Mucosal vaccination increases endothelial expression of mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 in the human gastrointestinal tract

Differential Effects of Ontamalimab Versus Vedolizumab on Immune Cell Trafficking in Intestinal Inflammation and Inflammatory Bowel Disease

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The anti-MAdCAM-1 antibody ontamalimab demonstrated efficacy in a phase II trial in ulcerative colitis and results of early terminated phase III trials are pending, but its precise mechanisms of action are still unclear. Thus, we explored the mechanisms of action of ontamalimab and compared it to the anti-α4β7 antibody vedolizumab.

METHODS

We studied MAdCAM-1 expression with RNA sequencing and immunohistochemistry. The mechanisms of action of ontamalimab were assessed with fluorescence microscopy, dynamic adhesion and rolling assays. We performed in vivo cell trafficking studies in mice and compared ontamalimab and vedolizumab surrogate [-s] antibodies in experimental models of colitis and wound healing. We analysed immune cell infiltration under anti-MAdCAM-1 and anti-α4β7 treatment by single-cell transcriptomics and studied compensatory trafficking pathways.

RESULTS

MAdCAM-1 expression was increased in active inflammatory bowel disease. Binding of ontamalimab to MAdCAM-1 induced the internalization of the complex. Functionally, ontamalimab blocked T cell adhesion similar to vedolizumab, but also inhibited L-selectin-dependent rolling of innate and adaptive immune cells. Despite conserved mechanisms in mice, the impact of ontamalimab-s and vedolizumab-s on experimental colitis and wound healing was similar. Single-cell RNA sequencing demonstrated enrichment of ontamalimab-s-treated lamina propria cells in specific clusters, and in vitro experiments indicated that redundant adhesion pathways are active in these cells.

CONCLUSIONS

Ontamalimab has unique and broader mechanisms of action compared to vedolizumab. However, this seems to be compensated for by redundant cell trafficking circuits and leads to similar preclinical efficacy of anti-α4β7 and anti-MAdCAM-1 treatment. These results will be important for the interpretation of pending phase III data.

Cholera toxin B scaffolded, focused SIV V2 epitope elicits antibodies that influence the risk of SIVmac251 acquisition in macaques

Introduction

An efficacious HIV vaccine will need to elicit a complex package of innate, humoral, and cellular immune responses. This complex package of responses to vaccine candidates has been studied and yielded important results, yet it has been a recurring challenge to determine the magnitude and protective effect of specific in vivo immune responses in isolation. We therefore designed a single, viral-spike-apical, epitope-focused V2 loop immunogen to reveal individual vaccine-elicited immune factors that contribute to protection against HIV/SIV.

Method

We generated a novel vaccine by incorporating the V2 loop B-cell epitope in the cholera toxin B (CTB) scaffold and compared two new immunization regimens to a historically protective 'standard' vaccine regimen (SVR) consisting of 2xDNA prime boosted with 2xALVAC-SIV and 1xΔV1gp120. We immunized a cohort of macaques with 5xCTB-V2c vaccine+alum intramuscularly simultaneously with topical intrarectal vaccination of CTB-V2c vaccine without alum (5xCTB-V2/alum). In a second group, we tested a modified version of the SVR consisting of 2xDNA prime and boosted with 1xALVAC-SIV and 2xALVAC-SIV+CTB-V2/alum, (DA/CTB-V2c/alum).

Results

In the absence of any other anti-viral antibodies, V2c epitope was highly immunogenic when incorporated in the CTB scaffold and generated highly functional anti-V2c antibodies in the vaccinated animals. 5xCTB-V2c/alum vaccination mediated non-neutralizing ADCC activity and efferocytosis, but produced low avidity, trogocytosis, and no neutralization of tier 1 virus. Furthermore, DA/CTB-V2c/alum vaccination also generated lower total ADCC activity, avidity, and neutralization compared to the SVR. These data suggest that the ΔV1gp120 boost in the SVR yielded more favorable immune responses than its CTB-V2c counterpart. Vaccination with the SVR generates CCR5- α4β7+CD4+ Th1, Th2, and Th17 cells, which are less likely to be infected by SIV/HIV and likely contributed to the protection afforded in this regimen. The 5xCTB-V2c/alum regimen likewise elicited higher circulating CCR5- α4β7+ CD4+ T cells and mucosal α4β7+ CD4+ T cells compared to the DA/CTB-V2c/alum regimen, whereas the first cell type was associated with reduced risk of viral acquisition.

Conclusion

Taken together, these data suggest that individual viral spike B-cell epitopes can be highly immunogenic and functional as isolated immunogens, although they might not be sufficient on their own to provide full protection against HIV/SIV infection.

Mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 expression reflects mucosal inflammation and subsequent relapse in patients with ulcerative colitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule 1 (MAdCAM-1) is upregulated in the vascular endothelium of the colonic mucosa in ulcerative colitis (UC). Although the association between MAdCAM-1 expression and mucosal inflammation has been discussed, the association with the clinical course of UC patients has not been reported. In this study we investigated not only the association between mucosal MAdCAM-1 expression and mucosal inflammation, but also its association with subsequent relapse in UC patients with clinical remission.

METHODS

Eighty UC patients in remission who visited Kyoto Prefectural University of Medicine for follow-up for 2 years were included. Biopsy samples were collected during colonoscopy, and transcriptional expression levels of UC-related cytokines and MAdCAM-1 were quantified using real-time polymerase chain reaction. MAdCAM-1 mRNA expression and protein expression by immunohistochemistry was compared in patients who subsequently relapsed and those who remained in remission and examined in relation to endoscopic findings, histologic activity, and cytokine expression.

RESULTS

MAdCAM-1 expression was correlated with endoscopic severity, and significantly elevated in histological active mucosa than inactive mucosa. Furthermore, MAdCAM-1 expression levels were closely correlated with those of several cytokines. MAdCAM-1 mRNA and protein expression were significantly higher in the relapse group than in the remission group, indicating that MAdCAM-1 expression in the mucosa is already elevated in UC patients in clinical remission who subsequently relapse.

CONCLUSIONS

MAdCAM-1 expression in the colonic mucosa of UC patients related to mucosal inflammation and subsequent relapse; it may serve as a marker for both relapse and therapeutic effectiveness in UC.

Etrolizumab-s Does Not Induce Residual Trafficking of Regulatory T Cells

BACKGROUND

Blocking immune cell gut homing via α4β7 integrin with the monoclonal antibody vedolizumab is an established therapeutic strategy in inflammatory bowel disease. However, despite promising preclinical and phase 2 clinical data, the anti-β7 antibody etrolizumab yielded disappointing results in a large phase 3 trial program in UC. Mechanistic explanations are still lacking. We have recently shown that vedolizumab is associated with residual homing of regulatory T (Treg) cells in a certain exposure range and aimed to investigate whether a similar mechanism applies for etrolizumab.

METHODS

We used flow cytometry, competitive dynamic adhesion, and transmigration assays to assess binding of the etrolizumab surrogate (etrolizumab-s) antibody FIB504 to Treg and effector T cells (Teff) and to explore the impact on cell trafficking.

RESULTS

We observed only minimal differences in the binding of etrolizumab-s to Treg and Teff cells. Dynamic adhesion and transmigration of Treg and Teff cells was not substantially differentially affected at relevant concentrations. The β1+ and PI16+ Treg cells were only resistant to etrolizumab-s at low concentrations.

CONCLUSIONS

Etrolizumab does not seem to induce notable residual trafficking of Treg cells. Thus, the Teff overweight in the inflamed gut might persist despite reduced overall T cell recruitment. This might be one piece of the puzzle to explain recent clinical results in phase 3.

The role of cytokine and immune responses in intestinal fibrosis

The rapidly increasing incidence of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in South America, eastern Europe, Asia, and Africa has resulted in a global public health challenge. Intestinal fibrosis is a common complication in patients with long-term IBD, which may develop into stenosis and subsequent obstruction. Hitherto, the origin of IBD is unclear and several factors may be involved, including genetic, immune, environmental and microbial influences. Little is known about how the recurrent inflammation in patients with IBD develops into intestinal fibrosis and currently, there is no suitable treatment to reverse intestinal fibrosis in these patients. Here, we review the role of immune components in the pathogenesis of IBD and intestinal fibrosis, including cytokine networks, host-microbiome interactions, and immune cell trafficking.

Mucosal application of gp140 encoding DNA polyplexes to different tissues results in altered immunological outcomes in mice

Increasing evidence suggests that mucosally targeted vaccines will enhance local humoral and cellular responses whilst still eliciting systemic immunity. We therefore investigated the capacity of nasal, sublingual or vaginal delivery of DNA-PEI polyplexes to prime immune responses prior to mucosal protein boost vaccination. Using a plasmid expressing the model antigen HIV CN54gp140 we show that each of these mucosal surfaces were permissive for DNA priming and production of antigen-specific antibody responses. The elicitation of systemic immune responses using nasally delivered polyplexed DNA followed by recombinant protein boost vaccination was equivalent to a systemic prime-boost regimen, but the mucosally applied modality had the advantage in that significant levels of antigen-specific IgA were detected in vaginal mucosal secretions. Moreover, mucosal vaccination elicited both local and systemic antigen-specific IgG(+) and IgA(+) antibody secreting cells. Finally, using an Influenza challenge model we found that a nasal or sublingual, but not vaginal, DNA prime/protein boost regimen protected against infectious challenge. These data demonstrate that mucosally applied plasmid DNA complexed to PEI followed by a mucosal protein boost generates sufficient antigen-specific humoral antibody production to protect from mucosal viral challenge.

Probing local innate immune responses after mucosal immunisation

Background

Intranasal immunisation is potentially a very effective route for inducing both mucosal and systemic immunity to an infectious agent.

Methods

Balb/c mice were intranasally immunised with the mucosal adjuvant heat labile toxin and the Mycobacterium tuberculosis fusion protein Ag85B-ESAT6 and early changes in innate immune responses within local mucosal tissues were examined using flow cytometry and confocal microscopy. Antigen-specific humoral and cellular immune responses were also evaluated.

Results

Intranasal immunisation induced significant changes in both number and distribution of dendritic cells, macrophages and neutrophils within the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue and cervical lymph nodes in comparison to controls as early as 5 h post immunisation. Immunisation also resulted in a rapid and transient increase in activation marker expression first in the nasal-associated lymphoid tissue, and then in the cervical lymph nodes. This heightened activation status was also apparent from the pro-inflammatory cytokine profiles of these innate populations. In addition we also showed increased expression and distribution of a number of different cell adhesion molecules early after intranasal immunisation within these lymphoid tissues. These observed early changes correlated with the induction of a T_H1 type immune response.

Conclusions

These data provide insights into the complex nature of innate immune responses induced following intranasal immunisation within the upper respiratory tract, and may help clarify the concepts and provide the tools that are needed to exploit the full potential of mucosal vaccines.

Sublingual immunization protects against Helicobacter pylori infection and induces T and B cell responses in the stomach

Sublingual (SL) immunization has been described as an effective novel way to induce mucosal immune responses in the respiratory and genital tracts. We examined the potential of SL immunization against Helicobacter pylori to stimulate immune responses in the gastrointestinal mucosa and protect against H. pylori infection. Mice received two SL immunizations with H. pylori lysate antigens and cholera toxin as an adjuvant, and after challenge with live H. pylori bacteria, their immune responses and protection were evaluated, as were immune responses prior to challenge. SL immunization induced enhanced proliferative responses to H. pylori antigens in cervicomandibular lymph nodes and provided at least the same level of immune responses and protection as corresponding intragastric immunization. Protection in SL-immunized mice was associated with strong H. pylori-specific serum IgG and IgA antibody responses in the stomach and intestine, with strong proliferation and gamma interferon (IFN-γ) and interleukin-17 (IL-17) production by spleen and mesenteric lymph node T cells stimulated with H. pylori antigens in vitro, and with increased IFN-γ and IL-17 gene expression in the stomach compared to levels in infected unimmunized mice. Immunohistochemical studies showed enhanced infiltration of CD4(+) T cells and CD19(+) B cells into the H. pylori-infected stomach mucosa of SL-immunized but not unimmunized H. pylori-infected mice, which coincided with increased expression of the mucosal addressin cell adhesion molecule (MAdCAM-1) and T and B cell-attracting chemokines CXCL10 and CCL28. We conclude that, in mice, SL immunization can effectively induce protection against H. pylori infection in association with strong T and B cell infiltration into the stomach.

Mucosal vaccines: the promise and the challenge

Most infectious agents enter the body at mucosal surfaces and therefore mucosal immune responses function as a first line of defence. Protective mucosal immune responses are most effectively induced by mucosal immunization through oral, nasal, rectal or vaginal routes, but the vast majority of vaccines in use today are administered by injection. As discussed in this Review, current research is providing new insights into the function of mucosal tissues and the interplay of innate and adaptive immune responses that results in immune protection at mucosal surfaces. These advances promise to accelerate the development and testing of new mucosal vaccines against many human diseases including HIV/AIDS.

Differential mechanisms for T lymphocyte recruitment in normal and neoplastic human gastric mucosa

Worldwide, gastric adenocarcinoma (GC) is the second most common cause of death from malignant disease. The reason why immune responses are unable to clear the tumour is not fully understood, although aberrant lymphocyte recruitment to the tumour site might be one factor. Therefore, we investigated the homing phenotype of mucosal T lymphocytes in GC, compared to tumour-free mucosa. We could detect significantly decreased frequencies of mucosal homing alpha4beta7+ T cells in the tumour tissues and increased frequencies of L-selectin+ T cells. This was probably due to the correlated decrease in MAdCAM-1 positive and increase in PNAd positive blood vessels in the tumour mucosa. There were also fewer CXCR3+ T lymphocytes in the tumour tissue. These findings provide evidence that endothelial cells within tumours arising at mucosal sites do not support extravasation of typical mucosa-infiltrating T cells. This may be of major relevance for future immunotherapeutic strategies for treatment of GC.

The importance of mucosal immunity in defense against epithelial cancers

Many cancers arise in epithelial mucosa. These mucosal surfaces are characterized by the induction of divergent immune responses, as they are both the main portal of entry for pathogens and a large niche of commensal bacteria and tolerized antigens. In addition, mucosa located in different anatomical sites harbor distinct typical features. Exploiting the different requirements for inducing an effective immune response at mucosal sites might help to define new immunotherapeutic approaches against epithelial cancers, at least in the case of differentiated tumors that have retained their mucosal characteristics.