Inappropriate drug prescribing in older adults: the updated 2002 Beers criteria--a population-based cohort study

Reduction of Sleep Medications via a Combined Digital Insomnia and Pharmacist-Led Deprescribing Intervention: Protocol for a Feasibility Trial

BACKGROUND

Chronic insomnia is one of the most common health problems among veterans and negatively impacts their health, function, and quality of life. Although cognitive behavioral therapy for insomnia (CBT-I) is the first-line recommended treatment, sedative-hypnotic medications remain the most common. Sedative-hypnotics, however, have mixed effectiveness, are frequently prescribed longer than recommended, and are associated with numerous risks and adverse effects that negatively impact veteran function. Meeting the treatment needs of veterans impacted by insomnia requires delivering gold standard behavioral care, like CBT-I, and the reduction of sedative-hypnotics through innovative methods.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this feasibility clinical trial is to test a digital CBT-I approach combined with deprescribing to improve the success of sedative-hypnotic reduction among veterans. The intervention combines Noctem Health Clinician Operated Assistive Sleep Technology (COAST), an effective and efficient, scalable, and adaptable digital platform to deliver CBT-I, with clinical pharmacy practitioner (CPP)-led deprescribing of sedative-hypnotic medications.

METHODS

In this nonrandomized single-group clinical trial, 50 veterans will be recruited and enrolled to receive CBT-I delivered via Noctem COAST and CPP-led deprescribing for up to 12 weeks. Assessments will occur at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up. The aims are to (1) assess the feasibility of recruiting veterans with chronic sedative-hypnotic use to participate in the combined intervention, (2) evaluate veterans' acceptability and usability of the COAST platform, and (3) measure changes in veterans' sleep, sedative-hypnotic use, and function at baseline, posttreatment, and 3-month follow-up.

RESULTS

The institutional review board approved the study in October 2021 and the trial was initiated in May 2022. Recruitment and data collection began in September 2022 and is anticipated to be completed in April 2024. Aim 1 will be measured by tracking the response to a mail-centric recruitment approach using electronic medical records to identify potentially eligible veterans based on sedative-hypnotic use. Aim 2 will be measured using the Post-Study System Usability Questionnaire, assessing overall usability as well as system usefulness, information quality, and interface quality. Aim 3 will use the Insomnia Severity Index and sleep diaries to measure change in insomnia outcomes, the Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System Profile to measure change in physical function, anxiety, depression, fatigue, sleep disturbance, participation in social roles, pain, cognitive function, and self-reported sedative-hypnotic use to measure change in dose and frequency of use.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings will inform the utility of a combined digital CBT-I and CPP-led deprescribing intervention and the development of an adequately powered clinical trial to test the effectiveness in a diverse sample of veterans. Further, findings will help inform potential new approaches to deliver care and improve access to care for veterans with insomnia, many of whom use sedative-hypnotics that may be ineffective and increase the risk for negative outcomes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05027438; https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05027438.

INTERNATIONAL REGISTERED REPORT IDENTIFIER (IRRID)

DERR1-10.2196/47636.

Limiting Factors in Implementing Pharmacovigilance Principles in the Elderly

The overarching aim of pharmacovigilance is to ensure the safe and effective usage of medication across the population and optimise medicines through holistic considerations. However, within the heterogeneous elderly population, several unique factors are at play, limiting the ability of clinicians to fulfil this aim. A matured physiology influencing the response and effects of drugs, increased polypharmacy enabling drug-drug interactions, and greater consumption of concurrent herbal medicines predispose patients to harmful drug events. This increasingly multimorbid subpopulation requires complex pharmaceutical regimens encouraging inappropriate prescribing and medicine non-adherence leading to suboptimal therapy. Furthermore, restrictive practices in clinical trials commonly exclude elderly patients creating disparities from expected findings within a real-world setting. These issues create an environment where elderly patients are at a heightened risk of adverse drug events and clinicians are forced to make significant decisions from limited information. With projections showing that this demographic will continue growing in size, the true burden of these limiting factors is yet to be realised.

STOPP/START interventions to improve medicines management for people aged 65 years and over: a realist synthesis

Background

Drug-related problems and potentially inappropriate prescribing impose a huge burden on patients and the health-care system. The most widely used tools for appropriate prescription in older adults in England and in other European countries are the Screening Tool of Older People’s Prescriptions (STOPP)/Screening Tool to Alert to the Right Treatment (START) tools. STOPP/START tools support medicines optimisation for older adults.

Objectives

To identify, test and refine the programme theories underlying how interventions based on the STOPP/START tools are intended to work, for whom, in what circumstances and why, as well as the resource use and cost requirements or impacts.

Design

A realist synthesis.

Setting

Primary care, hospital care and nursing homes.

Patients

Patients aged ≥ 65 years.

Interventions

Any intervention based on the use of the STOPP/START tools.

Review methods

Database and web-searching was carried out to retrieve relevant evidence to identify and test programme theories about how interventions based on the use of the STOPP/START tools work. A project reference group made up of health-care professionals, NHS decision-makers, older people, carers and members of the public was set up. In phase 1 we identified programme theories about STOPP/START interventions on how, for whom, in what contexts and why they are intended to work. We searched the peer-reviewed and grey literature to identify documents relevant to the research questions. We interviewed experts in the field in our reference group to gain input on our list of candidate context–mechanism–outcome configurations, to identify additional context–mechanism–outcome configurations and to identify additional literature and/or relevant concepts. In phase 2 we reviewed and synthesised relevant published and unpublished empirical evidence and tested the programme theories using evidence from a larger set of empirical studies.

Results

We developed a single logic model structured around three key mechanisms: (1) personalisation, (2) systematisation and (3) evidence implementation. Personalisation: STOPP/START-based interventions are based on shared decision-making, taking into account patient preferences, experiences and expectations (mechanisms), leading to increased patient awareness, adherence, satisfaction, empowerment and quality of life (outcomes). Systematisation: STOPP/START tools provide a standardised/systematic approach for medication reviews (mechanisms), leading to changes in professional and organisational culture and burden/costs (outcomes). Evidence implementation: delivery of STOPP/START-based interventions is based on the implementation of best evidence (mechanisms), reducing adverse outcomes through appropriate prescribing/deprescribing (outcomes). For theory testing, we identified 40 studies of the impact of STOPP/START-based interventions in hospital settings, nursing homes, primary care and community pharmacies. Most of the interventions used multiple mechanisms. We found support for the impact of the personalisation and evidence implementation mechanisms on selected outcome variables, but similar impact was achieved by interventions not relying on these mechanisms. We also observed that the impact of interventions was linked to the proximity of the selected outcomes to the intervention in the logic model, resulting in a clearer benefit for appropriateness of prescribing, adverse drug events and prescription costs.

Limitations

None of the available studies had been explicitly designed for evaluating underlying causal mechanisms, and qualitative information was sparse.

Conclusions

No particular configuration of the interventions is associated with a greater likelihood of improved outcomes in given settings.

Study registration

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42018110795.

Funding

This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 9, No. 23. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

Expert Consensus on a List of Inappropriate Prescribing after Prescription Review in Pediatric Units in Abidjan, Côte d'Ivoire

Introduction

Inappropriate prescribing (IP) includes inappropriate prescription and omission of prescription. IP can adversely affect the quality of health care in pediatric units. A list of IP taking into account frequently encountered drug-related problems (DRPs) can be useful to optimize prescriptions in pediatrics. The aim of this study was to validate by expert consensus a list of IP after a prescription review in pediatric units in Abidjan.

Materials and Methods

A list of IPs was developed from a prescription review of inpatients and outpatients aged 1 month to 15 years and followed in pediatric units at teaching hospitals of Abidjan during 16 months. A two-round Delphi method was used to validate a qualitative list of IPs by experts according to their level of agreement on a six-point Likert scale of 0–5 (0, no opinion; 5, strongly agree). Only propositions obtaining the agreement (rating 4 or 5) of >70% of experts who gave a non-zero rating for the first round and 80% for the second round were retained.

Results

A qualitative list of 54 IPs was drawn up from 267 DRPs detected after prescription review of 4,992 prescription lines for 881 patients. Our panel comprised 22 pediatricians (96%) and one clinical pharmacist (4%). Mean agreement ratings were 4.43/5 (95% CI 4.39–4.48) and 4.6/5 (95% CI 4.56–4.64), respectively, during the first Delphi round and the second (p<0.001). At the end of the first round, all items submitted (54) were retained, including 13 items that had been reworded. In the second round, 20 experts participated and two IPs (4%) were not retained for the final list. This list comprised 52 IPs (44 inappropriate prescriptions and eight omissions of prescription).

Conclusion

The list of IP validated in this study should help in the detection of DRPs and optimize prescriptions in pediatric units in Côte d’Ivoire.

Chronic kidney disease (CKD) -a brand ambassador/alarming bell for potentially inappropriate medication in elderly inpatients

BACKGROUND

In the past decade, the prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) among elderly inpatients has increased drastically. However, limited data is available on PIM indicators, and PIMs use among the elderly in patients with Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the prevalence of PIMs in elderly hospitalized patients with CKD.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out on 102 patients in a tertiary care hospital. PIMs were identified using Beers criteria 2019. A Chi-square test was used to determine the association between variables and PIMs use.

RESULTS

PIMs, as assessed according to AGS updated Beers criteria 2019 was found to be in more than 68.6% of patients of median age 65years and 3 number of diagnoses and seven days median length of stay. Most of the patients (47.1%) had ≥four diagnoses. The most common comorbidities in the patient were diabetes mellitus (n=54) and hypertension (n=55). Most of the subjects (66.7%) were on polypharmacy (5-9 medications/day), and 25.5% were on a higher level of polypharmacy (>10 medicines/day). Approximately 90% of the patients had very low CrCl < 21ml/min (calculated with the help of Cockcroft- Gault formula). A significant association between PIM use and an increased number of diagnoses, polypharmacy or high-level polypharmacy, was observed.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of PIMs in elderly inpatients suffering from CKD is relatively high. The study indicates negligence/ lack of awareness amongst physicians leading to increase PIM use. The authors propose that the CKD patients should attract the special attention of the physician and should be treated as brand ambassadors or alarming bells for PIM use.

Trends in polypharmacy and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in older and middle-aged people treated for diabetes

Aims

Polypharmacy is common in people with diabetes and is associated with the use of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). This study aimed to assess trends in the prevalence of polypharmacy and PIM in older and middle‐aged people with diabetes.

Methods

A repeated cross‐sectional study using the University Groningen IADB.nl prescription database was conducted. All people aged 45 years and over who were treated for diabetes registered in the period 2012–2016 were included. Polypharmacy was assessed for three age groups. PIMs were assessed using Beers criteria for people ≥65 years old, and PRescribing Optimally in Middle‐aged People's Treatments (PROMPT) criteria for 45–64 years old. Chi‐square tests and regression analysis were applied.

Results

The prevalence of polypharmacy increased significantly in all age groups in the study period. In 2016, the prevalence of polypharmacy was 36.9% in patients aged 45–54 years, 50.3% in those aged 55–64 years, and 66.2% in those aged ≥65 years. The prevalence of older people with at least one PIM decreased by 3.1%, while in the middle‐aged group this prevalence increased by 0.9% from 2012 to 2016. The most common PIMs in both age groups were the use of long‐term high‐dose proton pump inhibitors, benzodiazepines and strong opioids without laxatives. Of those, only benzodiazepines showed a decreasing trend.

Conclusions

Polypharmacy increased in older and middle‐aged people with diabetes. While the prevalence of PIM decreased over time in older age, this trend was not observed in middle‐aged people with diabetes. Efforts are needed to decrease the use of PIMs in populations already burdened with many drugs, notably at middle age.

Illness narratives and preferences for treatment among older veterans living with treatment-resistant depression and insomnia

BACKGROUND

Despite the prevalence of comorbid late-life treatmentresistant depression (LLTRD) and insomnia in older adults, there is a gap in the literature describing patient factors, such as patients' beliefs about their illnesses and preferences for treatment, that can facilitate recovery. Therefore, we explored the perceptions and treatment preferences of older veterans with LLTRD and insomnia.

METHODS

Semi-structured interviews were completed with 11 older veterans. A thematic analysis of the interviews was conducted.

RESULTS

Four main themes were identified: 1. Insomnia and medical problems were considered to be significant contributors to depression, which was defined by low mood and anhedonia; 2. "Overthinking" was thought to be a cause of insomnia; 3. Participants' preference for psychotherapy was driven by their past experiences with therapy; and 4. Participants viewed patient education as a facilitator for compliance.

CONCLUSIONS

Older veterans with LLTRD and insomnia have a preference for behavioral interventions. However, they lack knowledge about available treatment options, such as behavioral interventions for sleep that can improve both their sleep and mood while being a good fit with their illness narratives, such as "overthinking." There is a need for patient education, which should be offered early and often during treatment.

Integrating the 2019 AGS Beers Criteria into NP practice: A stepwise approach

The American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, designed to prevent the prescription of potentially inappropriate medications to older adult patients, were updated in 2019. This article provides a stepwise protocol on how to incorporate the Beers Criteria guidelines into NP practice using a case study model.

Prevalence of Potentially Inappropriate Medication use in older drivers

Background

Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) use has been studied in a variety of older adult populations across the world. We sought to examine the prevalence and correlates of PIM use in older drivers.

Methods

We applied the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria to baseline data collected from the “brown-bag” review of medications for participants of the Longitudinal Research on Aging Drivers (LongROAD) study to examine the prevalence and correlates of PIM use in a geographically diverse, community-dwelling sample of older drivers (n = 2949). Proportions of participants who used one or more PIMs according to the American Geriatrics Society 2015 Beers Criteria, and estimated odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of PIM use associated with participant characteristics were calculated.

Results

Overall, 18.5% of the older drivers studied used one or more PIM. The most commonly used therapeutic category of PIM was benzodiazepines (accounting for 16.6% of the total PIMs identified), followed by nonbenzodiazepine hypnotics (15.2%), antidepressants (15.2%), and first-generation antihistamines (10.5%). Compared to older drivers on four or fewer medications, the adjusted ORs of PIM use were 2.43 (95% CI 1.68–3.51) for those on 5–7 medications, 4.19 (95% CI 2.95–5.93) for those on 8–11 medications, and 8.01 (95% CI 5.71–11.23) for those on ≥12 medications. Older drivers who were female, white, or living in urban areas were at significantly heightened risk of PIM use.

Conclusion

About one in five older drivers uses PIMs. Commonly used PIMs are medications known to impair driving ability and increase crash risk. Implementation of evidence-based interventions to reduce PIM use in older drivers may confer both health and safety benefits.

Trial registration

Not applicable.

A novel forehead temperature-regulating device for insomnia: a randomized clinical trial

Study Objectives

Insomnia is one of the most common disorders in the general population. Hypnotic medications are efficacious, but their use is limited by adverse events (AEs). This study evaluated the safety and efficacy of a novel forehead temperature-regulating device that delivers frontal cerebral thermal therapy (maintained at 14-16°C, equivalent to 57-61°F) for the treatment of insomnia.

Methods

This was a prospective, randomized controlled trial involving two nights of therapy in 106 adults diagnosed with insomnia. The main outcome measures included latency to persistent sleep and sleep efficiency derived from polysomnographic (PSG) recordings and frequency and severity of AEs.

Results

The safety profile was comparable to sham treatment. Statistically significant differences were not found in the two a priori co-primary endpoint measures absolute latency to persistent sleep (p = 0.092) or absolute sleep efficiency. Frontal cerebral thermal therapy produced improvements over sham in other convergent measures of sleep latency including relative changes from baseline in latency to persistent sleep (p = 0.013), the latency to stage 1 NREM sleep (p = 0.006), the latency to stage 2 NREM sleep (p = 0.002), a trend for the latency to stage 3 NREM sleep (p = 0.055), and an increase in the minutes of sleep during the first hour of the night (p = 0.024).

Conclusions

Two-night frontal cerebral thermal therapy produced improvements in PSG measures of insomnia patients' ability to fall asleep and had a benign safety profile. Further studies are warranted to determine the role of this therapy in the longer-term management of insomnia.

Trial Registration

clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT01966211.

[Descriptive analysis of medication errors notified by Primary Health Care: Learning from errors]

Introducción y objetivo

El objetivo del presente estudio es describir los errores de medicación (EM) notificados en atención primaria analizando el ámbito, el daño y las causas, y orientando el análisis a las medidas para prevenir estos errores.

Material y métodos

Ámbito: Atención primaria. Servicio Madrileño de Salud. 2016.

Diseño

Estudio descriptivo transversal.

Participantes

Todas las notificaciones de EM realizadas desde los centros de salud en el sistema de notificación de incidentes de seguridad entre el 1 de enero y el 17 de noviembre de 2016 (n = 1.839).

Mediciones principales

Ámbito donde ocurrió el error, daño real, daño potencial y causa del error. Fueron clasificadas por un investigador. Se comprobó la concordancia con otro investigador.

Resultados

En el ámbito del centro de salud ocurrieron el 47% (IC95%: 44,8-49,3%) de los EM y en el entorno del paciente el 26,5% (IC95%: 24,5-28,6%). El 27,5% (IC95%: 24,1-30,8%) de los EM tenían potencialidad de daño grave. En el ámbito del centro de salud, la causa más frecuente fue la prescripción inadecuada: 27,4% (IC95%: 24,4-30,4%). En el entorno del paciente, la causa más frecuente fue el fallo en la comunicación profesional-paciente: 66% (IC95%: 61,8-70,2%), seguida por equivocaciones y despistes del paciente.

Conclusiones

La mitad de los errores de medicación notificados desde atención primaria tiene lugar en el centro de salud mientras que los EM del paciente son la cuarta parte. Uno de cada 4 es un error potencialmente grave. Las causas más importantes son la prescripción inadecuada (incluyendo indicación o dosis incorrecta, interacciones, contraindicaciones y alergias), los fallos en la comunicación profesional-paciente y los despistes en la autoadministración del paciente. Parece prioritario implantar sistemas de ayuda a la prescripción, prácticas seguras efectivas en comunicación profesional-paciente y ayudas que eviten los despistes en la autoadministración del paciente.

Potentially inappropriate medication use among hypertensive older African-American adults

Background

Inappropriate use of medications, particularly among minority older adults with co-morbidity, remains a major public health concern. The American Geriatrics Society (AGS) reports that Potentially Inappropriate Medication (PIM) continues to be prescribed for older adults, despite evidence of poor outcomes. The main objective of this study was to examine the prevalence of PIM use among underserved non-institutionalized hypertensive older African-American adults. Furthermore, this study examines potential correlations between PIM use and the number and type of chronic conditions.

Methods

This cross-sectional study is comprised of a convenience sample of 193 hypertensive non-institutionalized African-American adults, aged 65 years and older recruited from several senior housing units located in underserved areas of South Los Angeles. The updated 2015 AGS Beers Criteria was used to identify participants using PIMs.

Results

Almost one out of two participants had inappropriate medication use. While the average number of PIMs taken was 0.87 drugs, the range was from one to seven medications. Almost 23% of PIMs were due to drugs with potential drug-drug interactions. The most common PIM was the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) and Central Nervous System (CNS) active agents. Nearly 56% of PIMs potentially increased the risk of falls and fall-associated bone fractures. The use of PIMs was significantly higher among participants who reported a higher number of chronic conditions. Nearly 70% of participants with PIM use reported suffering from chronic pain.

Conclusions

The major reason for high levels of polypharmacy, PIMs, and drug interactions is that patients suffer from multiple chronic conditions. But it may not be possible or necessary to treat all chronic conditions. Therefore, the goals of care should be explicitly reviewed with the patient in order to determine which of the many chronic conditions has the greatest impact on the life goals and/or functional priorities of the patient. Those drugs that have a limited impact on the patient’s functional priorities and that may cause harmful drug-drug interactions can be reduced or eliminated, while the remaining medications can focus on the most important functional priorities of the patient.

Continuation of non-essential medications in actively dying hospitalised patients

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this analysis was to examine the use of 11 non-essential medications in actively dying patients.

METHODS

This was a planned secondary analysis of data from the Best Practices for End-of-Life Care for Our Nation's Veterans trial, a multicentre implementation trial of an intervention to improve processes of end-of-life care in inpatient settings. Supported with an electronic comfort care decision support tool, intervention included training hospital staff to identify actively dying patients, communicate the prognosis to patients/families and implement best practices of traditionally home-based hospice care. Data on medication use before and after intervention were derived from electronic medical records of 5476 deceased veterans.

RESULTS

Five non-essential medications, clopidogrel, donepezil, glyburide, metformin and propoxyphene, were ordered in less than 5% of cases. More common were orders for simvastatin (15.8%/15.1%), calcium tablets (8.4%/7.9%), multivitamins (11.6%/10.8%), ferrous sulfate (9.1%/7.6%), diphenhydramine (7.2%/5.1%) and subcutaneous heparin (29.9%/27.5%). Significant decreases were found for donepezil (2.5%/1.3%; p=0.001), propoxyphene (0.8%/0.1%; p=0.001), metformin (0.8%/0.3%; p=0.007) and multivitamins (11.6%/10.8%; p=0.01). Orders for one or more non-essential medications were less likely to occur in association with palliative care consultation (adjusted OR (AOR)=0.64, p<0.001), do-not-resuscitate orders (AOR=0.66, p=0.001) and orders for death rattle medication (AOR=0.35, p<0.001). Patients who died in an intensive care unit were more likely to receive a non-essential medication (AOR=1.60, p=0.009), as were older patients (AOR=1.12 per 10 years, p=0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Non-essential medications continue to be administered to actively dying patients. Discontinuation of these medications may be facilitated by interventions that enhance recognition and consideration of patients' actively dying status.

Explicit definitions of potentially inappropriate prescriptions of antibiotics in older patients: a compilation derived from a systematic review

Potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIPs) of antibiotics (antibiotic-PIPs) are generally detected by applying implicit definitions based on expert opinion. Explicit definitions are less frequently used, even though this approach would enable the automated detection of antibiotic-PIPs in electronic health records. Here, explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs used in studies of older adults were systematically reviewed. The MEDLINE^®, Scopus^® and Web of Science^TM core collection databases were searched with a combination of three terms and their synonyms: 'potentially inappropriate prescription' AND 'antibiotic treatment' AND 'older patients'. Following standardised selection of publications, explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs were extracted and were classified into infectious diseases domains and subdomains. A total of 600 search queries identified 4270 records, 93 of which were selected for review. A total of 160 mentions of antibiotic-PIPs were found, corresponding to 62 distinct definitions in 19 infectious diseases domains. Nearly one-half of the definitions were related to upper respiratory tract infections (n = 11 definitions; 17.7%), lower respiratory tract infections (n = 8; 12.9%) and drug-drug interactions (n = 11; 17.7%). Almost 75% of definitions (n = 46) were mentioned in a single study only. Only three definitions concerned critically important antibiotics such as third-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones. This systematic review identified 62 explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs. Most of the definitions were not found in more than one study and they varied in the degree of precision. We advocate the implementation of an expert consensus on explicit definitions of antibiotic-PIPs that correspond to today's challenges in public health.

PIM-Check: development of an international prescription-screening checklist designed by a Delphi method for internal medicine patients

OBJECTIVES

Potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) occurs frequently and is a well-known risk factor for adverse drug events, but its incidence is underestimated in internal medicine. The objective of this study was to develop an electronic prescription-screening checklist to assist residents and young healthcare professionals in PIM detection.

DESIGN

Five-step study involving selection of medical domains, literature review and 17 semistructured interviews, a two-round Delphi survey, a forward/back-translation process and an electronic tool development.

SETTING

22 University and general hospitals from Canada, Belgium, France and Switzerland.

PARTICIPANTS

40 physicians and 25 clinical pharmacists were involved in the study.Agreement with the checklist statements and their usefulness for healthcare professional training were evaluated using two 6-point Likert scales (ranging from 0 to 5).

PRIMARY AND SECONDARY OUTCOME MEASURES

Agreement and usefulness ratings were defined as: >65% of the experts giving the statement a rating of 4 or 5, during the first Delphi-round and >75% during the second.

RESULTS

166 statements were generated during the first two steps. Mean agreement and usefulness ratings were 4.32/5 (95% CI 4.28 to 4.36) and 4.11/5 (4.07 to 4.15), respectively, during the first Delphi-round and 4.53/5 (4.51 to 4.56) and 4.36/5 (4.33 to 4.39) during the second (p<0.001). The final checklist includes 160 statements in 17 medical domains and 56 pathologies. An algorithm of approximately 31 000 lines was developed including comorbidities and medications variables to create the electronic tool.

CONCLUSION

PIM-Check is the first electronic prescription-screening checklist designed to detect PIM in internal medicine. It is intended to help young healthcare professionals in their clinical practice to detect PIM, to reduce medication errors and to improve patient safety.

Antipsychotic drug use in nursing home residents with and without dementia: keep an eye on the pro re nata medication

Behavioral and psychological symptoms of dementia often lead to the prescription of antipsychotics, especially in nursing homes, but their use remains controversial. This study aimed to assess antipsychotic drug use in residents with dementia compared with those without dementia. Data were obtained through the cross-sectional 'inappropriate medication in patients with renal insufficiency in nursing homes' (IMREN) study including data from 21 nursing homes. Descriptive statistics were used and factors associated with the prescription of antipsychotics were identified by logistic regression. Overall, 57.5% of the 837 residents had a diagnosis of dementia and 47.0% of residents with dementia and 19.5% of those without dementia received antipsychotics. 35.9% of all antipsychotics in residents with dementia were prescribed as pro re nata (PRN) compared with 23.0% for residents without dementia. Typical antipsychotics were prescribed more commonly than atypical ones. The adjusted logistic regression showed a significant association between the prescription of antipsychotics and dementia (odds ratio: 3.58, 95% confidence interval: 2.45-5.25) as well as severe care dependency (odds ratio: 1.68, 95% confidence interval: 1.10-2.55). Despite safety warnings, antipsychotics are still frequently prescribed to residents with dementia. Almost half received antipsychotics and about a third of the antipsychotics are prescribed as PRN. Further studies should assess the use of PRN antipsychotics and guidelines for PRN prescriptions are clearly needed.

[Identifying potentially inappropriate prescriptions in patients over 65 years-old using original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation]

OBJECTIVE

To compare the detection of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) using the original Beers criteria, a global reference for evaluating prescriptions in the elderly, and their Spanish version.

DESIGN

Retrospective observational study LOCATION: A Primary Care area in the province of Murcia, Spain.

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 7,856 subjects aged 65 and over, with at least one drug prescribed in a Primary Care Area of Spain during study period.

METHOD

Illnesses and treatments registered in the Primary Care computerised medical history of patients were analysed during a 12month study period (2012). The original Beers criteria and their Spanish adaptation were used to evaluate PIM, considering both sets of criteria overall, and individually.

RESULTS

The median age of the patients was 76.0years, with the majority females (56.6%). Patients received a median of 13 active substances and 66 medical prescriptions. The percentage of patients prescribed PIM ranged from 44.8% according to the original Beers criteria to 49.4% with the Spanish adaptation.

CONCLUSIONS

PIMs are frequent in our context. The original Beers criteria, if not adapted to the local drug catalogue, underestimated the frequency of PIM in the elderly population studied.

Drug dispensings among elderly in the year before colon cancer diagnosis versus matched cancer-free controls

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

The concomitant use of multiple drugs is common among the general population of elderly. The aim of this study was to provide an overview of which drugs are dispensed to elderly in the year before colon cancer diagnosis and to compare this with cancer-free controls.

METHODS

Data from the Eindhoven Cancer Registry were linked to the PHARMO Database Network. Patients with colon cancer aged ≥70 years were included and matched with controls on gender, year of birth and postal code. Proportions of cases and controls with ≥1 dispensing of each WHO ATC-2-level drug during the total year and during each quarter of the year were calculated and differences between cases and controls tested.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Proportion of cases with ≥1 drug dispensing was highest for drugs for constipation (cases vs. controls 58% vs. 10%), antithrombotics (42% vs. 33%), drugs for acid-related disorders (35% vs. 22%), antibacterials (34% vs. 24%), agents acting on the renin-angiotensin system (33% vs. 27%), beta-blockers (33% vs. 23%), lipid-modifying agents (29% vs. 22%), diuretics (29% vs. 21%), psycholeptics (25% vs. 18%) and antianaemics (23% vs. 6%). The proportion of cases with ≥1 drug dispensing increased from the first to the last quarter of the year for drugs for constipation (7%-53%), drugs for acid-related disorders (16%-27%), antibacterials (12%-16%), beta-blockers (26%-28%), psycholeptics (15%-19%) and antianaemics (6%-18%). Elevated proportions of cases with ≥1 drug dispensing for several drugs are mostly related to comorbidity, although increasing proportions of cases with ≥1 drug dispensing for certain drugs during the year can be attributed to the incidence of colon cancer.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

We have provided insight into which drugs are commonly used in the year preceding colon cancer diagnosis. This may trigger general practitioners and medical specialists to further evaluate the patient.

Potentially inappropriate medications use in community-based aged patients: a cross-sectional study using 2012 Beers criteria

Background

Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) should be avoided by the aged population. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of PIMs among Lebanese aged outpatients using Beers criteria of 2012. The secondary objectives were to identify the correlates of the PIMs use and to compare the PIMs prevalence rates as per Beers criteria of 2003 and 2012.

Methods

This cross-sectional observational study was conducted among aged outpatients of different accredited community pharmacies across Lebanon. Data were collected through a validated questionnaire. The Beers criteria of 2012 were used to evaluate PIMs. The association between PIMs used and independent variables were analyzed by logistic regression. The differences between PIMs use according to Beers criteria 2003 and 2012 were calculated using chi-squared and McNemar’s tests.

Results

A total of 248 outpatients were analyzed. We identified 112 (45.2%) out of 248 patients taking PIMs. The leading classes of medications identified to cause PIMs were those acting on the central nervous system (71.4%). The factors associated with PIMs use were age, osteoporosis, Alzheimer/dementia, diabetes, and alcohol consumption. PIMs use increased significantly between Beers criteria 2003 and 2012 (Chi-squared test, P<0.001; McNemar’s test, P<0.001).

Conclusion

Our study showed a high prevalence of PIMs use in Lebanon, which is associated with various correlates. Education of health care providers and medication review should be considered to improve medication safety of older adults.

Psychotropic Drug Consumption Among Older People Enrolled in a French Private Health Insurance Plan

Background

In France, little information exists on psychotropic drug consumption in the elderly.

Objective

This study aimed to describe the patterns of psychotropic drug consumption, including the extent of inappropriate prescribing, in elderly subjects enrolled in a large health insurance plan in France (MGEN).

Methods

In 2011, 5840 MGEN affiliates aged at least 65 years were randomly selected. Reimbursement claims were organized into a 1-year cross-sectional data set. The EphMRA (European Pharmaceutical Market Research Association) classification was used to identify prescriptions of psychotropic drugs, and the Laroche criteria to identify potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs). Treatment duration was estimated using WHO defined daily doses (DDDs). A multivariate analysis was performed to identify factors associated with the prescription of PIMs.

Results

In 2011, 2213 subjects (37.9 %) made at least one reimbursement claim for a psychotropic drug, with the claims rate increasing with age. The mean annual volume of prescriptions per user was 193 DDDs. General practitioners were found to generate most of these prescriptions (81.8 %). Of these 2213 users, only 137 (6.2 %) had consulted a mental health specialist, and this rate decreased with age. Moreover, 1428 (64.5 %) subjects were prescribed at least one PIM, rising to 1711 (77.3 %) when including concomitant use of psychotropic drugs. Finally, the number of psychotropic drugs prescribed was associated with a higher odds ratio (OR) of PIM prescription.

Conclusions

Efforts should be made to reduce psychotropic drug prescriptions in elderly patients. This may contribute to reduce the amount of PIM prescriptions and the occurrence of iatrogenic side effects.

Prescription of potentially inappropriate medication in Korean older adults based on 2012 Beers Criteria: a cross-sectional population based study

Background

A high number of elderly people with multiple comorbidities are exposed to the risk of polypharmacy and prescription of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM). The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence and patterns of PIM prescription in Korean older adults according to the 2012 Beers Criteria.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted using data from the Korean Health Insurance Review and Assessment (KHIRA) database of outpatient prescription claims collected from January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2011. A total of 523,811 elderly subjects aged 65 years and older were included in the study, and several covariates related to the prescription of PIMs were obtained from the KHIRA database. These covariates were analyzed using Student’s t test and the chi-square test; furthermore, multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate the risk factors associated with the prescription of PIMs.

Results

A total of 80.96 % subjects were prescribed at least one PIM independent of their diagnosis or condition according to the 2012 Beers Criteria. The most commonly prescribed medication class was first-generation antihistamines with anticholinergic properties (52.33 %). Pain medications (43.04 %) and benzodiazepines (42.53 %) were next in line. When considering subjects’ diagnoses or conditions, subjects diagnosed with central nervous system conditions were most often prescribed PIMs. Female sex, severity of comorbidities, and polypharmacy were significant risk factors for PIM prescriptions.

Conclusions

This study confirmed that PIM prescription is common among elderly Koreans. A clinical decision support system should be developed to decrease the prevalence of PIM prescriptions.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12877-016-0285-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Factors associated with ADL/IADL disability in community dwelling older adults in the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA)

PURPOSE

To identify the factors associated with disability across many domains using a large powered sample in the activities of daily living (ADL) and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

METHODS

Those aged ≥65 years from the Irish longitudinal study on ageing (TILDA) were included in this cross sectional analysis. Three logistic regression models were used to examine the relationships between 25 health, psychological and sociodemographic variables and difficulties in ADL, IADL and ADL/IADL combined.

RESULTS

The proportion of those reporting combined ADL/IADL difficulties was 18%. More individuals reported difficulty with ADLs (13%) than IADLS (11%). The main model showed that after age, the top three factors associated with difficulty in ADL/IADL combined were pain, taking five or more medications and depression. After age, the factors with the highest impact on ADL disability were pain, taking five or more medications and body mass index (BMI); the factors with the highest impact on IADL were being separated or divorced, living with others (non-spouse) and self-rated memory.

CONCLUSIONS

Awareness of sociodemographics and early interventions for pain and cognitive deficits could reduce ADL/IADL disability and promote successful ageing. Identification of variables that influence ADL/IADLs can be used to inform policy and practice. Implications for rehabilitation After age, pain and taking five or more medications were the strongest factors associated with difficulty in ADL/IADL combined and ADL alone. Practice therefore needs to be cognizant that it is not the disease label but the symptoms of a disease that affect ADL and IADL activities. Given the strong influence of pain on difficulties with ADL and IADL, there is a need for early interventions from a multidisciplinary perspective for pain reduction, control, and self-management. These interventions should include development of pain-coping strategies and exercises to maintain mobility. After age, being separated/divorced or living with non-spouse others are the strongest factors associated with IADL difficulties. Awareness of these social factors can be used to inform support mechanisms, such as development of community services and suitable housing for those with these changing sociodemographics. Unsurprisingly, cognitive impairments were strongly associated with IADL difficulties. Simple cognitive screening assessments could be used for early detection of cognitive changes. In order to maintain optimal cognitive functioning, rehabilitation professionals should facilitate older adults' engagement in activities that are cognitively demanding and socially interactive.

National indicators for quality of drug therapy in older persons: the Swedish experience from the first 10 years

Inappropriate drug use is an important health problem in elderly persons. Beginning with the Beers’ criteria in the early 1990s, explicit criteria have been extensively used to measure and improve quality of drug use in older people. This article describes the Swedish indicators for quality of drug therapy in the elderly, introduced in 2004 and updated in 2010. These indicators were designed to be applied to people aged 75 years and over, regardless of residence and other characteristics. The indicators are divided into drug specific, covering choice, indication and dosage of drugs, polypharmacy, drug–drug interactions (DDIs), drug use in decreased renal function and in some symptoms; and diagnosis specific, covering the rational, irrational and hazardous drug use in common disorders in elderly people. During the 10 years since introduction, the Swedish indicators have several applications. They form the basis for recommendations for drug therapy in older people, are implemented in prescribing supports and drug utilisation reviews, are used in national benchmarking of the quality of Swedish healthcare and have contributed to initiatives from pensioner organisations. The indicators have also been used in several pharmacoepidemiological studies. Since 2005, there have been signs of improvement of the quality of drug prescribing to elderly persons in Sweden. For example, the prescribing of drugs that should be avoided in older persons decreased by 36 % between 2006 and 2012 in persons aged 80 years and older. Similarly, drug combinations that may cause DDIs decreased by 26 % and antipsychotics by 41 %. The indicators have likely contributed to this.

Inappropriate Medication Use Among Underserved Elderly African Americans

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this study is to identify correlates and the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) use among underserved elderly African Americans.

METHOD

This cross-sectional study recruited 400 elderly African Americans living in South Los Angeles, and used structured, face-to-face surveys. These elicited data pertaining to the type, frequency, dosage, and indications of all medications used by participants.

RESULTS

Seventy percent of participants engaged in PIM use and used at least one medication that was classified as "Avoid" (27%) and "Use Conditionally" (43%) through Beers Criteria. Significant correlations emerged between PIM use and the number of autonomic and central nervous system, neurological and psychotherapeutic medications, medication duplications, and drug-drug interactions.

DISCUSSION

Our findings point to the need for multidisciplinary team programs of health care providers that include primary and specialist physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and social workers. Together, they can improve health outcomes, enhance the quality of life, and reduce morbidity and mortality due to inappropriate medication use.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications and prescription cost analysis among older cardiac patients in an outpatient department of a tertiary care hospital in India

Aims:

The aim of this study is to evaluate potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in the elderly at cardiology outpatient department (OPD) of a tertiary care teaching hospital using Beers criteria and to find the direct cost burden of PIMs.

Materials and Methods:

The present study was an observational cross-sectional study. Prescriptions of the patients’ aged ≥65 years were collected from the cardiology OPD and were analyzed. PIMs were identified with the help of Beers 2012 criteria. Direct costs of prescribed drugs were calculated. Predictors (comorbid conditions, number of drugs prescribed) associated with PIM use were identified using bivariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression was then applied to study the influence of these variables on PIM use. A P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results:

A total of 236 patients received 1443 drugs. According to Beers 2012 criteria, 29.3% patients received at least one PIM followed by two and three PIMs in 10 and 23 patients, respectively. The most commonly prescribed PIM was spironolactone in 15.7% patients followed by benzodiazepines in 15 patients. The total cost of therapy for 1 day was Indian Rupee (INR) 10,029.2 while total cost of all prescribed medications in per day was INR 42.5.

Conclusions:

This study showed higher use of PIMs among the elderly in cardiac OPD. It is important to improve the situation of older cardiac patients who have higher use of PIMs. In older patients, high prevalence of PIMs was associated with increased cost. The use of regular continuing medical education program by the hospital and educating and training doctors on rational prescribing will help alleviate this issue.

How safe is primary care? A systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Improving patient safety is at the forefront of policy and practice. While considerable progress has been made in understanding the frequency, causes and consequences of error in hospitals, less is known about the safety of primary care.

OBJECTIVE

We investigated how often patient safety incidents occur in primary care and how often these were associated with patient harm.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We searched 18 databases and contacted international experts to identify published and unpublished studies available between 1 January 1980 and 31 July 2014. Patient safety incidents of any type were eligible. Eligible studies were critically appraised using validated instruments and data were descriptively and narratively synthesised.

FINDINGS

Nine systematic reviews and 100 primary studies were included. Studies reported between <1 and 24 patient safety incidents per 100 consultations. The median from population-based record review studies was 2-3 incidents for every 100 consultations/records reviewed. It was estimated that around 4% of these incidents may be associated with severe harm, defined as significantly impacting on a patient's well-being, including long-term physical or psychological issues or death (range <1% to 44% of incidents). Incidents relating to diagnosis and prescribing were most likely to result in severe harm.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Millions of people throughout the world use primary care services on any given day. This review suggests that safety incidents are relatively common, but most do not result in serious harm that reaches the patient. Diagnostic and prescribing incidents are the most likely to result in avoidable harm.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

This systematic review is registered with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO CRD42012002304).

Impact of potentially inappropriate medication and continuity of care in a sample of Taiwan elderly patients with diabetes mellitus who have also experienced heart failure

AIMS

Continuity of care (COC) and potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) can affect the elderly healthcare outcome. We evaluated the COC and PIM effects in older diabetes mellitus (DM) patients with heart failure (HF).

METHODS

The Longitudinal Health Insurance Database of 2005 was multiple-year claim data collected from 2005 to 2010 in Taiwan. There were both 823 DM and non-DM subjects aged 65 years and older in this observational study. The COC index and 2012 Beers criteria were applied to evaluate the COC and HF-PIM in older DM patients with heart failure. The dependent variables were either hospital admissions or emergency department visits. Generalized estimating equation was used to adjust all covariates.

RESULTS

During 2005-2010, the rate of HF-PIM in the elderly DM group was 86.1%, the mean COC index was 0.28 ± 0.19, the admission rate was 31.9% and the emergency department rate was 38.8 %. Lower COC index was associated with HF-PIM and HF-PIM duration in older DM patients with HF. Lower COC index was associated with hospitalizations (OR 0.07, 95% CI 0.05-0.11) and ED visits (OR 0.10, 95% CI 0.07-0.13), but HF-PIM was not significant. The duration of HF-PIM was related with poor health outcomes over 90 and 180 days for hospitalization and emergency department visit, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Among elderly DM patients with HF, COC had positive effects on healthcare outcomes. Improving COC and reducing PIM duration for elderly DM patients with HF seems warranted. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2016; 16: 1117-1126.

Measuring prevalence, reliability and variation in high-risk prescribing in general practice using multilevel modelling of observational data in a population database

Background

High-risk primary care prescribing is common and is known to vary considerably between practices, but the extent to which high-risk prescribing varies among individual general practitioners (GPs) is not known.

Objectives

To create prescribing safety indicators usable in existing electronic clinical data and to examine (1) variation in high-risk prescribing between patients, GPs and practices including reliability of measurement and (2) changes over time in high-risk prescribing prevalence and variation between practices.

Design

Descriptive analysis and multilevel logistic regression modelling of routine data.

Setting

UK general practice using routine electronic medical record data.

Participants

(1) For analysis of variation and reliability, 398 GPs and 26,539 patients in 38 Scottish practices. (2) For analysis of change in high-risk prescribing, ≈ 300,000 patients particularly vulnerable to adverse drug effects registered with 190 Scottish practices.

Main outcome measures

For the analysis of variation between practices and between GPs, five indicators of high-risk non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) prescribing. For the analysis of change in high-risk prescribing, 19 previously validated indicators.

Results

Measurement of high-risk prescribing at GP level was feasible only for newly initiated drugs and for drugs similar to NSAIDs which are usually initiated by GPs. There was moderate variation between practices in total high-risk NSAID prescribing [intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) 0.034], but this indicator was highly reliable (> 0.8 for all practices) at distinguishing between practices because of the large number of patients being measured. There was moderate variation in initiation of high-risk NSAID prescribing between practices (ICC 0.055) and larger variation between GPs (ICC 0.166), but measurement did not reliably distinguish between practices and had reliability > 0.7 for only half of the GPs in the study. Between quarter (Q)2 2004 and Q1 2009, the percentage of patients exposed to high-risk prescribing measured by 17 indicators that could be examined over the whole period fell from 8.5% to 5.2%, which was largely driven by reductions in high-risk NSAID and antiplatelet use. Variation between practices increased for five indicators and decreased for five, with no relationship between change in the rate of high-risk prescribing and change in variation between practices.

Conclusions

High-risk prescribing is common and varies moderately between practices. High-risk prescribing at GP level cannot be easily measured routinely because of the difficulties in accurately identifying which GP actually prescribed the drug and because drug initiation is often a shared responsibility with specialists. For NSAID initiation, there was approximately three times greater variation between GPs than between practices. Most GPs with above average high-risk prescribing worked in practices which were not themselves above average. The observed reductions in high-risk prescribing between 2004 and 2009 were largely driven by falls in NSAID and antiplatelet prescribing, and there was no relationship between change in rate and change in variation between practices. These results are consistent with improvement interventions in all practices being more appropriate than interventions targeted on practices or GPs with higher than average high-risk prescribing. There is a need for research to understand why high-risk prescribing varies and to design and evaluate interventions to reduce it.

Funding

Funding for this study was provided by the Health Services and Delivery Research programme of the National Institute for Health Research.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in community-dwelling older people across Europe: a systematic literature review

BACKGROUND

Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) is one of the main risk factors for adverse drug events (ADEs) in older people.

PURPOSE

This systematic literature review aims to determine prevalence and type of PIP in community-dwelling older people across Europe, as well as identifying risk factors for PIP.

METHODS

The PubMed and Web of Science database were searched systematically for relevant manuscripts (January 1, 2000-December 31, 2014). Manuscripts were included if the study design was observational, the study participants were community-dwelling older patients in Europe, and if a published screening method for PIP was used. Studies that focused on specific pathologies or that focused on merely one inappropriate prescribing issue were excluded. Data analysis was performed using R statistics.

RESULTS

Fifty-two manuscripts were included, describing 82 different sample screenings with an estimated overall PIP prevalence of 22.6 % (CI 19.2-26.7 %; range 0.0-98.0 %). Ten of the sample screenings were based on the Beers 1997 criteria, 19 on the Beers 2003 criteria, 14 on STOPP criteria (2008 version), 8 on START-criteria (2008 version), and 7 on the PRISCUS list. The 24 remaining sample screenings were carried out using compilations of screening methods or used country-specific lists such as the Laroche criteria. It appears that only PIP prevalence calculated from insurance data significantly differs from the other data collection method categories. Furthermore, risk factors most often positively associated with PIP prevalence were polypharmacy, poor functional status, and depression. Drug groups most often involved in PIP were anxiolytics (ATC-code: N05B), antidepressants (N06A), and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory and anti-rheumatic products (M01A).

CONCLUSION

PIP prevalence in European community-dwelling older adults is high and depends partially on the data collection method used. Polypharmacy, poor functional status, and depression were identified as the most common risk factors for PIP.

Uso de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos por uma população de idosos atendida na Estratégia Saúde da Família

ResumoEste estudo objetivou analisar a prevalência do uso de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos em idosos da Estratégia Saúde da Família de Porto Alegre-RS, bem como investigar fatores associados: dados sociodemográficos e de saúde; uso contínuo ou se necessário da medicação; indicação médica ou automedicação. A coleta de dados ocorreu entre março de 2011 e dezembro de 2012. Os agentes de saúde comunitários aplicaram um questionário com dados sociodemográficos, de saúde e uso de medicamentos. Foram estudados os anti-inflamatórios não esteroidais, glicocorticoides, analgésicos não opioides e opioides de uso oral. Foram incluídos 758 idosos e o uso de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos era feito por 28,8%. O paracetamol e o ibuprofeno foram os mais utilizados. No que diz respeito à autopercepção de saúde, quanto pior a saúde relatada, maior o uso da terapêutica (p<0,001). A doença hepática e artrose/artrite/reumatismo mostraram estar associadas ao uso de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos (p<0,001). A prevalência de uso de anti-inflamatórios e analgésicos foi considerada moderada quando comparada a estudos prévios (28,8%). Além disso, a maioria dos idosos fazia uso desses medicamentos quando era preciso, provavelmente porque sentia dores leves a moderadas, não sendo necessário o uso contínuo da medicação ou também por sofrer com os efeitos adversos desses medicamentos, optando por usá-los esporadicamente.

Conceptualizing and measuring potentially inappropriate drug therapy

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE

Elderly people are the principal consumers of prescription drugs. The more the medication used by the patient, the greater the likelihood there is of the patient being subjected to potentially inappropriate drug therapy (PIDT). PIDT has been measured in the literature with both implicit and explicit tools. The purpose of this review was to assess the use of tools to detect PIDT in various studies and to determine which terms are used to refer to PIDT in practice.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the following steps: the first was identification. In this step, studies were selected from different combinations of the descriptors 'aged', 'elderly', 'inappropriate prescribing' and 'drug utilization' in three different languages, using the Embase, Medline, Scielo, Scopus and Web of Science databases. Second, the papers that satisfied the inclusion criteria for data extraction were carefully examined by three evaluators to determine the tools used and terms that referred to PIDT.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

From the combinations of keywords, 8610 articles were found. At the end of the selection process, 119 of the articles complied with the specified criteria. The degree of agreement among evaluators was moderate for the study titles (κ1  = 0·479) and substantial for abstracts (κ2  = 0·647). With respect to the PIDT evaluation criteria used by the studies, 27·7% used two criteria. Of the 27 evaluation criteria identified, the Beers criteria were used by 82·3% of the studies. More than 50 different terms to identify PIDT were found in the literature.

WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION

This review is the first study to conceptualize and discuss terms that refer to PIDT. At present, there is no consensus regarding terms used to refer to PIDT, with over 50 different terms currently in use. This review shows an increase in the number of articles aimed at evaluating PIDT using implicit and explicit tools.

[Analysis of the medical prescription in institutionalised patients]

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate/assess the therapeutic concordance/agreement with prescribed medication in patients institutionalized diagnoses in two periods of time as well as the characteristics of this prescription.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Observational and descriptive study. Prescribing and clinical diagnoses of institutionalized patients were analyzed. These patients were treated by the same physicians during the period of time with a one-year interval (2010-2011), offering prescribing information in this period.

RESULTS

A total of 81 patients (78% women), mean age 84±7 years, and 5±2 diagnoses per patient. The number of drugs per patient was more than 8 in the 2 periods, being higher in 2011 compared to 2010. From all the prescription, we found that 8.88% in 2010 and 9.3% in 2011 are included as "limited clinical value" drugs. In 2010, it sees a concordance of 86.71±13.75 against 87.17±14.58 in 2011, it means, 87% of patients are treated with drugs in agreement with their diagnoses, representing an increase of 0.47 in 2011 regarding 2010. No statistically significant differences between the 2 years.

CONCLUSIONS

The prescriptions in institutionalized patients are very high and the number of drugs per patient increased after information. When we analyzed prescriptions we underline a high percentage of drugs included in the group of limited clinical value (citicoline). A significant percentage of prescriptions don't correspond with diagnoses avaiable in their clinical history.

Use of potentially inappropriate medications in hospitalized elderly at a teaching hospital: a comparison between Beers 2003 and 2012 criteria

Objectives:

To detect the prevalence and pattern of use of Potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) in hospitalized elderly patients of a tertiary care teaching hospital using Beers 2012 criteria and to compare the same with Beers 2003 criteria.

Materials and Methods:

Prescriptions of the elderly patients aged 65 years and above were collected from the medicine ward and analyzed. PIMs were identified with help of Beers 2003 and Beers 2012 criteria and comparison was made between the two criteria. Predictors associated with use of PIM were identified using bivariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis.

Results:

A total of 210 patients received 2,267 drugs. According to Beers 2003 criteria, 60 (28.57%) elderly patients received at least one PIM and 2.9% drugs were prescribed inappropriately. According to Beers 2012 criteria, 84 (40%) elderly received at least one PIM while 22 (10.47%) received multiple PIMs and about 5% drugs were prescribed inappropriately. The most commonly prescribed PIM was mineral oil-liquid paraffin (30, 14.3%) followed by spironolactone (25, 11.9%), digoxin (19, 9%), and benzodiazepines (14, 6.7%). There was a significant association between the number of patients receiving more than six drugs and the use of PIMs (P < 0.01). Use of more than 10 drugs was a significant predictor for use of PIMs in the elderly.

Conclusion:

The study shows high prevalence of prescribing PIMs in hospitalized elderly patients. Beers 2012 criteria are more effective in identifying PIMs than Beers 2003 criteria.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing among older people in the United Kingdom

Background

Potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older people is associated with increases in morbidity, hospitalisation and mortality. The objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of and factors associated with PIP, among those aged ≥70 years, in the United Kingdom, using a comprehensive set of prescribing indicators and comparing these to estimates obtained from a truncated set of the same indicators.

Methods

A retrospective cross-sectional study was carried out in the UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD), in 2007. Participants included those aged ≥ 70 years, in CPRD. Fifty-two PIP indicators from the Screening Tool of Older Persons Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP) criteria were applied to data on prescribed drugs and clinical diagnoses. Overall prevalence of PIP and prevalence according to individual STOPP criteria were estimated. The relationship between PIP and polypharmacy (≥4 medications), comorbidity, age, and gender was examined. A truncated, subset of 28 STOPP criteria that were used in two previous studies, were further applied to the data to facilitate comparison.

Results

Using 52 indicators, the overall prevalence of PIP in the study population (n = 1,019,491) was 29%. The most common examples of PIP were therapeutic duplication (11.9%), followed by use of aspirin with no indication (11.3%) and inappropriate use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (3.7%). PIP was strongly associated with polypharmacy (Odds Ratio 18.2, 95% Confidence Intervals, 18.0-18.4, P < 0.05). PIP was more common in those aged 70–74 years vs. 85 years or more and in males. Application of the smaller subset of the STOPP criteria resulted in a lower PIP prevalence at 14.9% (95% CIs 14.8-14.9%) (n = 151,598). The most common PIP issues identified with this subset were use of PPIs at maximum dose for > 8 weeks, NSAIDs for > 3 months, and use of long-term neuroleptics.

Conclusions

PIP was prevalent in the UK and increased with polypharmacy. Application of the comprehensive set of STOPP criteria allowed more accurate estimation of PIP compared to the subset of criteria used in previous studies. These findings may provide a focus for targeted interventions to reduce PIP.

2012 American Geriatrics Society Beers criteria: enhanced applicability for detecting potentially inappropriate medications in European older adults? A comparison with the Screening Tool of Older Person's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions

OBJECTIVES

To determine the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) and related factors through a comparative analysis of the Screening Tool of Older Person's Potentially Inappropriate Prescriptions (STOPP), the 2003 Beers criteria, and the 2012 AGS update of the Beers criteria.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional.

SETTING

Primary care.

PARTICIPANTS

Community-dwelling persons aged 65 and older who live on the island of Lanzarote, Spain (N = 407).

MEASUREMENTS

Sociodemographic characteristics; independence in activities of daily living; cognitive function; Geriatric Depression Scale; clinical diagnoses; and complete data on indication, dosage, and length of drug treatments. One thousand eight hundred seventh-two prescriptions were examined, and the rate of PIMs was assessed with the three criteria. The primary endpoint was the percentage of participants receiving at least one PIM. Multivariate logistic regression was used to examine the factors related to PIMs.

RESULTS

Potentially inappropriate medications were present in 24.3%, 35.4%, and 44% of participants, according to the 2003 Beers criteria, STOPP, and 2012 Beers criteria, respectively. The profile of PIMs was also different (the most frequent being benzodiazepines in both Beers criteria lists and aspirin in the STOPP). The number of drugs was associated with risk of prescribing PIMs in all three models, as was the presence of a psychological disorder in the 2003 Beers criteria (odds ratio (OR) = 2.07, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.26-3.40) and the 2012 Beers criteria (OR = 2.91, 95% CI = 1.83-4.66). The kappa for degree of agreement between STOPP and the 2012 Beers criteria was 0.35 (95% CI = 0.25-0.44).

CONCLUSION

The 2012 Beers criteria detected the highest number of PIMs, and given the scant overlapping with the STOPP criteria, the use of both tools may be seen as complementary.

Potentially inappropriate medication related to weakness in older acute medical patients

BACKGROUND

The use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) is common in the older population. Inappropriate medications as well as polypharmacy expose older people to a greater risk of adverse drug reactions and may result in hospitalizations.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the prevalence of PIMs among acutely hospitalized patients aged ≥65 years in an acute medical unit, and to investigate the relationship between use of PIMs and weakness.

SETTING

This longitudinal observational study was undertaken in the Acute Medical Unit, Hvidovre Hospital, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.

METHOD

Patients aged ≥65 years admitted to the acute medical unit during the period October to December 2011 were included. Patients were interviewed at admission and at a follow-up visit 30 days after discharge. Data included information about medications, social status, functional status, cognitive status, handgrip strength, health-related quality of life, visual acuity, days of hospitalization, and comorbidities, and was prospectively collected. Polypharmacy was defined as regular use of 5 or more drugs. The Charlson Comorbidity Index was used to categorize comorbidities.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The prevalence of PIMs and the association with PIMs and functional status handgrip strength, HRQOL, comorbidities, social demographic data and vision.

RESULTS

Seventy-one patients (55 % men) with a median age of 78.7 years participated. The median number of medications was eight per person. Eighty percent were exposed to polypharmacy. PIMs were used by 85 % of patients, and PIMs were associated with low functional status (p = 0.032), low handgrip strength (p = 0.006), and reduced health-related quality of life (p = 0.005), but not comorbidities (p = 0.63), age (p = 0.60), sex (p = 0.53), education (p = 0.94), cognition (p = 0.10), pain (p = 0.46), or visual acuity (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSIONS

Use of PIMs was very common among older people admitted to an acute medical unit. The use of PIMs is associated with low functional status, low handgrip strength, and reduced health-related quality of life.

Potentially inappropriate prescribing in elderly outpatients in Croatia

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to determine the prevalence of inappropriate prescribing to the elderly and to identify possible gender-related differences in prescribing certain potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) to outpatients by using large administrative prescription database.

METHODS

Medications prescribed for elderly outpatients (≥ 65 years) in Primorsko-Goranska County, Croatia, who received five or more different drugs simultaneously in 2010, were analyzed. The prevalence of potentially inappropriate drugs prescribed to the elderly was assessed using the new comprehensive protocol developed by authors Mimica Matanović and Vlahović-Palčevski.

RESULTS

A total of 62.4 % of patients received at least one medication with unfavorable benefit/risk ratio in the elderly. Female patients were given inappropriate medications in a significantly higher percentage than men (69.3 % vs. 50.5 %; p < 0.001). The average number of prescriptions for PIMs that should have been avoided with certain diseases or conditions was 0.88 per patient in the survey. The most common drug combination potentially leading to serious drug-drug interactions (DDIs) included an angiotensin-converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor and a potassium supplement.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study has shown that every tenth medication prescribed to a patient > 65 years and receiving five or more drugs was potentially inappropriate. Elderly women were prescribed PIMs more often than men. Drugs of concern in female patients were benzodiazepines, antidepressants, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). In male patients, there was a significantly higher proportion of possible interactions with warfarin, theophylline, and medications affecting the cardiovascular system, such as ACE inhibitors and amiodarone.

Fast-Acting Sublingual Zolpidem for Middle-of-the-Night Wakefulness

Sleep disorders (somnipathies) are conditions characterized by disruptions of sleep quality or of sleep pattern. They can involve difficulty falling asleep (prolonged sleep onset latency), difficulty staying asleep (disturbance of sleep maintenance), sleep of poor quality (unrefreshing), or combinations of these and can lead to poor health and quality of life problems. A subtype of sleep-maintenance insomnia is middle-of-the-night wakefulness, a relatively common occurrence. Zolpidem, a nonbenzodiazepine benzodiazepine receptor agonist, allosterically modulates an ion channel and increases the influx of Cl⁻, thereby dampening the effect of excitatory (sleep disrupting) input. Recently, product label changes to some zolpidem containing products have been implemented by the FDA in order to reduce the risk associated with their morning after residual side effects. A new formulation of zolpidem tartrate (Intermezzo) sublingual tablet, an approved product indicated exclusively for the treatment of middle-of-the-night wakefulness and difficulty returning to sleep, did not have its label changed. We present a short summary of its basic science and clinical attributes in light of the recent regulatory changes for zolpidem products.

Prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescribing and prescribing omissions in older Irish adults: findings from The Irish LongituDinal Study on Ageing study (TILDA)

PURPOSE

We sought to estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate prescriptions (PIP) and potential prescribing omissions (PPOs) using a subset of the STOPP/START criteria in a population based sample of Irish adults aged ≥ 65 years using data from The Irish LongituDinal Study on Ageing (TILDA).

METHODS

A subset of 26 PIP indicators and 10 PPO indicators from the STOPP/START criteria were applied to the TILDA dataset. PIP/PPO prevalence according to individual STOPP/START criteria and the overall prevalence of PIP/PPO were estimated. The relationship between PIP and PPOs and polypharmacy, age, gender and multimorbidity was examined using logistic regression.

RESULTS

The overall prevalence of PIP in the study population (n=3,454) was 14.6 %. The most common examples of PIP identified were NSAID with moderate-severe hypertension (200 participants; 5.8 %) and aspirin with no history of coronary, cerebral, or peripheral vascular symptoms or occlusive event (112 participants; 3.2 %). The overall prevalence of PPOs was 30 % (n=1,035). The most frequent PPO was antihypertensive therapy where systolic blood pressure consistently >160 mmHg (n=341, 9.9 %), There was a significant association between PIP and PPO and polypharmacy when adjusting for age, sex and multimorbidity (adjusted OR 2.62, 95 % CI 2.05-3.33 for PIP and adjusted OR 1.46, 95 % CI 1.23-1.75 for prescribing omissions).

CONCLUSION

Our findings indicate prescribing omissions are twice as prevalent as PIP in the elderly using a subset of the STOPP/START criteria as an explicit process measure of potentially inappropriate prescribing and prescribing omissions. Polypharmacy was independently associated with both PPO and PIP. Application of such screening tools to prescribing decisions may reduce unnecessary medication, related adverse events, healthcare utilisation and cost.

Inappropriate prescribing in older fallers presenting to an Irish emergency department

BACKGROUND

certain medications increase falls risk in older people.

OBJECTIVE

to assess if prescribing modification occurs in older falls presenting to an emergency department (ED).

DESIGN

before-and-after design: presentation to ED with a fall as the index event.

SUBJECTS

over 70's who presented to ED with a fall over a 4-year period.

METHODS

dispensed medication in the 12 months pre- and post-fall was identified using a primary care reimbursement services pharmacy claims database. Screening Tool of Older Person's PIP (STOPP) and Beers prescribing criteria were applied to identify potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). Polypharmacy was defined as four or more regular medicines. Psychotropic medication was identified using the WHO Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical classification system. Changes in prescribing were compared using McNemar's test (significance P < 0.05).

RESULTS

One thousand sixteen patients were eligible for analysis; 53.1% had at least one STOPP criteria pre-fall with no change post-fall (53.7%, P = 0.64). Beers criteria were identified in 44.0% pre-fall, with no change post-fall (41.5%, P = 0.125). The most significant individual indicators to change were neuroleptics, which decreased from 17.5 to 14.7% (P = 0.02) and long-acting benzodiazepines decreased from 10.7 to 8.6% (P = 0.005). Polypharmacy was observed in 63% and was strongly predictive of PIP, OR 4.0 (95% CI 3.0, 5.32). A high prevalence of psychotropic medication was identified pre-fall: anxiolytics (15.7%), antidepressants (26%), hypnosedatives (30%). New initiation of anxiolytics and hypnosedatives occurred in 9-15%, respectively, post-fall.

CONCLUSION

a significant prevalence of PIP was observed in older fallers presenting to the ED. No substantial improvements in PIP occurred in the 12 months post-fall, suggesting the need for focused intervention studies to be undertaken in this area.

Prescription errors in older individuals with an intellectual disability: prevalence and risk factors in the Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability Study

Prescribing pharmacotherapy for older individuals with an intellectual disability (ID) is a complex process, possibly leading to an increased risk of prescription errors. The objectives of this study were (1) to determine the prevalence of older individuals with an intellectual disability with at least one prescription error and (2) to identify potential risk factors for these prescription errors (age, gender, body mass index (BMI), frailty index, level of intellectual disability and living situation). The study population consisted of 600 older (≥ 50 years) individuals with an ID using one or more drugs who were randomly selected from the study cohort of the Healthy Ageing and Intellectual Disability (HA-ID) Study. The medication used at the time of measurement was screened for errors by a hospital pharmacist/clinical pharmacologist and a Master's student pharmacy using consensus methodology. Participants with one or more prescription errors were compared to participants without prescription errors by multivariate logistic regression to identify potential risk factors. The prevalence of individuals with one or more prescription errors was 47.5% (285 of 600 individuals; 95% confidence interval (CI) 43-52%). Relevant errors, defined as errors that actually do require a change of pharmacotherapy, were identified in 26.8% of the individuals (161 of 600 individuals; 95% CI 23-30%). Higher age (adjusted odds ratio (OR adj) 1.03; 95% CI 1.01-1.06), less severe intellectual disability (moderate: OR adj 0.48; 95% CI 0.31-0.74 and severe: OR adj 0.56; 95% CI 0.32-0.98), higher BMI (OR adj 1.04; 95% CI 1.01-1.08), higher frailty index (0.39-0.54: OR adj 2.4; 95% CI 1.21-4.77 and ≥ 0.55: OR adj 3.4; 95% CI 1.03-11.02), polypharmacy (OR adj 8.06; 95% CI 5.59-11.62) and use of medicines acting on the central nervous system (OR adj 3.34; 95% CI 2.35-4.73) were independently associated with the occurrence of prescription errors. Interventions targeted to high risk patients should be designed and implemented to improve pharmacotherapy in older individuals with an intellectual disability.

Prescribing potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in Germany's elderly as indicated by the PRISCUS list. An analysis based on regional claims data

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medication (PIM) in the elderly as indicated by Germany's recently published list (PRISCUS) and to assess factors independently associated with PIM prescribing, both overall and separately for therapeutic groups.

METHODS

Claims data analysis (Health Insurance Sample AOK Hesse/KV Hesse, 18.75% random sample of insurants from AOK Hesse, Germany) is used in the study. The study population is composed of 73,665 insurants >64 years of age continuously insured in the last quarter of 2009 and either continuously insured or deceased in 2010. Prevalence estimates are standardized to the population of Germany (31 December 2010). The variables age, sex, polypharmacy, hospital stay and nursing care are assessed for their independent association with general PIM prescription and among 11 therapeutic subgroups using multivariate logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

In 2010, 22.0% of the elderly received at least one PIM prescription (men: 18.3%, women: 24.8%). The highest PIM prevalence was observed for antidepressants (6.5%), antihypertensives (3.8%) and antiarrhythmic drugs (3.5%). Amitriptyline, tetrazepam, doxepin, acetyldigoxin, doxazosin and etoricoxib were the most frequently prescribed PIMs. Multivariate analyses indicate that women (OR 1.39; 95% CI: 1.34-1.44) and persons with extreme polypharmacy (≥10 vs. <5 drugs: OR 5.16; 95% CI: 4.87-5.47) were at higher risk for receiving a PRISCUS-PIM. Risk analysis for therapeutic groups shows divergent associations.

CONCLUSION

PRISCUS-PIMs are widely used. Educational programs should focus on drugs with high treatment prevalence and call professionals' attention to those elderly patients who are at special risk for inappropriate medication.

Hospitalization as a turning point for sleep medication use in older adults: prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Use of sleep medications as a result of hospitalization among older adults is common and has been shown to result in chronic use and increased risks for adverse effects such as falls and cognitive decline. However, few studies have explored in-hospital sleep medication use or disuse as a possible factor related to subsequent home use.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to examine changes in sleep medication use pre- to post-hospitalization as a function of in-hospital use.

METHODS

The study was designed as a prospective cohort study, and included 485 acute medical patients aged 70 years and older, hospitalized in a large, Israeli, teaching medical centre. Sleep medication use was assessed by patient interviews regarding patterns of use prior to, during and at 1 and 3 months after discharge. Post-discharge using patterns were assessed as a function of in-hospital discontinuation or initiation of sleep medications; background demographic and clinical characteristics were assessed as well. Logistic regressions were modelled separately for discontinuation and initiation of sleep medication use at each follow-up.

RESULTS

Of those patients who used sleep medications prior to admission, 37 (18% of 206 prior users) discontinued use during the hospital stay. Non-use of sleep medications during hospitalization was the main significant characteristic associated with post-hospitalization discontinuation among prior users, when comparing patients who continued with those who discontinued using sleep medications in bivariate analyses. Discontinuation was associated with an adjusted odds ratio (AOR, adjusted for cognitive status) of 3.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.64, 9.30) for non-use at the 1-month follow-up. Of those who did not use sleep medications prior to admission, 39 (14% of 279 non-prior users) initiated use during hospitalization. Again, sleep medication initiation at time of hospitalization was the main correlate of change in post-hospitalization medication use status, when comparing post-discharge users and non-users, among the non-prior users. Hospital initiation of sleep medications was associated with an AOR (adjusted for levels of education and morbidity, readmission, and functional status) of 4.65 (95% CI 1.95, 11.09) for post-discharge use. Similar results were obtained for the 3-month follow-up, reaching significance levels only for the discontinuation group.

CONCLUSIONS

Though overall prevalence rates of sleep medication use pre- and post-hospitalization are fairly similar, rigorous scrutiny of the findings demonstrates that in-hospital sleep medication use and disuse may be a significant turning point both for initiation and discontinuation of sleep medications, especially in the short post-discharge time frame. Thus, in-hospital sleep medication prescribing policies should acknowledge the potential for changes in the post-discharge sleep medication regimen.

Continuity of care, potentially inappropriate medication, and health care outcomes among the elderly: evidence from a longitudinal analysis in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

Better continuity of care (COC) is associated with improved health care outcomes, such as decreased hospitalization and emergency department visit. However, little is known about the effect of COC on potentially inappropriate medication.

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to investigate the association between COC and the likelihood of receiving inappropriate medication, and to examine the existence of a mediating effect of inappropriate medication on the relationship between COC and health care outcomes and expenses.

METHODS

A longitudinal analysis was conducted using claim data from 2004 to 2009 under universal health insurance in Taiwan. Participants aged 65 years and older were categorized into 3 equal tertiles by the distribution of COC scores. This study used a propensity score matching approach to assign subjects to 1 of 3 COC groups to increase the comparability among groups. Generalized estimating equations were used to examine the association between COC, potentially inappropriate medication, and health care outcomes and expenses.

RESULTS

The results revealed that patients with the best COC were less likely to receive drugs that should be avoided [odd ratios (OR), 0.44; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.43-0.45) or duplicated medication (OR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.22-0.23) than those with the worst COC. The findings also indicated that potentially inappropriate medication was a partial mediator in the association between COC and health care outcomes and expenses.

CONCLUSION

Better COC is associated with fewer negative health care outcomes and lower expenses, partially through the reduction of potentially inappropriate medication. Improving COC deserves more attention in future health care reforms.

Potentially inappropriate medications among elderly Brazilian outpatients

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVES In Brazil, few studies have investigated the prevalence of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs) among elderly outpatients. This study aimed to determine the prevalence of PIMs prescribed for elderly outpatients, identify the PIMs most commonly involved, and investigate whether age, sex and number of medications are related to prescription of such medications. DESIGN AND SETTING Observational descriptive study developed in the Geriatrics Service of the Central Institute of Hospital das Clínicas (HC), Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (FMUSP), São Paulo, Brazil. METHODS Prescriptions issued to 1,270 elderly patients (≥ 60 years) were gathered from a database. These prescriptions had been written by geriatricians at a tertiary-level university hospital in São Paulo, Brazil, between February and May 2008. The prescriptions were divided according to sex and age group (60-69, 70-79 and ≥ 80). The Beers criteria were used to evaluate PIMs. RESULTS Most of the sample comprised women (77%) and the mean age was 80.1 years. The mean prevalence of PIM prescriptions was 26.9%. Female sex and number of medications prescribed were associated with prescription of PIMs. The chance of having a PIM prescription was lower among patients ≥ 70 years. CONCLUSION The greater prevalence of PIMs was correlated with female sex. The chance of having a PIM prescription was lower among patients ≥ 70 years and became greater with increasing numbers of medications prescribed (≥ 7).