Disparities in the Participation Rate of Colorectal Cancer Screening by Fecal Occult Blood Test among People with Disabilities: A National Database Study in South Korea

Assessing cancer in people with profound and multiple disabilities

BACKGROUND

Cancers are as common in individuals with intellectual disabilities as in the general population (GP). For the subgroup of people with profound and multiple disabilities (PMD) who present with both severe intellectual disability and major motor disorders, the frequency and distribution of cancers are currently not known, preventing proper cancer surveillance.

METHODS

We carried out a systematic and synthetic review of the medical literature, including a focused search of Japanese data.

RESULTS

The total risk of cancer in individuals with PMD is thought to be lower than in the GP, possibly due to a shorter life expectancy. They have reduced exposure to cancer risk factors, such as alcohol, tobacco, sunlight, human papillomavirus infection, occupational toxins, and being overweight. On the other hand, individuals with PMD present a greater frequency of gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori gastritis, chronic cystitis, and cryptorchidism, which increase the risk for cancer of the esophagus, stomach, urinary bladder, and testes. In addition, certain genetic disorders underlying compromised motor and cognitive functions are associated with higher risk of childhood cancers. An analysis of 135 cancers in persons with PMD in Japan suggested that they present a particular tumor profile, with certain cancers rarer than in the GP, whereas cancers of the digestive tract are frequent. Cancers of the digestive tract occurred significantly earlier than in the GP (colon: average age 48.3 years vs. 71.3 years in the GP, esophagus: 39 years vs. 72 years in the GP). An increasing number of therapeutic successes in children and adults with PMD have been reported in different countries when cancers are discovered early.

CONCLUSION

Individuals with PMD must be appropriately monitored for cancer. Screenings for breast and colon cancer, as well as regular monitoring of the esophagus, stomach, urinary bladder, and testicles, are necessary. Population-based epidemiological studies are needed to better understand risk factors, frequency, and distribution of cancers in the PMD population.

The Korea National Disability Registration System

The Korea National Disability Registration System (KNDRS) was established in 1989 to provide social welfare benefits based on predefined criteria for disability registration and an objective medical assessment using a disability grading system. Disability registration requires (1) a medical examination by a qualified specialist physician and (2) a medical advisory meeting to review the degree of disability. Medical institutions and specialists for the diagnosis of disabilities are legally stipulated, and medical records for a specified period are required to support the diagnosis. The number of disability types has gradually expanded, and 15 disability types have been legally defined. As of 2021, 2.645 million people were registered as disabled, accounting for approximately 5.1% of the total population. Among the 15 disability types, disabilities of the extremities account for the largest proportion (45.1%). Previous studies have investigated the epidemiology of disabilities using data from the KNDRS, combined predominantly with data from the National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD). Korea has a mandatory public health insurance system that covers the entire Korean population, and the National Health Insurance Services manages all eligibility information, including disability types and severity ratings. In short, the KNDRS-NHIRD is a significant data resource for research on the epidemiology of disabilities.

Uptake patterns and predictors of colorectal cancer screening among adults resident in Spain: A population-based study from 2017 to 2020

Background

Although population screening has improved the early diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC), most cases are diagnosed in symptomatic patients. This study aimed to estimate the prevalence and evolution over time of uptake patterns to fecal immunochemical test (FIT) as a screening test for CRC among individuals aged 50-69 in Spain, and to determine the predictive factors for uptake patterns to this type of screening based on sociodemographic, health, and lifestyle characteristics.

Methods

A cross-sectional study with 14,163 individuals from the 2017 Spanish National Health Survey and the 2020 European Health Survey was performed, including as the main variable uptake pattern to FIT screening within the last 2 years, with which we analyzed sociodemographic factors, health status and lifestyle habits.

Results

38.01% of participants had undergone FIT in the previous 2 years, and from 2017 to 2020, a significant increase in the uptake rate for CRC was observed (2017: 32.35%, 2020: 43.92%, p < 0.001). The positive predictors to FIT uptake pattern included factors such as being between 57 and 69 years, having a higher educational level or a higher social class, having at least one chronic illness, frequent contact with the primary care physician, alcohol consumption and physical activity, while immigration and smoking habit were negative predictors.

Conclusion

In Spain, although the evolution of FIT uptake pattern over time is positive, the prevalence of FIT uptake is still low (38.01%), not reaching the level considered as acceptable in the European guidelines. Moreover, there are disparities in CRC screening uptake among individuals.

Family physicians' and trainees' experiences regarding cancer screening with patients with intellectual disability: An interpretive description study

People with intellectual disability receive breast, cervical, and colorectal cancer screening at lower rates relative to the general population, although the reasons for this disparity are largely unknown. Research, both with the general population and specific to people with intellectual disability, has revealed that a family physician's recommendation for cancer screening or continuity of primary care may increase screening rates. We interviewed family physicians and family medicine trainees regarding their experiences recommending cancer screening to patients with intellectual disability. We concluded that the decision to recommend cancer screening is complex, and includes physicians weighing their clinical judgement as to the best provision of care for patients with a patient's eligibility for screening, while continuing to respect patients' autonomy. This patient-physician interaction occurs within the larger medical environment. Further research with experienced family physicians is warranted to better understand this complex phenomenon.

Spatial and temporal patterns of colorectal cancer in Asia, 1990-2019

BACKGROUND

Asia accounts for the largest burden of colorectal cancer (CRC) worldwide. This study examines the temporal patterns of CRC in Asia in the last three decades.

METHODS

The data pertaining to CRC burden measured by incidence, mortality, and disability-adjusted-life-years (DALYs) and its risk factors for 49 countries in the Asian continent were drawn from the Global Burden of Disease 2019 study between 1990 and 2019. Mortality-to-incidence ratio (MIR) was employed as a proxy indicator of 5-year survival rates.

RESULTS

In Asia, incident cases more than tripled from 270,851 to 1.1 million, deaths tripled from 183,252 to 560,426, and DALYs more than doubled from 5 million to 13.4 million between 1990 and 2019. The age-standardized incidence rate (ASIR) increased from 14.0/100,000 to 23.9/100,000, age-standardized mortality rate (ASMR) increased from 10.1/100,000 to 12.5/100,000, and MIR decreased from 0.68 to 0.50 between 1990 and 2019. ASIR varied 10-folds across countries from 5.6/100,000 in Bangladesh to 62.0/100,000 in Taiwan in 2019 and ASMR from 4.9/1000 in Bangladesh to 30.3/100,000 in Brunei. In 2019, diet low in milk (18.7%) and whole grains (15.2%) and calcium (16.6%) were the major contributory risk factors in CRC DALYs in 2019.

CONCLUSION

CRC is a fast-rising neoplasm in Asia and its burden can be curtailed by focusing on primary prevention (e.g., diet and physical activity) and secondary prevention through screening. The policy focus and resources must be directed towards capacity building, including cancer infrastructure and quality data availability from cancer registries.

Type and Severity of Mental Illness and Participation in Colorectal Cancer Screening

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening programs depends on the participation rate. This study examined the association between type and severity of mental illness and colorectal cancer screening participation.

METHODS

Between 2012 and 2017, a total of 46,919 individuals were invited to sigmoidoscopy screening in Norway, and 70,019 were invited to fecal immunochemical testing. In 2022, logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between the use of antipsychotics, anxiolytics, hypnotics, and antidepressants in the year preceding the screening invitation and screening participation, adjusted for demographic and socioeconomic factors. Defined daily doses of individual drugs were used to assess dose‒response relationships.

RESULTS

Overall, 19.2% (24.8% of women, 13.4% of men) of all invitees used at least 1 psychotropic medication. Nonparticipation in the 2 arms combined was associated with the use of anxiolytics (60.7% in users vs 43.2% in nonusers; OR=1.53; 95% CI=1.45, 1.62) and antipsychotics (64.3% vs 43.8%; OR=1.41; 95% CI=1.30, 1.53) and increased with higher doses for both drugs. Hypnotics and antidepressants were only weakly associated with nonparticipation in higher doses. Participation rates were 57.3%, 52.3%, 42.9%, and 35.4% in those prescribed 0, 1, 2, and 3-4 classes of psychotropic medications, respectively. The associations between the use of psychotropic medications and nonparticipation were similar for the 2 screening tests.

CONCLUSIONS

These findings show significant disparities in colorectal cancer screening participation for individuals with mental illness, independent of the screening method. Moreover, screening participation varied depending on the type and severity of mental illness. Targeted interventions are warranted to ensure that people with mental illness are supported to access the benefits of colorectal cancer screening.

Mental illness and participation in colorectal cancer screening: a scoping review

INTRODUCTION

Compared with the background population, persons with mental illness have increased colorectal cancer (CRC) mortality. Screening has the potential to alleviate the increased cancer mortality due to mental illness, but the extent to which persons with mental illness participate in CRC screening programs is uncertain. This scoping review aims to summarize the literature on CRC screening participation among persons with mental illness.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We searched four databases (PubMed, PsychInfo, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) to identify published literature on mental illness and participation in CRC screening programs. We included full-text papers available in English, published before February 2021, and excluded papers on dementia, intellectual disabilities, and developmental disabilities.

RESULTS

In total, we included 17 studies and categorized the findings according to severity of mental illness. Across varying study designs, the studies found that persons with severe mental illness, e.g. schizophrenia, participate less in CRC screening compared with the background population. The results were ambiguous for common mental illness, such as depression and anxiety. In general, studies were small or lacked comparison groups and the estimates were imprecise.

CONCLUSION

This is the first scoping review to evaluate participation in CRC screening programs among persons with mental illness. Overall, the existing literature lacks high quality evidence from large population-based studies and comparison groups based on organized screening programs.

Disability and Participation in Breast and Cervical Cancer Screening: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

It is well established that access to preventative care, such as breast or cervical cancer screening, can reduce morbidity and mortality. Certain groups may be missed out of these healthcare services, such as women with disabilities, as they face many access barriers due to underlying inequalities and negative attitudes. However, the data have not been reviewed on whether women with disabilities face inequalities in the uptake of these services. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to compare the uptake of breast and cervical cancer screening in women with and without disabilities. A search was conducted in July 2021 across four databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Global Health, and CINAHL. Quantitative studies comparing the uptake of breast or cervical cancer screening between women with and without disabilities were eligible. Twenty-nine studies were included, all from high-income settings. One third of the 29 studies (34.5%, n = 10) were deemed to have a high risk of bias, and the remainder a low risk of bias. The pooled estimates showed that women with disabilities have 0.78 (95% CI: 0.72–0.84) lower odds of attending breast cancer screening and have 0.63 (95% CI: 0.45–0.88) lower odds of attending cervical cancer screening, compared to women without disabilities. In conclusion, women with disabilities face disparities in receipt of preventative cancer care. There is consequently an urgent need to evaluate and improve the inclusivity of cancer screening programs and thereby prevent avoidable morbidity and mortality.

Patients' acceptability and implementation outcomes of a case management approach to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: a qualitative secondary analysis of a mixed-method randomised clinical trial

OBJECTIVES

We examined the efficacy of case management (CM) interventions to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening for patients with schizophrenia. This study aimed to clarify patients' acceptability of the intervention and the helpful components of the intervention. Simultaneously, the study aimed to determine the acceptability, appropriateness and feasibility of the intervention from the perspective of psychiatric care providers.

STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING

This study was a secondary qualitative analysis of a mixed-method randomised controlled trial that evaluated the efficacy of the CM approach to encourage participation in cancer screening for people with schizophrenia. The intervention comprised education and patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening. Interviews were conducted with patients who received the intervention and staff from two psychiatric hospitals in Japan who delivered the intervention.

PARTICIPANTS

Of the 172 patients with schizophrenia who participated in the trial, 153 were included. In addition, three out of six providers were included.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Using a structured interview, the case manager asked participants about patient acceptability and the helpful components of the intervention. Content analysis was conducted for the responses obtained, and the number of responses was tabulated by two researchers. For the interviews with the providers, opinions obtained from verbatim transcripts were extracted and summarised.

RESULTS

Forty-three of the 56 patients perceived that the intervention was acceptable. For the intervention component, inperson counselling with an explanation of the screening process by psychiatric care providers was most frequently reported by the patients as helpful (48 of the 68 respondents). Psychiatric care providers evaluated the intervention as acceptable, appropriate and easy to understand and administer. However, providing the intervention to all patients simultaneously was considered difficult with the current human resources.

CONCLUSIONS

This study showed that the CM intervention was perceived as acceptable by patients and acceptable and appropriate by psychiatric care providers.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

UMIN000036017.

Evaluation of health belief model-based educational intervention on colorectal cancer screening behavior at South Khorasan, Iran

BACKGROUND

Colorectal cancer is the most common cancer of the gastrointestinal tract. Health beliefs play an important role in the development of health behaviors. In this study, the effect of educational intervention based on Health Belief Model on colorectal cancer screening behavior was investigated.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study was performed as a randomized controlled intervention. The study population was 50-70-years old in Khosf city. Initially, 120 eligible populations were randomly divided into intervention and control groups (60 people in each group). The data collection tool was a standard colorectal cancer screening questionnaire that was completed before, immediately, and 3 months after the intervention. The intervention consisted of eight 60-min training sessions. The collected data were analyzed using SPSS19 software and statistical tests.

RESULTS

The mean age of the intervention and control groups was 63.53 ± 5.67 and 57.73 ± 5.77 years. In terms of mean scores of knowledge, perceived susceptibility, perceived severity, and perceived barriers were homogeneous before intervention. After the intervention, the mean score of the model constructs showed significant changes, which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The rate of occult blood test in stool 3 months after training reached 90% in the intervention group and 15% in the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study showed that by taking measures to reduce perceived barriers as well as increase knowledge, perceived susceptibility, severity, benefits and self-efficacy, the rate of participation in occult blood testing in feces can be significantly increased.

Disparities in the Diagnosis, Treatment, and Survival Rate of Cervical Cancer among Women with and without Disabilities

Introduction

Not much is known regarding the disparities in cancer care between women with and without disabilities.

Objectives

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of women with cervical cancer with and without disabilities.

Methods

We performed a retrospective cohort study and linked the National Disability Database, Korean Central Cancer Registry, and Korean National Health Insurance claims database. Charlson comorbidity index was used for adjusting the comorbidity. The study population comprised 3 185 women with disabilities (physical/brain, communication, mental, cardiopulmonary, and other impairment) who were diagnosed with cervical cancer and 13 582 age- and sex-matched women without disability who were diagnosed with cervical cancer for comparison.

Results

Distant metastatic stage (7.7% vs 3.7%) and unknown stage (16.1% vs 7.0%) were more common in cervical cancer women with grade 1 disabilities, compared with women without disabilities. Women with cervical cancer with disabilities were less likely to undergo surgery (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.81, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.73–0.90) or chemotherapy (aOR 0.86, 95% CI 0.77–0.97). Lower rate of surgery was more evident in patients with physical/brain impairment (aOR 0.46, 95% CI 0.37–0.58) and severe mental impairment (aOR 0.57, 95% CI 0.41–0.81). The overall mortality risk was also higher in patients with disabilities (adjusted hazard ratio (aHR) 1.36, 95% CI 1.25–1.48).

Conclusion

Women with cervical cancer with disabilities, especially with severe disabilities, were diagnosed at later stages, received less treatment, and had higher mortality rates, compared with patients who lacked disabilities. Social support and policies, along with education for women with disabilities, their families, and healthcare professionals, are needed to improve these disparities.

Encouraging participation in colorectal cancer screening for people with schizophrenia: A randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

We examined the efficacy of a case management approach to improve participation in colorectal cancer screening among people with schizophrenia.

METHODS

This was a randomized, parallel group trial. We recruited outpatients with schizophrenia aged 40 years or over from two psychiatric hospitals in Japan. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to treatment as usual or case management intervention plus treatment as usual using a web-based system. Attending clinicians and participants were unmasked to the allocation. Case management included education and patient navigation for colorectal cancer screening using a fecal occult blood test. Treatment as usual included direct mail government recommendations. The primary endpoint was participation in colorectal cancer screening assessed using municipal records. We also assessed the secondary endpoint of participation in other cancer screenings (lung, gastric, breast, and cervical).

RESULTS

Between 3 June and 9 September 2019, 172 eligible participants were randomly assigned to the case management plus treatment as usual group (n = 86) or treatment as usual group (n = 86). One participant was ineligible and another withdrew consent; both were excluded from analysis. A significantly higher proportion of participants received colorectal cancer screening in the case management plus treatment as usual group than in the treatment as usual group (40 [47.1%] of 85 participants vs. 10 [11.8%] of 85 participants, p < 0.0001). The proportion of lung cancer screening also increased. No serious adverse events associated with the study intervention occurred.

CONCLUSION

The case management intervention to encourage participation in colorectal cancer screening was effective for patients with schizophrenia.

Population-Based Data Reveal Factors Associated with Organised and Non-Organised Colorectal Cancer Screening: An Important Step towards Improving Coverage

We investigated factors associated with organised and non-organised colorectal cancer screening using faecal occult blood tests, based on data from 308 municipalities in Flanders (6.6 million residents, 57% of Belgium) during 2015-2017. Logistic regression with generalized estimating equations was used to assess the associations between municipal characteristics and organised and non-organised screening coverages. Factors associated negatively with both organised and non-organised screening: percentage of people aged 70-74 in the target population [OR (odds ratios) = 0.98, 95%CI (confidence interval): 0.97-0.99 and OR = 0.98, 95%CI: 0.96-0.999, respectively]; negatively with organised screening: average income [OR = 0.97, 95%CI: 0.96-0.98], percentage of people with a non-Belgian/Dutch nationality [OR = 0.962, 95%CI: 0.957-0.967]; positively with organised screening: percentages of men in the target population [OR = 1.13, 95%CI: 1.11-1.14], jobseekers [OR = 1.12, 95%CI: 1.09-1.15] and people with at least one general practitioner (GP) visit in the last year [OR = 1.04, 95%CI: 1.03-1.05]; positively with non-organised screening: number of patients per GP [OR = 1.021, 95%CI: 1.016-1.026], percentage of people with a global medical dossier handled by a preferred GP [OR = 1.025, 95%CI: 1.018-1.031]. This study helps to identify the hard-to-reach subpopulations in CRC screening, and highlights the important role of GPs in the process of promoting screening among non-participants and encouraging non-organised participants to switch to organised screening.

Disparities in the Diagnosis and Treatment of Gastric Cancer in Relation to Disabilities

We investigated potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of gastric cancer (GC) patients with and without disabilities.

Disparities in prostate cancer diagnosis, treatment, and survival among men with disabilities: Retrospective cohort study in South Korea

BACKGROUND

Disparities in cancer care have not been well documented for individuals with disability.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate potential disparities in the diagnosis, treatment, and survival of prostate cancer (PC) patients according to disability status.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study using disability registration data linked to Korean National Health Insurance and national cancer registry data. Totals of 7924 prostate cancer cases among patients with disabilities (diagnosed between 2005 and 2013) and 34,188 PC patients without disability were included.

RESULTS

While overall PC stage distribution at diagnosis was similar, unknown stage was more common in patients with severe disabilities compared to those without disabilities (18.1% vs. 16.2%, respectively). People with disabilities were less likely to undergo surgery (33.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 0.79, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.74-0.84), and more likely to receive androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) (57.9% vs. 55%, respectively; aOR 1.10, 95% CI 1.04-1.16) compared to those without disabilities. This was more evident for people with severe brain/mental impairment (aORs 0.29 for surgery; 1.52 for ADT). Patients with disabilities had higher overall mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 1.20; 95% CI, 1.15-1.25), but only slightly higher PC-specific mortality after adjustment for patient factors and treatment (aHR 1.11, 95% CI 1.04-1.18) than people without disability.

CONCLUSIONS

PC patients with disabilities underwent less staging work-up and were more likely to receive ADT than surgical treatment. Overall mortality of PC patients with disabilities was greater than those of PC patients without disability, but PC-specific mortality was only slightly worse.

Disparities in Liver Cancer Surveillance Among People With Disabilities: A National Database Study in Korea

GOAL

The goal of this study was to determine disparities in liver cancer surveillance among people with disabilities is the goal of this study.

BACKGROUND

Using the linked administrative database in Korea, we sought to investigate (1) whether there are disparities in liver cancer surveillance according to degree and type of disability and (2) temporal trends in liver cancer surveillance among people with disabilities.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We linked national disability registration data with national cancer surveillance data. We analyzed age-standardized participation rates for each year during the 2006-2015 period according to presence, type, and severity of the disability. We also examined factors associated with liver cancer surveillance by multivariate logistic regression using the most current data (2014-2015).

RESULTS

The age-adjusted and sex-adjusted surveillance rate for liver cancer in people with disabilities increased from 25.7% in 2006 to 49.6% in 2015; however, during the same period, surveillance rate among people without disabilities increased from 24.9% to 54.5%. As a result, disparities in surveillance for liver cancer increased over time. The surveillance participation rate among people with disabilities was 12% lower than among people without disabilities. Surveillance rates were markedly lower among people with severe disabilities [adjusted odds ratio (aOR)=0.71] and people with renal disease (aOR=0.43), brain injuries (aOR=0.60), ostomy problems (aOR=0.60), and intellectual disabilities (aOR=0.69).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the availability of a national liver cancer surveillance program, a marked disparity was found in liver cancer surveillance participation, especially among people with severe disabilities, renal disease, or brain-related or mental disabilities.

Do cholesterol levels and continuity of statin use affect colorectal cancer incidence in older adults under 75 years of age?

INTRODUCTION

Colorectal cancer(CRC) is 3rd most common cancer and has a relatively high mortality rate. Currently, the relationships between CRC and serum cholesterol or statin treatment, especially in older adults under 75 years of age, remain questionable due to a lack of data. The present study evaluated the association between serum cholesterol levels and statin treatment continuity and CRC risk in older adults under 75 years of age.

METHODS

This study used senior cohort data obtained from the National Health Insurance Service of South Korea. The selected cohort contains 131,266 participants who were enrolled from 2009 to 2011 and followed for up to 5 years. Serum cholesterol levels were classified as categorical variables, and continuity of statin treatment was evaluated based on dyslipidemia diagnosis and average medication possession ratio. We used Cox regression analysis to evaluate the associations between CRC risk and serum cholesterol level or statin use.

RESULTS

A low level of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol(HDL-C) was significantly associated with high CRC risk compared to an HDL-C level in the normal range(hazard ratio [HR]: 1.197, 95% CI: 1.040-1.377). A high level of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol(LDL-C) was associated with increased CRC risk compared to a normal LDL-C level, but not statistically significant. Statin use was associated with decreased CRC risk, and high medication compliance was inversely associated with CRC risk in patients with and without dyslipidemia.

CONCLUSIONS

Statin use was associated with decreased CRC risk, and high medication compliance was inversely associated with CRC risk in patients with and without dyslipidemia compared to non-use of medication. Regular health examinations can help identify individuals who are vulnerable to CRC, and continued statin use may be associated with a reduced risk of CRC. This is particularly important in patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia.

Time trends of colorectal cancer incidence and associated lifestyle factors in South Korea

Worldwide, South Korea had the second highest incidence rates of colorectal cancer (CRC) in 2018. To inform public health policy to prevent CRC, we aimed to identify major modifiable lifestyle factors underlying the alarming increase in CRC incidence. We obtained information on CRC statistics from the Korea National Cancer Incidence Database and on the distribution of dietary and lifestyle factors known to modify CRC risk from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. To examine time trends between 2001 and 2013, we calculated annual percent changes of CRC incidence rates and of prevalence of etiologic factors by sex and age. Across all sex and age groups, the most commonly diagnosed cancer was rectal cancer while the most rapidly increasing cancer was distal colon cancer. For the lifestyle factors examined, decreases in exercise were observed across all age groups of both sexes. Yet, obesity and alcoholic drinks appear more relevant CRC contributor to men, smoking to women aged 30–49 years, and processed meat intake to adults aged 30–49 years. The heterogeneous results suggest that dietary and lifestyle target to prevent CRC be tailored by sex and age.

Disparities in gastric cancer screening among people with disabilities: a national registry-linkage study in South Korea

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Using the national disability registration linked to the cancer screening database in Korea, we examined (1) trends in the gastric cancer screening rate among people with disabilities over time, and (2) whether gastric cancer screening participation and modalities differed according to presence, severity, and type of disability.

METHODS

We examined gastric cancer screening participation rates among individuals with registered disability, from 2006 to 2015.

RESULTS

The age- and sex-adjusted rate for gastric cancer screening in people with disabilities increased from 25.9% in 2006 to 51.9% in 2015 (change: + 26.0%). During the same period, screening rates among people without disability improved from 24.7 to 56.5% (change: + 31.8%). Disability was associated with a screening rate [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.89, 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.88-0.89]. Screening rates were markedly lower among people with severe disabilities (aOR 0.58, 95% CI 0.57-0.58) and people with autism (aOR 0.36, 95% CI 0.25-0.52), renal failure (aOR 0.39, 95% CI 0.38-0.39), brain injury (aOR 0.41, 95% CI 0.40-0.41), ostomy problems (aOR 0.53, 95% CI 0.51-0.55), intellectual disabilities (aOR 0.54, 95% CI 0.53-0.54), or mental disorders (aOR 0.55, 95% CI 0.54-0.56). The use of gastroscopy as the initial screening modality in people with disabilities was lower than in people without a disability.

CONCLUSIONS

In spite of the availability of national gastric cancer screening program, we found significant disparities in gastric cancer screening participation, especially among people with severe disabilities and those with renal failure or brain-related/mental disabilities.