Activity of a ritonavir plus saquinavir-containing regimen in patients with virologic evidence of indinavir or ritonavir failure

The Effects of Once-Daily Saquinavir/Minidose Ritonavir on the Pharmacokinetics of Methadone

Twelve methadone-maintained HIV-negative subjects were given saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/rtv) 1600 mg/100 mg once daily for 14 days. Pharmacokinetic evaluations of total and unbound methadone enantiomers (R and S) were conducted before and after SQV/rtv. SQV/rtv was well tolerated, with no ACTG Grade 3-4 adverse events, no evidence of sedation, and no changes in methadone dose. For R-methadone (active isomer), C(max), AUC(0-24 h), and C(min) were unchanged, but percent unbound 4 hours after dosing was reduced by 12%. For S-methadone, no differences in pharmacokinetic parameters of total drug were seen, but unbound concentrations were reduced by 15% and 21% at 4 and 24 hours after dosing, respectively. SQV trough concentrations exceeded the anticipated EC(50) (50 ng/mL) in 10/12 subjects, persisting for at least 6 hours after the final dose in 4/6 subjects. Once-daily SQV/rtv in methadone-maintained subjects is safe and not associated with any clinically significant interaction with methadone during 14 days of concomitant administration.

Drug-drug interactions in the treatment of HIV infection: focus on pharmacokinetic enhancement through CYP3A inhibition

The aim of this review is to discuss the effect of pharmacokinetic drug-drug interactions (DDIs) in the antiretroviral treatment of HIV infection. In particular, but not exclusively, DDIs due to the cytochrome P450 3A (CYP3A) inhibitor ritonavir, which is used to increase antiretroviral drug exposure - a technique known as pharmacokinetic enhancement or 'ritonavir boosting'- will be reviewed. The emphasis here will be on the treatment of important co-morbidities common in patients with HIV, including dyslipidaemia, hypertension, tuberculosis and opiate dependence, as well as on the potentially life-threatening interaction between ritonavir and inhalational steroids, and on the effect of acid-reducing agents on some antiretroviral drugs. Finally, further developments with regard to the use of CYP3A-blocking agents to augment the efficacy of antiviral therapy will be discussed.

Molecular Basis for Drug Resistance in HIV-1 Protease

HIV-1 protease is one of the major antiviral targets in the treatment of patients infected with HIV-1. The nine FDA approved HIV-1 protease inhibitors were developed with extensive use of structure-based drug design, thus the atomic details of how the inhibitors bind are well characterized. From this structural understanding the molecular basis for drug resistance in HIV-1 protease can be elucidated. Selected mutations in response to therapy and diversity between clades in HIV-1 protease have altered the shape of the active site, potentially altered the dynamics and even altered the sequence of the cleavage sites in the Gag polyprotein. All of these interdependent changes act in synergy to confer drug resistance while simultaneously maintaining the fitness of the virus. New strategies, such as incorporation of the substrate envelope constraint to design robust inhibitors that incorporate details of HIV-1 protease’s function and decrease the probability of drug resistance, are necessary to continue to effectively target this key protein in HIV-1 life cycle.

Increased Langerhans cell accumulation after mycobacterial stimuli

Aims:

To evaluate the role of Langerhans cells (LCs) in the local activation of leprosy lesions. LCs, acting as tolerance inducers and immune stimuli, are dendritic cells recently implicated in cutaneous homeostasis. The role of LCs in the defence against mycobacterial infection remains poorly understood.

Methods and results:

The number and distribution of CD1a+ skin cells and HLA-DR and intercellular adhesion molecule (ICAM)-1 expression were analysed in leprosy skin lesions and in delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) tests. The results showed a high number of LCs in tuberculin and lepromin tests, in tuberculoid lesions and in the epidermis and dermis during type I and II reactions. In multibacillary lesions, however, the number of LCs was consistently low in comparison with other groups. Increased numbers of LCs were accompanied by marked HLA-DR and ICAM-1 expression, suggesting a strong relationship between these immunological events.

Conclusions:

CD1a+ cells are implicated in the local immunological events taking place after mycobacterial stimuli and may account for the local activation of all types of reactional episodes in leprosy.

Estimating the rate of accumulating drug resistance mutations in the HIV genome

OBJECTIVE

HIV mutation accumulation has great implications for pharmacoeconomics and clinical care, yet scarcity of data has hindered its representation in decision analytic models. Our objective is to determine the accuracy with which mutation accumulation and other unmeasured parameters could be estimated during model calibration.

METHODS

We used a second-order Monte Carlo simulation of HIV natural history that had been calibrated by varying two unmeasured parameters (mutation accrual rate and probability of adherence) to minimize differences between estimated and observed clinical outcomes (time to treatment failure and survival). We compared these estimated values first with only those results that had been already published at the time of model calibration, and second including results that were published after model calibration.

RESULTS

The value for mutation accrual rate assigned during calibration was 0.014 mutations per month for antiretroviral-naïve patients, at the lower bound of the results for nine heterogeneous studies published at the time of calibration (pooled 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.014-0.039 mutations per month). In contrast, this estimate accurately anticipated results from 11 larger and more homogeneous studies published after calibration (pooled 95% CI for antiretroviral-naïve patients, 0.012-0.015 mutations per month). The value for probability of adherence assigned during calibration (75%) was also within the range of published results (pooled 95% CI 62-76%).

CONCLUSION

Estimates for unobserved parameters derived during model calibration were not only within the range of clinical observations, but anticipated with accuracy clinical results that were not yet available. It may be feasible to use models to estimate unobserved parameters.

Mechanism of substrate recognition by drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease variants revealed by a novel structural intermediate

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease processes and cleaves the Gag and Gag-Pol polyproteins, allowing viral maturation, and therefore is an important target for antiviral therapy. Ligand binding occurs when the flaps open, allowing access to the active site. This flexibility in flap geometry makes trapping and crystallizing structural intermediates in substrate binding challenging. In this study, we report two crystal structures of two HIV-1 protease variants bound with their corresponding nucleocapsid-p1 variant. One of the flaps in each of these structures exhibits an unusual "intermediate" conformation. Analysis of the flap-intermediate and flap-closed crystal structures reveals that the intermonomer flap movements may be asynchronous and that the flap which wraps over the P3 to P1 (P3-P1) residues of the substrate might close first. This is consistent with our hypothesis that the P3-P1 region is crucial for substrate recognition. The intermediate conformation is conserved in both the wild-type and drug-resistant variants. The structural differences between the variants are evident only when the flaps are closed. Thus, a plausible structural model for the adaptability of HIV-1 protease to recognize substrates in the presence of drug-resistant mutations has been proposed.

Structural basis for coevolution of a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 nucleocapsid-p1 cleavage site with a V82A drug-resistant mutation in viral protease

Maturation of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) depends on the processing of Gag and Pol polyproteins by the viral protease, making this enzyme a prime target for anti-HIV therapy. Among the protease substrates, the nucleocapsid-p1 (NC-p1) sequence is the least homologous, and its cleavage is the rate-determining step in viral maturation. In the other substrates of HIV-1 protease, P1 is usually either a hydrophobic or an aromatic residue, and P2 is usually a branched residue. NC-p1, however, contains Asn at P1 and Ala at P2. In response to the V82A drug-resistant protease mutation, the P2 alanine of NC-p1 mutates to valine (AP2V). To provide a structural rationale for HIV-1 protease binding to the NC-p1 cleavage site, we solved the crystal structures of inactive (D25N) WT and V82A HIV-1 proteases in complex with their respective WT and AP2V mutant NC-p1 substrates. Overall, the WT NC-p1 peptide binds HIV-1 protease less optimally than the AP2V mutant, as indicated by the presence of fewer hydrogen bonds and fewer van der Waals contacts. AlaP2 does not fill the P2 pocket completely; PheP1' makes van der Waals interactions with Val82 that are lost with the V82A protease mutation. This loss is compensated by the AP2V mutation, which reorients the peptide to a conformation more similar to that observed in other substrate-protease complexes. Thus, the mutant substrate not only binds the mutant protease more optimally but also reveals the interdependency between the P1' and P2 substrate sites. This structural interdependency results from coevolution of the substrate with the viral protease.

Pharmacokinetic enhancement of protease inhibitor therapy

Combination antiretroviral therapy with two or more protease inhibitors has become the standard of care in the treatment of HIV infection. Dual protein inhibitor (PI) regimens, such as lopinavir/ritonavir, are commonly used as initial PI therapy. As viral resistance increases and the development of mechanistically novel protease inhibitors decreases, clinicians turn to ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy to treat salvage patients. Potency of these combination regimens is increased while pill burden, food restrictions and often, side effects are decreased. These clinical advantages result from the enhancement of their pharmacological properties, including alterations in the absorption and metabolism process. Alterations in the absorption and metabolism of protease inhibitors when co-administered with a cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme inhibitor, such as low dose ritonavir, are reflected by impressive changes in pharmacokinetic parameters. For example, the addition of ritonavir 100 or 200 mg to saquinavir 1200-1800 mg has been shown to increase saquinavir area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) by approximately 300-800% compared with saquinavir alone. The ability of ritonavir to increase plasma trough concentrations (C(min)) of concomitantly administered PIs is perhaps the greatest clinical benefit of dual or ritonavir-enhanced dual PI therapy since inadequate concentrations of antiretrovirals may support long term antiretroviral resistance. For example, lopinavir 400mg alone in healthy volunteers produced plasma concentrations that briefly exceeded the concentration required to inhibit 50% of viral replication (IC(50)). Yet, when low doses of ritonavir were added, C(min) values were 50- to 100-fold greater than the concentration required to produce 50% of the maximum effect for wild-type HIV (EC(50)). The following manuscript will discuss the rationale for combining protease inhibitors and will review pertinent pharmacokinetic and clinical data on these combination regimens.

Predictive Value of HIV-1 Protease Genotype and Virtual Phenotype on the Virological Response to Lopinavir/Ritonavir-Containing Salvage Regimens

The predictive values of HIV-1 protease genotype and virtual phenotype (vPhenotype) results on the HIV-1 RNA response to lopinavir/ritonavir (LPV/r)-containing salvage regimens were assessed. Data were evaluated from patients with antiretroviral (ARV) resistance testing prior to initiating an LPV/r-containing salvage ARV regimen, from two independent cohorts from Toronto, Ontario and British Columbia, Canada. Multivariate logistic regression models controlling for previous non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor use, baseline viral load and AIDS-defining illness were used to assess the impact of different protease genotypic mutations (individual and in combination) and lopinavir vPhenotyping on virological suppression to <50 copies/ml by 12 months. We confirmed that the 11-mutation ‘lopinavir mutation score’ (LMS) was significantly inversely associated with the probability of virological suppression within 12 months [odds ratio (OR)=0.91; P=0.02]. The only single specific protease mutation found to predict virological response in multivariate analyses was 46I (OR=0.55; P=0.02). The most predictive three-mutation combination was 10F/I/R/V, 46I, 82A/F/T (OR=0.18; P=0.0004). We confirmed that a 10-fold increase of lopinavir IC50 is an appropriate clinical cut–off for lopinavir vPhenotype. In univariate analyses, a cut-off of the LMS as low as 3 was significantly associated with a lack of virological suppression ( P=0.04). This finding, which is in contrast to those of other studies, may be due to the high degree of ARV experience of our population and lack of active agents in the salvage regimen. Selecting the 11 specific mutations to make the LMS is potentially arbitrary; we determined that when different combinations of 11 protease mutations were chosen randomly from a set of 30, similar associations with virological response were found, probably due to the co-linearity of these mutations.

Efficacy of indinavir-ritonavir-based regimens in HIV-1-infected patients with prior protease inhibitor failures

OBJECTIVE

To assess responses to indinavir (IDV)-ritonavir (RTV)-based regimens among HIV-1 infected patients with prior failure of protease inhibitors, and to assess the effects of adherence to therapy and pre-existing genotypic and phenotypic resistance on this response.

METHODS

Twenty-eight patients initiating salvage regimens with IDV-RTV (800 mg and 200 mg twice daily, respectively) plus one or more reverse transcriptase inhibitor (RTI) were identified retrospectively. Genotypic and phenotypic susceptibilities to multiple antiretroviral agents were determined on viral samples collected at initiation of the salvage regimens, and adherence to therapy was determined through patient self-reporting. Response to therapy (viral RNA </= 400 copies/ml) was assessed at the end of and beyond 6 months of follow-up.

RESULTS

Based on responses measured in the first 6 months of follow-up, 16 responders and 12 non-responders were identified without differences in baseline demographic factors, laboratory parameters, extent of prior antiretroviral therapy, or characteristics of the RTI components of the new IDV-RTV-based regimens. Adequate adherence was associated with virologic responses (P = 0.005). There were trends for genotypic and phenotypic resistance to be associated with adequate adherence, and, surprisingly, phenotypic resistance to IDV was associated with virologic response rather than with therapeutic failure (P = 0.02). Beyond 6 months of follow-up (mean follow-up 69 weeks), adequate adherence was still associated with virologic response (P = 0.001), but genotypic or phenotypic resistance to IDV were not associated with therapeutic failure.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that IDV-RTV-based regimens may be able to overcome IDV resistance. This underscores the importance of drug adherence, potency, and exposure in determining virologic responses to antiretroviral therapy.

Long-term maintenance of gp120-specific immune responses by genetic vaccination with the HIV-1 envelope genes linked to the gene encoding Flt-3 ligand

DNA vaccines target dendritic cells (DC) to induce Ag-specific immune responses in animals. Potent HIV-specific immunity could be achieved by efficient priming of the immune system by DNA vaccines. We investigated a novel DNA vaccine approach based on the role of growth factors in DC expansion and differentiation. To this end, we constructed chimeric genes encoding the HIV envelope glycoproteins physically linked to the extracellular domain of Fms-like tyrosine kinase receptor-3 ligand (FLex; a DC growth factor; both mouse (m)FLex and human (h)FLex). These chimeric gene constructs synthesized biologically active, oligomeric FLex:gp120 fusion proteins and induced DC expansion (CD11c(+)CD11b(+)) when injected i.v. into mice. This DC expansion is comparable to that achieved by FLex DNA encoding native FLex protein. When delivered intramuscularly as DNA vaccines, hFLex:gp120 induced high frequencies of gp120-specific CD8(+) T cells in the presence or absence of FLex DNA-induced DC expansion, but gp120 and mFLex:gp120 elicited only low to moderate levels of Ag-specific CD8(+) T cells. In contrast, mFLex:gp120 induced high levels of anti-gp120 Abs under identical conditions of DNA vaccination. However, the Ab levels in mice immunized with DNA vaccines encoding hFLex:gp120 and gp120 proteins were low without DC expansion, but reached high levels comparable to that elicited by mFLex:gp120 only after the second boost in the presence of DC expansion. Importantly, the gp120-specific CD8(+) T cells persisted at high frequency for 114 days (16 wk) after a booster injection. These experiments provide insight into the importance of modulating DC function in vivo for effective genetic vaccination in animals.

Selection of high-level resistance to human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors

Protease inhibitors represent some of the most potent agents available for therapeutic strategies designed to inhibit human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) replication. Under certain circumstances the virus develops resistance to the inhibitor, thereby negating the benefits of this therapy. We have carried out selections for high-level resistance to each of three protease inhibitors (indinavir, ritonavir, and saquinavir) in cell culture. Mutations accumulated over most of the course of the increasing selective pressure. There was significant overlap in the identity of the mutations selected with the different inhibitors, and this gave rise to high levels of cross-resistance. Virus particles from the resistant variants all showed defects in processing at the NC/p1 protease cleavage site in Gag. Selections with pairs of inhibitors yielded similar patterns of resistance mutations. A virus that could replicate at near-toxic levels of the three protease inhibitors combined was selected. The pro sequence of this virus was similar to that of the viruses that had been selected for high-level resistance to each of the drugs singly. Finally, a molecular clone carrying the eight most common resistance mutations seen in these selections was characterized. The sequence of this virus was relatively stable during selection for revertants in spite of displaying poor processing at the NC/p1 site and having significantly reduced fitness. These results reveal patterns of drug resistance that extend to near the limits of attainable selective pressure with these inhibitors and confirm the patterns of cross-resistance for these three inhibitors and the attenuation of virion protein processing and fitness that accompanies high-level resistance.

Viability of a drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease variant: structural insights for better antiviral therapy

Under the selective pressure of protease inhibitor therapy, patients infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) often develop drug-resistant HIV strains. One of the first drug-resistant mutations to arise in the protease, particularly in patients receiving indinavir or ritonavir treatment, is V82A, which compromises the binding of these and other inhibitors but allows the virus to remain viable. To probe this drug resistance, we solved the crystal structures of three natural substrates and two commercial drugs in complex with an inactive drug-resistant mutant (D25N/V82A) HIV-1 protease. Through structural analysis and comparison of the protein-ligand interactions, we found that Val82 interacts more closely with the drugs than with the natural substrate peptides. The V82A mutation compromises these interactions with the drugs while not greatly affecting the substrate interactions, which is consistent with previously published kinetic data. Coupled with our earlier observations, these findings suggest that future inhibitor design may reduce the probability of the appearance of drug-resistant mutations by targeting residues that are essential for substrate recognition.

Managing failure to antiretroviral drugs in HIV-1-infected patients

Managing failure to antiretroviral therapies implies the addressing of several issues: the clinical stage, the virological and the immunological response to the failing regimen, together with drug history, resistance and exposure. Each of these issues will be discussed with the aim of providing useful data to design an optimal rescue antiretroviral therapy.

Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic analysis of lopinavir-ritonavir in combination with efavirenz and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors in extensively pretreated human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients

The steady-state pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of two oral doses of lopinavir-ritonavir (lopinavir/r; 400/100 and 533/133 mg) twice daily (BID) when dosed in combination with efavirenz, plus two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, were assessed in a phase II, open-label, randomized, parallel arm study in 57 multiple protease inhibitor-experienced but non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-infected subjects. All subjects began dosing of lopinavir/r at 400/100 mg BID; subjects in one arm increased the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg BID on day 14. When codosed with efavirenz, the lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID regimen resulted in lower lopinavir concentrations in plasma, particularly C(min), than were observed in previous studies of lopinavir/r administered without efavirenz. Increasing the lopinavir/r dose to 533/133 mg increased the lopinavir area under the concentration-time curve over a 12-h dosing interval (AUC(12)), C(predose), and C(min) by 46, 70, and 141%, respectively. The increase in lopinavir C(max) (33%,) did not reach statistical significance. Ritonavir AUC(12), C(max), C(predose), and C(min) values were increased 46 to 63%. The lopinavir predose concentrations achieved with the 533/133-mg BID dose were similar to those observed with lopinavir/r 400/100 mg BID in the absence of efavirenz. Results from univariate logistic regression analyses identified lopinavir and efavirenz inhibitory quotient (IQ) parameters, as well as the baseline lopinavir phenotypic susceptibility, as predictors of antiviral response (HIV RNA < 400 copies/ml at week 24); however, no lopinavir or efavirenz concentration parameter was identified as a predictor. Multiple stepwise logistic regressions confirmed the significance of the IQ parameters, as well as other baseline characteristics, in predicting virologic response at 24 weeks in this patient population.

Evolution of phenotypic drug susceptibility and viral replication capacity during long-term virologic failure of protease inhibitor therapy in human immunodeficiency virus-infected adults

Continued use of antiretroviral therapy despite the emergence of drug-resistant human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) has been associated with the durable maintenance of plasma HIV RNA levels below pretherapy levels. The factors that may account for this partial control of viral replication were assessed in a longitudinal observational study of 20 HIV-infected adults who remained on a stable protease inhibitor-based regimen despite ongoing viral replication (plasma HIV RNA levels consistently >500 copies/ml). Longitudinal plasma samples (n = 248) were assayed for drug susceptibility and viral replication capacity (measured by using a single-cycle recombinant-virus assay). The initial treatment-mediated decrease in plasma viremia was directly proportional to the reduction in replicative capacity (P = 0.01). Early virologic rebound was associated the emergence of a virus population exhibiting increased protease inhibitor phenotypic resistance, while replicative capacity remained low. During long-term virologic failure, plasma HIV RNA levels often remained stable or increased slowly, while phenotypic resistance continued to increase and replicative capacity decreased slowly. The emergence of primary genotypic mutations within protease (particularly V82A, I84V, and L90M) was temporally associated with increasing phenotypic resistance and decreasing replicative capacity, while the emergence of secondary mutations within protease was associated with more-gradual changes in both phenotypic resistance and replicative capacity. We conclude that HIV may be constrained in its ability to become both highly resistant and highly fit and that this may contribute to the continued partial suppression of plasma HIV RNA levels that is observed in some patients with drug-resistant viremia.

Activation of HIV-1 specific CD4 and CD8 T cells by human dendritic cells: roles for cross-presentation and non-infectious HIV-1 virus

BACKGROUND

The CD4 T cells in mucosal subepithelia are the first cells to become infected during sexual transmission of HIV-1. Dendritic cells (DC) are located in the same area and are known to play a central role in antiviral immune responses. However, extensive viral replication, syncytia formation and cell death follows the interaction between T cells and DC previously exposed to HIV-1. Despite this, anti-HIV responses are generated that control viremia following acute infection.

OBJECTIVE

The anti-HIV-1 cellular immune responses observed may be activated by sources other than productively infected DC. HIV-1 induces apoptosis both in cells it infects and in bystander cells. Furthermore, retroviral replication typically generates a predominance of defective particles. We tested whether DC exposed to antigen from either of these sources could elicit anti-HIV specific immune responses.

DESIGN AND METHODS

Apoptotic or necrotic monocytes infected with vaccinia virus vectors encoding HIV antigens, a cell line with integrated HIV-1 and apoptotic CD4 T cells pulsed with non-infectious or infectious HIV-1 virus were used as sources of antigens to assess cross presentation by DC. Furthermore, direct DC presentation of antigen from non-infectious and infectious HIV-1 was examined.

RESULTS

We find that dead cells expressing HIV-1 antigens as well as non-infectious HIV-1 particles can be acquired and processed by DC, leading to the activation, differentiation and expansion of viral antigen-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells from seropositive individuals.

CONCLUSIONS

These sources of antigens may be critical for the generation and maintenance of anti-HIV-1 immunity by DC.

Combination of Protease Inhibitors for the Treatment of HIV-1-Infected Patients: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Clinical Experience

The use of highly active antiretroviral therapy, the combination of at least three different antiretroviral drugs for the treatment of HIV-1 infection, has greatly improved the prognosis for HIV-1-infected patients. The efficacy of a combination of a protease inhibitor (PI) plus two nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors has been well established over a period of up to 3 years. However, virological treatment failure has been reported in 40–60% of unselected patients within 1 year after initiation of a PI-containing regimen. This observation may, at least in part, be attributed to the poor pharmacokinetic characteristics of the PIs. Given as a single agent the PIs have several pharmacokinetic limitations; relatively short plasma-elimination half-lives and a modest and variable oral bioavailability, which is, for some of the PIs, influenced by food. To overcome these suboptimal pharmacokinetics, high doses (requiring large numbers of pills) must be ingested, often with food restrictions, which complicates patient adherence to the prescribed regimen.

Positive drug–drug interactions increase the exposure to the PIs, allowing administration of lower doses at reduced dosing frequencies with less dietary restrictions. In addition to increasing the potency of an antiretroviral regimen, combinations of PIs may enhance patient adherence, both of which will contribute to a more durable suppression of viral replication. The favourable pharmacokinetics of PIs in combination are a result of interactions through cytochrome P450 3A4 (CYP3A4) isoenzymes and, possibly, the multi-drug transporting P-glycoprotein (P-gp). Antiretroviral synergy between PIs and non-overlapping primary resistance patterns in the HIV-1 protease genome may further enhance the anti-retroviral potency and durability of combinations of PIs. Many combinations contain ritonavir because this PI has the most pronounced inhibiting effects on CYP3A4. The combination of saquinavir and ritonavir, both in a dose of 400 mg twice-a-day, is the most studied double PI combination, with clinical experience extending over 3 years. Combination of a PI with a low dose of ritonavir (≤400 mg/day), only to boost its pharmacokinetic properties, seems an attractive option for patients who cannot tolerate higher doses of ritonavir. A recently introduced PI, lopinavir, has been co-formulated with low-dose ritonavir, which allows for a convenient three-capsules, twice-a-day dosing regimen. In an attempt to prolong suppression of viral replication combinations of PIs are becoming increasingly popular. However, further clinical studies are needed to identify the optimal combinations for treatment of antiretroviral naive and experienced HIV-1-infected patients. This review covers combinations of saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, amprenavir and lopinavir with different doses of ritonavir, as well as the combinations of saquinavir and indinavir with nelfinavir.

Genotypic testing for human immunodeficiency virus type 1 drug resistance

There are 16 approved human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) drugs belonging to three mechanistic classes: protease inhibitors, nucleoside and nucleotide reverse transcriptase (RT) inhibitors, and nonnucleoside RT inhibitors. HIV-1 resistance to these drugs is caused by mutations in the protease and RT enzymes, the molecular targets of these drugs. Drug resistance mutations arise most often in treated individuals, resulting from selective drug pressure in the presence of incompletely suppressed virus replication. HIV-1 isolates with drug resistance mutations, however, may also be transmitted to newly infected individuals. Three expert panels have recommended that HIV-1 protease and RT susceptibility testing should be used to help select HIV drug therapy. Although genotypic testing is more complex than typical antimicrobial susceptibility tests, there is a rich literature supporting the prognostic value of HIV-1 protease and RT mutations. This review describes the genetic mechanisms of HIV-1 drug resistance and summarizes published data linking individual RT and protease mutations to in vitro and in vivo resistance to the currently available HIV drugs.

A randomized trial assessing the impact of phenotypic resistance testing on antiretroviral therapy

OBJECTIVE

To compare the effect of treatment decisions guided by phenotypic resistance testing (PRT) or standard of care (SOC) on short-term virological response.

DESIGN

A prospective, randomized, controlled clinical trial conducted in 25 university and private practice centers in the United States.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 272 subjects who failed to achieve or maintain virological suppression (HIV-1-RNA plasma level > 2000 copies/ml) with previous exposure to two or more nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors and one protease inhibitor.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization was to antiretroviral therapy guided by PRT or SOC.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The percentage of subjects with HIV-1-RNA plasma levels less than 400 copies/ml at week 16 (primary); change from baseline in HIV-1-RNA plasma levels and number of "active" (less than fourfold resistance) antiretroviral agents used (secondary).

RESULTS

At week 16, using intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis, a greater proportion of subjects had HIV-1-RNA levels less than 400 copies/ml in the PRT than in the SOC arm (P = 0.036, ITT observed; P = 0.079, ITT missing equals failure). An ITT observed analysis showed that subjects in the PRT arm had a significantly greater median reduction in HIV-1-RNA levels from baseline than the SOC arm (P = 0.005 for 400 copies/ml; P = 0.049 for 50 copies/ml assay detection limit). Significantly more subjects in the PRT arm were treated with two or more "active" antiretroviral agents than in the SOC arm (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Antiretroviral treatment guided prospectively by PRT led to the increased use of "active" antiretroviral agents and was associated with a significantly better virological response.

Naturally occurring amino acid polymorphisms in human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) Gag p7(NC) and the C-cleavage site impact Gag-Pol processing by HIV-1 protease

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease activity is targeted at nine cleavage sites comprising different amino acid sequences in the viral Gag-Pol polyprotein. Amino acid polymorphisms in protease and in regions of Gag, particularly p7(NC) and the C-cleavage site between p2 and p7(NC), occur in natural variants of HIV-1 within infected patients. Studies were designed to examine the role of natural polymorphisms in protease and to identify determinants in Gag that modulate protease processing activity. Closely related Gag-Pol regions from an HIV-1-infected mother and two children were evaluated for processing in an inducible expression system, for protease activity on cleavage-site analogues, and for impact on replication by recombinant viruses. Gag-Pol regions displayed one of three processing phenotypes based on the appearance of Gag intermediates and accumulation of mature p24(CA). Gag-Pol regions that were processed rapidly to produce p24(CA) resulted in high-level replication by recombinant viruses, while slow-processing Gag-Pol variants resulted in recombinant viruses that replicated with reduced kinetics in both T cell lines and peripheral blood mononuclear cells. Direct impact by Gag sequences on processing by protease was assessed by construction of chimeric Gag-Pol regions and by site-directed mutagenesis. Optimal protease activity occurred when Gag and Pol regions were derived from the same gag-pol allele. Heterologous Gag regions generally diminished rates and extent of protease processing. Natural polymorphisms in novel positions in p7(NC) and the C-cleavage site have a dominant effect on protease processing activity. Accumulation of Gag products after processing at the C site appears to delay subsequent cleavage and production of mature p24(CA).

Plasma drug levels, genotypic resistance, and virological response to a nelfinavir plus saquinavir-containing regimen

OBJECTIVE

To determine the importance of resistance and drug levels in the response to a dual-protease inhibitor (PI) combination.

METHODS

Prospective study of 62 HIV-positive patients who switched to a salvage regimen including nelfinavir plus saquinavir. Virological response was defined as a decrease in viraemia > 0.5 log10 after 24 weeks. Optimal PI levels were defined as those above the protein binding-corrected 95% inhibitory concentration (IC95), as estimated in the presence of 50% human serum.

RESULTS

Baseline median HIV load was 4.78 log10 copies/ml. The median number of mutations in the protease gene was nine (range, 2-25), predominantly at residues 82 (52%), and 90 (40%). After 24 weeks, 45% of patients had responded and 19% were < 50 copies/ml. A higher number of mutations in the protease gene (12 versus 8;P = 0.001), and the L90M mutation (36% versus 67%; P = 0.001) were associated with treatment failure. Trough levels of nelfinavir and saquinavir were two- and fivefold, respectively, greater than those reached when used as the only PI (2480 and 260 ng/ml, respectively), and they were above the estimated protein-corrected IC95 in 96% and 32% of cases. Thus, the Cmin : IC95 ratio ranged from 0.1 to 10 for nelfinavir and from 0.12 to 3.24 for saquinavir. Suboptimal PI levels were associated with a poorer response, but there was no correlation between optimal drug levels and a better response.

CONCLUSION

Genotypic resistance predicts the virological response to a nelfinavir-saquinavir salvage regimen. Our data suggest that higher than optimal drug levels could be necessary to control the replication of many PI-resistant viruses.

Response to Antiretroviral Therapy among Patients Exposed to Three Classes of Antiretrovirals: Results from the Eurosida Study

There is an increasing proportion of HIV-positive patients exposed to all licensed classes of antiretrovirals, and the response to salvage regimens may be poor. Among over 8500 patients in EuroSIDA, the proportion of treated patients exposed to nucleosides, protease inhibitors (PIs) and non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI) increased from 0% in 1996 to 47% in 2001. Four-hundred-and-thirteen patients, who had failed virologically two highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) regimens and experienced all three main drug classes, started a salvage regimen of at least three drugs, in which at least one new PI or NNRTI was included. Median viral load was 4.7 log copies/ml [Interquartile range (IQR) 4.2–5.2], CD4 lymphocyte count 150/mm3 (IQR 60–274/mm3) and follow-up 14 months. Of these patients, 283 (69%) subsequently experienced at least a 1 log decline in viral load and 202 (49%) achieved a viral load <500 copies/ml. Conversely, the CD4 count halved from the baseline value in 88 (21%), and 45 (11%) experienced a new AIDS-defining disease. In multivariable analyses, a 1 log viral load reduction was related to baseline viral load [relative hazard (RH) 1.27 per 1 log higher; P=0.008], a previous viral load of less than 500 copies/ml (RH 1.69; P=0.002), more recent initiation of the regimen (RH 1.36 per year more recent; P=0.02), number of new drugs in the regimen (RH 1.20 per drug; P=0.02), time since start of antiretroviral therapy (RH 0.94 per extra year; P=0.035) and time spent on HAART with viral load >1000 copies/ml (RH 0.96 per extra month; P=0.0001). Analysis of factors associated with CD4 count decline and new AIDS disease also indicated improved outcomes in more recent times and a tendency for a better response in those starting more new drugs, but no relationship with the total number of drugs. Outcomes in people starting salvage regimens appear to depend on the number of new drugs started but not on the total number of drugs being used.

Dendritic cells: immune regulators in health and disease

Dendritic cells (DCs) are bone marrow-derived cells of both lymphoid and myeloid stem cell origin that populate all lymphoid organs including the thymus, spleen, and lymph nodes, as well as nearly all nonlymphoid tissues and organs. Although DCs are a moderately diverse set of cells, they all have potent antigen-presenting capacity for stimulating naive, memory, and effector T cells. DCs are members of the innate immune system in that they can respond to dangers in the host environment by immediately generating protective cytokines. Most important, immature DCs respond to danger signals in the microenvironment by maturing, i.e., differentiating, and acquiring the capacity to direct the development of primary immune responses appropriate to the type of danger perceived. The powerful adjuvant activity that DCs possess in stimulating specific CD4 and CD8 T cell responses has made them targets in vaccine development strategies for the prevention and treatment of infections, allograft reactions, allergic and autoimmune diseases, and cancer. This review addresses the origins and migration of DCs to their sites of activity, their basic biology as antigen-presenting cells, their roles in important human diseases and, finally, selected strategies being pursued to harness their potent antigen-stimulating activity.

The use of efavirenz as a part of late rescue antiretroviral treatment

PURPOSE

Because rescue antiretroviral strategies are increasingly needed, patients' response to a late salvage treatment including efavirenz plus a novel protease inhibitor (PI), with or without at least one novel nucleoside analogue, was assessed.

METHOD

41 consecutive patients, who underwent four or more prior therapeutic failures and received nucleoside analogues alone for > or = 18 months and a PI-based HAART for > or = 15 months, had a 12- to 24-month prospective follow-up. 6 patients who interrupted treatment after 3-8 weeks because of side effects were excluded. In the remaining 35 evaluable participants, the efavirenz-containing rescue regimen included nelfinavir in 23 cases, indinavir in 7, ritonavir in 2, and ritonavir plus hard gel saquinavir in the remaining 3 cases. 17 of 35 patients concurrently introduced one or more novel nucleoside analogues. Initial mean viremia was 4.8 +/- 0.9 log(10) HIV RNA copies/mL, while mean baseline CD4+ lymphocyte count was around 100 cells/microL. Genotyping resistance testing was obtained at the time of treatment modification.

RESULTS

The virologic response was both limited and transient. A significant drop of mean viremia was reached at the third month (-0.7 log(10)), but it was not maintained beyond the sixth month; only 4 patients reached viral suppression during the first 6 months. A more evident and sustained benefit on CD4+ cell count was observed throughout the study (p <.007, compared with baseline). The 31 patients who remained evaluable beyond 12 months did not show relevant modifications of laboratory parameters. The patient subgroup that received > or = 1 novel nucleoside analogue at the time of efavirenz adjunct had a significantly more favorable virologic outcome until the ninth month of follow-up and included all cases who reached viral suppression. Antiviral resistance pattern showed frequent mutations of the protease gene, and a cross-resistance with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs; found in 19 cases of 41), although our patients were not previously exposed to these compounds.

CONCLUSION

A late salvage therapy based on efavirenz plus a novel PI is not expected to achieve a complete and sustained virologic success in patients highly experienced with both nucleoside analogues and PIs and with a concurrent elevated viremia, probably due to extensive resistances acquired through time. Our rate of virologic failure proved even greater than that observed in previous studies of salvage therapy including NNRTIs. Prior long-term treatment with isolated nucleoside analogues and HAART, the use of highly sensitive techniques for monitoring of viremia, and a quite prolonged observation period may have played a role. However, the CD4+ response proved to be more evident and sustained than the virologic one, and the concurrent introduction of >/= 1 nucleoside analogue added significantly, especially during the first 9 months of salvage therapy.

Pharmacokinetics and resistance mutations affect virologic response to ritonavir/saquinavir-containing regimens

The authors assessed the impact of protease and reverse transcription (RT) mutations and individual pharmacokinetic parameters on virologic response to a four-drug regimen including ritonavir/saquinavir. Treatment was given at the start of the study (M0) to 22 HIV-1 protease inhibitor-naive or pretreated patients. Protease and RT genes were sequenced at M0, at the time of virologic failure, or at the end of the follow-up. Plasma ritonavir and saquinavir peak C(max), C(min), and area under the curve (AUC) were determined based on samples taken 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 hours after administration. HIV-1 RNA decreased to less than 50 copies/mL in 11 patients (group 1). At M0, five of them had no RT mutation and 10 had three or fewer secondary protease mutations with no new mutation during follow-up. Ritonavir and saquinavir pharmacokinetics showed wide interindividual variability. Treatment failed in 11 patients (group 2): 9 had three to eight protease mutations and a mean of 5.8 RT mutations at M0, with emergence of new mutations during follow-up. Pharmacokinetics was similar to those of group 1. The other two patients with virologic failure showed no baseline primary mutation but were the only patients with insufficient saquinavir and ritonavir AUC. The authors showed the complementarity between drug-resistance genotype and individual pharmacokinetics and the potential utility of AUC and Cmax to manage treatment.

Limits of deep salvage antiretroviral therapy with nelfinavir plus either efavirenz or nevirapine, in highly pre-treated patients with HIV disease

The virological and immunological response to an efavirenz-containing rescue regimen was compared with that of a nevirapine-containing one in a prospective, open-label 12-month study performed in patients previously treated with > or = 12 months of nucleoside analogue monotherapy, and > or = 15 months of indinavir- or ritonavir-containing HAART. Pooled laboratory data were assessed according to change or continuation of nucleoside analogues, at the time of start of salvage treatment. An improvement of markers of HIV disease progression occurred in all 59 evaluable patients (with a higher viral load decrease in the efavirenz over the nevirapine group at the third month), but the virological response was neither complete nor sustained at the end of study, irrespective of efavirenz or nevirapine adjunct, and complete viral suppression was attained in only 16.9% of subjects. A progressively increasing mean CD4+ lymphocyte count characterized the immunological response of all patients. The 35 patients who changed at least one nucleoside analogue when introducing salvage therapy had a better outcome, irrespective of the non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor chosen. Rescue strategies are increasingly needed in HIV-infected patients treated for a long time with HAART. The association of nelfinavir, a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, and dual nucleoside analogues, is popular among patients who fail first-line HAART. When prolonged prior treatment with nucleoside analogue monotherapy and HAART are of concern, and a quite elevated viral load is present, this salvage regimen may not allow a complete and sustained virological response in a 1-year period, while a more favourable immunological recovery can be expected. However, the concurrent change of nucleoside analogues significantly improves treatment outcome.

The use of and response to second-line protease inhibitor regimens: results from the EuroSIDA study

OBJECTIVE

To describe the use of second line protease-inhibitor (PI) regimens across Europe and to determine factors associated with virological and immunological response.

DESIGN

Analysis of data from 984 patients with a median follow-up of 21 months enrolled in EuroSIDA. Patients started their second PI-containing regimen at least 16 weeks after starting the first PI-containing regimen and with viral load > 1000 copies/ml.

METHODS

Virological response was defined as a viral load < 500 copies/ml and immunological response as an increase of 50 x 10(6)/l or more in CD4 lymphocyte count.

RESULTS

The median CD4 cell count at starting the second PI was 171 x 10(6) cells/l; viral load was 4.45 log copies/ml. As a second PI regimen, 45% were using a dual PI, while of those on one PI, indinavir (42%) and nelfinavir (34%) were most common. In multivariate Cox models, a higher viral load at starting the second PI [relative hazard (RH), 0.67 per 1 log higher; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.58-0.77; P < 0.0001) and a lower CD4 cell count (RH, 1.15 per 50% higher; 95% CI, 1.06-1.26; P = 0.0014) were associated with a reduced probability of virological response. Those who had achieved viral suppression on the first PI-regimen were more likely to respond to the second (RH, 1.65; 95% CI, 1.30-2.10; P < 0.0001) as were those who added one or two new nucleosides to their second PI.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who initiate a second PI regimen at lower viral load, higher CD4 cell count or who added new nucleosides tended to be more likely to achieve a viral load < 500 copies/ml. The roles of cross-resistance and adherence in response to second-line regimens needs further investigation.

Efficacy, tolerance, and pharmacokinetics of the combination of stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir as salvage regimen after ritonavir or indinavir failure

The high rate of protease inhibitor treatment failure in clinical cohorts makes it necessary to define novel salvage therapies. In a prospective study of 31 HIV-infected patients included in a salvage regimen with stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir, viral load decreased a median of 1.65 log(10) and 1.95 log(10) after 6 and 12 months of treatment, respectively, and 35 and 56% of patients had an HIV RNA level below 50 copies/ml at the same time points. At baseline, the mean number of mutations in the protease gene was 10 (2-19), and the V82A and L90M mutations were present in 54 and 21% of patients. The presence of the V82A mutation did not affect significantly the rate of response (36 vs. 38%), whereas the L90M mutation was associated with treatment failure (0 vs. 43%). Plasma trough levels of nelfinavir (NFV) and saquinavir (SQV), in a twice daily dosing regimen, were above the protein-corrected IC(95) in most patients despite the addition of an enzymatic inducer such as nevirapine, and peak levels were 2- and 5-fold increased with respect to standard doses. However, pharmacokinetics of saquinavir-hard gel capsule (SQV-hgc) did not improve significantly in the three times daily dosing regimen. In conclusion, the combination of stavudine, nevirapine, nelfinavir, and saquinavir increased plasma drug levels and produced an adequate virological response in patients who had failed indinavir or ritonavir therapy. This degree of response is not significantly decreased in the presence of genotypic mutations associated with indinavir/ritonavir (IDV/RTV) resistance.

Phase I/II dose escalation and randomized withdrawal study with add-on azodicarbonamide in patients failing on current antiretroviral therapy

BACKGROUND

Azodicarbonamide (ADA), a HIV-1 zinc finger inhibitor, targets a new step in viral replication and cell infectivity.

OBJECTIVE

A first phase I/II clinical study of ADA.

METHODS

ADA was administered at escalating doses concomitantly with current antiviral therapy during a 3-month open-label period in patients with advanced AIDS and documented virological failure. After 3 months, patients were randomized in a double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal, ADA being given at the highest tolerated dosage.

RESULTS

Fifteen patients with advanced disease failing on combined antiretroviral therapy, 75% of them with proven phenotypic resistance, had a median baseline CD4 cell count of 85 x 10(6) cells/l, CD4/CD8 cell ratio of 0.09 and median plasma RNA viral load of 4.2 log10 copies/ml. Tolerance to ADA was dose dependent and some patients developed nephrolithiasis, glucose intolerance or showed an ADA-related cytotoxicity towards CD4 cells at higher dosages. No patient died during the study period. ADA increased CD4 cell percentage, increased the CD4/CD8 cell ratio and decreased plasma RNA viral load from baseline. At the end of the double-blind period, the ADA group, but not the placebo group, showed a significant response (P < 0.05). No phenotypic resistance to ADA was observed. Overall, 3/11 patients (27%) had consistent viral load reductions > 0.5 log10 copies/ml compared with baseline and 5/ 11 (45%) showed a CD4 cell recovery from baseline > 33%. In responders, ADA induced a median peak increase in CD4 cell percentage change from baseline of 65% (range 47-243%), and viral load decrease of 1.04 log10 copies/ml (range 0.52-1.23).

CONCLUSIONS

The maximal tolerated dosage of ADA appears to be 2 g (three times daily). This study provides safety results that will allow larger clinical trials to confirm the preliminary efficacy data.

Predictors of Virological Response in HIV-Infected Patients to Salvage Antiretroviral Therapy that Includes Nelfinavir

Different salvage strategies have been used to regain control in patients with HIV who have virological failure on combination antiretroviral therapy. We conducted a cohort study of 63 extensively antiretroviral pretreated patients who initiated nelfinavir as part of salvage therapy, to determine predictors of virological response. The maximum HIV RNA response was >0.5 log10 copies/ml reduction in 43 patients (68%), including 21 patients (33%) who had suppression to <500 copies/ml. Corresponding response rates at 24 weeks were 41 and 19%, respectively. Responders and non-responders could not be distinguished by mean baseline HIV RNA or CD4 cell count, duration of prior protease inhibitor (PI) use, introduction of an initial non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor or the number of antiretroviral agents changed when nelfinavir was added, likely reflecting the homogeneity of the population studied. The only parameter predictive of response was virus genotype. Response rates were lower in patients with increasing numbers of primary ( P=0.045) or secondary ( P=0.001) PI mutations. The addition of increasing numbers of reverse transcriptase mutations further impaired response rates ( P=0.004).

Combined therapy with saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed HIV-infected protease inhibitor-naive patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the short-term and long-term effect of a combination of saquinavir, ritonavir and stavudine in moderately to severely immunosuppressed protease inhibitor-naive patients.

DESIGN

Prospective open-label multicentre study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A total of 64 protease inhibitor-naive and stavudine-naive HIV-infected patients with a CD4 count of < 250 cells/microL and > 10 000 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL received saquinavir hard-gelatin capsules, ritonavir and stavudine. Full (drop in viraemia of > 2 log10 and/or < 500 copies/mL) and partial responders (drop to between 500 and 5000 viraemia copies/mL) at week 9 (end of phase I) entered the second phase (additional 12-month period).

RESULTS

Fifty-six patients completed phase I, 45 (70%) full responders and nine (14%) partial responders by intent-to-treat analysis. Thirty-nine patients completed phase II, 33 (52%) full responders and two (3%) partial responders. Six patients had < 50 HIV-1 RNA copies/mL at week 9, and 20 (31%) patients at month 12 of phase II. Mean CD4 cell counts increased significantly in the 56 patients from 89 to 184 cells/microL after 9 weeks and from 100 to 292 cells/microL in the 39 patients treated for another 12 months. Higher baseline viraemia and lower baseline CD4 cell counts were not associated with an unfavourable virological response at week 9 and month 12 of phase II. HIV DNA in peripheral blood monocytes decreased substantially (- 1.5 log10) but was detectable in all except one patient at the end of phase II.

CONCLUSION

In protease- and stavudine-naive HIV-infected patients with moderate to severe immunosuppression, saquinavir in combination with ritonavir and stavudine caused a substantial long-term decrease in plasma viral load in approximately half the participants and a substantial increase in CD4 cell counts.

Antiretroviral Resistance: Mechanisms, Detection and Clinical Implications

Widespread use of antiretroviral agents and the epidemic of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) strains resistant to these drugs have raised a lot of issues including the biology and clinical implications of HIV resistance, reliability of resistant assays and their role in clinical practice. In May 2000, the International AIDS panel endorsed and recommended the use of antiretroviral drug resistance testing in patients. Considerable data on HIV drug resistance testing that strongly suggest that utility of these assays may be of great value have been published and presented at major meetings. Although the genotypic and phenotypic assays are available for antiretroviral drug resistance testing, the testing has certain limitations. The role of these resistance assays is not clearly defined in clinical practice. Prospective studies are needed to define the long-term benefits of these assays. HIV drug resistance testing in the near future may become an important tool and standard of practice for patients infected with HIV. Clinicians caring for HIV-positive patients should be familiar with the antiretroviral drug resistant assays.

Presentation of SIVgag to monkey T cells using dendritic cells transfected with a recombinant adenovirus

To pursue the capacity of monkey dendritic cells (DC) to be modified by adenoviral vectors and present the encoded antigens, we generated DC from blood monocytes and infected them with recombinant adenoviruses encoding GFP reporter and SIVgag or nef genes. Recombinant, E1- and E3-deleted, adenoviruses could transfect immature DC to >90% efficiency. When differentiated in the presence of a maturation stimulus, the infected cells were identical to control uninfected DC in surface markers and potent stimulatory activity for the mixed leukocyte reaction. Recombinant adeno-SIVgag was comparable to vaccinia-gag in stimulating IFN-gamma-secreting CD8(+) T cells from PBMC of macaques vaccinated with SIV(mac239) Deltanef and challenged with pathogenic SIV or chimeric SIV/HIV. Small numbers of adeno-SIVgag-infected DC were sufficient to trigger specific ELISPOT responses by CD8(+) T cells from these animals. Some CD4(+) IFN-gamma-secreting cells were also found in the three of eight vaccinated animals with the highest CD8(+) responses. T cells from control animals did not respond to DC transfected with adeno-gag. Therefore recombinant adenoviruses efficiently transfect monkey DC in a nonperturbing fashion, and these DC efficiently present antigens to SIVgag immune CD8(+) T cells. These findings will allow autologous DC, expressing SIV genes with high efficiency, to be tested in vivo to achieve strong specific T cell immunity.

Low level of cross-resistance to amprenavir (141W94) in samples from patients pretreated with other protease inhibitors

The therapeutic success of an antiretroviral salvage regimen containing protease inhibitors (PI) is limited by PI-resistant viral strains exhibiting various degrees of resistance and cross-resistance. To evaluate the extent of cross-resistance to the new PI amprenavir, 155 samples from 132 human immunodeficiency virus type 1-infected patients were analyzed for viral genotype by direct sequencing of the protease gene. Concomitantly, drug sensitivity to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir, nelfinavir, and amprenavir was analyzed by a recombinant virus assay. A total of 111 patients had been pretreated with 1-4 PI, but all were naive to amprenavir. A total of 105 samples (67.7%) were sensitive to amprenavir; 25 samples (16.1%) were intermediately resistant, and another 25 samples were highly resistant (4- to 8-fold- and >8-fold-reduced sensitivity, respectively). The mutations 46I/L, 54L/V, 84V, and 90M showed the strongest association with amprenavir resistance (P < 0. 0001). The scoring system using 84V and/or any two of a number of mutations (10I/R/V/F, 46I/L, 54L/V, and 90M) predicted amprenavir resistance with a sensitivity of 86.0% and a specificity of 81.0% within the analyzed group of samples. Of 62 samples with resistance against 4 PI, 23 (37.1%) were still sensitive to amprenavir. In comparison, only 2 of 23 samples (8.7%) from nelfinavir-naive patients with resistance against indinavir, saquinavir, and ritonavir were still sensitive to nelfinavir. Amprenavir thus appears to be an interesting alternative for PI salvage therapy.

Antiretroviral therapy of HIV-1 infection: established treatment strategies and new therapeutic options

Recently, studies have shown that non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors, such as efavirenz or nevirapine, in combination with two nucleoside analogues have an antiretroviral potency comparable to protease inhibitor containing regimens. Triple combination therapy that includes a non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor can therefore be regarded as an effective alternative first-line treatment of HIV-1 infection.

Safety and pharmacokinetics of once-daily regimens of soft-gel capsule saquinavir plus minidose ritonavir in human immunodeficiency virus-negative adults

Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) protease inhibitors have dramatically improved treatment options for HIV infection, but frequent dosing may impact adherence to highly active antiretroviral treatment regimens (HAART). Previous studies demonstrated that combined therapy with ritonavir and saquinavir allows a decrease in frequency of saquinavir dosing to twice daily. In this study, we evaluated the safety and pharmacokinetics of combining once-daily doses of the soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation of saquinavir (saquinavir-SGC) and minidose ritonavir. Forty-four healthy HIV-negative volunteers were randomized into groups receiving once-daily doses of saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg) plus ritonavir (100 to 200 mg) or a control group receiving only saquinavir-SGC (1,200 mg) three times daily. Saquinavir-SGC alone and saquinavir-SGC-ritonavir combinations were generally well tolerated, and there were no safety concerns. Addition of ritonavir (100 mg) to saquinavir-SGC (1,200 to 1,800 mg/day) increased the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for saquinavir severalfold, and the intersubject peak concentration in plasma and AUC variability were reduced compared to those achieved with saquinavir-SGC alone (3,600 mg/day), while trough saquinavir levels (24 h post-dose) were substantially higher than the 90% inhibitory concentration calculated from HIV-1 clinical isolates. Neither increasing the saquinavir-SGC dose to higher than 1,600 mg nor increasing ritonavir from 100 to 200 mg appeared to further enhance the AUC. These results suggest that an all once-daily HAART regimen, utilizing saquinavir-SGC plus a more tolerable low dose of ritonavir, may be feasible. Studies of once-daily saquinavir-SGC (1,600 mg) in combination with ritonavir (100 mg) in HIV-infected patients are underway.

The cumulative occurrence of resistance mutations in the HIV-1 protease gene is associated with failure of salvage therapy with ritonavir and saquinavir in protease inhibitor-experienced patients

Salvage therapy with ritonavir (RTV) and saquinavir (SQV) failed to achieve virological and immunological improvement in 24 HIV-infected patients who discontinued triple therapy with RTV or indinavir (IDV) because of failure or intolerance to treatment. Changes in the HIV-1 protease gene sequence were analyzed prospectively in 14 patients. No primary protease mutation was found prior to the use of protease inhibitors. After 7 months of treatment with IDV or RTV, primary resistance mutations at codons pol 46 and/or pol 82 were observed in 11 of 13 patients. After 16 weeks on RTV-SQV, novel primary mutations related to SQV emerged in 7 of 13 patients, together with an increase in the number of secondary resistance mutations. Our observations indicate that the cumulative occurrence of resistance mutations in the protease gene was associated with failure of antiretroviral therapy. The presence of mutations to a first protease inhibitor may represent a risk factor for the failure of a subsequent treatment with a second line protease inhibitor.

Simple algorithm derived from a geno-/phenotypic database to predict HIV-1 protease inhibitor resistance

BACKGROUND

Resistance against protease inhibitors (PI) can either be analysed genotypically or phenotypically. However, the interpretation of genotypic data is difficult, particularly for PI, because of the unknown contributions of several mutations to resistance and cross-resistance.

OBJECTIVE

Development of an algorithm to predict PI phenotype from genotypic data.

METHODS

Recombinant viruses containing patient-derived protease genes were analysed for sensitivity to indinavir, saquinavir, ritonavir and nelfinavir. Drug resistance-associated mutations were determined by direct sequencing. geno- and phenotypic data were compared for 119 samples from 97 HIV-1 infected patients.

RESULTS

Samples with one or two mutations in the gene for the protease were phenotypically sensitive in 74.3%, whereas 83.6% of samples with five or more mutations were resistant against all PI tested. Some mutations (361, 63P, 71V/T, 771) were frequent both in sensitive and resistant samples, whereas others (241, 30N, 461/L, 48V, 54V, 82A/F/T/S, 84V, 90M) were predominantly present in resistant samples. Therefore, the presence or absence of a single drug resistance-associated mutation predicted phenotypic PI resistance with high sensitivity (96.5-100%) but low specificity (13.3-57.4%). A more specific algorithm was obtained by taking into account the total number of drug resistance-associated mutations in the gene for the protease and restricting these to certain key positions for the PI. The algorithm was subsequently validated by analysis of 72 independent samples.

CONCLUSION

With an optimized algorithm, phenotypic PI resistance can be predicted by viral genotype with good sensitivity (89.1-93.0%) and specificity (82.6-93.3%). The reliability and relevance of this algorithm should be further evaluated in clinical practice.

Saquinavir soft-gel capsule: an updated review of its use in the management of HIV infection

Saquinavir is a potent and highly selective HIV protease inhibitor. Initially formulated as a hard-gel capsule (HGC), saquinavir was the first protease inhibitor available commercially for the treatment of patients with HIV infection. The limited oral bioavailability of saquinavir HGC has been improved significantly with the introduction of a soft-gel capsule (SGC) formulation. Saquinavir SGC displays greater than dose-proportional pharmacokinetics and mean area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) values are 8- to 10-fold higher with saquinavir SGC 1200 mg 3 times daily than with the HGC formulation 600 mg 3 times daily, the recommended dosages of the 2 formulations. In combination with other protease inhibitors (particularly "low dose" ritonavir), the oral bioavailability of saquinavir (as either the HGC or SGC formulation) is markedly increased, allowing for reduced dosing frequency and/or dosage. The efficacy and tolerability of once- or twice-daily saquinavir SGC/"low dose" ritonavir combinations are currently being evaluated in patients with HIV infection. Data (up to 48 weeks) from noncomparative and comparative clinical trials evaluating saquinavir SGC-containing combination regimens in adult patients with HIV infection, support and strengthen the clinical efficacy profile of the drug that was demonstrated in initial trials. In antiretroviral therapy-naive and -experienced patients, saquinavir SGC combined with > or =2 nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs), or nelfinavir, or nelfinavir plus 2 NRTIs or nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NNRTIs), markedly improved immunological and virological surrogate markers (increased mean CD4+ cell counts and decreased mean plasma HIV RNA levels) of HIV infection. Saquinavir SGC demonstrated a trend to greater antiviral efficacy (measured by improvements in surrogate markers) than the HGC formulation (not statistically significant); a significantly greater proportion of patients treated with saquinavir SGC had plasma HIV RNA levels <400 copies/ml than patients receiving the HGC formulation. In the first direct comparison of 2 protease inhibitors, saquinavir SGC plus 2 NRTIs demonstrated similar antiviral efficacy to indinavir plus 2 NRTIs in patients with HIV infection (almost all of whom were antiretroviral therapy-naive); at 24 weeks, a significantly greater increase in CD4+ cell count from baseline was obtained in the saquinavir SGC group compared with the indinavir group, although this difference was not apparent at week 32. Triple therapy with saquinavir SGC plus 2 NRTIs was as effective as nelfinavir-containing triple therapy, or quadruple therapy (saquinavir SGC plus 2 NRTIs plus nelfinavir) in markedly suppressing HIV RNA levels in antiretroviral therapy-experienced or -naive patients. Saquinavir SGC is generally well tolerated. Gastrointestinal disturbances (generally nausea, diarrhoea, abdominal pain, vomiting and dyspepsia of moderate or greater intensity) are the most common adverse events associated with saquinavir SGC-containing therapy. In comparative trials, saquinavir SGC-containing therapy was as well tolerated as indinavir- and nelfinavir-containing therapy; although there were no statistical differences between treatment groups, the incidence of diarrhoea was lower in patients receiving saquinavir SGC compared with nelfinavir, saquinavir SGC plus nelfinavir (all combined with 2 NRTIs) or saquinavir SGC plus nelfinavir without additional therapy. Compared with the HGC formulation, saquinavir SGC appears to be associated with a higher overall incidence of adverse events.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical trial data have shown that as part of triple or quadruple combination therapy, saquinavir SGC is an effective and generally well tolerated protease inhibitor in antiretroviral therapy-naive or -experienced patients with HIV infection. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

A randomized study of antiretroviral management based on plasma genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in patients failing therapy. CPCRA 046 Study Team for the Terry Beirn Community Programs for Clinical Research on AIDS

OBJECTIVE

To determine the short-term effects of using genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing (GART) with expert advice in the management of patients failing on a protease inhibitor and two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors.

DESIGN

Prospective randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

Multicenter community-based clinical trials network.

PATIENTS

One-hundred and fifty-three HIV-infected adults with a threefold or greater rise in plasma HIV-1 RNA on at least 16 weeks of combination antiretroviral therapy.

INTERVENTIONS

Randomization was either to a GART group, where genotype interpretation and suggested regimens were provided to clinicians, or to a no-GART group, where treatment choices were made without such input.

MAIN OUTCOMES MEASURES

Plasma HIV-1 RNA levels and CD4 cell counts were measured at 4, 8, and 12 weeks following randomization. The primary endpoint was change in HIV-1 RNA levels from baseline to the average of the 4 and 8 week levels.

RESULTS

The average baseline CD4 cell count was 230 x 10(6) cells/l and the median HIV-1 RNA was 28,085 copies/ml. At entry, 82 patients were failing on regimens containing indinavir, 51 on nelfinavir, 11 on ritonavir, and nine on saquinavir. HIV-1 RNA, averaged at 4 and 8 weeks, decreased by 1.19 log10 for the 78 GART patients and -0.61 log10 for the 75 no-GART patients (treatment difference: -0.53 log, 95% confidence interval, -0.77 to -0.29; P = 0.00001). Overall, the best virologic responses occurred in patients who received three or more drugs to which their HIV-1 appeared to be susceptible.

CONCLUSION

In patients failing triple drug therapy, GART with expert advice was superior to no-GART as measured by short-term viral load responses.

Once-daily dosing of saquinavir and low-dose ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals: a pharmacokinetic pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the steady-state pharmacokinetics of a once-daily dosing regimen of saquinavir soft gelatin capsules in combination with a low dose of ritonavir in HIV-1-infected individuals.

DESIGN

Open-label, multi-dose, pharmacokinetic pilot study.

PATIENTS

Seven HIV-1-infected individuals who were treated with saquinavir hard gelatin capsules 400 mg twice daily + ritonavir liquid formulation 400 mg twice daily were switched to saquinavir soft gelatin formulation 1600 mg once daily in combination with ritonavir liquid formulation 200 mg once daily (day 0). Patients were instructed to ingest saquinavir and ritonavir simultaneously in the morning and with a meal.

METHODS

Steady-state pharmacokinetics of saquinavir and ritonavir were assessed during a 24 h dosing interval after 2 weeks of continued therapy (day 14). Plasma saquinavir and ritonavir concentrations were measured using a validated high performance liquid chromatography assay. In addition, plasma HIV-1 RNA, and fasting total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, low-density lipoprotein, and triglyceride levels were measured on days 0 and 14. A non-compartmental pharmacokinetic method was used to calculate the area under the plasma concentration versus time curve (AUC[0-24h]), the maximum and trough plasma concentrations (Cmax and Cmin), the time to reach Cmax (Tmax), the elimination half-life (t1/2), the apparent clearance (Cl/F), and the apparent volume of distribution (V/F).

RESULTS

Median (range) values of the pharmacokinetic parameters for saquinavir after 2 weeks of treatment were: AUC[0-24h], 19,802h* ng/ml (3720-74,016); Cmax, 2936 ng/ml (573-6848); Cmin, 84 ng/ml (11-854); Tmax, 3.5 h (3.0-4.0), t1/2, 6.8 h (4.6-10.2); Cl/F, 81 l/h (22-430); V/F, 1189 l (215-3086). Ritonavir concentrations were always below the 90% effective concentration of 2100 ng/ml (median Cmax, 1323 ng/ml; range, 692-1528 ng/ml). No significant changes were observed for total serum cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein, and low-density lipoprotein levels between days 0 and 14 (P > or = 0.24). In six out of seven patients the fasting serum triglyceride levels were lower 2 weeks after the treatment switch (median decrease was 32%, P = 0.03). No significant changes in plasma HIV-1 RNA concentrations were observed between days 0 and 14. The regimen was generally well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

This pharmacokinetic study indicates that the combination of 1600 mg of saquinavir (soft gelatin capsules) and 200 mg of ritonavir (liquid formulation) in a once-daily dosing regimen generally results in therapeutic plasma concentrations of saquinavir. Due to the large interindividual variation in saquinavir exposure, the monitoring of saquinavir concentrations in plasma is warranted. These pharmacokinetic findings rationalize the further clinical evaluation of once-daily dosing of this combination of protease inhibitors.

HIV-1 protease inhibitors

Treatment of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) infection with regimens that include protease inhibitors (PIs) has contributed to marked improvements in HIV-related disease progression and mortality. Five PIs are approved by the US Food and Drug Administration and have potent activity in vitro. PIs with 2 nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitors have demonstrated prolonged suppression of HIV-1 replication in treated patients and improvements in disease progression and mortality. PIs combined with nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors or other PIs produce marked antiretroviral effects. Although not all patients have prolonged responses to PIs, and salvage treatment has had mixed results for patients who have not responded to initial PI therapy or whose HIV RNA levels have relapsed during such therapy, newer PIs currently being developed hold promise. Most patients can successfully tolerate PI-including regimens; however, long-term side effects, such as body fat redistribution, insulin resistance, and increased serum lipids, are now being observed in some patients receiving PI-including therapy.

Pharmacodynamics of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 protease inhibitors

Many factors are involved in the success or failure of antiretroviral therapy. Recent data suggest that there are significant differences in drug absorption and disposition for the protease inhibitor class of antiretroviral drugs, and relationships between plasma concentrations and their antiviral effect have been described. Consequently, the issue of whether therapeutic drug monitoring should be employed for patients receiving treatment with these drugs has arisen. Several criteria must be met before a drug is considered a candidate for therapeutic drug monitoring. These criteria include pharmacological, clinical, and analytic components. Although not all the necessary criteria have yet been met, some of these components have been defined, and additional data are being generated. However, prospectively designed clinical trials must be completed to determine if monitoring protease inhibitor plasma concentrations provides additional clinical benefit to the patient.