Peptic ulcer in rheumatoid arthritis

Épidémiologie des complications gastro-duodénales associées aux anti-inflammatoires non stéroïdiens

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory agents (NSAIDs) are among the most widely prescribed drugs worldwide. In France, about 25% of individuals aged 40 years or older are treated with NSAIDs at least one week in the year. Although the therapeutic benefits of these drugs are substantial, their use is limited by their gastroduodenal toxicity. Dyspepsia occurs in about 30% of patients receiving NSAIDs, an approximately two-fold enhancement of risk compared with control subjects. Asymptomatic endoscopic lesions are observed in 20 to 80% of patients, depending on population characteristics, individual NSAIDs and definitions of endoscopic lesions. The risk of symptomatic ulcer, complicated ulcer (haemorrhage, perforation, stenosis) and death related to ulcer complication is multiplied by 4 in patients treated with NSAIDs. Established risk factors for NSAID-induced gastroduodenal complications are age, ulcer history, heavy alcohol consumption, individual NSAIDs, dose, association with corticoid or aspirin or anticoagulants (ulcer haemorrhage) while the role of treatment duration and Helicobacter pylori infection are controversial.

Occurrence of peptic ulcer disease in connective tissue disease patients associated with xerostomia

BACKGROUND

Saliva plays a role in mucosal protection and ulcer healing.

AIM

: To study whether decreased salivary production leads to peptic ulcer disease in connective tissue disease patients associated with xerostomia.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Two hundred and two connective tissue disease patients (90 with xerostomia and 112 without xerostomia) were enrolled. Their demographic data and use of medications were recorded. Peptic ulcer disease was confirmed by endoscopy. The stimulated salivary output and secretory epidermal growth factor level were measured.

RESULTS

Compared with non-xerostomic counterparts, xerostomic patients manifested a higher occurrence of peptic ulcer disease (31% vs. 12%, P = 0.001), lower stimulated salivary output (9.3 +/- 4.1 vs. 22.9 +/- 5.9 mL/15 min, P < 0.001) and lower stimulated salivary epidermal growth factor output (1.40 +/- 0.77 vs. 3.00 +/- 0.96 ng/min, P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis disclosed that an older age (> or = 60 years) (odds ratio, 4.71; P < 0.001), xerostomia with stimulated salivary output of < or =1 mL/min (odds ratio, 7.54; P = 0.014) and the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (odds ratio, 5.76; P = 0.031) were the risk factors leading to peptic ulcer disease. In addition, xerostomic connective tissue disease patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs manifested an extremely high risk of development of peptic ulcer disease (odds ratio, 19.78; P < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ageing, the use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and poor salivary function are potential risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer disease in patients with connective tissue disease. If these xerostomic subjects consume non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, they will encounter an extremely high peptic ulcer disease risk.

[Epidermal growth factor: a probable oral and digestive health protector]

The integrity of oral and digestive mucosa depend on many salivary components like the Epidermal Growth Factor (EGF). Sometimes indicative, sometimes stimulated or modulated factor of oral and digestive health, EGF appears as a clinical marker in neoplastic and inflammatory diseases. As cellular growth factor, it protects the digestive mucosa with stimulation of mucus production and with inhibition of gastric secretion. Equally implicated in healing process, it enhances this one, and determines, in patients, more or less sensibility to inflammatory damages. Its strategic place in various pathologies, as stomach ulcer and tumoral process, open research prospects with a real potential of repair and pronostic.

Approaches to healing and prophylaxis of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-associated ulcers

Treating and preventing peptic ulcers associated with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) calls for clinical judgment. Physicians must weigh their patients' need for anti-inflammatory therapy against their individual risks for ulcer development; their likelihood of coping with an ulcer complication if it should develop; and the economics, efficacy, and tolerability of various treatment and prevention options. This article considers some general strategies common to both treatment and prevention. Data from randomized trials that can guide clinicians and their patients as they attempt to heal an established NSAID ulcer or prevent one occurring in the future are also reviewed.

Cost effectiveness of replacing diclofenac with a fixed combination of misoprostol and diclofenac in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the costs and health consequences of replacing treatment with diclofenac 50 mg with a fixed combination of diclofenac 50 mg and misoprostol 0.2 mg 3 times a day in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A decision tree was developed to simulate 6 months of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID) treatment for RA. The probabilities of the clinical outcomes were based on a literature review. A survey of Norwegian rheumatologists was undertaken to explore their clinical management of dyspepsia in RA patients taking NSAIDs. Valuation of health states was based on results of the Short Form 36 health survey.

RESULTS

In female RA patients without any risk factors associated with serious gastrointestinal (GI) complications, the incremental cost of replacing diclofenac with the fixed misoprostol/diclofenac combination therapy was $72,700 per quality-adjusted life-year gained. For patients with 1 risk factor, the cost was less than $16,000. With 2 or 3 risk factors, the use of misoprostol was cost saving. The cost-effectiveness ratios in males were approximately 20% higher than in females.

CONCLUSION

Replacing diclofenac with a fixed diclofenac/misoprostol combination is cost effective when restricted to RA patients at increased risk of serious GI events.

Gastrointestinal effects of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory therapy

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are widely prescribed for the treatment of many conditions including rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis, gouty arthritis, the joint and muscle discomfort associated with systemic lupus erythematosus, and other musculoskeletal disorders. Yet, their benefits, which are believed to be a result of their ability to inhibit cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), are accompanied by considerable toxicity. NSAIDs' untoward effects are attributed to their inhibition of the constitutively expressed enzyme cyclooxygenase-1 (COX-1), with attendant suppression of the synthesis of prostanoids, substances that mediate key homeostatic functions. Side effects include suppression of hemostasis through inhibition of platelet aggregation, adverse effects in patients with heart failure and cirrhosis, and those with certain renal diseases, as well as complicating antihypertensive therapies involving diuretics or beta-adrenoceptor blockade. Perhaps most importantly, NSAIDs disrupt the gastrointestinal mucosal-protective and acid-limiting properties of prostaglandins, frequently leading to upper gastrointestinal erosions and ulceration, with possible subsequent hemorrhage and perforation. These complications can be reduced through identification of patients at risk, with circumspect use of NSAIDs, careful functional monitoring, and, in the case of gastrointestinal toxicity, co-administration of such agents as misoprostol or omeprazole. However, these strategies introduce complexity into the treatment paradigm. Moreover, side effects and adverse events may be significantly reduced through the use of COX-2-specific inhibitors, new agents that alleviate pain and inflammation without the liability for adverse events caused by COX-1 inhibition.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug-related gastrointestinal toxicity: definitions and epidemiology

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-associated gastrointestinal (GI) toxicity is a broad topic encompassing symptoms as well as severe GI complications. GI bleeding and perforation are the 2 overlapping components that account for the majority of deaths and disability associated with these drugs. Abnormal gastric endoscopic profiles as well as symptoms such as heartburn, pain, and dyspepsia are common in NSAID users, but no correlation has been found between these factors and the occurrence of the more severe complications; therefore, neither symptoms nor endoscopic observations can necessarily be considered reliable predictors of future outcomes. Confounding factors can increase the risk of complications, and specific NSAIDs vary in the magnitude and type of risk attending their use. Recent studies have focused on the contribution of nonprescription NSAIDs to total complications, and combined with evidence suggesting that the risk is greatest during the first month of NSAID use, it is apparent that NSAID toxicity is an acute as well as a chronic problem.

Improving the gastrointestinal safety of NSAIDs: the development of misoprostol--from hypothesis to clinical practice

Arthritis is a major source of disability for the American population. It results in significant morbidity for the millions of patients affected and costs billions of dollars yearly for diagnosis and management. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are the principal therapy for the majority of arthritis patients. It has been estimated that more than 15 million people with arthritis take these drugs daily. This use is predicted to increase greatly not only as a result of an aging population, with the consequent increase in the prevalence of arthritis, but also because NSAIDs may prove to have a role in decreasing colonic neoplasia and in reducing the likelihood of conditions such as Alzheimer's disease. It is therefore increasingly important to understand the nature of the side effects associated with these agents as well as ways of decreasing or preventing their occurrence. NSAIDs inhibit the enzymes cyclooxygenase-1 and cyclooxygenase-2. This reduces the synthesis of prostaglandins and therefore decreases joint inflammation, but it may also lead to the development of gastric and duodenal ulcers. For this reason, exogenous prostaglandins have been studied for their potential role in preventing NSAID-associated ulcers and ulcer complications. This paper reviews the development of the prostaglandin E1 analog misoprostol, the theory behind its use as a mucosal protective agent, and the results of studies in animals as well as in normal volunteers and patients with arthritis. Ultimately, a study was performed to evaluate whether misoprostol reduces the incidence of serious ulcer complications in patients taking NSAIDs. It is an interesting story, which promises to be of increasing importance as NSAID use expands to new indications while concern remains about their associated complications, especially those related to the gastrointestinal tract.

Evidence for participation of gliostatin/platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor in gastric ulcer healing

Gliostatin (GLS)/Platelet-derived endothelial cell growth factor (PD-ECGF) is a protein factor that has angiogenic and thymidine phosphorylase activity. It has been recently demonstrated to be related to disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis. However, its physiological role in the gastric mucosa is unknown. In the present study, concentrations of this protein in human gastric mucosa and plasma were evaluated. Further, the effect of purified human GLS/PD-ECGF on experimental ulcer healing was investigated in the rat. The human plasma concentration of GLS/PD-ECGF was significantly higher in patients with intractable gastric ulcer than in patients with significant resolution. The tissue content was significantly higher at the gastric ulcer edge than in either the fundic or pyloric region. GLS/PD-ECGF infusion delayed ulcer healing in a dose-dependent manner. These results suggest that gastric tissue and/or circulating GLS/PD-ECGF may participate in pathology and etiology of gastric ulcers and that this mechanism may relate to the pathogenesis of RA.

Meta-analysis of risk factors for peptic ulcer. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and smoking

Attributable risk models describe the role of three risk factors for peptic ulcer and related serious upper gastrointestinal (GI) events. The factors-nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), Helicobacter pylori, and cigarette smoking-have been identified as major risk factors for peptic ulcer in numerous clinical and epidemiologic studies. Overall risk ratios for each risk factor were based on meta-analyses of English-language studies of risk for peptic ulcer-related GI events. Exposure estimates for factors used data from North American populations. Summary risk and exposure values were computed for the general population, males and females separately, and the elderly. Hypothetical models of multiple factor attributable risks were developed using population attributable risk percent calculated from these summary values. General population attributable risk percent were as follows: 24%, NSAIDs; 48%, H. pylori; and 23%, cigarette smoking. Based on these numbers, the "no interaction" attributable risk model estimates that 95% of total peptic ulcer related risk is attributable to these factors in the general population. The "interaction" model attributes 89% of cases to these risk factors: 24%, NSAIDs alone; 31%, H. pylori alone; 34%, H. pylori/smoking combined. Between 89% and 95% of peptic ulcer-related serious upper GI events may be attributed to NSAID use, H. pylori infection, and cigarette smoking.

The cost effectiveness of diclofenac plus misoprostol compared with diclofenac monotherapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

The objective of our study was to estimate the cost effectiveness of treatment with a fixed-dose combination of diclofenac and misoprostol compared with diclofenac monotherapy in the prevention of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced ulcers in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. A model was used to incorporate estimates of costs, incidence of ulcers and their complications, death rates and the efficacy of misoprostol. The costs per ulcer-free period gained and costs per additional survivor were calculated. Cost effectiveness was calculated for the treatment of all RA patients, and of risk groups only. All costs were measured in 1995 Netherlands guilders (NLG; exchange rate at the time of the study: NLG1 = $US0.60). The analysis showed that if 100 RA patients receive 3 months of treatment with diclofenac plus misoprostol, instead of diclofenac alone, this will lead to overall additional costs of NLG773, while 0.82 symptomatic ulcers and 0.019 deaths will be prevented. If misoprostol is given only to patients at high risk for NSAID-induced ulcer, cost savings will occur instead of additional costs. Univariate sensitivity analysis showed that the outcomes are sensitive to changes in: (i) the percentage of ulcers treated in the ambulatory setting; (ii) the price difference between diclofenac and the fixed-dose diclofenac-misoprostol combination; (iii) the percentage of ulcers with complications; and (iv) the efficacy of misoprostol. In conclusion, it can be stated that treatment with diclofenac-misoprostol is cost saving in RA patients at high risk for NSAID-induced ulcers. For RA patients in general, the cost-effectiveness of this intervention compares favourably with that of other prophylactic treatments.

Considerations for nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy: safety

Although therapeutically beneficial, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs are associated with serious gastrointestinal side effects, including ulceration, hemorrhage, and perforation. Endoscopic studies indicate that up to 30% of chronic NSAID users will develop gastroduodenal ulceration. Various case-control studies have reported an association between ulcer-related complications or deaths and NSAID use. An imprecise correlation has been found to exist between the presence of NSAID-induced gastrointestinal damage and symptoms, such as dyspepsia and pain. It is now thought that the major deleterious effects of NSAIDs on the gastrointestinal tract are related to the ability of systemically absorbed NSAIDs to alter gastric and duodenal defense mechanisms, primarily via inhibition of mucosal prostaglandin synthesis. Although various therapeutic agents have been investigated for their ability to prevent NSAID-induced ulcers, only the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol has been shown to significantly reduce the incidence of both gastric and duodenal ulcers in NSAID users. Recently, the Misoprostol Ulcer Complications Outcomes Safety Assessment trial demonstrated that misoprostol also reduces the most serious complications of NSAID-induced ulcers, namely bleeding, perforation, and gastric outlet obstruction.

A comparison of two prostaglandin analogues (enprostil vs misoprostol) in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcer disease

We conducted a clinical trial to compare the efficacy and safety profile of two prostaglandin analogues, enprostil (35 micrograms twice daily) and misoprostol (200 micrograms four times daily) in the treatment of acute duodenal ulcers in 214 patients. The two agents healed approximately 80% and in excess of 90% of duodenal ulcers after 4 and 6 weeks' therapy, respectively. There was a significantly lower ulcer healing rate in both treatment groups in smokers compared with non-smokers (P < 0.05). However, daytime and nighttime ulcer pain relief was achieved in fewer than 50% of patients by either agent. Diarrhea, which occurred in more than 40% of patients, was the predominant side effect, and occurred mainly during the first 2 weeks of therapy with either agent. Nevertheless, this side effect was mild and self-limiting in the majority of patients. Both agents were found to be safe and well tolerated by the majority of patients. We conclude that these prostaglandin analogues are safe and effective duodenal ulcer healing agents. Furthermore, there was very little difference between enprostil and misoprostol. The limiting factors, however, for their routine use as ulcer healing agents are their low efficacy with regard to ulcer pain relief and the high incidence of diarrhea.

Postsurgical complications in older patients. The role of pharmacological intervention

The number of elderly patients undergoing surgery has been rapidly increasing during the last few years. Following surgical interventions, high rates of mortality and morbidity have been reported in the most advanced age groups. Nevertheless, perioperative evaluation and postoperative care are the major determinants of the overall outcome. Postsurgical complications are common in advanced age, since multiple pathology is often present in geriatric patients. Furthermore, the decreased efficiency of homeostatic mechanisms may facilitate the development of multiple organ failure (MOF), even as a consequence of apparently slight alterations in immune, cardiac or respiratory systems. Thus, prompt recognition and treatment of any complication often prevents the development of irreversible conditions. While cardiac and pulmonary complications account for 50% of early postoperative adverse events, infections, thromboembolism, renal failure, stress ulcers and coagulation disorders may occur well after surgical procedures. An important part of postoperative geriatric care is the diagnosis and correction of fluid, electrolyte and acid-base disturbances. These disturbances may manifest as mild, atypical signs, such as slight neuromuscular depression or delirium. Yet, they often constitute life-threatening conditions that should be rapidly and properly corrected. Finally, it should be remembered that, due to the frequent use of multiple drugs, elderly patients are at high risk of developing adverse drug reactions. Thus, the treatment of postoperative complications requires a strong rational effort to disentangle the combined effects of aging, drugs and pathology.

Increased gastric juice epidermal growth factor after non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug ingestion

Epidermal growth factor (EGF), present in saliva and gastric juice, is a potent mitogen and an important element of mucosal defence. Changes in salivary and gastric juice epidermal growth factor in response to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAIDs) ingestion were measured to assess the role of EGF in gastric mucosal adaptation to NSAIDs. Patients with arthritis underwent endoscopy with collection of saliva and gastric juice for EGF measurement, before and two weeks after continuous NSAID ingestion. During this period patients also received either the prostaglandin analogue misoprostol or placebo in addition to their NSAID. In the misoprostol group (n = 5) there was no observed mucosal damage and no change in either salivary or gastric juice EGF. In the placebo group (n = 10) three patients developed erosions. Salivary EGF did not change (mean (SEM) 3.02 (0.54) ng/ml v 2.80 (0.41) ng/ml) but gastric juice EGF increased from 0.42 (0.12) ng/ml to 0.69 (0.14) ng/ml (p < 0.05). This increased EGF could contribute to the increased cellular proliferation observed during NSAID ingestion and may represent an important mechanism underlying gastric mucosal adaptation.

Gastrointestinal complications of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs: prophylactic and therapeutic strategies

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are some of the most commonly used drugs in the Western world. Patients undergoing NSAID therapy often experience abdominal discomfort, and some of them develop serious complications, such as ulceration, perforation, or bleeding. Since serious complications of NSAID therapy can occur in relatively asymptomatic patients and abdominal symptoms do not serve as a signal of impending difficulties, there is a need for methods to identify those patients who may benefit from prophylactic therapy to prevent NSAID-induced injury. Therapy to prevent NSAID-associated gastrointestinal ulcerations is most effective when prostaglandins are used. H2-receptor antagonists prevent duodenal ulcerations but not gastric ulcerations. The role of omeprazole (hydrogen-potassium pump inhibitor) and sucralfate in the prevention of gastroduodenal ulcerations has not been firmly established. Healing of existing ulcerations in the face of continuing therapy with NSAIDs is marginally accelerated by H2-receptor antagonists, but the rate of healing in the presence of continued NSAID therapy is much slower than when NSAIDs are discontinued. Omeprazole may prove to accelerate the healing of NSAID-associated ulcerations even when NSAID therapy is continued, but more information is needed to substantiate this possibility. New methods are needed for early noninvasive detection of mucosal damage by NSAIDs and for the identification of individuals who should receive prophylactic therapy. New agents are also needed to provide cost-effective prophylaxis against the development of ulcerations and serious complications from NSAIDs.

Review article: controversies in NSAID-induced gastroduodenal damage--do they matter?

BACKGROUND

This article reviews various issues surrounding NSAID-induced gastroduodenal ulceration, about which there appear to be conflicting views and data in the literature. These issues include the size, clinical relevance and main site of the problem; when complications occur (early or late?); the relevance of non-ulcer lesions and whether adaptation is a clinically relevant phenomenon.

METHOD

A comprehensive literature search was carried out to identify relevant new data published since 1987.

RESULTS

NSAIDs are causally associated with more gastric than duodenal ulcers but their use may be associated with duodenal ulcers or complications. Erosive lesions may progress to more severe damage. The theories of early or late onset of complications during a course of NSAID therapy may not be mutually exclusive.

CONCLUSIONS

Available data indicate that NSAID ulcers are at least as dangerous as classic peptic ulcers, and result in significant morbidity and mortality which in the patient population does not appear to be significantly reduced by processes such as adaptation.

Nizatidine in therapy and prevention of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal ulcer in rheumatic patients

Two hundred and sixty-nine patients with various rheumatic disorders who had been treated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID) for at least 3 weeks were enrolled in this randomized double-blind multicentre trial. Entry criteria were the presence of an ulcer in the gastric and/or duodenal mucosa (> 3 mm and < 20 mm in diameter) and dyspeptic symptoms. The patients were treated with 150 mg nizatidine nocte (n = 86), 2 x 150 mg/d (n = 93) and 2 x 300 mg/d (n = 90) nizatidine. All patients continued to take their original NSAID medication. The three nizatidine groups were well matched with respect to important patient characteristics. After 8 weeks of treatment more than 90% of gastric and duodenal ulcers (DU) had healed under all three nizatidine dosages. There was a tendency to higher healing rates in the case of gastric ulcers after 4 weeks following the higher dose of nizatidine. Erosion, in the stomach and duodenum as well as oesophagitis, improved to a similar degree with all nizatidine doses. There were similar improvements in clinical symptoms such as epigastric pain, heartburn etc. Consumption of additional antacids were similar in all three groups. In the subsequent prevention trial, 237/221 patients were followed for 3/6 months. In addition to their continued antirheumatic medication 116/107 received nizatidine 150 mg nocte and 121/114 patients 2 x 150 mg nizatidine daily. The cumulative relapse rates within 6 months averaged 5.5% in the low and 1.8% in the high dose group (NS). The safety of nizatidine was assessed as good in both the therapeutic and the preventive trial.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Double-blind comparison of efficacy and gastroduodenal safety of diclofenac/misoprostol, piroxicam, and naproxen in the treatment of osteoarthritis

OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy and gastroduodenal safety of a fixed-dose combination of diclofenac sodium 50 mg and misoprostol 200 micrograms twice daily with those of piroxicam 10 mg twice daily and naproxen 375 mg twice daily in patients with osteoarthritis.

METHODS

A 4 week, randomised, double-blind, parallel-group, multicentre study was conducted in 643 patients with symptomatic osteoarthritis of the hip and/or knee, who required continuous non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy for 4 weeks and who were without significant upper gastrointestinal damage as confirmed by endoscopy.

RESULTS

For patients who had pre- and post-treatment endoscopic examinations, gastroduodenal ulcers developed in 3 (1.5%) of 200 patients treated with diclofenac/misoprostol, 21 (10.3%) of 204 piroxicam-treated patients, and 17 (8.6%) of 198 patients receiving naproxen (Chi square = 13.771, p = 0.001). The improvement in the osteoarthritis severity index was greater in the diclofenac/misoprostol group than in the piroxicam group (p = 0.004). Changes in physician and patient global assessments showed no significant differences between treatment groups. The incidences of diarrhoea and abdominal pain were higher in the diclofenac/misoprostol group than in the piroxicam and naproxen groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Diclofenac/misoprostol at twice daily dosing is associated with significantly fewer gastroduodenal ulcers than either piroxicam or naproxen. The efficacy of diclofenac/misoprostol in treating the signs and symptoms of osteoarthritis is at least comparable to that of piroxicam and naproxen.

Prevalence of Helicobacter pylori infection and its effect on symptoms and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced gastrointestinal damage in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter (H pylori) are both associated with an increased risk of peptic ulceration and gastropathy. It is not known, however, if there is an interaction between these two agents, and thus whether or not screening for H pylori before NSAID treatment is of value. The aim of this study was to find out if H pylori potentiates the damaging effects of NSAIDs. Fifty two patients with rheumatoid arthritis requiring longterm NSAID treatment were studied. Dyspeptic symptoms were assessed according to a standardised questionnaire. Gastroscopy was performed after a one week washout period during which NSAIDs were discontinued. Gastric and duodenal mucosal damage was graded endoscopically. H pylori was identified by biopsy urease test and by histological tests. Investigations were repeated after one month's treatment with an NSAID. Patients with H pylori infection (n = 26) had a higher dyspeptic symptom score (p < 0.05). One patient with duodenal ulcer (H pylori +ve) and two with endoscopic gastritis (both H pylori +ve) were excluded from further study. Forty two subjects completed the study. After treatment there was a rise in the gastric damage score both in the H pylori +ve (p = 0.06) and the H pylori -ve (p < 0.005) groups. There was no difference in the extent of increase in grade or the final grade at the end of the treatment period between the H pylori +ve and -ve patients. It is concluded that H pylori infection is associated with increased dyspeptic symptoms in patients receiving NSAIDs but that it does not potentiate NSAID gastropathy.

Duodenal histology, ulceration, and Helicobacter pylori in the presence or absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Duodenitis and gastric metaplasia, which is often colonised by Helicobacter pylori (H pylori), are increasingly recognised for their importance in the pathogenesis of duodenal ulcers. The situation is not clear in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), who have a higher risk of peptic ulceration. The aim of this study was to identify the duodenal histological abnormalities in the presence or absence of NSAIDs, H pylori, and duodenal ulceration. Endoscopic duodenal biopsy specimens were taken from healthy looking mucosa of 172 patients (74 took NSAIDs, and 98 did not). Duodenitis was graded according to the degree of neutrophilic and plasma cell infiltration, villus height, Brunner's gland prolapse, and gastric metaplasia. The activity of duodenitis was dependent on the neutrophilic infiltration. A global score covering all the above factors was constructed, and H pylori in both the stomach and duodenum, was also assessed. The results showed that duodenitis with varying degrees of neutrophilic infiltration and gastric metaplasia was found in 20 patients (27%) taking NSAIDs, compared with 56 patients (57%) not taking NSAIDs (chi 2 = 16.24, p < 0.001). This degree of duodenitis was also found in 20 of 25 patients (80%) with duodenal ulcers, regardless of NSAID intake (chi 2 = 15.38, p < 0.001). Gastric metaplasia was identified in 20 patients (27%) receiving NSAIDs and 38 (39%) not receiving NSAIDs. Duodenal H pylori was only seen in patients with gastric metaplasia 10 (50%) receiving NSAIDs, and 34 (89%) not receiving NSAIDs. H pylori positive gastritis, and the combination of active duodenitis and gastric metaplasia were independent predictors of duodenal ulceration. It is concluded that active duodenitis is less common in patients taking NSAIDs but is strongly associated with gastric metaplasia, H pylori positive gastritis, and duodenal ulceration. These findings are relevant to the pathogenesis and treatment of duodenal ulcers in patients taking NSAIDs.

Gastric and duodenal mucosal blood flow in patients receiving non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs--influence of age, smoking, ulceration and Helicobacter pylori

Using laser Doppler flowmetry, we measured gastric and duodenal mucosal blood flow in 70 patients who had taken non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) for longer than 4 weeks, and studied the correlation with demographic factors, ulceration, and Helicobacter pylori. Blood flow was also measured in 17 other subjects not taking any drugs. Measurements were taken from healthy-looking mucosa in the gastric antrum and the first part of the duodenum. Both gastric and duodenal blood flow values were significantly lower in patients taking NSAID than in those who did not. In the NSAID group, the median duodenal mucosal blood flow was 150 perfusion units in smokers (n = 29) compared with 175 in non-smokers (P = 0.024), 123 units in patients with duodenal ulcers (n = 12) compared with 160 in those without duodenal ulcers (P = 0.020), 135 units in patients with H. pylori (n = 30) compared with 168 in patients without H. pylori (P = 0.033), and 118 in smokers infected with H. pylori compared with 175 units in non-smokers not infected with H. pylori (F = 13.4, P = 0.0005). There was no correlation with age. Gastric blood flow was not significantly influenced by any of the above variables. These results suggest that chronic NSAID intake is associated with reduced blood flow in both the stomach and duodenum. However, amongst NSAID patients, duodenal, but not gastric, mucosal blood flow is reduced in smokers, and in those with duodenal ulcers and H. pylori.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Ankylosing spondylitis. Current drug treatment

The administration of drugs constitutes an important component of the therapeutic programme in ankylosing spondylitis (AS). The main objective of initiating such therapy is to reduce pain, stiffness and discomfort. There are at present 3 groups of drugs available for the management of AS. The first group is represented by drugs thought to influence the disease process itself. In this group, sulfasalazine is the only drug which is controlled trials has been shown to suppress disease activity in AS. We recommend the use of sulfasalazine in patients with high disease activity, with peripheral arthritis and in those with AS of short duration. The second group of drugs includes nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), which suppress inflammation without influencing the disease process. These drugs should be administered selectively during periods of high disease activity. Moreover, 1 drug should be used in appropriate dosage before it is assumed to be inefficient. High doses of NSAIDs may be prescribed before bedtime in patients suffering from severe pain and stiffness during the night. The toxicity profile of NSAIDs includes gastrointestinal and renal side effects. The third group comprises analgesics and muscle relaxants. Such drugs should be used rather frequently in patients with longstanding AS refractory to treatment with NSAIDs. Peripheral arthritis and enthesopathy are generally managed by local injections of corticosteroids, while AS complicated by psoriasis or inflammatory bowel disease is treated as primary AS. AS occurring in juveniles is best treated with aspirin and an NSAID, although careful observation is necessary for the development of Reye's syndrome (with aspirin) and gastric irritation (with NSAIDs). When patients with AS undergo surgery, the possibility of silent gastrointestinal bleeding due to the use of NSAIDs and salicylates should not be ignored. Patients treated with oral corticosteroids should receive a bolus injection of soluble corticosteroid prior to surgical intervention. NSAIDs may be administered pre- and postoperatively to relieve stiffness induced by immobility. Rapid treatment of intervening infections and use of NSAIDs is recommended in AS complicated by renal amyloidosis. During pregnancy and lactation, ibuprofen may be the preferred drug in AS.

Arthritis outpatients: disability, pain and alcohol use

There is a small body of literature describing investigations into the relationships between pain and disabling conditions and alcohol consumption. Of these few studies, most have concluded that pain and disability are positively associated with alcohol consumption, though these particular studies have not been methodologically rigorous. Arthritis is the most prevalent of the disabling conditions, and one of the major symptoms of arthritis is pain. Several factors associated with the disease are thought to make arthritis sufferers particularly vulnerable to the use of alcohol for its mind-altering and analgesic properties. In the present study, conducted in 1987, a sample of 154 Perth arthritic outpatients were interviewed to investigate the relationship between pain, disability and alcohol consumption. Results showed that pain and disability scores were very weak predictors of volume of weekly alcohol consumption for males, but the relationship was in a negative direction. Results from a previous study were confirmed in the finding that being an ex-drinker was a predictor of a higher disability score for females. Fewer patients were drinkers than in the population at large and fewer drank at the level of the highest consumption category. However, the proportions of male and female patients drinking above NHMRC low risk levels were the same as the general population (age-standardised comparison). Most who considered themselves current drinkers said that alcohol did not help their pain, stiffness or weakness. Various possible explanations are offered for these results and recommendations for future research are presented.

Diagnostic tests for Helicobacter pylori: comparison and influence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

AIMS

To evaluate the efficacy of culture, histology, CLO-test, Helico-G and Pyloriset tests in diagnosing Helicobacter pylori in the presence or absence of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs).

METHODS

Of 134 patients studied, 75 had taken NSAIDs. At endoscopy, biopsy specimens were taken for culture, histology, and CLO-test. Blood was also taken for enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) (Helico-G) and latex agglutination (Pyloriset) tests.

RESULTS

The sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of histology and CLO-test, compared with culture, ranged from 90% to 97%, regardless of NSAID intake. In the 59 patients not taking NSAIDs Helico-G had a sensitivity of 75% (p < 0.05) and a specificity of 61%; Pyloriset's sensitivity and specificity were, respectively, 63% (p < 0.05) and 67%. In the 75 patients taking NSAIDs the sensitivity of Helico-G was 81% and its specificity 45% (p < 0.05); Pyloriset had a sensitivity of 61% (p < 0.05) and a specificity of 50% (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

These findings suggest that H pylori is more reliably diagnosed by culture, histology, and CLO-test than by the serological tests used in this study, especially in patients treated with NSAIDs.

Review article: non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs--the extending scope of gastrointestinal side effects

The gastrointestinal side effects of non-steroidal, anti-inflammatory drugs extend beyond the duodenal bulb, and comprise a variety of lesions in all parts of the gut. Gastroduodenal ulceration is quantitatively dominant, although a major part of these lesions probably go unnoticed and heal spontaneously. Adaptation has been demonstrated for acetylsalicylic acid, and may be of importance for other substances as well. Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) may induce relapse of inflammatory bowel disease. Permeability changes and mucosal inflammation are found in the small and large bowel in the majority of subjects taking NSAIDs, although the clinical significance is still not clear. Ulceration and perforation do, however, occur in this part of the gut as well. Treatment of NSAID-associated ulceration is similar to traditional ulcer treatment, possibly with extended treatment duration if the NSAID is continued. Prophylaxis is of some value, but is not required for every patient receiving an NSAID.

Management of gastroduodenopathy associated with use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Adverse events associated with the use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are reported more frequently to the Food and Drug Administration than are those associated with any other group of drugs. The absolute risk for serious gastrointestinal events--in particular, ulcer bleeding, perforation, and death--is controversial; some investigators believe that an epidemic of NSAID-related complications is being experienced, whereas others suggest that the risks are being overemphasized. The management of patients who take NSAIDs regularly also remains controversial. Key unresolved issues include how best to identify those patients at particularly high risk for the development of ulcer complications and whether such patients should receive prophylactic therapy in an attempt to prevent such problems. In this review, we critically evaluate the currently available literature and present a management algorithm for the treatment and prevention of NSAID-associated gastroduodenopathy.

A prospective study of risk for peptic ulcer disease in Seventh-Day Adventists

Cross-sectional and prospective data were collected and analyzed to identify risk factors for the development of peptic ulcer disease in a population of 34,198 white, non-Hispanic Seventh-Day Adventists. On a life-style questionnaire administered in 1976, 3853 subjects reported ever having had a physician-diagnosed peptic ulcer for a lifetime prevalence of 13.5% for men and 11.0% for women. Odds ratios of greater than 2.0 (P less than 0.0001) were observed for use of "stronger pain relievers," current cigarette smoking, and history of rheumatism or other arthritis and coronary disease. For both sexes, lower but statistically significant odds ratios (P less than 0.05) were found for eating white bread, "snacking," ever having smoked cigarettes, low church involvement, poor dietary adherence, high blood pressure, rheumatoid arthritis, aspirin use, job frustration and dissatisfaction, having a "blue collar household," and having less education. During 3 years of follow-up, 154 incident cases of ulcer were identified. The average annual incidence was 1.7 per 1000. Multivariate adjusted relative risks were statistically significant for using stronger pain relievers (P less than 0.001), having rheumatic conditions (P = 0.006), and using aspirin (P = 0.013). These findings suggest that rheumatic disease and use of aspirin and stronger pain relievers are more important risk factors for development of peptic ulcer disease in certain populations than diet, life-style, or psychological or socioeconomic characteristics.

Effect of misoprostol on concentrations of prostaglandins in synovial fluid

The effect of misoprostol, a synthetic analogue of prostaglandin E, on prostaglandin concentrations in synovial fluids was investigated in a randomised placebo controlled, double blind study. The synovial fluid concentrations of prostaglandin E1, 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha, and thromboxane B2 were measured at the beginning and end of a 24 hour period in 25 patients with effusions of the knee joint. During this period the patients were treated with diclofenac (50 mg every eight hours) and either misoprostol (400 micrograms) or placebo every 12 hours. The concentrations of prostaglandin E and 6-keto-prostaglandin F1 alpha were not significantly altered during treatment. There was an unexpected significant reduction in thromboxane B2 concentrations in the group treated with misoprostol (within group analysis). Although the mean concentration with misoprostol was about half the mean concentration with placebo, this difference was not statistically significant in the between group analysis. These results indicate that misoprostol is unlikely to exert a proinflammatory effect or to interfere with the prostaglandin mediated effects of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs. The significant decrease in thromboxane B2 concentrations in the misoprostol treated group suggests that misoprostol may exert an anti-inflammatory effect.

Non-steroid anti-inflammatory drug associated ulcer: epidemiology, causation and treatment

Epidemiological evidence consistently indicates that aspirin or non-aspirin non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug use is associated with the occurrence of gastric ulceration, gastric and ulcer bleeding, and ulcer death. Evidence on duodenal ulcer occurrence conflicts, possibly because of differences in study populations. A wide range of mechanisms could explain the occurrence of non steroidal-induced damage. These include inhibition of bicarbonate secretion, effects on mucus formation, and vascular actions. Not all effects are dependent on cyclo-oxygenase inhibition. Short-term studies in humans provide indications of likely therapeutic effects, but cannot demonstrate clinical efficiency. Although anti-secretory drugs and prostaglandins can protect patients against the development of duodenal or gastric ulcers, but not both, there is no clinical evidence which bears upon the critical issue of protection against complications.

Aspirin-induced gastric mucosal damage: prevention by enteric-coating and relation to prostaglandin synthesis

1. Gastric damage induced by low-dose aspirin and the protective effect of enteric-coating was assessed in healthy volunteers in a double-blind placebo-controlled cross-over trial using Latin square design. Each was administered placebo, plain aspirin 300 mg daily, plain aspirin 600 mg four times daily, enteric-coated aspirin 300 mg daily, or enteric-coated aspirin 600 mg four times daily for 5 days. Gastric damage was assessed endoscopically, and gastric mucosal bleeding measured. 2. Aspirin 300 mg daily and 600 mg four times daily caused significant increases in gastric injury compared with placebo. Gastric mucosal bleeding was significantly more with the high dose, with a trend towards increased gastric erosions, compared with the low dose. 3. Enteric-coating of aspirin eliminated the injury caused by low dose aspirin and substantially reduced that caused by the higher dose. 4. All dosages and formulations caused similar inhibition of gastric mucosal prostaglandin E2 synthesis. 5. Serum thromboxane levels were suppressed equally with plain and enteric-coated aspirin. 6. In this short-term study in healthy volunteers, gastric toxicity from aspirin was largely topical, independent of inhibition of prostaglandin synthesis, and could be virtually eliminated by the use of an enteric-coated preparation.

[Epidemiology and treatment of gastroduodenal lesions caused by non-steroidal anti-inflammatory agents]

The most common serious adverse reactions to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are those affecting the gastro-intestinal tract. There is epidemiologic evidence that NSAIDs use is associated with the development of gastric ulcer and with upper gastrointestinal bleeding and perforation of both duodenal and gastric ulcers. The individual risk is low but given the widespread use of NSAIDs, the number of cases is large with appreciable morbidity and mortality. The main risk factors are age above 65, previous ulcer history and treatment with several NSAIDs. Prophylactic therapy is justified in high risk patients. Synthetic prostaglandin misoprostol has been shown to reduce significantly the frequency of gastric ulcer in patients on NSAIDs. By contrast, H2 receptor blockade with ranitidine has been demonstrated to prevent duodenal but not gastric ulcers. Gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with NSAIDs appear to heal on H2 receptors antagonists and prostaglandins even if NSAIDs are continued. However, large gastric ulcer may heal slowly over 8 to 12 weeks. The place of omeprazole remains to be determined.

Ranitidine prevents duodenal ulcers associated with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug therapy

The results of four similarly designed, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies conducted to evaluate ranitidine as prophylaxis for NSAID-associated damage are reviewed. A total of 673 patients receiving therapeutic dosages of NSAIDs for arthritic or musculoskeletal conditions also received either ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 343) or placebo (n = 330) for four weeks (two studies) or eight weeks (two studies). Endoscopic grading of mucosal lesions was based on a modified Lanza scoring system. All patients had normal baseline endoscopies. After four weeks of treatment a significant protective effect against duodenal mucosal lesions including duodenal ulcers (three studies) and gastric mucosal lesions including gastric ulcers (one study) was observed in patients who received ranitidine compared with those who received placebo. A meta-analysis of the four studies confirmed that significantly fewer patients receiving ranitidine than placebo developed duodenal ulcers (1% vs. 6%, P = 0.01). Endoscopic data at eight weeks from the two longer-term studies showed that duodenal ulcers occurred in ranitidine- and placebo-treated patients at a rate of 1% (2/137) vs. 8% (10/126) (P = 0.02), respectively, in one trial, and 0% (0/57) vs. 8% (4/49) (P = 0.02), respectively, in the other trial. No protective effect in the stomach was evident at eight weeks. We conclude that ranitidine is effective in preventing NSAID-associated duodenal ulcers and may be appropriate prophylaxis for certain high-risk patients.

The management of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug-induced gastroduodenal ulcers

The risks associated with NSAID-induced gastroduodenal lesions are now relatively well defined. Identification of high-risk patients is important for prophylactic treatment or for maintenance treatment with gastric acid-suppressing medication during NSAID therapy. If patients develop a gastric ulcer and continue to take NSAIDs, all available evidence suggests that strong acid-suppressing therapy is important. Good healing rates have been described with conventional doses of H2 antagonists, but studies with higher doses have to be awaited. Small prepyloric or antrum ulcers will probably react well to conventional H2 antagonists; larger crater-like ulcers are probably best treated with omeprazole. When patients develop a duodenal ulcer and continue to take NSAIDs, all available evidence suggests that excellent treatment results can be obtained with conventional doses of H2 antagonists.

The interaction between Helicobacter pylori culture filtrate and indomethacin: effects on the integrity of human gastric antral mucosa and its prostaglandin E2 production in vitro

Histopathological methods and radioimmunoassay were used to assess the microstructure and prostaglandin E2 production by paired specimens of human gastric antral mucosa; the specimens were studied after 48 h of incubation in base-line tissue culture medium, Helicobacter pylori culture filtrate, H. pylori culture control fluid, indomethacin, and H. pylori culture filtrate plus indomethacin. When applied alone, the filtrate did not affect the structure of the mucosal tissue or its prostaglandin E2 synthesis. In the overall group (n = 21), specimens incubated with the mixture of H. pylori filtrate and indomethacin had a median histological grade of 1 and prostaglandin E2 of 29 pg/mg tissue, compared to 2 pg/mg (P = 0.04) and 60 pg/mg (P = 0.0007) respectively, in specimens incubated with indomethacin alone. These results indicate that an interaction may exist between indomethacin and a factor contained in H. pylori culture filtrate. Such interaction is damaging to the human gastric antral mucosa, and its understanding might have therapeutic implications.

Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug-induced ulcers: management by traditional therapies

Endoscopic distinction between ulcers and erosions is difficult. Consequently, existing literature, which must be taken at face value, may be misleading. Nevertheless, from published studies most gastric and duodenal ulcers associated with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs appear to heal on antacids or H2-antagonists. Sucralfate appears useful for duodenal but not gastric ulcers. Continuing nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs does not prevent or delay healing of duodenal or small gastric ulcers; their effects on large gastric ulcers remain uncertain. Thus far, only full doses of H2-antagonists, or their combinations with antacids, have been shown to heal ulcers and prevent recurrences. Ulcer recurrences and complications have occurred in small numbers of patients on maintenance doses of H2-antagonists. Available antiulcer drugs (antacids, H2-antagonists, sucralfate) reduce severe acute injury when taken before or with nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. They also reduce ulcerlike symptoms due to nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs. Inexplicably, chronic prophylaxis with H2-antagonists for 4 wk or more appears ineffective in preventing gastric ulcers, although duodenal injury is reduced. As the efficacy of available prophylactic therapy (H2-antagonists, sucralfate, and antacids) has not been established, routine use in all cases seems unjustified at present.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in patients with peptic ulcer disease: to be considered in certain circumstances

Images