1
|
Williams E, Lakkiss S. Supporting children, young people and families to self-manage atopic eczema. Nurs Child Young People 2024:e1478. [PMID: 38247728 DOI: 10.7748/ncyp.2024.e1478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 01/23/2024]
Abstract
Atopic eczema is common in childhood and can continue into adulthood. Adherence to treatment is a significant factor in its effective management, but the complexity of treatment regimens can make adherence challenging. Additionally, living with the condition can have adverse psychosocial consequences for young people in particular. This article discusses treatment regimens for moderate-to-severe atopic eczema and some of the challenges encountered by children, young people and families in self-managing the condition. The authors discuss strategies that can support families to achieve optimal self-management, namely online support tools, written action plans and nurse-led eczema clinics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Williams
- School of Health and Social Care, Swansea University, Swansea, Wales
| | - Samantha Lakkiss
- Singleton Hospital, Swansea Bay University Health Board, Swansea, Wales
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Brown H, Singleton HJ. Atopic eczema and the barriers to treatment adherence for children: a literature review. Nurs Child Young People 2023; 35:21-27. [PMID: 37066679 DOI: 10.7748/ncyp.2023.e1459] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 04/18/2023]
Abstract
Atopic eczema is a chronic, non-contagious, relapsing inflammatory skin condition commonly seen in children and adults. Children with atopic eczema often endure complex skincare regimens that can keep the condition under control when managed effectively. Nonadherence, particularly to topical treatments, is one of the most common causes of treatment failure in atopic eczema. This literature review aimed to explore the barriers that influence treatment adherence in children and young people with atopic eczema and identify recommendations for practice. Six studies were included in the literature review and three themes were identified: relationships, medicines concerns and information deficits. Healthcare professionals should strive to develop trusting relationships with parents and understand the barriers to treatment adherence. Individualised conversations and education about medicines concerns, understanding the psychosocial effects of atopic eczema on children and families, and providing clear, consistent advice can be beneficial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hayley Brown
- Dorset County Hospital, Dorchester, England and former student, Bournemouth University, Bournemouth, England
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Meng YC, Fan JC, Bian WN. Effectiveness of calamine lotion as an adjunctive therapy to mometasone furoate ointment in the treatment of infant eczema: A retrospective study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2022; 101:e30237. [PMID: 36107506 PMCID: PMC9439764 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000030237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective study investigated the effectiveness of calamine lotion (CL) as an adjunctive therapy to mometasone furoate ointment (MFO) in the treatment of infant eczema (IE). This retrospective study analyzed the electronic medical records of 50 IE infants. They were allocated to a treatment group or a control group, with 25 subjects in each group. All infants in both groups received MFO. In addition, infants in the treatment group underwent CL. The outcomes were effectiveness based on the eczema area and severity index, lesion area, and pruritus severity. We analyzed the outcomes before and after treatment. The results of this study showed that infants in the treatment group had more effective in effectiveness based on eczema area and severity index (P < .01), lesion area (P < .01), and pruritus severity (P = .01) than those in the control group. However, no medical records reported any adverse events in either group. The results of this study showed that CL added to MFO was more effective than MFO alone in the treatment of infants with IE.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuan-Cui Meng
- Department of Neonatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Jin-Chao Fan
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China
| | - Wei-Ni Bian
- Department of Neonatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University, Xi’an, China
- *Correspondence: Wei-Ni Bian, Department of Neonatology, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Xi’an Medical University, No. 167, East Street of Fangzhicheng, Dongjiao District, Xi’an, Shaanxi 710038, China (e-mail: )
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ridd MJ, Santer M, MacNeill SJ, Sanderson E, Wells S, Webb D, Banks J, Sutton E, Roberts A, Liddiard L, Wilkins Z, Clayton J, Garfield K, Barrett TJ, Lane JA, Baxter H, Howells L, Taylor J, Hay AD, Williams HC, Thomas KS. Effectiveness and safety of lotion, cream, gel, and ointment emollients for childhood eczema: a pragmatic, randomised, phase 4, superiority trial. Lancet Child Adolesc Health 2022; 6:522-532. [PMID: 35617974 DOI: 10.1016/s2352-4642(22)00146-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [What about the content of this article? (0)] [Affiliation(s)] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2022] [Revised: 04/19/2022] [Accepted: 04/29/2022] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To our knowledge, there are no trials comparing emollients commonly used for childhood eczema. We aimed to compare the clinical effectiveness and safety of the four main emollient types: lotions, creams, gels, and ointments. METHODS We did a pragmatic, individually randomised, parallel group, phase 4 superiority trial in 77 general practice surgeries in England. Children aged between 6 months and 12 years with eczema (Patient Orientated Eczema Measure [POEM] score >2) were randomly assigned (1:1:1:1; stratified by centre and minimised by baseline POEM score and age, using a web-based system) to lotions, creams, gels, or ointments. Clinicians and parents were unmasked. The initial emollient prescription was for 500 g or 500 mL, to be applied twice daily and as required. Subsequent prescriptions were determined by the family. The primary outcome was parent-reported eczema severity over 16 weeks (weekly POEM), with analysis as randomly assigned regardless of adherence, adjusting for baseline and stratification variables. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned participants. This trial was registered with the ISRCTN registry, ISRCTN84540529. FINDINGS Between Jan 19, 2018, and Oct 31, 2019, 12 417 children were assessed for eligibility, 550 of whom were randomly assigned to a treatment group (137 to lotion, 140 to cream, 135 to gel, and 138 to ointment). The numbers of participants who contributed at least two POEM scores and were included in the primary analysis were 131 in the lotion group, 137 in the cream group, 130 in the gel group, and 126 in the ointment group. Baseline median age was 4 years (IQR 2-8); 255 (46%) participants were girls, 295 (54%) were boys; 473 (86%) participants were White; and the mean POEM score was 9·3 (SD 5·5). There was no difference in eczema severity between emollient types over 16 weeks (global p value=0·77), with adjusted POEM pairwise differences of: cream versus lotion 0·42 (95% CI -0·48 to 1·32), gel versus lotion 0·17 (-0·75 to 1·09), ointment versus lotion -0·01 (-0·93 to 0·91), gel versus cream -0·25 (-1·15 to 0·65), ointment versus cream -0·43 (-1·34 to 0·48), and ointment versus gel -0·18 (-1·11 to 0·75). This result remained unchanged following multiple imputation, sensitivity, and subgroup analyses. The total number of adverse events did not significantly differ between the treatment groups (lotions 49 [36%], creams 54 [39%], gels 54 [40%], and ointments 48 [35%]; p=0·79), although stinging was less common with ointments (12 [9%] of 138 participants) than lotions (28 [20%] of 137), creams (24 [17%] of 140), or gels (25 [19%] of 135). INTERPRETATION We found no difference in effectiveness between the four main types of emollients for childhood eczema. Users need to be able to choose from a range of emollients to find one that they are more likely to use effectively. FUNDING National Institute for Health and Care Research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J Ridd
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
| | - Miriam Santer
- Primary Care Research Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
| | | | | | - Sian Wells
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Douglas Webb
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Jonathan Banks
- National Institute for Health Research Applied Research Collaboration West, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - Eileen Sutton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Amanda Roberts
- Nottingham Support Group for Carers of Children with Eczema, Nottingham, UK
| | - Lyn Liddiard
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Zoe Wilkins
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Julie Clayton
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | | | - Tiffany J Barrett
- South West Medicines Information and Training, University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust, Bristol, UK
| | - J Athene Lane
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Helen Baxter
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Laura Howells
- Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Jodi Taylor
- Bristol Trials Centre, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Alastair D Hay
- Population Health Sciences, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK
| | - Hywel C Williams
- Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| | - Kim S Thomas
- Centre of Evidence-Based Dermatology, University of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK
| |
Collapse
|