Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of nosocomial infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae in critically ill patients: a prospective evaluation

Intravenous fosfomycin in combination regimens as a treatment option for difficult-to-treat infections due to multi-drug-resistant Gram-negative organisms: A real-life experience

AIM

To investigate the efficacy of intravenous (IV) fosfomycin as combination therapy for treatment of difficult-to-treat (DTT) acute and subacute infections with multi-drug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB), and risk factors associated with 90-day mortality.

METHODS

A retrospective, observational, monocentric study enrolled patients treated with IV fosfomycin in combination regimens (≥72 h) for proven DTT-MDR-GNB infection. Multi-variate regression analysis identified independent risk factors for 90-day mortality. A propensity score for receiving fosfomycin was performed to control for confounding factors.

RESULTS

In total, 70 patients were included in this study: 54.3% had carbapenem-resistant isolates, 31.4% had ceftazidime/avibactam-resistant isolates and 28.6% had ceftolozane/tazobactam-resistant isolates. The main pathogens were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (57.1%) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (22.9%). The most prevalent infections were nosocomial pneumonia (42.9%), osteomyelitis (17.1%) and intra-abdominal infections. All-cause 30- and 90-day mortality were 15.7% and 31.4%, respectively (18.9% and 50% considering acute DTT-MDR-GNB infections alone). Relapse at 30 days occurred in 22.9% of cases (29% with emergence of fosfomycin resistance). Mortality at 90 days was independently associated with septic shock and ceftolozane/tazobactam resistance. The relationship between resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam and 90-day mortality was confirmed to be significant after adjustment by propensity score analysis (hazard ratio 5.84, 95% confidence interval 1.65-20.68; P=0.006).

CONCLUSIONS

Fosfomycin seems to be a promising salvage, combination treatment in DTT-MDR-GNB infections. Resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam seems to be independently associated with treatment failure. Randomized clinical trials focusing on pathogen and infection sites are needed urgently to demonstrate the superiority of fosfomycin in combination with other agents for the resolution of DTT-MDR-GNB infections.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

The aim of the study was to evaluate clinical and microbiological efficacy and safety of intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. All adult inpatients receiving 48 h of intravenous fosfomycin, alone or combined with other antibiotics were included in the study. Overall favorable clinical response rate was 75.3% among 94 patients. Clinical response rates were 92.3%, 72.2% and 56.0% for urinary tract infections, bacteremia and pneumonia, respectively. Microbiological eradication was achieved in 55 of 86 patients. 30-day mortality was 33.0%. Adverse events were generally mild. Common adverse events were hypokalemia (37.2%) and hypernatremia (22.3%). Intravenous fosfomycin is an effective antibiotic option with a good safety profile for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae infections. The most favorable clinical and microbiological responses are obtained in urinary tract infections. The efficacy of the drug in more severe infections, such as pneumonia and bacteremia, is comparable to the literature.

Risk model and validation of carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infection in patients with cerebrovascular disease in the ICU

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) is an emerging global epidemic. The intention of this study was to explore the risk model and validation of CRKP infection in patients with cerebrovascular disease in the intensive care unit (ICU). The data of patients with cerebrovascular disease and Klebsiella pneumoniae infection were retrospectively collected. The patients were divided into the CRKP group and the carbapenem-susceptible Klebsiella pneumoniae (CSKP) group. There were significant differences (P < 0.05) between the CRKP group and the CSKP group for many variables. Multivariate binary logistic regression analysis showed that the number of types of antibiotics used, history of glucocorticoid use, and duration of mechanical ventilation before the occurrence of infectious bacteria are the independent risk factors for CRKP infection in patients with cerebrovascular disease in the ICU, and a nomogram risk model was constructed accordingly. The area under the ROC curve of the risk model was 0.868 (95% CI: 0.803-0.934).

Antibiotic Therapy Strategies for Treating Gram-Negative Severe Infections in the Critically Ill: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Not enough data exist to inform the optimal duration and type of antimicrobial therapy against GN infections in critically ill patients.

METHODS

Narrative review based on a literature search through PubMed and Cochrane using the following keywords: "multi-drug resistant (MDR)", "extensively drug resistant (XDR)", "pan-drug-resistant (PDR)", "difficult-to-treat (DTR) Gram-negative infection," "antibiotic duration therapy", "antibiotic combination therapy" "antibiotic monotherapy" "Gram-negative bacteremia", "Gram-negative pneumonia", and "Gram-negative intra-abdominal infection".

RESULTS

Current literature data suggest adopting longer (≥10-14 days) courses of synergistic combination therapy due to the high global prevalence of ESBL-producing (45-50%), MDR (35%), XDR (15-20%), PDR (5.9-6.2%), and carbapenemases (CP)/metallo-β-lactamases (MBL)-producing (12.5-20%) Gram-negative (GN) microorganisms (i.e., Klebsiella pneumoniae, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter baumanii). On the other hand, shorter courses (≤5-7 days) of monotherapy should be limited to treating infections caused by GN with higher (≥3 antibiotic classes) antibiotic susceptibility. A general approach should be based on (i) third or further generation cephalosporins ± quinolones/aminoglycosides in the case of MDR-GN; (ii) carbapenems ± fosfomycin/aminoglycosides for extended-spectrum β-lactamases (ESBLs); and (iii) the association of old drugs with new expanded-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitors for XDR, PDR, and CP microorganisms. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in combination with minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC), bactericidal vs. bacteriostatic antibiotics, and the presence of resistance risk predictors (linked to patient, antibiotic, and microorganism) should represent variables affecting the antimicrobial strategies for treating GN infections.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the strategies of therapy described in the results, clinicians must remember that all treatment decisions are dynamic, requiring frequent reassessments depending on both the clinical and microbiological responses of the patient.

Fosfomycin resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales: an increasing threat

Antimicrobial resistance is well-known to be a global health and development threat. Due to the decrease of effective antimicrobials, re-evaluation in clinical practice of old antibiotics, as fosfomycin (FOS), have been necessary. FOS is a phosphonic acid derivate that regained interest in clinical practice for the treatment of complicated infection by multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria. Globally, FOS resistant Gram-negative pathogens are raising, affecting the public health, and compromising the use of the antibiotic. In particular, the increased prevalence of FOS resistance (FOS^R) profiles among Enterobacterales family is concerning. Decrease in FOS effectiveness can be caused by i) alteration of FOS influx inside bacterial cell or ii) acquiring antimicrobial resistance genes. In this review, we investigate the main components implicated in FOS flow and report specific mutations that affect FOS influx inside bacterial cell and, thus, its effectiveness. FosA enzymes were identified in 1980 from Serratia marcescens but only in recent years the scientific community has started studying their spread. We summarize the global epidemiology of FosA/C2/L1-2 enzymes among Enterobacterales family. To date, 11 different variants of FosA have been reported globally. Among acquired mechanisms, FosA3 is the most spread variant in Enterobacterales, followed by FosA7 and FosA5. Based on recently published studies, we clarify and represent the molecular and genetic composition of fosA/C2 genes enviroment, analyzing the mechanisms by which such genes are slowly transmitting in emerging and high-risk clones, such as E. coli ST69 and ST131, and K. pneumoniae ST11. FOS is indicated as first line option against uncomplicated urinary tract infections and shows remarkable qualities in combination with other antibiotics. A rapid and accurate identification of FOS^R type in Enterobacterales is difficult to achieve due to the lack of commercial phenotypic susceptibility tests and of rapid systems for MIC detection.

The Use of Intravenous Fosfomycin in Clinical Practice: A 5-Year Retrospective Study in a Tertiary Hospital in Italy

Fosfomycin in intravenous (IV) formulation has re-emerged as a valuable tool in the treatment of multi-drug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) infections because of its broad spectrum of antibacterial action and pharmacokinetic characteristics. This retrospective study aimed to evaluate how fosfomycin was used in patients admitted to the Polyclinic of Palermo between January 2017 and July 2022. Clinical indications, therapeutic associations, clinical outcomes, and any side effects were analyzed. Intravenous fosfomycin was used in 343 patients, 63% male, with a mean age of 68 years (range 15-95). Urinary tract infections (UTIs) and hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) were the main indications for treatment (19% and 18% of the total cases, respectively), followed by skin and soft tissue infections and sepsis. IV fosfomycin was administered in combination with other antibacterial agents, the most common of which were ceftazidime/avibactam (35%), meropenem (17%), and colistin (14%). Nineteen patients received it as monotherapy for UTIs. About 66% had resolution of the infectious process with clinical remission (cure or discharge). Electrolyte disturbances occurred in 2.6% and gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in 2.9%. The data showed that IV fosfomycin is a safe and effective therapeutic option in the treatment of infections with multidrug-resistant microorganisms.

Polymyxin combination therapy for multidrug-resistant, extensively-drug resistant, and difficult-to-treat drug-resistant gram-negative infections: is it superior to polymyxin monotherapy?

INTRODUCTION

The increasing prevalence of infections with multidrug-resistant (MDR), extensively-drug resistant (XDR) or difficult-to-treat drug resistant (DTR) Gram-negative bacilli (GNB), including Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumannii, Klebsiella pneumoniae, Enterobacter species, and Escherichia coli poses a severe challenge.

AREAS COVERED

The rapid growing of multi-resistant GNB as well as the considerable deceleration in development of new anti-infective agents have made polymyxins (e.g. polymyxin B and colistin) a mainstay in clinical practices as either monotherapy or combination therapy. However, whether the polymyxin-based combinations lead to better outcomes remains unknown. This review mainly focuses on the effect of polymyxin combination therapy versus monotherapy on treating GNB-related infections. We also provide several factors in designing studies and their impact on optimizing polymyxin combinations.

EXPERT OPINION

An abundance of recent in vitro and preclinical in vivo data suggest clinical benefit for polymyxin-drug combination therapies, especially colistin plus meropenem and colistin plus rifampicin, with synergistic killing against MDR, XDR, and DTR P. aeruginosa, K. pneumoniae and A. baumannii. The beneficial effects of polymyxin-drug combinations (e.g. colistin or polymyxin B + carbapenem against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae and carbapenem-resistant A. baumannii, polymyxin B + carbapenem + rifampin against carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae, and colistin + ceftolozan/tazobactam + rifampin against PDR-P. aeruginosa) have often been shown in clinical setting by retrospective studies. However, high-certainty evidence from large randomized controlled trials is necessary. These clinical trials should incorporate careful attention to patient's sample size, characteristics of patient's groups, PK/PD relationships and dosing, rapid detection of resistance, MIC determinations, and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Treatment of ventilator-associated pneumonia due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria with novel agents: a contemporary, multidisciplinary ESGCIP perspective

INTRODUCTION

: In the past 15 years, treatment of VAP caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) has represented an intricate challenge for clinicians.

AREAS COVERED

In this perspective article, we discuss the available clinical data about novel agents for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP, together with general PK/PD principles for the treatment of VAP, in the attempt to provide some suggestions for optimizing antimicrobial therapy of CR-GNB VAP in the daily clinical practice.

EXPERT OPINION

Recently, novel BL and BL/BLI combinations have become available that have shown potent in vitro activity against CR-GNB and have attracted much interest as novel, less toxic, and possibly more efficacious options for the treatment of CR-GNB VAP compared with previous standard of care. Besides randomized controlled trials, a good solution to enrich our knowledge on how to use these novel agents at best in the near future, while at the same time remaining adherent to current evidence-based guidelines, is to improve our collaboration to conduct larger multinational observational studies to collect sufficiently large populations treated in real life with those novel agents for which guidelines currently do not provide a recommendation (in favor or against) for certain causative organisms.

In vitro Investigation of Antibiotic Combinations against Multi- and Extensively Drug-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives: Community and hospital acquired K. pneumoniae infections have become a ubiquitous medical issue due to the limited treatment options and high mortality rate therefore the aims of this study are in vitro investigation of double antimicrobial combinations against multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug resistant (XDR) isolates. Materials and Methods: Antimicrobial susceptibility of twelve isolates from eight Bulgarian hospitals was determined to study the interaction effect of selected double combinations in accordance to fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) method. Furthermore, the isolates were subjected to genotyping by Multilocus sequence typing (MLST) and detection of carbapenemase genes by multiplex PCR. The results were assessed by groups of strains with either NDM or KPC carbapenemase. Results: Nine antimicrobial combinations: meropenem-colistin, meropenem-fosfomycin, meropenem-gentamicin, meropenem-rifampicin, meropenem-tigecycline, colistin-fosfomycin, colistin-gentamicin, colistin-rifampicin and colistin-tigecycline were tested for synergism on twelve K. pneumoniae, producing either KPC-2 (KPC-KP, 41.7%, 5/12) or NDM-1 (NDM-KP, 58.3%, 7/12). The isolates were distributed in three sequence types: ST11 (58.3%, 7/12), ST15 (25%, 3/12) and ST258 (16.7%, 2/12). All KPC-KP (ST258 and ST15) originated from three hospitals. The rest were NDM-1 carriers isolated from six hospitals and belonged to ST11. The highest synergistic effect was determined for MER-GEN (83.3%, 10/12) and COL-RIF (83.3%, 10/12). The MER-FOS combination was most efficient against NDM-KP, opposite to the KPC strains. Antagonism was not observed for any combinations. Conclusions: The evaluated joint synergistic effect of the MER-GEN and COL-RIF may facilitate the treatment options for patients infected with NDM- and KPC-KP, whereas MER-FOS is highly synergetic against NDM-KP.

Transporter Genes and fosA Associated With Fosfomycin Resistance in Carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) are of significant clinical concern worldwide. Fosfomycin is one of the limited treatment options for CRKP. However, resistance to fosfomycin in CRKP has been observed. In this study, we aimed to investigate the fosfomycin resistance mechanism of CRKP. Fosfomycin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates were collected from four medical centers in Taiwan from 2010 to 2018. The genes that contributed to fosfomycin resistance were amplified and sequenced. Carbohydrate utilization assays and mutagenesis studies were performed to determine the mechanisms underlying fosfomycin resistance. Forty fosfomycin-resistant CRKP strains were collected and used for further analysis. Fourteen strains exhibited low-level resistance (MIC = 256–512 mg/dl), while 26 strains showed high-level resistance (MIC ≥ 1,024 mg/dl). Chromosomal fosA^KP I91V was detected in 39/40 fosfomycin-resistant CRKP strains. We observed that amino acid substitution of chromosomal fosA^KP I91V increased the MIC of fosfomycin by approximately eight folds, and this was the only mechanism elucidated for low-level fosfomycin resistance. Among the 26 high-level resistance strains, fosA^KP I91V combined with transporter deficiencies (18/26, 69.2%) was the most common resistant mechanism, and one strain showed transporter deficiency only. Plasmid-borne fosA3 accounted for 27.0% (7/26) of high-level resistance. Various G3P and G6P transporter gene mutations, including three novel single amino acid mutations (glpT E299D, glpT D274V, and uhpC A393V) were detected in 19 strains. No murA mutation was found in this study. Our study highlights the need for new therapeutic agents for CRKP infections in Taiwan.

A Real-world Study on Prescription Pattern of Fosfomycin in Critical Care Patients

Background

This study presents a real-world scenario for prescription pattern, efficacy, and safety data on the current clinical use of intravenous fosfomycin in critically ill patients in Indian settings.

Patients and methods

This was a retrospective cohort study conducted for a period of 10 months among critically ill patients admitted to hospital's critical care unit. The primary objective of the study was to analyze the prescription pattern of intravenous fosfomycin, and the secondary objective was to evaluate the safety profile and patient outcomes.

Results

A total of 309 patients were enrolled, and they were diagnosed with bacteremia (45.3%), pneumonia (15.85%), septic shock (14.24%), and urinary tract infections (UTI) (13.91%). The average dose of fosfomycin given was 11.7 ± 4.06 gm/day. The average duration of the therapy was 4.85 ± 3.59 days with a median duration of 4 days. Fosfomycin was given at 8 hourly dosing frequency to maximum (45.6%) cases. Hypokalemia was the most observed adverse event. The overall survival was seen in 55% of patients.

Conclusion

Our data suggest that UTI, infection caused by Escherichia coli, and a daily dose of >12 g were associated with better clinical outcomes. The overall survival of critically ill patients receiving fosfomycin was 55%.

How to cite this article

Zirpe KG, Mehta Y, Pandit R, Pande R, Deshmukh AM, Patil S, et al. A Real-world Study on Prescription Pattern of Fosfomycin in Critical Care Patients. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(9):1055–1058.

European Society of clinical microbiology and infectious diseases (ESCMID) guidelines for the treatment of infections caused by Multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacilli (endorsed by ESICM -European Society of intensive care Medicine)

SCOPE

These ESCMID guidelines address the targeted antibiotic treatment of 3^rd generation cephalosporin-resistant Enterobacterales (3GCephRE) and carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria, focusing on the effectiveness of individual antibiotics and on combination vs. monotherapy.

METHODS

An expert panel was convened by ESCMID. A systematic review was performed including randomized controlled trials and observational studies, examining different antibiotic treatment regimens for the targeted treatment of infections caused by the 3GCephRE, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa (CRPA) and carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumanni (CRAB). Treatments were classified as head-to-head comparisons between individual antibiotics and monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens, including defined monotherapy and combination regimens only. The primary outcome was all-cause mortality, preferably at 30 days and secondary outcomes included clinical failure, microbiological failure, development of resistance, relapse/recurrence, adverse events and length of hospital stay. The last search of all databases was conducted in December 2019, followed by a focused search for relevant studies up until ECCMID 2021. Data were summarized narratively. The certainty of the evidence for each comparison between antibiotics and between monotherapy vs. combination therapy regimens was classified by the GRADE recommendations. The strength of the recommendations for or against treatments was classified as strong or conditional (weak).

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel reviewed the evidence per pathogen, preferably per site of infection, critically appraising the existing studies. Many of the comparisons were addressed in small observational studies at high risk of bias only. Notably, there was very little evidence on the effects of the new, recently approved, beta-lactam beta-lactamase inhibitors on infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria. Most recommendations are based on very-low and low certainty evidence. A high value was placed on antibiotic stewardship considerations in all recommendations, searching for carbapenem-sparing options for 3GCephRE and limiting the recommendations of the new antibiotics for severe infections, as defined by the sepsis-3 criteria. Research needs are addressed.

Fosfomycin therapeutic drug monitoring in real-life: development and validation of a LC-MS/MS method on plasma samples

Individualization of fosfomycin dosing based on therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of plasma concentrations could reduce drug-related adverse events and improve clinical outcome in complex clinical conditions. Quantification of fosfomycin in plasma samples was performed by a rapid ultraperformance liquid chromatography mass spectrometry method. Sample preparation involved protein precipitation with [¹³C₃]-fosfomycin benzylamine salt as internal standard. The calibration curve ranged from 2 to 800 mg/L. Within- and between-day precision and accuracy, sensitivity, selectivity, dilution integrity, recovery were investigated and the results met the acceptance criteria. In patients, multiple drug dosing (every 6 or 8 hours) or in continuous administration were adopted, resulting in a large interpatient variability in drug concentrations (from 7.4 mg/L and 644.6 mg/L; CV: 91.1%). In critical care patient setting TDM can represent an important tool to identify the best fosfomycin dosing in single patients, taking into consideration clinical characteristics, infection sites and susceptibility of the treated pathogens.

Treatment for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales infections: recent advances and future directions

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) are a growing threat to human health worldwide. CRE often carry multiple resistance genes that limit treatment options and require longer durations of therapy, are more costly to treat, and necessitate therapies with increased toxicities when compared with carbapenem-susceptible strains. Here, we provide an overview of the mechanisms of resistance in CRE, the epidemiology of CRE infections worldwide, and available treatment options for CRE. We review recentlyapproved agents for the treatment of CRE, including ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and novel aminoglycosides and tetracyclines. We also discuss recent advances in phage therapy and antibiotics that are currently in development targeted to CRE. The potential for the development of resistance to these therapies remains high, and enhanced antimicrobial stewardship is imperative both to reduce the spread of CRE worldwide and to ensure continued access to efficacious treatment options.

Convergent phenotypic evolution towards fosfomycin collateral sensitivity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic-resistant mutants

The rise of antibiotic resistance and the reduced amount of novel antibiotics support the need of developing novel strategies to fight infections, based on improving the use of the antibiotics we already have. Collateral sensitivity is an evolutionary trade‐off associated with the acquisition of antibiotic resistance that can be exploited to tackle this relevant health problem. However, different works have shown that patterns of collateral sensitivity are not always conserved, thus precluding the exploitation of this evolutionary trade‐off to fight infections. In this work, we identify a robust pattern of collateral sensitivity to fosfomycin in Pseudomonas aeruginosa antibiotic‐resistant mutants, selected by antibiotics belonging to different structural families. We characterize the underlying mechanism of the collateral sensitivity observed, which is a reduced expression of the genes encoding the peptidoglycan‐recycling pathway, which preserves the peptidoglycan synthesis in situations where its de novo synthesis is blocked, and a reduced expression of fosA, encoding a fosfomycin‐inactivating enzyme. We propose that the identification of robust collateral sensitivity patterns, as well as the understanding of the molecular mechanisms behind these phenotypes, would provide valuable information to design evolution‐based strategies to treat bacterial infections.

Rescuing the Last-Line Polymyxins: Achievements and Challenges

Antibiotic resistance is a major global health challenge and, worryingly, several key Gram negative pathogens can become resistant to most currently available antibiotics. Polymyxins have been revived as a last-line therapeutic option for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram negative bacteria, in particular Acinetobacter baumannii, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, and Enterobacterales. Polymyxins were first discovered in the late 1940s but were abandoned soon after their approval in the late 1950s as a result of toxicities (e.g., nephrotoxicity) and the availability of "safer" antibiotics approved at that time. Therefore, knowledge on polymyxins had been scarce until recently, when enormous efforts have been made by several research teams around the world to elucidate the chemical, microbiological, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic, and toxicological properties of polymyxins. One of the major achievements is the development of the first scientifically based dosage regimens for colistin that are crucial to ensure its safe and effective use in patients. Although the guideline has not been developed for polymyxin B, a large clinical trial is currently being conducted to optimize its clinical use. Importantly, several novel, safer polymyxin-like lipopeptides are developed to overcome the nephrotoxicity, poor efficacy against pulmonary infections, and narrow therapeutic windows of the currently used polymyxin B and colistin. This review discusses the latest achievements on polymyxins and highlights the major challenges ahead in optimizing their clinical use and discovering new-generation polymyxins. To save lives from the deadly infections caused by Gram negative "superbugs," every effort must be made to improve the clinical utility of the last-line polymyxins. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to global health. The increasing prevalence of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections has been highlighted by leading global health organizations and authorities. Polymyxins are a last-line defense against difficult-to-treat MDR Gram negative pathogens. Unfortunately, the pharmacological information on polymyxins was very limited until recently. This review provides a comprehensive overview on the major achievements and challenges in polymyxin pharmacology and clinical use and how the recent findings have been employed to improve clinical practice worldwide.

Treating infections caused by carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE): a pragmatic approach to antimicrobial stewardship on behalf of the UKCPA Pharmacy Infection Network (PIN)

The emergence of carbapenemase-producing Enterobacterales (CPE) as a major cause of invasive infection both within the UK and internationally poses a very real concern for all providers of healthcare. The burden of morbidity and mortality associated with CPE infections is well described. The need for early, targeted, effective and safe antimicrobial therapy remains key for the management of these infected patients yet reliable antimicrobial treatment options remain scarce. In the absence of a universal treatment for these CPE invasive infections, individual treatment options tailored to susceptibilities and severity of infection are required. This working group from within the UK Clinical Pharmacy Association (UKCPA) Pharmacy Infection Network has developed evidence-based treatment recommendations to support infection specialists in managing these complex infections. A systematic review of peer-reviewed research was performed and analysed. We report consensus recommendations for the management of CPE-associated infections. The national expert panel makes therapeutic recommendations regarding the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of the drugs and pharmacokinetic targets, dosing, dosage adjustment and monitoring of parameters for novel and established antimicrobial therapies with CPE activity. This manuscript provides the infection specialist with pragmatic and evidence-based options for the management of CPE infections.

Is it time to move away from polymyxins?: evidence and alternatives

Increasing burden of carbapenem resistance and resultant difficult-to-treat infections are of particular concern due to the lack of effective and safe treatment options. More recently, several new agents with activity against certain multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensive drug-resistant (XDR) Gram-negative pathogens have been approved for clinical use. These include ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-cilastatin-relebactam, plazomicin, and cefiderocol. For the management of MBL infections, clinically used triple combination comprising ceftazidime-avibactam and aztreonam is hindered due to non-availability of antimicrobial susceptibility testing methods and lack of information on potential drug-drug interaction leading to PK changes impacting its safety and efficacy. Moreover, in several countries including Indian subcontinent and developing countries, these new agents are yet to be made available. Under these circumstances, polymyxins are the only last resort for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant infections. With the recent evidence of suboptimal PK/PD particularly in lung environment, limited efficacy and increased nephrotoxicity associated with polymyxin use, the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) has revised both colistin and polymyxin B breakpoints. Thus, polymyxins 'intermediate' breakpoint for Enterobacterales, P. aeruginosa, and Acinetobacter spp. are now set at ≤ 2 mg/L, implying limited clinical efficacy even for isolates with the MIC value 2 mg/L. This change has questioned the dependency on polymyxins in treating XDR infections. In this context, recently approved cefiderocol and phase 3 stage combination drug cefepime-zidebactam assume greater significance due to their potential to act as polymyxin-supplanting therapies.

Evaluation of Intravenous Fosfomycin Disodium Dosing Regimens in Critically Ill Patients for Treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Infections Using Monte Carlo Simulation

There are limited intravenous fosfomycin disodium (IVFOS) dosing regimens to treat carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections. This study aimed to use Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) for evaluation of IVFOS dosing regimens in critically ill patients with CRE infections. The dosing regimens in critically ill patients with various creatinine clearance were evaluated with MCS using minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions of fosfomycin against CRE clinical isolates in Thailand and the 24 h area under the plasma drug concentration-time curve over the minimum inhibitory concentration (AUC0-24/MIC) of ≥21.5 to be a target for IVFOS. The achieved goal of the probability of target attainment (PTA) and a cumulative fraction of response (CFR) were ≥90%. A total of 129 non-duplicated CRE clinical isolates had MIC distributions from 0.38 to >1024 mg/L. IVFOS 8 g every 8 h, 1 h, or 4 h infusion, could achieve approximately 90% PTA of AUC0-24/MIC target to treat CRE infections with MICs ≤ 128 mg/L. According to PTA target, an IVFOS daily dose to treat carbapenem-resistant Escherichia coli based on Clinical Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) breakpoints for urinary tract infections and one to treatment for CRE infections based on the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST) breakpoints were 16 g/day and 8 g/day, respectively. All dosing regimens of IVFOS against CRE achieved CFR ≤ 70%. This study proposes the IVFOS dosing regimens based on CLSI and EUCAST breakpoints for the treatment of CRE infections. However, further clinical studies are needed to confirm the results of these findings.

Review of therapeutic options for infections with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Infections with multi-drug resistant (MDR) bacteria including carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae are emerging worldwide but are difficult to treat with the currently available antibiotic compounds and therefore constitute serious threats to human health. This prompted us to perform a literature survey applying the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials including clinical trials comparing different treatment regimens for infections caused by carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae. Our survey revealed that a combined application of antibiotic compounds such as meropenem plus vaborbactam, meropenem plus colistin and carbapenem plus carbapenem, resulted in significantly increased clinical cure and decreased mortality rates as compared to respective control treatment. However, further research on novel antibiotic compounds, but also on antibiotic-independent molecules providing synergistic or at least resistance-modifying properties needs to be undertaken in vitro as well as in large clinical trials to provide future options in the combat of emerging life-threatening infections caused by MDR bacteria.

The role of fosfomycin for multidrug-resistant gram-negative infections

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In the last decade, an increasing interest in using fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant gram-negative (MDR-GNB) infections have been registered, especially when none or only a few other active alternatives remained available.

RECENT FINDINGS

Fosfomycin may remain active against a considerable proportion of MDR-GNB. In observational studies, a possible curative effect of oral fosfomycin monotherapy has been described for uncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) and bacterial prostatitis caused by MDR-GNB, whereas intravenous fosfomycin has been mostly used in combination with other agents for various type of severe MDR-GNB infections. The ZEUS randomized controlled trial (RCT) has started to provide high-level evidence about the possible use of fosfomycin for complicated UTI caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing GNB, but no results of large RCT are currently available to firmly guide the use of fosfomycin for carbapenem-resistant GNB.

SUMMARY

Fosfomycin is an important therapeutic option for MDR-GNB infections. Further pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic and clinical research is needed to optimize its use.

New strategies and structural considerations in development of therapeutics for carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

Antimicrobial resistance poses a significant threat to our ability to treat infections. Especially concerning is the emergence of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). In the new 2019 United States Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Antibiotic Resistance Report, CRE remain in the most urgent antimicrobial resistance threat category. There is good reason for this concerning designation. In particular, the combination of several resistance elements in CRE can make these pathogens untreatable or effectively untreatable with our current armamentarium of anti-infective agents. This article reviews recently approved agents with activity against CRE and a range of modalities in the pipeline, from early academic investigation to those in clinical trials, with a focus on structural aspects of new antibiotics. Another article in this series addresses the need to incentive pharmaceutical companies to invest in CRE antimicrobial development and to encourage hospitals to make these agents available in their formularies. This article will also consider the need for change in requirements for antimicrobial susceptibility testing implementation in clinical laboratories to address practical roadblocks that impede our efforts to provide even existing CRE antibiotics to our patients.

Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales: Considerations for Treatment in the Era of New Antimicrobials and Evolving Enzymology

Purpose of Review

Gram-negative resistance is a growing concern globally. Enterobacterales, formerly Enterobacteriaceae, have developed resistance mechanisms to carbapenems that leave very few antimicrobial options in the clinician’s armamentarium.

Recent Findings

New antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam, meropenem-vaborbactam, imipenem-relebactam, cefiderocol, and plazomicin have the potential to overcome resistance mechanisms in Enterobacterales including different classes of carbapenemases.

Summary

Novel β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitors, plazomicin, and cefiderocol give the clinician options that were once not available. Utilizing these options is of the utmost importance when treating carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales.

Mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections (a meta-analysis dataset)

This meta-analysis was conducted to assess mortality, clinical and microbiological response following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections. Fifty-four observational studies involving 3195 CRKP-infected patients who received antibiotic treatment were included. We found combination therapy to be associated with lower mortality than monotherapy, but no differences in clinical and microbiological response. Among the various combination therapies, no significant differences in mortality, clinical and microbiological response were found. Moreover, clinical outcomes did not differ significantly among various monotherapies. This report describes the data related to the article entitled: "A systematic review and meta-analysis of treatment outcomes following antibiotic therapy among patients with carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae infections".

Epidemiology, Treatment, and Prevention of Nosocomial Bacterial Pneumonia

Septicaemia likely results in high case-fatality rates in the present multidrug-resistant (MDR) era. Amongst them are hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP) and ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), two frequent fatal septicaemic entities amongst hospitalised patients. We reviewed the PubMed database to identify the common organisms implicated in HAP/VAP, to explore the respective risk factors, and to find the appropriate antibiotic choice. Apart from methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae spp., MDR or extensively drug-resistant (XDR)-Acinetobacter baumannii complex spp., followed by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Chryseobacterium indologenes, and Elizabethkingia meningoseptica are ranked as the top Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) implicated in HAP/VAP. Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae notably emerged as an important concern in HAP/VAP. The above-mentioned pathogens have respective risk factors involved in their acquisition. In the present XDR era, tigecycline, colistin, and ceftazidime-avibactam are antibiotics effective against the Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase and oxacillinase producers amongst the Enterobacteriaceae isolates implicated in HAP/VAP. Antibiotic combination regimens are recommended in the treatment of MDR/XDR-P. aeruginosa or A. baumannii complex isolates. Some special patient populations need prolonged courses (>7-day) and/or a combination regimen of antibiotic therapy. Implementation of an antibiotic stewardship policy and the measures recommended by the United States (US) Institute for Healthcare were shown to decrease the incidence rates of HAP/VAP substantially.

Fosfomycin in severe infections due to genetically distinct pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms: synergy with meropenem

Background

In vitro and clinical studies using parenteral fosfomycin have suggested the possibility of using this drug against infections caused by MDR microorganisms. The aim of this study was to describe a case series of patients treated with fosfomycin who had severe infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria.

Methods

We describe a prospective series of cases of hospitalized patients with infections caused by Gram-negative bacteria resistant to β-lactams and colistin, treated with 16 g of fosfomycin daily for 10-14 days. Isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and synergism of fosfomycin with meropenem. We tested for resistance genes and performed typing using PCR and WGS.

Results

Thirteen patients received fosfomycin (seven immunosuppressed); they had bloodstream infections (n = 11; 85%), ventilator-associated pneumonia (n = 1; 8%) and surgical site infection (n = 1; 8%), caused by Klebsiella pneumoniae (n = 9), Serratia marcescens (n = 3) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n = 1). Overall, eight (62%) patients were cured. Using time-kill assays, synergism between fosfomycin and meropenem occurred in 9 (82%) of 11 isolates. Typing demonstrated that K. pneumoniae were polyclonal. Eight patients (62%) had possible adverse events, but therapy was not discontinued.

Conclusions

Fosfomycin may be safe and effective against infections caused by pan-drug-resistant Gram-negative microorganisms with different antimicrobial resistance mechanisms and there seems to be synergism with meropenem.

Addressing clinical safety of antimicrobial resistance: personal perspectives

Introduction: Antimicrobial resistance is an important challenge for patients, societies, practicing physicians and health care organizations worldwide. Predictions in regard to the morbidity and mortality of antimicrobial resistance are grave especially in the setting of an era where the pipeline of production of antimicrobial agents is relatively dry.Areas covered: Herein, a viewpoint will be provided regarding antimicrobial bacterial resistance as a clinical safety need based on personal experience and data from the literature.Expert opinion: A variety of antibiotics has been produced during the last decade but novelty regarding truly new antimicrobial agents is rather little, as these new antibiotics are mainly based on modifications of known pharmaceutical molecules. Therefore, as there is still a desperate need to address optimal clinical safety in regard to antimicrobial resistance, we believe that strong financial incentives and rewards to producers of antimicrobial agents (especially new in concept) are necessary. Furthermore, global surveillance of antimicrobial resistance as suggested by the World Health Organization, coordination of measures of justified and appropriate use of antibiotics and application of strict infection control principles are needed to lessen the negative clinical impact of antimicrobial resistance.

Parenteral Fosfomycin for the Treatment of Multidrug Resistant Bacterial Infections: The Rise of the Epoxide

Fosfomycin was initially discovered in 1969 but has recently gained renewed interest for the treatment of multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacterial infections, particularly in the United States. Its unique mechanism of action, bactericidal activity, broad spectrum of activity, and relatively safe and tolerable adverse effect profile make it a great addition to the dwindling antibiotic armamentarium. Fosfomycin contains a three-membered epoxide ring with a direct carbon to phosphorous bond that bypasses the intermediate oxygen bond commonly present in other organophosphorous compounds; this structure makes the agent unique from other antibiotics. Despite nearly 50 years of parenteral fosfomycin use in Europe, fosfomycin has retained stable activity against most pathogens. Furthermore, fosfomycin demonstrated in vitro synergy in combination with other cell wall-active antibiotics (e.g., β-lactams, daptomycin). These combinations may offer respite for severe infections due to MDR gram-positive and gram-negative bacteria. The intravenous (IV) formulation is currently under review in the United States, and apropos, this review collates more contemporary evidence (i.e., studies published between 2000 and early 2019) in anticipation of this development. The approval of IV fosfomycin provides another option for consideration in the management of MDR infections. Its unique structure will give rise to a promising epoxide epoch in the battle against MDR bacteria.

The "Old" and the "New" Antibiotics for MDR Gram-Negative Pathogens: For Whom, When, and How

The recent expansion of multidrug resistant and pan-drug-resistant pathogens poses significant challenges in the treatment of healthcare associated infections. An important advancement, is a handful of recently launched new antibiotics targeting some of the current most problematic Gram-negative pathogens, namely carbapenem-producing Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA). Less options are available against carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB) and strains producing metallo-beta lactamases (MBL). Ceftazidime-avibactam signaled a turning point in the treatment of KPC and partly OXA- type carbapenemases, whereas meropenem-vaborbactam was added as a potent combination against KPC-producers. Ceftolozane-tazobactam could be seen as an ideal beta-lactam backbone for the treatment of CRPA. Plazomicin, an aminoglycoside with better pharmacokinetics and less toxicity compared to other class members, will cover important proportions of multi-drug resistant pathogens. Eravacycline holds promise in the treatment of infections by CRAB, with a broad spectrum of activity similar to tigecycline, and improved pharmacokinetics. Novel drugs and combinations are not to be considered "panacea" for the ongoing crisis in the therapy of XDR Gram-negative bacteria and colistin will continue to be considered as a fundamental companion drug for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (particularly in areas where MBL predominate), for the treatment of CRPA (in many cases being the only in vitro active drug) as well as CRAB. Aminoglycosides are still important companion antibiotics. Finally, fosfomycin as part of combination treatment for CRE infections and P. aeruginosa, deserves a greater attention. Optimal conditions for monotherapy and the "when and how" of combination treatments integrating the novel agents will be discussed.

Evaluation of the Bactericidal Activity of Fosfomycin in Combination with Selected Antimicrobial Comparison Agents Tested against Gram-Negative Bacterial Strains by Using Time-Kill Curves

The effects of combining fosfomycin with various antimicrobial agents were evaluated in vitro by broth microdilution checkerboard and time-kill kinetic studies. Checkerboard analyses were used to evaluate the following 30 Gram-negative isolates: 5 Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 5 Acinetobacter baumannii-Acinetobacter calcoaceticus species complex, and 20 Enterobacteriaceae isolates. No isolate exhibited antagonism when fosfomycin was tested in combination, and synergy was observed in more than 25% of the drug combinations tested. The most frequent instances of synergy occurred when testing fosfomycin with β-lactams. Two isolates of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 2 of Klebsiella pneumoniae, and 1 of the A. baumannii-A. calcoaceticus species complex that exhibited synergy when fosfomycin was tested in combination were subjected to time-kill kinetic analyses for confirmation. Time-kill assays confirmed synergistic activity. These data indicated that combination therapy with fosfomycin may be beneficial.

Management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae infections

BACKGROUND

Carbapenem resistance is defined as in vitro non-susceptibility to any carbapenem and/or documented production of a carbapenemase. This feature has rapidly spread worldwide among clinical isolates of Enterobacteriaceae, mostly Klebsiella spp., and is associated with diverse molecular mechanisms. Carbapenem resistance is often associated with resistance to all traditional β-lactams and other classes of antibiotics, denoting a typical example of an extensively drug-resistant phenotype.

OBJECTIVES

To summarize and interpret in a balanced manner the most clinically relevant data in terms of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infection management.

SOURCES

Data were extracted by PubMed and clinicaltrials.gov search and manual scrutiny among references of analysed articles.

CONTENT

Features of newer and older, rediscovered antimicrobial options for CRE are described. Observational studies and randomized clinical trials (RCT) of CRE treatment are summarized, with a specific focus on the effects of monotherapy compared with combination treatment.

IMPLICATIONS

The available evidence on the current management of CRE mostly comes from observational, non-comparative, retrospective, small studies, with a high risk of selection bias. Very little evidence comes from RCT. Conflicting results of RCT and observational studies call for caution before combination therapies are deemed superior to monotherapy. Data on newer agents have spurred enthusiasm but remain limited as concerns severe CRE infections. A balanced approach should guide the clinician in the choice of old or new drugs, and of monotherapies or combination regimens. Efforts should be made to perform adequately sized clinical trials answering well-defined research questions.

Polymyxins: To Combine or Not to Combine?

Polymyxins have been a mainstay for the treatment of extensively drug resistant (XDR) Gram-negative bacteria for the past two decades. Many questions regarding the clinical use of polymyxins have been answered, but whether the administration of polymyxins in combination with other antibiotics leads to better outcomes remains unknown. This review discusses the limitations of observational studies that suggest a benefit of combinations of colistin and carbapenems to treat infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE), especially Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae, and summarizes the results of randomized controlled trials in which treatment with colistin in combination with meropenem or rifampin does not lead to better clinical outcomes than colisitn monotherapy in infections caused by carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (CRAB). Although the introduction of new antibiotics makes it possible to treat certain strains of CRE and carbapenem-resistant P. aeruginosa (CRPA) with polymyxin-sparing regimens, the use of polymyxins is, for now, still necessary in CRAB and in CRE and CRPA harboring metallo-beta-lactamases. Therefore, strategies must be developed to optimize polymyxin-based treatments, informed by in vitro hollow fiber models, careful clinical observations, and high-quality evidence from appropriately designed trials.

Treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria: report of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy/Healthcare Infection Society/British Infection Association Joint Working Party

The Working Party makes more than 100 tabulated recommendations in antimicrobial prescribing for the treatment of infections caused by multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) and suggest further research, and algorithms for hospital and community antimicrobial usage in urinary infection. The international definition of MDR is complex, unsatisfactory and hinders the setting and monitoring of improvement programmes. We give a new definition of multiresistance. The background information on the mechanisms, global spread and UK prevalence of antibiotic prescribing and resistance has been systematically reviewed. The treatment options available in hospitals using intravenous antibiotics and in primary care using oral agents have been reviewed, ending with a consideration of antibiotic stewardship and recommendations. The guidance has been derived from current peer-reviewed publications and expert opinion with open consultation. Methods for systematic review were NICE compliant and in accordance with the SIGN 50 Handbook; critical appraisal was applied using AGREE II. Published guidelines were used as part of the evidence base and to support expert consensus. The guidance includes recommendations for stakeholders (including prescribers) and antibiotic-specific recommendations. The clinical efficacy of different agents is critically reviewed. We found there are very few good-quality comparative randomized clinical trials to support treatment regimens, particularly for licensed older agents. Susceptibility testing of MDR GNB causing infection to guide treatment needs critical enhancements. Meropenem- or imipenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae should have their carbapenem MICs tested urgently, and any carbapenemase class should be identified: mandatory reporting of these isolates from all anatomical sites and specimens would improve risk assessments. Broth microdilution methods should be adopted for colistin susceptibility testing. Antimicrobial stewardship programmes should be instituted in all care settings, based on resistance rates and audit of compliance with guidelines, but should be augmented by improved surveillance of outcome in Gram-negative bacteraemia, and feedback to prescribers. Local and national surveillance of antibiotic use, resistance and outcomes should be supported and antibiotic prescribing guidelines should be informed by these data. The diagnosis and treatment of both presumptive and confirmed cases of infection by GNB should be improved. This guidance, with infection control to arrest increases in MDR, should be used to improve the outcome of infections with such strains. Anticipated users include medical, scientific, nursing, antimicrobial pharmacy and paramedical staff where they can be adapted for local use.

Small-Molecule Inhibitor of FosA Expands Fosfomycin Activity to Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Pathogens

The spread of multidrug or extensively drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria is a serious public health issue. There are too few new antibiotics in development to combat the threat of multidrug-resistant infections, and consequently the rate of increasing antibiotic resistance is outpacing the drug development process. This fundamentally threatens our ability to treat common infectious diseases. Fosfomycin (FOM) has an established track record of safety in humans and is highly active against Escherichia coli, including multidrug-resistant strains. However, many other Gram-negative pathogens, including the "priority pathogens" Klebsiella pneumoniae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa, are inherently resistant to FOM due to the chromosomal fosA gene, which directs expression of a metal-dependent glutathione S-transferase (FosA) that metabolizes FOM. In this study, we describe the discovery and biochemical and structural characterization of ANY1 (3-bromo-6-[3-(3-bromo-2-oxo-1H-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-6-yl)-4-nitro-1H-pyrazol-5-yl]-1H-pyrazolo[1,5-a]pyrimidin-2-one), a small-molecule active-site inhibitor of FosA. Importantly, ANY1 potentiates FOM activity in representative Gram-negative pathogens. Collectively, our study outlines a new strategy to expand FOM activity to a broader spectrum of Gram-negative pathogens, including multidrug-resistant strains.

Antimicrobial treatment challenges in the era of carbapenem resistance

Infections due to carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are burdened by high mortality and represent an urgent threat to address. Clinicians are currently at a dawn of a new era in which antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacilli is being dealt with by the availability of the first new antibiotics in this field for many years. Although new antibiotics have shown promising results in clinical trials, there is still uncertainty over whether their use will improve clinical outcomes in real world practice. Some observational studies have reported a survival benefit in carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae bloodstream infections using combination therapy, often including "old" antibiotics such as colistin, aminoglycosides, tigecycline, and carbapenems. These regimens, however, are linked to increased risk of antimicrobial resistance, and their efficacy has yet to be compared to new antimicrobial options. While awaiting more definitive evidence, antibiotic stewards need clear direction on how to optimize the use of old and novel antibiotic options. Furthermore, carbapenem-sparing regimens should be carefully considered as a potential tool to reduce selective antimicrobial pressure.

Intravenous fosfomycin for the treatment of multidrug-resistant pathogens: what is the evidence on dosing regimens?

INTRODUCTION

The intravenous (IV) formulation of fosfomycin has been re-introduced in clinical practice mainly to overcome treatment failures against multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. Appropriate dosing schedules of the IV formulation have not yet been established. Areas covered: The mechanism of action and resistance development, commercial IV formulations, pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) properties, IV dosing regimens for the treatment of MDR infections along with efficacy and safety issues were reviewed. Data regarding specific MDR pathogens, daily doses and patients' outcomes, gaps in the current literature, and in progress research agenda are presented. Expert opinion: The doses of fosfomycin IV range between 12 and 24 grams/day depending on the severity of infection. The efficacy and safety of the commonly administered doses have been shown mainly in observational non-comparative trials. The optimal dose ensuring maximal efficacy with minimal toxicity along with the most appropriate co-administered antibiotic(s) need further evaluation. The pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic parameter associated with maximum efficacy has not yet been established, although, the ratio of the area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for the free unbound fraction of fosfomycin versus the MIC (fAUC/MIC) may be linked to optimal treatment. RCTs and other comparative studies are underway to address gaps of knowledge in adult patients and neonates.

Resistance to fosfomycin: Mechanisms, Frequency and Clinical Consequences

Fosfomycin has been used for the treatment of infections due to susceptible and multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria. It inhibits bacterial cell wall synthesis through a unique mechanism of action at a step prior to that inhibited by β-lactams. Fosfomycin enters the bacterium through membrane channels/transporters and inhibits MurA, which initiates peptidoglycan (PG) biosynthesis of the bacterial cell wall. Several bacteria display inherent resistance to fosfomycin mainly through MurA mutations. Acquired resistance involves, in order of decreasing frequency, modifications of membrane transporters that prevent fosfomycin from entering the bacterial cell, acquisition of plasmid-encoded genes that inactivate fosfomycin, and MurA mutations. Fosfomycin resistance develops readily in vitro but less so in vivo. Mutation frequency is higher among Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Klebsiella spp. compared with Escherichia coli and is associated with fosfomycin concentration. Mutations in cAMP regulators, fosfomycin transporters and MurA seem to be associated with higher biological cost in Enterobacteriaceae but not in Pseudomonas spp. The contribution of fosfomycin inactivating enzymes in emergence and spread of fosfomycin resistance currently seems low-to-moderate, but their presence in transferable plasmids may potentially provide the best means for the spread of fosfomycin resistance in the future. Their co-existence with genes conferring resistance to other antibiotic classes may increase the emergence of MDR strains. Although susceptibility rates vary, rates seem to increase in settings with higher fosfomycin use and among multidrug-resistant pathogens.

Activity of fosfomycin when tested against US contemporary bacterial isolates

Fosfomycin and comparators were susceptibility tested against over 2200 contemporary clinical isolates from US medical centers. Fosfomycin was active against Enterobacterales (MIC_50/90, 4/16 μg/mL), including multidrug-resistant isolates. Potent activity was exhibited against gram-positive organisms, including Staphylococcus aureus (MIC_50/90, 4/8 μg/mL). Fosfomycin may provide a promising alternative option for treatment of infections where resistant bacteria may occur.

Molecular Epidemiology of Plasmid-Mediated Fosfomycin Resistance Gene Determinants in Klebsiella pneumoniae Carbapenemase-Producing Klebsiella pneumoniae Isolates in China

The Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC)-producing K. pneumoniae has become a serious problem because the species is wide ranging and there are few treatment options. Fosfomycin has attracted renewed interest in combination therapy for infections caused by KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. Because of the increasing use of fosfomycin, resistant isolates have been continually reported in carbapenem-resistant K. pneumoniae (CRKP). At present, multiple mechanisms can result in fosfomycin resistance. However, there is limited knowledge with respect to plasmid-mediated fosfomycin resistance gene (fosA3) determinants in KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates. In this study, a total of 101 CRKP strains were collected from four hospitals in Zhejiang province from January 2013 to August 2014; 28.7% (29/101) of CRKP isolates were resistant to fosfomycin. Gene fosA3 was detected in 29 fosfomycin-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, whereas genes fosA, fosB, fosB2, fosC, fosC2, and fosX were all negative among the resistant isolates. In addition, among 29 fosfomycin-resistant KPC-producing K. pneumoniae isolates, pulsed-field gel electrophoresis (PFGE) analysis revealed five pulsotypes. S1-PFGE and Southern blot showed that the fosA3 gene was located on an approximately 140-kb plasmid in all isolates. Eight of the 29 isolates (27.6%) tested could successfully transfer their fosfomycin-resistant phenotype to Escherichia coli strain J53. All fosA3-positive isolates were determined to have an identical genetic background, IS26-tetR-cadC-orf1-fosA3-IS26, which is the same as that of the fosA3-positive plasmid pFOS18 in China. The primary resistance mechanism to fosfomycin was caused by a plasmid-mediated fosA3. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the plasmid genetically carrying a combination of the fosA3 and bla_KPC-2 genes could accelerate the spread of antibiotic resistance. Effective and persistent monitoring and surveillance will be vital to prevent further dissemination of these resistance genes.

Pharmacodynamics of fosfomycin against ESBL- and/or carbapenemase-producing Enterobacteriaceae

Background

The increase in antibiotic resistance in Gram-negative bacteria and the limited therapeutic options due to the shortage of new antibiotics have increased the interest of the 'old' antibiotic fosfomycin in the treatment of infections. However, there are contradictory reports on the pharmacodynamics of and emergence of resistance to fosfomycin.

Methods

Time-kill assays were performed with 11 ESBL-positive and 3 ESBL-negative strains, exposing the bacteria to 2-fold static concentrations from 0.125× to 32× MIC. The sigmoid maximum effect (Emax) model was fitted to the time-kill curve data. Amplification of resistance over time was evaluated under various conditions of selective pressure by plating on 16× MIC plates.

Results

Fosfomycin was bactericidal for all strains within 8 h. Using the Emax model, no significant differences between strains were observed for the pharmacodynamic parameters. However, the large variation in Hill slope factors for Escherichia coli of 0.87 up to 4.02 indicates that the killing behaviour appears to be more time dependent for some strains but concentration dependent for others. In the fosfomycin-exposed cultures under low and high selective pressure (≥2× MIC) the median resistance proportions between the resistant and total population increased from ≤2 × 10-6 (T = 0 h) to 0.652-0.899 (T = 24 h). Resistance appeared stable after repeated subculturing.

Conclusions

Killing behaviour of fosfomycin does not only differ between species but also within species and may have an impact on the design of optimal dosing regimens. Although fosfomycin was bactericidal against all strains (re)growth of resistant subpopulations occurred relatively fast. This may limit the use of fosfomycin as a single drug therapy.

Antimicrobial resistance and treatment: an unmet clinical safety need

INTRODUCTION

Infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria are burdened by high mortality rates. The development of new compounds to face the global threat of resistance is urgently needed. Combination regimens including "old" high-dose antimicrobials are currently limited by the risk of toxicity, resistance selection, and reduced efficacy. Following the Infectious Diseases Society of America call to develop 10 new antibacterials by 2020, new molecules are currently under development or have become available for use in clinical practice.

AREAS COVERED

We have reviewed safety characteristics and tolerability of old antimicrobials that are currently employed in combination regimens as well as new antimicrobials, including beta-lactams/beta-lactamase inhibitors, new cephalosporins, quinolones, and aminoglycosides.

EXPERT OPINION

The availability of new compounds that show in vitro efficacy against MDR represents a unique opportunity to face the threat of resistance and to optimize the current use of antimicrobials, potentially reducing toxicity. Agents that are potentially active against MDR Gram-negatives are ceftozolane/tazobactam, new carbapenems and cephalosporins, the combination of avibactam with ceftazidime, and plazomicin. Further data from clinical trials and post-marketing studies for drugs targeting MDR pathogens are crucial to confirm their efficacy and safety.

Efficacy of Colistin and Its Combination With Rifampin in Vitro and in Experimental Models of Infection Caused by Carbapenemase-Producing Clinical Isolates of Klebsiella pneumoniae

Despite the relevance of carbapenemase-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (CP-Kp) infections there are a scarce number of studies to evaluate in vivo the efficacy of combinations therapies. The bactericidal activity of colistin, rifampin, and its combination was studied (time–kill curves) against four clonally unrelated clinical isolates of CP-Kp, producing VIM-1, VIM-1 plus DHA-1(acquired AmpC β-lactamase), OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 (extended spectrum β-lactamase) and KPC-3, respectively, with colistin MICs of 0.5, 64, 0.5, and 32 mg/L, respectively. The efficacies of antimicrobials in monotherapy and in combination were tested in a murine peritoneal sepsis model, against all the CP-Kp. Their efficacies were tested in the pneumonia model against the OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 producers. The development of colistin-resistance was analyzed for the colistin-susceptible strains in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, colistin plus rifampin was synergistic against all the strains at 24 h. In vivo, compared to the controls, rifampin alone reduced tissue bacterial concentrations against VIM-1 and OXA-48 plus CTX-M-15 strains; CMS plus rifampin reduced tissue bacterial concentrations of these two CP-Kp and of the KPC-3 strain. Rifampin and the combination increased the survival against the KPC-3 strain; in the pneumonia model, the combination also improved the survival. No resistant mutants appeared with the combination. In conclusion, CMS plus rifampin had a low and heterogeneous efficacy in the treatment of severe peritoneal sepsis model due to CP-Kp producing different carbapenemases, increasing survival only against the KPC-3 strain. The combination showed efficacy in the less severe pneumonia model. The combination prevented in vitro and in vivo the development of colistin resistant mutants.

In vitro antibacterial effect of fosfomycin combination therapy against colistin-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae

Objectives

Colistin is still a “last-resort” antibiotic used to manage human infections due to multidrug-resistant (MDR) Klebsiella pneumoniae. However, colistin-resistant K. pneumoniae (CR-Kp) isolates emerged a decade ago and had a worldwide distribution. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the genetic data of CR-Kp and identify the antibacterial activity of fosfomycin (FM) alone and in combination with amikacin (AMK) or colistin (COL) against CR-Kp in vitro.

Methods

Three clinical CR-Kp isolates from three patients were collected. Whole-genome sequencing and bioinformatics analysis were performed. The Pharmacokinetics Auto Simulation System 400, by simulating human pharmacokinetics in vitro, was employed to simulate FM, AMK, and COL alone and in combination. Different pharmacodynamic parameters were calculated for determining the antimicrobial effect.

Results

Whole-genome sequencing revealed that none of the three isolates contain mcr gene and that no insertion was found in pmrAB, phoPQ, or mgrB genes. We found the antibacterial activity of AMK alone was more efficient than FM or COL against CR-Kp. The area between the control growth and antibacterial killing curves of FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with AMK (15 mg/kg once daily) was higher than 170 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹. In addition, the area between the control growth and antibacterial killing curves of FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with COL (75,000 IU/kg every12 hours) was higher than that of monotherapies (>100 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹ vs <80 LogCFU/mL·h⁻¹).

Conclusion

FM (8 g every 8 hours) combined with AMK (15 mg/kg once daily) was effective at maximizing bacterial killing against CR-Kp.

Intravenous fosfomycin for pulmonary exacerbation of cystic fibrosis: Real life experience of a large adult CF centre

BACKGROUND

The increased prevalence of multi-drug resistant strains of P.aeruginosa and allergic reactions among adult patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) limits the number of antibiotics available to treat pulmonary exacerbations. Fosfomycin, a unique broad spectrum bactericidal antibiotic, might offer an alternative therapeutic option in such cases.

AIM

To describe the clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of intravenous fosfomycin in combination with a second anti-pseudomonal antibiotic to treat pulmonary exacerbations in adult patients with CF.

METHOD

A retrospective analysis of data captured prospectively, over a 2-years period, on the Unit electronic medical records for patients who received IV fosfomycin was performed. Baseline characteristics in the 12 months prior treatment, lung function, CRP, renal and liver function and electrolytes at start and end of treatment were retrieved.

RESULTS

54 patients received 128 courses of IV fosfomycin in combination with a second antibiotic, resulting in improved FEV1 (0.94 L vs 1.24 L, p < 0.01) and reduced CRP (65 mg/L vs 19.3 mg/L, p < 0.01). Renal function pre- and post-treatment remained stable. 4% (n = 5) of courses were complicated with AKI at mid treatment, which resolved at the end of the course. Electrolyte supplementation was required in 18% of cases for potassium and magnesium and 7% for phosphate. Nausea was the most common side effect (48%), but was well controlled with anti-emetics.

CONCLUSION

Antibiotic regimens including fosfomycin appear to be clinically effective and safe. Fosfomycin should, therefore, be considered as an add-on therapy in patients who failed to respond to initial treatment and with multiple drug allergies.

Fosfomycin as a potential therapy for the treatment of systemic infections: a population pharmacokinetic model to simulate multiple dosing regimens

Fosfomycin has emerged as a potential therapy for multidrug-resistant bacterial infections. In most European countries, the oral formulation is only approved as a 3 g single dose for treatment of uncomplicated cystitis. However, for the treatment of complicated systemic infections, this dose regimen is unlikely to reach efficacious serum and tissue concentrations. This study aims to investigate different fosfomycin-dosing regimens to evaluate its rationale for treatment of systemic infections. Serum concentration-time profiles of fosfomycin were simulated using a population pharmacokinetic model based on published pharmacokinetic parameter values, their uncertainty, inter-individual variability and covariates. The model was validated on published data and used to simulate a wide range of dosing regimens for oral and intravenous administration of fosfomycin. Finally, based on the minimum inhibitory concentration for E. coli, surrogate pharmacodynamic indices were calculated for each dosing regimen. This is the first population pharmacokinetic model to describe the oral pharmacokinetics of fosfomycin using data from different literature sources. The model and surrogate pharmacodynamic indices provide quantitative evidence that a dosing regimen of 6-12 g per day divided in 3 doses is required to obtain efficacious exposure and may serve as a first step in the treatment of systemic multi-drug-resistant bacterial infections.