Luseogliflozin improves liver fat deposition compared to metformin in type 2 diabetes patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A prospective randomized controlled pilot study

Optimized strategy among diet, exercise, and pharmacological interventions for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Emerging treatment methods, including exercise, diet, and drugs, for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease have been proposed. However, the differences in their efficacy have not been determined. We aimed to compare the effects of these treatments excluding surgery via a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

DATA SOURCE

The data sources included PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane up to February 1st, 2023. The endpoints consisted of body mass index (BMI), serum markers of metabolism and liver injury markers, liver fat content, and stiffness.

RESULTS

A total of 174 studies with 10,183 patients were included in this meta-analysis. In terms of improving BMI, Pan-agonist of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors (PPAR) is the best treatment with the highest SUCRA (surface under the cumulative ranking) of 84.8% (mean = -3.40, 95% CI -5.55, -1.24) by the comparative effectiveness ranking. GLP-1 (glucagon-like peptide-1) has the best effect in improving the liver fat content based on the MRI-PDFF, steatosis score (SUCRA 99.7%, mean = -2.19, 95% CI -2.90, -1.48) and ballooning score (SUCRA 61.2%, mean = -0.82, 95% CI -4.46, 2.83).

CONCLUSIONS

Pan-agonist of PPAR was the most efficacious regimen in lowering BMIs, whereas GLP-1R agonists achieved the highest efficacy of steatosis improvement in this network meta-analysis.

Comparison of SGLT2 inhibitors vs. DPP4 inhibitors for patients with metabolic dysfunction associated fatty liver disease and diabetes mellitus

PURPOSE

This study aimed to examine the potential benefit of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors for patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and diabetes mellitus (DM) using a real-world database.

METHODS

We analyzed individuals with MAFLD and DM newly initiated on SGLT2 or dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) inhibitors from a large-scale administrative claims database. The primary outcome was the change in the fatty liver index (FLI) assessed using a linear mixed-effects model from the initiation of SGLT2 or DPP4 inhibitors. A propensity score-matching algorithm was used to compare the change in FLI among SGLT2 and DPP4 inhibitors.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching, 6547 well-balanced pairs of SGLT2 and 6547 DPP4 inhibitor users were created. SGLT2 inhibitor use was associated with a greater decline in FLI than DPP4 inhibitor use (difference at 1-year measurement, - 3.8 [95% CI - 4.7 to - 3.0]). The advantage of SGLT2 inhibitor use over DPP4 inhibitor use for improvement in FLI was consistent across subgroups. The relationship between SGLT2 inhibitors and amelioration of FLI was comparable between individual SGLT2 inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Our analysis using large-scale real-world data demonstrated the potential advantage of SGLT2 inhibitors over DPP4 inhibitors in patients with MAFLD and DM.

Metformin and the Liver: Unlocking the Full Therapeutic Potential

Metformin is a highly effective medication for managing type 2 diabetes mellitus. Recent studies have shown that it has significant therapeutic benefits in various organ systems, particularly the liver. Although the effects of metformin on metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease and metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis are still being debated, it has positive effects on cirrhosis and anti-tumoral properties, which can help prevent the development of hepatocellular carcinoma. Furthermore, it has been proven to improve insulin resistance and dyslipidaemia, commonly associated with liver diseases. While more studies are needed to fully determine the safety and effectiveness of metformin use in liver diseases, the results are highly promising. Indeed, metformin has a terrific potential for extending its full therapeutic properties beyond its traditional use in managing diabetes.

Insulin resistance and Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD): Pathways of action of hypoglycemic agents

Metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) is characterized by overweight/obesity, and the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus is the most important criterion. We propose an independent disease perspective without exclusion criteria and with less heterogeneity and greater impact because, according to the National Health and Nutrition Survey (ENSANUT), in Mexico, 25 % of adults over 60 years of age suffer from diabetes, and 96 % of those over 50 years of age have abdominal obesity. Due to the impact of insulin resistance in the pathophysiology of MASLD, which results in damage to hepatocytes, this work aims to provide an overview of the action pathways of hypoglycemic agents such as glucagon-like-1 receptor agonist and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists, whose importance lies in the fact that they are currently undergoing phase 2 studies, as well as dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors and sodium-glucose co-transporter type 2 inhibitors, which are undergoing phase 1 study trials.

Efficacy of sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors on hepatic fibrosis and steatosis in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a substantial contributor to liver-related morbidity worldwide, and yet, there are no standard, universal pharmacologic therapies approved for this indication. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the effectiveness of SGLT-2 inhibitors in improving hepatic steatosis and hepatic fibrosis in patients with NAFLD. An extensive electronic database search was done to identify studies published from inception until December 2023, without any language restrictions. All randomized controlled trials (RCT) that evaluated the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors for patients with NAFLD, regardless of diabetes mellitus status, were included. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2.0 tool was used to assess the risk of bias of each study included. Evidence from all studies were synthesized as mean differences for continuous data, and as risk ratio for dichotomous outcomes. An inverse variance or Mantel-Haenszel test was used in conjunction with a random-effects meta-analysis model, where necessary. 18 eligible RCTs involving 1330 participants were analyzed, all of which had risk of bias ranging from low to some concerns. Significant difference in means was observed for controlled attenuation parameter (6 trials, n = 372; MD: - 10.59 dB/m, 95% CI [- 18.25, - 2.92], p = 0.007, I2 = 0%); L/S ratio (3 trials, n = 163; MD: 0.11, 95% CI [0.01, 0.21], p = 0.04, I2 = 78%); LSM (7 trials, n = 447; MD: - 0.67 kPa, 95% CI [- 1.19, - 0.16], p = 0.010, I2 = 69%); MRI-PDFF (5 trials, n = 330; MD: - 2.61%, 95% CI [- 5.05, - 0.17], p = 0.04, I2 = 78%), and FIB-4 index (10 trials, n = 648; MD: - 0.12, 95% CI [- 0.21, - 0.04], p = 0.005, I2 = 16%) after SGLT-2 inhibitor treatment as compared to controls. In conclusion, the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors may lead to slight improvement of hepatic steatosis and/or fibrosis as compared to controls in patients with NAFLD and Type 2 diabetes mellitus based on imaging and histopathology biomarkers with low to moderate certainty of evidence.

Antifibrotic effects of sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors: A comprehensive review

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Scar tissue accumulation in organs is the underlying cause of many fibrotic diseases. Due to the extensive array of organs affected, the long-term nature of fibrotic processes and the large number of people who suffer from the negative impact of these diseases, they constitute a serious health problem for modern medicine and a huge economic burden on society. Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a relatively new class of anti-diabetic pharmaceuticals that offer additional benefits over and above their glucose-lowering properties; these medications modulate a variety of diseases, including fibrosis. Herein, we have collated and analyzed all available research on SGLT2is and their effects on organ fibrosis, together with providing a proposed explanation as to the underlying mechanisms.

METHODS

PubMed, ScienceDirect, Google Scholar and Scopus were searched spanning the period from 2012 until April 2023 to find relevant articles describing the antifibrotic effects of SGLT2is.

RESULTS

The majority of reports have shown that SGLT2is are protective against lung, liver, heart and kidney fibrosis as well as arterial stiffness. According to the results of clinical trials and animal studies, many SGLT2 inhibitors are promising candidates for the treatment of fibrosis. Recent studies have demonstrated that SGLT2is affect an array of cellular processes, including hypoxia, inflammation, oxidative stress, the renin-angiotensin system and metabolic activities, all of which have been linked to fibrosis.

CONCLUSION

Extensive evidence indicates that SGLT2is are promising treatments for fibrosis, demonstrating protective effects in various organs and influencing key cellular processes linked to fibrosis.

The role of anti-diabetic drugs in NAFLD. Have we found the Holy Grail? A narrative review

PURPOSE

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become a leading cause of liver disease, affecting 30% of the global population. NAFLD prevalence is particularly high in obese individuals and patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). NAFLD ranges from simple fat deposition in the liver to necroinflammation and fibrosis (non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)), NASH-cirrhosis, and/or hepatocellular carcinoma. Insulin resistance plays a key role in NAFLD pathogenesis, alongside dysregulation of adipocytes, mitochondrial dysfunction, genetic factors, and changes in gut microbiota. Since insulin resistance is also a major predisposing factor of T2DM, the administration of anti-diabetic drugs for the management of NAFLD seems reasonable.

METHODS

In this review we provide the NAFLD-associated mechanisms of action of some of the most widely used anti-diabetic drugs, namely metformin, pioglitazone, sodium-glucose transport protein-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor analogs (GLP1 RAs), and dipeptyl-peptidase-4 inhibitors (DPP4i) and present available data regarding their use in patients with NAFLD, with and without T2DM.

RESULTS

Both metformin and DPP4i have shown rather contradictory results, while pioglitazone seems to benefit patients with NASH and is thus the only drug approved for NASH with concomitant significant liver fibrosis by all major liver societies. On the other hand, SGLT2i and GLP1 RAs seem to be beneficiary in patients with NAFLD, showing both remarkable results, with SGLT2i proving to be more efficient in the only head-to-head study so far.

CONCLUSION

In patients with NAFLD and diabetes, pioglitazone, GLP1 RAs, and SGLT2i seem to be logical treatment options. Larger studies are needed before these drugs can be recommended for non-diabetic individuals.

An Update on the Effect Of Sodium Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review of Clinical Trials

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the main causes of liver disease, specifically chronic liver disease. Type 2 diabetes (T2DM) is associated with the risk of NAFLD given that patients usually have insulin resistance as one of the observed complications with NAFLD. Hypoglycemic agents, including sodium glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT-2), have shown to improve NAFLD. The objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on NAFLD patients' outcomes, whether they have T2DM or not. We conducted a comprehensive search using the PubMed and Ovid databases to identify published studies that addressed the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in NAFLD patients. The outcomes assessed include changes in liver enzymes, lipid profiles, weight changes, the fibrosis-4-index (FIB4), and magnetic resonance imaging proton density-based fat fraction (MRI-PDFF). Only clinical trials that met the quality measures were included in this review. Out of 382 potential studies, we included 16 clinical trials that discussed the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in NAFLD patients. A total of 753 patients were enrolled in these trials. The majority of the trials reported positive effects of SGLT-2 inhibitors on liver enzymes; alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and gamma-glutamyl transferase. All 10 trials that reported changes in body mass index (BMI) from baseline showed a statistically significant reduction with SGLT-2 inhibitor use, while 11 studies reported a significant increase in high density lipoprotein (HDL) levels, 3 studies reported a reduction in triglycerides (TG) levels, and 2 studies showed a decrease in low density lipoprotein (LDL) levels. The available evidence shows that the use of SGLT-2 inhibitors in NAFLD is associated with positive outcomes on liver enzymes, lipid profiles, and BMI. Further studies with larger sample size and longer follow-up time are warranted.

Comparative effectiveness of multiple different treatment regimens for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) are closely related and mutually contribute to the disease's development. There are many treatment options available to patients. We provide a comprehensive overview of the evidence on the treatment effects of several potential interventions for NAFLD with T2DM.

METHODS

This systematic review and network meta-analysis included searches of PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science from inception to June 30, 2023, for randomised controlled trials of treatment of NAFLD with T2DM. We performed Bayesian network meta-analyses to summarise effect estimates of comparisons between interventions. We applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) frameworks to rate all comparative outcomes' certainty in effect estimates, categorise interventions, and present the findings. This study was registered with PROSPERO, CRD42022342373.

RESULTS

Four thousand three hundred and sixty-nine records were retrieved from the database and other methods, of which 24 records were eligible for studies enrolling 1589 participants. Eight clinical indicators and 14 interventions were finally in focus. Referring to the lower surface under the cumulative ranking curves (SUCRA) and the league matrix table, exenatide and liraglutide, which are also glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs), showed excellent potential to reduce liver fat content, control glycemia, reduce body weight, and improve liver function and insulin resistance. Exenatide was more effective in reducing glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) (mean difference (MD) 0.32, 95%CI 0.12 to 0.52), lowering BMI (MD 0.81, 95%CI 0.18 to 1.45), and lowering alanine transaminase (ALT) (MD 10.96, 95%CI 5.27 to 16.66) compared to liraglutide. However, this evidence was assessed as low certainty. Omega-3 was the only intervention that did not have a tendency to lower HbA1c, with standard-treatment (STA-TRE) as reference (MD - 0.17, 95%CI - 0.42 to 0.07). Glimepiride is the only intervention that causes an increase in ALT levels, with standard-treatment (STA-TRE) as reference (MD - 11.72, 95%CI - 17.82 to - 5.57). Based on the available evidence, the treatment effects of pioglitazone, dapagliflozin, and liraglutide have a high degree of confidence.

CONCLUSIONS

The high confidence mandates the confident application of these findings as guides for clinical practice. Dapagliflozin and pioglitazone are used for glycaemic control in patients with NAFLD combined with T2DM, and liraglutide is used for weight loss therapy in patients with abdominal obesity. The available evidence does not demonstrate the credibility of the effectiveness of other interventions in reducing liver fat content, visceral fat area, ALT, and insulin resistance. Future studies should focus on the clinical application of GLP-1Ras and the long-term prognosis of patients.

Comparison of the efficacy and safety of hypoglycemic treatments in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type-2 diabetes: a systematic review and Bayesian network analysis

PURPOSE

The association between non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and metabolic disorders, especially type-2 diabetes (T2DM), has been proven to be bidirectional. Hypoglycemic agents may be promising treatments for those disorders. However, there is currently no approved hypoglycemic therapy for NAFLD. In this review, we aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of twelve different hypoglycemic treatments in patients with NAFLD and T2DM.

METHODS

We systematically screened randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published from March 2013 to March 2023 by searching PubMed, Embase, Medline, and Web of Science without any language restriction. We registered this project on the PROSPERO website: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/ (ID: CRD42023429701). All subsequent analyses were performed under the registered protocol. The mean difference (MD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI) were adapted to evaluate the effect size of the treatment. The surface under the cumulative sorting curve (SUCRA) was used to rank the efficacy of the included treatments.

RESULTS

We included 19 trials involving 1212 patients in total. Insulin plus glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP1RA) combination therapy was probably the most effective treatment for reducing weight and body mass index (BMI) (SUCRA: 0.93 and 1.00). Thiazolidinediones (TZD) were probably the most effective treatment for reducing glycosylated hemoglobin (HbA1c) and γ-glutamyltranspeptidase (γ-GGT) levels (SUCRA: 0.78 and 0.97). Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) had the highest probability of presenting good therapeutic efficacy in reducing triglyceride (TG) levels (SUCRA: 0.72). The most common adverse reactions were gastrointestinal disorders, mainly after the administration of GLP1RA, and mild hypoglycemia, which was closely related to the use of insulin.

CONCLUSION

GLP1RA plus insulin combination therapy, GLP1RA, SGLT2i, and TZD may be the most effective therapeutic methods for patients with NAFLD and T2DM.

Biomarkers for Assessing Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus on Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitor Therapy

In the current modern era of unhealthy lifestyles, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most prevalent liver disease and has become a serious global health problem. To date, there is no approved pharmacotherapy for the treatment of NAFLD, and necessary lifestyle changes such as weight loss, diet, and exercise are usually not sufficient to manage this disease. Patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) have a significantly higher risk of developing NAFLD and vice versa. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are antidiabetic agents that have recently been approved for two other indications: chronic kidney disease and heart failure in diabetics and non-diabetics. They are also emerging as promising new agents for NAFLD treatment, as they have shown beneficial effects on hepatic inflammation, steatosis, and fibrosis. Studies in animals have reported favorable effects of SGLT2 inhibitors, and studies in patients also found positive effects on body mass index (BMI), insulin resistance, glucose levels, liver enzymes, apoptosis, and transcription factors. There are some theories regarding how SGLT2 inhibitors affect the liver, but the exact mechanism is not yet fully understood. Therefore, biomarkers to evaluate underlying mechanisms of action of SGLT2 inhibitors on the liver have now been scrutinized to assess their potential as a future in-label therapy for NAFLD. In addition, finding suitable non-invasive biomarkers could be helpful in clinical practice for the early detection of NAFLD in patients. This is crucial for a positive disease outcome. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the most recent findings on the effects of SGLT2 inhibitors on NAFLD biomarkers and the potential of SGLT2 inhibitors to successfully treat NAFLD.

Impact of tofogliflozin on hepatic outcomes: a systematic review

PURPOSE

Studies have demonstrated a high prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) patients. The aim was to review the effect of tofogliflozin on hepatic outcomes in T2DM patients.

METHODS

A literature search in PubMed, Science Direct and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials was conducted for randomised clinical trials of tofogliflozin by applying predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria.

RESULTS

A total number of four randomised clinical trials, including 226 subjects, were included in the review. There was a significant decrease in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) and alanine transaminase (ALT) levels in the tofogliflozin group as compared to the control or active comparator groups. Additionally, gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP) and magnetic resonance imaging proton density fat fraction (MRI-PDFF) levels were also significantly decreased in the tofogliflozin group. However, no significant difference was observed in levels of adiponectin.

CONCLUSION

Overall, an improvement in levels of hepatic parameters was observed in T2DM patients with concurrent liver disorders. However, a large number of clinical trials are needed to prove the efficacy of tofogliflozin on hepatic outcomes in patients with T2DM.

Therapies for patients with coexisting heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are two common comorbidities that share similar pathophysiological mechanisms. There is a growing interest in the potential of targeted therapies to improve outcomes in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. This manuscript reviews current and potential therapies for patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD. Pharmacological therapies, including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors/angiotensin receptor blockers, mineralocorticoids receptor antagonist, and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors, have been shown to reduce fibrosis and fat deposits in the liver. However, there are currently no data showing the beneficial effects of sacubitril/valsartan, ivabradine, hydralazine, isosorbide nitrates, digoxin, or beta blockers on NAFLD in patients with HFrEF. This study highlights the importance of considering HFrEF and NAFLD when developing treatment plans for patients with these comorbidities. Further research is needed in patients with coexisting HFrEF and NAFLD, with an emphasis on novel therapies and the importance of a multidisciplinary approach for managing these complex comorbidities.

Pharmacokinetic, toxicological, and clinical considerations for the treatment of type 2 diabetes in patients with liver disease: a comprehensive update

INTRODUCTION

Type 2 diabetes and liver disease, mainly metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) and more rarely cirrhosis, coexist in many patients. This duality has direct implications for the physician when choosing glucose-lowering agents, with classical concerns but also recent new hopes.

AREAS COVERED

This updated comprehensive review will consider the pharmacokinetics, the tolerance/safety profile, the benefit/risk balance in cirrhosis, the effects on MAFLD and the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma of old and new glucose-lowering compounds in patients with liver disease, with a special focus on glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

We are currently facing a new paradigm in the management of patients with diabetes and liver disease. From previous reluctance when using antidiabetic agents (except insulin) in diabetic patients with hepatic impairment because of safety concerns, the commercialization of novel glucose-lowering agents has changed the scene. These agents, which have a good safety profile, are associated with weight loss and pleiotropic effects. They have proven their efficacy in improving MAFLD. However, more specific studies are still needed to prove their efficacy in preventing the progression to fibrosis/cirrhosis and confirm this new opportunity for the management of patients with diabetes and liver disease.

New anti-diabetic agents for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Objectives

This network meta-analysis aims to compare the efficacy and safety of new anti-diabetic medications for the treatment of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD).

Materials and methods

PubMed and Scopus were searched from inception to 27th March 2022 to identify all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in NAFLD patients. Outcomes included reductions in intrahepatic steatosis (IHS) and liver enzyme levels. The efficacy and safety of DPP-4 inhibitors, GLP-1 agonists, SGLT-2 inhibitors, and other therapies were indirectly compared using a NMA approach. Unstandardized mean difference (USMD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated.

Results

2,252 patients from 31 RCTs were included. "Add-on" GLP-1 agonists with standard of care (SoC) treatment showed significantly reduced IHS compared to SoC alone [USMD (95%CI) -3.93% (-6.54%, -1.33%)]. Surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) identified GLP-1 receptor agonists with the highest probability to reduce IHS (SUCRA 88.5%), followed by DPP-4 inhibitors (SUCRA 69.6%) and pioglitazone (SUCRA 62.2%). "Add-on" GLP-1 receptor agonists were also the most effective treatment for reducing liver enzyme levels; AST [USMD of -5.04 (-8.46, -1.62)], ALT [USMD of -9.84 (-16.84, -2.85)] and GGT [USMD of -15.53 (-22.09, -8.97)] compared to SoC alone. However, GLP-1 agonists were most likely to be associated with an adverse event compared to other interventions.

Conclusion

GLP-1 agonists may represent the most promising anti-diabetic treatment to reduce hepatic steatosis and liver enzyme activity in T2DM and NAFLD patients. Nevertheless, longer-term studies are required to determine whether this delays progression of liver cirrhosis in patients with NAFLD and T2DM.

Systematic review registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42021259336.1.

The Effects of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2-Inhibitors on Steatosis and Fibrosis in Patients with Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease or Steatohepatitis and Type 2 Diabetes: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are part of metabolic syndrome and share multiple causal associations. Both conditions have an alarmingly increasing incidence and lead to multiple complications, which have an impact on a variety of organs and systems, such as the kidneys, eyes, and nervous and cardiovascular systems, or may cause metabolic disruptions. Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2-inhibitors (SGLT2-i), as an antidiabetic class with well-established cardiovascular benefits, and its class members have also been studied for their presumed effects on steatosis and fibrosis improvement in patients with NAFLD or non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The MEDLINE and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials examining the efficacy of SGLT2-i on the treatment of NAFLD/NASH in patients with T2DM. Of the originally identified 179 articles, 21 articles were included for final data analysis. Dapagliflozin, empagliflozin, and canagliflozin are some of the most used and studied SGLT2-i agents which have proven efficacy in treating patients with NAFLD/NASH by addressing/targeting different pathophysiological targets/mechanisms: insulin sensitivity improvement, weight loss, especially visceral fat loss, glucotoxicity, and lipotoxicity improvement or even improvement of chronic inflammation. Despite the considerable variability in study duration, sample size, and diagnostic method, the SGLT2-i agents used resulted in improvements in non-invasive markers of steatosis or even fibrosis in patients with T2DM. This systematic review offers encouraging results that place the SGLT2-i class at the top of the therapeutic arsenal for patients diagnosed with T2DM and NAFLD/NASH.

Empagliflozin reduces podocyte lipotoxicity in experimental Alport syndrome

Sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) are anti-hyperglycemic agents that prevent glucose reabsorption in proximal tubular cells. SGLT2i improves renal outcomes in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, indicating it may have beneficial effects beyond glycemic control. Here, we demonstrate that SGLT2i affects energy metabolism and podocyte lipotoxicity in experimental Alport syndrome (AS). In vitro, we found that the SGLT2 protein was expressed in human and mouse podocytes to a similar extent in tubular cells. Newly established immortalized podocytes from Col4a3 knockout mice (AS podocytes) accumulate lipid droplets along with increased apoptosis when compared to wild-type podocytes. Treatment with SGLT2i empagliflozin reduces lipid droplet accumulation and apoptosis in AS podocytes. Empagliflozin inhibits the utilization of glucose/pyruvate as a metabolic substrate in AS podocytes but not in AS tubular cells. In vivo, we demonstrate that empagliflozin reduces albuminuria and prolongs the survival of AS mice. Empagliflozin-treated AS mice show decreased serum blood urea nitrogen and creatinine levels in association with reduced triglyceride and cholesterol ester content in kidney cortices when compared to AS mice. Lipid accumulation in kidney cortices correlates with a decline in renal function. In summary, empagliflozin reduces podocyte lipotoxicity and improves kidney function in experimental AS in association with the energy substrates switch from glucose to fatty acids in podocytes.

How far are we from an approved drug for non-alcoholic steatohepatitis?

INTRODUCTION

Metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) previously known but still debatable, as non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is one of the main causes of chronic liver disease and subsequent cirrhosis worldwide, accounting for around 30% of liver diseases. The change in its nomenclature has been brought about by the novel discoveries regarding its pathogenesis, in which metabolic dysfunction plays the most important role. It is widely known that for every disease, the treatment should always be targeted toward the underlying etiology and pathogenesis.

AREAS COVERED

MAFLD/NAFLD pathogenesis is heterogeneous, and includes multiple gene polymorphisms, presence of insulin resistance, as well as concomitant diseases that contribute to the disease onset and progression. As a result of this, even though lifestyle modification (owing to metabolic abnormalities) is the first line of treatment, multiple drugs have been tested to target each of the known pathways leading to MAFLD/NAFLD and progression of steatohepatitis. We aim to review the most relevant information regarding previous and ongoing research and recommendations regarding treatment of MAFLD/NAFLD.

EXPERT OPINION

Combination therapies associated to weight loss and exercise will be the optimal approach for these patients. It is important to evaluate each patient to select the specific combination according to patient characteristics.

Therapeutic Potentials of Reducing Liver Fat in Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Close Association with Type 2 Diabetes

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most widespread chronic liver disease worldwide, confers a significant burden on health systems and leads to increased mortality and morbidity through several extrahepatic complications. NAFLD comprises a broad spectrum of liver-related disorders, including steatosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. It affects almost 30% of adults in the general population and up to 70% of people with type 2 diabetes (T2DM), sharing common pathogenetic pathways with the latter. In addition, NAFLD is closely related to obesity, which acts in synergy with other predisposing conditions, including alcohol consumption, provoking progressive and insidious liver damage. Among the most potent risk factors for accelerating the progression of NAFLD to fibrosis or cirrhosis, diabetes stands out. Despite the rapid rise in NAFLD rates, identifying the optimal treatment remains a challenge. Interestingly, NAFLD amelioration or remission appears to be associated with a lower risk of T2DM, indicating that liver-centric therapies could reduce the risk of developing T2DM and vice versa. Consequently, assessing NAFLD requires a multidisciplinary approach to identify and manage this multisystemic clinical entity early. With the continuously emerging new evidence, innovative therapeutic strategies are being developed for the treatment of NAFLD, prioritizing a combination of lifestyle changes and glucose-lowering medications. Based on recent evidence, this review scrutinizes all practical and sustainable interventions to achieve a resolution of NAFLD through a multimodal approach.

Comparative efficacy of 5 sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitor and 4 glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonist drugs in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A GRADE-assessed systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background: The relative efficacy of 5 sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors and 4 glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) therapy has not been sufficiently investigated. Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in which patients with NAFLD were treated with SGLT-2 inhibitors or GLP-1 receptor agonists were included. Primary outcomes were improvements in liver enzymes and liver fat parameters, while secondary outcomes included anthropometric measures, blood lipids and glycemic parameters. The frequentist method was used to perform a network meta-analysis. Evidence certainty was assessed using the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE). Results: The criteria were satisfied by 37 RCTs with 9 interventions (5 SGLT-2 inhibitors and 4 GLP-1 receptor agonists). Based on high certainty evidence, in patients with NAFLD (or comorbid with type 2 diabetes), semaglutide could lower alanine aminotransferase as well as aspartate aminotransferase, γ-glutamyl transferase, controlled attenuation parameter, liver stiffness measurement, body weight, systolic blood pressure, triglycerides, high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol, glycosylated hemoglobin. Liraglutide could lower alanine aminotransferase as well as subcutaneous adipose tissue, body mass index, fasting blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, glucose and homeostasis model assessment, while dapagliflozin could lower alanine aminotransferase as well as body weight, fasting blood glucose, postprandial blood glucose, glycosylated hemoglobin, glucose and homeostasis model assessment. Conclusion: Semaglutide, liraglutide, and dapagliflozin all have a certain effect on NAFLD (or comorbid with type 2 diabetes) based on high confidence evidence from indirect comparisons, and semaglutide appears to have a therapeutic advantage over the other included medicines. Head-to-head studies are needed to provide more confidence in clinical decision-making.

Efficacy and safety of luseogliflozin in improving glycaemic and non-glycaemic outcomes in type-2 diabetes: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND & AIMS

No meta-analysis is available analysing the role of luseogliflozin in type-2 diabetes. We undertook this meta-analysis to address this knowledge-gap.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for RCTs involving diabetes patients receiving luseogliflozin in intervention arm, and placebo/active comparator in control arm. Primary outcome was to evaluate changes in HbA1c. Secondary outcomes were to evaluate alterations in glucose, blood pressure, weight, lipids, and adverse events.

RESULTS

From initially screened 151 articles, data from 10 RCTs involving 1304 patients was analysed. Individuals receiving luseogliflozin 2.5 mg/d had a significantly lower HbA1c [MD -0.76% (95% CI: 1.01 to -0.51); P < 0.01; I² = 83%], fasting glucose [MD -26.69 mg/dl (95% CI: 35.41 to -17.96); P < 0.01; I² = 80%], systolic blood pressure [MD -4.19 mm Hg (95% CI: 6.31 to -2.07); P < 0.01; I² = 0%], body-weight [MD -1.61 kg (95% CI: 3.14 to -0.08); P = 0.04; I² = 0%], triglycerides PCG [MD -12.60 mg/dl (95% CI: 24.25 to -0.95); P = 0.03; I² = 0%], uric acid [MD -0.48 mg/dl (95% CI: 0.73 to -0.23); P < 0.01; I² = 49%] and alanine aminotransferase [MD -4.11 IU/L (95% CI: 6.12 to -2.10); P < 0.01; I² = 0%] compared to placebo. Occurrence of treatment-emergent adverse-events [RR 0.93 (95% CI: 0.72-1.20); P = 0.58; I² = 0%], severe adverse-events [RR 1.19 (95% CI: 0.40-3.55); P = 0.76; I² = 0%], hypoglycaemia [RR 1.56 (95% CI: 0.85-2.85); P = 0.15; I² = 0%] and genital infections [RR 1.42 (95% CI: 0.48-4.18); P = 0.53; I² = 0%] were not increased with luseogliflozin. Cardiovascular outcome trials are lacking and are urgently required.

CONCLUSION

Luseogliflozin has good glycaemic and non-glycaemic benefits similar to other SGLT2 inhibitors and is well tolerated.

Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease and Cardiovascular Disease: Causation or Association

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a disease process that is gaining increasing recognition. The global prevalence of NAFLD is increasing in parallel with growing rates of risk factors for NAFLD such as hypertension, obesity, diabetes, and metabolic syndrome. NAFLD has been referred to as a risk factor for cardiovascular disease (CVD). As CVD is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, there are constant efforts to describe and alleviate its risk factors. Although there is conflicting data supporting NAFLD as a causative or associative factor for CVD, NAFLD has been shown to be associated with structural, electrical, and atherosclerotic disease processes of the heart. Shared risk factors and pathophysiologic mechanisms between NAFLD and CVD warrant further explication. Pathologic mechanisms such as endothelial dysfunction, oxidative stress, insulin resistance, genetic underpinnings, and gut microbiota dysregulation have been described in both CVD and NAFLD. The mainstay of treatment for NAFLD is lifestyle intervention including physical exercise and hypocaloric intake in addition to bariatric surgery. Investigations into various therapeutic targets to alleviate hepatic steatosis and fibrosis by way of maintaining the balance between lipid synthesis and breakdown. A major obstacle preventing the success of many pharmacologic approaches has been the effects of these medications on CVD risk. The future of pharmacologic treatment of NAFLD is promising as effective medications with limited CVD harm are being investigated.

Development and prognosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with diabetes

The incidence of diabetes mellitus and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has been increasing worldwide during the last few decades, in the context of an increasing prevalence of obesity and non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Epidemiologic studies have revealed that patients with diabetes have a 2- to 3-fold increased risk of developing HCC, independent of the severity and cause of the underlying liver disease. A bidirectional relationship exists between diabetes and liver disease: advanced liver disease promotes the onset of diabetes, and HCC is an important cause of death in patients with diabetes; conversely, diabetes is a risk factor for liver fibrosis progression and HCC development, and may worsen the long-term prognosis of patients with HCC. The existence of close interconnections among diabetes, obesity, and NAFLD causes insulin resistance-related hyperinsulinemia, increased oxidative stress, and chronic inflammation, which are assumed to be the underlying causes of hepatocarcinogenesis in patients with diabetes. No appropriate surveillance methods for HCC development in patients with diabetes have been established, and liver diseases, including HCC, are often overlooked as complications of diabetes. Although some antidiabetic drugs are expected to prevent HCC development, further research on the optimal use of antidiabetic drugs aimed at hepatoprotection is warranted. Given the increasing medical and socioeconomic impact of diabetes on HCC development, diabetologists and hepatologists need to work together to develop strategies to address this emerging health issue. This article reviews the current knowledge on the impact of diabetes on the development and progression of HCC.

Comparative efficacy of diabetes medications on liver enzymes and fat fraction in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: A network meta-analysis,

OBJECTIVES

This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to evaluate the relative rank-order of existing diabetes medications in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) with or without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted using the Medline, Embase and Cochrane databases. Clinical trials comparing the efficacy of diabetes medications with other interventions, including lifestyle modification and placebo, in patients with NAFLD were included. The results from the NMA are presented as the weighted mean difference (WMD) of the continuous results and the corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs).

RESULTS

The articles presented the results of 49 trials involving 3,836 subjects published between 2013 and 2021. According to our results, thiazolidinedione (TZD) was ranked as the best diabetes medication in the reduction of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (WMD = -10.10, 95% CI: -15.18, -5.01), followed by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor (DPP4i) (WMD = -8.90, 95% CI: -14.41, -3.40). DPP4i also resulted in the greatest reduction in aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (WMD = -6.89, 95% CI: -11.72, -2.07). γ-Glutamyl transferase (γ-GT) reduction was highest in patients treated with glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RAs) (WMD = -15.48, 95% CI: -30.93, -0.02). Ultimately, SGLT2is and GLP1RAs were superior to other diabetes medications or placebo in reducing liver fat fraction (LFF) (WMD = -6.09, 95% CI: -10.50, -1.68; WMD = -5.55, 95% CI: -10.40, -0.69, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Diabetes medications, including TZD, DPP4i and GLP1RAs, were found to be suitable alternatives for liver enzyme reduction in the treatment of NAFLD patients. SGLT2is are considered the most effective therapies for lipid modulation in these patients.

Antitumor Effects and Mechanisms of Metabolic Syndrome Medications on Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Liver cancer has a high incidence and mortality rate worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most common histological type. With the decrease in the number of newly infected patients and the spread of antiviral therapy, hepatitis virus-negative chronic liver diseases including steatohepatitis are increasingly accounting for a large proportion of HCC, and an important clinical characteristic is the high prevalence of metabolic syndrome including hypertension, type 2 diabetes (T2D), dyslipidemia, and obesity. Since patients with steatohepatitis are less likely to undergo surveillance for early detection of HCC, they may be diagnosed at an advanced stage and have worse prognosis. Therefore, treatment strategies for patients with HCC caused by steatohepatitis, especially in advanced stages, become increasingly important. Further, hypertension, T2D, and dyslipidemia may occur as side effects during systemic treatment, and there will be increasing opportunities to prescribe metabolic syndrome medications, not only for originally comorbid diseases, but also for adverse events during HCC treatment. Interestingly, epidemiological studies have shown that patients taking some metabolic syndrome medications are less likely to develop various types of cancers, including HCC. Basic studies have also shown that these drugs have direct antitumor effects on HCC. In particular, angiotensin II receptor blockers (a drug group for treating hypertension), biguanides (a drug group for treating T2D), and statins (a drug group for treating dyslipidemia) have shown to elucidate antitumor effects against HCC. In this review, we focus on the antitumor effects of metabolic syndrome medications on HCC and their mechanisms based on recent literature. New therapeutic agents are also increasingly being reported. Analysis of the antitumor effects of metabolic syndrome medications on HCC and their mechanisms will be doubly beneficial for HCC patients with metabolic syndrome, and the use of these medications may be a potential strategy against HCC.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A nationwide propensity-score matched cohort study

AIMS

This study was to determine the association between sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i) and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) in type 2 diabetes.

METHODS

We used data from the Korean National Health Insurance Service from 2014 to 2017. New drug users were screened, dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors (DPP4i) were set as the active comparator, and the differences between the two groups were corrected through propensity score matching. NAFLD was evaluated by the fatty liver index (FLI), which was calculated using body mass index, waist circumference, triglycerides, and gamma glutamyl peptidase.

RESULTS

After 1:1 matching, 25,371 patients in each group who received medication for an average of 299 days were analyzed. Despite similar baseline FLI of each group, the FLI of the SGLT2i users was 44.4 ± 26.7 and the FLI of the DPP4i users was 48.9 ± 27.3 (P value < 0.001) after treatment. SGLT2i showed more significant decrements than DPP4i in all components of FLI. The more the adherence to the SGLT2i increased, the greater the decrease in FLI.

CONCLUSIONS

SGLT2i showed a significant reduction in FLI and its components. We suggest that SGLT2i may have beneficial effects in reducing the prevalence of NAFLD in type 2 diabetes.

Anti-obesity Medications for the Management of Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Obesity is closely associated with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), a highly prevalent disease without any approved medication. The aim of this review was to summarize the evidence on the effect of anti-obesity medications on NAFLD, especially focusing on hepatic histology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Orlistat and some glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor analogs, including liraglutide and semaglutide, have beneficial effects on hepatic steatosis and inflammation, but not fibrosis. Other anti-obesity medications, including lorcaserin, setmelanotide, phentermine hydrochloric, phentermine/topiramate, and naltrexone/bupropion, have been minimally investigated in NAFLD. Furthermore, medications like sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitors and farnesoid X receptor have shown beneficial effects in both NAFLD and obesity, but they have not been licensed for either disease. Liraglutide, semaglutide, and orlistat may be currently used in selected patients with obesity and NAFLD. Further research is warranted, since targeting obesity may provide additional benefits on its comorbidities, including NAFLD.

Comparison of Tofogliflozin and Glimepiride Effects on Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease in Participants With Type 2 Diabetes: A Randomized, 48-Week, Open-Label, Active-Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a liver phenotype of type 2 diabetes and obesity. Currently, the efficacy of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and sulfonylureas in liver pathology and hepatic gene expression profiles for type 2 diabetes with NAFLD are unknown.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We conducted a 48 week, randomized, open-label, parallel-group trial involving participants with biopsy-confirmed NAFLD. A total of 40 participants were randomly assigned to receive once daily 20 mg tofogliflozin or 0.5 mg glimepiride. The primary outcome was the percentage of participants with at least an improvement in all individual scores for histological categories of steatosis, hepatocellular ballooning, lobular inflammation, and fibrosis by at least 1 point. The secondary end points were the changes in liver enzymes, metabolic markers, and hepatic gene expression profiles.

RESULTS

Fibrosis scores improved in the tofogliflozin group (60%, P = 0.001), whereas the change from baseline did not differ significantly between the groups (P = 0.172). The histological variables of steatosis (65%, P = 0.001), hepatocellular ballooning (55%, P = 0.002), and lobular inflammation (50%, P = 0.003) were improved in the tofogliflozin group, whereas only hepatocellular ballooning was improved in the glimepiride group (25%, P = 0.025). Hepatic gene expression profiling revealed histology-associated signatures in energy metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis that were reversed with tofogliflozin.

CONCLUSIONS

Tofogliflozin and, to a lesser degree, glimepiride led to liver histological and metabolic improvement in participants with type 2 diabetes and NAFLD, with no significant difference between the agents. The hepatic expression of the genes involved in energy metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis was well correlated with liver histological changes and rescued by tofogliflozin. We need further confirmation through long-term larger-scale clinical trials of SGLT2 inhibitors.

Targeted therapeutics and novel signaling pathways in non-alcohol-associated fatty liver/steatohepatitis (NAFL/NASH)

Non-alcohol-associated fatty liver/steatohepatitis (NAFL/NASH) has become the leading cause of liver disease worldwide. NASH, an advanced form of NAFL, can be progressive and more susceptible to developing cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Currently, lifestyle interventions are the most essential and effective strategies for preventing and controlling NAFL without the development of fibrosis. While there are still limited appropriate drugs specifically to treat NAFL/NASH, growing progress is being seen in elucidating the pathogenesis and identifying therapeutic targets. In this review, we discussed recent developments in etiology and prospective therapeutic targets, as well as pharmacological candidates in pre/clinical trials and patents, with a focus on diabetes, hepatic lipid metabolism, inflammation, and fibrosis. Importantly, growing evidence elucidates that the disruption of the gut-liver axis and microbe-derived metabolites drive the pathogenesis of NAFL/NASH. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) act as a signaling mediator, resulting in lipid accumulation, macrophage and hepatic stellate cell activation, further promoting inflammation and liver fibrosis progression during the development of NAFL/NASH. Targeting gut microbiota or EVs may serve as new strategies for the treatment of NAFL/NASH. Finally, other mechanisms, such as cell therapy and genetic approaches, also have enormous therapeutic potential. Incorporating drugs with different mechanisms and personalized medicine may improve the efficacy to better benefit patients with NAFL/NASH.

Crosstalk between kidney and liver in non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: mechanisms and therapeutic approaches

Liver and kidney are vital organs that maintain homeostasis and injury to either of them triggers pathogenic pathways affecting the other. For example, non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) promotes the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD), vice versa acute kidney injury (AKI) endorses the induction and progression of liver dysfunction. Progress in clinical and basic research suggest a role of excessive fructose intake, insulin resistance, inflammatory cytokines production, activation of the renin-angiotensin system, redox imbalance, and their impact on epigenetic regulation of gene expression in this context. Recent developments in experimental and clinical research have identified several biochemical and molecular pathways for AKI-liver interaction, including altered liver enzymes profile, metabolic acidosis, oxidative stress, activation of inflammatory and regulated cell death pathways. This review focuses on the current preclinical and clinical findings on kidney-liver crosstalk in NAFLD-CKD and AKI-liver dysfunction settings and highlights potential molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.

Changing clinical management of NAFLD in Asia

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) has become the leading cause of chronic liver disease, affecting approximately 25% of the world's population. Recently, because of the sedentary lifestyle and overnutrition resulting from urbanisation, the burden of NAFLD has rapidly increased in many Asian countries. Currently, the prevalence of NAFLD in Asia is approximately 30%, as is the case in many Western countries. In Asia, the prevalence and presentation of NAFLD vary widely across regions because of the substantial diversity in race, socioeconomic status and living environment. Furthermore, the dual aetiology of fatty liver, particularly with viral hepatitis in Asia, makes it complex and challenging to manage. Because Asians are likely to have central adiposity and insulin resistance, approximately 7%-20% of non-obese Asians with body mass indexes of less than 25 kg/m² are estimated to have NAFLD. Accumulating evidence indicates that NAFLD is associated with various extrahepatic comorbidities such as cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, malignancy, in addition to liver-specific complications. Therefore, NAFLD should be managed as a multisystem disease in conjunction with metabolic syndrome. Lifestyle modification remains the basis of NAFLD management, but few patients can achieve adequate weight loss and maintain it long term. While various pharmacological agents are in phase 3 trials for steatohepatitis, Asian patients are underrepresented in most trials. This article reviews the epidemiological trends, clinical features, optimal assessment and current management practices for NAFLD in Asia.

Impact of NAFLD and its pharmacotherapy on lipid profile and CVD

Atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) remains the leading cause of death worldwide. Increasing evidence suggests that, in addition to traditional metabolic risk factors such as obesity, hypercholesterolemia, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and insulin resistance (IR), nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an emerging driver of ASCVD via multiple mechanisms, mainly by disrupting lipid metabolism. The lack of pharmaceutical treatment has spurred substantial investment in the research and development of NAFLD drugs. However, many reagents with promising therapeutic potential for NAFLD also have considerable impacts on the circulating lipid profile. In this review, we first summarize the mechanisms linking lipid dysregulation in NAFLD to the progression of ASCVD. Importantly, we highlight the potential risks of/benefits to ASCVD conferred by NAFLD pharmaceutical treatments and discuss potential strategies and next-generation drugs for treating NAFLD without the unwanted side effects.

The effect of metformin on low birth weight girls with precocious puberty: A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In recent years, the role of metformin in girls with precocious puberty (PP) has been increasingly frequently studied. The objective of this present study is to assess the effect of metformin on low birth weight girls with precocious puberty (LBW-PP girls).

METHODS

We search the confirmed studies about circulating metformin and PP from the databases of EMBASE, PubMed, and Web of Science. Data were reported as weighted mean difference (WMD) and associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Analysis was performed by Review Manager 5.3 and Stata version 12.0.

RESULTS

A total of 205 cases (metformin group n = 102, untreated group n = 103) were included in this study. The meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) suggested that metformin had statistically significant effects on testosterone (P = .001), androstenedione (P = .022), bone mineral density (BMD; P = .151), triglycerides (P ≤ .001), body mass index Z score (BMI Z score; P ≤ .001), dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS; P = .053), sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG; P = .049), high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol (P ≤ .001), low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol (P = .021), fat mass (P ≤ .001), lean mass (P = .025), and fasting insulin (P = .002).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provided evidence of the efficacy of metformin in girls with LBW-PP girls, which proved that metformin could improve metabolism and reduce weight. Metformin had a positive effect on preventing LBW-PP girls from developing into obesity and polycystic ovarian syndrome. In addition, this meta-analysis provided important reference opinions and directions for the treatment of LBW-PP girls.

SGLT-2 inhibitors and GLP-1 receptor agonists in metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease

Metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) is a chronic condition that affects nearly one billion people globally, characterized by triacylglycerol accumulation in the liver as a consequence of metabolic abnormalities (obesity and impaired glucose regulation). Low-grade inflammation, oxidative stress, mitochondrial dysfunction, and dysbiosis in gut microbiota are involved in the etiology of MAFLD, and both cardiovascular events and hepatic complications are the long-term consequences. In the absence of approved therapies for this condition, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT-2 Is) and glucagon-like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have the specific advantage of lowering body weight and providing cardiovascular benefits. Here, we discuss potential roles for SGLT-2 Is and GLP-1 RAs in the prevention and treatment of intrahepatic triacylglycerol accumulation and associated inflammation and/or fibrosis.

Sodium-glucose cotransporter protein-2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists versus thiazolidinediones for non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A network meta-analysis

AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a leading cause of chronic liver disorders worldwide. Some hypoglycemic drugs can improve NAFLD. However, it is unclear which of these types of hypoglycemic drugs are more effective for NAFLD. Therefore, we conducted a network meta-analysis to determine the effect of thiazolidinediones (TZDs), sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, and glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists on NAFLD patients.

METHODS

A literature search of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and Medline was conducted, and the literature from database inception up to April 30, 2021 was obtained. Liver function tests, lipid profiles, body mass index (BMI) and glycemic parameters were obtained from randomized controlled trials. Weighted mean differences (WMDs), relative risks and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for continuous outcomes, and the I2 statistic was used to evaluate the heterogeneity of the studies.

RESULTS

In total, 22 trials, including 1361 patients, were selected. In direct meta-analysis, GLP-1 receptor agonists were superior to TZDs in decreasing alanine aminotransferase (WMD, -0.40, 95% CI: -0.60 to -0.20), γ-glutamyl transferase (WMD, -5.00, 95% CI: -6.47 to -3.53), BMI (WMD, -4.10, 95%CI: -6.55 to -1.65) and triglycerides (WMD, - 0.50, 95% CI: -0.68 to -0.32). Based on Bayesian network meta-analysis, the effect of SGLT-2 inhibitors on weight loss was superior to that of TZDs (WMD, -1.80, 95%CI: -3.30 to -0.41).

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 receptor agonists and SGLT-2 inhibitors improved liver enzymes, BMI, blood lipid, blood glucose and insulin resistance in NAFLD patients.

SGLT2 Inhibitors as the Most Promising Influencers on the Outcome of Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), the most frequent liver disease in the Western world, is a common hepatic manifestation of metabolic syndrome (MetS). A specific cure has not yet been identified, and its treatment is currently based on risk factor therapy. Given that the initial accumulation of triglycerides in the liver parenchyma, in the presence of inflammatory processes, mitochondrial dysfunction, lipotoxicity, glucotoxicity, and oxidative stress, can evolve into non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). The main goal is to identify the factors contributing to this evolution because, once established, untreated NASH can progress through fibrosis to cirrhosis and, ultimately, be complicated by hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Several drugs have been tested in clinical trials for use as specific therapy for NAFLD; most of them are molecules used to cure type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), which is one of the main risk factors for NAFLD. Among the most studied is pioglitazone, either alone or in combination with vitamin E, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors. Actually, the most promising category seems to be sodium-glucose cotransporter (SGLT2) inhibitors. Their action is carried out by inhibiting glucose reabsorption in the proximal renal tubule, leading to its increased excretion in urine and decreased levels in plasma. Experimental studies in animal models have suggested that SGLT2 inhibitors may have beneficial modulatory effects on NAFLD/NASH, and several trials in patients have proven their beneficial effects on liver enzymes, BMI, blood lipids, blood glucose, and insulin resistance in NAFLD patients, thus creating strong expectations for their possible use in preventing the evolution of liver damage in these patients. We will review the main pathogenetic mechanisms, diagnostic modalities, and recent therapies of NAFLD, with particular attention to the use of SGLT2 inhibitors.

SGLT-2 Inhibitors in NAFLD: Expanding Their Role beyond Diabetes and Cardioprotection

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an ‘umbrella’ term, comprising a spectrum ranging from benign, liver steatosis to non-alcoholic steatohepatitis, liver fibrosis and eventually cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. NAFLD has evolved as a major health problem in recent years. Discovering ways to prevent or delay the progression of NAFLD has become a global focus. Lifestyle modifications remain the cornerstone of NAFLD treatment, even though various pharmaceutical interventions are currently under clinical trial. Among them, sodium-glucose co-transporter type-2 inhibitors (SGLT-2i) are emerging as promising agents. Processes regulated by SGLT-2i, such as endoplasmic reticulum (ER) and oxidative stress, low-grade inflammation, autophagy and apoptosis are all implicated in NAFLD pathogenesis. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the NAFLD pathophysiology, and specifically focus on the potential impact of SGLT-2i in NAFLD development and progression, providing current evidence from in vitro, animal and human studies. Given this evidence, further mechanistic studies would advance our understanding of the exact mechanisms underlying the pathogenesis of NAFLD and the potential beneficial actions of SGLT-2i in the context of NAFLD treatment.

Selection and Warning of Evidence-Based Antidiabetic Medications for Patients With Chronic Liver Disease

The global prevalence of chronic liver disease and diabetes mellitus (DM) has gradually increased potentially due to changes in diet and lifestyle. The choice of antidiabetic medications for patients with coexisting DM and chronic liver disease is complicated. Severe liver injury may decrease the metabolism of antidiabetic medications, resulting in elevated drug concentrations and adverse effects. The choice of antidiabetic medications in patients with chronic liver disease has not been well studied. The long-term outcomes of antidiabetic medications in patients with chronic liver disease have gained attention recently. Herein, we reviewed relevant articles to extend our understanding on the selection and warning of antidiabetic medications for patients with chronic liver disease.

Role of diabetologists in the management of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease: Primary prevention and screening/management of fibrosis and cirrhosis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a common condition, especially among individuals with type 2 diabetes (T2D). Presence of T2D increases the risk of progression of simple steatosis to more severe liver conditions, such as nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) and fibrosis (NASH-fibrosis). Since majority of patients with T2D are managed by diabetologists (including physicians and endocrinologists), their roles in the management of coexisting NAFLD are not well defined, partly due to lack of unambiguous guidelines.

METHODS

A literature search was performed with Medline (PubMed), Scopus and Google Scholar electronic databases till January 2022, using relevant keywords (nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and diabetologist; screening of NASH; management of NASH) to extract relevant studies describing prevention and screening of NAFLD/NASH, especially in people with T2D.

RESULTS

Diabetologists have two main roles for the management of patients with T2D and coexisting NAFLD. The most important role is to prevent the development of NASH-fibrosis in patients with simple steatosis (primary prevention). This can be achieved by reinforcing the importance of lifestyle measures, and by early use of glucose-lowering agents with beneficial effects on the liver. The second important role of diabetologists is to screen all patients with T2D for liver fibrosis and compensated cirrhosis, and provide appropriate referral for timely management of complications (secondary prevention).

CONCLUSION

Diabetologists can play a central role in mitigating the epidemic of NAFLD in individuals with T2D. However, diabetologists need to be aware about their roles in NASH-fibrosis prevention and screening. Furthermore, longitudinal studies should explore the role of newer glucose-lowering drugs in the primary prevention of NASH-fibrosis in individuals with coexisting T2D and simple steatosis.

The National Consensus statement on the management of adult patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and main comorbidities

The National Consensus was prepared with the participation of the National Medical Association for the Study of the Multimorbidity, Russian Scientific Liver Society, Russian Association of Endocrinologists, Russian Association of Gerontologists and Geriatricians, National Society for Preventive Cardiology, Professional Foundation for the Promotion of Medicine Fund PROFMEDFORUM. The aim of the multidisciplinary consensus is a detailed analysis of the course of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and the main associated conditions. The definition of NAFLD is given, its prevalence is described, methods for diagnosing its components such as steatosis, inflammation and fibrosis are described. The association of NAFLD with a number of cardio-metabolic diseases (arterial hypertension, atherosclerosis, thrombotic complications, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, dyslipidemia, etc.), chronic kidney disease (CKD) and the risk of developing hepatocellular cancer (HCC) were analyzed. The review of non-drug methods of treatment of NAFLD and modern opportunities of pharmacotherapy are presented. The possibilities of new molecules in the treatment of NAFLD are considered: agonists of nuclear receptors, antagonists of pro-inflammatory molecules, etc. The positive properties and disadvantages of currently used drugs (vitamin E, thiazolidinediones, etc.) are described. Special attention is paid to the multi-target ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) molecule in the complex treatment of NAFLD as a multifactorial disease. Its anti-inflammatory, anti-oxidant and cytoprotective properties, the ability to reduce steatosis an independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular pathology, reduce inflammation and hepatic fibrosis through the modulation of autophagy are considered. The ability of UDCA to influence glucose and lipid homeostasis and to have an anticarcinogenic effect has been demonstrated. The Consensus statement has advanced provisions for practitioners to optimize the diagnosis and treatment of NAFLD and related common pathogenetic links of cardio-metabolic diseases.

Pharmacotherapy for Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Emerging Targets and Drug Candidates

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), or metabolic (dysfunction)-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD), is characterized by high global incidence and prevalence, a tight association with common metabolic comorbidities, and a substantial risk of progression and associated mortality. Despite the increasingly high medical and socioeconomic burden of NAFLD, the lack of approved pharmacotherapy regimens remains an unsolved issue. In this paper, we aimed to provide an update on the rapidly changing therapeutic landscape and highlight the major novel approaches to the treatment of this disease. In addition to describing the biomolecules and pathways identified as upcoming pharmacological targets for NAFLD, we reviewed the current status of drug discovery and development pipeline with a special focus on recent evidence from clinical trials.

The Efficacy of Tofogliflozin on Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Fatty Liver Disease

The increasing number of patients with fatty liver disease is a major health problem. Fatty liver disease with metabolic dysfunction has been recognized as nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Although there is no standard therapy for NAFLD, previous reports support the effect of sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on NAFLD. Recently, fatty liver disease with metabolic dysfunction was proposed to be defined as a novel concept, “metabolic associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD)”, and it was proposed that new criteria for MAFLD diagnosis be established. To clarify the effect of SGLT2 inhibitors on MAFLD, we analyzed the efficacy of tofogliflozin in patients with MAFLD. We conducted a single-center, retrospective study to evaluate the efficacy of tofogliflozin in patients with MAFLD treated at Kyushu University Hospital between 2017 and 2019. Tofogliflozin was used to treat 18 patients with MAFLD. To determine the efficacy of tofogliflozin, we evaluated glucose metabolism, insulin resistance, liver injury, hepatic steatosis, and body composition three and six months after drug initiation. Although our study was a preliminary study because of some limitations (e.g., retrospective, observational, single-arm study, small sample size), we show that tofogliflozin could improve liver injury in patients with MAFLD by improving glucose metabolism and insulin resistance without causing muscle loss.

GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 Inhibitors for Insulin Resistance in Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVE

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 (SGLT-2) inhibitors reduce glycaemia and weight and improve insulin resistance (IR) via different mechanisms. We aim to evaluate and compare the ability of GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors to ameliorate the IR of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) patients.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Three electronic databases (Medline, Embase, PubMed) were searched from inception until March 2021. We selected randomized controlled trials comparing GLP-1 RAs and SGLT-2 inhibitors with control in adult NAFLD patients with or without T2DM. Network meta-analyses were performed using fixed and random effect models, and the mean difference (MD) with corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were determined. The within-study risk of bias was assessed with the Cochrane collaborative risk assessment tool RoB.

RESULTS

25 studies with 1595 patients were included in this network meta-analysis. Among them, there were 448 patients, in 6 studies, who were not comorbid with T2DM. Following a mean treatment duration of 28.86 weeks, compared with the control group, GLP-1 RAs decreased the HOMA-IR (MD [95%CI]; -1.573[-2.523 to -0.495]), visceral fat (-0.637[-0.992 to -0.284]), weight (-2.394[-4.625 to -0.164]), fasting blood sugar (-0.662[-1.377 to -0.021]) and triglyceride (- 0.610[-1.056 to -0.188]). On the basis of existing studies, SGLT-2 inhibitors showed no statistically significant improvement in the above indicators. Compared with SGLT-2 inhibitors, GLP-1 RAs decreased visceral fat (-0.560[-0.961 to -0.131]) and triglyceride (-0.607[-1.095 to -0.117]) significantly.

CONCLUSIONS

GLP-1 RAs effectively improve IR in NAFLD, whereas SGLT-2 inhibitors show no apparent effect.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, CRD42021251704.

Metabolic-Associated Fatty Liver Disease (MAFLD), Diabetes, and Cardiovascular Disease: Associations with Fructose Metabolism and Gut Microbiota

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is an increasingly common condition associated with type 2 diabetes (T2DM) and cardiovascular disease (CVD). Since systemic metabolic dysfunction underlies NAFLD, the current nomenclature has been revised, and the term metabolic-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) has been proposed. The new definition emphasizes the bidirectional relationships and increases awareness in looking for fatty liver disease among patients with T2DM and CVD or its risk factors, as well as looking for these diseases among patients with NAFLD. The most recommended treatment method of NAFLD is lifestyle changes, including dietary fructose limitation, although other treatment methods of NAFLD have recently emerged and are being studied. Given the focus on the liver-gut axis targeting, bacteria may also be a future aim of NAFLD treatment given the microbiome signatures discriminating healthy individuals from those with NAFLD. In this review article, we will provide an overview of the associations of fructose consumption, gut microbiota, diabetes, and CVD in patients with NAFLD.

Antidiabetic Medications for Type 2 Diabetics with Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: Evidence From a Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

Type 2 diabetes mellitus and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) are closely related, and antidiabetic medications have been shown to be potential therapeutics in NAFLD. Using a network meta-analysis, we sought to examine the effectiveness of antidiabetic agents for the treatment of NAFLD in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.

METHODS

Medline and Embase were searched for randomized controlled trials relating to the use of antidiabetic agents, including sodium-glucose transport protein 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists, and peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor gamma (PPARγ) agonists, biguanides, sulfonylureas and insulin, on NAFLD in patients with diabetes. The p-score was used as a surrogate marker of effectiveness.

RESULTS

A total of 14 articles were included in the analysis. PPARγ agonists were ranked as the best treatment in steatosis reduction, resulting in the greatest reduction of steatosis. There was statistical significance between PPARγ agonists [mean difference (MD): -6.02%, confidence interval (CI): -10.37% to -1.67%] and SGLT2 inhibitors (MD: -2.60%, CI: -4.87% to -0.33%) compared with standard of care for steatosis reduction. Compared with PPARγ agonists, SGLT2 inhibitors resulted in a statistical significant reduction in fibrosis (MD: -0.06, CI: -0.10 to -0.02). Body mass index reduction was highest in SGLT2 inhibitors and glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists. Additionally, SGLT2 inhibitors were ranked as the best treatment for increasing high-density lipoprotein and reducing low-density lipoprotein.

CONCLUSION

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and SGLT2 inhibitors were suitable alternatives for the treatment of NAFLD in those with type 2 diabetes mellitus with a reduction in body mass index, fibrosis, and steatosis. SGLT2 inhibitors also have the added benefit of lipid modulation.

Effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 inhibitors on liver parameters and steatosis: A meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

AIMS

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is the most common form of chronic liver disease in Western countries and a common comorbidity with type 2 diabetes (T2D). It lacks effective pharmacotherapy. We aimed to summarize the evidence on the effects of sodium-glucose co-transporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors on liver structure and function.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials in PubMed, Web of Science and ClinicalTrials.gov from their inception to April 2019. Trials evaluating liver function and/or structure and comparing SGLT2 inhibitors with placebo or other oral antidiabetic drugs in patients with T2D were included. Twenty studies (from 3033) were included. A total of 1950 patients with T2D, with or without NAFLD, were treated with SGLT2 inhibitors for at least 8 weeks, and 1900 patients were used as controls. Independent extraction was carried out by two observers. This study was conducted according to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis.

RESULTS

SGLT2 inhibitors induced a significant decrease in serum alanine (-7.43U/L, [95%CI -12.14, -2.71], p < 0.01), in aspartate aminotransferases (-2.83U/L, [-4.71, -0.95], p < 0.01), as well as in gamma glutamyl transferase (-8.21U/L, [-9.52, -6.91], p < 0.01), and an increase in total plasma bilirubin (8.19% [0.79, 15.59], p < 0.01), comparing with placebo or other oral antidiabetic drugs. SGLT2 inhibitors treatment was associated with a decrease in liver steatosis (-3.39% [-6.01, -0.77], p < 0.0.1).

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with SGLT2 inhibitors improves liver structure and function in patients with T2D. This meta-analysis suggests that SGLT2 inhibitors are a promising pharmacological approach for treatment of NAFLD.

Emerging and Established Therapeutic Approaches for Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease

PURPOSE

Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), more recently referred to as metabolic-associated fatty liver disease, refers to a disease spectrum ranging from hepatic steatosis to nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH), fibrosis, and cirrhosis, associated with hepatic complications (including liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma) and extrahepatic complications (particularly cardiometabolic complications, including type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease). Treatment options include lifestyle interventions (dietary modification and physical activity programs) and pharmacologic interventions. Treatment aims should be broad, with a hepatic focus (to improve/reverse hepatic inflammation, fibrosis, and steatohepatitis), ideally with additional extrahepatic effects affecting metabolic co-morbidities (eg, insulin resistance, glucose dysregulation, dyslipidemia), causing weight loss and affording cardiovascular protection. NASH and fibrosis represent the main histopathological features that warrant treatment to prevent disease progression. Despite a paucity of established treatments, the array of potential molecular targets, pathways, and potential treatments is continually evolving. The goal of this article was to provide a narrative review summarizing the emerging and more established therapeutic options considering the complex pathophysiology of NAFLD and the important long-term sequelae of this condition.

METHODS

The literature was reviewed by using PubMed, conference abstracts, and press releases from early-phase clinical studies to provide an overview of the evidence.

FINDINGS

As understanding of the pathophysiology of NASH/NAFLD evolves, drugs with different mechanisms of action, targeting different molecular targets and aberrant pathways that mediate hepatic steatosis, inflammation, and fibrosis, have been developed and are being tested in clinical trials. Pharmacologic therapies fall into 4 main categories according to the molecular targets/pathways they disrupt: (1) meta-bolic targets, targeting insulin resistance, hepatic de novo lipogenesis, or substrate utilization; (2) inflam-matory pathways, inhibiting inflammatory cell recruitment/signaling, reduce oxidative/endoplasmic reticulum stress or are antiapoptotic; (3) the liver-gut axis, which modulates bile acid enterohepatic circulation/signaling or alters gut microbiota; and (4) antifibrotic targets, targeting hepatic stellate cells, decrease collagen deposition or increase fibrinolysis.

IMPLICATIONS

Lifestyle modification must remain the cornerstone of treatment. Pharmacologic treatment is reserved for NASH or fibrosis, the presence of which requires histopathological confirmation. The disease complexity provides a strong rationale for combination therapies targeting multiple pathways simultaneously.

Use of Lipid-Modifying Agents for the Treatment of Glomerular Diseases

Although dyslipidemia is associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), it is more common in nephrotic syndrome (NS), and guidelines for the management of hyperlipidemia in NS are largely opinion-based. In addition to the role of circulating lipids, an increasing number of studies suggest that intrarenal lipids contribute to the progression of glomerular diseases, indicating that proteinuric kidney diseases may be a form of "fatty kidney disease" and that reducing intracellular lipids could represent a new therapeutic approach to slow the progression of CKD. In this review, we summarize recent progress made in the utilization of lipid-modifying agents to lower renal parenchymal lipid accumulation and to prevent or reduce kidney injury. The agents mentioned in this review are categorized according to their specific targets, but they may also regulate other lipid-relevant pathways.

Differential Pathophysiological Mechanisms in Heart Failure With a Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction in Diabetes

Diabetes promotes the development of both heart failure with a reduced ejection fraction and heart failure with a preserved ejection fraction through diverse mechanisms, which are likely mediated through hyperinsulinemia rather than hyperglycemia. Diabetes promotes nutrient surplus signaling (through Akt and mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1) and inhibits nutrient deprivation signaling (through sirtuin-1 and its downstream effectors); this suppresses autophagy and promotes endoplasmic reticulum and oxidative stress and mitochondrial dysfunction, thereby undermining the health of diabetic cardiomyocytes. The hyperinsulinemia of diabetes may also activate sodium-hydrogen exchangers in cardiomyocytes (leading to injury and loss) and in the proximal renal tubules (leading to sodium retention). Diabetes may cause epicardial adipose tissue expansion, and the resulting secretion of proinflammatory adipocytokines onto the adjoining myocardium can lead to coronary microcirculatory dysfunction and myocardial inflammation and fibrosis. Interestingly, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors-the only class of antidiabetic medication that reduces serious heart failure events-may act to mitigate each of these mechanisms. SGLT2 inhibitors up-regulate sirtuin-1 and its downstream effectors and autophagic flux, thus explaining the actions of these drugs to reduce oxidative stress, normalize mitochondrial structure and function, and mute proinflammatory pathways in the stressed myocardium. Inhibition of SGLT2 may also lead to a reduction in the activity of sodium-hydrogen exchangers in the kidney (leading to diuresis) and in the heart (attenuating the development of cardiac hypertrophy and systolic dysfunction). Finally, SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the mass and mute the adverse biology of epicardial adipose tissue (and reduce the secretion of leptin), thus explaining the capacity of these drugs to mitigate myocardial inflammation, microcirculatory dysfunction, and fibrosis, and improve ventricular filling dynamics. The pathophysiological mechanisms by which SGLT2 inhibitors may benefit heart failure likely differ depending on ejection fraction, but each represents interference with distinct pathways by which hyperinsulinemia may adversely affect cardiac structure and function.