Impact of EGFR mutation detection methods on the efficacy of erlotinib in patients with advanced EGFR-wild type lung adenocarcinoma

Association of smoking status with non-small cell lung cancer patients harboring uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor mutation

INTRODUCTION

Uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations include single and complex mutations. However, the association of the smoking status of patients with uncommon and complex EGFR mutations remains unclear.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluates the spectrum of uncommon EGFR mutations and investigates the influence of smoking status on the frequency of various uncommon EGFR mutations using a multi-institutional medical database.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2019, 5,608 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients were analyzed. EGFR mutations were detected in 3,155 (56.3%) patients. Among the 399 (12.6%) patients with uncommon mutations, 198 had single uncommon and 201 complex mutations, including 87 exon 20 insertions, 79 de novo T790M, 70 complex common, and 52 complex uncommon mutations. For comparison, we also included 402 patients with common EGFR mutations. The percentage of ever-smokers was significantly higher in patients with uncommon EGFR mutations than in patients with common EGFR mutations (25.8% vs. 17.4%, p = 0.005). Furthermore, the percentage of ever-smokers was higher in those with a complex mutation than in those with a single uncommon mutation (30.3% vs. 21.2%, p = 0.040). Among patients carrying uncommon EGFR mutations, ever-smokers had significantly more complex uncommon EGFR mutations than never-smokers (22.3% vs. 9.8%, p = 0.002). Among patients carrying G719X, L861Q, and S768I, ever-smokers tended to have complex EGFR mutations more frequently than never-smokers (64.7% vs. 28.7%, 50.0% vs. 18.7%, 88.9% vs. 81.2%, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study demonstrates not only a comprehensive spectrum of uncommon EGFR mutations, but also a positive relationship between smoking status and uncommon EGFR mutation frequency, especially complex uncommon EGFR mutations. The results suggest that smoking contributes to the development of complex EGFR mutations.

Uncommon EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: A systematic literature review of prevalence and clinical outcomes

Mutations in exons 18-21 of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) can confer sensitivity to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Deletions in exon 19 or the exon 21 L858R substitution comprise approximately 85% of mutations, but comparatively few data are available on the remaining "uncommon" mutations. We conducted a systematic literature review to identify evidence on uncommon EGFR mutations in locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42019126583). Electronic screening and congress searches identified studies published in 2012-2020 including patients with locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC and uncommon EGFR mutations (excluding T790M). We assessed the prevalence of uncommon mutations (in studies using direct sequencing of exons 18-21), and compared response to treatment and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with common versus uncommon mutations and in those with exon 20 mutations versus other uncommon mutations. We identified 64 relevant studies. Uncommon mutations constituted 1.0-18.2% of all EGFR mutations, across 10 studies. The most frequently reported uncommon mutations were G719X (0.9-4.8% of all EGFR mutations), exon 20 insertions (Ex20ins; 0.8-4.2%), L861X (0.5-3.5%), and S768I (0.5-2.5%). Patients with common mutations typically experienced better treatment response and longer PFS on EGFR-TKIs than patients with uncommon mutations; Ex20ins mutations were associated with less favourable outcomes than other uncommon mutations. This review shows that uncommon mutations may comprise a clinically significant proportion of the EGFR mutations occurring in NSCLC, and highlights disparities in EGFR-TKI sensitivity between different uncommon mutations.

Epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small cell lung cancer undetected by high-sensitivity allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assays

BACKGROUND

Identifying epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status is critical for planning lung cancer treatment. Sanger sequencing detects both known and novel mutations but shows poor sensitivity. High-sensitivity allele-specific real-time polymerase chain reaction (ASRP)-based assays offer quick and reliable results, but may overlook uncommon mutations. We aimed to define the rate at which high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays missed uncommon EGFR mutations.

METHODS

Non-small cell lung cancer specimens that were diagnosed as EGFR wild-type (EGFR-WT) by high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays and had residual DNA samples were sent for Sanger sequencing. Patient characteristics and clinical features were evaluated by chart review, and outcomes of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) therapy were studied.

RESULTS

Hundred DNA specimens diagnosed by high-sensitivity ASRP-based assays as EGFR-WT were rechecked by Sanger sequencing. Two samples which were re-biopsy specimens from patients with EGFR mutations were excluded from the analysis. Sanger sequencing was failed in 24 samples. Among the remaining 74 samples, 6 (8.1%) had EGFR mutations-one exhibited exon 19 deletion (delT751_I759insS), two exhibited substitution mutations (S768I+V769L and L861Q), and three exhibited exon 20 insertions (N771_P772insN, P772_H773insHP, and H773_V774insAH). Only the patient with the exon 19 deletion had received EGFR-TKI therapy. Although the best tumor response was only stable disease, this was maintained for >10 months.

CONCLUSION

High-sensitivity ASRP-based assays can overlook uncommon mutations. This detection failure rate is worth noting, especially when treating patients from regions known to have a high prevalence of EGFR mutation. Patients carrying uncommon mutations may still benefit from EGFR-TKI therapy.

Feasibility of re-biopsy and EGFR mutation analysis in patients with non-small cell lung cancer

Background

In cases of EGFR‐tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) failure, re‐biopsy may be useful to understand resistance mechanisms and guide further treatment decisions. However, performing re‐biopsy is challenging because of several hurdles. We assessed the feasibility of re‐biopsy in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients in real‐world clinical practice.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical and pathologic data of advanced NSCLC patients who experienced disease progression after previous treatment with EGFR‐TKIs at a single tertiary hospital in Korea between January 2014 and December 2016. Re‐biopsy specimens included small biopsy, surgical tissue, or liquid‐based cytology. EGFR mutation was tested using peptide nucleic acid‐mediated clamping PCR.

Results

Of the 230 NSCLC patients that experienced progression after EGFR‐TKI therapy, 105 (45.7%) underwent re‐biopsy. Re‐biopsy was successfully performed in 94 (89.5%) patients, and 11 patients were diagnosed with no malignancy. The complication rate was 8.6%, including seven cases of pneumothorax. EGFR mutation testing was performed on 75 patients using re‐biopsy specimens. Of the 57 patients who had sensitizing mutations at diagnosis, T790M mutations were found in 19 (33.3%), while 38 (66.7%) had no T790M mutation. Multivariate analysis showed that the re‐biopsy group was younger (P = 0.002) and exhibited a previous response to EGFR‐TKIs (P < 0.001).

Conclusion

Re‐biopsy in advanced NSCLC is feasible in real world clinical practice, particularly in younger patients and those who achieved a previous response to EGFR‐TKIs.

The emergence of T790M mutation in EGFR-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients having a history of acquired resistance to EGFR-TKI: focus on rebiopsy timing and long-term existence of T790M

Different growth kinetics occurring between the sensitive and T790M-containing cells may result in the repopulation of tumor cells over time. Little information has yet been uncovered on whether rebiopsy timing influences the T790M detection rate. We enrolled a total of 98 epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients, who had a history of acquired resistance to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) and available rebiopsy tumor specimens for reassessment of EGFR mutations. Rebiopsy was performed at the time of first EGFR-TKI progression in 54 patients (55.1%); for the other 44 patients (44.9%), rebiopsy was done with an interval from first EGFR-TKI progression (median 470.5 days, range 46-1742 days). Our results indicated that rebiopsy timing did not influence the detection rate of T790M and that the mutation could be identified in patients with a long EGFR-TKI-free interval. For patients without suitable lesions for rebiopsy at the time of EGFR-TKI progression, an attempt to rebiopsy should be considered during the subsequent treatment courses.

Higher frequency but random distribution of EGFR mutation subtypes in familial lung cancer patients

Despite the advancement of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibitors in lung cancer therapy, it remains unclear whether EGFR mutation status in familial lung cancers is different from that of sporadic cases. In this multicenter retrospective study, we compared both the EGFR mutation frequency and patterns between familial and sporadic cases. The results explored that family history of lung cancer is an independent predictor for higher EGFR mutation rate in 1713 lung adenocarcinoma patients (Odd ratio 1.68, 95% CI 1.06–2.67, P = 0.028). However, the distribution of EGFR mutation subtypes was similar to that of sporadic cases. Part of our study involved 40 lung cancer families with at least 2 tumor tissues available within each single family (n = 88) and there was no familial aggregation pattern in EGFR mutation subtypes. There were two families harboring the YAP1 R331W germline risk allele and EGFR mutation statuses among YAP1 family members also varied. These phenomena may hint at the direction of future research into lung carcinogenesis and EGFR mutagenesis.

EGFR mutation, smoking, and gender in advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Purpose

In the current targeted therapy era, information on the effect of smoking in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant lung cancer patients is scarce.

Results

In total, 11,678 adenocarcinoma patients were enrolled. Of these, 33.3% and 91.8% of male and female patients were non-smokers, respectively. An increased amount of smoking (P < 0.001 for trend), fewer smoke-free years (P < 0.001 for trend), and younger age of smoking initiation (P = 0.034 for trend) were all associated with significantly lower EGFR mutation rates. Smokers had a shorter median overall survival (OS) among both EGFR-mutant and EGFR-wild type patients (17.8 vs. 21.1 months, and 7.9 vs. 11.4 months respectively; both P < 0.001). Among patients with EGFR-mutant adenocarcinoma, younger smokers were associated with shorter OS (P = 0.047). In multivariate analysis, female gender was an independent prognostic factor for OS (hazard ratio: 0.86 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 0.80-0.93]; P < 0.001 in the EGFR-mutant group and 0.88 [95% CI: 0.81-0.96]; P = 0.004 in the EGFR-wild type group).

Materials and Methods

We reviewed the National Lung Cancer database (Taiwan) to assess the impact of smoking on the EGFR mutation rate and survival in advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients during 2011 and 2014 retrospectively.

Conclusions

Smoking was associated with lower incidence of EGFR mutation rate and reduced OS of advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in a dose-dependent manner. In addition to EGFR mutation and smoking, gender also plays an important role in survival among these patients.

Diamond: immunohistochemistry versus sequencing in EGFR analysis of lung adenocarcinomas

AIMS

Identification of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in lung adenocarcinomas is the single most important predictor of clinical response and outcome using EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). EGFR E746-A750del and L858R mutations are the most common gene alterations, also predicting the best clinical response to TKIs. We evaluated the accuracy of EGFR mutation-specific antibodies in a large cohort of lung adenocarcinomas, with different molecular settings and types of tissue samples.

METHODS

300 lung adenocarcinomas diagnosed on cytology (48 cell blocks), biopsy (157 cases) and surgical resections (95 cases) were selected. All cases were investigated for EGFR by sequencing and two mutation-specific antibodies (clone 6B6 for E746-A750del; clone 43B2 for L858R) were tested using an automated immunostainer. Discordant results were investigated by next-generation sequencing (NGS).

RESULTS

Overall sensitivity and specificity of mutant-specific antibodies were 58.6% and 98.0%, respectively, and they increased up to 84% and 100% if only tumours harbouring E746-A750del were considered. In 13 discordant cases, NGS confirmed immunohistochemistry results in eight samples.

CONCLUSIONS

The EGFR mutation-specific antibodies have a fair/good sensitivity and good/high specificity in identifying classic mutations, but they cannot replace molecular tests. The antibodies work equally well on biopsies and cell blocks, possibly permitting a rapid screening in cases with poor material.

Molecular heterogeneity assessment by next-generation sequencing and response to gefitinib of EGFR mutant advanced lung adenocarcinoma

Cancer molecular heterogeneity might explain the variable response of EGFR mutant lung adenocarcinomas to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). We assessed the mutational status of 22 cancer genes by next-generation sequencing (NGS) in poor, intermediate or good responders to first-line gefitinib. Clinical outcome was correlated with Additional Coexisting Mutations (ACMs) and the EGFR Proportion of Mutated Alleles (PMA). Thirteen ACMs were found in 10/17 patients: TP53 (n=6), KRAS (n=2), CTNNB1 (n=2), PIK3CA, SMAD4 and MET (n=1 each). TP53 mutations were exclusive of poor/intermediate responders (66.7% versus 0, p=0.009). Presence of ACMs significantly affected both PFS (median 3.0 versus 12.3 months, p=0.03) and survival (3.6 months versus not reached, p=0.03). TP53 mutation was the strongest negative modifier (median PFS 4.0 versus 14.0 months). Higher EGFR PMA was present in good versus poor/intermediate responders. Median PFS and survival were longer in patients with EGFR PMA ≥0.36 (12.0 versus 4.0 months, p=0.31; not reached versus 18.0 months, p=0.59). Patients with an EGFR PMA ≥0.36 and no ACMs fared significantly better (p=0.03), with a trend towards increased survival (p=0.06). Our exploratory data suggest that a quantitative (PMA) and qualitative (ACMs) molecular heterogeneity assessment using NGS might be useful for a better selection of patients.

Identification of five driver gene mutations in patients with treatment-naïve lung adenocarcinoma in Taiwan

BACKGROUND

It is important to select appropriate targeted therapies for subgroups of patients with lung adenocarcinoma who have specific gene alterations.

METHODS

This prospective study was a multicenter project conducted in Taiwan for assessment of lung adenocarcinoma genetic tests. Five oncogenic drivers, including EGFR, KRAS, BRAF, HER2 and EML4-ALK fusion mutations, were tested. EGFR, KRAS, BRAF and HER2 mutations were assessed by MALDI-TOF MS (Cohort 1). EML4-ALK translocation was tested by Ventana method in EGFR-wild type patients (Cohort 2).

RESULTS

From August 2011 to November 2013, a total of 1772 patients with lung adenocarcinoma were enrolled. In Cohort 1 analysis, EGFR, KRAS, HER2 and BRAF mutations were identified in 987 (55.7%), 93 (5.2%), 36 (2.0%) and 12 (0.7%) patients, respectively. Most of these mutations were mutually exclusive, except for co-mutations in seven patients (3 with EGFR + KRAS, 3 with EGFR + HER2 and 1 with KRAS + BRAF). In Cohort 2 analysis, 29 of 295 EGFR-wild type patients (9.8%) were positive for EML4-ALK translocation. EGFR mutations were more common in female patients and non-smokers and KRAS mutations were more common in male patients and smokers. Gender and smoking status were not correlated significantly with HER2, BRAF and EML4-ALK mutations. EML4-ALK translocation was more common in patients with younger age.

CONCLUSION

This was the first study in Taiwan to explore the incidence of five oncogenic drivers in patients with lung adenocarcinoma and the results could be valuable for physicians in consideration of targeted therapy and inclusion of clinical trials.