1
|
Joosten SE, Gregoricchio S, Stelloo S, Yapıcı E, Huang CCF, Collier MD, Morova T, Altintas B, Kim Y, Canisius S, Korkmaz G, Lack N, Vermeulen M, Linn SC, Zwart W. Breast cancer risk SNPs converge on estrogen receptor binding sites commonly shared between breast tumors to locally alter estrogen signalling output. bioRxiv 2023:2023.10.30.564691. [PMID: 37961147 PMCID: PMC10634999 DOI: 10.1101/2023.10.30.564691] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2023]
Abstract
Estrogen Receptor alpha (ERα) is the main driver and prime drug target in luminal breast. ERα chromatin binding is extensively studied in cell lines and a limited number of human tumors, using consensi of peaks shared among samples. However, little is known about inter-tumor heterogeneity of ERα chromatin action, along with its biological implications. Here, we use a large set of ERα ChIP-seq data from 70 ERα+ breast cancers to explore inter-patient heterogeneity in ERα DNA binding, to reveal a striking inter-tumor heterogeneity of ERα action. Interestingly, commonly-shared ERα sites showed the highest estrogen-driven enhancer activity and were most-engaged in long-range chromatin interactions. In addition, the most-commonly shared ERα-occupied enhancers were enriched for breast cancer risk SNP loci. We experimentally confirm SNVs to impact chromatin binding potential for ERα and its pioneer factor FOXA1. Finally, in the TCGA breast cancer cohort, we could confirm these variations to associate with differences in expression for the target gene. Cumulatively, we reveal a natural hierarchy of ERα-chromatin interactions in breast cancers within a highly heterogeneous inter-tumor ERα landscape, with the most-common shared regions being most active and affected by germline functional risk SNPs for breast cancer development.
Collapse
|
2
|
Berkel C, Cacan E. Estrogen- and estrogen receptor (ER)-mediated cisplatin chemoresistance in cancer. Life Sci 2021; 286:120029. [PMID: 34634322 DOI: 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.120029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2021] [Revised: 08/28/2021] [Accepted: 10/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Cisplatin is a platinum-based chemotherapeutic drug used in the standard treatment of various solid cancers including testicular, bladder, head and neck, cervical and ovarian cancer. Although successful clinical responses are observed in patients following initial cisplatin treatment, resistance to cisplatin ultimately develops in most patients, leading to therapeutic failure. Multiple molecular mechanisms contributing to cisplatin resistance in cancer cells have been identified to date. In this review, we discuss the effect of estrogen, estrogen receptors (ERs) and estrogen-related receptors (ERRs) on cisplatin resistance in various cancer types. We highlight that estrogen treatment or increased expression of ERs or ERRs are generally associated with higher cisplatin resistance in cancer in vitro, mostly due to decreased caspase activity, increased anti-apoptotic protein levels such as BCL-2, higher drug efflux and higher levels of antioxidant enzymes. Targeted inhibition of ERs or estrogen production in combination with cisplatin treatment thus can be a useful strategy to overcome chemoresistance in certain cancer types. Estrogen levels and ER status can also be considered to identify cancer patients with a high potential of therapy response against cisplatin. A better mechanistic understanding of the involvement of estrogen, ERs and ERRs in the development of cisplatin resistance is needed to improve the management of cancer treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Caglar Berkel
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Turkey.
| | - Ercan Cacan
- Department of Molecular Biology and Genetics, Tokat Gaziosmanpasa University, Tokat 60250, Turkey.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Damiana TST, Dalm SU. Combination Therapy, a Promising Approach to Enhance the Efficacy of Radionuclide and Targeted Radionuclide Therapy of Prostate and Breast Cancer. Pharmaceutics 2021; 13:pharmaceutics13050674. [PMID: 34067215 PMCID: PMC8151894 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics13050674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Revised: 04/30/2021] [Accepted: 05/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
In recent years, radionuclide therapy (RT) and targeted radionuclide therapy (TRT) have gained great interest in cancer treatment. This is due to promising results obtained in both preclinical and clinical studies. However, a complete response is achieved in only a small percentage of patients that receive RT or TRT. As a consequence, there have been several strategies to improve RT and TRT outcomes including the combination of these treatments with other well-established anti-cancer therapies, for example, chemotherapy. Combinations of RT and TRT with other therapies with distinct mechanisms of action represent a promising strategy. As for prostate cancer and breast cancer, the two most prevalent cancer types worldwide, several combination-based therapies have been evaluated. In this review, we will provide an overview of the RT and TRT agents currently used or being investigated in combination with hormone therapy, chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and external beam radiation therapy for the treatment of prostate cancer and breast cancer.
Collapse
|
4
|
Mayayo-Peralta I, Prekovic S, Zwart W. Estrogen Receptor on the move: Cistromic plasticity and its implications in breast cancer. Mol Aspects Med 2021; 78:100939. [PMID: 33358533 DOI: 10.1016/j.mam.2020.100939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2020] [Revised: 12/08/2020] [Accepted: 12/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/27/2023]
Abstract
Estrogen Receptor (ERα) is a hormone-driven transcription factor, critically involved in driving tumor cell proliferation in the vast majority of breast cancers (BCas). ERα binds the genome at cis-regulatory elements, dictating the expression of a large spectrum of responsive genes in 3D genomic space. While initial reports described a rather static ERα chromatin binding repertoire, we now know that ERα DNA interactions are highly versatile, altered in breast tumor development and progression, and deviate between tumors from patients with differential outcome. Multiple cellular signaling cascades are known to impinge on ERα genomic function, changing its cistrome to retarget the receptor to other regions of the genome and reprogram its impact on breast cell biology. This review describes the current state-of-the-art on which factors manipulate the ERα cistrome and how this alters the response to both endogenous and exogenous hormonal stimuli, ultimately impacting BCa cell progression and response to commonly used therapeutic interventions. Novel insights in ERα cistrome dynamics may pave the way for better patient diagnostics and the development of novel therapeutic interventions, ultimately improving cancer care and patient outcome.
Collapse
|
5
|
Kastrati I, Joosten SEP, Semina SE, Alejo LH, Brovkovych SD, Stender JD, Horlings HM, Kok M, Alarid ET, Greene GL, Linn SC, Zwart W, Frasor J. The NF-κB Pathway Promotes Tamoxifen Tolerance and Disease Recurrence in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Breast Cancers. Mol Cancer Res 2020; 18:1018-1027. [PMID: 32245803 PMCID: PMC7335344 DOI: 10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-19-1082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Revised: 02/19/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to identify critical pathways promoting survival of tamoxifen-tolerant, estrogen receptor α positive (ER+) breast cancer cells, which contribute to therapy resistance and disease recurrence. Gene expression profiling and pathway analysis were performed in ER+ breast tumors of patients before and after neoadjuvant tamoxifen treatment and demonstrated activation of the NF-κB pathway and an enrichment of epithelial-to mesenchymal transition (EMT)/stemness features. Exposure of ER+ breast cancer cell lines to tamoxifen, in vitro and in vivo, gives rise to a tamoxifen-tolerant population with similar NF-κB activity and EMT/stemness characteristics. Small-molecule inhibitors and CRISPR/Cas9 knockout were used to assess the role of the NF-κB pathway and demonstrated that survival of tamoxifen-tolerant cells requires NF-κB activity. Moreover, this pathway was essential for tumor recurrence following tamoxifen withdrawal. These findings establish that elevated NF-κB activity is observed in breast cancer cell lines under selective pressure with tamoxifen in vitro and in vivo, as well as in patient tumors treated with neoadjuvant tamoxifen therapy. This pathway is essential for survival and regrowth of tamoxifen-tolerant cells, and, as such, NF-κB inhibition offers a promising approach to prevent recurrence of ER+ tumors following tamoxifen exposure. IMPLICATIONS: Understanding initial changes that enable survival of tamoxifen-tolerant cells, as mediated by NF-κB pathway, may translate into therapeutic interventions to prevent resistance and relapse, which remain major causes of breast cancer lethality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Irida Kastrati
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Stacey E P Joosten
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Svetlana E Semina
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Luis H Alejo
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Svitlana D Brovkovych
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Joshua D Stender
- Department of Cellular and Molecular Medicine, University of California San Diego, San Diego, California
| | - Hugo M Horlings
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marleen Kok
- Department of Medical Oncology, Division of Tumor Biology & Immunology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Elaine T Alarid
- Department of Oncology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Geoffrey L Greene
- The Ben May Department for Cancer Research, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Sabine C Linn
- Division of Molecular Pathology, Department of Pathology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Jonna Frasor
- Department of Physiology and Biophysics, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Guo WY, Zeng SMZ, Deora GS, Li QS, Ruan BF. Estrogen Receptor α (ERα)-targeting Compounds and Derivatives: Recent Advances in Structural Modification and Bioactivity. Curr Top Med Chem 2019; 19:1318-1337. [PMID: 31215379 DOI: 10.2174/1568026619666190619142504] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2019] [Revised: 04/29/2019] [Accepted: 05/05/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Breast cancer is the most common cancer suffered by female, and the second highest cause of cancer-related death among women worldwide. At present, hormone therapy is still the main treatment route and can be divided into three main categories: selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs), selective estrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs), and aromatase inhibitors (AIs). However, breast cancer is difficult to cure even after several rounds of anti-estrogen therapy and most drugs have serious side-effects. Here, we review the literature published over the past five years regarding the isolation and synthesis of analogs and their derivatives.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei-Yun Guo
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Shang-Ming-Zhu Zeng
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Girdhar Singh Deora
- Monash Institute of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Monash University, Parkville, Victoria 3052, Australia
| | - Qing-Shan Li
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| | - Ban-Feng Ruan
- School of Food and Biological Engineering, Hefei University of Technology, Hefei, 230009, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Stelloo S, Bergman AM, Zwart W. Androgen receptor enhancer usage and the chromatin regulatory landscape in human prostate cancers. Endocr Relat Cancer 2019; 26:R267-R285. [PMID: 30865928 DOI: 10.1530/erc-19-0032] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2019] [Accepted: 03/13/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
The androgen receptor (AR) is commonly known as a key transcription factor in prostate cancer development, progression and therapy resistance. Genome-wide chromatin association studies revealed that transcriptional regulation by AR mainly depends on binding to distal regulatory enhancer elements that control gene expression through chromatin looping to gene promoters. Changes in the chromatin epigenetic landscape and DNA sequence can locally alter AR-DNA-binding capacity and consequently impact transcriptional output and disease outcome. The vast majority of reports describing AR chromatin interactions have been limited to cell lines, identifying numerous other factors and interacting transcription factors that impact AR chromatin interactions. Do these factors also impact AR cistromics - the genome-wide chromatin-binding landscape of AR - in vivo? Recent technological advances now enable researchers to identify AR chromatin-binding sites and their target genes in human specimens. In this review, we provide an overview of the different factors that influence AR chromatin binding in prostate cancer specimens, which is complemented with knowledge from cell line studies. Finally, we discuss novel perspectives on studying AR cistromics in clinical samples.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Suzan Stelloo
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Andries M Bergman
- Division of Oncogenomics, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Division of Medical Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Oncogenomics, Oncode Institute, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Laboratory of Chemical Biology and Institute for Complex Molecular Systems, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
In the past decade, chromatin immunoprecipitation sequencing (ChIP-seq) has emerged as the dominant technique for those wishing to perform genome-wide protein:DNA profiling. Owing to the tissue- and cell-type-specific nature of epigenetic marks, the field has been driven towards obtaining data from ever-lower cell numbers. In this review, we focus on the methodological developments that have lowered input requirements and the biological findings they have enabled, as we strive towards the ultimate goal of robust single-cell ChIP-seq.
Collapse
|
9
|
Severson TM, Kim Y, Joosten SEP, Schuurman K, van der Groep P, Moelans CB, Ter Hoeve ND, Manson QF, Martens JW, van Deurzen CHM, Barbe E, Hedenfalk I, Bult P, Smit VTHBM, Linn SC, van Diest PJ, Wessels L, Zwart W. Characterizing steroid hormone receptor chromatin binding landscapes in male and female breast cancer. Nat Commun 2018; 9:482. [PMID: 29396493 DOI: 10.1038/s41467-018-02856-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/30/2016] [Accepted: 01/04/2018] [Indexed: 11/09/2022] Open
Abstract
Male breast cancer (MBC) is rare and poorly characterized. Like the female counterpart, most MBCs are hormonally driven, but relapse after hormonal treatment is also noted. The pan-hormonal action of steroid hormonal receptors, including estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), androgen receptor (AR), progesterone receptor (PR), and glucocorticoid receptor (GR) in this understudied tumor type remains wholly unexamined. This study reveals genomic cross-talk of steroid hormone receptor action and interplay in human tumors, here in the context of MBC, in relation to the female disease and patient outcome. Here we report the characterization of human breast tumors of both genders for cistromic make-up of hormonal regulation in human tumors, revealing genome-wide chromatin binding landscapes of ERα, AR, PR, GR, FOXA1, and GATA3 and enhancer-enriched histone mark H3K4me1. We integrate these data with transcriptomics to reveal gender-selective and genomic location-specific hormone receptor actions, which associate with survival in MBC patients.
Collapse
|
10
|
Abstract
Male breast cancer is a rare disease, of which little is known. In contrast to female breast cancer, the very vast majority of all cases are positive for estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), implicating the function of this steroid hormone receptor in tumor development and progression. Consequently, adjuvant treatment of male breast cancer revolves around inhibition of ERα. In addition, the androgen receptor (AR) gradually receives more attention as a relevant novel target in breast cancer treatment. Importantly, the rationale of treatment decision making is strongly based on parallels with female breast cancer. Yet, prognostic indicators are not necessarily the same in breast cancer between both genders, complicating translatability of knowledge developed in female breast cancer toward male patients. Even though ERα and AR are expressed both in female and male disease, are the genomic functions of both steroid hormone receptors conserved between genders? Recent studies have reported on mutational and epigenetic similarities and differences between male and female breast cancer, further suggesting that some features are strongly conserved between the two diseases, whereas others are not. This review critically discusses the recent developments in the study of male breast cancer in relation to ERα and AR action and highlights the potential future studies to further elucidate the genomic regulation of this rare disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tesa M Severson
- Division of Molecular Pathologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
- Division of Molecular Carcinogenesisthe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Wilbert Zwart
- Division of Molecular Pathologythe Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Droog M, Nevedomskaya E, Dackus GM, Fles R, Kim Y, Hollema H, Mourits MJ, Nederlof PM, van Boven HH, Linn SC, van Leeuwen FE, Wessels LF, Zwart W. Estrogen receptor α wields treatment-specific enhancers between morphologically similar endometrial tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2017; 114:E1316-25. [PMID: 28167798 DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1615233114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
The DNA-binding sites of estrogen receptor α (ERα) show great plasticity under the control of hormones and endocrine therapy. Tamoxifen is a widely applied therapy in breast cancer that affects ERα interactions with coregulators and shifts the DNA-binding signature of ERα upon prolonged exposure in breast cancer. Although tamoxifen inhibits the progression of breast cancer, it increases the risk of endometrial cancer in postmenopausal women. We therefore asked whether the DNA-binding signature of ERα differs between endometrial tumors that arise in the presence or absence of tamoxifen, indicating divergent enhancer activity for tumors that develop in different endocrine milieus. Using ChIP sequencing (ChIP-seq), we compared the ERα profiles of 10 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users with those of six endometrial tumors from nonusers and integrated these results with the transcriptomic data of 47 endometrial tumors from tamoxifen users and 64 endometrial tumors from nonusers. The ERα-binding sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial tumors differed from those in the tumors from nonusers and had distinct underlying DNA sequences and divergent enhancer activity as marked by histone 3 containing the acetylated lysine 27 (H3K27ac). Because tamoxifen acts as an agonist in the postmenopausal endometrium, similar to estrogen in the breast, we compared ERα sites in tamoxifen-associated endometrial cancers with publicly available ERα ChIP-seq data in breast tumors and found a striking resemblance in the ERα patterns of the two tissue types. Our study highlights the divergence between endometrial tumors that arise in different hormonal conditions and shows that ERα enhancer use in human cancer differs in the presence of nonphysiological endocrine stimuli.
Collapse
|