Predicting Survival in Patients Undergoing Resection for Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: A Study and Novel Nomogram from TARPSWG

A randomized, non-comparative phase 2 study of neoadjuvant immune-checkpoint blockade in retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma and extremity/truncal undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma

Based on the demonstrated clinical activity of immune-checkpoint blockade (ICB) in advanced dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma (UPS), we conducted a randomized, non-comparative phase 2 trial ( NCT03307616 ) of neoadjuvant nivolumab or nivolumab/ipilimumab in patients with resectable retroperitoneal DDLPS (n = 17) and extremity/truncal UPS (+ concurrent nivolumab/radiation therapy; n = 10). The primary end point of pathologic response (percent hyalinization) was a median of 8.8% in DDLPS and 89% in UPS. Secondary end points were the changes in immune infiltrate, radiographic response, 12- and 24-month relapse-free survival and overall survival. Lower densities of regulatory T cells before treatment were associated with a major pathologic response (hyalinization > 30%). Tumor infiltration by B cells was increased following neoadjuvant treatment and was associated with overall survival in DDLPS. B cell infiltration was associated with higher densities of regulatory T cells before treatment, which was lost upon ICB treatment. Our data demonstrate that neoadjuvant ICB is associated with complex immune changes within the tumor microenvironment in DDLPS and UPS and that neoadjuvant ICB with concurrent radiotherapy has significant efficacy in UPS.

Gender Differences in Prognosis After Primary Resection for Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma

BACKGROUND

Current evidence regarding gender difference in retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) is scarce, so we sought to investigate whether gender may affect prognosis after primary resection of RLPS.

METHODS

We used the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to identify RLPS patients from January 1973 to December 2015. Multivariate cox proportional hazard analysis was adopted to generate adjusted hazard ratio (AHR) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) of survival outcomes.

RESULTS

In total, 2108 RLPS patients, including 971 women and 1137 men, were identified, with a median follow-up of 45.0 (17.0-92.0) months. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 50.5% and 31.5% for men and 60.4% and 42.5% for women. The 5-year and 10-year disease-specific survival rates for men and women were 71.5%, 57.3% and 76.3%, 62.1%, respectively. We found men were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality (AHR 1.3, 95% CI 1.0-1.6, P = .017) but not disease-specific mortality (AHR 1.2, 95% CI .9-1.6, P = .246). The subgroup analyses revealed that men were associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality in patients with low-grade tumors (AHR 1.8, 95% CI 1.3-2.5) or patients who received non-radical resection (AHR 1.6, 95% CI 1.2-2.1). In the subgroup of low-grade tumors, men were also associated with an increased risk of disease-specific mortality (AHR 2.0, 95% CI 1.2-3.3).

CONCLUSION

Men may have worse survival after primary resection of RLPS compared with women, especially in patients with low-grade tumors or patients who received non-radical resection. Gender-based disparities may deserve more attention in patients with RLPS.

Dose-Escalated Preoperative Proton Therapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Initial Outcomes of a New Treatment Paradigm

Purpose

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) have varied treatment practices with regard to the use of radiation therapy (RT). Preoperative RT ∼50 Gy is commonly used, but the Surgery With or Without Radiation Therapy in Untreated Nonmetastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (STRASS-1) randomized trial demonstrated no improvement in abdominal recurrence-free survival with preoperative RT. Dose escalation has been proposed to improve the efficacy of preoperative RT. We analyzed RPS treated with preoperative intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) to an escalated dose of 63 Gy at a single institution.

Methods and Materials

Patients who received preoperative RT with IMPT with RPS between January 2015 and October 2021 were reviewed. IMPT 63 Gy in 28 fractions to the clinical target volume high-risk and 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions to clinical target volume low-risk was used. Patient baseline characteristics, RT dose parameters, toxicities, margin status, and recurrence patterns were recorded. Local control was computed by Fine-Gray analysis and overall survival by Kaplan-Meier analysis.

Results

Sixteen patients met the study criteria (n = 16): 12 primary and 4 isolated local recurrences. Median age was 62 years (IQR, 43.5-66 years) and 62.5% were male; 10 were liposarcoma. The median maximum tumor diameter was 19.9 cm (IQR, 12-24 cm). With a median follow-up of 18 months (IQR, 11.5-37 months), the estimated 3-year freedom from local failure rate was 68.2% (95% CI, 41.7%-94.7%); 3-year overall survival (OS) rate was 68.8% (95% CI, 41.9%-95.8%). No Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade ≥3 acute or late toxicities were noted.

Conclusions

In our RPS cohort, preoperative dose-escalated RT to 63 Gy demonstrated comparable local control without G3 acute toxicities. Given the high local recurrence rates of RPS, this approach warrants further study to validate these results and identify patients most likely to benefit from therapy.

Extremity and Truncal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: Risk Assessment and Multidisciplinary Management

Extremity and truncal soft tissue sarcomas are a heterogeneous group of rare cancers that arise from mesenchymal tissues. Hence, the adoption of tailored risk assessment and prognostication tools plays a crucial role in optimizing the decision-making for which of the many possible treatment strategies to select. Management of these tumors requires a multidisciplinary strategy, which has seen significant development in recent decades. Surgery has emerged as the primary treatment approach, with the main goal of achieving microscopic negative tumor margins. To reduce the likelihood of local recurrence, loco-regional treatments such as radiation therapy and isolated limb perfusion are often added to the treatment regimen in combination with surgery. This approach also enables surgeons to perform limb-sparing surgery, particularly in cases where a positive tumor margin is expected. Chemotherapy may also provide a further benefit in decreasing the probability of local recurrence or reducing distant metastasis in selected patients. Selecting the optimal treatment strategy for these rare tumors is best accomplished by an experienced multi-disciplinary team.

Advancements in Diagnosis and Multimodal Treatment Strategies for Retroperitoneal Tumors: A Comprehensive Review

Retroperitoneal tumors (RPTs) encompass both benign and malignant entities, constituting ~0.1% to 0.2% of all malignant tumors, of which 70% to 80% manifest malignancy. Predominantly, retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent the most prevalent subtype among RPT. With over 70 histologic forms identified, liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas emerge as the primary constituents of RPS. Accurate diagnosis of RPTs necessitates preoperative core-needle biopsy and comprehensive imaging assessment. The current staging protocol for RPS relies on the eighth edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer/TNM classification. Surgical excision remains the established gold standard for treating RPS. Therapeutic approaches vary according to the underlying pathophysiology. Although chemotherapy and radiotherapy exhibit efficacy in managing metastatic and recurrent unresectable RPS, their role in primary RPS remains unresolved, necessitating further clinical trials for validation. Concurrently, ongoing research explores the potential of targeted therapies and immunotherapy. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of existing research, delineating diagnostic pathways and optimal therapeutic strategies for RPT.

Does compartmental resection really impact retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas? A retrospective analysis from a Single Referral Center

BACKGROUND

The treatment of choice for retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcomas (RPS) is surgical resection; the outcomes with more radical surgeries, notably compartmental resection, remains a subject of debate. Arguments against it, include the complexity of the technique and high morbidity.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of cases treated in a single center from January 2010 to December 2019 is presented. Two time periods were evaluated: 2010-2015 and 2016-2019, corresponding to before and after the implementation of routine compartmentectomy. We evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of compartmental resection compared to limited surgeries through a multivariate analysis of prognostic factors.

RESULTS

A total of 176 cases were included, of which 102 met the inclusion criteria. The sex distribution was similar. The average age was 52.9 years, and the average tumor size was 24.5 cm. The most frequent histology was liposarcoma (65.7%), followed by leiomyosarcoma (12.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (8.8%). The median follow-up period was 40 months. We found a lower local recurrence in the group treated in the recent period (compartmentectomy) 42.3% vs 20% p = 0.007. The median overall survival (OS) was 38.7 months, and there was no difference in distant recurrence between the two time periods. Postoperative morbidity was higher in the recent period (25% vs 10% p 0.041), with no difference in 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of extensive surgery, specifically compartmentectomy, for retroperitoneal sarcomas has been linked to reduced local recurrence. We recommend considering this surgical approach for RPS in alignment with current expert consensus guidelines, as highlighted by the updated TARPSWG consensus.

Nomogram development and external validation for predicting overall survival and cancer-specific survival in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) comprises over 70 histologic subtypes, yet there are limited studies that have developed prognostic nomograms for RPS patients to predict overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS). The objective of this study was to construct prognostic nomograms for predicting OS and CSS in RPS patients.

METHODS

We identified a total of 1166 RPS patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database, and an additional 261 cases were collected from a tertiary cancer center. The study incorporated various clinicopathological and epidemiologic features as variables, and prediction windows for overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) were set at 3, 5, and 7 years. Multivariable Cox models were utilized to develop the nomograms, and variable selection was performed using a backward procedure based on the Akaike Information Criterion. To evaluate the performance of the nomograms in terms of calibration and discrimination, we used calibration plots, coherence index, and area under the curve.

FINDINGS

The study included 818 patients in the development cohort, 348 patients in the internal validation cohort, and 261 patients in the external validation cohort. The backward procedure selected the following variables: age, French Federation of Cancer Centers Sarcoma Group (FNCLCC) grade, pre-/postoperative chemotherapy, tumor size, primary site surgery, and tumor multifocality. The validation results demonstrated that the nomograms had good calibration and discrimination, with C-indices of 0.76 for OS and 0.81 for CSS. Calibration plots also showed good consistency between the predicted and actual survival rates. Furthermore, the areas under the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic curves for the 3-, 5-, and 7-year OS (0.84, 0.82, and 0.78, respectively) and CSS (0.88, 0.88, and 0.85, respectively) confirmed the accuracy of the nomograms.

INTERPRETATION

Our study developed accurate nomograms to predict OS and CSS in patients with RPS. These nomograms have important clinical implications and can assist healthcare providers in making informed decisions regarding patient care and treatment options. They may also aid in patient counseling and stratification in clinical trials.

Adjuvant Palbociclib May be Associated with Delayed Recurrence in Completely Resected Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma: Results of a Single-Institution Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are locally aggressive and frequently recur following complete surgical resection. Palbociclib, a cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4/CDK6 inhibitor, is effective in the treatment of metastatic or unresectable liposarcoma.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience using adjuvant palbociclib to delay recurrence.

METHODS

Patients with resected RPS were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. In 2017, we began offering adjuvant palbociclib to patients following complete gross resection. Treatment interval, defined as the time between surgical resection and re-resection or change in systemic therapy, was compared between patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib or observation.

RESULTS

Between 2017 and 2020, 12 patients underwent a total of 14 operations (14 patient cases) and were selected for adjuvant palbociclib for recurrence prevention. These patients were compared with 14 patients who, since 2010, underwent a total of 20 operations (20 patient cases) and were selected for observation. Histology was primarily dedifferentiated liposarcoma for both groups (observation: 70% [14/20]; adjuvant palbociclib: 64% [9/14]). All patients underwent complete gross resection. Neither age, number of previous surgeries, histologic grade, or Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status differed between groups (p > 0.05 for all). Patients selected for adjuvant palbociclib experienced a longer treatment interval than those selected for observation, although it did not reach statistical significance (20.5 months vs. 13.1 months, p = 0.08, log rank).

CONCLUSION

Adjuvant palbociclib may be associated with a prolonged interval between liposarcoma resection and the need for re-resection or other systemic therapy. Palbociclib may be effective in delaying liposarcoma recurrence, and its use for this indication warrants prospective study.

Long-term quality of life after resection of retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS) is characterized by high recurrence rates. Since complete tumor resection, often necessitating multivisceral resection, enables long-term survival in both primary and recurrent disease, health related quality of life (QoL) after RPS resection has attracted increasing interest. However, data regarding this topic is limited. Here, we multidimensionally assessed long-term QoL after RPS resection.

METHODS

Five previously validated (1. EORTC QLQ-C30, 2. WEMWBS, 3. FoP-Q-SF, 4. PC-PTSD, 5. Pro-CTCAE) were sent to patients having undergone resection of primary, recurrent and metastasized RPS at Heidelberg University Hospital between 10/2001 and 12/2020. Multivariable linear regression models were used to test associations between clinical/demographic variables and patient reported outcomes (PROs).

RESULTS

Questionnaires were answered by 127 patients (71% response rate). The median interval between RPS diagnosis and assessment of PROs was 80 months. The overall Global Health score was 64.1 and comparable to the general German population. RPS patients reported deficits regarding emotional and social functioning, whereas physical limitations were less pronounced. Besides diarrhea, abdominal symptoms were comparable to the overall population. Tumor recurrences, the number of surgeries, multivisceral resections or postoperative complications did not significantly affect long-term QoL ratings.

CONCLUSION

RPS patients rate their QoL relatively high, even after multiple and multivisceral resections. Psychosocial well-being should be monitored in follow-up sessions to offer tailored support if necessary, thus improving postoperative care.

Nomogram predicting overall survival after surgical resection for retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma patients

Background

Surgery is the best way to cure the retroperitoneal leiomyosarcoma (RLMS), and there is currently no prediction model on RLMS after surgical resection. The objective of this study was to develop a nomogram to predict the overall survival (OS) of patients with RLMS after surgical resection.

Methods

Patients who underwent surgical resection from September 2010 to December 2020 were included. The nomogram was constructed based on the COX regression model, and the discrimination was assessed using the concordance index. The predicted OS and actual OS were evaluated with the assistance of calibration plots.

Results

118 patients were included. The median OS for all patients was 47.8 (95% confidence interval (CI), 35.9-59.7) months. Most tumor were completely resected (n=106, 89.8%). The proportions of French National Federation of Comprehensive Cancer Centres (FNCLCC) classification were equal as grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 (31.4%, 30.5%, and 38.1%, respectively). The tumor diameter of 73.7% (n=85) patients was greater than 5 cm, the lesions of 23.7% (n=28) were multifocal, and 55.1% (n=65) patients had more than one organ resected. The OS nomogram was constructed based on the number of resected organs, tumor diameter, FNCLCC grade, and multifocal lesions. The concordance index of the nomogram was 0.779 (95% CI, 0.659-0.898), the predicted OS and actual OS were in good fitness in calibration curves.

Conclusion

The nomogram prediction model established in this study is helpful for postoperative consultation and the selection of patients for clinical trial enrollment.

Next questions in the management of retroperitoneal sarcoma

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Retroperitoneal soft-tissue sarcomas (RPS) are a group of rare, histologically distinct tumours with variable recurrence patterns depending on histological type. This review will discuss the growing body of evidence supporting histology-specific, multidisciplinary management and highlight areas of future research for patients with RPS.

RECENT FINDINGS

Histology-tailored surgery is the cornerstone of management in patients with localized RPS. Further efforts to develop resectability criteria and identify patients who will benefit from neoadjuvant treatment strategies will help standardize the treatment of patients with localized RPS. Surgery for local recurrence is well tolerated in selected patients and re-iterative surgery in liposarcoma (LPS) may be beneficial at the time of local recurrence. The management of advanced RPS holds promise with several trials currently investigating systemic treatment beyond conventional chemotherapy.

SUMMARY

The management of RPS has made significant progress over the past decade owing to international collaboration. Ongoing efforts to identify patients who will derive the most benefit from all treatment strategies will continue to advance the field of RPS.

Web-based nomogram to predict postresection risk of distant metastasis in patients with leiomyosarcoma: retrospective analysis of the SEER database and a Chinese cohort

OBJECTIVES

This study investigated risk factors and constructed an online tool to predict distant metastasis (DM) risk in patients with leiomyosarcoma (LMS) after surgical resection.

METHODS

Data regarding patients with LMS who underwent surgical resection between 2010 and 2018 were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Data were collected regarding patients with LMS who underwent surgical resection at Tianjin Medical University Cancer Hospital and Institute (TJMUCH) between October 2010 and July 2018. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets. Logistic regression analyses were performed; a nomogram was established. The area under the curve (AUC) and calibration curve were used to evaluate the nomogram, which served as the basis for a web-based nomogram.

RESULTS

This study included 4461 and 76 patients from the SEER database and TJMUCH, respectively. Age, ethnicity, grade, T stage, N stage, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were associated with DM incidence. C-index values were 0.815 and 0.782 in the SEER and Chinese datasets, respectively; corresponding AUC values were 0.814 and 0.773, respectively. A web-based nomogram (https://weijunqiang-leimyosarcoma-seer.shinyapps.io/dynnomapp/) was established.

CONCLUSIONS

Our web-based nomogram is an accurate and user-friendly tool to predict DM risk in patients with LMS; it can aid clinical decision-making.

Updated Review and Clinical Recommendations for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma by the Spanish Sarcoma Research Group (GEIS)

Soft tissue sarcomas (STS) are an uncommon and biologically heterogeneous group of tumors arising from mesenchymal cells. The incidence is estimated at five cases per 100,000 people per year. Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) account for 10-15% of all STS, and their management depends on their anatomical characteristics and histotype. Due to their very low incidence, it is recommended that RPS be treated in reference centers and evaluated by an experienced multidisciplinary team (MDT). In Spain, the Spanish Group for Research in Sarcomas (GEIS) brings together experts from various specialties to promote research on sarcomas and improve treatment results. This paper summarizes the GEIS recommendations for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of patients with RPS.

Follow-up of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare malignancies that are potentially curable by complete surgical resection. A regular surveillance program is normally commenced following surgery due to the risk of local recurrence (LR), especially in low-intermediate grade disease, and distant metastases (DM), especially in high-grade RPS. Consensus guidelines usually advocate for more frequent imaging during the first 2-3 years and less intensive imaging over a prolonged period thereafter, reflecting the incidence pattern of LR and DM. Definitive evidence for the most effective imaging schedule has never been provided, and retrospective studies have not shown an association between follow-up intensity and survival. Improvement in the prediction of recurrence patterns has been sustained by prognostic dynamic nomograms, which are now capable of forecasting disease behaviour in each patient according to specific features. Incorporation of such tools in clinical practice may help to stratify patients and tailor ongoing surveillance to the risk of recurrence. This may help to relieve patients' anxiety while awaiting results of surveillance investigations, and also reduce the economic and environmental burden of repeated imaging. A randomized controlled study (SARveillance Trial) is proposed to shed light on this controversial topic, allowing clinicians to harmonize the follow-up protocol of patients undergoing surgery for RPS.

Management of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas

Recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare, with patterns of recurrence determined by the histologic subtype. A range of patient characteristics and treatment profiles combined with a myriad of presentations and clinical courses of recurrences make this diverse entity challenging to manage. Although surgical resection improves survival in select patients, the oncological outcomes are inferior to that of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas. Management options for unresectable disease include local ablative therapy, radiation and systemic therapy, with palliative surgery indicated occasionally. Attempts at disease control must be balanced with potential morbidity and impact on the patient's quality of life. This review aims to offer insights into the current understanding of recurrent retroperitoneal sarcomas and provide some guidance on management.

How to treat liposarcomas located in retroperitoneum

Almost half of retroperitoneal (RP) sarcomas are liposarcomas (LPS). The large majority of RP LPS are either well-differentiated LPS (WDLPS) or dedifferentiated LPS (DDLPS), these latter further classified according to grading in G2 and G3 DDLPS. Surgery is the only potentially curative treatment to achieve local control and possibly cure in primary localized disease. Over the last decade, a better delineation of the different histology-specific patterns of failure and the development of nomograms predictors of outcome has led to a better management of these rare tumors, with a special focus on non-surgical treatments. Available evidences - although far from exhaustive - show that radiation therapy might have a role, if any, as neoadjuvant treatment in locally aggressive histologies (i.e. WDLPS and G2 DDLPS), while it does not seem beneficial for histologies with a higher metastatic risk (i.e. G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy, instead, can be considered to reduce the risk of distant metastasis while waiting for the results of an ongoing RCT (STRASS-2) evaluating its effect in these tumors. However, given the rarity of these diseases and the subsequent lack of strong evidences to guide treatment, outcome improvement in these patients remains a challenge. Patients' referral to a sarcoma center where a dedicated specialized multidisciplinary team tailor optimal treatment on a case-by-case basis is crucial to ensure these patients the best outcome. Refining available nomograms - e.g including molecular variables - and identifying predictors of response/toxicity to chemotherapy and immunotherapy might be significantly helpful in tailoring treatments to the patient's characteristics. Also, new systemic agents are eagerly awaited for improving the management further.

CT and MR Imaging of Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: A Practical Guide for the Radiologist

Primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) represent around 10-16% of all sarcomas, with liposarcomas and leiomyosarcomas being the most common subtypes. RPS have some peculiar characteristics, imaging appearances, worse prognosis, and complications compared to other locations of sarcoma. Commonly, RPS primarily present as large masses, progressively encasing adjacent structures, causing mass effect, and complications. RPS diagnosis is often challenging, and these tumors may be overlooked; however, failure to recognize RPS characteristics leads to a worse prognosis for the patients. Surgery is the only recognized curative treatment, but the anatomical constraints of the retroperitoneum limit the ability to achieve wide resection margins; therefore, these tumors have a high rate of recurrence, and require long-term follow-up. The radiologist has an important role in the diagnosis of RPS, the definition of their extent, and their follow-up. Specific knowledge of the main imaging findings is required to reach an early diagnosis, and, ultimately, to guarantee the best patient management. This article provides an overview of the current knowledge regarding cross-sectional imaging features of patients with retroperitoneal sarcomas, presenting tips and tricks to improve imaging diagnosis of RPS.

The Role of Surgery in Oligometastatic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are extremely rare, comprising <15% of primary sarcomas. Distant metastasis occurs in about 20% of cases, with pulmonary and hepatic metastasis as the most common sites of hematogenous spread. Although surgical resection is well established as the main treatment of localized primary disease, there are limited guidelines for the surgical treatment of intra-abdominal and distant metastases. There are inadequate systemic treatment options for patients with metastatic sarcoma, thereby necessitating the consideration of surgical options in carefully selected patients. Key points to consider include tumor biology, patient fitness and co-morbidities, overall prognosis, and goals of care. Multidisciplinary sarcoma tumor board discussion for each case is an essential practice in order to deliver the best care to these patients. The purpose of this review is to summarize the published literature on the past and present role of surgery in the treatment of oligometastatic retroperitoneal sarcoma in order to inform the management of this difficult disease.

Surgical Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Surgery should be performed by a surgical oncologist with sub-specialization in this disease and in the context of a multidisciplinary team of sarcoma specialists. For primary RPS, the goal of surgery is to achieve the complete en bloc resection of the tumor along with involved organs and structures to maximize the clearance of the disease. The extent of resection also needs to consider the risk of complications. Unfortunately, the overarching challenge in primary RPS treatment is that even with optimal surgery, tumor recurrence occurs frequently. The pattern of recurrence after surgery (e.g., local versus distant) is strongly associated with the specific histologic type of RPS. Radiation and systemic therapy may improve outcomes in RPS and there is emerging data studying the benefit of non-surgical treatments in primary disease. Topics in need of further investigation include criteria for unresectability and management of locally recurrent disease. Moving forward, global collaboration among RPS specialists will be key for continuing to advance our understanding of this disease and find more effective treatments.

Staging Systems and Nomograms for Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Reliable tools for prognosis prediction are crucially needed by oncologists so they can tailor individual treatments. However, the wide spectrum of histologies and prognostic behaviors of sarcomas challenges their development. In this field, nomograms could definitely better account for their granularity compared to the more widely used AJCC/UICC TNM staging system. Nomograms are predictive tools that incorporate multiple risk factors and return a numerical probability of a clinical event. Since the development of the first nomogram in 2002, several other nomograms have been built, either general, site-specific, histology-specific, or both. Recently, some new “dynamic” nomograms and prognostic tools have been developed, allowing doctors to “recalculate” a patient’s prognosis by taking into account the time since primary surgery, the event history, and the potential time-dependent effect of covariates. Due to these new tools, prognosis prediction is no longer limited to the time of the first computation but can be adapted and recalculated based on the occurrence (or not) of any event as time passes from the first computation. In this review, we aimed to give an overview of the available nomograms for STS and to help clinicians in the process of selecting the best tool for each patient.

Short- and long-term surgical outcomes of pancreatic resection for retroperitoneal sarcoma: A long-term single-center experience of 90 cases

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) en bloc with pancreas is challenging and controversial. This single-center retrospective study aimed to analyze the impact of pancreatic resection (PR) and its different types on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RPS.

METHODS

Data from 242 consecutive patients with RPS who underwent surgical treatment at the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between January 2010 and February 2021 were analyzed. Out of these, 90 patients underwent PR, including pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD) in 31 and distal pancreatectomy (DP) in 59.

RESULTS

Patients in the PR group had a higher major morbidity (37.8% vs. 14.5%) and mortality (8.9% vs. 1.3%) than those in the non-PR group, with a similar 5-year overall survival (OS) rate (46.9% vs. 53.6%). Patients in the PD and DP groups had a slight difference in major morbidity (48.4% vs. 32.2%), mortality (6.4% vs. 10.2%), and 5-year OS rates (43.3% vs. 49.3%). The PR type was not an independent risk factor for major morbidity or OS.

CONCLUSIONS

PR in RPS resection was associated with increased morbidity and mortality with minimal influence on survival. Patients with RPS undergoing PD and DP showed slight differences in terms of safety and OS.

Surveillance Post Surgery for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Complete en bloc surgical resection offers the best opportunity for the cure of primary retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The potential for disease recurrence, in the form of both loco-regional recurrence and distant metastases, underpins the rationale for postoperative surveillance. There is a paucity of high-quality evidence underpinning follow-up for RPS patients, and most practice guidelines draw from expert opinion and evidence from soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities. The available observational retrospective data analysis has failed to demonstrate that high-intensity radiological surveillance improves the overall survival in patients. The lack of a robust evidence base has given rise to variations in approaches to post-operative surveillance strategies adopted by specialist centres managing RPS across the world. More high-quality prospective research is needed and planned to more clearly support surveillance approaches that balance oncologic outcomes, patient-centric care, and health service value. Risk stratification tools exist and are available for use in routine practice. Their use will likely support more individualised post-operative surveillance moving forward. Surveillance will likely be underpinned by serial radiological imaging for the medium term. However, developments in genomics offer hope for biomarkers such as ctDNA to impact patient care positively in the future and further support individualised patient care pathways.

Management of Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Recurrence after resection of retroperitoneal sarcoma is common and varies by histological subtype. Pattern of recurrence is similarly affected by histology (e.g., well-differentiated liposarcoma is more likely to recur locoregionally, whereas leiomyosarcoma is more likely to develop distant metastases). Radiotherapy may provide effective locoregional control in limited circumstances and the data on the impact of chemotherapy are scant. Surgery for locally recurrent disease is associated with the greatest survival benefit; however, data are retrospective and from a highly selected subgroup of patients. Limited retrospective data have also suggested a survival association with the resection of limited distant metastases. Given the complexity of these patients, multidisciplinary evaluation at a high-volume sarcoma center is critical.

Role of Imaging in Initial Prognostication of Locally Advanced Soft Tissue Sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Although imaging is central in the initial staging of patients with soft tissue sarcomas (STS), it remains underused and few radiological features are currently used in practice for prognostication and to help guide the best therapeutic strategy. Yet, several prognostic qualitative and quantitative characteristics from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and positron emission tomography (PET) have been identified over these last decades.

OBJECTIVE

After an overview of the current validated prognostic features based on baseline imaging and their integration into prognostic tools, such as nomograms used by clinicians, the aim of this review is to summarize more complex and innovative MRI, PET, and radiomics features, and to highlight their role to predict indirectly (through histologic grade) or directly the patients' outcomes.

Lipidomics and Transcriptomics Differ Liposarcoma Differentiation Characteristics That Can Be Altered by Pentose Phosphate Pathway Intervention

Liposarcoma (LPS) is a rare and heterogeneous malignancy of adipocytic origin. Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) are two of the most common subtypes, showing similar genetic characterizations but distinct biological behaviors and clinical prognosis. Compared to WDLPS, DDLPS is more aggressive and has the potential of metastasis, as the malignant adipocytic tumor's metabolic changes may have taken place during the tumorigenesis of LPSs. Therefore, to investigate the lipid alterations between the two subtypes, high-resolution liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) based untargeted lipidomic analysis was performed onto LPS tissues from 6 WDLPS and 7 DDLPS patients. The lipidomic analysis showed the upregulated phosphatidylcholines and phosphoethanolamines in DDLPS, and the upregulated triglycerides and diglycerides in WDLPS, which might be due to the uncompleted adipocytic dedifferentiation leading to such tumorigenesis. Such a finding was also confirmed by the similarity comparison of two LPS subtypes to the transcriptome of stromal vascular fraction at different differentiation stages. Transcriptomic analysis also demonstrated that metabolic pathways including the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP) were upregulated in WDLPS compared to DDLPS. Therefore, the cell line LPS853 was treated with the PPP inhibitor 6-aminonicotinamide ex vivo and the proliferation and invasion of LPS853 was significantly promoted by PPP inhibition, suggesting the potential role of PPP in the development and differentiation of LPS. In conclusion, this study described the altered lipid profiles of WDLPS and DDLPS for the first time, revealing the different differentiation stages of the two subtypes and providing a potential metabolic target for LPS treatment.

Patients with first recurrent retroperitoneal sarcoma that can be macroscopically completely resected can achieve comparable outcomes with that of primary patients after en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs

The outcomes of patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) are significantly superior to those with recurrence. En bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs is recommended in primary RPS. However, whether en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs can benefit recurrent patients or some recurrent patients is unclear. We compared the outcomes of patients with primary RPS, first recurrence (RPS-Rec1), and ≥2 recurrences (≥RPS-Rec2) to evaluate the value and criteria for en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs in recurrent cases. We evaluated the safety of en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs by assessing operation time, blood loss volume, postoperative morbidities (POM), and efficacy by comparing local recurrence and peritoneal metastasis (LR-PM), distant metastasis, progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). A total of 101, 47, and 30 patients with primary RPS, RPS-Rec1, and ≥RPS-Rec2 were included, respectively. Recurrent RPS invaded more adjacent organs and surrounding fat tissue than primary RPS. The operation time, amount of blood loss, incidence of grade III–V POM, LR-PM rate, PFS, and OS in the RPS-Rec1 group were similar to those of the primary group, both of which were significantly superior to those of the ≥RPS-Rec2 group. Macroscopically incomplete resection and high-grade RPS rather than first recurrence were independent risk factors for LR-PM, PFS, and OS. In conclusion, the safety and efficacy of en bloc resection of tumor and adjacent organs in RPS-Rec1 were comparable with those in primary RPS but significantly superior to those of ≥RPS-Rec2. For RPS-Rec1, comparable outcomes to patients with primary RPS can be achieved, particularly in those in whom a macroscopically complete resection is achieved.

Survival outcomes of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Definitive evidence to guide clinical practice on the principles of surgery for retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPSs) is still lacking. This study aims to summarise the available evidence to assess the relative benefits and disadvantages of an aggressive surgical approach with contiguous organ resection in patients with RPS, the association between surgical resection margins and survival outcomes, and the role of surgery in recurrent RPS.

Methods

We searched PubMed, the Cochrane Library, and EMBASE for relevant randomised trials and observational studies published from inception up to May 1, 2021. Prospective or retrospective studies, published in the English language, providing outcome data with surgical treatment in patients with RPS were selected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS).

Findings

In total, 47 articles were analysed. There were no significant differences in the rates of OS (HR: 0.93; 95% CI: 0.83–1.03; P = 0.574) and recurrence-free survival (HR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.74–1.27; P = 0.945) between the extended resection group and the tumour resection alone group. Organ resection did not increase postoperative mortality (OR: 1.00; 95% CI: 0.55–1.81; P = 0.997) but had a relatively higher complication rate (OR: 2.24, 95% CI: 0.94–5.34; P = 0.068). OS was higher in R0 than in R1 resection (HR: 1.34; 95% CI: 1.23–1.44; P < 0.001) and in R1 resection than in R2 resection (HR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.35–2.36; P < 0.001). OS was also higher in R2 resection than in no surgery (HR: 1.26; 95% CI: 1.07–1.45; P < 0.001), however, subgroup analysis showed that the pooled HR in the trials reporting primary RPS was similar between the two groups (HR, 1.14; 95% CI, 0.87–1.42; P = 0.42). Surgical treatment achieves a significantly higher OS rate than does conservative treatment (HR: 2.42; 95% CI: 1.21–3.64; P < 0.001) for recurrent RPS.

Conclusions

For primary RPS, curative-intent en bloc resection should be aimed, and adjacent organs with evidence of direct invasion must be resected to avoid R2 resection. For recurrent RPS, surgical resection should be considered as a priority. Incomplete resection remains to have a survival benefit in select patients with unresectable recurrent RPS.

Retroperitoneal and Mesenteric Liposarcomas

Retroperitoneal liposarcomas are a rare entity and are comprised mostly of the well-differentiated and dedifferentiated subtypes. Eight-year survival ranges from 30% to 80% depending on histologic subtype and grade. Surgery is the cornerstone of treatment and compartment resection is the current standard. Mesenteric liposarcomas are extremely rare and comprise more high-grade lesions, with poorer prognosis of 50% 5-year overall survival. They are managed with a similar aggressive surgical approach. This review presents the current management of retroperitoneal and mesenteric liposarcomas.

Management of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma in the Adult: An Updated Consensus Approach from the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group

BACKGROUND

Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS), but local recurrence is common. Biologic behavior and recurrence patterns differ significantly among histologic types of RPS, with implications for management. The Transatlantic Australasian RPS Working Group (TARPSWG) published a consensus approach to primary RPS, and to complement this, one for recurrent RPS in 2016. Since then, additional studies have been published, and collaborative discussion is ongoing to address the clinical challenges of local recurrence in RPS.

METHODS

An extensive literature search was performed, and the previous consensus statements for recurrent RPS were updated after review by TARPSWG members. The search included the most common RPS histologic types: liposarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, solitary fibrous tumor, undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma, and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor.

RESULTS

Recurrent RPS management was evaluated from diagnosis to follow-up evaluation. For appropriately selected patients, resection is safe. Nomograms currently are available to help predict outcome after resection. These and other new findings have been combined with expert recommendations to provide 36 statements, each of which is attributed a level of evidence and grade of recommendation. In this updated document, more emphasis is placed on histologic type and clarification of the intent for surgical treatment, either curative or palliative. Overall, the fundamental tenet of optimal care for patients with recurrent RPS remains individualized treatment after multidisciplinary discussion by an experienced team with expertise in RPS.

CONCLUSIONS

Updated consensus recommendations are provided to help guide decision-making for treatment of locally recurrent RPS and better selection of patients who would potentially benefit from surgery.

Real-world use of palbociclib monotherapy in retroperitoneal liposarcomas at a large volume sarcoma center

Palbociclib has been evaluated in early phase trials for well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) patients, with reported median progression-free survival (PFS) of 18 weeks. Here, we report on real-world use and surgical outcomes associated with palbociclib treatment. We retrospectively reviewed 61 consecutive patients with retroperitoneal WDLPS (n = 14) or DDLPS (n = 47) treated with palbociclib monotherapy between 1 March 2016 and 28 February 2021 at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center. At palbociclib initiation, median age was 64 (interquartile range [IQR] 56-72). In WDLPS and DDLPS cohorts, the median number of prior systemic treatments was 0 (IQR 0-0) and 2 (IQR 0-4), respectively. Median number of prior surgeries was 2 (WDLPS IQR 1-2.75) and 2 (DDLPS IQR 1-3). Median PFS was 9.2 (WDLPS IQR 3.9-21.9) and 2.6 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-6.1), with median time on treatment of 7.4 months (WDLPS IQR 3.5-14.2) and 2.7 months (DDLPS IQR 2.0-5.7). Twelve patients ultimately underwent surgical resection. Resections were macroscopically complete (R0/R1) in half (n = 6/12), among whom only one patient experienced relapse after resection (median follow-up 7.5 months). All patients who underwent macroscopically incomplete resections progressed after surgery with median time to progression of 3.3 months (IQR 2.3-4.4). Surgery after palbociclib treatment was not associated with improved overall survival. Efficacy of palbociclib monotherapy for patients with advanced WDLPS and DDLPS is disappointing. While palbociclib may have been used to delay surgery, there was no clear benefit from treatment and few patients achieved prolonged tumor control.

The Role of Surgical Expertise and Surgical Access in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Resection – A Retrospective Study

Background

Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease often requiring multi-visceral and wide margin resections for which a resection in a sarcoma center is advised. Midline incision seems to be the access of choice. However, up to now there is no evidence for the best surgical access. This study aimed to analyze the oncological outcome according to the surgical expertise and also the incision used for the resection.

Methods

All patients treated for RPS between 2007 and 2018 at the Department of Visceral Surgery and Medicine of the University Hospital Bern and receiving a RPS resection in curative intent were included. Patient- and treatment specific factors as well as local recurrence-free, disease-free and overall survival were analyzed in correlation to the hospital type where the resection occurred.

Results

Thirty-five patients were treated for RPS at our center. The majority received their primary RPS resection at a sarcoma center (SC = 23) the rest of the resection were performed in a non-sarcoma center (non-SC = 12). Median tumor size was 24 cm. Resections were performed via a midline laparotomy (ML = 31) or flank incision (FI = 4). All patients with a primary FI (n = 4) were operated in a non-SC (p = 0.003). No patient operated at a non-SC received a multivisceral resection (p = 0.004). Incomplete resection (R2) was observed more often when resection was done in a non-SC (p = 0.013). Resection at a non-SC was significantly associated with worse recurrence-free survival and disease-free survival after R0/1 resection (2 vs 17 months; Log Rank p-value = 0.02 respectively 2 vs 15 months; Log Rank p-value &lt; 0.001).

Conclusions

Resection at a non-SC is associated with more incomplete resection and worse outcome in RPS surgery. Inadequate access, such as FI, may prevent complete resection and multivisceral resection if indicated and demonstrates the importance of surgical expertise in the outcome of RPS resection.

Prognostic Factors and Nomogram Construction for First Local Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Following Surgical Resection: A Single Asian Cohort of 169 Cases

Objective

This study aimed to explore the prognostic factors for first local recurrent retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (FLR-RPS) and construct predictive nomograms in the Asian population.

Methods

In a single Asian sarcoma center, data of patients with FLR-RPS were retrospectively analyzed from January 2011 to September 2020. We developed and internally validated prognostic factors determined by the Cox regression model, as well as nomograms for predicting recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS). The concordance index and calibration curve were used to determine the nomogram’s discriminative and predictive ability.

Results

With 169 patients, the median follow-up duration was 48 months and the 5-year OS rate was 60.9% (95% confidence interval (CI), 51.9%–69.9%). OS was correlated with chemotherapy at the time of initial surgery and tumor grading. The 5-year cumulative local recurrence rate and distant metastasis rate were 75.9% (95% CI, 67.5%–84.3%) and 10.1% (95% CI, 4.2%–16.0%), respectively, and the length of the disease-free interval following the primary operation was associated with disease recurrence. The 6-year OS and cumulative recurrence rate after surgery in our cohort were comparable with those in the TARPSWG cohort, but the proportion of local recurrence was higher (80.4% vs. 59.0%), and distant metastasis was less common (10.1% vs. 14.6%). In this study, two nomogram prediction models were established, which could predict the 1-, 2-, and 5-year OS and RFS, and the concordance indices were 0.74 and 0.70, respectively. The calibration plots were excellent.

Conclusions

For the FLR-RPS patients, some can still achieve an ideal prognosis. The treatment of FLR-RPS in Asian populations can be aided by the predictive model established in this study.

Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Care in 2021

Soft-tissue sarcomas are biologically heterogenous tumors arising from connective tissues with over 100 subtypes. Although sarcomas account for <1% of all adult malignancies, retroperitoneal sarcomas are a distinct subgroup accounting for <10% of all sarcomatous tumors. There have been considerable advancements in the understanding and treatment of retroperitoneal sarcoma in the last decade, with standard treatment consisting of upfront primary surgical resection. The evidence surrounding the addition of radiation therapy remains controversial. There remains no standard with regards to systemic therapy, including immunotherapy. Adjunctive therapy remains largely dictated by expert consensus and preferences at individual centers or participation in clinical trials. In this 2021 review, we detail the anatomical boundaries of the retroperitoneum, clinical characteristics, contemporary standard of care and well as recent advancements in retroperitoneal sarcoma care. Ongoing international collaborations are encouraged to advance our understanding of this complex disease.

Post-Systemic Chemotherapy Prognoses of Recurrent/Metastatic Soft Tissue Sarcoma Patients with Retroperitoneal/Intra-Abdominal Origin vs. Those with Extremities/Trunk Origin

BACKGROUND

The clinical benefit of systemic chemotherapy for recurrent/metastatic retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal soft tissue sarcoma (STS) compared to its benefits for other primary lesions has not been known or sufficiently evaluated.

METHODS AND PATIENTS

We retrospectively reviewed the cases of the STS patients who consulted a department of medical oncology in Tokyo between June 2011 and March 2018, and we extracted the cases of patients with primary sites at the retroperitoneum/intra-abdomen (cohort R) or extremities/trunk (cohort E) who received systemic chemotherapy in a recurrent/metastatic setting, comparing the cohorts' characteristics, chemotherapy details, and prognoses.

RESULTS

Of all 337 STS patients, we enrolled 49 patients in cohort R and 75 patients in cohort E. Liposarcoma was more frequently observed in cohort R (51.0%) than cohort E (22.7%). The median chemotherapy treatment line was two lines (range: 1-6) in cohort R and three lines (range: 1-9) in cohort E. The doxorubicin usage rates differed in recurrent/metastatic settings (90.0% in cohort R and 55.0% in cohort E), due mainly to the higher rate of a perioperative chemotherapy treatment history in cohort E (52.0% vs. 6.1% in cohort R). The median overall survival from the start of salvage chemotherapy was 31.9 months (cohort R; 95%CI: 20.9-42.8) and 27.1 months (cohort E; 95%CI: 21.6-32.5) (p=0.549).

CONCLUSION

There were differences in the distributions of pathology and antitumor drugs used in a salvage setting between retroperitoneal/intra-abdominal and extremities/trunk STS patients in recurrent/metastatic settings, but the prognoses with salvage chemotherapy were similar in the two cohorts.

Characteristics and Outcomes of Locally Recurrent Retroperitoneal Sarcoma After First Relapse in a Single Tertiary Asian Centre and Applicability of the Sarculator

Objective

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) comprise of 15% of soft tissue sarcomas where five-year overall survival rate is about 50%. Locoregional recurrences are observed in up to 50% of patients within the first five years following resection. Various factors have been shown to influence survival outcomes, such as histological subtype and tumour size. A nomogram for first relapse locally recurrent RPS was developed using 602 patients from 22 centres. The recurrent RPS Sarculator is available in an electronic interface and includes variables of age, size, margins of re-resection, radiotherapy, chemotherapy and histology to predict for 6-year disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). It has not been validated externally. This study aims to validate the Sarculator recurrence nomogram in predicting the survival outcomes of recurrent RPS in an Asian population as well as examine relapse patterns.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with first recurrent RPS from 1 January 2000 to 31 December 2017 with first local relapse and eligible for curative re-resection were retrospectively analysed. The type of surgery was unique for individual patients and suggestions of adjuvant therapy were based on globally recognised standards. Patients were followed up every 3 to 4 months post-operatively for the first 2 to 3 years and 6-monthly to a year thereafter. A R0 or R1 margin is deemed as complete resection, including a microscopically negative margin (R0) and microscopically positive but macroscopically clear margin (R1). R2 is classified as an incomplete resection with tumour rupture or remaining disease. Harrell’s C concordance index was used to determine the nomogram’s discriminative ability and calibration plots were used to assess accuracy. For the calibration, the patients were divided into 3 groups. Death data was retrieved from the National Birth and Death registry for accuracy.

Results

There were 53 patients included in this study. Patient and tumour characteristics have been summarised in Table 1. All patients had their second resection at a single centre. 66.0% had their first resection at the same centre. The median age was 53 (range 21- 79) at diagnosis, median tumour size was 17cm (12cm to 28cm) and median follow-up duration was 44.1 months. The most commonly encountered subtypes were de-differentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) (56.6%), well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) (20.8%) and leiomyosarcoma (LMS) (11.3%) with a majority being high-grade (75.5%). The median disease-free interval was 2.9 years (2- 5.3 years) from the first surgery. The median age at second surgery was 56 (21- 79) and all patients had a complete resection (R0/R1). Recurrence patterns differed with subtypes where 90.9% and 9.1% of WDLS, 76.7% and 16.7% of DDLPS and 83.3% and 16.7% of LMS had local and distant relapses respectively from the second surgery. 62.5% of distant relapses was in the lung followed by nodes (18.8%) and liver (12.5%). The 5-year OS from the second surgery was 66.2% (95% CI: 54.3%- 80.8%). The 1-year, 3 years and 6 years DFS were 50.2% (95% CI: 38.2% - 65.9%), 10.4% (4.26% - 25.5%) and 3.91% (0.684% - 22.4%) respectively. Overall, 32 patients (60.4%) had passed away from sarcoma. The concordance indices for 6-year OS and DFS were 0.7 and 0.65 (Figure 1) respectively which represents a fairly accurate prediction by Sarculator.

Conclusion

Our study has shown the Sarculator nomogram for primary recurrent was applicable in our cohort and its potential application in an Asian setting. The Sarculator nomogram will be a useful tool in clinical practice to improve risk stratification and facilitate prognosis-based decision-making. Moving forward, novel therapeutic strategies are required to enhance the prognosis of patients with recurrent RPS.

Risk factors for the development of local recurrence in extremity soft-tissue sarcoma

INTRODUCTION

Local recurrence (LR) is one of the main pitfalls in surgery for extremities soft tissue sarcoma (eSTS). Achieving clear histopathological margins is the most important factor to reduce the risk of LR, but the ability to do so depends on not only surgical technique but also the interplay between tumor biology, anatomical location and surgical approach. The balance between postoperative morbidity and oncological benefits in reducing the risk of LR needs to be considered.

AREAS COVERED

This review will cover which etiological factors for the development of eSTS lead to an increased risk of LR and discuss histological subtypes that have a high risk of LR and which surgical and neoadjuvant therapeutic strategies can minimize the risk of LR.

EXPERT OPINION

The traditional view that surgical radicality always results in low rates of LR, while marginality alone always leads to high rates of relapse, is outdated. In the modern era of surgical oncology, limb salvage and high-level function after resectional surgery are the key surgical goals. The best results are achieved by combining effective neoadjuvant treatments with planned bespoke oncological operations that consider the biological and anatomical factors of each individual sarcoma.

[Active surgical approach for retroperitoneal liposarcoma]

OBJECTIVE

To assess the influence of active surgical approach on the long-term postoperative outcomes in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study included 190 patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. The effect of malignancy grade, adjuvant chemotherapy, number of separate tumor nodes in primary neoplasm and the first relapse, as well as the number of previous total resections on survival rate was analyzed.

RESULTS

Overall and relapse-free survival is significantly worse in patients with high-grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma (G2-3) compared to low-grade (G1) tumor (p_log-rank=0.000). Multifocal growth of primary tumor (p=0.869; p_log-rank=0.607) and multiple (>1) separately located nodes in abdominal cavity and retroperitoneal space at the first relapse (p_log-rank=0.158 to 0.985) did not significantly impair prognosis after total resection of all types of retroperitoneal liposarcoma regardless malignancy grade. Adjuvant chemotherapy does not significantly improve relapse-free survival. Overall survival was significantly higher in patients who underwent ≥4 previous total resections compared to 1 surgical treatment for all types of retroperitoneal liposarcoma regardless malignancy grade (p=0.000; p_log-rank=0.001).

CONCLUSION

The only potentially radical treatment for patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma is surgery. We reported the advantages of active surgical approach for improvement of long-term outcomes in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

Longitudinal prognostication in retroperitoneal sarcoma survivors: Development and external validation of two dynamic nomograms

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to create and validate dynamic nomograms to predict overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) at different time points during follow-up in patients who had undergone resection of primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS).

METHODS

Patients with primary RPS operated upon between 2002 and 2017 at four and six referral centres comprised the development and external validation cohorts, respectively. Landmark analysis and multivariable Cox models were used to develop dynamic nomograms. Variables were selected using two backward procedures based on the Akaike information criterion. The prediction window was fixed at 5 years. Nomogram performances were tested in terms of calibration and discrimination on the development and validation cohorts.

RESULTS

Development and validation cohorts totalled 1357 and 487 patients (OS analysis), and 1309 and 452 patients (DFS analysis), respectively. The final OS model included age, landmark time (T_LM), tumour grade, completeness of resection and occurrence of local/distant recurrence. The final DFS model included T_LM, histologic subtype, tumour size, tumour grade, multifocality and the interaction terms between T_LM and size, grade and multifocality. For OS, Harrell C indices were higher than 0.7 in both cohorts, indicating very good discriminative capability. For DFS, Harrell C indices were between 0.64 and 0.72 in the development cohort and 0.62 and 0.68 in the validation cohort. Calibration plots showed good agreement between predicted and observed outcomes.

CONCLUSION

Validated nomograms are available to predict the 5-year OS and DFS probability at different time points throughout the first 5 years of follow-up in RPS survivors.

18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Is Useful in the Evaluation of Prognosis in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma

Simple Summary

Retroperitoneal sarcomas are difficult malignancies to treat because complete surgical resection is the only effective treatment option, but it is difficult to secure sufficient surgical margins. It is essential for developing a treatment strategy to assess tumor aggressiveness and predict prognosis for patients. However, the aggressiveness of retroperitoneal sarcomas before treatment cannot be fully evaluated. In patients with resectable soft tissue sarcomas or several carcinomas, SUV evaluated with FDG-PET has been reported to be a valuable prognostic parameter. However, the correlation between SUVmax on FDG-PET and the prognosis of several histological subtypes in retroperitoneal sarcoma, including dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma, remains uncertain. This study revealed that SUVmax calculated with FDG-PET was useful as a prognostic factor in retroperitoneal sarcoma, especially in dedifferentiated liposarcoma and Grade2 retroperitoneal sarcoma.

Abstract

Background: Retroperitoneal sarcomas are rare neoplasms that occur in the retroperitoneum. Complete surgical resection is the only effective treatment option. The prediction of prognosis by histological diagnosis has not yet been established. The purpose of this study was to identify the usefulness of [18-F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET) imaging for validating the prognosis of retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) established by histological diagnosis. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 201 patients with RPS treated at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between 2010 and 2021. We extracted the clinical data, including standardized uptake values (SUVs), evaluated with FDG-PET, and statistically analyzed the data. Results: The median age of patients was 64 years (range, 31–85 years). A total of 101 (50.2%) patients were men, and 100 (49.8%) were women. Surgical resection was performed in 155 (77.1%) patients. On histological analysis, 75 (37.3%), 52 (25.9%), and 29 (14.4%) patients were diagnosed with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, well-differentiated liposarcoma, and leiomyosarcoma, respectively. The median survival time for patients with high maximum SUV (SUVmax) (≥4) or low SUVmax (<4) was 275.8 months and 79.5 months, respectively. Furthermore, among the patients with dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the overall survival rate for patients with high SUVmax (≥4) was significantly lower than that of those with low SUVmax (<4). Conclusions: The present study demonstrated that SUVmax calculated with FDG-PET was useful as a prognostic factor in RPS, especially in dedifferentiated liposarcoma and Grade2 RPS. To devise a treatment strategy for RPS, SUVmax during FDG-PET scan may be considered for clinical assessment.

Epidemiologic Trends of and Factors Associated With Overall Survival for Patients With Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors in the United States

IMPORTANCE

Although the incidence and prevalence of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) have been thought to have increased during the past decades, updated epidemiologic and survival data are lacking.

OBJECTIVES

To conduct an epidemiologic and survival analysis of the largest cohort of patients with GEP-NETs using the latest data and to establish a novel nomogram to predict the survival probability of individual patients with GEP-NETs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

In this cohort study, 43 751 patients with GEP-NETs diagnosed from January 1, 1975, to December 31, 2015, were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Associated data were used for epidemiologic and survival analysis, as well as the establishment and validation of a nomogram to predict the survival probability of individual patients with GEP-NETs. The study cutoff date was December 31, 2018. Statistical analysis was performed from February 1 to April 30, 2020.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Incidence, factors associated with overall survival, and a nomogram model for patients with GEP-NETs.

RESULTS

A total of 43 751 patients received a diagnosis of GEP-NETs from 1975 to 2015 (22 398 women [51.2%], 31 976 White patients [73.1%], 7097 Black patients [16.2%], 3207 Asian and Pacific Islander patients [7.3%], 270 American Indian and Alaska Native patients [0.6%], and 4546 patients of unknown race [10.4%]; mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 58 [15] years). The age-adjusted incidence rate of GEP-NETs increased 6.4-fold from 1975 to 2015 (annual percentage change [APC], 4.98; 95% CI, 4.75-5.20; P < .001). Furthermore, among site groups, the incidence of GEP-NETs in the rectum increased most significantly (APC, 6.43; 95% CI, 5.65-7.23; P < .001). As for stage and grade, the incidence increased the most in localized GEP-NETs (APC, 6.53; 95% CI, 6.08-6.97; P < .001) and G1 GEP-NETs (APC, 18.93; 95% CI, 17.44-20.43; P < .001). During the study period, the mean age at diagnosis for localized disease increased by 9.0 years (95% CI, 3.3-14.7 years; P = .002), which remained unchanged for regional and distant cases. On multivariable analyses, age, sex, marital status, and tumor size, grade, stage, and site were significantly associated with overall survival for patients with GEP-NETs (eg, patients with distant vs localized disease: hazard ratio, 10.32; 95% CI, 8.56-12.43; G4 vs G1 GEP-NET: hazard ratio, 6.37; 95% CI, 5.39-7.53). Furthermore, a nomogram comprising age, size, grade, stage, and site was established to predict the 3-year and 5-year survival probability, with the concordance indexes of 0.893 (95% CI, 0.883-0.903) for the internal validations and 0.880 (95% CI, 0.866-0.894) for the external validations. The receiver operating characteristic curve demonstrated that the nomogram exhibited better discrimination power than TNM classification (area under the curve for 3-year overall survival, 0.908 vs 0.795; for 5-year overall survival, 0.893 vs 0.791).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

In this study, the incidence and prevalence of GEP-NETs have continued to increase over 40 years, especially among patients with rectal GEP-NETs. In addition, this study suggests that a nomogram with 5 prognostic parameters may accurately quantify the risk of death among patients with GEP-NETs, indicating that it has satisfactory clinical practicality.

Multidisciplinary Management of Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Diagnosis, Prognostic Factors and Treatment

Simple Summary

The management of retroperitoneal sarcomas can be challenging due to the variety of their presentation, histopathological types, and behaviours. This literature review provides a comprehensive and practical overview of the management of retroperitoneal sarcomas, focusing on diagnostic challenges, prognostic factors, multidisciplinary aspects of treatment and new research perspectives.

Abstract

Retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare cancers whose management can be challenging due to various presentation patterns, multiple organ involvement, and a high local and distant recurrence rate. Histopathology and prognostic factors analysis are essential to predict the behaviour of the disease and plan the best therapeutic strategy. To date, surgery is still the main therapeutic option that guarantees a chance of cure from the primary disease. While chemotherapy and radiotherapy seem to be good options for controlling metastatic and recurrent irresectable disease, their role in the treatment of primary RPS remains unclear. This literature review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of the multidisciplinary aspects of RPS management in high-volume centres, summarising the diagnostic path, the prognostic factors, and the most suitable therapeutic options.

[Differentiated surgical approach for retroperitoneal non-organ liposarcoma]

OBJECTIVE

To determine the indications for combined and organ-sparing surgery depending on malignancy grade of retroperitoneal liposarcoma.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A retrospective study included 190 patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Influence of malignancy grade, lesion of adjacent organs and resection/excision of adjacent organs on the overall and recurrence-free survival was studied. Moreover, we analyzed the issue of kidney-sparing surgery and nephrectomy.

RESULTS

Overall and recurrence-free survival were significantly worse in high grade (G2-3) compared to low-grade tumors (G1) (p=0.0001; log-rank test). Visceral invasion was revealed in 23% of patients with low-grade (G1) tumors and 53% of patients with high-grade (G2-3) neoplasms. Visceral invasion significantly impairs overall and recurrence-free survival in both low grade (G1) and high-grade (G2-3) tumors (p=0.0001; log-rank test). In case of low grade (G1) retroperitoneal liposarcoma, overall and recurrence-free survival was similar after combined surgery without histologically confirmed visceral invasion of liposarcoma and organ-sparing surgery (p=0.006; p=0.053; log-rank test). On the contrary, high grade (G2-3) tumor was followed by significantly better overall and recurrence-free survival after combined surgery without histologically confirmed visceral invasion compared to organ-sparing surgery (p=0.006; p=0.053; log-rank test). Recurrence-free survival was similar after kidney-sparing surgery and nephrectomy among patients with low-grade (G1) tumor (p=0.456; log-rank test). In case of high-grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma (G2-3), recurrence-free survival was significantly worse after kidney-sparing surgery compared to nephrectomy (p=0.039; log-rank test).

CONCLUSION

Surgery is the only potentially radical treatment of patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma. Organ-sparing including kidney-sparing surgery is advisable for low-grade liposarcoma (G1). On the contrary, organ-sparing surgery impairs long-term results and prognosis in patients with high-grade tumors (G2-3). Combined operations including nephrectomy are justified for high-grade retroperitoneal liposarcoma (G2-3).

Retroperitoneal sarcoma: the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group Program

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) is a bottom-up clinical network established in 2013 with the goal of improving the care and outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Here, we review the knowledge produced by this collaborative effort and examine the future potential of this group.

RECENT FINDINGS

TARPSWG has produced retrospective studies focused on patients with primary and recurrent RPS allowing a better understanding of patient prognosis, treatment outcomes and tumor biology. The group has played a pivotal role in a phase III randomized STudy of preoperative RAdiotherapy plus Surgery versus surgery alone for patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (STRASS) trial, favoring patient recruitment and trial completion. A prospective registry for patients with primary RPS populated by TARPSWG members is ongoing. TARPSWG has created consensus papers with recommendations regarding the management of patients with primary, recurrent and metastatic RPS that collated the views of representatives of sarcoma centers from Europe, North America, Asia and Australia.

SUMMARY

Since its inception, TARPSWG has become a leading network in the field of RPS. It has made a major contribution to the world of RPS research and cares allowing to overcome the limitations related to the rarity of the disease through collaboration.

What is the standard indication of adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy in localized soft-tissue sarcoma?

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The aim is to bring latest evidence of the role of perioperative chemotherapy in localized soft-tissue sarcomas (STS) of limbs and to review the risk classification systems of retroperitoneal and extremity STS.

RECENT FINDINGS

High-risk subset of localized STS of limbs and trunk-wall, defined with classic prognostic factors, consistently obtained 5-year overall survival ranging from 69 to 76% in randomized patients treated with full-dose of anthracycline and ifosfamide. Validated nomograms accurately predict, on individual basis, the risk of death and recurrence in localized STS of retroperitoneum and limbs, enabling a better selection of high-risk patients (usually those with death risk of ≥40%) that potentially could benefit with perioperative systemic treatment. Nomograms have virtually converted a negative large perioperative trial into a positive, favouring chemotherapy arm in the high-risk selection.

SUMMARY

Perioperative three cycles of full-dose of anthracycline and ifosfamide should be proposed on an individual basis, in reference sarcoma centres, to high-risk localized STS of limbs or trunk-wall in certain histologies.

Construction of Two Alternative Polyadenylation Signatures to Predict the Prognosis of Sarcoma Patients

Background

Increasing evidence indicates that alternative polyadenylation (APA) is associated with the prognosis of cancers.

Methods

We obtained gene expression and APA profiles of 259 sarcoma patients from the TCGA dataportal and TC3A database, respectively. The prognostic signatures, clinical nomograms, and regulatory networks were studied by integrated bioinformatics analyses. Then, the immune cell infiltration profile was obtained from the ImmuCellAI. The association between APA-based signature and immune cells was studied.

Results

A total of 61 and 38 APA events were identified as overall survival (OS)- and progress free-survival (PFS)-related biomarkers, respectively. Two signatures were generated. The area under the curves (AUC) values of OS signature were 0.900, 0.928, and 0.963 over 2-, 4-, and 6-years, respectively. And the AUC values of PFS signature at 2-, 4-, and 6-years were 0.826, 0.840, and 0.847, respectively. Overall and subgroup analyses indicated that high-risk patients had a worse prognosis than low-risk patients (all p-values < 0.05). In addition, immunomics analyses indicated that there are different patterns of immune cell infiltration between low- and high-risk patients. Furthermore, two clinical-APA nomograms were established and the C-indexes were 0.813 and 0.809 for OS nomogram and PFS nomogram, respectively. Finally, two APA regulatory networks were constructed. FIP1L1-VPS26B was identified as a key regulating relationship and validated in the pan-cancer analyses.

Conclusion

In this study, we identified prognostic predictors based on APA events with high accuracy for risk stratification in sarcoma patients and uncovered interesting regulatory networks in sarcoma that could be underlying mechanisms. This study not only provides novel potential prognostic biomarkers but promote precision medicine and provide potential novel research interests for immunotherapy.