1
|
Kister I, Curtin R, Piquet AL, Borko T, Pei J, Banbury BL, Bacon TE, Kim A, Tuen M, Velmurugu Y, Nyovanie S, Selva S, Samanovic MI, Mulligan MJ, Patskovsky Y, Priest J, Cabatingan M, Winger RC, Krogsgaard M, Silverman GJ. Longitudinal study of immunity to SARS-CoV2 in ocrelizumab-treated MS patients up to 2 years after COVID-19 vaccination. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2024. [PMID: 38713096 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.52081] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2024] [Revised: 04/04/2024] [Accepted: 04/06/2024] [Indexed: 05/08/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES (1) To plot the trajectory of humoral and cellular immune responses to the primary (two-dose) COVID-19 mRNA series and the third/booster dose in B-cell-depleted multiple sclerosis (MS) patients up to 2 years post-vaccination; (2) to identify predictors of immune responses to vaccination; and (3) to assess the impact of intercurrent COVID-19 infections on SARS CoV-2-specific immunity. METHODS Sixty ocrelizumab-treated MS patients were enrolled from NYU (New York) and University of Colorado (Anschutz) MS Centers. Samples were collected pre-vaccination, and then 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-primary series, and 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks post-booster. Binding anti-Spike antibody responses were assessed with multiplex bead-based immunoassay (MBI) and electrochemiluminescence (Elecsys®, Roche Diagnostics), and neutralizing antibody responses with live-virus immunofluorescence-based microneutralization assay. Spike-specific cellular responses were assessed with IFNγ/IL-2 ELISpot (Invitrogen) and, in a subset, by sequencing complementarity determining regions (CDR)-3 within T-cell receptors (Adaptive Biotechnologies). A linear mixed-effect model was used to compare antibody and cytokine levels across time points. Multivariate analyses identified predictors of immune responses. RESULTS The primary vaccination induced an 11- to 208-fold increase in binding and neutralizing antibody levels and a 3- to 4-fold increase in IFNγ/IL-2 responses, followed by a modest decline in antibody but not cytokine responses. Booster dose induced a further 3- to 5-fold increase in binding antibodies and 4- to 5-fold increase in IFNγ/IL-2, which were maintained for up to 1 year. Infections had a variable impact on immunity. INTERPRETATION Humoral and cellular benefits of COVID-19 vaccination in B-cell-depleted MS patients were sustained for up to 2 years when booster doses were administered.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya Kister
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Ryan Curtin
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Amanda L Piquet
- Rocky Mountain MS Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Tyler Borko
- Rocky Mountain MS Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Jinglan Pei
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | | | - Tamar E Bacon
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Angie Kim
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of Neurology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Michael Tuen
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yogambigai Velmurugu
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Samantha Nyovanie
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Sean Selva
- Rocky Mountain MS Center, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, Colorado, USA
| | - Marie I Samanovic
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Mark J Mulligan
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center and Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Yury Patskovsky
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - Ryan C Winger
- Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA
| | - Michelle Krogsgaard
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of Pathology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gregg J Silverman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Meltzer E, Charron O, Wozny J, Onuorah H, Montague A, Kline AC, Largent A, Krause TM, Freeman L. Indirect impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the care and outcomes of people with MS: A combined survey and insurance claims study. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 80:105085. [PMID: 37931487 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2023.105085] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Revised: 09/08/2023] [Accepted: 10/15/2023] [Indexed: 11/08/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the context of the COVID-19 pandemic, people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) have been particularly vulnerable to adverse outcomes due to increased risk of severe infection and/or widespread disruptions in care. The CopeMS study led by The University of Texas at Austin and the MS Association of America investigates the long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare access, disease modifying therapy (DMT) utilization and outcomes of pwMS. METHODS This retrospective cohort analysis used Optum's de-identified Clinformatics® Data Mart Database (CDM), a large de-identified administrative healthcare claims database to identify pwMS who were continuously enrolled from 01/01/2019 to 12/31/2020 and assessed changes in the utilization of DMTs and healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic compared to the year prior. Additionally, a national survey of pwMS and healthcare providers (HCPs) was conducted to further understand the indirect impact of the pandemic on healthcare resource utilization (HCRU), outcomes and prescription patterns. RESULTS Out of 529 pwMS in our national survey, over 47 % reported that their overall health and neurologic symptoms had deteriorated during the COVID-19 pandemic, with increased anxiety, and inability to maintain exercise habits as leading perceived causes for worsening. Survey respondents reported widespread disruption of MS-related services during the pandemic. In the Optum database, we identified 39,209 pwMS validating inclusion criteria. We observed a decrease in the utilization of MS-related services in 2020 compared to 2019. Significantly fewer pwMS had visits with their neurologist, primary care provider, physical or occupational therapist despite an increased utilization of telemedicine services. Fewer pwMS had magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) studies of the brain or spinal cord during the pandemic. Only 22.2 % of HCPs surveyed agreed that the perceived risk of more severe COVID-19 infection on a specific DMT influenced their therapeutic decisions. In the Optum database, individuals with an established diagnosis of MS prior to 2019 saw decreases in utilization of platform and moderate efficacy DMTs. In this group, those over the age of 55 saw a decrease in utilization of B-cell therapies (rate ratio 0.79, CI 0.75-0.83), whereas individuals under the age of 55 saw an increase in utilization of B-cell therapies (rate ratio 1.10, CI 1.03-1.17). We did not see any difference in rates of starting DMTs in persons diagnosed in 2019 prior to the pandemic and those diagnosed in 2020. Compared to 2019, B-cell therapies were prescribed more frequently in pwMS diagnosed in 2020 who were younger than 55 or commercially insured (rate ratio 1.35, CI 1.11-1.63). CONCLUSION The COVID-19 pandemic was associated with perceived worsening of neurological symptoms in pwMS. Despite the expansion of telemedicine, we observed decreased access to healthcare services important to the comprehensive care of pwMS. Additionally, we observed changes in DMT utilization in pwMS during the pandemic, particularly in older adults with an established diagnosis of MS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ethan Meltzer
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
| | - Odelin Charron
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
| | - Joe Wozny
- Center for Healthcare Data, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA
| | - Helen Onuorah
- University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX, USA
| | | | | | - Avery Largent
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity St, Austin, TX 78701, USA
| | - Trudy Millard Krause
- Center for Healthcare Data, School of Public Health, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, USA
| | - Leorah Freeman
- Department of Neurology, Dell Medical School, The University of Texas at Austin, 1601 Trinity St, Austin, TX 78701, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu H, Aviszus K, Zelarney P, Liao SY, Gerber AN, Make B, Wechsler ME, Marrack P, Reinhardt RL. Vaccine-elicited B- and T-cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is impaired in chronic lung disease patients. ERJ Open Res 2023; 9:00400-2023. [PMID: 37583809 PMCID: PMC10423317 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00400-2023] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background While vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) provides significant protection from coronavirus disease 2019, the protection afforded to individuals with chronic lung disease is less well established. This study seeks to understand how chronic lung disease impacts SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-elicited immunity. Methods Deep immune phenotyping of humoral and cell-mediated responses to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was performed in patients with asthma, COPD and interstitial lung disease (ILD) compared to healthy controls. Results 48% of vaccinated patients with chronic lung diseases had reduced antibody titres to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antigen relative to healthy controls. Vaccine antibody titres were significantly reduced among asthma (p<0.035), COPD (p<0.022) and a subset of ILD patients as early as 3-4 months after vaccination, correlating with decreased vaccine-specific memory B-cells in circulation. Vaccine-specific memory T-cells were significantly reduced in patients with asthma (CD8+ p<0.004; CD4+ p<0.023) and COPD (CD8+ p<0.008) compared to healthy controls. Impaired T-cell responsiveness was also observed in a subset of ILD patients (CD8+ 21.4%; CD4+ 42.9%). Additional heterogeneity between healthy and disease cohorts was observed among bulk and vaccine-specific follicular T-helper cells. Conclusions Deep immune phenotyping of the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response revealed the complex nature of vaccine-elicited immunity and highlights the need for more personalised vaccination schemes in patients with underlying lung conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haolin Liu
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Katja Aviszus
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | | | - Shu-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Anthony N. Gerber
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Barry Make
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Michael E. Wechsler
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
| | - Philippa Marrack
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - R. Lee Reinhardt
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, USA
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Asashima H, Kim D, Wang K, Lele N, Buitrago-Pocasangre NC, Lutz R, Cruz I, Raddassi K, Ruff WE, Racke MK, Wilson JE, Givens TS, Grifoni A, Weiskopf D, Sette A, Kleinstein SH, Montgomery RR, Shaw AC, Li F, Fan R, Hafler DA, Tomayko MM, Longbrake EE. Prior cycles of anti-CD20 antibodies affect antibody responses after repeated SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. JCI Insight 2023; 8:e168102. [PMID: 37606046 PMCID: PMC10543713 DOI: 10.1172/jci.insight.168102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2022] [Accepted: 07/06/2023] [Indexed: 08/23/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUNDWhile B cell depletion is associated with attenuated antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination, responses vary among individuals. Thus, elucidating the factors that affect immune responses after repeated vaccination is an important clinical need.METHODSWe evaluated the quality and magnitude of the T cell, B cell, antibody, and cytokine responses to a third dose of BNT162b2 or mRNA-1273 mRNA vaccine in patients with B cell depletion.RESULTSIn contrast with control individuals (n = 10), most patients on anti-CD20 therapy (n = 48) did not demonstrate an increase in spike-specific B cells or antibodies after a third dose of vaccine. A third vaccine elicited significantly increased frequencies of spike-specific non-naive T cells. A small subset of B cell-depleted individuals effectively produced spike-specific antibodies, and logistic regression models identified time since last anti-CD20 treatment and lower cumulative exposure to anti-CD20 mAbs as predictors of those having a serologic response. B cell-depleted patients who mounted an antibody response to 3 vaccine doses had persistent humoral immunity 6 months later.CONCLUSIONThese results demonstrate that serial vaccination strategies can be effective for a subset of B cell-depleted patients.FUNDINGThe NIH (R25 NS079193, P01 AI073748, U24 AI11867, R01 AI22220, UM 1HG009390, P01 AI039671, P50 CA121974, R01 CA227473, U01CA260507, 75N93019C00065, K24 AG042489), NIH HIPC Consortium (U19 AI089992), the National Multiple Sclerosis Society (CA 1061-A-18, RG-1802-30153), the Nancy Taylor Foundation for Chronic Diseases, Erase MS, and the Claude D. Pepper Older Americans Independence Center at Yale (P30 AG21342).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hiromitsu Asashima
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Dongjoo Kim
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Stem Cell Center and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Kaicheng Wang
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Nikhil Lele
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Rachel Lutz
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Isabella Cruz
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Khadir Raddassi
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - William E. Ruff
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Repertoire Immune Medicines, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | | | | | - Alba Grifoni
- Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Daniela Weiskopf
- Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Alessandro Sette
- Center for Infectious Disease and Vaccine Research, La Jolla Institute for Immunology, La Jolla, California, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases and Global Public Health, UCSD, La Jolla, California, USA
| | - Steven H. Kleinstein
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Program in Computational Biology and Bioinformatics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | | - Albert C. Shaw
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Internal Medicine, and
| | - Fangyong Li
- Yale Center for Analytical Sciences, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Rong Fan
- Department of Biomedical Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Yale Stem Cell Center and Yale Cancer Center, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - David A. Hafler
- Department of Neurology, and
- Department of Immunobiology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | - Mary M. Tomayko
- Department of Pathology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
- Department of Dermatology, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Otero-Romero S, Lebrun-Frénay C, Reyes S, Amato MP, Campins M, Farez M, Filippi M, Hacohen Y, Hemmer B, Juuti R, Magyari M, Oreja-Guevara C, Siva A, Vukusic S, Tintoré M. ECTRIMS/EAN consensus on vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: Improving immunization strategies in the era of highly active immunotherapeutic drugs. Mult Scler 2023; 29:904-925. [PMID: 37293841 PMCID: PMC10338708 DOI: 10.1177/13524585231168043] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 03/19/2023] [Indexed: 06/10/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND With the new highly active drugs available for people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), vaccination becomes an essential part of the risk management strategy. OBJECTIVE To develop a European evidence-based consensus for the vaccination strategy of pwMS who are candidates for disease-modifying therapies (DMTs). METHODS This work was conducted by a multidisciplinary working group using formal consensus methodology. Clinical questions (defined as population, interventions, and outcomes) considered all authorized DMTs and vaccines. A systematic literature search was conducted and quality of evidence was defined according to the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Levels of Evidence. The recommendations were formulated based on the quality of evidence and the risk-benefit balance. RESULTS Seven questions, encompassing vaccine safety, vaccine effectiveness, global vaccination strategy and vaccination in sub-populations (pediatric, pregnant women, elderly and international travelers) were considered. A narrative description of the evidence considering published studies, guidelines, and position statements is presented. A total of 53 recommendations were agreed by the working group after three rounds of consensus. CONCLUSION This first European consensus on vaccination in pwMS proposes the best vaccination strategy according to current evidence and expert knowledge, with the goal of homogenizing the immunization practices in pwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Susana Otero-Romero
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | | | - Saúl Reyes
- Fundación Santa Fe de Bogotá, Bogotá, Colombia School of Medicine, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia Blizard Institute, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - Maria Pia Amato
- Department NEUROFARBA, University of Florence, Florence, Italy IRCCS Fondazione Don Carlo Gnocchi, Florence, Italy
| | - Magda Campins
- Department of Preventive Medicine and Epidemiology, Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Mauricio Farez
- Centro para la Investigación de Enfermedades Neuroinmunológicas (CIEN), FLENI, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Massimo Filippi
- Neuroimaging Research Unit, Division of Neuroscience, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Neurology Unit, Neurorehabilitation Unit, and Neurophysiology Service, IRCCS San Raffaele Scientific Institute, Milan, Italy Vita-Salute San Raffaele University, Milan, Italy
| | - Yael Hacohen
- Department of Paediatric Neurology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children, London, UK Department of Neuroinflammation, Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK
| | - Bernhard Hemmer
- Department of Neurology, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, School of Medicine, Technical University of Munich, Munich, Germany Munich Cluster for Systems Neurology (SyNergy), Munich, Germany
| | - Rosa Juuti
- Multiple Sclerosis International Federation, London, UK
| | - Melinda Magyari
- Department of Neurology, Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center and the Danish Multiple Sclerosis Registry, Rigshospitalet and University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Celia Oreja-Guevara
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, IdISSC, Departamento de Medicina, Universidad Complutense, Madrid, Spain
| | - Aksel Siva
- Department of Neurology, School of Medicine, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Sandra Vukusic
- Service de Neurologie, Sclérose en Plaques, Pathologies de la Myéline et Neuro-inflammation, Centre de Référence des Maladies Inflammatoires Rares du Cerveau et de la Moelle, Hôpital Neurologique Pierre Wertheimer, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France
- Centre des Neurosciences de Lyon, Observatoire Français de la Sclérose en Plaques, INSERM 1028 et CNRS UMR5292, Lyon, France Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Faculté de Médecine Lyon Est, Lyon, France
| | - Mar Tintoré
- Multiple Sclerosis Centre of Catalonia (Cemcat), Vall d’Hebron Barcelona Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Jamali E, Shapoori S, Farrokhi MR, Vakili S, Rostamzadeh D, Iravanpour F, Tavakoli Oliaee R, Jafarinia M. Effect of Disease-Modifying Therapies on COVID-19 Vaccination Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis Patients: A Comprehensive Review. Viral Immunol 2023; 36:368-377. [PMID: 37276047 DOI: 10.1089/vim.2023.0035] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023] Open
Abstract
According to current knowledge, the etiopathogenesis of multiple sclerosis (MS) is complex, involving genetic background as well as several environmental factors that result in dysimmunity in the central nervous system (CNS). MS is an immune-mediated, inflammatory neurological disease affecting the CNS. As part of its attack on the axons of the CNS, MS witnesses varying degrees of myelin and axonal loss. A total of about 20 disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) are available today that, both in clinical trials and in real-world studies, reduce disease activity, such as relapses, magnetic resonance imaging lesions, and disability accumulation. Currently, the world is facing an outbreak of the new coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), which originated in Wuhan, Hubei Province, China, in December 2019 and spread rapidly around the globe. Viral infections play an important role in triggering and maintaining neuroinflammation through direct and indirect mechanisms. There is an old association between MS and viral infections. In the context of MS-related chronic inflammatory damage within the CNS, there has been concern regarding COVID-19 worsening neurological damage. A high rate of disability and increased susceptibility to infection have made MS patients particularly vulnerable. In addition, DMTs have been a concern during the pandemic since many DMTs have immunosuppressive properties. In this article, we discuss the impact of DMTs on COVID-19 risks and the effect of DMTs on COVID-19 vaccination efficacy and outcome in MS patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elham Jamali
- Diagnostic Laboratory Sciences and Technology Research Center, School of Paramedical Sciences, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Peyvand Pathobiology and Genetic Laboratory, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Shima Shapoori
- Science Foundation Ireland (SFI), Center for Research in Medical Devices (CÚRAM), University of Galway, Galway, Ireland
| | - Majid Reza Farrokhi
- Shiraz Neuroscience Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
- Department of Neurosurgery, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Sina Vakili
- Infertility Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Davoud Rostamzadeh
- Medicinal Plants Research Center, Yasuj University of Medical Sciences, Yasuj, Iran
- Department of Immunology, University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut, USA
| | - Farideh Iravanpour
- Shiraz Neuroscience Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Razieh Tavakoli Oliaee
- Shiraz Neuroscience Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Morteza Jafarinia
- Shiraz Neuroscience Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Reder AT, Stuve O, Tankou SK, Leist TP. T cell responses to COVID-19 infection and vaccination in patients with multiple sclerosis receiving disease-modifying therapy. Mult Scler 2023; 29:648-656. [PMID: 36440826 PMCID: PMC9708532 DOI: 10.1177/13524585221134216] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2022] [Revised: 09/07/2022] [Accepted: 09/30/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a neurological disorder marked by accumulating immune-mediated damage to the central nervous system. The dysregulated immune system in MS combined with immune effects of disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) used in MS treatment could alter responses to infections, including severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) that causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Most of the literature on immune response to SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination, in both the general population and patients with MS on DMTs, has focused on humoral immunity. However, immune response to COVID-19 involves multiple lines of defense, including T cells. OBJECTIVE AND METHODS We review innate and adaptive immunity to COVID-19 and expand on the role of T cells in mediating protective immunity against SARS-CoV-2 infection and in responses to COVID-19 vaccination in MS. RESULTS Innate, humoral, and T cell immune responses combat COVID-19 and generate protective immunity. Assays detecting cytokine expression by T cells show an association between SARS-CoV-2-specific T cell responses and milder/asymptomatic COVID-19 and protective immune memory. CONCLUSION Studies of COVID-19 immunity in people with MS on DMTs should ideally include comprehensive assessment of innate, humoral, and T cell responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthony T Reder
- Department of Neurology, University of Chicago Medicine,
Chicago, IL, USA
| | - Olaf Stuve
- Peter O’Donnell Jr. Brain Institute, UT Southwestern
Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA; VA North Texas Health Care System, Dallas VA Medical
Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | | | - Thomas P Leist
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University,
Philadelphia, PA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Schultz K, Jannat-Khah D, Spiera R. B Cell Reconstitution is Associated With COVID-19 Booster Vaccine Responsiveness in Patients Previously Seronegative Treated With Rituximab. J Rheumatol 2023; 50:420-425. [PMID: 36521910 PMCID: PMC11059211 DOI: 10.3899/jrheum.220475] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/26/2022] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess factors associated with serologic response to the coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) booster vaccine in patients with autoimmune rheumatic diseases treated with rituximab (RTX) who were previously serologically unresponsive to the initial vaccine series. METHODS A retrospective chart review of patients treated with RTX who failed to demonstrate a serologic response to the first SARS-CoV-2 vaccination series and subsequently received an mRNA vaccine booster was performed. Serologic response ≥ 4 weeks after the booster was the primary outcome. Fisher exact tests, t tests, and Wilcoxon rank-sum tests were used for comparisons. RESULTS In 31 patients who were previously seronegative, 68% seroconverted following a booster of the COVID-19 vaccine. B cell reconstitution was significantly different between those with positive (median 1.79, IQR 0.65-3.00) and negative (median 0, IQR 0-0) serologic responses to the booster. The days from last RTX dose were also statistically different among seroconverters (median 301, IQR 251-368) vs nonseroconverters (median 188, IQR 169-245). Demographic characteristics were not associated with serologic positivity. Positive predictive value of B cell presence was 90.9% (95% CI 70.8-98.9) and negative predictive value was 100% (95% CI 59-100) for serologic response to the mRNA booster vaccine. Positive predictive value of time ≥ 6 months from last RTX dose to booster was 78.3% (95% CI 56.3-92.5) and the negative predictive value was 62.5% (95% CI 24.5-91.5). CONCLUSION Detectable B cells and longer time from last RTX exposure were associated with the development of anti-SARS-CoV-2 spike protein antibodies following the booster vaccine. These findings should be considered in timing boosters in patients treated with RTX.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlin Schultz
- K. Schultz, BA, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery
| | - Deanna Jannat-Khah
- D. Jannat-Khah, DrPH, MSPH, R. Spiera, MD, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA
| | - Robert Spiera
- D. Jannat-Khah, DrPH, MSPH, R. Spiera, MD, Department of Medicine, Hospital for Special Surgery, and Department of Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Sabatino JJ, Mittl K, Rowles W, Zamecnik CR, Loudermilk RP, Gerungan C, Spencer CM, Sagan SA, Alexander J, Mcpolin K, Chen P, Deshpande C, Wyse K, Maiese EM, Wilson MR, Zamvil SS, Bove R. Longitudinal adaptive immune responses following sequential SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in MS patients on anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2023; 70:104484. [PMID: 36608538 PMCID: PMC9794398 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104484] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/22/2022] [Revised: 12/13/2022] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adequate response to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine represents an important treatment goal in caring for patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) during the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic. Previous data so far have demonstrated lower spike-specific IgG responses following two SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations in MS patients treated with sphingosine-1-phosphate (S1P) receptor modulators and anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (mAb) compared to other disease modifying therapies (DMTs). It is unknown whether subsequent vaccinations can augment antibody responses in these patients. OBJECTIVES The goal of this observational study was to determine the effects of a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination on antibody and T cell responses in MS patients treated with anti-CD20 mAb or S1P receptor modulators. METHODS Vaccine responses in patients treated with anti-CD20 antibodies (ocrelizumab and ofatumumab) or S1P receptor modulators (fingolimod and siponimod) were evaluated before and after third SARS-CoV-2 vaccination as part of an ongoing longitudinal study. Total spike protein and spike receptor binding domain (RBD)-specific IgG responses were measured by Luminex bead-based assay. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were measured by activation-induced marker expression. RESULTS MS patients and healthy controls were enrolled before and following SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. A total of 31 MS patients (n = 10 ofatumumab, n = 13 ocrelizumab, n = 8 S1P) and 10 healthy controls were evaluated through three SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Compared to healthy controls, total spike IgG was significantly lower in anti-CD20 mAb-treated patients and spike RBD IgG was significantly lower in anti-CD20 mAb and S1P-treated patients following a third vaccination. While seropositivity was 100% in healthy controls after a third vaccination, total spike IgG and spike RBD IgG seropositivity were lower in ofatumumab (60% and 60%, respectively), ocrelizumab (85% and 46%, respectively), and S1P-treated patients (100% and 75%, respectively). Longer treatment duration, including prior treatment history, appeared to negatively impact antibody responses. Spike-specific CD4+ and CD8+ T cell responses were well maintained across all groups following a third vaccination. Finally, immune responses were also compared in patients who were vaccinated prior to or following ofatumumab treatment. Antibody responses were significantly higher in those patients who received their primary SARS-CoV-2 vaccination prior to initiating ofatumumab treatment. CONCLUSIONS This study adds to the evolving understanding of SARS-CoV-2 vaccine responses in people with MS treated with disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) known to suppress humoral immunity. Our findings provide important information for optimizing vaccine immunity in at-risk MS patient populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joseph J Sabatino
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kristen Mittl
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - William Rowles
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Colin R Zamecnik
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Rita P Loudermilk
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Chloe Gerungan
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Collin M Spencer
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Sharon A Sagan
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Jessa Alexander
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Kira Mcpolin
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - PeiXi Chen
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | | | - Kerri Wyse
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| | | | - Michael R Wilson
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Scott S Zamvil
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
| | - Riley Bove
- UCSF Weill Institute for Neurosciences, Department of Neurology, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Liu H, Aviszus K, Zelarney P, Liao SY, Gerber AN, Make B, Wechsler ME, Marrack P, Reinhardt RL. Vaccine-elicited B and T cell immunity to SARS-CoV-2 is impaired in chronic lung disease patients. medRxiv 2023:2023.01.25.23284971. [PMID: 36747750 PMCID: PMC9901055 DOI: 10.1101/2023.01.25.23284971] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The protection afforded by vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) to individuals with chronic lung disease is not well established. To understand how chronic lung disease impacts SARS-CoV-2 vaccine-elicited immunity we performed deep immunophenotyping of the humoral and cell mediated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine response in an investigative cohort of vaccinated patients with diverse pulmonary conditions including asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and interstitial lung disease (ILD). Compared to healthy controls, 48% of vaccinated patients with chronic lung diseases had reduced antibody titers to the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine antigen as early as 3-4 months after vaccination, correlating with decreased vaccine-specific memory B cells. Vaccine-specific CD4 and CD8 T cells were also significantly reduced in patients with asthma, COPD, and a subset of ILD patients compared to healthy controls. These findings reveal the complex nature of vaccine-elicited immunity in high-risk patients with chronic lung disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Haolin Liu
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
| | - Katja Aviszus
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
| | - Pearlanne Zelarney
- Research Informatics Services, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
| | - Shu-Yi Liao
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Division of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, National Jewish Health, Denver CO, 80206, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - Anthony N Gerber
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Department of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver CO, 80206, USA
| | - Barry Make
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver CO, 80206, USA
| | - Michael E Wechsler
- Department of Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver CO, 80206, USA
| | - Philippa Marrack
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| | - R Lee Reinhardt
- Department of Immunology and Genomic Medicine, National Jewish Health, Denver, CO, 80206, USA
- Department of Immunology and Microbiology, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, 80045, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Capone F, Rossi M, Cruciani A, Motolese F, Pilato F, Di Lazzaro V. Safety, immunogenicity, efficacy, and acceptability of COVID-19 vaccination in people with multiple sclerosis: a narrative review. Neural Regen Res 2023; 18:284-288. [PMID: 35900404 PMCID: PMC9396498 DOI: 10.4103/1673-5374.346539] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/01/2022] Open
Abstract
In the last two years, a new severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus (SARS-CoV) infection has spread worldwide leading to the death of millions. Vaccination represents the key factor in the global strategy against this pandemic, but it also poses several problems, especially for vulnerable people such as patients with multiple sclerosis. In this review, we have briefly summarized the main findings of the safety, efficacy, and acceptability of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination for multiple sclerosis patients. Although the acceptability of COVID-19 vaccines has progressively increased in the last year, a small but significant part of patients with multiple sclerosis still has relevant concerns about vaccination that make them hesitant about receiving the COVID-19 vaccine. Overall, available data suggest that the COVID-19 vaccination is safe and effective in multiple sclerosis patients, even though some pharmacological treatments such as anti-CD20 therapies or sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators can reduce the immune response to vaccination. Accordingly, COVID-19 vaccination should be strongly recommended for people with multiple sclerosis and, in patients treated with anti-CD20 therapies and sphingosine l-phosphate receptor modulators, and clinicians should evaluate the appropriate timing for vaccine administration. Further studies are necessary to understand the role of cellular immunity in COVID-19 vaccination and the possible usefulness of booster jabs. On the other hand, it is mandatory to learn more about the reasons why people refuse vaccination. This would help to design a more effective communication campaign aimed at increasing vaccination coverage among vulnerable people.
Collapse
|
12
|
Friedli C, Salmen A, Hoepner R, Achtnichts L, Bigi S, Derfuss T, Gobbi C, Kamber N, Kamm CP, Kuhle J, Lalive P, Müller S, Papadopoulou A, Pot C, Zecca C, Chan A. Specific Aspects of Immunotherapy for Multiple Sclerosis in Switzerland—A Structured Commentary, Update 2022. CTN 2022; 7:2. [DOI: 10.3390/ctn7010002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS), particularly relapsing MS (RMS), has become a treatable disease in recent decades, and immunotherapies are now able to influence long-term disease course. A wide range of disease-modifying drugs are available, which makes the choice of therapy in individual cases considerably more complex. Due to specific regulatory aspects (partly diverging approvals by Swissmedic compared to the European Medicines Agency (EMA), and an independent evaluation process for the Federal Office of Public Health (FOPH) specialities list (SL)), we issued a consensus recommendation regarding specific aspects of immunotherapy for MS in Switzerland in 2019. Here, we present revised recommendations with an update on newly approved drugs and new safety aspects, also in reference to the risk of COVID-19 infection and vaccination.
Collapse
|
13
|
Hauer L, Sellner J. Diroximel Fumarate as a Novel Oral Immunomodulating Therapy for Relapsing Forms of Multiple Sclerosis: A Review on the Emerging Data. Drug Des Devel Ther 2022; 16:3915-3927. [PMID: 36388086 PMCID: PMC9663167 DOI: 10.2147/dddt.s236926] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/03/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory, demyelinating and neurodegenerative disorder of the central nervous system. Disease-modifying drugs (DMDs) and subsequent adherence are crucial for preventing reversible episodes of neurological dysfunction and delayed onset of progressive accumulation of irreversible deficits. Yet, side effects may limit their usage in clinical practice. Gastrointestinal (GI) side effects are a significant limitation of the use of dimethyl fumarate (DMF), the most frequently prescribed oral DMD in MS worldwide. Diroximel fumarate (DRF) is a second-generation oral fumaric acid ester (FAE) that was developed as a formulation with better GI tolerability. The improved tolerability is assumed to be related to a lower synthesis of gut-irritating methanol. Other explanations for DRF’s lower extent of GI irritation include a more modest off-target activity due to its chemical structure. The superior GI tolerability of DRF compared to DMF could be proven in clinical trials and lead to approval of DRF for the treatment of relapsing forms of MS/relapsing-remitting MS (United States Food and Drug Administration and European Medicines Agency, respectively). Here, we summarize the mode of action of oral FAE and compare the chemical and physiological characteristics of DMF and DRF. Moreover, we discuss the adverse effects of FAE and introduce the emerging preclinical and trial data leading to the approval of DRF in MS. This article additionally reviews our current understanding of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and the efficacy of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination in people treated with FAE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Larissa Hauer
- Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatic Medicine, Christian Doppler Medical Center, Paracelsus Medical University, Salzburg, Austria
| | - Johann Sellner
- Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
- Correspondence: Johann Sellner, Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Liechtensteinstr. 67, Mistelbach, 2130, Austria, Tel +2572/9004-12850, Fax +2572/9004-49281, Email
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Bellinvia A, Aprea MG, Portaccio E, Pastò L, Razzolini L, Fonderico M, Addazio I, Betti M, Amato MP. Hypogammaglobulinemia is associated with reduced antibody response after anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in MS patients treated with antiCD20 therapies. Neurol Sci 2022; 43:5783-5794. [PMID: 35918574 PMCID: PMC9345744 DOI: 10.1007/s10072-022-06287-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2022] [Accepted: 07/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
Background Methods Results Conclusion
Collapse
|
15
|
Kister I, Curtin R, Pei J, Perdomo K, Bacon TE, Voloshyna I, Kim J, Tardio E, Velmurugu Y, Nyovanie S, Valeria Calderon A, Dibba F, Stanzin I, Samanovic MI, Raut P, Raposo C, Priest J, Cabatingan M, Winger RC, Mulligan MJ, Patskovsky Y, Silverman GJ, Krogsgaard M. Hybrid and vaccine-induced immunity against SAR-CoV-2 in MS patients on different disease-modifying therapies. Ann Clin Transl Neurol 2022; 9:1643-1659. [PMID: 36165097 PMCID: PMC9538694 DOI: 10.1002/acn3.51664] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare "hybrid immunity" (prior COVID-19 infection plus vaccination) and post-vaccination immunity to SARS CoV-2 in MS patients on different disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) and to assess the impact of vaccine product and race/ethnicity on post-vaccination immune responses. METHODS Consecutive MS patients from NYU MS Care Center (New York, NY), aged 18-60, who completed primary COVID-19 vaccination series ≥6 weeks previously were evaluated for SARS CoV-2-specific antibody responses with electro-chemiluminescence and multiepitope bead-based immunoassays and, in a subset, live virus immunofluorescence-based microneutralization assay. SARS CoV-2-specific cellular responses were assessed with cellular stimulation TruCulture IFNγ and IL-2 assay and, in a subset, with IFNγ and IL-2 ELISpot assays. Multivariate analyses examined associations between immunologic responses and prior COVID-19 infection while controlling for age, sex, DMT at vaccination, time-to-vaccine, and vaccine product. RESULTS Between 6/01/2021 and 11/11/2021, 370 MS patients were recruited (mean age 40.6 years; 76% female; 53% non-White; 22% with prior infection; common DMT classes: ocrelizumab 40%; natalizumab 15%, sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators 13%; and no DMT 8%). Vaccine-to-collection time was 18.7 (±7.7) weeks and 95% of patients received mRNA vaccines. In multivariate analyses, patients with laboratory-confirmed prior COVID-19 infection had significantly increased antibody and cellular post-vaccination responses compared to those without prior infection. Vaccine product and DMT class were independent predictors of antibody and cellular responses, while race/ethnicity was not. INTERPRETATION Prior COVID-19 infection is associated with enhanced antibody and cellular post-vaccine responses independent of DMT class and vaccine type. There were no differences in immune responses across race/ethnic groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilya Kister
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of NeurologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Ryan Curtin
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Jinglan Pei
- Genentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | - Katherine Perdomo
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of NeurologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Tamar E. Bacon
- NYU Multiple Sclerosis Comprehensive Care Center, Department of NeurologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Iryna Voloshyna
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Joseph Kim
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Ethan Tardio
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Yogambigai Velmurugu
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Samantha Nyovanie
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Andrea Valeria Calderon
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Fatoumatta Dibba
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Igda Stanzin
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Marie I. Samanovic
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center, Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Pranil Raut
- Genentech, Inc.South San FranciscoCaliforniaUSA
| | | | | | | | | | - Mark J. Mulligan
- NYU Langone Vaccine Center, Department of MedicineNYU Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew YorkUSA
| | - Yury Patskovsky
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Gregg J. Silverman
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of MedicineNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| | - Michelle Krogsgaard
- Laura and Isaac Perlmutter Cancer Center and Department of PathologyNew York University Grossman School of MedicineNew YorkNew York10016USA
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Kim E, Haag A, Nguyen J, Kesselman MM, Demory Beckler M. Vaccination of multiple sclerosis patients during the COVID-19 era: Novel insights into vaccine safety and immunogenicity. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 67:104172. [PMID: 36116380 PMCID: PMC9462931 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.104172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2022] [Revised: 07/13/2022] [Accepted: 09/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an incurable autoimmune disease known to cause widespread demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) and a host of debilitating symptoms in patients. The development of MS is believed to be driven by the breakdown of the blood brain barrier, subsequent infiltration by CD4+ and CD8+ T cells, and widespread CNS inflammation and demyelination. Disease modifying therapies (DMTs) profoundly disrupt these processes and therefore compose an essential component of disease management. However, the effects of these therapeutic agents on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in individuals with MS are not yet fully understood. As such, the primary objective of this review article was to summarize the findings of recently conducted studies on vaccine safety and immunogenicity in MS patients treated with DMTs, particularly in the context of the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. Discussed in this review are vaccinations against influenza, yellow fever, human papillomavirus, measles, mumps, rubella, Streptococcus pneumoniae, hepatitis B, and COVID-19. This article additionally reviews our current understanding of COVID-19 severity and incidence in this patient population, the risks and benefits of vaccination against severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), and vaccination guidelines set forth by MS societies and organizations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Enoch Kim
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Alyssa Haag
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Jackie Nguyen
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Marc M Kesselman
- Division of Rheumatology, Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Osteopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| | - Michelle Demory Beckler
- Dr. Kiran C. Patel College of Allopathic Medicine, Nova Southeastern University, Fort Lauderdale, FL, United States of America.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Etemadifar M, Nouri H, Pitzalis M, Idda ML, Salari M, Baratian M, Mahdavi S, Abhari AP, Sedaghat N. Multiple sclerosis disease-modifying therapies and COVID-19 vaccines: a practical review and meta-analysis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2022; 93:986-994. [PMID: 35688629 DOI: 10.1136/jnnp-2022-329123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2022] [Accepted: 05/10/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Studies among people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) receiving disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) have provided adequate evidence for an appraisal of COVID-19 vaccination policies among them. To synthesise the available evidence addressing the effect of MS DMTs on COVID-19 vaccines' immunogenicity and effectiveness, following the Cochrane guidelines, we systematically reviewed all observational studies available in MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, MedRxiv and Google Scholar from January 2021 to January 2022 and extracted their relevant data. Immunogenicity data were then synthesised in a quantitative, and other data in a qualitative manner. Evidence from 28 studies suggests extensively lower B-cell responses in sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator (S1PRM) treated and anti-CD20 (aCD20) treated, and lower T-cell responses in interferon-treated, S1PRM-treated and cladribine-treated pwMS-although most T cell evidence currently comprises of low or very low certainty. With every 10-week increase in aCD20-to-vaccine period, a 1.94-fold (95% CI 1.57 to 2.41, p<0.00001) increase in the odds of seroconversion was observed. Furthermore, the evidence points out that B-cell-depleting therapies may accelerate postvaccination humoral waning, and boosters' immunogenicity is predictable with the same factors affecting the initial vaccination cycle. Four real-world studies further indicate that the comparative incidence/severity of breakthrough COVID-19 has been higher among the pwMS treated with S1PRM and aCD20-unlike the ones treated with other DMTs. S1PRM and aCD20 therapies were the only DMTs reducing the real-world effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination among pwMS. Hence, it could be concluded that optimisation of humoral immunogenicity and ensuring its durability are the necessities of an effective COVID-19 vaccination policy among pwMS who receive DMTs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Masoud Etemadifar
- Neurosurgery Research Department, Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
| | - Hosein Nouri
- Neurosurgery Research Department, Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Isfahan, Iran
| | - Maristella Pitzalis
- Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research (IRGB) of the National Research Council (CNR), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Maria Laura Idda
- Institute of Genetic and Biomedical Research (IRGB) of the National Research Council (CNR), Cagliari, Italy
| | - Mehri Salari
- Functional Neurosurgery Research Center, Shohada Tajrish Comprehensive Neurosurgical Center of Excellence, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mahshid Baratian
- Clinical Research Developement Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
| | - Sepide Mahdavi
- Clinical Research Developement Center, Najafabad Branch, Islamic Azad University, Najafabad, Iran
| | - Amir Parsa Abhari
- Neurosurgery Research Department, Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Isfahan, Iran
| | - Nahad Sedaghat
- Neurosurgery Research Department, Alzahra University Hospital, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran .,Network of Immunity in Infection, Malignancy, and Autoimmunity (NIIMA), Universal Scientific Education and Research Network (USERN), Isfahan, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Wu X, Wang L, Shen L, Tang K. Response of COVID-19 vaccination in multiple sclerosis patients following disease-modifying therapies: A meta-analysis. EBioMedicine 2022; 81:104102. [PMID: 35759920 PMCID: PMC9230320 DOI: 10.1016/j.ebiom.2022.104102] [Citation(s) in RCA: 29] [Impact Index Per Article: 14.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/25/2022] [Revised: 04/29/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Background COVID-19 vaccination is recommended for patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS), while disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) may influence the efficacy of SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in this population. Thus, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the impact of DMTs on immune response to COVID-19 vaccines in pwMS. Methods Literature search from December 1, 2019 to March 31, 2022 was performed in PubMed, MedRxiv, Embase and Cochrane Library. The risk of impaired response to vaccination in pwMS receiving DMTs was estimated in odds ratios (ORs) using random-effects method. Findings A total of 48 studies comprising 6860 pwMS were included. Overall, pwMS with anti-CD20 (OR=0.02, 95% CI: 0.01-0.03) and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator (S1PRM) (OR=0.03, 95% CI: 0.01-0.06) treatments had attenuated serologic response after full vaccination compared with those without DMTs. Additionally, pwMS vaccinated within six months since last anti-CD20 therapy were at significantly higher risk of blunted response compared with those receiving anti-CD20 therapy more than six months prior to vaccination (P = 0.001). We found no significant associations between other treatments (including IFN-β, GA, DMF, TERI, NTZ, CLAD, and ALE) and humoral response to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in pwMS. As for T-cell response, no significant difference was found between pwMS on anti-CD20 and those without DMTs after vaccination, while S1PRM was marginally associated with impaired cellular response (P = 0.03). Interpretation Our findings suggested that routine serological monitoring may be required for pwMS on anti-CD20 and S1PRMs after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and highlighted the benefits of a booster dose. The effect of cellular response and optimal interval from last anti-CD20 treatment to vaccination should be further addressed. Funding This study was supported by Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai (21ZR1433000).
Collapse
|
19
|
Ovchinnikov A, Findling O. An overview of pivotal trials and real-world evidence for CD20-depleting therapy in multiple sclerosis : Immunotherapy with rituximab, ocrelizumab, and ofatumumab. Wien Med Wochenschr 2022; 172:359-364. [PMID: 35723820 PMCID: PMC9208251 DOI: 10.1007/s10354-022-00939-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/04/2022] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the central nervous system leading to demyelination and neurodegeneration of brain tissue. For a long time, research focused on T cells as the primary mechanism of disease. Driven by reports on the clinical results of B cell-depleting therapies, this therapeutic approach has come into focus in the last decade, and new highly effective treatments have been developed and are now complementing the therapeutic landscape. This review provides an overview of the development of B cell-depleting therapies and shows the advantages and disadvantages of current developments. In addition, we discuss basic considerations for CD20-depleted MS patients in the face of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Arkady Ovchinnikov
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstr. 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland
| | - Oliver Findling
- Department of Neurology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Tellstr. 25, 5001, Aarau, Switzerland.
| |
Collapse
|
20
|
Brill L, Raposo C, Rechtman A, Zveik O, Levin N, Oiknine‐Djian E, Wolf DG, Vaknin‐Dembinsky A. Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 Third Vaccine Immune Response in Multiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Ocrelizumab. Ann Neurol 2022; 91:796-800. [PMID: 35243687 PMCID: PMC9082479 DOI: 10.1002/ana.26343] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/14/2022] [Revised: 02/27/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
The introduction of a third-dose vaccination along with new variants of concern raises questions regarding serology and T-cell responses in patients with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) treated with B-cell depletion who develop attenuated humoral response to vaccines. The aim of this study was to longitudinally evaluate humoral and cellular response to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine in ocrelizumab-treated pwMS before and following a third vaccine dose. Following the third vaccine dose, patients who are low or nonresponders following initial vaccination did not increase antibody titers. In healthy controls and ocrelizumab-treated pwMS, cellular response decreased 6 months after initial vaccination and increased significantly after the third dose. ANN NEUROL 2022;91:796-800.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Livnat Brill
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, and Agnes‐Ginges Center for NeurogeneticsHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | | | - Ariel Rechtman
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, and Agnes‐Ginges Center for NeurogeneticsHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Omri Zveik
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, and Agnes‐Ginges Center for NeurogeneticsHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Netta Levin
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, and Agnes‐Ginges Center for NeurogeneticsHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| | - Esther Oiknine‐Djian
- Clinical Virology UnitHadassah Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor ImmunologyHebrew University Faculty of MedicineJerusalemIsrael
| | - Dana G. Wolf
- Clinical Virology UnitHadassah Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
- Lautenberg Center for General and Tumor ImmunologyHebrew University Faculty of MedicineJerusalemIsrael
| | - Adi Vaknin‐Dembinsky
- Department of Neurology, Laboratory of Neuroimmunology, and Agnes‐Ginges Center for NeurogeneticsHadassah‐Hebrew University Medical CenterJerusalemIsrael
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Rakusa M, Öztürk S, Moro E, Helbok R, Bassetti CL, Beghi E, Bereczki D, Bodini B, Di Liberto G, Jenkins TM, Macerollo A, Maia LF, Martinelli-Boneschi F, Pisani A, Priori A, Sauerbier A, Soffietti R, Taba P, von Oertzen TJ, Zedde M, Crean M, Burlica A, Cavallieri F, Sellner J. COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy among people with chronic neurological disorders: a position paper. Eur J Neurol 2022; 29:2163-2172. [PMID: 35460319 PMCID: PMC9111566 DOI: 10.1111/ene.15368] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2022] [Accepted: 04/15/2022] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Background and purpose Health risks associated with SARS‐CoV‐2 infection are undisputed. Moreover, the capability of vaccination to prevent symptomatic, severe, and fatal COVID‐19 is recognized. There is also early evidence that vaccination can reduce the chance for long COVID‐19. Nonetheless, the willingness to get vaccinated and receive booster shots remains subpar among people with neurologic disorders. Vaccine scepticism not only jeopardizes collective efforts to end the COVID‐19 pandemic but puts individual lives at risk, as some chronic neurologic diseases are associated with a higher risk for an unfavorable COVID‐19 course. Methods In this position paper, the NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force of the European Academy of Neurology (EAN) summarizes the current knowledge on the prognosis of COVID‐19 among patients with neurologic disease, elucidates potential barriers to vaccination coverage, and formulates strategies to overcome vaccination hesitancy. A survey among the Task Force members on the phenomenon of vaccination hesitancy among people with neurologic disease supports the lines of argumentation. Results The study revealed that people with multiple sclerosis and other nervous system autoimmune disorders are most skeptical of SARS‐CoV‐2 vaccination. The prevailing concerns included the chance of worsening the pre‐existing neurological condition, vaccination‐related adverse events, and drug interaction. Conclusions The EAN NeuroCOVID‐19 Task Force reinforces the key role of neurologists as advocates of COVID‐19 vaccination. Neurologists need to argue in the interest of their patients about the overwhelming individual and global benefits of COVID‐19 vaccination. Moreover, they need to keep on eye on this vulnerable patient group, its concerns, and the emergence of potential safety signals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin Rakusa
- Department of Neurologic Diseases, University Medical Centre Maribor, Maribor, Slovenia
| | - Serefnur Öztürk
- Department of Neurology and Neurointensive Care, Selcuk University, Faculty of Medicine, Konya, Turkey
| | - Elena Moro
- Grenoble Alpes University, Division of Neurology, CHU of Grenoble, Grenoble Institute of Neurosciences, Grenoble, France
| | - Raimund Helbok
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria.,Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Claudio L Bassetti
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital, Bern University Hospital and University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ettore Beghi
- Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, IRCCS, Milan, Italy
| | - Daniel Bereczki
- Department of Neurology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary
| | - Benedetta Bodini
- Department of Neurology, Saint-Antoine Hospital, APHP, Paris, France.,Paris Brain Institute, Sorbonne University, Paris, France
| | - Giovanni Di Liberto
- Department of Clinical Neurosciences, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois and University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Thomas M Jenkins
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.,Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Sheffield, UK
| | - Antonella Macerollo
- The Walton Centre NHS Foundation Trust for Neurology and Neurosurgery, Liverpool, UK.,Institute of Systems, Molecular and Integrative Biology, University of Liverpool, UK
| | - Luis F Maia
- Department of Neurology, Hospital Santo António, Centro Hospitalar Universitário do Porto, Porto, Portugal.,i3S - Instituto de Investigação e Inovação em Saúde Universidade do Porto, Porto, Portugal
| | - Filippo Martinelli-Boneschi
- Neurology Unit and MS Centre, Foundation IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Milan, Italy.,Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation (DEPT), Dino Ferrari Centre, Neuroscience Section, University of Milan, Milan
| | - Antonio Pisani
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences, University of Pavia, Pavia, Italy.,IRCCS Mondino Foundation, Pavia, Italy
| | - Alberto Priori
- Division of Neurology, Department of Neurology, 'Aldo Ravelli' Research Center, University of Milan and ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy
| | - Anna Sauerbier
- University of Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Department of Neurology, Cologne, Germany
| | - Riccardo Soffietti
- Division of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Pille Taba
- Department of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Institute of Clinical Medicine, Tartu, Estonia.,Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Tim J von Oertzen
- Department of Neurology, Neuromed Campus, Kepler Universitätsklinikum, Linz, Austria.,Medical Faculty, Johannes Kepler University, Linz, Austria
| | - Marialuisa Zedde
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Michael Crean
- European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Head Office, Vienna, Austria
| | - Anja Burlica
- European Academy of Neurology (EAN) Head Office, Vienna, Austria
| | - Francesco Cavallieri
- Neurology Unit, Neuromotor and Rehabilitation Department, Azienda USL-IRCCS di Reggio Emilia, Reggio Emilia, Italy.,Clinical and Experimental Medicine PhD Program, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Johann Sellner
- Department of Neurology, Landesklinikum Mistelbach-Gänserndorf, Mistelbach, Austria
| | | |
Collapse
|
22
|
Lee ARYB, Wong SY, Tay SH. Booster COVID-19 Vaccines for Immune-Mediated Inflammatory Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:668. [PMID: 35632424 PMCID: PMC9144569 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10050668] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2022] [Revised: 04/17/2022] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: Seroconversion and longevity of vaccine-induced immune response is blunted in immune-mediated inflammatory disease (IMID) patients owing to immunosuppressive regimens. COVID-19 booster vaccines after a primary series have been proposed with inconclusive evidence on efficacy to date. Methods: This PROSPERO-registered systematic review (CRD42022302534) was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, CORD-19, WHO ICTRP, and medRxiv were searched up to 28 February 2022 for eligible studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute critical appraisal tools. Results: From 6647 records, 17 prospective studies were included for systematic review and 12 in meta-analysis of primary series non-responders. The risk of bias was low. Pooling 340 non-responders, a booster dose proved effective with 0.47 seroconverting (95% CI: 0.32–0.63, I2 = 82%). Rituximab therapy was associated with significant impairment, with risks of 0.25 (95% CI: 0.17–0.36, I2 = 50.7%) versus 0.81 (95% CI: 0.72–0.87, I2 = 0.0%) for those without rituximab therapy. A systematic review of antibody levels against COVID-19 showed several-fold increases across studies. Incidence of local and systemic adverse events, including disease flares, were either comparable or slightly increased after the booster dose compared to primary series. No major events such as myocarditis or death were reported. Conclusion: Our results show that booster doses are effective in eliciting seroconversion in non-responders, bolstering immunity to COVID-19. It has also not been associated with major adverse events.
Collapse
|
23
|
Abstract
Neuroimmunological diseases and their treatment compromise the immune system, thereby increasing the risk of infections and serious illness. Consequently, vaccinations to protect against infections are an important part of the clinical management of these diseases. However, the wide variety of immunotherapies that are currently used to treat neuroimmunological disease — particularly multiple sclerosis and neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorders — can also impair immunological responses to vaccinations. In this Review, we discuss what is known about the effects of various immunotherapies on immunological responses to vaccines and what these effects mean for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with a neuroimmunological disease. The success of vaccination in patients receiving immunotherapy largely depends on the specific mode of action of the immunotherapy. To minimize the risk of infection when using immunotherapy, assessment of immune status and exclusion of underlying chronic infections before initiation of therapy are essential. Selection of the required vaccinations and leaving appropriate time intervals between vaccination and administration of immunotherapy can help to safeguard patients. We also discuss the rapidly evolving knowledge of how immunotherapies affect responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and how these effects should influence the management of patients on these therapies during the COVID-19 pandemic. In this Review, the authors discuss how various immunotherapies for neuroimmunological diseases interact with vaccination responses, including responses to SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations, and the implications for the safe and effective use of vaccines in patients with these diseases. Vaccination against infection is an essential part of the management of neuroimmunological diseases. All indicated vaccinations should be administered before initiation of immunotherapy whenever possible; appropriate intervals between vaccination and treatment vary with treatment and vaccination. Inactivated vaccines are considered safe in neuroimmunological diseases but live vaccines are generally contraindicated during immunotherapy. Vaccination responses during immunotherapy can be diminished or abrogated, depending on the treatment and vaccination; antibody titre testing to monitor responses can be considered where appropriate. Vaccinations must be avoided during relapses or exacerbations of neuroimmunological diseases. Vaccination against SARS-CoV-2 is recommended for patients with neuroimmunological disease but some immunotherapies limit the immune response; therefore, timing should be considered carefully.
Collapse
|
24
|
Krajnc N, Bsteh G, Berger T, Mares J, Hartung HP. Monoclonal Antibodies in the Treatment of Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis: an Overview with Emphasis on Pregnancy, Vaccination, and Risk Management. Neurotherapeutics 2022; 19:753-773. [PMID: 35378683 PMCID: PMC8978776 DOI: 10.1007/s13311-022-01224-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 03/14/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Monoclonal antibodies have become a mainstay in the treatment of patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (RMS) and provide some benefit to patients with primary progressive MS. They are highly precise by specifically targeting molecules displayed on cells involved in distinct immune mechanisms of MS pathophysiology. They not only differ in the target antigen they recognize but also by the mode of action that generates their therapeutic effect. Natalizumab, an [Formula: see text]4[Formula: see text]1 integrin antagonist, works via binding to cell surface receptors, blocking the interaction with their ligands and, in that way, preventing the migration of leukocytes across the blood-brain barrier. On the other hand, the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody alemtuzumab and the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies rituximab, ocrelizumab, ofatumumab, and ublituximab work via eliminating selected pathogenic cell populations. However, potential adverse effects may be serious and can necessitate treatment discontinuation. Most importantly, those are the risk for (opportunistic) infections, but also secondary autoimmune diseases or malignancies. Monoclonal antibodies also carry the risk of infusion/injection-related reactions, primarily in early phases of treatment. By careful patient selection and monitoring during therapy, the occurrence of these potentially serious adverse effects can be minimized. Monoclonal antibodies are characterized by a relatively long pharmacologic half-life and pharmacodynamic effects, which provides advantages such as permitting infrequent dosing, but also creates disadvantages regarding vaccination and family planning. This review presents an overview of currently available monoclonal antibodies for the treatment of RMS, including their mechanism of action, efficacy and safety profile. Furthermore, we provide practical recommendations for risk management, vaccination, and family planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nik Krajnc
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Gabriel Bsteh
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Thomas Berger
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Jan Mares
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic
| | - Hans-Peter Hartung
- Department of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
- Department of Neurology, Palacky University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
- Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Moorenstrasse 5, 40225, Düsseldorf, Germany.
- Brain and Mind Center, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
Milo R, Staun-Ram E, Karussis D, Karni A, Hellmann MA, Bar-Haim E, Miller A. Humoral and Cellular Immune Responses to SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis: An Israeli Multi-Center Experience Following 3 Vaccine Doses. Front Immunol 2022; 13:868915. [PMID: 35432335 PMCID: PMC9012137 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.868915] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/03/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Immunomodulatory/immunosuppressive activity of multiple sclerosis (MS) disease modifying therapies (DMTs) might affect immune responses to SARS-CoV-2 exposure or vaccination in patients with MS (PwMS). We evaluated the effect of DMTs on humoral and cell-mediated immune responses to 2 and 3 vaccinations and the longevity of SARS-Cov-2 IgG levels in PwMS. Methods 522 PwMS and 68 healthy controls vaccinated with BNT162b2-Pfizer mRNA vaccine against SARS-CoV-2, or recovering from COVID-19, were recruited in a nation-wide multi-center study. Blood was collected at 3 time-points: 2-16 weeks and ~6 months post 2nd vaccination and 1-16 weeks following 3rd vaccination. Serological responses were measured by quantifying IgG levels against the spike-receptor-binding-domain of SARS-CoV-2, and cellular responses (in a subgroup analysis) by quantifying IFNγ secretion in blood incubated with COVID-19 spike-antigen. Results 75% PwMS were seropositive post 2nd or 3rd vaccination. IgG levels decreased by 82% within 6 months from vaccination (p<0.0001), but were boosted 10.3 fold by the 3rd vaccination (p<0.0001), and 1.8 fold compared to ≤3m post 2nd vaccination (p=0.025). Patients treated with most DMTs were seropositive post 2nd and 3rd vaccinations, however only 38% and 44% of ocrelizumab-treated patients and 54% and 46% of fingolimod-treated patients, respectively, were seropositive. Similarly, in COVID-19-recovered patients only 54% of ocrelizumab-treated, 75% of fingolimod-treated and 67% of cladribine-treated patients were seropositive. A time interval of ≥5 months between ocrelizumab infusion and vaccination was associated with higher IgG levels (p=0.039 post-2nd vaccination; p=0.036 post-3rd vaccination), and with higher proportions of seropositive patients. Most fingolimod- and ocrelizumab-treated patients responded similarly to 2nd and 3rd vaccination. IFNγ-T-cell responses were detected in 89% and 63% of PwMS post 2nd and 3rd vaccination, however in only 25% and 0% of fingolimod-treated patients, while in 100% and 86% of ocrelizumab-treated patients, respectively. Conclusion PwMS treated with most DMTs developed humoral and T-cell responses following 2 and 3 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccinations. Fingolimod- or ocrelizumab-treated patients had diminished humoral responses, and fingolimod compromised the cellular responses, with no improvement after a 3rd booster. Vaccination following >5 months since ocrelizumab infusion was associated with better sero-positivity. These findings may contribute to the development of treatment-stratified vaccination guidelines for PwMS.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ron Milo
- Department of Neurology, Barzilai Medical Center, Ashkelon & Faculty of Health Sciences, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel
| | - Elsebeth Staun-Ram
- Multiple Sclerosis Center and Neuroimmunology Unit, Carmel Medical Center & Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| | - Dimitrios Karussis
- Unit for Neuroimmunology, Multiple Sclerosis and Cell Therapy, Hadassah Medical Center & Faculty of Medicine, Hebrew University, Jerusalem, Israel
| | - Arnon Karni
- Neuroimmunology and Multiple Sclerosis Unit, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center & Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Sagol School of Neuroscience, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mark A. Hellmann
- Department of Neurology, Rabin Medical Center & Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Erez Bar-Haim
- Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Genetics, Israel Institute for Biological Research, Ness Ziona, Israel
| | - Ariel Miller
- Multiple Sclerosis Center and Neuroimmunology Unit, Carmel Medical Center & Rappaport Faculty of Medicine, Technion-Israel Institute of Technology, Haifa, Israel
| |
Collapse
|
26
|
Broseta JJ, Rodríguez-espinosa D, Cuadrado E, Rodríguez N, Bedini JL, Maduell F. Humoral Response after Three Doses of mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 Vaccines in Hemodialysis Patients. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:522. [PMID: 35455271 PMCID: PMC9030003 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10040522] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/23/2022] [Revised: 03/11/2022] [Accepted: 03/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic continues to be a worldwide health issue. Among hemodialysis (HD) patients, two-dose immunization schemes with mRNA vaccines have contributed to preventing severe COVID-19 cases; however, some have not produced a sufficient humoral response, and most have developed a rapid decline in antibody levels over the months following vaccination. This observational, prospective, multi-center study evaluated the humoral response in terms of presence and levels of IgG antibodies to the receptor-binding domain of the S1 spike antigen of SARS-CoV-2 (anti-S1-RBD IgG) to the third dose of SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines, either the mRNA-1273 (Moderna) or BNT162b2 (Pfizer), in 153 patients from three dialysis units affiliated to Hospital Clínic of Barcelona (Spain). Most hemodialysis patients responded intensely to this third vaccine dose, achieving the seroconversion in three out of four non- or weak responders to two doses. Moreover, 96.1% maintained the upper limit or generated higher titers than after the second. BNT162b2 vaccine, active cancer, and immunosuppressive treatment were related to a worse humoral response. Every hemodialysis patient should be administered a third vaccine dose six months after receiving the second one. Despite the lack of data, immunosuppressed patients and those with active cancer may benefit from more frequent vaccine boosters.
Collapse
|
27
|
Töllner M, Speer C, Benning L, Bartenschlager M, Nusshag C, Morath C, Zeier M, Süsal C, Schnitzler P, Schmitt W, Bergner R, Bartenschlager R, Lorenz HM, Schaier M. Impaired Neutralizing Antibody Activity against B.1.617.2 (Delta) after Anti-SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination in Patients Receiving Anti-CD20 Therapy. J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11061739. [PMID: 35330069 PMCID: PMC8952324 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11061739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 03/15/2022] [Accepted: 03/18/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: To characterize humoral response after standard anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination in Rituximab-treated patients and to determine the optimal time point after last Rituximab treatment for appropriate immunization. Methods: Sixty-four patients who received Rituximab within the last seven years prior to the first anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination were recruited in a prospective observational study. Anti-S1 IgG, SARS-CoV-2 specific neutralization, and various SARS-CoV-2 target antibodies were determined. A live virus assay was used to assess neutralizing antibody activity against B.1.617.2 (delta). In Rituximab-treated patients, CD19+ peripheral B-cells were quantified using flow cytometry. Results: After second vaccination, all antibodies were significantly reduced compared to healthy controls. Neutralizing antibody activity against B.1.617.2 (delta) was detectable with a median (IQR) ID50 of 0 (0−1:20) compared to 1:320 (1:160−1:320) in healthy controls (for all p < 0.001). Longer time period since last Rituximab administration correlated with higher anti-SARS-CoV-2 antibody levels and a stronger neutralization of B.1.617.2 (delta). With one exception, only patients with a CD19+ cell proportion ≥ 1% had detectable neutralizing antibodies. Conclusion: Our data indicate that a reconstitution of the B-cell population to >1% seems crucial in developing neutralizing antibodies against SARS-CoV-2. We suggest that anti-SARS-CoV-2 vaccination should be administered at least 8−12 months after the last Rituximab treatment for sufficient humoral responses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maximilian Töllner
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Claudius Speer
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
- Molecular Medicine Partnership Unit Heidelberg, European Molecular Biology Laboratory, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Louise Benning
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
| | - Marie Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.B.); (R.B.)
| | - Christian Nusshag
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
| | - Christian Morath
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
| | - Martin Zeier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
| | - Caner Süsal
- Transplant Immunology Research Center of Excellence, Koç University Hospital, Istanbul 34010, Turkey;
| | - Paul Schnitzler
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Virology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | | | - Raoul Bergner
- Clinical Center Ludwigshafen, Department of Internal Medicine A, 67036 Ludwigshafen, Germany;
| | - Ralf Bartenschlager
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Molecular Virology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (M.B.); (R.B.)
- German Center for Infection Research (DZIF), Heidelberg Partner Site, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
- Division Virus-Associated Carcinogenesis, German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), 69120 Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Hanns-Martin Lorenz
- Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine V, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany;
| | - Matthias Schaier
- Department of Nephrology, University of Heidelberg, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany; (C.S.); (L.B.); (C.N.); (C.M.); (M.Z.); (M.S.)
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Habek M, Željko C, Savić Mlakar A, Bendelja K, Rogić D, Adamec I, Barun B, Gabelić T, Krbot Skorić M. Humoral and cellular immunity in convalescent and vaccinated COVID-19 people with multiple sclerosis: Effects of disease modifying therapies. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 59:103682. [PMID: 35158189 PMCID: PMC8824161 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103682] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 01/29/2022] [Accepted: 02/07/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To determine anti-SARS-Cov2 antibodies and T-cell immunity in convalescent people with multiple sclerosis (pwMS) and/or pwMS vaccinated against Covid-19, depending on the disease modifying therapy, and in comparison to healthy controls (HC). Methods 75 participants were enrolled: Group 1—29 (38.7%) COVID-19 convalescent participants; Group 2—34 (45.3%) COVID-19 vaccinated; Group 3—12 (16.0%) COVID-19 convalescent participants who were later vaccinated against COVID-19. Cellular immunity was evaluated by determination of number of CD4+ and CD8+ cells secreting TNFα, IFNγ, and IL2 after stimulation with SARS-CoV-2 peptides. Results pwMS treated with ocrelizumab were less likely to develop humoral immunity after COVID-19 recovery or vaccination. No difference was observed in the cellular immunity in all studied parameters between pwMS treated with ocrelizumab compared to HC or pwMS who were treatment naïve or on first line therapies. These findings were consistent in convalescent, vaccinated, and convalescent+vaccinated participants. COVID-19 vaccinated convalescent pwMS on ocrelizumab compared to COVID-19 convalescent HC who were vaccinated did not show statistically difference in the rate of seroconversion nor titers of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies. Conclusion Presence of cellular immunity in pwMS on B-cell depleting therapies is reassuring, as at least partial protection from more severe COVID-19 outcomes can be expected.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mario Habek
- University Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Zagreb, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia.
| | - Cvetić Željko
- Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ana Savić Mlakar
- Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Krešo Bendelja
- Center for Research and Knowledge Transfer in Biotechnology, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Dunja Rogić
- Clinical Institute for Laboratory Diagnostics, University Hospital Center Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Ivan Adamec
- University Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Zagreb, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Barbara Barun
- University Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Zagreb, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Tereza Gabelić
- University Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Zagreb, Croatia; School of Medicine, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| | - Magdalena Krbot Skorić
- University Hospital Center Zagreb, Department of Neurology, Referral Center for Autonomic Nervous System Disorders, Zagreb, Croatia; Faculty of Electrical Engineering and Computing, University of Zagreb, Zagreb, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Bajwa HM, Novak F, Nilsson AC, Nielsen C, Holm DK, Østergaard K, Witt AH, Byg KE, Johansen IS, Mittl K, Rowles W, Zamvil SS, Bove R, Sabatino JJ, Sejbaek T. Persistently reduced humoral and sustained cellular immune response from first to third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination in anti-CD20-treated multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler Relat Disord 2022; 60:103729. [PMID: 35334278 PMCID: PMC8898195 DOI: 10.1016/j.msard.2022.103729] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/04/2022] [Indexed: 01/14/2023]
Abstract
Objective To examine humoral and cellular response in multiple sclerosis patients on anti-CD20 therapy after third BNT162b2 mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. Methods A prospective longitudinal study design from first throughout third vaccination in Danish and American MS centers. All participants were treated with ocrelizumab. Antibody (Ab) levels were assessed before and after third vaccination using SARS-CoV-2 IgG II Quant assay (Abbott Laboratories). B- and T-lymphocytes enumeration was done with BD Multitest™6-color TBNK reagent. Spike-specific T-cell responses were measured through PBMC stimulation with spike peptide pools (JPT Peptide Technologies). Results We found that 14.0%, 37.7%, and 33.3% were seropositive after first, second and third vaccination. The median Ab-levels were 74.2 BAU/mL (range: 8.5–2427) after second vaccination, as well as 43.7 BAU/ml (range: 7.8–366.1) and 31.3 BAU/mL (range: 7.9–507.0) before and after third vaccination, respectively. No difference was found in levels after second and third vaccination (p = 0.1475). Seropositivity dropped to 25.0% of participants before the third vaccination, a relative reduction of 33.3% (p = 0.0020). No difference was found between frequencies of spike reactive CD4+and CD8+ T-cells after second (0.65 ± 0.08% and 0.95 ± 0.20%, respectively) and third vaccination (0.99 ± 0.22% and 1.3 ± 0.34%, respectively). Conclusion In this longitudinal cohort we found no significant increased humoral or cellular response with administration of a third SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccination. These findings suggest the need for clinical strategies to include allowance of B cell reconstitution before repeat vaccination and/or provision of pre-exposure prophylactic monoclonal antibodies.
Collapse
|
30
|
Sidler D, Born A, Schietzel S, Horn MP, Aeberli D, Amsler J, Möller B, Njue LM, Medri C, Angelillo-Scherrer A, Borradori L, Seyed Jafari SM, Radonjic-Hoesli S, Chan A, Hoepner R, Bacher U, Mani LY, Iype JM, Suter-Riniker F, Staehelin C, Nagler M, Hirzel C, Maurer B, Moor MB. Trajectories of humoral and cellular immunity and responses to a third dose of mRNA vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in patients with a history of anti-CD20 therapy. RMD Open 2022; 8:e002166. [PMID: 35361691 PMCID: PMC8971359 DOI: 10.1136/rmdopen-2021-002166] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/17/2021] [Accepted: 03/09/2022] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The majority of patients with B-cell-depleting therapies show compromised vaccination-induced immune responses. Herein, we report on the trajectories of anti-SARS-CoV-2 immune responses in patients of the RituxiVac study compared with healthy volunteers and investigate the immunogenicity of a third vaccination in previously humoral non-responding patients. METHODS We investigated the humoral and cell-mediated immune response after SARS-CoV-2 messanger RNA vaccination in patients with a history with anti-CD20 therapies. Coprimary outcomes were antispike and SARS-CoV-2-stimulated interferon-γ concentrations in vaccine responders 4.3 months (median; IQR: 3.6-4.8 months) after first evaluation, and humoral and cell-mediated immunity (CMI) after a third vaccine dose in previous humoral non-responders. Immunity decay rates were compared using analysis of covariance in linear regression. RESULTS 5.6 months (IQR: 5.1-6.7) after the second vaccination, we detected antispike IgG in 88% (29/33) and CMI in 44% (14/32) of patients with a humoral response after two-dose vaccination compared with 92% (24/26) healthy volunteers with antispike IgG and 69% (11/16) with CMI 6.8 months after the second vaccination (IQR: 6.0-7.1). Decay rates of antibody concentrations were comparable between patients and controls (p=0.70). In two-dose non-responders, a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine elicited humoral responses in 19% (6/32) and CMI in 32% (10/31) participants. CONCLUSION This study reveals comparable immunity decay rates between patients with anti-CD20 treatments and healthy volunteers, but inefficient humoral or CMI after a third SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in most two-dose humoral non-responders calling for individually tailored vaccination strategies in this population.Trial registration numberNCT04877496; ClinicalTrials.gov number.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Sidler
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Born
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Simeon Schietzel
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael P Horn
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Daniel Aeberli
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Jennifer Amsler
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Burkhard Möller
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Linet M Njue
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cesare Medri
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Anne Angelillo-Scherrer
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Luca Borradori
- Department of Dermatology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | | | - Andrew Chan
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Robert Hoepner
- Department of Neurology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Ulrike Bacher
- Department of Haematology and Central Haematology Laboratory, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Laila-Yasmin Mani
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joseena Mariam Iype
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | | | - Cornelia Staehelin
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Michael Nagler
- Department of Clinical Chemistry, Inselspital Universitatsspital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Cedric Hirzel
- Department of Infectious Diseases, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Britta Maurer
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Matthias B Moor
- Department of Nephrology and Hypertension, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Achtnichts L, Ovchinnikov A, Jakopp B, Oberle M, Nedeltchev K, Fux CA, Sellner J, Findling O. SARS-CoV-2 mRNA Vaccination in People with Multiple Sclerosis Treated with Fingolimod: Protective Humoral Immune Responses May Develop after the Preferred Third Shot. Vaccines (Basel) 2022; 10:341. [PMID: 35214799 DOI: 10.3390/vaccines10020341] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2022] [Revised: 02/15/2022] [Accepted: 02/19/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Evidence suggests limited development of protective IgG responses to mRNA-based vaccines in sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor (S1PR)-modulator treated individuals with multiple sclerosis (MS). We studied the extent of the humoral immune response after the preferred third mRNA SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in S1PR-modulator treated people with MS (pwMS) and insufficient IgG responses after the standard immunization scheme. Eight pwMS that were treated with fingolimod received a third homologous SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine dose, either the Moderna's mRNA-1273 or Pfizer-BioNTech's BNT162b2 vaccine. We quantified the serum levels of IgG antibodies against the receptor-binding domain of SARS-CoV-2 four weeks later. An antibody titer of 100 AU/mL or more was considered protective. After the third vaccination, we found clinically relevant IgG titers in four out of eight individuals (50%). We conclude that the humoral immune response may reach protective levels after the third preferred dose of the homologous SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccine. Vaccine shots in S1PR-modulator treated pwMS ahead of schedule may be a strategy to overcome insufficient humoral immune responses following the standard vaccination scheme.
Collapse
|
32
|
Stevens KI, Frangou E, Shin JIL, Anders HJ, Bruchfeld A, Schönermarck U, Hauser T, Westman K, Fernandez-Juarez GM, Floege J, Goumenos D, Turkmen K, van Kooten C, McAdoo SP, Tesar V, Segelmark M, Geetha D, Jayne DRW, Kronbichler A. OUP accepted manuscript. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:1400-1410. [PMID: 35244174 PMCID: PMC9383521 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/13/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Jae I l Shin
- Department of Pediatrics, Yonsei University College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Hans-Joachim Anders
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | - Annette Bruchfeld
- Department of Health, Medicine and Caring Sciences, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
- Department of Renal Medicine, Karolinska University Hospital and CLINTEC Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Ulf Schönermarck
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine IV, Ludwig-Maximilians-University Hospital, Munich, Germany
| | | | - Kerstin Westman
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | | | - Jürgen Floege
- Division of Nephrology, RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Aachen, Germany
| | - Dimitrios Goumenos
- Department of Nephrology and Renal Transplantation, Patras University Hospital, Patras, Greece
| | - Kultigin Turkmen
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Necmettin Erbakan University, Konya, Turkey
| | - Cees van Kooten
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Medicine, Department of Medicine, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - Stephen P McAdoo
- Centre for Inflammatory Disease, Department of Immunology and Inflammation, Imperial College London, London, UK
- Imperial College Renal and Transplant Centre, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, Hammersmith Hospital, London, UK
| | - Vladimir Tesar
- Department of Nephrology, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - Mårten Segelmark
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Clinical Sciences Lund, Lund University and Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden
| | - Duvuru Geetha
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - David R W Jayne
- Department of Medicine, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | | | | |
Collapse
|