1
|
Paolucci M, Wuillemin N, Köhli A, Ballmer-Weber B, Severin Y, Waeckerle-Men Y, Arena C, Homère V, Bieli D, Kündig TM, Sonati T, Johansen P. Multivariate allergen-specific analysis and profiling of serum antibodies from patients with peanut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2023; 53:353-358. [PMID: 36478618 DOI: 10.1111/cea.14262] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/02/2022] [Revised: 11/21/2022] [Accepted: 11/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Paolucci
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Alice Köhli
- Division of Allergology, University Children's Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Yannik Severin
- Institute of Molecular Systems Biology, ETH, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Valentine Homère
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Thomas M Kündig
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | | | - Pål Johansen
- Department of Dermatology, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland.,Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Dramburg S, Hilger C, Santos AF, de Las Vecillas L, Aalberse RC, Acevedo N, Aglas L, Altmann F, Arruda KL, Asero R, Ballmer-Weber B, Barber D, Beyer K, Biedermann T, Bilo MB, Blank S, Bosshard PP, Breiteneder H, Brough HA, Bublin M, Campbell D, Caraballo L, Caubet JC, Celi G, Chapman MD, Chruszcz M, Custovic A, Czolk R, Davies J, Douladiris N, Eberlein B, Ebisawa M, Ehlers A, Eigenmann P, Gadermaier G, Giovannini M, Gomez F, Grohman R, Guillet C, Hafner C, Hamilton RG, Hauser M, Hawranek T, Hoffmann HJ, Holzhauser T, Iizuka T, Jacquet A, Jakob T, Janssen-Weets B, Jappe U, Jutel M, Kalic T, Kamath S, Kespohl S, Kleine-Tebbe J, Knol E, Knulst A, Konradsen JR, Korošec P, Kuehn A, Lack G, Le TM, Lopata A, Luengo O, Mäkelä M, Marra AM, Mills C, Morisset M, Muraro A, Nowak-Wegrzyn A, Nugraha R, Ollert M, Palosuo K, Pastorello EA, Patil SU, Platts-Mills T, Pomés A, Poncet P, Potapova E, Poulsen LK, Radauer C, Radulovic S, Raulf M, Rougé P, Sastre J, Sato S, Scala E, Schmid JM, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, Schrama D, Sénéchal H, Traidl-Hoffmann C, Valverde-Monge M, van Hage M, van Ree R, Verhoeckx K, Vieths S, Wickman M, Zakzuk J, Matricardi PM, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K. EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2023; 34 Suppl 28:e13854. [PMID: 37186333 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13854] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 26.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2022] [Accepted: 09/05/2022] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
Since the discovery of immunoglobulin E (IgE) as a mediator of allergic diseases in 1967, our knowledge about the immunological mechanisms of IgE-mediated allergies has remarkably increased. In addition to understanding the immune response and clinical symptoms, allergy diagnosis and management depend strongly on the precise identification of the elicitors of the IgE-mediated allergic reaction. In the past four decades, innovations in bioscience and technology have facilitated the identification and production of well-defined, highly pure molecules for component-resolved diagnosis (CRD), allowing a personalized diagnosis and management of the allergic disease for individual patients. The first edition of the "EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide" (MAUG) in 2016 rapidly became a key reference for clinicians, scientists, and interested readers with a background in allergology, immunology, biology, and medicine. Nevertheless, the field of molecular allergology is moving fast, and after 6 years, a new EAACI Taskforce was established to provide an updated document. The Molecular Allergology User's Guide 2.0 summarizes state-of-the-art information on allergen molecules, their clinical relevance, and their application in diagnostic algorithms for clinical practice. It is designed for both, clinicians and scientists, guiding health care professionals through the overwhelming list of different allergen molecules available for testing. Further, it provides diagnostic algorithms on the clinical relevance of allergenic molecules and gives an overview of their biology, the basic mechanisms of test formats, and the application of tests to measure allergen exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie Dramburg
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Christiane Hilger
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Alexandra F Santos
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | | | - Rob C Aalberse
- Sanquin Research, Dept Immunopathology, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Nathalie Acevedo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Lorenz Aglas
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Friedrich Altmann
- Department of Chemistry, University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Vienna, Austria
| | - Karla L Arruda
- Department of Medicine, Ribeirão Preto Medical School, University of São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto, Sao Paulo, Brasil, Brazil
| | - Riccardo Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Italy
| | - Barbara Ballmer-Weber
- Klinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Kantonsspital St. Gallen, St. Gallen, Switzerland
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Domingo Barber
- Institute of Applied Molecular Medicine Nemesio Diez (IMMAND), Department of Basic Medical Sciences, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad San Pablo CEU, CEU Universities, Madrid, Spain
- RETIC ARADyAL and RICORS Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Madrid, Spain
| | - Kirsten Beyer
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Tilo Biedermann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Maria Beatrice Bilo
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Sciences, Università Politecnica delle Marche, Ancona, Italy
- Allergy Unit Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Torrette, Italy
| | - Simon Blank
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine and Helmholtz Center Munich, German Research Center for Environmental Health, Munich, Germany
| | - Philipp P Bosshard
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Heimo Breiteneder
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Helen A Brough
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Merima Bublin
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Dianne Campbell
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Children's Hospital at Westmead, Sydney Children's Hospitals Network, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Child and Adolescent Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Luis Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Jean Christoph Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Giorgio Celi
- Centro DH Allergologia e Immunologia Clinica ASST- MANTOVA (MN), Mantova, Italy
| | | | - Maksymilian Chruszcz
- Department of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of South Carolina, Columbia, South Carolina, USA
| | - Adnan Custovic
- National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK
| | - Rebecca Czolk
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Janet Davies
- Queensland University of Technology, Centre for Immunology and Infection Control, School of Biomedical Sciences, Herston, Queensland, Australia
- Metro North Hospital and Health Service, Emergency Operations Centre, Herston, Queensland, Australia
| | - Nikolaos Douladiris
- Allergy Department, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Bernadette Eberlein
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Biederstein, School of Medicine, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Motohiro Ebisawa
- Clinical Research Center for Allergy and Rheumatology, National Hospital Organization, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - Anna Ehlers
- Chemical Biology and Drug Discovery, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Philippe Eigenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - Gabriele Gadermaier
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Mattia Giovannini
- Allergy Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Meyer Children's University Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francisca Gomez
- Allergy Unit IBIMA-Hospital Regional Universitario de Malaga, Malaga, Spain
- Spanish Network for Allergy research RETIC ARADyAL, Malaga, Spain
| | - Rebecca Grohman
- NYU Langone Health, Department of Internal Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Carole Guillet
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christine Hafner
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Robert G Hamilton
- Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - Michael Hauser
- Department of Biosciences and Medical Biology, Paris Lodron University Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Thomas Hawranek
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Hans Jürgen Hoffmann
- Institute for Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | | | - Tomona Iizuka
- Laboratory of Protein Science, Graduate School of Life Science, Hokkaido University, Sapporo, Japan
| | - Alain Jacquet
- Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, Thailand
| | - Thilo Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Justus Liebig University Gießen, Gießen, Germany
| | - Bente Janssen-Weets
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Uta Jappe
- Division of Clinical and Molecular Allergology, Priority Research Area Asthma and Allergy, Research Center Borstel, Borstel, Germany
- Leibniz Lung Center, Airway Research Center North (ARCN), Member of the German Center for Lung Research, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Allergy Outpatient Clinic, Dept. of Pneumology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - Marek Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, Wroclaw Medical University, Wroclaw, Poland
| | - Tanja Kalic
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital St. Poelten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, St. Poelten, Austria
| | - Sandip Kamath
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Sabine Kespohl
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Jörg Kleine-Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient Clinic and Clinical Research Center, Berlin, Germany
| | - Edward Knol
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - André Knulst
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Jon R Konradsen
- Department of Women's and Children's Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Pediatric Allergy and Pulmonology Unit at Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Peter Korošec
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases Golnik, Golnik, Slovenia
- Faculty of Pharmacy, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Annette Kuehn
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Gideon Lack
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Peter Gorer Department of Immunobiology, School of Immunology and Microbial Sciences, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Thuy-My Le
- Center for Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Andreas Lopata
- Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
| | - Olga Luengo
- RETIC ARADyAL and RICORS Enfermedades Inflamatorias (REI), Madrid, Spain
- Allergy Section, Internal Medicine Department, Vall d'Hebron University Hospital, Vall d'Hebron Research Institute (VHIR), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mika Mäkelä
- Division of Allergy, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
- Pediatric Department, Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Clare Mills
- Division of Infection, Immunity and Respiratory Medicine, School of Biological Sciences, Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | | | - Antonella Muraro
- Food Allergy Referral Centre, Department of Woman and Child Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy
| | - Anna Nowak-Wegrzyn
- Division of Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, Hassenfeld Children's Hospital, New York, New York, USA
- Department of Pediatrics, Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Collegium Medicum, University of Warmia and Mazury, Olsztyn, Poland
| | - Roni Nugraha
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, College of Public Health, Medical and Veterinary Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
- Department of Aquatic Product Technology, Faculty of Fisheries and Marine Science, IPB University, Bogor, Indonesia
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Kati Palosuo
- Department of Allergology, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | | | - Sarita Ulhas Patil
- Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Immunology, Departments of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Thomas Platts-Mills
- Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA
| | | | - Pascal Poncet
- Institut Pasteur, Immunology Department, Paris, France
- Allergy & Environment Research Team Armand Trousseau Children Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Ekaterina Potapova
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Lars K Poulsen
- Allergy Clinic, Department of Dermatology and Allergy, Copenhagen University Hospital-Herlev and Gentofte, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christian Radauer
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Suzana Radulovic
- Department of Women and Children's Health (Pediatric Allergy), School of Life Course Sciences, Faculty of Life Sciences and Medicine, King's College London, London, United Kingdom
- Children's Allergy Service, Evelina London, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom
| | - Monika Raulf
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Institute of the Ruhr- Universität Bochum, Bochum, Germany
| | - Pierre Rougé
- UMR 152 PharmaDev, IRD, Université Paul Sabatier, Faculté de Pharmacie, Toulouse, France
| | - Joaquin Sastre
- Allergy Service, Fundación Jiménez Díaz; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES); Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Sakura Sato
- Allergy Department, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Enrico Scala
- Clinical and Laboratory Molecular Allergy Unit - IDI- IRCCS, Fondazione L M Monti Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Johannes M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - Denise Schrama
- Centre of Marine Sciences (CCMAR), Universidade do Algarve, Faro, Portugal
| | - Hélène Sénéchal
- Allergy & Environment Research Team Armand Trousseau Children Hospital, APHP, Paris, France
| | - Claudia Traidl-Hoffmann
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Marcela Valverde-Monge
- Allergy Service, Fundación Jiménez Díaz; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES); Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Autonoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Department of Experimental Immunology and Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Kitty Verhoeckx
- Department of Immunology and Dermatology/ Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Division of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - Magnus Wickman
- Department of Environmental Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Josefina Zakzuk
- Institute for Immunological Research, University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, Colombia
| | - Paolo M Matricardi
- Department of Pediatric Respiratory Medicine, Immunology and Critical Care Medicine, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kronfel CM, Cheng H, McBride JK, Nesbit JB, Krouse R, Burns P, Cabanillas B, Crespo JF, Ryan R, Simon RJ, Maleki SJ, Hurlburt BK. IgE epitopes of Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 in peanut-allergic individuals from Spain and the US. Front Allergy 2023; 3:1090114. [PMID: 36698378 PMCID: PMC9869384 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.1090114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/16/2022] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Non-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) are well studied allergens that can lead to severe reactions, but often cause oral allergy syndrome in the Mediterranean area and other European countries. However, studies focused on LTP reactivity in allergic individuals from the United States are lacking because they are not considered major allergens. The goal of this study is to determine if differences in immunoglobulin (Ig) E binding patterns to the peanut allergen Ara h 9 and two homologous LTPs (walnut Jug r 3 and peach Pru p 3) between the US and Spain contribute to differences observed in allergic reactivity. Synthetic overlapping 15-amino acid-long peptides offset by five amino acids from Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 were synthesized, and the intact proteins were attached to microarray slides. Sera from 55 peanut-allergic individuals from the US were tested for IgE binding to the linear peptides and IgE binding to intact proteins using immunofluorescence. For comparison, sera from 17 peanut-allergic individuals from Spain were also tested. Similar IgE binding profiles for Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 were identified between the US and Spain, with slight differences. Certain regions of the proteins, specifically helices 1 and 2 and the C-terminal coil, were recognized by the majority of the sera more often than other regions of the proteins. While serum IgE from peanut-allergic individuals in the US binds to peptides of Ara h 9 and its homologs, only IgE from the Spanish subjects bound to the intact LTPs. This study identifies Ara h 9, Jug r 3, and Pru p 3 linear epitopes that were previously unidentified using sera from peanut-allergic individuals from the US and Spain. Certain regions of the LTPs are recognized more often in US subjects, indicating that they represent conserved and possible cross-reactive regions. The location of the epitopes in 3D structure models of the LTPs may predict the location of potential conformational epitopes bound by a majority of the Spanish patient sera. These findings are potentially important for development of peptide or protein-targeting diagnostic and therapeutic tools for food allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina M. Kronfel
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Hsiaopo Cheng
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Jane K. McBride
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | - Jacqueline B. Nesbit
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| | | | - Preston Burns
- Rho Federal Systems Division, Durham, NC, United States
| | - Beatriz Cabanillas
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Jesus F. Crespo
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
| | - Robert Ryan
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Reyna J. Simon
- Aimmune Therapeutics, a Nestlé Health Science Company, Brisbane, CA, United States
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States,Correspondence: Soheila J. Maleki
| | - Barry K. Hurlburt
- United States Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Research Service, Southern Regional Research Center, New Orleans, LA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Sánchez-Ruano L, Fernández-Lozano C, Ferrer M, Gómez F, de la Hoz B, Martínez-Botas J, Goikoetxea MJ. Differences in Linear Epitopes of Ara h 9 Recognition in Peanut Allergic and Tolerant, Peach Allergic Patients. Front Allergy 2022; 3:896617. [PMID: 35935018 PMCID: PMC9352880 DOI: 10.3389/falgy.2022.896617] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 06/22/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Peanut-allergic patients from the Mediterranean region are predominantly sensitized to the lipid transfer protein (LTP) Ara h 9, and the peach LTP Pru p 3 seems to be the primary sensitizer. However, LTP sensitization in peanut allergy is not a predictive marker for clinically relevant symptoms. Objective We aimed to identify sequential epitopes of IgE and IgG4 from Pru p 3 and Ara h 9 in peach-allergic patients sensitized to peanuts. We also sought to determine the differences in IgE and IgG4 binding between patients who had developed peanut allergy and those tolerating peanuts. Methods A total of 46 peach-allergic patients sensitized to peanuts were selected. A total of 35 patients were allergic to peanuts (peanut-allergic group) and 11 were tolerant to peanuts (peanut-tolerant group). We measured sIgE and sIgG4 in peanut, peach, and their recombinant allergen (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, Ara h 8, and Ara h 9) with fluorescence enzyme immunoassay. We examined the IgE and IgG4 binding to sequential epitopes using a peptide microarray corresponding to linear sequences of the LTPs Ara h 9 and Pru p 3 with a library of overlapping peptides with a length of 20 amino acids (aa) and an offset of 3 aa. Results The frequency and the intensity of IgE recognition of Ara h 9 and Pru p 3 peptides were higher in the peanut-tolerant group than in the peanut-allergic group. We found four Ara h 9 peptides (p4, p14, p21, and p25) and four Pru p 3 peptides (p1, p3, p21, and p24) with a significantly elevated IgE recognition in peanut-tolerant patients. Only one peptide of Ara h 9 (p4) recognized by IgG4 was significantly elevated in the peanut-tolerant group. The IgG4/IgE ratio of Ara h 9 peptide 4 was significantly higher in peanut-tolerant patients than in peanut-allergic patients, while no significant differences were observed in the IgG4/IgE ratio of this peptide in Pru p 3. Conclusion Although we found significant differences in IgE and IgG4 recognition of Ara h 9 and Pru p 3 between peanut-tolerant and peanut-allergic patients (all of whom were allergic to peach), polyclonal IgE peptide recognition of both LTPs was observed in peach-allergic patients tolerating peanuts. However, the IgG4 blocking antibodies against Ara h 9 peptide 4 could provide an explanation for the absence of clinical reactivity in peanut-tolerant peach-allergic patients. Further studies are needed to validate the usefulness of IgG4 antibodies against Ara h 9 peptide 4 for peanut allergy diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L. Sánchez-Ruano
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - C. Fernández-Lozano
- Servicio de Bioquímica-Investigación, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal - Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
| | - M. Ferrer
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra Health Research Institute (IDISNA, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra), Pamplona, Spain
- Research Network on Asthma, Drug Adverse Reactions and Allergy (ARADyAL, Red de Investigacion en Asma, Reacciones Adversas a Farmacos y Alergia), Málaga, Spain
| | - F. Gómez
- Research Network on Asthma, Drug Adverse Reactions and Allergy (ARADyAL, Red de Investigacion en Asma, Reacciones Adversas a Farmacos y Alergia), Málaga, Spain
- Allergy Clinical Unit, Hospital Regional Universitario de Málaga, Instituto de Investigación Biomédica de Málaga (IBIMA), Málaga, Spain
| | - B. de la Hoz
- Allergy Department, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
- Research Network on Asthma, Drug Adverse Reactions and Allergy (ARADyAL, Red de Investigacion en Asma, Reacciones Adversas a Farmacos y Alergia), Málaga, Spain
| | - J. Martínez-Botas
- Servicio de Bioquímica-Investigación, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal - Instituto Ramón y Cajal de Investigación Sanitaria (IRYCIS), Madrid, Spain
- CIBER de Fisiopatología de la Obesidad y Nutrición (CIBEROBN)-Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain
- *Correspondence: J. Martínez-Botas
| | - M. J. Goikoetxea
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Clínica Universidad de Navarra, Navarra Health Research Institute (IDISNA, Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria de Navarra), Pamplona, Spain
- Research Network on Asthma, Drug Adverse Reactions and Allergy (ARADyAL, Red de Investigacion en Asma, Reacciones Adversas a Farmacos y Alergia), Málaga, Spain
- M. J. Goikoetxea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Cañas JA, Pérez-Sánchez N, Lopera-Doblas L, Palomares F, Molina A, Bartra J, Torres MJ, Gómez F, Mayorga C. Basophil Activation Test Utility as a Diagnostic Tool in LTP Allergy. Int J Mol Sci 2022; 23. [PMID: 35563370 DOI: 10.3390/ijms23094979] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/27/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Plant-food allergy is an increasing problem, with nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) triggering mild/severe reactions. Pru p 3 is the major sensitizer in LTP food allergy (FA). However, in vivo and in vitro diagnosis is hampered by the need for differentiating between asymptomatic sensitization and allergy with clinical relevance. The basophil activation test (BAT) is an ex vivo method able to identify specific IgE related to the allergic response. Thus, we aimed to establish the value of BAT in a precise diagnosis of LTP-allergic patients. Ninety-two individuals with peach allergy sensitized to LTP, Pru p 3, were finally included, and 40.2% of them had symptoms to peanut (n = 37). In addition, 16 healthy subjects were recruited. BAT was performed with Pru p 3 and Ara h 9 (peanut LTP) at seven ten-fold concentrations, and was evaluated by flow cytometry, measuring the percentage of CD63 (%CD63+) and CD203c (%CD203chigh) cells, basophil allergen threshold sensitivity (CD-Sens), and area under the dose−response curve (AUC). Significant changes in BAT parameters (%CD63+ and %CD203chigh) were found between the controls and patients. However, comparisons for %CD63+, %CD203chigh, AUC, and CD-Sens showed similar levels among patients with different symptoms. An optimal cut-off was established from ROC curves, showing a significant positive percentage of BAT in patients compared to controls and great values of sensitivity (>87.5%) and specificity (>85%). In addition, BAT showed differences in LTP-allergic patients tolerant to peanut using its corresponding LTP, Ara h 9. BAT can be used as a potential diagnostic tool for identifying LTP allergy and for differentiating peanut tolerance, although neither reactivity nor sensitivity can distinguish the severity of the clinical symptoms.
Collapse
|
6
|
Fuhrmann V, Huang HJ, Akarsu A, Shilovskiy I, Elisyutina O, Khaitov M, van Hage M, Linhart B, Focke-Tejkl M, Valenta R, Sekerel BE. From Allergen Molecules to Molecular Immunotherapy of Nut Allergy: A Hard Nut to Crack. Front Immunol 2021; 12:742732. [PMID: 34630424 PMCID: PMC8496898 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.742732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/23/2021] [Indexed: 12/02/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanuts and tree nuts are two of the most common elicitors of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated food allergy. Nut allergy is frequently associated with systemic reactions and can lead to potentially life-threatening respiratory and circulatory symptoms. Furthermore, nut allergy usually persists throughout life. Whether sensitized patients exhibit severe and life-threatening reactions (e.g., anaphylaxis), mild and/or local reactions (e.g., pollen-food allergy syndrome) or no relevant symptoms depends much on IgE recognition of digestion-resistant class I food allergens, IgE cross-reactivity of class II food allergens with respiratory allergens and clinically not relevant plant-derived carbohydrate epitopes, respectively. Accordingly, molecular allergy diagnosis based on the measurement of allergen-specific IgE levels to allergen molecules provides important information in addition to provocation testing in the diagnosis of food allergy. Molecular allergy diagnosis helps identifying the genuinely sensitizing nuts, it determines IgE sensitization to class I and II food allergen molecules and hence provides a basis for personalized forms of treatment such as precise prescription of diet and allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT). Currently available forms of nut-specific AIT are based only on allergen extracts, have been mainly developed for peanut but not for other nuts and, unlike AIT for respiratory allergies which utilize often subcutaneous administration, are given preferentially by the oral route. Here we review prevalence of allergy to peanut and tree nuts in different populations of the world, summarize knowledge regarding the involved nut allergen molecules and current AIT approaches for nut allergy. We argue that nut-specific AIT may benefit from molecular subcutaneous AIT (SCIT) approaches but identify also possible hurdles for such an approach and explain why molecular SCIT may be a hard nut to crack.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Verena Fuhrmann
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Huey-Jy Huang
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Aysegul Akarsu
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Igor Shilovskiy
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Olga Elisyutina
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
| | - Musa Khaitov
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Marianne van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Division of Immunology and Allergy, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University, Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Birgit Linhart
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Margarete Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
| | - Rudolf Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Laboratory for Molecular Allergology, National Research Center (NRC) Institute of Immunology Federal Medical-Biological Agency (FMBA) of Russia, Moscow, Russia
- Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, Krems, Austria
- Laboratory of Immunopathology, Department of Clinical Immunology and Allergology, Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Moscow, Russia
| | - Bulent Enis Sekerel
- Division of Allergy and Asthma, Department of Pediatrics, Hacettepe University Faculty of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Achour J, Guinot M, Guillon B, Kapel R, Galet O, Adel‐Patient K, Hazebrouck S, Bernard H. Sensitization Potency of Sunflower Seed Protein in a Mouse Model: Identification of 2S-Albumins More Allergenic Than SFA-8. Mol Nutr Food Res 2021; 65:e2100369. [PMID: 34331387 PMCID: PMC9285957 DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.202100369] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 07/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
SCOPE Food allergy to sunflower seed (SFS) protein is not frequent and only non-specific lipid transfert protein (nsLTP) Hel a 3 is officially recognized as a food allergen. Out of the eleven seed storage 2S-albumins (SESA) detected in SFS, only SFA-8 allergenicity has been investigated so far. The study aimed then to evaluate SFS protein allergenicity and particularly, to compare the sensitization potency of SESA in a mouse model. METHODS AND RESULTS The most abundant SESA and nsLTP were isolated from SFS through a combination of chromatographic methods. Purified proteins were then used to measure specific IgG1 and IgE responses in BALB/c mice orally sensitized to different SFS protein isolates. The study, thus, confirmed the allergenicity of SFA-8 and Hel a 3 but mice were also highly sensitized to other SESA such as SESA2-1 or SESA20-2. Furthermore, competitive inhibition of IgE-binding revealed that SFA-8 IgE-reactivity was due to cross-reactivity with other SESA. 11S-globulins were weakly immunogenic and were rapidly degraded in an in vitro model of gastroduodenal digestion. In contrast, Hel a 3, SESA2-1 and SFA-8 were more resistant to proteolysis and gastroduodenal digestion did not affect their IgE-reactivity. CONCLUSIONS SESA2-1 or SESA20-2 were more potent allergens than SFA-8 in this mouse model. Allergenicity of SESA must be now confirmed in SFS-allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jihana Achour
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Marine Guinot
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Blanche Guillon
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Romain Kapel
- Laboratoire Réactions et Génie des ProcédésCNRSLRGPUniversité de LorraineNancyFrance
| | | | - Karine Adel‐Patient
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Stéphane Hazebrouck
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| | - Hervé Bernard
- CEAINRAEDépartement Médicaments et Technologies pour la Santé (DMTS)/Service de Pharmacologie et d'ImmunoanalyseUniversité Paris‐SaclayGif‐sur‐YvetteFrance
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Beitia JM, Vega Castro A, Cárdenas R, Peña-Arellano MI. Pru p 3 Sublingual Immunotherapy in Patients with Lipid Transfer Protein Syndrome: Is It Worth? Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2021; 182:447-454. [PMID: 33588417 DOI: 10.1159/000512613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/09/2020] [Accepted: 10/27/2020] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Lipid transfer proteins (LTPs) syndrome is an important cause of multiple plant food allergy in the Mediterranean area. The effectiveness of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) with the LTP Pru p 3 extract has been little investigated in the real-world setting. This study aimed to investigate the outcome of Pru p 3 SLIT in real-life patients with LTP syndrome with/without concurrent reactions to peanut and/or nuts. METHODS This was a prospective real-life study including all patients diagnosed with LTP allergy and treated with Pru p 3 SLIT between 2011 and 2018 in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Patients underwent open oral food challenge (OFC) tests for unpeeled peach and nuts/peanuts 1 year after the treatment started to assess food tolerance. A control group of patients diagnosed with LTP allergy who refused treatment with immunotherapy were included. Severity of symptoms and diet avoidance was recorded in both groups. RESULTS Twenty-nine patients with a median age of 24.7 years (range 5.5-43.1) were included: 100% were allergic to fruit; 72%, to peanut and/or nuts; 19 had a history of severe systemic reactions. Seven patients discontinued therapy; 3 (10%), due to adverse events. One year after SLIT start, 16 (73%) patients had negative OFC to peach; 95%, after 2 years; 69% had negative OFC to nuts/peanuts. The control group included 13 patients: 53.8% experienced reactions with new foods; severity of symptoms increased significantly (p < 0.001), and diet restrictions were maintained in this group. CONCLUSIONS SLIT with Pru p 3 shows a good safety profile, and avoid dietary restrictions in patients with LTP syndrome treated in the real-life setting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan María Beitia
- Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain
| | - Arantza Vega Castro
- Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain, .,ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain,
| | - Remedios Cárdenas
- Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain
| | - Maria Isabel Peña-Arellano
- Allergy Service, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain.,ARADyAL Spanish Thematic Network and Co-operative Research Centre RD16/0006/0023, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To provide an overview of the prevalence and clinical manifestation of non-specific lipid transfer proteins (LTP)-mediated allergies outside the Mediterranean area and to address potential reasons for the different geographical significance of LTP-driven allergies. RECENT FINDINGS LTPs are major allergens in the Mediterranean area, which frequently can elicit severe reactions. Pru p 3 the LTP from peach is reported as genuine allergen and is considered a prototypic marker for LTP-mediated allergies. However, both food and pollen LTP allergies exist outside the Mediterranean area, but with lower clinical significance, different immunogenicity, and less clarified role. Evidence has been reported that in areas with high exposure to pollen, in particular to mugwort, pollen-derived LTPs can act as a primary sensitizer to trigger secondary food allergies. Co-sensitization to unrelated allergens might be causative for less severe reactions in response to LTPs. However, the reason for the geographical different sensitization patterns to LTPs remains unclear.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephan Scheurer
- Molecular Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Germany.
| | - Ronald van Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Stefan Vieths
- Molecular Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Paul-Ehrlich Str. 51-59, 63225, Langen, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Yakhlef M, Giangrieco I, Ciardiello MA, Fiume I, Mari A, Souiki L, Pocsfalvi G. Potential allergenicity of Medicago sativa investigated by a combined IgE-binding inhibition, proteomics and in silico approach. J Sci Food Agric 2021; 101:1182-1192. [PMID: 32790067 DOI: 10.1002/jsfa.10730] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2020] [Revised: 07/23/2020] [Accepted: 08/13/2020] [Indexed: 06/11/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L) is one of the most planted crops worldwide primarily used to feed animals. The use of alfalfa in human diet as sprouts, infusions and nutritional supplements is rapidly gaining popularity. Despite this, allergenicity assessment of this novel plant food is largely lacking. RESULTS Here, leaf protein extract of alfalfa was studied using a combined proteomics, Immunoglobulin E (IgE)-binding inhibition assay and in silico approach to find potential allergens. We have identified and annotated 129 proteins using in-gel digestion proteomics and Blast2Go suit. A search against COMPARE database, using the identified proteins as query sequences, revealed high similarity with several allergenic proteins. The Single Point Highest Inhibition Achievable assay (SPHIAa) performed on the multiplex FABER® allergy testing system confirmed the in silico results and showed some additional potential allergens. This approach allowed the detection of proteins in alfalfa leaves cross-reacting with plant allergens from three different allergen families such as lipid transfer, thaumatin-like and Bet v 1-like protein families. In addition, the absence of structural determinants cross-reacting with seed storage allergenic proteins and with animal allergens was recorded. CONCLUSION This study reports for the first time potential allergenic proteins in alfalfa. The results suggest that this plant food can be safely introduced, as a protein-rich supplement, in the diet of patients allergic to animal food allergens. Allergic patients towards certain plant food allergens need to be careful about consuming alfalfa because they might have allergic symptoms. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marwa Yakhlef
- Laboratoire de Biologie, Eau et Environnement, Department of Biology, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie et Sciences de la Terre et l'Univers, Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Guelma, Algeria
- Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Ivana Giangrieco
- Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
- Allergy Data Laboratories (ADL), Latina, Italy
| | - Maria A Ciardiello
- Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Immacolata Fiume
- Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| | - Adriano Mari
- Allergy Data Laboratories (ADL), Latina, Italy
- Associated Centre for Molecular Allergology, Rome, Italy
| | - Lynda Souiki
- Department of Biology, Faculté des Sciences de la Nature et de la Vie et Sciences de la Terre et l'Univers, Université 8 Mai 1945 Guelma, Guelma, Algeria
| | - Gabriella Pocsfalvi
- Institute of Biosciences and BioResources, National Research Council, Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Czolk R, Klueber J, Sørensen M, Wilmes P, Codreanu-Morel F, Skov PS, Hilger C, Bindslev-Jensen C, Ollert M, Kuehn A. IgE-Mediated Peanut Allergy: Current and Novel Predictive Biomarkers for Clinical Phenotypes Using Multi-Omics Approaches. Front Immunol 2021; 11:594350. [PMID: 33584660 PMCID: PMC7876438 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.594350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/13/2020] [Accepted: 12/11/2020] [Indexed: 01/22/2023] Open
Abstract
Food allergy is a collective term for several immune-mediated responses to food. IgE-mediated food allergy is the best-known subtype. The patients present with a marked diversity of clinical profiles including symptomatic manifestations, threshold reactivity and reaction kinetics. In-vitro predictors of these clinical phenotypes are evasive and considered as knowledge gaps in food allergy diagnosis and risk management. Peanut allergy is a relevant disease model where pioneer discoveries were made in diagnosis, immunotherapy and prevention. This review provides an overview on the immune basis for phenotype variations in peanut-allergic individuals, in the light of future patient stratification along emerging omic-areas. Beyond specific IgE-signatures and basophil reactivity profiles with established correlation to clinical outcome, allergenomics, mass spectrometric resolution of peripheral allergen tracing, might be a fundamental approach to understand disease pathophysiology underlying biomarker discovery. Deep immune phenotyping is thought to reveal differential cell responses but also, gene expression and gene methylation profiles (eg, peanut severity genes) are promising areas for biomarker research. Finally, the study of microbiome-host interactions with a focus on the immune system modulation might hold the key to understand tissue-specific responses and symptoms. The immune mechanism underlying acute food-allergic events remains elusive until today. Deciphering this immunological response shall enable to identify novel biomarker for stratification of patients into reaction endotypes. The availability of powerful multi-omics technologies, together with integrated data analysis, network-based approaches and unbiased machine learning holds out the prospect of providing clinically useful biomarkers or biomarker signatures being predictive for reaction phenotypes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rebecca Czolk
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Faculty of Science, Technology and Medicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Julia Klueber
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Martin Sørensen
- Department of Pediatric and Adolescent Medicine, University Hospital of North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
- Pediatric Research Group, Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Paul Wilmes
- Luxembourg Centre for Systems Biomedicine, University of Luxembourg, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Françoise Codreanu-Morel
- Department of Allergology and Immunology, Centre Hospitalier de Luxembourg-Kanner Klinik, Luxembourg, Luxembourg
| | - Per Stahl Skov
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
- RefLab ApS, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Institute of Immunology, National University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Christiane Hilger
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - Carsten Bindslev-Jensen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Markus Ollert
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Annette Kuehn
- Department of Infection and Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Kansen HM, van Erp FC, Knulst AC, Ehlers AM, Lyons SA, Knol EF, Meijer Y, Otten HG, van der Ent CK, Le TM. Accurate Prediction of Peanut Allergy in One-Third of Adults Using a Validated Ara h 2 Cutoff. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract 2020; 9:1667-1674.e3. [PMID: 33248282 DOI: 10.1016/j.jaip.2020.11.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/02/2020] [Revised: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 11/09/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The diagnostic value of peanut components is extensively studied in children, but to a lesser extent in adults with suspected peanut allergy. The use of peanut components in daily practice may reduce the need for double-blind placebo-controlled food challenges (DBPCFCs); however, validation studies are currently lacking. OBJECTIVE To evaluate the diagnostic value of (combined) peanut components and validate a previously found Ara h 2 cutoff level with 100% positive predictive value (PPV) in adults with suspected peanut allergy. METHODS Adults who underwent a peanut DBPCFC were included: 84 patients from a previous study (2002-2012) and 70 new patients (2012-2019). Specific IgE (sIgE) to peanut extract, Ara h 1, 2, 3, 6, and 8 was measured using ImmunoCAP. Diagnostic value was assessed with an area under the curve (AUC) analysis. RESULTS In total, 95 (62%) patients were peanut allergic. sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were the best predictors with an AUC (95% confidence interval) of 0.85 (0.79-0.91) and 0.85 (0.79-0.92), respectively. The Ara h 2 cutoff level with 100% PPV (≥1.75 kUA/L) was validated in the 70 new patients. Thirty percent of all included patients could be classified correctly as peanut allergic using this validated cutoff level. CONCLUSION sIgE to Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 have equally high discriminative ability. Peanut allergy can be predicted accurately in one-third of adults using a validated cutoff level of sIgE to Ara h 2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hannah M Kansen
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Francine C van Erp
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - André C Knulst
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Anna M Ehlers
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Sarah A Lyons
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Edward F Knol
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Yolanda Meijer
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Henny G Otten
- Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Cornelis K van der Ent
- Department of Pediatric Pulmonology and Allergology, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Thuy-My Le
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands; Center of Translational Immunology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Song X, Li E, Song H, Du G, Li S, Zhu H, Chen G, Zhao C, Qiao L, Wang J, Yu S, Sui JM. Genome-wide identification and characterization of nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP) genes in Arachis duranensis. Genomics 2020; 112:4332-41. [PMID: 32717318 DOI: 10.1016/j.ygeno.2020.07.034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2020] [Revised: 07/07/2020] [Accepted: 07/20/2020] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
Nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) play vital roles in lipid metabolism, cell apoptosis and biotic and abiotic stresses in plants. However, the distribution of nsLTPs in Arachis duranensis has not been fully characterized. In this study, we identified 64 nsLTP genes in A. duranensis (designated AdLTPs), which were classified into six subfamilies and randomly distributed along nine chromosomes. Tandem and segmental duplication events were detected in the evolution of AdLTPs. The Ks and ω values differed significantly between Types 1 and D subfamilies, and eight AdLTPs were under positive selection. The expression levels of AdLTPs were changed after salinity, PEG, low-temperature and ABA treatments. Three AdLTPs were associated with resistance to nematode infection, and DOF and WRI1 transcription factors may regulate the AdLTP response to nematode infection. Our results may provide valuable genomic information for the breeding of peanut cultivars that are resistant to biotic and abiotic stresses.
Collapse
|
14
|
Larsen JM, Bang-Berthelsen CH, Qvortrup K, Sancho AI, Hansen AH, Andersen KIH, Thacker SSN, Eiwegger T, Upton J, Bøgh KL. Production of allergen-specific immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of food allergy. Crit Rev Biotechnol 2020; 40:881-894. [PMID: 32515236 DOI: 10.1080/07388551.2020.1772194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
Allergen-specific immunotherapy (IT) is emerging as a viable avenue for the treatment of food allergies. Clinical trials currently investigate raw or slightly processed foods as therapeutic agents, as trials using food-grade agents can be performed without the strict regulations to which conventional drugs are subjected. However, this limits the ability of standardization and may affect clinical trial outcomes and reproducibility. Herein, we provide an overview of methods used in the production of immunotherapeutic agents for the treatment of food allergies, including processed foods, allergen extracts, recombinant allergens, and synthetic peptides, as well as the physical and chemical processes for the reduction of protein allergenicity. Commercial interests currently favor producing standardized drug-grade allergen extracts for therapeutic use, and clinical trials are ongoing. In the near future, recombinant production could replace purification strategies since it allows the manufacturing of pure, native allergens or sequence-modified allergens with reduced allergenicity. A recurring issue within this field is the inadequate reporting of production procedures, quality control, product physicochemical characteristics, allergenicity, and immunological properties. This information is of vital importance in assessing therapeutic standardization and clinical safety profile, which are central parameters for the development of future therapeutic agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeppe Madura Larsen
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | - Katrine Qvortrup
- Department of Chemistry, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | - Ana Isabel Sancho
- National Food Institute, Technical University of Denmark, Kgs. Lyngby, Denmark
| | | | | | | | - Thomas Eiwegger
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, The Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada.,Research Institute, The Hospital for Sick Children, Translational Medicine Program, Toronto, Canada.,Department of Immunology, The University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
| | - Julia Upton
- Division of Immunology and Allergy, Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Program, The Department of Pediatrics, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Monaci L, Pilolli R, De Angelis E, Crespo JF, Novak N, Cabanillas B. Food allergens: Classification, molecular properties, characterization, and detection in food sources. Adv Food Nutr Res 2020; 93:113-146. [PMID: 32711861 DOI: 10.1016/bs.afnr.2020.03.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
Food allergy is a large and growing public health problem in many areas of the world. The prevalence of food allergy has increased in the last decades in a very significant way in many world regions, particularly in developed countries. In that respect, the research field of food allergy has experienced an extensive growth and very relevant progress has been made in recent years regarding the characterization of food allergens, the study of their immunological properties, and their detection in food sources. Furthermore, food labeling policies have also been improved decidedly in recent years. For that immense progress made, it is about time to review the latest progress in the field of food allergy. In this review, we intend to carry out an extensive and profound overview regarding the latest scientific advances and knowledge in the field of food allergen detection, characterization, and in the study of the effects of food processing on the physico-chemical properties of food allergens. The advances in food labeling policies, and methodologies for the characterization of food allergens are also thoroughly reviewed in the present overview.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Linda Monaci
- Institute of Sciences of Food Production, CNR-ISPA, Bari, Italy
| | - Rosa Pilolli
- Institute of Sciences of Food Production, CNR-ISPA, Bari, Italy
| | | | - Jesus F Crespo
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | - Natalija Novak
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy, University Hospital Bonn, Bonn, Germany
| | - Beatriz Cabanillas
- Department of Allergy, Research Institute Hospital 12 de Octubre de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Nilsson C, Berthold M, Mascialino B, Orme ME, Sjölander S, Hamilton RG. Accuracy of component-resolved diagnostics in peanut allergy: Systematic literature review and meta-analysis. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2020; 31:303-314. [PMID: 31872899 DOI: 10.1111/pai.13201] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/24/2019] [Revised: 12/13/2019] [Accepted: 12/13/2019] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy diagnosis relies on clinical reactivity to peanut supported by detection of specific IgE (sIgE) antibodies. Extract-based sIgE tests have low specificity, so component-resolved diagnostics may complement whole-extract testing. METHODS We systematically collected peanut allergen component data in seven databases and studied the diagnostic accuracy of peanut storage proteins (Arah1, 2, 3) and cross-reactive peanut proteins (Arah8 PR-10 and Arah9 lipid transfer protein) through meta-analyses. The systematic literature review included studies employing peanut components and oral food challenge (OFC) as reference standard in patients suspected of peanut allergy. Data for component sIgE at pre-defined detection thresholds were extracted and combined in random-effects bivariate meta-analyses. Risk of bias was assessed as recommended by Cochrane, with two additional quality items of importance for this review. RESULTS Nineteen eligible studies presented data suitable for meta-analysis. In cross-sectional pediatric studies, the pooled sensitivity of Arah2-sIgE at 0.35 kUA /L cutoff was 83.3% [95% CI 75.6, 88.9] and specificity in diagnosing objective peanut allergy was 83.6% [95% CI 77.4, 88.4]. Compared with 0.1 and 1.0 kUA /L, this threshold provided the best diagnostic accuracy. At 0.35 kUA /L, Arah1 and Arah3 had comparable specificity (86.0% and 88.0%, respectively) but significantly lower sensitivity compared with Arah2 (37.0% and 39.1%, respectively; P < .05). CONCLUSION sIgE to Arah2 can enhance the certainty of diagnosis and reduce the number of OFC necessary to rule out clinical peanut allergy in unclear cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caroline Nilsson
- Dept. Clinical Science and Education, Karolinska Institutet, Sachs' Children and Youth Hospital, Sodersjukhuset, Stockholm, Sweden
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
Martín-Pedraza L, Wangorsch A, Bueno-Diaz C, de Las Heras M, Scheurer S, Cuesta-Herranz J, Villalba M. 2S albumins and nsLTP are involved in anaphylaxis to pizza sauce: IgE recognition before and after allergen processing. Food Chem 2020; 321:126679. [PMID: 32247887 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126679] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/13/2019] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/21/2020] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Although pizza is one of the most popular foods in the world, allergic responses after ingesting pizza are relatively uncommon. However, precisely identifying the allergens responsible for these allergic reactions is challenging because of the high and diverse number of ingredients used in pizza preparation. In this report, we aim to identify the allergens responsible for systemic allergic reactions following ingestion of pizza in two patients. Using a skin prick by prick test (SPPT) and in vitro techniques, with natural and recombinant purified allergens from tomato and mustard seeds, we identified 2S albumin and non-specific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTP) as the proteins involved. However, IgE responses to the four nsLTPs differed before and after denaturation and reduction, thus suggesting additional complexity around nsLTP in food processing.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laura Martín-Pedraza
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | - Cristina Bueno-Diaz
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | | - Mayte Villalba
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology I, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Yu J, Mikiashvili N. Effectiveness of different proteases in reducing allergen content and IgE-binding of raw peanuts. Food Chem 2019; 307:125565. [PMID: 31630022 DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125565] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/13/2019] [Revised: 08/30/2019] [Accepted: 09/17/2019] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
The effectiveness of some non-specific proteases in reducing raw peanut allergenicity was investigated. Peanut kernels were treated by Alcalase, papain, Neutrase and bromelain, respectively. The residues of major peanut allergens Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were determined by sandwich ELISA and SDS-PAGE, and the allergenicities of treated peanuts were compared to that of untreated peanuts by western blot. All tested proteases were effective in reducing Ara h 1, but their effectiveness in hydrolyzing Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 varied greatly. The maximal reductions of extractable Ara h 1, Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 were 100%, 100% and 99.8%, respectively, achieved by Alcalase hydrolysis. Alcalase was more effective in overall allergenicity reduction; bromelain and Neutrase were the least effective in reducing Ara h 2 and Ara h 6, respectively. The hydrolysis of original allergens also produced some smaller peptides with strong IgE-binding.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jianmei Yu
- Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA.
| | - Nona Mikiashvili
- Department of Family and Consumer Sciences, North Carolina Agricultural and Technical State University, Greensboro, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Shah F, Shi A, Ashley J, Kronfel C, Wang Q, Maleki SJ, Adhikari B, Zhang J. Peanut Allergy: Characteristics and Approaches for Mitigation. Compr Rev Food Sci Food Saf 2019; 18:1361-1387. [DOI: 10.1111/1541-4337.12472] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/11/2018] [Revised: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Faisal Shah
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Aimin Shi
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Jon Ashley
- International Iberian Nanotechnology LaboratoryFood Quality and Safety Research group Berga 4715‐330 Portugal
| | - Christina Kronfel
- Food Processing and Sensory Quality ResearchUnited States Dept. of Agriculture New Orleans LA 70124 USA
| | - Qiang Wang
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| | - Soheila J. Maleki
- Food Processing and Sensory Quality ResearchUnited States Dept. of Agriculture New Orleans LA 70124 USA
| | - Benu Adhikari
- School of ScienceRMIT Univ. Melbourne VIC 3083 Australia
| | - Jinchuang Zhang
- Inst. of Food Science and Technology, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key research Laboratory of Agro‐Products ProcessingMinistry of Agriculture Beijing 100193 P. R. China
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brusca I, Barrale M, Onida R, La Chiusa SM, Gjomarkaj M, Uasuf CG. The extract, the molecular allergen or both for the in vitro diagnosis of peach and peanut sensitization? Clin Chim Acta 2019; 493:25-30. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2019.01.016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2018] [Revised: 01/20/2019] [Accepted: 01/20/2019] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
21
|
Zambrano Ibarra G, Fuentes Aparicio V, Infante Herrero S, Blanca M, Zapatero Remon L. Peanut Allergy in Spanish Children: Comparative Profile of Peanut Allergy versus Tolerance. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2019; 178:370-376. [DOI: 10.1159/000495579] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2018] [Accepted: 11/19/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
22
|
Magnusdottir H, Vidarsdóttir A, Ludviksson B, Clausen M, Lund S, Jensen A, Sigurdardottir S. Ara h 1 and Ara h 6 Sensitization Causes Clinical Peanut Allergy in Ara h 2-Negative Individuals. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2018; 178:66-75. [DOI: 10.1159/000493327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2018] [Accepted: 08/28/2018] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
23
|
Becker WM, Petersen A, Jappe U. Peanut allergens: new consolidated findings on structure, characteristics, and allergome. Allergol Select 2018; 2:67-79. [PMID: 31826045 DOI: 10.5414/ALX01418E] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2011] [Accepted: 03/29/2011] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Immunoglobulin E-mediated food allergy is the result of a complex pathomechanism. Factors contributing to the dysfunction of the immune system are the allergenic sources and the variable matrix effects arising from the processes involved in interaction with the gastrointestinal tract, the allergens themselves through their structural features, and the specific behavior of the individual immune system. The starting point for elucidating the pathomechanism of food allergy is the identification of allergens and the description of their structure. They are the basis for in vitro diagnostics as well as the development of immunotherapeutic drugs. With regard to Class I food allergy, peanut allergy affects by far the largest group of patients. 11 allergens have been identified in peanuts. Ara h 1, Ara h 3, and Ara h 4 belong to the cupin superfamily, Ara h 2, Ara h 6, and Ara h 7 to the prolamin superfamily; Ara h 5 (profilins) and Ara h 8 (superfamily of Bet v 1-homologous proteins) are associated with aeroallergens. Peanut lipid transfer proteins (LTP) and two peanut oleosins are listed as Ara h 9, Ara h 10, and Ara h 11 by the IUIS Allergen Nomenclature Subcommittee. Peanut agglutinin (PNA) and a third oleosin have been shown to possess allergenic properties. The effect of the above specified allergens has to be considered in the context of their matrix, which is influenced by processing factors.
Collapse
|
24
|
Abstract
Peanut allergens have the potential to negatively impact on the health and quality of life of millions of consumers worldwide. The seeds of the peanut plant Arachis hypogaea contain an array of allergens that are able to induce the production of specific IgE antibodies in predisposed individuals. A lot of effort has been focused on obtaining the sequences and structures of these allergens due to the high health risk they represent. At present, 16 proteins present in peanuts are officially recognized as allergens. Research has also focused on their in-depth immunological characterization as well as on the design of modified hypoallergenic derivatives for potential use in clinical studies and the formulation of strategies for immunotherapy. Detailed research protocols are available for the purification of natural allergens as well as their recombinant production in bacterial, yeast, insect, and algal cells. Purified allergen molecules are now routinely used in diagnostic multiplex protein arrays for the detection of the presence of allergen-specific IgE. This review gives an overview on the wealth of knowledge that is available on individual peanut allergens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Palladino
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Heimo Breiteneder
- Institute of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Stiefel G, Anagnostou K, Boyle RJ, Brathwaite N, Ewan P, Fox AT, Huber P, Luyt D, Till SJ, Venter C, Clark AT. BSACI guideline for the diagnosis and management of peanut and tree nut allergy. Clin Exp Allergy 2018; 47:719-739. [PMID: 28836701 DOI: 10.1111/cea.12957] [Citation(s) in RCA: 82] [Impact Index Per Article: 13.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/13/2017] [Revised: 05/01/2017] [Accepted: 05/08/2017] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Peanut nut and tree nut allergy are characterised by IgE mediated reactions to nut proteins. Nut allergy is a global disease. Limited epidemiological data suggest varying prevalence in different geographical areas. Primary nut allergy affects over 2% of children and 0.5% of adults in the UK. Infants with severe eczema and/or egg allergy have a higher risk of peanut allergy. Primary nut allergy presents most commonly in the first five years of life, often after the first known ingestion with typical rapid onset IgE-mediated symptoms. The clinical diagnosis of primary nut allergy can be made by the combination of a typical clinical presentation and evidence of nut specifc IgE shown by a positive skin prick test (SPT) or specific IgE (sIgE) test. Pollen food syndrome is a distinct disorder, usually mild, with oral/pharyngeal symptoms, in the context of hay fever or pollen sensitisation, which can be triggered by nuts. It can usually be distinguish clinically from primary nut allergy. The magnitude of a SPT or sIgE relates to the probability of clinical allergy, but does not relate to clinical severity. SPT of ≥ 8 mm or sIgE ≥ 15 KU/L to peanut is highly predictive of clinical allergy. Cut off values are not available for tree nuts. Test results must be interpreted in the context of the clinical history. Diagnostic food challenges are usually not necessary but may be used to confirm or refute a conflicting history and test result. As nut allergy is likely to be a long-lived disease, nut avoidance advice is the cornerstone of management. Patients should be provided with a comprehensive management plan including avoidance advice, patient specific emergency medication and an emergency treatment plan and training in administration of emergency medication. Regular re-training is required.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Stiefel
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - K Anagnostou
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | | | - N Brathwaite
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Ewan
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - A T Fox
- Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - P Huber
- British Society for Allergy and Clinical Immunology, London, UK
| | - D Luyt
- Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | - S J Till
- King's College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - C Venter
- St. Mary's Hospital, Isle of Wight, UK
| | - A T Clark
- Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
|
27
|
Valcour A, Jones JE, Lidholm J, Borres MP, Hamilton RG. Sensitization profiles to peanut allergens across the United States. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2017; 119:262-266.e1. [PMID: 28890021 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2017.06.021] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2017] [Revised: 06/09/2017] [Accepted: 06/28/2017] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Measurement of IgE antibody to peanut components can aid in the prediction of allergic responses the food. OBJECTIVE To investigate the association between patient demographics (age, location) and allergic sensitization to peanut components across the United States. METHODS Serum samples from 12,155 individuals with peanut extract specific IgE levels of 0.35 kUA/L or higher were analyzed for IgE antibodies to Ara h 1, 2, 3, 8, and 9 by ImmunoCAP. RESULTS Among this population of peanut sensitized individuals, 79.1% of children (<3 years old) were sensitized to one or more peanut storage proteins (Ara h 1, 2, and/or 3), in contrast to 64.2% of adolescents (12-15 years old) and 22.1% of adults (>20 years old). Although sensitization was more prevalent to Ara h 2 than to the other storage proteins, a sizable fraction of patients were sensitized to Ara h 1 and/or 3 but not to Ara h 2 (eg, 13% of children <3 years old). Moreover, 9.6% of children, 10.2% of adolescents, and 10.5% of adults were sensitized to Ara h 9, whereas 2.4% of children, 49.4% of adolescents, and 42.9% of adults produced IgE to Ara h 8 (pathogenesis-related protein 10). Sensitization to Ara h 8 alone was markedly higher in the Northeastern United States relative to other regions of the country. CONCLUSION We conclude that sensitization to individual peanut components is highly dependent on age and geographic location. Given that a severe allergic reaction to peanut is unlikely in individuals with isolated sensitization to Ara h 8, a sizable fraction of patients, in particular adolescents and adults, may be at lower risk than anticipated based only on demonstration of sensitization to whole peanut extract.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Valcour
- Laboratory Corporation of America, Burlington, North Carolina.
| | - Joseph E Jones
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Phadia US Inc, Portage, Michigan
| | | | - Magnus P Borres
- Thermo Fisher Scientific, Uppsala, Sweden; Department of Maternal and Child Health, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | | |
Collapse
|
28
|
Di Stasio L, Picariello G, Mongiello M, Nocerino R, Berni Canani R, Bavaro S, Monaci L, Ferranti P, Mamone G. Peanut digestome: Identification of digestion resistant IgE binding peptides. Food Chem Toxicol 2017; 107:88-98. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2017.06.029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
29
|
Beck SC, Huissoon AP, Collins D, Richter AG, Krishna MT. The concordance between component tests and clinical history in British adults with suspected pollen-food syndrome to peanut and hazelnut. J Clin Pathol 2017; 71:239-245. [PMID: 28780515 DOI: 10.1136/jclinpath-2017-204573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2017] [Revised: 07/03/2017] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Mild oropharyngeal symptoms to peanut/hazelnut occur in ~30% of patients with pollen-food syndrome (PFS). Component tests are considered a useful adjunct to the diagnosis and may help differentiate PFS from those at a risk of anaphylaxis due to storage protein/lipid transfer protein (LTP) sensitisation. AIMS To assess concordance between component tests and clinical history in suspected PFS to peanut/hazelnut in a specialist clinic. METHODS Adult patients were classified into PFS (group 1, n=69) and PFS with mild systemic symptoms (group 2, n=45) based on clinical history. Specific IgE (sIgE) of ≥0.35 kUA/L was considered positive as per manufacturers' recommendation. Kappa (κ) inter-rater agreement was calculated for concordance between clinical classification and test profiles. RESULTS Group 1 hazelnut: 85% monosensitised to Cor a1, 12% to storage protein/s or LTP and 3% negative to all components. Group 1 peanut: 41% monosensitised to Ara h8, 44% to storage protein/s or ±LTP and 15% negative to all components. Group 2 hazelnut: 67% monosensitised to Cor a1, 16% sensitised to storage protein/s and 17% negative to all components. Group 2 peanut: 19% monosensitised to Ara h8, 62% sensitised to storage protein/s and/or LTP and 19% negative to all components.SIgE to Ara h8 and Cor a1 were greater in group 1 versus group 2: (median (IQR) kUA/L; hazelnut: 12.1 (7.8-25.2) vs 2.4 (0.36-6.3), p<0.001; peanut: 2.4 (0.10-21.1) vs 0.3 (0-3), p<0.01)). CONCLUSION Concordance between component tests and clinical history for adults with PFS was good for hazelnut (κ=0.63) but poor for peanut (κ=-0.12). Food challenges are warranted in discordant cases for an accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah C Beck
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Aarnoud P Huissoon
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Donna Collins
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Alex G Richter
- Department of Immunology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| | - Mamidipudi T Krishna
- Department of Allergy and Immunology, Heart of England NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK.,Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Ciprandi G, Comite P, Bruzzone M, Fontana V. Can pan-allergens affect the sensitization pattern? Immunobiology 2017; 222:726-729. [PMID: 28159395 DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2017.01.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2017] [Revised: 01/20/2017] [Accepted: 01/22/2017] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
31
|
van der Valk JPM, Schreurs MWJ, El Bouch R, Arends NJT, de Jong NW. Mono-sensitisation to peanut component Ara h 6: a case series of five children and literature review. Eur J Pediatr 2016; 175:1227-1234. [PMID: 27206507 PMCID: PMC5005383 DOI: 10.1007/s00431-016-2733-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/25/2015] [Revised: 03/20/2016] [Accepted: 05/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
UNLABELLED Here, we summarise the current clinical knowledge on Ara h 6 sensitisation and clinical relevance of this sensitisation pattern using five illustrative clinical cases. The literature search yielded a total of 166 papers, and an additional relevant article was found by 'snowballing'. A total of ten articles were considered relevant for this review. Most studies included patients with a sensitisation to Ara h 6 and cosensitisation to Ara h 2. Only three studies showed patients with a mono-sensitisation to Ara h 6. This illustrates that Ara h 6 mono-sensitisation has been neglected in literature. We present a case series of five children with sensitisation to peanut component Ara h 6. Only one of these five patients showed Ara h 8 cosensitivity. Three out of the five children had a positive double-blind placebo-controlled food challenge (DBPCFC), with moderate to strong reactions. CONCLUSION A mono-sensitisation to peanut component Ara h 6 is uncommon but can cause severe allergic reactions. Therefore, the determination of sIgE to Ara h 6 is warranted in patients with a suspected peanut allergy, especially in the absence of sensitisation to Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 9. WHAT IS KNOWN • Peanut allergy is common and can cause severe allergic reactions. • The diagnostics of peanut allergy has recently improved with the use of component resolved diagnosis What is new: • A mono-sensitisation to peanut component Ara h 6 is uncommon, but can cause severe allergic reactions • Determination of sIgE to Ara h 6 is warranted in patients with a suspected peanut allergy, especially in the absence of sensitisation to Ara h 1, 2, 3 and 9.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J P M van der Valk
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Allergology, Erasmus MC, Office Gk 323, P.O. box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - M W J Schreurs
- Department of Immunology, Laboratory Medical Immunology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - R El Bouch
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Allergology, Erasmus MC, Office Gk 323, P.O. box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - N J T Arends
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Allergology, Erasmus MC, Office Gk 323, P.O. box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Paediatric Allergology, Diaconessenhuis Voorburg, Reinier de Graaf Group, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - N W de Jong
- Department of Internal Medicine, section of Allergology, Erasmus MC, Office Gk 323, P.O. box 2040, 3000CA, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Comstock SS, Maleki SJ, Teuber SS. Boiling and Frying Peanuts Decreases Soluble Peanut (Arachis Hypogaea) Allergens Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 But Does Not Generate Hypoallergenic Peanuts. PLoS One 2016; 11:e0157849. [PMID: 27310538 PMCID: PMC4911009 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157849] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2015] [Accepted: 06/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Peanut allergy continues to be a problem in most developed countries of the world. We sought a processing method that would alter allergenic peanut proteins, such that allergen recognition by IgE from allergic individuals would be significantly reduced or eliminated. Such a method would render accidental exposures to trace amounts of peanuts safer. A combination of boiling and frying decreased recovery of Ara h 1 and Ara h 2 at their expected MWs. In contrast, treatment with high pressures under varying temperatures had no effect on protein extraction profiles. Antibodies specific for Ara h 1, Ara h 2, and Ara h 6 bound proteins extracted from raw samples but not in boiled/fried samples. However, pre-incubation of serum with boiled/fried extract removed most raw peanut-reactive IgE from solution, including IgE directed to Ara h 1 and 2. Thus, this method of processing is unlikely to generate a peanut product tolerated by peanut allergic patients. Importantly, variability in individual patients' IgE repertoires may mean that some patients' IgE would bind fewer polypeptides in the sequentially processed seed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sarah S Comstock
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
| | - Soheila J Maleki
- United States Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service-Southern Regional Research Center (USDA-ARS-SRRC), New Orleans, Louisiana, United States of America
| | - Suzanne S Teuber
- Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, Allergy and Clinical Immunology, School of Medicine, University of California Davis, Davis, California, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Ma S, Nie L, Li H, Wang R, Yin J. Component-Resolved Diagnosis of Peanut Allergy and Its Possible Origins of Sensitization in China. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2016; 169:241-8. [PMID: 27240834 DOI: 10.1159/000446156] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2015] [Accepted: 04/11/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Clinical and immunological characteristics of food allergies vary depending on geographic regions. Little is known about peanut allergy in China. The aim of this study was to investigate the peanut sensitization profile in China. METHODS Thirty-eight participants with immunoglobulin E (IgE)-positive responses to peanuts (peanut-sensitized) were included in our study, and clinical characteristics were evaluated. Total and specific IgE reactivity against peanuts, other plant-derived foods, pollens, and related allergen components were determined. RESULTS Eighteen patients were symptomatic when exposed to peanuts. The majority of them presented with systemic reactions. More than half of the peanut-sensitized subjects also suffered from mugwort pollinosis and peach allergy. In patients with both peanut and peach allergies, reactions to peanuts were the same as or severer than those to peaches. Positivity rates of IgE response to rAra h 1-3, 8, and 9 in the peanut allergy group were 5.6, 11.1, 5.6, 22.2, and 83.3%, respectively. 66.7% (12/18) of the peanut-allergic patients were monosensitized to rAra h 9. Anti-nArt v 3 [mugwort nonspecific lipid transfer protein (nsLTP)] IgE positivity in the peanut allergy group was significantly higher than that in the asymptomatic peanut-sensitized group. In Ara h 9 (peanut nsLTP)-sensitized patients with mugwort pollinosis, anti-nArt v 3 IgE levels were remarkably higher than anti-rAra h 9 (peanut nsLTP) IgE levels as well as anti-Pru p 3 (peach nsLTP) IgE levels. CONCLUSIONS Ara h 9 was the major allergen of peanut, and Ara h 9 monosensitization was the most common peanut sensitization pattern in our population. Furthermore, there was a strong correlation between peanut sensitization and mugwort pollinosis, as well as peach allergy, in our country.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shikun Ma
- Department of Allergy, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Peking Union Medical College and Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing, China
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
34
|
Martinet J, Couderc L, Renosi F, Bobée V, Marguet C, Boyer O. Diagnostic Value of Antigen-Specific Immunoglobulin E Immunoassays against Ara h 2 and Ara h 8 Peanut Components in Child Food Allergy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2016; 169:216-22. [PMID: 27225199 DOI: 10.1159/000446181] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2015] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy is one of the most severe food allergies in children. The diagnostic gold standard is the oral food challenge (OFC). However, OFC has inherent risks and is time consuming. The measurement of specific immunoglobulin E (sIgE) to peanut components in blood detects peanut sensitization, but the decision point predicting allergy is still unclear. The aim of this study was to determine the diagnostic value of these tests for the evaluation of child peanut allergy. METHODS In this retrospective study, 81 children were referred for peanut allergy. The diagnosis of peanut allergy was based on the clinical context and a positive OFC. Levels of sIgE against whole peanuts or peanut components (Ara h 2 and Ara h 8) were determined by immunoassay. RESULTS The Ara h 2 sIgE assay has the best negative predictive value (0.93) and positive predictive value (1) at a cutoff of 0.1 kU/l. Ara h 2 sIgE titers can predict the risk of anaphylaxis (<0.44 kU/l, low risk; >14 kU/l, high risk). The Ara h 8 sIgE assay is not able to discriminate peanut-allergic patients but can be used to evaluate possible cross-reactions to birch pollen with a low risk of anaphylaxis. The best diagnostic strategy is to first determine the Ara h 2 sIgE level and, if negative, evaluate Ara h 8 sIgE. CONCLUSIONS We propose an algorithm for a better use of peanut component sIgE immunoassays that should improve their diagnostic value and avoid unnecessary OFC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jérémie Martinet
- Department of Immunology, Rouen University Hospital, Rouen, France
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
35
|
Matricardi PM, Kleine-Tebbe J, Hoffmann HJ, Valenta R, Hilger C, Hofmaier S, Aalberse RC, Agache I, Asero R, Ballmer-Weber B, Barber D, Beyer K, Biedermann T, Bilò MB, Blank S, Bohle B, Bosshard PP, Breiteneder H, Brough HA, Caraballo L, Caubet JC, Crameri R, Davies JM, Douladiris N, Ebisawa M, EIgenmann PA, Fernandez-Rivas M, Ferreira F, Gadermaier G, Glatz M, Hamilton RG, Hawranek T, Hellings P, Hoffmann-Sommergruber K, Jakob T, Jappe U, Jutel M, Kamath SD, Knol EF, Korosec P, Kuehn A, Lack G, Lopata AL, Mäkelä M, Morisset M, Niederberger V, Nowak-Węgrzyn AH, Papadopoulos NG, Pastorello EA, Pauli G, Platts-Mills T, Posa D, Poulsen LK, Raulf M, Sastre J, Scala E, Schmid JM, Schmid-Grendelmeier P, van Hage M, van Ree R, Vieths S, Weber R, Wickman M, Muraro A, Ollert M. EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2016; 27 Suppl 23:1-250. [PMID: 27288833 DOI: 10.1111/pai.12563] [Citation(s) in RCA: 500] [Impact Index Per Article: 62.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
The availability of allergen molecules ('components') from several protein families has advanced our understanding of immunoglobulin E (IgE)-mediated responses and enabled 'component-resolved diagnosis' (CRD). The European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology (EAACI) Molecular Allergology User's Guide (MAUG) provides comprehensive information on important allergens and describes the diagnostic options using CRD. Part A of the EAACI MAUG introduces allergen molecules, families, composition of extracts, databases, and diagnostic IgE, skin, and basophil tests. Singleplex and multiplex IgE assays with components improve both sensitivity for low-abundance allergens and analytical specificity; IgE to individual allergens can yield information on clinical risks and distinguish cross-reactivity from true primary sensitization. Part B discusses the clinical and molecular aspects of IgE-mediated allergies to foods (including nuts, seeds, legumes, fruits, vegetables, cereal grains, milk, egg, meat, fish, and shellfish), inhalants (pollen, mold spores, mites, and animal dander), and Hymenoptera venom. Diagnostic algorithms and short case histories provide useful information for the clinical workup of allergic individuals targeted for CRD. Part C covers protein families containing ubiquitous, highly cross-reactive panallergens from plant (lipid transfer proteins, polcalcins, PR-10, profilins) and animal sources (lipocalins, parvalbumins, serum albumins, tropomyosins) and explains their diagnostic and clinical utility. Part D lists 100 important allergen molecules. In conclusion, IgE-mediated reactions and allergic diseases, including allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, asthma, food reactions, and insect sting reactions, are discussed from a novel molecular perspective. The EAACI MAUG documents the rapid progression of molecular allergology from basic research to its integration into clinical practice, a quantum leap in the management of allergic patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P M Matricardi
- Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charitè Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - J Kleine-Tebbe
- Allergy & Asthma Center Westend, Outpatient Clinic Ackermann, Hanf, & Kleine-Tebbe, Berlin, Germany
| | - H J Hoffmann
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - R Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - C Hilger
- Department of Infection & Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - S Hofmaier
- Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charitè Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - R C Aalberse
- Sanquin Research, Department of Immunopathology, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Landsteiner Laboratory, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - I Agache
- Department of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Faculty of Medicine, Transylvania University of Brasov, Brasov, Romania
| | - R Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia, Clinica San Carlo, Paderno Dugnano, Italy
| | - B Ballmer-Weber
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - D Barber
- IMMA-School of Medicine, University CEU San Pablo, Madrid, Spain
| | - K Beyer
- Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charitè Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - T Biedermann
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, Technical University Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - M B Bilò
- Allergy Unit, Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Ospedali Riuniti di Ancona, Ancona, Italy
| | - S Blank
- Center of Allergy and Environment (ZAUM), Helmholtz Center Munich, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - B Bohle
- Division of Experimental Allergology, Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Center of Pathophysiology, Infectiology & Immunology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - P P Bosshard
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
| | - H Breiteneder
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - H A Brough
- Paediatric Allergy, Department of Asthma, Allergy and Respiratory Science, King's College London, Guys' Hospital, London, UK
| | - L Caraballo
- Institute for Immunological Research, The University of Cartagena, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia
| | - J C Caubet
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - R Crameri
- Swiss Institute of Allergy and Asthma Research, University of Zürich, Davos, Switzerland
| | - J M Davies
- School of Biomedical Sciences, Institute of Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology, Brisbane, Qld, Australia
| | - N Douladiris
- Allergy Unit, 2nd Paediatric Clinic, National & Kapodistrian University, Athens, Greece
| | - M Ebisawa
- Department of Allergy, Clinical Research Center for Allergology and Rheumatology, Sagamihara National Hospital, Kanagawa, Japan
| | - P A EIgenmann
- Pediatric Allergy Unit, Department of Child and Adolescent, University Hospitals of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland
| | - M Fernandez-Rivas
- Allergy Department, Hospital Clinico San Carlos IdISSC, Madrid, Spain
| | - F Ferreira
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - G Gadermaier
- Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Molecular Biology, University of Salzburg, Salzburg, Austria
| | - M Glatz
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - R G Hamilton
- Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - T Hawranek
- Department of Dermatology, Paracelsus Private Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - P Hellings
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center (AMC), Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - K Hoffmann-Sommergruber
- Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - T Jakob
- Department of Dermatology and Allergology, University Medical Center Giessen and Marburg, Justus Liebig University Giessen, Giessen, Germany
| | - U Jappe
- Division of Clinical and Molecular Allergology, Research Centre Borstel, Airway Research Centre North (ARCN), Member of the German Centre for Lung Research (DZL), Borstel, Germany
- Interdisciplinary Allergy Division, Department of Pneumology, University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany
| | - M Jutel
- Department of Clinical Immunology, 'ALL-MED' Medical Research Institute, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - S D Kamath
- Molecular Allergy Research Laboratory, Centre for Biodiscovery and Molecular Development of Therapeutics, Australian Institute of Tropical Health and Medicine, James Cook University, Townsville City, Qld, Australia
| | - E F Knol
- Departments of Immunology and Dermatology/Allergology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - P Korosec
- University Clinic of Respiratory and Allergic Diseases, Golnik, Slovenia
| | - A Kuehn
- Department of Infection & Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
| | - G Lack
- King's College London, MRC & Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, London, UK
- Division of Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology, Guy's and St Thomas' NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - A L Lopata
- Department of Clinical Immunology, 'ALL-MED' Medical Research Institute, Wrocław Medical University, Wrocław, Poland
| | - M Mäkelä
- Skin and Allergy Hospital, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - M Morisset
- National Service of Immuno-Allergology, Centre Hospitalier Luxembourg (CHL), Luxembourg, UK
| | - V Niederberger
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - A H Nowak-Węgrzyn
- Pediatric Allergy and Immunology, Jaffe Food Allergy Institute, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY, USA
| | - N G Papadopoulos
- Centre for Paediatrics and Child Health, Institute of Human Development, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - E A Pastorello
- Unit of Allergology and Immunology, Niguarda Ca' Granda Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - G Pauli
- Service de Pneumologie, Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - T Platts-Mills
- Department of Microbiology & Immunology, University of Virginia School of Medicine, Charlottesville, VA, USA
| | - D Posa
- Paediatric Pneumology and Immunology, Charitè Medical University, Berlin, Germany
| | - L K Poulsen
- Allergy Clinic, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - M Raulf
- Institute for Prevention and Occupational Medicine of the German Social Accident Insurance, Ruhr-University Bochum (IPA), Bochum, Germany
| | - J Sastre
- Allergy Division, Fundación Jimenez Díaz, Madrid, Spain
| | - E Scala
- Experimental Allergy Unit, IDI-IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - J M Schmid
- Department of Respiratory Diseases and Allergy, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - P Schmid-Grendelmeier
- Allergy Unit, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland
- Christine Kühne Center for Allergy Research and Education CK-CARE, Davos, Switzerland
| | - M van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna, Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit, Karolinska Institutet and Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - R van Ree
- Departments of Experimental Immunology and of Otorhinolaryngology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - S Vieths
- Department of Allergology, Paul-Ehrlich-Institut, Langen, Germany
| | - R Weber
- School of Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health Service, Denver, CO, USA
| | - M Wickman
- Sachs' Children's Hospital, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - A Muraro
- The Referral Centre for Food Allergy Diagnosis and Treatment Veneto Region, Department of Mother and Child Health, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - M Ollert
- Department of Infection & Immunity, Luxembourg Institute of Health, Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg
- Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Iqbal A, Shah F, Hamayun M, Ahmad A, Hussain A, Waqas M, Kang SM, Lee IJ. Allergens of Arachis hypogaea and the effect of processing on their detection by ELISA. Food Nutr Res 2016; 60:28945. [PMID: 26931300 PMCID: PMC4773821 DOI: 10.3402/fnr.v60.28945] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/24/2015] [Revised: 02/02/2016] [Accepted: 02/06/2016] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Food allergies are an emerging public health problem in industrialized areas of the world. They represent a considerable health problem in these areas because of the relatively high number of reported cases. Usually, food allergens are proteins or glycoproteins with a molecular mass ranging from 10 to 70 kDa. Among the food allergies, peanut is accounted to be responsible for more than 50% of the food allergy fatalities. Threshold doses for peanut allergenic reactions have been found to range from as low as 100 µg to 1 g of peanut protein, which equal to 400 µg to 4 g peanut meal. Allergens from peanut are mainly seed storage proteins that are composed of conglutin, vicilin, and glycinin families. Several peanut proteins have been identified to induce allergic reactions, particularly Ara h 1-11. This review is mainly focused on different classes of peanut allergens, the effect of thermal and chemical treatment of peanut allergens on the IgY binding and detectability of these allergens by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) to provide knowledge for food industry.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amjad Iqbal
- Department of Food Safety and Food Quality, University of Gent, Gent, Belgium
- Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Farooq Shah
- Department of Agriculture, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Hamayun
- Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Ayaz Ahmad
- Department of Biotechnology, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Anwar Hussain
- Department of Botany, Abdul Wali Khan University Mardan, Mardan, Pakistan
| | - Muhammad Waqas
- School of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sang-Mo Kang
- School of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - In-Jung Lee
- School of Applied Biosciences, College of Agriculture and Life Science, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea;
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Uasuf CG, Villalta D, Conte ME, Di Sano C, Barrale M, Cantisano V, Pace E, Gjomarkaj M, Gangemi S, Brusca I. Different co-sensitizations could determine different risk assessment in peach allergy? Evaluation of an anaphylactic biomarker in Pru p 3 positive patients. Clin Mol Allergy 2015; 13:30. [PMID: 26633941 PMCID: PMC4667484 DOI: 10.1186/s12948-015-0035-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/28/2015] [Accepted: 10/22/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background In Italy, the nsLTP (Pru p 3) has been identified as the most frequent cause of food allergy and anaphylaxis. In order to estimate the risk assessment in peach allergy, we investigated the presence of correlations between the levels of sIgE to Pru p 3 with the severity of the clinical symptoms in two Pru p 3 positive populations from two different areas of Italy. Methods 133 consecutively Pru p 3 positive patients were recruited from South Italy, where the prevalence of PR-10 and profilin sensitization is low, and from North-East Italy, where the sensitization to pathogenesis related protein -10 (PR-10) and profilin is higher. Skin prick test (SPT) to peach extract and sIgE to peach panallergens were performed. Results All 133 patients were positive to SPT to peach extract and to sIgE to Pru p 3. The North-East population was simultaneously positive to Pru p 1 (42.8 %) and Pru p 4 (12.7 %), while no Southern patients were positive to PR-10 or to profilin. A significant difference in the levels of sIgE to Pru p 3 was found only in South Italy Pru p 3 + patients vs. asymptomatic patients (p = 0.01) and in mild reactions vs. severe reactions (p = 0.0008). In South Italy patients, it was also found a significant correlation between the severity of the clinical reaction and the levels of sIgE to Pru p 3 (p = 0.001). Conclusion Level of sIgE to Pru p 3 indicates the possibility of development a severe food allergic reaction. Pru p 3 positive patients from different geographical areas and with different co-sensitizations to Pru p 1 and/or Pru p 4 could have a different risk assessment in peach allergy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Carina Gabriela Uasuf
- Allergy Diseases Center "Prof. G. Bonsignore", Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology "A. Monroy"(IBIM)-National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Danilo Villalta
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, A.O "S. Maria degli Angeli di Pordenone", Pordenone, Italy
| | - Maria Elisabetta Conte
- Allergy and Clinical Immunology Unit, A.O "S. Maria degli Angeli di Pordenone", Pordenone, Italy
| | - Caterina Di Sano
- Allergy Diseases Center "Prof. G. Bonsignore", Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology "A. Monroy"(IBIM)-National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Maria Barrale
- Clinical Pathology, Allergy Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Cantisano
- Clinical Pathology, Allergy Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Pace
- Allergy Diseases Center "Prof. G. Bonsignore", Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology "A. Monroy"(IBIM)-National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Mark Gjomarkaj
- Allergy Diseases Center "Prof. G. Bonsignore", Institute of Biomedicine and Molecular Immunology "A. Monroy"(IBIM)-National Research Council (CNR), Palermo, Italy
| | - Sebastiano Gangemi
- School and Division of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Ignazio Brusca
- Clinical Pathology, Allergy Unit, Buccheri La Ferla Hospital, Palermo, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liu F, Zhang X, Lu C, Zeng X, Li Y, Fu D, Wu G. Non-specific lipid transfer proteins in plants: presenting new advances and an integrated functional analysis. J Exp Bot 2015; 66:5663-81. [PMID: 26139823 DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erv313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 100] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/20/2023]
Abstract
Plant non-specific lipid-transfer proteins (nsLTPs) are small, basic proteins present in abundance in higher plants. They are involved in key processes of plant cytology, such as the stablization of membranes, cell wall organization, and signal transduction. nsLTPs are also known to play important roles in resistance to biotic and abiotic stress, and in plant growth and development, such as sexual reproduction, seed development and germination. The structures of plant nsLTPs contain an eight-cysteine residue conserved motif, linked by four disulfide bonds, and an internal hydrophobic cavity, which comprises the lipid-binding site. This structure endows stability and increases the ability to bind and/or carry hydrophobic molecules. There is growing interest in nsLTPs, due to their critical roles, resulting in the need for a comprehensive review of their form and function. Relevant topics include: nsLTP structure and biochemical features, their classification, identification, and characterization across species, sub-cellular localization, lipid binding and transfer ability, expression profiling, functionality, and evolution. We present advances, as well as limitations and trends, relating to the different topics of the nsLTP gene family. This review collates a large body of research pertaining to the role of nsLTPs across the plant kingdom, which has been integrated as an in depth functional analysis of this group of proteins as a whole, and their activities across multiple biochemical pathways, based on a large number of reports. This review will enhance our understanding of nsLTP activity in planta, prompting further work and insights into the roles of this multifaceted protein family in plants.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fang Liu
- Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Xiaobo Zhang
- Life Science and Technology Center, China National Seed Group Co. Ltd., Wuhan 430206, China
| | - Changming Lu
- Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Xinhua Zeng
- Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Yunjing Li
- Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China
| | - Donghui Fu
- The Key Laboratory of Crop Physiology, Ecology and Genetic Breeding, Ministry of Education, Agronomy College, Jiangxi Agricultural University, Nanchang, China
| | - Gang Wu
- Key Laboratory of Oil Crop Biology of the Ministry of Agriculture, Oil Crops Research Institute, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Wuhan, China
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Scala E, Till SJ, Asero R, Abeni D, Guerra EC, Pirrotta L, Paganelli R, Pomponi D, Giani M, De Pità O, Cecchi L. Lipid transfer protein sensitization: reactivity profiles and clinical risk assessment in an Italian cohort. Allergy 2015; 70:933-43. [PMID: 25903791 DOI: 10.1111/all.12635] [Citation(s) in RCA: 74] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 04/19/2015] [Indexed: 01/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonspecific lipid transfer proteins (nsLTPs) represent a major cause of systemic food allergic reactions in the Mediterranean area. This study investigate hierarchical patterns and cluster relationships of IgE sensitization to different nsLTPs, and the relationship to clinical allergy in a large Italian cohort. METHODS A total of 568 nsLTP-positive subjects after IgE ImmunoCAP-ISAC microarray analysis with Ara h 9, Art v 3, Cor a 8, Jug r 3, Pla a 3, Pru p 3 and Tri a 14 allergens were studied. IgE inhibition experiments were carried out with mugwort and plane tree pollen extracts. RESULTS Eighty-two per cent of nsLTP-positive participants (94% if <6 years old) were Pru p 3(pos) , and 71% were Jug r 3(pos) . Participants who reacted to >5 nsLTPs reported a higher incidence of food-induced systemic reactions. Only Art v 3 and Pla a 3 (mugwort and plane tree nsLTPs, respectively) were associated with respiratory symptoms, and a correlation was observed between sensitization to pollen and plant food nsLTPs, particularly between Pla a 3 and tree nut/peanut nsLTPs. Co-sensitization to Par j 2 and PR-10 or profilin pan-allergens was associated with a lower prior prevalence of severe food-induced reactions. In inhibition assays, plane and mugwort pollen extracts inhibited 50-100% of IgE binding to food nsLTPs in microarrays. CONCLUSIONS Testing IgE reactivity to a panel of nsLTP allergens unveils important associations between nsLTP sensitization profiles and clinical presentation and allows the identification of novel cluster patterns indicating likely cross-reactivities and highlighting potential allergens for nsLTP immunotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Scala
- Experimental Allergy Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - S. J. Till
- Asthma, Allergy and Lung Biology; King's College London; School of Medicine; Guy's Hospital; London UK
| | - R. Asero
- Ambulatorio di Allergologia; Clinica San Carlo; Paderno Dugnano Milan Italy
| | - D. Abeni
- Health Services Research Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - E. C. Guerra
- Experimental Allergy Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - L. Pirrotta
- Experimental Allergy Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - R. Paganelli
- Department of Medicine and Ageing Science (DMSI); University G. d'Annunzio of Chieti-Pescara; Chieti Italy
| | - D. Pomponi
- Experimental Allergy Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - M. Giani
- Experimental Allergy Unit; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - O. De Pità
- Laboratory of Allergy and Clinical Immunology; IDI-IRCCS; Rome Italy
| | - L. Cecchi
- UOSD Allergy and Immunology; Azienda Sanitaria di Prato; Prato Italy
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- P J Turner
- Section of Paediatrics (Allergy and Infectious Diseases) and MRC and Asthma UK Centre in Allergic Mechanisms of Asthma, Imperial College London, London, UK; Division of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Rentzos G, Lundberg V, Lundqvist C, Rodrigues R, van Odijk J, Lundell AC, Pullerits T, Telemo E. Use of a basophil activation test as a complementary diagnostic tool in the diagnosis of severe peanut allergy in adults. Clin Transl Allergy 2015; 5:22. [PMID: 26075055 PMCID: PMC4464723 DOI: 10.1186/s13601-015-0064-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2014] [Accepted: 05/19/2015] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Diagnosis of severe peanut allergy is difficult and delays in making an accurate diagnosis may place the patient at risk. Adults with a history of anaphylaxis must strictly avoid any contact with peanuts or products that may contain traces of peanuts. For these persons, conventional evaluations with skin prick testing (SPT) and IgE tests may not be sufficient to assess the risk of anaphylaxis. Therefore, we investigated whether the basophil activation test (BAT) could be used for the diagnosis of severe peanut allergy in adults. We compared the non-invasive BAT with conventional laboratory diagnostic tests, including SPT and specific IgE to allergen extracts and components, for the diagnosis of severe peanut allergy. Methods Forty-seven persons with severe allergy to peanuts and a clinical diagnosis of anaphylaxis (PA-group), 22 subjects with peanut sensitization (PS-group) and 22 control (C-group) subjects, all in the age range of 18–60 years, were recruited retrospectively and prospectively into the study. Thirty-four patients with peanut allergy and 11 peanut-sensitized patients were sensitized to soy, while 36 patients in the PA-group and 20 patients in the PS-group were sensitized to birch pollen. All the patients and control subjects were investigated with BAT and SPT for responses to peanut, soy and birch extracts and their serum samples were assayed for the presence of specific IgE to peanut, soy and birch extracts, as well as IgE to allergen components (ISAC). Results In a multivariate factor analysis, severe peanut allergy (PA) was positively associated with SPT to peanut, IgE to peanut, BAT to peanut and IgE to rAra h 1, 2, 3 and 6 peanut components, as well as to soy components (nGly m 5 and nGly m 6). In contrast, peanut sensitization was positively associated with increased levels of IgE to rAra h 8, birch and birch-related components. BAT-detected reactivity to peanut was significantly higher in patients who had a history of severe allergy to peanuts, as compared with patients who were sensitized to peanuts (p < 0.001), and the receiver operating curve (ROC) analysis showed that BAT had high sensitivity and specificity for predicting severe peanut allergy, with a ROC area under the curve of 0.862. However, in the PA-group, the BAT results for peanut correlated only weakly with the levels of IgE to rAra h 1, 2 and 3 and nAra h 6. Study limitations: oral provocation in the patients with a history of severe peanut allergy could not be performed to compare clinical reactivity with the BAT result due to ethical constraints. Neither was it possible to perform BAT with peanut recombinant allergens which were not available at the time the study commenced Conclusions BAT is useful in determining the severity of peanut allergy and may be used as a complementary diagnostic tool to ensure accurate diagnosis of severe peanut allergy in adults. Thus, it may reduce the need to subject these patients to further tests, including an open challenge with peanuts. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13601-015-0064-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Georgios Rentzos
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Section of Allergology, Gothenburg, Sweden ; Department of Respiratory Medicine and Allergology, Section of Allergology, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, 413 45 Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Vanja Lundberg
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Christina Lundqvist
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Rui Rodrigues
- Department of Clinical Immunology and Transfusion Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Jenny van Odijk
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Section of Allergology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Anna-Carin Lundell
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Teet Pullerits
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Section of Allergology, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Esbjörn Telemo
- Department of Rheumatology and Inflammation Research, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Pedrosa M, Boyano-Martínez T, García-Ara C, Caballero T, Quirce S. Utility of specific IgE to Ara h 6 in peanut allergy diagnosis. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol 2015; 115:108-12. [PMID: 26073164 DOI: 10.1016/j.anai.2015.05.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2015] [Revised: 05/19/2015] [Accepted: 05/25/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Specific IgE to Ara h 2 has been shown to be useful in the diagnosis of peanut allergy, whereas the peanut lipid transfer protein, Ara h 9, has been suggested to be responsible for peanut allergy in the Mediterranean population. OBJECTIVE To better characterize peanut allergy in children from a Mediterranean area and determine the value of specific IgE to Ara h 6 (conglutinin, 2S albumin) for the diagnosis of peanut allergy. METHODS Ninety-one children with suspected allergy to edible vegetables were included in the study. They were classified as allergic or tolerant to peanut. Specific IgE to peanut allergens was measured by a commercially available microarray (ImmunoCAP ISAC 112, ThermoFisher, Uppsala, Sweden). RESULTS Patients allergic to peanut showed positive specific IgE changes to peanut seed storage proteins (Ara h 1, Ara h 2, Ara h 3, and Ara h 6) more frequently than tolerant subjects. Ara h 9 showed a similar frequency of reactivity in the 2 groups. Ara h 6 was the allergen most frequently recognized by patients with allergy. Four patients with allergy were found to be mono-sensitized to Ara h 6. Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 showed similar diagnostic accuracy (areas under the curve 0.792 and 0.852). A combined cutoff point for Ara h 2 (≥0.1 ISU) and Ara h 6 (≥2 ISU) yielded the best diagnostic performance (sensitivity 0.77, specificity 0.97, positive predictive value 0.89, negative predictive value 0.93). CONCLUSION Peanut allergy cannot be ruled out without obtaining a negative determination of Ara h 6.
Collapse
|
43
|
Wollmann E, Hamsten C, Sibanda E, Ochome M, Focke-Tejkl M, Asarnoj A, Önell A, Lilja G, Gallerano D, Lupinek C, Thalhamer T, Weiss R, Thalhamer J, Wickman M, Valenta R, van Hage M. Natural clinical tolerance to peanut in African patients is caused by poor allergenic activity of peanut IgE. Allergy 2015; 70:638-52. [PMID: 25683061 DOI: 10.1111/all.12592] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In Africa, peanuts are frequently consumed, but severe allergic reactions are rare. We investigated immunological patterns of clinical tolerance to peanut in peanut-sensitized but asymptomatic patients from central Africa compared to peanut-allergic and peanut-sensitized but asymptomatic patients from Sweden. METHODS Sera from allergic patients (n = 54) from Zimbabwe sensitized to peanut but without allergic symptoms to peanut, and sera from peanut-allergic (n = 25) and peanut-sensitized but asymptomatic (n = 25) patients from Sweden were analyzed toward peanut allergen components (Ara h 1-3, 6, 8-9) and other allergen molecules from important allergen sources using microarray. IgE to Ara h 2 peptide epitopes was analyzed, and allergenic activity was assessed by basophil activation assay. RESULTS Forty-six percent of the African and all peanut-allergic Swedish patients showed IgE toward one of the highly allergenic peanut allergens (Ara h 1-3, 6, 9). However, 48% of the African patients had IgE to cross-reactive carbohydrate determinants (CCDs) with low allergenic activity and 60% of the Swedish asymptomatic patients had IgE against the PR protein Ara h 8. IgG and IgG4 specificities and levels could not discriminate between the African asymptomatic and Swedish peanut-allergic patients. Asymptomatic patients almost lacked IgE to Ara h 2 peptides, which were recognized by peanut-allergic patients. Peanut IgE from peanut asymptomatic patients showed poor allergenic activity compared with IgE from peanut-allergic patients. CONCLUSIONS Natural clinical tolerance to peanut in the African patients can be caused by IgE to low allergenic peanut components and by poor allergenic activity of peanut-specific IgE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E. Wollmann
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - C. Hamsten
- Department of Medicine Solna; Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit; Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
- Center for Inflammatory Diseases; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - E. Sibanda
- University of Zimbabwe Medical School; Harare Zimbabwe
| | - M. Ochome
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - M. Focke-Tejkl
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - A. Asarnoj
- Department of Medicine Solna; Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit; Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
- Astrid Lindgren Children's Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - A. Önell
- Thermo Fisher Scientific ImmunoDiagnostics; Uppsala Sweden
| | - G. Lilja
- Department of Pediatrics; Sachs' Children's Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| | - D. Gallerano
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - C. Lupinek
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - T. Thalhamer
- Department of Molecular Biology; University of Salzburg; Salzburg Austria
| | - R. Weiss
- Department of Molecular Biology; University of Salzburg; Salzburg Austria
| | - J. Thalhamer
- Department of Molecular Biology; University of Salzburg; Salzburg Austria
| | - M. Wickman
- Department of Pediatrics; Sachs' Children's Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
- Institute of Environmental Medicine; Karolinska Institutet; Stockholm Sweden
| | - R. Valenta
- Division of Immunopathology; Department of Pathophysiology and Allergy Research; Center for Pathophysiology, Infectiology and Immunology; Medical University of Vienna; Vienna Austria
| | - M. van Hage
- Department of Medicine Solna; Clinical Immunology and Allergy Unit; Karolinska Institutet and University Hospital; Stockholm Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Ciprandi G, Pistorio A, Silvestri M, Rossi GA, Tosca MA. Peanut anaphylaxis: the usefulness of molecular-based allergy diagnostics. Allergy 2015; 70:129-30. [PMID: 25491330 DOI: 10.1111/all.12527] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- G. Ciprandi
- Medicine Department; IRCCS - Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria San Martino
| | - A. Pistorio
- Epidemiology and Biostatistics Service; Istituto Giannina Gaslini
| | - M. Silvestri
- Pulmonary Disease and Allergy Unit; Istituto Giannina Gaslini; Genoa Italy
| | - G. A. Rossi
- Pulmonary Disease and Allergy Unit; Istituto Giannina Gaslini; Genoa Italy
| | - M. A. Tosca
- Pulmonary Disease and Allergy Unit; Istituto Giannina Gaslini; Genoa Italy
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Abstract
Peanut allergy is common and can be a cause of severe, life-threatening reactions. It is rarely outgrown like other food allergies such as egg and milk. Measures aiming to reduce its prevalence via maternal avoidance during pregnancy and lactation, or delayed introduction into the diet, have failed to show any benefit. Peanut allergy has a significant effect on the quality of life of sufferers and their families due to dietary and social restrictions, but mainly stemming from fear of accidental peanut ingestion. The current management consists of strict avoidance, education and provision of emergency medication. Families find avoidance challenging as peanut is hidden in various food products. Despite the fact that food labelling has improved, with a legal obligation to declare certain food allergens (including nuts) in prepacked products, it still causes confusion and does not extend to cross-contamination. In an effort to address issues of safety at school, a lot of work has been undertaken to better care for peanut-allergic children in that environment. This includes training of school staff on how to recognise and treat allergic reactions promptly. Recent developments in the management of peanut allergy, such as immunotherapy, have shown some promise as an active form of treatment, but larger studies are required to further investigate safety and efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Anagnostou
- Department of Paediatric Allergy, Guy's and St Thomas' Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Andrew Clark
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Morales M, López-matas MÁ, Moya R, Carnés J. Cross-reactivity among non-specific lipid-transfer proteins from food and pollen allergenic sources. Food Chem 2014; 165:397-402. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.101] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/07/2013] [Revised: 02/16/2014] [Accepted: 05/16/2014] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
|
47
|
Agabriel C, Ghazouani O, Birnbaum J, Liabeuf V, Porri F, Gouitaa M, Cleach I, Grob JJ, Bongrand P, Sarles J, Vitte J. Ara h 2 and Ara h 6 sensitization predicts peanut allergy in Mediterranean pediatric patients. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2014; 25:662-7. [PMID: 25376086 DOI: 10.1111/pai.12299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 11/03/2014] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Peanut allergy (PA) management was improved by the introduction of molecular allergology, but guidelines for Mediterranean patients are lacking. We aimed at evaluating peanut component-resolved diagnosis as a diagnostic and prognostic tool in children from Southern France. METHODS In 181 pediatric patients, PA diagnosis was founded on medical history, skin prick testing, serum-specific IgE to Arachis hypogea extract and components, Pru p 4, and plant carbohydrates, and oral food challenge. Allergen microarray was also performed in 68 of these patients. RESULTS In peanut-allergic children (n = 117), IgE to Ara h 6 were most prevalent (64%), followed by Ara h 2 (63%), Ara h 1 (60%), and Ara h 9 (52%). Ara h 6 was the best predictor of PA. The second best predictor was the ratio of Ara h 2 IgE to peanut IgE (cutoff 0.113). Persistent childhood PA was associated with complex molecular profiles. Comparison of singleplex and microarray results showed poor concordance for Ara h 2 and Ara h 9. CONCLUSION Ara h 6 and Ara h 2 are the best predictors of PA at diagnosis in Mediterranean pediatric patients. Ara h 1, Ara h 8, and molecular complexity are associated with PA persistence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Agabriel
- Multidisciplinary Pediatrics Department, APHM Assistance Publique Hôpitaux de Marseille, La Timone Hospital, Marseille, France
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
48
|
Bolla M, Zenoni S, Scheurer S, Vieths S, San Miguel Moncin MDM, Olivieri M, Antico A, Ferrer M, Berroa F, Enrique E, Avesani L, Marsano F, Zoccatelli G. Pomegranate ( Punica granatum L.) Expresses Several nsLTP Isoforms Characterized by Different Immunoglobulin E-Binding Properties. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2014; 164:112-21. [DOI: 10.1159/000362761] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2013] [Accepted: 04/09/2014] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
|
49
|
Abstract
Peanut seeds are currently widely used as source of human food ingredients in the United States of America and in European countries due to their high quality protein and oil content. This article describes the classification and molecular biology of peanut seed allergens with particular reference to their cross-reactivities. Currently, the IUIS allergen nomenclature subcommittee accepts 12 peanut allergens. Two allergens belong to the cupin and four to the prolamin superfamily, and six are distributed among profilins, Bet v 1-like proteins, oleosins, and defensins. Clinical observations frequently report an association of peanut allergy with allergies to legumes, tree nuts, seeds, fruits and pollen. Molecular cross-reactivity has been described between members of the Bet v 1-like proteins, the non-specific lipid transfer proteins, and the profilins. This review also addresses the less well-studied cross-reactivity between cupin and prolamin allergens of peanuts and of other plant food sources and the recently discovered cross-reactivity between peanut allergens of unrelated protein families.
Collapse
|
50
|
Abstract
Peanut is recognized as a potent food allergen producing one of the most frequent food allergies. This fact has originated the publication of an elevated number of scientific reports dealing with peanut allergens and, especially, the prevalence of peanut allergy. For this reason, the information available on peanut allergens is increasing and the debate about peanut allergy is always renewed. This article reviews the information currently available on peanut allergens and on the techniques used for their chemical characterization. Moreover, a general overview on the current biotechnological approaches used to reduce or eliminate peanut allergens is also provided.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jorge Sáiz
- Department of Chemistry I, Faculty of Biology, Environmental Sciences, and Chemistry, University of Alcalá, 28871 Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|