1
|
You DD, Paik KY, Woo YK, Jung JH, Kim HA, Hwang SS, Hong TH, Lee SH. Accuracy of preoperative T2 gallbladder tumor localization and the adequate surgical resection. Eur J Surg Oncol 2024; 50:108049. [PMID: 38442637 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2024.108049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2023] [Revised: 02/13/2024] [Accepted: 02/20/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The agreement between the radiologic and histopathologic tumor locations in T2 gallbladder cancer is critical. There is no consensus regarding the extent of curative resection by tumor locations. METHODS Between January 2010 and December 2019, a consecutive series of 118 patients with pathological T2 gallbladder cancer who underwent surgery were retrospectively analyzed in terms of the accordance between radiologic and histopathologic tumor locations, the extents of hepatic resection and the numbers of harvested lymph nodes. Radical resection was defined as liver resection with harvesting of at least four lymph nodes. RESULTS The accuracy of preoperative tumor localization was only 68%. After radical resection, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was 59.4%; after nonradical resection, the figure was 46.1% (p = 0.092). In subanalyses, the 5-year OS was marginally better for patients who underwent liver resection or from whom at least four lymph nodes were harvested than those who did not undergo liver resection or from whom three or fewer lymph nodes were harvested (58.2% vs. 39.4%, p = 0.072; 59.9% vs. 50.0%, p = 0.072, respectively). In patients with peritoneal side tumor, the 5-year OSs of those who did and did not undergo liver resection were 67% and 41.2%, respectively (p = 0.028). In multivariate analysis, perineural invasion and radical resection were independently prognostic of OS. CONCLUSION The accuracy of preoperative tumor localization was 68%. Hepatic resection, lymph node dissection harvesting of at least four lymph nodes are required for curative resection for gallbladder cancer, regardless of tumor location.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dong Do You
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Yeol Paik
- Department of Surgery, Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| | - Yoon Kyung Woo
- Department of Surgery, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ji Han Jung
- Department of Pathology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyun A Kim
- Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Seong Su Hwang
- Department of Radiology, St. Vincent's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Tae Ho Hong
- Department of Surgery, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Sung Hak Lee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Sohn HJ, Lee M, Han Y, Kwon W, Yoon YS, Han HS, Lim CS, Jang JY. Clinical outcomes of minimally invasive (laparoscopic and robotic) versus open extended cholecystectomy: A multicenter propensity score matched study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2024. [PMID: 38323670 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.1419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/08/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND This multicenter study aimed to compare the clinical outcomes of minimally invasive extended cholecystectomy (MI-EC) versus open EC (O-EC) for patients with gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS Patients who underwent EC (cholecystectomy, wedge resection of the liver bed, and regional lymphadenectomy) for GBC between 2010 and 2020 in three centers were included in the study. The clinicopathological data were compared after propensity score matching. Additional subgroup analysis on laparoscopic and robotic EC (L-EC and R-EC) was performed. RESULTS A total of 377 patients were included: 308 for O-EC and 69 for MI-EC, respectively. The MI-EC group had a longer operative time (188.9 vs. 238.1 min, p < .001) and shorter hospital stay (9.0 vs. 7.2 days, p = .007), although no differences were found in operative blood loss, complication rate and survival outcome. In subgroup analysis, L-EC patients had a longer operative time (264.4 vs. 202.0 min, p = .001), compared to R-EC patients with comparable perioperative and survival outcomes. CONCLUSION Although patients with MI-EC had a longer operation time and higher medical costs, the advantages were enhanced recovery with comparable short- and long-term outcomes. The operation time was less for R-EC patients than for L-EC patients, though the high cost still remains. The surgery type for EC can be selected according to the patient's condition, social status and surgeon's preference.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hee Ju Sohn
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
- Department of Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Sup Lim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Tang Z, Wu YP, Tan BG, Chen XQ, Guo WW, Wu KS, Zhang XM, Chen TW, Zhou HY. Apparent diffusion coefficient and its standard deviation from diffusion-weighted imaging in preoperative predicting liver invasion by T3-staged resectable gallbladder carcinoma. Clin Radiol 2024; 79:e247-e255. [PMID: 38007337 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2023.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/21/2023] [Revised: 10/18/2023] [Accepted: 10/23/2023] [Indexed: 11/27/2023]
Abstract
AIM To evaluate apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and its standard deviation (SDADC) in preoperative predicting liver invasion by T3-staged gallbladder carcinoma (GBC). MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-one consecutive patients with T3-staged resectable GBC were included and divided into two sets with (n=27) and without (n=14) liver invasion. All patients underwent DWI at b-values of 0, 20, 50, 80, 100, 200, 400, 600, 800, and 1,000 s/mm2 with a 3 T magnetic resonance imaging scanner before surgery. ADC and SDADC of tumour-adjacent and tumour-distant liver tissues were measured on DWI, and were compared by Mann-Whitney U-tests. If there was a significant difference in any derived parameter, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess performance of this parameter to predict liver invasion. RESULTS DWI could differentiate between patients with and without liver invasion when b = 0, 1,000 s/mm2 (AUCs of ADC and SDADC were 0.697 and 0.714, respectively). In patients with liver invasion, mean ADC and SDADC of tumour-adjacent liver tissue were lower than of tumour-distant liver tissue when b = 0, 800 s/mm2, and = 0, 1,000 s/mm2 (all p-values <0.05). To differentiate tumour-adjacent from tumour-distant liver tissues in patients with liver invasion, AUCs of ADC were 0.687 (b = 0, 800 s/mm2) and 0.680 (b = 0, 1,000 s/mm2), and AUCs of SDADC were 0.673 (b = 0, 800 s/mm2) and 0.731 (b = 0, 1,000 s/mm2). CONCLUSIONS DWI could have potential value in preoperative predicting liver invasion by T3-staged GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Z Tang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China; Department of Radiology, Meishan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Meishan, Sichuan, China
| | - Y-P Wu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China; Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong, Chongqing, China
| | - B-G Tan
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China; Department of Radiology, Panzhihua Central Hospital, Panzhihua, Sichuan, China
| | - X-Q Chen
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - W-W Guo
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - K-S Wu
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - X-M Zhang
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China
| | - T-W Chen
- Department of Radiology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Yuzhong, Chongqing, China.
| | - H-Y Zhou
- Medical Imaging Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, and Department of Radiology, Affiliated Hospital of North Sichuan Medical College, Nanchong, Sichuan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Cho YJ, Yun WG, Jung HS, Lee M, Han Y, Kwon W, Jang JY. Oncologic safety of robotic extended cholecystectomy for gallbladder cancer. Surg Endosc 2023; 37:9089-9097. [PMID: 37798528 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-023-10463-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2023] [Indexed: 10/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although laparoscopic cholecystectomy is applicable for the treatment of early gallbladder cancer (GBC), minimally invasive surgery is not widely used for advanced GBC. This is because advanced GBCs necessitate complicated surgical techniques, including lymph node dissection and liver resection. Robotic extended cholecystectomy (REC) is thought to overcome the limitations of laparoscopic surgery, but oncological safety studies are lacking. Therefore, in this study, we aimed to evaluate the oncologic outcomes of REC compared with those of open extended cholecystectomy (OEC). METHODS A total of 125 patients, who underwent extended cholecystectomy for GBC with tentative T2 or higher stage between 2018 and 2021, were included and stratified by surgical methods. To minimize the confounding factors, 1:1 propensity-score matching was performed between the patients who underwent REC and those who underwent OEC. RESULTS Regarding short-term outcomes, the REC group showed significantly lower estimated blood loss (382.7 vs. 717.2 mL, P = 0.020) and shorter hospital stay (6.9 vs. 8.5 days, P = 0.042) than the OEC group. In addition, the REC group had significantly lower subjective pain scores than the OEC group from the day of surgery through the 5th postoperative day (P = 0.006). Regarding long-term outcomes, there were no significant differences in the 3-year [5-year] overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates between the REC group [OS, 92.3% (92.3%); DFS, 84.6% (72.5%)] and the OEC group [OS, 96.8% (96.8%); DFS, 78.2% (78.2%)] (P = 0.807 for OS and 0.991 for DFS). CONCLUSIONS In this study, REC showed superior short-term outcomes to OEC and no difference in long-term survival outcomes. Additionally, REC was superior to OEC in terms of postoperative pain. Therefore, REC may be a feasible option with early recovery compared with OEC for patients with advanced GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Jae Cho
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Won-Gun Yun
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Hye-Sol Jung
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Mirang Lee
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, 101 Daehak-ro, Jongno-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Park Y, Lee JS, Lee B, Jo Y, Lee E, Kang M, Kwon W, Lim CS, Jang JY, Han HS, Yoon YS. Prognostic Effect of Liver Resection in Extended Cholecystectomy for T2 Gallbladder Cancer Revisited: A Retrospective Cohort Study With Propensity Score-matched Analysis. Ann Surg 2023; 278:985-993. [PMID: 37218510 DOI: 10.1097/sla.0000000000005908] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE This study aimed to evaluate the effect of liver resection on the prognosis of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC). BACKGROUND Although extended cholecystectomy [lymph node dissection (LND) + liver resection] is recommended for T2 GBC, recent studies have shown that liver resection does not improve survival outcomes relative to LND alone. METHODS Patients with pT2 GBC who underwent extended cholecystectomy as an initial procedure and did not reoperation after cholecystectomy at 3 tertiary referral hospitals between January 2010 and December 2020 were analyzed. Extended cholecystectomy was defined as either LND with liver resection (LND+L group) or LND only (LND group). We conducted 2:1 propensity score matching to compare the survival outcomes of the groups. RESULTS Of the 197 patients enrolled, 100 patients from the LND+L group and 50 from the LND group were successfully matched. The LND+L group experienced greater estimated blood loss ( P <0.001) and a longer postoperative hospital stay ( P =0.047). There was no significant difference in the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) of the 2 groups (82.7% vs 77.9%, respectively, P =0.376). A subgroup analysis showed that the 5-year DFS was similar in the 2 groups in both T substages (T2a: 77.8% vs 81.8%, respectively, P =0.988; T2b: 88.1% vs 71.5%, respectively, P =0.196). In a multivariable analysis, lymph node metastasis [hazard ratio (HR) 4.80, P =0.006] and perineural invasion (HR 2.61, P =0.047) were independent risk factors for DFS; liver resection was not a prognostic factor (HR 0.68, P =0.381). CONCLUSIONS Extended cholecystectomy including LND without liver resection may be a reasonable treatment option for selected T2 GBC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yeshong Park
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yeongsoo Jo
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Eunhye Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - MeeYoung Kang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang-Sup Lim
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Boramae Medical Center, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ji Z, Ren L, Liu F, Liu L, Song J, Zhu J, Ji G, Huang G. Effect of different surgical options on the long-term survival of stage I gallbladder cancer: a retrospective study based on SEER database and Chinese Multi-institutional Registry. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol 2023; 149:12297-12313. [PMID: 37432456 DOI: 10.1007/s00432-023-05116-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2023] [Accepted: 07/04/2023] [Indexed: 07/12/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GC) is a uncommon and highly malignant tumor. This study compared the effects of simple cholecystectomy (SC) and extended cholecystectomy (EC) on the long-term survival of stage I GC. METHODS Patients with stage I GC between 2004 and 2015 in the SEER database were selected. Meanwhile, this study collected the clinical information of patients with stage I GC admitted to five medical centers in China between 2012 and 2022. Using clinical data from patients in the SEER database as a training set to construct a nomogram, which was validated in Chinese multicenter patients. Long-term survival between SC and EC were distinguished using propensity score matching (PSM). RESULTS A total of 956 patients from the SEER database and 82 patients from five Chinese hospitals were included in this study. The independent prognostic factors were age, sex, histology, tumor size, T stage, grade, chemotherapy and surgical approach by multivariate Cox regression analysis. We developed a nomogram based on these variables. The nomogram has been proved to have good accuracy and discrimination in internal and external validation. The cancer-specific survival (CSS) and overall survival of patients receiving EC were better than those of SC before and after the propensity score match. The interaction test showed that EC was associated with better survival in patients aged ≥ 67 years (P = 0.015) and in patients with T1b and T1NOS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION A novel nomogram to predict CSS in patients with stage I GC after SC or EC. Compared with SC, EC for stage I GC had higher OS and CSS, especially in specific subgroups (T1b, T1NOS, and age ≥ 67 years).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zuhong Ji
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China
| | - Ling Ren
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, Lianyungang No 1 People's Hospital, Lianyungang, China
| | - Fang Liu
- Pathological Diagnosis Center, XuZhou Central Hospital, Xuzhou, China
| | - Lei Liu
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Affiliated Yixing Hospital of Jiangsu University, Yixing, Jiangsu, China
| | - Jing Song
- Department of Endocrinology, The Affiliated Huaian No.1 People's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Huai'an, China
| | - Juntao Zhu
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China
| | - Guozhong Ji
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China.
| | - Guangming Huang
- Medical Centre for Digestive Diseases, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, 121 Jiangjiayuan Road, Nanjing, 210046, China.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Takala S, Lassen K, Søreide K, Sparrelid E, Angelsen JH, Bringeland EA, Eilard MS, Hemmingsson O, Isaksson B, Karjula H, Lammi JP, Larsen PN, Lavonius M, Lindell G, Mortensen FV, Mortensen K, Nordin A, Pless T, Sandström P, Sandvik O, Vaalavuo Y, Villard C, Sallinen V. Practice patterns in diagnostics, staging, and management strategies of gallbladder cancer among Nordic tertiary centers. Scand J Surg 2023; 112:147-156. [PMID: 37377127 DOI: 10.1177/14574969231181228] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/29/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy in the Nordic countries and no common Nordic treatment guidelines exist. This study aimed to characterize the current diagnostic and treatment strategies in the Nordic countries and disclose differences in these strategies. METHODS This was a survey study with a cross-sectional questionnaire of all 19 university hospitals providing curative-intent surgery for GBC in Sweden, Norway, Denmark, and Finland. RESULTS In all Nordic countries except Sweden, neoadjuvant/downstaging chemotherapy was used in GBC patients. In T1b and T2, majority of the centers (15-18/19) performed extended cholecystectomy. In T3, majority of the centers (13/19) performed cholecystectomy with resection of segments 4b and 5. In T4, majority of the centers (12-14/19) chose palliative/oncological care. The centers in Sweden extended lymphadenectomy beyond the hepatoduodenal ligament, whereas all other Nordic centers usually limited lymphadenectomy to the hepatoduodenal ligament. All Nordic centers except those in Norway used adjuvant chemotherapy routinely for GBC. There were no major differences between the Nordic centers in diagnostics and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS The surgical and oncological treatment strategies of GBC vary considerably between the Nordic centers and countries.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sini Takala
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Kristoffer Lassen
- Department of HPB Surgery, University Hospital of Oslo at Rikshospitalet, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Tromsø, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Kjetil Søreide
- HPB Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - Ernesto Sparrelid
- Division of Surgery, Department of Clinical Science, Intervention, and Technology, Karolinska Institute, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Jon-Helge Angelsen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway
| | - Erling A Bringeland
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, NTNU-Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Malin S Eilard
- Department of Surgery, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden; Transplantation Center, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| | - Oskar Hemmingsson
- Department of Surgical and Perioperative Sciences/Surgery, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden; Wallenberg Centre for Molecular Medicine, Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
| | - Bengt Isaksson
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Heikki Karjula
- Department of Surgery, Oulu University Hospital, Oulu, Finland
| | | | - Peter N Larsen
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Maija Lavonius
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Turku University Hospital and University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Gert Lindell
- Department of Surgery, Skåne University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Kim Mortensen
- Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, University Hospital North Norway, Tromsø, Norway
| | - Arno Nordin
- Transplantation and Liver Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Torsten Pless
- Department of Surgery, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark
| | - Per Sandström
- Department of Surgery and Biomedical and Clinical Sciences, University Hospital of Linköping, Linköping, Sweden
| | - Oddvar Sandvik
- HPB Unit, Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway
| | - Yrjö Vaalavuo
- Department of Gastroenterology and Alimentary Tract Surgery, Tampere, Finland; Faculty of Medicine and Health Technology, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland
| | - Christina Villard
- Department of Medicine, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden; Department of Transplantation, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery Transplantation and Liver Surgery University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital Haartmaninkatu 4 Helsinki 00029 Finland
- Gastroenterological Surgery, University of Helsinki and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Huang M, Zhong F, Chen M, Hong L, Chen W, Abudukeremu X, She F, Chen Y. CEP55 as a promising biomarker and therapeutic target on gallbladder cancer. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1156177. [PMID: 37274251 PMCID: PMC10232967 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1156177] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/01/2023] [Accepted: 05/05/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly malignant biliary tumor with a poor prognosis. As existing therapies for advanced metastatic GBC are rarely effective, there is an urgent need to identify more effective targets for treatment. Methods Hub genes of GBC were identified by bioinformatics analysis and their expression in GBC was analyzed by tissue validation. The biological role of CEP55 in GBC cell and the underlying mechanism of the anticancer effect of CEP55 knockdown were evaluated via CCK8, colony formation assay, EDU staining, flow cytometry, western blot, immunofluorescence, and an alkaline comet assay. Results We screened out five hub genes of GBC, namely PLK1, CEP55, FANCI, NEK2 and PTTG1. CEP55 is not only overexpressed in the GBC but also correlated with advanced TNM stage, differentiation grade and poorer survival. After CEP55 knockdown, the proliferation of GBC cells was inhibited with cell cycle arrest in G2/M phase and DNA damage. There was a marked increase in the apoptosis of GBC cells in the siCEP55 group. Besides, in vivo, CEP55 inhibition attenuated the growth and promoted apoptosis of GBC cells. Mechanically, the tumor suppressor effect of CEP55 knockdown is associated with dysregulation of the AKT and ERK signaling networks. Discussion These data not only demonstrate that CEP55 is identified as a potential independent predictor crucial to the diagnosis and prognosis of gallbladder cancer but also reveal the possibility for CEP55 to be used as a promising target in the treatment of GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maotuan Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Fuxiu Zhong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Department of Nursing, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Mingyuan Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Lingju Hong
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Weihong Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Xiahenazi Abudukeremu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Feifei She
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| | - Yanling Chen
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery and Fujian Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Fujian Medical University Union Hospital, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Medical University Cancer Center, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Key Laboratory of Ministry of Education for Gastrointestinal Cancer, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
- Fujian Key Laboratory of Tumor Microbiology, Department of Medical Microbiology, Fujian Medical University, Fuzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Das S, Prakash S, Shaikh O, Reddy A, Kumbhar U. Small Cell Carcinoma of the Gallbladder. Cureus 2023; 15:e38444. [PMID: 37273321 PMCID: PMC10234611 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.38444] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 05/02/2023] [Indexed: 06/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Primary neuroendocrine carcinoma of the gallbladder (GB) is a rare, highly dismal lethal disease with a fatal prognosis. A 45-year-old female presented with right upper abdomen pain and multiple vomiting episodes. Imaging studies showed diffuse thickening of the wall of the GB with locoregional invasion into the nearby structures with extensive abdominal lymph node metastasis and arteriovenous encasements. Ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration was done, which was diagnostic of small cell carcinoma of the GB. The patient was planned for palliative chemotherapy. A small cell variant of neuroendocrine carcinoma of the GB is a rare entity with a moribund lethality associated with it. Patients are diagnosed in advanced stages with not many treatment modalities to offer. Usually, patients are treated with palliative chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Snehasis Das
- Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Sagar Prakash
- Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Oseen Shaikh
- Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Abhinaya Reddy
- Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| | - Uday Kumbhar
- Surgery, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research, Puducherry, IND
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Bang S, Jee S, Son H, Cha H, Song K, Park H, Myung J, Kim H, Paik S. Clinicopathological Significance of Cell Adhesion Molecule 4 Expression in Gallbladder Cancer and Its Prognostic Role. Int J Mol Sci 2023; 24:ijms24086898. [PMID: 37108061 PMCID: PMC10138777 DOI: 10.3390/ijms24086898] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Revised: 04/03/2023] [Accepted: 04/05/2023] [Indexed: 04/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Cell adhesion molecule 4 (CADM4) is involved in intercellular interactions and is a tumor-suppressor candidate. The role of CADM4 in gallbladder cancer (GBC) has not been reported. Therefore, the clinicopathological significance and prognostic value of CADM4 expression in GBC were evaluated in the present study. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed on 100 GBC tissues to assess CADM4 expression at the protein level. The association between CADM4 expression and the clinicopathological characteristics of GBC was analyzed, and the prognostic significance of CADM4 expression was evaluated. Low CADM4 expression was significantly associated with advanced T category (p = 0.010) and high AJCC stage (p = 0.019). In a survival analysis, low CADM4 expression was associated with shorter overall survival (OS; p = 0.001) and recurrence-free survival (RFS; p = 0.018). In univariate analyses, low CADM4 expression was associated with shorter OS (p = 0.002) and RFS (p = 0.023). In multivariate analyses, low CADM4 expression was an independent prognostic factor of OS (p = 0.013). Low CADM4 expression was associated with tumor invasiveness and poor clinical outcomes in patients with GBC. CADM4 may play an important role in cancer progression and patient survival and can be used as a potential prognostic marker of GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seongsik Bang
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungyun Jee
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Hwangkyu Son
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyebin Cha
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Kihyuk Song
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Hosub Park
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Jaekyung Myung
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyunsung Kim
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| | - Seungsam Paik
- Department of Pathology, Seoul Hospital, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Zhang W, Ouyang DL, Che X. Short- and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic vs open surgery for T2 gallbladder cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. World J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 14:1387-1396. [PMID: 36632125 PMCID: PMC9827575 DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v14.i12.1387] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/25/2022] [Revised: 10/28/2022] [Accepted: 12/07/2022] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the development of laparoscopic techniques, gallbladder cancer (GBC) is no longer a contraindication to laparoscopic surgery (LS). Although LS is recommended for stage T1 GBC, the value of LS for stage T2 GBC is still controversial.
AIM To evaluate the short- and long-term outcomes of LS in comparison to those of open surgery (OS) for stage T2 GBC.
METHODS We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Ovid, Google Scholar, and Web of Science databases for published studies comparing the efficacy of LS and OS in the treatment of stage T2 GBC, with a cutoff date of September 2022. The Stata 15 statistical software was used for analysis. Relative risk (RR) and weighted mean difference (WMD) were calculated to assess binary and continuous outcome indicators, respectively. Begg’s test and Egger’s test were used for detecting publication bias.
RESULTS A total of five studies were included, with a total of 297 patients, 153 in the LS group and 144 in the OS group. Meta-analysis results showed that the LS group was better than the OS group in terms of operative time [WMD = -41.29, 95% confidence interval (CI): -75.66 to -6.92, P = 0.02], estimated blood loss (WMD = -261.96, 95%CI: -472.60 to -51.31, P = 0.01), and hospital stay (WMD = -5.67, 95%CI: -8.53 to -2.81, P = 0.0001), whereas there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of blood transfusion (RR = 0.60, 95%CI: 0.31-1.15, P = 0.13), complications (RR = 0.72, 95%CI: 0.39-1.33, P = 0.29), number of lymph nodes retrieved (WMD = –1.71, 95%CI: -4.27 to -0.84, P = 0.19), recurrence (RR = 0.41, 95%CI: 0.06-2.84, P = 0.36), 3-year and 5-year overall survival (RR = 0.99, 95%CI: 0.82-1.18, P = 0.89 and RR = 1.02, 95%CI: 0.68-1.53, P = 0.92; respectively), and 3-year and 5-year disease-free survival (RR = 1.01, 95%CI: 0.84-1.21, P = 0.93 and RR = 1.15, 95%CI: 0.90-1.46, P = 0.26; respectively).
CONCLUSION The long-term outcomes of LS for T2 GBC are similar to those of OS, but LS is superior to OS in terms of operative time, intraoperative bleeding, and postoperative hospital stay. Nevertheless, these findings should be validated via high-quality randomized controlled trials and longer follow-ups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, Guangdong Province, China
| | - De-Liang Ouyang
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Affiliated Hospital, Hengyang Medical School, University of South China, Hengyang 421900, Hunan Province, China
| | - Xu Che
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen 518116, Guangdong Province, China
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lv X, Wei F. Robotic surgery in treating biliary tract cancers: An updated systematic review. Asian J Surg 2022:S1015-9584(22)01717-1. [PMID: 36509603 DOI: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2022.12.011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/20/2022] [Accepted: 12/01/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Xiangkang Lv
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China; Second Clinical Medical College, Zhejiang Chinese Medical University, Hangzhou, 310053, Zhejiang Province, China
| | - Fangqiang Wei
- General Surgery, Cancer Center, Department of Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Surgery and Minimally Invasive Surgery, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, 310014, Zhejiang, China.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is the most common cancer of the biliary tract, characterized by a very poor prognosis when diagnosed at advanced stages owing to its aggressive behaviour and limited therapeutic options. Early detection at a curable stage remains challenging because patients rarely exhibit symptoms; indeed, most GBCs are discovered incidentally following cholecystectomy for symptomatic gallbladder stones. Long-standing chronic inflammation is an important driver of GBC, regardless of the lithiasic or non-lithiasic origin. Advances in omics technologies have provided a deeper understanding of GBC pathogenesis, uncovering mechanisms associated with inflammation-driven tumour initiation and progression. Surgical resection is the only treatment with curative intent for GBC but very few cases are suitable for resection and most adjuvant therapy has a very low response rate. Several unmet clinical needs require to be addressed to improve GBC management, including discovery and validation of reliable biomarkers for screening, therapy selection and prognosis. Standardization of preneoplastic and neoplastic lesion nomenclature, as well as surgical specimen processing and sampling, now provides reproducible and comparable research data that provide a basis for identifying and implementing early detection strategies and improving drug discovery. Advances in the understanding of next-generation sequencing, multidisciplinary care for GBC, neoadjuvant and adjuvant strategies, and novel systemic therapies including chemotherapy and immunotherapies are gradually changing the treatment paradigm and prognosis of this recalcitrant cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan C Roa
- Department of Pathology, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
| | - Patricia García
- Department of Pathology, Millennium Institute on Immunology and Immunotherapy, School of Medicine, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Vinay K Kapoor
- Department of Hepato-pancreato-biliary (HPB) Surgery, Mahatma Gandhi Medical College & Hospital (MGMCH), Jaipur, India
| | - Shishir K Maithel
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Winship Cancer Institute, Emory University, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Milind Javle
- Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, UT M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, USA
| | - Jill Koshiol
- Infections and Immunoepidemiology Branch, Division of Cancer Epidemiology and Genetics, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Rockville, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Li Y, Song Y, Zhang Y, Liu S. Progress in gallbladder cancer with lymph node metastasis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:966835. [PMID: 36072797 PMCID: PMC9441950 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.966835] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/11/2022] [Accepted: 08/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a malignant tumor that originates from the mucosal lining of the gallbladder. It is distinctly regional and is common in certain geographic regions of developing countries. GBC has a high degree of insidiousness as well as a high propensity for metastatic spread, resulting in the majority of patients being diagnosed at an advanced stage. Lymph node metastasis (LNM) is fairly common in GBC patients and is an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis. This article is focused on the lymph node pathways and metastatic directions of GBC. Furthermore, it summarizes the different lymph node groupings, disease stages and treatments. In the future, it is of great significance to develop individualized treatment and predict the outcomes of GBC patients with different lymph node conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuhang Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Yinghui Song
- Central Laboratory of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Yujing Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Molecular Epidemiology of Hunan Province, School of Medicine, Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
| | - Sulai Liu
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
- Central Laboratory of Hunan Provincial People's Hospital/The First Affiliated Hospital of Hunan Normal University, Changsha, China
- *Correspondence: Sulai Liu,
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Oh MY, Kim H, Sohn HJ, Lee S, Lee M, Kim HS, Han Y, Kwon W, Jang JY. Long-Term Oncologic Outcomes for T2 Gallbladder Cancer According to the Type of Surgery Performed and the Optimal Timing for Sequential Extended Cholecystectomy. J Gastrointest Surg 2022; 26:1705-12. [PMID: 35641810 DOI: 10.1007/s11605-022-05368-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/28/2022] [Accepted: 05/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Sequential extended cholecystectomy (SEC) is currently recommended for T2 and higher gallbladder cancer (GBC) diagnosed after simple cholecystectomy (SC), but the value and timing of re-resection has not been fully studied. We evaluated the long-term oncologic outcomes of T2 GBC according to the type of surgery performed and investigated the optimal timing for SEC. METHODS Patients diagnosed with T2 GBC who underwent SC, extended cholecystectomy (EC), or SEC between 2002 and 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Those who underwent other surgical procedures or those with incomplete medical records were excluded. Overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) according to the types of surgeries and prognostic factors for OS and DFS were analyzed. Survival analysis was done between groups that were divided according to the optimal cutoff time interval between SC and SEC based on DFS data. RESULTS Of the 226 T2 GBC patients, 53, 173, and 44 underwent SC, EC, and SEC, respectively. The 5-year OS rate was 50.1%, 73.2%, and 78.7%, and the DFS rate was 46.8%, 66.3%, and 65.2% in the SC, EC, and SEC groups, respectively. EC (p = 0.001 and p = 0.001) and SEC (p = 0.007 and p = 0.065) groups had better 5-year OS and DFS rates than the SC group. Preoperative CA 19-9 level > 37 U/mL (HR 1.56; 95% CI 1.87-2.79; p < 0.001) and N1 stage (HR 2.88; 95% CI 1.76-4.71; p < 0.001) were associated with poorer prognosis. The optimal cutoff interval between SC and SEC was 28 days. Patients who underwent SEC ≤ 28 days after the initial cholecystectomy had better 5-year DFS rates than patients who underwent SEC after > 28 days (75.0% vs. 52.8%, p = 0.023). CONCLUSIONS SEC is recommended for T2 GBC diagnosed after SC, because SEC provides better survival outcomes than SC alone. A time interval of less than 28 days to SEC is associated with an improved DFS.
Collapse
|
16
|
Cassese G, Han HS, Yoon YS, Lee JS, Cho JY, Lee HW, Lee B, Troisi RI. Preoperative Assessment and Perioperative Management of Resectable Gallbladder Cancer in the Era of Precision Medicine and Novel Technologies: State of the Art and Future Perspectives. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12071630. [PMID: 35885535 PMCID: PMC9320561 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12071630] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/07/2022] [Revised: 07/01/2022] [Accepted: 07/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is a rare malignancy, with an estimated 5-year survival rate of less than 5% in the case of advanced disease. Surgery is the only radical treatment for early stages, but its application and effectiveness depend on the depth of tumoral invasion. The extent of resection is usually determined according to the T-stage. Therefore, an early and correct preoperative assessment is important for the prognosis, as well as for the selection of the most appropriate surgical procedure, to avoid unnecessary morbid surgeries and to reach the best outcomes. Several modalities can be used to investigate the depth of invasion, from ultrasounds to CT scans and MRI, but an ideal method still does not exist. Thus, different protocols are proposed according to different recommendations and institutions. In this scenario, the indications for laparoscopic and robotic surgery are still debated, as well as the role of new technologies such as next-generation sequencing and liquid biopsies. The aim of this article is to summarize the state of the art current modalities and future perspectives for assessing the depth of invasion in GBC and to clarify their role in perioperative management accordingly.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gianluca Cassese
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Ho-Seong Han
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-31-787-7091
| | - Yoo-Seok Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
| | - Jun Suh Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
| | - Jai Young Cho
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
| | - Hae-Won Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
| | - Boram Lee
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
| | - Roberto Ivan Troisi
- Department of Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam 13620, Korea; (G.C.); (Y.-S.Y.); (J.S.L.); (J.Y.C.); (H.-W.L.); (B.L.); (R.I.T.)
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, Division of Minimally Invasive and Robotic HPB Surgery, Federico II University Hospital, 80131 Naples, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Choi JH, Kang CM, Park JY. EGFR-targeted fluorescent imaging using the da Vinci® Firefly™ camera for gallbladder cancer. World J Surg Oncol 2022; 20:201. [PMID: 35701793 PMCID: PMC9199159 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-022-02675-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 06/05/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Fluorescent imaging may aid with the precise diagnosis and treatment of patients with gallbladder cancer. In this study, we sought to demonstrate whether the da Vinci® surgical system and Firefly™ camera could detect EGFR-targeted fluorescent images in orthotopic mouse models of gallbladder cancer. Methods An orthotopic mouse model of gallbladder cancer was created by injecting NOZ gallbladder cancer cells mixed with Matrigel into the gallbladder. In vivo imaging of subcutaneous and orthotopic gallbladder tumors was performed after the injection of DyLight 650- or 800-conjugated EGFR antibody. Results Western blotting, flow cytometry, and confocal microscopy showed the presence of EGFR in NOZ cells, but not in HEK293 cells. Subcutaneous NOZ cell tumors fluoresced after injection with fluorescent EGFR antibody, but subcutaneous HEK293 tumors did not. Fluorescent EGFR antibody made orthotopic NOZ tumors fluoresce, with an intensity stronger than that in the surrounding normal tissues. Histochemical examination confirmed the location of the tumors inside the gallbladder and adjacent liver parenchyma. Fluorescent signal was also detected in orthotopic gallbladder tumors with Firefly™ camera. Conclusion Our study showed that fluorescent EGFR antibodies and the Firefly camera in the da Vinci system can detect fluorescing gallbladder tumors, which demonstrates their potential use for molecular imaging-based prevision surgery in the near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Ha Choi
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of HBP Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, and Yonsei Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jeong Youp Park
- Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea. .,Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, and Yonsei Institute of Gastroenterology, Severance Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Cho JK, Kim JR, Jang JY, Kim HG, Kim JM, Kwag SJ, Park JH, Kim JY, Ju YT, Jeong CY. Comparison of the Oncological Outcomes of Open versus Laparoscopic Surgery for T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Score-Matched Analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11092644. [PMID: 35566770 PMCID: PMC9099510 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11092644] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/18/2022] [Revised: 04/25/2022] [Accepted: 05/06/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Although laparoscopic treatment for T1 gallbladder cancer (GBC) has been described previously, the differences in oncologic outcomes between laparoscopic and conventional open surgery for T2 GBC have not been investigated. We aimed to assess the role of laparoscopic surgery using retrospectively collected data for 81 patients with T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 2010 and December 2017. Eligible patients were classified into “laparoscopic” and “open” groups. Propensity-score matching was performed in a 1:1 ratio. The effects of surgery type on surgical and oncological outcomes were investigated. After propensity-score matching, 19 patients were included in the open and laparoscopic surgery groups. The median follow-up durations were 70 and 26 months in the open and laparoscopic groups, respectively. The operative time (316.8 ± 80.3 vs. 218.9 ± 145.0 min, p = 0.016) and length of postoperative hospital stay (14.4 ± 6.0 vs. 8.4 ± 5.9 days, p = 0.004) were significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group. The three-year overall (86.3% vs. 88.9%, p = 0.660) and disease-free (76.4% vs. 60.2%, p = 0.448) survival rates were similar between the groups. Propensity-score matching showed that laparoscopic surgery for T2 GBC yielded similar long-term oncological outcomes and favorable short-term outcomes in comparison with open surgery. Laparoscopic treatment should be considered in patients with T2 GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Kyu Cho
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Jae-Ri Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwon-si 51472, Korea; (J.-R.K.); (J.-Y.J.)
| | - Jae-Yool Jang
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwon-si 51472, Korea; (J.-R.K.); (J.-Y.J.)
| | - Han-Gil Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Jae-Myung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Seung-Jin Kwag
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Ji-Ho Park
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Ju-Yeon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Young-Tae Ju
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
| | - Chi-Young Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju 52727, Korea; (J.-K.C.); (H.-G.K.); (J.-M.K.); (S.-J.K.); (J.-H.P.); (J.-Y.K.); (Y.-T.J.)
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +82-10-9360-8294
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Kwon YJ, Song KD, Ko SE, Hwang JA, Kim M. Diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability to differentiate between T1- and T2-stage gallbladder cancers using multi-detector row CT. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2022; 47:1341-1350. [PMID: 35192044 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-022-03450-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2021] [Revised: 02/07/2022] [Accepted: 02/09/2022] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To evaluate the diagnostic performance and inter-observer variability of differentiating T1 and T2 gallbladder (GB) cancers using multi-detector row CT (MDCT). METHODS This retrospective study included 151 patients with surgically confirmed T1 (n = 49)- or T2 (n = 102)-stage GB cancer who underwent contrast-enhanced MDCT from 2016 to 2020. Five radiologists (two experienced and three less experienced) evaluated the T-stage with a confidence level calculated using a six-point scale. GB cancers were morphologically classified into three types: polypoid, polypoid with wall thickening, and wall thickening. The diagnostic performance of T-staging was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were calculated based on a binary scale (T1 = positive). Inter-observer agreement was assessed using Fleiss κ statistics. RESULTS The area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of each reviewer for T-staging ranged from 0.69 to 0.80 (median 0.77). The overall accuracy of the five radiologists was 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 71-84%). Sensitivity was higher and specificity was lower in experienced radiologists than in less experienced radiologists (P < 0.001). The overall inter-observer agreement was fair (κ = 0.36; 95% CI 0.31, 0.41). The overall accuracy for T-stage was 63% (95% CI 48-76), 78% (95% CI 63-88), and 87% (95% CI 77-93) for polypoid, polypoid with wall thickening, and wall thickening type, respectively. CONCLUSION The accuracy of MDCT for differentiating T1 and T2 GB cancer is limited, and there is considerable inter-observer variability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yong Jae Kwon
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Kyoung Doo Song
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea.
| | - Seong Eun Ko
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong Ah Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, 81 Irwon-Ro, Gangnam-Gu, Seoul, 06351, Republic of Korea
| | - Minji Kim
- Statistics and Data Center, Research Institute for Future Medicine, Samsung Medical Center, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Goel M, Pandrowala S, Parel P, Patkar S. Node positivity in T1b gallbladder cancer: A high volume centre experience. Eur J Surg Oncol 2022; 48:1585-1589. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejso.2022.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/21/2022] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/17/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
|
21
|
Feo CF, Ginesu GC, Fancellu A, Perra T, Ninniri C, Deiana G, Scanu AM, Porcu A. Current management of incidental gallbladder cancer: A review. Int J Surg 2022; 98:106234. [PMID: 35074510 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2022.106234] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2021] [Revised: 01/11/2022] [Accepted: 01/12/2022] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
Early-stage gallbladder cancer (GBC) is mostly discovered incidentally by the pathologist after cholecystectomy for a presumed benign disease. It is the most common malignancy of the biliary tract with a variable incidence rate all over the World. The majority of patients with GBC remain asymptomatic for a long time and diagnosis is usually late when the disease is at an advanced stage. Radical surgery consisting in resection of the gallbladder liver bed and regional lymph nodes seems to be the best treatment option for incidental GBC. However, recurrence rates after salvage surgery are still high and the addition of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy may improve outcomes. The aim of the present review is to evaluate current literature for advances in management of incidental GBC, with particular focus on staging techniques and surgical options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Claudio F Feo
- Unit of General Surgery 2, Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, 07100, Sassari, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Peng DZ, Nie GL, Li B, Cai YL, Lu J, Xiong XZ, Cheng NS. Prediction of Early Recurrence After R0 Resection for Gallbladder Carcinoma of Stage T1b-T3. Cancer Manag Res 2022; 14:37-47. [PMID: 35018120 PMCID: PMC8740626 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s342674] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Purpose The time-to-tumor recurrence can predict the prognosis of hepatobiliary cancers following curative-intent resection. Therefore, for patients with gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) of stage T1b–T3 who had undergone R0 resection, we investigated the risk factors for early recurrence of GBC and their prognosis. Patients and Methods A total of 260 patients with GBC with T1b–T3 disease and an R0 margin were identified. Their clinicopathologic characteristics, perioperative details and prognostic data were reviewed. Survival analyses were carried out using the Kaplan–Meier method. Logistic regression models were used to identify the risk factors for early recurrence. Results The optimal cutoff for early recurrence was 29 months. Early recurrence tended to result in relapse far from the primary tumor, and such patients tended to have significantly worse overall survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that T3 disease, N1/N2 stage, poor differentiation of tumor, and lymphovascular invasion (LI) were associated with a greater risk of early recurrence. Patients diagnosed as having GBC incidentally and who had the risk factors of early recurrence were more likely to benefit from re-resection 2–4 weeks after a cholecystectomy. Conclusion T3 stage, N1–N2 stage, poor differentiation, and LI were independent risk factors associated with early recurrence for patients with GBC with stage T1b–T3 disease after R0 resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ding-Zhong Peng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Gui-Lin Nie
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Bei Li
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yu-Long Cai
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiong Lu
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xian-Ze Xiong
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Nan-Sheng Cheng
- Department of Biliary Surgery, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Sung MK, Lee W, Lee JH, Song KB, Kim SC, Kwak BJ, Hwang DW. Comparing survival rate and appropriate surgery methods according to tumor location in T2 gallbladder cancer. Surg Oncol 2021; 40:101693. [PMID: 34923377 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101693] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2021] [Revised: 10/10/2021] [Accepted: 12/05/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The survival outcomes and optimal extent of surgery of T2 gallbladder cancers remain controversial. We aimed to investigate the difference in overall/disease-free survival rates and assess the prognosis of T2 gallbladder cancers. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of 147 patients who underwent surgical resection for pathologically confirmed T2 gallbladder cancer between January 2003 and December 2012. Patients were categorized into two groups according to the tumor location (T2a vs. T2b) and three groups according to surgery method (simple cholecystectomy, cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection, and extended cholecystectomy). We compared the overall and disease-free survival rates according to T2 subgroups and surgery methods. Cox proportional hazard analysis was performed to evaluate prognostic factors for the overall survival of T2 gallbladder cancer. RESULTS Of all patients, 40 (27.2%) and 107 (72.8%) were diagnosed with T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers, respectively. The 5-year overall and disease-free survival rates were 75.0% vs. 73.8% (p = 0.653) and 72.5% vs. 70.1% (p = 0.479) in T2a and T2b gallbladder cancers, respectively. There was no difference in the survival rate among T2a gallbladder cancer according to the surgery method. However, in T2b gallbladder cancer, extended cholecystectomy showed a better overall survival than simple cholecystectomy and cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection groups (p = 0.043 and p = 0.003, respectively). CONCLUSIONS There is no difference in overall and disease-free survival rates according to the location of T2 gallbladder cancers. Extended cholecystectomy increases overall survival rate, especially in T2b gallbladder cancers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Min Kyu Sung
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Woohyung Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Song Cheol Kim
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Bong Jun Kwak
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Zhang W, Huang Z, Wang WE, Che X. Survival Benefits of Simple Versus Extended Cholecystectomy and Lymphadenectomy for Patients With T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Population-Based Study (2010 to 2015). Front Oncol 2021; 11:705299. [PMID: 34513687 PMCID: PMC8426630 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.705299] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/05/2021] [Accepted: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective This article aims to evaluate the survival benefits of simple cholecystectomy, extended cholecystectomy, as well as scope regional lymphadenectomy for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients. Methods We identified eligible patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. The confounding factors were controlled via propensity score matching. The log-rank test was utilized to compare overall survival. The multivariate Cox regression was then used to determine risk factors. Results Overall, data from 1,009 patients were obtained. The median overall survival (OS) of 915 patients that underwent simple cholecystectomy was 15 months; the median OS of 94 patients that underwent extended cholecystectomy was 17 months. There were no significant differences before and after propensity score matching (p = 0.542 and p = 0.258). The patients who received regional lymphadenectomy did show significant survival benefit, compared to those who did not receive regional lymphadenectomy. Furthermore, this benefit is observed in the N0 stage, but not observed in the N1 stage. In addition, the OS of patients who received lymphadenectomy for four or more regions was significantly better than those who received one to three regions lymphadenectomy. Age, the scope of regional lymphadenectomy, N stage, and tumor size were identified as prognostic factors. Conclusions Extended cholecystectomy was not observed to significantly improve postoperative prognosis of patients with T2 GBC. However, there was a significant survival benefit shown for those with regional lymphadenectomy, particularly for patients with negative lymph nodes. Future studies on the control of potential confounding factors and longer follow-ups are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Jishou, China.,Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| | - Zhangkan Huang
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China
| | - Wen-Er Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, People's Hospital of Xiangxi Autonomous Prefecture, Jishou, China
| | - Xu Che
- Department of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital & Shenzhen Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Shenzhen, China.,Department of Pancreatic and Gastric Surgery, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Koppatz H, Takala S, Peltola K, But A, Mäkisalo H, Nordin A, Sallinen V. Gallbladder cancer epidemiology, treatment and survival in Southern Finland - a population-based study. Scand J Gastroenterol 2021; 56:929-939. [PMID: 34224306 DOI: 10.1080/00365521.2021.1915373] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare malignancy in Western population with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the trends in GBC incidence, treatment pattern, and survival in Finland. METHODS Patients diagnosed with primary GBC in a geographically defined area (Southern Finland Regional Cancer Center) during 2006-2017 were identified. RESULTS Final cohort included 270 patients with GBC. The incidence was 1.32/100,000 persons, and it decreased 6.8 cases per million personyears during the study period. One hundred fifty-one (56%) patients were diagnosed at Stage IV. Fifty-one patients (19%) underwent curative-intent resection with 96% R0-resection rate. The median overall survival was 7.1 months and 5-year overall survival 11.6% for all patients, and 67.7 months and 56.8% after curative-intent resection, respectively. No improvement was noted over time in overall survival in patients with GBC, or in subgroups of different stages of GBC. CONCLUSIONS The incidence of GBC is slightly decreasing in Southern Finland, but survival has not improved over time.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hanna Koppatz
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Sini Takala
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Katriina Peltola
- Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Anna But
- Biostatistics consulting, Department of Public Health, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Heikki Mäkisalo
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Arno Nordin
- Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Ville Sallinen
- Department of Abdominal Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.,Department of Transplantation and Liver Surgery, Helsinki University Hospital and University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Kang H, Choi YS, Suh SW, Choi G, Do JH, Oh HC, Kim HJ, Lee SE. Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Med 2021; 10:3317. [PMID: 34362101 DOI: 10.3390/jcm10153317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/21/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual, Eighth Edition, subdivided T2 GBC into T2a and T2b. However, there still exist a lack of evidence on the prognostic significance of tumor location. The aim of the present study was to examine the existing evidence to determine the prognostic significance of tumor location of T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) and to evaluate the optimal surgical extent according to tumor location. (2) Methods: We searched for relevant literature published in the electronic databases PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, and Embase before September 2020 using search terms related to gallbladder, cancer, and stage. Data were weighted and pooled using random-effects modeling. (3) Results: Seven studies were deemed eligible for inclusion, representing a cohort of 1789 cases of resected T2 GBC. The overall survival for T2b tumor was significantly worse than that for T2a tumor (HR, 2.141; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.140 to 4.023; I2 = 71.4%; Pchi2 = 0.007). The rate of lymph node metastasis was lower in the T2a group (26.6%) than in the T2b group (36.6%) (OR, 2.164; 95% CI, 1.309 to 3.575). There was no evidence of a survival difference between the patients who underwent extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy in T2a GBC (OR, 0.802; 95% CI, 0.618 to 1.042) and T2b GBC (OR, 0.820; 95% CI, 0.620 to 1.083). (4) Conclusions: Hepatic side tumor was a significant poor prognostic factor in T2 GBC. Extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy showed comparable survival outcomes in T2 GBC, and additional large-scale prospective studies are warranted to establish evidence-based treatment guidelines for T2 GBC.
Collapse
|
27
|
Qin JM. Causes of misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis and therapeutic and preventive strategies for unexpected gallbladder carcinoma. Shijie Huaren Xiaohua Zazhi 2020; 28:1167-1176. [DOI: 10.11569/wcjd.v28.i23.1167] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) has been widely used in the treatment of gallbladder diseases. Since the indications for operation are constantly expanding, the intraoperative or postoperative incidence of unexpected gallbladder carcinoma (UGC) is gradually increasing. The incidence of UGC in LC and open cholecystectomy is 2.09% and 0.91%, respectively. Because gallbladder carcinoma is often accompanied by gallstones or inflammation and lacks specific clinical manifestations, imaging features, and specific serum tumor markers, the preoperative diagnostic rate of gallbladder carcinoma is only 30%, and 30% of cases of gallbladder carcinoma are diagnosed intraoperatively or postoperatively. Pathological T stage, lymph node metastasis, and gallbladder rupture are independent risk factors for the prognosis of patients with UGC. Preoperative imaging combined with serological tumor markers, intraoperative careful exploration, and rapid pathological examination are important measures to reduce the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis of UGC. For patients with benign gallbladder diseases with a high potential of canceration, performing cholecystectomy in time and strictly grasping the indications for preserving gallbladder for benign gallbladder diseases are important preventive measures to reduce the incidence of UGC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jian-Min Qin
- Department of General Surgery, The Third Hospital Affiliated to Naval Military Medical University, Shanghai 201805, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Lee SE, Choi YS, Kim YH, Heo JS, Jeong CY, Lee WJ, Seo HI, Yoon YS, Jang JY. Prognostic Significance of Tumor Location in T2 Gallbladder Cancer: A Korea Tumor Registry System Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) Database Analysis. J Clin Med 2020; 9:E3268. [PMID: 33053857 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9103268] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2020] [Revised: 10/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/10/2020] [Indexed: 01/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC) is subdivided into T2a and T2b by the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8th edition. However; there is a lack of evidence for the prognostic significance of tumor location and validation with large-scale studies is needed. The aims of this study were to investigate the clinical features and clinical outcomes of T2 GBC according to tumor location and determine the prognostic significance of tumor location and an appropriate surgical strategy. Methods: Between 2000 and 2014 the Korea Tumor Registry System Biliary Pancreas (KOTUS-BP) database was used to identify and enroll a total 707 patients with pathologically diagnosed T2 GBC who underwent curative resection. Clinicopathological findings and long-term follow-up results were analyzed. Results: The incidence of lymph node metastasis in T2b was significantly higher than that of T2a tumors (37.9% vs. 29.5%, p = 0.032). The 5-year disease-specific survival of T2a was better than that of T2b tumors (74.8% vs. 65.4%, p = 0.019). There was no significant survival difference in T2a between extended cholecystectomy and simple cholecystectomy with lymph node dissection (81.8% vs. 73.7%, p = 0.361). However; there was a better survival trend for T2b tumor after extended cholecystectomy (71.7% vs. 59.3%, p = 0.057). Adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with improved survival for patients with lymph node metastasis in T2a (72.1% vs. 56.9; p = 0.022) and in T2b (68.2 vs. 48.5; p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis revealed that lymph node metastasis was the only significant poor prognostic factor (Hazard ratio 3.222; 95% confidential interval 1.960–4.489; p < 0.001). Conclusions: For T2 GBC; tumor location was not an independent prognostic factor. Lymph node metastasis was a significant poor prognostic factor and adjuvant chemotherapy should be considered for the patients with lymph node metastasis.
Collapse
|
29
|
Bennett S, Søreide K, Gholami S, Pessaux P, Teh C, Segelov E, Kennecke H, Prenen H, Myrehaug S, Callegaro D, Hallet J. Strategies for the delay of surgery in the management of resectable hepatobiliary malignancies during the COVID-19 pandemic. Curr Oncol 2020; 27:e501-e511. [PMID: 33173390 PMCID: PMC7606047 DOI: 10.3747/co.27.6785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective We aimed to review data about delaying strategies for the management of hepatobiliary cancers requiring surgery during the covid-19 pandemic. Background Given the covid-19 pandemic, many jurisdictions, to spare resources, have limited access to operating rooms for elective surgical activity, including cancer, thus forcing deferral or cancellation of cancer surgeries. Surgery for hepatobiliary cancer is high-risk and particularly resource-intensive. Surgeons must critically appraise which patients will benefit most from surgery and which ones have other therapeutic options to delay surgery. Little guidance is currently available about potential delaying strategies for hepatobiliary cancers when surgery is not possible. Methods An international multidisciplinary panel reviewed the available literature to summarize data relating to standard-of-care surgical management and possible mitigating strategies to be used as a bridge to surgery for colorectal liver metastases, hepatocellular carcinoma, gallbladder cancer, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and hilar cholangiocarcinoma. Results Outcomes of surgery during the covid-19 pandemic are reviewed. Resource requirements are summarized, including logistics and adverse effects profiles for hepatectomy and delaying strategies using systemic, percutaneous and radiation ablative, and liver embolic therapies. For each cancer type, the long-term oncologic outcomes of hepatectomy and the clinical tools that can be used to prognosticate for individual patients are detailed. Conclusions There are a variety of delaying strategies to consider if availability of operating rooms decreases. This review summarizes available data to provide guidance about possible delaying strategies depending on patient, resource, institution, and systems factors. Multidisciplinary team discussions should be leveraged to consider patient- and tumour-specific information for each individual case.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S Bennett
- Canada: Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Bennett, Callegaro, Hallet); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Myrehaug); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON (Hallet)
| | - K Søreide
- Norway: Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, and Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen
| | - S Gholami
- United States: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA (Gholami); Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA (Kennecke)
| | - P Pessaux
- France: Department of Surgery, Institut Hospitalo-Universitaire de Strasbourg, Strasbourg
| | - C Teh
- Philippines: Institute of Surgery, St. Luke's Medical Center, Quezon City; Department of Surgery, Makati Medical Center, Makati; and Department of General Surgery, National Kidney and Transplant Institute, Quezon City
| | - E Segelov
- Australia: Monash University and Monash Health, Melbourne
| | - H Kennecke
- United States: Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, University of California, Davis, CA (Gholami); Virginia Mason Cancer Institute, Seattle, WA (Kennecke)
| | - H Prenen
- Belgium: Department of Oncology, University Hospital Antwerp, Antwerp
| | - S Myrehaug
- Canada: Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Bennett, Callegaro, Hallet); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Myrehaug); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON (Hallet)
| | - D Callegaro
- Canada: Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Bennett, Callegaro, Hallet); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Myrehaug); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON (Hallet)
- Italy: Department of Surgery, Fondazione irccs Istituto Nazionale Tumori, Milan
| | - J Hallet
- Canada: Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Bennett, Callegaro, Hallet); Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON (Myrehaug); Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON (Hallet)
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
Zhang W, Che X. Feasibility and Safety of Laparoscopic Treatment for Early and T3 Stage Gallbladder Cancer: A Systematic Review. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech 2020; 31:113-23. [PMID: 32810031 DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0000000000000852] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/20/2020] [Accepted: 07/10/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Effect of laparoscopic approach in the treatment of gallbladder cancer (GBC) is still controversial. MATERIALS AND METHODS Literature published before December 2019 was retrieved from PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library databases for a comparative study between laparoscopic group (LG) and open group (OG) for GBC. Revman 5.3 statistical software was used for analysis. RESULTS Nine comparative studies were eligible and included 654 patients, 287 were in LG and 367 were in OG. Meta-analysis showed that the operation time, estimated blood loss, drainage tube time, and hospitalization time after LG were significantly less than those in the OG [weighted mean difference (WMD)=-27.5; 95% confidence interval (CI), -36.6 to -18.4; P<0.00001; WMD=-267.56, 95% CI, -372.25 to -162.86; P<0.00001; WMD=-1.35; 95% CI, -2.26 to -0.44; P=0.004; WMD=-6.44; 95% CI,-9.07 to -3.81; P<0.00001, respectively). There was no significant difference between LG and OG in postoperative complications, mortality, lymph node dissection, R0 rate, scar recurrence, recurrence, and the 3- and 5-year overall survival (OS) rates. The 1-year OS of all patients, and the 1- and 2-year OS of patients with T3 tumors in the LG were significantly better than those in the OG [relative risk (RR)=1.11; 95% CI, 1.01 to 1.22; P=0.04; RR=1.46; 95% CI, 1.03 to 2.08, P=0.04 and RR=1.71; 95% CI, 1.02 to 2.84; P=0.04, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS The safety and efficacy of LG for early GBC is comparable to OG, and to some extent, it can reduce operation time, estimated blood loss, drainage tube time, and hospitalization time, and have a higher 1-year OS. Patients in T3 stage may have a longer survival by LC, however, this conclusion still needs to be validated by more high-quality clinical studies, especially prospective randomized controlled trials.
Collapse
|
31
|
Im JH, Lee WJ, Kang CM, Hwang HK, Seong J. Prognostic factors and patterns of loco-regional failure in patients with R0 resected gallbladder cancer. HPB (Oxford) 2020; 22:1168-1173. [PMID: 31784211 DOI: 10.1016/j.hpb.2019.10.2447] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/27/2019] [Revised: 10/29/2019] [Accepted: 10/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In this study, risk factors for loco-regional recurrence in curative R0 resected gallbladder adenocarcinoma were investigated. METHODS Patients with gallbladder adenocarcinoma with curative R0 resections between 2000 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Loco-regional failure-free survival (LRFFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method; prognostic factors were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazards model. Based on the identified risk factors, patients were grouped for further analysis. RESULTS A total of 272 patients were included for analysis; overall, 5-year LRFFS and OS were 83% and 81%, respectively. On multivariate analysis, 3 risk factors for LRFFS were identified; lymphovascular invasion, T3, and N1, by which patients were grouped; group 1 for 0 factor, group 2 for 1 factor and group 3 for 2 to 3 factors. The 5-year LRFFS in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 94%, 73%, and 40%, and the 5-year OS in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 90%, 75%, and 47%, respectively. LRFFS and OS differed significantly among groups (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION In patients with R0 resected gallbladder cancer, the presence of >1 risk factor increased the risk of loco-regional recurrence. Additional therapeutic strategy for these patients needs further consideration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jung Ho Im
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Woo Jung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Ho Kyoung Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
| | - Jinsil Seong
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, Severance Hospital, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Widmann B, Warschkow R, Beutner U, Weitzendorfer M, Ukegjini K, Schmied BM, Tarantino I, Steffen T. Effect of lymphadenectomy in curative gallbladder cancer treatment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2020; 405:573-84. [PMID: 32458141 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-020-01878-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/09/2020] [Accepted: 03/31/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Only a small fraction of resectable gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients receive a thorough lymphadenectomy. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to investigate the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery. METHODS On May 19, 2019, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were searched for English or German articles published since 2002. Studies assessing the effect of lymphadenectomy on survival in GBC surgery were included. Fixed effect and random effects models were used to summarise the hazard ratio (HR). RESULTS Of the 530 identified articles, 18 observational studies (27,570 patients, 10 population-based, 8 cohort studies) were reviewed. In the meta-analysis, lymphadenectomy did not show a significant benefit for T1a tumours (n = 495; HR, 1.37; 95%CI, 0.65-2.86; P = 0.41). Lymphadenectomy showed a significant survival benefit in T1b (n = 1618; HR, 0.69; 95%CI, 0.50-0.94; P = 0.02) and T2 (n = 6204; HR, 0.68; 95%CI, 0.56-0.83; P < 0.01) tumours. Lymphadenectomy improved survival in the 2 studies assessing T3 tumours (n = 1961). A conclusive analysis was not possible for T4 tumours due to a low case load. Among patients undergoing lymphadenectomy, improved survival was observed in patients with a higher number of resected lymph nodes (HR, 0.57; 95%CI, 0.45-0.71; P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS Regional lymphadenectomy improves survival in T1b to T3 GBC. A minimum of 6 retrieved lymph nodes are necessary for adequate staging, indicating a thorough lymphadenectomy. Patients with T1a tumours should be evaluated for lymphadenectomy, especially if lymph node metastases are suspected.
Collapse
|
33
|
Kwon W, Kim H, Han Y, Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Kwon HJ, Vinuela E, Járufe N, Roa JC, Han IW, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Lee W, Jeong CY, Hong SC, Troncoso AT, Losada HM, Han SS, Park SJ, Kim SW, Yanagimoto H, Endo I, Kubota K, Wakai T, Ajiki T, Adsay NV, Jang JY. Role of tumour location and surgical extent on prognosis in T2 gallbladder cancer: an international multicentre study. Br J Surg 2020; 107:1334-1343. [PMID: 32452559 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11618] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/29/2019] [Revised: 02/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In gallbladder cancer, stage T2 is subdivided by tumour location into lesions on the peritoneal side (T2a) or hepatic side (T2b). For tumours on the peritoneal side (T2a), it has been suggested that liver resection may be omitted without compromising the prognosis. However, data to validate this argument are lacking. This study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of tumour location in T2 gallbladder cancer, and to clarify the adequate extent of surgical resection. METHODS Clinical data from patients who underwent surgery for gallbladder cancer were collected from 14 hospitals in Korea, Japan, Chile and the USA. Survival and risk factor analyses were conducted. RESULTS Data from 937 patients were available for evaluation. The overall 5-year disease-free survival rate was 70·6 per cent, 74·5 per cent for those with T2a and 65·5 per cent among those with T2b tumours (P = 0·028). Regarding liver resection, extended cholecystectomy was associated with a better 5-year disease-free survival rate than simple cholecystectomy (73·0 versus 61·5 per cent; P = 0·012). The 5-year disease-free survival rate was marginally better for extended than simple cholecystectomy in both T2a (76·5 versus 66·1 per cent; P = 0·094) and T2b (68·2 versus 56·2 per cent; P = 0·084) disease. Five-year disease-free survival rates were similar for extended cholecystectomies including liver wedge resection versus segment IVb/V segmentectomy (74·1 versus 71·5 per cent; P = 0·720). In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for recurrence were presence of symptoms (hazard ratio (HR) 1·52; P = 0·002), R1 resection (HR 1·96; P = 0·004) and N1/N2 status (N1: HR 3·40, P < 0·001; N2: HR 9·56, P < 0·001). Among recurrences, 70·8 per cent were metastatic. CONCLUSION Tumour location was not an independent prognostic factor in T2 gallbladder cancer. Extended cholecystectomy was marginally superior to simple cholecystectomy. A radical operation should include liver resection and adequate node dissection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - H Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Y J Hwang
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - S G Kim
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - H J Kwon
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea.,Kyungpook National University Chilgok Hospital, Daegu, South Korea
| | - E Vinuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Santiago, Chile
| | - N Járufe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Santiago, Chile
| | - J C Roa
- Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - I W Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - J S Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - S-H Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - D W Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Centre, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - K S Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, South Korea
| | - K J Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Centre, Daegu, South Korea
| | - W Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - C-Y Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - S-C Hong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - A T Troncoso
- Department of Surgery, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - H M Losada
- Department of Surgery, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - S-S Han
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - S-J Park
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - S-W Kim
- Department of Surgery, Centre for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Centre, Goyang, South Korea
| | - H Yanagimoto
- Department of Surgery, Kansai Medical University, Hirakata, Japan
| | - I Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - K Kubota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - T Wakai
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - T Ajiki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - N V Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Pathology, Emory University School of Medicine, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - J-Y Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Navarro JG, Kang I, Hwang HK, Yoon DS, Lee WJ, Kang CM. Oncologic safety of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy in pT2 gallbladder cancer: A propensity score matching analysis compared to open approach. Medicine (Baltimore) 2020; 99:e20039. [PMID: 32443308 PMCID: PMC7253605 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000020039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy (LRC) in the surgical management of T2 gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) is still controversial.The medical records of patients with T2 GBC treated with radical cholecystectomy were retrospectively reviewed. In this study, we compare the short- and long-term oncologic outcomes, using propensity score matching analysis, of patients with T2 GBC who underwent LRC and open radical cholecystectomy (ORC).Among 183 patients, 86 were selected by propensity score matching (LRC = 43 and ORC = 43). The ORC group underwent more extensive surgery (liver resections and extended lymph node dissections [ELND]) than the LRC group. The LRC group had less operative blood loss, shorter length of hospital stay, fewer complications, and had the earlier start of adjuvant chemotherapy. There was no significant difference between the laparoscopic and open surgery groups in terms of 5-year overall survival rate (64.6% vs 80.4%, P = .214) and disease-free survival rate (77.1% vs 82.2%, P = .641). A subgroup analyses showed that liver resection and ELND had no survival advantage compared to no liver resection and regional lymph node dissection, respectively.Our LRC approach is safe and effective, with long-term survival comparable to that of ORC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Geograpo Navarro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, Cebu, Philippines
| | - Incheon Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ho Kyoung Hwang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dong Sup Yoon
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Woo Jung Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Sung YN, Song M, Lee JH, Song KB, Hwang DW, Ahn CS, Hwang S, Hong SM. Validation of the 8th Edition of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Staging System for Gallbladder Cancer and Implications for the Follow-up of Patients without Node Dissection. Cancer Res Treat 2020; 52:455-468. [PMID: 31623417 PMCID: PMC7176947 DOI: 10.4143/crt.2019.271] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/19/2019] [Accepted: 09/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The 8th edition of gallbladder cancer staging in the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) staging system changed the T and N categories. MATERIALS AND METHODS In order to validate the new staging system, a total of 348 surgically resected gallbladder cancers were grouped based on the 8th edition of the T and N categories and compared with patients' survival. RESULTS Significant differences were noted between T1b-T2a (p=0.003) and T2b-T3 (p < 0.001) tumors, but not between Tis-T1a, T1a-T1b, and T2a-T2b tumors. However, significant survival differences were observed both by the overall and pair-wise (T1-T2, T2-T3) comparisons (all, p < 0.001) without dividing T1/T2 subcategories. When cases with ≥ 6 examined lymph nodes were evaluated, significant survival differences were observed among the entire comparison (p < 0.001) and pair-wise comparisons of N0-N1 (p=0.001) and N1-N2 (p=0.039) lesions. When cases without nodal dissection (NX) were additionally compared, significant survival differences were observed between patients with N0-NX (p=0.001) and NX-N1 (p < 0.001) lesions. CONCLUSION The T category in the 8th edition of the AJCC staging system did not completely stratify the prognosis of patients with gallbladder cancer. Modification by eliminating T subcategories can better stratify the prognosis. In contrast, the N category clearly determines patients' survival with ≥ 6 examined lymph nodes. The survival time in patients of gallbladder cancers without nodal dissection is between N0 and N1 cases. Therefore, close postoperative followed up is recommended for those patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- You-Na Sung
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minjeong Song
- Department of Pathology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Hoon Lee
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ki Byung Song
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Dae Wook Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Chul-Soo Ahn
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Shin Hwang
- Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Seung-Mo Hong
- Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea,Correspondence: Seung-Mo Hong, MD, PhD Department of Pathology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, 88 Olympic-ro 43-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul 05505, Korea Tel: 82-2-3010-4558 Fax: 82-2-472-7898 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Chong JU, Lee WJ. Oncologic Outcomes of Extended Lymphadenectomy without Liver Resection for T1/T2 Gallbladder Cancer. Yonsei Med J 2019; 60:1138-1145. [PMID: 31769244 PMCID: PMC6881702 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.12.1138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 10/15/2019] [Accepted: 10/22/2019] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study provides a standardized operative strategical algorithm that can be applied to patients with T1/T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC). Our aim was to determine the oncologic outcome of radical cholecystectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection without liver resection in T1/T2 GBC. MATERIALS AND METHODS From January 2005 to December 2017, 164 patients with GBC underwent operations by a single surgeon at Severance Hospital. A retrospective review was performed for 113 of these patients, who were pathologically determined to be in stages T1 and T2 according to American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th guidelines. RESULTS Of the 113 patients, 109 underwent curative resection for T1/T2 GBC; four patients who underwent palliative operations without radical cholecystectomies were excluded from further analyses. For all T1b and T2 lesions, radical cholecystectomy with para-aortic lymph node dissection was performed without liver resection. There were four GBC-related mortalities, and 5-year disease-specific survival was 97.0%. The median follow-up was 50 months (range: 5-145 months). In all T stages, the median was not reached for survival analysis. Five-year disease-specific survival for T1a, T1b, and T2 were 100%, 94.1%, and 97.1%, respectively. Five-year disease-free survival for T1a, T1b, and T2 were 100%, 87.0%, and 91.8%, respectively. CONCLUSION Our results suggest that the current operative protocol can be applied to minimal invasive operations for GBC with similar oncologic outcomes as open approach. For T1/T2 GBC, radical cholecystectomy, including para-aortic lymph node dissection, can be performed safely with favorable oncologic outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jae Uk Chong
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Surgery, National Health Insurance Service Ilsan Hospital, Goyang, Korea
| | - Woo Jung Lee
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Kim BH, Kim SH, Song IS, Chun GS. The appropriate surgical strategy for T1b gallbladder cancer incidentally diagnosed after a simple cholecystectomy. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019; 23:327-333. [PMID: 31824997 PMCID: PMC6893052 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.4.327] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/30/2019] [Revised: 07/14/2019] [Accepted: 07/25/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Backgrounds/Aims The appropriate surgical treatment was investigated for T1b gallbladder (GB) cancer through a retrospective analysis of the clinical outcomes of patients with incidental T1 GB cancer. Methods Patients with T1 GB cancer who were incidentally diagnosed while undergoing a simple cholecystectomy at Chungnam University Hospital from January 2004 to December 2017 were enrolled. Overall, 39 patients with T1 GB cancer, 17 patients with T1a, and 22 patients with T1b were included. We retrospectively analyzed the patients' clinical and pathologic findings and follow-up results. Results Among the 6490 patients who underwent cholecystectomy during the study period, 165 patients were diagnosed with GB cancer (T1=42 [25.5%]). The risk factor associated with recurrence and cancer-related death in patients with T1 GB cancer was lymphovascular invasion (recurrence, p=0.028; death, p=0.004). In the T1b group, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate showed a statistical difference between patients with and without lymphovascular invasion (45.7% vs. 83.6%, p=0.048). There was no statistically significant difference in 5-year DFS and overall survival rate between simple cholecystectomy and extended cholecystectomy in T1b GB cancer with lymphovasular invasion (p=0.054 and p=0.091, respectively). Conclusions In incidental T1b GB cancer, extended cholecystectomy was not superior to simple cholecystectomy in terms of the 5-year DFS rate and nor in overall survival rate or recurrence rate, even when lymphovascular invasion was identified after simple cholecystectomy. Therefore, simple cholecystectomy may be recommended as a primary surgical strategy for T1b GB cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Byoung-Hyoung Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Seok-Hwan Kim
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - In-Sang Song
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Gwang-Sik Chun
- Department of Surgery, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Lee W, Jeong CY, Kim YH, Roh YH, Yoon MH, Seo HI, Park JI, Jung BH, Shin DH, Choi YI, Ryu JH, Yang KH, Choi CS, Park YH, Nah YW, Hong SC. Validation of the prognostic performance in various nodal staging systems for gallbladder cancer: results of a multicenter study. Langenbecks Arch Surg 2019; 404:581-588. [PMID: 31414179 DOI: 10.1007/s00423-019-01807-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2019] [Accepted: 07/17/2019] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Although the current nodal staging system for gallbladder cancer (GBC) was changed based on the number of positive lymph nodes (PLN), it needs to be evaluated in various situations. METHODS We reviewed the clinical data for 398 patients with resected GBC and compared nodal staging systems based on the number of PLNs, the positive/retrieved LN ratio (LNR), and the log odds of positive LN (LODDS). Prognostic performance was evaluated using the C-index. RESULTS Subgroups were formed on the basis of an restricted cubic spline plot as follows: PLN 3 (PLN = 0, 1-2, ≥ 3); PLN 4 (PLN = 0, 1-3, ≥ 4); LNR (LNR = 0, 0-0.269, ≥ 0.27); and LODDS (LODDS < - 0.8, - 0.8-0, ≥ 0). The oncological outcome differed significantly between subgroups in each system. In all patients with GBC, PLN 4 (C-index 0.730) and PLN 3 (C-index 0.734) were the best prognostic discriminators of survival and recurrence, respectively. However, for retrieved LN (RLN) ≥ 6, LODDS was the best discriminator for survival (C-index 0.852). CONCLUSION The nodal staging system based on PLN was the optimal prognostic discriminator in patients with RLN < 6, whereas the LODDS system is adequate for RLN ≥ 6. The following nodal staging system considers applying different systems according to the RLN.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Woohyung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University, College of Medicine, 79 Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702, Republic of Korea
- Division of Hepato-Biliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chi-Young Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University, College of Medicine, 79 Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hoon Kim
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Hoon Roh
- Department of Surgery, Dong-A University Hospital, Dong-A University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Myung Hee Yoon
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Hyung Il Seo
- Department of Surgery, Biomedical Research Institute, Pusan National University Hospital, Pusan National University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Jeong-Ik Park
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Bo-Hyun Jung
- Department of Surgery, Haeundae Paik Hospital, Inje University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Dong Hoon Shin
- Department of Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Young Il Choi
- Department of Surgery, Kosin University Gospel Hospital, Kosin University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Je Ho Ryu
- Department of Surgery, Pusan University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Kwang Ho Yang
- Department of Surgery, Pusan University Yangsan Hospital, Pusan University, College of Medicine, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Chang Soo Choi
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yo-Han Park
- Department of Surgery, College of Medicine, Inje University, Busan Paik Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea
| | - Yang Won Nah
- Department of Surgery, Ulsan University Hospital, Ulsan University, College of Medicine, Ulsan, Republic of Korea
| | - Soon-Chan Hong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University, College of Medicine, 79 Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702, Republic of Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Zhou D, Wang J, Quan Z, Yang Y, Ma F. Improvement in the diagnosis and treatment of T2 gallbladder carcinoma is pivotal to improvement in the overall prognosis for this disease. Biosci Trends 2019; 13:1-9. [PMID: 30867371 DOI: 10.5582/bst.2019.01039] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
Since the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) subdivided the T2 stage of gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) into T2a and T2b, the diagnosis and treatment of those stages have been a subject of heated discussion and controversy. T2 is a stage of GBC that might be treatable. Based on the extent of lymph node metastasis and distant metastasis, T2 GBC can be classified into various pathological stages such as IIA, IIB, IIIB, and IVB, leading to controversy in clinical settings. This review aims to discuss the effectiveness of and controversies concerning S4b+5 resection, the acceptable extent of lymph node dissection, the timing for treatment of incidental gallbladder cancer, and adjuvant therapy. This review also aims to suggest directions for and recommendations regarding clinical research in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Di Zhou
- Department of General Surgery, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| | - Jiandong Wang
- Department of General Surgery, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| | - Zhiwei Quan
- Department of General Surgery, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| | - Yong Yang
- Department of General Surgery, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| | - Fei Ma
- Department of Oncology, XinHua Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University
| |
Collapse
|
40
|
Søreide K, Guest RV, Harrison EM, Kendall TJ, Garden OJ, Wigmore SJ. Systematic review of management of incidental gallbladder cancer after cholecystectomy. Br J Surg 2019; 106:32-45. [PMID: 30582640 DOI: 10.1002/bjs.11035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 64] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2018] [Revised: 08/16/2018] [Accepted: 10/01/2018] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer is rare, but cancers detected incidentally after cholecystectomy are increasing. The aim of this study was to review the available data for current best practice for optimal management of incidental gallbladder cancer. METHODS A systematic PubMed search of the English literature to May 2018 was conducted. RESULTS The search identified 12 systematic reviews and meta-analyses, in addition to several consensus reports, multi-institutional series and national audits. Some 0·25-0·89 per cent of all cholecystectomy specimens had incidental gallbladder cancer on pathological examination. Most patients were staged with pT2 (about half) or pT1 (about one-third) cancers. Patients with cancers confined to the mucosa (T1a or less) had 5-year survival rates of up to 100 per cent after cholecystectomy alone. For cancers invading the muscle layer of the gallbladder wall (T1b or above), reresection is recommended. The type, extent and timing of reresection remain controversial. Observation time may be used for new cross-sectional imaging with CT and MRI. Perforation at initial surgery had a higher risk of disease dissemination. Gallbladder cancers are PET-avid, and PET may detect residual disease and thus prevent unnecessary surgery. Routine laparoscopic staging before reresection is not warranted for all stages. Risk of peritoneal carcinomatosis increases with each T category. The incidence of port-site metastases is about 10 per cent. Routine resection of port sites has no effect on survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy is poorly documented and probably underused. CONCLUSION Management of incidental gallbladder cancer continues to evolve, with more refined suggestions for subgroups at risk and a selective approach to reresection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- K Søreide
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.,Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery, Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.,Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway
| | - R V Guest
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - E M Harrison
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - T J Kendall
- Division of Pathology, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - O J Garden
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| | - S J Wigmore
- Clinical Surgery, Royal Infirmary of Edinburgh and University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Kim HS, Park JW, Kim H, Han Y, Kwon W, Kim SW, Hwang YJ, Kim SG, Kwon HJ, Vinuela E, Járufe N, Roa JC, Han IW, Heo JS, Choi SH, Choi DW, Ahn KS, Kang KJ, Lee W, Jeong CY, Hong SC, Troncoso A, Losada H, Han SS, Park SJ, Yanagimoto H, Endo I, Kubota K, Wakai T, Ajiki T, Adsay NV, Jang JY. Optimal surgical treatment in patients with T1b gallbladder cancer: An international multicenter study. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci 2019; 25:533-543. [PMID: 30562839 DOI: 10.1002/jhbp.593] [Citation(s) in RCA: 31] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND There is no consensus on the optimal treatment of T1b gallbladder cancer (GBC) due to the lack of evidence and the difficulty of anatomy and pathological standardization. METHODS A total of 272 patients with T1b GBC who underwent surgical resection at 14 centers with specialized hepatobiliary-pancreatic surgeons and pathologists in Korea, Japan, Chile, and the United States were studied. Clinical outcomes including disease-specific survival (DSS) rates according to the types of surgery were analyzed. RESULTS After excluding patients, the 237 qualifying patients consisted of 90 men and 147 women. Simple cholecystectomy (SC) was performed in 116 patients (48.9%) and extended cholecystectomy (EC) in 121 patients (51.1%). The overall 5-year DSS was 94.6%, and it was similar between SC and EC patients (93.7% vs. 95.5%, P = 0.496). The 5-year DSS was similar between SC and EC patients in America (82.3% vs. 100.0%, P = 0.249) as well as in Asia (98.6% vs. 95.2%, P = 0.690). The 5-year DSS also did not differ according to lymph node metastasis (P = 0.688) or tumor location (P = 0.474). CONCLUSIONS SC showed similar clinical outcomes (including recurrence) and survival outcomes as EC; therefore, EC is not needed for the treatment of T1b GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hyeong Seok Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jae Woo Park
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea.,Department of Surgery, Daejeon St. Mary's Hospital, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Hongbeom Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Youngmin Han
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Wooil Kwon
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sun-Whe Kim
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Yoon Jin Hwang
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Sang Geol Kim
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Hyung Jun Kwon
- School of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Eduardo Vinuela
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Nicolas Járufe
- Department of Digestive Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - Juan Carlos Roa
- Department of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, Catholic University of Chile, Santiago, Chile
| | - In Woong Han
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Jin Seok Heo
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Seong-Ho Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Dong Wook Choi
- Department of Surgery, Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Keun Soo Ahn
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Koo Jeong Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
| | - Woohyung Lee
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - Chi-Young Jeong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - Soon-Chan Hong
- Department of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University College of Medicine, Jinju, South Korea
| | - Andres Troncoso
- Surgery Department, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Hector Losada
- Surgery Department, Universidad de la Frontera, Temuco, Chile
| | - Sung-Sik Han
- Department of Surgery, Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | - Sang-Jae Park
- Department of Surgery, Center for Liver Cancer, National Cancer Center, Goyang, South Korea
| | | | - Itaru Endo
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama City University, Yokohama, Japan
| | - Keiichi Kubota
- Department of Gastroenterological Surgery, Dokkyo Medical University, Tochigi, Japan
| | - Toshifumi Wakai
- Division of Digestive and General Surgery, Niigata University Graduate School of Medical and Dental Sciences, Niigata, Japan
| | - Tetsuo Ajiki
- Division of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Kobe University Graduate School of Medicine, Kobe, Japan
| | - Nazmi Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koc University, Istanbul, Turkey.,Department of Pathology, Emory University School, Atlanta, GA, USA
| | - Jin-Young Jang
- Department of Surgery and Cancer Research Institute, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Caparica R, Lengelé A, Bekolo W, Hendlisz A. FOLFIRI as second-line treatment of metastatic biliary tract cancer patients. Autops Case Rep 2019; 9:e2019087. [PMID: 31528622 PMCID: PMC6738847 DOI: 10.4322/acr.2019.087] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Accepted: 05/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
The combination of cisplatin and gemcitabine is the standard first-line treatment of metastatic biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients. The benefit of second-line chemotherapy in these patients is controversial. This study aims to evaluate the activity of FOLFIRI (fluorouracil and irinotecan) after failure to the first-line platinum and gemcitabine-based chemotherapy in metastatic BTC patients. We present a single-institution, retrospective cohort study. Patients with locally advanced or metastatic BTC who progressed after at least one line of chemotherapy, consecutively treated at our Institution between 2007 and 2017 were included. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), clinical benefit rate (CBR) and safety profile of FOLFIRI. Twelve patients were included in the analysis, with a median follow up of 5 months (95% CI 2.77-7.20). The median number of cycles received was 3 (range 1 to 9). Four grade 3 toxicities were recorded; no grade 4 toxicities and no treatment-related deaths occurred. The median PFS was 1.7 months (95% CI; 0.66-2.67), and median OS was 5 months (95% CI; 2.77-7.20). Two patients presented stable disease, providing a CBR of 17%. We concluded that FOLFIRI presented a favorable toxicity profile and a modest activity in metastatic BTC patients who had progressed to platinum and gemcitabine and may be considered in patients who are able to tolerate additional lines of chemotherapy. Immunotherapy and targeted therapies selected according to the tumoral genomic profile are promising alternatives to improve the outcomes of second-line treatment in BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rafael Caparica
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Department of Medical Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| | | | - Winnie Bekolo
- Douala General Hospital, University of Douala, Cameroon
| | - Alain Hendlisz
- Institut Jules Bordet and Université Libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Department of Medical Oncology, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
43
|
Choi YH, Lee JW, Lee SH, Choi JH, Kang J, Lee BS, Paik WH, Ryu JK, Kim YT. A High Monocyte-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Predicts Poor Prognosis in Patients with Advanced Gallbladder Cancer Receiving Chemotherapy. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2019; 28:1045-1051. [PMID: 30842131 DOI: 10.1158/1055-9965.epi-18-1066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 02/25/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Monocyte-to-lymphocyte ratio (MLR), neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), and platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) have been reported to be prognostic markers in various cancers. However, the prognostic value of these inflammatory biomarkers, particularly MLR, in gallbladder cancer remains to be determined. METHODS From 2005 to 2016, 178 patients with histologically confirmed gallbladder adenocarcinoma who underwent palliative chemotherapy were queried in this study. The association between survival and various clinical and laboratory variables, including MLR, NLR, and PLR, was investigated. The optimal cutoff values for MLR, NLR, and PLR were determined using the maxstat package of R. RESULTS Patients with high MLR (>0.24) were expected to have shorter progression-free survival [PFS; hazard ratio (HR), 2.100; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.397-3.157; P < 0.001] and overall survival (OS; HR, 2.533; 95% CI, 1.664-3.856; P < 0.001) compared with patients with low MLR (≤0.24). In multivariate Cox model, CA 19-9, stage, and MLR were independent factors for PFS. MLR was also an independent predictor of OS along with PLR, age, and CA 19-9, whereas NLR was not significantly associated with OS. Time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis showed that the area under the curve of MLR for predicting OS was greater than that of NLR and PLR at most time points. CONCLUSIONS MLR independently predicts survival in gallbladder cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy. Future prospective studies are needed to validate its value as a prognostic biomarker. IMPACT MLR is an inexpensive and easily available biomarker for predicting prognosis in patients with gallbladder cancer undergoing chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Hoon Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea; Cancer Research Institute, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Woo Lee
- Department of Gastroenterology, Mediplex Sejong Hospital, Incheon, Korea
| | - Sang Hyub Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| | - Jin Ho Choi
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jinwoo Kang
- Department of Internal Medicine, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ban Seok Lee
- Department of Internal Medicine, Kang-Il Hospital, Gimhae, Korea
| | - Woo Hyun Paik
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Ji Kon Ryu
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong-Tae Kim
- Department of Internal Medicine and Liver Research Institute, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Navarro JG, Kang CM. Laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with common bile duct resection for T2 gallbladder cancer. Ann Hepatobiliary Pancreat Surg 2019; 23:69-73. [PMID: 30863811 PMCID: PMC6405374 DOI: 10.14701/ahbps.2019.23.1.69] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2018] [Revised: 08/07/2018] [Accepted: 08/18/2018] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The oncologic safety and feasibility of laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy for a preoperatively suspected gallbladder cancer is continually being challenged even in an era of minimally invasive surgery. A seventy-four-year-old woman was presented in the outpatient department with a history of fever, abdominal pain, and vomiting. CT scan showed an irregular wall thickening of the body to the cystic duct of the gallbladder and portocaval lymph node. In addition, EUS revealed no subserosal invasion of the tumor. PET scan showed an intense FDG uptake of in the gallbladder and in the portocaval lymph node. The laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy was performed with 6 trocars. The procedure included simple cholecystectomy, hepatoduodenal and aortocaval lymphadenectomy, and common bile duct resection. The hepaticojejunal anastomosis was constructed laparoscopically, while the jejunal continuity was established via an extracorporeal anastomosis. The patient was discharged on the 7th postoperative day with no complications and adjuvant chemotherapy was started on the 14th day after surgery. Based on our experienced, laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy with combined common bile duct resection is technically safe and feasible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonathan Geograpo Navarro
- Division of Surgical Oncology, Department of Surgery, Vicente Sotto Memorial Medical Center, Cebu City, Philippines
| | - Chang Moo Kang
- Division of Hepatobiliary and Pancreatic Surgery, Department of Surgery, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.,Pancreatobiliary Cancer Center, Yonsei Cancer Center, Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Baskiran A, Sahin E, Karadag N, Sahin TT, Barut B, Ozgor D, Dirican A. Outcomes of surgery for gallbladder cancer: A single-center experience. North Clin Istanb 2018; 5:195-8. [PMID: 30688940 DOI: 10.14744/nci.2017.69320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2017] [Accepted: 11/17/2017] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a rare clinical entity that has a poor prognosis. Radical resection with meticulous lymph node dissection is the only treatment option. The aim of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy of radical resection for GBC in the early postoperative period with the viewpoint of clinicopathological correlation. METHODS: Patients (n=24) who underwent radical resection with lymph node dissection for GBC between 2015 and 2017 were included. Demographic data, histopathologic tumor type, preoperative tumor markers, pathologic tumor size/stage (depth of invasion), lymph node metastasis and metastasis rates, and postoperative early mortality were evaluated. The patients were grouped in two groups according to lymph node metastases: Group 1 (without lymph node metastasis) and Group 2 (with lymph node metastasis). RESULTS: The median age of the patients in Group 1 and Group 2 was 65 (range, 42–89) years and 68 (range, 48–87) years, respectively (p>0.05). The female/male ratio in Group 1 and Group 2 was 4/4 and 13/3, respectively (p>0.05). There was a tendency for increased metastasis in Group 2 compared with Group 1 (31% vs. 0%) (p>0.05). Also, 88% of the tumors in Group 2 were in the advanced stage, whereas the rate was 37% in Group 1 (p<0.05). There was early postoperative mortality in seven patients who underwent resection. Four of the seven patients (43%) were from Group 2 and three (37%) from Group 1 (p>0.05). CONCLUSION: Lymph node metastasis in GBC indicates advanced tumor stage. This causes a more complex surgical resection and therefore results in higher early postoperative mortality.
Collapse
|
46
|
Cho JK, Lee W, Jang JY, Kim HG, Kim JM, Kwag SJ, Park JH, Kim JY, Park T, Jeong SH, Ju YT, Jung EJ, Lee YJ, Hong SC, Jeong CY. Validation of the oncologic effect of hepatic resection for T2 gallbladder cancer: a retrospective study. World J Surg Oncol 2019; 17:8. [PMID: 30616645 PMCID: PMC6323785 DOI: 10.1186/s12957-018-1556-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/18/2018] [Accepted: 12/27/2018] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND While extended cholecystectomy is recommended for T2 gallbladder cancer (GBC), the role of hepatic resection for T2 GBC is unclear. This study aimed to identify the necessity of hepatic resection in patients with T2 GBC. METHODS Data of 81 patients with histopathologically proven T2 GBC who underwent surgical resection between January 1999 and December 2017 were enrolled from a retrospective database. Of these, 36 patients had peritoneal-side (T2a) tumors and 45 had hepatic-side (T2b) tumors. To identify the optimal surgical management method, T2 GBC patients were classified into the hepatic resection group (n = 44, T2a/T2b = 20/24) and non-hepatic resection group (n = 37, T2a/T2b = 16/21). The recurrence pattern and role of hepatic resection for T2 GBC were then investigated. RESULTS Mean age of the patients was 69 (range 36-88) years, and the male-to-female ratio was 42:39 (male, 51.9%; female, 48.1%). Hepatic-side GBC had a higher rate of recurrence than peritoneal-side GBC (44.4% vs. 8.3%, p = 0.006). The most common type of recurrence in T2a GBC was para-aortic lymph node recurrence (n = 2, 5.6%); the most common types of recurrence in T2b GBC were para-aortic lymph node recurrence (n = 7, 15.6%) and intrahepatic metastasis (n = 6, 13.3%). Hepatic-side GBC patients had worse survival outcomes than peritoneal-side GBC patients (76.0% vs. 96.6%, p = 0.041). Hepatic resection had no significant treatment effect in T2 GBC patients (p = 0.272). Multivariate analysis showed that lymph node metastasis was the only significant prognostic factor (p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS Hepatic resection is not essential for curative treatment in T2 GBC, and more systemic treatments are needed for GBC patients, particularly for those with T2b GBC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jin-Kyu Cho
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Woohyung Lee
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwoun-si, 51472 South Korea
| | - Jae Yool Jang
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Han-Gil Kim
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Jae-Myung Kim
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Seung-Jin Kwag
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Ji-Ho Park
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Ju-Yeon Kim
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Taejin Park
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwoun-si, 51472 South Korea
| | - Sang-Ho Jeong
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwoun-si, 51472 South Korea
| | - Young-Tae Ju
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Eun-Jung Jung
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Changwon Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 11, Samjeongja-ro, Changwoun-si, 51472 South Korea
| | - Young-Joon Lee
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Soon-Chan Hong
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| | - Chi-Young Jeong
- 0000 0001 0661 1492grid.256681.eDepartment of Surgery, Gyeongsang National University Hospital, Gyeongsang National University Postgraduate School of Medicine, 79, Gangnam-ro, Jinju, 660-702 South Korea
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Feng JW, Yang XH, Liu CW, Wu BQ, Sun DL, Chen XM, Jiang Y, Qu Z. Comparison of Laparoscopic and Open Approach in Treating Gallbladder Cancer. J Surg Res 2018; 234:269-276. [PMID: 30527484 DOI: 10.1016/j.jss.2018.09.025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 06/27/2018] [Accepted: 09/11/2018] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Preliminary study on the feasibility and efficacy of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and radical cholecystectomy in stage Tis-T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS Retrospective analysis of the clinical data of 102 patients with GBC from August 2008 to August 2017 in the Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary Surgery at the Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University. The clinical and pathological data of laparoscopic surgery and open surgery were compared. RESULTS Of 102 patients with GBC, 41 underwent laparoscopic treatment, 12 of whom underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy, and the others underwent laparoscopic radical cholecystectomy/extended radical cholecystectomy. Sixty-one patients underwent radical cholecystectomy/extended radical cholecystectomy. Based on the individual patient's condition, excision of the extrahepatic biliary tract and cholangioenterostomy were performed. There were no perioperative deaths. There was no significant difference in the operative blood loss (P = 0.732), operative time (P = 0.058), postoperative complications (P = 0.933), R0 margins (P = 0.679), and tumor-related death (P = 0.396) between the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group. The postoperative activity time (P < 0.001), postoperative eating time (P < 0.001), drainage tube removal time (P < 0.001), and postoperative hospital discharge time (P < 0.001) in the laparoscopic group were all earlier than those in the laparotomy group, and the difference was statistically significant. The number of lymph nodes resected in the laparoscopic group and the laparotomy group was 1-17, average (5 ± 3) and 1-13 average (5 ± 3), respectively, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.973). The 1-, 3-, and 5-y survival rates in the laparoscopic group were 97.1%, 69.4%, and 51.9%, respectively, and those in the laparotomy group were 94.7%, 64.9%, and 55.7%, respectively; there were no significant difference between the two groups (P = 0.453). In terms of different pathologic T stages, the 5-y survival rates of patients with stage Tis (9 cases), T1a (2 cases), T1b (8 cases), T2 (14 cases), and T3 (8 cases) disease in the laparoscopic group were 100%, 100%, 75%, 48.1%, and 12.5%, respectively, and the 5-y survival rates in patients with stage Tis (4 cases), T1b (9 cases), T2 (32 cases), and T3 (16 cases) disease in the laparotomy group were 100%, 87.5%, 64.7%, and 16%, respectively; there were no significant differences between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS Laparoscopic treatment of stage Tis-T3 GBC is feasible. Laparoscopic treatment of GBC does not increase the incision metastasis rate on the basis of the intact gallbladder wall. The same survival rates can be achieved with laparoscopic treatment as with open treatment of GBC. In terms of postoperative rehabilitation, laparoscopic treatment has more advantages.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jia-Wei Feng
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xing-Hai Yang
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Chi-Wen Liu
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Bao-Qiang Wu
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Dong-Lin Sun
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Xue-Min Chen
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China
| | - Yong Jiang
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
| | - Zhen Qu
- Changzhou First People's Hospital, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Changzhou, Jiangsu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
48
|
Dasari BVM, Ionescu MI, Pawlik TM, Hodson J, Sutcliffe RP, Roberts KJ, Muiesan P, Isaac J, Marudanayagam R, Mirza DF. Outcomes of surgical resection of gallbladder cancer in patients presenting with jaundice: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Surg Oncol 2018; 118:477-485. [PMID: 30259519 DOI: 10.1002/jso.25186] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/15/2018] [Revised: 06/12/2018] [Accepted: 06/30/2018] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Preoperative jaundice is considered a relative contraindication to radical gallbladder cancer (GBC) resection due to poor prognosis and high postoperative morbidity. Recent reports have indicated that aggressive surgery may improve long-term survival for patients with advanced GBC who present with obstructive jaundice. The current systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare postoperative outcomes among jaundiced and non-jaundiced patients with resectable GBC. METHODS An electronic search was performed using several Medical Subject Headings terms: cholecyst, gallbladder, tumor, cancer, carcinoma, adenocarcinoma, neoplasia, neoplasm, jaundice, and icterus. Overall survival after surgery was the primary outcome; resectability and postoperative morbidity were the secondary outcomes. RESULTS Overall survival was shorter among patients who presented with jaundice (Hazard ratio [HR]: 2.21, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.64-2.97; P < 0.001). Patients with jaundice were less likely to have resectable disease (odds ratio: 0.27, 95% CI, 0.17-0.43; P < 0.001). The jaundice group had higher odds of postoperative morbidity, bile-leak, and posthepatectomy failure versus the non-jaundiced control group. CONCLUSIONS Radical surgery for GBC resection for patients presenting with obstructive jaundice was associated with reduced overall survival and increased postoperative morbidity. Jaundiced patients with advanced GBC should be considered for surgical resection but need careful evaluation and counseling before undertaking extensive surgical resection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bobby V M Dasari
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Mihnea I Ionescu
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Timothy M Pawlik
- Department of Surgery, Wexner Medical Centre, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio
| | - James Hodson
- Institute of Translational Medicine, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Robert P Sutcliffe
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Keith J Roberts
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Paolo Muiesan
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - John Isaac
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Ravi Marudanayagam
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| | - Darius F Mirza
- Department of HPB Surgery, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, United Kingdom
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Yifan T, Zheyong L, Miaoqin C, Liang S, Xiujun C. A predictive model for survival of gallbladder adenocarcinoma. Surg Oncol 2018; 27:365-372. [PMID: 30217289 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2018.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2017] [Revised: 02/23/2018] [Accepted: 05/02/2018] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a life-threatening disease with a poor prognosis worldwide. Although several risk factors for survival have been identified, an ideal model for predicting prognosis has still not been developed due to the low incidence of GBC. This study aims to solve this dilemma by attempting to develop an efficient survival prediction model for GBC. METHODS This is a retrospective study. From January 2009 to June 2016, 164 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of gallbladder adenocarcinoma were enrolled in this study. The cohort was randomly divided into two cohorts, the development cohort (n = 110) and validation cohort (n = 54). On the basis of the risk factors identified in the development cohort, a nomogram-based predictive model (P-risk Plus), composed of carbohydrate antigen 199 and pathological characteristics, was established for prognosis. RESULTS In this model, the calibration curves for the 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival probabilities were well-matched with the actual survival rates. In addition, the highest C-index and best decision curve analysis were able to be obviously determined. Meanwhile, the P-risk Plus model result yielded a better fit for survival between the development and validation groups. CONCLUSION Compared with conventional tumor stages, our nomogram-based P-risk Plus model for gallbladder adenocarcinoma has a better predictive capacity and thereby has a better potential to facilitate decision-making clinically.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tong Yifan
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Li Zheyong
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Chen Miaoqin
- Department of Biological Treatment Research Center, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Shi Liang
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China
| | - Cai Xiujun
- Department of General Surgery, Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Zeng G, Teo NZ, Goh BKP. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive surgery for patients presenting with suspected gallbladder cancer: Report of 8 cases. J Minim Access Surg 2018; 15:109-114. [PMID: 29582801 PMCID: PMC6438059 DOI: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_229_17] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gallbladder cancer (GBCa) has traditionally been discouraged, with limited studies reporting on its outcomes. The aim of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of MIS for patients with GBCa or suspected GBCa. Methods: A retrospective study of 8 consecutive patients who underwent MIS for GBCa by a single surgeon over a 22-month period between 2015 and 2017. Results: Three patients underwent robotic surgery, while five underwent conventional laparoscopic surgery. Four patients presented with histologically proven GbCa detected incidentally after cholecystectomy. All 4 patients underwent resection of Segment 4b/5. Of these, 3 underwent hilar lymphadenectomy and 1 underwent hilar lymph node sampling. Four patients presenting with suspected GBCa underwent upfront extended cholecystectomy. Two patients who had malignancy on frozen section underwent hilar lymphadenectomy. The median operation time was 242.5 (range, 165–530) min, and the median blood loss was 175 (range, 50–700) ml. The median post-operative hospital stay was 3.5 (range, 2–8) days. There were no open conversion, post-operative morbidities and mortalities. Six had histologically proven GBCa. Five were T3 and one had T2 cancers. Conclusions: The results of the present study confirm the short-term safety and feasibility of MIS for patients with GBCa, as all eight patients underwent successful MIS with no major morbidity or mortality. Further studies with larger patient cohorts with long-term follow-up are needed to determine the oncologic outcomes and the definitive role of MIS in treating GBCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gerald Zeng
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Duke-Nus Medical School, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, USA
| | - Nan Zun Teo
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Duke-Nus Medical School, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, USA
| | - Brian K P Goh
- Department of Hepatopancreatobiliary and Transplant Surgery, Duke-Nus Medical School, Singapore General Hospital, Singapore, USA
| |
Collapse
|