1
|
Kuźmiuk-Glembin I, Komorowska-Jagielska K, Moszkowska G, Chamienia A, Dębska-Ślizień A. Desensitization of Highly Immunized Kidney Transplant Recipients Awaiting Transplantation-Polish Single-Center Experience. Transplant Proc 2024:S0041-1345(24)00252-5. [PMID: 38688729 DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2024.04.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2023] [Revised: 04/18/2024] [Accepted: 04/18/2024] [Indexed: 05/02/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The increasing number of highly immunized patients waiting for kidney transplantation is a significant problem in Europe as the proportion of such patients has doubled in the last decade. Transplantation in this group is enabled by desensitization methods, i.e., intravenous pharmacotherapy with human immunoglobulin (IVIG), anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody (rituximab), and plasma exchange. The objective was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of this protocol. MATERIAL AND METHODS The inclusion criteria: presence of established anti-HLA antibodies with complement-binding capacity, i.e., anti-HLAC1q+ (>MFI 15,000 for the most common antigens), no renal transplantation within 1 year after activation on the waiting list. Thirteen patients were selected for the procedure. IVIG was administered twice (2 g/kg-maximum 140 g/dose). Between IVIG doses, patients received rituximab (375 mg/m2). Anti-HLA was tested after 1 and 2 months after completion of the procedure. RESULTS All patients have completed the protocol. No significant changes after desensitization in the amount/profile of alloantibodies were observed. However, with negative vCM for HLA-A/B/DR (no DSA against the reported donor) and negative CM-CDC, according to the allocation system, patients were given priority on the recipient list. Seven out of 13 patients received a transplant within 12 months after treatment (mean 11.5 weeks). Renal graft function was good (mean creatinine level after 1 month: 1.5 mg/dL). No incidents of acute rejection were reported. The most common complications were infections (especially pneumonia). CONCLUSION The desensitization protocol (IVIG + rituximab) allows highly immunized patients to undergo organ transplantation. In short-term analysis, no acute rejection was observed, graft function was satisfactory. Desensitization was associated with an increased risk of infection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Izabella Kuźmiuk-Glembin
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine; Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland.
| | | | - Grażyna Moszkowska
- Department of Medical Immunology, Medical University of Gdansk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Andrzej Chamienia
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine; Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| | - Alicja Dębska-Ślizień
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantology and Internal Medicine; Medical University of Gdańsk, Gdańsk, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Furian L, Bestard O, Budde K, Cozzi E, Diekmann F, Mamode N, Naesens M, Pengel LHM, Schwartz Sorensen S, Vistoli F, Thaunat O. European Consensus on the Management of Sensitized Kidney Transplant Recipients: A Delphi Study. Transpl Int 2024; 37:12475. [PMID: 38665475 PMCID: PMC11043529 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2024.12475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2023] [Accepted: 03/04/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024]
Abstract
An increasing number of sensitized patients awaiting transplantation face limited options, leading to fatalities during dialysis and higher costs. The absence of established evidence highlights the need for collaborative consensus. Donor-specific antibodies (DSA)-triggered antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) significantly contributes to kidney graft failure, especially in sensitized patients. The European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) launched the ENGAGE initiative, categorizing sensitized candidates by AMR risk to improve patient care. A systematic review assessed induction and maintenance regimens as well as antibody removal strategies, with statements subjected to the Delphi methodology. A Likert-scale survey was distributed to 53 European experts (Nephrologists, Transplant surgeons and Immunologists) with experience in kidney transplant recipient care. A rate ≥75% with the same answer was considered consensus. Consensus was achieved in 95.3% of statements. While most recommendations aligned, two statements related to complement inhibitors for AMR prophylaxis lacked consensus. The ENGAGE consensus presents contemporary recommendations for desensitization and immunomodulation strategies, grounded in predefined risk categories. The adoption of tailored, patient-specific measures is anticipated to streamline the care of sensitized recipients undergoing renal allografts. While this approach holds the promise of enhancing transplant accessibility and fostering long-term success in transplantation outcomes, its efficacy will need to be assessed through dedicated studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterological Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology and Medical Intensive Care, Charité University Medicine Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Emanuele Cozzi
- Transplant Immunology Unit, Department of Cardiac, Thoracic and Vascular Sciences, School of Medicine and Surgery, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Fritz Diekmann
- Experimental Nephrology and Transplant Laboratory, August Pi i Sunyer Biomedical Research Institute (IDIBAPS), Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, Faculty of Medicine, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Liset H. M. Pengel
- Erasmus MC Transplant Institute, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, Netherlands
| | - Soren Schwartz Sorensen
- Department of Neurology, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Fabio Vistoli
- University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
- Department of Biothecnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, University of L’Aquila, L’Aquila, Italy
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Provenzano M, Hu L, Tringali E, Senatore M, Talarico R, Di Dio M, Ruotolo C, La Manna G, Garofalo C, Zaza G. Improving Kidney Disease Care: One Giant Leap for Nephrology. Biomedicines 2024; 12:828. [PMID: 38672183 PMCID: PMC11048002 DOI: 10.3390/biomedicines12040828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/18/2024] [Revised: 03/24/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Nephrology is an ever-evolving field of medicine. The importance of such a discipline is related to the high clinical impact of kidney disease. In fact, abnormalities of kidney function and/or structure are common in the general population, reaching an overall prevalence of about 10%. More importantly, the onset of kidney damage is related to a strikingly high risk of cardiovascular events, mortality, and progression to kidney failure which, in turn, compromises quality and duration of life. Attempts to comprehend the pathogenesis and molecular mechanisms involved in kidney disease occurrence have prompted the development and implementation of novel drugs in clinical practice with the aim of treating the 'specific cause' of kidney disease (including chronic kidney disease, glomerular disease, and genetic kidney disorders) and the main immunological complications following kidney transplantation. Herein, we provide an overview of the principal emerging drug classes with proved efficacy in the context of the aforementioned clinical conditions. This can represent a simplified guide for clinical nephrologists to remind them of the vast and heterogeneous armamentarium of drugs that should be used in the present and the future to improve the management of patients suffering from kidney disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michele Provenzano
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; (M.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Lilio Hu
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.H.); (E.T.); (G.L.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Edoardo Tringali
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.H.); (E.T.); (G.L.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Massimo Senatore
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; (M.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Roberta Talarico
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; (M.S.); (R.T.)
| | - Michele Di Dio
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, SS Annunziata Hospital, 87100 Cosenza, Italy;
| | - Chiara Ruotolo
- Unit of Nephrology, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (C.R.); (C.G.)
| | - Gaetano La Manna
- Nephrology, Dialysis and Kidney Transplant Unit, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy; (L.H.); (E.T.); (G.L.M.)
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), Alma Mater Studiorum University of Bologna, 40138 Bologna, Italy
| | - Carlo Garofalo
- Unit of Nephrology, Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Campania “Luigi Vanvitelli”, 81100 Caserta, Italy; (C.R.); (C.G.)
| | - Gianluigi Zaza
- Department of Pharmacy Health and Nutritional Sciences, University of Calabria, 87036 Rende, Italy; (M.S.); (R.T.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Vo A, Ammerman N, Jordan SC. Advances in desensitization for human leukocyte antigen incompatible kidney transplantation. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2024; 29:104-120. [PMID: 38088373 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/08/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) sensitization is a major barrier to kidney transplantation induced by exposure to alloantigens through pregnancy, blood product exposure and previous transplantations. Desensitization strategies are undertaken to improve the chances of finding compatible organ offers. Standard approaches to desensitization include the use of plasmapheresis/low dose intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) or high dose IVIG plus anti-CD20. However, current methods to reduce HLA antibodies are not always successful, especially in those with calculated panel reactive antibody 99-100%. RECENT FINDINGS Newer desensitization strategies such as imlifidase [immunoglobulin G (IgG) endopeptidase] rapidly inactivates IgG molecules and creates an "antibody-free zone", representing an important advancement in desensitization. However, pathogenic antibodies rebound, increasing allograft injury that is not addressed by imlifidase. Here, use of anti-IL-6R (tocilizumab) or anti-interleukin-6 (clazakizumab) could offer long-term control of B-memory and plasma cell DSA responses to limit graft injury. Agents aimed at long-lived plasma cells (anti-CD38 and anti-BCMAxCD3) could reduce or eliminate HLA-producing plasma cells from marrow niches. Other agents such as complement inhibitors and novel agents inhibiting the Fc neonatal receptor (FcRn) mediated IgG recycling will likely find important roles in desensitization. SUMMARY Use of these agents alone or in combination will likely improve the efficacy and durability of desensitization therapies, improving access to kidney transplantation for immunologically disadvantaged patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashley Vo
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Iesari S, Nava FL, Zais IE, Coubeau L, Ferraresso M, Favi E, Lerut J. Advancing immunosuppression in liver transplantation: A narrative review. Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int 2024:S1499-3872(24)00040-7. [PMID: 38523030 DOI: 10.1016/j.hbpd.2024.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/14/2024] [Indexed: 03/26/2024]
Abstract
Immunosuppression is essential to ensure recipient and graft survivals after liver transplantation (LT). However, our understanding and management of the immune system remain suboptimal. Current immunosuppressive therapy cannot selectively inhibit the graft-specific immune response and entails a significant risk of serious side effects, i.e., among others, de novo cancers, infections, cardiovascular events, renal failure, metabolic syndrome, and late graft fibrosis, with progressive loss of graft function. Pharmacological research, aimed to develop alternative immunosuppressive agents in LT, is behind other solid-organ transplantation subspecialties, and, therefore, the development of new compounds and strategies should get priority in LT. The research trajectories cover mechanisms to induce T-cell exhaustion, to inhibit co-stimulation, to mitigate non-antigen-specific inflammatory response, and, lastly, to minimize the development and action of donor-specific antibodies. Moreover, while cellular modulation techniques are complex, active research is underway to foster the action of T-regulatory cells, to induce tolerogenic dendritic cells, and to promote the function of B-regulatory cells. We herein discuss current lines of research in clinical immunosuppression, particularly focusing on possible applications in the LT setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Samuele Iesari
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Laura Nava
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Elena Zais
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Laurent Coubeau
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium; Service de Chirurgie et Transplantation Abdominale, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, 55 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Mariano Ferraresso
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 19 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy
| | - Evaldo Favi
- General Surgery and Kidney Transplantation, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, 15 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy; Department of Clinical Sciences and Community Health, Università degli Studi di Milano, 19 Via della Commenda, 20122 Milan, Italy.
| | - Jan Lerut
- Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique, Université catholique de Louvain, 10 Avenue Hippocrate, 1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kanbay M, Copur S, Yilmaz ZY, Baydar DE, Bilge I, Susal C, Kocak B, Ortiz A. The role of anticomplement therapy in the management of the kidney allograft. Clin Transplant 2024; 38:e15277. [PMID: 38485664 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.15277] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2023] [Revised: 02/04/2024] [Accepted: 02/16/2024] [Indexed: 03/19/2024]
Abstract
As the number of patients living with kidney failure grows, the need also grows for kidney transplantation, the gold standard kidney replacement therapy that provides a survival advantage. This may result in an increased rate of transplantation from HLA-mismatched donors that increases the rate of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), which already is the leading cause of allograft failure. Plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulin therapy, anti-CD20 therapies (i.e., rituximab), bortezomib and splenectomy have been used over the years to treat AMR as well as to prevent AMR in high-risk sensitized kidney transplant recipients. Eculizumab and ravulizumab are monoclonal antibodies targeting the C5 protein of the complement pathway and part of the expanding field of anticomplement therapies, which is not limited to kidney transplant recipients, and also includes complement-mediated microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, paroxysmal nocturnal hemoglobinuria, and ANCA-vasculitis. In this narrative review, we summarize the current knowledge concerning the pathophysiological background and use of anti-C5 strategies (eculizumab and ravulizumab) and C1-esterase inhibitor in AMR, either to prevent AMR in high-risk desensitized patients or to treat AMR as first-line or rescue therapy and also to treat de novo thrombotic microangiopathy in kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kanbay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sidar Copur
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Zeynep Y Yilmaz
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Dilek Ertoy Baydar
- Department of Pathology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ilmay Bilge
- Department of Pediatrics, Division of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Caner Susal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burak Kocak
- Department of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Alberto Ortiz
- Department of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid and IIS-Fundacion Jimenez Diaz, Madrid, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kanbay M, Copur S, Guldan M, Topcu AU, Ozbek L, Hasbal B, Süsal C, Kocak B, Callemeyn J, Segelmark M. Imlifidase in kidney transplantation. Clin Kidney J 2024; 17:sfae033. [PMID: 38504664 PMCID: PMC10949912 DOI: 10.1093/ckj/sfae033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2024] Open
Abstract
Kidney transplantation, the gold-standard therapeutic approach for patients with end-stage kidney disease, offers improvement in patient survival and quality of life. However, broad sensitization against human leukocyte antigens often resulting in a positive crossmatch against the patient's living donor or the majority of potential deceased donors in the allocation system represents a major obstacle due to a high risk for antibody-mediated rejection, delayed graft function and allograft loss. Kidney-paired donation and desensitization protocols have been established to overcome this obstacle, with limited success. Imlifidase, a novel immunoglobulin G (IgG)-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes and recombinantly produced in Escherichia coli, is a promising agent for recipients with a positive crossmatch against their organ donor with high specificity towards IgG, rapid action and high efficacy in early pre-clinical and clinical studies. However, the rebound of IgG after a few days can lead to antibody-mediated rejection, making the administration of potent immunosuppressive regimens in the early post-transplant phase necessary. There is currently no comparative study evaluating the efficiency of imlifidase therapy compared with conventional desensitization protocols along with the lack of randomized control trials, indicating the clear need for future large-scale clinical studies in this field. Besides providing a practical framework for the clinical use of the agent, our aim in this article is to evaluate the underlying mechanism of action, efficiency and safety of imlifidase therapy in immunologically high-risk kidney transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehmet Kanbay
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sidar Copur
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Mustafa Guldan
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Ahmet U Topcu
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Lasin Ozbek
- Department of Medicine, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Baris Hasbal
- Department of Medicine, Division of Nephrology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koc University Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Burak Kocak
- Department of Urology, Koc University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Jasper Callemeyn
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Mårten Segelmark
- Department of Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden
- Department of Endocrinology, Nephrology and Rheumatology, Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
de Weerd AE, Roelen DL, van de Wetering J, Betjes MGH, Heidt S, Reinders MEJ. Imlifidase Desensitization in HLA-incompatible Kidney Transplantation: Finding the Sweet Spot. Transplantation 2024; 108:335-345. [PMID: 37340532 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000004689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/22/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase, derived from a Streptococcus pyogenes enzyme, cleaves the entire immunoglobulin G pool within hours after administration in fully cleaved antigen-binding and crystallizable fragments. These cleaved fragments can no longer exert their antibody-dependent cytotoxic functions, thereby creating a window to permit HLA-incompatible kidney transplantation. Imlifidase is labeled, in Europe only, for deceased donor kidney transplantation in highly sensitized patients, whose chances for an HLA-compatible transplant are negligible. This review discusses outcomes of preclinical and clinical studies on imlifidase and describes the phase III desensitization trials that are currently enrolling patients. A comparison is made with other desensitization methods. The review discusses the immunological work-up of imlifidase candidates and especially the "delisting strategy" of antigens that shift from unacceptable to acceptable with imlifidase desensitization. Other considerations for clinical implementation, such as adaptation of induction protocols, are also discussed. Imlifidase cleaves most of the currently used induction agents except for horse antithymocyte globulin, and rebound of donor-specific antibodies should be managed. Another consideration is the timing and interpretation of (virtual) crossmatches when bringing this novel desensitization agent into the clinic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Annelies E de Weerd
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Dave L Roelen
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Jacqueline van de Wetering
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Michiel G H Betjes
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - Marlies E J Reinders
- Department of Internal Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center Transplant Institute, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Srivastava PK, Kittleson MM. Modern advances in heart transplantation. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2024; 82:147-156. [PMID: 38244826 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2024.01.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/14/2024] [Indexed: 01/22/2024]
Abstract
Heart transplantation (HTx) is the only definitive therapy for patients with end stage heart disease. With the increasing global prevalence of heart failure, the demand for HTx has continued to grow and outpace supply. In this paper, we will review advances in the field of HTx along the clinical journey of a HTx recipient. Starting with the sensitized patient, we discuss current methods to define sensitization, and assays to help identify clinically relevant anti-HLA antibodies. Desensitization strategies targeting all levels of the adaptive immune system are discussed with emphasis on novel techniques such as anti-CD 38 blockade and use of the Immunoglobulin G-Degrading Enzyme of Streptococcus Pyogenes. We next discuss donor procurement and the resurgence of donation after circulatory death as a viable strategy to significantly and safely increase the donor pool. Post-transplant, we evaluate non-invasive surveillance techniques including gene expression profiling and donor-derived cell-free DNA. Last, we discuss the ground-breaking developments in the field of xenotransplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pratyaksh K Srivastava
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America
| | - Michelle M Kittleson
- Department of Cardiology, Smidt Heart Institute at Cedars-Sinai, Los Angeles, CA, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Milhès J, Marion O, Puissant B, Carlé C, Bouthemy C, Del Bello A, Kamar N, Renaudineau Y, Congy-Jolivet N. Impact of imlifidase treatment on immunoglobulins in an HLA-hypersensitized lupus nephritis patient with anti-SSA/SSB antibodies after kidney transplantation: A case report. J Transl Autoimmun 2023; 7:100223. [PMID: 38162455 PMCID: PMC10755536 DOI: 10.1016/j.jtauto.2023.100223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/01/2023] [Accepted: 11/28/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024] Open
Abstract
Bacterial recombinant cysteine protease Ides (imlifidase, Idefirix®, Hansa Biopharma) is used to prevent humoral transplant rejection in highly HLA-sensitized recipients, and to control IgG-mediated autoimmune diseases. We report the case of a 51 years old woman suffering from lupus nephritis with end stage kidney disease, grafted for the second time and pre-treated with imlifidase. The patient was HLA-hypersensitized (calculated Panel Reactive Antibodies [Abs], cPRA>99 %) and has three preformed Donor Specific Antibodies (DSA). Circulating immunoglobulins were monitored at initiation (0, 6, 36, 72 and 96 h), and at Ab recovery one and two months following imlifidase injection. From baseline, the higher depletion was reported after 36h for total IgG (-75 %) and IgG subclasses (-87 % for IgG1, IgG2 and IgG3, -78 % for IgG4), while no significant impact on IgA and IgM was observed. Anti-SSA 60 kDa and anti-SSB auto-Abs quickly decreased after imlifidase injection (-96 % for both after 36 h) as well as post-vaccinal specific IgG (-95 % for tetanus toxoid, -97 % for pneumococcus and -91 % for Haemophilus influenzae Abs after 36 h). At the Ab recovery phase, total IgG and anti-SSA60/SSB Abs reached their initial level at two months. Regarding alloreactive Abs, anti-HLA Abs including the three DSA showed a dramatic decrease after injection with 100 % depletion from baseline after 36 h as assessed by multiplex single bead antigen assay, leading to negative crossmatches using both lymphocytotoxicity (LCT) and flow cell techniques. DSA rebound at recovery was absent and remained under the positivity threshold (MFI = 1000) after 6 months. The findings from this case report are that imlifidase exerts an early depleting effect on all circulating IgG, while IgG recovery may depend in part from imlifidase's capacity to target memory B cells.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jean Milhès
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
| | - Olivier Marion
- Nephrology and Organ Transplantation Department, Rangueil Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Benedicte Puissant
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
- INSERM UMR 1291 - CNRS UMR 5051, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITy), University Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Caroline Carlé
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
- INSERM UMR 1291 - CNRS UMR 5051, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITy), University Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Charlène Bouthemy
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
| | - Arnaud Del Bello
- Nephrology and Organ Transplantation Department, Rangueil Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Nephrology and Organ Transplantation Department, Rangueil Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France
| | - Yves Renaudineau
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
- INSERM UMR 1291 - CNRS UMR 5051, Toulouse Institute for Infectious and Inflammatory Diseases (INFINITy), University Toulouse III, Toulouse, France
| | - Nicolas Congy-Jolivet
- Immunology Laboratory Department, Institut Fédératif de Biologie, Purpan, Toulouse University Hospital Center, Toulouse, France
- UMR 1037 INSERM Team 20 / Université Toulouse III Paul Sabatier, Toulouse Cancerology Research Center (CRCT), Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Gardin A, Ronzitti G. Current limitations of gene therapy for rare pediatric diseases: Lessons learned from clinical experience with AAV vectors. Arch Pediatr 2023; 30:8S46-8S52. [PMID: 38043983 DOI: 10.1016/s0929-693x(23)00227-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/05/2023]
Abstract
Gene therapy using adeno-associated viral (AAV) vectors is a promising therapeutic strategy for multiple inherited diseases. Following intravenous injection, AAV vectors carrying a copy of the missing gene or the genome-editing machinery reach their target cells and deliver the genetic material. Several clinical trials are currently ongoing and significant success has already been achieved with at least six AAV gene therapy products with market approval in Europe and the United States. Nonetheless, clinical trials and preclinical studies have uncovered several limitations of AAV gene transfer, which need to be addressed in order to improve the safety and enable the treatment of the largest patient population. Limitations include the occurrence of immune-mediated toxicities, the potential loss of correction in the long run, and the development of neutralizing antibodies against AAV vectors preventing re-administration. In this review, we summarize these limitations and discuss the potential technological developments to overcome them. © 2023 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS on behalf of French Society of Pediatrics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Gardin
- Genethon, 91000 Evry, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, Inserm, Genethon, Integrare research unit UMR_S951, 91000 Evry, France; Hépatologie et Transplantation Hépatique Pédiatriques, Centre de référence de l'atrésie des voies biliaires et des cholestases génétiques, FSMR FILFOIE, Health Care Provider of the European Reference Network on Rare Liver Disorders (ERN RARE LIVER), Hôpital Bicêtre, AP-HP, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France
| | - Giuseppe Ronzitti
- Genethon, 91000 Evry, France; Université Paris-Saclay, Univ Evry, Inserm, Genethon, Integrare research unit UMR_S951, 91000 Evry, France.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Bauer-Smith H, Sudol ASL, Beers SA, Crispin M. Serum immunoglobulin and the threshold of Fc receptor-mediated immune activation. Biochim Biophys Acta Gen Subj 2023; 1867:130448. [PMID: 37652365 PMCID: PMC11032748 DOI: 10.1016/j.bbagen.2023.130448] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/05/2023] [Revised: 08/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 09/02/2023]
Abstract
Antibodies can mediate immune recruitment or clearance of immune complexes through the interaction of their Fc domain with cellular Fc receptors. Clustering of antibodies is a key step in generating sufficient avidity for efficacious receptor recognition. However, Fc receptors may be saturated with prevailing, endogenous serum immunoglobulin and this raises the threshold by which cellular receptors can be productively engaged. Here, we review the factors controlling serum IgG levels in both healthy and disease states, and discuss how the presence of endogenous IgG is encoded into the functional activation thresholds for low- and high-affinity Fc receptors. We discuss the circumstances where antibody engineering can help overcome these physiological limitations of therapeutic antibodies. Finally, we discuss how the pharmacological control of Fc receptor saturation by endogenous IgG is emerging as a feasible mechanism for the enhancement of antibody therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah Bauer-Smith
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK; Centre for Cancer Immunology, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK
| | - Abigail S L Sudol
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK
| | - Stephen A Beers
- Centre for Cancer Immunology, School of Cancer Sciences, University of Southampton Faculty of Medicine, Southampton SO16 6YD, UK.
| | - Max Crispin
- School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton SO17 1BJ, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Bureau C, Rafat C, Taupin JL, Malard S, Mesnard L, François H, Petit-Hoang C, Ouali N, Hertig A, Jamme M, Buob D, Rondeau E, Galichon P, Luque Y. Immunoadsorption-Based HLA Desensitization in Patients Awaiting Deceased Donor Kidney Transplantation: An Interventional, Non-Randomised, Single Cohort Study. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11212. [PMID: 37680645 PMCID: PMC10481532 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11212] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2023] [Accepted: 08/01/2023] [Indexed: 09/09/2023]
Abstract
Whether immunoadsorption (IADS) as part of desensitization protocols could facilitate deceased donor kidney transplantation (KT) in highly sensitized (HS) patients remains to be proven. We retrospectively analyzed our IADS based desensitization protocol for deceased donor KTs between 2013 and 2018. Fifteen HS patients (age 52 years [40-56]) were included. Waiting time before IADS was 6 years [5-10] and the interval between IADS initiation and KT was 5 months [1-12] for the 14 transplanted patients. Nine patients had prior KT. Calculated panel reactive antibody decreased significantly during the protocol (99.3% [92.5-99.9] vs. 79.4% [56.7-81.9]; p = 0.004). Death-censored graft survival was 85.7% at 1 and 2 years post-transplantation. One-year median plasma creatinine level was 135 µmol/L [111-202]. Six developed active antibody mediated rejection (ABMR) at 1 year, with a median delay of 13 days [11-26]. Eight patients developed severe infections, including two fatal outcomes. Finally, compared to 93% of patients who received desensitization receiving a KT, only 43% of a control with similar characteristics underwent transplantation. However, no difference was found in overall probability of being alive with a functioning graft at the end of follow-up. The results indicate that our IADS-based desensitization strategy was not effective due to a high rate of ABMR and severe infectious complications which pose a challenge to its universalization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Côme Bureau
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Cédric Rafat
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Jean Luc Taupin
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire Régional d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Stéphanie Malard
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Laboratoire Régional d’Histocompatibilité, Hôpital Saint Louis, Paris, France
| | - Laurent Mesnard
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Hélène François
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Camille Petit-Hoang
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Nacera Ouali
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Alexandre Hertig
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Matthieu Jamme
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - David Buob
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Service d’Anatomie et Cytologie Pathologiques, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
| | - Eric Rondeau
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Pierre Galichon
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| | - Yosu Luque
- Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris, Soins Intensifs Néphrologiques et Rein Aigu, Département de Néphrologie, Hôpital Tenon, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, CoRaKid Inserm UMR_S1155, Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abuazzam F, Dubrawka C, Abdulhadi T, Amurao G, Alrata L, Yaseen Alsabbagh D, Alomar O, Alhamad T. Emerging Therapies for Antibody-Mediated Rejection in Kidney Transplantation. J Clin Med 2023; 12:4916. [PMID: 37568318 PMCID: PMC10419906 DOI: 10.3390/jcm12154916] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2023] [Revised: 07/21/2023] [Accepted: 07/25/2023] [Indexed: 08/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite the advances in immunosuppressive medications, antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) continues to be a major cause of kidney allograft failure and remains a barrier to improving long-term allograft survival. Recently, there have been significant advances in the understanding of the pathophysiological process of AMR, along with the development of new therapeutic options. Additionally, surveillance protocols with donor-derived cell-free DNA and gene profile testing have been established, leading to the early detection of AMR. A multitude of clinical trials are ongoing, opening numerous opportunities for improving outcome in kidney transplant recipients. In this brief review, we discuss the emerging therapies for managing both active and chronic active AMR and highlight the ongoing clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Farah Abuazzam
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Casey Dubrawka
- Department of Pharmacy, Barnes Jewish Hospital, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA;
| | - Tarek Abdulhadi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Gwendolyn Amurao
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Louai Alrata
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Dema Yaseen Alsabbagh
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Omar Alomar
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
| | - Tarek Alhamad
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA; (F.A.); (T.A.); (G.A.); (L.A.); (D.Y.A.); (O.A.)
- Transplant Epidemiology Research Collaboration (TERC), Institute of Public Health, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Couzi L, Malvezzi P, Amrouche L, Anglicheau D, Blancho G, Caillard S, Freist M, Guidicelli GL, Kamar N, Lefaucheur C, Mariat C, Koenig A, Noble J, Thaunat O, Thierry A, Taupin JL, Bertrand D. Imlifidase for Kidney Transplantation of Highly Sensitized Patients With a Positive Crossmatch: The French Consensus Guidelines. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11244. [PMID: 37448448 PMCID: PMC10336835 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11244] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/15/2023]
Abstract
Imlifidase recently received early access authorization for highly sensitized adult kidney transplant candidates with a positive crossmatch against an ABO-compatible deceased donor. These French consensus guidelines have been generated by an expert working group, in order to homogenize patient selection, associated treatments and follow-up. This initiative is part of an international effort to analyze properly the benefits and tolerance of this new costly treatment in real-life. Eligible patients must meet the following screening criteria: cPRA ≥ 98%, ≤ 65-year of age, ≥ 3 years on the waiting list, and a low risk of biopsy-related complications. The final decision to use Imlifidase will be based on the two following criteria. First, the results of a virtual crossmatch on recent serum, which shall show a MFI for the immunodominant donor-specific antibodies (DSA) > 6,000 but the value of which does not exceed 5,000 after 1:10 dilution. Second, the post-Imlifidase complement-dependent cytotoxicity crossmatch must be negative. Patients treated with Imlifidase will receive an immunosuppressive regimen based on steroids, rATG, high dose IVIg, rituximab, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid. Frequent post-transplant testing for DSA and systematic surveillance kidney biopsies are highly recommended to monitor post-transplant DSA rebound and subclinical rejection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Couzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
- CNRS-UMR 5164 Immuno ConcEpT, Université de Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | | | - Gilles Blancho
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Nantes, Nantes, France
| | | | - Marine Freist
- Centre Hospitalier Emile Roux, Le Puy-en-Velay, France
| | | | - Nassim Kamar
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Toulouse, Toulouse, France
| | | | - Christophe Mariat
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Saint-Étienne, Saint-Etienne, France
| | | | - Johan Noble
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble, La Tronche, France
| | | | - Antoine Thierry
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) de Poitiers, Poitiers, France
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
16
|
Bestard O, Moreso F, Dorling A. Prime Time for HLA Desensitization: Imlifidase in the Spotlight. Transpl Int 2023; 36:11616. [PMID: 37456683 PMCID: PMC10348404 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2023.11616] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/02/2023] [Indexed: 07/18/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Oriol Bestard
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Francesc Moreso
- Kidney Transplant Unit, Nephrology Department, Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anthony Dorling
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, King’s College London, London, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Dudreuilh C, Jarvis P, Beadle N, Pilecka I, Shaw O, Gardner L, Scottà C, Mamode N, Game DS, Sanchez-Fueyo A, Lombardi G, Learoyd A, Douiri A, Dorling A. Can regulatory T cells improve outcomes of sensitised patients after HLA-Ab incompatible renal transplantation: study protocol for the Phase IIa GAMECHANgER-1 trial. BMC Nephrol 2023; 24:117. [PMID: 37118685 PMCID: PMC10140710 DOI: 10.1186/s12882-023-03157-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2022] [Accepted: 04/06/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Kidney transplantation is the gold-standard treatment for patients with kidney failure. However, one-third of patients awaiting a kidney transplant are highly sensitized to human leukocyte antigens (HLA), resulting in an increased waiting time for a suitable kidney, more acute and chronic rejection, and a shorter graft survival compared to non-highly sensitised patients. Current standard immunosuppression protocols do not adequately suppress memory responses, and so alternative strategies are needed. Autologous polyclonally expanded regulatory T cells (Tregs) have been demonstrated to be safe in transplant settings and could be a potential alternative to modulate memory immune alloresponses. METHODS The aim of this trial is to determine whether adoptive transfer of autologous Tregs into HLA sensitised patients can suppress memory T and B cell responses against specific HLA antigens. This is a two-part, multi-centre, prospective clinical trial, comprising an observational phase (Part 1) aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to HLA (Pure HLA Proteins) followed by an interventional phase (Part 2). The first 9 patients identified as being eligible in Part 1 will undergo baseline immune monitoring for 2 months to inform statistical analysis of the primary endpoint. Part 2 is an adaptive, open labelled trial based on Simon's two-stage design, with 21 patients receiving Good Manufacturing Practice (GMP)-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs to a dose of 5-10 × 106 cells/kg body weight. The primary EP is suppression of in vitro memory responses for 2 months post-infusion. 12 patients will receive treatment in stage 1 of Part 2, and 9 patients will receive treatment in stage 2 of Part 2 if ≥ 50% patients pass the primary EP in stage 1. DISCUSSION This is a prospective study aiming to identify patients with unregulated cellular memory responses to Pure HLA Proteins and determine baseline variation in these patterns of response. Part 2 will be an adaptive phase IIa clinical trial with 21 patients receiving a single infusion of GMP-grade polyclonally expanded Tregs in two stages. It remains to be demonstrated that modulating memory alloresponses clinically using Treg therapy is achievable. TRIAL REGISTRATION EudraCT Number: 2021-001,664-23. REC Number: 21/SC/0253. Trial registration number ISRCTN14582152.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Dudreuilh
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK.
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
| | - P Jarvis
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Beadle
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - I Pilecka
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Clinical Trials Unit, King's College London, London, UK
| | - O Shaw
- Guy's and St Thomas's Hospital Trust, London, UK
| | - L Gardner
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - C Scottà
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - N Mamode
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - D S Game
- Department of Transplantation, Guys and St, Thomas's Hospital NHS Trust, London, UK
| | - A Sanchez-Fueyo
- Institute of Liver Studies, King's College London University and King's College Hospital, London, UK
| | - G Lombardi
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Learoyd
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Douiri
- School of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - A Dorling
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, Department of Inflammation Biology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London & NIHR Biomedical Research Centre-Transplant Theme, Guy's Hospital, Great Maze Pond, London, SE1 9RT, UK
- Centre for Nephrology, Urology and Transplantation, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Romei MG, Leonard B, Kim I, Kim HS, Lazar GA. Antibody-guided proteases enable selective and catalytic degradation of challenging therapeutic targets. J Biol Chem 2023; 299:104685. [PMID: 37031819 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbc.2023.104685] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Revised: 03/08/2023] [Accepted: 03/23/2023] [Indexed: 04/11/2023] Open
Abstract
The exquisite specificity, natural biological functions, and favorable development properties of antibodies make them highly effective agents as drugs. Monoclonal antibodies are particularly strong as inhibitors of systemically accessible targets where trough-level concentrations can sustain full target occupancy. Yet beyond this pharmacologic wheelhouse, antibodies perform suboptimally for targets of high abundance and those not easily accessible from circulation. Fundamentally, this restraint on broader application is due largely to the stoichiometric nature of their activity - one drug molecule is generally able to inhibit a maximum of two target molecules at a time. Enzymes in contrast are able to catalytically turnover multiple substrates, making them a natural sub-stoichiometric solution for targets of high abundance or in poorly accessible sites of action. However, enzymes have their own limitations as drugs, including, in particular the polypharmacology and broad specificity often seen with native enzymes. In this study, we introduce antibody-guided proteolytic enzymes to enable selective sub-stoichiometric turnover of therapeutic targets. We demonstrate that antibody-mediated substrate targeting can enhance enzyme activity and specificity, with proof of concept for two challenging target proteins, amyloid-β (Aβ) and immunoglobulin G (IgG). This work advances a new biotherapeutic platform that combines the favorable properties of antibodies and proteolytic enzymes to more effectively suppress high-bar therapeutic targets.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew G Romei
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA.
| | - Brandon Leonard
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Ingrid Kim
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Hok Seon Kim
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Greg A Lazar
- Department of Antibody Engineering, Genentech Inc., South San Francisco, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Patterson CM, Jolly EC, Burrows F, Ronan NJ, Lyster H. Conventional and Novel Approaches to Immunosuppression in Lung Transplantation. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:121-136. [PMID: 36774159 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.10.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Most therapeutic advances in immunosuppression have occurred over the past few decades. Although modern strategies have been effective in reducing acute cellular rejection, excess immunosuppression comes at the price of toxicity, opportunistic infection, and malignancy. As our understanding of the immune system and allograft rejection becomes more nuanced, there is an opportunity to evolve immunosuppression protocols to optimize longer term outcomes while mitigating the deleterious effects of traditional protocols.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline M Patterson
- Transplant Continuing Care Unit, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Elaine C Jolly
- Division of Renal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Fay Burrows
- Department of Pharmacy, St Vincent's Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Nicola J Ronan
- Transplant Continuing Care Unit, Royal Papworth Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, Cambridge, United Kingdom
| | - Haifa Lyster
- Cardiothoracic Transplant Unit, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom; Kings College, London, United Kingdom; Pharmacy Department, Royal Brompton and Harefield Hospitals, Part of Guy's & St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Courtwright A, Atkinson C, Pelaez A. The Highly Sensitized Recipient: Pretransplant and Posttransplant Considerations. Clin Chest Med 2023; 44:85-93. [PMID: 36774171 DOI: 10.1016/j.ccm.2022.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/11/2023]
Abstract
Highly sensitized patients, who are often black and Hispanic women, are less likely to be listed for lung transplant and are at higher risk for prolonged waitlist time and waitlist death. In this review, the authors discuss strategies for improving access to transplant in this population, including risk stratification of crossing pretransplant donor-specific antibodies, based on antibody characteristics. The authors also review institutional protocols, such as perioperative desensitization, for tailoring transplant immunosuppression in the highly sensitized population. The authors conclude with suggestions for future research, including development of novel donor-specific antibody-directed therapeutics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Courtwright
- Hospital of University of Pennsylvania, 3400 Spruce Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA
| | - Carl Atkinson
- University of Florida, 1600 Southwest Archer Road, Gainesville, FL 32608, USA
| | - Andres Pelaez
- Jackson Health System, University of Miami, Miller School of Medicine, Miami Transplant Institute, 1801 Northwest 9th Avenue, Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Abstract
Access to kidney transplantation is limited by HLA-specific sensitization. Desensitization strategies enable crossmatch-positive kidney transplantation. In this review, we describe clinical experience gained over the last 20 y using desensitization strategies before kidney transplantation and describe the different tools used (both drugs and apheresis options), including IVIg, rituximab, apheresis techniques, interleukin-6 interference, proteasome inhibition, enzymatic degradation of HLA antibodies, complement inhibition, and B cytokine interference. Although access to transplantation for highly sensitized kidney transplantation candidates has been vastly improved by desensitization strategies, it remains, however, limited by the recurrence of HLA antibodies after transplantation and the occurrence of antibody-mediated rejection.
Collapse
|
22
|
Sethi S, Jordan SC. Novel therapies for treatment of antibody-mediated rejection of the kidney. Curr Opin Organ Transplant 2023; 28:29-35. [PMID: 36579683 DOI: 10.1097/mot.0000000000001037] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW We aim to discuss current literature on novel therapies for antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplantation with a focus on chronic AMR. RECENT FINDINGS IL-6/IL-6 receptor blockers appear promising in the treatment of chronic AMR. Blocking this pathway was shown to reduce human leucocyte antigen-antibodies, improve histologic inflammation and increase T-regulatory cells. Based on experience in desensitization, IgG degrading endopeptidase, imlifidase, could be effective in AMR. There have been case reports describing the successful use of plasma cell/natural killer-cell-directed anti-CD38 antibody in the treatment of AMR. Off-target effects have been noted and strategies to mitigate these will be needed when using these agents. Complement inhibitors could be an effective add-on strategy to antibody-depleting therapies but their role in AMR needs to be better defined. Combining proteasome inhibitors and costimulation blockers has shown encouraging results in the prevention of AMR in animal models and is now being investigated in humans. Other novel strategies such as Fc neonatal receptor blockers which inhibit the recycling of pathogenic IgG and bispecific antibodies against B-cell maturation antigen/CD3+ T cells warrant further investigation. SUMMARY There are now a number of emerging therapies with varied targets and mechanism(s) of action that hold promise in the management of AMR and improving allograft survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Supreet Sethi
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
23
|
Roux A, Bunel V, Belousova N, Messika J, Tanaka S, Salpin M, Roussel A, Beaumont-Azuar L, Picard C, Brugiere O, Devaquet J, Sage E, Le Guen M, Taupin JL, Devriese M, Glorion M, Parquin F. First use of imlifidase desensitization in a highly sensitized lung transplant candidate: a case report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:294-7. [PMID: 36695676 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/27/2022] [Revised: 10/10/2022] [Accepted: 11/13/2022] [Indexed: 01/15/2023]
Abstract
Lung transplant candidates who are highly sensitized against human leucocyte antigen present an ongoing challenge with regards to finding immunologically acceptable donors. Desensitization strategies aimed at reducing preformed donor-specific antibodies have a number of limitations. Imlifidase, an IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, is a novel agent that has been used to convert positive crossmatches to negative in kidney transplant candidates, allowing transplantation to occur. We present the first case of imlifidase use for antibody depletion in a highly sensitized lung transplant candidate who went on to undergo a successful bilateral lung transplant.
Collapse
|
24
|
Rostaing L, Noble J, Malvezzi P, Jouve T. Imlifidase therapy: exploring its clinical uses. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2023; 24:259-265. [PMID: 36404277 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2022.2150965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Imlifidase, the IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes, can cleave all four human IgG subclasses with precise specificity. All IgG molecules can be inactivated for ~1-to-2 weeks, until new IgG synthesis is detected. AREAS COVERED Imlifidase was first studied for the desensitization of highly HLA-sensitized patients to enable kidney transplantation. It is currently being evaluated for kidney transplant recipients who have antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), those with acute kidney injury in the setting of anti-glomerular basement membrane disease, and those with Guillain-Barré syndrome. In 2020, imlifidase received conditional approval from the European Medicines Agency for use to desensitize deceased-donor kidney transplant recipients with a positive crossmatch. Literature search through PubMed revealed that so far, 39 crossmatched-positive patients, i.e. in the presence of donor-specific alloantibodies (DSA) on the transplantation day, have received imlifidase prior to kidney transplantation in four single-arm, open-label, phase II studies. Results at 3-year follow-up are good, i.e. allograft survival is 84%, despite 38% of patients presenting with acute AMR. Mean estimated glomerular filtration rate at 3 years was 55 mL/min/1.73 m2. EXPERT OPINION The major hurdle now is how to prevent/avoid DSA rebound within days 5-15 post-transplantation. Thus, imlifidase represents a major breakthrough for highly HLA-sensitized kidney transplant candidates, particularly those that have calculated panel-reactive alloantibodies of ≥90%.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lionel Rostaing
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France.,Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Johan Noble
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| | - Paolo Malvezzi
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France
| | - Thomas Jouve
- Nephrology, Hemodialysis, Apheresis and Kidney Transplantation Department, University Hospital Grenoble, Grenoble, France.,School of Medicine, University Grenoble Alpes, Grenoble, France
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Grimaldi V, Pagano M, Moccia G, Maiello C, De Rosa P, Napoli C. Novel insights in the clinical management of hyperimmune patients before and after transplantation. Curr Res Immunol 2023; 4:100056. [PMID: 36714552 PMCID: PMC9876744 DOI: 10.1016/j.crimmu.2023.100056] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2022] [Revised: 01/11/2023] [Accepted: 01/18/2023] [Indexed: 01/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Despite improvements in anti-Human Leucocyte Antigens antibody detection, identification, and characterization offer a better in peri-operative management techniques, antibodies remain a serious cause of morbidity and mortality for patients both before and after organ transplantation. Hyperimmune patients are disadvantaged by having to wait longer to receive an organ from a suitably matched donor. They could benefit from desensitization protocols in both pre- and post-transplantation period. Clinical studies are underway to highlight which best desensitization strategies could be assure the best outcome in both heart and kidney transplantation. Although most clinical evidence about desensitization strategies by using anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies, proteasome inhibitors, anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies, interleukin-6 blockade, cysteine protease and complement inhibitors, comes from kidney transplantation studies, many of the debated novel concepts can be easily applied to desensitization also in heart transplantation. Here, we discuss the candidates and recipients' management by using most common standard of care and novel therapeutics, desensitization endpoints, and strategies for future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincenzo Grimaldi
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy,Corresponding author.
| | - Martina Pagano
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Giusi Moccia
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ciro Maiello
- Cardiac Transplantation Unit, Department of Cardiac Surgery and Transplantation, Ospedali dei Colli, Naples, Italy
| | - Paride De Rosa
- General Surgery and Transplantation Unit, "San Giovanni di Dio e Ruggi D'Aragona," University Hospital, Scuola Medica Salernitana, Salerno, Italy
| | - Claudio Napoli
- U.O.C. Division of Clinical Immunology, Immunohematology, Transfusion Medicine and Transplant Immunology. Regional Reference Laboratory of Transplant Immunology (LIT) (EFI and ASHI Certifications). Department of Internal Medicine and Specialistics, University of Campania "L. Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy,Department of Advanced Medical and Surgical Sciences (DAMSS), University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Roux A, Hachem RR. Point-Counterpoint: Desensitization to improve the likelihood of lung transplantation. Hum Immunol 2023; 84:43-45. [PMID: 36328804 DOI: 10.1016/j.humimm.2022.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Antoine Roux
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Ramsey R Hachem
- Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Washington University in St. Louis, MO, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
27
|
Tambur AR, Bestard O, Campbell P, Chong AS, Barrio MC, Ford ML, Gebel HM, Heidt S, Hickey M, Jackson A, Kosmoliaptsis V, Lefaucheur C, Louis K, Mannon RB, Mengel M, Morris A, Pinelli DF, Reed EF, Schinstock C, Taupin JL, Valenzuela N, Wiebe C, Nickerson P. Sensitization in transplantation: Assessment of Risk 2022 Working Group Meeting Report. Am J Transplant 2023; 23:133-149. [PMID: 36695615 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajt.2022.11.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/22/2022] [Revised: 10/20/2022] [Accepted: 11/02/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
The Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk workgroup is a collaborative effort of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Histocompatibility and Immunogenetics that aims at providing recommendations for clinical testing, highlights gaps in current knowledge, and proposes areas for further research to enhance histocompatibility testing in support of solid organ transplantation. This report provides updates on topics discussed by the previous Sensitization in Transplantation: Assessment of Risk working groups and introduces 2 areas of exploration: non-human leukocyte antigen antibodies and utilization of human leukocyte antigen antibody testing measurement to evaluate the efficacy of antibody-removal therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anat R Tambur
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca, Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Patricia Campbell
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anita S Chong
- Section of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Martha Crespo Barrio
- Department of Nephrology, Hospital del Mar & Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mandy L Ford
- Department of Surgery and Emory Transplant Center, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Howard M Gebel
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - Sebastiaan Heidt
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Netherlands
| | - Michelle Hickey
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Annette Jackson
- Department of Immunology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Kevin Louis
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut national de la santé et de la recherche médicale UMR-S970, Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Roslyn B Mannon
- Department of Medicine, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, USA
| | - Michael Mengel
- Department of Laboratory Medicine & Pathology, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada
| | - Anna Morris
- Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - David F Pinelli
- Department of Surgery, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - Elaine F Reed
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | | | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Department of Immunology, Saint Louis Hospital and University Paris-Cité, Paris, France
| | - Nicole Valenzuela
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California, USA
| | - Chris Wiebe
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Peter Nickerson
- Department of Medicine, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Sudol ASL, Butler J, Ivory DP, Tews I, Crispin M. Extensive substrate recognition by the streptococcal antibody-degrading enzymes IdeS and EndoS. Nat Commun 2022; 13:7801. [PMID: 36528711 PMCID: PMC9759587 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-022-35340-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Enzymatic cleavage of IgG antibodies is a common strategy used by pathogenic bacteria to ablate immune effector function. The Streptococcus pyogenes bacterium secretes the protease IdeS and the glycosidase EndoS, which specifically catalyse cleavage and deglycosylation of human IgG, respectively. IdeS has received clinical approval for kidney transplantation in hypersensitised individuals, while EndoS has found application in engineering antibody glycosylation. We present crystal structures of both enzymes in complex with their IgG1 Fc substrate, which was achieved using Fc engineering to disfavour preferential Fc crystallisation. The IdeS protease displays extensive Fc recognition and encases the antibody hinge. Conversely, the glycan hydrolase domain in EndoS traps the Fc glycan in a "flipped-out" conformation, while additional recognition of the Fc peptide is driven by the so-called carbohydrate binding module. In this work, we reveal the molecular basis of antibody recognition by bacterial enzymes, providing a template for the development of next-generation enzymes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abigail S. L. Sudol
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - John Butler
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Dylan P. Ivory
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Ivo Tews
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| | - Max Crispin
- grid.5491.90000 0004 1936 9297School of Biological Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ UK
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Mamode N, Bestard O, Claas F, Furian L, Griffin S, Legendre C, Pengel L, Naesens M. European Guideline for the Management of Kidney Transplant Patients With HLA Antibodies: By the European Society for Organ Transplantation Working Group. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10511. [PMID: 36033645 PMCID: PMC9399356 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10511] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2022] [Accepted: 06/14/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
This guideline, from a European Society of Organ Transplantation (ESOT) working group, concerns the management of kidney transplant patients with HLA antibodies. Sensitization should be defined using a virtual parameter such as calculated Reaction Frequency (cRF), which assesses HLA antibodies derived from the actual organ donor population. Highly sensitized patients should be prioritized in kidney allocation schemes and linking allocation schemes may increase opportunities. The use of the ENGAGE 5 ((Bestard et al., Transpl Int, 2021, 34: 1005–1018) system and online calculators for assessing risk is recommended. The Eurotransplant Acceptable Mismatch program should be extended. If strategies for finding a compatible kidney are very unlikely to yield a transplant, desensitization may be considered and should be performed with plasma exchange or immunoadsorption, supplemented with IViG and/or anti-CD20 antibody. Newer therapies, such as imlifidase, may offer alternatives. Few studies compare HLA incompatible transplantation with remaining on the waiting list, and comparisons of morbidity or quality of life do not exist. Kidney paired exchange programs (KEP) should be more widely used and should include unspecified and deceased donors, as well as compatible living donor pairs. The use of a KEP is preferred to desensitization, but highly sensitized patients should not be left on a KEP list indefinitely if the option of a direct incompatible transplant exists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nizam Mamode
- Department of Transplantation, Guys Hospital, London, United Kingdom
- *Correspondence: Nizam Mamode,
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Vall d’Hebrón University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Frans Claas
- Department of Immunology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, Netherlands
- Department of Immunology, University of Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
| | - Lucrezia Furian
- Kidney and Pancreas Transplantation Unit, Department of Surgical Gastroenterological and Oncological Sciences, University Hospital of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - Siân Griffin
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Wales, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Department of Nephrology and Adult Kidney Transplantation, Hôpital Necker and Université de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Liset Pengel
- Centre for Evidence in Transplantation, University of Oxford, Oxford, United Kingdom
| | - Maarten Naesens
- Department of Microbiology, Immunology and Transplantation, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Klontz EH. Chop-chop: The future of bacterial enzymes in transfusion medicine. Transfus Med Rev 2022; 36:246-251. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2022.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2022] [Accepted: 05/25/2022] [Indexed: 10/15/2022]
|
31
|
Mayer KA, Budde K, Jilma B, Doberer K, Böhmig GA. Emerging drugs for antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation: a focus on phase II & III trials. Expert Opin Emerg Drugs 2022; 27:151-167. [PMID: 35715978 DOI: 10.1080/14728214.2022.2091131] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) is a leading cause of kidney allograft failure. Its therapy continues to be challenge, and no treatment has been approved for the market thus far. AREAS COVERED In this article, we discuss the pathophysiology and phenotypic presentation of ABMR, the current level of evidence to support the use of available therapeutic strategies, and the emergence of tailored drugs now being evaluated in systematic clinical trials. We searched PubMed, Clinicaltrials.gov and Citeline's Pharmaprojects for pertinent information on emerging anti-rejection strategies, laying a focus on phase II and III trials. EXPERT OPINION Currently, we rely on the use of apheresis for alloantibody depletion and intravenous immunoglobulin (referred to as standard of care), preferentially in early active ABMR. Recent systematic trials have questioned the benefits of using the CD20 antibody rituximab or the proteasome inhibitor bortezomib. However, there are now several promising treatment approaches in the pipeline, which are being trialed in phase II and III studies. These include interleukin-6 antagonism, CD38-targeting antibodies, and selective inhibitors of complement. On the basis of the information that has emerged so far, it seems that innovative treatment strategies for clinical use in ABMR may be available within the next 5-10 years.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katharina A Mayer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Klemens Budde
- Department of Nephrology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Bernd Jilma
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Medical University of Vienna, Austria
| | - Konstantin Doberer
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Georg A Böhmig
- Division of Nephrology and Dialysis, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Abstract
Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) is an acute autoimmune polyradiculoneuropathy affecting 1-2 subjects per 100,000 every year worldwide. It causes, in its classic form, symmetric weakness in the proximal and distal limb muscles with common involvement of the cranial nerves, particularly facial weakness. Respiratory function is compromised in a case in four. Randomised controlled trials have demonstrated the benefit of therapeutic plasma exchange in hastening time to recovery. Intravenous immunoglobulin was subsequently shown to be as efficacious as plasma exchange in adult subjects. In children, few trials have shown the benefit of intravenous immunoglobulin versus supportive care. Pharmacokinetic studies suggested a relationship between increase in immunoglobulin G level post-infusion and outcome, implying administration of larger doses may be beneficial in subjects with poor prognosis. However, a subsequent trial of a second dose of immunoglobulin in such subjects failed to show improved outcome, while demonstrating a higher risk of thromboembolic side-effects. Monoclonal antibody therapy has more recently been investigated for GBS, after multiple studies in animal models, with different agents and variable postulated mechanisms of action. Eculizumab, a humanised monoclonal antibody against the complement protein C5, was tested in in two randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 trials. Neither showed benefit versus immunoglobulins alone on disability level at 4 weeks, although one study importantly suggested possible, clinically highly relevant, late effects on normalising function. A phase 3 trial is in progress. Preliminary results of a placebo-controlled ongoing study of ANX005, a humanised recombinant antibody against C1q inhibiting the complement cascade, have been promising.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yusuf A Rajabally
- Aston Medical School, Aston University, Birmingham, B4 7ET, UK.
- Inflammatory Neuropathy Clinic, University Hospitals Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, B15 2TH, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Salvadori M, Tsalouchos A. Innovative immunosuppression in kidney transplantation: A challenge for unmet needs. World J Transplant 2022; 12:27-41. [PMID: 35433332 PMCID: PMC8968476 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v12.i3.27] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Revised: 01/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/07/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Due to the optimal results obtained in kidney transplantation and to the lack of interest of the industries, new innovative drugs in kidney transplantation are difficult to be encountered. The best strategy to find the new drugs recently developed or under development is to search in the sections of kidney transplantation still not completely covered by the drugs on the market. These unmet needs are the prevention of delayed graft function (DGF), the protection of the graft over the long time and the desensitization of preformed anti human leukocyte antigen antibodies and the treatment of the acute antibody-mediated rejection. These needs are particularly relevant due to the expansion of some kind of kidney transplantation as transplantation from non-heart beating donor and in the case of antibody-incompatible grafts. The first are particularly exposed to DGF, the latter need a safe desensitization and a safe treatments of the antibody mediated rejections that often occur. Particular caution is needed in treating these drugs. First, they are described in very recent studies and the follow-up of their effect is of course rather short. Second, some of these drugs are still in an early phase of study, even if in well-conducted randomized controlled trials. Particular caution and a careful check need to be used in trials launched 2 or 3 years ago. Indeed, is always necessary to verify whether the study is still going on or whether and why the study itself was abandoned.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Salvadori
- Department of Renal Transplantation, Careggi University Hospital, Florence 50139, Italy
| | - Aris Tsalouchos
- Division of Nephrology, Santa Maria Annunziata Hospital, Florence 50012, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Huang E, Maldonado AQ, Kjellman C, Jordan SC. Imlifidase for the treatment of anti-HLA antibody-mediated processes in kidney transplantation. Am J Transplant 2022; 22:691-697. [PMID: 34467625 PMCID: PMC9293130 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/28/2021] [Revised: 08/08/2021] [Accepted: 08/26/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
The IgG-degrading enzyme derived from Streptococcus pyogenes (Imlifidase, Hansa Biopharma) is a novel agent that cleaves all four human subclasses of IgG and has therapeutic potential for HLA desensitization in kidney transplantation and antibody-mediated rejection. Data from clinical trials in kidney transplantation demonstrated rapid degradation of anti-HLA donor-specific antibodies facilitating HLA-incompatible transplantation, which led to conditional approval of imlifidase by the European Medicines Agency for desensitization in kidney transplant recipients of a deceased donor with a positive cross match. Important considerations arising from the early experiences with imilfidase on kinetics of donor-specific antibodies after administration, timing of complementary therapeutic monoclonal or polyclonal IgG antibodies, and interference with cross match assays should be recognized as imlifidase emerges as a therapeutic agent for clinical transplantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Edmund Huang
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyTransplant Immunotherapy ProgramCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | - Stanley C. Jordan
- Department of MedicineDivision of NephrologyTransplant Immunotherapy ProgramCedars‐Sinai Medical CenterLos AngelesCaliforniaUSA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Bertacchi M, Parvex P, Villard J. Antibody-mediated rejection after kidney transplantation in children; therapy challenges and future potential treatments. Clin Transplant 2022; 36:e14608. [PMID: 35137982 PMCID: PMC9286805 DOI: 10.1111/ctr.14608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/09/2021] [Revised: 01/14/2022] [Accepted: 01/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
Antibody‐mediated rejection (AMR) remains one of the most critical problems in renal transplantation, with a significant impact on patient and graft survival. In the United States, no treatment has received FDA approval jet. Studies about treatments of AMR remain controversial, limited by the absence of a gold standard and the difficulty in creating large, multi‐center studies. These limitations emerge even more in pediatric transplantation because of the limited number of pediatric studies and the occasional use of some therapies with unknown and poorly documented side effects. The lack of recommendations and the unsharp definition of different forms of AMR contribute to the challenging management of the therapy by pediatric nephrologists. In an attempt to help clinicians involved in the care of renal transplanted children affected by an AMR, we rely on the latest recommendations of the Transplantation Society (TTS) for the classification and treatment of AMR to describe treatments available today and potential new treatments with a particular focus on the pediatric population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Paloma Parvex
- Division of Pediatric Nephrology, University Children Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Jean Villard
- Division of Nephrology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.,Division of Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Ziemann M, Suwelack B, Banas B, Budde K, Einecke G, Hauser I, Heinemann FM, Kauke T, Kelsch R, Koch M, Lachmann N, Reuter S, Seidl C, Sester U, Zecher D. Determination of unacceptable HLA antigen mismatches in kidney transplant recipients. HLA 2021; 100:3-17. [PMID: 34951119 DOI: 10.1111/tan.14521] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/26/2021] [Revised: 12/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/17/2021] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
With the introduction of the virtual allocation crossmatch in the Eurotransplant (ET) region in 2023, the determination of unacceptable antigen mismatches (UAM) in kidney transplant recipients is of utmost importance for histocompatibility laboratories and transplant centers. Therefore, a joined working group of members from the German Society for Immunogenetics (Deutsche Gesellschaft für Immungenetik, DGI) and the German Transplantation Society (Deutsche Transplantationsgesellschaft, DTG) revised and updated the previous recommendations from 2015 in light of recently published evidence. Like in the previous version, a wide range of topics is covered from technical issues to clinical risk factors. This review summarizes the evidence about the prognostic value of contemporary methods for HLA antibody detection and identification, as well as the impact of UAM on waiting time, on which these recommendations are based. As no clear criteria could be determined to differentiate potentially harmful from harmless HLA antibodies, the general recommendation is to assign all HLA against which plausible antibodies are found as UAM. There is, however, a need for individualized solutions for highly immunized patients. These revised recommendations provide a list of aspects that need to be considered when assigning UAM to enable a fair and comprehensible procedure and to harmonize risk stratification prior to kidney transplantation between transplant centers. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malte Ziemann
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Schleswig-Holstein, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Barbara Suwelack
- Medizinische Klinik D, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Bernhard Banas
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| | - Klemens Budde
- Medizinische Klinik m. S. Nephrologie, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Mitte, Berlin, Germany
| | - Gunilla Einecke
- Clinic for Renal and Hypertensive Disorders, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Ingeborg Hauser
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Frankfurt, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Falko Markus Heinemann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital Essen, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Teresa Kauke
- Division of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, München, Germany and Transplantation Center, Hospital of the Ludwig-Maximilians-University München, München, Germany
| | - Reinhard Kelsch
- Institute of Transfusion Medicine and Transplantation Immunology, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Martina Koch
- General-, Visceral- and Transplant Surgery, University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg-University Mainz, Germany
| | - Nils Lachmann
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine, H&I Laboratory, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Reuter
- Medizinische Klinik D, University Hospital Münster, Münster, Germany
| | - Christian Seidl
- Institute for Transfusion Medicine and Immunohaematology, German Red Cross Baden-Württemberg-Hessen, Frankfurt am Main, Germany
| | - Urban Sester
- Transplant center, University Hospital of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | - Daniel Zecher
- Department of Nephrology, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Schinstock CA, Tambur AR. Apples, oranges, and anything in between: In search of the best desensitization therapy. Am J Transplant 2021; 21:3825-3826. [PMID: 34416097 DOI: 10.1111/ajt.16808] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2021] [Revised: 07/18/2021] [Accepted: 08/01/2021] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Carrie A Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - Anat R Tambur
- Comprehensive Transplant Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Nierentransplantation mit Imlifidase bei signifikanter immunologischer Barriere. Transfusionsmedizin 2021; 11:220-220. [DOI: 10.1055/a-1580-4156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|