The intensity and extent of staining of tumor cells were scored. Patients were categorized as low and high PKM2.

RESULTS

A total of 119 patients were evaluated. While 80.7% of the cases had a low score, 19.3% had a high PKM2 score. It was observed that the group with high PKM2 expression had lower performance, received more hypofractionated RT and received adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) less frequently. Median overall survival (OS) was 15.77 months in the low PKM2 expression group and 6.50 months in the high PKM2 group. In univariate analyses, PKM2 expression, age, performance status, type of surgery, RT scheme, and concurrent and adjuvant CT were prognostic factors in predicting OS. In multivariate analyses, PKM2 expression, type of surgery, RT scheme and receiving adjuvant CT were prognostic factors for OS.

CONCLUSION

PKM2 is an independent prognostic factor for survival and is associated with poor prognosis in GBM patients treated with radiotherapy. It may be a potential therapeutic target for anticancer therapy.

Primary brain tumours in adults

The most frequent adult-type primary CNS tumours are diffuse gliomas, but a large variety of rarer CNS tumour types exists. The classification of these tumours is increasingly based on molecular diagnostics, which is reflected in the extensive molecular foundation of the recent WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumours. Resection as extensive as is safely possible is the cornerstone of treatment in most gliomas, and is now also recommended early in the treatment of patients with radiological evidence of histologically low-grade tumours. For the adult-type diffuse glioma, standard of care is a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although treatment with curative intent is not available, combined modality treatment has resulted in long-term survival (>10-20 years) for some patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant tumours. Other rarer tumours require tailored approaches, best delivered in specialised centres. Targeted treatments based on molecular alterations still only play a minor role in the treatment landscape of adult-type diffuse glioma, and today are mainly limited to patients with tumours with BRAFV600E (ie, Val600Glu) mutations. Immunotherapy for CNS tumours is still in its infancy, and so far, trials with checkpoint inhibitors and vaccination studies have not shown improvement in patient outcomes in glioblastoma. Current research is focused on improving our understanding of the immunosuppressive tumour environment, the molecular heterogeneity of tumours, and the role of tumour microtube network connections between cells in the tumour microenvironment. These factors all appear to play a role in treatment resistance, and indicate that novel approaches are needed to further improve outcomes of patients with CNS tumours.

Initial Treatment of IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma in Adults Older Than 70 Years

The incidence of glioblastoma, the most common malignant primary brain tumour in adults, increases after the age of 40 and peaks in adults aged 75-84 years. Initial management involves maximising surgical resection while preserving neurologic function. IDH mutations and MGMT promoter methylation should be checked in tumour samples. Radiation and temozolomide constitute initial treatment for newly diagnosed glioblastoma patients with good functional status. It is suggested that patients who have received concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide treatment should undergo six cycles of adjuvant monthly temozolomide, as opposed to a more extended treatment regimen. Low-intensity alternating electric field therapy improved survival in a large randomised trial. We provide a detailed review, providing the latest treatment viewpoint for IDH-wildtype glioblastoma and including the current situation of immunotherapy. The treatment ideas and methods reviewed here would be of help to physicians when they encounter patients with this kind of IDH-wildtype glioblastoma in clinical practice.

SEOM-GEINO clinical guidelines for high-grade gliomas of adulthood (2022)

High-grade gliomas (HGG) are the most common primary brain malignancies and account for more than half of all malignant primary brain tumors. The new 2021 WHO classification divides adult HGG into four subtypes: grade 3 oligodendroglioma (1p/19 codeleted, IDH-mutant); grade 3 IDH-mutant astrocytoma; grade 4 IDH-mutant astrocytoma, and grade 4 IDH wild-type glioblastoma (GB). Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy (CTX) are the current standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed HGG. Several clinically relevant molecular markers that assist in diagnosis and prognosis have recently been identified. The treatment for recurrent high-grade gliomas is not well defined and decision-making is usually based on prior strategies, as well as several clinical and radiological factors. Whereas the prognosis for GB is grim (5-year survival rate of 5-10%) outcomes for the other high-grade gliomas are typically better, depending on the molecular features of the tumor. The presence of neurological deficits and seizures can significantly impact quality of life.

Advances in Treatment of Isocitrate Dehydrogenase (IDH)-Wildtype Glioblastomas

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The management of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-wildtype glioblastomas is an area of unmet need. Despite multimodal therapy incorporating maximal safe resection, radiotherapy, and temozolomide, clinical outcomes remain poor. At disease progression or relapse, available systemic agents such as temozolomide, lomustine, and bevacizumab have limited efficacy. We review the recent advances in the treatment of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas.

RECENT FINDINGS

A broad repertoire of systemic agents is in the early stages of development, encompassing the areas of precision medicine, immunotherapy, and repurposed medications. The use of medical devices may present opportunities to bypass the blood-brain barrier. Novel clinical trial designs aim to efficiently test treatment options to advance the field. There are a number of emerging treatment options for IDH-wildtype glioblastomas which are undergoing evaluation in clinical trials. Advances in our scientific understanding of IDH-wildtype glioblastomas offer hope and the prospect of incremental improvements in clinical outcomes.

IKBIP might be a potential prognostic biomarker for glioblastoma multiforme

BACKGROUND

Due to the negative association between inhibitor of nuclear factor-kB kinase-interacting protein (IKBIP) and survival in gliomas, this study aimed to comprehensively analyze the potential function of IKBIP in glioblastoma multiforme (GBM).

METHODS

GBM samples were retrieved from The Cancer Genome Atlas and Chinese Glioma Genome Atlas as training and validation cohorts, respectively, and survival and Cox regression analyses were conducted. Based on clinical indicators and IKBIP, three prognostic models were established and then verified using the validation dataset. Infiltrating immune cell analysis and single-sample gene set enrichment analysis were also conducted to explore the underlying mechanisms. Finally, the key findings were validated through molecular biology experiments.

RESULTS

Patients in the high IKBIP score group had poorer survival. Based on Cox regression and subgroup analyses, IKBIP was identified as an independent prognostic factor. Among the three models constructed, the model combining the IKBIP signature and clinical features displayed good performance in terms of discrimination, calibration, and model improvement capability in the training cohort. This model was also successfully validated in an external cohort from the CGGA. Further analysis revealed that many immune cells and related pathways were involved in the high-risk group. In vitro experiments revealed that the knockdown of IKBIP inhibited cell invasion and proliferation, and promoted their senescence.

CONCLUSIONS

The prognostic value of IKBIP and its positive impact on the invasiveness of GBM were identified, indicating that IKBIP may serve as an underlying target for the treatment of GBM.

Survival in a consecutive series of 467 glioblastoma patients: Association with prognostic factors and treatment at recurrence at two independent institutions

Therapy of recurrent glioblastoma (GBM) is challenging due to lack of standard treatment. We investigated physicians' treatment choice at recurrence and prognostic and predictive factors for survival in GBM patients from Norway's two largest regional hospitals. Clinicopathological data from n = 467 patients treated at Haukeland and Oslo university hospitals from January 2015 to December 2017 was collected. Data included tumour location, promoter methylation of O6 methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) and mutation of isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH), patient age, sex, extent of resection at primary diagnosis and treatment at successive tumour recurrences. Cox-proportional hazards regression adjusting for multiple risk factors was used. Median overall survival (OS) was 12.1 months and 21.4% and 6.8% of patients were alive at 2 and 5 years, respectively. Median progression-free survival was 8.1 months. Treatment at recurrence varied but was not associated with difference in overall survival (OS) (p = 0.201). Age, MGMT hypermethylation, tumour location and extent of resection were independent prognostic factors. Patients who received 60 Gray radiotherapy with concomitant and adjuvant temozolomide at primary diagnosis had 16.1 months median OS and 9.3% were alive at 5 years. Patients eligible for gamma knife/stereotactic radiosurgery alone or combined with chemotherapy at first recurrence had superior survival compared to chemotherapy alone (p<0.001). At second recurrence, combination chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab were both superior to no treatment. Treatment at recurrence differed between the institutions but there was no difference in median OS, indicating that it is the disease biology that dictates patient outcome.

Updated systematic review and meta-analysis of extended adjuvant temozolomide in patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma

Background

Contemporary standard-of-care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) is maximal safe resection followed by postoperative focal conformal radiotherapy (RT) plus concurrent temozolomide (TMZ) and 6-cycles of adjuvant TMZ (Stupp regimen). However, many patients continue to receive extended adjuvant TMZ (beyond 6-cycles) without solid scientific evidence. This review pools data from nonrandomized studies and randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing extended adjuvant TMZ (>6-cycles) to standard adjuvant TMZ (6-cycles) in patients with newly diagnosed GBM for updated evidence-synthesis.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with the Cochrane methodology including quality assessment of primary studies. Primary outcome of interest was comparative efficacy defined as progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CIs) were extracted/computed from individual primary studies and pooled using random-effects model. Any p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Evidence-synthesis was based on pooling of data from 2578 patients enrolled in 16 nonrandomized comparative studies and 5 RCTs. Overall, extended adjuvant TMZ was associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression (HR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.60-0.87; p = 0.007) and death (HR = 0.71, 95%CI: 0.57-0.90; p = 0.004) compared to standard adjuvant TMZ. However, on subgroup analysis, survival benefit of extended adjuvant TMZ was limited to data synthesized from retrospective nonrandomized comparative studies with no statistically significant difference in outcomes seen after pooling of data from RCTs only.

Conclusion

Apparent survival benefit of extended adjuvant TMZ in newly diagnosed GBM is largely driven by nonrandomized comparative studies with high inherent potential for multiple biases.

The Equipoise Between the Treatment of Glioblastoma and the Risk of Secondary Acute Myelogenous Leukemia: An Illustrative Case Report

We present a case report of a 56-year-old woman who was diagnosed with biopsy-proven left thalamic glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). She was treated with standard concurrent chemotherapy and radiation, as well as a 2-year period of adjuvant temozolomide. She relapsed 2 ½ years after starting her initial therapy and was treated with bevacizumab and lomustine, but she relapsed. She was then placed on a phase 1/2 clinical trial that included KHK2455 and mogamulizumab-kpkc individually and in combination for almost 4 years. She had a rapid demise due to the development of a neutropenic pneumonia and treatment-induced acute myeloid leukemia (AML) and elected for hospice care.

Nomogram Model for Predicting the Prognosis of High-Grade Glioma in Adults Receiving Standard Treatment: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVES

To identify the critical factors associated with the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of high-grade glioma (HGG) in adults who have received standard treatment and establish a novel graphical nomogram and an online dynamic nomogram.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective study of adult HGG patients receiving standard treatment (surgery, postoperative radiotherapy, and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy) at Huashan Hospital, Fudan University between January 2017 and December 2019. We used uni- and multi-variable COX models to identify the significant prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Based on the significant predictors, graphical and online nomograms were established.

RESULTS

A total of 246 patients were enrolled in the study based on the inclusion criteria. The average PFS and OS were 22.99 ± 11.43 and 30.51 ± 13.73 months, respectively. According to the multi-variable COX model, age, extent of resection (EOR), and IDH mutation were associated with PFS and OS, while edema index (EI) was relevant to PFS. In addition, patients with IDH and TERT promoter co-mutations had longer PFSs and OSs, and no apparent survival benefit was found in the long-cycle TMZ adjuvant chemotherapy compared with the standard Stupp protocol. Based on these critical factors, a graphical nomogram and online nomogram were developed for predicting PFS and OS, respectively. The calibration curve showed favorable consistency between the predicted and actual survival rates. C-index and time-dependent AUC showed good discrimination abilities.

CONCLUSIONS

We identified the significant predictors for the PFS and OS of HGG adults receiving standard treatment and established user-friendly nomogram models to assist neurosurgeons in optimizing clinical management and treatment strategies.

Treatment of Adult Gliomas: A Current Update

Gliomas are the most common type of primary brain tumor in adults. Glioma treatment requires a multidisciplinary approach involving surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Multiple trials have been conducted to establish the appropriate choice of treatment to achieve long-term survival and better quality of life. This review provides up-to-date evidence regarding treatment strategies for gliomas.

Extended adjuvant temozolomide in newly diagnosed glioblastoma: A single-center retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether extending adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) improved the prognosis of newly diagnosed glioblastoma (GBM) patients with different mutation statuses of O⁶-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT), isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1), p53 and different expression level of Ki67.

METHODS

This study was a retrospective cohort study that postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM who did not progress after receiving radiotherapy with concomitant and 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were enrolled in control group, and those received more than 6 cycles of adjuvant TMZ were incorporated in extended group. Patients were stratified by MGMT expression, IDH1 mutation, p53 mutation and expression level of Ki67. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULT

A total of 93 postoperative patients with newly diagnosed GBM were included in this study, 40 and 53 cases were included in control group and extended group, respectively. On the whole, extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM [median OS (mOS): 29.00 months vs. 16.70 months, P < 0.001; median PFS (mPFS): 13.80 months vs. 9.60 months, P = 0.002]. The results of subgroup analysis showed that patients with methylated MGMT in extended group had significantly longer OS and PFS than those in control group; patients with IDH1 mutation benefited more from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy than those with wild-type IDH1; there was no significant difference in the effect of extended TMZ chemotherapy on OS between GBM patients with wild-type p53 and those with mutant p53; compared with GBM patients with lower expression of Ki67, extended adjuvant TMZ treatment dramatically improved the OS and PFS of those with higher expression of Ki67.

CONCLUSION

The therapeutic schedule of extended adjuvant TMZ significantly prolonged OS and PFS of patients with newly diagnosed GBM regardless of p53 mutation status, and patients with different MGMT methylation, IDH1 mutation and Ki67 expression level benefited differently from extended adjuvant TMZ chemotherapy.

Randomized phase III study of high-dose methotrexate and whole-brain radiotherapy with/without temozolomide for newly diagnosed primary CNS lymphoma: JCOG1114C

BACKGROUND

The goal was to determine whether the addition of temozolomide (TMZ) to the standard treatment of high-dose methotrexate (HD-MTX) and whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for primary central nervous system lymphoma (PCNSL) improves survival.

METHODS

An open-label, randomized, phase III trial was conducted in Japan, enrolling immunocompetent patients aged 20-70 years with histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed PCNSL. After administration of HD-MTX, patients were randomly assigned to receive WBRT (30 Gy) ± 10 Gy boost (arm A) or WBRT ± boost with concomitant and maintenance TMZ for two years (arm B). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Between September 29, 2014 and October 15, 2018, 134 patients were enrolled, of whom 122 were randomly assigned and analyzed. At the planned interim analysis, two-year OS was 86.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 72.5-94.0%) in arm A and 71.4% (56.0-82.2%) in arm B. The hazard ratio was 2.18 (95% CI: 0.95 to 4.98), with the predicted probability of showing the superiority of arm B at the final analysis estimated to be 1.3%. The study was terminated early due to futility. O 6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status was measured in 115 tumors, and it was neither prognostic nor predictive of TMZ response.

CONCLUSIONS

This study failed to demonstrate the benefit of concomitant and maintenance TMZ in newly diagnosed PCNSL.

Can Extended Chemotherapy Improve Glioblastoma Outcomes? A Retrospective Analysis of Survival in Real-World Patients

Standard treatment for glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is surgery followed by radiotherapy plus concurrent chemotherapy with daily temozolomide (TMZ), and six subsequent TMZ 5/28-day cycles. Research has focused on identifying more effective alternatives to the current protocol, including extension of the number of adjuvant TMZ cycles. We performed a retrospective analysis of all GBM patients treated in our hospital (160 patients, 2011−2020). Median follow-up was 16.0 months. Analysis of prognostic factors was performed with a particular focus on the benefit of extending TMZ chemotherapy. Improved survival correlated with younger age, female gender, good performance status, absence of cognitive dysfunctions, no steroid use, and total tumor resection. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12 months and median overall survival (OS) was 20.0 months for the entire cohort. Median OS by adjuvant TMZ was 10.0 months if no adjuvant chemotherapy given (group 0), 15.0 months for patients that did not complete six TMZ cycles (group A), 24.0 months for those that did (group B), and 29.0 months for patients having received more than six cycles (group C) (p < 0.0001). At the three-year mark, 15.9% patients were alive in group A, 24.4% in group B and 38.1% in group C. Carefully selected GBM patients may derive benefit from extending the standard adjuvant chemotherapy beyond six TMZ cycles, but more data is required.

Updates in IDH-Wildtype Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a poor prognosis. The 2021 WHO CNS5 classification has further stressed the importance of molecular signatures in diagnosis although therapeutic breakthroughs are still lacking. In this review article, updates on the current and novel therapies in IDH-wildtype GBM will be discussed.

Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA): protocol for a multiarm randomised clinical trial for people affected by glioblastoma

INTRODUCTION

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common malignant primary central nervous system cancer in adults. The objective of the Multi-Arm GlioblastoMa Australasia (MAGMA) trial is to test hypotheses in real world setting to improve survival of people with GBM. Initial experimental arms are evaluating the effectiveness of interventions in newly diagnosed GBM (ndGBM). This study will compare maximal surgical resection followed by chemoradiotherapy plus adjuvant chemotherapy for 6 months with the addition of (1) 'neoadjuvant' chemotherapy beginning as soon as possible after surgery and/or (2) adjuvant chemotherapy continued until progression within the same study platform.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

MAGMA will establish a platform for open-label, multiarm, multicentre randomised controlled testing of treatments for GBM. The study began recruiting in September 2020 and recruitment to the initial two interventions in MAGMA is expected to continue until September 2023.Adults aged ≥18 years with ndGBM will be given the option of undergoing randomisation to each study intervention separately, thereby giving rise to a partial factorial design, with two separate randomisation time points, one for neoadjuvant therapy and one for extended therapy. Patients will have the option of being randomised at each time point or continuing on with standard treatment.The primary outcome for the study is overall survival from the date of initial surgery until death from any cause. Secondary outcomes include progression-free survival, time to first non-temozolomide treatment, overall survival from each treatment randomisation, clinically significant toxicity as measured by grade 3 or 4 adverse events and health-related quality-of-life measures. Tertiary outcomes are predictive/prognostic biomarkers and health utilities and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio.The primary analysis of overall survival will be performed separately for each study intervention according to the intention to treat principle on all patients randomised to each study intervention.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The study (Protocol version 2.0 dated 23 November 2020) was approved by a lead Human Research Ethics Committee (Sydney Local Health District: 2019/ETH13297). The study will be conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki and Good Clinical Practice.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

ACTRN12620000048987.

Current and promising treatment strategies in glioma

Gliomas are the most common primary central nervous system tumors; despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment, glioma patients generally have a poor prognosis. Hence there is a clear need for improved therapeutic options. In recent years, significant effort has been made to investigate immunotherapy and precision oncology approaches. The review covers well-established strategies such as surgery, temozolomide, PCV, and mTOR inhibitors. Furthermore, it summarizes promising therapies: tumor treating fields, immune therapies, tyrosine kinases inhibitors, IDH(Isocitrate dehydrogenase)-targeted approaches, and others. While there are many promising treatment strategies, none fundamentally changed the management of glioma patients. However, we are still awaiting the outcome of ongoing trials, which have the potential to revolutionize the treatment of glioma.

Continuing maintenance temozolomide therapy beyond 12 cycles confers no clinical benefit over discontinuation at 12 cycles in patients with IDH1/2-wildtype glioblastoma

OBJECTIVE

The optimal duration of maintenance temozolomide therapy is controversial. We aimed to examine the clinical benefits of continuing temozolomide therapy beyond 12 cycles in patients with glioblastoma.

METHODS

We included 41 patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase 1/2-wildtype glioblastoma, who received 12 or more cycles of temozolomide therapy between June 2006 and December 2019. We evaluated the outcome between 16 patients who continued temozolomide therapy beyond 12 cycles up to 24 cycles (≥13 cycles group) and 25 patients wherein temozolomide therapy was discontinued at 12 cycles (12 cycles group).

RESULTS

The median progression-free survival and survival time after completing 12 cycles (residual progression-free survival and residual overall survival) did not differ between the 12 cycles group and ≥13 cycles group (residual progression-free survival: 11.3 vs. 9.2 months, P = 0.61, residual overall survival: 25.7 vs. 30.2 months, P = 0.76). Multivariate analysis including temozolomide therapy beyond 12 cycles, age at 12 cycles, Karnofsky performance status at 12 cycles, residual tumor at 12 cycles, maintenance therapy regimen and O-6-methylguanine deoxyribonucleic acid methyltransferase promoter methylation status revealed that extended temozolomide therapy beyond 12 cycles was not correlated with residual progression-free survival and residual overall survival (P = 0.80 and P = 0.41, respectively) but Karnofsky performance status at 12 cycles ≥80 was significantly associated with increased residual overall survival (P = 0.0012).

CONCLUSIONS

Continuing temozolomide beyond 12 cycles confers no clinical benefit over the discontinuation of temozolomide at 12 cycles. Karnofsky performance status at 12 cycles ≥80 may serve as a novel predictive factor for long-term survival.

GNG12 as A Novel Molecular Marker for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Glioma

Purpose

GNG12 influences a variety of tumors; however, its relationship with glioma remains unclear. The aim of this study was to comprehensively investigate the relationship between GNG12 and the clinical characteristics and prognosis of glioma patients and reveal the mechanisms causing the malignant process of GNG12.

Materials and Methods

We obtained information on clinical samples from multiple databases. The expression level of GNG12 was validated using a RT-qPCR and IHC. KM curves were used to assess the correlation between the GNG12 expression and OS of glioma patients. An ROC curve was drawn to assess the predictive performance of GNG12. Univariate and multivariate Cox analyses were performed to analyze the factors affecting the prognosis of patients with glioma. GSEA and TIMER databases were used to estimate the relationship between GNG12 expression, possible molecular mechanisms, and immune cell infiltration. CMap analysis was used to screen candidate drugs for glioma. Subsequent in vitro experiments were used to validate the proliferation and migration of glioma cells and to explore the potential mechanisms by which GNG12 causes poor prognosis in gliomas.

Results

GNG12 was overexpressed in glioma patients and GNG12 expression level correlated closely with clinical features, including age and histological type, etc. Subsequently, the K-M survival analysis indicated that the expression level of GNG12 was relevant to the prognosis of glioma, and the ROC curve implied that GNG12 can predict glioma stability. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that GNG12 represents a risk factor for glioma occurrence. GNG12 expression is closely associated with some immune cells. Additionally, several in vitro experiments demonstrated that down-regulation of GNG12 expression can inhibits the proliferation and migration capacity of glioma cells. Ultimately, the results for the GSEA and WB experiments revealed that GNG12 may promote the malignant progression of gliomas by regulating the cell adhesion molecule cell signaling pathway.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified GNG12 as a novel oncogene elevated in gliomas. Reducing GNG12 expression inhibits the proliferation and migration of glioma cells. In summary, GNG12 can be used as a novel biomarker for the early diagnosis of human gliomas and as a potential therapeutic target.

Management of newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme: current state of the art and emerging therapeutic approaches

Glioblastoma multiforme represent > 50% of primary gliomas and have five year survival rates of ~ 5%. Maximal safe surgical resection followed by radiotherapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide remains the standard treatment since published by Stupp et al. (in N Engl J Med 352:987-996, 2005), with additional benefit for patients with MGMT-methylated tumors. We review the current treatment landscape and ongoing efforts to improve these outcomes. An extensive literature search of Pubmed and Google Scholar involving the search terms "glioblastoma," "glioblastoma multiforme," or "GBM" for papers published to July 2021 was conducted and papers evaluated for relevance. As well as current data that informs clinical practice, we review ongoing clinical research in both newly diagnosed and recurrent settings that provides hope for a breakthrough. The Stupp protocol remains standard of care in 2021. Addition of tumor treating fields improved mOS modestly, with benefit seen in MGMT-methylated and unmethylated cohorts and also improved time to cognitive decline but has not been widely adopted. The addition of lomustine to temozolomide, in MGMT-methylated patients, also showed a mOS benefit but further investigation is required. Other promising therapeutic strategies including anti-angiogenic therapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy have yet to show a survival advantage. Improvements in the multidisciplinary management, surgical techniques and equipment, early palliative care, carrier support, and psychological support may be responsible for improving survival over time. Despite promising preclinical rationale, immunotherapy and targeted therapy are struggling to impact survival. A number of ongoing clinical trials provide hope for a breakthrough.

Efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide compared to standard adjuvant temozolomide in glioblastoma: updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

This study was designed to compare outcomes of extended adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) versus standard adjuvant TMZ following radiotherapy (RT) plus concurrent TMZ in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma.

Methods

This systematic review and meta-analysis was carried out in accordance with Cochrane methodology. Only prospective clinical trials randomly assigning adults with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma after concurrent RT/TMZ to 6-cycles of adjuvant TMZ (control arm) or extended (&gt;6-cycles) adjuvant TMZ (experimental arm) were eligible. Primary outcome of interest was overall survival, while progression-free survival and toxicity were secondary endpoints. Hazard ratio (HR) for progression and death with corresponding 95% confidence interval (CI) were computed for individual primary study and pooled using random-effects model. Toxicity was defined as proportion of patients with ≥grade 3 hematologic toxicity and expressed as risk ratio (RR) with 95%CI. Any p-value &lt;0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Systematic literature review identified five randomized controlled trials comparing standard (6-cycles) versus extended (&gt;6-cycles) adjuvant TMZ in newly-diagnosed glioblastoma. Outcome data could be extracted from 358 patients from four primary studies. Extended adjuvant TMZ was not associated with statistically significant reduction in the risk of progression (HR=0.82, 95%CI: 0.61-1.10; p=0.18) or death (HR=0.87, 95%CI:0.60-1.27; p=0.48) compared to standard adjuvant TMZ. Grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity though somewhat higher with extended adjuvant TMZ, was not significantly different between the two arms (RR=2.01, 95%CI: 0.83-4.87; p=0.12).

Conclusions

There is low-certainty evidence that extended adjuvant TMZ is not associated with significant survival benefit or increased hematologic toxicity in unselected patients with newly-diagnosed glioblastoma compared to standard adjuvant TMZ.

Recent advances in the therapeutic strategies of glioblastoma multiforme

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most common, most formidable, and deadliest malignant types of primary astrocytoma with a poor prognosis. At present, the standard of care includes surgical tumor resection, followed by radiation therapy concomitant with chemotherapy and temozolomide. New developments and significant advances in the treatment of GBM have been achieved in recent decades. However, despite the advances, recurrence is often inevitable, and the survival of patients remains low. Various factors contribute to the difficulty in identifying an effective therapeutic option, among which are tumor complexity, the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB), and the presence of GBM cancer stem cells, prompting the need for improving existing treatment approaches and investigating new treatment alternatives for ameliorating the treatment strategies of GBM. In this review, we outline some of the most recent literature on the various available treatment options such as surgery, radiotherapy, cytotoxic chemotherapy, gene therapy, immunotherapy, phototherapy, nanotherapy, and tumor treating fields in the treatment of GBM, and we list some of the potential future directions of GBM. The reviewed studies confirm that GBM is a sophisticated disease with several challenges for scientists to address. Hence, more studies and a multimodal therapeutic approach are crucial to yield an effective cure and prolong the survival of GBM patients.

Glioma targeted therapy: insight into future of molecular approaches

Gliomas are the common type of brain tumors originating from glial cells. Epidemiologically, gliomas occur among all ages, more often seen in adults, which males are more susceptible than females. According to the fifth edition of the WHO Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System (WHO CNS5), standard of care and prognosis of gliomas can be dramatically different. Generally, circumscribed gliomas are usually benign and recommended to early complete resection, with chemotherapy if necessary. Diffuse gliomas and other high-grade gliomas according to their molecule subtype are slightly intractable, with necessity of chemotherapy. However, for glioblastoma, feasible resection followed by radiotherapy plus temozolomide chemotherapy define the current standard of care. Here, we discuss novel feasible or potential targets for treatment of gliomas, especially IDH-wild type glioblastoma. Classic targets such as the p53 and retinoblastoma (RB) pathway and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene alteration have met failure due to complex regulatory network. There is ever-increasing interest in immunotherapy (immune checkpoint molecule, tumor associated macrophage, dendritic cell vaccine, CAR-T), tumor microenvironment, and combination of several efficacious methods. With many targeted therapy options emerging, biomarkers guiding the prescription of a particular targeted therapy are also attractive. More pre-clinical and clinical trials are urgently needed to explore and evaluate the feasibility of targeted therapy with the corresponding biomarkers for effective personalized treatment options.

Prognostic and Predictive Factors in Elderly Patients With Glioblastoma: A Single-Center Retrospective Study

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most common primary malignant intracranial tumor and the median age at diagnosis is 65 years. However, elderly patients are usually excluded from clinical studies and age is considered as an independent negative prognostic factor for patients with GBM. Therefore, the best treatment method for GBM in elderly patients has remained controversial. Elderly GBM patients (≥ 60 years old) treated between January 2015 and December 2019 were enrolled in this study. Medical records were reviewed retrospectively, and clinicopathological characteristics, treatments, and outcomes were analyzed. A total of 68 patients were included, with a median age of 65.5 years (range: 60–79). The median preoperative Karnofsky performance scale (KPS) score was 90 (range 40–100) and median postoperative KPS score was 80 (range 0–90). Univariate analysis results showed that age, gender, comorbidities, preoperative KPS < 90 and MGMT promoter methylation were not significantly associated with PFS and OS. On the other hand, total resection, postoperative KPS ≥ 80, Ki67 > 25%, and Stupp-protocol treatment were significantly associated with prolonged PFS and OS. Moreover, multivariate analysis found that postoperative KPS ≥ 80, total resection, and Stupp-protocol treatment were prognostic factors for PFS and OS. The findings of this study have suggested that, on the premise of protecting function as much as possible, the more aggressive treatment regimens may prolong survival for elderly patients with GBM. However, further studies, particularly prospective randomized clinical trials, should be conducted to provide more definitive data on the appropriate management of elderly patients, especially for patients with MGMT promoter methylation.

The efficacy and safety of extended adjuvant temozolomide following concurrent radio-chemotherapy among Egyptian patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

Although concurrent radio-chemotherapy and adjuvant temozolomide (TMZ) treatment for 6 cycles has been established as a standard of care for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) patients, the recommended duration of adjuvant TMZ remains a matter of debate. Hereby, we aimed to report for the first time our experience from Upper Egypt through comparing survival and toxicity profile between two treatment modalities of adjuvant TMZ (> six cycles versus six cycles) and delineating factors of prognostic significance in Egyptian patients with newly diagnosed GBM treated by radiation therapy with concomitant and adjuvant TMZ. Between June 2016 and February 2018, the medical records of 121 patients were eligible to be retrospectively reviewed to extract the study relevant data. All patients received concurrent radio-chemotherapy, followed by TMZ for 6 cycles in 29 patients (Group 1) and for >6 cycles in 26 patients (Group 2). Patients in Group 1 had a median PFS of 15 months (95% CI: 10.215-19.785), while those in Group 2 had a median PFS of 18 months (95% CI: 16.611-19.389). After a median follow up duration of 20 months (range: 12-41), the median OS was 18 months (95% CI: 13.420-22.580) in Group 1 and 22 months (95% CI: 18.777-25.223) in Group 2. There was no statistically significant correlation between the number of chemotherapy cycles and PFS (P=0.513) or OS (P=0.867). The extent of surgical resection was the only independent prognostic factor for both PFS (P=0.015) and OS (P=0.028) by multivariate analysis. Three grade ≥3 hematologic toxicity were encountered in 3 patients. One in the six-cycle group (neutropenia), and two in the extended cycles group (one had neutropenia and the other one developed thrombocytopenia). No statistically significant difference in the toxicity profile between both groups. The results of our study suggest that extended TMZ therapy is safe and tolerable, however it did not significantly improve PFS or OS as compared to the standard six-cycle course. Larger randomized studies are required to shed more light on this issue.

Therapy for Diffuse Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors in Adults: ASCO-SNO Guideline

Purpose

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults.

Methods

ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

Results

Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified.

Recommendations

Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)–mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMTpromoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis on the Number of Adjuvant Temozolomide Cycles in Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma

Background

In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, radiation with concurrent and adjuvant (six cycles) temozolomide (TMZ) is the established standard of postsurgical care. However, the benefit of extending adjuvant TMZ therapy beyond six cycles has remained unknown.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Embase up to October 1, 2021. The search keywords were “glioblastoma,” “adjuvant chemotherapy,” and their synonyms. The data of randomized clinical trials were extracted and included in this meta-analysis if they had reported patients’ median overall survival (OS) or median progression-free survival (PFS). The standard and extended chemotherapy regimens were considered as adjuvant TMZ up to six cycles and beyond six cycles (up to a total of 12 cycles), respectively. The median OS and median PFS were pooled and compared.

Results

Four studies consisting of 882 patients (461 patients for the standard chemotherapy group and 421 patients for the extended chemotherapy group) were included in this meta-analysis. The extended TMZ regimen was associated with a nonsignificant improvement in PFS [12.0 months (95% CI 9.0 to 15.0) vs. 10.0 months (95% CI 7.0 to 12.0), P = 0.27] without corresponding improvement in OS [23.0 months (95% CI 19.0 to 27.0) and 24.0 months (95% CI 20.0 to 28.0), P = 0.73].

Conclusions

In newly diagnosed glioblastoma, continuing adjuvant TMZ beyond six cycles did not shown an increase neither in PFS nor OS.

Therapy for Diffuse Astrocytic and Oligodendroglial Tumors in Adults: ASCO-SNO Guideline

PURPOSE

To provide guidance to clinicians regarding therapy for diffuse astrocytic and oligodendroglial tumors in adults.

METHODS

ASCO and the Society for Neuro-Oncology convened an Expert Panel and conducted a systematic review of the literature.

RESULTS

Fifty-nine randomized trials focusing on therapeutic management were identified.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Adults with newly diagnosed oligodendroglioma, isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH)-mutant, 1p19q codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 and 3 should be offered radiation therapy (RT) and procarbazine, lomustine, and vincristine (PCV). Temozolomide (TMZ) is a reasonable alternative for patients who may not tolerate PCV, but no high-level evidence supports upfront TMZ in this setting. People with newly diagnosed astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 2 should be offered RT with adjuvant chemotherapy (TMZ or PCV). People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 should be offered RT and adjuvant TMZ. People with astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, CNS WHO grade 4 may follow recommendations for either astrocytoma, IDH-mutant, 1p19q non-codeleted CNS WHO grade 3 or glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4. Concurrent TMZ and RT should be offered to patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma, IDH-wildtype, CNS WHO grade 4 followed by 6 months of adjuvant TMZ. Alternating electric field therapy, approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, should be considered for these patients. Bevacizumab is not recommended. In situations in which the benefits of 6-week RT plus TMZ may not outweigh the harms, hypofractionated RT plus TMZ is reasonable. In patients age ≥ 60 to ≥ 70 years, with poor performance status or for whom toxicity or prognosis are concerns, best supportive care alone, RT alone (for MGMT promoter unmethylated tumors), or TMZ alone (for MGMT promoter methylated tumors) are reasonable treatment options. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/neurooncology-guidelines.

Isocitrate Dehydrogenase Wild-type Glial Tumors, Including Glioblastoma

Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) 1 and 2 mutations represent essential components for the diagnosis of diffuse astrocytic tumors and oligodendroglioma. IDH wild-type glial tumors include a wide spectrum of tumors with differences in prognosis and recommended therapeutic approaches. Tumors characterized as molecular glioblastoma in the World Health Organization 2021 classification should be treated according to the glioblastoma therapeutic principles and included in glioblastoma trials. Improving on existing treatments options including targeted and immunotherapy approaches is imperative for most patients with IDH wild-type glial tumors, and enrollment in clinical trials is encouraged.

Lack of Benefit of Extending Temozolomide Treatment in Patients with High Vascular Glioblastoma with Methylated MGMT

In this study, we evaluated the benefit on survival of the combination of methylation of O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promotor gene and moderate vascularity in glioblastoma using a retrospective dataset of 123 patients from a multicenter cohort. MRI processing and calculation of relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), used to define moderate- and high-vascular groups, were performed with the automatic ONCOhabitats method. We assessed the previously proposed rCBV threshold (10.7) and the new calculated ones (9.1 and 9.8) to analyze the association with survival for different populations according to vascularity and MGMT methylation status. We found that patients included in the moderate-vascular group had longer survival when MGMT is methylated (significant median survival difference of 174 days, p = 0.0129*). However, we did not find significant differences depending on the MGMT methylation status for the high-vascular group (p = 0.9119). In addition, we investigated the combined correlation of MGMT methylation status and rCBV with the prognostic effect of the number of temozolomide cycles, and only significant results were found for the moderate-vascular group. In conclusion, there is a lack of benefit of extending temozolomide treatment for patients with high vascular glioblastomas, even presenting MGMT methylation. Preliminary results suggest that patients with moderate vascularity and methylated MGMT glioblastomas would benefit more from prolonged adjuvant chemotherapy.

Combination chemoradiotherapy with temozolomide, vincristine, and interferon-β might improve outcomes regardless of O6-methyl-guanine-DNA-methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter methylation status in newly glioblastoma

Background

This investigator-initiated, open-label, single-arm, single-institute study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of induction combination chemoradiotherapy and long-term maintenance therapy with temozolomide (TMZ) plus interferon (IFN)-β for glioblastoma.

Methods

The initial induction combination chemoradiotherapy comprised radiotherapy plus TMZ plus vincristine plus IFN-β. Maintenance chemotherapy comprised monthly TMZ, continued for 24–50 cycles, plus weekly IFN-β continued for as long as possible. The primary endpoint was 2-year overall survival (2y-OS). The study protocol was to be considered valid if the expected 2y-OS was over 38% and the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval (CI) was no less than 31.7% compared with historical controls, using Kaplan-Meier methods. Secondary endpoints were median progression-free survival (mPFS), median OS (mOS), 5-year OS rate (5y-OS), and mPFS and mOS classified according to MGMT promoter methylation status.

Results

Forty-seven patients were analyzed. The 2y-OS was 40.7% (95%CI, 27.5–55.4%). The mPFS and mOS were 11.0 months and 18.0 months, respectively, and 5y-OS was 20.3% (95%CI, 10.9–34.6%). The mPFS in groups with and without MGMT promoter methylation in the tumor was 10.0 months and 11.0 months (p = 0.59), respectively, and mOS was 24.0 months and 18.0 months (p = 0.88), respectively. The frequency of grade 3/4 neutropenia was 19.1%.

Conclusions

The 2y-OS with induction multidrug combination chemoradiotherapy and long-term maintenance therapy comprising TMZ plus IFN-β tended to exceed that of historical controls, but the lower limit of the 95%CI was below 31.7%. Although the number of cases was small, this protocol may rule out MGMT promoter methylation status as a prognostic factor.

Trial registration

University Hospital Medical Information Network (number UMIN000040599).

Role of neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio as a predictive factor of glioma tumor grade: A systematic review

Gliomas are the main type of intra-axial primary brain tumors. We performed a systematic review of studies on the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and its role in the prognosis of patients with gliomas. An English-language literature-based search, using the PubMed and Biblioteca Virtual em Saúde databases, was conducted for papers published until May 2, 2020. The quality of the selected articles was stratified using the Newcastle-Ottawa scale's criteria. We found 137 publications for a query string. After applying the inclusion criteria, 13 articles were selected. Seven studies assessed overall survival and found high NLR values associated with poor overall survival. Six studies approached the issue of tumor grading and differential diagnosis and demonstrated that patients with high NLR values were diagnosed with high-grade gliomas. NLR is a low-cost method and an effective prognostic factor associated with tumor grading and OS in patients with gliomas.

Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio is prognostic in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan

Aim: We intended to survey the prognostic utility of pretreatment neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) as a novel prognostic index in recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (R-GBMs) treated with bevacizumab plus irinotecan (BEVIRI). Patients & methods: The present retrospective investigation incorporated the R-GBMs patients who underwent BEVIRI. The pre-BEVIRI NLR was calculated for each patient by utilizing the complete blood count tests obtained on the first day of BEVIRI. Results: The data of a total of 103 patients were analyzed. The ideal cutoff was identified at 3.04 (area under the curve: 60%; sensitivity: 60.3%; specificity 60%) for the pre-BEVIRI NLR. Low-NLR group had significantly longer overall survival times than the high-NLR group (15.8 vs 9.3 months; p = 0.015). Conclusion: NLR might be utilized as a novel biomarker in the prognostic stratification of the R-GBMs treated with BEVIRI.

Dose Escalated Radiation Therapy for Glioblastoma Multiforme: An International Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of 22 Prospective Trials

PURPOSE

Limited evidence is available on the utility of dose-escalated radiation therapy (DE-RT) with or without temozolomide (TMZ) versus standard-of-care radiation therapy (SoC-RT) for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme. We performed a systematic review/meta-analysis to compare overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) between DE-RT and SoC-RT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We used a Population, Intervention, Control, Outcomes, Study Design/Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses/Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology selection criterion to identify studies. The primary and secondary outcomes were 1-year OS and 1-year PFS, respectively. Outcomes and comparisons were subdivided based on receipt of TMZ and MGMT status. DE-RT was defined based on equivalent dose calculations. Random effects meta-analyses using the Knapp-Hartung correction, arcsine transformation, and restricted maximum likelihood method were conducted. Meta-regression was used to compare therapeutic (eg, DE-RT or TMZ) and pathologic characteristics (eg, MGMT methylation status) using the Wald-type test.

RESULTS

Across 22 published studies, 2198 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were included; 507 received DE-RT. One-year OS after DE-RT alone was higher than SoC-RT alone (46.3% vs 23.4%; P = .02) as was 1-year PFS (17.9% vs 5.3%; P = .02). No significant difference in 1-year OS (73.2% vs 64.4%; P = .23) or 1-year PFS (44.5% vs 44.3%; P = .33) between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ was noted. No difference in 1-year OS was noted between DE-RT + TMZ and SoC-RT + TMZ in either MGMT methylated (83.2% vs 73.2%; P = .23) or MGMT unmethylated (72.6% vs 50.6%; P = .16) patients.

CONCLUSIONS

DE-RT alone resulted in superior PFS and OS versus SoC-RT alone. DE-RT + TMZ did not lead to improved outcomes versus SoC-RT + TMZ. No differential benefit based on MGMT status was found. Future studies are warranted to define which subgroups benefit most from DE-RT.

The Challenge of Diagnosing Constitutional Mismatch Repair Deficiency Syndrome in Brain Malignancies from Young Individuals

Biallelic germline mismatch repair (MMR) gene (MLH1, MSH2, MSH6, and PMS2) mutations are an extremely rare event that causes constitutional mismatch repair deficiency (CMMRD) syndrome. CMMRD is underdiagnosed and often debuts with pediatric malignant brain tumors. A high degree of clinical awareness of the CMMRD phenotype is needed to identify new cases. Immunohistochemical (IHC) assessment of MMR protein expression and analysis of microsatellite instability (MSI) are the first tools with which to initiate the study of this syndrome in solid malignancies. MMR IHC shows a hallmark pattern with absence of staining in both neoplastic and non-neoplastic cells for the biallelic mutated gene. However, MSI often fails in brain malignancies. The aim of this report is to draw attention to the peculiar IHC profile that characterizes CMMRD syndrome and to review the difficulties in reaching an accurate diagnosis by describing the case of two siblings with biallelic MSH6 germline mutations and brain tumors. Given the difficulties involved in early diagnosis of CMMRD we propose the use of the IHC of MMR proteins in all malignant brain tumors diagnosed in individuals younger than 25 years-old to facilitate the diagnosis of CMMRD and to select those neoplasms that will benefit from immunotherapy treatment.

An Update on Glioblastoma Biology, Genetics, and Current Therapies: Novel Inhibitors of the G Protein-Coupled Receptor CCR5

The mechanisms governing therapeutic resistance of the most aggressive and lethal primary brain tumor in adults, glioblastoma, have increasingly focused on tumor stem cells. These cells, protected by the periarteriolar hypoxic GSC niche, contribute to the poor efficacy of standard of care treatment of glioblastoma. Integrated proteogenomic and metabolomic analyses of glioblastoma tissues and single cells have revealed insights into the complex heterogeneity of glioblastoma and stromal cells, comprising its tumor microenvironment (TME). An additional factor, which isdriving poor therapy response is the distinct genetic drivers in each patient's tumor, providing the rationale for a more individualized or personalized approach to treatment. We recently reported that the G protein-coupled receptor CCR5, which contributes to stem cell expansion in other cancers, is overexpressed in glioblastoma cells. Overexpression of the CCR5 ligand CCL5 (RANTES) in glioblastoma completes a potential autocrine activation loop to promote tumor proliferation and invasion. CCL5 was not expressed in glioblastoma stem cells, suggesting a need for paracrine activation of CCR5 signaling by the stromal cells. TME-associated immune cells, such as resident microglia, infiltrating macrophages, T cells, and mesenchymal stem cells, possibly release CCR5 ligands, providing heterologous signaling between stromal and glioblastoma stem cells. Herein, we review current therapies for glioblastoma, the role of CCR5 in other cancers, and the potential role for CCR5 inhibitors in the treatment of glioblastoma.